Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Rare Earth‐Doped Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles

Written By

Vesna Ðorđević, Bojana Milićević and Miroslav D. Dramićanin

Submitted: December 2nd, 2016 Reviewed: March 29th, 2017 Published: July 26th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68882

Chapter metrics overview

2,436 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Titanium dioxide is a wide band‐gap semiconductor of high chemical stability, nontoxicity and large refractive index. Because of the high photocatalytic activity, anatase is a preferred TiO2 form in many applications such as for air and water splitting and purification. Doping of TiO2 with various ions can increase the photocatalytic activity by enhancing light absorption in visible region and can alter structure, surface area and morphology. Also, by doping TiO2 with optically active ions, visible light via up‐ or downconversion luminescence can be produced. It is a challenge to optimize the synthesis procedure to incorporate rare earth RE3+ ions into the TiO2 structure due to large mismatch in ionic radii between the Ti4+ and RE3+ and because of the charge imbalance. Visible (VIS) and ultraviolet (UV) luminescence of several RE3+ ions can be obtained when incorporated into anatase TiO2, also affecting microstructural characteristics of TiO2. It is of great importance to summarize publications on rare earth‐doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles to find correct TiO2-RE combination to sensitize trivalent rare earths luminescence, as well as to predict or tune structural and morphological properties. A better understanding on these topics may progress the desired design of this kind of material towards specific applications.


  • anatase
  • rare earth ions
  • photoluminescence
  • photocatalysis

1. Introduction

Rare earth (RE) elements are sixth period elements in the periodic table, from 57La to 71Lu. Because of many similarities, such as ionic +3 charges and similar ionic radius, 39Y that also belongs to the III transition group and is positioned just above 57La is also often considered as a part of the RE group. Even though the group is regarded as rare earth elements, they are not particularly rare. However, they are costly but highly efficient for many technological applications, mainly in lighting and display devices. With the absence of 57La and 71Lu, RE atoms, all have incompletely filled 4f orbitals that are positioned in the inner shell of xenon [Xe: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d10 4p6 5s2 4d10 5p6] electron configuration, which are responsible for their emission properties. Since they are shielded by outer 5s2 and 5p6 orbitals, electrons from 4f orbitals do not participate in bonding and are only slightly affected by the surroundings of the ions. Ionic +3 charges are the most often, although some cases +2 and +4 can be stable as presented in Table 1. Electronic states are noted as 2S+1LJ, where Lis the orbital angular momentum, Sis the spin angular momentum, and Jis the total angular momentum, and corresponding notations are also presented in Table 1. Lanthanide contraction makes significant decrease of ionic radii in the series with an increase in atomic number, and the values for six‐coordinated RE3+ are also presented in Table 1.

Atomic numberNameRE symbolAtomRE2+RE3+RE4+2S+1LJRadii REVI3+[Å]
57LanthanumLa5d1 6s2[Xe]1S01.032
58CeriumCe4f1 5d1 6s24f1[Xe]2F5/21.020
59PraseodymiumPr4f3 6s24f24f13H40.990
60NeodymiumNd4f4 6s24f44f34f24I9/20.983
61PromethiumPm4f4 6s24f45I40.970
62SamariumSm4f6 6s24f64f56H5/20.958
63EuropiumEu4f7 6s24f74f67F00.947
64GadoliniumGd4f7 5d1 6s24f78S7/20.938
65TerbiumTb4f9 6s24f84f77F60.923
66DysprosiumDy4f10 6s24f94f811H15/20.912
67HolmiumHo4f11 6s24f105I80.901
68ErbiumEr4f12 6s24f114I15/20.890
69ThuliumTm4f13 6s24f134f123H60.880
70YtterbiumYb4f14 6s24f144f132F7/20.868
71LutetiumLu4f14 5d1 6s24f141S00.861

Table 1.

Outer electronic configurations of RE atoms and ions, outside of the [Xe] shell, ground‐state term of RE3+ and radii of 6‐coordinated RE3+ (taken from Ref. [1]).

Laporte’s selection rule states that electron transitions between 4f states are forbidden, but they become partially allowed when RE ions are incorporated in non‐symmetric sites [2, 3]. In that way, each ion has characteristic 4f energy levels with narrow‐emission lines that depend on the crystalline environment of the host material in the order of few hundred cm−1. The Dieke diagram is the energy‐level diagram of trivalent lanthanide 4f electrons of RE3+incorporated in LaCl3 crystals, which can be found in the original or revised form, which is informative for many materials [47]. It schematically represents variations between ground‐ and excited‐level energies or rare earth ions, proposing emissions of almost any colour in visible spectra by using one, or a combination of various RE ions in hosts.

Luminescent materials that absorb energy as light and do not emit it as heat, but as ultraviolet, visible or infrared (IR) light, are called phosphor materials. Typically, they are composed of insulating or semiconducting host material that is doped with activator ions. Phosphors with RE ions as activators are important materials that have found applications in artificial light, cathode‐ray tubes, vacuum fluorescent and field emission displays, solid‐state lasers, and so on [8]. It is now a custom to refer materials that have at least one dimension less than 100 nm as nanomaterials. The great number of atoms in top layers of nanoparticles significantly alters their optical properties; hence, it is justified to name nanostructured phosphors as a nanophosphors. Today, nanophosphors can be found in many forms, such as nanopowders, composites, coatings and thin films, giving new possibilities for application in bio‐imaging and various types of physical and chemical sensing [911].

Photoluminescence of RE ions can be induced by the absorption of light through host lattice (host, H) that is transferred to RE ion (activator, A), directly exciting A, or energy transfer from other exited ions (sensitizer, S) that are also incorporated in matrix. A schematic diagram showing direct and indirect excitations with energy transfer resulting in the emission of light or heat is presented in Figure 1(a).

Figure 1.

(a) Direct and indirect excitation with energy transfer resulting in emission of light or heat, by activators (A), hosts (H) and sensitizers (S). (b) Basic mechanisms of downconversion and upconversion luminescence.

When RE ions are used as activators in phosphor materials, depending on the positions of energy levels in RE ion, two main energy conversion mechanisms can lead to radiative energy transfer that results in the emission of light, one being downconversion, and the other upconversion. As it can be seen in Figure 1(b), the principal difference between the two is the difference in excited and emitted energies. As schematically presented, in downconversion process electrons are excited by higher‐energy photons compared to energy obtained from emission. In the process, prior to the emission of photons some energy is lost by non‐radiative transitions. Oppositely, in upconversion process electrons are excited by lower‐energy photons compared to energy obtained from emission. In order to preserve energy conservation rule, more than one photon is necessary for either single‐ion excited‐state absorption process, or in energy transfer upconversion process where the second ion is the sensitizer ion.

In order to fully understand the processes of downconversion light emission, we refer to energy‐level diagram scheme presented in Figure 2. In honour of professor Alexander Jablonski, this type of energy diagrams is often called the Jablonski diagram. It qualitatively represents electronic energy levels as bolded horizontal lines and vibrational energy levels as a stack of horizontal lines in vertical energy diagram. Straight and wavy vertical arrows represent transitions between the states, where straight arrow represents transition associated with photon, while wavy arrows represent non‐radiative transfers. A radiative decay process is a process in which electron releases some of its excitation energy as photon, while in a non‐radiative decay excess energy is transferred into thermal motions, as vibration, rotation and translation processes, heat. Once an electron is excited through very quick process of absorption of photon, into, for example, some vibronic state of second excited singlet state, there are several ways that energy may be dissipated. The first is through vibrational relaxation, a non‐radiative process that lowers energy of electron to the lowest excited singlet state, with or without non‐radiative internal conversion process, depending on the overlap of vibrational and electronic energy of different states. Next, a radiative process of energy transfer to ground singlet state is followed by emission of photons in terms of fluorescence. There is no change in multiplicity S1S0, so the transition is spin allowed and consequently fast. Since there are a large number of vibrational levels in electronic states, transitions can result in a range of emitted wavelengths. There is also a probability of non‐radiative relaxations between the singlet states (S1S0). If in the process of dissipating of energy spin multiplicity changes by slower process of intersystem crossing, energy can be radiatively emitted from lowest excited triplet state to ground singlet state by phosphorescence T1S0, or non‐radiatively by relaxations between the triplet and singlet states (T1S0). Intersystem crossing and therefore phosphorescence are spin‐forbidden processes; nevertheless, by coupling vibrational factors into the selection rules transitions become partially allowed, and they are consequently much slower.

Figure 2.

Radiative and non‐radiative processes with corresponding approximate time interval of the processes in energy‐level diagram scheme.S0, ground singlet state;S1,S2, excited singlet states;T1, excited triplet state.


2. Synthesis of rare earth‐doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles

TiO2 nanoparticles present several advantages for applications compared to their bulk counterparts. Their high‐surface‐to‐volume ratio, improved charge transport and lifetime, afforded by their dimensional anisotropy, allows efficient contribution to the separation of photo‐generated holes and electrons [12]. The properties of TiO2 depend on its crystal structure, surface chemistry, dopants, doping levels, crystallization degree, size and morphology [13]. Hence, it is of great importance to control the particle size, shape and distribution of the synthetized TiO2. To achieve desired characteristics, a variety of TiO2 nanostructures have been prepared, such as nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanorods, nanofibres, nanosheets and nanofilms. These structures can be synthetized through various preparation methods, such as sol‐gel, direct oxidation, micelle and inverse micelle techniques, sonochemical, hydrothermal/solvothermal, microwave, chemical vapour deposition, physical vapour deposition and electrospray deposition [1417]. Significant progress has been made in the last 10 years regarding new approaches to the preparation of TiO2. These include doping TiO2 with optically active rare earth ions (RE). TiO2 can be considered as an ‘unusual’ matrix for doping with RE3+ ions due to the large mismatch of both charge and ionic radius between the dopant and the host constituent cations. It is a challenge even now to optimize the synthesis procedure in the way to efficiently incorporate RE3+ ions into TiO2 nanostructure and to obtain material with high crystallinity. Spectroscopic studies have showed that the RE ions can reside in the anatase in three different sites [1820]. In nanopowders, substantial number of RE ions occupies the sites near the surface with the lowest point symmetry.

TiO2 occurs in three most abundant crystalline phases in nature: anatase (tetragonal), rutile (tetragonal) and brookite (orthorhombic). Rutile TiO2 is the most stable form, while anatase and brookite phases are metastable and can be transformed to rutile phase at higher temperatures. Even though rutile is denser and thermodynamically more stable than anatase, this significant temperature treatment is not favourable for the formation of nanoparticles with a diameter lower than 15 nm, which is a feature of anatase form TiO2 [21, 22].

Sol‐gelsynthesis is the most common method for the preparation of RE‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles, being simple, cost‐effective and low‐temperature procedure, with the ability to fabricate nanostructure with high purity, homogeneity and controllable morphology. This synthesis includes the process of hydrolysis and poly‐condensation of Ti–OH–Ti or Ti–O–Ti bonds forming densely three‐dimensional structure that after heating changes from sol to gel, and after thermic treatment results in the form of oxide. Titanium source precursors can be alkoxides (such as titanium (IV)‐isopropoxide (TTIP), titanium (IV)‐butoxide (TBT)) or titanium (IV)‐chloride (TiCl4). RE ion precursors can be acid‐soluble oxides (RE2O3) or water‐ soluble nitrates, acetates or chlorides (RE(NO3)3·xH2O, RE(CH3COO)3·x(H2O), RECl3).

In the method of hydrolysis of TTIP, products are characterized by low surface area, wide pore size distribution with contribution to pores of mesopores scale (<50 nm) [22]. The sol‐gel synthesis with a two‐step procedure of mixing precursor solutions was successfully used to obtain RE‐doped TiO2 [18, 2336]. The gels obtained in such procedures undergo various temperature treatments, which are summarized in Table 2. In the method of hydrolysis of TiCl4, which is another sol‐gel method for the preparation of RE‐doped anatase TiO2, minor amounts of brookite phases are often present and slightly larger crystallite size compared to RE‐doped TiO2 from the titanium alkoxides is reported [13, 37].

Dopant ionsDoping conc. (%)Calcination temperature (°C)Crystalline phaseCrystallite size* (nm)BET surface area (m2/g)Pore diameter (nm)Refs.
400–700A8.14–79.125–1173.26–6.4[13, 18, 2228, 38, 39]
500–800A + R14.1–101.80.59–17.944.68[2224, 29]
Sc2500A + B16.6[37]
Sc2600A + R45.0[13]
Y0.25–2400–500A8.5–9.489.68–151[28, 30, 31]
La600A + R17.236.7[32]
Ce0.1–10500A8.68–13.7953.31–94.495.46–12.52[24, 25]
Ce5800A + CeO2[24]
Pr0.25–1400–650A9–2077.5–134[28, 33, 40]
Nd0.05–4400–700A10–207.5–75[24, 34, 40, 41]
Nd0.1–5800A + R25<1.0[24, 41]
Nd0.1–5900–1000A + R + Nd4Ti9O24[24]
Sm0.3–3420–700A5.8–1250.78–95.95.20[18, 29, 34, 35, 38, 42]
Sm0.3–0.5800A + R16.1–24.7[38]
Eu0.25–3400–500A6–1288.55–178.33.6–7.5[18, 2730, 39, 42]
Eu5800A + R27[24]
Gd2800A + Gd2Ti2O7[22]
Gd5600–800A + R26–27[24, 32]
Gd5–10800–900A + R + Gd2Ti2O77.2–14.715.3–51.5[22]
Tb0.7–3420–500A8.69–988.345.43[18, 29]
Tb5800A + R25.5[24]
Dy5800A + R24[24]
Ho0.3–2500–800A12.5–20.576.76–98.81[23, 36]
Er0.25–5400–700A8.5–21.918–132[24, 26, 28, 42]
Er5800A + Er2Ti2O723.8[24]
Yb5600–800A + R19–23[24, 32]

Table 2.

The sol‐gel synthesis conditions and major physicochemical properties of RE‐doped TiO2 nanostructures; A‐anatase, B‐brookite, R‐rutile.

*Anatase phase.

Hydrothermalsynthesis is a heterogeneous chemical reaction in the presence of an aqueous solvent, above room temperature (<200°C) in a closed system, where the pressure is elevated. The synthesis has been used to produce homogeneous, high‐purity, crystalline nanostructured RE‐doped TiO2 with different morphologies: nanotubes, nanobelts, nanowires or spherical nanoparticles. Alkoxide Ti precursors and water‐soluble RE precursors are activated by acids or bases prior to the temperature treatments in Teflon‐liners autoclave up to several days [28, 4453]. Obtained precipitates should be washed to neutral pH [47] before calcination in order to gain well‐defined TiO2 nanoparticles. Also, hydrothermal route can use the synthesized or commercial available TiO2 nanoparticle without the post‐calcination treatment [44, 46]. The main difference of solvothermalsynthesis is using other solvents than water. The obtained samples are spherical nanoparticles with an average diameter of 16 nm and the doping process can be easily achieved without significant loss of dopants [54]. The main characteristics and major physicochemical properties of RE‐doped TiO2 nanostructures synthetized by hydrothermal and solvothermal are summarized in Table 3.

Dopant ionsDoping conc. (%)Hydrothermal treatment (°C)Calcination temperature (°C)Crystalline phaseCrystallite size (nm)BET surface area (m2/g)MorphologyRefs.
140–160≤400A9.3–30102–312.5Spherical particle (d* = 10–30 nm)[28, 4749, 54]
200500A + R22.853–165Spherical particle[44, 51]
Y0.25150–160≤400A9.8120–157Spherical particle (d= 5–15 nm)[28, 47]
Y0.380A + R[51]
La0.11–0.53200500A + R22.32–24.3869–86Spherical particle[44]
La0.380A + R[51]
Pr0.25–2.0100400A5.04–6.22155–170Spherical particle (d< 10 nm)[55]
Pr0.25160400A9.0127Spherical particle (d= 5–15 nm)[28]
Pr0.380A + R200[51]
Nd0.380A + R220[51]
Sm1150500A16Spherical particles (d∼ 16 nm)[54]
Eu0.25–0.5130–200400–500A8.6133Spherical particle (d= 5–15 nm)[28, 56]
Sub‐microspheres (d= 300 nm)[52]
Spindle particles (d= 50–100 nm, l* = up to several μm)[53]
Nanorods (d= 10–20 nm, l= up to several μm)[53]
Nanobelts (w* = 200–400 nm, l= several μm)[45]
Eu180700A + RNano‐belts forming aggregates (d= 50–200 nm)[45]
Eu180900RNano‐belts forming aggregates (d= 50–200 nm)[45]
Eu1150500A16Spherical particle (d∼ 16 nm)[54]
Ho0.75150**A + R7.6–20.4Nanowires (d= 500 nm, l= 15 nm)[46]
2% Ho + Yb2% Yb120**25, 100, 280ANanotube[50]
Er0.25–4140–160>400A8.9–1698.1–127Spherical particles (d< 16 nm)[28, 48, 49, 54]

Table 3.

Hydrothermal and solvothermal synthesis conditions and major physicochemical properties of RE‐doped TiO2 nanostructures.

*d, diameter; w, weight; l, length.

**TiO2 calcined at 550°C was used in the synthesis route.

Electrospinning methodcan be employed to produce nanostructure RE‐doped TiO2 with fibre morphology and the average fibre diameter in the range of 35–80 nm. Typically, RE‐doped TiO2nanofibres are fabricated with the use of polymer solvents of polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), titanium alkoxides and RE chlorides or nitrates. Starting solutions in glass syringe with stainless‐steel needle are connected to a high voltage and electrospun in air at different tensions, needle‐target distances and feed rates [5761]. In order to remove the polymeric component and obtain nanocrystalline anatase, RE‐doped TiO2, as‐spun nanofibres were calcined at 500°C. However, the pure phase of RE‐doped rutile TiO2 can be obtained after higher calcination temperature (>1000°C). The synthesis conditions and major physicochemical properties of RE‐doped TiO2 nanostructures reported in the literature are summarized in Table 4.

Precursor materialsDopant ionsDoping conc. (%)Calcination temperature (°C)Crystalline phaseCrystallite size (nm)Fibre diameter (nm)Refs.
PVP, TTIP400–500A[57, 58]
PVP, TTIP500–900A + R15.71–40[5759]
PVP, TTIP1000R[57]
PVP, TTIP, Y(NO3)3Y1–2500A + R11.35–13.8[59]
PVP, TTIP, Y(NO3)3Y3500A8.8[59]
PVP, TTIP, La(NO3)3La1500–800A40[57]
PVP, TTIP, La(NO3)3La1900–1000A + R[57]
PVP, TTIP, La(NO3)3La11100R[57]
PVA, TTIP, La(NO3)3La1500A[58]
PVA, TTIP, La(NO3)3La1700A + R12.51[58]
PVA,,TTIP, Ce(NO3)3Ce1500A[58]
PVA, TTIP, Ce(NO3)3Ce1700A + R11.49[58]
PVA, TTIP, Nd(NO3)3Nd1500A[58]
PVA, TTIP, Nd(NO3)3Nd1700A + R10.2[58]
PVP, TTIP, Eu(NO3)3Eu1, 3500–800A60, 70[57]
PVP, TTIP, Eu(NO3)3Eu1900A + R[57]
PVP, TTIP, Eu(NO3)3Eu3900A + R + Eu2Ti2O7[57]
PVP, TTIP, Eu(NO3)3Eu1, 31000–1100R + Eu2Ti2O7[57]
PVP, TTIP, Tb(NO3)3Tb1, 3400–800A35, 80[60]
PVP, TTIP, Tb(NO3)3Tb1900A + R[60]
PVP, TTIP, Tb(NO3)3Tb3900A + R + Tb2Ti2O7[60]
PVP, TTIP, Tb(NO3)3Tb1, 31000–1100R + Tb2Ti2O7[60]
PVP, TTIP, Er(NO3)3Er1400–900A60[57]
PVP, TTIP, Er(NO3)3Er11000–1100A + R + Er2Ti2O7[57]
PVP, TTIP, Er(NO3)3Er3500–800A77[57]
PVP, TTIP, Er(NO3)3Er3900A + R + Er2Ti2O7[57]
PVP, TTIP, Er(NO3)3Er31000–1100R + Er2Ti2O7[57]
PVP, TBT, ErCl3Er0.5–1.5500A11.5–8.1[61]
PVP, TBT, ErCl3Er0.5600–700A + R17.9–23.1[61]
PVP, TBT, ErCl3Er0.5800R27[61]
PVP, TTIP, Yb(NO3)3Yb1, 3400–800A55, 70[60]
PVP, TTIP, Yb(NO3)3Yb1900A + R[60]
PVP, TTIP, Yb(NO3)3Yb3900A + R + Yb2Ti2O7[60]
PVP, TTIP, Yb(NO3)3Yb1, 31000–1100R + Yb2Ti2O7[60]

Table 4.

The electrospinning synthesis conditions and major physicochemical properties of RE‐doped TiO2 nanostructures.

Thermal plasma pyrolysisis rarely used for the synthesis and preparation of RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders, which enables highly crystallized and well‐dispersed nanoparticles due to the processing temperature (up to 1.0 × 104 K), rapid quenching rate at the plasma tail (~105–7 K/s) and very short residence time [62]. The advantage of this synthesis is that well‐dispersed and highly crystalline nanoparticles in a single processing step are obtained, without post‐annealing treatment. On the other hand, it promotes crystallization of several crystalline phases of TiO2, and with small amount of RE dopants mixtures of anatase and rutile are formed, while at higher temperatures dititanate structures were also formed [62].

Electrochemicalsynthesis is a significant method in the preparation of TiO2 nanotubes at substrates, providing the precise control of nanotube morphology, length and pore size, and the formation of thick walls at substrates. Electrolytes used in this procedure are fluorides, where the concentration strongly effects on the dimensions and pH on the thickness of TiO2 nanotubes [63, 64]. With anodic potential from 10 to 30 V, nanotubes with diameters between 15 and 200 nm are formed, and by cathodic electrochemical process RE ions are incorporated into the nanotubes. Also, magnetron‐sputtering method can be used to prepare RE‐doped TiO2 films [65] as well as evaporation‐induced self‐assembly method [6669].

In order to investigate structural, morphological, photocatalytic and optical properties of RE‐doped anatase TiO2 nanopowders with a series of RE3+ ions (Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er and Tm) at a fixed concentration of 1 at.%, the sol‐gel method has been used. To prepare samples, titanium (IV)‐isopropoxide, water, ethanol and nitric acid were mixed in 1:3:20:0.08 molar ratios and the synthesis procedure is schematically shown in Figure 3 and given in Ref. [27].

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the sol‐gel synthesis with quantities of precursors used to prepare 3 g RE3+‐doped TiO2 nanopowders.


3. The influence of rare earth doping on the stability of phase structure, surface area and morphology of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles

In most morphologies of calcinated TiO2 powders, anatase phase is stabile up to temperatures below 500°C. Anatase to rutile crystalline phase transformation occurs above this temperature. In RE ions doped of anatase materials, the temperature of phase transformations shifts to higher values, suggesting the stabilization of anatase phase. As it can be seen in Tables 24 in Section 2, phase transformations of RE‐doped anatase to rutile crystalline phase occur in the temperature range of 500–1000°C. There are three types of dominant nucleation modes in forming rutile from anatase, bulk, interface and surface, which lead to the phase transformation. The proposed mechanisms affect the rate of grain forming and the density of rutile nucleation sites. The bulk nucleation of rutile particles is most likely to occur at temperatures above 500°C, when the grain boundary is surrounded by RE ions hindering the surface nucleation. The interface nucleation mode is dominant in the range of 550–680°C, when rutile particles with a larger crystallite size are formed on account of anatase particles, probably through aggregating of some anatase particles at the surfaces [70]. When calcination temperature increases, the phase transformation is not completed because the surface region is still in the mixed phases of anatase and rutile, with increasing percentage of rutile particles. At the same time, the formation of multiphase RE‐titanate structures can also be noticed at higher temperatures, usually dititanates pyrochlore structures with a general formula of RE2Ti2O7 [22, 57, 60, 71]. The contribution of these structures increases with RE‐doping concentration [57], and it is more pronounced with RE ions with smaller ionic radius (heavier ions). When RE ions with a larger ionic radius occupy TiO2 lattice sites, ionic mobility is hindered and the possibility of forming other titanate phases is lower. The electrospinning sol‐gel route can be used to fabricate RE‐doped TiO2 with pure rutile phase at higher calcination temperature (>1000°C) without the formation of the RE2Ti2O7 phase [57].

The influence of doping TiO2 with RE, where larger RE ions of different charge (+3) compared to Ti ions are introduced into the anatase phase, gives rise to substitutional defects and, consequently, the large decrease in the short lattice order, thus in the reduction of the crystallite size. With increasing the concentration of RE ions, amorphization of crystalline powders is expected. The contents of RE ions used in sol‐gel synthesis are usually in the 0.1–3% range, while further addition of RE ions (≥5%) effectively obstructs TiO2 crystallinity owing to a lattice distortion, and remarkably reduces the crystallite size [22, 25]. The increase of doping concentration leads to a higher content of RE–O–Ti bonds that inhibit the growth of TiO2 crystal grains restricting the direct contact of anatase particles, shifts diffractions to lower 2 theta angles, and as a consequence of smaller crystallites, broadening of X‐ray diffraction (XRD) maxima [18, 55, 72, 73]. Even in undoped TiO2, the anatase phase is reported to be thermodynamically stable at very low particle size. In respect to the particle size, it is reported that rutile phase can be formed when the crystallite size reaches a critical value of 12–20 nm [22]. Therefore, with the temperature increase, the crystallite size increases, which also favours anatase to rutile phase conversion. The influence of the incorporation of RE ions into the TiO2 is reflected in the reduction of the crystallite size that inhibits the transformation of anatase to rutile phase. Taking into account all possible RE‐doping effects on the stability of anatase phase, size and concentration of RE ion, applied synthesis method and calcination temperature, a number of parameters may be varied in an attempt to optimize desired TiO2 powder structure and properties.

RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders were prepared by the sol‐gel route using a series of RE (Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er, Tm) oxides and titanium(IV)‐isopropoxide. The final calcination treatment is carried out at a temperature of 420°C for 2 h. XRD measurements were done on synthesized powders using Rigaku SmartLab instrument under the Cu Kα1,2 radiation, in a 2θ‐range from 10° to 120° in 0.02° steps, and are shown in Figure 4. The XRD patterns indexed according to the ICDD card No. 00‐021‐1272. These patterns consist of the characteristic, intense peaks corresponding to 101, 004, 200, 105, 211 and 204 main reflections from anatase phase TiO2 in all RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders. There are no diffraction peaks of another crystalline phase of TiO2 (rutile or brookite), rare earth oxide phase or dititanate pyrochlore structures. The analysis of relevant structural parameters was obtained using PDXL Integrated software, and calculated results are presented in Table 5. The average crystallite size of undoped TiO2 was determined to be 149.6 Å, which is a much higher value than for the doped ones, suggesting the decrease in crystallinity with doping with RE as a result of the RE–O–Ti bonds in doped TiO2 nanopowders. A consequence of the incorporation of larger RE ion compared to Ti ion (r(TiVI4+)= 0.605 Å into anatase structure results in an increase in cell parameters that result in an increase of cell volume.

Figure 4.

XRD patterns of undoped TiO2 and TiO2 doped with series of RE ions (RE = Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er and Tm).

SampleCrystallite size (Å)Strain (%)Lattice parameters a= b(Å)Lattice parameter c(Å)Unit cell volume (Å3)Specific area (m2/g)
Undoped TiO2149.60.353.7859.502136.1289.7
TiO2: Pr72.10.853.8039.508137.51254.4
TiO2: Nd68.40.463.7969.505136.963101.5
TiO2: Sm103.10.483.8049.521137.64368.2
TiO2: Eu81.60.733.7969.494136.80552.4
TiO2: Dy101.30.563.7949.505136.18987.4
TiO2: Tb83.10.663.7899.494136.301
TiO2: Ho102.630.403.8069.535138.12081.0
TiO2: Er81.30.683.7979.516137.19468.2
TiO2: Tm79.50.583.8019.528137.65763.7

Table 5.

XRD and BET results of undoped TiO2 and RE doped TiO2.

Mesoporous materials have important properties for potential applications, such as well‐defined pore structure, uniform pores in the range between 2 and 50 nm and high surface area that provides a large number of active sites. Nevertheless, during the calcination treatment, TiO2 nanoparticles pass through the process of crystal growth and anatase‐to‐rutile phase transformation causing the collapse of the mesoporous framework and a decrease of surface area. Incorporation of RE ions into the TiO2 matrix has been presented as a potential strategy to overcome these disadvantages, with a possibility for thermal stability of the mesoporous structure and retarded decreasing of surface area of TiO2 nanoparticles at high temperatures [25]. Also, RE ion‐doped nanocrystalline TiO2 has a significant number of active sites at anatase wall, leading to different physicochemical properties compared to undoped TiO2 nanoparticles.

One of the problems in the synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 is to achieve an appropriate balance between the hydrolysis and condensation processes of the titanium precursor. A slow hydrolytic condensation could lead to a small surface area in pure mesoporous TiO2, because small quantities of water influence the reactivity of titanium precursor materials, and affects polymerization of TiO2 [25]. On the other hand, higher reactivity of the titanium precursor towards hydrolysis and condensation leads to denser inorganic networks, which is promoted by the influence of hydrated RE precursors. In that way, relatively higher surface area and pore diameter are expected in RE‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles compared to undoped TiO2 [25]. In sol‐gel synthesis of anatase, TiO2 nanoparticles crystallize with a pore diameter in the range of 3.26–6.4 nm and the surface area in the range of 25–117 m2/g [13, 18, 2228, 38]. In the low‐concentration RE‐doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles annealed at the intermediate temperatures, pores have almost the same size as in the undoped ones. However, relatively high doping concentrations of RE ions (up to 10%) induce significant change in pore size distribution, indicating the significant process of filling the pores, additionally promoted at higher temperatures. For most of the RE ion‐doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles, porosity can be presented by unimodal distributions, while the bimodal distribution may occur in some cases of higher doping concentration of RE ions and higher calcination treatments, when their pore diameter exceeded 100 nm [38].

The adsorption isotherms of RE‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol‐gel route show type IV behaviour with the typical hysteresis loop. Undoped TiO2 often show tails in their hysteresis loops at higher relative pressure, which are usually attributed to wide distribution of mesopores with some percentage of macropores (>50 nm). With the increase in calcination temperature, the crystallite size increases, also resulting in the significantly larger average pore size, but also with reduction in surface area values. The RE‐doped TiO2 are characterized by high degree of pore‐size uniformity and a well‐defined narrow pore size distribution without any contribution of macropores. On the contrary to the undoped TiO2, high surface area can be retained even at relatively high temperatures [22]. Different trends are observed in samples prepared by impregnation sol‐gel synthesis based on the later addition of RE metals that can lead to blockage pores and the formation of agglomerations due to low dispersion over the surface. The comparison of surface areas reveals that the specific surface area decreases by adding the metal oxides on the surface [71, 74]. The pore diameter of the RE‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles prepared with co‐precipitation synthesis is larger and basically consists of some percentage of macropores (>50 nm). The formation of macroporous structure in the RE‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles was attributed to the agglomerations of TiO2 particles and higher calcination treatment, as already known that higher calcination temperature will facilitate the growth of grains, obviously the smaller pores endured much greater stress and collapsed first during the calcination treatment [32].

RE‐doped TiO2 prepared by hydrothermal route shows higher Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) surface area values when compared to undoped TiO2. Probably, the increase in the BET surface area with increasing the doping level of RE ions is a consequence of smaller crystallite size for RE‐doped TiO2 [28]. However, the lack of linear correlation between the crystallite size of TiO2 and the specific surface area may suggest that small amounts of RE2O3 were accumulated on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles resulting in higher surface area [28].

The specific surface area of the synthesized materials estimated by BET method is summarized in Table 5. The significant influence of RE3+ ions in doped anatase TiO2 is obvious by the huge increase in the surface area of doped materials compared to the undoped one. The crystallite size and BET surface area have no linear correlation, suggesting a small amount of RE2O3 accumulated on the surface of TiO2. The result could also be discussed regarding agglomeration of nanoparticle which is unavoidable in this kind of synthesis.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed in order to investigate the surface morphology of the undoped TiO2 nanopowder and nanopowders doped with the series of RE ions. RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders were prepared by the sol‐gel method using the series of RE (Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er and Tm) oxides and titanium(IV)‐isopropoxide, as previously discussed. The final calcination treatment is carried out at a temperature of 420°C for 2 h. As it can be seen from Figure 5(A), the undoped sol‐gel anatase sample consists of densely aggregated crystalline nanoparticles of irregular shapes, and variable dimensions of about 10–20 nm in size. Using selected area electron diffraction (SAED) technique, local crystal structure was confirmed to be pure anatase phase. The ring pattern was indexed by ICDD card no. 00‐021‐1272 with rings that correspond to 101, 004, 200, 105, 211 and 204 main reflections, presented in Figure 5(B). The presence of rings suggests polycrystalline sample, and the characteristic grainy appearance of the rings suggests that crystallites have a size of 20 nm or more, suggesting only few joint unit cells per particle.

Figure 5.

Transmission electron micrograph of undoped TiO2 nanopowders recorded at magnification of ×67,000 (A), with corresponding selected area electron diffraction (B).

In Figure 6(A–I), TEM of RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders is collected at different magnifications, all showing a bar of 20 nm. All of the doped samples show agglomerated nanoparticles, only the estimated particles are smaller in size compared to the undoped sample.

Figure 6.

Transmission electron micrographs of RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders at different magnification with bar of 20 nm: (A) TiO2:Pr, (B) TiO2:Nd, (C) TiO2:Sm, (D) TiO2:Eu, (E) TiO2:Dy, (F) TiO2:Tb, (G) TiO2:Ho, (H) TiO2:Er and (I) TiO2:Tm.


4. The influence of rare earth doping on photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles

One of the main challenges in photocatalytic research is the increase of spectral sensitivity of TiO2 from ultraviolet (UV) to visible (VIS) spectrum. Incorporation of various RE ions into the anatase TiO2 can increase the photocatalytic activity by enhancing the light absorption, adjustment of the phase structure, crystallinity, doping concentration, surface area and morphology. An overview of literature where RE‐doped TiO2 was used as a photocatalyst in respect to variables to experiments is given in Table 6. For detailed information about the type of artificial light source, time of illumination, as well as the percentage of dye degradation, the readers are advised to inquire the reference list provided in Table 6.

Dopant ionOptimal doping conc. (%)Synthesis methodOptimal calcination temperature (°C)Crystalline phaseDyeRefs.
Sc2Sol‐gel500A + BRhodamine B[37]
Y1.5Sol‐gel500AMethyl orange[31]
YHydrothermal150AMethyl orange[47]
Y0.3Hydrothermal400A + RPhenol[51]
La0.3Hydrothermal400A + RPhenol[51]
La1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]
Pr0.3Sol‐gel450AHerbicide metazachlor[33]
Pr0.25, 0.5Hydrothermal400AMethyl orange[55]
Pr0.3Hydrothermal400A + RPhenol[51]
Nd0.3Hydrothermal400A + RPhenol[51]
Nd1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]
Sm0.7Sol‐gel500ARemazol red RB‐133[29]
Sm1Sol‐gel500AMethylene blue[42]
Sm1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]
Eu0.5–2.0Sol‐gel400AMethylene blue[39]
Eu1Sol‐gel500ARhodamine B[71]
Eu1Sol‐gel420ACrystal violet[27]
Eu1.3Sol‐gel500ARemazol red RB‐133[29]
Eu1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]
Eu1.5Sol‐gel500AMethylene blue[30]
Gd1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]
Gd5Sol‐gel800A + Gd2Ti2O7Methylene blue[22]
Gd0.3‐0.6Magnetron sputtering1000RMethyl orange[65]
Tb0.7Sol‐gel500ARemazol red RB‐133[29]
Ho0.3Sol‐gel500AMethyl orange[23]
Ho0.5Sol‐gel600AMethyl orange[23]
Ho0.5Sol‐gel500AMethyl orange[36]
Ho0.75Hydrothermal150A + RMethylene blue[46]
Er1.5Sol‐gel500AOrange I[26]
Er2Hydrothermal400APhenol[48, 49]
Er0.5Electrospinning500AMethylene blue[61]
Yb1Sol‐gel550ADirect blue dye (DB53)[75]

Table 6.

RE‐doped TiO2 used as photocatalyst in recent photocatalytic studies.

Initially, when TiO2 is exposed to light, it produces two types of charge carriers: electrons (e) in conduction band and holes (h+) in valence band, as presented in Figure 7(a). These e/h+ pair generations follow the processes of charge separation and migration to the surface. At the surface, active species in valence band (hvb+) reacts with adsorbed water producing OH radical and proton (H+). At the same time, active species in conducting band (ecb) reacts with oxygen to produce active O2•‐ radical. The radical reacts with the proton and produces OH2 radical. When paired, the OH2 radicals produce H2O2 which degrades into two OH radicals. The formation of OH is crucial for the degradation of organic dye. However, the rate of recombination of photogenerated e/h+ pairs is very fast (few nanoseconds) and substantial number can be recombined with just the release of heat [76]. When RE‐doped TiO2 is used as photocatalyst, incorporation of RE ions into the TiO2 host creates charge imbalance. With increasing charge imbalance, more hydroxide ions are being adsorbed on the TiO2 surface. Hydroxide ions (OH) restrain the recombination of e and h+, and additionally react with holes to produce surface hydroxyl radical (OH), which substantially improve the photocatalytic degradation of dye [26, 28]. The main disadvantage in the application of anatase TiO2 as catalyst is dominant absorption in UV caused by its band gap (Eg 3.2 eV). One approach to enhance absorption in VIS is doping. In the means of energy, doping can alter absorption threshold to lower energies. Incorporation of RE ions into the TiO2 host modifies the band gap of TiO2 with sub‐band‐gap energy levels of RE ions, as illustrated in Figure 7(b) [64, 77]. These energy levels offer electronic transition from the TiO2 valence band to the empty RE ion sub‐band‐gap energy levels. These transitions require less energy than TiO2 valence‐to‐conduction band transition and can be induced by visible light. In that way, RE ions in the TiO2 host enhance the separation of e and h+, contributing to photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes [28].

Figure 7.

(a) Basic photocatalytic mechanism under UV or visible light irradiation. (b) Modification of band gap with sub‐band‐gap energy levels of RE ions.

The main focus on the photocatalytic activity of RE ions incorporated into the anatase TiO2 is the influence of RE‐doping concentration [23, 26, 28, 31, 46, 56, 61, 65]. On the other hand, reports of comprehensive investigation of the type of RE ions in TiO2 matrix, in order to predict the influence of dopants on the photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light, are scarce [51, 75, 78]. The results for photocatalytic activity of 1 at.% RE (RE = Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er and Tm)‐doped anatase TiO2 nanopowders are presented in Figure 8. All of doped nanopowders were prepared in the same way, as presented in Figure 3. Methylene orange (MO) aqueous solution with a concentration of 5 mg/l was used in all experiments. Solutions were photocatalytically treated up to 4 h with 0.1 g of undoped‐ and RE‐doped TiO2 nanopowders. UV‐VIS light irradiation Ultra‐Vitalux 300 W, Osram lamp was used in all experiments in order to simulate the solar radiation. Absorptions of MO solution aliquots were measured after 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 240 min of illumination. The results of photodegradation of MO, observed at a maximum absorbance of MO at 464 nm, for Ho‐doped TiO2 nanopowder, are presented in Figure 8(a). The results of MO degradation for all samples were calculated by Degradation (%)=[(C0C)C0]×100%, where C0 is the initial concentration of MO solution and Cis the concentration of MO solution after 4 h, and is given in Figure 8(b). These results show that the incorporation of the RE ions into the TiO2matrix may bring a positive effect on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, as presented in Figure 8(b). The reasons could be attributed to the synergetic effects of anatase phase stability, reduced crystallite size, relatively large surface area, significant improvement of the separation rate of photogenerated e/h+ pairs and efficient absorption of visible light due to sub‐energy levels of RE ions into the band gap of TiO2.

Figure 8.

(a) The concentration of MO solution as a function of irradiation time for Ho‐doped TiO2 used as photocatalyst, inset: the absorption spectra of MO after different illumination times. (b) Photocatalytic degradation of MO after 4 h for various RE‐doped TiO2, with the fixed concentration of RE ions.


5. Optical properties of rare earth‐doped anatase

When light interacts with matter, the material can absorb, transmit or reflect some part of the light. Absorption spectroscopy is a method to measure absorption as a function of wavelength or frequency. Since light cannot penetrate opaque samples such as powders and other solids, it is reflected on the surface of the samples. Spectrometers with integrating spheres measure the change of reflected light of a surface and compare it to a standard, most often barium sulphate, which is taken to be 100% of reflected light. Then, the obtained value is relative reflectance, and the reflectance spectrum provides the information of interaction of light in the sample as a function of wavelength. In that manner, reflectance can be directly correlated with absorption. Nowadays, research‐grade spectrophotometers can combine detectors and extend detected light up to the near‐infrared region of 1400 nm.

Some of the absorbed light can subsequently be emitted as light, as was already discussed in Section 1. Then, the radiative processes can be observed by photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL). In steady‐state PL spectroscopy, we primarily refer to excitation and emission spectroscopy measurements obtained by a continual light source which emits a constant number of photons in time. Since exciting of electrons takes about 10–15 s−1, following energy dissipation, whether radiative of non‐radiative, is a much slower process so the number of excited electrons could be considered as constant. Absorption spectroscopy could suggest the wavelength that could be used to gain luminescence, but not all absorption result in emission. When we refer to the Jablonski diagram, it is obvious that absorption can occur to several excited singlet states, such as S1, S2, and so on, and expected emission normally occurs only from the lowest excited singlet or triplet states, S1 and T1. In excitation spectrum, a single emission detection wavelength is chosen that corresponds to an expected band in the emission spectrum. The excitation source is then scanned through wavelength region, and the intensity of the emission at the single selected wavelength is scanned in a function of excitation wavelength. The output of absorption and excitation spectrum is not the same, although detected maxima (or minima) at the same wavelength suggest the same excited energy levels. In luminescence emission spectroscopy, a wavelength of exciting light is selected, and emission spectrum is obtained by detecting the intensity of the emitted light as a function of wavelength. In downconversion emission spectroscopy, emitted luminescence is recorded in the spectral range above the excitation wavelength to longer wavelengths, up to the region where luminescence is expected. It was then of interest to study the influence of rare earth doping on anatase nanoparticles by the interpretation of absorption (reflectance), excitation and emission spectroscopy methods.

Samples of RE‐doped anatase materials are in literature most often characterized by a positioning of the threshold of absorption of doped samples and compared to the undoped ones. Even with the reduction of nanoparticles size after rare earth ions incorporation, the difference in extrapolated slopes after Kubelka–Munk transformations in doped and undoped nanopowder samples should not be ascribed to quantum confinement effect, since particle sizes exceed the Bohr radius several times [18, 79]. Some modifications of materials density of states after the incorporation of trivalent rare earth ions are the most probable reason for small differences in observed band gaps, which is highly dependent on the synthesis procedure and the RE dopant. Kubelka‐Munk transformation of reflectance spectra of RE3+‐doped anatase TiO2 measured over the 360–440 nm spectral range is presented in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Kubelka‐Munk transformation of reflectance spectra of RE3+‐doped anatase TiO2 measured over the 360–440 nm spectral range.

5.1. Praseodymium

The absorption of praseodymium ion in TiO2 hosts is reported in Refs. [28, 55, 80, 81]. From reflectance spectrum of TiO2:Pr presented in Figure 10(a), absorptions of Pr3+ ions in TiO2 absorption edge are observed at approximately 445, 480 and 595 nm that could be attributed to the transition from 3H4 ground state to the 3P2‐0 and 1D2 excited states of the Pr3+ ions. Low wide absorption at around 1000 nm could be assigned to 1G4 excited state. Excitation spectrum is recorded at a fixed emission wavelength of 493 nm in the range of 260–460 nm, presented in Figure 10(b). Two wide excitations are observed at 325 and 447 nm. The excitation of 447 nm was used to obtain emission spectrum in the range of 475–780 nm. Even though the room temperature emission maxima are wide, several transitions can be assigned as follows: 3P03H5 (493 and 536 nm), 3P03H6 (620 nm) and 3P03F2 (650 nm), as can be seen in Figure 10(c). 1D23H4 transition is not observed, suggesting high concentration of Pr3+ ions in TiO2 matrix, where cross‐relaxation between neighbouring Pr3+ ions occurs [82].

Figure 10.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Pr nanopowders.

5.2. Neodymium

The absorption of neodymium ion in TiO2 hosts is reported in a spectral range up to 700 nm [41] and up to 1200 nm [34, 83]. From reflectance spectrum of TiO2:Nd presented in Figure 11(a), eight absorptions from ground 4I9/2 to excited energy levels of Nd3+ ions in TiO2 are observed and assigned in energy‐level diagram in Figure 11(b). Intense emission of Nd3+ can be obtained in the IR spectral range above 850 nm, Figure 11(c). Three transitions from 4F3/2 to its lower 4I9/2, 4I11/2 and 4I13/2 are obtained with an excitation of 752 nm. The transitions correspond well with the reported data of Nd3+ in anatase matrix [34, 40, 84]. The position and shape of 4F3/24I9/2 strongly suggest Nd‐doped TiO2 anatase sample, without the presence of other compositions of segregated neodymium oxide and neodymium titanate phases [34].

Figure 11.

(a) Reflectance, (b) energy‐level diagram and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Nd nanopowders.

5.3. Samarium

In reflectance measurements presented in Figure 12(a), significant absorptions of Sm3+ ion can be observed, with maxima positioned at around 480 nm, which corresponds to absorption into 4G5/2, and several strong absorptions positioned at around 947, 1080 and 1230 nm. Room temperature excitation spectrum is in the range of 310–550 nm at a fixed emission at 585 nm shown in Figure 12(b). Strong wide band below 400 nm, with maximum at about 365 nm, is characteristic for Sm3+ in TiO2 matrix that is assigned to charge transfer from the oxygen ligands in TiO2 to Sm3+ ion [18, 29, 34, 35]. Several smaller and combined excitations at around 411 and 476 nm could be assigned to 6G7/2 or 6P5/2 and 4I13/2, respectively [18, 34]. In Figure 12(c), room temperature emission spectrum in the range of 400–700 nm obtained after excitation into charge transfer at 365 nm showed only characteristic emissions from 4G5/26H5,7,9/2 energy levels. It is worth mentioning that the same spectral features are obtained also with exciting directly into Sm3+ ion by excitation with 411 nm, with all the intensities decreased as expected from the excitation spectrum. No complete splitting of Stark components caused by ligand field that are obvious at room temperatures and are in correspondence with the literature is attributed to the large number of defect at the surface [18, 29, 34, 35, 42]. When directly excited, the enhancement of Sm3+ emission in TiO2 by codoping with silver dopant, caused by combined influence of plasmonic effects and sensitizing of Sm3+ emission by silver ions, is reported in TiO2 films [85].

Figure 12.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Sm nanopowders.

5.4. Europium

The lowest excited level (5D0) of Eu3+ ion is a non‐degenerate (J= 0) singlet level, along with crystal field non‐sensitive 5D07F1 transition and hypersensitive 5D07F2 emissions simplify the interpretation of emission spectra. Consequently, europium ion incorporated in various matrices is often used as a luminescent probe ion in photoluminescence spectroscopy [8690]. In Figure 13(a), after a sharp rise of absorption in UV spectral range below 400 nm, low‐intensity Eu3+ absorptions from 7F05D2 at around 465 nm and 7F05D1 at around 535 nm transitions are clearly observed. Those transitions are also present in excitation spectrum (Figure 13(b)) obtained with an emission fixed at 613 nm. Four dominant excitation bands originate from direct excitation of Eu3+ ions from ground 7F0 level to 5L6 (394 nm), 5D3 (414 nm), 5D2 (464 nm) and 5D1 (532 nm) levels. By excitation into 5L6 level, room temperature emission spectrum presented in Figure 13(c) clearly shows that emissions from 5D07FJ(J= 0–4) transitions are centred at around 580, 593, 613, 653 and 702 nm, respectively. A small emission observed at 540 nm is emission from higher excited 5D1 level. The positions and relative intensities of wide emissions are in correspondence with extensive literature data [18, 29, 42, 45, 52, 53, 63, 67, 69, 91]. In some presented results of low‐temperature site‐selective spectroscopy of the materials, three possible positions of Eu ion in TiO2 can be distinguished: Eu3+ can occupy Ti4+ site, it could enter into the interstitial site in the chain structure, or a third possible site for dopant cation is low‐symmetry‐distorted sites near nanoparticle’s surface [18, 19, 91].

Figure 13.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Eu nanopowders.

5.5. Terbium

Terbium ions often show a tendency to be stabilized by matrices in two valence states, +3 and +4. Only lower valence state is optically active in visible spectrum. The mixture of valences can additionally disturb crystallinity of matrices and introduce additional vacancies, and hence perturbations in energy states. In absorption spectra presented in Figure 14(a), no clear absorption of Tb3+ ion can be resolved, but significant difference in absorption threshold of TiO2 is obvious, suggesting possible weak absorption of energy in the range below 500 nm. Some reports state no or very weak emission of Tb3+ ion in TiO2 matrix attributed to the mismatch of the energy levels of the 5D4‐emitting state of Tb3+ with band gap of TiO2 [18, 29, 60, 69]. Nevertheless, as presented in Figure 14(b, c), excitation and emission spectra are actually obtained. At an emission wavelength of 545 nm, excitation spectrum was measured in the range of 300–500 nm. Wide charge transfer band can be seen below 350 nm, and excitations of Tb3+ ion from 7F6 ground level to 5D4 excited level are observed at 484 nm, two excitations to 5D2 368 nm and 5D3 at 377 nm. When excited into 5D4 excited energy level with 484 nm, emission spectrum in the range of 510–780 nm shows emission from 5D4 to 7F5 at 546 nm, 5D4 to 7F4 at 585 nm and 5D4 to 7F3 at 622 nm. The green emission at 546 nm is the dominant one. The findings are in good agreement with the literature [29, 60, 64, 69].

Figure 14.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Tb nanopowders.

5.6. Dysprosium

Reflectance spectrum of Dy3+ ions into TiO2 presented in Figure 15(a) shows low‐wavelength bands of Dy3+ that overlaps with the absorption threshold of anatase at 450 and 470 nm and intense longer wavelength bands in the range of 700–1300 nm. Excitation spectrum of TiO2:Dy3+ sample recorded at room temperature in the 300–500 nm range with a fixed emission wavelength of 577 nm showed excitations corresponding to electron transitions from the Dy3+ ground states to the excited states: 4K17/2 at 391 nm, 4G11/2 at 425 nm, 4I15/2 at 452 nm and 4F9/2 at 472nm, Figure 15(b). When excited with 425 nm, dominant luminescence is observed with two bands observed in the blue spectral region at 483 nm, which correspond to magnetic‐dipole 4F9/26H15/2 transition and in yellow spectral region at 580 nm, which correspond to electric‐dipole 4F9/26H13/2 transition, Figure 15(c). A low‐intensity emission is observed in the red region at 674 nm that corresponds to 4F9/26H11/2 transition. With literature proposing no luminescence from Dy3+ ion in anatase host [92], this finding shows that nanocrystalline anatase powders can actually host this ion that can successfully be excited and luminescence can be observed.

Figure 15.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Dy nanopowders.

5.7. Holmium

Among all RE3+ ions doped in nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 powders in this work, Ho3+ has the most pronounced absorptions in VIS. As can be seen from Figure 16(a), intense bands can be observed at 420, 456, 490, 542 and 645 nm and smaller intensity bands are observed at 890, 1150 and 1200 nm. In excitation spectrum at fixed emission wavelength of 554 nm presented in Figure 16(b), several excitations centred at around 422, 452, 468 and 493 nm show several possible energies for potential emission. As can be seen in Figure 16(c), when excited with 452 nm, emission spectra in the range of 500–700 nm show dominant emissions from 5F4/5S25I8 transitions at about 545, 554, and 559 nm, and emission from 5F55I8 transition with maximum centred at 665 nm. Emissions from the same transitions can also be observed in samples sensitized with Yb3+ ions, when excitation wavelength was 980 nm that corresponds to the absorption of Yb3+ ions, and the mechanism of obtaining luminescence is upconversion [50].

Figure 16.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Ho nanopowders.

5.8. Erbium

Absorptions of Er3+ ions in TiO2 matrices are reported in spectral range from UV up to 700 nm [26, 28], up to 800 nm [49], and when sensitized with Yb3+ ions up to 1200 nm [48]. All of the reported data correspond well with results presented in Figure 17(a). Absorptions located at 452, 477, 491, 525, 655, 795 and 980 nm correspond to the transitions from 4I15/2 to 4F3/2, 4F5/2, 4F7/2, 2H11/2 and 4S3/2, 4F9/2, 4G9/2, 4I11/2, respectively. In excitation spectrum shown in Figure 17(b), with fixed emission of 565 nm, some low‐intensity excitations can be noticed at around 378, 410 and 453 nm. More pronounced excitations can be observed at 488 and 525 nm. In order to characterize emissions in the range of 520–700 nm, excitation wavelength of 488 nm was used, and the spectrum is presented in Figure 17(c). From the combination of 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 transitions, wide emissions can be observed in the range of 540–575 nm, as also reported in Refs. [42, 92].

Figure 17.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Er nanopowders.

5.9. Thulium

Absorption of thulium ion in the sample presented in Figure 18(a) shows small absorption at 470 nm, as well as stronger absorptions at 690, 795 and 1210 nm. Excitation spectrum with a fixed emission at 495 nm showed poor optical answer with some picks that most probably originate from defect, Figure 18(b). In order to directly excite Tm3+ ion 470 nm excitation was used. Emission spectrum in the range of 490–780nm presented in Figure 18(c) shows shoulder of maximum at 495 nm originating from 1G45H6 transition and very low intensity of group of lines in the range of 650–670 nm that could be attributed to the 1G43F4 transition.

Figure 18.

(a) Reflectance, (b) excitation and (c) emission spectra of anatase TiO2:Tm nanopowders.


6. Conclusion

To conclude, the structure, morphology and optical properties of TiO2 nanoparticles may be substantially swayed by the addition of small quantities of RE3+ ions. Such nanostructures deliver new options to the already broad range of important TiO2 uses. In RE ion‐doped TiO2, anatase phase is stabilized at medium temperatures since the temperature of phase transformations shifts to higher values. The reduction of the crystallite size is readily observed and doping induces mesoporous structure with enlarged specific surface in respect to one of undoped anatase TiO2. Thus, the photocatalytic performance of nanopowder improves with the addition of RE3+ in small concentrations except for Pr3+ and Tb3+. Different rare earth ions cause TiO2 property changes of different magnitudes. Optical properties are altered too. The modification of materials density of states after incorporation of RE3+ ions in TiO2 causes changes in materials absorption which can be clearly evidenced from optical absorption spectra. Rare earth ions may be incorporated at three different sites in TiO2 structure: they can substitute Ti4+ in the bulk of particle, enter vacancy site, but they at large reside near surface in low‐symmetry sites. In such cases, the characteristic RE3+ luminescence is observed in the case of doping with the following ions: Nd3+, Sm3+, Eu3+, Dy3+, Ho3+ and Er3+, while luminescence of low intensity is detected for Pr3+, Tb3+ and Tm3+.



The authors thank Prof. Damien Bregiroux and Alexandre Bahezre from Université Pierre et Marie Curie—LCMCP for BET and TEM measurements. This work was done as a French‐Serbian collaboration under Bilateral project no. 451‐03‐39/2016/09/03. The financial support for this work was provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (Project 172056).


  1. 1. Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica. 1976;A32:751-767. DOI: 10.1107/S0567739476001551
  2. 2. Laporte O, Meggers WF. Some rules of spectral structure. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1925;11(5):459-463. DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.11.000459
  3. 3. Bünzli J‐CG, Eliseeva SV. Basics of lanthanide photophysics. In: Hänninen P, Härmä H, editors. Lanthanide Luminescence: Photophysical, Analytical and Biological Aspects. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag; 2010. pp. 1-45. DOI: 10.1007/4243_2010_3
  4. 4. Dieke GH, Crosswhite HM. The spectra of the doubly and triply ionized rare earths. Applied Optics. 1963;2(7):675-686. DOI: 10.1364/AO.2.000675
  5. 5. Dieke GH. Spectra and Energy Levels of Rare Earth Ions in Crystals. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers; 1968. 401 p.
  6. 6. Peijzel PS, Meijerink A, Wegh RT, Reid MF, Burdick GW. A complete 4fn energy level diagram for all trivalent lanthanide ions. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2005;178(2):448-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2004.07.046
  7. 7. Solé JG, Bausá LE, Jaque D. An Introduction to the Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids. 1st ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005. 283 p. DOI: 10.1002/0470016043
  8. 8. Yen WM, Shionoya S, Yamamoto H, editors. Practical Applications of Phosphors. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006. 528 p.
  9. 9. Dramićanin MD. Sensing temperature via downshifting emissions of lanthanide‐doped metal oxides and salts. A review. Methods and Applications in Fluorescence. 2016;4(4):42001. DOI: 10.1088/2050‐6120/4/4/042001
  10. 10. Eliseeva SV, Bunzli J‐CG. Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio‐sciences. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(1):189-227. DOI: 10.1039/B905604C
  11. 11. Wolfbeis OS. An overview of nanoparticles commonly used in fluorescent bioimaging. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(14):4743-4768. DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00392f
  12. 12. Wang Y, He Y, Lai Q, Fan M. Review of the progress in preparing nano TiO2: An important environmental engineering material. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2014;26(11):2139-2177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.09.023
  13. 13. Zhang DR, Jin XZ, Li JH. Effects of Sc and V dopants on the anatase‐to‐rutile phase transition and crystallite size of TiO2 nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2016;176:68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.03.027
  14. 14. Bavykin DV, Friedrich JM, Walsh FC. Protonated titanates and TiO2 nanostructured materials: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Advanced Materials. 2006;18(21):2807-2824. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200502696
  15. 15. Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2007;107(7):2891-2959. DOI: 10.1021/cr0500535
  16. 16. Diebold U. The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surface Science Reports. 2003;48(5):53-229. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0.
  17. 17. Roy P, Berger S, Schmuki P. TiO2 Nanotubes: Synthesis and applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2011;50(13):2904-2939. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001374
  18. 18. Antić Ž, Krsmanović RM, Nikolić MG, Marinović‐Cincović M, Mitrić M, Polizzi S, Dramićanin MD. Multisite luminescence of rare earth doped TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2012;135(2‐3):1064-1069. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.016
  19. 19. Luo W, Li R, Liu G, Antonio MR, Chen X. Evidence of trivalent europium incorporated in anatase TiO2 nanocrystals with multiple sites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:10370-10377. DOI: 10.1021/jp801563k
  20. 20. Liu Y, Luo W, Zhu H, Chen X. Optical spectroscopy of lanthanides doped in wide band‐gap semiconductor nanocrystals. Journal of Luminescence. 2011;131(3):415-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.07.018
  21. 21. Hanaor DAH, Sorrell CC. Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. Journal of Materials Science. 2011;46(4):855-874. DOI: 10.1007/s10853‐010‐5113‐0
  22. 22. Baiju KV, Periyat P, Shajesh P, Wunderlich W, Manjumol KA, Smith VS, Jaimy KB, Warrier KGK. Mesoporous gadolinium doped titania photocatalyst through an aqueous sol‐gel method. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2010;505(1):194-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.028
  23. 23. Shi J‐W, Zheng J‐T, Wu P. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activities of holmium‐doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;161(1):416-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.114
  24. 24. Yurtsever HA, Çiftçioğlu M. The effect of rare earth element doping on the microstructural evolution of sol‐gel titania powders. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017;695:1336-1353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.275
  25. 25. Nguyen‐Phan T‐D, Song MB, Kim EJ, Shin EW. The role of rare earth metals in lanthanide‐incorporated mesoporous titania. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2009;119(1-3):290-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.039
  26. 26. Liang C‐H, Hou M‐F, Zhou S‐G, Li F‐B, Liu C‐S, Liu T‐X, Gao Y‐X, Wang X‐G, Lü J‐L. The effect of erbium on the adsorption and photodegradation of orange I in aqueous Er3+‐TiO2 suspension. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2006;138(3):471-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.066
  27. 27. Milićević B, Ðorđević V, Lončarević D, Ahrenkiel SP, Dramićanin MD, NedeljkovićJM. Visible light absorption of surface modified TiO2 powders with bidentate benzene derivatives. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2015;217:184-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.06.028
  28. 28. Reszczynska J, Grzyb T, Wei Z, Klein M, Kowalska E, Ohtani B, Zaleska‐MedynskaA. Photocatalytic activity and luminescence properties of RE3+–TiO2 nanocrystals prepared by sol‐gel and hydrothermal methods. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2016;181:825-837. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.001
  29. 29. Saif M, Abdel‐Mottaleb MSA. Titanium dioxide nanomaterial doped with trivalent lanthanide ions of Tb, Eu and Sm: Preparation, characterization and potential applications. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2007;360(9):2863-2874. DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2006.12.052
  30. 30. Wang R, Wang F, An S, Song J, Zhang Y. Y/Eu co‐doped TiO2: synthesis and photocatalytic activities under UV‐light. Journal of Rare Earths. 2015;33(2):154-159. DOI: 10.1016/S1002‐0721(14)60396‐3
  31. 31. Niu X, Li S, Chu H, Zhou J. Preparation, characterization of Y3+‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic activities for methyl orange degradation. Journal of Rare Earths. 2011;29(3):225-229. DOI: 10.1016/S1002‐0721(10)60435‐8
  32. 32. Quan X, Zhao Q, Tan H, Sang X, Wang F, Dai Y. Comparative study of lanthanide oxide doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts prepared by coprecipitation and sol‐gel process. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2009;114(1):90-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.051
  33. 33. Kralova M, Levchuk I, Kasparek V, Sillanpa M, Cihlar J. Influence of synthesis conditions on physical properties of lanthanide‐doped titania for photocatalytic decomposition of metazachlor. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2015;36:1679-1685. DOI: 10.1016/S1872‐2067(15)60943‐3
  34. 34. Luo W, Li R, Chen X. Host‐sensitized luminescence of Nd3+ and Sm3+ ions incorporated in anatase titania nanocrystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113(20):8772-8777. DOI: 10.1021/jp901862k
  35. 35. Hu L, Song H, Pan G, Yan B, Qin R, Dai Q, Fan L, Li S, Bai X. Photoluminescence properties of samarium‐doped TiO2 semiconductor nanocrystalline powders. Journal of Luminescence. 2007;127(2):371-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2007.01.020
  36. 36. Shi J‐W, Zheng J‐T, Hu Y, Zhao Y‐C. Influence of Fe3+ and Ho3+ co‐doping on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2007;106(2-3):247-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.05.042
  37. 37. Zhang DR, Liu HL, Han SY, Piao WX. Synthesis of Sc and V‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles and photodegradation of rhodamine‐B. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2013;19(6):1838-1844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.02.029
  38. 38. de la Cruz D, Arévalo JC, Torres G, Bautista Margulis RG, Ornelas C, Aguilar‐ElguézabalA. TiO2 doped with Sm3+ by sol‐gel: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of diuron under solar light. Catalysis Today. 2011;166(1):152-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.08.023
  39. 39. Chen D, Zhu Q, Lv Z, Deng X, Zhou F, Deng Y. Microstructural and photocatalytic properties of Eu‐doped mesoporous titanium dioxide nanoparticles by sol‐gel method. Materials Research Bulletin. 2012;47:3129-3134. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.08.021
  40. 40. Ghigna P, Speghini A, Bettinelli M. “Unusual Ln3+ substitutional defects”: The local chemical environment of Pr3+ and Nd3+ in nanocrystalline TiO2 by Ln–K edge EXAFS. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2007;180(11):3296-3301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2007.09.025
  41. 41. Huang C., You W, Dang L, Lei Z, Sun Z, Zhang L. Effect of Nd3+ doping on photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles for water decomposition to hydrogen. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2006;27(3):203-209. DOI: 10.1016/S1872‐2067(06)60013‐2
  42. 42. Bettinelli M, Speghini A, Falcomer D, Daldosso M, Dallacasa V, Romanò L. Photocatalytic, spectroscopic and transport properties of lanthanide‐doped TiO2 nanocrystals. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2006;18:S2149–S2160. DOI: 10.1088/0953‐8984/18/33/S30
  43. 43. Hamza MA, Khalil ASh, Yaseen HM. Synthesis of Yb3+ doped TiO2 nano particles powder as IR filter via sol‐gel. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry. 2013;3:214-216. DOI: 10.4236/ampc.2013.34032
  44. 44. Zhang Z, Li G, Cui Z, Zhang K, Feng Y, Meng S. Influence of difference quantity La‐doped TiO2 photoanodes on the performance of dye‐sensitized solar cells: A strategy for choosing an appropriate doping quantity. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2016;237:242-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.02.005
  45. 45. Li H, Zheng K, Sheng Y, Song Y, Zhang H, Huang J, Huo Q, Zou H. Facile synthesis and luminescence properties of TiO2:Eu3+ nanobelts. Optics and Laser Technology. 2012;49:33-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.007
  46. 46. Zhou W, He Y. Ho/TiO2 nanowires heterogeneous catalyst with enhanced photocatalytic properties by hydrothermal synthesis method. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;179:412-416. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.094
  47. 47. Khan M, Cao W. Cationic (V, Y)‐codoped TiO2 with enhanced visible light induced photocatalytic activity: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Journal of Applied Physics. 2013;114:183514-1 (7pp). DOI: 10.1063/1.4831658
  48. 48. Bhethanabotla VC, Russell DR, Kuhn JN. Assessment of mechanisms for enhanced performance of Yb/Er/titania photocatalysts for organic degradation: Part 2. Role of rare earth elements in the titania phase. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;202:156-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.008
  49. 49. Obregón S, Kubacka A, Fernández‐García M, Colón G. High‐performance Er3+–TiO2 system: Dual up‐conversion and electronic role of the lanthanide. Journal of Catalysis. 2013;299:298-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.12.021
  50. 50. Pedroni M, Piccinelli F, Polizzi S, Speghini A, Bettinelli M, Haro‐González P. Upconverting Ho–Yb doped titanate nanotubes. Materials Letters. 2012;80:81-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.096
  51. 51. Yan X, He J, Evans DG, Duan X, Zhu Y. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of Si‐doped and rare earth‐doped TiO2 from mesoporous precursors. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2005;55(4):243-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.08.014
  52. 52. Qi X, Zou H, Song Y, Zhang H, Zhao H, Shi Z, Sheng Y. Hydrothermal synthesis and luminescence properties of TiO2: Eu3+ submicrospheres. Ceramics International. 2014;40:12993-12997. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.162
  53. 53. Li H, Sheng Y, Zhao H, Song Y, Gao F, Huo Q, Zou H. Facile synthesis and luminescent properties of TiO2:Eu3+ nanorods and spindle‐shaped nanoparticles from titanate nanotubes precursors. Materials Research Bulletin. 2012;47(12):4322-4328. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.09.010
  54. 54. Falcomer D, Daldosso M, Cannas C, Musinu A, Lasio B, Enzo S, Speghini A, Bettinelli M. A one‐step solvothermal route for the synthesis of nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 doped with lanthanide ions. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2006;179(8):2452-2457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2006.04.043
  55. 55. Wang Y, Chen G, Shen Q, Yang H, Li L, Song Y. A hydrothermal synthesis of Pr3+ doped mesoporous TiO2 for UV light photocatalysis. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2014;14(7):4988-4994. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2014.9487
  56. 56. Diamandescu L, Vasiliu F, Tarabasanu‐Mihaila D, Feder M, Vlaicu AM, TeodorescuCM, et al. Structural and photocatalytic properties of iron‐ and europium‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles obtained under hydrothermal conditions. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2008;112(1):146-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.023
  57. 57. Cacciotti I, Bianco A, Pezzotti G, Gusmano G. Synthesis, thermal behaviour and luminescence properties of rare earth‐doped titania nanofibers. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;166(2):751-764. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.008
  58. 58. Hassan MS, Amna T, Yang O‐B, Kim H‐C, Khil M‐S. TiO2 nanofibers doped with rare earth elements and their photocatalytic activity. Ceramics International. 2012;38(7):5925-5930. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.043
  59. 59. Kumar KS, Song C‐G, Bak GM, Heo G, Seong M‐J, Yoon J‐W. Phase control of yttrium (Y)‐doped TiO2 nanofibers and intensive visible photoluminescence. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;617:683-687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.067
  60. 60. Cacciotti I, Bianco A, Pezzotti G, Gusmano G. Terbium and ytterbium‐doped titania luminescent nanofibers by means of electrospinning technique. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2011;126(3):532-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.034
  61. 61. Yang Y, Zhang C, Xu Y, Wang H, Li X, Wang C. Electrospun Er:TiO2 nanofibrous films as efficient photocatalysts under solar simulated light. Materials Letters. 2010;64(2):147-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.10.028
  62. 62. Ikeda M, Li J‐G, Kobayashi N, Moriyoshi Y, Hamanaka H, Ishigaki T. Phase formation and luminescence properties in Eu3+‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by thermal plasma pyrolysis of aqueous solutions. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516(19):6640-6644. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.037
  63. 63. Liu H, Yu L, Chen W, Li Y. The progress of TiO2 nanocrystals doped with rare earth ions. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2012;2012:235879. DOI: 10.1155/2012/235879
  64. 64. Mazierski P, Lisowski W, Grzyb T, Winiarski MJ, Klimczuk T, Mikołajczyk A, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic properties of lanthanide‐TiO2 nanotubes: An experimental and theoretical study. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;205:376-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.044
  65. 65. Cheng XQ, Ma CY, Yi XY, Yuan F, Xie Y, Hu JM, Hu BC, Zhang QY. Structural, morphological, optical and photocatalytic properties of Gd‐doped TiO2 films. Thin Solid Films. 2016;615:13-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.06.049
  66. 66. Borlaf M, Caes S, Dewalque J, Colomer MT, Moreno R, Cloots R, Boschini F. Effect of the RE (RE = Eu, Er) doping on the structural and textural properties of mesoporous TiO2 thin films obtained by evaporation induced self‐assembly method. Thin Solid Films. 2014;558:140-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.03.002
  67. 67. Conde‐Gallardo A, Garciá‐Rocha M, Hernández‐Calderón I, Palomino‐Merino R. Photo-luminescence properties of the Eu3+ activator ion in the TiO2 host matrix. Applied Physics Letters. 2001;78(22):3436-3438. DOI: 10.1063/1.1372338
  68. 68. Burns A, Hayes G, Li W, Hirvonen J, Demaree JD, Shah SI. Neodymium ion dopant effects on the phase transformation in sol‐gel derived titania nanostructures. Materials Science and Engineering B. 2004;111:150-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.04.008
  69. 69. Meng Q, Zhang H, Wang S, Fu L, Zheng Y, Yang K. Preparation and characterization of luminescent thin films doped with rare earth (Tb3+, Eu3+) complexes derived from a sol‐gel process. Materials Letters. 2000;45:213-216. DOI: 10.1016/S0167‐577X(00)00107‐5
  70. 70. Zhang J, Li M, Feng Z, Chen J, Li C. UV Raman spectroscopic study on TiO2. I. Phase transformation at the surface and in the bulk. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006;110:927-935. DOI: 10.1021/jp0552473
  71. 71. Zhang Y, Zhang H, Xu Y, Wang Y. Europium doped nanocrystalline titanium dioxide: Preparation, phase transformation and photocatalytic properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2003;13:2261-2265. DOI: 10.1039/b305538h
  72. 72. Stengl V, Bakardjieva S. Molybdenum‐doped anatase and its extraordinary photocatalytic activity in the degradation of orange II in the UV and Vis regions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(45):19308-19317. DOI: 10.1021/jp104271q
  73. 73. Li F, Li X, Hou M. Photocatalytic degradation of 2‐mercaptobenzothiazole in aqueous La3+–TiO2 suspension for odor control. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2004;48(3):185-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.10.003
  74. 74. Parida KM, Sahu N. Visible light induced photocatalytic activity of rare earth titania nanocomposites. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2008;287(1-2):151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2008.02.028
  75. 75. El‐Bahy ZM, Ismail AA, Mohamed RM. Enhancement of titania by doping rare earth for photodegradation of organic dye (Direct Blue). Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;166:138-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.022
  76. 76. Serp P, Machado B. Photocatalysis on nanostructured carbon supported catalysts. In: Nanostructured Carbon Materials for Catalysis. Great Britain:The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015. pp. 412-444. DOI: 10.1039/9781782622567‐00412
  77. 77. Xie Y, Yuan C. Photocatalysis of neodymium ion modified TiO2 sol under visible light irradiation. Applied Surface Science. 2004;221:17-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0169‐4332(03)00945‐0
  78. 78. Xu A‐W, Gao Y, Liu H‐Q. The preparation, characterization, and their photocatalytic activities of rare‐earth‐doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Catalysis. 2002;207:151-157. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.2002.3539
  79. 79. Hörmann U, Kaiser U, Albrecht M, Geserick J, Hüsing N. Structure and luminescence of sol‐gel synthesized anatase nanoparticles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2010;209(1):012039 (7pp). DOI: 10.1088/1742‐6596/209/1/012039
  80. 80. Yang J, Dai J, Li J. Synthesis, characterization and degradation of bisphenol A using Pr, N co‐doped TiO2 with highly visible light activity. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257(21):8965-8973. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.074
  81. 81. Su W, Chen J, Wu L, Wang X, Wang X, Fu X. Visible light photocatalysis on praseo-dymium(III)‐nitrate‐modified TiO2 prepared by an ultrasound method. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2008;77:264-271. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.015
  82. 82. Li Y‐C, Chang Y‐H, Lin Y‐F, Chang Y‐S, Lin Y‐J. Luminescent properties of trivalent praseodymium‐doped lanthanum aluminum germanate LaAlGe2O7. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2007;68(10):1940-1945. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.06.013
  83. 83. de Sousa Filho PC, Lima JF, Serra OA. From lighting to photoprotection: Fundamentals and applications of rare earth materials. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2015;26(12):2471-2495. DOI: 10.5935/0103‐5053.20150328
  84. 84. Yildirim S, Yurddaskal M, Dikici T, Aritman I, Ertekin K, Celik E. Structural and luminescence properties of undoped, Nd3+ and Er3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis method. Ceramics International. 2016;42(9):10579-10586. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.131
  85. 85. Dolgov L, Kiisk V, Reedo V, Pikker S, Sildos I, Kikas J. Sensitizing of Sm3+ fluorescence by silver dopant in the TiO2 films. Central European Journal of Physics. 2011;9(2):542-546. DOI: 10.2478/s11534‐010‐0069‐x
  86. 86. Buenzli JCG, Plancherel D, Pradervand GO. The europium(III) ion as luminescent probe: structural investigation of complexes between europium nitrate and two polyethers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1989;93(2):980-984. DOI: 10.1021/j100339a083
  87. 87. Wolfbeis OS, Dürkop A, Wu M, Lin Z. A europium‐ion‐based luminescent sensing probe for hydrogen peroxide. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2002;41(23):4495-4498.DOI: 10.1002/1521‐3773(20021202)41:23<4495::AID‐ANIE4495>3.0.CO;2‐I
  88. 88. Reisfeld R, Zigansky E, Gaft M. Europium probe for estimation of site symmetry in glass films, glasses and crystals. Molecular Physics. 2004;102(11-12):1319-1330. DOI: 10.1080/00268970410001728609
  89. 89. Tanner PA. Some misconceptions concerning the electronic spectra of tri‐positive europium and cerium. Chemical Society Reviews. 2013;42(12):5090-5101. DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60033E
  90. 90. Binnemans K. Interpretation of europium(III) spectra. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2015;295:1-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.02.015
  91. 91. Xueyuan C, Wenqin L, Yongsheng L, Guokui L. Recent progress on spectroscopy of lanthanide ions incorporated in semiconductor nanocrystals. Journal of Rare Earths. 2007;25(5):515-525. DOI: 10.1016/S1002‐0721(07)60555‐9
  92. 92. Chakraborty A, Debnath GH, Saha NR, Chattopadhyay D, Waldeck DH, Mukherjee P. Identifying the correct host‐guest combination to sensitize trivalent lanthanide (guest) luminescence: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a model host system. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2016;120(41):23870-23882. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08421

Written By

Vesna Ðorđević, Bojana Milićević and Miroslav D. Dramićanin

Submitted: December 2nd, 2016 Reviewed: March 29th, 2017 Published: July 26th, 2017