Conductance (
Abstract
Identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) mechanisms could improve the rate of ablation success. However, the incomplete understanding of those mechanisms makes difficult the decision of targeting sites for ablation. This work is focused on the importance of EGM analysis for detecting and modulating rotors to guide ablation procedures and improve its outcomes. Virtual atrial models are used to show how nonlinear measures can be used to generate electroanatomical maps to detect critical sites in AF. A description of the atrial cell mathematical models, and the procedure of coupling them within two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional virtual atrial models in order to simulate arrhythmogenic mechanisms, is given. Mathematical modeling of unipolar and bipolar electrogramas (EGM) is introduced. It follows a discussion of EGM signal processing. Nonlinear descriptors, such as approximate entropy and multifractal analysis, are used to study the dynamical behavior of EGM signals, which are not well described by a linear law. Our results evince that nonlinear analysis of EGM can provide information about the dynamics of rotors and other mechanisms of AF. Furthermore, these fibrillatory patterns can be simulated using virtual models. The combination of features using machine learning tools can be used for identifying arrhythmogenic sources of AF.
Keywords
- atrial fibrillation
- arrhythmogenic sources
- electrogram model
- computer simulation
- nonlinear features
- electroanatomical mapping
1. Introduction
The most common sustained cardiac arrhythmias in humans are associated with the atria. Atrial arrhythmias, mainly atrial fibrillation (AF), frequently provoke incapacitating symptoms and severe complications such as stroke and heart failure [1]. Overall, 20–25% of all strokes are caused by AF [2]. The presence of AF is related to a significant increase in morbidity and mortality [3]. Electrocardiogram‐based surveys suggest that 1% of the total population is affected by AF [4].
There are a large number of clinical conditions that are associated with an increased incidence of AF. This contributes to a progressive process of atrial remodeling characterized by a set of changes in atrial properties that contributes in sustaining of the arrhythmia. These changes include alterations in the electrical cellular activity, calcium handling and in the atrial structure such as cellular hypertrophy and fibrosis. They have been described in some animal models [5–8] and in humans [9–11]. These alterations may favor the occurrence of triggers that initiate the AF and the formation of a substrate that promotes its perpetuation. Changes in electrical activity cause a significant shortening of the action potential duration (APD) and a decrease in refractoriness [8–10], which may support the initiation and maintenance of multiple re‐entrant waves, as suggested by experimental studies [5, 9].
It is well known that AF can be caused by different mechanisms, including single‐circuit re‐entry, multiple‐circuit re‐entry, rapid local ectopic activity and rotors [12–15]. It is very important to know the mechanisms underlying AF, since these have implications in the treatment of the disease. An important percentage of patients suffers of paroxysmal AF, which is initiated by focal triggers that are localized at preferential sites, mainly in the pulmonary veins (PV) [13]. Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins can prevent recurrence of AF in 70–80% of these lone AF patients. The rationale for this is the crucial observation, reported in [13], that AF was mostly triggered by ectopic beats arising from the muscle sleeves of the pulmonary veins. They demonstrated that atrial rapid paces or ectopic activity originated in the proximities or in the interior of the pulmonary veins could act like triggers, and, in some cases, they would be responsible for the maintenance of paroxysmal AF episodes [16, 17]. A unifying theory suggests that rapid focal activity is responsible for generating atrial, which is necessary to maintain a substrate for the generation of multiple re‐entrant waves [18, 19]. While paroxysmal AF is maintained predominantly by ectopic focal activity or local re‐entrant circuits located in one or more pulmonary veins, as the arrhythmia evolves into more persistent forms promoted by atrial remodeling, the mechanisms that maintain AF move toward the atria and are increasingly based on re‐entry substrates [11, 20–22]. Based on clinical [23–25] and experimental [14, 26] results, certain types of AF can be attributed to a stable high‐frequency rotor or a small number of rotor waves in left atrium, which maintain the arrhythmia, whose periodic activation can be converted into a chaotic pattern when the wavefronts propagate across the atrial wall. This phenomenon, known as the
All localized sources of AF as re‐entry circuits, ectopic foci, or rotors, cause fibrillatory conduction remote from the source, which is difficult to distinguish from propagation that maintains the AF by multiple wavelets, and any of these phenomena may generate rotors registered by intracardiac recordings [32, 24]. Studies carried out by [33, 34] have shown evidence that human AF can be sustained by localized rotors; however, the existence of stable rotors maintaining AF remains a focus of discussion. Hence, the importance of the implementation of virtual models and computational tools in the studies of AF sources and its relation with the signals recorded from surface. In the same way, the rotors have been shown in computer models of AF [35–38].
Ablation has emerged as an important treatment strategy for AF [39]. Pulmonary veins isolation reaches single procedure success rates of 60–80% for paroxysmal AF treatment [40]. However, for the chronic case, this strategy does not achieve satisfactory outcomes [41]; consequently, complex ablation lines are added to the procedure [45]. Catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping has revolutionized the treatment of permanent AF. Identification of AF mechanisms could improve the rate of ablation success. However, the incomplete understanding of those mechanisms makes difficult the decision of targeting sites for ablation. To overcome this limitation, two‐dimensional and realistic three‐dimensional human atria computer models have been developed to investigate the relationship between the characteristics of EGM and the propagation pattern associated with them [42–45].
It is thought that the different mechanisms lead to changes in the characteristics of spatiotemporal organization of AF [44, 45]. EGM‐guided ablation procedures have been proposed as an alternative strategy, which involves mapping and ablating focal sources or complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) [46]. Recent studies have shown that a large number of sites representing AF substrates are characterized by a high degree of disorganization in EGM signals [29], and therefore, signal processing methods are being designed in order to quantify their degree of fractionation [47, 48]. The relationship between the rotor tip and CFAE has been published in recent studies [36, 45, 47, 49, 50]; however, automatic rotor mapping methods have not been fully developed.
Different mapping techniques are being used to identify target sites for ablation, and some of them are activation waves, voltage, dominant frequency [23, 51–55] and CFAE maps [39, 46, 56]. Nevertheless, there are several limitations with these techniques, and one of the most important is that they depend considerably on the electrophysiologist expertise [57].
The term CFAE was introduced by Nademanee [46] as a pathophysiological concept; however, its definition is unclear and broad and includes inherent subjectivity [58]. CFAE are formally defined as follows: (1) atrial EGM that have fractionated electrograms composed of two deflections or more, and/or perturbation of the baseline with continuous deflection of a prolonged activation complex over a 10 s recording period; (2) atrial EGM with a very short cycle length (<120 ms) over a 10 s recording period. CFAE definition does not distinguish between different morphologies; consequently, fractionated EGM according with CFAE definition are not necessarily related to arrhythmogenic substrates. Moreover, several studies have shown conflicting results with Nademanee [56, 59]. This may lead the electrophysiologist to confuse the fractionated EGM that are functional in nature [60] with fractionated EGM corresponding to arrhythmogenic sources, leading to incorrect target sites for ablation. This also makes clinical results difficult to compare. Inconsistent results have been found in different studies using the CFAE concept. Although the concept of CFAE has made a great contribution to the study of AF, it may fail to describe the wide range of fractionation that occurs in the EGM signals in specific cases. Thus, the electrogram‐guided approach by mapping and targeting areas of CFAE is a technique that is still debated [61], and further studies are needed to strengthen the treatment techniques.
To date, indexes computation from EGM is carried out mostly based on the detection of local activation waves and time intervals. However, the concept of EGM fractionation, such as CFAE, defined using time criteria, is not enough to describe the complexity of EGM during AF. Morphological irregularity and temporal variability of the signal must be included. To overcome the limitations of CFAE definition, designation of different degree of fractionation has been proposed based on the perturbation of baseline and the presence of continuous deflection [36]. Some studies have presented evidence linking the vortex of the rotor with a high degree of fractionation in the EGM [36, 47]. However, the patterns of EGM signals associated with the rotors are still unknown, and the development of tools for characterizing fractionated EGM signals is still a current topic. In addition, there is not a standard for description of fractionation degrees, and there are different descriptions in the literature. In order to quantify the behavior of different morphologies of EGM signals and the fractionation degrees, recent studies have helped to understand the concept of EGM fractionation as a nonlinear phenomenon [47, 48, 62]. Mathematical descriptors of the nonlinear dynamical behavior have been used to study cardiac signals and are based on the description of the state of the system and its evolution. If a linear law does not describe the evolution of the system, the dynamics is nonlinear. Thus, indexes and features calculated using nonlinear dynamics theory become an alternative for enhancing assessment of EGM complexity.
2. Simulated atrial fibrillation dynamics
The mathematical modeling of atrial electrophysiology has become a useful method for studying the underlying mechanisms responsible for AF. Different models of human atrial electrophysiology have been published with various formulations of ionic currents and calcium handling, therefore, with different electrophysiological properties [63–67]. In our studies, the transmembrane potential was based on the Courtemanche‐Ramirez‐Nattel and Kneller [63, 68] model of human atrial cell kinetics in the presence of 0.005 μM of acetylcholine (ACh). Based on the experimental data [9, 10, 69], the cell model was modified in order to reproduce electrophysiological conditions of permanent AF: the maximum conductance of delayed rectifier potassium current (

Figure 1.
(A) Action potential under physiological and permanent AF conditions. (B) S1–S2 cross‐field protocol. The plane S1 and rectangular S2 stimulus are shown. (C) Stable rotor under permanent AF conditions. (D) Contour map, the circular point indicates the rotor tip location.
Conductance | Permanent AF |
---|---|
Increased by 100% | |
– | |
Decreased by 50% | |
Decreased by 50% | |
Decreased by 70% |
Table 1.
The development of multi‐dimensional models has allowed representing fibers, pieces of tissue and atrial cavities. These models have served to approach, among other aspects, the biophysics of the action potential propagation under physiological and pathological conditions.
Different studies have developed and implemented two‐dimensional (2D) models of atrial tissue to study the action potential propagation dynamics under physiological and pathological conditions [36, 37, 68, 70].
We have developed a two‐dimensional model of human atrial tissue. The tissue surface was discretized into a 150 × 150 hexahedral mesh (22,500 elements and 45,602 nodes). Spatial resolution was 0.4 mm. The electrical propagation of the atrial action potential was modeled using the monodomain reaction–diffusion equation:
where
The tissue was considered isotropic. A conductivity of 0.3 S/cm was assigned to obtain a realistic conduction velocity of 60 cm/s.
Rotor was generated by S1–S2 cross‐field stimulation protocol. Stimuli pulses were rectangular with 2 ms of duration and 6 mA of amplitude. The S1 was a train of five plane stimuli applied at the left boundary of the model at a basic cycle length of 1000 ms. The S2 stimulus was rectangular (3 × 2 cm) and was applied 40 ms after the last S1 in the inferior left corner of the model (Figure 1B).
A 4s stable clockwise spiral wave (rotor) was observed in the two‐dimensional model after applying the protocol (Figure 1C). The APD shortening due to the atrial remodeling allowed the rotor stability over time. Wijffels et al. [8] in goats demonstrated that maintenance of AF by pacing in the normal goat heart resulted in the development of sustained AF within 1–3 weeks. This observation of tachycardia‐induced electrical remodeling creating a background for persistent AF led to the concept that “Atrial Fibrillation Begets Atrial Fibrillation.” The longer duration and stability of the AF episodes was explained by a shortening of the wavelength of the atrial impulse. The simulated rotor pattern agrees with the “rotor hypothesis” proposed by Jalife [15]. The contour map was implemented to show the core of the rotor (circular point in Figure 1D).
Virtual models of cardiac structures are needed in the study of atrial arrhythmias that are critically dependent on the spatial organization of cardiac structures and fibers. Some atrial arrhythmias, such as AF, need complete structures to perpetuate them. The validity and enormous potential of multi‐scale heart models in improving diagnosis, prevention and therapy of cardiac pathologies are supported by different scientific results. These virtual models have opened new horizons in the study of the complex mechanisms underlying atrial arrhythmias and their treatment, either pharmacological or surgical. The earliest complex atrial models incorporated parts of the anatomical architecture of the atria [72, 73]. During the last few years, a significant number of new models of the animal and human atrial anatomy have been published [44, 74–88]. Some of these models included the atrial fiber architecture observed in histological sections. Studies developed by Seemann et al. [75] and Aslanidi et al. [79] included only the main bundles fiber orientation in their human atrial model. An image‐based anatomical model of the sheep atrial has been published [80] including realistic fiber orientation. The model reproduces the whole atria with highly detailed myofiber architecture. The three‐dimensional models also allow relating the arrhythmic behaviors as focal activity, rotors and multiple wavelet reentries, with their manifestation in the electrograms [44, 81].
A realistic three‐dimensional model of human atria including the main anatomical structures (Figure 2A), electrophysiological heterogeneity, anisotropy (conduction velocity in the direction of myocardial fibers is usually several times larger than that vertical to them), and fiber orientation (Figure 2B) was developed in an earlier work [42]. It includes 52,906 hexahedral elements (polyhedrons with six faces, eight corners or nodes, topologically equivalent to cubes). The mathematical atrial cell model coupled within three‐dimensional (3D) virtual atria model was used to simulate AF dynamics. AF episodes were generated by the S1–S2 stimulation protocol as follows [36]: a train of five stimuli with a basic cycle length of 1000 ms was applied in the sinus node area for a period of 5 s to simulate the atrial sinus rhythm (S1). Based on the study developed by Haissaguerre et al. [13], a burst pacing of 6 ectopic beats to high frequency (S2) at cycle length (CL) of 130 ms was delivered into the right superior pulmonary vein after the last S1.

Figure 2.
(A) Frontal view of the three‐dimensional model of human atria. (B) Fiber orientation. (C) AP for different atrial areas (CT: crista terminalis, PM: pectinate muscles, APG: appendages, AVR: atrioventricular rings, and AWM: atrial working myocardium) under physiological conditions. (D) Activation isochronal maps. Stable rotors located in the posterior wall of the left atrium (#2) and A in the superior vena cava (#1) are showed. A block line can be seen at the right inferior pulmonary vein (#3).
During AF activity initiated by the ectopic activity, it was observed the generation of two rotors of stable activity during 5 s of simulation. One was located in the posterior wall of the left atrium, near the left pulmonary vein (#2 in Figure 2D), and the other was located in the superior vena cava (#1 in Figure 2D). The rotors were generated spontaneously, which is in agreement with the rotor hypothesis [27]. Additionally, a block line located over the inferior right pulmonary vein has been observed (#3 in Figure 2D).
3. Simulated atrial electrograms
Several studies [21, 60, 82–84] have investigated the effects of factors such as slow conduction, anisotropy, conduction blocks, re‐entries, and wave collisions, on the morphology of unipolar and bipolar EGM. However, it is still not entirely clear to what extent these factors contribute to temporal and spatial variations in EGM morphology as observed during AF.
Calculating atrial EGM from the virtual models allows the study of EGM morphology and their relationship with arrhythmogenic sources.
Unipolar EGM are modeled as the register of the extracellular potential measured by a positive polarity electrode whose reference (zero potential) is located at infinity. The distance from the electrode to the surface quantifies the influence area of the electrode, so the closer it is to the tissue, the greater the field uptake. The extracellular potential (
where
Zlochiver et al. [45] investigated the regularity of EGM in the presence of stable rotors, in a two‐dimensional atrial model. Jacquemet et al. [87] in a computer model representing a monolayer of atrial cells concluded that microscale obstacles cause significant changes to EGM waveforms. Using two‐dimensional computer models and cell cultures, Navoret et al. [88] detected CFAE using the criteria of cycle length, number of deflections, and amplitude. They established a relationship between the detected CFAE and the presence of rotors and shock waves, but they failed to differentiate them. Ashihara et al. [89], using a two‐dimensional myocardial sheet of size 4.5 × 4.5 cm, studied the role of fibroblasts in CFAE during AF. Yun et al. [90] reported that CFAE in a homogeneous two‐dimensional AF model were weakly correlated with wave break, phase singularity, and local dominant frequency.
We simulated that in the two‐dimensional atrial model, a total of 22,500 virtual electrodes (150 × 150, one for each element of the model), spaced by 0.4 mm at a distance of 0.2 mm above the atrial surface, unipolar EGM were calculated with temporal resolution of 1 ms.
The 98.9% of EGM, located away from the rotor tip, present simple morphology (Figure 3A). The remaining 1.1% of EGM, located at the rotor tip, exhibits potentials composed by two or more deflections (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.
(A) Regular EGM calculated in ‘*’ from
The mechanism by which fractionation of unipolar EGM occurs in our simulations can be explained as follows: the rotor is a singularity point or phase singularity, when the rotor is stable it pivots around a circular trajectory forming the core of the spiral wave, afterwards the pivot point is affected by the wavefronts from the rotor tip. When the wavefront passes near to the pivot point in each rotation cycle, several electrotonic potentials (nonpropagated local potential) are observed; consequently, irregularity and fractionation arise [36]. Our results are consistent with other studies, in which unipolar EGM symmetry was affected by the wavefront curvature (convex, concave or amorphous) [44] and fractionated unipolar EGM were observed at pivot points (functionally unexcitable core around which the rotor turns) [82]. Umapathy et al. [50] reported that CFAE were located in the region of a rotor tip and sites where wave breaks, using a murine HL‐1 atrial monolayer model.
Most of the in silico studies using three‐dimensional atrial models have characterized the simulated arrhythmias by observing the re‐entrant patterns. Few authors [44] have also calculated EGM in a circular region on the free wall of the right atrium, using the 16 unipolar virtual electrodes on a simplified three‐dimensional model of human atria. They suggested that analysis of the amplitude and symmetry of unipolar atrial electrograms can provide information about the electrophysiological substrate maintaining AF. Hwang et al. [81] calculated bipolar EGM in a personalized three‐dimensional left atrial model in order to applied virtual ablation at CFAE points.
We calculated 42,835 EGM in the whole atrial surface of the three‐dimensional atrial model, over a 4‐s window and recorded at 1 kHz. Bipolar EGM were calculated by subtracting two 1 mm‐spaced adjacent unipolar EGM.
Fractionated atrial EGM were shown to be located in rotor tip areas, when the tip of the rotor turned on this point, displaying low voltage and irregular morphology with potentials composed by two or more deflections (Figure 4A and B). The wavefront of the rotor surrounds the pivot point, without depolarizing it completely, which results in multiple low amplitude deflections in the EGM.

Figure 4.
EGM calculated in the three‐dimensional atrial model, under simulated AF episode. Fractionated EGM corresponding to the rotor in the posterior wall of the left atrium (A) and in the vena cava (B). (C) EGM corresponding to a functional block line. (D) Regular EGM corresponding to plain wavefront.
The EGM corresponding to the block line present fractionation; however, the activation patterns are visible, and their amplitudes are similar to nonfractionated EGM (Figure 4C). The EGM from sites with a plain wavefront are regular with potentials composed by one deflection (Figure 4D).
We identified the area in the posterior wall of the left atrium where the rotor spins (shaded circle in Figure 5A). EGM signals obtained from this area were used. From the selected region of the model, a conversion was made from the three‐dimensional coordinate system to the two‐dimensional coordinate system (

Figure 5.
(A) The area in the posterior wall in the model to obtain bipolar EGM. Samples of two bipolar EGM are shown, a fractionated signal from the rotor tip (B) and a regular activation pattern from nonrotor area (C).
4. Estimation of nonlinear features for electroanatomical mapping
EGM‐guided ablation has been proposed as a strategy to find critical sites of AF as target sites for ablation. Multiple clinical trials have shown that ablation of fractionated electrograms adds no benefit to conventional AF ablation with pulmonary vein isolation [91, 92]. This is likely because sites of electrogram fractionation, according with CFAE definition, not always correlate with sites of arrhythmic drivers and can also represent sites of wavefront collision or slow conduction, among others. Although CFAE may be relevant to detect areas that maintain AF, further characteristics apart from fractionation should be important to identify the atrial sites that maintain AF.
To overcome the limitation of CFAE, nonlinear analysis of EGM signals has been proposed by several authors to analyze the signals using further characteristics apart from time intervals or number of deflection [93, 94]. Nonlinear features are studied using the raw EGM signals, and it is not necessary to detect local activation waves. This is an important property, because in fragmented signals detection of activation waves is not always feasible. Nonlinear features as entropy estimation and fractal analysis are compute over each single EGM, and its value is related to the complexity of the signal.
Nonlinear mathematical tools can be used to quantify the irregularity of a signal. During the last years, measures have been developed to estimate the complexity of biomedical signals. Main goal of these advancements is to provide new theories about the dynamics of biological systems. Such is the case of Kolmogorov‐Sinai entropy, Lempel‐Ziv complexity, and correlation dimension, among others [95]. However, most of the complexity indexes require long time series to obtain reliable and convergent measures. Pincus [96] proposed the statistic approximate entropy (
4.1. Approximate and Shannon entropy definitions
In general words, entropy has been conceived as a measure of the degree of disorganization or irregularity of a process. The most organized the process is, the lower the entropy related to it.
The statistic
we have that
The variable
In previous work, we have reported the use of
Another index that estimates the entropy value from an
where
4.2. Nonlinear features to complexity estimation for building maps: two‐dimensional model case
Nonlinear features such as

Figure 6.
(A) Two‐dimensional ShEn map. ShEn map reconstructed 75% using IDW‐MF (B) and BPANN (C). (D) Log entropy map. (E) Two-dimensional ApEn map. ApEn map reconstructed 75% using IDW-MF (F) and BPANN (G). (H) Log entropy map.
5. Approximate entropy for rotor detection: three‐dimensional model case
Motivated by the features of the
5.1. Approximate entropy for locating critical sites in AF
As stated earlier, our group has performed numerical experiments to assess the regularity of atrial EGM signals by means of the
In order to calculate the

Figure 7.
Three degrees of EGM irregularity and the corresponding ApEn value.
Figure 8 (middle) shows the electroanatomical map of

Figure 8.
ApEn electroanatomical maps for AF episode. The notations R1 and R2 correspond to the tip of rotors at the left atrial posterior wall and superior cava vein.
The fibrillatory activity presented in Figure 8 includes stable rotors that were characterized by the

Figure 9.
Nonoverlapping moving window procedure to obtain ApEn values varying in time.

Figure 10.
Three consecutive frames of propagation (first and second columns) of a meandering rotor and the Pincus parameters ApEn map (third column) and optimized parameters ApEn map (fourth column).
Under the assumptions of our computational model, we provide evidence that the hypotheses stated above: we are able to quantify fragmentation of EGM using the
The fragmented EGM were characterized by means of the
Some authors have pointed out the disadvantages of
5.2. Multifractal analysis of EGM signals
Fluctuations in EGM signals are nonperiodic and exhibit nonlinear behavior. Fractal models could be used to describe this behavior through the identification of self‐similarity and scale invariance in the statistical properties of the signals. Fractal signals present self‐similarities and scale invariance properties that can be described by a single quantity, for example, the Hausdorff dimension or the Hurst exponent, and it is represented using a power law relationship. Fractal properties of physiological signals are not homogeneous, which means that local scaling properties change with time, and there is necessary to use different local Hurts exponent to describe the evolution of the system. Therefore, multifractal analysis could capture these changes in the global singularity distributions [101]. Then, the power law for multifractal behavior is written as follows:
where
To compute the singular spectrum
5.3. Location of simulated rotors using multifractal analysis
Multifractal analysis can be used to calculate features such as h‐fluctuation index and to build electroanatomical maps to located sites fractal or multifractal activity. This measure is related to the complexity of the EGM signals recorded over the atrial surface. In this case, we work with signals recorded from a simulated episode of AF in the three‐dimensional model described above. Figure 11A shows a color map built with the values obtained by the multifractal analysis according with Orozco‐Duque et al. [126]. Here, red dots are locating in regions where the rotor tip is presented in the model, and in the neighborhood of the rotor tip where the tip is meandering.

Figure 11.
(A) Three‐dimensional electroanatomical map using multifractal analysis. (B) Two‐dimensional electroanatomical map using ApEn. (C) Two‐dimensional electroanatomical map using multifractal analysis.
On the other hand, h‐fluctuation index was calculated in EGM signals recorded from the two‐dimensional simulated episode of fibrillatory conduction. For the sake of comparison,
In Figure 11C, multifractal map exhibits an interesting behavior because it captures the dynamic of the whole rotor in the atrial tissue, not only the neighborhood of the tip. One can note that the direction of the rotation is illustrated and can be interpreted using this map.
6. Combination of features in the same EA map
EGM signals exhibit different morphologies that have not been enough studied. An inadequate characterization of EGM morphologies has limited the success of EGM‐guide ablation strategies. Looking for a better description of different EGM patterns, some authors have proposed the combination of features to detect critical sites in AF. This approach has the advantage of use different information from the signals and detects patterns that could be associated with wave collisions, conduction block, or pivot points.
Ravelli et al. [127] used a logical digital map to combined two indexes, one based on the detection of activation rate, the cycle length; and another based on the analysis of similarities between activation waves, the similarity (S). Logical operator map can discriminate two morphologies: rapidly organized and rapidly fragmented. According with Kalifa et al. rapidly organized, EGM could be associated with localized source of AF, while rapidly fragmented could be associated with the neighborhood of a pivot point [52]. One limitation of the approach proposed by Ravelli et al. is that the computation of cycle length and S requires the segmentation of EGM signals and the detection of local activation waves (LAW). This process is not always feasible especially with high‐disorganized patterns.
Schilling et al. proposed an approach based on a classifier called Fuzzy decision tree to combine features and classify the EGM signals among four classes [128]. Classes are assigned according to a modified Well’s criteria, where class 0 corresponds to organized and nonfragmented signal, class 1 is assigned to signals with fragmented waves but periodic activity, class 2 corresponds to signals with fragmented waves with periodic and nonperiodic activity, and class 3 is assigned to signals with high frequency and continuous activity. A limitation for using supervised learning is that the classifier depends on the classes selected by the group who collected the training database. This could be critical and bias the results because there is not a complete understanding about EGM morphologies.
Unsupervised learning has been proposed to combine features and creates maps to show the distribution of EGM cluster according with conduction patterns. We have tested some clustering methods based on machine learning such as K‐means and Self‐Organized Maps (SOM) in previous work. To locate rotors over simulation in two‐dimensional models, the best performance was obtained using the combination of Shannon Entropy and the mean value of the EGM signal as an input of K‐means algorithm with three clusters or the SOM algorithm with four clusters. Figure 12B and C shows the result of K‐means and SOM applied to signals from the two‐dimensional model. The classifiers performance was calculated using the distance between the rotor tip location and the mean of the points grouped by the nearest cluster. These results evince the capability of the combination of simple features using unsupervised algorithms for rotor tip location.

Figure 12.
(A) Electroanatomical map using semisupervised clustering applied to signals from three‐dimensional model. (B) Two‐dimensional electroanatomical map using K‐means. (C) Electroanatomical map using SOM.
The issues related to the clustering approach are the selection of clusters number and the classification of clusters to identify the set of EGM related to a specific pattern. To overcome these limitations, Orozco‐Duque et al. [129] have proposed a semisupervised clustering approach to combine features. Semisupervised clustering (SC) is not limited to previously defined classes. The method selected was spectral clustering with an automatic detection of cluster number. In a previous work, it was tested the performance of SC to discriminated between four classes according with the scheme proposed by Schilling et al. [130]. We tested SC and its feasibility to located pivot points in simulated episodes of AF. We used unipolar signals acquired in an AF simulation using the three‐dimensional model of human atrial. Figure 12A shows a map built from the results of SC evaluation. Four clusters were detected; the cluster that represents regular signals is displayed in blue, and the cluster with the highest disorganized pattern is displayed in red. This cluster is located in the areas where the two rotors meander. The distribution of yellow and green clusters gives us an idea about cluster rotation.
7. Concluding remarks
Phase maps are, currently, the accepted tools for rotor characterization [131], by tracking the tip through the phase singularity. Although it is widely applied in computational studies [132, 133] and in vitro experimentation, such as optical mapping [134, 135], clinical application presents technical limitations: high spatial resolution and EGM require a preprocessing stage in which information of activation can be lost [136]. Here, we have presented how nonlinear features and clustering approaches provide information about the rotor dynamics during AF virtual episodes. Translated to a clinical context, these measures can be extracted from real EGM without needing special signal conditioning. However, our simulations provide high spatial resolution that places the same limitation as phase maps. In a recent report [137], we tested the influence of the spatial resolution over the
Nonlinear features such as
References
- 1.
Wolf PA, Benhamin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, D’Agostino RB. Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: The Framingham study. American Heart Journal. 1996; 131 (4):790-795 - 2.
MiyasakaY, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Seward JB, Bailey KR, Iwasaka T, Tsang TSM. Time trends of ischemic stroke incidence and mortality in patients diagnosed with first atrial fibrillation in 1980-2000: Report of a community‐based study. Stroke. 2005; 36 (11):2362-2366 - 3.
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey J, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Aha ACC, Force T, Smith SC, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Committee ESC, Practice FOR, Priori SG, Blanc J, Budaj A, Camm AJ, Dean V, Deckers JW, Morais J, Osterspey A, Zamorano JL. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006; 114 (7):700-752 - 4.
Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: Population‐based estimates. American Journal of Cardiology. 1998; 82 (8A):2N‐9N - 5.
Nattel S. New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature. 2002; 415 (6868):219-226 - 6.
Voigt N, Maguy A, Yeh YH, Qi X, Ravens U, Dobrev D, Nattel S. Changes in IK, ACh single‐channel activity with atrial tachycardia remodelling in canine atrial cardiomyocytes. Cardiovascular Research. 2008; 77 (1):35-43 - 7.
Ausma J, Van der Velden HMW, Lenders MH, Van Ankeren EP, Jongsma HJ, Ramaekers FCS, Borgers M, Allessie MA. Reverse structural and gap‐junctional remodeling after prolonged atrial fibrillation in the goat. Circulation. 2003; 107 (15):2051-2058 - 8.
Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995; 92 (7):1954-1968 - 9.
Workman AJ, Kane KA, Rankin AC. The contribution of ionic currents to changes in refractoriness of human atrial myocytes associated with chronic atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research. 2001; 52 (2):226-235 - 10.
Bosch RF, Zeng X, Grammer JB, Popovic K, Mewis C, Kühlkamp V. Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research. 1999; 44 (1):121-131 - 11.
Nattel S, Burstein B, Dobrev D. Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and implications. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2008; 1 (1):62-73 - 12.
Allessie MA. Atrial electrophysiologic remodeling: Another vicious circle? Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 1998; 9 (12):1378-1393 - 13.
HaissaguerreM, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Métayer P, Clémenty J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998; 339 (10):659-666 - 14.
Mandapati R, Skanes A, Chen J, Berenfeld O, Jalife J. Stable microreentrant sources as a mechanism of atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation. 2000; 101 (2):194-199 - 15.
JalifeJ. Rotors and spiral waves in atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2003; 14 (7):776-780 - 16.
Chen SA, Hsieh MH, Tai CT, Tsai CF, Prakash VS, Yu WC, Hsu TL, Ding YA, Chang MS. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: Electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1999; 100 (18):1879-1886 - 17.
Chen YJ, Chen SA, Chang MS, Lin CI. Arrhythmogenic activity of cardiac muscle in pulmonary veins of the dog: Implication for the genesis of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research. 2000; 48 (2):265-273 - 18.
Veenhuyzen GD, Simpson CS, Abdollah H. Atrial fibrillation. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2004; 171 (7):755-760 - 19.
Weiss JN, Qu Z, Shivkumar K. Ablating atrial fibrillation: A translational science perspective for clinicians. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (9):1868-1877 - 20.
de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, Prins MH, Tieleman RG, Coelen RJS, van den Heijkant AC, Allessie MA, Crijns HJGM. Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation. Clinical Correlates and Prognosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 55 (8):725-731 - 21.
De Groot NMS, Schalij MJ. Fragmented, long‐duration, low‐amplitude electrograms characterize the origin of focal atrial tachycardia. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2006; 17 (10):1086-1092 - 22.
Pison L, Tilz R, Jalife J, Haissaguerre M. Pulmonary vein triggers, focal sources, rotors and atrial cardiomyopathy: Implications for the choice of the most effective ablation therapy. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2016; 279 (5):449-456 - 23.
Sanders P, Berenfeld O, Hocini M, Jaïs P, Vaidyanathan R, Hsu L‐F, Garrigue S, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Sacher F, Scavée C, Ploutz‐Snyder R, Jalife J, Haïssaguerre M. Spectral analysis identifies sites of high‐frequency activity maintaining atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2005; 112 (6):789-797 - 24.
Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Shivkumar K, Clopton P, Rappel WJ, Miller JM. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 60 (7):628-636 - 25.
Hansen BJ, Zhao J, Csepe TA, Moore BT, Li N, Jayne LA, Kalyanasundaram A, Lim P, Bratasz A, Powell KA, Simonetti OP, Higgins RSD, Kilic A, Mohler P, Janssen JPML, Weiss R, Hummel JD, Fedorov VV. Atrial fibrillation driven by micro‐anatomic intramural re‐entry revealed by simultaneous sub‐epicardial and sub‐endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. European Heart Journal. 2015; 36 (35):2390-2401 - 26.
Mansour M, Mandapati R, Berenfeld O, Chen J, Samie FH, Jalife J. Left‐to‐right gradient of atrial frequencies during acute atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation. 2001; 103 (21):2631-2636 - 27.
Jalife J, Berenfeld O, Mansour M. Mother rotors and fibrillatory conduction: A mechanism of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research. 2002; 54 (2):204-216 - 28.
Climent AM, Guillem MS, Fuentes L, Lee P, Bollensdorff C, Fernandez‐Santos ME, Suarez‐Sancho S, Sanz‐Ruiz R, Sanchez PL, Atienza F, Fernandez‐Aviles F. The role of atrial tissue remodeling on rotor dynamics: An in‐vitro study. The American Journal of Physiology‐Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2015; 309 :H1964‐H1973 - 29.
Skanes AC, Mandapati R, Berenfeld O, Davidenko JM, Jalife J. Spatiotemporal periodicity during atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation. 1998; 98 (12):1236-1248 - 30.
Wieser L, Nowak CN, Tilg B, Fischer G. Mother rotor anchoring in branching tissue with heterogeneous membrane properties. Biomedical Technician Education. 2008; 53 (1):25-35 - 31.
Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Rappel WJ. Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillation, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2012; 23 (5):447-454 - 32.
Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Denis A, Shah AJ, Komatsu Y, Yamashita S, Daly M, Amraoui S, Zellerhoff S, Picat MQ, Quotb A, Jesel L, Lim H, Ploux S, Bordachar P, Attuel G, Meillet V, Ritter P, Derval N, Sacher F, Bernus O, Cochet H, Jais P, Dubois R. Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014; 130 (7):530-538 - 33.
Narayan SM, Patel J, Mulpuru S, Krummen DE. Focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation of sustaining rotors abruptly terminates persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm with elimination of follow‐up: A video case study. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (9):1436-1439 - 34.
Narayan SM, Shivkumar K, Krummen DE, Miller JM, Rappel WJ. Panoramic electrophysiological mapping but not electrogram morphology identifies stable sources for human atrial fibrillation: Stable atrial fibrillation rotors and focal sources relate poorly to fractionated electrograms. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6 (1):58-67 - 35.
Reumann M, Bohnert J, Osswald B, Hagl S, Doessel O. Multiple wavelets, rotors, and snakes in atrial fibrillation‐a computer simulation study. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2007; 40 (4):328-334 - 36.
UgarteJ P, Orozco‐Duque ACTN, Kremen V, Novak D, Saiz J, Oesterlein T, Schmitt C, Luik A, Bustamante J. Dynamic approximate entropy electroanatomic maps detect rotors in a simulated atrial fibrillation model. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (12):e114577. - 37.
Calvo CJ, Deo M, Zlochiver S, Millet J, Berenfeld O. Attraction of rotors to the pulmonary veins in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A modeling study. Biophysical Journal. 2014; 106 (8):1811-1821 - 38.
Gonzales MJ, Vincent KP, Rappel WJ, Narayan SM, McCulloch AD. Structural contributions to fibrillatory rotors in a patient‐derived computational model of the atria. Europace. 2014; 16 :iv3‐iv10 - 39.
Nademanee K, Lockwood E, Oketani N, Gidney B. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram mapping of atrial fibrillation substrate. Journal of Cardiology. 2010; 55 (1):1-12 - 40.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 64 (21):e1‐e76 - 41.
Bhargava M, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Prasad S, Martin DO, Williams‐Andrews M, Wazni OM, Burkhardt JD, Cummings JE, Khaykin Y, Verma A, Hao S, Beheiry S, Hongo R, Rossillo A, Raviele A, Bonso A, Themistoclakis S, Stewart K, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Natale A. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation and repeat catheter ablation on long‐term freedom from atrial fibrillation: Results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (10):1403-1412 - 42.
TobónC, Ruiz‐Villa CA, Heidenreich E, Romero L, Hornero F, Saiz J. A three‐dimensional human atrial model with fiber orientation. Electrograms and arrhythmic activation patterns relationship. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (2):e50883 - 43.
Song JS, Lee YS, Hwang M, Lee JK, Li C, Joung B, Lee MH, Shim EB, Pak HN. Spatial reproducibility of complex fractionated atrial electrogram depending on the direction and configuration of bipolar electrodes: An in‐silico modeling study. Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2016; 20 (5):507-514 - 44.
Jacquemet V, Virag N, Ihara Z, Dang L, Blanc O, Zozor S, Vesin JM, Kappenberger L, Henriquez CS. Study of unipolar electrogram morphology in a computer model of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2003; 14 (10 Suppl):S172‐S179 - 45.
Zlochiver S, Yamazaki M, Kalifa J, Berenfeld O. Rotor meandering contributes to irregularity in electrograms during atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5 (6):846-854 - 46.
Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, Khunnawat C, Ngarmukos T. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004; 43 (11):2044-2053 - 47.
Ganesan AN, Kuklik P, Lau DH, Brooks AG, Baumert M, Lim WW, Thanigaimani S, Nayyar S, Mahajan R, Kalman JM, Roberts‐Thomson KC, Sanders P. Bipolar electrogram Shannon entropy at sites of rotational activation: Implications for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6 (1):48-57 - 48.
Navoret N, Jacquir S, Laurent G, Binczak S. Detection of complex fractionated atrial electrograms using recurrence quantification analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2013; 60 (7):1975-1982 - 49.
Navoret N, Jacquir S, Laurent G, Binczak S. Relationship between complex fractionated atrial electrogram patterns and different heart substrate configurations materials numerical cell models method, the modelled catheter is a thermocool irrigated tip. Computing in Cardiology. 2012; 39 :893-896 - 50.
Umapathy K, Masse S, Kolodziejska K, Veenhuyzen GD, Chauhan VS, Husain M, Farid T, Downar E, Sevaptsidis E, Nanthakumar K. Electrogram fractionation in murine HL‐1 atrial monolayer model. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5 (7):1029-1035 - 51.
Lin YJ, Tsao HM, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Chang CJ, Tsai WC, Suenari K, Huang SY, Chang HY, Wu TJ, Chen SA. Role of high dominant frequency sites in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation patients: Insights from high‐density frequency and fractionation mapping. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (9):1255-1262 - 52.
Kalifa J, Tanaka K, Zaitsev AV, Warren M, Vaidyanathan R, Auerbach D, Pandit S, Vikstrom KL, Ploutz‐Snyder R, Talkachou A, Atienza F, Guiraudon G, Jalife J, Berenfeld O. Mechanisms of wave fractionation at boundaries of high‐frequency excitation in the posterior left atrium of the isolated sheep heart during atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006; 113 (5):626-633 - 53.
Berenfeld O, Mandapati R, Dixit S, Skanes AC, Chen JAY, Mansour M, Jalife J. Spatially distributed dominant excitation frequencies reveal hidden organization in atrial fibrillation in the Langendorff‐perfused sheep heart. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2000; 11 (8):869-879 - 54.
Lazar S, Dixit S, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, Gerstenfeld EP. Presence of left‐to‐right atrial frequency gradient in paroxysmal but not persistent atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2004; 110 (20):3181-3186 - 55.
Sanders P, Nalliah CJ, Dubois R, Takahashi Y, Hocini M, Rotter M, Rostock T, Sacher F, Hsu LF, Jonsson A, O’Neill MD, Jais P, Haissaguerre M. Frequency mapping of the pulmonary veins in paroxysmal versus permanent atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2006; 17 (9):965-972 - 56.
Oral H, Chugh A, Good E, Wimmer A, Dey S, Gadeela N, Sankaran S, Crawford T, Sarrazin JF, Kuhne M, Chalfoun N, Wells D, Frederick M, Fortino J, Benloucif‐Moore S, Jongnarangsin K, Pelosi F, Bogun F, Morady F. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation guided by complex electrograms. Circulation. 2007; 115 (20):2606-2612 - 57.
Gupta AK, Maheshwari A, Thakur R, Lokhandwala YY. Cardiac mapping: Utility or futility? Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2002; 2 (1):20-32 - 58.
Reddy VY. Atrial fibrillation: Unanswered questions and future directions. Cardiology Clinics. 2009; 27 (1):201-216 - 59.
Chen J, Lin Y, Chen L, Yu J, Du Z, Li S, Yang Z, Zeng C, Lai X, Lu Q, Tian B, Zhou J, Xu J, Zhang A, Li Z. A decade of complex fractionated electrograms catheter‐based ablation for atrial fibrillation: Literature analysis, meta‐analysis and systematic review. IJC Heart & Vessels. 2014; 4 (1):63-72 - 60.
Jadidi AS, Duncan E, Miyazaki S, Lellouche N, Shah AJ, Forclaz A, Nault I, Wright M, Rivard L, Liu X, Scherr D, Wilton SB, Derval N, Knecht S, Kim SJ. Functional nature of electrogram fractionation demonstrated by left atrial high‐density mapping. 2012; 5 (1):32-42 - 61.
De Bakker JMT, Wittkampf FHM. The pathophysiologic basis of fractionated and complex electrograms and the impact of recording techniques on their detection and interpretation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2010; 3 (2):204-213 - 62.
CiaccioEJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Garan H. Identification of recurring patterns in fractionated atrial electrograms using new transform coefficients. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2012; 11 (1):4 - 63.
Courtemanche M, Ramirez RJ, Nattel S. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: Insights from a mathematical model. The American Journal of Physiology‐Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1998; 275 :H301‐H321 - 64.
Nygren I, Fiset C, Firek L, Clark JW, Lindblad DS, Clark RB, Giles WR. Mathematical model of an adult human atrial cell: The role of K+ currents in repolarization. Circulation Research. 1998; 82 (1):63-81 - 65.
Maleckar MM, Greenstein JL, Trayanova NA, Giles WR. Mathematical simulations of ligand‐gated and cell‐type specific effects on the action potential of human atrium. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology. 2008; 98 (2-3):161-170 - 66.
Koivumaki JT, Korhonen T, Tavi P. Impact of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release on calcium dynamics and action potential morphology in human atrial myocytes: A computational study. PLoS Computational Biology. 2011; 7 (1):e1001067 - 67.
Grandi E, Pandit SV, Voigt N, Workman AJ, Dobrev D, Jalife J, Bers DM. Human atrial action potential and Ca2+ model: Sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation Research. 2011; 109 (9):1055-1066 - 68.
Kneller J, Zou R, Vigmond EJ, Wang Z, Leon LJ, Nattel S. Cholinergic atrial fibrillation in a computer model of a two‐dimensional sheet of canine atrial cells with realistic ionic properties. Circulation Research. 2002; 90 (9):E73–E87 - 69.
Van Wagoner DR. Electrophysiological remodeling in human atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2003; 26 (7 Pt 2):1572-1575 - 70.
Pandit S, Berenfeld O, Anumonwo JMB, Zaritski RM, Kneller J, Nattel S, Jalife J. Ionic determinants of functional reentry in a 2‐D model of human atrial cells during simulated chronic atrial fibrillation. Biophysical Journal. 2005; 88 (6):3806-3821 - 71.
Heidenreich EA, Ferrero JM, Doblaré M, Rodríguez JF. Adaptive macro finite elements for the numerical solution of monodomain equations in cardiac electrophysiology. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2010; 38 (7):2331-2345 - 72.
Harrild D, Henriquez C. A computer model of normal conduction in the human atria. Circulation Research. 2000; 87 (7):E25–E36 - 73.
Sachse FB, Frech R, Werner CD, Dossel O. A model based approach to assignment of myocardial fibre orientation. Computers in Cardiology. 1999; 26 :145-148 - 74.
Tobón C, Rodríguez JF, Ferrero JM, Hornero F, Saiz J. Dominant frequency and organization index maps in a realistic three‐dimensional computational model of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2012; 14 :v25‐v32 - 75.
Seemann G, Höper C, Sachse FB, Dössel O, Holden AV, Zhang H. Heterogeneous three‐dimensional anatomical and electrophysiological model of human atria. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences. 2006; 364 (1843):1465-1481 - 76.
Dang L, Virag N, Ihara Z, Jacquemet V, Vesin JM, Schlaepfer J, Ruchat P, Kappenberger L. Evaluation of ablation patterns using a biophysical model of atrial fibrillation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2005; 33 (4):465-474 - 77.
Kharche S, Zhang H. Simulating the effects of atrial fibrillation induced electrical remodeling: a comprehensive simulation study. Conference Proceedings: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2008; 2008 :593-596 - 78.
Dössel O, Krueger MW, Weber FM, Wilhelms M, Seemann G. Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2012; 50 (8):773-799 - 79.
Aslanidi OV, Colman MA, Stott J, Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Holden AV, Zhang H. 3D virtual human atria: A computational platform for studying clinical atrial fibrillation. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology. 2011; 107 (1):156-168 - 80.
Zhao J, Butters TD, Zhang H, Pullan AJ, LeGrice IJ, Sands GB, Smaill BH. An image‐based model of atrial muscular architecture effects of structural anisotropy on electrical activation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2012; 5 (2):361-370 - 81.
Hwang M, Song JS, Lee YS, Li C, Shim EB, Pak HN. Electrophysiological rotor ablation in in‐silico modeling of atrial fibrillation: Comparisons with dominant frequency, Shannon entropy, and phase singularity. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (2):1-15 - 82.
Konings KT, Smeets JL, Penn OC, Wellens HJ, Allessie MA. Configuration of unipolar atrial electrograms during electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 1997; 95 (5):1231-1241 - 83.
Chorro FJ, Ferrero A, Canoves J, Mainar L, Porres JC, Navarro A, Sanchis J, Millet J, Bodí V, López‐Merino V, Such L. Significance of the morphological patterns of electrograms recorded during ventricular fibrillation: An experimental study. PACE—Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2003; 26 (5);1262‐1269 - 84.
Kirubakaran S, Chowdhury RA,. Hall MCS, Patel PM, Garratt CJ, Peters NS. Fractionation of electrograms is caused by colocalized conduction block and connexin disorganization in the absence of fibrosis as AF becomes persistent in the goat model. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (2):397-408 - 85.
Ferrero JM, Ferrero JMJ, Saiz J, Arnau A. Bioelectrónica. Señales Bioeléctricas. 1994 - 86.
Clayton RH, Holden AV. Propagation of normal beats and re‐entry in a computational model of ventricular cardiac tissue with regional differences in action potential shape and duration. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2004; 85 (2-3);473-499 - 87.
Jacquemet V, Henriquez CS. Genesis of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in zones of slow conduction: A computer model of microfibrosis. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (6):803-810 - 88.
Navoret N, Xu B, Jacquir S, Binczak S. Comparison of complex fractionated atrial electrograms at cellular scale using numerical and experimental models. Conference Proceedings: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2010; 2010 :3249-3252 - 89.
Ashihara T, Haraguchi R, Nakazawa K, Namba T, Ikeda T, Nakazawa Y, Ozawa T, Ito M, Horie M, Trayanova NA. The role of fibroblasts in complex fractionated electrograms during persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation: Implications for electrogram‐based catheter ablation. Circulation Research. 2012; 110 (2):275-284 - 90.
Yun Y, Hwang M, Park JH, Shin H, Shim EB, Pak HN. The relationship among complex fractionated electrograms, wavebreak, phase singularity, and local dominant frequency in fibrillation wave‐dynamics: A modeling comparison study. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2014; 29 (3):370-377 - 91.
Verma A, Sanders P, Macle L, Deisenhofer I, Morillo CA, Chen J, Jiang C, Ernst S, Mantovan R. Substrate and trigger ablation for reduction of a trial fibrillation trial‐part II (STAR AF II): Design and rationale. American Heart Journal. 2012; 164 (1):1-6.e6 - 92.
Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, Schreiber D, Lüker J, Servatius H, Schäffer B, Moser J, Hoffmann BA, Steven D. Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation the CHASE‐AF clinical trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 66 (24);2743-2752 - 93.
LinYJ, Lo MT, Lin C, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Hsieh WH, Chang HY, Lin WY, Chung FP, Liao JN, Chen YY, Hanafy D, Huang NE, Chen SA. Prevalence, characteristics, mapping, and catheter ablation of potential rotors in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6 (5):851-858 - 94.
Novák D, Kremen V, Cuesta D, Schmidt K, Chudácek V, Lhotská L. Discrimination of endocardial electrogram disorganization using a signal regularity analysis. Conference Proceedings: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2009;( 2009 ):1812-1815 - 95.
Kinsner W, Chen H. Estimating multifractal measures. In Proceedings of 1996 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. 1996. pp. 716-719 - 96.
Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1991; 88 (6):2297-2301 - 97.
Lake DE. Improved entropy rate estimation in physiological data. Conference Proceedings: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2011;( 2011 ):1463-1466 - 98.
Chen W, Wang Z, Xie H, Yu W. Characterization of surface EMG signal based on fuzzy entropy. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2007; 15 (2):266-272 - 99.
Jiang Y, Peng CK, Xu Y. Hierarchical entropy analysis for biological signals. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2011; 236 (5):728-742 - 100.
Ugarte J, Orozco‐Duque A, Tobón C, Kremen V, Novak D. Dynamic approximate entropy electroanatomic maps detect rotors in a simulated atrial fibrillation model. PLoS One. 2014;1-19 - 101.
Orozco‐Duque A, Novak D, Kremen V, Bustamante J. Multifractal analysis for grading complex fractionated electrograms in atrial fibrillation. Physiological Measurement. 2015; 36 (11):2269-2284 - 102.
Murillo‐Escobar J, Becerra MA, Cardona EA, Tobón C, Palacio LC, Valdés BE, Orrego DA. Reconstruction of Multi Spatial Resolution Feature Maps on a 2D Model of Atrial Fibrillation: Simulation Study. IFMBE proceedings. 2015; 49 :623-626 - 103.
Chen FW, Liu CW. Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy and Water Environment. 2012; 10 (3):209-222 - 104.
Vijayarajan R, Muttan S. Influence of iterative relaxed median filter over FCM clustering in MR images. India Conference (INDICON). 2011. pp. 1-4 - 105.
Babaee A, Shahrtash SM, Najafipour A. Comparing the trustworthiness of signal‐to‐noise ratio and peak signal‐to‐noise ratio in processing noisy partial discharge signals. IET Science, Measurement & Technology. 2013; 7 (2):112-118 - 106.
Mohktar MS, Ibrahim F, Ismail NA. Non‐invasive approach to predict the cholesterol level in blood using bioimpedance and neural network techniques. 2013; 25 (6):1-7 - 107.
Kipli K, Muhammad MS, Masniah S, Masra W. Performance of Levenberg‐Marquardt backpropagation for full reference hybrid image quality metrics. 2012; I :14-17 - 108.
Hassan M, Terrien J, Marque C, Karlsson B. Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: Application to uterine electromyogram signals. Medical Engineering Physics. 2011; 33 (8):980-986 - 109.
Ning X, Xu Y, Wang J, Ma X. Approximate entropy analysis of short‐term HFECG based on wave mode. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2005; 346 (3-4):475-483 - 110.
Rigoldi C, Cimolin V, Camerota F, Celletti C, Albertini G, Mainardi L, Galli M. Measuring regularity of human postural sway using approximate entropy and sample entropy in patients with Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome hypermobility type. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2013; 34 (2):840-846 - 111.
Valenza G, Allegrini P, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP. Dominant lyapunov exponent and approximate entropy in heart rate variability during emotional visual elicitation. Frontiers in Neuroengineering. 2012; 5 (February):3 - 112.
Wu HT, Liu CC, Lo MT, Hsu PC, Liu AB, Chang KY, Tang CJ. Multiscale cross‐approximate entropy analysis as a measure of complexity among the aged and diabetic. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2013:324325 - 113.
Pincus S, Singer BH. Randomness and degrees of irregularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996; 93 (5):2083-2088 - 114.
Molina‐Picó A, Cuesta‐Frau D, Aboy M, Crespo C, Miró‐Martínez P, Oltra‐Crespo S. Comparative study of approximate entropy and sample entropy robustness to spikes. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2011; 53 (2):97-106 - 115.
Ugarte J, Orozco‐Duque A, Tobón C, Kremen V, Novak D, Saiz J, Oesterlein T, Schmitt C, Luik A, Bustamante J. Dynamic approximate entropy electroanatomic maps detect rotors in a simulated atrial fibrillation model. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (12):e114577 - 116.
Sanjiv M, Narayan M, Wright M, Derval N, Jadidi A, Forclaz A, Nault I, Miyazaki S, Sacher F, Bordachar P, Clémenty J, Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Hocini M. Classifying fractionated electrograms in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials and activation mapping: Evidence for localized drivers, rate acceleration, and nonlocal signal etiologies. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (2):244-253 - 117.
Kremen V. Automated Assessment of Endocardial Electrograms Fractionation in Human. Czech Technical University in Prague. 2008 - 118.
Ohara T, Ohara KJ, Cao M, Lee MH, Fishbein MC, Mandel WJP, Chen S, Karagueuzian HS. Increased wave break during ventricular fibrillation in the epicardial border zone of hearts with healed myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001; 103 (10):1465-1472 - 119.
Oketani N, Ichiki H, Iriki Y, Okui H, Ryuichi M, Fuminori N, Ninomiya Y, Ishida S, Hamasaki S, Tei C. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram mapping with or without pulmonary vein isolation. Journal of Arrhythmia. 2012; 28 (6):311-323 - 120.
Zeemering S, Maesen B, Nijs J, Lau H, Granier M, Verheule S, Schotten U. Automated quantification of atrial fibrillation complexity by probabilistic electrogram analysis and fibrillation wave reconstruction. 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2012. pp. 6357-6360 - 121.
Kim AM, Olgin JE. Microfibrosis and complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (6):811-812 - 122.
Alcaraz R, Rieta JJ. A review on sample entropy applications for the non‐invasive analysis of atrial fibrillation electrocardiograms. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2010; 5 (1):1-14 - 123.
Richman JS, Moorman JR. Physiological time‐series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. The American Journal of Physiology‐Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2000; 278 (6):H2039‐H2049 - 124.
Zurek S, Guzik P, Pawlak S, Kosmider M, Piskorski J. On the relation between correlation dimension, approximate entropy and sample entropy parameters, and a fast algorithm for their calculation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2012; 391 (24):6601-6610 - 125.
Ihlen EAF. Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab. Frontiers in Physiology. 2012; 3 (June):141 - 126.
Orozco‐Duque A, Ugarte JP, Tobon C, Saiz J, Bustamante J, Gi B, Tecnol I, Val D. Approximate entropy can localize rotors, but not ectopic foci during chronic atrial fibrillation: A simulation study. Computers in Cardiology. 2010; 2013 :903-906 - 127.
Ravelli F, Masè M, Cristoforetti A, Marini M, Disertori M. The logical operator map identifies novel candidate markers for critical sites in patients with atrial fibrillation. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology. 2014;( 115 ):186-197 - 128.
Schilling C, Keller M, Scherr D, Oesterlein T, Haïssaguerre M, Schmitt C, Dössel O, Luik A. Fuzzy decision tree to classify complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering. 2015 - 129.
Orozco‐Duque A, Bustamante J, Castellanos‐Dominguez G. Semi‐supervised clustering of fractionated electrograms for electroanatomical atrial mapping. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2016; 15 (1):44 - 130.
Schilling A. Analysis of Atrial Electrograms. Karlrsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing; 2012. p. 17 - 131.
Clayton RH, Nash MP. Analysis of cardiac fibrillation using phase mapping. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics. 2015; 7 (1):49-58 - 132.
McDowell KS, Zahid S, Vadakkumpadan F, Blauer J, MacLeod RS, Trayanova NA. Virtual electrophysiological study of atrial fibrillation in fibrotic remodeling. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (2):e0117110 - 133.
Fenton FH, Cherry EM, Hastings HM, Evans SJ. Multiple mechanisms of spiral wave breakup in a model of cardiac electrical activity. Chaos. 2002; 12 (3):852-892 - 134.
Bray MA, Lin SF, Aliev RR, Roth BJ, Wikswo JP. Experimental and theoretical analysis of phase singularity dynamics in cardiac tissue. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2001; 12 (6):716-722 - 135.
Attin M, Clusin WT. Basic concepts of optical mapping techniques in cardiac electrophysiology. Biological Research for Nursing. 2009; 11 (2):195-207 - 136.
Nash MP, Mourad A, Clayton RH, Sutton PM, Bradley CP, Hayward M, Paterson DJ, Taggart P. Evidence for multiple mechanisms in human ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2006; 114 (6):536-542 - 137.
Ugarte JP, Tobón C, Orozco‐Duque A, Becerra MA, Bustamante J. Effect of the electrograms density in detecting and ablating the tip of the rotor during chronic atrial fibrillation: An in silico study. Europace. 2015; 17 :ii97‐ii104