Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Antioxidant Capacity of Anthocyanin Pigments

Written By

Julia Martín, Eugenia Marta Kuskoski, María José Navas and Agustín G. Asuero

Submitted: October 19th, 2016 Reviewed: February 2nd, 2017 Published: August 23rd, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/67718

Chapter metrics overview

3,530 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Anthocyanins are a family of natural pigments classified into the group of flavonoids, considered to be responsible for the color and taste of many fruits and vegetables, i.e. berries. Anthocyanins are common components of the human diet. Besides their interest as colorant because of their coloring properties, the study of anthocyanin compounds stems from their wide applicability in the prevention and even in the treatment of various human diseases. However, various aspects of the pharmacological roles of anthocyanins remain in the dark, having still several obstacles to the development of robust diets or prescribing lines on consumption of anthocyanins. The chemical structure of anthocyanins determines in large measure its capacity and efficacy as an antioxidant agent. In this study, the following aspects are reviewed: the antioxidant effect of anthocyanin pigments; the oxidative stress, the bioavailability after intake and biological aspects of anthocyanins, the method for measuring the antioxidant activity of anthocyanins, the relationship between structure and activity; and the influence of the anthocyanins in the antioxidant activity of wines. Finally an overview of some potential uses in food industry is attempted mainly focusing in the anthocyanin encapsulation topic. Attention has been paid to the more recent publications in the field.


  • anthocyanins
  • antioxidant
  • biological properties
  • wines
  • encapsulation

1. Introduction

Fruits and vegetables supply a number of micronutrients, such as minerals, fibres and vitamins, as well as a whole series of compounds called phytochemicals, among which are the secondary metabolites of a phenolic nature, called polyphenols [13]. Phenolic compounds have attracted the attention of researchers for decades [47]. This was initially due to their physiological importance to plants, mainly relating to pigmentation and flavour [8, 9] and, more recently, because of their free radical scavenging capacity, which, among other biological effects, increases antioxidant activity and prevents cellular oxidation [10, 11].

The flavonoids (Figure 1) constitute the largest group of phenols and are considered to be responsible for the colour and taste of many fruits and vegetables. More than 9000 flavonoid structures have been described, with formula, references and biological information [12, 13]. These include more than 600 different anthocyanins that are widely distributed among at least 27 families, 73 genera and innumerable species. It has been shown that, of the flavonoids studied, around 5000 have antioxidant activity [4, 5, 14].

Figure 1.

Some selected samples containing anthocyanins.

Anthocyanins, the largest group of phenolic pigments, are found in red wine, some cereals, root vegetables and red fruits. The red, blue and purple colours (Figure 2) of most fruits, flowers and leaves are due to anthocyanins. They are glycosides (water‐soluble molecules) of aglycons called anthocyanidins and effective donors of hydrogen. A wide variety of anthocyanins are produced by the higher plants via modification of the six common anthocyanin aglycons (cyanidin, delphinidin, pelargonidin, malvidin, peonidin and petudinin) present in nature. A summary of previous history with references to the pioneers in this field of work has been given [5, 14]. Apart from their physiological role in plants, anthocyanins are regarded as important components in human nutrition [5, 1416]. It has been stated that the consumption of the anthocyanins is of the order of 200 mg/day, a high amount if compares with the intake of other dietary flavonoids [5]. A possible association between consumption of anthocyanins and quality of the diet is admitted [17], although there are currently no recommendations regarding their dietary intake. A glass of red wine provides around 115 mg of polyphenols, contributing towards a total intake of phenolic compounds of 1171 mg/person/day [18, 19]. The antioxidant activity of anthocyanins is depending to a large extent with their chemical structure: number and position of the hydroxyl groups and the conjugated double bonds, as well as on the presence of electron donors in the structural ring [5, 20].

Figure 2.

Type of phytochemicals [5].

Numerous epidemiological studies have confirmed the influence of the consumption of antioxidants contained in fruits, vegetables and grains [2124]. Some beverages [25, 26], such as wine, tea and coffee, have received considerable attention due to their protective effects against the oxidative damage related to various chronic diseases, including cancer, reducing the risk of contracting these diseases by 30–50% [27]. The principal cause of death in the Western world is related to chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease or heart attacks. Low plasmatic levels of vitamin E and vitamin C have been shown to increase the risk of angina pectoris among the population of Scotland [28, 29]. This is attributed, to a great extent, to the low consumption of foodstuffs rich in micronutrients, vitamins and antioxidants, combined with the general lifestyle.

In agreement with the French Paradox [30, 31] and other studies [32, 33] undertaken about the European population (WHO Project MONICA, MOLI‐SANS, FLORA and ATHEAN EU Projects), the components of the Mediterranean diet [3438], especially vitamins and polyphenols, are the factors responsible for the low incidence of coronary heart disease in these populations [3941]. The moderate consumption of red wine [4246] is another factor closely linked to this low incidence, as the phenolic compounds have a cumulative effect. A diet rich in fruits and vegetables increases by itself the antioxidant capacity of the plasma and the level of plasmatic polyphenols [45]. These factors are increased when supplemented by the intake of red wine. Consumption of wine in moderate amounts has also proved to be beneficial [47] to the skeletal system lowering the risk of loss of mass and fractures. What is clear is that a high consumption of fruits or vegetables rich in antioxidants is related to a decrease in cardiovascular diseases and cancer [41].

Anthocyanins have an antioxidant potential twice that other known antioxidants, such as (+)–catechin and other compounds like vitamin E, synthetic antioxidants such as BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene), compounds widely used in food technology [13, 4851] that have undesirable effects on the enzymes of the human body. The apparent capacity of the strongly polarized anthocyanins to regenerate lipophilic antioxidants like vitamin E could be because they have similar properties to vitamin C, such as protecting the biomembranes from peroxidation, by effectively trapping the peroxyl radicals.

Using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) method, Wang and Goodman [52] evaluated the antioxidant capacity of 14 anthocyanins and obtained values more than 3.5 times greater than those for trolox (a synthetic antioxidant similar to vitamin E). Kuskoski et al. [51], using the ABTS method in purified and isolated patterns of anthocyanins, found an activity twice that of trolox and also confirmed the influence of the structure or the combination of anthocyanins on the antioxidant capacity.

Sources rich in anthocyanins are very interesting options as functional foods [5358]. Here, the oxidative process, the antioxidant effect and the biological properties of the anthocyanin pigments, described in last years, are reviewed. Furthermore, the most commonly used chemical methods to determine the antioxidant capacity of the anthocyanins are outlined. An overview of the bioavailability of anthocyanins, the metabolism after their intake and their presence and influence in red wine is also given. Finally, an overview of some potential uses in food industry is attempted mainly focusing in the anthocyanin encapsulation topic.

The fertility field of flavonoids antioxidants (e.g. anthocyanins) has grown exponentially in recent decades in such a way that a number of areas are involved such as nutrition, food processing, physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology and analytical chemistry affecting foods and health. Emphasis in this contribution is given in most recent reviews and references. Some 150 journals are cited from the fields of food science and technology, nutrition, chemistry (analytical) and biochemistry, engineering, agriculture, medicine, pharmacy, biology, physiology and clinic. Taking into account that thousands of references are available, the authors apologize for those they may have overlooked or inadvertently omitted. For older references please consult, for example, some reviews [47] published on 2012 and the excellent monograph of Andersen and Markhan [59].


2. Oxidative process

The process of oxidation has been studied for many years [60], because of the importance it has both for the organisms and the foodstuffs. In live organisms, the oxidative metabolism is essential for the survival of the cells. Oxidation is related to the production of energy associated with the degradation of glucans, lipids and proteins, to the detoxification of many xenobiotics and to the immune response through some of the free radicals (FR) generated [61].

Oxygen is associated with the conditions for aerobic life and is the motive force for the maintenance of the metabolism and cellular viability, but, at the same time, it is responsible for the formation of partially reduced mediators with high reactivity, known as reactive oxygen species (ROS). The majority of ROS are FR, that is, active molecular species with a separated electron at a higher energy level, which, therefore have paramagnetic properties, providing them with high reactivity [20, 62].

The systems of antioxidant protection have to act on the substrates susceptible to oxidation in a controlled way to maintain the physiological equilibrium of the organism. The protective effect of some enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and glutation peroxidase, may start when an excess of FR is produced. If this excess cannot be neutralized, oxidation of the lipidic membrane, the low‐density lipoproteins (LDLs), the protein cellular components, DNA and enzymes can occur, thereby destroying them [63, 64].

It is worth emphasizing that arteriosclerosis is currently defined as chronic inflammation of the vascular system, triggered by a specific inflammatory agent, the oxidized LDL. The LDLs are very small particles made up by lipids, cholesterol and proteins, with the function of transporting cholesterol and lipids from the blood to the adipose and muscular tissue and, in general, to all cells of the body [65, 66]. However, the LDLs can be oxidized by the FR, affecting, consequently, the molecules of cholesterol and fatty acids that constitute each LDL. The oxidized LDLs are involved in the pathogenesis of coronary heart diseases [67, 68].

Environmental, dietary or physiological factors can provoke an imbalance in favour of oxidation, causing what is known as oxidative stress [6971]. Whether the oxidation or the oxidative stress, in particular, is either a primary cause or a side effect of many chronic diseases and of the phenomenon of ageing itself has been a scientific debate prompted over the last few decades. Therefore, many efforts and resources have been devoted to finding out the role oxidants play in hindering oxidation, thus resulting in either the prevention or the retardation of the oxidative stress [72].

An excessive production of ROS, particularly hydroxyl radicals, can easily initiate the process of oxidation of the LDLs. In turn, they contribute to a greater or lesser degree to the onset of coronary heart diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory diseases, cancer, renal diseases, pancreatitis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, cataracts, diabetes, pulmonary disorders and all diseases related to cellular ageing [73]. The intake of dietary antioxidants, that is exogenous antioxidants (Figure 3), is very important [74], and some compounds of this family, that is vitamin E, β‐carotene and phenolic compounds, are only synthesized by plants [27, 31, 34, 35]. Therefore, it is important to maintain a balance between oxidants and antioxidants. It is worth bearing in mind that over a lifetime, as the individual ages, this balance tilts in favour of the oxidants [75].

Figure 3.

Summary of antioxidant defence system [74].

In foods, oxidation can be one of the main causes of alterations leading to rancidity, deterioration and loss of nutritional, commercial and organoleptic quality (colour, taste, smell and texture), besides being a possible health risk to the consumer. For this reason, the food industry, by improving the preparation of the products and by using antioxidants, is trying to prevent and slow down the process of deterioration, in order to offer the consumer a safer deadline for use, which guarantees the quality of the food product [7680].

However, according to studies carried out in vivo during the last two decades, FR and ROS are no longer seen only as [71] destructive factors but also (and perhaps first of all) as messengers involved in intracellular signalling. So, there has been a substantial change [10] in the conception of these processes in both normal and pathological conditions. Ideas about the role of FR in the functioning of cells and organisms have been revised, resulting in a new concept of redox equilibrium. Oxidative stress is then viewed as [72] a modulation of thiol redox reactions, involved mainly in signalling pathways. On this way, nonradical oxidants (enzymatically generated hydrogen peroxide, other peroxides, quinones, etc.) play a basic role [10] in the oxidation of thiols for the sake of signalling, the formation of free radical intermediates being not necessary. The common conviction of the beneficial effect that the phenolic plants exert on the improvement of health is being revised [64].

The potential health benefits of natural antioxidants, while interesting, seem to escape our basic understanding of biological oxidation processes. Oxidation balances both very beneficial, even crucial, outcomes with decidedly negative impacts. This suggests that moderation in the use of some antioxidants may be advisable. Note that a large measure of the biological oxidation occurring in the body is essential for extracting energy from food and is highly adaptive, depending on health status. Apart from energetics, oxidation supports immunological integrity. While the bulk of epidemiological evidence supports the nutritional/health value of fruits and vegetables [4, 11, 12, 19, 22, 33, 39, 40, 50], the doses of individual components they contain, such as specific antioxidants that may contribute to improved health and reduced risk of certain diseases, remain uncertain.


3. Bioavailability and metabolism of the anthocyanins

The existing knowledge concerning with the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of anthocyanin compounds (including their decomposition within the gastrointestinal lumen) has been the subjects of several recent reviews [8195]. In general, few comparative studies have been undertaken about their metabolism, physiological availability or biotransformation after intake in comparison with the number of studied devoted to absorption and distribution. Little information is also available on the effects of food matrix on anthocyanin bioavailability, particularly food matrices of the usual diet [92].

In general, anthocyanins are considered to have a remarkably low bioavailability (relatively low as well in comparison with that of other flavonoids), on the basis of the levels detected in human blood after ingestion [81]. This fact contrasts with the health‐promoting properties [81, 83, 84, 90] of anthocyanins, suggesting bioavailability and their interaction with other components present. Anthocyanins appear to be rapidly absorbed in the stomach and small intestine [89] and removed, being in the plasma and urine where reach low maximal concentrations [90]. After oral administration, anthocyanins follow a particular pattern different from other flavonoids [84]. A 20–25% of intact anthocyanins were detected in plasma few minutes after intake [86]. Kinetic studies have shown that anthocyanins have a rapid distribution and appearance in blood that is compatible with a tricompartmental model. Elimination takes place mainly through bile. Anthocyanins could be absorbed from the stomach as well as intestines where they undergo decomposition catalysed by microbiota. Bacterial action is capable of hydrolysing anthocyanins or aglucons into simpler phenolic compounds, which can be absorbed and still maintain free phenolic groups, retaining part of the reducing capacity of the original molecule. Active transport may play a role in the absorption of anthocyanins from the stomach as well as in their transfer within the kidney or liver [84]. The metabolic destination of the anthocyanins can differ depending on their aglucon structure, as well as on the tissue where they are metabolized (intestine or liver).

However, the persistence of anthocyanin metabolites, phenolic acid breakdown products (which could be responsible for the health benefits associated with anthocyanins) suggests enterohepatic recycling, leading to prolonged residence time, and supports the notion that anthocyanins are far more bioavailability than previously suggested [81, 88, 92]. However, the compounds as well as the molecular mechanisms involving all those biological events [83] still remain under exploited. The ability to cross membranes, pH effect, digestive enzymes, microbiota, biliary acids and food matrix are critical factors, which may contribute to this apparent paradox [86]. There are many doubts if the effect is due to the native compounds or other forms, their mechanism or which factors have crucial impact on bioavailability [86]. To clear the access both native and metabolized forms in vivo and to distinguish their different biological roles have been a very challenging task. Accumulative evidence, which is emerging, suggests multiple roles [92] explaining the apparent incongruity (poor absorption). Compared with other flavonoids, much remains to be discovered [94, 95] about details and mechanisms of anthocyanin absorption and transport. The activity of anthocyanins could be associated with the ability to elicit cell adaptive responses involving the transcription factor Brf2 by affecting the “nucleophilic one” of the organism [89]. Recent studies on the bioavailability topic are summarized in Table 1 [82, 96108].

Comments References
Pharmacokinetic trial to evaluate the bioavailability of anthocyanins and colonic polyphenol metabolites after consumption of aronia berry extract in plasma and urine [96]
Pharmacokinetic characterization and bioavailability of strawberry anthocyanins relative to meal intake [97]
Bioavailability studies and anticancer properties of malvidin‐based anthocyanins, pyranoanthocyanins and nonoxonium derivatives [98]
Effect of red cabbage fermentation on anthocyanin bioavailability and plasma antioxidant capacity in humans [99]
Bioavailability of red raspberry anthocyanins and ellagitannins: new insights [82]
Bioavailability and uptake of anthocyanins and their metabolites from grape/blueberry juice and smoothie in vivo and in vitro [100]
Tissue bioavailability and intake of tart cherry anthocyanins [101]
Confirmation and identification of tart cherry anthocyanins in several target tissues of healthy rats [102]
Bioactive anthocyanins in ‘Queen Garnet’ plum: maturity and bioavailability [103]
Use of anthocyanins as bioactive colourants in lipstick formulations [104]
Application of the developed flavonoid‐poor menu meals to the study of the bioavailability of bilberry anthocyanins as model flavonoids [105]
Anthocyanin stability, mucus binding, and uptake into epithelial cells in healthy individuals that retained red grape or chokeberry juice in the mouth [106]
Absorption and bioavailability of anthocyanins across the gastrointestinal mucosa [107]
Effects of processing sour cherry fresh fruit to the final juice product on the content of anthocyanins and other related polyphenols [108]

Table 1.

Bioavailability of anthocyanins.


4. Biological activity of the anthocyanins

Establishing the biological activities of phytochemicals, flavonoids and polyphenol is dependent on the complete understanding of their intake, absorption, metabolism and excretion; however, to date, this had only realized for a limited few structures [109]. The increasing evidence of potential therapeutic effects that present anthocyanin compounds has boosted the interest in the knowledge of their biochemistry and biological effects during the last two decades [95, 110112]. Biological properties of anthocyanins depend on their bioavailability. The chemical structure of anthocyanins [113] determines their rate and extent of intestinal absorption and nature of the metabolites in the plasma. The growing and current interest in the study of anthocyanin compounds [114, 115] stems from their wide applicability in the prevention and even in the treatment of various human diseases. They could also be used in the control of the viruses that cause immunodeficiency, such as the causal agent of AIDS, and they have a strong activity against the influence A and B viruses as well as against the herpes virus [116]. Though many articles have been devoted to varying biological effects of anthoxyanins, only a limited number of studies deal with their antimicrobial activity [117].

The favourable effects of anthocyanins on improvement of vision in humans (increase in visual acuity), one of the first reported, were described in 1966, which prompted their introduction into ophthalmology [56, 57]. It continues to be an interesting field of study due to the prevalence of myopia in today's society [118]. Although these effects are not completely understood [119], it has been confirmed that cyanidin helps regeneration of rhodopsin. Anthocyanins have been associated with substances that strengthen the capillaries, reinforce the action of vitamin C and favour the accumulation of this vitamin in the liver and in the suprarenal glands. Blackcurrant anthocyanins inhibit transient myopia, reduce eye fatigue, improve dark adaptation and enhance retinal blood flow with glaucoma [56]. Anthocyanin‐rich bilberry extract has a protective effect on visual function during retinal inflammation [116].

Anthocyanins have been shown to be effective in the prevention of arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases [25, 40, 41, 72]. Commercial extracts of Vaccinium myrtillus (bilberry) [120, 121] contain glucosides of delphinidin and cyanidin and, since 1977, have been used to inhibit platelet aggregation [122] because of their preventive effect in the initial stage of the formation of thrombi, in the treatment of some diseases related to poor microcirculation resulting from capillary fragility, and also to prevent the oxidation of the LDLs [123125].

Moreover, it has been demonstrated that these preparations accelerate the spontaneous process of cicatrization and that they have a preventive and curative activity against gastroduodenal ulcers induced in rats. These effects are probably due to their influence on the biosynthesis of mucopolysaccharides [126], which improves the efficacy of the gastric mucous layer and increases the base substance of the connective tissue and of the capillaries.

Another described effect is the inhibition in vitro that certain anthocyanins have on the porcine pancreatic elastase [127]. This enzyme attacks fibres and collagen, playing an important role in some pathologies, such as arteriosclerosis, emphysema and rheumatoid arthritis. Beneficial effects have also been described in experiments with diabetes, with a substantial reduction observed in the sugar concentration in urine and plasma of rats treated with the anthocyanin pigments of grapes [128]. It is suggested that anthocyanins act by reducing the biosynthesis of collagen, lipoproteins and glycoproteins, as well as reducing the activity of elastase and adenosine deaminase, which are both known to be high in diabetic patients.

Anthocyanins are recognized for their various [67, 129] pharmacological and medicinal properties. They are antimutagenic, anti‐inflammatory and vasotonic [111, 112, 130, 131]. They protect against radiation, are chemoprotective against the toxicity of platinum, are used in therapy against cancer and are hepatoprotective against carbon tetrachloride. They also have other effects due to several actions of a variety of enzymes and metabolic processes.

There are various patented pharmaceutical preparations [132] containing flavylium salts and anthocyanins for the treatment of wounds, gastroduodenal ulcers, inflammation of the mouth and throat, vascular diseases and other diseases linked with the lipidic and the glyceric acid metabolisms. More recently, they have been used in the treatment of circulatory diseases.

Some studies specify the anticarcinogenic effect of anthocyanins [12, 13, 19, 111, 112, 133135]. They inhibit the growth of carcinogenic cells that provoke colon cancer, induce the apoptosis effect, have the capacity to inhibit in vitro the growth of cells that cause tumours in humans and are even able to act as modulators of the macrophages in the immune response [89, 112].

Anthocyanins are effective against cytotoxicity, lipidic peroxidation, and as protectors of DNA, by forming co‐pigments of DNA‐anthocyanins. Moreover, anthocyanins have cellular antioxidant mechanisms comparable to or greater than other micronutrients, such as vitamin E. The capacity of the anthocyanins for stabilizing triple‐helical complexes of DNA [136] by forming complexes of anthocyanins‐DNA [137] is well established.

Pharmacokinetics of anthocyanins has recently reviewed [85, 113, 138, 139]. The most recent papers published on the subject are summarized in Table 2 [96, 101, 140151]. Anthocyanins are metabolized to a structurally diverse range of metabolites that exhibit dynamic kinetic profiles. A multicompartmental (theoretical physiologically based) pharmacokinetic (PBMK) model has been proposed [138] in order to describe the anthocyanins fate in vivo. Understanding the elimination kinetics of these metabolites is key to the design of future studies [152] concerning with their utility in dietary intervention or as therapeutics for disease risk reduction. In words of Kay [152], ‘These studies on (flavonoid) metabolism and biological activity of metabolites mark a new beginning in phytochemical research and, in this respect, this work is in its infancy’. Phenol‐Explorer web database gathers polyphenol metabolites [153] identified in human and animal biofluids, from 221 publications.

Comments References
Pharmacokinetic trial to evaluate the bioavailability of anthocyanins and colonic polyphenol metabolites after consumption of aronia berry extract in plasma and urine [96]
Evaluation of the protective effects of protocatechuic acid [140]
Effects of black raspberry extract and protocatechuic acid on DNA adduct formation and mutagenesis in rat oral fibroblasts [141]
Influence of ethanol on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of blackberry anthocyanins [142]
Pharmacokinetic trial to evaluate the of nanoencapsulation of a phenol extract from grape pomace on human plasma [143]
Pharmacokinetic characterization of anthocyanins in overweight adults on the basis of meal timing [97]
Determination of cyanidin 3‐glucoside in rat brain, liver and kidneys: a short‐term pharmacokinetic study [144]
Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and regional brain distribution of polyphenols from apple‐grape seed extract mixture and bilberry extract [145]
Evaluation of changes in metabolic parameters, and in cardiovascular and liver structure and function in rat due to administration of either cyanidin 3‐glucoside or Queen Garnet plum juice [146]
Bioavailability and uptake of anthocyanins and their metabolites from an anthocyanins‐rich grape/blueberry juice and smoothie in vivo and in vitro [101]
Effects of anthocyanins and their corresponding anthocyanidins on the expression levels of organic anion transporting polypeptides in primary human hepatocytes [147]
Effect of flavan‐3‐ols and anthocyanins against inflammatory‐related diseases [148]
Anthocyanin pharmacokinetics and dose‐dependent plasma antioxidant pharmacodynamics by intake of Montmorency tart cherries in healthy humans [149]
Pharmacokinetics of the metabolites of cyanidin‐3‐glucoside [150]
Abundance and persistence of metabolites of anthocyanins in human urine [151]

Table 2.

Selected papers on pharmacokinetics of anthocyanins in the 2014–2016 period.


5. Methods for measuring the antioxidant activity of anthocyanins

Although a plethora of biological actions has been ascribed to flavonoids, their antioxidant activity, in particular, has recently attracted much attention. Anthocyanins behave as antioxidants by a variety of ways, including direct trapping of ROS, inhibition of enzymes responsible for superoxide anion production, chelation of transition metals involved in processes forming radicals and prevention of the peroxidation process by reducing alkoxy and peroxy radicals.

There are a variety of methods for measuring antioxidant activity, either in vitro or in vivo (greater complexity involved) or a combination of both. The number of reviews published on the matter reflects the transcendence of this hot topic and its richness. Selected reviews found in the literature from 2000 up to the present time are summarized in Table 3 [154204]. The most common chemical methods used for measurement in vitro of antioxidant activity of polyphenolic compounds (e.g. anthocyanins) are shown in Table 4 [197241]. Methodological contributions are preferably cited in Table 4 instead of specific practical applications. Both conceptual and technical problems limiting the use and validity of three commonly used [119] assays TEAC/ABTS*+, DPPH and ORAC have been subject of recent revision. Some reviews dealing with the DPPH [208, 212, 214], ORAC [223] and CUPRAC [239, 240] assays have also been the subject of recent treatments. However, the aspects concerning with the assay chemistry, standardization and report of the antioxidants determination have not been solved after 25 years of intense study [199].

Content References
Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement: classification, physicochemical principles, mechanisms and electron transfer‐based assays [154]
Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement: hydrogen atom transfer‐based, mixed‐mode and lipid peroxidation assays [155]
Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement: reactive oxygen and nitrogen species scavenging assays, oxidative stress biomarkers and chromatographic/chemometric assays [156]
Recent applications for in vitro antioxidant activity assay [157]
Evaluation of procedures for assessing anti‐ and pro‐oxidants in plant samples [158]
Capacity of antioxidants to scavenge multiple reactive oxidants and to inhibit plasma lipid oxidation induced by different biological oxidants [159]
Analytical methods applied to antioxidant and antioxidant capacity assessment in plant‐derived products [160]
Advantages and limitations of commons testing methods for antioxidants [161]
A comprehensive overview on the biology behind some reactive molecules and the means for their detection [162]
Potentiometric study of antioxidant activity: development and prospects [163]
Methods for determining the efficacy of radical‐trapping antioxidants [164]
Electrochemical methods for total antioxidant capacity [165]
The role of consumption of dietary bioactives on the prevention of adverse health [166]
Synthetic and natural phenolic antioxidants: mode of action, health effects, degradation products and toxicology [167]
Up‐to‐date overview of methods available for measuring antioxidant activity [168]
Use of metallic nanoparticles and quantum dots as novel tools for reliable assessment of antioxidant activity in food and biological samples [169]
Review on in vivo and in vitro methods evaluation of antioxidant activity [170]
IUPAC technical report: methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity [171]
Evaluating the antioxidant capacity of natural products: a review on chemical and cellular‐based assays [172]
Application of free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl to estimate the antioxidant capacity of food samples [173]
Application of both stationary and flow electrochemical methods for analysis of antioxidant properties of plant and clinical samples [174]
Phenol‐based antioxidants and the in vitro methods used for their assessment [175]
Main components in the foodstuffs and beverages: antioxidant methods, chemical and kinetic basis [176]
Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay [177]
Evaluation of antioxidants: scope, limitations and relevance of assays [178]
A comprehensive review of cupric reducing antioxidant capacity methodology [179]
Overview of the importance and mechanism of action of antioxidants, as well as of the methods of assessment of the antioxidant capacity [180]
Methods for evaluating the potency and efficacy of antioxidants [181]
A comprehensive review of chemical methods to evaluate antioxidant ability [182]
Assessment of antioxidant capacity in vitro and in vivo [183]
Direct measurement of the total antioxidant capacity of foods: the ‘QUENCHER’ approach [184]
Flow injection‐based methods for fast screening of antioxidant capacity [185]
Flow injection‐based systems for determination of scavenging capacity against biologically relevant reactive species of oxygen and nitrogen [186]
Antioxidant assays for plant and food components [187]
Oxygen radical antioxidant capacity and trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assays comparison to estimate the total antioxidant capacity of food products [188]
How to standardize the multiplicity of methods to evaluate natural antioxidants [189]
The use of total antioxidant capacity, total antioxidant capacity test, as a biomarker of disease in biochemistry, medicine, food and nutritional sciences [190]
Critical review of the most commonly used methods for in vitro determination of antioxidant capacity [191]
Updated methodology to determine antioxidant capacity in plant foods, oils and beverages [192]
Methods to measure the antioxidant defence system [193]
Popular methods commonly used for testing antioxidant activity in vitro: reliability, efficiency, accessibility and biological relevance [194]
Methods for measuring antioxidant activity and assays for measuring overall reducing capacity [195]
Model systems of the evaluation of antioxidants in three types of foods: bulk oil, oil‐in‐water emulsions, and muscle foods [196]
The multifaceted aspects of antioxidants and the basic kinetic models of inhibited autoxidation [197]
Application of various chemical methods to determine antioxidant activity in fruit pulp [198]
Overview of cell culture models for antioxidant research [199]
Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements [200]
Review of methods to determine chain‐breaking antioxidant activity in food [201]
Methods of measuring antioxidant activity particularly as they relate to lipid oxidation [202]
Methods used to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity in foods and biological systems [203]
Methodologies for evaluation of total antioxidant activities in complex mixtures [204]

Table 3.

Published reviews on used methods for measurement of antioxidant activity.

Method Detection Measurement/oxidant References
Radical ABTS•+ Reduction of absorbance of the radical cation in an aqueous medium at 414 nm (or 645, 734 or 815 nm) TEAC value, antioxidant activity equivalent to trolox (μmol/g) [197205]
Radical DMPD•+ Reduction of absorbance to 505 nm Expressed in μmol equivalent to trolox (TEAC) by g of sample [206, 207]
Radical DPPH•+ Reduction of absorbance to 517 nm Expressed in EC50 (quantity of antioxidant required to reduce to 50% of the initial concentration of DPPH) or in TEAC [208219]
FRAP Increase of the absorbance to 593 nm Expressed in μmol of equivalents of reduced ferric ion (Fe2+) by g of sample or a value equivalent to a pattern [203, 204, 220]
ORAC‐PE Reduction of fluorescence (β‐phycoerythrin) μmol equivalent to trolox (TEAC) by g of sample
ORAC‐FL Reduction of fluorescence (fluorescein) μmol equivalent to trolox (TEAC) by g of sample [221236]
ORAC‐PGR Reducon of fluorescence (pyrogallol red) μmol equivalent to trolox (TEAC) by g of sample
CUPRAC Absorbance measurement of the Cu(I)‐neocuproine chelate μmol equivalent to trolox (TEAC) by g of sample [199, 237241]

Table 4.

Commonly used methods for measurement in vitro of antioxidant activity.

Abbreviations: ABTS (2,2′‐azino‐bis (3‐ethylbenzothiazolinine‐6‐sulfonic acid); DMPD (N,N‐dimethyl‐p‐phenylenediamine dihydrochloride); DPPH (2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl); FRAP (ferric reducing ability of plasma); ORAC‐PE (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) with β‐phycoerythrin; ORAC‐FL (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) using fluorescein (3′6′‐dihydroxyspiro[isobenzofuran‐1[3H], 9′[9H]‐xanthen]‐3‐one), ORAC‐PGR (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) with pyrogallol red (pyrogallol sulphone phthalein); TROLOX (6‐hydroxy‐2,5,7,8‐tetramethilcroman‐2‐carboxylic acid).

Antioxidant activity is always measured in an indirect way as a response (of the antioxidants present in the sample) to induced oxidation [192, 160, 173]. For foodstuffs, there is a range of methods for determining antioxidant activity. These can vary from those that evaluate the inhibition of lipidic peroxidation by the antioxidants and quantify the products as peroxides, hydroperoxides and products resulting from decomposition measured by the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay [171], to methods that determine the content of free fatty acids, polymer content, viscosity, absorptivity at 232 and 268 nm, colour and physiological measurements in vivo, such as measuring the products from oxidation of the LDLs, or indirect indicators of lipidic oxidation. Alternatively, antioxidant activity can be evaluated by measuring the immunological response to antigens (the products of lipidic oxidation). Though solvent effect is a vital parameter [203] exerting an influence on the chemical behaviour of antioxidant compounds, the information concerning about its role on the antioxidant capacity is relatively scarce.

There are some drawbacks to assays in vivo. The interpretation of changes in the antioxidant activity of the plasma can be complicated because of the possibility of producing adaptability in response to an increase in oxidative stress. However, assays in vitro can also have their drawbacks, such as the interactions between samples and reagents.

The in vivo antioxidant potential of anthocyanins can be measured by reducing the serum concentration of the reactive substance to thiobarbituric acid (TBARS assay) or by increasing the resistance to oxidation in the plasma of the lipidic peroxidation caused by 2,2′‐azobis (2‐amidinopropane) hydrochloride (AAPH) or by Cu2+.

Most in vitro measurements of the antioxidant activity of anthocyanins involve the following factors: calculating the rate and range of the decrease of the substance in assay or the oxygen consumption, the formation of products from oxidation and the formation or decline of the number of FR. Detection can be carried out by inhibition of fluorescence, chemoluminiscence, oxygen consumption or absorbance, the evolution of which is related to the end product.

FR can be generated by various chromogenic compounds, such as azo ABTS (2,2′‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzthiazoline)‐6‐sulphonic acid), DMPD (N,N‐dimethyl‐p‐phenylenediamine dihydro‐chloride), DPPH (2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl), FRAP (ferric reducing ability of plasma) and DMPO (5,5‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrroline N‐oxide). Inhibition of oxidation can be measured by the reduction in fluorescence by the ORAC method or by the TRAP (total radical‐trapping antioxidant parameter) assay.

Currently, ABTS is one of the methods most frequently used for assays of coloured compounds, like anthocyanins [197], as the radical generated has a maximum absorption at a wavelength of 734 nm, reducing the possibilities of interference of antioxidants that absorb in the red colour zone. The radical ABTS•+ can be generated by enzymes (peroxidase, myoglobin) or chemically (manganese dioxide, potassium persulphate or ABAP (2,2′‐azobis‐2‐amidino‐propane hydrochloride). The radical, once generated, displays new characteristics with maximums of absorption at 414, 645, 734 and 815 nm.

Kuskoski et al. [51] found a maximum absorption of around 754 nm in an alcoholic medium, and this wavelength was used to determine the antioxidant activity of fruit extracts of baguaçu (Eugenia umbelliflora Berg) that are rich in anthocyanin pigments [242].

If compared with other methods of formation of FR, such as DPPH, DMPD and others, the capture reaction time of the radical ABTS•+ is fairly rapid, it can range from 1 to 7 min, although according to Re et al. 4 min is sufficient to complete the reaction. Antioxidant data based on ABTS assay are dependent on reaction time because the applied standard compounds (trolox) present a scavenging kinetic profile [200] different from that of polyphenol‐rich foods. Studies have been carried out on the effects of molecular structure (molecular weight, number of ─OH groups, redox potential) on kinetics and dynamics of [201] the trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay with ABTS. Attempt has been made to standardize the method [202] by extrapolating to zero sample concentration.

The chromatic properties of the stable radical cation DPPH were first described [171] by Blois in 1958, who used the radical to measure the antioxidant activity of several natural compounds. Only much later did Brand‐Williams et al. develop a technique based on the reduction of the absorbance of the radical DPPH at 517 nm. This technique has also been applied by other authors with modifications and measurement of absorbance at 515 nm. Results are expressed as IC50 [213], that is, the quantity of antioxidant required to reduce the initial concentration of DPPH to 50%, or as the percentage of interacted DPPH % DDPH = [(Absreferencia − Absextracto)/(Absreferencia)] × 100. DPPH assay on food additives and foods and beverages has been subject to interlaboratory study [211, 215]. The DMPH reaction has been revisited and re‐evaluated [216218] and simplified in order to characterize samples of wine origin [210].

The influences of reaction time, DPPH concentration inference and kinetics parameters of bioactive molecules and plant extracts [209] in the reaction with the DPPH radical have been evaluated. A collaborative study on the DDPH assay [215] has been promoted as well as a kinetic‐matching approach to express antioxidant capacity in a more standardized way.

The spectrophotometric DMPD method, described by [171, 206, 207] Fogliano et al. in 1999, is similar to the ABTS method. In the presence of an adequate oxidant solution, the radical cation DMPD•+ generated has the ability to link hydrogen atoms, causing the discolouration of the solution, producing a reduction of absorbance measured at 515 nm. DMPD cannot be used with hydrophobic antioxidants, as it is only water soluble [171, 206]. DMPD method is not considered suitable for assays of coloured compounds, as interference can occur in the measurements, because they absorb in the same region of the spectrum.

The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) assay measure the ability of antioxidant to reduce the ferric [Fe3+−(TPTZ)2]3+ complex to the ferrous [Fe2+−(TPTZ)2]2+ complex (blue coloured) in acidic medium. It is a simple, reproducible method that can not only be applied to the study of the antioxidant activity of plasma, or in foods and beverages, but also to the study of the antioxidant efficacy of pure compounds with results that are comparable to those of more complex methodologies. It is widely used to determine the antioxidant activity of anthocyanins in different samples. However, the FRAP assay is carried out at a very low pH (3.6), far from the pH found in biological fluids. Nevertheless, this method has the advantage of determining the activity of the antioxidant directly in plasma; it does not depend on an enzymatic or a nonenzymatic method for generating FR and evaluates the antiradical efficacy of plasma. It also does not need the isolation of plasma fragments as is required in LDL.

The assay by fluorescence spectrophotometry known as ORAC was first set up [25, 29, 171] by Cao et al. in 1993 and later modified by Cao et al. in 1995. The ORAC method is based on measuring the decrease of the fluorescence of the proteins β‐phycoerythrin and R‐phycoerythrin (PE). These proteins have a high fluorescence in the presence of peroxyl radicals generated by the thermic decomposition of the 2′2′azobis (2‐amidinopropan) dihydrochloride (AAPH); the decrease is recorded in the presence of antioxidants. It is considered to be a very sensitive method that evaluates the oxidation process from its beginning, although it has the drawbacks of being expensive and time‐consuming [194].

However, β‐phycoerythrin [219] is photo‐unstable and it forms complexes with polyphenols giving, therefore low values of ORAC‐PE. For this reason, it is substituted [234236] by fluorescein (ORAC‐FL), which, in contrast, is much more stable, and does not react with polyphenols, making it a much more precise and more economic method. Two alternative solutions have been proposed to decrease a systematic error related to AAPH addition in the fluorescence‐based ORAC assay [221].

A simple mathematical model for conversion of ORAC values to mass units [229] has been proposed. ORAC standardization [227] and validation [230] have been attempted. The use of pyrogallol red as a probe [233, 225] for competitive antioxidant assay is a significant improvement. Pyrogallol reacts faster than fluorescein with RCOO* radicals, and its consumption does not present induction times, even in the presence of very reactive oxidants, with the exception of ascorbic acid. First action ORAC assay has been reported both with fluorescein [226] (dextracts from tea, blueberry and grape skins) and pyrogallol red [228] (red wine, fruit juices and iced teas).

A proportional measurement of antioxidant activity is obtained using the ORAC assay, which is currently one of the most commonly used methods for measuring the antioxidant activity of the anthocyanins [218].

Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) test is conceptually similar to the FRAP test, but is based on the reduction of Cu2+ ions in the presence of neocuproine (2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenatroline) at pH 7, which involves faster kinetics. The ammonium acetate buffer solution account for the liberated protons in reaction with polyphenols.

The total radical‐trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP) method [171] proposed by Wayner et al. (1985) is based on the measurement of oxygen consumption during a peroxidation reaction of lipids controlled and induced by the thermic decomposition of some substances, such as ABAP or AAPH, which produces a flow of peroxyl radicals at a constant rate that is temperature dependent. These peroxyl radicals initiate a chain of lipoperoxidations. The method has some problems, including being sensitive to temperature and to changes in pH. The storage conditions of the samples are also important due to the liability of some antioxidants; therefore, their immediate analysis is recommended. When this is not possible, it is advisable to rapidly collect plasma for blood samples, to store them at −80°C and to measure them within 3 days. The concentration of proteins or uric acid, because of their high antioxidant power, should be taken into account when describing the results.

It is interesting to mention the fact that electrochemical [243249] and ESR [250] methods are increasingly being applied to the determination of antioxidant capacity. The kind of technology and free radical generator or oxidant influences the antioxidant capacity measurement. A key factor that helps researchers to choose a given method and to understand the results obtained is the comparison of different analytical methods. In order to gather comprehensible information about the total antioxidant capacity of a food [184], at least two of these tests, and preferably all, should be combined, if possible, taking into account both the arguments for and against, and its applicability. Table 5 shows selected articles [20, 190, 198, 204, 231, 251260] in which more than one criterion has been applied to real samples with practical purposes. Advantages and limitations of the most common chemical methods of determination of the antioxidant capacity are compiled in Table 6 [160, 161, 167, 171173, 176, 184, 231, 261263].

Samples Methods References
Eight anthocyanidins, seven anthocyanins and two synthesized 4′‐hydroxy flaviliums DDPH, ABTS, hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, FRAP [20]
Dried fruits and juices from chokeberry FRAP, ABTS [251]
Protucatechuates DPPH, ORAC, CAT [252]
Six deoxyanthocyanidins and cyaniding‐3‐glucoside DPPH, FRAP [253]
Plant foods CUPRAC, ABTS [254]
Anthocyanins from different varieties blueberries Inhibiting activity on lipid peroxidation, hydroxyl radical scavenging, superoxide anion radical, DPPH [255]
Plan extracts DPPH, ABTS, AAPH [198]
Commercial beverages (wines, beers, soft drinks and waters) TRAP, TEAC, FRAP [256]
Popular antioxidants‐rich US foods ABTS, DPPH [257]
Commercially available vegetable juices (23) FRAP, DPPH, ABTS [258]
Anthocyanidins, anthocyanidin‐3‐glucosides and portisins DPPH, FRAP [259]
Plants extracts of industrial interest (30) DDPH, ABTS, FRAP, FRAP, SOD, ORAC [260]
Food products ORAC, TEAC [231]
Selected small fruits ABTS, FRAP, DPPH [204]
Pulps of frozen fruits ABTS, DPPH, DMPD [190]

Table 5.

Antioxidant capacity of selected samples evaluated using more than one criterion.

CAT (conjugate autoxidizable assay); SOD (superoxide dismutase assay).

Mixed hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single electron transfer (SET)
  • Inexpensive and easy to use

  • Applicability in lipid and aqueous phase

  • Stable to pH

  • Fast reaction

  • Can be automated and adapted for use with microplates

  • Complex mechanism of reaction

  • Extra step to generate free radical

  • Free radical not stable for long periods of time

  • Not standardised

  • Simple and highly sensitive

  • Can be automated

  • It just needs a UV‐vis spectrophotometer to perform

  • No sample separation is needed

  • High price of ABTS reagent

  • Complex mechanism of reaction

  • DPPH colour can be lost

  • Steric accessibility influences the reaction

  • Sensitive to acidic pH

Single electron transfer (SET)
  • Simpler, more productive and less expensive and compared ABTS test

  • No data of its stoichiometry with antioxidant standard and radical stability are available

  • DMPD is only soluble in water

  • Simplicity, speed and robustness

  • It does not require specialized equipment

  • It can be performed using automated, semi‐automated, or manual methods

  • It is nonspecific

  • Not all antioxidants reduce Fe3+ at a rate fast enough to allows its measurement

  • Compounds that absorbs at the wavelength of the determination may interfere

  • Requiring an acidic pH

  • Rapid way to study plant extract profiles

  • Fast enough to oxidize thiol‐type antioxidants

  • Selective

  • Stable and accessible reagents

  • Applicable to both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants It is carried out at nearly physiological pH values

  • FRAP and CUPRAC depend on the reaction time

  • The antioxidant which reduce metal ions may exert pro‐oxidant effect under certain conditions

  • Low correlation between the capacity measured by FRAP or CUPRAC method with that for radical scavenging measured by competition method such as ORAC

Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)
  • Uses biologically relevant free radicals

  • Simple and standardised

  • Integrates both degree and time of antioxidant reaction

  • Determine the capacity of hydrophilic and hydrophobic samples simply

  • May be performed in thermostated microplates

  • Expensive equipment

  • Data variability can be large across equipment

  • pH sensitive

  • Requires long times to quantifies results

Table 6.

Advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly chemical methods used for testing the antioxidant activity [160, 161, 167, 171173, 176, 184, 231, 261263].

Mechanisms involved in the corresponding chemical reactions are also shown in the table: hydrogen atom transfer, HAT, ability of an antioxidant to reduce radicals by hydrogen donation for ORAC and TRAP assays; single electron transfer, SET, ability of an antioxidant to transfer one electron to reduce any compounds, including metals, carbonyl and radicals for DMPD and FRAP assays. HAT and SET mechanisms may occur together as in ABTS and DPPH assays. The DPPH method is one of the oldest and most frequently used for determining the antioxidant activity of food extracts and single compounds. In comparison with DPPH assay, the ABTS assay estimates more accurately [183, 254] the antioxidant capacity of foods, especially for those contain lycophilic, lipophilic and highly pigmented compounds. However, it has been stated that methods using HAT reactions will be preferred to those with SET reactions because the peroxyl radicals used in the first are the main FR found in lipid oxidation and biological systems [259]. ORAC is the most commonly used total radical‐trapping antioxidant assay and the most widely used essay for evaluating antioxidant [172] both in the industry and in the academic institutions. The evaluation of total antioxidant capacity is preferable than the individual antioxidant measurements [74] due to the complexity of food composition and the possibility of synergic interactions among the antioxidant compounds.


6. Antioxidant activity of the anthocyanins

The capacity of phenolic compounds to trap FR depends upon their structure, in particular, of the hydrogen atoms of the aromatic group that can be transferred to the FR [5, 10, 20, 24, 63, 113] and of the capacity of the aromatic compound to cope with the uncoupling of electrons as a result of the surrounding displacement of the electrons‐π system. As compared to other antioxidants, research on their health effects started more recently. This late interest in polyphenols is largely explained by the complexity [264] of their chemical structures. The anthocyanin and anthocyanidin health properties are due to their peculiar chemical structure, as they are very reactive towards ROS because of their electron deficiency [265269]. The antioxidative properties of anthocyanidins have been recently explored; most of the widely distributed anthocyanidins and anthocyanins show more scavenging activity than that of the well‐known strong antioxidants trolox and catechol [20]. The physicochemical characteristics of anthocyanins [83, 90, 91], that is structure and size of the molecules (number and position of hydroxyl and methoxyl groups), water solubility and acidity constants, can control their ability to cross biological barriers. Results of antioxidant activity of foods are commonly expressed in TEAC (mmol or μmol/g sample), a capacity equivalent to trolox (a hydrosoluble synthetic antioxidant similar to vitamin E). However, some authors suggest [270] that the results should be expressed in vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC in mg/100 g), given that vitamin C is found naturally in some foods, whereas trolox is a synthetic compound.

Quantum chemical computations have recently been performed to study [265] the antioxidative properties of anthocyanidins, quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) and mechanisms of action involved such as HAT, SET and SPLET (sequential proton loss electron transfer). Construction and evaluation of QSAR for predicting anthocyanin activity radical scavenging using quantum chemical descriptor have been developed [271] with good prediction efficiency. 3D‐QSAR models from 21 anthocyanins based on their ORAC values have been used [272] with prediction (eggplant and radish) purposes. 3D‐QASR models have also been developed in a series [273] of anthocyanin derivatives of CYP3AH inhibitors (cytochrome P450).


7. Structure of the anthocyanins

The chemical structure of anthocyanins is appropriate for acting as antioxidants, as they can donate hydrogen or electrons to the FR or trap them and delocalize them in their aromatic structure [5, 10, 20, 265269]. The structural differences among anthocyanins are related [5, 14, 274, 275] to the number of hydroxyl or methoxyl groups in the anthocyanidin skeleton, the position and the number of bonded sugar residues as well as by the aliphatic or aromatic carboxylates bonded to them. The hydroxylation pattern influences [276, 277] physiological properties such as light absorption and antioxidative activity, which is the base for many beneficial health effects of flavonoids. The hydroxyl groups in positions 3′ and 4′ provide a high stability to the radical formed by trapping FR and displacing the electrons in ring B, as well as the free hydroxyl groups in position 3 of ring C, and in position 5 of ring A, together with the carbonyl group in position 4 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Chemical structure of pelargonidin (top left), malvidin (top right) and peonidin (bottom).

There are three important structural criteria for evaluating the antiradical effectiveness of a compound: (1) the presence of neighbouring hydroxyl groups, that is, in the position of ring B; (2) double bonds at conjugation 4‐oxo of ring C; and (3) hydroxyl groups in positions 3 and 5 of ring A.

The aglucons with identical hydroxylation in rings A and C, and a single OH group in ring B (4′‐OH), including pelargonidin, malvidin and peonidin (Figure 4), have lower antioxidant activity when compared to compounds with groups 3′, 4′ di‐OH substituted (e.g. cyanidin) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Chemical structures of pelargonidin, cyaniding and delphinidin, their spots on TLC and the colour of plant tissues [276].

Apparently, the OH groups in position 3′ and 4′ of ring B (catechol) are determinants of the antioxidant activity of saturated flavonoids. However, delphinidin is an exception to this principle as it has groups 3′ and 4′ di‐OH substituted (Figure 5) and still has a low antioxidant activity. The importance of the hydroxyl groups in position 3′ and 4′ of ring B contributes to the high antioxidant capacity also found for flavones [276, 277].

Most flavonoids are found naturally in a glycosylate form, and glycosylation changes the antioxidant activity [5, 278]: for cyanidin, there is an increase; for malvidin, a decrease; and for pelargonidin, no significant effect was shown [137]. Different sugars can have distinct effects on antioxidant activity. For example, in ORAC assays for cyanidin, glycosylation in position 3 of ring C with glucose or rhamnose increases the antioxidant activity, but with galactose, it declines.

The glycosylation (site, type and number of the glycosyl, glycosidic bond type) generally enhances [269] the stability, results in the hypsochromic effect and blueing, decreases the bioavailability and anticancer activity, and decreases, increases, or does not change the antioxidant activity of the anthocyanidins or anthocyanins. Note the diverse and complex chemistry of acyl groups and that their stabilizing effect exerted may be either independent or synergic. However, the acylation decreases the polarity of anthocyanins and creates steric hindrance effects (changing molecular size and spatial structure) to decrease the sensitivity of the anthocyanins to nucleophilic attack [274] and increasing the in vitro and in vivo chemical stability (though it lowers their apparent absorption) [113]. Nonacylated monoglycosylated anthocyanins have a greater inhibitory effect on human colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT29) cell proliferation [279]; anthocyanins with pelargonidin, triglycoside and/or acylation with cinnamic acid have a lesser effect.

Anthocyanins are more than flavylium cations [280]. In aqueous solutions, equilibrium of at least four other species determined by pH (and temperature) exists [281285]. Above about pH 2.5, the coloured flavylium cation (only stable at pH ≤ 1, rare in natural environments) form typically hydrates (pH 4–5) to form the colourless hemiacetal (carbinol pseudo‐base), followed by ring‐opening tautomerization to the light yellow (E)‐chalcone, which can isomerize to the (Z)‐chalcone. At pH values of 7–8, blue‐purple quinoidal anions (which fades in several minutes) are formed. Figure 6 shows a sample of wine (moderately acid pH 3.5–4.0) at different pH values and corresponds to the graphical abstracts of reference [280]. The state of ionization of the anthocyanins can be an important factor in relation to their antiradical activity. This is corroborated by the fact that the pseudo‐base and the quinoidal base of malvidin 3‐glucoside, generated at pH 4.0 and pH 7.0, respectively, have differences in antioxidant activity. It is possible play with the colour of anthocyanins [286, 287], for example, complexation with metal ions or with colourless organic molecules (co‐pigments) such as hydroxylated benzoic or cinnamic acids. Experiments undertaken with synthetic colourants (Ponceau 4R) have shown that they do not have antioxidant activity, whereas anthocyanin pigments confer an antioxidant activity far greater than that of the synthetic colourants available on the market. This shows that natural pigments besides providing a good source of colour have considerable antioxidant potential. Public concern about synthetic food dyes (suspected to cause adverse effect on health) has increased recently. For this reason, consumers and food manufacturers (i.e. beverage industry) increasingly demand “cleaner” colourants from natural sources [13, 48, 49, 54, 57, 79]. Table 7 compares [288] the characteristics of both synthetic and natural colourants. Interesting alternatives in food systems to synthetic colourants are acylated anthocyanins [289293]. A huge variety of hues can be achieved as a function of anthocyanin structure and pH of food matrix. The increasing interest in foods that help to prevent diseases has boosted the market for nutraceutical and/or medicinal food [294]. The term functional food appeared in Japan in the 1980s associated with processed food containing ingredients that affect physiological functions. Identification of health effects provoked by anthocyanins will increase their demanding what would open new perspectives [295] for their use in the food market.

Figure 6.

Red wine at various pH values: graphical abstracts of Ref. [285].

Synthetic antioxidants Natural antioxidants
Inexpensive Expensive
Widely applied Usage of some products restricted
Medium to high antioxidant activity Wide ranging antioxidant activity
Increasing safety concern Perceived as innocuous substances
Usage of some of them banned Increasing usage and expanding applications
Low water solubility Broad range of solubilities
Decreasing interest Increasing interest
Some of them stored in adipose tissue Completely metabolized

Table 7.

Advantages and disadvantages of natural and synthetic antioxidants commonly used for food protections [288].


8. Influence of the anthocyanins in the antioxidant activity of wines

Anthocyanins are the most abundant polyphenolic compounds in red wines. Red wine is probably the foodstuff that presents the highest diversity of these polyphenolic pigments in their original form and in other derivative structures. Various studies in vitro and in vivo have confirmed that wine has antioxidant properties, mainly attributable to its composition rich in phenolic compounds [296298], which vary from 1200 to 2400 mg/L [299303].

Wines, particularly red wines, inhibit platelet aggregation, increase antioxidant capacity in humans and reduce the susceptibility to lipidic peroxidation in plasma [45, 304306]. Anthocyanins are the pigments responsible for the attractive colour of red wine and are one of the main flavonolic compounds with antioxidant activity, which is why red wine has a greater antioxidant activity than white wine [307310]. Its antioxidant capacity can be up to 10 times stronger than that of white wine [205].

Nevertheless, alcohol itself has a protective effect as, to some extent, it is a mediator of the increase (close to 50%) of the level of high‐density lipoproteins (HDLs) and of the decrease (of around 18%) of low‐density lipoproteins (LDLs), such as cholesterol [311, 312]. However, various studies have correlated the effect of the consumption of red wine with a reduction in coronary heart disease, which is more significant than that for beer or other alcoholic drinks [18, 45]. Therefore, this reduction can be attributed to nonalcoholic components present in red wine [304, 307].

The nonalcoholic components of wine, mainly phenolic compounds, are considered to be the primary factor responsible for this protective effect. There is a significant concentration of flavonoids in red wines (>500 mg/L) and a very low one in white wines (<60 mg/L) [313315]. In a study by Frankel et al. [300], the relative antioxidant activity of 20 Californian wines was mainly correlated with the presence of cyanidin and malvidin 3‐glucoside. Similar results were obtained by Aguirre et al. [316] and Rivero‐Pérez et al. [317, 318] in Chilean and Spanish red wines, respectively. According to Fernández‐Pachón et al. [319], in the ranking of activity, the most active is the anthocyanins and flavan‐3‐ol, followed by the phenolic and flavonol acids.

Ghiselli et al. [320] studied three polyphenolic subfractions of red wine, evaluating the capacity to trap hydroxyl and peroxyl radicals, the inhibition in vitro of the oxidation of LDLs and platelet aggregation. The fraction containing the anthocyanins proved to be the most effective in its capacity to trap ROS and to inhibit the oxidation of LDLs and platelet aggregation. Anthocyanins are quantitatively the most abundant phenolic subclass in red wine [321, 322]. The other two fractions, containing the phenolic acids and quercitin 3‐glucuronide, and procyanidins, catechins and quercitin 3‐glucoside, are less active.

Some authors still attribute the antioxidant activity of red wines to all polyphenolic compounds [323325], not discarding the hypothesis that the different classes of polyphenolic compounds can be more effective and act in a synergistic way. However, according to Fernández‐Pachón et al. [319], no synergistic effects were observed among the isolated fractions of red wines (anthocyanins, flavonols and phenolic acids). Galanakis et al. [326] characterized the phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Cypriot wines. The higher concentrations of phenols did not always reflect higher antioxidant capacity of wines, probably due to the observed antagonistic effect between hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, flavonols and anthocyanins.


9. Encapsulation of anthocyanins

As it has been mentioned throughout the chapter, anthocyanins are potentially used in food and pharmaceutical industries since their practical applications as natural colourants [13, 49, 58, 76, 79, 327] as well as their potential health benefits to humans [13, 56, 90, 110, 114]. Nevertheless, the incorporation of anthocyanins into food and medical products is a challenging task due to their low stability and susceptibility to degradation [292] towards environmental conditions during processing and storage. In order to prevent these limitations, delivery systems have been developed, and among them, encapsulation [328334] would appear to be an interesting option.

Encapsulation, developed approximately 60 years ago [335], is a rapidly expanding technology to entrap one substance (active agent, solid, liquid or gas) within another substance (a matrix or a polymeric wall) in the form of micro‐ and nanoparticles to protect the ‘actives’ from environmental conditions and their interactions with other components or to control their release [331, 332]. In addition, once encapsulated bioactive compounds are easier to transportation and handling, masking of undesirable flavour and compartmentalization of two or more reactive species [328, 335].

In general, the three‐stage process during encapsulation is [335] as follows: (i) formation of the wall around the material; (ii) ensuring that undesired leakage does not occur; and (iii) ensuring that undesired materials are kept out. For that end, different techniques have been studied and applied to encapsulate active agents, some of them successfully applied for anthocyanins including spray‐drying, emulsification, ionotropic gelation or coacervation, and thermal gelation [328, 330].

Among the most important factors to take into account when choosing the microencapsulation technique are particle size, physicochemical properties of the core, the process cost and the selection of wall materials. According to the literature, encapsulation by spray‐drying is the most economical, simplest and the most applied method (80–90% of encapsulates are spray‐dried) for preservation of anthocyanin pigments [332], being maltodextrins as the most used coating material. The use of other techniques than spray‐drying [331] still remains an unexplored area. This fact could be explained by the hydrophilic nature of anthocyanins [332, 336], so it is, therefore, a promising area of research.

In order to increase the efficiency and stability by spray‐drying, different biopolymers are used [328, 333], most common are natural gums (gum arabic, alginates, etc.), proteins (dairy proteins, soy proteins, gelatine, etc.), carbohydrates (maltodextrins and cellulose derivatives) and/or lipids (waxes, emulsifiers). Some authors [330, 332] have revealed that a combination of other wall materials and other modifiers (as oxygen scavengers, antioxidants, chelating agents, and surfactants) increases the encapsulation efficiencies.

Table 8 [131, 328342] summarizes some selected reviews on anthocyanin, polyphenol and bioactive compounds encapsulation. In last years, the use of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles has attracted the interest of researches [337] due to their good biocompatibility, easy design and preparation, structure variations and interesting biomimetic characters.

Content References
Overview of the most recent studies and patents aimed at enhancing anthocyanin stability in food systems [328]
Anthocyanin extraction, microencapsulation and release properties during in vitro digestion [329]
Study on colour stability and microencapsulation from Jamun of anthrocyanin pigment using spray‐drying [330]
Health benefits of anthocyanins and their extraction, characterization, encapsulation and delivery [331]
Encapsulation of anthocyanins from berry‐type fruit species as a technology for improving the stability and/or bioavailability of anthocyanins [332]
Microencapsulation of anthocyanins with different biopolymers through spray‐drying [333]
Nonthermal stabilization mechanisms of anthocyanins in model and food systems [334]
Stabilization of cranberry anthocyanins in nutraceutical capsules [335]
Relevant recent studies on biopolymer nanoparticles and natural nanocarriers for nanoencapsulation of phenolic compounds [338]
The encapsulation methods in plants using protein matrices [339]
Phenolic‐enriched foods: sources and processing for enhanced health benefits [131]
Using nanoparticles to enhance absorption and bioavailability of phenolic phytochemicals [340]
Overview on encapsulation of natural polyphenolic compounds [341]
Overview of encapsulation of widely used polyphenols: effectiveness, variations, developments and trends [336]
Bioactive substances
Development of food applications containing micro‐encapsulated coffee antioxidants [342]
Encapsulation of active compounds used in food products by drying technology [337]

Table 8.

Selected reviews on encapsulations of anthocyanins, polyphenols and bioactive substances.


10. Final comments

Anthocyanins [13, 14, 17, 293, 343346] are members of the flavonoid group of phytochemicals, a group predominant in fruits and vegetables, especially in berries. Recent research raised awareness of the importance [347, 348] of anthocyanins in the diet. Anthocyanin identification is critical in adulteration and profiling [349, 350] studies and in evaluating the quality of crude and processed food. The design of plant products with a high added value allows increasing the synthesis [351] of plant‐derived food antioxidants and in particular anthocyanins. In an effort to expand the palette of natural organic colourants (colour additives of food and beverage products), the food industry has launched a search for new products, for example blue colourants [352, 353]. Food, pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries are interested in [354] clean recovery of valuable compounds. Thus, exploration of more efficient, cost‐effective and eco‐friendly techniques of polyphenol extraction, that is anthocyanins, from food matrices and waste plant food processing residues (grape fruit, fruits by‐products, winery waste materials, by‐products) is a challenge [355360]. In any case, in order to ascertain the nutraceutical potential of bioactive compounds, quantification [359, 361] is required, thus obtaining vital information for future food industrial applications.

Apart from their well‐known potential for their practical applications as natural colourants [1348, 49, 58, 76, 79, 281, 328], anthocyanins show antioxidant activity and a wide variety of health‐promoting properties for human health [12, 56, 81, 85, 90, 111, 112, 120, 130, 264, 343], ranging from cytoprotective, antimicrobial and antitumor activities to neuroprotective, anti‐obesity and lipidomic potential. Moreover, epidemiological evidence suggests [12, 111, 112362] a direct correlation between anthocyanin intake and a lower incidence of chronic and degenerative diseases.

However, the issue of food antioxidants although important is a controversial topic [11, 64, 72, 363365]. The plethora of published studies on mechanisms [132] that may mediate therapeutic or chemical chemopreventive effects of dietary constituents contrasts sharply with a scarcity of information on their pharmaceutical and clinical‐pharmacological properties. Most of the evidence supporting a therapeutic effect of anthocyanins is in vitro or mechanical in nature, although the number of studies on bioavailability in humans has increased significantly over the past two decades. Anthocyanins show a complex biochemical (more than other compounds of flavonoids type), and there is still much to discover [94, 95, 366] about the biochemical activity and clinical pharmacology of these compounds (stability, bioavailability and formulation of dietary constituents), which constitutes an obstacle [367] to understand their health benefits. As evidence of their therapeutic effects accumulates, it is important to understand the nature [81, 85, 87, 89, 139] of the absorption and metabolism “in vivo” and that such knowledge will enable the development of new food products, both fresh and manufactured with greater therapeutic efficacy [95, 366]. Progress in this field requires a multidisciplinary research carried out by a wide range of professionals: food science and technology scientists, chemists (analytical chemists), nutritionist, physiologists, pharmacist, pharmacologists, engineers, physicians, biologists, genetics, clinics, etc., being a field in which promising progress will be undoubtedly made in the future.

More complete details of the basics of polyphenols and anthocyanins can be seen in previous reviews [47, 346, 368] by the authors.


  1. 1. Harborne JB, Williams CA. Anthocyanins and other flavonoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001;18(3):310-333.
  2. 2. Veitch NC, Grayer RJ. Flavonoids and their glycosides including anthocyanins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008;25(3):555-611.
  3. 3. Ziyatdinova GK, Budnikov HC. Natural phenolic antioxidants in bioanalytical chemistry: State of the art and prospects of development. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2015;84(2):194-224.
  4. 4. Martín Bueno J, Ramos‐Escudero F, Sáez‐Plaza P, Muñoz AM, Navas MJ, Asuero AG. Analysis and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanin pigments. Part I: General considerations concerning polyphenols and flavonoids. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012;42(2):102-125.
  5. 5. Martín Bueno J, Sáez‐Plaza P, Ramos‐Escudero F, Jímenez AM, Fett R, Asuero AG. Analysis and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanin pigments. Part II: Chemical structure, color, and intake of anthocyanins. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012;42(2):126-151.
  6. 6. Navas MJ, Jiménez‐Moreno AM, Martín Bueno J, Sáez‐Plaza P, Asuero AG. Analysis and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanin pigments. Part III: An introduction to sample preparation and extraction. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012;42(4):284-312.
  7. 7. Navas MJ, Jiménez‐Moreno AM, Martín Bueno J, Sáez‐Plaza P, Asuero AG. Analysis and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanin pigments. Part IV: Extraction of anthocyanins. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012;42(4):313-342.
  8. 8. Manetas Y. Why some leaves are anthocyanic and why most anthocyanic leaves are red? Flora 2006;201(3):163-177.
  9. 9. Grotewold E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:761-780.
  10. 10. Tirzitis G, Bartosz G. Determination of antiradical and antioxidant activity: Basic principles and new insights. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2010;57(1), 139-142.
  11. 11. Martins N, Barros L, Ferreira ICFR. In vivo antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds: facts and gaps. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016;28:1-12.
  12. 12. Fraga CG. (ed.) Plant Phenolics and Human Health: Biochemistry, Nutrition and Pharmacology. New York: Wiley, 2010.
  13. 13. He J, Giusti MM. Anthocyanins: natural colorants with health‐promoting properties. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010;1(1):163-187.
  14. 14. Andersen OM, Jordheim M. The anthocyanins. In: Andersen OM, Markham KR (eds) Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, 2006. pp. 471-551.
  15. 15. Santos Buelga C, Mateus N, de Freitas V. Anthocyanins. Plant pigments and beyond. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(29):6879-6884.
  16. 16. Fang J. Classification of fruits based on anthocyanin types and relevance to their health effects. Nutrition 2015;31(11):1301-1306.
  17. 17. Wallace TC, Giusti MM. Anthocyanins. Adv. Nutr. 2015;6:620-622.
  18. 18. Saura‐Calixto F, Goñi I. Antioxidant capacity of the Spanish Mediterranean diet. Food Chem. 2006;94(3):442-447.
  19. 19. Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005;45(4):287-306.
  20. 20. Ali HM, Almagribi W, Al‐Rashidi MN. Antiradical and reductant activities of anthocyanidins and anthocyanins, structure‐activity relationship and synthesis. Food Chem. 2016;194:1275-1282.
  21. 21. Guo X, Yang B, Tan J, Jiang J, Li D. Association of dietary intakes of anthocyanins and berry fruits with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;70(12):1360-1367.
  22. 22. Joseph SV, Edirisinghe I, Burton‐Freeman BM. Fruit polyphenols: a review of antiinflammatory effects in humans. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56(3):419-444.
  23. 23. Jacob JK, Tiwari K, Correa‐Betanzo J, Misran A, Chandrasekaran R, Paliyath G. Biochemical basis for functional ingredient design from fruits. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012;3:79-104.
  24. 24. Masisi K, Beta T, Moghadasian MH. Antioxidant properties of diverse grain cereals: a review on in vitro and in vivo studies. Food Chem. 2016;196:90-97.
  25. 25. Shahidi F, Alasalvar C. Handbook of Functional Beverages and Human Health. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016.
  26. 26. Aguilera Y, Martin‐Cabrejas MA, de Mejia EG. Phenolic compounds in fruits and beverages consumed as part of the Mediterranean diet: their role in prevention of chronic diseases. Phytochem. Rev. 2016;15(3):405-423.
  27. 27. Zhang H, Tsao R. Dietary polyphenols, oxidative stress and antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016;8:33-42.
  28. 28. Cao G, Booth SL, Sadowski JA, Prior RL. Increases in human plasma antioxidant capacity following consumption of controlled diets high in fruits and vegetables. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68(5):1081-1087.
  29. 29. Wang H, Cao G, Prior RL. Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996;44(3):701-705.
  30. 30. Renaud S, Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992;339(8808):1523-1526.
  31. 31. Lippi G, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Red wine and cardiovascular health: the “French Paradox” revisited. Int. J. Wine Res. 2010;2:1-7.
  32. 32. Cerletti C, de Curtis A, Bracone F, Digesu C, Morganti AG, Iacoviello L, de Gaetano G, Donati MB. Diethary anthocyanins and health: data from FLORA and ATHENA EU Projects. Br. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;83(1):103-106.
  33. 33. Bonaccio M, Pounish G, Cerletti C, Donati MB, Iacoviello L, de Gaetano G. Mediterranean diet, dietary polyphenols and low grade inflammation: results from the MOLI‐SANI study. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017;83(1):107-113.
  34. 34. Giacosa A, Barale R, Bavaresco L, Faliva MA, Gerbi V, LaVecchia C, Negri E, Opizzi A, Perna S, Pezzotti M, Rondanelli M. Mediterranean way of drinking and longevity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56(4):635-640.
  35. 35. Delgado‐Lista J, Perez‐Martinez P, Garcia‐Rios A, Perez‐Caballero AI, Perez‐Jimenez F, Lopez‐Miranda J. Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular risk: beyond traditional risk factors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56(5):788-801.
  36. 36. Guidi L, Penella C, Landi M. Anthocyanins in Mediterranean diet: common and innovative sources. In: Warner LM (ed) Handbook of Anthocyanins, Chapter 1. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2015. pp. 1-49.
  37. 37. Chiou A, Panagopoulos EA, Karathanos VT. Anthocyanins and other flavonoids in dried fruits of the Mediterranean area. In: Warner LM (ed) Handbook of Anthocyanins, Chapter 15. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2015. pp. 395-419.
  38. 38. Grosso G, Mistretta A, Frigiola A, Giuttadauria S, Biondi A, Basile F, Vitaglione P, D’Orazio N, Galvano F. Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014;54(5):593-610.
  39. 39. Tomé‐Carneiro J, Visioli F. Polyphenol‐based nutraceuticals for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: review of human evidence. Phytomed. 2016;23(11):1145-1174.
  40. 40. Cassidy A, Bertoia M, Chiuve S, Flint A, Forman J, Rimm EB. Habitual intake of anthocyanins and flavanones and risk of cardiovascular disease in men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;104(3):587-594.
  41. 41. Liobikas J, Skemiene K, Trumbeckaite S, Borutaite V. Anthocyanins in cardioprotection: a path through mitochondria. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;113B:808-815.
  42. 42. Guilford JM, Pezzuto JM. Wine and health: a review. Am. J. Enol. Vit. 2011;62(4):471-486.
  43. 43. Rifler JO, Lorcerie F, Durand P, Delmas D, Ragot K, Limagne E, Mazue F, Riedinger JM, d’Athis P, Hudelot B, Prost M, Lizard G, Latrufle N. A moderate red wine intake improves blood lipid parameters and erythrocytes membrane fluidity in post myocardial infarct patients. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012;56(2):345-351.
  44. 44. Yoo YJ, Saliba AJ, Prenzler PD. Should red wine be considered as a functional food? Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010;9(5):530-551.
  45. 45. Garcia‐Alonso M, Minihane A‐M, Rimbach G, Rivas‐Gonzalo JC, de Pascual‐Teresa S. Red wine anthocyanins are rapidly absorbed in humans and affect monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 levels and antioxidant capacity of plasma. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2009;20(7):521-529.
  46. 46. Higgins LM, Llanos E. A healthy indulgence? Wine consumers and the health benefits of wine. Wine Econ. Policy 2015;4(1):3-11.
  47. 47. Kutlesa Z, Budimir MD. Wine and bone health: a review. J. Bone Mineral Metab. 2016;34(1):11-22.
  48. 48. Wrolstad RE, Culver CA. Alternatives to those artificial FD&C food colorants. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012;3:59-77.
  49. 49. Martin N, Roriz CL, Morales P, Barros L, Ferreira, IC. Food colorants: challenges, opportunities and current desires of agroindustries to ensure consumer expectation and regulatory practices. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016;52:1-15.
  50. 50. Eghbaliferiz S, Iranshahi M. Prooxidant activity of polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins and carotenoids: updated review of mechanisms and catalysing metals. Phytother. Res. 2016;30(9):1379-1391.
  51. 51. Kuskoski EM, Asuero AG, Troncoso AM, Garcia‐Parrilla MC, Fett R. Actividad antioxidante de pigmentos antociánicos. Food Sci. Technol. (Campinas) 2004;24:691-693.
  52. 52. Wang W, Goodman MT. Antioxidant property of dietary agents in a human LDL‐oxidation in vivo model: interaction of protein binding activity. Nutr. Res. 1999;19(2):191-202.
  53. 53. Castro‐Acosta ML, Lenihan‐Geels GN, Corpe CP, Hall WL. Berries and anthocyanins: promising functional food ingredients with postprandial glycaemia‐lowering effects. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016;75(3):342-355.
  54. 54. Lee J. Rosaceae products: anthocyanins quality and comparisons between dietary supplements and foods. NFS J. 2016;4:1-8.
  55. 55. Cheynier V, Gomez C, Ageorges A. Flavonoids: anthocyanins. In: Nollet LML, Toldrá F (eds) Handbook of Analysis of Active Compounds in Functional Foods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012. pp. 379-404.
  56. 56. Tsuda T. Anthocyanins as functional food factors: chemistry, nutrition and health promotion. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2012;18(3):315-324.
  57. 57. Shipp J, Abdel‐Aal ESM. Food applications and physiological effects of anthocyanins as functional food ingredients. Open Food Sci. J. 2010;4(2):7-22.
  58. 58. Motohashi N, Sakagami H. Anthocyanins as functional food colors. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2009;16:1-40.
  59. 59. Andersen OM, Markham KR (eds) Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005.
  60. 60. Salvayre R, Negre‐Salvayre A, Camaré C. Oxidative theory of artherosclerosis and antioxidants. Biochimie 2016;125:281-286.
  61. 61. Choe E, Min DB. Mechanisms of antioxidants in the oxidation of foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009;8(4):345-358.
  62. 62. Johnson DR, Decker EA. The role of oxygen in lipid oxidation reactions: a review. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;6:171-190.
  63. 63. Urquiza‐Martinez MV, Navarro BF. Antioxidant capacity of food. Free Rad. Antiox. 2016;6(1):1-12.
  64. 64. Liu Z‐Q. Antioxidants may not always be beneficial to health. Nutrition 2014;30(1):131-133.
  65. 65. Zanotti I, Dall’Asta M, Mena P, Mele L, Bruni R, Ray S, del Rio D. Artheroprotective effect of (poly)phenols: a focus on cell cholesterol metabolism. Food Funct. 2015;6(1):13-31.
  66. 66. Kapourchali FR, Surendiran G, Goulet A, Moghadasian MH. The role of dietary cholesterol in lipoprotein metabolism and related metabolic abnormalities: a mini‐review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56(14):2408-2415.
  67. 67. Yin H, Xu L, Porter NA. Free radical lipid peroxidation: mechanisms and analysis. Chem. Rev. 2011;111(10):5944-5972.
  68. 68. Koyama T, Watanabe H, Ito H. The association of circulating inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarker levels with diagonal earlobe crease in patients with atherosclerotic diseases. J. Cardiol. 2016;67(4):347-351.
  69. 69. Pisoschi AM, Pop A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;97:55-74.
  70. 70. Kaur R, Kaur J, Mahajan J, Kumar R, Aora S. Oxidative stress‐implications, source and its prevention. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21(3):1599-1613.
  71. 71. Halliwell B. Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007;35(5):1147-1150.
  72. 72. Halliwell B. The antioxidant paradox: Less paradoxical now? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013;75(3)637-644.
  73. 73. Altiparmak IH, Erkus ME, Gunebakmaz O. Oxidative stress is associated with not only coronary artery disease on statin therapy but also diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Indian Heart J. 2016;68(2):194-195.
  74. 74. Barroso MF, de‐los‐Santos‐Álvarez N, Delerue‐Matos C, Oliveira MBPP. Towards a reliable technology for antioxidant capacity and oxidative damage evaluation: electrochemical (bio)sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011;30(1):1-12.
  75. 75. Vitale G, Salvioli S, Franceschi C. Oxidative stress and the ageing endocrine system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9(4):228-240.
  76. 76. Mateus N, de Freitas V. Anthocyanins as food colorants, in anthocyanins, biosynthesis, functions and applications. In: Gould K, Davies K, Winifield C (eds), Chapter 9. New York: Springer, 2008. pp. 284-304.
  77. 77. Jiang J, Xiong YL. Natural antioxidants as food and feed additives to promote health benefits and quality of meat products: a review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:107-117.
  78. 78. Botelho G, Canas S, Lameiras J. Development of phenolic compounds encapsulation techniques as a major challenge for food industry and for health and nutrition fields. In: Grumezescu A (ed) Nutrient Delivery. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2017. pp. 535-586.
  79. 79. Chung C, Rojanasasithara T, Mutilangi W, McClements DJ. Stability improvement of natural food colours: impact of amino acid and peptide addition of anthocyanin stability in model beverages. Food Chem. 2017;218:277-184.
  80. 80. Xiaonan S. Impact of Food Processing on Anthocyanins. PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore. Singapore: Springer, 2015.
  81. 81. Lila M, Burton‐Freeman B, Grace M, Kalt W. Unraveling anthocyanin bioavailability for human health. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;7:375-393.
  82. 82. Ludwig IA, Mena P, Calani L, Borges G, Pereira‐Caro G, Bresciani L, del Rio D, Lean MEJ, Crozier A. New insights into the bioavailability of red raspberry anthocyanins and ellagitannins. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2015;89:758-769.
  83. 83. Fernandes I, Faria A, de Freitas V, Calhau C, Mateus, N. Multiple‐approach studies to assess anthocyanin bioavailability. Phytochem. Rev. 2015;14(6):899-919.
  84. 84. Fang J. Bioavailability of anthocyanins. Drug Metab. Rev. 2014;46(4):508-520.
  85. 85. Pojer E, Mattivi F, Johnson D, Stockely S. The case for anthocyanin consumption to promote human health: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013;12(5):483-508.
  86. 86. Fernandes I, Faria A, Calhau C, de Freitas V, Mateus N. Bioavailability of anthocyanins and derivatives. J. Funct. Foods 2014;7:54-66.
  87. 87. Hribar U, Ulrih P. The metabolism of anthocyanins. Curr. Drug Metab. 2014;15(1):3-13.
  88. 88. Carbonell‐Capella JM, Buniowska M, Barba FJ, Esteve MJ, Frígola A. Analytical methods for determining bioavailability and bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds from fruits and vegetables: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014;13(2):155-171.
  89. 89. Speciale A, Cimino F, Saija A, Canali R, Virgili F, Bioavailability and molecular activities of anthocyanins as modulators of endothelial function. Genes Nutr. 2014;9(4):404.
  90. 90. Fernandes I, de Freitas V, Mateus, N. Anthocyanins and human health: how gastric absorption may influence acute human physiology. Nutr. Aging 2014;2(1):1-14.
  91. 91. Faria A, Fernandes I, Mateus N, Calhau C. Bioavailability of anthocyanins. In: Raawat KG, Mérillon JM (eds) Natural Products. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 2013. pp. 2465-2487.
  92. 92. Novotny JA. Anthocyanin bioavailability: past progress and current challenges. In: Emerging Trends in Dietary Components for Preventing and Combating Disease, Chapter 32, ACS Symposium Series, 2012. p. 559-568.
  93. 93. Del Rio D, Borges G, Crozier A. Berry flanonoids and phenolics: bioavailability and evidence or protective effects. Br. J. Nutr. 2010;104(S3):S67–S90.
  94. 94. Yang M, Koo S, Song W, Chun O. Food matrix affecting anthocyanin bioavailability: review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011;18(2):291-300.
  95. 95. McGhie TK, Walton MC. The bioavailability and absorption of anthocyanins: towards a better understanding. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007;51(6):702-713.
  96. 96. Xie LY, Lee SG, Vance TM, Wang Y, Kim B, Lee JY, Chun OK, Bolling BW. Bioavailability of anthocyanins and colonic polyphenol metabolites following consumption of aronia berry extract. Food Chem. 2016;211:860-868.
  97. 97. Sandhu AK, Huang YC, Xiao D, Park E, Edirisinghe I, Burton‐Freeman B. Pharmacokinetic characterization and bioavailability of strawberry anthocyanins relative to meal intake. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64(24):4891-4899.
  98. 98. Oliveira H, Wu N, Zhang Q, Wang JY, Oliveira J, de Freitas V, Mateus N, He JR, Fernandes I. Bioavailability studies and anticancer properties of malvidin based anthocyanins, pyranoanthocyanins and non‐oxonium derivatives. Food Funct. 2016;7(5):2462-2468.
  99. 99. Wiczkowski W, Szawara‐Nowak D, Romaszko J. The impact of red cabbage fermentation on bioavailability of anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity of human plasma. Food Chem. 2016:190:730-740.
  100. 100. Kuntz S, Rudloff S, Asseburg H, Borsch C, Frohling B, Unger F, Dold S, Spengler B, Rompp A, Kunz C. Uptake and bioavailability of anthocyanins and phenolic acids from grape/blueberry juice and smoothie in vitro and in vivo. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;113(7):1044-1055.
  101. 101. Kirakosyan A, Seymour EM, Kaufman P, Bolling S. Tissue bioavailability of Tart Cherry anthocyanins. FASEB J. 2015;29(1 Supplement):606-610.
  102. 102. Kirakosyan A, Seymour EM, Wolforth J, McNish R, Kaufman P, Bolling S. Tissue bioavailability of anthocyanins from whole tart cherry in healthy rats. Food Chem. 2015;171:26-31.
  103. 103. Netzel ME, Fanning K, Russell D, Stanley R, Topp B. Bioactive anthocyanins in ‘Queen Garnet’ plum—maturity and bioavailability. In: OHare TJ and Netzel ME (eds) XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (Ihc2014): VI International Symposium on Human Health Effects of Fruits and Vegetables (Favhealth 2014), vol 106. Book Series: Acta Hortic, 2015. pp. 219-222.
  104. 104. Westfall A. In Vitro Evaluation of Biological Activity of Anthocyanin Based Lipstick Formulations. 29th Hayes Graduate Research Forum, 2015.
  105. 105. Sakakibara H, Ichikawa Y, Tajima S, Makino Y, Wakasugi Y, Shimoi K, Kobayashi S, Kumazawa S, Goda T. Practical application of flavonoid‐poor menu meals to the study of the bioavailability of bilberry anthocyanins in human subjects. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014;78(10):1748-1752.
  106. 106. Kamonpatana K, Failla ML, Kumar P, Giusti MM. Anthocyanin structure determines susceptibility to microbial degradation and bioavailability to the buccal mucosa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(29):6903-6910.
  107. 107. Fang J. Some anthocyanins could be efficiently absorbed across the gastrointestinal mucosa: extensive presystemic metabolism reduces apparent bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(18):3904-3911.
  108. 108. Toydemir G, Capanoglu E, Boyacioglu D, Beekwilder J, de Vos RCH, Hall RD. Sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) anthocyanins: effects of juice processing on phenolic compounds and bioavailability. In: X International Symposium on Vaccinium and Other Superfruits, vol 1017. Book Series: Acta Hortic, 2014. pp. 387-398.
  109. 109. Kay CD. The future of flavonoid research. Br. J. Nutr. 2010;104(S3):S91–S95.
  110. 110. Li D, Wang P, Luo Y, Zhao M, Chen F. Health benefits of anthocyanins and molecular mechanisms: update from recent decade. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;57(8):1729-1741.
  111. 111. Riaz M, Zia‐Ul‐Haq M, Saad B. Anthocyanins and Human Health: Biomolecular and Therapeutical Aspects. New York: Springer, 2016.
  112. 112. Wallace TC, Giusti MM. Anthocyanins in Health and Disease. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014.
  113. 113. Prior RL, Wu X. Anthocyanins: structural characteristics that result in unique metabolic patterns and biological activities. Free Rad. Res. 2006;40(10):1014-1028.
  114. 114. Smeriglio A, Bareca D, Bellocco E, Trombetta D. Chemistry, pharmacology and health benefits of anthocyanins. Phytother. Res. 2016;30(8):1256-1286.
  115. 115. Legua P, Forner‐Giner MA, Nuncio‐Jáuregui N, Hernández F. Polyphenolic compouns, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity of nineteen pomegranate fruits: a rich source of bioactive compounds. J. Funct. Foods 2016;23:628-636.
  116. 116. Ahmad A, Kaleem M, Ahmed Z, Shafiq H. Therapeutic potential of flavonoids and their mechanism of action against microbial and viral infections—a review. Food Res. Int. 2015;77:221-235.
  117. 117. Cisowska A, Wojnicz D, Hendrich AB. Anthocyanins as antimicrobial agents of natural plant origin. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011;6(1):149-156.
  118. 118. Ghosh D, Konishi T. Anthocyanins and anthocyanin‐rich extracts: role in diabetes and eye function. Asian Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;16(2):200-208.
  119. 119. Miyake S, Takahashi N, Sasaki M, Kobayashi S, Tsubota K, Ozawa Y. Vision preservation during retinal inflammation by anthocyanin‐rich bilberry extract: cellular and molecular mechanism. Lab. Invest. 2012;92(1):102-109.
  120. 120. Smeriglio A, Monteleone D, Trombetta D. Health effects of Vaccinium myrtillus L.: evaluation of efficacy and technological strategies for preservation of active ingredients. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2014;14(7):567-584.
  121. 121. EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY. Assessment report on Vaccinium myrthillus L., fructus recens and Vaccinium myrtillus L., fructus siccus. Final. EMA/HMPC/55161/2013, Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC), 2015.
  122. 122. Yang Y, Shi Z, Reheman A, Jin W, Li C, Zhu G, Wang Y, Freedman JJ, Ling W, Ni H. Anthocyanins inhibit platelet activation and attenuate thrombus growth in both human ad murine thrombosis models. Blood 2010;116(1):3197-3197.
  123. 123. Liu LK, Lee HJ, Shih YW, Chyau CC, Wang CJ. Mulberry anthocyanins extracts inhibit LDL oxidation and macrophage‐derived foam cell formation induced by oxidative LDL. J. Food Sci. 2008;73(6):4113-4121.
  124. 124. Kao ES, Tseng TH, Lee HJ, Chan KC, Wang CJ. Anthocyanins extracted from Hibiscus attenuate oxidized LDL‐mediated foam fell formation involving regulation of CD36 gene. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009;179(2-3):212-218.
  125. 125. Astadi IR, Astuti M, Santoso U, Nugraheni PS. In vitro antioxidant activity of anthocyanins of black soybean seed coat in human low density lipoprotein (LDL). Food Chem. 2009;112(3):659-663.
  126. 126. Bone K, Mills S. Principles and Practice of Phytotherapy: Modern Herbal Medicine. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone, 2013.
  127. 127. Ksonzékova P, Mariychuk R, Eliasova A, Mudronova D, Csank T, Kiraly J Marcincakova D, Pistl J, Tkacikova L. In vitro studies of biological activities of anthocyanin‐rich berry extracts on porcine intestinal epithelial cells. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016;96(4):1093-1100.
  128. 128. Jankowski A, Jankowska B, Niedworok J. The effects of anthocyanin dye from grapes on experimental diabetes. Folia Med. Cracov. 2000;41(3-4):5-15.
  129. 129. Semaming Y, Pannengpetch P, Chattipakorn SC, Chattipakorn N. Pharmacological properties of protocatechuic acid and its potential roles as complementary medicine. J. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015;2015:11 (ArticleID593902).
  130. 130. McDougall GJ. Phenolic‐enriched foods: sources and processing for enhanced health benefits. In: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2016. p. 9.
  131. 131. Vendrame S, Klimis‐Zacas D. Anti‐inflammatory effect of anthocyanins via modulation of nuclear factor‐kB and mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Nutr. Rev. 2015;76(3):348-358.
  132. 132. Choi TH, Chang KC, Shin SC, Chung JII, Kim HJ, Kim JS. Pharmaceutical composition for wound heating containing anthocyanin extracted from the black soybean seed coat, WO2008126980A1, PCT/KR2008/000513. Industry‐Academic Cooperation Foundation Gyeongsang National University, 2008.
  133. 133. Lin B‐W, Gong C‐C, Song H‐F, Cui YY. Effects of anthocyanins on the prevention and treatment of cancer. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016. doi:10.1111/6ph.13627
  134. 134. Thomasset S, Teller N, Cai H, Marko D, Berry DP, Steward WP, Gescher AJ. Do anthocyanins and anthocyanidins, cancer chemopreventive pigments in the diet, merit development as potential drugs. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009;64(1):201-211.
  135. 135. Galvano F, Salamone F, Nicolosi A, Vitaglione P. Anthocyanins‐based drugs for colon cancer treatment: the nutriotionist's point of view. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009;64(2):431-432.
  136. 136. Webb MR, Min K, Ebeler SE. Anthocyanins interactions with DNA: intercalation, topoisomerase I inhibition and oxidative reactions. J. Food Biochem. 2008;32(5):176-196.
  137. 137. Kong J‐M, Chia L‐S, Goh N‐K, Chia T‐F, Brouillard R. Analysis and biological activities of anthocyanins. Phytochem. 2003;64(5):923-933.
  138. 138. Celli GB, Ghanem A, Brooks MSL. A theoretical physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic approach for modeling the fate of anthocyanins in vivo. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016. doi:10.1080/10408398.2015.1104290
  139. 139. Kay CD. Aspects of anthocyanin absorption, metabolism and pharmacokinetics in humans. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2006;19(1):137-146.
  140. 140. Hornedo‐Ortega R, Alvarez‐Fernandez MA, Cerezo AB, Richard T, Troncoso AM, Garcia‐Parrilla MC. Protocatechuic acid: inhibition of fibril formation, destabilization of preformed fibrils of amyloid‐beta and alpha‐synuclein, and neuroprotection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64(41):7722-7732.
  141. 141. Guttenplan JB, Chen KM, Sun YW, Kosinska W, Zhou Y, Kim S, Sung Y, Gowda K, Amin S, Stoner GD, El‐Bayoumy K. Effects of black raspberry extract and protocatechuic acid on carcinogen‐DNA adducts and mutagenesis, and oxidative stress in rat and human oral cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 2016;9(8):704-712.
  142. 142. Marques C, Fernandes I, Norberto S, Sá C, Teixeira D, Freitas V, Mateus N, Calhau Faria A. Pharmacokinetics of blackberry anthocyanins consumed with or without ethanol: a randomized and crossover trial. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016;60(11):2319-2330.
  143. 143. Motilva MJ, Macia A, Romero MP, Rubio L, Mercader M, Gonzalez‐Ferrero C. Human bioavailability and metabolism of phenolic compounds from red wine enriched with free or nano‐encapsulated phenolic extract. J. Funct. Foods 2016;25:80-93.
  144. 144. Fornasaro S, Ziberna L, Gasperotti M, Tramer F, Vrhovsek U, Mattivi F, Passamonti S. Determination of cyanidin 3‐glucoside in rat brain, liver and kidneys by UPLC/MS‐MS and its application to a short‐term pharmacokinetic study. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22815.
  145. 145. Chen TY, Kritchevsky J, Hargett K, Feller K, Klobusnik R, Song BJ, Cooper B, Jouni Z, Ferruzzi MG, Janle EM. Plasma bioavailability and regional brain distribution of polyphenols from apple/grape seed and bilberry extracts in a young swine model. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015;59(12):2432-2447.
  146. 146. Bhaswant M, Fanning K, Netzel M, Mathai M, Panchal SK, Brown L. Cyanidin 3‐glucoside improves diet‐induced metabolic syndrome in rats. Pharmacol. Res. 2015;102:208-217.
  147. 147. Riha J, Brenner S, Srovnalova A, Klameth L, Dvorak Z, Jager W, Thalhammer T. Effects of anthocyans on the expression of organic anion transporting polypeptides (SLCOs/OATPs) in primary human Hepatocytes. Food Funct. 2015;6(3):772-779.
  148. 148. Mena P, Dominguez‐Perles R, Girones‐Vilaplana A, Baenas N, Garcia‐Viguera C, Villano D. Flavan‐3‐ols, anthocyanins, and inflammation. IUBMB Life 2014;66(11):745-758.
  149. 149. Seymour EM, Warber SM, Kirakosyan A, Noon KR, Gillespie B, Uhley VE, Wunder J, Urcuyo DE, Kaufman PB, Bolling SF. Anthocyanin pharmacokinetics and dose‐dependent plasma antioxidant pharmacodynamics following whole tart cherry intake in healthy humans. J. Funct. Foods 2014;11:509-516.
  150. 150. de Ferrars RM, Czank C, Zhang Q, Botting NP, Kroon PA, Cassidy A, Kay CD. The pharmacokinetics of anthocyanins and their metabolites in humans. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014;171(13):3268-3282.
  151. 151. Kalt W, Liu Y, McDonald JE, Vinqvist‐Tymchuk MR, Fillmore SAE. Anthocyanin  metabolites are abundant and persistent in human urine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(18):3926-3934.
  152. 152. Kay CD. Rethinking paradigms for studying mechanisms of action of plant bioactives. Nutr. Bull. 2015;40(4):335-339.
  153. 153. Rothwell JA, Urpi‐Sarda M, Boto‐Ordonez M, Llorach R, Farran‐Codina A, Barupal DK, Neveu V, Manach C, Andres‐Lacueva C. Systematic analysis of the polyphenol metabolome using the Phenol‐Explorer database. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2001;60(1):203-211.
  154. 154. Apak R, Özyürek M, Gücļü K, Çapanogĭu E. Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement. 1. Classification, physicochemical principles, mechanisms, and electron transfer (ET)‐based assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64(5):997-1027.
  155. 155. Apak R, Özyürek M, Gücļü K, Çapanogĭu E. Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement. 2. Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)‐based, mixed‐mode (electron transfer (ET)/HAT), and lipid peroxidation assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64(5):1046-1070.
  156. 156. Apak R, Özyürek M, Gücļü K, Çapanogĭu E. Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement. 3. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) scavenging assays, oxidative stress biomarkers, and chromatographic/chemometric assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64(5):1028-1045.
  157. 157. Bunaciu AA, Danet AF, Fleschin S, Aboul‐Enein HY. Recent applications for in vitro antioxidant activity assay. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016;46(5):389-399.
  158. 158. Majer P, Vidovic M, Czegeny G, Jovanovic SV, Strid A, Hideg E. Evaluation of procedures for assessing anti‐ and pro‐oxidants in plant samples. Anal. Methods 2016;8(28):5569-5580.
  159. 159. Niki E. Antioxidant capacity of foods for scavenging reactive oxidants and inhibition of plasma lipid oxidation induced by multiple oxidants. Food Funct. 2016;7(5):2156-2168.
  160. 160. Pisoschi AM, Pop A, Cimpeanu C, Predoi G. Antioxidant capacity determination in plants and plant‐derived products: a review. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longe. 2016;2016:1-36.
  161. 161. Amorati R, Valgimigli L. Advantages and limitations of common testing methods for antioxidants. Free Rad. Res. 2015;49(5):633-649.
  162. 162. Held P. An Introduction to Reactive Oxygen Species Measurement of ROS in Cells. Winooski, VT, USA: BioTek Instruments Inc., Application Guide. 2010.
  163. 163. Li B, Pratt DA. Methods for determining the efficacy of radical‐trapping antioxidants. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2015;82:187-202.
  164. 164. Shahidi F, Ambigaipalan P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: antioxidant activity and health effects—a review. J. Funct. Foods 2015;18:820-897.
  165. 165. Shahidi F, Zhong Y. Measurement of antioxidant activity. J. Funct. Foods 2015;18:757-781.
  166. 166. Vilela D, González MC, Escarpa A. Nanoparticles as analytical tools for in‐vitro antioxidant‐capacity assessment and beyond. Trends Anal. Chem. 2015;64:1-16.
  167. 167. Alam MN, Bristi NJ, Rafiquzzaman M. Review on in vivo and in vitro methods evaluation of antioxidant activity. Saudi Pharm. J. 2013;21(2):143-152.
  168. 168. Apak R, Gorinstein S, Böhm V, Schaich KM, Özyürek M, Güçlü K. Methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2013;85(5):957-998.
  169. 169. López‐Alarcón C, Denicola A. Evaluating the antioxidant capacity of natural products: a review on chemical and cellular‐based assays. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013;763:1-10.
  170. 170. Craft BD, Kerrihard AL, Amarowicz R, Pegg RB. Phenol‐based antioxidants and the in vitro methods used for their assessment. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012;11:148-173.
  171. 171. Gülcin I. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: an overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2012;86(3):345-391.
  172. 172. Pinchuk I, Shoval H, Dotan Y, Lichtenberg D. Evaluation of antioxidants: scope, limitations and relevance of assays. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2012;165(6):638-647.
  173. 173. Pisoschi AM, Negulescu GP. Methods for total antioxidant activity determination: a review. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2011;1(1):1-11.
  174. 174. Laguerre M, Decker EA, Lecomte J, Villeneuve P. Methods for evaluating the potency and efficacy of antioxidants. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2010;13(5):518-525.
  175. 175. Liu Z‐Q. Chemical methods to evaluate antioxidant ability. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(10):5675-5691.
  176. 176. Niki E. Assessment of antioxidant capacity in vitro and in vivo. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2010;49(4):503-515.
  177. 177. Gökmen V, Serpen A, Fogliano V. Direct measurement of the total antioxidant capacity of foods: the ‘QUENCHER’ approach. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009;20(6):278-288.
  178. 178. Magalhães LM, Santos M, Segundo MA, Reis S, Lima JLFC. Flow injection based methods for fast screening of antioxidant capacity. Talanta 2009;77(5):1559-1566.
  179. 179. Magalhães LM, Santos M, Segundo MA, Reis S, Lima JLFC. Automatic flow injection based methodologies for determination of scavenging capacity against biologically relevant reactive species of oxygen and nitrogen. Talanta 2009;78(4):1219-1226.
  180. 180. Moon J‐K, Shibamoto T. Antioxidant assays for plant and food components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:1655-1666.
  181. 181. Frankel EN, Finley JW. How to standardize the multiplicity of methods to evaluate natural antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56(13):4901-4908.
  182. 182. Kusano C, Ferrari B. Total antioxidant capacity: a biomarker in biomedical and nutritional studies. J. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2008;7(1):1-15.
  183. 183. Magalhaes LM, Segundo MA, Reis S, Lima JLFC. Methodological aspects about in vitro evaluation of antioxidant properties. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2008;613(1):1-19.
  184. 184. Pérez‐Jiménez J, Arranz S, Tabernero M, Díaz‐Rubio ME, Serrano J, Goñi I, Saura‐Calixto F. Updated methodology to determine antioxidant capacity in plant foods, oils and beverages: extraction, measurement and expression of results. Food Res. Int. 2008;41(3):274-285.
  185. 185. Somogyi A, Rosta K, Pusztai P, Tulassay Z, Nagy G. Antioxidant measurements. Physiol. Meas. 2007;28(4):R41–R55.
  186. 186. MacDonald‐Wicks LK, Wood LG, Gar ML. Methodology for the determination of biological antioxidant capacity in vitro: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006;86(13):2046-2056.
  187. 187. Wood LG, Gibson PG, Garg ML. A review of the methodology for assessing in vivo antioxidant capacity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006;86(13):2057-2066.
  188. 188. Decker EA, Warner K, Richards MP, Shahidi F. Measuring antioxidant effectiveness in food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:4303-4310.
  189. 189. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53(10):1841-1856.
  190. 190. Kuskoski EM, Asuero AG, Troncoso AM, Mancini‐Filho J, Fett R. Aplicación de diversos métodos químicos para determinar actividad antioxidante en pulpa de frutos. Food Sci. Technol. (Campinas). 2005;25(4):726-732.
  191. 191. Liu RH, Finley J. Potential cell culture models for antioxidant research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4311-4314.
  192. 192. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4290-4302.
  193. 193. Roginsky V, Lissi EA. Review of methods to determine chain‐breaking antioxidant activity in food. Food Chem. 2005;92(2):235-254.
  194. 194. Antolovich M, Prenzler PD, Patsalides E, McDonald S, Robards K. Methods for testing antioxidant activity. Analyst. 2002;127(1):183-198.
  195. 195. Sánchez Moreno C. Review: methods used to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity in foods and biological systems. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2002;8(3):121-137.
  196. 196. Llesuy S, Evelson P, Campos AM, Lissi E. Methodologies for evaluation of total antioxidant activities in complex mixtures. A critical review. Biol. Res. 2001;34(2):51-73.
  197. 197. Kuskoski EM, Asuero AG, Troncoso AM, Fett R. Actividad antioxidante de pulpas de frutos tropicales. Aplicación del método ABTS. Alimentaria 2006;376:67-70.
  198. 198. Tan JBL, Lim YY. Critical analysis of current methods for assessing the in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activity of plant extracts. Food Chem. 2015;172:814-822.
  199. 199. Schaich KM, Tian X, Xie J. Reprint of “Hurdles and pitfalls in measuring antioxidant efficacy: a critical evaluation of ABTS, DPPH, and ORAC assays. J. Funct. Foods 2015;14:111-125.
  200. 200. Magalhaes LM, Barreiros L, Reis S, Segundo MA. Kinetic matching approach applied to ABTS assay for high‐throughput determination of total antioxidant capacity of food products. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014;33(2):187-194.
  201. 201. Tian X, Schaich KM. Effects of molecular structure on kinetics and dynamics of the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity assay with ABTS+*. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013;61(23):5511-5519.
  202. 202. Barton HJ. A “zero sample concentration approach”: standardization of method for the estimation of total antioxidant activity by the use of extrapolation to zero sample concentration. A novel standard. 1. ABTS cation radical scavenging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58(16):8918-8926.
  203. 203. Çelik SE, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R. Solvent effects on the antioxidant capacity of lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants measured by CUPRAC, ABTS/persulphate and FRAP methods. Talanta 2010;81(4-5):1300-1309.
  204. 204. Ozgen M, Reese RN, Tulio AZJR, Scheerens J, Miller AR. Modified 2,2‐azino‐bis‐3‐ethylbenzothiazoline‐6‐sulfonic acid (abts) method to measure antioxidant capacity of selected small fruits and comparison to ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2′‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54(4):1151-1157.
  205. 205. Villaño D, Fernandez‐Pachon AM, Troncoso AM, Garcia Parrilla MC. The antioxidant activity of wines determined by the ABTS method: influence of sample dilution and time. Talanta 2004;64(2):501-509.
  206. 206. Mehdi MM, Rizvi SI. N,N‐Dimethyl‐p‐phenylenediamine dihydrochloride‐based method for the measurement of plasma oxidative capacity during human aging. Anal. Biochem. 2013;436(2):165-167.
  207. 207. Verde V, Fogliano V, Ritieni A, Maiani G, Morisco F, Caporaso N. Use of N,N‐dimethyl‐p‐phenylenediamine to evaluate the oxidative status of human plasma. Free Rad. Res. 2002;36(8):69-873.
  208. 208. Foti MC. Use and abuse of the DPPH(*) radical. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63(40):8765-8776.
  209. 209. Fadda A, Serra M, Molinu AMG, Azara E, Barberis A, Sanna D. Reaction time and DPPH concentration influence antioxidant activity and kinetic parameters of bioactive molecules and plant extracts in the reaction with the DPPH radical. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014;35(2):112-119.
  210. 210. Carmona‐Jiménez Y, García‐Moteno MV, Igartuburu JM, García‐Barroso C. Simplification of the DPPH assay for estimating the antioxidant activity of wine by‐products. Food Chem. 2014;165:198-204.
  211. 211. Shimamura T, Sumikura Y, Yamazaki T, Tada A, Kashiwagi T, Ishikawa H, Matsui T, Sugimoto N, Akyama H, Ukeda H. Applications of the DPPH assay for evaluating the antioxidant capacity of food additives. Interlaboratory evaluation study. Anal. Sci. 2014;30(7):717-721.
  212. 212. Pyrzynska K, Pekal A. Application of free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) to estimate the antioxidant capacity of food samples. Anal. Methods 2013;5(17):4288-4295.
  213. 213. Chen Z, Bertin R, Froldi G. EC50 estimation of antioxidant activity in DPPH assay using several statistical programs. Food Chem. 2013;138(1):414-420.
  214. 214. Mishra K, Ojha H, Chaudhury NK. Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay. A critical review and results. Food Chem. 2012;130(4):1036-1043.
  215. 215. Plank DW, Szpylka J, Sapirstein H, Woollard D, Zapf CM, Lee V, Chen CY, Liu RH, Tsao R, Düsterloh A, Baugh S. Determiation of antioxidant activity in foods and beverages by reaction with 2,2′‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH): Collaborative Study First Action 2012.04. J. AOAC Int. 2012;95(6):1562-1569.
  216. 216. Dawidowicz AL, Wianowska D, Olszowy H. On practical problems in estimation of antioxidant activity of compounds by DPPH method (problems in estimation of antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2012;131(3):1037-1043.
  217. 217. Xie J, Schaich KM. Re‐evaluation of the 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl free radical (DPPH) assay for antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;62(19):4251-4260.
  218. 218. Sharma OP, Bhat TK. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food Chem. 2009;113(4):1202-1205.
  219. 219. Kuskoski EM, Asuero AG, Morales MT, Fett R. Frutos tropicais silvestres e polpas de frutas congeladas: atividade antioxidante, polifenóis e antocianinas. Ciência Rural 2006;36(4);1283-1287.
  220. 220. Benzie IF, Choi SW. Antioxidants in food content measurement, significance, action, cautions, caveat and research methods. Adv. Food Nutr. 2014;71:1-53.
  221. 221. Mellado‐Ortega E, Zabalgogeazcoa I, de Aldana BRV, Arellano JB. Solutions to decrease a systematic error related to AAPH addition in the fluorescence‐based ORAC assay. Anal. Biochem. 2017;519:27-29.
  222. 222. Garzón GA, Manns DC, Riedl K, Schwartz SJ, Padilla‐Zakour O. Identification of phenolic compounds in petals of Nasturtium Flowers (Tropaeolum majus) by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and determination of oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63(6):1803-1811.
  223. 223. Prior RL. Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC): new horizonts in relating dietary antioxidant/bioactives and health benefits. J. Funct. Foods 2015;18:797-810.
  224. 224. Dorta E, Fuentes‐Lemus E, Aspée A, Atala E, Speisky H, Bridi R, Lissi E, López‐Alarcón C. The ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) index does not reflect the capacity of antioxidants to trap peroxyl radicals. RSC Adv. 2015;5(50):39899-39901.
  225. 225. Atala E, Aspée A, Speisky H, Lissi E, López‐Alarcón C. Antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds in acidic medium: a pyrogallol red‐based ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013;32(2):116-125.
  226. 226. Ou B, Chang T, Huang D, Prior RL. Determination of total antioxidant capacity by oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) using fluorescein as the fluorescence probe: first action 2012.23. J. AOAC Int. 2013;96(6):1372-1376.
  227. 227. Osakwe ON, Siegel A. A novel standardized oxygen radical absorbance assay for evaluating antioxidant natural products. J. AOAC Int. 2013;96(6):1365-1371.
  228. 228. Ortiz R, Antilen M, Speisky H, Aliaga M E, López‐Alarcón C, Baugh S. Application of a microplate‐based ORAC‐Pyrogallol red assay for the estimation of antioxidant capacity: First action 2012.03. J. AOAC Int. 2012;95(6):1558-1561.
  229. 229. Stockham K, Paimin R, Orbell JD, Adorno P, Buddhadasa S. Modes of handling oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) data and reporting values in product labelling. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011;24(4):686-691.
  230. 230. Kevers C, Sipel A, Pincemail J, Dommes J. Antioxidant capacity of hydrophilic food matrices: optimization and validation of ORAC assays. Food Anal. Methods 2014;7(2):409-416.
  231. 231. Zulueta A, Esteve MJ, Frígola A. ORAC and TEAC assays comparison to measure the antioxidant capacity of food products. Food Chem. 2009;114(1):310-316.
  232. 232. Kohri S, Fujii H, Oowada S, Endoh N, Sueishi Y, Kusakabe M, Shimmei M, Kotake Y. An oxygen radical absorbance capacity‐live assay that directly quantifies the antioxidant's scavenging capacity against AAPH‐derived free radicals. Anal. Biochem. 2009;386(2):167-171.
  233. 233. López‐Alarcón C, Lissi E. A novel and simple ORAC methodology based on the interaction of pyrogallol red with peroxyl radicals. Free Rad. Res. 2006;40(9):979-985.
  234. 234. Dávalos A, Gómez‐Cordovés C, Bartolomé B. Extending applicability of the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC‐fluorescein) assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52(1):48-54.
  235. 235. Prior RL, Hoang H, Gu L, Wu X, Bacchiocca M, Howard L, Hampsch‐Woodill M, Huang D, Ou B. Jacob R. Assays for hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity (oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORACFL)) of plasma and other biological and food samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51(11):3273-3279.
  236. 236. Ou B, Hampsch‐Woodill M, Prior RL. Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49(10):4619-4626.
  237. 237. Cardenas A, Gomez M, Frontana C. Electrochemical method to quantify antioxidants employing cupric reducing antioxidant capacity, CUPRAC. Procedia Chem. 2014;12:62-65.
  238. 238. Gosmaro F, Bagnati M, Berto S, Bellomo G, Prenesti E. Measurement of total antioxidant capacity of human plasma: Setting and validation of the CUPRAC‐BCS method on routine apparatus ADVIA 2400. Talanta 2013;115:526-532.
  239. 239. Özyürek M, Guçlü K, Tütem E, Baskan KS, Erçağ E, Celik E, Baki S, Yıldız L, Karaman S, Apak R. A comprehensive review of CUPRAC methodology. Anal. Methods 2011;3(11):2439-2453.
  240. 240. Özyürek M, Guçlu K, Apak R. The main and modified CUPRAC methods of antioxidant measurement. Trends Anal. Chem. 2011;30(4):652-664.
  241. 241. Campos C, Guzman R, López‐Fernández E, Casado A. Evaluation of the copper(II) reduction assay using bathocuproinedisulfonic acid disodium salt for the total antioxidant capacity assessment: the CUPRAC‐BSC assay. Anal. Biochem. 2009;392(1):37-44.
  242. 242. Kuskoski EM, Vega JM, Rios JJ, Fett R, Troncoso AM, Asuero AG. Characterization of anthocyanins from the fruits of Baguaçu (Eugenia umbelliflora Berg). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51(18):5450-5454.
  243. 243. Hoyos‐Arbeláez J, Vazquez M, Contreras‐Calderon J. Electrochemical methods as a tool for determining the antioxidant capacity of foods and beverages: a review. Food Chem. 2017;221:1371-1381.
  244. 244. Hilgemann M, Costa Bassetto V, Tatsuo Kubota L. Electrochemical approaches employed for sensing the antioxidant capacity exhibited by vegetal extracts: a review. Comb. Chem. High T. SCR 2016;16(2):98-108.
  245. 245. Brainina KhZ, Zaharov AS, Vidrevich MB. Potentiometry for the determination of oxidant activity. Anal. Methods 2016;8:5667-5675.
  246. 246. Pisoschi AM, Cimpeanu C, Predoi G. Electrochemical methods for total antioxidant capacity and its main contributors determination: a review. Open Chem. 2015;13(1):824-856.
  247. 247. Ivanova AV, Gerasimova EL, Brainina KhZ. Potentiometric study of antioxidant activity: Development and prospects. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2015;45:311-322.
  248. 248. Sochor J, Dobes J, Krystofova O, Ruttkay‐Nedechy B, Babula P, Pohanka M, Jurilova T, Zitka O, Adam V, Klejdus B, Kizek R. Electrochemistry as a tool for studying antioxidant properties. Int. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013;8(6):8469-8489.
  249. 249. Jaldappagari S, Hegde AH, Narayan PS, Terada NL, Motohasi N. Electrochemical, bioactive mechanism of interaction and analytical studies of anthocyanins and related compounds. In: Anthocyanins, Structure, Biosynthesis and Health Benefits. Motohashi N. (Ed.), Chapter 3, Tokyo, Japan: Nova Science Publishers, 2012. pp. 35-92.
  250. 250. Barriga‐Gonzalez G, Aguilera‐Venegas B, Folch‐Cano C, Pérez‐Cruz F, Olea‐Azar, C. Electron spin resonance as a powerful tool for studying antioxidant and radicals. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013;20(37):4731-4743.
  251. 251. Oszmianski J, Lachowicz S. Effect of the production of dried fruits and juice from chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa L.) on the content and antioxidative activity of bioactive compounds. Molecules 2016;21(8):E1098.
  252. 252. Grajeda‐Iglesias C, Salas E, Barouh N, Baréa B, Panya A, Figueroa‐Espinoza MC. Antioxidant activity of protocatechuates evaluated by DPPH, ORAC, and CAT methods. Food Chem. 2016;194:749-757.
  253. 253. Sousa A, Araujo P, Azevedo J, Cruz L, Fernandes I, Mateus N, de Freitas V. Antioxidant and antiproliferative properties of 3‐deoxyanthocyanidins. Food Chem. 2016;192:142-148.
  254. 254. Baskan KS, Tutem E, Akyüz E, Apak R. Assessment of the contribution of anthocyanins to the total antioxidant capacities of plant foods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015;241(4):529-541.
  255. 255. Li YC, He YT. Anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of different varieties blueberries. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013;610-613:3421-3427.
  256. 256. Queirós RB, Tafulo PA, Sales MG. Assessing and comparing the total antioxidant capacity of commercial beverages: application to beers, wines, waters and soft drinks using TRAP, TEAC and FRAP methods. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2013;16(1):22-31.
  257. 257. Floegel A, Kim D‐O, Chung S‐J, Koo SI, Chun OK. Comparison of ABTS/DPPH assays to measure antioxidant capacity in popular antioxidant‐rich US foods. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011;24(7):1043-1048.
  258. 258. Wootton‐Beard PC, Moran A, Ryan L. Stability of the total antioxidant capacity and total polyphenol content of 23 commercially available vegetable juices after in vitro digestion measured by FRAP, DPPH, ABTS and Folin‐Ciocalteu methods. Food Res. Int. 2011;44(1):217-224.
  259. 259. Azevedo J, Fernandes I, Faria A, Oliveira J, Fernandes A, de Freitas V, Mateus N. Antioxidant properties of anthocyanidins, anthocyanidin‐3‐glucosides and respective portisins. Food Chem. 2010;119(2):518-523.
  260. 260. Dudonné S, Vitrac X, Coutière P, Woillez M, Mérillon J‐M. Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57(5):1768-1774.
  261. 261. Shalaby EA, Shanab SMM. Antioxidant compounds, assay of determination and mode of action. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013;7(10):528-539.
  262. 262. Badarinath AV, Rao KM, Chetty MS, Ramkanth S., Rajan TVS, Gnanaprakash K. A review on in‐vitro antioxidant methods: comparisons, correlations and considerations. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2010;2(2):1276-1285.
  263. 263. Ioannou I, Chaaban H, Slimane M, Ghoul M. Origin of the variability of the antioxidant activity determination of food material. In: Ekinci D (ed) Biotechnology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chap 4. Rijeka: InTech, 2015. pp. 77-92.
  264. 264. Quideau S, Deffieux D, Douat‐Casassus C, Pouysegu L. Plant polyphenols: chemical properties, biological activity and synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50(3):586-521.
  265. 265. Lu L, Qiang M, Li F, Zhang H, Zhang S. Theoretical investigation on the antioxidative activity of anthocyanidins: a DFT/B3LYP study. Dyes Pigm. 2014;103:175-182.
  266. 266. Estévez L, Otero N, Mosquera RA. A computational study on the acidity dependence of radical‐scavenging mechanisms of anthocyanidins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010;114(29):9706-9712.
  267. 267. Guzman R, Santiago C, Sánchez M. A density functional study of antioxidant properties on anthocyanidins. J. Mol. Struct. 2009;935(1-3):110-114.
  268. 268. Martinez A. Donator acceptor map of psittacofulvins and anthocyanins: are they good antioxidant substances? J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113(14):4915-4921.
  269. 269. Estévez L, Mosquera RA. Molecular structure and antioxidant properties of delphidin. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008;112(42):10614-10623.
  270. 270. Kim D‐O, Lee KW, Lee HJ, Lee CY. Vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) of phenolics phytochemicals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50(13):3713-3717.
  271. 271. Jhin C, Hwang KT. Prediction and radical scavenging activities of anthocyanins applying adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with quantum chemical descriptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15(8):14715-14727.
  272. 272. Jing P, Zhao S, Ruan S, Sui Z, Chen L, Jiang L, Qian B. Quantitative studies on structure‐ORAC relationships of anthocyanins from eggplant and radish using 3D‐QASR. Food Chem. 2014;145:365-371.
  273. 273. Shityakov S, Puskas I, Roewer N, Förster C, Broscheit J. Three‐dimensional quantitative structure‐activity relationship and docking studies in a series of anthocyanin derivatives as cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors. Adv. Appl. Bioinf. Chem. 2014;7(1):11-21.
  274. 274. Zhao C‐L, Yu Y‐Q, Chen Z‐J, Wen G‐S, Wei F‐G, Zheng Q, Wang C‐D, Xiao X‐L. Stability‐increasing effects of anthocyanin glycosyl acylation. Food Chem. 2017;214:119-128.
  275. 275. Goulas V, Vicente AR, Manganaris GA. Structural diversity of anthocyanins in fruits. In: Motohashi N (ed) Anthocyanins: Structure, Biosynthesis and Health Benefits. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2012. pp. 225-250.
  276. 276. Halbwirth H. The creation and physiological relevance of divergent hydroxylation patterns in the flavonoid pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010;11(2),595-621.
  277. 277. Bors W, Michel C, Stettmaier K. Structure‐activity relationships governing antioxidant capacities of plant polyphenols. Methods Enzymol. 2001;335:166-180.
  278. 278. Kähkonen MP, Heinonen M. Antioxidant activity of anthocyanins and their aglycons. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51(3):628-633.
  279. 279. Jing P, Bomser JA, Schwartz SJ, He J, Magnuson BA, Giusti MM. Structure‐function relationships of anthocyanins from various anthocyanin‐rich extracts on the inhibition of colon cancer cell growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56(20):9391-9398.
  280. 280. Pina F, Oliveira J, de Freitas V. Anthocyanins and derivatives are more than flavylium cations. Tetrahedron 2015;71(20):3107-3114.
  281. 281. Silva VO, Freitas AA, Maçanita AL, Quina FH. Chemistry and photochemistry of natu- ral plant pigments: the anthocyanins. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2016;29(11):594-599.
  282. 282. Basilio N, Pina F. Chemistry and photochemistry of anthocyanins and related compounds: a thermodynamic and kinetic approach. Molecules 2016;21(11):1502.
  283. 283. Pina F. Chemical applications of anthocyanins and related compounds. A source of bioinspiration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(29):6885-6897.
  284. 284. Pina F, Melo MJ, Laia CAT, Parola AJ, Lima JC. Chemistry and applications of flavylium compounds: a handful of colours. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41(2):896-908.
  285. 285. Pina F, Petrov V, Laia CAT. Photochemistry of flavylium systems. An overview of a versatile multistate system. Dyes Pigm. 2012;92(2):877-889.
  286. 286. Trouillas P, Sancho‐García JC, de Freytas V, Gierschner J, Otyepka M, Dangles O. Stabilizing and modulating color by copigmentation: insights from theory and experiment. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(9):4937-4982.
  287. 287. Bimpilas A, Panagopoulou M, Tsimogiannis D, Oreopoulou V. Anthocyanin copigmentation and color of wine: the effect of naturally obtained hydroxycinnamic acids as cofactors. Food Chem. 2016;197:39-46.
  288. 288. Valenzuela A, Nieto KS. Synthetic and natural antioxidants: food quality protectors. Grasas y Aceites 1996;47(3):186-196.
  289. 289. Ahmadiani N, Robbins RJ, Collins TM, Giusti MM. Molar absorptivity (ε) and spectral characteristics of cyanidin‐based anthocyanins from red cabbage. Food Chem. 2016;197:900-906.
  290. 290. Wang BC, He R, Li ZM. The stability and antioxidant activity of anthocyanins from blueberry. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010;48(1):42-49.
  291. 291. Bakowska‐Barczak A. Acylated anthocyanins as stable, natural food colorants—a review. Polish J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2005;14/55(2):107-116.
  292. 292. Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE. Acylated anthocyanins from edible sources and their applications in food systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003;14(3):217-225.
  293. 293. Andersen OM, Jordheim M. Anthocyanins. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Chichester: Wiley, 2010. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0001909.pub2
  294. 294. El Sohaimy SA. Functional foods and nutraceutical‐modern approach to Food Science. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012;20(5):691-708.
  295. 295. EFSA (European Food Safety Autority). Scientific opinion on the re‐evaluation of anthocyanins (E163) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2013;11(4):3145-3196.
  296. 296. Hosu A, Cristea V‐M, Cimpoiu C. Analysis of total phenolic, flavonoids, anthocyanins and tannins content in Romanian red wines: prediction of antioxidant activities and classification of wines using artificial neural networks. Food Chem. 2014;150:113-118.
  297. 297. Tenore GC. Anthocyanin profile and their biological properties in popular mediterranean red wines. In: Anthocyanins: Structure, Biosynthesis and Health Benefits. New York: Nova Science Publisher, 2012. pp. 283-298.
  298. 298. Menković N, Živković J, Šavikin K, Godevac D, Zdunić G. Phenolic composition and free radical scavenging activity of wine produced from the Serbian autochthonous grape variety Prokupac—a model approach. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2014;79(1):11-24.
  299. 299. Rice‐Evans CA, Miller NJ, Papaganda G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. Rev. 1997;2(4):152-159.
  300. 300. Frankel EN, Waterhouse AL, Teissedre PL. Principal phenolic phytochemicals in selected California wines and their antioxidant activity in inhibiting oxidation of human low density lipoproteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995;43(4):890-894.
  301. 301. Monagas M, Bartolomé B, Gómez‐Cordovés C. Updated knowledge about the presence of phenolic compounds in wine. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005;45(2):85-118.
  302. 302. Ivanova‐Petropulos V, Hermosín‐Gutiérrez I, Boros B, Stefova M, Stafilov T, Vojnoski B, Dörnyei Á, Kilár F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Macedonian red wines. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015;41:1-14.
  303. 303. Pisano PL, Silva MF, Olivieri AC. Anthocyanins as markers for the classification of Argentinean wines according to botanical and geographical origin. Chemometric modeling of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data. Food Chem. 2015;175:174-180.
  304. 304. Satué‐Gracia MT, Heinonen M, Frankel EN. Anthocyanin as antioxidants on human low‐density lipoprotein and lecithin‐liposome systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45(9):3362-3367.
  305. 305. Hayek B, Fuhrman J, Vaya M, Rosenblat P, Belinky R, Coleman Elis A, Aviram M. Reduced progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E‐deficient mice following consumption of red wine, or its polyphenols quercetin or catechin, is associated with reduced susceptibility of LDL to oxidation and aggregation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1997;17(11):2744-52.
  306. 306. Netzel M, Strass G, Bitsch I, Konitz R, Christmann M, Bitsch R. Effect of grape processing on selected antioxidant phenolics in red wine. J. Food Eng. 2003;56(2):223-228.
  307. 307. Zheng W, Wang SY. Oxygen radical absorbing capacity of phenolics in blueberries, cranberries, chokeberries, and lingonberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51(2):502-509.
  308. 308. Gris EF, Mattivi F, Ferreira EA, Vrhovsek U, Filho DW, Pedrosa RC, Bordignon‐Luiz MT. Phenolic profile and effect of regular consumption of Brazilian red wines on in vivo antioxidant activity. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013;31(1):31-40.
  309. 309. Jordão AM, Simões S, Correia AC, Gonçalves FJ. Antioxidant activity evolution during portuguese red wine vinification and their relation with the proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin composition. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2012;36(4):298-309.
  310. 310. Jordão AM, Correia AC. Relationship between antioxidant capacity, proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin content during grape maturation of touriga nacional and tinta roriz grape varieties. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2012;33(2):214-224.
  311. 311. Langer RD, Criqui MH, Reed DM. Lipoproteins and blood pressure as biological pathways for effect of moderate alcohol consumption on coronary heart disease. Circulation 1992;85(3):910-915.
  312. 312. Savolainen MJ, Kesaniemi YA. Effects of alcohol on lipoproteins in relation to coronary artery disease. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1995;6(4):243-250.
  313. 313. Simonetti P, Pietta P, Testolin G. Polyphenol content and total antioxidant potential of selected Italian wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45(4):1152-1155.
  314. 314. Radovanović B, Radovanović A. Free radical scavenging activity and anthocyanin profile of cabernet sauvignon wines from the balkan region. Molecules 2010;15(6):4213-4226.
  315. 315. Bajčan D, Vollmannová A, Šimanský V, Bystrická J, Trebichalský P, Árvay J, Czako P. Antioxidant activity, phenolic content and colour of the slovak cabernet sauvignon wines. Potravinarstvo 2016;10(1):89-94.
  316. 316. Aguirre MJ, Chen YY, Isaacs M, Matsuhiro B, Mendoza L, Torres S. Electrochemical behaviour and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanins from Chilean red wine, grape and raspberry. Food Chem. 2010;121(1):44-48.
  317. 317. Rivero‐Pérez MD, Muñiz P, González‐Sanjosé ML. Contribution of anthocyanin fraction to the antioxidant properties of wine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46(8):2815-2822.
  318. 318. Rivero‐Pérez MD, Muñiz P, González‐Sanjosé ML. Antioxidant profile of red wines evaluated by total antioxidant capacity, scavenger activity, and biomarkers of oxidative stress methodologies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007;55(14):5476-5483.
  319. 319. Fernández‐Pachón MS, Villaño D, García‐Parilla MC, Troncoso AM. Antioxidant activity of wines and relation with their polyphenolic composition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004;513(1):113-118.
  320. 320. Ghiselli A, Nardini M, Baldi A, Scaccini C. Antioxidant activity of different penol fractions separated from an Italian red wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46(2):3641-3647.
  321. 321. Trikas ED, Melidou M, Papi RM, Zachariadis GA, Kyriakidis DA. Extraction, separation and identification of anthocyanins from red wine by‐product and their biological activities. J. Funct Foods 2016;25:548-558.
  322. 322. Cristino R, Costa E, Cosme F, Jordão AM. General phenolic characterisation, individual anthocyanin and antioxidant capacity of matured red wines from two Portuguese appellations of origins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013;93(10):2486-2493.
  323. 323. López‐Vélez M, Martínez‐Martínez F, Del Valle‐Ribes C. The study of phenolic compounds as natural antioxidants in wine. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003;43(3):233-244.
  324. 324. Lee J‐H, Talcott ST. Fruit maturity and juice extraction influences ellagic acid derivatives and other antioxidant polyphenolics in muscadine grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52(2):361-366.
  325. 325. Zhang L, Li N, Gao X. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of wines fermented using ten blueberry varieties. Am. J. Food Technol. 2016;11(6):291-197.
  326. 326. Galanakis CM, Kotanidis A, Dianellou M, Gekas V. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of cypriot wines. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015;33(2):126-136.
  327. 327. Iwashina T. Contribution to flower colors of flavonoids including anthocyanins: a review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015;10(3):129-144.
  328. 328. Cortez R, Luna‐Vital DA, Margulis D, Gonzalez de Mejia E. Natural pigments: stabilization methods of anthocyanins for food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017;16(1):180-198.
  329. 329. Flores FP, Singh RK, Kong F. Anthocyanin extraction, microencapsulation, and release properties during in vitro digestion. Food Rev. Int. 2016;32(1):46-67.
  330. 330. Shwetha BP, Preetha R. Study on color stability and microencapsulation of anthocyanin pigment using spray drying. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia. 2016;13(2):1207-1214.
  331. 331. Yousuf B, Gul K, Wani AA, Singh P. Health benefits of anthocyanins and their encapsulation for potential use in food systems: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56(13):2223-2230.
  332. 332. Robert P, Fredes C. The encapsulation of anthocyanins from berry‐type fruits. Trends in foods. Molecules 2015;20(4):5875-5888.
  333. 333. Mahdavi SA, Jafari SM, Ghorbani M, Assadpoor E. Spray‐drying microencapsulation of anthocyanins by natural biopolymers: a review. Dry Technol. 2014;32(5):509-518.
  334. 334. Cavalcanti RN, Santos DT, Meireles MAA. Non‐thermal stabilization mechanisms of anthocyanins in model and food systems—an overview. Food Res. Int. 2011;44(2):499-509.
  335. 335. Bononi M, Tateo F. Stabilization of cranberry anthocyanins in nutraceutical capsules. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007;58(2):142-149.
  336. 336. Fang Z, Bhandari B. Encapsulation of polyphenols—a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010;21(10):510-523.
  337. 337. Ray S, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty R. An overview of encapsulation of active compounds used in food products by drying technology. Food Biosci. 2016;13:76-83.
  338. 338. Esfanjani AF, Jafari SM. Biopolymer nano‐particles and natural nano‐carriers for nano‐encapsulation of phenolic compounds. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016;146:532-543.
  339. 339. Jia Z, Dumont M‐J, Orsat V. Encapsulation of phenolic compounds present in plants using protein matrices. Food Biosci. 2016;15:87-104.
  340. 340. Li Z, Jiang H, Xu C, Gu L. A review: using nanoparticles to enhance absorption and bioavailability of phenolic phytochemicals. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;43:153-164.
  341. 341. Munin A, Edwards‐Lévy F. Encapsulation of natural polyphenolic compounds: a review. Pharmaceutics 2011;3(4):793-829.
  342. 342. Aguiar J, Estevinho BN, Santos L. Microencapsulation of natural antioxidants for food application—the specific case of coffee antioxidants—a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016;58:21-39.
  343. 343. Kammerer DR. Anthocyanins. In: Carle R, Schweggert R (eds) Handbook of Natural Pigments in Food and Beverages. Industrial Applications for Improving Food Color, Chapter 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. pp. 61-80.
  344. 344. Glover BJ, Martin C. Anthocyanins. Curr. Biol. 2012;22(5):R147–R150.
  345. 345. Olivas‐Aguirre FJ, Rodrigo‐Garcia J, Martinez‐Ruiz N del R, Cárdenas‐Robles AI, Mendoza‐Diaz SO, Álvarez‐Parrilla E, González‐Aguilar GA, de la Rosa LA, Ramos‐Jimenez A, Wall‐Medrano A. Cyanidin‐3‐O‐glucoside: physical chemistry, foodomics and health effects. Molecules 2016;21(9):E1264.
  346. 346. Kuskoski EM, Fett P, Asuero AG. Anthocyanins: a group of natural pigments, isolation, identification and properties. Alimentaria 2002;339:61-74.
  347. 347. Andersen OM, Jordheim M. Basic anthocyanin chemistry and dietary sources. In: Wallace TC, Giusti MM (eds) Anthocyanins in Health and Disease, Chapter 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014. pp. 13-89.
  348. 348. Martin C, Butelli E, Petroni K, Tonelli C. How can research on plants contribute to promoting human health. Plant Cell 2011;23:1685-1689.
  349. 349. Gardana C, Ciappellano S, Marinoni L, Fachechi C, Simonetti P. Bilberry adulteration: identification and chemical profiling of anthocyanins by different analytical methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(45):10998-11004.
  350. 350. Picariello G, Ferranti P, Garro G, Manganiello G, Chianese L, Coppola R, Addeo F. Profiling of anthocyanins for the taxonomic assessment of ancient purebred V. vinifera red grape varieties. Food Chem. 2014;146:15-22.
  351. 351. Passeri V, Koes R, Quattrocchio FM. New challenges for the design of high value plant products: stabilization of anthocyanins in plant vacuoles. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:153 (pp. 9).
  352. 352. Newsome AG, Culver CA, Breemen RB. Nature's palette: the search for natural blue colorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62(28):6498-6511.
  353. 353. Sasaki N, Takayama T. Achievements and perspectives in biochemistry concerning anthocyanin modification for blue flower coloration. Plant Cell. Physiol. 2015;56(1):28-40.
  354. 354. Roselló‐Soto E, Galanakis CM, Brncic M, Orlien V, Trujillo FJ, Mawson R, Knoerzer K, Tiwari BK, Barba FJ. Clean recovery of antioxidant compounds from plant foods, by‐products and algae assisted by ultrasound processing. Modeling approaches to optimize processing conditions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015;42(2):134-139.
  355. 355. Ameer K, Shahbaz M, Kwon J‐H. Green extraction methods for polyphenols from plant matrices and their byproducts: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017. doi:10.1111/1541‐4337.12253
  356. 356. Barba FJ, Zhu Z, Koubaa M, Sant’Ana AS. Green alternative methods for the extraction of antioxidant bioactive compounds from winery wastes and by‐products: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016;49:96-109.
  357. 357. Castro‐López C, Rojas R, Sánchez‐Alejo EJ, Niño‐Medina G, Martínez‐Avila GCG. Phenolic compounds recovery from grape fruit and by‐products: an overview of extraction methods. In: Morata A, Loira I (eds) Grape and Wine Biotechnology, Chapter 5. Rijeka: InTech, 2016. pp. 103-123.
  358. 358. Miraje SY, Amlepatil NM, Sahoo AK, Mote GV. Anthocyanin extraction from winery waste material: a review. JIPBS 2015;2(2):218-221.
  359. 359. da Silva LM, de Figuereido EAT, Ricardo NMPS, Viera IGP, de Figuereido RW, Brasil IM, Gomez CL. Quantification of bioactive compounds in pulps and by‐products of tropical fruits from Brazil. Food Chem. 2014;143:398-404.
  360. 360. Kammerer DR, Kammerer J, Valet R, Carle R. Recovery of polyphenols from the by‐products of plant food processing and application as valuable food ingredients. Food Res. Int. 2014;65A:2-12.
  361. 361. Jing P, Giusti MM. Analysis of anthocyanins in biological samples. In: Wallace TC, Giusti MM (eds) Anthocyanins in Health and Disease, Chapter 4. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014. pp. 115-139.
  362. 362. Zafra‐Stone S, Yasmin T, Bagchi M, Chatterjee A, Vinson JA, Bagchi D. Berry anthocyanins in human health and disease prevention. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007;51(6):675-683.
  363. 363. Halliwell B, Guteridge J. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed. Oxford: University Press, 2015.
  364. 364. Croft KD. Dietary polyphenols: antioxidant or not? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016;595:120-124.
  365. 365. Poljsak B, and Milisav I. Oxidized forms of dietary antioxidants: friends or foes? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014;39(2):155-166.
  366. 366. McGhie TK, Stevenson DE. Bioavailability and bioabsorption of anthocyanins. In: Wallace TC, Giusti MM (eds) Anthocyanins in Health and Disease, Chapter 3. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press, 2014. pp. 91-113.
  367. 367. Lila MA. Anthocyanins and human health: an in vitro investigative approach. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004;2004(5):306-313.
  368. 368. Martin J, Navas MJ, Jimenez‐Moreno AM, Asuero AG. Anthocyanin pigments, importance, sample preparation and extraction. In: Phenolic Compounds—Natural Sources, Importance and Applications. Rijeka: InTech, 2016.

Written By

Julia Martín, Eugenia Marta Kuskoski, María José Navas and Agustín G. Asuero

Submitted: October 19th, 2016 Reviewed: February 2nd, 2017 Published: August 23rd, 2017