Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Organic Field-Effect Transistor: Device Physics, Materials, and Process

Written By

Jingjing Chang, Zhenhua Lin, Chunfu Zhang and Yue Hao

Submitted: 20 October 2016 Reviewed: 01 March 2017 Published: 07 June 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68215

From the Edited Volume

Different Types of Field-Effect Transistors - Theory and Applications

Edited by Momcilo M. Pejovic and Milic M. Pejovic

Chapter metrics overview

3,809 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Organic field-effect transistors have received much attention in the area of low cost, large area, flexible, and printable electronic devices. Lots of efforts have been devoted to achieve comparable device performance with high charge carrier mobility and good air stability. Meanwhile, in order to reduce the fabrication costs, simple fabrication conditions such as the printing techniques have been frequently used. Apart from device optimization, developing novel organic semiconductor materials and using thin-film alignment techniques are other ways to achieve high-performance devices and functional device applications. It is expected that by combining proper organic semiconductor materials and appropriate fabrication techniques, high-performance devices for various applications could be obtained. In this chapter, the organic field-effect transistor in terms of device physics, organic materials, device process, and various thin-film alignment techniques will be discussed.


  • organic field-effect transistors
  • device physics
  • organic semiconductor materials
  • device process
  • thin-film alignment

1. Introduction

Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) have received much attention for plastic electronics due to their good solution processability, low temperature deposition, low cost, and compatibility with large-area printing technology. Although the conventional amorphous silicon-based semiconductors have achieved much progress with charge carrier mobility around 1.0 cm2 V−1 s−1, the thin-film deposition of conventional semiconductor usually needs high temperature process and dustless conditions which significantly increase the fabricating cost. Most importantly, the silicon-based materials are rare to be processed on flexible substrates due to their poor stretching characteristics. Nevertheless, compared to the conventional silicon-based semiconductors, the organic-based semiconductors exhibit low cost, good processibility and can be fabricated on flexible substrates. Hence, using organic semiconducting materials has become an important topic in the development of low-cost, large area, flexible, and lightweight devices.

Organic-based semiconductors have various applications as key components of numerous electronic and optoelectronic devices, including field-effect transistors (FETs), photovoltaics (PVs), and light-emitting diodes (LED). Especially for the field-effect transistor, a lot of efforts have been done to develop new organic materials to improve device performance with high charge carrier mobility and good air stability. Anyhow, OFETs have been considered as a key component of organic integrated circuits for application in flexible smart cards, low-cost radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, sensor devices, organic active matrix displays, and so on [16]. However, it is still far from satisfactory for practical applications. The focus of recent attention has been devoted to improving device performance and stability, reducing the fabrication cost, exploring new applications, and developing simple fabrication techniques. Overcoming these challenges relies on the novel organic semiconductor development and device optimization.

In this chapter, organic field-effect transistors will be discussed from three aspects: the device physics, device materials, and device processing. The first section will talk about the charge transport and related mechanisms in organic semiconductor materials and the techniques used to characterize the charge carrier mobility, such as time of flight, field-effect transistor, and space-charge limited current (SCLC) technique. In the second section, we discuss the organic field-effect transistor from basic principle, device structure, and the main parameters, such as charge carrier mobility, current on/off ratio, threshold voltage, subthreshold voltage, and the corresponding influence factors in the OFET. The third section will talk about the organic materials selection, including mostly used aromatic p-type semiconductors and n-type semiconductors. The forth section will discuss the fabrication techniques in the organic field-effect transistors, including vapor deposition, solution deposition, and some thin-film alignment methods.


2. Device physics

2.1. Charge transport and related mechanisms

The study of electron and hole transport in organic materials has a long history which dates back to 60 years ago. Many groups have done their efforts on this topic. In the mid-1970s, Scher group laid the theoretical description of hopping transport in disordered materials by using the continuous-time random walk model [7]. Until today, the exact nature of charge transport in organic semiconductors is still open to debate. However, a general idea can be obtained using the disordered semiconductors and highly ordered organic single crystals as the standards. In organic semiconductors, the charge carrier transport mechanism depends on the degree of order and falls between the band and hopping transport which are the two extreme transport cases. Typically, band transport could be observed in highly purified molecular crystals at low temperatures. However, the bandwidth in organic semiconductors is smaller than that in inorganic semiconductors (typically a few kT at room temperature only) due to the weak electronic delocalization [8]. Hence, the mobility value in molecular single crystals at room temperature reaches only in the range from 1 to 10 cm2 V−1 s−1. In the other extreme case of an amorphous organic solid, hopping transport prevails, which leads to much lower mobility values (at best around 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1).

When localization occurs in conjugated organic materials, the polarons resulting from the conjugated chain deformation under the charge action could be formed (or the charge is self-trapped by the deformation) [9]. This mechanism of self-trapping is often described through the creation of localized states in the gap between the valence and the conduction bands.

To better understand the charge transport in organic materials, a one-dimensional, one-electron model, the small polaron model, has been developed by Holstein [9]. In this model, the electron-electron interactions are assumed to be neglected, and the lattice energy, electron dispersion energy, and the polaron banding energy are the three terms which constitute the total energy of the system [9].

The charge carrier mobility is temperature and field dependence. For temperature-dependent mobility, when the mobility is extrapolated at the zero-field limit, the Monte Carlo (MC) fitting results lead to the following expression:


where μ0 is the mobility at room temperature and T0 is the room temperature. Since the temperature helps in overcoming the barriers introduced by the energetic disorder in the system, the temperature talked about here only depends on the amplitude of the diagonal disorder width. This expression deviates from an Arrhenius-like law, and this expression generally fits the experimental data well, as a result of the limited range of temperatures available.

The impact of an external electric field is to lower the energy barrier for the electron conduction band transport since part of this energy could be provided by the driving force of the electric field. In the presence of energetic disorder only, the Monte Carlo results generally yield a Poole-Frenkel behavior when electric fields are larger than 104–105 V/cm:


where μ0 is the low field mobility, β is Poole-Frenkel coefficient, and E is the applied electric field [10]. The field dependence becomes more pronounced as the extent of energetic disorder grows. The increase in electric field amplitude is also accompanied by an increased diffusion constant.

2.2. Characterization of charge carrier mobility

Charge carrier mobility can be determined by various techniques [11, 12]. The mobility measured by the methods with the measurement over macroscopic scales (~1 mm) is often dependent on the material order and purity. Instead, when the mobility measurement is over microscopic scales, the measurement result is less dependent on these characteristics. In this section, the basic principle of most used mobility measurement techniques, time-of-flight (TOF), field-effect transistor (FET), and space-charge limited current (SCLC) will be briefly described.

2.2.1. Time-of-flight (TOF)

For the TOF measurement, a few micron thick organic active layer is sandwiched between two metal electrodes (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1, first, the material is irradiated to generate charges by a laser pulse near one electrode. Then, the photo-generated holes or electrons migrate across the material toward another electrode depending on the polarity of the applied bias and the corresponding electric field (in the 104–106 V/cm range). After that, the current at that electrode is recorded as a function of time. Finally, for ordered materials, a sharp signal will be obtained, while for disordered systems, a broadening of the signal will occur because of the distribution of transient times across the material. The hole or electron mobility is estimated via the following equation:

Figure 1.

The setup of the TOF technique.


where d is the distance between the electrodes, F is the electric field, t is the averaged transient time, and V is the applied voltage. TOF measurements clearly show the impact of structural defects present in the material on charge carrier mobility. Charge carrier mobilities in organic materials were first measured with the TOF technique by Kepler [13] and Leblanc [14].

2.2.2. Field-effect transistor (FET) configuration

The electrical characteristics measured in a field-effect transistor (FET) configuration could also be used to extract the charge carrier mobilities (Figure 2). As previously Horowitz talked about [15], the derived current-voltage expressions for inorganic-based transistors in both linear and saturated regimes are also applicable to organic field-effect transistors (OFETs). These expressions in the linear regime are:

Figure 2.

The structure of thin-film transistor.


and in the saturated regime:


Here, IDS and VDS are the current and voltage bias between source and drain, respectively, VG denotes the gate voltage, VT is the threshold voltage, Ci is the capacitance of the gate dielectric, and W and L stand for the width and length of the conducting channel, respectively. In FETs, the charges migrate at the interface between the organic semiconductor and the dielectric within a few nanometer-wide channel [16, 17]. There are several factors that affect the charge transport, such as structural defects at the interface within the organic layer, the dielectric surface morphology and polarity, and the traps existing at the interface (that depends on the chemical structure of the gate dielectric surface). Contact resistances at the source and drain metal/organic interfaces also play significantly important roles, and when the channel length decreases and the transistor operates at low fields, it becomes more important. Anyhow, its effect can be accounted for via four-probe measurements [18].

The charge carrier mobilities extracted from the FET current-voltage curves in the saturated regime are generally higher than those in the linear regime due to different electric-field distributions. The mobility was found to be gate-voltage dependent [19], and it is often related to the presence of traps which is usually caused by structural defects and/or impurities and/or charge carrier density (which is modulated by VG) [20].

The dielectric constant of the gate insulator is another important parameter. For instance, measurements on rubrene single crystals [21] and polytriarylamine chains [22] show that the charge carrier mobility decreases with the increased dielectric constant because of polarization effects across the interface. At the dielectric surface, the polarization induced by the charge carriers within the conducting channel of organic semiconductors couples to the carrier motion, which can be cast in the form of a Frolich polaron [23, 24].

2.2.3. Space-charge limited current (SCLC)

The mobilities can also be extracted from the electrical characteristics measured in a diode configuration with an organic layer sandwiched between two metal electrodes (Figure 3). In this case, we are assuming that carrier transport is bulk limited instead of contact limited. The electrode is chosen in such a way that at low voltage, only electrons or holes are injected. In the absence of traps and at low electric fields, the behavior of the current density J quadratically scaling with applied bias V is a space-charge limited current (SCLC) characteristic, and it corresponds to the current obtained when the number of injected charges reaches a maximum because their electrostatic potential prevents the injection of additional charges [25]. In this case, the charge density is maximum approaching the injecting electrode instead of uniform across the material [26]. In this regime, when diffusion contributions are neglected, we can describe J-V characteristics as:

Figure 3.

The structure of a SCLC-based device.


where εr is the dielectric constant of the active layer and d denotes the device thickness. (Note that at high electric fields, it has to consider a field-dependence of the mobility.) With the presence of traps, the J-V curves become more complex. First, a linear regime with injection-limited transport is exhibited in the J-V curves. Then, a sudden increase occurs in the intermediate range of applied biases. Finally, the V2 dependence of the trap-free SCLC regime is reached. The extent of the intermediate region is governed by the spatial and energetic distribution of trap states, which is generally modeled by a Gaussian [27] or exponential distribution [28].


3. Organic field-effect transistors

3.1. Basic principles of field-effect transistors

In 1962, Weimer first introduced the concept of the thin-film transistor (TFT) [29]. This structure is well adapted to low conductivity materials and is currently used in amorphous silicon transistors. As shown in Figure 2, ohmic contacts are formed directly between the source and drain electrodes with conducting channel. Compared with the metal-insulation-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MISFET) structure, there are two crucial differences in the TFT structure. First, the depletion region to isolate the device from the substrate is absent. Second, instead of the inversion regime, the TFT operates in the accumulation regime although it is an insulated gate device. As a result, it should be especially careful when transferring the drain current equations from the MISFET to the TFT. In fact, the absence of a depletion region leads to a simplification of the equation as the following [30]:


Here, the threshold voltage is the gate voltage, and the channel conductance (at low drain voltages) is equal to that of the whole semiconducting layer.

3.2. Important parameters in OFET

3.2.1. Mobility

The FET J-V characteristics in different operating regimes can be analytically expressed by the gradual channel approximation assumption which means that the electric field parallel to the current flow generated by the drain voltage is much smaller compared with the field perpendicular to the current flow created by the gate voltage [30, 31].

In the linear regime, the drain current is directly proportional to VG, and the field-effect mobility in the linear regime (μlin) can be extracted from the gradient of ID versus VG at constant VD.


In the saturation regime, the channel is pinched off when VD = VGVT. The current cannot increase anymore and saturates. The square root of the saturation current is directly proportional to the gate voltage.


Eq. (10) predicts that plotting the square root of the saturation current against gate voltage would result in a straight line. The mobility is obtained from the slope of the line, while the threshold voltage corresponds to the extrapolation of the line at zero current. However, in the saturation regime, the density of charge varies largely along the conducting channel, from a maximum near the source electrode to practically zero at the drain electrode. Hence, the mobility in organic semiconductors largely depends on various parameters, including the density of charge carriers. Meanwhile, in the saturation regime, the mobility is not constant along the channel and the extracted value only represents a mean value. Therefore, it is often more rational to extract the mobility in the linear regime, in which the density of charge is more uniform. This is usually done through the transconductance gm, which follows from the first derivative of Eq. (3) with respect to the gate voltage [30].


This equation assumes that the mobility is gate voltage independent. However, the mobility is actually gate voltage dependent. In this case, an extra term ∂μ/∂VG should be involved in Eq. (5), so that this method is only applicable when the mobility varies slowly with the gate voltage [30]. Moreover, this method is very sensitive to the charge injection limitation and retrieval at source and drain electrodes.

3.2.2. Current on/off ratio

The current on/off ratio is another important FET parameter that can be extracted from the transfer characteristics. It is the ratio of the drain current in the on-state (at a particular gate voltage) and the drain current in the off-state (Ion/Ioff). For best performing behavior of the transistor, this value should be as large as possible. When neglected the contact resistance effects at the source-drain electrodes, the on-current mainly depends on the mobility of the semiconductor and the capacitance of the gate dielectric. The off-current is mainly determined by gate leakage current. It can be increased for unpatterned gate electrodes and semiconductor layers due to the conduction pathways at the substrate interface and the bulk conductivity of the semiconductor. Moreover, the unintentional doping could also increase the off-current [31].

3.2.3. Threshold voltage

Threshold voltage originates from several effects and strongly depends on the organic semiconductor and dielectric used. Generally speaking, the threshold voltage could be caused by interface states, charge traps, built-in dipoles, impurities, and so on [31, 32]. And it can be reduced by increasing the gate capacitance, which induces more charges at lower applied voltages. In many cases, the threshold voltage is not always constant for a given device. The Vth tends to increase when organic transistors are operated under an extended time scale. This is called bias stress behavior, and it has a significant effect on the applicability of organic transistors in electric circuits and real applications. And thus is presently under intense investigation [33, 34]. A current hysteresis could be caused by the shift of the threshold voltage on the time scale of current-voltage measurements. Large stable threshold shifts, for example, induced by polarization of a ferroelectric gate dielectric, can be used in organic memory devices.


4. Organic semiconductor materials

The mobilities of organic semiconductors have achieved significant progress in OFETs from the initially reported 10−5 cm2 V−1 s−1 for polythiophene in 1986 [35] to 10 cm2 V−1 s−1 for present diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based polymers [36]. The high mobility of organic semiconductors over conventional amorphous silicon indicates large potential application of organic electronic devices. The remarkable progress of organic semiconductors provides a road for organic electronic industry. Generally, for high-performance organic semiconductors, some critical factors, such as molecular structure, molecular packing, electronic structure, energy alignment, and purity, play important roles. Among them, tuning the molecular packing is especially important for high-performance semiconductors since the charge carrier transport is along the molecular π orbitals. Hence, the overlap degree of neighboring molecular orbitals significantly determines the charge carrier mobility. Molecular packing with strong intermolecular interactions is favorable for efficient charge transport and high field-effect mobility. The electronic structure and energy levels are crucial for the materials and device stability. In order to obtain the high-performance and stable organic semiconductors, structural modification with electron donors and acceptors are necessary. Except the above talked aspects, the film morphologies such as grain boundaries also could affect the charge carrier transport. The grain boundaries and disordered domains could hamper the efficient intermolecular charge hopping between them. Hence, increasing the crystal grain size and film uniformity could efficiently improve the charge transport and mobility. In this section, we introduce some feature compounds with mobility of/over amorphous silicon and/or with high stability.

4.1. P-type semiconductors

In the last two decades, p-type semiconductor materials have achieved much progress because of their simple design and synthetic approach. P-type organic semiconductors mainly contain acene, heteroacene, thiophenes, as well as their correlated oligomers and polymers, and two-dimensional (2D) disk-like molecules. Several comprehensive reviews have given detailed information about these compounds [32, 36]. Among them, the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are most representative of the class of compounds due to their unique features. Some representative p-type semiconductors are shown in Chart 1.

Chart 1.

Chemical structures of some p-type semiconducting materials.

Pentacene (1), as the benchmark of organic semiconductors, was first reported in 1970s, but the numerous OFET applications were only conducted recently [37, 38]. With strong intermolecular interactions and herringbone packing motif, pentacene exhibits efficient charge transport. Hence, polycrystalline thin film of pentacene (1) and tetracene (2) showed surprisingly high mobility approaching 0.1 cm2 V−1 s−1 [37] and 3.0 cm2 V−1 s−1 [39], respectively. The substituted tetracene derivative rubrene (3) showed the highest charge carriers mobility with 20 cm2 V−1 s−1 for single crystal device in the FET configuration [40]. This implies that the conjugated acene is a good building block for the p-type semiconductors. Later on, phthalocyanines (4) and more core-extended hexa-peri-benzocoronenes (HBC) (5) containing two-dimensional (2D) aromatic core were reported and showed typically discotic columnar liquid crystalline phases. As a result, the HBC showed enhanced mobility along the column due to the solid-state organization. Moreover, HBC-based OFETs by zone casting method exhibited a high mobility up to 0.01 cm2 V−1 s−1 [41]. The chemistry based on acene has paved the way for designing efficient p-type semiconducting materials.

The sulfur containing heteroacenes and their derivatives constitute another large group of p-type aromatic hydrocarbons, as shown in Chart 1. The thienoacenes and their derivatives were also synthesized and investigated as semiconductors for p-type materials. The asymmetric oligoacene, such as the tetraceno-thiophene (6), was also synthesized and showed similar mobility (0.3 cm2 V−1 s−1) compared to their centrosymmetric counterparts processed in the same conditions [42]. The tetrathienoacene (7) with aryl groups had a higher mobility up to 0.14 cm2 V−1 s−1 by vapor deposition [43]. The sulfur-sulfur interaction in the packing motif was believed to enhance the charge carrier transport. The introduction of sulfur and other heteroatoms induced different energy alignments and crystal packing, which promotes the development of p-type materials.

Among the p-type polymers, poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) (8) has been studied extensively and showed high mobility due to its good crystalline properties and well-ordered lamella structure which facilitates the efficient charge transport [44]. And it has been widely used as electron donor in organic solar cells. DPP-based polymers, such as PDDPT-TT (9), have been shown as high-performance semiconductor materials with hole mobility over 10 cm2 V−1 s−1. Moreover, the device exhibited excellent shelf life and operating stabilities under ambient conditions. Finally, exceptionally high-gain inverters and functional ring oscillator devices on flexible substrates have been demonstrated [45, 46].

4.2. N-type semiconductors

Although the p-type semiconductor materials have achieved much progress, the development of n-type organic semiconductors still lags behind that of p-type organic semiconductors due to low device performance, ambient instability, and complex synthesis. Owing to their important roles in organic electronics, such as p-n junctions, bipolar transistors, and complementary circuits, it is desirable to develop stable n-type semiconductor materials with high charge carrier mobility for organic field-effect transistors.

To date, n-type organic semiconductors with high mobility are relatively rare and significantly lagging behind p-type semiconductors, and most of the n-type materials are still air unstable in ambient conditions due to its high lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level. De Leeuw et al. reasoned that the air unstable problem is due to redox reaction with oxygen and water [47]. Based on this result, we can calculate the LUMO energy level and it should be lower than −3.97 eV in order to be stable toward water and oxygen. N-type organic semiconductors mainly contain halogen or cyano-substituted n-type semiconductors that could be converted from p-type materials, perylene derivatives, naphthalene derivatives, fullerene-based materials, and so on (Chart 2).

Chart 2.

Chemical structures of some n-type semiconducting materials.

The important n-type semiconductor material perfluoropentacene (11) was first reported by Sakamoto et al. [48]. This molecule adopted similar crystal packing to pentacene, and transistors fabricated from vacuum-deposited films showed a high mobility up to 0.11 cm2 V−1 s−1 and an on/off ratio of 105. It was thought that attaching fluorine atoms could lower the LUMO energy level of this compound. However, the LUMO energy level is not low enough to make the OFET device stable in the ambient condition. Similarly, the 2,5,8,11,14,17-hexafluoro-hexa-peri- hexabenzocoronene was synthesized by Kikuzawa et al. from hexakis(4-fluorophenyl)benzene [49]. This fluorinated compound was also suitable for the fabrication of n-channel transistors due to the decreased LUMO energy level, showing a mobility of 1.6 × 10−2 cm2 V−1 s−1 and an on/off ratio of 104. Based on these results, they showed that the halogen substitution is a proper way to obtain n-type semiconductors.

Naphthalene diimide (12) and perylene diimide (13) derivatives are two of the most studied n-type materials used in OFETs. Simple naphthalene and perylene diimides can be prepared from bisanhydrides and primary amines. Generally, the aromatic diimide in transistors shows an n-type character due to imide functionalization. Then, cyano or halogen was introduced to improve the air stability. Naphthalene diimide substituted with electron-withdrawing CN groups at the core position was reported by Jones et al. [50]. This molecule showed a mobility as high as 0.11 cm2 V−1 s−1 as well as good ambient stability compared to unsubstituted compound. Cyano-substituted perylene diimide was also reported by the same group [51]. The good air stability was also observed, which indicates that cyano substituent is another efficient way to lower the LUMO energy level and achieve stable n-type materials. Later on, the core-expand NDI bearing two 2-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)malonitrile moieties at the core (14) needs to be mentioned due to its good solution processability and good air stability [52].

Based on these results, it could be concluded that there is an efficient way to achieve stable n-type materials by combining imide functionalization and cyano or halogen substitutions. Electron-deficient aromatic diimides, such as ovalene diimide (ODI-CN), have attracted increasing attention as promising n-type semiconductors for OFETs (15) [53]. The materials of this class showed not only highly planar conjugated backbone but also easily tunable electronic properties through core and imide-nitrogen substituents with electron withdrawing groups and alkyl chains, respectively.

Similar to organic small molecules, the high-performance n-type polymers reported so far are much scarcer than that of p-type polymers. However, in order to achieve complementary circuits and plastic electronics, developing high-performance polymeric semiconductor with good air stability is essential. According to the previous works, the most promising results for n-type polymers is naphthalene-based polymer (P(NDI2OD-T2)), which exhibited an unprecedented high performance, with a mobility of >0.1 cm2 V−1 s−1 (up to 0.85 cm2 V−1 s−1) and on/off ratio of 106 and excellent air stability in ambient conditions. Furthermore, the semiconductors could be processed by gravure, flexographic, and inkjet printing technique, and achieve all-printed polymeric complementary inverters (with gain 25–65) [54].


5. Fabrication techniques

The deposition of semiconductors is the determining step of the OFET fabrication. And it will decide the performance of the devices significantly. Here, we will introduce some important techniques commonly used in the OFET fabrication.

5.1. Vacuum evaporation

This technique allows for deposition and purification of small molecule organic semiconductors. The process is performed in an ultrahigh vacuum environment. The organic semiconductor material is placed in a metal boat and heated by Joule effects or electron gun, and the substrate is placed above the boat to allow growth and formation of the organic materials. In principle, high molecular weight organic semiconductors cannot be deposited by this way, because they are too heavy to evaporate and tend to decompose at high temperatures. The main advantages of the vacuum evaporation are the facile control of the purity and thickness of the deposited film. Meanwhile, that highly ordered crystalline thin films can be realized by controlling the deposition rate and the temperature of the substrate. Its major deficiency is that it requires complicated instruments. This is different with the solution processing technique which is simple and low-cost.

5.2. Liquid deposition

Liquid deposition process is an important part of most OFET fabrication process, either to deposit the active layers or to manipulate layers deposited through other means. Many organic semiconductor materials have been engineered to be soluble or dispersible in solution, which gives a possibility toward the device fabrication. Many strategies have been applied to the deposition of organic semiconductors for utilization in OFETs. The common deposition methods include spin-coating, drop-casting, dip-coating, spray-coating, and roll-coating techniques (Figure 4) [55].

Figure 4.

A schematic summary of the solution-based deposition techniques discussed. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Printing comprises a family of techniques and can simultaneously deposit and pattern a target material. This technique mainly contains ejected drop printing, contact stamp printing, indirect and offset printing methods, and capillary stylus dispensing. The comparison of these techniques in terms of advantages and disadvantages has been reported by some comprehensive reviews [55, 56]. Among them, piezo inkjet printing has dominated OFET fabrication printing techniques due to its excellent compatibility and the availability of sophisticated print heads to the development community. In this technique, some parameters like ink viscosity, ink surface tension, and substrate surface energy are crucial for ejection and deposition of the droplets. It is necessary to control the droplet spreading and drying to avoid “coffee ring” effect and form precisely patterned arrays. Some method such as combining the antisolvent crystallization and inkjet printing has been used to produce highly crystalline organic semiconducting thin films. By this approach, thin-film transistors with average carrier mobilities as high as 16.4 cm2 V−1 s−1 have been achieved based on single crystalline thin films of 2,7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3, 2-b][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT) [57].

5.3. Thin-film alignment

Depositing of crystalline organic semiconductors with controlled in-plane orientation is one important issue for high-performance OFETs. It is generally accepted that charge transport in organic materials occurs via the hopping mechanism, which depends on the degree of orbital overlap between the molecules. Since charge carriers are preferentially transported along the π-π stacking direction in organic semiconductors, macroscopically aligned organic films have potentially higher mobilities and provide more unusual properties, such as optically and electrically anisotropic characteristics. Therefore, many deposition techniques have been investigated for patterning and alignment of organic semiconductors [56]. The techniques mainly contain (1) mechanical forces alignment, such as friction-transfer, nanoimprinting, and the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique; (2) depositing the organic semiconductors directly on the alignment layers prepared by different methods, such as rubbing and photoirradiation; (3) growing the organic semiconductors on inorganic single crystals; (4) using magnetic or electric field-induced alignment; (5) using solution-processed technique to align organic semiconductors on isotropic substrates.

Among the solution processing techniques, the traditional techniques such as spin-coating and drop-casting cannot control the thin-film orientation. Therefore, some methods have been used to overcome this issue. For example, zone-casting offers a route to control the orientation of the deposited layers. In this process, a continuously supplied hot solution is deposited by means of a nozzle onto a moving, thermally controlled support. Under appropriate rates of solution supply and solvent evaporation, a stationary gradient of concentration is formed within the meniscus, which gives rise to directional crystallization [58]. Dip-coating is another technique to give a better thin-film alignment in solution-processed devices [59, 60]. This process can be controlled by the substrate lift rate, solvent evaporation, and capillary flow. Solvent choice is especially important because of its effect on the rate of solvent evaporation. The drying speed which influences the thin-film morphologies can be quantitatively controlled during the dip-coating process by adjusting the substrate lifting rate.

Solution-sheared deposition is a recently developed approach that can deposit highly crystalline and aligned thin films on isotropic substrates [61]. This method is related to doctor blading, which employs a blade to distribute a viscous solution over a substrate. A small volume of a diluted organic solution is sandwiched between two preheated silicon substrates, which move relatively to each other at a controlled speed. The top wafer acts as the shearing tool and is treated to be hydrophobic and the bottom wafer acts as the device substrate. The motion of the wafers exposes a liquid front that quickly evaporates to form a seeding film comprising multiple crystal grains. These crystals act as nucleation sites and allow the remaining molecules in solution to grow along the direction of the shearing direction (Figure 5) [61]. It has been reported that by using this method, metastable molecular packing motifs (or lattice-strained crystal structure) could be formed, which can alter the intermolecular π-π stacking distance and enhance the charge transport properties [62].

Figure 5.

Schematic diagram of the solution-shearing method (a) and (b) cross-polarized optical microscope images of solution-sheared TIPS-pentacene thin films, formed with shearing speeds of 0.4 mm/s. Adapted with permission from Ref. [62]. Copyright 2011, Nature Publishing Group.

Slot-die coating is also a promising technique to control the thin-film alignment and self-assembly process for OFET applications. It has been proved to be a simplistic and manufacturable approach to fabricate large area high-performance field-effect transistors. This technique saves raw materials and controls film uniformity reliably, accurately, and reproducibly. The slot die coating is scalable to large areas and, therefore, applicable for the fabrication of large area low-cost electronics. We first applied this technique in the OFET fabrication [63]. Figure 6 schematically illustrates this process. A temperature-controlled vacuum suction plate was used to fix and preheat the substrates to a certain temperature. A small volume of organic solution is deposited onto the modified substrate surface by a slot die with different coating gaps ranging from 15 to 90 µm. The depositing speed is controlled within the range of 0.1–19.9 mm/s. The pre-exposed seeding film can act as nucleation sites and allow the remaining molecules in the solution to grow along the coating direction [63].

Figure 6.

Schematic of slot-die coating and the AFM image of the film with molecular structure superimposed. (a), (b) and (c) indicate the crystal axises of the crystal structure. Adapted with permission [63]. Copyright 2013, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.


6. Conclusions and future outlook

In general, impressive progress has been accomplished in the design, synthesis, and processing of organic semiconductors in the past few years. In the future, organic semiconductors will become more attractive due to comparable performance to traditional amorphous inorganic semiconductor materials, and their near-infinite tunability. Meanwhile, for large-scale fabrication of low-cost devices, solution-based film deposition processes at low temperatures with high charge carrier mobility are highly desirable.

Currently, more attention is focused on the solution-processable, air-stable high-performance organic n-type semiconductor; the relationship between the molecular structure of the organic semiconductor and device performance; and large area semiconductor thin-film alignment. Meanwhile, some important issues still need further investigation such as operational stability, low-cost and large area fabrication process, device integration, as well as functionalization in sensor fields. The study of the defect electronic structure of organic semiconductors will also be the important subject in the coming years.

In summary, although organic materials and devices still have some deficiencies, they can be improved and used in a wide range of low-cost functional devices to meet the needs of different markets, and they are sure to become a unique feature of our life in the future.


  1. 1. Crone B, Dodabalapur A, Lin Y, et al. Large-scale complementary integrated circuits based on organic transistors. Nature. 2000;403(6769):521–523. DOI: 10.1038/350 00530
  2. 2. Klauk H, Zschieschang U, Pflaum J, Halik M. Ultralow-power organic complementary circuits. Nature. 2007;445(7129):745–748. DOI: 10.1038/nature05533
  3. 3. Gelinck GH, Huitema HEA, van Veenendaal E, et al. Flexible active-matrix displays and shift registers based on solution-processed organic transistors. Nature Materials. 2004;3(2):106–110. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1061
  4. 4. Janata J, Josowicz M. Conducting polymers in electronic chemical sensors. Nature Materials. 2003;2(1):19–24. DOI: 10.1038/nmat768
  5. 5. Roberts ME, Mannsfeld SCB, Queraltó N, et al. Water-stable organic transistors and their application in chemical and biological sensors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:12134–12139. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802105105
  6. 6. Rogers JA, Bao Z, Baldwin K, et al. Paper-like electronic displays: Large-area rubber-stamped plastic sheets of electronics and microencapsulated electrophoretic inks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(9):4835–4840. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.091588098
  7. 7. Scher H, Lax M. Stochastic transport in a disordered solid. I. Theory. Physical Review B. 1973;7(10):4491–4502. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.4491
  8. 8. Brütting W. Physics of Organic Semiconductors. 2006; WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN 3-527-40550-X
  9. 9. Holstein T. Studies of polaron motion: Part II. The “small” polaron. Annals of Physics-New York. 1959;8(3):343–389. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(59)90003-X
  10. 10. Bassler H. Charge transport in disordered organic photoconductors a Monte Carlo simulation study. Physica Status Solidi (B). 1993;175(1):15–56. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221750102
  11. 11. Horowitz G, Delannoy P. An analytical model for organic-based thin-film transistors. Journal of Applied Physics. 1991;70(1):469–475. DOI: 10.1063/1.350250
  12. 12. Karl N. Charge carrier transport in organic semiconductors. Synthetic Metals. 133–134; 2003:649–657. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)00398-3
  13. 13. Kepler RG. Charge carrier production and mobility in anthracene crystals. Physical Review. 1960;119(4):1226–1229. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.119.1226
  14. 14. LeBlanc OH. Hole and electron drift mobilities in anthracene. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1960;33(2):626. DOI: 10.1063/1.1731216
  15. 15. Horowitz G. Organic field-effect transistors. Advanced Materials. 1998;10(5):365–377. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(199803)10
  16. 16. Horowitz G. Organic thin film transistors: From theory to real devices. Journal of Materials Research. 2011;19(7):1946–1962. DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2004.0266
  17. 17. Dodabalapur A, Torsi L, Katz HE. Organic transistors: Two-dimensional transport and improved electrical characteristics. Science. 1995;268(5208):270–271. DOI: 10.1126/science.268.5208.270
  18. 18. Pesavento PV, Chesterfield RJ, Newman CR, Frisble CD. Gated four-probe measurements on pentacene thin-film transistors: Contact resistance as a function of gate voltage and temperature. Journal of Applied Physics. 2004;96(12):7312–7324. DOI: 10.1063/1.1806533
  19. 19. Dimitrakopoulos CD, Shaw JM. Low-voltage organic transistors on plastic comprising high-dielectric constant gate insulators. Science. 1999;283(5403):822–824. DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5403.822
  20. 20. Tanase C, Meijer EJ, Blom PWM, De Leeuw DM. Unification of the hole transport in polymeric field-effect transistors and light-emitting diodes. Physical Review Letters. 2003;91(21):216601. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.216601
  21. 21. Stassen AF, De Boer RWI, Losad NN, Morpurgo AF. Influence of the gate dielectric on the mobility of rubrene single-crystal field-effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;85(17):3899–3901. DOI: 10.1063/1.1812368
  22. 22. Veres J, Ogier SD, Leeming SW, Cupertino DC, Khaffaf SM. Low-k insulators as the choice of dielectrics in organic field-effect transistors. Advanced Functional Materials. 2003;13(3):199–204. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200390030
  23. 23. Houili H, Picon JD, Zuppiroli L, Bussac MN. Polarization effects in the channel of an organic field-effect transistor. Journal of Applied Physics. 2006;100(2):023702. DOI: 10.1063/1.2214363
  24. 24. Hulea IN, Fratini S, Xie H, et al. Tunable Fröhlich polarons in organic single-crystal transistors. Nature Materials. 2006;5(12):982–986. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1774
  25. 25. Blom PWM, De Jong MJM, Vleggaar JJM. Electron and hole transport in poly(p-phenylene vinylene) devices. Applied Physics Letters. 1996;68(23):3308–3310. DOI: 10.1063/1.116583
  26. 26. Fichou D. Handbook of Oligo- and Polythiophenes. Weinheim, New York: Wiley-VCH; 1999
  27. 27. Bassler H. Charge transport in disordered organic photoconductors: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Physica Status Solidi. 1993;175(1):15–56. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221750102
  28. 28. Horowitz G, Hajlaoui ME, Hajlaoui R. Temperature and gate voltage dependence of hole mobility in polycrystalline oligothiophene thin film transistors. Journal of Applied Physics. 2000;87(9):4456. DOI: 10.1063/1.373091
  29. 29. Weimer PK. The TFT—A new thin-film transistor. Proceedings of the IRE. 1962;50:1462–1469. DOI: 10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288190
  30. 30. Braga D, Horowitz G. High-performance organic field-effect transistors. Advanced Materials. 2009;21(14–15):1473–1486. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200802733
  31. 31. Zaumseil J, Sirringhaus H. Electron and ambipolar transport in organic field-effect transistors. Chemical Reviews. 2007;107(4):1296–1323. DOI: 10.1021/cr0501543
  32. 32. Veres J, Ogier S, Lloyd G, de Leeuw D. Gate insulators in organic field-effect transistors. Chemistry of Materials. 2004;16(23):4543–4555. DOI: 10.1021/cm049598q
  33. 33. Salleo A, Street RA. Kinetics of bias stress and bipolaron formation in polythiophene. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2004;70(23):1–8. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235324
  34. 34. Kagan CR, Afzali A, Graham TO. Operational and environmental stability of pentacene thin-film transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 2005;86(19):193505. DOI: 10.1063/1.1924890
  35. 35. Tsumura A, Koezuka H, Ando T. Macromolecular electronic device: Field-effect transistor with a polythiophene thin film. Applied Physics Letters. 1986;49(18):1210–1212. DOI: 10.1063/1.97417
  36. 36. Nielsen CB, Turbiez M, McCulloch I. Recent advances in the development of semiconducting DPP-containing polymers for transistor applications. Advanced Materials. 2013;25(13):1859–1880. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201795
  37. 37. Roberson LB, Kowalik J, Tolbert LM, et al. Pentacene disproportionation during sublimation for field-effect transistors. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127(9):3069–3075. DOI: 10.1021/ja044586r
  38. 38. Watanabe M, Chang YJ, Liu SW, et al. The synthesis, crystal structure and charge-transport properties of hexacene. Nature Chemistry. 2012;4(7):574–578. DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1381
  39. 39. Clemens W, Fix W, Ficker J, Knobloch A, Ullmann A. From polymer transistors toward printed electronics. Journal of Materials Research. 2004;19(7):1963–1973. DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2004.0263
  40. 40. Podzorov V, Menard E, Borissov A, Kiryukhin V, Rogers JA, Gershenson ME. Intrinsic charge transport on the surface of organic semiconductors. Physical Review Letters. 2004;93(8):86602. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.086602
  41. 41. Pisula W, Menon A, Stepputat M, et al. A zone-casting technique for device fabrication of field-effect transistors based on discotic hexa-perihexabenzocoronene. Advanced Materials. 2005;17(6):684–688. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200401171
  42. 42. Tang ML, Okamoto T, Bao Z. High-performance organic semiconductors: Asymmetric linear acenes containing sulphur. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128(50):16002–16003. DOI: 10.1021/ja066824j
  43. 43. Liu Y, Wang Y, Wu W, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and field-effect transistor performance of thieno[3, 2-b]thieno[2′,3′:4,5]thieno[2, 3-d]thiophene derivatives. Advanced Functional Materials. 2009;19(5):772–778. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800829
  44. 44. Sirringhaus H, Brown PJ, Friend RH, Nielsen MM, Bechgaard K, Spiering AJH. Two-dimensional charge transport in self-organized, high-mobility conjugated polymers. Nature. 1999;401:685–688. DOI: 10.1038/44359
  45. 45. Li J, Zhao Y, Tan HS, et al. A stable solution-processed polymer semiconductor with record high-mobility for printed transistors. Scientific Reports. 2012;2:754. DOI: 10.1038/srep00754
  46. 46. Chang J, Lin Z, Li J, et al. Enhanced polymer thin-film transistor performance by carefully controlling the solution self-assembly and film alignment with slot die coating. Advanced Electronic Materials. 2015;1(7):1500036. DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201500036
  47. 47. de Leeuw DM, Simenon MMJ, Brown AR, Einerhand REF. Stability of n-type doped conducting polymers and consequences for polymeric microelectronic devices. Synthetic Metals. 1997;87(1):53–59. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-6779(97)80097-5
  48. 48. Sakamoto Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi M, et al. Perfluoropentacene: High-performance p-n junctions and complementary circuits with pentacene. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126(26):8138–8140. DOI: 10.1021/ja0476258
  49. 49. Kikuzawa Y, Mori T, Takeuchi H. Synthesis of 2,5,8,11,14,17-hexafluoro-hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene for n-type organic field-effect transistors. Organic Letters. 2007;9(23):4817–4820. DOI: 10.1021/ol702158a
  50. 50. Jones BA, Facchetti A, Marks TJ, Wasielewski MR. Cyanonaphthalene diimide semiconductors for air-stable, flexible, and optically transparent n-channel field-effect transistors. Chemistry of Materials. 2007;19(11):2703–2705. DOI: 10.1021/cm0704579
  51. 51. Jones BA, Ahrens MJ, Yoon MH, Facchetti A, Marks TJ, Wasielewski MR. High-mobility air-stable n-type semiconductors with processing versatility: dicyanoperylene-3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximides). Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2004;43(46):6363–6366. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461324
  52. 52. Gao X, Di C, Hu Y, et al. Core-expanded naphthalene diimides fused with 2-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)malonitrile groups for high-performance, ambient-stable, solution-processed n-channel organic thin film transistors. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(11):3697–3699. DOI: 10.1021/ja910667y
  53. 53. Li J, Chang JJ, Tan HS, et al. Disc-like 7, 14-dicyano-ovalene-3,4:10,11-bis(dicarboximide) as a solution-processible n-type semiconductor for air stable field-effect transistors. Chemical Science. 2012;3(3):846. DOI: 10.1039/c1sc00739d
  54. 54. Yan H, Chen Z, Zheng Y, et al. A high-mobility electron-transporting polymer for printed transistors. Nature. 2009;457(7230):679–686. DOI: 10.1038/nature07727
  55. 55. Diao Y, Shaw L, Bao Z, Mannsfeld SCB. Morphology control strategies for solution-processed organic semiconductor thin films. Energy and Environmental Science. 2014;7(7):2145. DOI: 10.1039/c4ee00688g
  56. 56. Liu S, Wang WM, Briseno AL, Mannsfeld SCB, Bao Z. Controlled deposition of crystalline organic semiconductors for field-effect-transistor applications. Advanced Materials. 2009;21(12):1217–1232. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200802202
  57. 57. Minemawari H, Yamada T, Matsui H, et al. Inkjet printing of single-crystal films. Nature. 2011;475(7356):364–367. DOI: 10.1038/nature10313
  58. 58. Duffy CM, Andreasen JW, Breiby DW, et al. High-mobility aligned pentacene films grown by zone-casting. Chemistry of Materials. 2008;20(23):7252–7259. DOI: 10.1021/cm801689f
  59. 59. Jang J, Nam S, Im K, et al. Highly crystalline soluble acene crystal arrays for organic transistors: Mechanism of crystal growth during dip-coating. Advanced Functional Materials. 2012;22(5):1005–1014. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201102284
  60. 60. Sele CW, Kjellander BKC, Niesen B, et al. Controlled deposition of highly ordered soluble acene thin films: Effect of morphology and crystal orientation on transistor performance. Advanced Materials. 2009;21(48):4926–4931. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200901548
  61. 61. Becerril HA, Roberts ME, Liu Z, Locklin J, Bao Z. High‐performance organic thin‐film transistors through solution‐sheared deposition of small‐molecule organic semiconductors. Advanced Materials. 2008;20(13):2588–2594. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200703120
  62. 62. Giri G, Verploegen E, Mannsfeld SCB, et al. Tuning charge transport in solution-sheared organic semiconductors using lattice strain. Nature. 2011;480(7378):504–508. DOI: 10.1038/nature10683
  63. 63. Chang J, Chi C, Zhang J, Wu J. Controlled growth of large-area high-performance small-molecule organic single-crystalline transistors by slot-die coating using a mixed solvent system. Advanced Materials. 2013;25(44):6442–6447. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201301267

Written By

Jingjing Chang, Zhenhua Lin, Chunfu Zhang and Yue Hao

Submitted: 20 October 2016 Reviewed: 01 March 2017 Published: 07 June 2017