Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
The bamboo charcoal is manufactured in earth kilns with the temperature at 700–800°C from Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Bamboo vinegars, by-products of the charcoal, are collected from the chimney outflow of earthen kiln at six different temperatures at 80–150°C, and with categories over 80, 90–92, 99–102, 120–123, and 145–150°C during the pyrolysis of the charcoal. The preliminary safety evaluation using the Ames test for the bamboo charcoals has no cytotoxicity and mutagenicity toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 with S9 mix and without S9 mix. This suggests that the charcoal can not only be considered to be a safe pigment for food but also be used as a natural moisture-proof material. The safety of the bamboo vinegars shows that neither cytotoxicity nor mutagenicity toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 with S9 mix at the diluting percent content of vinegars is lower than 20.00% or less and without S9 mix is at 33.33% or less, and the reverse mutation assay (antimutagenic activity) denotes that the vinegars express this dose-dependent inhibitory effect against both 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and aflatoxin B1 in S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100. The main compounds in the vinegars may partially account for the safety evaluation of biological action.
Department of Wood Based Materials and Design, College of Agriculture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
*Address all correspondence to: alexhlin@mail.ncyu.edu.tw
1. Introduction
Bamboo is regarded as a natural and renewable bioresource, a green and environmentally friendly material, and has chemical and physical qualities/properties similar to wood. It quickly reaches its full potential size, which usually only takes approximately 60–70 days after the bamboo culms emerge from the ground [1]. According to the annual statistics of the agricultural reports in Taiwan (2015), the volume of diverse bamboos is about 1,581,330,000 pieces. The three main types of bamboo used include Phyllostachys makinoi Hayata (Makino bamboo), Phyllostachys heterocycla Milf (Moso bamboo), and Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro (Ma bamboo) [2]. This indicates that bamboo is one of the economic green resources in Taiwan. Among these bamboos, Moso bamboo has been mainly used as a material for the making of furniture, handicrafts, and athletic/leisure goods, because it can grow over 20 m tall and 60–150 mm in diameter in one growing season [3]. Moreover, bamboo is accumulated from organic compounds from which a bamboo converts carbon dioxide (CO2) by photosynthesis, but it can naturally decay by organic compound oxidization or be burned, and this produces CO2 that returns to the atmosphere. To decrease bamboo decaying or burning, the preparation of charcoal becomes one of the selected methods because carbon can extend the lifetime of bamboo [4]. In other words, the charcoals can also become earth friendly materials because they can slow down the increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.
Bamboo and its products show good prospects for commercial applications, when considering the need for the protection of our wood resources and environmental balance. It is therefore important to study the characteristics of bamboo and its by-products in order to make good use of them. Domestic and foreign manufacturers and researchers have invested a great deal of money, labor and time to discover the characteristics and functions of charcoal in recent years. Bamboo charcoals are mainly derived from 4-year-old or older bamboo as raw materials [4, 5, 6, 7]. The utilization of bamboo charcoal, conventionally regarded as fuel, is widely applied to daily life or/and industry. The use of bamboo charcoal is more wide and diverse because it is a porous material with a high specific surface area that has lots of functions, such as indoor deodorization, humidity control, water quality improvement, air purification and so on [5, 8, 9]. Recently, there has been a tendency to maintain good health from food products. Some food producers have added charcoal materials into food products, for example, charcoal bread/cookies, charcoal peanuts, charcoal ice cream, etc. This is advertised as being able to absorb unclean substances, such as heavy metal elements, and producers have exaggerated that these materials can clean the intestines and stomach after eating. However, in May of 2006, the Department of Health’s Executive Yuan, Taiwan, announces that the charcoals can only be used as colorants of food without any medical and health effects, that is, as a natural black pigment only [10]. The charcoals can be added as a pigment in food, but it is a profound question whether or not residue in vivo causes any harm by inducing cell lesions or carcinogens.
The application of bamboo vinegar (brown-red transparent liquids), even the compounds that are complex and different, is mainly able to be divided into three main portions: acid, phenol, and neutral compounds [11]. The vinegar consists of 80–200 compounds: 32% organic acid, 40% phenolic compound, 3% aldehyde, 5% alkone compound, 5% alcohol compound, 4% ester compound, and 5% others. When bamboo vinegar is dehydrated, there is usually 80% water [12, 13, 14, 15]. The organic compounds in bamboo vinegars may have practical applications even when present in only trace quantities [14, 16], such as in improving soil, promoting crops and preventing worm growth, as well as reducing agricultural chemicals, compost odor and sterilization [12]. Recently, bamboo vinegars have been developed that are beneficial for promoting growth of plants to as a plant root growth promoter or a pH value adjuster of cultural media [17, 18, 19]. It is also effective when used against allergies [20], in healthy drinks [13, 21, 22], as a virus/fungi/bacterial resistant [16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27] and as an agent of antioxidation, especially for a resistant lipid oxidation effect [15]. As stated in the above references, the commercial production of bamboo vinegar is being increased and highly valued for its diverse effective uses in Taiwan. However, bamboo vinegars collect at the exit of chimney of earthen or furnace kiln, when the carbonization temperature of bamboo is raised to over 500°C, produce some carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), such as naphthalene and phenanthrene [28, 29, 30]. The concentrations of these toxics increase with the increase in temperature as well. Even though the council of agriculture in Taiwan has submitted certified agricultural standards of forest products (2004) to prove that it is necessary for bamboo vinegars to be collected at 80–150°C at an exit of chimney of earthen kiln and below 350°C for a furnace kiln [31], the collected bamboo vinegars from above this range of temperatures are necessary to evaluate the potential of mutagenic and carcinogenic agents, due to the fact that they are omnipresent in the human environment and seem impossible to completely eliminate.
Ames et al. [32] reports that for screening of environmental mutagens and carcinogens, the Ames test (safety evaluation), a convenient method to evaluate mutagenic activities of these chemicals, has been developed, and McCann et al. and Sugimura et al. have suggested that the mutagenic activities of a number of chemicals correlate well with the carcinogenic activities [33, 34]. The main goal of this chapter is to realize fundamental knowledge of the bamboo charcoal/vinegars as functional additives, while at the same time understanding the preliminary safety evaluation of both using the bacterial mutation assay on Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) TA98 and TA100 strains with and without an extrinsic metabolic activation system. Moreover, because the reverse mutation assay (antimutagenic activity) has an array of prospective applications in human care, such as the increasing application in drinks and food antioxidation, and has not been reported for the antimutagenic activities of bamboo vinegars that have been made so far, the antimutagenic activity of the vinegars is reported. Besides, the basic compounds of vinegars, collected at different temperatures from the exit of earthen kiln chimney and analyzed by using gas chromatography‐mass spectroscopy, are considered, in order to realized the effect of bamboo vinegars’ compounds on preliminary safety evaluation.
The preliminary safety evaluation, including cytotoxicity and mutagenicity, is performed in accordance with the Ames test [32], a widely used convenient and short-term assay with predictable accuracy for carcinogen up to 72–91% [35]. Referring to the Ames test, as proposed by Ames et al. [32], Waleh et al. [36], which indicates that if the sample is toxic for the strain, the bacterial count decreases, and the test result is likely to be misjudged. Therefore, the specimen cytotoxicity has to be tested before the mutagenicity test, in order to evaluate whether the growth of the strain is influenced. The mutagenicity can be implemented if there is no toxicity [32, 36]. In this report, the S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 are used as test strains. TA98 is the strain sensitive to frame shifting mutation, as caused by specific mutagens; TA100 is the strain for testing base substitution variation [37].
2.1. Cytotoxicity
The methods of the cytotoxicity for the bamboo charcoal and vinegars are taken 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mg of bamboo charcoal, as well as 0.1 mL of bamboo vinegars, collected at different temperatures (80–150, over 80, 90–92, 99–102, 120–123, and 145–150°C), from the exit of chimney of earthen kiln are diluted to a percent content of 50, 33.33, 25, 20, 13.33, and 10%, respectively. Both of them are examined with S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 for either S9 (+S9) or zero S9 (-S9) in accordance with the Ames test and the experimental procedure referred to [32, 37, 38, 39]. The colony count is calculated; if the bacterial count of the test group (+S9 or -S9) is larger than the bacterial count of the control group (no bamboo charcoal/vinegars) by 80% (the bacterial count rate, Survival), there is no toxicity [35]. The Survival (%) is the residual bacteria rate that is the percentage relative to the control (100%). The formula of the Survival of cytotoxicity is: Survival (%) = (the bacterial count of test group/the bacterial count of control group) × 100.
Figure 1.
Cytotoxicity of Moso bamboo charcoal toward S. tyhpimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
2.2. Mutagenicity
The mutagenicity is analyzed by using the method proposed by Maron and Ames [40]. The test charcoal and vinegars for this mutagenicity test, with or without S9 mix, are the same as for the cytotoxicity test, and the experimental procedure is referred by [37, 38, 39]. If the colony count of the TA98 and TA100 test group is larger than the control group by more than two times; that is, the mutagenicity ratio is larger than 2, the specimen for bamboo charcoal/vinegars is considered to have mutagenicity. The mutagenicity ratio is calculated as: mutagenicity ratio (MR) = induced revertants per plate/spontaneous revertants per plate (blank).
Figure 2.
Mutagenicity of Moso bamboo charcoal toward S. tyhpimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
2.3. Antimutagenic activity
The test vinegars of the antimutagenic activity are assayed according to the Ames method [40]. The mutagens are 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (NQNO) and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) that are diluted with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). NQNO (1 μg/plate for TA98 and TA100, respectively), a direct-acting mutagen and AFB1 (5 μg/plate for TA98 and TA100, respectively), an indirect mutagen which requires metabolic activation, require S9 mix for metabolic activation, respectively. A mutagen (0.1 mL; contained 1 μg NQNO or 5 μg AFB1) is added to the mixture of a strain (TA98 or TA100), and 0.1 mL of each test vinegar is added to S9 mix for AFB1 or to the phosphate buffer (0.1 mol/L, pH 7.4) for NQNO. The mutagenicity of each mutagen in the absence of an extract is defined as 100%. The inhibition (%) of mutagenicity of test vinegar is calculated as follows:
Inhibition (%) = [1–(number of His+ revertants in the presence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)/(number of His+ revertants in the absence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)] × 100.
The true density, BET specific surface area and average pore diameter of Moso bamboo charcoals are 1.68 (g/cm3), 138.70 (m2/g), and 2.41 (nm), respectively. Moreover, the heavy metal element of bamboo charcoal for Br, Pb, Hg, Cr and Cd is analyzed using X-ray Fluorescent Analyzer of XGT-1000WR [39]. Br and Cr are not detected because their amounts are probably very low. Both Cd and Hg in the charcoal are closed to 0.5 ppm. The Pb in the charcoal is 2.9 ppm. That meets the Sanitation Standard for Edible Natural Colorants, Food Sanitation Standards (1989), Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan at below 40 ppm [41].
3.2. Cytotoxicity of bamboo charcoal
The cytotoxicity test results with 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mg of Moso bamboo charcoal for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 are shown in Figure 1. The Survival (%) of the Moso bamboo charcoal with either zero S9 (-S9) or S9 (+S9) is higher than 80%. Waleh et al. [36] indicate that the amount of residual bacteria of S. typhimurium must be over 80% of the control group (Control) to determine that the test group has no cytotoxicity for S. typhimurium [36]. The Survival of the charcoals is higher than that of control by more than 80%, indicating that the Moso bamboo charcoal has no cytotoxicity for the test strains in the additional range of 1–10 mg/plate, and the dose for the mutagenicity test can be selected according to this range.
3.3. Mutagenicity of bamboo charcoal
Figure 2 shows the mutagenicity test results of the Moso bamboo charcoal for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100. The bamboo charcoal, without or with S9, in the test range (1–10 mg/plate) does not exceed spontaneous revertants by more than two times for TA98 and TA100, that is, the mutagenicity ratio (MR) is smaller than 2. According to the standards proposed by Ames et al. [32], if the number of spontaneous revertants induced by the specimen is larger than the spontaneous revertants of the control group by more than two times, the specimen has mutagenicity. Therefore, the bamboo charcoals have no mutagenicity toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100. Furthermore, Weng reports that the maximum percent weight of Moso bamboo at RH 40% is 6.7% and at RH 90% is 9.9% [39]. The water activity of the bamboo charcoal (0.57), compared to Aw for the growth of a microorganism environment, is below 6.0. The heavy metal contents (as Pb ppm base) of charcoal are below 40 ppm and meet the Sanitation Standard for Edible Natural Colorants, Food Sanitation Standards as well. For the Ames test, the bamboo charcoal has no toxicity and mutagenicity toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100. In the scope of this report, the above results indicate that the bamboo charcoal can be expected to be the same as the materials of edible natural colorants.
One of the cytotoxicity results for the bamboo vinegars collected at temperatures of 90–92°C with the original vinegar (no diluting) and a range of diluting percent contents of 50.00, 33.33, 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without S9 mix, as well as for with S9 mix with diluting percent contents of 33.33, 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% is shown in Table 1.
Cytotoxicity of bamboo vinegar collected at the temperature of 90–92oC toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
Survival (%) = (the bacterial count of test group/the bacterial count of control group) × 100.
Blank (the control group) was added without bamboo vinegars.
Mean.
The residual bacterial count of the control group (Blank) toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 is 1838 and 1500, respectively. For bamboo vinegars collected at temperatures of 90–92°C, the residual bacterial count without S9 for diverse diluting percent contents is 0–1830 for TA98 and 87–1641 for TA100; for those with S9, it is 1605–2000 for TA98 and 1736–2249 for TA100. Waleh et al. indicate that the residual bacteria rate of S. typhimurium must be over 80% of the control group to determine that the test group has no cytotoxicity for S. typhimurium [36]. The residual bacteria rate (Survival, %) toward TA98 and TA100 for bamboo vinegar without S9 mix at a diluting percent content 33.3% or less, and with S9 mix at 25.00% or less is greater than 80%. In other words, the bamboo vinegars collected at temperatures of 90–92°C has cytotoxicity for S. typhimurium at a diluting 33.3% less. For vinegars collected at all different temperatures, the Survivals are shown in Table 2.
Survival of diverse bamboo vinegars collected at different temperatures toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
Survival (%) = (the bacterial count of test group/the bacterial count of control group) × 100.
Unit: %.
The Survival of all bamboo vinegars collected from 80 to 150, over 80, 90–92, 99–102, 120–123, and 145–150°C without S9 mix at a diluting percent content of 33.33% or less is all higher than those for Blank by more than 80%. However, the Survival of the bamboo vinegar collected at temperatures of 99–102°C at a diluting percent content of 25% shows that the cytotoxicity toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 with S9 mix is lower than 80%, indicating “with toxicity.” It is asserted that the Survival of bamboo vinegars collected at all different temperatures at a diluting percent content of 20.00% less for either with or without S9 mix is no cytotoxicity absolutely, and the dose for the mutagenicity test can be selected according to the results (Table 2).
4.2. Mutagenicity of bamboo vinegars
Ames et al. report that the number of spontaneous revertants induced by the specimen is less than that for the control group by more than two times; the specimen has no mutagenicity [32]. Table 3 shows the mutagenicity results for the bamboo vinegar collected at temperatures of 90–92°C with a diluting percent content of 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without S9 mix and with S9 for a diluting percent content of 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00%. The spontaneous revertants of Blank are 65 for TA98 and 132 for TA100 and of bamboo vinegars without S9 mix are from 41 to 53 for TA98 and from 109 to 129 for TA100. With S9 mix, the spontaneous revertants of Blank and bamboo vinegars are 69–76 for TA98 and 140–206 for TA100. The results on the same Table 3 also show that the bamboo vinegars in the test range do not exceed spontaneous revertants by more than two times for TA98 and TA100 without/with S9 mix; that is, the MR is less than 2. The spontaneous revertants of the other bamboo vinegars collect at diverse temperatures, 80–150, over 80, 99–102, 120–123 and 145–150°C, at the ranges of the diluting percent content are smaller than those of Blank by more than two times [38].
Mutagenicity of diverse bamboo vinegar collected at the temperature of 90–92°C toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
MR (mutagenicity ratio) = induced revertants per plate/spontaneous revertants per plate (control).
Blank (the control group) was added without either bamboo or wood vinegars.
Mean.
The MR of the bamboo vinegars collected at all different temperatures toward S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without S9 mix for a diluting percent content of 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% or with S9 mix for a diluting percent content of 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% is shown in Table 4. No matter what the vinegars are for all collected temperatures and S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without/with S9 mix, the MR is less than 2. Neither mutagenicity nor toxicity is observed for bamboo vinegars collected at diverse temperatures toward S. typhimurium TA98 or TA100 without/with S9 mix. The bamboo vinegars, therefore, have no mutagenicity toward S. typhimurium TA98 at 25% less and TA100 at 20% less.
Mutagenicity ratio of diverse bamboo vinegars collected at different temperatures toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 without or with S9 mix.
MR (mutagenicity ratio) = induced revertants per plate/spontaneous revertants per plate (control).
Unit: %.
4.3. Antimutagenic activity of bamboo vinegars
If mutagenicity occurred in a treated material, the results of the antimutagenic assay would be confused due to increased or decreased numbers of revertants of TA98 and TA100 [42]. Hence, without S9 mix a diluting percent content of 25.00–10.00% and with S9 mix at 20.00–10.00% a diluting percent content are selected for the antimutagenic activity. NQNO and AFB1 are used as direct mutagens requiring metabolic activation and indirect acting mutagen, respectively [37]. Doses of mutagens, 1 μg for NQNO and 5 μg for AFB1, are selected from a dose-response curve of a preliminary experiment [43]. The His+revertants of strain are less than those of the control group (Blank), indicating that with antimutagenic activities. Meanwhile, the inhibitory effect of the specimen is expressed by inhibition (%), and the higher the inhibition, the more effective the antimutagenic activities [40]. The inhibitory effects for one of the antimutagenic activity results for the bamboo vinegar collected at temperatures of 90–92°C with a diluting percent content of 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% for NQNO and at 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% for AFB1 are summarized in Table 5.
Antimutagenic activity of diverse bamboo vinegar collected at the temperature of 90–92°C toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 with S9 mix.
Inhibition (%) = [1–(number of His+revertants in the presence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)/(number of His+revertants in the absence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)] × 100.
Blank (the control group) is added without either bamboo or wood vinegars.
Mean.
The His+ revertants of strain against the NQNO in Blank (without bamboo vinegars) are 1128 for TA98, and 1445 for TA100, for AFB1: they are 1824 for TA98 and 2406 for TA100. The spontaneous revertants without NQNO are 65 for TA98 and 132 for TA100 and without AFB1 are 76 for TA98 and 140 for TA100. The His+ revertants of strain (inhibition,%) against the NQNO for bamboo vinegar at 90–92°C with different diluting percent contents are 807–985 (30.18–13.49%) for TA98 and 425–616 (77.65–63.15%) for TA100. For AFB1, they are 1114–1319 (40.63–28.88%) for TA98 and 843–1202 (68.97–53.14%) for TA100 from bamboo vinegar at 90–92°C with different diluting percents. The results also show that the higher diluting percent content, the greater the inhibition, as well as, no matter what the vinegar is, the inhibition for TA100 is greater than that of TA98. Moreover, the inhibition of the bamboo vinegars collected at all different temperatures against the NQNO for diluting percent contents of 25.00, 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% or against the AFB1 at 20.00, 13.33 and 10.00% is shown in Table 6.
Inhibition of diverse bamboo vinegars collected at different temperatures toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 with S9 mix.
Inhibition (%) = [1–(number of His+revertants in the presence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)/(number of His+revertants in the absence of the test vinegar—number of spontaneous revertants)] × 100.
The inhibition of the bamboo vinegars to TA98 is 0.19–30.18% for NQNO and 0.92–40.63% for AFB1. For TA100 against NQNO (18.18–81.77%) and AFB1 (37.43–75.24%), they are better than those for TA98. The antimutagenic activity to NQNO is effective for bamboo vinegars collected at diverse temperatures with a diluting percent content of 25.00% or less, and for AFB1, it is also effective at a 20.00% or less diluting percent content. Furthermore, the bamboo vinegars show that the inhibitory effect on NQNO or AFB1 toward TA100 is greater than that toward TA98. It is also indicated that the inhibition of the vinegars against AFB1 toward TA98 and TA100 is better than that against NQNO.
4.4. Effect of bamboo vinegars’ compounds on preliminary safety evaluation
The identified compounds of bamboo vinegars collected from different temperatures in the category of 80–150°C, over 80, 90–92, 99–102, 120–123 and 145–150°C are analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy [15, 38, 44]. The acid, phenol, ketone and other compounds of bamboo vinegars are about 10.65–20.09%, 57.87–65.98%, 10.13–18.76% and 9.66–15.30, respectively. The acid compounds included butanoic acid, 2-methoxyethyl acetate, 4-hydroxy-butanoic acid and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-butanoic acid. The maximum fraction of acid compounds is the bamboo vinegar collected from 80 to 150°C. The phenol (5.93–16.60%), 2-methoxy-phenol (8.27–16.39%) and 4-ethyl-phenol (3.68–9.48%) are the main fractions of phenol compounds for bamboo vinegars. For ketone compounds, the 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone-1-one, 2, 3-dimethyl-2-cyclopentenone-1-one and maltol can be measured for bamboo vinegars collected at all temperatures. The maximum fraction of ketone compounds is the bamboo vinegar collected from 120 to 123°C.
According to the former, results of safety evaluation (Tables 1 and 2; Tables 3 and 4) and antimutagenic activity (Tables 5 and 6) are present in diverse bamboo vinegars, the mutagenicity is occurred in the diluting percent content of vinegars that are higher than 20.00%, and without S9 mix is at 33.33%, but the diluting percent content of vinegars of 20.00% or less, expressed the amount-dependent inhibitory effect against both NQNO with 1 μg/plate and AFB1 with 5 μg/plate in S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100. This is because the antimicrobial activity is affected by some phenol compounds [45]. In this report, the main fractions of bamboo vinegars are phenol compounds, 57.87–65.98% [38]. It is inferred that the phenol compounds may partially account for the biological action of bamboo vinegars.
The biological action of bamboo charcoal and vinegars is evaluated by Salmonella mutagenesis assay, as a safety evaluation and antimutagenic activity. The charcoal can be expected to be similar to the materials of edible natural colorants and/or natural drying agents, because the water activity of charcoal is below 6.0, the Pb base of charcoal is below 40 ppm, and the bamboo charcoals have no toxicity and mutagenicity toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100. For the bamboo vinegars, the main percent content of the phenol compounds for bamboo vinegars is phenol (5.93–16.60%) and 2-methoxy-phenol (8.27–16.39%). The diluting percent content of vinegars is lower than 20.00% or less with S9 mix and 33.33% or less without S9 mix in cytotoxicity and mutagenicity toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 because the rest of the bacterium (Survival) these percent contents is higher than 80% of the control group (Blank), and the mutagenicity ratio (MR) is less than for the control group by more than two times. The diluting percent content of vinegars of 20.00% or less expressed the amount-dependent inhibitory effect against both the mutagenicity of 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (NQNO) with 1 μg/plate and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) with 5 μg/plate in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100. It is suggested that bamboo vinegars with a diluting percent content to the least extent of 20.00% or less have no cytotoxicity and mutagenicity, and their antimutagenic activity with NQNO and AFB1 is effective. The bamboo vinegars in the extent of this report can be as the reference of functional additives, due to their prospective applications in human care, such as in the portion of drinks or/and food.
References
1.Austin R, Ueda K. Bamboo. New York: John Weatherhill Inc; p. 1970. 215 Record Number: 19780646836
2.Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. The Annual Statistics of the Agricultural Reports. Taiwan ROC: Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan Publication; 2015
3.Wang D, Shen SJ. Bamboos of China. Portland, Oregon: Timer Press; 1987. p. 167
4.Lin YZ, Hwang GS. Contribution of CO2 reduction from wood based wastes charcoal materials. Forest Technology Report. 2006;13(1):23-27
5.Hung CP. Application of wood/bamboo charcoal in life. Forest Technology Report. 2004;11(3):18-21
6.Wang SY, Hung CP, Wang CK, Wan WT, Lai FT. Prosperity examination and activation preparation of bamboo. Industrial Materials. 2004;205:86-92
7.Wang CK. Effects on the basic properties and ability of carbonization of Taiwan giant bamboo and bamboo carbonized materials [thesis]. Taiwan: National Taiwan University; 2004
8.Lin YZ, Hwang GS, Wang IS. Introduction to production and utilization of bamboo charcoal. Forest Technology Report. 2003;10(3):31
9.Lin HC, Li ST, Shiah TC, Duh MH, Fujimoto N. Charcoals evaluation regarding the effect of preservative-treated woods leached metal loss on water-based environment. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. Japan. 2016;61(2):351-359
10.Lee BS. Bamboo charcoal for inside body environmental protection. All Health. 2007;262:69-70
11.Yataga M, Nishimoto M, Hori K, Ohira T, Shibata A. Termiticidal activity of wood vinegar, its components and their homologues. Journal of Wood Science. 2002;48:338-342. DOI:10.1007/BF00831357
12.Ikimoto T, Ikeshima O. Usages of Bamboo Charcoal and Bamboo Vinegar. Japan: Nobunkyou Publication; 2000. p. 320
13.Nomura R. Healthy Effects of Bamboo Vinegar. Japan: Nobunkyou Publication; 2004. p. 245
14.Uchimura T, Tanikai H, Hosoukawa K. Issues of Bamboo Charcoal and Bamboo Vinegar. Japan: Soumorisya Publication; 2000. p. 256
15.Tsai CT. Evaluation of antioxidation activity and resist lipid oxidation effect with Moso bamboo vinegar collected from different temperatures [thesis]. Taiwan: National Chiayi University; 2009
16.Lin HC, Ohuchi T, Murase Y, Shiah TC, Shieh SL, Chiu PC, Juan YM, Cheng SC. Application of bamboo vinegar with vacuum process to evaluate fungi resistance of bamboo materials. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. Japan. 2006;51(1):5-11
17.Huang YP, Peng CW, Huang YH, Tsai TR, Kuo WR, Lin HC. Investigation of Mikania micrantha charcoal applied on cultural media. Materials Science Forum. 2011;685:216-229. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.685.216
18.Lin HC, Huang YH, Tsai TR, Peng CW, Hwang GS, Kuo WR. Investigation of promoting growth of tomato plug seedlings from Moso bamboo charcoal cultural media with Bamboo vinegar. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. (NCYU). 2011;8(2):58-72
19.Ho HM, Kuo WR, Peng CW, Hwang GS, Lin HC. Investigation of yield and seedling growth of cabbage from cultural media with Moso bamboo charcoal. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. (NCYU). 2013;10(1):43-60
20.Hageta Y. Application of Wood/Bamboo Vinegar on the Cultivation of Grape. Japan: Nobunkyou Publication; 2004. p. 450
21.Kobahasi Y. Reductive Effectives of Agricultural Chemical. Japan: Nobunkyou Publication; 2004. p. 580
22.Yoshie L. Effects of Wood/Bamboo Vinegar on Cow Skin. Japan: Nobunkyou Publication; 2004. p. 520
23.Kou CW. Effects of heating rates on fundamental properties of vinegar during bamboo carbonization and its application on inhibit plant pathogenic bacteria [thesis]. Taiwan: National Chung University; 2004
24.Lin HC, Shiah TC. Evaluation of fungi resistance of Moso bamboo materials using bamboo vinegar with smoking process. Journal of Forestry Research. Taiwan. 2006;28(2):51-66
25.Lu KT, Kuo CW, Liu CT. Inhibition efficiency of a mixed solution of bamboo vinegar and chitosan against ralstonia solanacearum. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science. 2007;22(3):329-338
26.Lin HC, Murase Y, Shiah TC, Hwang GS, Chen PK, Wu WL. Application of Moso bamboo vinegar with different collection temperatures to evaluate fungi resistance of Moso bamboo materials. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. Japan. 2008;53(1):107-113
27.Chen PK, Wu SC, Hwang GS, Lin HC. Investigation on basic properties and antibacterial activity of bamboo/wood vinegars collected from different temperature. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. (NCYU). 2010;7(2):95-117
28.Namiki M. Antioxidants/antimutagens in foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 1990;29:273-300. DOI: 10.1080/10408399009527528
29.Horne PA, Paul TW. Influence of temperature on the products from the flash pyrolysis of biomass. Fuel. 1996;75(9):1051-1059. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(96)00081-6
30.Vasavada MN, Cornforth DP. Evaluation of antioxidant effects of raisin paste in cooked ground beef, pork, and chicken. Journal of Food Science. 2006;71(4):242-246. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00026.x
31.Council of Agriculture Certified Agricultural Standards of Forest Products. Taiwan ROC: Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan; 2004
32.Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/Mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Research. 1975;31:347-364. PMID: 768755
33.McCann J, Choi E, Yamasaki E, Ames BN. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1975;72(12):5135-5139. PMCID: PMC388891
34.Sugimura T, Sato S, Nagao M, Yahagi T, Matsushima T, Seino Y. Overlapping of carcinogens and mutagens. In: Magee PN, Takayama S, Sugimura T, Matsushima T, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund, Tokyo, 1975. Fundamentals In: Cancer Prevention. vol. 6. Baltimore: University Par Press; 1976. pp. 191-215
35.Ames BN, McCann J. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1976;73:950-954. PMID: PMC336038
36.Waleh NS, Rapport SJ, Mortelmans KE. Development of a toxicity test to be coupled to the Ames Salmonella assay and the method of construction of the required strains. Mutation Research. 1982;97:247-256
37.Mortelmans K, Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research. 2000;455:29-60. PMID: 11113466
38.Chen PC. Evaluation of bamboo/wood vinegars collected from different temperatures on antibacterial activity and preliminary safety [thesis]. Taiwan: National Chiayi University; 2010
39.Weng YC. Evaluation of adsorption properties and mutagenicity of activated carbons refined from charcoals [thesis]. Taiwan: National Chiayi University; 2010
40.Maron DM, Ames BN. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Research. 1983;113:173-215. PMID: 6341825
41.Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Sanitation Standard for Edible Natural Colorants, Food Sanitation Standards. Taiwan ROC: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan; 1989
42.Duh PD, Yen GC. Antioxidant activity of three herbal water extracts. Food Chemistry. 1997;60:639-645. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00049-6
43.Yen GC, Duh PD, Hung YL. Contributions of major components to the antimutagenic effect of Hsian-Tsao (Mesona procumbens Hemsl.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49:5000-5004. DOI: 10.1021/jf0103929
44.Huang YH. Antifungal activity of bamboo/wood vinegars collected from different temperatures against Tinea pedis fungi [thesis]. Taiwan: National Chiayi University; 2013
45.Yam TS, Shah S, Hamilton-Miller JMT. Microbiology activity of whole and fractionated crude extracts of tea (Camellia sinensis), and of tea components. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1997;152:169-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10424.x
Written By
Han Chien Lin
Submitted: 08 October 2016Reviewed: 14 March 2017Published: 20 December 2017
Open access peer-reviewed chapter
