Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Neonatal Gene Therapy for Inherited Disorders

Written By

Koichi Miyake, Noriko Miyake and Takashi Shimada

Submitted: 20 October 2016 Reviewed: 13 April 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69218

From the Edited Volume

Selected Topics in Neonatal Care

Edited by R. Mauricio Barría

Chapter metrics overview

1,405 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


In spite of developments of neonatal intensive care medicine, it is still difficult or impossible to treat several inherited genetic disorders using conventional pharmacological methods. Gene therapy is a promising alternate approach for treating a variety of genetic disorders. By the time the patient reaches adulthood, however, it is often too late for effective treatment. But in several of these cases, neonatal gene therapy appears potentially useful against inherited disorders that are not obviously treatable through any other methods. This chapter describes the strategy for neonatal gene therapy for inherited disorders and presents preclinical neonatal gene therapy data for two inherited disorders, metachromatic leukodystrophy and hypophosphatasia. We also discuss the utility, advantages, problems and potential of neonatal gene therapy for inherited disorders.


  • neonatal gene therapy
  • AAV vectors
  • metachromatic leukodystrophy
  • hypophosphatasia

1. Introduction

Although there have been significant advances in neonatal intensive care medicine, several neonatal disorders remain major causes of mortality and morbidity. Consequently, there is an urgent need for development of new safe and effective therapies to improve the outcomes of these intractable and devastating neonatal disorders. Gene therapy is an exciting and promising approach to treat many diseases for which there are still no effective therapies. To date, more than 2400 clinical trials of gene therapy protocols have been attempted in effort to treat various genetic diseases as well as many types of cancers and infectious diseases ( The results of preclinical studies suggest that neonatal gene therapies represent potentially effective treatments for currently intractable neonatal disorders [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. However, although neonatal gene therapies have several advantages over similar therapies used in adult patients, there is as yet no clinical protocol for use of gene therapy in newborn infants. This chapter describes a strategy for the use of neonatal gene therapy in the treatment of inherited disorders and presents preclinical neonatal gene therapy data for two inherited disorders, metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) and hypophosphatasia (HPP). We also discuss the utility, advantages, problems and the potential of neonatal gene therapeutic approaches for the treatment of inherited disorders.


2. Adeno‐associated virus‐mediated gene transfer to neonate

Among the numerous viral and nonviral vectors that have been developed to deliver genes of interest into target cells, adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vector has emerged as a particularly promising tool for gene delivery, thanks to its safety (AAV is not pathogenic) and its ability to transduce nondividing cells [7, 8, 9]. We are now using several AAV vector serotypes (mainly 1–12), depending on the target [10, 11, 12, 13]. Figure 1 shows the results after intravenous injection into neonatal mice of AAV vector serotypes 1, 8 and 9, harboring the luciferase gene. Expression of luciferase was detected within 3 days and continued for more than 16 weeks with no decrease in expression. Serotype 9 mediated the highest expression during the observation period (Figure 1A, B). In addition, using an AAV vector encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), we determined that the organs most efficiently transduced are the liver, heart and muscle (Figure 1C). Moreover, although transduction efficiency was not as high, the central nervous system (CNS) was also transduced after intravenous injection of AAV vector, which apparently passes through the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) [14] in neonatal mice [15]. Thus, a systemically administered AAV vector was able to transduce several important target organs in neonatal mice, including the CNS, and mediate expression of a gene of interest for a prolonged period of time.

Figure 1.

Systemic intravenous injection of AAV vectors into neonatal mice. (A) Approximately 5.0 × 1011 vector genomes (vg) of recombinant AAV vectors encoding the luciferase gene (AAV/Luc) (serotype 1, 8, 9) were injected into the external jugular vein of neonatal mice using a syringe with a 29‐G needle. Bioluminescent images of mice were obtained using a Xenogen IVIS imaging system 3 days and 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after administration. Color scale bar indicates radiant efficiency (photons s−1 cm−2 steradian−1 per µW cm−2). (B) Radiant efficiency of serotype 1 (blue), 8 (red), and 9 (green) AAV vectors injected mice was quantified. (C) Approximately 5.0 × 1011 vg of AAV vectors encoding green fluorescent protein (serotype 1, 8, 9) were injected into the external jugular vein of neonatal mice. Sixteen weeks after injection, liver, heart and muscle were stained with anti‐GFP antibody.


3. Advantages of neonatal gene therapy

Systemic gene transfer to neonates has several advantages over treatment of the adults (Table 1). First, as mentioned above, neonatal gene therapy has the potential to overcome the limitation imposed by the BBB on treating genetic disorders of the CNS. Because the BBB is developmentally immature during the perinatal period, AAV‐mediated neonatal gene therapy is a highly promising strategy for treating genetic neurological diseases. Second, because the immune system is immature, neonates are immunologically tolerant of the transgene and/or viral vector [16, 17, 18]. Immune rejection of the transgene product by neutralizing antibodies is a severe problem for gene therapy in adults. Third, treatment administered soon after birth may enable prevention of early‐onset genetic disease. Finally, neonates can be effectively treated with a smaller amount of viral vector than adults. Using smaller amounts of viral vector is superior with respect to both safety and cost. Taken together, these advantages make systemic neonatal gene therapy a promising method for treating systemic genetic diseases.

  • Penetrates the blood‐brain barrier

  • Induces immune tolerance

  • Prevents early‐onset genetic diseases

  • Enables the use of smaller amounts of vector

Table 1.

Advantages of neonatal gene therapy.


4. Application of neonatal gene therapy

4.1. Neonatal gene therapy for metachromatic leukodystrophy

Metachromatic leukodystrophy is an inherited, autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease (LSD) caused by a deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme arylsulfatase A (ASA), which catalyzes the degradation of galactosyl‐3‐sulfate ceramide (sulfatide (Sulf)), a major myelin sphingolipid [19]. This disease is characterized by myelin degeneration, mainly in the CNS, and clinically by progressive motor and mental deterioration that is ultimately lethal. Therefore, the major target organ for treatment of this disease is the CNS, and the aim is to arrest or reverse the progression of the neurological symptoms. A major obstacle, however, is the BBB, which limits delivery of systemically administered therapeutic molecules to the brain [14]. It is therefore hoped that systemic administration of an AAV vector harboring ASA during the neonatal period would be useful for treating the CNS. We previously showed that a single systemic injection of AAV vector encoding human ASA (AAV/hASA) into neonatal ASA knockout (MLD) mice results in the wide distribution of ASA in the brain and correction of the biochemical and neurological phenotypes [20]. Figure 2A shows that a single systemic injection of AAV/hASA enables transduction of the CNS in neonates but not in adults. Efficient hASA expression was detected in the brain of AAV/hASA treated at the neonatal period of MLD mice. PCR analysis confirmed that AAV vector genome was observed only in neonatal‐treated MLD mice. Moreover, sustained expression of hASA in plasma was detected for at least 30 weeks after intravenous injection into neonatal MLD mice, while only transient increase in plasma hASA was obtained when injected into either adult MLD mice or wild‐type C57Bl/6 mice (Figure 2B). Vector injection into adult NOD‐SCID mice led to sustained secretion of hASA into the circulation, suggesting that immune responses to hASA are a major hurdle for successful gene therapy in immunocompetent adult MLD mice. It thus appears that the systemic injection of AAV vector during the neonatal period is a potentially useful means of treating neurological disorders.

Figure 2.

hASA expression of MLD mice following neonatal systemic administration of AAV/hASA vectors. (A) Fifty‐two weeks after AAV/hASA injection, hASA concentration in the brain was determined by an indirect sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (left panel). DNA from the brain was extracted and analyzed using PCR with hASA‐specific primers (right panel). (B) hASA expression in plasma of AAV/hASA‐injected mice. hASA concentration in plasma was determined by ELISA. Sustained expression was observed after neonatal injection of AAV/hASA.

4.2. Neonatal gene therapy for hypophosphatasia

Hypophosphatasia is an inherited disease caused by a deficiency of tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNALP) [21, 22]. The major symptom of human HPP is hypomineralization, rickets or osteomalacia, although the clinical severity is highly variable. Patients with infantile HPP may appear normal at birth but gradually develop rickets before reaching 6 months of age. Neonatal gene therapy is a promising strategy for treating infantile HPP by preventing early onset. We have shown that the phenotype of TNALP knockout mice [23, 24, 25], which mimics the severe infantile form of HPP, can be prevented by a single neonatal injection of AAV vector encoding bone‐targeted TNALP in which a deca‐aspartate tail is linked to the C‐terminus of soluble TNALP (AAV/TNALP‐D10). Sustained expression of TNALP and phenotypic correction of TNALP knockout mice were observed following the neonatal gene therapy [26]. X‐ray analysis showed that treated TNALP knockout mice grow as well as normal wild‐type mice (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

X‐ray images of the whole bodies of TNALP knockout mice. Radiographic images were obtained on lFX1000 film (Fujifilm Corp., Tokyo, Japan) using a setup for analysis of small animals. The energy level was 25 kV, and the exposure time was 90 s for 10‐day‐old untreated TNALP knockout (A), normal wild‐type (B) and AAV/TNALP‐D10‐treated TNALP knockout mice (C).


5. Problems of neonatal gene therapy

There are several problems that must be overcome before neonatal gene therapies can be used in humans. First, safety concern must be addressed, as there is the possibility of tumor development and of germ‐line transmission. It was reported that liver and lung cancers appeared in some mice treated using AAV‐mediated neonatal gene therapy [27, 28]. In addition, differences in developmental stages of organs in mice and humans may be another problem. The immune system in mice is less mature at birth than that in larger animals, and the human BBB is functionally mature before birth. It is therefore not clear whether the same beneficial effect of neonatal gene therapy seen in mice would be achieved in human infants. These problems must be overcome before there can be clinical trials of neonatal gene therapy.


6. Summary and future developments

We have shown that AAV‐mediated gene transfer in neonatal mice has characteristics that could potentially overcome the problems encountered with current gene therapy protocols. However, before applying neonatal gene transfer to humans, several important issues must be addressed. In particular, the safety of neonatal gene transfer must be carefully evaluated using large animal models, including nonhuman primates. Nonetheless, because of its advantages over gene therapies used to treat genetic disorders in adults, safe and effective neonatal gene therapy has the potential to be an invaluable method for treating genetic diseases.



We thank Dr. James Wilson (University of Pennsylvania), Dr. R. Jude Samulski (University of North Carolina), Dr. Robert M. Kotin (National Institutes of Health) and Dr. David W. Russell (University of Washington) for kindly providing AAV packaging or vector plasmids and Dr. Volkmar Gieselmann (Rheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐University) and Dr. Jose Luis Millán (Stanford Children’s Health Research Center) for kindly providing MLD and HPP model mice. We also thank Dr. Tae Matsumoto and Dr. Yukihiko Hirai for joint research and helpful discussions. This chapter was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan and the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.


  1. 1. Cantero G, Liu XB, Mervis RF, Lazaro MT, Cederbaum SD, Golshani P, Lipshutz GS. Rescue of the functional alterations of motor cortical circuits in arginase deficiency by neonatal gene therapy. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2016;36(25):6680-6690
  2. 2. Heldermon CD, Qin EY, Ohlemiller KK, Herzog ED, Brown JR, Vogler C, Hou W, Orrock JL, Crawford BE, Sands MS. Disease correction by combined neonatal intracranial AAV and systemic lentiviral gene therapy in Sanfilippo syndrome type B mice. Gene Therapy. 2013;20(9):913-921
  3. 3. Iijima O, Miyake K, Watanabe A, Miyake N, Igarashi T, Kanokoda C, Nakamura‐Takahashi A, Kinoshita H, Noguchi T, Abe S, Narisawa S, Millan JL, Okada T, Shimada T. Prevention of lethal murine hypophosphatasia by neonatal ex vivo gene therapy using lentivirally transduced bone marrow cells. Human Gene Therapy. 2015;26(12):801-812
  4. 4. Lattanzi A, Salvagno C, Maderna C, Benedicenti F, Morena F, Kulik W, Naldini L, Montini E, Martino S, Gritti A. Therapeutic benefit of lentiviral‐mediated neonatal intracerebral gene therapy in a mouse model of globoid cell leukodystrophy. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23(12):3250-3268
  5. 5. Mearini G, Stimpel D, Geertz B, Weinberger F, Kramer E, Schlossarek S, Mourot‐Filiatre J, Stoehr A, Dutsch A, Wijnker PJ, Braren I, Katus HA, Muller OJ, Voit T, Eschenhagen T, Carrier L. Mybpc3 gene therapy for neonatal cardiomyopathy enables long‐term disease prevention in mice. Nature Communications. 2014;5:5515
  6. 6. Xing EM, Wu S, Ponder KP. The effect of Tlr4 and/or C3 deficiency and of neonatal gene therapy on skeletal disease in mucopolysaccharidosis VII mice. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2015;114(2):209-216
  7. 7. Grieger JC, Samulski RJ. Adeno‐associated virus vectorology, manufacturing, and clinical applications. Methods in Enzymology. 2012;507:229-254
  8. 8. Skubis‐Zegadlo J, Stachurska A, Malecki M. Vectrology of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV). Medycyna Wieku Rozwojowego. 2013;17(3):202-206
  9. 9. Wright JF, Qu G, Tang C, Sommer JM. Recombinant adeno‐associated virus: Formulation challenges and strategies for a gene therapy vector. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development. 2003;6(2):174-178
  10. 10. Gao G, Vandenberghe LH, Wilson JM. New recombinant serotypes of AAV vectors. Current Gene Therapy. 2005;5(3):285-297
  11. 11. Gao GP, Alvira MR, Wang L, Calcedo R, Johnston J, Wilson JM. Novel adeno‐associated viruses from rhesus monkeys as vectors for human gene therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(18):11854-11859
  12. 12. Miyake K, Miyake N, Yamazaki Y, Shimada T, Hirai Y. Serotype‐independent method of recombinant adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vector production and purification. Journal of Nippon Medical School. 2012;79(6):394-402
  13. 13. Summerford C, Samulski RJ. AAVR: A multi‐serotype receptor for AAV. Molecular Therapy. 2016;24(4):663-666
  14. 14. Tajes M, Ramos‐Fernandez E, Weng‐Jiang X, Bosch‐Morato M, Guivernau B, Eraso‐Pichot A, Salvador B, Fernandez‐Busquets X, Roquer J, Munoz FJ. The blood‐brain barrier: Structure, function and therapeutic approaches to cross it. Molecular Membrane Biology. 2014;31(5):152-167
  15. 15. Miyake N, Miyake K, Yamamoto M, Hirai Y, Shimada T. Global gene transfer into the CNS across the BBB after neonatal systemic delivery of single‐stranded AAV vectors. Brain Research. 2011;1389:19-26
  16. 16. Hinderer C, Bell P, Louboutin JP, Katz N, Zhu Y, Lin G, Choa R, Bagel J, O’Donnell P, Fitzgerald CA, Langan T, Wang P, Casal ML, Haskins ME, Wilson JM. Neonatal tolerance induction enables accurate evaluation of gene therapy for MPS I in a canine model. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2016;119(1-2):124-130
  17. 17. Hinderer C, Bell P, Louboutin JP, Zhu Y, Yu H, Lin G, Choa R, Gurda BL, Bagel J, O’Donnell P, Sikora T, Ruane T, Wang P, Tarantal AF, Casal ML, Haskins ME, Wilson JM. Neonatal systemic AAV induces tolerance to CNS gene therapy in MPS I dogs and nonhuman primates. Molecular Therapy. 2015;23(8):1298-1307
  18. 18. Hu C, Lipshutz GS. AAV‐based neonatal gene therapy for hemophilia A: Long‐term correction and avoidance of immune responses in mice. Gene Therapy. 2012;19(12):1166-1176
  19. 19. von Figura K, Gieselmann V, Jaeken J. Metachromatic leukodystrophy. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. New York: McGraw‐Hill; 2001
  20. 20. Miyake N, Miyake K, Asakawa N, Yamamoto M, Shimada T. Long‐term correction of biochemical and neurological abnormalities in MLD mice model by neonatal systemic injection of an AAV serotype 9 vector. Gene Therapy. 2014;21(4):427-433
  21. 21. Mornet E. Hypophosphatasia. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2007;2:40
  22. 22. Whyte MP. Physiological role of alkaline phosphatase explored in hypophosphatasia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1192:190-200
  23. 23. Narisawa S, Fröhlander N, Millán JL. Inactivation of two mouse alkaline phosphatase genes and establishment of a model of infantile hypophosphatasia. Developmental Dynamics: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 1997;208(3):432-446
  24. 24. Narisawa S, Yadav MC, Millán JL. In vivo overexpression of tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase increases skeletal mineralization and affects the phosphorylation status of osteopontin. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research : The Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2013;28(7):1587-1598
  25. 25. Yadav MC, Simão AM, Narisawa S, Huesa C, McKee MD, Farquharson C, Millán JL. Loss of skeletal mineralization by the simultaneous ablation of PHOSPHO1 and alkaline phosphatase function: a unified model of the mechanisms of initiation of skeletal calcification. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research : The Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2011;26(2):286-297
  26. 26. Matsumoto T, Miyake K, Yamamoto S, Orimo H, Miyake N, Odagaki Y, Adachi K, Iijima O, Narisawa S, Millán JL, Fukunaga Y, Shimada T. Rescue of severe infantile hypophosphatasia mice by AAV‐mediated sustained expression of soluble alkaline phosphatase. Human Gene Therapy. 2011;22(11):1355-1364
  27. 27. Chandler RJ, LaFave MC, Varshney GK, Burgess SM, Venditti CP. Genotoxicity in mice following AAV gene delivery: A safety concern for human gene therapy? Molecular Therapy. 2016;24(2):198-201
  28. 28. Walia JS, Altaleb N, Bello A, Kruck C, LaFave MC, Varshney GK, Burgess SM, Chowdhury B, Hurlbut D, Hemming R, Kobinger GP, Triggs‐Raine B. Long‐term correction of Sandhoff disease following intravenous delivery of rAAV9 to mouse neonates. Molecular Therapy. 2015;23(3):414-422

Written By

Koichi Miyake, Noriko Miyake and Takashi Shimada

Submitted: 20 October 2016 Reviewed: 13 April 2017 Published: 20 December 2017