Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Physiology and Pathology of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Antibodies- and Vaccines-Based Pathogen-Specific Targeting

Written By

Yang Zhang, Jie Su and Donghui Wu

Reviewed: 28 July 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70488

From the Edited Volume

Physiology and Pathology of Immunology

Edited by Nima Rezaei

Chapter metrics overview

2,177 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) are increasing rapidly and posing a global threat to mankind. Alternative strategies other than antibiotics have to be explored urgently. In this chapter, we review the current status of nonantibiotics strategies including antibody-based therapy and vaccine development for targeting Gram-positive strains (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium) and MDR Gram-negative strains (Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Biologics-based clinical progress against these bacterial infections is updated.


  • multidrug-resistant bacteria
  • MDR
  • MRSA
  • VRE
  • A. baumannii
  • P. aeruginosa
  • infection
  • biologics
  • antibody
  • vaccine

1. Introduction

Antibiotics treatment for bacterial infections has been extensively used for over half century. This is coupled with increasing reports of bacteria drug resistance to almost all available classes of antibiotics.

The antibiotics multidrug resistance (MDR) situation is particularly severe in clinics and community for the designated ESKAPE notorious bugs (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.) [1, 2].

Given the prevalence of antibiotic resistance to these bacteria-associated infections, alternative strategies are urgently needed. This chapter reviews the current status of nonantibiotics-based strategies including antibody-based therapy and vaccine development for Gram-positive strains methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and MDR Gram-negative strains (A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa). Figure 1 shows the basic structures of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that are a key for design and development of antibodies and vaccines to target against these MDR bacterial infections.

Figure 1.

Bacterial cell and detailed cell wall architecture. Gram-positive bacterial cell (A1), the detailed Gram-positive bacterial cell wall (A2), Gram-negative bacterial cell (B1) and the detailed Gram-negative bacterial cell wall (B2) are shown.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have advantages over traditional chemotherapy in that (1) mAbs can bind target antigen specifically and thus reduce off-target side effects associated with traditional chemotherapy; (2) through Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) recycling mechanism, mAbs have long serum half-life (ranges in days to weeks) when compared to chemotherapy (ranges in minutes to hours); (3) mAbs can recruit effectors for antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) through its Fc region, which functions are missing in chemotherapy [3]. By 2015, more than 60 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat cancer, autoimmune disorders, and infections [4].

To conquer the serious antibiotic resistance from bacterial pathogens, passive immunization (mAb treatment against bacterial pathogen) and active immunization (vaccine against bacterial pathogen), as alternative strategies, are being actively explored.

In this chapter, we focus on the current status of antibody and vaccine development against Gram-positive strains (S. aureus and Enterococci) and Gram-negative strains (P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii). Antibodies and vaccines under clinical trials are summarized in Table 1.

Drug nameSponsor (s)TargetProduct classIndicationDevelopment stageRef.
AltastaphNabi BiopharmaceuticalsCP5/CP8S. aureus antibodyTreatment of bacteremia and continuing feverPhase I/II[48]
Aurexis (Tefibazumab)Bristol-Myers SquibbClfAS. aureus antibodyTreatment of bacteremiaPhase II[68]
AurograbNeuTec PharmaABC transporter GrfAS. aureus antibodyTreatment of severe, deep-seated infectionsPhase III, failed[189]
PagibaximabBiosynexus Inc./GlaxoSmithKlineLipoteichoic acidS. aureus antibodyPrevention of staphylococcal sepsis in very low birth weight infantsPhase II/III, failed[190]
MEDI4893MedImmune LLCα-toxinS. aureus antibodyPrevention of pneumoniaPhase II[36]
SAR279356 (F598)SanofiPNAGS. aureus antibodyPrevention of pneumoniaPhase II, terminated[191]
VeronateBristol-Myers SquibbClfA and SdrGS. aureus antibodyPrevention of infections in neonatesPhase III[192]
SA3AgPfizerCP5/CP8/ClfAS. aureus vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase I/II[92]
StaphVAXNabi BiopharmaceuticalsCP5/CP8S. aureus vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase III, failed[50]
STEBVaxNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSEBS. aureus vaccineTreatment for toxic shock syndromePhase I[193]
V710MerckIsdBS. aureus vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase III, failed[194]
SA4AgPfizerCP5/CP8/ClfA/ MntCS. aureus vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase I, II, IIb[195]
4C–StaphGSKHlaH35L/EsxAB/FhuD2/Csa1AS. aureus vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase I[196]
MEDI3902MedImmune LLCPcrV/PslP. aeruginosa antibodyPrevention of pneumoniaPhase II[197]
KB001-AKaloBios PharmaceuticalsPcrVP. aeruginosa antibodyPrevention of infectionsPhase II, failed[198]
PseudIgYImmunsystem ABUnknownP. aeruginosa antibodyPrevention of infectionsPhase I/II[199]
KBPA-101Kenta Biotech LtdO-polysaccharideP. aeruginosa antibodyTreatment of infectionsPhase I/II[200]
IC43Valneva Austria GmbHOprF/OprIP. aeruginosa vaccinePrevention of infectionsPhase II/III[201]
AerugenCrucellO-polysaccharideP. aeruginosa vaccinePrevention of chronic CF infectionPhase III, failed[140]
FlagellaSubtype-a and subtype-b flagellinP. aeruginosa vaccinePrevention of chronic CF infectionphase III[131]
MEPUnivax BiologicsMEP antigenP. aeruginosa vaccinePrevention of chronic CF infectionPhase I[142]
PseudostatProvalis PLCInactivated P. aeruginosa strain 385P. aeruginosa vaccinePrevention of chronic CF infectionPhase I[145]

Table 1.

Antibodies and vaccines for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in clinical development.

CP5/8: serotype 5/8 capsular polysaccharides; ClfA: clumping factor A; PNAG: poly-N-acetyl glucosamine; SdrG: serine-aspartate repeat-containing protein G; SEB: Staphylococcal enterotoxin serotype B; IsdB: iron-regulated surface determinant protein B; MntC: manganese transport protein C; HlaH35L: α-Hemolysin H35L; EsxAB: ess extracellular A/B; FhuD2: ferric hydroxamate-binding lipoprotein; Csa1A: conserved staphylococcal antigen 1A; PcrV: Low calcium response locus protein V; OprF/OprI: Major outer membrane porin F/I; MEP: mucoid exopolysaccharide.


2. Antibody and vaccine development against S. aureus

S. aureus establishes infection through a variety of complicated mechanisms. S. aureus produces cell envelope-associated proteins, nonprotein glycopolymers, a collection of secreted toxins that mediate host-microbe adhesion, host cell lysis, antibody function interference, complement activation inhibition, and invasion of immune nonprofessional phagocytes [5, 6].

2.1. Antibodies against staphylococcal-secreted virulent factors

2.1.1. Staphylococcal superantigens as antibody targets

S. aureus is a round-shaped, facultative anaerobe, which can produce an array of superantigens (SAgs), including staphylococcal exotoxins, enterotoxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1). These toxins exert their hyper-stimulatory properties and cause food poisoning, toxic shock syndrome, acute lung diseases, and autoimmune diseases [710]. The superantigenicity of SAgs is largely achieved by the activation of APCs and T cells, leading to a massive release of cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα [11].

Staphylococcal enterotoxin serotype B (SEB) was classified as a category B select agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) due to its high toxicity to human and potential use as a biological weapon [12]. Several mAbs targeting on SEB are under investigation. A high-affinity SEB-specific mouse mAb, 20B1, was investigated in mouse models with superficial skin, sepsis, or deep-tissue infections [13]. Treatment of 20B1 significantly increased the survival in the sepsis model, whereas it reduced bacterial burden and dissemination of bacteria in the superficial skin model. Moreover, 20B1 was shown to decrease pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and T cell proliferation. Remarkably, their following work further showed that isotype switching from original IgG1 to IgG2a, without changing of SEB binding affinity, greatly enhanced the protective ability in S. aureus sepsis models [14]. This is consistent with a recent report in which humanized anti-SEB mAbs attenuated virulence of exogenous SEB expressing S. aureus in a mouse pneumonia model [15].

In addition, Tilahun and colleagues explored the use of combined mAbs targeting on different epitopes of SEB, as well as co-administration of mAb and antibiotic, both of which showed synergistic protection in S. aureus infection mouse model [16, 17]. This strategy seems promising as synergistic protection by co-administration of two mAbs recognizing distinct SEB epitopes was also observed independently in another study [18]. To date, there are not any anti-SEB mAbs being tested in clinical trials. Of note, a phase I clinical study of safety of a recombinant SEB vaccine (STEBVax) against toxic shock syndrome has been completed [19].

TSST-1 is a 22 kDa monomeric protein, of which the N-terminal domain binds to the MHC-II on APCs and the C-terminal domain is implicated in β-chain variable region of TCR (TCR-Vβ) interaction [20, 21]. In a recent report, human single chain variable fragments (scFvs) against recombinant TSST-1 were panned out from synthetic human scFv library by phage display technology [22]. The scFvs were demonstrated to be able to inhibit TSST-1–mediated T cell activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Besides, a recombinant TSST-1 vaccine (Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbH) has been completed in phase I clinical study and proved to possess a good safety profile with no observable severe adverse events occurred [23, 24].

2.1.2. α-Hemolysin as antibody target

S. aureus releases a number of cytolytic toxins, among which the pore-forming α-hemolysin (Hla, α-toxin) is the most studied one. Hla is secreted as a 33 kDa monomer consisting almost entirely of β-strands by circular dichroism [25]. It exerts cell lytic activity through a membrane perforating mechanism, which is initiated through binding to membrane lipid or/and its proteinaceous receptor, a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) [26]. In detail, Hla monomers assemble into a heptameric structure on susceptible host cell membrane and form a central pore of approximately 1–3 nm in diameter [27, 28]. This allows rapid egress of Ca+, ATP, and low molecular weight molecules through the pore, resulting in alteration of cellular signaling pathways and cell lysis [2931].

Therapeutic anti-Hla mAbs have been actively developed due to the key role of Hla in Staphylococcal pathogenesis. In a study in which a recombinant Hla, AT62, was used as a vaccine, the study also showed that passive immunization of anti-AT62 IgG reduced wound infection and tissue damage in a mouse model [32]. In a S. aureus dermonecrosis model, combined administration of Hla-targeting mAb, MEDI4893*, with frontline antibiotic linezolid or vancomycin, exhibited enhanced protection by reduced lesion size, reduced tissue damage, and accelerated healing in a synergistic manner [33]. Furthermore, MEDI4893 (MedImmune) was generated from MEDI4893* by introducing three amino acids substitution (M252Y/S254 T/T256E) [33]. The YTE mutation has been shown to extend half-life by two- to fourfold without affecting distribution properties [34]. MEDI4893 not only abrogated Hla-host cell interaction but also potentially blocked oligomer formation due to steric hindrance [35]. Recently, a phase I clinical trial was completed by evaluating the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MEDI4893 in healthy adult subjects [36]. Currently, a phase II study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MEDI4893 in the prevention of S. aureus pneumonia [37].

2.2. Antibodies against staphylococcal surface-associated components

2.2.1. Capsular glycopolymer as antibody target

Bacterial capsule is a polysaccharide layer lying outside of the cell wall found in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Capsule produced by pathogens has been involved in promoting adherence, resisting bacterium from host immune attack, and mediating release of virulent factors [38]. Encapsulation of S. aureus prevents bacterial phagocytosis by interfering with effective opsonization [39].

Serotype 5 (CP5) and serotype 8 (CP8) capsular polysaccharides predominate among S. aureus clinical isolates, representing 75–80% of total isolates [40]. While several CP5 or CP8-specific mAbs were studied [41, 42], serum containing antibodies that recognize the shared epitope of CP5 and CP8 were recently developed [43, 44]. The cross-reactivity was confirmed in vitro and the sera were demonstrated to promote opsonophagocytic killing of both CP5 and CP8 S. aureus strains. There are no reports on therapeutic antibodies targeting staphylococcal polysaccharide in clinical trials. However, two vaccines, StaphVAX and Altastaph (Nabi Biopharmaceuticals), have been completed for their clinical studies for safety and immunogenicity evaluation [4548]. Although Altastaph was able to induce significant elevation of anti-CP5 and anti-CP8 antibody levels, unfortunately, it failed to show efficacy in a phase II clinical trial [49]. StaphVAX also showed ineffectiveness in the reduction of S. aureus in patients on hemodialysis and thus failed in a phase III trial [50].

Bacterial poly-N-acetyl glucosamine (PNAG) is another major class of surface polysaccharide that has been evaluated as a vaccine. PNAG, which is synthesized by enzymes encoded in intercellular adhesin (ica) locus, contributes to biofilm formation, colonization in host tissue, and immune evasion [51, 52]. Recent work showed that deacetylation of PNAG (dPNAG) by surface protein, IcaB, is a critical step for PNAG association to cell wall and plays key roles in colonization and resistance to host immune defense [53]. Indeed, antibodies specific to dPNAG were better in opsonic killing than that specific to PNAG [54]. In consistence, passive immunization of mice with antisera raised to dPNAG showed efficient clearance of S. aureus, compared with that raised to acetylated form [55].

2.2.2. Staphylococcal protein A as antibody target

Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) is anchored to S. aureus cell wall by sortase A through amide linking of its C-terminal threonine of LPXTG motif to pentaglycyl crossbridge within peptidoglycan [56]. SpA interferes with immunoglobulin (Ig) function by binding to Fcγ domain of Ig and prevents the bacterium from opsonophagocytic killing [57]. It also interacts with B cell receptor through binding with VH3-clan of antigen-binding fragment (Fab) region and induces supraclonal B cell responses, resulting in insufficient adaptive responses against infection [5860].

Based on the mechanistic studies, a mutated form of SpA, SpA(KKAA), was generated to abolish both Fcγ and Fab binding abilities [61]. Vaccination of SpA(KKAA) was able to elicit robust antibody responses against multiple staphylococcal antigens in a MRSA-infection mouse model. In their following studies, passive immunization of antibodies specific for SpA(KKAA) significantly promoted opsonophagocytic clearance, reduced abscess formation, and decreased the mortality [62]. Furthermore, a humanized version successfully conferred protection against S. aureus sepsis in neonatal mice [63].

2.2.3. Clumping factor A as antibody target

Microbial adhesion to host tissue is crucial to infection initiation in most of the bacterial infections. Microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM), such like clumping factor A (ClfA), plays a vital role in this process [64]. ClfA, a fibrinogen-binding protein, is required for establishing early infection, abscess formation, protection against phagocytosis, as well as bacterial persistence in host [65, 66].

Tefibazumab, a humanized anti-ClfA mAb, was developed and exhibited high affinity and specificity for ClfA [67]. In vitro study showed that tefibazumab inhibited fibrinogen-binding ability of ClfA and protected against MRSA infection in murine septicemia and rabbit infective endocarditis models. Safety and pharmacokinetic profile of tefibazumab were evaluated in phase II clinical trial [68]. Unfortunately, it failed to show significant differences between treatment and placebo groups in overall adverse clinical events. A detailed analysis of ClfA-fibrinogen structure observed a modest IC50 value of binding between ClfA and tefibazumab, which might partly explain the unsatisfactory clinical outcome [69].

2.2.4. Autolysin as antibody target

Autolysin (Atl) is a cell wall-associated enzyme with various functions. The major S. aureus autolysin (AtlS) contains two distinct domains, amidase and glucosaminidase, which are responsible for enzyme localization to cell wall and peptidoglycan hydrolysis, respectively [70, 71]. Atl participates in biofilm formation, separation of daughter cells after cell division and attachment to host matrix [72]. Moreover, AtlS is highly conserved among strains of S. aureus and other Staphylococci. These features together make AtlS an attractive target for anti-S. aureus mAb and vaccine investigation.

To test it, a mAb, 1C11, was generated to inhibit AtlS glucosaminidase domain and its effect in animal model was assessed [73, 74]. The mAb was shown to impair cell growth and cause cell aggregation and sedimentation in in vitro assay. Following this study, administration of 1C11 reduced severity of implant-associated osteomyelitis in a mouse model by decreased abscess numbers and efficient internalization of antibody-opsonized S. aureus.

Immunodominant staphylococcal antigen A (IsaA) is another highly conserved Atl. Similarly, protection was conferred by a mAb specific to IsaA in a mouse model [75]. The mode of action of mAb is mainly through activation of professional phagocytes and induction of oxidative burst activity of neutrophil.

2.3. Antibodies against staphylococcal cell wall components

2.3.1. Lipoteichoic acids as antibody target

Most Gram-positive bacteria produce teichoic acids (TAs) to facilitate their survival under disadvantageous conditions. Teichoic acids covalently link to either peptidoglycan or cytoplasmic membrane, known as wall teichoic acids (WTA) and lipoteichoic acids (LTA), respectively [76]. The roles of TAs in pathogenic bacteria include adherence to host cells [77], activation of complement [78], and cytokine induction [79].

Since structures of LTA are highly conserved across many clinical isolates, including Enterococci, Staphylococci, and several Streptococci, LTA is considered as a promising target for vaccine and therapeutic antibody development [80]. In a recent report, antibodies against E. faecalis LTA were used to test cross-activity with other Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus [80]. The in vitro data showed that the antibodies were also able to bind with LTA purified from S. aureus. Remarkably, the antibodies exhibited 60–90% opsonophagocytic killing activity across a variety of S. aureus strains, and great protection against MRSA infection in a mouse peritonitis model. In accordance with the observation, immunization with a BSA-conjugated LTA fragment, containing a conserved minimal structure in majority of Gram-positive bacteria, was able to induce opsonic killing of E. faecium E1162 and S. aureus MW2 [81]. Besides, immunization of WTA also elicited an anti-WTA immune response, illustrated by complement-dependent opsonophagocytosis [82, 83].

2.3.2. Peptidoglycan as antibody target

Peptidoglycan (PG) is composed of cross-linked polysaccharide and peptide chains, which forms the backbone of bacterial cell wall. So far, reports on therapeutic antibody or vaccine targeting on PG are scarce. A mAb against deacetylated peptidoglycan, ZBIA5H, was screened with best protective property in mouse models [84]. Surprisingly, ZBIA5H did not show the highest affinity to PG, compared with other mAbs. The superior property of ZBIA5H may be attributed to the unique epitope it recognizes. This study highlights that besides antigen binding affinity, other factors, such as epitope, should also be taken into consideration in therapeutic antibody discovery.

2.4. Antibodies against nutrient transporter proteins

Nutrient acquisition is one of the most basic and essential process virtually in all forms of life. Vertebrate host has evolved powerful strategy, termed nutritional immunity, to limit proliferation of invading pathogens by sequestering essential nutrients [85]. One of the best characterized examples of nutritional immunity is transition-metal-ion sequestration in which metal ions are predominantly trapped by host metal-binding proteins [86]. To combat with host defensive system, microorganism employs mechanisms to maintain intracellular metal homeostasis. Therefore, these mechanisms could be suitable targets for therapeutic antibody development. For example, an Fab was screened to inhibit acquisition pathway for Mn(II), which is essential for detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [87, 88]. The mAb is bound to manganese transporter C (MntC) of an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter system and thereby blocks the metal delivery to the channel. In vitro assay showed that the Fab increased the sensitivity of S. aureus to ROS by over 10-fold.

An earlier report identified ABC transporter as the most commonly associated protein with IgG from the sera of 26 patients suffered with septicemia [89]. ScFvs against the conserved peptides from the ABC transporter were then panned from a phage display library and were shown to reduce the bacterial burden in a mouse model.

2.5. Multicomponent vaccines

So far, neither passive nor active immunization has shown potent efficacy on humans. The failure from basic research to clinical practice could partly be attributed to the limited understanding of the sophisticated events associated with every stage of infection. Prior strategies targeting on single virulent factor showed efficacy only in certain experimental settings. In this regard, novel vaccine formulations targeting on multiple pathogenic components are proposed to offer protection from distinct aspects through a synergistic working mode.

Recently, efficacy of a combination vaccine, 4C–Staph (four-component S. aureus vaccine), was evaluated [90]. 4C–Staph is composed of detoxified α-Hemolysin, a fusion of ess extracellular A (EsxA) and ess extracellular B (EsxB), two staphylococcal surface proteins, which are ferric hydroxamate-binding lipoprotein (FhuD2) and conserved staphylococcal antigen 1A (Csa1A). 4C–Staph induced broad and synergistic protection against several Staphylococcal clinical isolates in different models. In addition, mechanistic study showed that the protection was mainly antibody dependent.

SA3Ag (Pfizer), a tri-component vaccine, consists of CP5 and CP8 individually linked with a nontoxic form of diphtheria toxin, and a recombinant mutant form of clumping factor A (rClfAm) [91]. A phase I clinical trial was completed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and effect of SA3Ag [92]. This vaccine showed a relatively safe profile among older and young adults.

In order to further enhance protection against S. aureus, another component, MntC, was added to SA3Ag to form a four-component vaccine SA4Ag (Pfizer) [93]. In phase 1/2 clinical trials, single-dose administration of SA4Ag was well-tolerated among young and older adults, shown by mild or moderate local reactions and comparable systemic events with placebo control [94, 95]. More excitingly, SA4Ag induced a rapid, robust, and sustained functional antibody response.

2.6. Antibody-antibiotic conjugate

While S. aureus has classically been considered as an extracellular pathogen, a growing body of evidence reveals that it is capable to survive and persist within host cells, including phagocytic cells, which are responsible for bacterial clearance [96, 97]. Although phagocytic cells, particularly neutrophils and macrophages, can efficiently kill majority of invading bacteria, a small population of persisters can however turn the circulating phagocytes to “Trojan horses” to facilitate bacterial dissemination via bloodstream [98]. Meanwhile, intracellular persistence allows bacteria to escape from antibiotic and immune attack. Indeed, most of the current antibiotics are less efficient in intracellular S. aureus killing, which may partly explain the poor response to treatment and the high frequency of recurrence in clinical practice [99, 100].

Based on these findings, therapies specifically targeting on intracellular pathogen may promote clinical outcome. Similar to antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), which has been successfully applied for cancer therapy, antibody-antibiotic conjugate (AAC) was first proposed and evaluated by Lehar and his colleagues in 2015 [101]. The AAC is composed of three building blocks: an antibody to target on bacteria, a highly bactericidal antibiotic payload, and a linker to attach antibiotic payload to the antibody. The AAC was designed with no antibacterial activity as antibiotic serves as a prodrug when covalently linked. However, when planktonic AAC-tagged bacteria are internalized by host cells, the antibiotics can be efficiently released in their active form by cleavage from host protease. Thus, the AACs take bacteria as “Trojan horses” to deliver potent antibiotics to cytoplasmic compartment and resulting in intracellular antibacterial effect. To their anticipation, the AAC was shown to efficiently restrict intracellular S. aureus growth when treatment was initiated several hours after intravenous infection. In contrast, poor efficacy was observed by delayed treatment of vancomycin. This result is particularly interesting as majority of bacteria were found to associate with neutrophils within 10–15 minutes [97]. Moreover, the AAC was able to limit metastasis of S. aureus to brain in an intravenous infection model.


3. Antibody and vaccine development against E. faecium

Different from S. aureus, which produces an array of virulent factors, pathogenesis of Enterococci is largely determined by their adherence to host tissue mediated by surface adhesion components. Several most-studied components include aggregation substance proteins, collagen adhesins, enterococcal leucine-rich repeat-containing proteins, pili, polysaccharides, and glycolipid [102], which are potential targets for antibody and vaccine development.

3.1. Enterococcal pili as antibody target

Enterococcal surface pili are filamentous proteins with Ig-like folds and LPXTG motifs, which have been implicated in biofilm formation, endocarditis, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) [103, 104]. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pilus A (EbpA), one of the most-studied pili in Enterococci, is widely present among Enterococcal species and highly conserved in N-terminal domains [105]. In detail, N-terminal domain of EbpA (EbpANTD) binds to host fibrinogen deposited on urinary catheter to facilitate Enterococcal colonization [106]. Sera against EbpANTD was recently shown to provide universal protection in a murine model by reducing bacterial titers of a broad spectrum of Enterococcal isolates, including E. faecalis, E. faecium, and VRE [105]. Consistently, vaccination of EbpA or EbpANTD, but not its carboxyl-terminal domain, diminished biofilm formation and prevented CAUTIs in E. faecalis infection model [106].

3.2. Polysaccharide antigens as antibody targets

Based on a previous serotyping analysis, about 60% of E. faecalis isolates fall into four serotypes from CPS-A to CPS-D [107]. CPS-C and CPS-D can express capsular polysaccharide, whereas CPS-A and CPS-B are nonencapsulated due to deficiency of essential gene locus [108]. In an early study, antibodies raised against LTA from CPS-A strain only opsonized acapsular CPS-A and CPS-B strains, but not encapsulated ones [109, 110]. To develop antibodies against capsule-bearing CPS-C and CPS-D strains, a novel diheteroglycan was identified from capsular polysaccharide [110]. As a result, passive immunization of anti-diheteroglycan antibodies successfully protected CPS-C and CPS-D E. faecalis bacteremia mouse model. However, it was observed that considerably lower susceptibility of CPS-C and CPS-D strains to opsonic killing by naturally acquired antibodies was present in healthy human sera as compared with CPS-A and CPS-B [111]. Therefore, capsule may be a natural barrier to access therapeutic antibody by masking antigens underneath.

3.3. Lipoproteins as antibody targets

A transcriptomic analysis from an E. faecalis infection mouse model identified two ABC transporter substrate-binding lipoproteins upregulated upon infection: PsaAfm for manganese transport and AdcAfm for zinc transport [112]. Treatment of antibodies raised from recombinant proteins showed increased opsonic killing in vitro and reduced colony counts in a mouse bacteremia model. Protective role was also seen in treatment with antibodies against distinct ABC transporter proteins [113], suggesting the potential of ABC transporter as a therapy target in enterococcal infection.


4. Antibodies and vaccines against P. aeruginosa

Effective control of P. aeruginosa infections remains a challenging problem due to its remarkable ability to evolve resistance to many antibiotics. Antibodies and vaccines are considered to be a promising and alternative strategy to treat or prevent P. aeruginosa infections in susceptible populations. The identified P. aeruginosa antibody and vaccine targets include the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O-antigens, pilus, flagella, alginate, outer membrane proteins (OMPs), mucoid exopolysaccharide (MEP), and antigens from the type III secretion system (T3SS) [114].

4.1. Antibody and vaccine development against T3SS translocation protein PcrV

Type III secretion system (T3SS), as a key virulence determinant in P. aeruginosa, is encoded by at least 42 genes and assembled as a needle-like apparatus that can directly inject bacterial effector proteins into host cell to elicit pathological response [115]. PcrV is located at the tip of needle-like apparatus and closely involved in translocation of effector proteins from P. aeruginosa to host cell [115].

Fab 1A8, a human Fab antibody fragment, can specifically target against P. aeruginosa PcrV antigen and elicit protective effects for mice with lethal pulmonary P. aeruginosa challenge [116]. KB001, a PEGylated anti-PcrV Fab fragment in clinical phase-2a trial for ventilator associated and P. aeruginosa colonized but not for infected patients in intensive care units (ICUs), showed good safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile. Although statistical significance was not observed for patients with KB001 treatment and placebo treatment, incidence of P. aeruginosa pneumonia was decreased in KB001 treatment group (31%) as compared to that of placebo treatment group (60%) [117]. Identification of anti-PcrV IgG from human sera confirms that PcrV is a vaccine target [118]. Moreover, human high titer anti-PcrV sera clearly have prophylactic effect for mice with lung P. aeruginosa infection [118].

4.2. Antibody and vaccine development against PsI

By construction and phenotypic screening of human scFv phage display libraries from peripheral blood B cells of healthy individuals and patients recovered from recent P. aeruginosa infections, mAbs against one epitope of Psl, the exopolysaccharide important for P. aeruginosa attachment to host cell and biofilm maintenance, was identified to show potent protection in several animal P. aeruginosa infection models [119]. Also, this finding suggests that PsI can be used as a vaccine target. However, most patients suffered from P. aeruginosa bloodstream infection (BSI) had low anti-PsI titer that showed nonprotective to P. aeruginosa BSI infection [120]. MEDI3902, the combination of anti-PsI and anti-PcrV in a bispecific format, showed synergistic protection against P. aeruginosa murine pneumonia models as compared with each parental mAb [121]. Moreover, MEDI3902 can synergize several classes of antibiotics for the treatment of clinical antibiotics resistant isolates [121].

4.3. Antibody and vaccine development against outer membrane proteins (OMPs)

OMPs form porins and other structural and functional components on the bacterial cell surface. CFC-101, a mixture of OMPs from P. aeruginosa, was used to immunize healthy human volunteers in a phase I/IIa clinical trial [122]. CFC-101 was safe and immunogenic in eliciting human mAbs after immunization that can passively protect mice from lethal P. aeruginosa challenge [122].

OprF and OprI are the major OMPs that are surface-exposed and conserved in wild-type strains of P. aeruginosa [123]. In phase I human trials, OprF-OprI vaccine (IC43) conjugating with aluminum hydroxide was safe and induced specific antibodies in healthy volunteers and burn patients by intramuscular administration [124, 125]. Intranasal immunization of OprF-OprI vaccine followed by systemic boost elicited a long-lasting systemic and local lung mucosal antibody response in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases [126]. Recently, phase II study on ICU P. aeruginosa infection showed that IC43 also produced a significant immunogenic effect without mortality or safety concerns [127].

4.4. Antibody and vaccine development against flagellins and pilins

Flagella are essential for motility, chemotaxis, invasiveness, and adhesion of P. aeruginosa to activate host inflammatory responses [128]. Flagellin is the primary protein component of flagella and consists of subtype a and subtype b [129].

A monovalent P. aeruginosa flagella vaccine was safe and immunogenic in healthy human adults by intramuscular immunization and showed high and long-lasting serum antibody (IgG and IgA) titers against flagella positive P. aeruginosa [130].

Then, a bivalent flagella vaccine, containing some of the flagella subtype antigens (a0a1a2 and b), was evaluated over a 2-year period on cystic fibrosis (CF) patients not colonized with P. aeruginosa in phase III trial. The vaccine lowered the risk of patients for initial infection as compared with that from the placebo group, though not statistically significant. Therefore, multivalent vaccine against P. aeruginosa flagella subtypes a and b is needed to improve overall efficacy of vaccine to more flagella subtypes [131]. A multivalent protein fusion vaccine consisting of flagellin subtype a and b, Oprl and OprF epitope 8, was used to immunize mice that induced specific IgGs against each individual antigen [132]. Although these IgGs elicited potent ADCC and increased clearance of nonmucoid P. aeruginosa, which reflect the initial colonization of P. aeruginosa, they were less effective for mucoid P. aeruginosa, which represent the colonized and chronic P. aeruginosa biofilm formation [132]. Conjugation vaccine of flagellin subtype a (FLA) with polymannuronic acid (PMA) built from mannuronic acid, the major component of alginate and biofilm, induced protection against mucoid P. aeruginosa in mice and rabbits [133].

Pili, as one key virulent factor, are filaments of pilin polymers located at the pole of P. aeruginosa and are responsible for adhesion of P. aeruginosa to host epithelial surfaces and twitching motility [134, 135]. A disulfide loop (DSL) at the C-terminal of pilin is the major epitope in bridging adherence of P. aeruginosa to host cell [134, 135]. Single copy of DSL was not an effective immunogen in mice, whereas multi-copy of DSL peptides increased IgG response 1000 times [136]. Immunization of mice with full length pilin of P. aeruginosa induced mAbs that inhibited pili-mediated epithelial cell adhesion [137].

4.5. Antibody and vaccine development against LPS

LPS is the major component of the outer membrane of P. aeruginosa. LPS has two types, smooth or S-type and rough or R-type. S-type LPS consists of O-polysaccharide (O-antigen) repeats linked with a core-conserved oligosaccharide and a lipid A moiety, while R-type LPS lacks O-antigen and only contains the core oligosaccharide [138]. The S-type LPS is involved in nonmucoid and in early stage of P. aeruginosa infection in CF patients, whereas the R-type LPS is associated with mucoid and late stage of P. aeruginosa infection in CF patients [139]. The O-antigen is immunogenic in the host for the induction of protective antibodies, whereas lipid A is the core endotoxic component for induction of inflammatory responses [138]. More than 20 serotypes of O-antigens have been identified [138].

Pseudogen, a heptavalent O-antigen vaccine, showed efficacy in nonrandomized trials among adult cancer and burn patients in preventing fatal P. aeruginosa infections but no benefit in leukemia and CF patients [139]. Furthermore, Aerugen, an octavalent vaccine, was developed by conjugating purified O-antigens from eight P. aeruginosa strains with exotoxin A. This vaccine induced high levels of specific opsonizing antibodies in CF patients and significantly reduced the frequency of chronic infection for 10 years without apparent adverse effects in a nonblind trial. However, a subsequent double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial failed to confirm the initial positive results and the further development of this vaccine was suspended [140].

4.6. Antibody and vaccine development against alginate

Alginate or mucoid exopolysaccharide (MEP), a linear polymer of partially acetylated D-mannuronic acid and L-guluronic acid, is the major component of the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix and thus critical in persistence of the bacteria in the CF lung [141]. MEP is relatively conserved between strains, which makes it an attractive vaccine antigen for CF patients. A high molecular weight MEP vaccine elicited long-lived opsonic antibodies in 80–90% of the volunteers in phase I trial [142]. MEPs conjugated to various carrier proteins successfully enhanced the MEP-specific immune responses and elicited opsonizing antibodies against heterologous MEPs in mice and rabbits [143]. However, a successful clinical product has not yet been developed, indicating that vaccine of MEP alone may not be sufficient for potent immunization in human and conjugation with other vaccine targets may be considered.

4.7. Inactivated whole-cell vaccine and antibody development against P. aeruginosa

Whole cell-inactivated vaccines contain multiple bacterial antigenic components and thus can potentially induce diverse immunologic responses against various targets of P. aeruginosa. Oral immunization of bronchiectasis patients with an enteric-coated whole-cell killed vaccine resulted in significant reduction of P. aeruginosa in the sputum by specific lymphocyte responses [144]. Oral immunization of healthy volunteers with killed Pseudomonas vaccine was safe and increased Pseudomonas-specific serum antibodies, most notably IgA, and promoted phagocytosis elimination of P. aeruginosa [145]. Whole cell inactivation by X-ray irradiation kept antigen expression functional but inhibited replication in P. aeruginosa [146]. Mice immunized with this vaccine showed statistically significant protection against P. aeruginosa challenge in acute pneumonia model via opsonic killing, recruitment of CD4+ T lymphocytes and neutrophil cells [146].

4.8. Antibody and vaccine development against exotoxin

Exotoxin A is a key virulence factor secreted by around 90% P. aeruginosa clinical isolates and around 10,000 times more lethal than LPS [147, 148]. Exotoxin A is an ADP-ribosyltransferase and can kill macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and other immune-related cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and inhibition of protein synthesis elongation factor 2 [148].

mAbs against two epitopes of exotoxin A after immunization of rabbits showed potent inhibition of exotoxin A-induced cytotoxic activity in vitro [149]. Furthermore, these mAbs showed protective effects against P. aeruginosa infection for mice after immunization and enhanced the survival rate of mice model when antibiotic amikacin was combined [150]. Similarly, immunization of mice with exotoxin A showed 93.8% protection efficacy against mice burn and P. aeruginosa-challenged models when compared with unimmunized mice group that all died within the 70-day period [151].

Chimeric vaccine composed of a nontoxic (active-site deletion) exotoxin A and a key pilin fragment sequence was used to immune rabbits subcutaneously [152]. The produced antibodies could target against both pilin to weaken P. aeruginosa adherence and exotoxin A to neutralize its cytotoxic activity in vitro [152]. Intranasal immunization of chimeric vaccine (pilin and exotoxin A) in mice elicited serum and saliva immune responses [153]. Moreover, saliva samples contain antibodies that can inhibit pilin-dependent P. aeruginosa adherence and neutralize exotoxin A [153]. This approach of immunization may be useful to provide protection against P. aeruginosa early-stage adhesion and infection via oropharyngeal airway [153].


5. Antibody development against A. baumannii

5.1. Iron-regulated outer membrane proteins (IROMP) as antibody and vaccine target

Iron is essential for bacteria to survive within host. Bacteria have evolved several ways to compete with host for iron uptake. Expression of iron-regulated outer membrane proteins (IROMPs) in bacteria is one such way. IROMPs, with molecular weight ranging from 77 to 88 kDa, are a class of specific cell surface receptors that can bind iron chelator siderophore with high affinity and subsequently lead to the internalization of iron-loaded siderophore and iron assimilation in A. baumannii [154, 155]. Goel et al. [155] used IROMPs from A. baumannii to immunize BALB/c mice and identified several mAbs of IgM isotype that can block interaction of siderophore with IROMPs and induce bactericidal and opsonizing activity in vitro.

5.2. Inactivated whole cell, outer membrane complexes (OMCs), and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) as vaccine and antibody target

Immunization of mice with inactivated whole A. baumannii, prepared from formalin-treatment, elicited protective antibody response against A. baumannii post-infection challenge in mice sepsis model [156]. Subsequently, these antibodies separated from immunized mice sera also showed passive protection against mice with A. baumannii infection [156]. As inactivated whole A. baumannii vaccine contains LPS (endotoxin) that may complicate immune responses after immunization, LPS-deficient and inactivated whole A. baumannii cell was used to immune mice [157]. Similar humoral and cellular immune responses was observed as compared with wild-type inactivated whole A. baumannii vaccine in protection against different mouse models with disseminated A. baumannii infections of various strains [157].

Vaccine made of outer membrane complexes (OMCs) from A. baumannii induced protective humoral and cellular immune responses against murine sepsis model [158]. Similarly, passive transfer of antiserum from immunized murine to naive mice rescued these mice from A. baumannii infection [158].

Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), released from Gram-negative outer cell wall surface, have a diameter within the range of 50–250 nm and contain all constituents as Gram-negative outer cell wall, such as proteins, LPS, phospholipids, DNAs, and RNAs [159161]. OMVs play important pathological roles by delivering virulence factors into host cell and coordinate group communications known as quorum sensing [160, 161]. High-dose challenging of mice with OMVs (200 μg) triggered a strong pro-inflammatory cytokine release that may be pathological to host [162].

Interestingly, immunization of mice with low dose OMVs (10 μg) from one clinical MDR A. baumannii isolate induced clear protection against mice pneumonia and sepsis models after A. baumannii challenge [163]. The protective mechanism is in part from specific anti-OMV antibody induced opsonophagocytic activity and suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokine release [163].

Recently, OMVs were engineered as a delivery vehicle to package and display Omp22 at the OMV surface [164]. The displayed Omp22-OMV can induce high-titer anti-Omp22 specific antibodies and protect mice from sepsis after lethal A. baumannii challenge [164].

5.3. Targeting outer membrane protein A (OmpA)

Outer membrane protein A (OmpA), previously known as Omp38, is a lethal and most abundantly expressed surface virulence factor in A. baumannii [165, 166]. OmpA belongs to the porin family with low permeability that may be a key factor contributing to its multidrug resistance [167]. OmpA can bind with host cell directly, internalize within mitochondria and nuclei compartments of host cell, and induce host cell death [165, 166]. Moreover, OmpA is highly conserved within six clinical isolates (99% protein sequence identity) and 14 other NCBI GenBank deposited sequences from different isolates of A. baumannii (89% protein sequence identity), while OmpA shows no homology to human proteins [168].

Thus, OmpA from A. baumannii is a potentially ideal vaccine and antibody target.

In agreement with the sequence identity analysis, immunization of diabetic mice subcutaneously with recombinant OmpA induced markedly protective effect upon lethal, extreme drug resistant-A. baumannii challenge; use of antibodies against OmpA also elicited similar protective effect on diabetic mice with lethal A. baumannii infection [168]. Interestingly, dosage of A. baumannii rOmpA vaccine correlates with various B cell epitopes and immunodominant T cell epitopes, emphasizing dosage needs to be taken into account for vaccine development [169]. Recently, intranasal immunization of mice with OmpA can trigger both mucosal and systemic protective antibodies against MDR A. baumannii infection [170].

Omp22 is an outer membrane protein with molecular weight of 22-kDa. Omp22 is more than 95% conserved within 851 reported A. baumannii strains [171]. In contrast, there is no homology with human proteins. This unique and conserved sequence makes Omp22 an ideal vaccine candidate. Immunization of mice with recombinant Omp22 induced clear protection from MDR A. baumannii infections, showing a potential vaccine candidate [171].

FilF is a highly conserved outer membrane protein predicted to be involved in pilus assembly in A. baumannii [172]. Immunization of mouse pneumonia model induced high titer of antibody, decreased the bacteria lung burden, and rescued around 50% of mice from lethal A. baumannii infection [172]. These promising results may suggest that FilF is a promising vaccine candidate for further evaluation [172].

5.4. Biofilm related proteins as vaccine and antibody target

Biofilms are bacterial communities connected by a surface of extracellular matrix with complicated compositions that may vary based on different bacteria and different living environments [173]. Identified biofilm components contain polysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNAs and play essential pathological roles in bacterial adhesion to host cell and shielding bacteria from nearby pressures such as antibiotics [173, 174].

Surface polysaccharide poly-beta-(1-6)-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG), as a major component of biofilm, is a key virulence factor in A. baumannii [175]. Immunization of rabbit with conjugation of a synthetic oligosaccharide, mimicking PNAG, with tetanus toxoid induced antibodies that can opsonize clinical isolates of A. baumannii with surface expression of PNAG in vitro and protect A. baumannii challenged mice [176].

Biofilm-associated protein (Bap) in A. baumannii, 8620 amino acids in length, is one of the largest proteins identified within bacterial proteins and plays a vital role in biofilm formation [177]. Bap, containing seven tandem repeats of modules, is 41–66% conserved among clinical isolates and its expression is induced by low iron concentration [177, 178]. Immunization of mice with one region of Bap from A. baumannii elicited protective immunity against A. baumannii of different strains, suggesting that Bap is conserved and can be used as a potential vaccine candidate [179].

Ata, a trimeric transporter and a key virulence factor in A. baumannii, is essential in biofilm formation [180]. Rabbit sera from Ata vaccination can opsonizeA. baumannii isolates effectively in complement and polymorphonuclear cells dependent manners [181]. Moreover, the rabbit sera can significantly lower the burden of mice lung infection from MDR A. baumannii strains, showing that Ata is one more potential vaccine target [181].

5.5. Targeting K1 capsular polysaccharide

K1 capsular polysaccharides are an important virulence factor that helps A. baumannii to establish infections within host [182]. Immunization of mice with sub-lethal and K1 capsular polysaccharide positive A. baumannii induced generation of specific anti-K1 capsular polysaccharide IgM monoclonal antibody (13D6) [183]. Moreover, 13D6 can induce efficient neutrophil-mediated in vitro opsonization and in vivo passive protectivity in rat soft tissue infection model [183]. However, only 13% of 100 collected A. baumannii strains were positive against 13D6, suggesting other capsular polysaccharide serotypes that may be unexplored. Additionally, lack of immunoglobulin class switch from IgM to IgG may not effectively trigger adaptive long-term immune memory response. Failure of class switching may be the inherent property of most capsular polysaccharides that only elicits a T cell independent immune response after immunization [184]. Thus, to target more A. baumannii strains effectively, identification of more capsular polysaccharide serotypes and conjugation of capsular polysaccharide with carrier proteins may be needed. As a matter of fact, this strategy has been successfully applied in clinics for the prevention of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection by the introduction of 23-valent nonconjugated and 13-valent conjugated capsular polysaccharide vaccines [185].


6. Concluding remarks

Antibody and vaccine are important treatment options in the mobilization of human immune system passively or actively to recognize, kill bacteria enemies, and moreover memorize these enemies for the long-term protection. Antigen selection is the key for antibody and vaccine development, which needs to be immunogenic and conserved. Initially, antibody and vaccine development mainly focused on individual antigen. It is now clear that multivalent antigens should be more potent in eliciting immune responses against bacteria. Combination of pan-genomics, proteomics, and reverse vaccinology analysis of bacteria revealed a list of conserved antigens as potential vaccine or antibody targets and some of these antigens are already known as virulence factors of related bacteria [186, 187]. These bioinformatics-based “omics” analysis will undoubtedly facilitate effective vaccine and antibody target identification and development.

Other alternatives to antibiotics, including short antimicrobial peptides, antibiofilm peptides, and host defense peptides, are not covered in this chapter; readers can refer to a recent excellent review and references therein for further information [188].


Author contributions

DW conceived the topic of the study. All authors wrote the manuscript. DW revised the manuscript.



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 81572698) to DW.


  1. 1. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009;48:1-12
  2. 2. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: No ESKAPE. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;197:1079-1081
  3. 3. Saxena A, Wu D. Advances in therapeutic fc engineering-modulation of IgG-associated effector functions and serum half-life. Frontiers in Immunology. 2016;7:580
  4. 4. Liu H, Saxena A, Sidhu SS, Wu D. Fc engineering for developing therapeutic bispecific antibodies and novel scaffolds. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:38
  5. 5. Spaan AN, Surewaard BG, Nijland R, van Strijp JA. Neutrophils versus Staphylococcus aureus: A biological tug of war. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2013;67:629-650
  6. 6. Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2015;13:529-543
  7. 7. DeVries AS, Lesher L, Schlievert PM, Rogers T, Villaume LG, et al. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome 2000-2006: Epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics. PloS One. 2011;6:e22997
  8. 8. Argudin MA, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR. Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2010;2:1751-1773
  9. 9. Brocke S, Hausmann S, Steinman L, Wucherpfennig KW. Microbial peptides and superantigens in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. Seminars in Immunology. 1998;10:57-67
  10. 10. Kumar S, Menoret A, Ngoi SM, Vella AT. The systemic and pulmonary immune response to staphylococcal enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2010;2:1898-1912
  11. 11. McCormick JK, Yarwood JM, Schlievert PM. Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: An update. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2001;55:77-104
  12. 12. Krakauer T. Update on staphylococcal superantigen-induced signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions. Toxins (Basel). 2013;5:1629-1654
  13. 13. Varshney AK, Wang X, Scharff MD, MacIntyre J, Zollner RS, et al. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B-specific monoclonal antibody 20B1 successfully treats diverse Staphylococcus aureus infections. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2013;208:2058-2066
  14. 14. Varshney AK, Wang X, Aguilar JL, Scharff MD, Fries BC. Isotype switching increases efficacy of antibody protection against staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced lethal shock and Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in mice. MBio. 2014;5:e01007-e01014
  15. 15. Karau MJ, Tilahun ME, Krogman A, Osborne BA, Goldsby RA, et al. Passive therapy with humanized anti-staphylococcal enterotoxin B antibodies attenuates systemic inflammatory response and protects from lethal pneumonia caused by staphylococcal enterotoxin B-producing Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence. 2016;1-12
  16. 16. Tilahun ME, Kwan A, Natarajan K, Quinn M, Tilahun AY, et al. Chimeric anti-staphylococcal enterotoxin B antibodies and lovastatin act synergistically to provide in vivo protection against lethal doses of SEB. PloS One. 2011;6:e27203
  17. 17. Tilahun ME, Rajagopalan G, Shah-Mahoney N, Lawlor RG, Tilahun AY, et al. Potent neutralization of staphylococcal enterotoxin B by synergistic action of chimeric antibodies. Infection and Immunity. 2010;78:2801-2811
  18. 18. Varshney AK, Wang X, Cook E, Dutta K, Scharff MD, et al. Generation, characterization, and epitope mapping of neutralizing and protective monoclonal antibodies against staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced lethal shock. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:9737-9747
  19. 19. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Phase I STEBVax in Healthy Adults. Available from: 2015.
  20. 20. Kim J, Urban RG, Strominger JL, Wiley DC. Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 complexed with a class II major histocompatibility molecule HLA-DR1. Science. 1994;266:1870-1874
  21. 21. Wahlsten JL, Ramakrishnan S. Separation of function between the domains of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. Journal of Immunology. 1998;160:854-859
  22. 22. Rukkawattanakul T, Sookrung N, Seesuay W, Onlamoon N, Diraphat P, et al. Human scFvs that counteract bioactivities of Staphylococcus aureus TSST-1. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9:
  23. 23. Schwameis M, Roppenser B, Firbas C, Gruener CS, Model N, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant toxic shock syndrome toxin (rTSST)-1 variant vaccine: A randomised, double-blind, adjuvant-controlled, dose escalation first-in-man trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2016;16:1036-1044
  24. 24. Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbH. rTSST-1 Variant Vaccine Phase 1 First-in-man Trail (rTSST-1). Available from: 2016.
  25. 25. Tobkes N, Wallace BA, Bayley H. Secondary structure and assembly mechanism of an oligomeric channel protein. Biochemistry. 1985;24:1915-1920
  26. 26. Wilke GA, Bubeck WJ. Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:13473-13478
  27. 27. Gouaux JE, Braha O, Hobaugh MR, Song L, Cheley S, et al. Subunit stoichiometry of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin in crystals and on membranes: A heptameric transmembrane pore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:12828-12831
  28. 28. Song L, Hobaugh MR, Shustak C, Cheley S, Bayley H, et al. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science. 1996;274:1859-1866
  29. 29. Bhakdi S, Tranum-Jensen J. Alpha-toxin of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiological Reviews. 1991;55:733-751
  30. 30. Grimminger F, Rose F, Sibelius U, Meinhardt M, Potzsch B, et al. Human endothelial cell activation and mediator release in response to the bacterial exotoxins Escherichia coli hemolysin and staphylococcal alpha-toxin. Journal of Immunology. 1997;159:1909-1916
  31. 31. Craven RR, Gao X, Allen IC, Gris D, Bubeck Wardenburg J, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells. PloS One. 2009;4:e7446
  32. 32. Adhikari RP, Thompson CD, Aman MJ, Lee JC. Protective efficacy of a novel alpha hemolysin subunit vaccine (AT62) against Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections. Vaccine. 2016;34:6402-6407
  33. 33. Hilliard JJ, Datta V, Tkaczyk C, Hamilton M, Sadowska A, et al. Anti-alpha-toxin monoclonal antibody and antibiotic combination therapy improves disease outcome and accelerates healing in a Staphylococcus aureus dermonecrosis model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59:299-309
  34. 34. Robbie GJ, Criste R, Dall'acqua WF, Jensen K, Patel NK, et al. A novel investigational fc-modified humanized monoclonal antibody, motavizumab-YTE, has an extended half-life in healthy adults. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57:6147-6153
  35. 35. Oganesyan V, Peng L, Damschroder MM, Cheng L, Sadowska A, et al. Mechanisms of neutralization of a human anti-alpha-toxin antibody. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:29874-29880
  36. 36. MedImmune LLC. A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of MEDI4893 in Healthy Adult Subjects. Available from: 2014.
  37. 37. MedImmune LLC. Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI4893. Available from: 2017.
  38. 38. Roberts IS. The biochemistry and genetics of capsular polysaccharide production in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1996;50:285-315
  39. 39. Peterson PK, Wilkinson BJ, Kim Y, Schmeling D, Quie PG. Influence of encapsulation on staphylococcal opsonization and phagocytosis by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infection and Immunity. 1978;19:943-949
  40. 40. Verdier I, Durand G, Bes M, Taylor KL, Lina G, et al. Identification of the capsular polysaccharides in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates by PCR and agglutination tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2007;45:725-729
  41. 41. Fattom AI, Sarwar J, Ortiz A, Naso R. A Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide (CP) vaccine and CP-specific antibodies protect mice against bacterial challenge. Infection and Immunity. 1996;64:1659-1665
  42. 42. Lee JC, Park JS, Shepherd SE, Carey V, Fattom A. Protective efficacy of antibodies to the Staphylococcus aureus type 5 capsular polysaccharide in a modified model of endocarditis in rats. Infection and Immunity. 1997;65:4146-4151
  43. 43. Jones C. Revised structures for the capsular polysaccharides from Staphylococcus aureus types 5 and 8, components of novel glycoconjugate vaccines. Carbohydrate Research. 2005;340:1097-1106
  44. 44. Park S, Gerber S, Lee JC. Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus serotype 8 capsular polysaccharide react with and protect against serotype 5 and 8 isolates. Infection and Immunity. 2014;82:5049-5055
  45. 45. Biopharmaceuticals N. StaphVAX Immunogenicity in Orthopedic Implant Patients. Available from: 2007.
  46. 46. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals. StaphVAX Immunogenicity and Safety in Orthopaedic Joint Surgery. Available from: 2007.
  47. 47. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals. Study to evaluate the effectiveness of StaphVAX in adults on hemodialysis. Available from: 2006.
  48. 48. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals. Safety and behavior of S. aureus immune globulin intravenous(human), [Altastaph] in patients with S. aureus bacteremia and continuing fever. Available from: 2012.
  49. 49. Rupp ME, Holley HP Jr, Lutz J, Dicpinigaitis PV, Woods CW, et al. Phase II, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a polyclonal anti-Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide immune globulin in treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51:4249-4254
  50. 50. Biopharmaceuticals N. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals Announces Results of StaphVAX(R) Confirmatory Phase III Clinical Trial. Available from: 2005
  51. 51. Kropec A, Maira-Litran T, Jefferson KK, Grout M, Cramton SE, et al. Poly-N-acetylglucosamine production in Staphylococcus aureus is essential for virulence in murine models of systemic infection. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73:6868-6876
  52. 52. Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, Leopold K, Hartmann R, et al. The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: Purification and structural analysis. Journal of Bacteriology. 1996;178:175-183
  53. 53. Vuong C, Kocianova S, Voyich JM, Yao Y, Fischer ER, et al. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:54881-54886
  54. 54. Kelly-Quintos C, Kropec A, Briggs S, Ordonez CL, Goldmann DA, et al. The role of epitope specificity in the human opsonic antibody response to the staphylococcal surface polysaccharide poly N-acetyl glucosamine. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;192:2012-2019
  55. 55. Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. Comparative opsonic and protective activities of Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccines containing native or deacetylated staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1-6)-glucosamine. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73:6752-6762
  56. 56. DeDent AC, McAdow M, Schneewind O. Distribution of protein a on the surface of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189:4473-4484
  57. 57. Peterson PK, Verhoef J, Sabath LD, Quie PG. Effect of protein a on staphylococcal opsonization. Infection and Immunity. 1977;15:760-764
  58. 58. Palmqvist N, Silverman GJ, Josefsson E, Tarkowski A. Bacterial cell wall-expressed protein a triggers supraclonal B-cell responses upon in vivo infection with Staphylococcus aureus. Microbes and Infection. 2005;7:1501-1511
  59. 59. Sasso EH, Silverman GJ, Mannik M. Human IgM molecules that bind staphylococcal protein a contain VHIII H chains. Journal of Immunology. 1989;142:2778-2783
  60. 60. Falugi F, Kim HK, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. Role of protein A in the evasion of host adaptive immune responses by Staphylococcus aureus. MBio. 2013;4:e00575-e00513
  61. 61. Kim HK, Cheng AG, Kim HY, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. Nontoxigenic protein a vaccine for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in mice. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207:1863-1870
  62. 62. Kim HK, Emolo C, DeDent AC, Falugi F, Missiakas DM, et al. Protein A-specific monoclonal antibodies and prevention of Staphylococcus aureus disease in mice. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80:3460-3470
  63. 63. Thammavongsa V, Rauch S, Kim HK, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. Protein A-neutralizing monoclonal antibody protects neonatal mice against Staphylococcus aureus. Vaccine. 2015;33:523-526
  64. 64. Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Hook M. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1994;48:585-617
  65. 65. Cheng AG, Kim HK, Burts ML, Krausz T, Schneewind O, et al. Genetic requirements for Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation and persistence in host tissues. The FASEB Journal. 2009;23:3393-3404
  66. 66. Palmqvist N, Patti JM, Tarkowski A, Josefsson E. Expression of staphylococcal clumping factor a impedes macrophage phagocytosis. Microbes and Infection. 2004;6:188-195
  67. 67. Patti JM. A humanized monoclonal antibody targeting Staphylococcus aureus. Vaccine. 2004;22(Suppl 1):S39-S43
  68. 68. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Available from: and 2013.
  69. 69. Ganesh VK, Liang X, Geoghegan JA, Cohen AL, Venugopalan N, et al. Lessons from the crystal structure of the S. aureus surface protein clumping factor a in complex with tefibazumab, an inhibiting monoclonal antibody. eBioMedicine. 2016;13:328-338
  70. 70. Biswas R, Voggu L, Simon UK, Hentschel P, Thumm G, et al. Activity of the major staphylococcal autolysin Atl. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;259:260-268
  71. 71. Oshida T, Sugai M, Komatsuzawa H, Hong YM, Suginaka H, et al. A Staphylococcus aureus autolysin that has an N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase domain and an endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase domain: Cloning, sequence analysis, and characterization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:285-289
  72. 72. Heilmann C, Hussain M, Peters G, Gotz F. Evidence for autolysin-mediated primary attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to a polystyrene surface. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;24:1013-1024
  73. 73. Varrone JJ, Li D, Daiss JL, Schwarz EM. Anti-glucosaminidase monoclonal antibodies as a passive immunization for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic infections. Bonekey Osteovision. 2011;8:187-194.
  74. 74. Varrone JJ, de Mesy Bentley KL, Bello-Irizarry SN, Nishitani K, Mack S, et al. Passive immunization with anti-glucosaminidase monoclonal antibodies protects mice from implant-associated osteomyelitis by mediating opsonophagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus megaclusters. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2014;32:1389-1396
  75. 75. Lorenz U, Lorenz B, Schmitter T, Streker K, Erck C, et al. Functional antibodies targeting IsaA of Staphylococcus aureus augment host immune response and open new perspectives for antibacterial therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011;55:165-173
  76. 76. Xia G, Kohler T, Peschel A. The wall teichoic acid and lipoteichoic acid polymers of Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2010;300:148-154
  77. 77. Weidenmaier C, Peschel A, Xiong YQ, Kristian SA, Dietz K, et al. Lack of wall teichoic acids in Staphylococcus aureus leads to reduced interactions with endothelial cells and to attenuated virulence in a rabbit model of endocarditis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;191:1771-1777
  78. 78. Lynch NJ, Roscher S, Hartung T, Morath S, Matsushita M, et al. L-ficolin specifically binds to lipoteichoic acid, a cell wall constituent of Gram-positive bacteria, and activates the lectin pathway of complement. Journal of Immunology. 2004;172:1198-1202
  79. 79. Draing C, Sigel S, Deininger S, Traub S, Munke R, et al. Cytokine induction by Gram-positive bacteria. Immunobiology. 2008;213:285-296
  80. 80. Weidenmaier C, Peschel A. Teichoic acids and related cell-wall glycopolymers in Gram-positive physiology and host interactions. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008;6:276-287
  81. 81. Laverde D, Wobser D, Romero-Saavedra F, Hogendorf W, van der Marel G, et al. Synthetic teichoic acid conjugate vaccine against nosocomial Gram-positive bacteria. PloS One. 2014;9:e110953
  82. 82. Takahashi K, Kurokawa K, Moyo P, Jung DJ, An JH, et al. Intradermal immunization with wall teichoic acid (WTA) elicits and augments an anti-WTA IgG response that protects mice from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection independent of mannose-binding lectin status. PloS One. 2013;8:e69739
  83. 83. Jung DJ, An JH, Kurokawa K, Jung YC, Kim MJ, et al. Specific serum Ig recognizing staphylococcal wall teichoic acid induces complement-mediated opsonophagocytosis against Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189:4951-4959
  84. 84. Ohsawa H, Baba T, Enami J, Hiramatsu K. Successful selection of an infection-protective anti-Staphylococcus aureus monoclonal antibody and its protective activity in murine infection models. Microbiology and Immunology. 2015;59:183-192
  85. 85. Cassat JE, Skaar EP. Metal ion acquisition in Staphylococcus aureus: Overcoming nutritional immunity. Seminars in Immunopathology. 2012;34:215-235
  86. 86. Brophy MB, Nolan EM. Manganese and microbial pathogenesis: Sequestration by the mammalian immune system and utilization by microorganisms. ACS Chemical Biology. 2015;10:641-651
  87. 87. Ahuja S, Rouge L, Swem DL, Sudhamsu J, Wu P, et al. Structural analysis of bacterial ABC transporter inhibition by an antibody fragment. Structure. 2015;23:713-723
  88. 88. Horsburgh MJ, Wharton SJ, Karavolos M, Foster SJ. Manganese: Elemental defence for a life with oxygen. Trends in Microbiology. 2002;10:496-501
  89. 89. Burnie JP, Matthews RC, Carter T, Beaulieu E, Donohoe M, et al. Identification of an immunodominant ABC transporter in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68:3200-3209
  90. 90. Bagnoli F, Fontana MR, Soldaini E, Mishra RP, Fiaschi L, et al. Vaccine composition formulated with a novel TLR7-dependent adjuvant induces high and broad protection against Staphylococcus aureus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:3680-3685
  91. 91. Nissen M, Marshall H, Richmond P, Shakib S, Jiang Q, et al. A randomized phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of three ascending dose levels of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) in healthy adults. Vaccine. 2015;33:1846-1854
  92. 92. Pfizer. An Evaluation of three Dose Levels of 3-Antigen Staphylococcus aureus Vaccine (SA3Ag) in Healthy Adults. Available from: 2014.
  93. 93. Begier E, Seiden DJ, Patton M, Zito E, Severs J, et al. SA4Ag, a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine, rapidly induces high levels of bacteria-killing antibodies. Vaccine. 2017;35:1132-1139
  94. 94. Frenck RW Jr, Buddy Creech C, Sheldon EA, Seiden DJ, Kankam MK, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag): Results from a first-in-human randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 study. Vaccine. 2017;35:375-384
  95. 95. Pfizer. Evaluation of a single vaccination with one of three ascending dose levels of a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag) in healthy adults aged 18 to <65 years. Available from: 2014.
  96. 96. Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, et al. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. Journal of Immunology. 2000;164:3713-3722
  97. 97. Rogers DE, Tompsett R. The survival of staphylococci within human leukocytes. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1952;95:209-230
  98. 98. Thwaites GE, Gant V. Are bloodstream leukocytes Trojan horses for the metastasis of Staphylococcus aureus? Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2011;9:215-222
  99. 99. Sandberg A, Hessler JH, Skov RL, Blom J, Frimodt-Moller N. Intracellular activity of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse peritonitis model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53:1874-1883
  100. 100. Barcia-Macay M, Seral C, Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Tulkens PM, Van Bambeke F. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the intracellular activities of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a model of THP-1 macrophages. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50:841-851
  101. 101. Lehar SM, Pillow T, Xu M, Staben L, Kajihara KK, et al. Novel antibody-antibiotic conjugate eliminates intracellular S. aureus. Nature. 2015;527:323-328
  102. 102. Arias CA, Murray BE. The rise of the enterococcus: Beyond vancomycin resistance. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2012;10:266-278
  103. 103. Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpaa J, Garsin DA, Hook M, et al. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116:2799-2807
  104. 104. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Bauman TM, Potretzke AM, Schreiber HL.t, et al. Fibrinogen release and deposition on urinary catheters placed during urological procedures. The Journal of Urology. 2016;196:416-421.
  105. 105. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Potretzke A, Schreiber HL.t, Pinkner JS, et al. Antibody-based therapy for Enterococcal catheter-associated urinary tract infections. MBio. 2016;7.
  106. 106. Flores-Mireles AL, Pinkner JS, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. EbpA vaccine antibodies block binding of Enterococcus faecalis to fibrinogen to prevent catheter-associated bladder infection in mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2014;6:254ra127
  107. 107. Hufnagel M, Hancock LE, Koch S, Theilacker C, Gilmore MS, et al. Serological and genetic diversity of capsular polysaccharides in Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004;42:2548-2557
  108. 108. Thurlow LR, Thomas VC, Hancock LE. Capsular polysaccharide production in Enterococcus faecalis and contribution of CpsF to capsule serospecificity. Journal of Bacteriology. 2009;191:6203-6210
  109. 109. Theilacker C, Kaczynski Z, Kropec A, Fabretti F, Sange T, et al. Opsonic antibodies to Enterococcus faecalis strain 12030 are directed against lipoteichoic acid. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74:5703-5712
  110. 110. Theilacker C, Kaczynski Z, Kropec A, Sava I, Ye L, et al. Serodiversity of opsonic antibodies against Enterococcus faecalis-glycans of the cell wall revisited. PloS One. 2011;6:e17839
  111. 111. Hufnagel M, Kropec A, Theilacker C, Huebner J. Naturally acquired antibodies against four Enterococcus faecalis capsular polysaccharides in healthy human sera. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 2005;12:930-934
  112. 112. Romero-Saavedra F, Laverde D, Budin-Verneuil A, Muller C, Bernay B, et al. Characterization of two metal binding lipoproteins as vaccine candidates for Enterococcal infections. PloS One. 2015;10:e0136625
  113. 113. Burnie J, Carter T, Rigg G, Hodgetts S, Donohoe M, et al. Identification of ABC transporters in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium as potential targets for antibody therapy. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2002;33:179-189
  114. 114. Doring G, Pier GB. Vaccines and immunotherapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vaccine. 2008;26:1011-1024
  115. 115. Hauser AR. The type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infection by injection. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2009;7:654-665
  116. 116. Baer M, Sawa T, Flynn P, Luehrsen K, Martinez D, et al. An engineered human antibody fab fragment specific for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PcrV antigen has potent antibacterial activity. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77:1083-1090
  117. 117. Francois B, Luyt CE, Dugard A, Wolff M, Diehl JL, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of an anti-PcrV PEGylated monoclonal antibody fragment in mechanically ventilated patients colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40:2320-2326
  118. 118. Kinoshita M, Kato H, Yasumoto H, Shimizu M, Hamaoka S, et al. The prophylactic effects of human IgG derived from sera containing high anti-PcrV titers against pneumonia-causing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2016;12:2833-2846
  119. 119. DiGiandomenico A, Warrener P, Hamilton M, Guillard S, Ravn P, et al. Identification of broadly protective human antibodies to Pseudomonas aeruginosa exopolysaccharide Psl by phenotypic screening. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2012;209:1273-1287
  120. 120. Thaden JT, Keller AE, Shire NJ, Camara MM, Otterson L, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremic patients exhibit nonprotective antibody titers against therapeutic antibody targets PcrV and Psl exopolysaccharide. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016;213:640-648
  121. 121. DiGiandomenico A, Keller AE, Gao C, Rainey GJ, Warrener P, et al. A multifunctional bispecific antibody protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Science Translational Medicine. 2014;6:262ra155
  122. 122. Jang IJ, Kim IS, Park WJ, Yoo KS, Yim DS, et al. Human immune response to a Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane protein vaccine. Vaccine. 1999;17:158-168
  123. 123. Mutharia LM, Hancock RE. Surface localization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane Porin protein F by using monoclonal antibodies. Infection and Immunity. 1983;42:1027-1033
  124. 124. Mansouri E, Blome-Eberwein S, Gabelsberger J, Germann G, Specht BU. Clinical study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprF-OprI vaccine in burn patients. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2003;37:161-166
  125. 125. Westritschnig K, Hochreiter R, Wallner G, Firbas C, Schwameis M, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study assessing the safety and immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hybrid outer membrane protein OprF/I vaccine (IC43) in healthy volunteers. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2014;10:170-183
  126. 126. Sorichter S, Baumann U, Baumgart A, Walterspacher S, von Specht BU. Immune responses in the airways by nasal vaccination with systemic boosting against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung disease. Vaccine. 2009;27:2755-2759.
  127. 127. Rello J, Krenn CG, Locker G, Pilger E, Madl C, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of a pseudomonas vaccine in ventilated ICU patients. Critical Care. 2017;21:22
  128. 128. Cobb LM, Mychaleckyj JC, Wozniak DJ, Lopez-Boado YS. Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellin and alginate elicit very distinct gene expression patterns in airway epithelial cells: Implications for cystic fibrosis disease. The Journal of Immunology. 2004;173:5659-5670
  129. 129. Rosok MJ, Stebbins MR, Connelly K, Lostrom ME, Siadak AW. Generation and characterization of murine antiflagellum monoclonal antibodies that are protective against lethal challenge with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection and Immunity. 1990;3819-3828
  130. 130. Doring G, Pfeiffer C, Weber U, Mohr-Pennert A, Dorner F. Parenteral application of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagella vaccine elicits specific anti-flagella antibodies in the Airways of Healthy Individuals. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1995;151:983-985
  131. 131. Doring G, Meisner C, Stern M. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase III study of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagella vaccine in cystic fibrosis patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:
  132. 132. Weimer ET, Lu H, Kock ND, Wozniak DJ, Mizel SB. A fusion protein vaccine containing OprF epitope 8, OprI, and type a and B flagellins promotes enhanced clearance of nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77:2356-2366
  133. 133. Campodonico VL, Llosa NJ, Bentancor LV, Maira-Litran T, Pier GB. Efficacy of a conjugate vaccine containing polymannuronic acid and flagellin against experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection in mice. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79:3455-3464
  134. 134. Mattick JS, Whitchurch CB, Alm RA. The molecular genetics of type-4 fimbriae in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-A review. Gene. 1996;179:147-155
  135. 135. Hahn HP. The type-4 pilus is the major virulence-associated adhesin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa–a review. Gene. 1997;192:99-108
  136. 136. Hahn H, Lane-Bell PM, Glasier LM, Nomellini JF, Bingle WH, et al. Pilin-based anti-pseudomonas vaccines: Latest developments and perspectives. Behring Institute Mitteilungen. 1997;315-325
  137. 137. Doig P, Sastry PA, Hodges RS, Lee KK, Paranchych W, et al. Inhibition of pilus-mediated adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human buccal epithelial cells by monoclonal antibodies directed against pili. Infection and Immunity. 1990;58:124-130
  138. 138. Bystrova OV, Knirel YA, Lindner B, Kocharova NA, Kondakova AN, et al. Structures of the core oligosaccharide and O-units in the R- and SR-type lipopolysaccharides of reference strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-serogroups. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2006;46:85-99
  139. 139. Priebe GP, Goldberg JB. Vaccines for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A long and winding road. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2014;13:507-519
  140. 140. Lang AB, Rüdeberg A, Schöni MH, Que JU, Fürer E, et al. Vaccination of cystic fibrosis patients against Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduces the proportion of patients infected and delays time to infection. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2004;23:504-510
  141. 141. Hogardt M, Heesemann J. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during persistence in the cystic fibrosis lung. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2010;300:557-562
  142. 142. Gerald BP, Denise D, Martha G, Carol G, Susan EB, et al. Human immune response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa mucoid exopolysaccharide (alginate) vaccine. Infection and Immunity. 1994;62:3972-3979
  143. 143. Cryz SJ, Furer RE, Que JU. Synthesis and characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa alginate-toxin a conjugate vaccine. Infection and Immunity. 1991;59:45-50
  144. 144. Sharma A, Krause A, Worgall S. Recent developments for Pseudomonas vaccines. Human Vaccines. 2011;7:999-1011
  145. 145. Cripps AW, Peek K, Dunkley M, Vento K, Marjason JK, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an oral inactivated whole-cell Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine administered to healthy human subjects. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74:968-974
  146. 146. Li Y, Wang Z, Liu X, Tang J, Peng B, et al. X-ray irradiated vaccine confers protection against pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:18823
  147. 147. Bjorn MJ, Vasil ML, Sadoff JC, Iglewski BH. Incidence of exotoxin production by pseudomonas species. Infection and Immunity. 1977;16:362-366
  148. 148. Pollack M. The role of exotoxin a in pseudomonas disease and immunity. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1983;5:979-984
  149. 149. Elzaim HS, Chopra AK, Peterson JW, Goodheart R, Heggers JP. Generation of neutralizing antipeptide antibodies to the enzymatic domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin a. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66:2170-2179
  150. 150. El-Zaim HS, Chopra AK, Peterson JW, Vasil ML, Heggers JP. Protection against exotoxin a (ETA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in mice with ETA-specific antipeptide antibodies. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66:5551-5554
  151. 151. Manafi A, Kohanteb J, Mehrabani D, Japoni A, Amini M, et al. Active immunization using exotoxin a confers protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn model. BMC Microbiology. 2009;9:23
  152. 152. Hertle R, Mrsny R, Fitzgerald DJ. Dual-function vaccine for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Characterization of chimeric exotoxin A-pilin protein. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69: 6962-6969
  153. 153. Hsieh JC, Tham DM, Feng W, Huang F, Embaie S, et al. Intranasal immunization strategy to impede pilin-mediated binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to airway epithelial cells. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73:7705-7717
  154. 154. Bagg A, Neilands JB. Molecular mechanism of regulation of siderophore-mediated iron assimilation. Microbiological Reviews. 1987;51:509-518
  155. 155. Goel VK, Kapil A. Monoclonal antibodies against the iron regulated outer membrane proteins of Acinetobacter baumannii are bactericidal. BMC Microbiology. 2001;1:16
  156. 156. McConnell MJ, Pachon J. Active and passive immunization against Acinetobacter baumannii using an inactivated whole cell vaccine. Vaccine. 2010;29:1-5
  157. 157. Garcia-Quintanilla M, Pulido MR, Pachon J, McConnell MJ. Immunization with lipopolysaccharide-deficient whole cells provides protective immunity in an experimental mouse model of Acinetobacter baumannii infection. PloS One. 2014;9:e114410
  158. 158. McConnell MJ, Dominguez-Herrera J, Smani Y, Lopez-Rojas R, Docobo-Perez F, et al. Vaccination with outer membrane complexes elicits rapid protective immunity to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79:518-526
  159. 159. Beveridge TJ. Structures of Gram-negative cell walls and their derived membrane vesicles. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999;181:4725-4733
  160. 160. Kuehn MJ, Kesty NC. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host-pathogen interaction. Genes & Development. 2005;19:2645-2655
  161. 161. Mashburn LM, Whiteley M. Membrane vesicles traffic signals and facilitate group activities in a prokaryote. Nature. 2005;437:422-425
  162. 162. Jun SH, Lee JH, Kim BR, Kim SI, Park TI, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane vesicles elicit a potent innate immune response via membrane proteins. PloS One. 2013;8:e71751
  163. 163. Huang W, Yao Y, Long Q, Yang X, Sun W, et al. Immunization against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii effectively protects mice in both pneumonia and sepsis models. PloS One. 2014;9:e100727
  164. 164. Huang W, Wang S, Yao Y, Xia Y, Yang X, et al. Employing Escherichia coli-derived outer membrane vesicles as an antigen delivery platform elicits protective immunity against Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:37242
  165. 165. Choi CH, Hyun SH, Lee JY, Lee JS, Lee YS, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein a targets the nucleus and induces cytotoxicity. Cellular Microbiology. 2008;10:309-319
  166. 166. Jyothisri K, Deepak V, Rajeswari MR. Purification and characterization of a major 40 kDa outer membrane protein of Acinetobacter baumannii. FEBS Letters. 1999;443:57-60
  167. 167. Sugawara E, Nikaido H. OmpA is the principal nonspecific slow porin of Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194:4089-4096
  168. 168. Luo G, Lin L, Ibrahim AS, Baquir B, Pantapalangkoor P, et al. Active and passive immunization protects against lethal, extreme drug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii infection. PloS One. 2012;7:e29446
  169. 169. Lin L, Tan B, Pantapalangkoor P, Ho T, Hujer AM, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii rOmpA vaccine dose alters immune polarization and immunodominant epitopes. Vaccine. 2013;31:313-318
  170. 170. Zhang X, Yang T, Cao J, Sun J, Dai W, et al. Mucosal immunization with purified OmpA elicited protective immunity against infections caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2016;96:20-25
  171. 171. Huang W, Yao Y, Wang S, Xia Y, Yang X, et al. Immunization with a 22-kDa outer membrane protein elicits protective immunity to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:20724
  172. 172. Singh R, Garg N, Shukla G, Capalash N, Sharma P. Immunoprotective efficacy of Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein, FilF, predicted in silico as a potential vaccine candidate. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:158
  173. 173. Payne DE, Boles BR. Emerging interactions between matrix components during biofilm development. Current Genetics. 2016;62:137-141
  174. 174. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2000;54:49-79
  175. 175. Choi AH, Slamti L, Avci FY, Pier GB, Maira-Litran T. The pgaABCD locus of Acinetobacter baumannii encodes the production of poly-beta-1-6-N-acetylglucosamine, which is critical for biofilm formation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2009;191:5953-5963
  176. 176. Bentancor LV, O'Malley JM, Bozkurt-Guzel C, Pier GB, Maira-Litran T. Poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1-6)-glucosamine is a target for protective immunity against Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80:651-656
  177. 177. Loehfelm TW, Luke NR, Campagnari AA. Identification and characterization of an Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm-associated protein. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008;190: 1036-1044
  178. 178. Omid A, Fereshteh S, Himen S, Farzan M, Mohammad Reza S, et al. Molecular analysis and expression of bap gene in biofilm-forming multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Reports of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2016;5:62-72
  179. 179. Fattahian Y, Rasooli I, Mousavi Gargari SL, Rahbar MR, Darvish Alipour Astaneh S, et al. Protection against Acinetobacter baumannii infection via its functional deprivation of biofilm associated protein (bap). Microbial Pathogenesis. 2011;51:402-406.
  180. 180. Bentancor LV, Camacho-Peiro A, Bozkurt-Guzel C, Pier GB, Maira-Litran T. Identification of Ata, a multifunctional trimeric autotransporter of Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194:3950-3960
  181. 181. Bentancor LV, Routray A, Bozkurt-Guzel C, Camacho-Peiro A, Pier GB, et al. Evaluation of the trimeric autotransporter Ata as a vaccine candidate against Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80:3381-3388
  182. 182. Russo TA, Luke NR, Beanan JM, Olson R, Sauberan SL, et al. The K1 capsular polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii strain 307-0294 is a major virulence factor. Infection and Immunity. 2010;78:3993-4000
  183. 183. Russo TA, Beanan JM, Olson R, MacDonald U, Cox AD, et al. The K1 capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii is a potential therapeutic target via passive immunization. Infection and Immunity. 2013;81:915-922
  184. 184. Avci FY, Kasper DL. How bacterial carbohydrates influence the adaptive immune system. Annual Review of Immunology. 2010;28:107-130
  185. 185. Daniels CC, Rogers PD, Shelton CM. A review of pneumococcal vaccines: Current polysaccharide vaccine recommendations and future protein antigens. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics: JPPT: The Official Journal of PPAG. 2016;21:27-35
  186. 186. Ni Z, Chen Y, Ong E, He Y. Antibiotic resistance determinant-focused Acinetobacter baumannii vaccine designed using reverse vaccinology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:
  187. 187. Hassan A, Naz A, Obaid A, Paracha RZ, Naz K, et al. Pangenome and immuno-proteomics analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii strains revealed the core peptide vaccine targets. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:732
  188. 188. Czaplewski L, Bax R, Clokie M, Dawson M, Fairhead H, et al. Alternatives to antibiotics-a pipeline portfolio review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2016;16:239-251
  189. 189. NeuTec Pharma. Aurograb and Vancomycin in MRSA Infection. Available from: 2006.
  190. 190. Weisman LE, Thackray HM, Garcia-Prats JA, Nesin M, Schneider JH, et al. Phase 1/2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, safety, and pharmacokinetic study of pagibaximab (BSYX-A110), an antistaphylococcal monoclonal antibody for the prevention of staphylococcal bloodstream infections, in very-low-birth-weight neonates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53:2879-2886
  191. 191. Sanofi. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of a Single Dose of SAR279356 in Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit and on Mechanical Ventilation. Available from: 2012.
  192. 192. DeJonge M, Burchfield D, Bloom B, Duenas M, Walker W, et al. Clinical trial of safety and efficacy of INH-A21 for the prevention of nosocomial staphylococcal bloodstream infection in premature infants. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2007;151:260-265
  193. 193. (NIAID) N.I.o.A.a.I.D. Phase I STEBVax in Healthy Adults. Available from: 2014.
  194. 194. Fowler VG, Allen KB, Moreira ED, Moustafa M, Isgro F, et al. Effect of an investigational vaccine for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections after cardiothoracic surgery: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;309:1368-1378
  195. 195. Knisely JM, Liu B, Ranallo RT, Zou L. Vaccines for healthcare-associated infections: Promise and challenge. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2016;63:657-662
  196. 196. Torre A, Bacconi M, Sammicheli C, Galletti B, Laera D, et al. Four-component Staphylococcus aureus vaccine 4C-staph enhances Fcgamma receptor expression in neutrophils and monocytes and mitigates S. aureus infection in neutropenic mice. Infection and Immunity. 2015;83:3157-3163
  197. 197. LLC M. Phase 1 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate Safety and PK of MEDI3902 in Healthy Adults. Available from: 2015.
  198. 198. Pharmaceuticals K. Study to Evaluate the Effect of KB001-a on Time-to-Need for Antibiotic Treatment (KB001-a). Available from: 2015.
  199. 199. AB I. Anti-Pseudomonas Igy to Prevent Infections in Cystic Fibrosis (Pseudigy). Available from: 2016.
  200. 200. Ltd KB. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Kbpa-101 in Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Caused by o11 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Available from: 2009.
  201. 201. Gmbh VA. Confirmatory Phase ii/iii Study Assessing Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of IC43. Available from: 2016.

Written By

Yang Zhang, Jie Su and Donghui Wu

Reviewed: 28 July 2017 Published: 20 December 2017