T1ρH data for the PHB/S systems, containing different proportions.
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a very powerful tool in the chemical characterization, both in solution and in solid state. With the development of NMR spectrometers more potent field, employing radio frequency pulse, provided the development of studies on materials, especially amorphous materials. Thus, there was a need to develop techniques to obtain spectra in solid state with high resolution in comparison to those obtained in solution. Therefore, the study of polymers and polymeric materials could be developed quickly as a result a lot of information about the structure-property could be obtained with more details. The use of NMR in the solid state has become particularly important in the study of amorphous materials, as well as in the study of crystal structures, and permits us to detect different constituents present in material. This chapter covers the basic solid-state NMR techniques that provide important information on sample molecular behavior because they are powerful and versatile tools to evaluate polymer and complex materials like nanomaterials.
- relaxation times
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) consists of several techniques, which are distinguished by different pulse sequences and generate different responses on the sample, allowing obtaining data on different time scales. This makes the development of new analytical methods for the study of polymer materials interesting. The solid-state analyses differentiate the solution by two main factors; the first is signal width. In the solid state, the signals are broader than solution, concerning to polymers due to the high-molecular weight and monomer ordination; among other factors, the signals are wider. The second point concerns the type of response obtained; in the solid state, the number of information obtained is greater than solution. When the material is insoluble or has soluble difficulties, the study of structure-property relation is of great interest because the search for responses with respect to homogeneity, phase dispersion, and intermolecular interaction between components is of great importance.
1.1. Nuclear magnetic resonance experiment
In the NMR experiment, a sample is placed in probe in a strong magnetic field, denominated Bo; if this sample presents magnetic moment (μ), its nuclear spins magnetize and at the excess of spin population, called magnetization (Mo), is applied for a radio frequency (RF) pulse by a radio frequency emission (B1) field, the magnetization is excited by transfer to the
The NMR relaxation processes with time constants T1 and T2 are governed by fluctuating magnetic fields associated with molecular motion. The relaxation process that determines the T1 values involving energy absorption, since this process is enthalpic. The temporal evolution of the transverse relaxation is fundamentally different from longitudinal, and it corresponds to a loss of phase coherence between the individual magnetic moment process in it, and, thus an increase of entropy. In many cases, solid sample loss phase coherence initially created by B1 is due to direct interactions between the spin moments of individual [1–10].
1.2. High-field NMR
1.2.1. Solid-state NMR analyses
The solid-state NMR is constituted by several distinct pulse sequences, which generate different responses on the sample, allowing obtaining data on different time scales. This makes possible to develop new analytical methods for the study of complex solid materials [1–5], as polymer nanocomposites.
The analysis of the complex materials in the solid state differentiates the analysis in solution by two main factors: the first is the signal width. In the solid state, the signals are broader than in solution and especially for polymers due to their high molecular weight and mere ordination, among other factors, the signals become even wider. The second point concerns the type of response to be obtained in the solid state the number of information to be obtained is greater than in solution [11–14]. However, when the material is insoluble or has soluble difficulties, the study of the structure-property relation is of great interest because the search for responses with respect to homogeneity, phase dispersion, and interaction between the components is of great importance.
Nuclear magnetic resonance signal line width
Generally, the spectra obtained in solution generate narrow signals best resolved comparing to solid-state signals, due to the isotropy of the chemical shift, since all interactions as shielding, dipolar coupling, and indirect coupling depend on the orientation of the local environment in nuclear magnetic field Bo and when the samples are in solution, these effects are compensated. However, they are dependent on the nature of the sample and the external magnetic field strength applied [7–10].
In solids, there is usually little movement relative to the liquid. However, most samples (except single crystals) have a substantial molecular orientation range of line width. This fact comes from the anisotropy of the chemical shift as well as the strong dipolar interaction between the hydrogen nuclei and carbon-13. The nature of the sample and the type of nucleus to be observed are also two points of fundamental importance to the spectral resolution in solid state.
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance response
The type of answer you want to get on a specific material or on a polymeric system may be a reason why those must be analyzed by solid-state NMR. Information on the molecular dynamics is of great interest for answers about the correlation structure-molecular-dynamic property.
The problem of signal line width in NMR solid-state spectra led to the development of techniques that allow them to obtain signals in the solid state the narrowest possible, like liquids. Along with the information to be obtained on the material, different techniques are performed to analyze more different polymer systems.
18.104.22.168. High-resolution solid-state NMR basic theory
The Hamiltonian that governs the analysis involves a solid sum of different Hamiltonians, according to expression 1.
When one observes spin nuclei ½, as carbon-13 (13C), for example, the Hamiltonian that promotes more interference in the signal enlargement are HCSA e HD. Improving the resolution of the signals in the NMR spectra obtained in the solid state requires techniques to eliminate factors that cause this signal enlargement [10–14]. Thus, techniques were developed using methods that mathematically eliminate these effects.
22.214.171.124.1. Magic angle spinning (MAS)
The strong dipolar interactions between hydrogen nuclei and carbon-13, facilitated by the internuclear distance between them and the restricted mobility of the chains and the anisotropy of the chemical shift generate signals in very wide solid, with line width of 20 kHz order. The elimination of the dipole-dipole interaction generates a decrease in the signal line width of 5 kHz, and the elimination of the anisotropy of chemical shift width of the signals decreases to 100 Hz, making possible the detection of signals. Both the dipolar interaction and the anisotropy of the chemical shift dependence have with the term 3cos2
The employed pulse sequence is simple:
All nuclei that undergo the phenomenon of resonance can be analyzed by this technique. However, for the observation of nuclei that have quadrupole moments, line widths are so large that the signals have no resolution. However, for nuclei having dipole moment, this technique generates high-resolution spectra. It should be considered that for high-molecular weight materials such as polymer, for example, the chemical structure can be defined by this technique. However, a fine or detailed microstructure structure cannot be observed as they are well resolved by the NMR solution techniques. Because in the carbon-13 solid state analysis the signals broadened comes from the dipolar interactions and the chemical shift anisotropy, generating large signals that contain all molecular information’s.
Note that using the MAS technique can obtain quantitative spectra solid. However, the long analysis time, comes from the high values of the spin-lattice relaxation times of the different nuclei, mainly rare spin. It makes this type of spectrum replaced by spectra expressing or representing only a portion of the sample. Therefore, variation in spectral parameters of this pulse sequence provides information about the increased mobility of a sample region, for example, a mixture of polymers, polymers, composites, amorphous, and nanocomposite materials. Thus, a greater number of applications of this technique can be obtained, when seeking information about the homogeneity, compatibility, and purity of polymers or any material samples.
The analysis of materials by the MAS technique using a small interval between pulses (ms) can detect only one region or the region that has the highest mobility. This variation in the MAS technique enables, in the case of amorphous polymers, that is, ethylene-
Analyzing EVA containing 28% of acetate by carbon-13 (C-13) solid-state NMR basic techniques will be shown as an example of how useful is the application of solid-state techniques.
Figure 2 exhibits the powder EVA C-13 MAS NMR spectrum. Showing the highest signal located at 30.2 ppm referred to CH2 (the methylene group) long chains and a small signal detected at 14.3 ppm attributed to the methyl group of the acetate part. Two small signals were detected at about 21 and 25 ppm, which were assigned as CH2 from the ethylene branching [11, 12].
126.96.36.199.2. Cross-polarization and magic angle spinning angle (CPMAS)
The cross-polarization technique was developed aimed at detection of rare nuclei spins with the aim to minimize the analysis time because of the long relaxation times of these nuclei. This method relies on the transfer of polarization of a nucleus spin abundant, hydrogen nucleus (1H), for example, to rare spin nuclei (i.e., 13C), the cores 13C and 1H are in thermal contact for a stipulated period of time, called during the cross-polarization contact time at that time the nuclei are kept in contact due to precession frequencies of both nuclei are kept identical, in this case the nuclei are in a condition called condition Hartman-Hahn [1–5], which is an equality where the frequency precession of hydrogen nucleus versus magnetic field of hydrogen are equal to precession of carbon-13 nucleus versus magnetic field of carbon-13, in a period of time:
The combined cross-polarization technique with the rotation of the sample at the magic angle and strong hydrogen decoupling (CPMAS), generating NMR spectra of solid high-resolution rare spin nuclei with increasing signal strength in a shorter analysis time than the MAS, considering that the hydrogen nucleus controls the relaxation process [1–10, 13].
The pulse sequence used to obtain the spectra through CPMAS is the same for MAS, but with the inclusion of the condition Hartman-Hahn, which is inserted a contact time between the two nuclei for transferring the polarization between them. Thus, the combination of cross-polarization technique, magic angle spinning process, and strong hydrogen decoupling of carbon-13 nucleus technique informs about the compatibility of polymer blends at the molecular level. The changes in the widths of the lines of NMR and the values of the chemical shifts provide information about changes in mobility at the molecular level. Figure 3 shows the powder EVA CPMAS C-13 NMR spectrum, with 1 ms of contact time. It already showed two signals: one located at short chemical shift, centered at 30.7 ppm referring to mobile region and the other one located at 32.3 ppm due to the segments of rigid region.
One type of solid-state NMR studies is to use a comparison between 13C NMR spectra obtained by techniques MAS and CPMAS, which can first show the different regions of the samples. One example was showed in the literature, which exhibits the MAS and CPMAS solid state NMR spectra of seed flour bourbon mango spectra [15, 16]. It shows that in these spectra have at least two segment areas of different molecular mobilities, and it may also a third due to the interaction of these two domains that may not be detected in this type of measurement.
188.8.131.52.3. Variable contact time (VCT) during polarization transfer
This technique generates a variation of contact times during the cross-polarization experiment, leading to a series of 13C CPMAS spectra with different contact times, and through this experiment, one can obtain some important information, such as heterogeneity of the sample, material stiffness, different types of domains, and the value of the hydrogen spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρH). This parameter can be obtained from the intensities decay of carbon-13 nucleus during the cross-polarization transfer experiment, according to the changes in the contact time, since the hydrogen nucleus is the one that controls this relaxation process. Figure 4 exhibits the variable contact-time experiment for powder EVA.
This experiment shows the decay of both resolved carbon types detected from CPMAS with contact-time variation, showing the rigid part of the sample and part of the mobile one with the increase in the signal related to the CH2 of the nonrigid phase.
2. Case study
2.1. Example of the determination of T1ρH for polymer nanocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxy butyrate) (PHB)
In this study, it was evaluated the T1ρH for the PHB/silica (PHB/S) systems contain different proportions of silica. All samples were obtained through solution casting, and the films after being dried were out into the rotor, the analyses were carried out at 30°C, and the values of this parameter are listed in Table 1.
|C = O||CH2||CH||CH3|
From the data listed in Table 1, just a small proportion of silica affects the polymer, promoting a formation of a new material. Therefore, the relaxation data for the samples containing 0.5 or more silica exhibit a similar behavior, promoting an increase in this parameter comparing to pure PHB indicating that a new material with good dispersion and distribution of the nanoparticle in the polymer was obtained. The limit of silica is 0.5%, and no more is needed since no change in the T1ρH for all carbons was detected. The evaluation of this parameter is not very much used for polymer nanocomposites yet. Therefore, studies have been already published by the group for other systems, as blends and composites , and show the behavior of these polymer materials .
3. Low-field NMR
In low-field NMR equipment due to low intensity and homogeneity of the magnetic field, the chemical shift cannot be used to discriminate between different molecules. The nuclear relaxation processes occurring in the nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon inherent to spectroscopy are spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times; however, they provide detailed information about the molecular dynamics. These relaxation times influence from the structural and microstructural quantitative determination by the study of molecular dynamics. The relaxation processes are associated to the time constant for these processes: T1, spin-lattice relaxation time, and T2, spin-spin relaxation time. In the low-field NMR, the relaxation parameters T1 and T2 for the hydrogen nuclei that constitute the samples can be measured directly, using the pulse sequences for such experiments and are widely used to characterize the types of molecular segments present in the samples and the interactions between them [15–20]. The time T1 is associated with the return of the nucleus excited by the absorption of radiation to the equilibrium. While T2 relaxation is related to the inverse of the half-width of the signal and occurs due to the loss of phase coherence in the precession of the nucleus excited about the direction of the applied magnetic field [1–3].
The relaxation times determined by NMR offer detailed information on the molecular mobility of a material. Thus, one could detect the formation of rigid and flexible segments, plasticization or antiplasticization process, and any other change in the molecular dynamics of the sample or comparing the variation of the molecular mobility of structures from the same type of material, but of different origin. The time of relaxation times T1H and T2H can be measured in a wide temperature range and identifying small differences in similar structures.
3.1. Determination of T1
The inversion-recovery pulse sequence is the most accurate technique for measuring the relaxation time spin–lattice process. The T1H relaxation time é measured in the frequency of magnetic field generated by the external magnetic field. This relaxation must do with the return of the excited nuclei to its ground state after removal of the excitation frequency, and therefore, it allows to evaluate the molecular mobility of a material, global compatibility and homogeneity, as well as processes and plasticization [1–3, 10–15]. In this process, the excess energy is emitted to the lattice in the form of dipole interaction since there is a lowering of the enthalpy of the nuclear spin system. The return to the magnetization to the equilibrium state is usually exponential, and is a first order process with constant speed, R1, and time constant T1.
The applied pulse sequence is described below:
where τ is a time interval between 90 pulses.
The relaxation time T1H reports on the molecular dynamics of materials. In the case of starches and starch flour, for example, this parameter is sensitive to the formation of domains or segments and structural changes in the range 15–50 nm.
3.2. Determination of T2
The proton spin-spin relaxation time, T2H, in principle, can be obtained by measuring the width of the NMR signal at half height. However, the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field causes the magnetization of the different nuclei processes at different rates when removing the RF and a time tau (
This relaxation time, and the time constant of spin-lattice relaxation reports about molecular mobility of materials in the molecular level, thereby assess overall molecular dynamics and segmental. The T2H parameter corroborates data obtained by T1H and sometimes can inform more detail of the material behavior under observation, if this have some regions or segments containing high-molecular mobility.
In several studies that involve the evaluation of molecular mobility of materials, specially using the NMR relaxometry, it was normally employed the measurements of relaxation times spin-lattice and spin-spin and evaluate the T1 and T2 times constants of both relaxation phenomena, respectively. This comes from the fact that these parameters are sensitive to dynamic processes that occur at different frequency ranges. Thus, T1 parameter measures the relaxation of the magnetization component parallel to the external magnetic field, being sensible to fast movements that are sensible to the movements of first order (MHz). The T1ρ relaxation parameter is measured in low frequencies in the range of tens of kilohertz [1, 7, 17–23].
4. Final comments
In the solids, there is a restricted molecular movement comparing to liquids. However, most of the samples range have a substantial molecular orientation of the line width. This fact stems from the anisotropy of the chemical shift as well as the strong dipolar interaction between the hydrogen and carbon-13. The nature of the sample and the type of nuclei to be observed are two points of fundamental importance to the spectral resolution. The type of answer you want to get on a specific material may be a reason why it must be analyzed by solid-state NMR. Information on the molecular dynamics is of great interest for answers about the correlation structure-molecular-dynamic property. The line width in NMR solid state spectra led to the development of techniques that allows obtaining signals in the solid state most narrow possible, like liquids. Along with the information to be obtained, different techniques are performed to analyze the more different polymer systems.
Komoroski RA. High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy of Synthetic Polymers in Bulk. Deerfield Beach: VCH Publishers; 1986
McBrierty VJ, Packer KJ. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Solid Polymers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993
Schmidt-Rohr K, Spiess HW. Multidimensional Solid-State NMR and Polymers. New York: Academic Press; 1994
Stejskal EO, Memory JD. High Resolution NMR in the Solid State. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994
Bovey FA, Mirau PA. NMR of Polymers. New York: Academic Press; 1996
Sandres JKM, Hunter BK. Modern NMR Spectroscopy: A Guide for Chemists. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996
Harris RK. NMR studies of solid polymer. In: Fawcell AH, editor. Polymer Spectroscopy. England: John Wiley & Sons; 1996
Silva NM, Tavares MIB. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1996; 60:663
Costa DA, Oliveira CMF, Tavares MIB. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998; 69:129
Harris RK. Recent advances in solid state NMR. The Fifth International Conference on Applications of Magnetic Resonance in Food Science, Aveiro, Portugal. 2000; I:1-11
Tavares MIB. Polymer Testing. 2000; 19:899
Silva EO, Tavares MIB, Bathista ALBS, Filho NP, Nogueira JS. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2002; 86:1848
Souza CMG, Tavares MIB. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2002; 86:116
Tavares MIB. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003; 87:473
Tavares MIB, Bathista ALBS, Silva EO, Filho NP, Nogueira JS. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2003; 53:213
Bathista ALBS, Silva EO, Tavares MIB, Prad RJ. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2012; 126(S1):E132-E126
Cheng HN. Modern Methods of Polymer Characterization. In: Barth HG, Mays JW, editors. Série Chemical Analysis. Vol. 113. 1991. p. 409-493
Ebdon JR. In: Dawking JV, editor. Developments in Polymer Characterisation-2. London: Applied Science Published Ltd; 1980
Silva MBR, Tavares MIB, Junior AWM, Cucinelli-Neto RP. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016; 16:7606
Sebastião PJO, Monteiro MSSB, Brito LM, Rodrigues E, Chávez FV, Tavares MIB. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016; 16:7539
Tavares MR, Menezes LR, Nascimento DF, Souza DHS, Reynaud F, Marques MFV, Tavares MIB. European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2016; 225:779
Monteiro MSSB, Tavares MIB, Sebastião PJO. Materials Scince and Applications. 2016; 7:575
Cunha APCB, Tavares MIB, Silva EO. Materials Sciences and Applications. 2016; 07:380
Preto M, Tavares MIB, Silva EP d. Polymer Testing. 2007; 26:501
Tavares MIB, Nogueira RF, San Gil RAS, Preto M, Silva EO, e Silva MBR, Miguez E. Polymer Testing. 2007; 26:1102