Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Electrochemical Capacitor Performance: Influence of Aqueous Electrolytes

Written By

Rajendran Ramachandran and Fei Wang

Submitted: 27 May 2017 Reviewed: 24 August 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70694

From the Edited Volume

Supercapacitors - Theoretical and Practical Solutions

Edited by Lionginas Liudvinavičius

Chapter metrics overview

2,498 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Due to low energy characteristics such as energy density and cyclic life, it is mandatory to enhance the energy characteristics of the supercapacitors (ESs). Electrolytes have been recognized as the most prominent ingredients in electrochemical supercapacitor performance. Most commercially available ESs use organic electrolytes and have some advantage like wide operating voltage. However, compared with aqueous alternatives, organic electrolytes are expensive, flammable, and, in some cases, toxic. It is reliable to assert that even though aqueous electrolytes examined by a cramped working voltage, the ions present in them are yet capable of incredibly faster carrier rates than organic electrolytes and can achieve better performance of ESs. Thus, efforts turned toward enlarging the working voltage window of aqueous electrolytes to increase overall operating potential and energy density of supercapacitor devices. This book chapter comprises the latest accomplishments in this area and provides an insight into the aqueous electrolyte advancement.


  • supercapacitors
  • energy density
  • aqueous electrolyte
  • operating voltage
  • electrolyte

1. Introduction

The dramatic global warming and the accessibility to fossil fuels in the earth require society to shift in the direction of renewable and sustainable resources. Due to this, the growth and ramp-up of sustainable, clean energy sources, as well as their associated technologies, are taken into account worldwide as a critical problem. The majority of the renewable and clean energy sources depend on the countrywide weather conditions. Among different energy storage systems, the electrochemical energy storage (EES) systems including batteries, fuel cells, as well as electrochemical capacitors or supercapacitors (ESs) are most efficient and frequently used in several applications [1]. The most common characteristic of these three devices is that the energy-producing processes perform at electrode/electrolyte interfaces. In both academia and industry, supercapacitors have drawn much importance due to benefits of high power density and long cyclic life compared with batteries and fuel cells [2]. By their charge storage process, ES is divided into three categories: (1) electric double layer capacitors (EDLC), (2) pseudocapacitors, and (3) hybrid capacitors [3]. Due to the technical maturity of EDLCs, almost all of the commercially available supercapacitors are made up by using EDLC electrode materials such as activated carbon. The low energy density (~10 Wh kg−1 for commercial supercapacitors) is truly the most significant challenge for supercapacitors in comparison to rechargeable batteries and fuel cells [4]. For that reason, enormous research attempts were carried out aiming to enhance the energy density of supercapacitors [5]. The important characteristic to get extraordinary energy density of supercapacitors is shown in Figure 1. As seen from the figure, the energy density of supercapacitors is directly proportional to the capacitance and square of the working voltage. Therefore, enhancing the capacitance and improving the working potential are considered as promising approaches to further improve high energy density supercapacitors. The high energy density can be attained by choosing appropriate electrode material with a high specific capacitance and electrolyte with a large operating voltage. Considering that the energy density is directly proportional to the square of the voltage, increasing the working potential window could be a more efficient way to improve the energy density rather than to improve the specific capacitance. Therefore, developing a new electrolyte with a large potential window is the top priority effort in comparison to seeking new electrode materials.

Figure 1.

Important characteristic of high energy density supercapacitors.

1.1. Effect of the electrolyte on supercapacitor performance

It is well recognized that the working potential of the supercapacitors is highly relying on the electrochemical stability of the electrolytes. For example, organic electrolytes and ionic liquid (IL)-derived supercapacitors can easily be handled at a large potential window of 2.5–2.7 and 3.5–4.0 V, respectively [6]. However, the electrodes are steady in aqueous electrolytes within the potential choice of 1.0–1.3 V due to H2/O2 evaluation reactions [7]. Since the interaction involving the electrode and electrolyte acts an essential function in the overall supercapacitor performance, aside from the operating voltage, the electrolytes have substantially influenced on the other parameters such as power density, cycling stability, operating temperature, equivalent series resistance, life time, and self-discharge rate of the capacitors [8]. The electrolyte ionic conductivity performs a serious role in the internal resistance of supercapacitors. It is highly crucial that the electrolyte ion size should be equal or less than that of the pore size of electrode material to possess a high capacitance and a high power density [9]. For a few cases, the freezing point and viscosity of electrolytes also affect the thermal stability of supercapacitor performance, and hence the working voltage range would be shifted [10, 11].

An ideal electrolyte of supercapacitor needs to have some fundamental requirements: (1) broad potential window, (2) a wide range of working temperature, (3) high ionic conductivity, (4) low viscosity, (5) high electrochemical stability, (6) environmentally friendly, (7) low cost, and (8) low flammability. Each electrolyte has its merits and drawbacks, and it is feasible to meet all the above specifications with one electrolyte. Nonstop and tremendous research efforts have been made in the present and will also keep going in the future for the electrolyte development investigation.


2. Types of electrolyte

Following the nature of electrolyte like the ion type, ion size, ion concentration, and the interplay among the ion and solvent, various electrolytes have been developed and examined currently. The electrolyte can be divided into three groups such as liquid, solid or semisolid, and redox-additive as shown in Figure 2. The liquid electrolyte can be further classified into aqueous electrolyte, nonaqueous electrolyte, and organic electrolyte [12].

Figure 2.

Classification of supercapacitor electrolytes.

As mentioned previously, no single electrolyte can meet all the requirements. For example, both high capacitance and ionic conductivity can be achieved by aqueous electrolytes, but the narrow decomposition voltage made the lower operating voltage of aqueous electrolytes. Though organic and ionic liquid electrolytes provide a wide operating voltage, they normally suffered from the low conductivity (large internal resistance), high cost, and high flammability which cause continual trouble during application in supercapacitor device. In this regard, extensive efforts are committed to the successful development of the overall performance of electrolytes. Some strategies have already been strived to enhance the electrolyte performance, including “(1) developing an entirely new electrolyte as well as improving its efficiency concerning a wide range of functioning voltage, high ionic conductivity, large working temperature range, and so on [13]; (2) investigation of the effect of electrolytes on capacitance, energy and power densities, thermal stability, and self-discharge rate of supercapacitors [14]; and (3) initiate and becoming familiar with a fundamental concept of the electrolyte on supercapacitor performance over sophisticated characterization, modeling, and simulation utilities [15].”


3. Aqueous electrolytes

Usually, regarding the energy density study, the aqueous electrolytes really are a poor selection for technical supercapacitor products because of their small voltage window. This could be the reason for why nearly all the commercial supercapacitors use organic electrolyte rather than aqueous electrolytes. Though aqueous electrolytes possess an insufficient cell voltage, they were considerably employed in the literature from 1997 onward because of that aqueous electrolytes seem to be cheaper and can be quite easily taken care of in the laboratory without having a special circumstance. However, ionic liquid and organic electrolytes generally call for complex purification treatments under a rigidly controlled environment to stay clear of moisture. All of these features of aqueous electrolytes tremendously explain the design and assembling of supercapacitors. Generally, aqueous electrolytes exhibit extremely high conductivity (Table 1) which is at least one magnitude larger than that of organic or IL electrolytes. The high conductivity of the aqueous electrolyte is propitious for reducing equivalent series resistance (ESR) which leads to significantly high power density supercapacitors.

ElectrolyteConductivity (mS cm−1)Potential window (V)
Aqueous KOH5400–1
Aqueous KCl2100–1
Aqueous H2SO47500–1
Aqueous K2SO488.60–1
Aqueous Na2SO491.10–1
Organic TEABF4/PC14.52.5–3
Organic TEABF4/ACN59.92.5–3
IL, [Et2MEIM]+[BF4]84

Table 1.

Electrolytic conductivity and operating voltage of various electrolytes at room temperature.

To evaluate the overall performance of aqueous electrolytes, some typical criteria should be taken into consideration such as the dimensions of hydrated and bare ions (Table 2), the flow of ions which alters the ionic conductivity, as well as the specific capacitance.

Type of ionSize of bare ion (Å)Size of hydrated ions (Å)Gibbs energy (kcal mol−1)Ion conductivity (S cm2 mol−1)

Table 2.

Size of electrolytic bare and hydrated ions and their conductivity [10].

Aqueous electrolyte/concentrationElectrode materialCs (F/g)E (W h kg−1)Potential window (V)Ref
H2SO4/0.5 MRuO2-graphene47920.281.2[36]
H2SO4/1 MGraphene-mesoporous PANI5101331[37]
H2SO4/1 MRuO2-carbon nano-onion57010.621[21]
KOH/6 MGraphene3036.51[38]
KOH/2 MNiCo2O41647.6380.41[39]
KOH/1 MNi(OH)2/graphene160481.5[40]
KOH/6 MIron nanosheets/graphene7201401.2[41]
KCl/3 MNi (OH)27180.5[42]
NaOH/1 MFe2O31780.5[43]
Na2SO4/1 MCNT/V2O5 nanocomposite//MnO2/C161.6[44]
Li2SO4/1 MActivated carbon1802.2[31]
Na2SO4/1 MHydrous RuO256.6618.771.6[45]

Table 3.

Some important aqueous-based electrolyte supercapacitors and their performance.

The aqueous electrolytes can be categorized into three groups such as alkaline, acid, and neutral solutions. The most commonly used aqueous electrolytes are KOH, H2SO4, and Na2SO4, respectively.

3.1. Acid electrolytes

Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is the most frequently used aqueous acid electrolyte in supercapacitor simply because of its extremely high conductivity (~0.8 cm−1 at 25°C for 1 M H2SO4) [16]. Since the electrolyte ionic conductivity is dependent on the concentrations, optimum molar concentrations have already been investigated to attain the highest possible ionic conductivities of a given electrolyte at particular temperature. So far, the electrolyte ionic conductivity can be quickly dropped when the concentration becomes extremely low or excessively high. So, the greater number of research studies uses 1 M H2SO4 solution, especially for carbon-based supercapacitors.

3.1.1. H2SO4 electrolyte-based EDLC and pseudocapacitors

Recently, several researchers discovered that for the carbon-based capacitors (EDLCs), specific capacitance obtained in the H2SO4 electrolyte is much higher than the specific capacitance in a neutral electrolyte. Moreover, due to the high value of H2SO4 ionic conductivity, the ESR value of supercapacitors is much lower in comparison to the neutral electrolyte. Torchala et al. have examined the EDLC behavior of activated carbon in the H2SO4 electrolyte, and they ascertained that the specific capacitance could be raised with increased electrolyte conductivity [17]. In past several years, many literatures have reported that the carbon-based materials had provided the specific capacitance within the range between 100 and 300 F g−1. Certain reported values are usually higher compared to those acquired in the commercial electrolytes. The changes in specific capacitance might replicate the diverse interplays among the electrode materials and the electrolyte ions caused by various electrolytes. As pointed out above, because of the small potential window of aqueous electrolyte, the energy density of EDLCs turns considerably lower. Thus, enormous attempts have been performed to raise the ES energy density by investigating other methods which can include utilizing pseudocapacitive behavior in electrodes.

In addition to the EDLC capacitance, it was discovered that the H2SO4 electrolyte also induced pseudocapacitance contribution due to the active redox reactions of carbon material surface functionalities. Introducing some heteroatoms that include nitrogen, oxygen, and boron to the carbon materials surface could enhance the pseudocapacitance contributions [18]. The doping of heteroatoms not only increases the specific capacitance but also improves the cycle life of the electrode materials even at a larger potential in the aqueous electrolytes. The pseudocapacitance materials including metal oxides, metal sulfides, and conducting polymers have much higher theoretical capacitance value compared to carbon-based electrodes in aqueous electrolyte [19]. Since the metal oxides and sulfide materials are highly sensitive to nature and pH of the electrolyte, these electrodes typically are not steady in the acidic electrolyte which restricts use in commercial products. As well known, ruthenium oxide (RuO2) is one of the potential electrodes that has been extensively examined for its pseudocapacitance in the H2SO4 electrolyte. Amorphous RuO2 can deliver a very high value of ~1000 F g−1 in acidic electrolyte resulting from easy insertion of the proton in the amorphous structure. Sadly, the expensive and limited Ru sources have restricted their practical usage.

3.1.2. H2SO4 electrolyte-based hybrid supercapacitors

To increase the energy densities of supercapacitors in aqueous electrolytes, designing a hybrid supercapacitor is the most potentially promising way. As a result of the gas evaluation reactions, the maximum cell voltage is limited for a symmetric supercapacitor by using the same electrode materials in aqueous electrolyte. The combinations of two alternative electrodes (asymmetric supercapacitors) can be performed in different working potentials, leading to a larger functioning potential window in aqueous electrolyte. Currently, several types of asymmetric-based supercapacitors such as carbon//PbO, carbon//RuO2, and carbon with various mass and properties in cathode and anode electrodes have already been examined in strong acidic electrolytes. An energy density of 25–30 Whkg−1 has been delivered by carbon//PbO2 asymmetric supercapacitor, which was considerably higher than that of the symmetric carbon-based EDLCs (3–6 Whkg−1) in the acidic electrolyte. Similar to metal oxide, conducting polymer and carbon-based asymmetric supercapacitor have delivered enough energy density for commercial applications. It was found that the energy density could reach up to 11.46 Whkg−1 when polyaniline (PANI) was used as a positive electrode and carbon as a negative electrode at a wider potential range (−1 V to +1 V) [20]. Though the energy density has reached higher than symmetric carbon capacitors, PANI is limited in the commercial product due to its poor stability. The stability can be improved through the use of liquid H2SO4 electrolyte for conducting polymer-based electrodes. When compared to solid-state polymer aqueous electrolytes, the thermal stability of liquid H2SO4 is high. Thus, the stability and the energy density of supercapacitors could possibly be improved in liquid-based electrolytes. For example, 0.5 M H2SO4 liquid electrolyte has delivered the energy density about ~20 W h kg−1 for RuO2/carbon nano-onion symmetric ESs, which is twofold higher than that of polymer gel acidic electrolyte (Figure 3) [21].

Figure 3.

Ragone plot of RuO2/carbon nano-onion symmetric ESs. (Reproduced from [21] with permission from ACS).

3.2. Alkaline electrolytes

Since acidic electrolytes are commonly not suitable for some cost-effective metal materials and metal oxides (Ni, Co, Eu, etc.), alkaline electrolytes have been utilized extensively in the literatures. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) is most commonly used alkaline aqueous electrolyte, simply because of its significantly better ionic conductivity (0.6 S cm−1).

3.2.1. Alkaline electrolyte-based EDLC and pseudocapacitors

The energy density of EDLC-based supercapacitors in aqueous KOH is similar to that reported with H2SO4 electrolyte. So, massive efforts have been given to raise the EDLC material energy density in the alkaline electrolyte by increasing the capacitance and enhancing the operating voltage. Some of the efforts were made as follows: (1) increasing carbon materials’ specific capacitance by doping some pseudocapacitance functional groups, (2) discovering some pseudocapacitance materials with large specific capacitance, (3) establishing new composite materials (EDLC material + pseudocapacitance material), and (4) developing asymmetric supercapacitors with a wider potential window.

As pointed out previously, the functional groups of carbon materials undergo the faradic redox reactions which are due to the interaction involving the electrolyte ions and the attached functional groups. It has been confirmed in literatures that the KOH electrolyte was favorable for the functioning/doping carbon materials to further increase their pseudocapacitance. The existence of oxygen functional groups in carbon material (graphene) can increase the pseudocapacitance contribution in KOH electrolyte, and hence overall capacitance of the electrode can be improved [22]. The redox reaction of those functional groups in KOH electrolyte can be expressed as follows:

> COH+OH > C =O+HO+eE2

From this, it is well known that the electrode and electrolyte ion interaction performs a serious role for pseudocapacitance contribution. Since the theoretical capacitance of some metal oxides, sulfides, and hydroxides such as Co3O4, NiO, MnO2, NiCo2O4, Ni(OH)2, CoS, etc. have extremely high values, these electrode materials have also been examined for supercapacitor applications in aqueous KOH electrolyte. For example, the specific capacitance has reached extremely high (~1400 F g−1) for Co3O4 nanofilm in 2 M KOH electrolyte [23]. The conversation of different oxidation states like CoII to CoIII and then CoIV in KOH aqueous electrolyte enhanced the capacitance of the electrode and described as follows:

CoIIs+OHCoIIsOHad +e¹E3
CoIIsOHad CoIIIsOHad+e¹E4

Similarly, though metal sulfides (CoS, MnS, NiS, etc.) have poor pseudocapacitance performance in KOH electrolyte, the electrochemical transformation of sulfides into some different electroactive forms (Co(OH)2, Ni(OH)2) might improve the pseudocapacitance of the electrodes. Some characteristics of the electrolyte including ion type, size, and concentrations can affect the working temperature and ES performance. Since the pH of KOH electrolyte seems to be high, the corrosion of electrode surface might be possible when using more concentrated electrolyte. Thus, optimization of the electrolyte concentration is a mandatory task to avoid the corrosion behavior of current collector. In addition to the concentration, the electrolyte ion type and size also impact the total efficiency of ESs. The rate of intercalation/de-intercalation of the ions in the electrolyte can determine the quantity of pseudocapacitance of materials. Misnon et al. [24] have achieved a higher specific capacitance of MnO2 electrode in LiOH electrolyte than that in KOH, resulting from the miniature-sized ionic radius of Li+ ions. The smaller radius can be favorable to the relatively easy intercalation/de-intercalation of ions into electrode material and improved the redox reactions. In addition, the effects of the different aqueous electrolytes on NiCo2O4 nanostructures at a wider range of temperature have been investigated, and the highest energy density from KOH electrolyte has been achieved in comparison with NaOH as well as LiOH electrolytes (Figure 4). Because of the smaller size of K+, the ion mobility in KOH turned into much higher which enhances the fast redox reactions between electrode and electrolyte [25]. Barzegar also reported that for activated carbon electrode, 6 M KOH could demonstrate significantly better electrochemical performance than Na2SO4 and LiCl electrolytes [26]. Besides of the cations, electrolyte anions also play a crucial role in ES performance. Ramachandran et al. performed extensive research toward the effect of anions on the specific capacitance behavior in potassium-based alkaline and neutral electrolytes (KOH and KCl) [27]. They have reported that the small size of OH ions can enhance the redox reaction of cobalt sulfide/graphene materials in KOH electrolyte. Due to the smaller ionic size of OH, only a limited number of literatures are available for comparative studies of different alkaline aqueous electrolyte behaviors, and still the electrolyte phenomenon and mechanisms are unclear.

Figure 4.

(a) Specific capacitance plot and (b) Ragone plot of NiCo2O4 at various alkaline aqueous electrolytes. (Reproduced from [25] with permission from Nature).

It is well known that the cyclic stability of pseudocapacitive materials is generally poor in the alkaline electrolyte when compared to EDLC materials, which could be associated with the repeated redox reactions in the electrolyte. An existing research was focused on enhancing the cyclic life of pseudocapacitive materials with carbon materials (composite materials). The composite materials not only improved the electrode stability but also increased the working potential range of alkaline electrolytes. For example, Fe2O3 nanodots/N-doped graphene composite material showed the ultralong cyclic stability of 75.3% even after 100,000 cycles in KOH electrolyte [28], and this might be due to the fact that the pyrolic N atoms in graphene can promote the electron transfer reactions of the composite.

3.2.2. Alkaline electrolyte-based hybrid supercapacitors

A sequence of alkaline electrolytes has been studied for hybrid supercapacitors to increase their energy density with a wide range of the potential. The working voltage of the KOH electrolyte can be improved up to ~1.7 V when asymmetric electrodes are used. For example, carbon//metal hydroxides (carbon//Ni(OH)2 −1.7 V and carbon//Co(OH)2) −1.6 V) and carbon//RuO2 (~1.4 V) asymmetric devices have been delivered high energy densities in KOH electrolyte. As a result of their wider potential window and high faradic reactions, most of the hybrid devices could deliver higher energy densities between 20 and 40 W h kg−1, which has been similar to rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Recently, Chen and Xue [29] have demonstrated that the vanadium-based colloids/activated carbon-based hybrids could provide a high energy density of ~50.4 W h kg−1 with potential range of 0–1.8 V in 2 M KOH electrolyte. In situ formation of electroactive vanadium-based colloids with high utilization of cations in asymmetric device enhanced the performance and the operating voltage. Thus, developing asymmetric hybrid supercapacitor is an efficient way to increase the operating voltage and could be used in practical applications in KOH electrolyte.

3.3. Neutral electrolyte

When compared with alkaline and acid electrolytes, neutral electrolytes have also been studied extensively due to their larger working potential and less corrosive feature. Up to date, there are many types of neutral electrolytes such as LiCl, Li2SO4, Na2SO4, NaCl, KCl, K2SO4, etc. used in supercapacitor studies. Among them, Na2SO4 neutral electrolyte has shown promising electrochemical reactions for electrodes especially pseudocapacitance materials.

3.3.1. Neutral electrolyte-based EDLC and pseudocapacitors

Since the lower H+ and OH concentrations of the neutral electrolyte, the potential of hydrogen and oxygen evolution reaction can be shifted into the higher potential window and the electrolyte-stable potential windows (ESPW) can be increased in comparison to the alkaline electrolyte. Demarconnay et al. reported an excellent cyclic stability even after 10,000 charge-discharge cycles for the symmetric-activated carbon-based device at a high cell potential of 1.6 V in 0.5 M Na2SO4 neutral electrolyte [30]. The cell voltage can be extended up to 2.2 V for carbon-based electrodes in the Li2SO4 electrolyte as a consequence of its miniature size of bare ions (Table 2). The small size of Li+ ions can enhance the charge accumulation process in carbon electrode/electrolyte interfaces and avoid the evolution of gases such as oxygen and hydrogen at higher potential. The reported operating voltage of neutral electrolyte for carbon materials is relatively higher and less corrosive than H2SO4 and KOH electrolytes. Symmetric carbon ESs in neutral electrolyte have been identified as a potential candidate for higher energy density and lower environmental impact devices. A few comparable studies of the neutral electrolyte with various salts (Li+, K+, Na+) based on carbon ESs have been reported to experience the impact of ions on capacitive performance. Several studies reported the electrochemical performance of carbon materials shown in neutral electrolytes following the order Li2SO4 > Na2SO4 > K2SO4 [31, 32]. As mentioned above, the performance of ESs not only relies on the type of electrolyte but also depends on the electrode preparation and analysis circumstances, which include voltage, scan rate, and temperature. With this view, the additional research work may be required to interpret the effect of salts on the ES performance.

Some of the pseudocapacitive materials like RuO2, MnO2, and V2O5 have shown excellent ES performance in neutral electrolytes. MnO2 is the most common pseudocapacitive material, and it has been studied widely in the neutral electrolyte. Li et al. [33] have confirmed that the order of energy density and specific capacitance of mesoporous MnO2 electrode is obtained in neutral electrolytes as follows: Li2SO4 > Na2SO4 > K2SO4. This behavior appears to be associated with the magnitude of these alkali metal bare and hydrated ion size, i.e., Li+ < Na+ < K+, suggesting that the smaller ion size is advantageous for improving the performance. The same phenomenon was also confirmed from Fic et al., for a RuO2 electrode in different neutral electrolytes. They observed that the mobility of alkali metal ions rises in the order of Li+ < Na+ < K+. In accordance with the ion shape and dimensions (obtained by modeling) [31], which is shown in Figure 5, the high mobility of Li+ ions is more favorable for increasing the overall performance of the pseudocapacitive materials.

Figure 5.

Ion size and dimensions in aqueous electrolyte obtained by modeling. (Reproduced from [31] with permission from RSC).

3.3.2. Neutral electrolyte-based hybrid supercapacitors

Like EDLC and pseudocapacitive ESs, neutral electrolytes were also utilized for asymmetric supercapacitor devices, which provided a wider range of potential window to achieve high energy density. Though MnO2-based symmetric ESs delivered enough specific capacitance, the operating voltage is limited and so is its overall energy density. The cell working voltage of approximately 1 V was applied for MnO2 symmetric devices in many cases. By substituting some carbon materials (CNT and activated carbon) as the negative electrode, the cell voltage of MnO2 can be significantly increased [34]. In contrast, manganese phosphate (Mn3 (PO4)2)-based symmetric ESs can be performed at an extremely high voltage in the Na2SO4 electrolyte (~1.8 V); therefore, it reached a maximum energy density of 19.09 Wh kg−1 [35]. From Figure 6, it is noticeable that both symmetric and asymmetric ESs have delivered high energy density in neutral electrolyte rather than the alkaline electrolyte. The reason for this enhanced performance and high cyclic stability of Mn3 (PO4)2 is still unclear in neutral electrolyte. To date, several positive and negative electrodes have been investigated for asymmetric supercapacitors in neutral electrolytes, and some of them are given in Table 3. The potential window of these asymmetric devices in the series of ~1.5–2.0 V is larger than those described in alkaline and acidic electrolytes.

Figure 6.

Ragone plot of Mn3 (PO4)2-based symmetric and asymmetric ESs in different neutral electrolytes. (Reproduced from [35] with permission from RSC).

The advantage of the neutral aqueous electrolytes is not solely solving the corrosion problems of the ESs but also affording a low cost and environmentally friendly choice to enhance the performance of ESs with larger operating voltage and energy density. There are still some challenges to develop the cycle stability of ESs in neutral aqueous electrolytes.


4. Summary and future research directions

In summary, this chapter contributes comprehensive review of the development and modern trends concerning aqueous electrolyte for ESs. The effect of aqueous electrolyte properties including ionic conductivity, ion size, ESPW, etc. on the ES performance like specific capacitance, cyclic stability, energy density, and temperature performance have been reviewed in details. In particular, the effect of interaction among the electrodes and electrolytes has been discussed. This argument shows that the current explored ESs relying on neutral aqueous electrolytes provide numerous benefits such as low cost, environmentally friendly, and safe, over the other electrolyte systems. Despite of considerable accomplishments in this field, still, some difficulties exist such as lower energy density and operating voltage in aqueous electrolytes. To overcome these problems, several research directions can be considered in the future as follows:

  1. Increasing the ESPW values of electrolyte: In aqueous electrolytes, the ESPW values are dependent on the cations and anions of a given conducting salts. Therefore, the enhancement of the ESPW values could be achieved by finding a new aqueous electrolyte salt and by optimization of the suitable electrolytes.

  2. Enhancing surface area of the pseudocapacitive materials: As the energy density mainly depends on the capacitance, the performance of ESs could be enhanced by improving charge capacity of the electrode material. Compared to EDLC, the pseudocapacitive material-based symmetric and asymmetric ESs provide higher energy density in aqueous electrolyte. Thus, improving the specific surface area of the pseudocapacitive materials is the promising strategy to enhance the efficiency of ESs.

  3. Building the purity of the aqueous electrolyte: In some cases, the contamination in electrolyte causes the negative effect on ESPW and also leads to high self-discharge rate. So, it is highly considered to develop the purity of the electrolyte to improve the ES performance.



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51505209) and Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (Projects No. JCYJ20170412154426330). Fei Wang is also supported by Guangdong Natural Science Funds (Project Nos. 2015A030313812 and 2016A030306042). This chapter is partly supported by the State Key Laboratories of Transducer Technology, Shanghai, China.


  1. 1. Ramachandran R, Saranya M, Grace AN, Wang F. MnS nanocomposites based on doped graphene: Simple synthesis by a wet chemical route and improved electrochemical properties as an electrode material for supercapacitors. RSC Advances. 2017;7:2249-2257. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA25457H
  2. 2. Yu G, Xie X, Pan L, Bao Z, Cui Y. Hybrid nanostructured materials for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Nano Energy. 2013;2:213-234. DOI:
  3. 3. Ramachandran R, Saranya M, Kollu P, Ragupathy BPC, Jeong SK, Grace AN. Solvothermal synthesis of zinc sulfide decorated graphene (ZnS/G) nanocomposites for novel supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochimica Acta. 2005;178:647-657. DOI:
  4. 4. Conway BE. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 1999
  5. 5. Xia L, Yu L, Chen GZ. Electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage. Materials Chemistry Frontiers. 2017;1:584-618. DOI: 10.1039/C6QM00169F
  6. 6. Jiang DE, Jin Z, Henderson D, Wu J. Solvent effect on the pore-size dependence of an organic electrolyte supercapacitor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012;3:1727-1731. DOI: 10.1021/jz3004624
  7. 7. Vindt ST, Skou EM. The buffer effect in neutral electrolyte supercapacitors. Applied Physics. 2016;122:64-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-015-9563-8
  8. 8. Yan J, Wang Q, Wei T, Fan Z. Recent advances in design and fabrication of electrochemical supercapacitors with high energy densities. Advanced Energy Materials. 2014;4:1300816. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201300816/full
  9. 9. Simon P, Gogotsi Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nature Materials. 2008;7:845-854. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2297
  10. 10. Zheng H, Zhang H, Fu Y, Abe T, Ogumi Z. Temperature effects on the electrochemical behavior of spinel LiMn2O4 in quaternary ammonium-based ionic liquid electrolyte. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2005;109:13676-13684. DOI: 10.1021/jp051238i
  11. 11. Girard GMA, Hilder M, Zhu H, Nucciarone D, Whitbread K, Zavorine S, Moser M, Forsyth M, MacFarlane DR, Howlett PC. Electrochemical and physicochemical properties of small phosphonium cation ionic liquid electrolytes with high lithium salt content. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2015;17:8706-8713. DOI: 10.1039/C5CP00205B
  12. 12. Zhong C, Deng Y, Hu W, Qiao J, Zhang L, Zhang J. A review of electrolyte materials and composites for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44:7484-7539. DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00303B
  13. 13. Peng X, Liu H, Yin Q, Wu J, Chen P, Zhang G, Liu G. A zwitterionic gel electrolyte for efficient solid-state supercapacitors. Nature Communications. 2016;7:11782-11789. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11782
  14. 14. Zhao Y, Hao M, Wang Y, Sha Y, Su L. Effect of electrolyte concentration on the capacitive properties of NiO electrode for supercapacitors. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 2016;20(1):81-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10008-015-3009-2
  15. 15. Lehtimaki S, Railanmaa, Keskinen, Kujala M, Tuukkanen S, Lupo D. Performance, stability and operation voltage optimization of screen-printed aqueous supercapacitors. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:46001. DOI: 10.1038/srep46001
  16. 16. Galinski M, Lewandowski A, Pniak IS. Ionic liquids as electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta. 2006;51:5567-5580. DOI:
  17. 17. Torchala K, Kierzek K, Machnikowski J. Capacitance behavior of KOH activated mesocarbon microbeads in different aqueous electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta. 2012;86:260-267. DOI:
  18. 18. Pognon G, Brousse T, Demarconnay L, Belanger D. Performance and stability of electrochemical capacitor based on anthraquinone modified activated carbon. Journal of Power Sources. 2011;196:4117-4122. DOI:
  19. 19. Augustyn V, Simon P, Dunn B. Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;7:1597-1614. DOI: 10.1039/C3EE44164D
  20. 20. Khomenko V, Pinero ER, Frackowiak E, Beguin F. High-voltage asymmetric supercapacitors operating in aqueous electrolyte. Applied Physics A. 2006;82:567-573. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-005-3397-8
  21. 21. Muniraj VKA, Kamaja CK, Shelke MV. RuO2·nHO nanoparticles anchored on carbon nano-onions: An efficient electrode for solid state flexible electrochemical supercapacitor. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2016;4:2528-2534. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01627
  22. 22. Ramachandran R, Saranya M, Velmurugan V, Ragupathy BPC, Jeong SK, Grace AN. Effect of reducing agent on graphene synthesis and its influence on charge storage towards supercapacitor applications. Applied Energy. 2015;153:22-31. DOI:
  23. 23. Feng C, Zhang JF, He Y, Zhong C, Hu WB, Liu L, Deng YD. Sub-3 nm Co3O4 nanofilms with enhanced supercapacitor properties. ACS Nano. 2015;9:1730-1739. DOI: 10.1021/nn506548d
  24. 24. Misnon II, Aziz RA, Zain NK, Vidhyadharan B, Krishnan SK, Jose R. High performance MnO2 nanoflower electrode and the relationship between solvated ion size and specific capacitance in highly conductive electrolytes. Materials Research Bulletin. 2014;57:221-230. DOI:
  25. 25. Gupta RK, Candler J, Palchoudhury S, Ramasamy K, Gupta BK. Flexible and high performance supercapacitors based on NiCo2O4 for wide temperature range applications. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:15265. DOI: 10.1038/srep15265
  26. 26. Barzegar F, Momodu DF, Fashedemi OO, Bello A, Dangbegnon JK, Manyala N. Investigation of different aqueous electrolytes on the electrochemical performance of activated carbon-based supercapacitors. RSC Advances. 2015;5:107482-107487. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA21962K
  27. 27. Ramachandran R, Grace AN, Subramaniam CK. Cobalt sulfide-graphene (CoSG) composite based electrochemical double layer capacitors. MRS Proceedings. 2015;1786:19-30. DOI:
  28. 28. Liu L, Lang J, Zhang P, Hu B, Yan X. Facile synthesis of Fe2O3 nano-dots@nitrogen-doped graphene for supercapacitor electrode with ultralong cycle life in KOH electrolyte. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8:9335-9344. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b00225
  29. 29. Chen K, Xue D. High energy density hybrid supercapacitor: In-situ functionalization of vanadium-based colloidal cathode. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8:29522-29528. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b10638
  30. 30. Demarconnay L, Pinero ER, Beguin F. A symmetric carbon/carbon supercapacitor operating at 1.6 V by using a neutral aqueous solution. Electrochemistry Communications. 2010;12:1275-1278
  31. 31. Fic K, Lota G, Meller M, Frackowiak E. Novel insight into neutral medium as electrolyte for high-voltage supercapacitors. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5:5842-5850. DOI: 10.1039/C1EE02262H
  32. 32. Chae JH, Chen GH. Influences of ions and temperature on performance of carbon nano-particulates in supercapacitors with neutral aqueous electrolytes. Particuology. 2014;15:9-17. DOI:
  33. 33. Li S, Qi L, Lu L, Wang H. Facile preparation and performance of mesoporous manganese oxide for supercapacitors utilizing neutral aqueous electrolytes. RSC Advances. 2012;2:3298-3308. DOI: 10.1039/C2RA00991A
  34. 34. Long JW, Belanger D, Brousse T, Sugimoto W, Sassin MB, Crosnier O. Asymmetric electrochemical capacitors—Stretching the limits of aqueous electrolytes. MRS Bulletin. 2011;36:513-522. DOI:
  35. 35. Ma XJ, Zhang WB, Kong LB, Luo YC, Kang L. Electrochemical performance in alkaline and neutral electrolytes of a manganese phosphate material possessing a broad potential window. RSC Advances. 2016;6:40077-40085. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA02217K
  36. 36. Deng LJ, Wang JF, Zhu G, Kang LP, Hao ZP, Lei ZB, Yang ZP, Liu ZH. RuO2/graphene hybrid material for high performance electrochemical capacitor. Journal of Power Sources. 2014;248:407-415. DOI:
  37. 37. Wang Q, Yan J, Fan ZJ, Wei T, Zhang ML, Jing XY. Mesoporous polyaniline film on ultra-thin graphene sheets for high performance supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources. 2014;247:197-203. DOI:
  38. 38. Wang HJ, Sun XX, Liu ZH, Lei ZB. Creation of nanopores on graphene planes with MgO template for preparing high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Nanoscale. 2014;6:6577-6584. DOI: 10.1039/C4NR00538D
  39. 39. Li L, Peng S, Cheah Y, Teh P, Wang J, Wee G, Ko Y, Woung C, Srinivasan M. Electrospun porous NiCo2O4 nanotubes as advanced electrodes for electrochemical capacitors. Chemistry: A European Journal. 2013;19:5892-5898. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201204153
  40. 40. Wang H, Liang Y, Mirfakhrai T, Chen Z, Casalomgue HS, Dai H. Advanced asymmetrical supercapacitors based on graphene hybrid materials. Nano Research. 2011;4(8):729-736. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-011-0129-6
  41. 41. Long C, Wei T, Yan J, Jiang L, Fan Z. Supercapacitors based on graphene-supported iron nanosheets as negative electrode materials. ACS Nano. 2013;7(12):11325-11332. DOI: 10.1021/nn405192s
  42. 42. Lee JW, Ahn T, Kim JH, Ko JM, Kim JD. Nanosheets based mesoporous NiO microspherical structures via facile and template-free method for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta. 2011;56:4849-4857. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.116
  43. 43. Kulal PM, Dubal DP, Lokhande CD, Fulari VJ. Chemical synthesis of Fe2O3 thin films for supercapacitor application. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509:2567-2571. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.091
  44. 44. QT Q, Shi Y, Li LL, Guo WL, Wu YP, Zhang HP, Guan SY, Holze R. V2O5·0.6H2O nanoribbons as cathode material for asymmetric supercapacitor in K2SO4 solution. Electrochemistry Communications. 2009;11:1325-1328. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.05.003
  45. 45. Xia H, Meng YS, Yuan G, Cui C, Lu L. A symmetric RuO2/RuO2 supercapacitor operating at 1.6 V by using a neutral aqueous electrolyte. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. 2012;15:A60-A63. DOI: 10.1149/2.023204esl

Written By

Rajendran Ramachandran and Fei Wang

Submitted: 27 May 2017 Reviewed: 24 August 2017 Published: 20 December 2017