Data for equilibrium points.

## Abstract

This paper focuses on the non-fragile guaranteed cost control problem for a class of Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy time-varying delay systems with local bilinear models and different state and input delays. A non-fragile guaranteed cost state-feedback controller is designed such that the closed-loop T-S fuzzy local bilinear control system is delay-dependent asymptotically stable, and the closed-loop fuzzy system performance is constrained to a certain upper bound when the additive controller gain perturbations exist. By employing the linear matrix inequality (LMI) technique, sufficient conditions are established for the existence of desired non-fragile guaranteed cost controllers. The simulation examples show that the proposed approach is effective and feasible.

### Keywords

- fuzzy control
- non-fragile guaranteed cost control
- delay-dependent
- linear matrix inequality (LMI)
- T-S fuzzy bilinear model

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, T-S (Takagi-Sugeno) model-based fuzzy control has attracted wide attention, essentially because the fuzzy model is an effective and flexible tool for the control of nonlinear systems [1–8]. Through the application of sector nonlinearity approach, local approximation in fuzzy partition spaces or other different approximation methods, T-S fuzzy models will be used to approximate or exactly represent a nonlinear system in a compact set of state variables. The merit of the model is that the consequent part of a fuzzy rule is a linear dynamic subsystem, which makes it possible to apply the classical and mature linear systems theory to nonlinear systems. Further, by using the fuzzy inference method, the overall fuzzy model will be obtained. A fuzzy controller is designed via the method titled ‘parallel distributed compensation (PDC)’ [3–6], the main idea of which is that for each linear subsystem, the corresponding linear controller is carried out. Finally, the overall nonlinear controller is obtained via fuzzy blending of each individual linear controller. Based on the above content,， T-S fuzzy model has been widely studied, and many results have been obtained [1–8]. In practical applications, time delay often occurs in many dynamic systems such as biological systems, network systems, etc. It is shown that the existence of delays usually becomes the source of instability and deteriorating performance of systems [3–8]. In general, when delay-dependent results were calculated, the emergence of the inner product between two vectors often makes the process of calculation more complicated. In order to avoid it, some model transformations were utilized in many papers, unfortunately, which will arouse the generation of an inequality, resulting in possible conservatism. On the other hand, due to the influence of many factors such as finite word length, truncation errors in numerical computation and electronic component parameter change, the parameters of the controller in a certain degree will change, which lead to imprecision in controller implementation. In this case, some small perturbations of the controllers’ coefficients will make the designed controllers sensitive, even worse, destabilize the closed-loop control system [9]. So the problem of non-fragile control has been important issues. Recently, the research of non-fragile control has been paid much attention, and a series of productions have been obtained [10–13].

As we know, bilinear models have been widely used in many physical systems, biotechnology, socioeconomics and dynamical processes in other engineering fields [14, 15]. Bilinear model is a special nonlinear model, the nonlinear part of which consists of the bilinear function of the state and input. Compared with a linear model, the bilinear models have two main advantages. One is that the bilinear model can better approximate a nonlinear system. Another is that because of nonlinearity of it, many real physical processes may be appropriately modeled as bilinear systems. A famous example of a bilinear system is the population of biological species, which can be showed by * v*is the birth rate minus death rate, and

*denotes the population. Obviously, the equation cannot be approximated by a linear model [14].*θ

Most of the existing results focus on the stability analysis and synthesis based on T-S fuzzy model with linear local model. However, when a nonlinear system has of complex nonlinearities, the constructed T-S model will consist of a number of fuzzy local models. This will lead to very heavy computational burden. According to the advantages of bilinear systems and T-S fuzzy control, so many researchers paid their attentions to the T-S fuzzy models with bilinear rule consequence [16–18]. From these papers, it is evident that the T-S fuzzy bilinear model may be suitable for some classes of nonlinear plants. In Ref. [16], a nonlinear system was transformed into a bilinear model via Taylor’s series expansion, and the stability of T-S fuzzy bilinear model was studied. Moreover, the result was stretched into the complex fuzzy system with state time delay [17]. Ref. [18] presented robust stabilization for a class of discrete-time fuzzy bilinear system. Very recently, a class of nonlinear systems is described by T-S fuzzy models with nonlinear local models in Ref. [19], and in this paper, the scholars put forward a new fuzzy control scheme with local nonlinear feedbacks, the advantage of which over the existing methods is that a fewer fuzzy rules and less computational burden. The non-fragile guaranteed cost controller was designed for a class of T-S discrete-time fuzzy bilinear systems in Ref. [20]. However, in Refs. [19, 20], the time-delay effects on the system is not considered. Ref. [17] is only considered the fuzzy system with the delay in the state and the derivatives of time-delay,

So far, the problem of non-fragile guaranteed cost control for fuzzy system with local bilinear model with different time-varying state and input delays has not been discussed.

In this paper, the problem of delay-dependent non-fragile guaranteed cost control is studied for the fuzzy time-varying delay systems with local bilinear model and different state and input delays. Based on the PDC scheme, new delay-dependent stabilization conditions for the closed-loop fuzzy systems are derived. No model transformation is involved in the derivation. The merit of the proposed conditions lies in its reduced conservatism, which is achieved by circumventing the utilization of some bounding inequalities for the cross-product between two vectors as in Ref. [17]. The three main contributions of this paper are the following: (1) a non-fragile guaranteed cost controller is presented for the fuzzy system with time-varying delay in both state and input; (2) some free-weighting matrices are introduced in the derivation process, where the constraint of the derivatives of time-delay,

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the fuzzy delay system with local bilinear model, and non-fragile controller law for such system is designed based on the parallel distributed compensation approach in Section 3. Results of non-fragile guaranteed cost control are given in Section 4. Two simulation examples are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in Section 5, which is followed by conclusions in Section 6.

Notation: Throughout this paper, the notation * P*> 0(

*≥ 0) stands for*P

*being real symmetric and positive definite (or positive semi-definite). In symmetric block matrices, the asterisk (*) refers to a term that is induced by symmetry, and diag{….} denotes a block-diagonal matrix. The superscript*P

*means matrix transposition. The notion*T

## 2. System description and assumptions

In this section, we introduce the T-S fuzzy time-delay system with local bilinear model. The * i*th rule of the fuzzy system is represented by the following form:

where _{ij}is the fuzzy set, * s*is the number of fuzzy rules,

*(*x

*) ∈*t

R

^{n}is the state vector, and

*(*u

*) ∈*t

*is the control input,*R

ϑ

_{1}(

*),*t

ϑ

_{2}(

*),…,*t

ϑ

_{v}(

*) are the premise variables. It is assumed that the premise variables do not depend on the input*t

*(*u

*).*t

*(*d

*) is a time-varying differentiable function that satisfies 0 ≤*t

*(*d

*) ≤*t

τ

_{1}, 0 ≤

*(*h

*) ≤*t

τ

_{2}, where

τ

_{1},

τ

_{2}are real positive constants as the upper bound of the time-varying delay. It is also assumed that

σ

_{1},

σ

_{2}are known constants. The initial conditions

*(*φ

*),*t

*(*ϕ

*) are continuous functions of*t

*,*t

** Remark 1:**The fuzzy system with time-varying state and input delays will be investigated in this paper, which is different from the system in Ref. [17]. In Ref. [17], only state time-varying delay is considered. And also, here, we assume that the derivative of time-varying delay is less than or equal to a known constant that may be greater than 1; the assumption on time-varying delay in Ref. [17] is relaxed.

By using singleton fuzzifier, product inferred and weighted defuzzifier, the fuzzy system can be expressed by the following globe model:

where

_{ij}(* ϑ*(

*)) is the grade of membership of*t

ϑ

_{i}(

*) in*t

F

_{ij}. In this paper, it is assumed that

*. Then, we have the following conditions*t

h

_{i}(

*(*ϑ

*)) ≥ 0,*t

*. In the consequent, we use abbreviation*t

h

_{i},

h

_{hi},

x

_{d}(

*),*t

u

_{d}(

*),*t

x

_{h}(

*),*t

u

_{h}(

*), to replace*t

h

_{i}(

*(*ϑ

*)),*t

h

_{i}(

*(*ϑ

*−*t

*(*h

*))),*t

*(*x

*−*t

*(*d

*)),*t

*(*u

*−*t

*(*d

*)),*t

*(*x

*−*t

*(*h

*)),*t

*(*u

*−*t

*(*h

*)), respectively, for convenience.*t

The objective of this paper is to design a state-feedback non-fragile guaranteed cost control law for the fuzzy system (2).

## 3. Non-fragile guaranteed cost controller design

Extending the design concept in Ref. [17], we give the following non-fragile fuzzy control law:

where * ρ*> 0 is a scalar to be assigned, and

K

_{i}∈

R

^{l×n}is a local controller gain to be determined. Δ

K

_{i}represents the additive controller gain perturbations of the form Δ

K

_{i}=

H

_{i}

F

_{i}(

*)*t

E

_{ki}with

H

_{i}and

E

_{ki}being known constant matrices, and

F

_{i}(

*) the uncertain parameter matrix satisfying*t

The overall fuzzy control law can be represented by

When there exists an input delay * h*(

*), we have that*t

where

So, it is natural and necessary to make an assumption that the functions _{i}are well defined all * t*∈ [−

τ

_{2}, 0], and satisfy the following properties:

* i*= 1,2,…,

*, and*s

By substituting Eq. (5) into Eq. (2), the closed-loop system can be given by

where

Given positive-definite symmetric matrices * S*∈

R

^{n×n}and

*∈*W

*, we take the cost function*R

** Definition 1.**The fuzzy non-fragile control law

*(*u

*) is said to be non-fragile guaranteed cost if for the system (2), there exist control laws (4) and (5) and a scalar*t

J

_{0}such that the closed-loop system (6) is asymptotically stable and the closed-loop value of the cost function (7) satisfies

*≤*J

J

_{0}.

## 4. Analysis of stability for the closed-loop system

Firstly, the following lemmas are presented which will be used in the paper.

** Lemma 1**[20]:

Given any matrices M

*> 0,*and N with appropriate dimensions such that ε

we have M

^{T}

*≤*N + N

^{T}M

ε

M

^{T}

*+*M

ε

^{−1}

N

^{T}

*.*N

** Lemma 2**[21]:

Given constant matrices G, E

and a symmetric constant matrix S

*+*of appropriate dimensions. The inequality S + GFE

E

^{T}

F

^{T}

G

^{T}< 0

*(*holds, where F

*)*t

satisfies F

^{T}(

*)*t

*(*F

*) ≤*t

*> 0,*I if and only if, for some ε

S + εGG

^{T}

+ ε

^{−1}

E

^{T}

*< 0.*E

The following theorem gives the sufficient conditions for the existence of the non-fragile guaranteed cost controller for system (6) with additive controller gain perturbations.

_{1} > 0, _{2} > 0, * σ*1 > 0,

σ

_{2}> 0,

*> 0,*if there exist matrices P

Q

_{1}> 0, Q2 > 0,

R

_{1}> 0,

R

_{2}> 0,

K

_{i},

*= 1, 2,…,*i

s, X

_{1},

X

_{2},

X

_{3},

X

_{4},

Y

_{1},

Y

_{2},

Y

_{3},

Y

_{4},

*> 0*and scalar ε

*,*satisfying the inequalities (8 ), the system (6 ) is asymptotically stable and the control law (5 ) is a fuzzy non-fragile guaranteed cost control law, moreover

Proof: Take a Lyapunov function candidate as

The time derivatives of * V*(

*(*x

*),*t

*), along the trajectory of the system (6), are given by*t

Define the free-weighting matrices as _{k}∈ ^{n×n}, _{k}∈ ^{n×n}, _{k}∈ ^{n×n}, * k*= 1, 2, 3, 4 will be determined later.

Using the Leibniz-Newton formula and system equation (6), we have the following identical equations:

Then, substituting Eq. (12) into Eq. (11) yields

where

Applying Lemma 1, we have the following inequalities:

Substituting Eq. (13) into Eq. (12) results in

where

In light of the inequality

Applying the Schur complement to Eq. (8) yields

Therefore, it follows from Eq. (15) that

which implies that the system (6) is asymptotically stable.

Integrating Eq. (16) from 0 to * T*produces

Because of * V*(

*(*x

*),*t

*) ≥ 0 and*t

*is a nonnegative constant. Therefore, the following inequality can be obtained:*c

This completes the proof.

** Remark 2:**In the derivation of Theorem 1, the free-weighting matrices

X

_{k}∈

R

^{n×n},

Y

_{k}∈

R

^{n×n},

*= 1, 2, 3, 4 are introduced, the purpose of which is to reduce conservatism in the existing delay-dependent stabilization conditions, see Ref. [17].*k

In the following section, we shall turn the conditions given in Theorem 1 into linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Under the assumptions that _{1}, _{2}, _{3}, _{4} are non-singular, we can define the matrix * i*= 1, 2, 3, 4,

*=*Z

P

^{−1},

*> 0.*λ

Pre- and post-multiply (8) and (9) with

where

Applying the Schur complement to Eq. (18) results in

where

With

Obviously, the closed-loop fuzzy system (6) is asymptotically stable, if for some scalars * λ*> 0, there exist matrices

* Consider the system (*> 0,

τ

_{1}> 0,

τ

_{2}> 0,

σ

_{1}> 0,

σ

_{2}> 0

*> 0,*and λ

*> 0,*δ

if there exist matricesZ > 0 , Q ¯ 1 > 0 , R ¯ 1 > 0 , Q ¯ 2 > 0 , R ¯ 2 > 0 andX ¯ 1 , X ¯ 2 , X ¯ 3 , X ¯ 4 , M

_{i},

*= 1,2,…,*i

*> 0*s and scalar ε

satisfying the following LMI (20 ), the system (6 ) is asymptotically stable and the control law (5 ) is a fuzzy non-fragile guaranteed cost control law

Proof: At first, we prove that the inequality (20) implies the inequality (19). Applying the Schur complement to Eq. (20) results in

Using Lemma 2 and noting _{i}= _{i}* Z*, by the condition (21), the following inequality holds:

where

Therefore, it follows from Theorem 1 that the system (6) is asymptotically stable and the control law (5) is a fuzzy non-fragile guaranteed cost control law. Thus, we complete the proof.

Now consider the cost bound of

Similar to Ref. [23], we supposed that there exist positive scalars _{1}, _{2}, _{3}, _{4}, _{5}, such that

Then, define

Using the idea of the cone complement linear algorithm in Ref. [24], we can obtain the solution of the minimization problem of upper bound of the value of the cost function as follows:

Using the following cone complement linearization (CCL) algorithm [24] can iteratively solve the minimization problem (24). □

## 5. Simulation examples

In this section, the proposed approach is applied to the Van de Vusse system to verify its effectiveness.

Example: Consider the dynamics of an isothermal continuous stirred tank reactor for the Van de Vusse

From the system equation (25), some equilibrium points are tabulated in Table 1. According to these equilibrium points, [_{e}_{e}], which are also chosen as the desired operating points,

_{e} | _{de} | ||
---|---|---|---|

[2.0422 1.2178] | [2.0422 1.2178] | 20.3077 | 20.3077 |

[3.6626 2.5443] | [3.6626 2.5443] | 77.7272 | 77.7272 |

[5.9543 5.5403] | [5.9543 5.5403] | 296.2414 | 296.2414 |

Thus, the system (25) can be represented by

where

The cost function associated with this system is given with * K*of the additive form is give with

H

_{1}=

H

_{2}=

H

_{3}= 0.1,

E

_{k1}= [0.05 −0.01],

E

_{k2}= [0.02 0.01],

E

_{k3}= [−0.01 0].

The membership functions of state _{1} are shown in Figure 1.

Then, solving LMIs (23) and (24) for * ρ*= 0.45,

*= 1.02 and*λ

Figures 2–4 illustrate the simulation results of applying the non-fragile fuzzy controller to the system (25) with * ϕ*(

*) = [1.2 −1.8]*t

^{T},

*∈ [−2 0]. It can be seen that with the fuzzy control law, the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable and an upper bound of the guaranteed cost is*t

J

_{0}= 292.0399. The simulation results show that the fuzzy non-fragile guaranteed controller proposed in this paper is effective.

## 6. Conclusions

In this paper, the problem of non-fragile guaranteed cost control for a class of fuzzy time-varying delay systems with local bilinear models has been explored. By utilizing the Lyapunov stability theory and LMI technique, sufficient conditions for the delay-dependent asymptotically stability of the closed-loop T-S fuzzy local bilinear system have been obtained. Moreover, the designed fuzzy controller has guaranteed the cost function-bound constraint. Finally, the effectiveness of the developed approach has been demonstrated by the simulation example. The robust non-fragile guaranteed cost control and robust non-fragile H-infinite control based on fuzzy bilinear model will be further investigated in the future work.

## References

- 1.
Pang CT, Lur YY. On the stability of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with time-varying uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2008; 16 :162–170 - 2.
Zhou SS, Lam J, Zheng WX. Control design for fuzzy systems based on relaxed non-quadratic stability and H∞ performance conditions. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2007; 15 :188–198 - 3.
Zhou SS, Li T. Robust stabilization for delayed discrete-time fuzzy systems via basis-dependent Lyapunov-Krasovskii function. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2005; 151 :139–153 - 4.
Gao HJ, Liu X, Lam J. Stability analysis and stabilization for discrete-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delay. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part B. 2009; 39 :306–316 - 5.
Wu HN, Li HX. New approach to delay-dependent stability analysis and stabilization for continuous-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delay. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2007; 15 :482–493 - 6.
Chen B, Liu XP. Delay-dependent robust H∞ control for T-S fuzzy systems with time delay. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2005; 13 :238–249 - 7.
Chen M, Feng G, Ma H, Chen G. Delay-dependent H∞ filter design for discrete-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delays. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2009; 17 :604–616 - 8.
Zhang J, Xia Y, Tao R. New results on H∞ filtering for fuzzy time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2009; 17 :128–137 - 9.
Keel LH, Bhattacharryya SP. Robust, fragile, or optimal?. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1997; 42 :1098–1105 - 10.
Yang GH, Wang JL, Lin C. H∞ control for linear systems with additive controller gain variations. International Journal of Control. 2000; 73 :1500–1506 - 11.
Yang GH, Wang JL. Non-fragile H∞ control for linear systems with multiplicative controller gain variations. Automatica. 2001; 37 :727–737 - 12.
Zhang BY, Zhou SS, Li T. A new approach to robust and non-fragile H∞ control for uncertain fuzzy systems. Information Sciences. 2007; 177 :5118–5133 - 13.
Yee JS, Yang GH, Wang JL. Non-fragile guaranteed cost control for discrete-time uncertain linear systems. International Journal of Systems Science. 2001; 32 :845–853 - 14.
Mohler RR. Bilinear Control Processes. New York, NY: Academic; 1973 - 15.
Elliott DL. Bilinear Systems in Encyclopedia of Electrical Engineering. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999 - 16.
Li THS, Tsai SH. T-S fuzzy bilinear model and fuzzy controller design for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2007; 15 :494–505 - 17.
Tsai SH, Li THS. Robust fuzzy control of a class of fuzzy bilinear systems with time-delay. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2009; 39 :2028–2040 - 18.
Li THS, Tsai SH, et al. Robust H∞ fuzzy control for a class of uncertain discrete fuzzy bilinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part B. 2008; 38 :510–526 - 19.
Dong J, Wang Y, Yang G. Control synthesis of continuous-time T-S fuzzy systems with local nonlinear models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part B. 2009; 39 :1245–1258 - 20.
Zhang G, Li JM. Non-fragile guaranteed cost control of discrete-time fuzzy bilinear system. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics. 2010; 21 :629–634 - 21.
Ho DWC, Niu Y. Robust fuzzy design for nonlinear uncertain stochastic systems via sliding-mode control. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2007; 15 :350–358 - 22.
Yang DD, Cai KY. Reliable guaranteed cost sampling control for nonlinear time-delay systems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2010; 80 :2005–2018 - 23.
Chen WH, Guan ZH, Lu XM. Delay-dependent output feedback guaranteed cost control for uncertain time-delay systems. Automatica. 2004; 44 :1263–1268 - 24.
Chen B, Lin C, Liu XP, Tong SC. Guaranteed cost control of T–S fuzzy systems with input delay. International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control. 2008; 18 :1230–1256 - 25.
Chen B, Liu XP, Tong SC, Lin C. Observer-based stabilization of T–S fuzzy systems with input delay. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2008; 16 :652–663 - 26.
Chen B, Liu X, Tong S, Lin C. guaranteed cost control of T-S fuzzy systems with state and input delay. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2007; 158 :2251–2267 - 27.
Du BZ, Lam J, Shu Z. Stabilization for state/input delay systems via static and integral output feedback. Automatica. 2010; 46 :2000–2007 - 28.
Kim JH. Delay-dependent robust and non-fragile guaranteed cost control for uncertain singular systems with time-varying state and input delays. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems. 2009; 7 :357–364 - 29.
Li L, Liu XD. New approach on robust stability for uncertain T–S fuzzy systems with state and input delays. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2009; 40 :2329–2339 - 30.
Yu KW, Lien CH. Robust H-infinite control for uncertain T–S fuzzy systems with state and input delays. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2008; 37 :150–156 - 31.
Yue D, Lam J. Non-fragile guaranteed cost control for uncertain descriptor systems with time-varying state and input delays. Optimal Control Applications and Methods. 2005; 26 :85–105 - 32.
Zhang G, Li JM. Non-fragile guaranteed cost control of discrete-time fuzzy bilinear system with time-delay. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control. 2014; 136 :044502–044504 - 33.
Yue HY, Li JM. Output-feedback adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear systems with input delay and unknown control directions. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 2013; 350 :129–154 - 34.
Yue HY, Li JM. Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for a class of perturbed nonlinear time-varying delays systems with unknown control direction. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems. 2013; 21 :497–531 - 35.
Wang RJ, Lin WW, Wang WJ. Stabilizability of linear quadratic state feedback for uncertain fuzzy time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part B. 2004; 34 :1288–1292 - 36.
Xia ZL, Li JM, Li JR. Delay-dependent fuzzy static output feedback control for discrete-time fuzzy stochastic systems with distributed time-varying delays. ISA Transaction. 2012; 51 :702–712 - 37.
Xia ZL, Li JM. Switching fuzzy filtering for nonlinear stochastic delay systems using piecewise Lyapunov-Krasovskii function. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2012; 14 :530–539 - 38.
Li JR, Li JM, Xia ZL. Delay-dependent generalized H2 fuzzy static-output-feedback control for discrete T-S fuzzy bilinear stochastic systems with mixed delays. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2013; 25 :863–880 - 39.
Xia ZL, Li JM, Li JR. Passivity-based resilient adaptive control for fuzzy stochastic delay systems with Markovian switching. Journal of the Franklin Institute-Engineering and Applied Mathematics. 2014; 351 :3818–3836 - 40.
Li JM, Li YT. Robust stability and stabilization of fractional order systems based on uncertain T-S fuzzy model with the fractional order. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. 2013; 8 :041005 - 41.
Li YT, Li JM. Stability analysis of fractional order systems based on T-S fuzzy model with the fractional order α: 0<α<1. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2014; 78 :2909–2919 - 42.
Li YT, Li JM. Decentralized stabilization of fractional order T-S fuzzy interconnected systems with multiple time delays. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2016; 30 :319–331 - 43.
Li JM, Yue HY. Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for stochastic nonlinear systems with unknown time-varying delays. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2015; 256 :514–528 - 44.
Yue HY, Yu SQ. Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for a class of stochastic nonlinearly parameterized systems with distributed input delay. Journal of the Franklin Institute-Engineering and Applied Mathematics. 2016; 353 :713–734 - 45.
Duan RR, Li JM, Zhang YN, Yang Y, Chen GP. Stability analysis and H-inf control of discrete T-S fuzzy hyperbolic systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. 2016; 26 :133–145 - 46.
Wang JX, Li JM. Stability analysis and feedback control of T-S fuzzy hyperbolic delay model for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying delay. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2016; 13 :111–134 - 47.
Li JR, Li JM, Xia ZL. Observer-based fuzzy control design for discrete time T-S fuzzy bilinear systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2013; 21 :435–454