Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Ionizing Radiation for Control of Salmonella in Food

Written By

Małgorzata E. Szczawińska

Submitted: 10 May 2016 Reviewed: 09 January 2017 Published: 05 April 2017

DOI: 10.5772/67408

From the Edited Volume

Current Topics in Salmonella and Salmonellosis

Edited by Mihai Mares

Chapter metrics overview

2,268 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Ionizing radiation (gamma rays from the radionuclides cobalt-60 or cesium-137, e-beams) is an effective, nonthermal method to reduce or eliminate food-borne pathogens, including Salmonella spp. both in raw and in cooked meats, poultry, fish, and shellfish. Irradiation treatment, applied as the final processing step, seems to be particularly promising in the case of packed food products, including ready-to-eat food. Final packaged food products can be contaminated from post-lethality exposure, that is, after heat treatment and before packaging. The application of ionizing radiation after packaging can eliminate or considerably reduce both saprophytic and pathogenic microflora in final products. It is of particular importance in the case of ready-to-eat food which is not subjected to heat treatment before consumption. According to hurdle concept technology, the combination of existing and novel preservation methods can ensure safety of food by applying all treatments as mild as possible. Irradiation treatment can be combined with the use of natural antibacterial compounds, such as extracts of spices and herbs, or various packaging systems. Doses of ionizing radiation required for the inactivation of Salmonella spp. in fish and seafood are lower than those used for meats and poultry.


  • Salmonella
  • radiation
  • meat
  • poultry
  • fish

1. Introduction

In the last years, the great consumer interest in “natural” or “fresh” foods, nonprocessed or only minimally processed, has caused an increasing interest in nonthermal preservation methods, that is, ionizing radiation, ultraviolet radiation, high-pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric field (PEF), high-pressure carbon dioxide (HPCD), the use of natural antibacterial compounds, such as extracts of spices and herbs, or the application of various packaging systems. However, at the same time consumer demand for ensuring food safety has to be met. Those two ideas are very often tough to reconcile in practice.

A great number of studies have shown that ionizing radiation improve the safety of various foods of animal as well as plant origin. Food irradiation is a process which can be used to inactivate both food-borne pathogens and microorganisms causing spoilage of food, thus extending storage of foods such as red meats, poultry, fish, and so on. It can also extend the storage of vegetables by prevention of sprouting (potatoes, onions, and garlic) or fruits by the delay of ripening. At present time, this technology may be used not only to raw foods but also as post-lethality treatment. The product may be exposed to the post-lethality processing environment into which the product is routed after having been subjected to an initial lethality treatment. The foodstuffs may be exposed to the environment in the area of establishment as a result of, for example, slicing, peeling, and re-bagging, or other procedures. Hotdog products are examples of ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products that receive a lethality treatment to eliminate pathogens (core temperatures of +70° to +72°C must be reached due to cooking) and they are subsequently exposed to the environment during peeling, slicing, and repackaging operations. Then, the technology of irradiation, used as an intervention step, can be applied to the final product or sealed package of product in order to reduce or eliminate the level of pathogens resulting from contamination from post-lethality exposure. Thus, for example, vacuum-packaged ready-to-eat (RTE) meat products may be subjected to irradiation to reduce or eliminate dangerous food-borne pathogens such as Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in a final food product. According to hurdle concept technology, the combination of existing and novel preservation methods can ensure safety of food by applying all treatments as mild as possible [1, 2].

A good example of such combination of preservation methods (low-dose irradiation and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP)) is the work of Chouliara et al. [3] who investigated the combined effect of gamma irradiation (2 and 4 kGy) and modified atmosphere (MA) packaging (30% CO2/70% N2 and 70% CO2/30% N2) on shelf-life extension of fresh chicken meat stored under refrigeration. The authors noted the reduction of the number of various groups of bacteria (from 1 to 5 logs), including Enterobacteriaceae family. Sensory evaluation showed that the combination of irradiation at 4 kGy and MAP (70% CO2/30% N2) resulted in the highest shelf-life extension by 12 days compared to the air-packaged samples. A study of Grant and Patterson [4] is another good example of hurdle concept technology: mild heating combined with low-dose irradiation. In this study, thermal treatment (70, 65, or 60°C) was applied alone, directly post 0.8 kGy irradiation or post irradiation combined with refrigerated storage on inactivation of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated into beef and gravy. The researchers observed heat sensitization of S. typhimurium at 60°C, but not at either 65 or 70°C like in the case of L. monocytogenes. In another study [5], the influence of heating and low-dose irradiation S. typhimurium in MDCM (mechanically deboned chicken meat) was examined. The researchers noted that salmonellae irradiated with 0.9 kGy were more heat sensitive; this effect was maintained during 6 weeks of refrigerated storage.

Those readers who want to deepen their knowledge of the subject can find an extensive description of microbiological issues associated with all muscle foods, their specific spoilage, safety issues, and their control for meat, poultry, and seafood in the work provided by Sofos et al. [6].

Thermal treatment is a very effective method for eliminating Salmonella spp. in foods. This organism is rather sensitive to pasteurization temperatures used in meat processing. Properly conducted heat treatment in industrial food processing should cause complete inactivation of these bacteria in meat and meat products; however, recontamination of ready-to-eat meat products with Salmonella spp. after cooking, as well as subsequent storage at abuse temperatures at food establishments or at a consumer’s home, can cause a significant risk to human health. Szczawińska et al. [7] inoculated commercial, smoked, cured, and cooked ham with Salmonella enteritidis and stored the samples at abused temperature (15°C). Lag time for S. enteritidis was at that temperature only 139.08 h, that is, less than 6 days [7]. Usually, the length of time for storage of such product recommended by the food manufacturer is much longer than the time mentioned above. It means that a consumer can contract food-borne salmonellosis during the recommended length of storage time for such ready-to-eat meat product if it was recontaminated with Salmonella. Thus, due to beneficial effects of ionizing radiation treatment of final packaged food product (RTE), we can expect that Salmonella (and other vegetative bacterial pathogens which show similar radiation resistance, e.g., L. monocytogenes) will be significantly reduced or eliminated.


2. The use of ionizing radiation

According to the Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods [8], the following sources of ionizing radiation can be used:

  1. Radionuclides, such as Cobalt-60 and Cesium-137, which emit gamma rays (γ-rays)

  2. Machines that produced high-energy electron beams (an energy level up to 10 MeV)

  3. X-rays machines (an energy level up to 5 MeV).

Compared to γ-rays, e-beams are characterized by a low penetrative capacity; therefore, e-beam irradiation is particularly useful for products which can be processed in thin layers or surface-contaminated products.

The dose of radiation received is commonly measured in grays. One gray is a derived unit of ionizing radiation. It is defined as the absorption of one joule of radiation energy in a mass of one kilogram (1 Gy = 1 J/kg). The gray has superseded the older unit—the rad (1 Gy = 100 rad). The gray (symbol: Gy) is used as a measure of absorbed dose.

According to several objectives for food (fresh or processed meats, poultry, and seafood) irradiation, the following terms are used [9]:

  1. Radicidation is the elimination of bacterial pathogens, non-spore formers; doses range 2.5–10 kGy.

  2. Radurization is the significant reduction of the number of saprophytic microorganisms ensuring shelf-life extension of foods; doses range 0.75–2.5 kGy.

  3. Radappertization is based on a similar concept (“botulinum cook”) like in canning industry. It should ensure complete elimination of spore formers in foods, thus significant shelf-life extension (years) and botulism food safety; doses range 30–40 kGy. The term was established to honor Nicolas Appert who invented the method of preserving food from spoilage by placing it in hermetically sealed containers and then sterilized by heat treatment.

In this review, special attention will be paid to radicidation. In case of this technology, one of the most important pathogens, Salmonella spp., public health problem, has been the main target for control, particularly in meat and poultry products (i.e., for example, see Ref. [10]). The most recent European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) summary report has informed us that the total number of food-borne outbreaks in Europe was 5251, including water-borne outbreaks [11]. Salmonella caused 20.0% of all reported food-borne outbreaks in European Union (EU) and it was the second most frequent cause of outbreaks; the largest number of reported food-borne outbreaks was caused by viruses (20.4% of all outbreaks) [11]. High level of noncompliance was noted for poultry meat [11]. Monitoring activities and control programs for Salmonella in fresh broiler meat are based on sampling at the slaughterhouse and/or at processing or cutting plants and at retail. In 2014, Salmonella was found in 0.6% of the 2263 units of RTE broiler meat products tested at retail or at processing (0.4% of single samples and 1.7% of batches) [11].

As in previous years, the two most commonly reported Salmonella serovars in 2014 were S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium, representing 44.4% and 17.4%, respectively, of all reported serovars in confirmed human cases [11]. Generally, there was no major change as regards Salmonella-contaminated foodstuffs compared with previous years. Salmonella was most frequently detected in fresh turkey meat (3.5%), fresh broiler (2.2%), pig (0.5%), and bovine meat (0.1%) [11]. It should be emphasized that according to the European legislation on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs [12] Salmonella spp. is currently included both in food safety as well as food hygiene criteria.

The main reason for the use of food irradiation is the ability of ionizing radiation to inactivate populations of microorganisms including pathogenic bacteria, parasites, and viruses. Depending on irradiation dose, food-borne pathogens can be injured or killed due to DNA damage. Radiation sensitivity depends on many factors such as species of microorganisms, age of cells, and their number. It is also affected by the environment (buffer solution, laboratory medium, or real food product). Thus, the effect of radiation on microorganisms is dependent on intrinsic and extrinsic factors which include temperature, water activity, pH, chemical composition, and structure of food and gaseous environment. Radiation resistance of bacteria is much higher at freezing temperatures than at chill temperatures; however, irradiation of frozen food offers much better results in some foods because it significantly reduces or eliminates some negative sensory changes caused by, for example, lipid oxidation. D10 values (D10 value is defined as decimal reduction dose or the dose of ionizing radiation required for a 90% inactivation of viable colony-forming unit (CFU) or by one logarithmic cycle) are higher in foods with a low water activity because the lack of water means that there are less OH radicals available to cause DNA damage. Hence, higher doses of ionizing radiation have to be used to ensure the elimination of pathogenic bacteria in dry foods such as spices [13].

Some authors observed different effects of meat irradiation depending on radiation source. Rajkowski et al. [14] discovered in their study that D10 values for S. typhimurium DT 104 irradiated in ground pork with gamma rays were 0.56–0.62 kGy, whereas D10 values for the same organism treated with e-beams ranged from 0.42 to 0.43 kGy.

However, Miyahara and Miyahara [15] concluded that both gamma rays and e-beams were similarly effective while irradiating ground beef patties inoculated with S. enteritidis.

The use of ionizing radiation as a means of reducing the risk to human health from food-borne pathogens, including Salmonella spp., is being extensively researched. It seems that the application of ionizing radiation to preserve food or eliminate pathogenic bacteria from food has been so intensively studied like not any other scientific field, because of consumer concerns, particularly associated with fear of nuclear energy and very often occurring confusion between terms, for example, radiation, radioactive contamination, or radioactivity. In general, consumer is rather reluctant to this technology due to well-known nuclear accidents (e.g., Chernobyl and Fukushima) believing that the process of food irradiation can make food radioactive, thus unsafe. Interestingly, there is much less consumer resistance to the high-pressure-processing technology which is used to treat wide range of foods including those of animal origin, for example, RTE products. To date, health and safety authorities in over 60 countries worldwide, for example, the United States, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, granted clearances for irradiation of more than 60 different foods [16]. Frog legs are the most often irradiated food items [17].

Currently, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible for updating and maintaining various irradiation databases as resources for researchers, government officials, and the general public. European Food Safety Authority [18] summarized and evaluated an opinion on the efficacy and microbiological safety of irradiation of food taking into consideration recommendations from the two panels: BIOHAZ (the EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards) and CEF (the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids).

EFSA emphasizes its standpoint that food irradiation should only be used in conjunction with an integrated food safety management program. With regard to efficacy and microbiological safety, the BIOHAZ Panel recommended that the application of food irradiation should be based on risk assessment and on the desired risk reduction rather than on predefined food classes/commodities and doses [18]). Concerning the safety assessment of irradiation of food, according to the BIOHAZ Panel, there are no microbiological risks for the consumer linked to the use of food irradiation and its consequences on the food microflora. EFSA’s experts conclude that the irradiation dose needed to inactivate food-borne pathogens depends on the targeted pathogen, on the reduction required, and on the physical state of the food, regardless of the food classes as previously proposed [18].

2.1. Reducing Salmonella spp. in red meats and poultry

Vegetative food-borne bacteria, such as Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes, are moderately sensitive to ionizing radiation. The medium-dose irradiation processes reduce their populations by several logs. As previously mentioned, various factors influence radiation sensitivity of bacterial cells. The presence of proteins can exert a protective effect on microorganisms subjected to radiation treatment. Maxcy and Tiwari [19] studied the effect of fat content in beef on radioresistance of S. enteritidis. They found D10 value higher in beef with lower level of fat (0.70 kGy) compared to lower D10 value obtained for salmonellae irradiated in beef with higher content of fat (0.49 kGy). Assuming that the low fat level in the meat is correlated with a higher protein content and because the proteins have the properties of free radicals scavenging, it can be suggested that the higher content of protein in meat protects more the bacteria against the damaging effects of radiation treatment.

There have been frequently voiced concerns that the reduction of the competitive microflora by radiation treatment could facilitate growth of pathogens contaminating the food after irradiation or that food pathogens which survived irradiation can grow better than the indigenous, competitive microflora. Dickson and Olson [20] studied the first problem; ground beef was irradiated at 0, 2, or 4 kGy, thus reducing the number of saprophytic microorganisms which cause food spoilage, and then inoculated with a mixture of four serotypes of salmonellae. The meat was stored at 4°C, temperature proper for storage, and at two abused temperatures 15 and 25°C. Bacterial growth was monitored during storage. The authors observed that there was no significant difference in lag-phase duration or generation time, irrespective of the dose to which the ground beef had previously been exposed. This suggests that, although irradiation eliminates a significant portion of the spoilage microflora in ground beef, the absence of this microflora provides no competitive advantage to the growth of salmonellae in ground beef [20]. Szczawińska [21] studied the effect of irradiation on the survival rate of non-sporing bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, S. typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens) during conventional methods of meat preservation (heating, chilling, freezing, salting, curing, and smoking). On the basis of the conducted experiments, it can be concluded that irradiated bacteria stored under conditions preventing their growth die faster compared to unirradiated bacteria or their survival rate is almost identical like unirradiated ones; those organisms which are stored under conditions that allow their growth show a worse adaptability to the environment and begin to grow after a certain delay [21]. In another work, Szczawińska et al. [22] studied the growth of salmonellae in mechanically deboned chicken meat (MDCM), which was irradiated at 0, 1.25, and 2.5 kGy and inoculated with S. dublin, S. enteritidis, and S. typhimurium. Subsequently, the inoculated MDCM was stored at 5, 10, or 20°C and bacterial numbers were determined over storage time. The results of the study suggested that there was no greater risk from the same number of Salmonella cells contaminating irradiated MDCM compared to unirradiated one. In the same study, irradiated indigenous microflora had dose-related increased lag phases and decreased rates of multiplication compared with that of the indigenous microflora in the unirradiated control [22]. Kim and Thayer [23] discovered that the gamma-injured S. typhimurium cells on mechanically deboned chicken meat were much more sensitive to heat than the nonirradiated cells, which implies that any cells surviving the irradiation process were unlikely to survive cooking. This increased sensitivity of the salmonellae to gamma radiation was retained during refrigerated storage of the irradiated chicken. Kim and Thayer [23] explained the mechanism of the heat sensitivity of S. typhimurium subjected to ionizing radiation. The results proved that combined effects of irradiation and heating were always beneficial in regard to food safety due to synergistic (when heating is applied after irradiation) or additive (when heating is applied before irradiation) effects depending on the order of both treatments. Therefore, on the basis of these studies it can be concluded that any microorganisms which survive irradiation are more sensitive to intrinsic or extrinsic factors, such as temperature, water activity, pH, and so on, compared to unirradiated organisms.

Irradiation of fresh meat up to an overall average dose of 2 kGy was proposed by the SCF in 1986 [24]. Implication of meat in food-borne salmonellosis still remains a concern, particularly in the countries or regions where traditional dishes are served and consumed as raw and cold. In the Netherlands, Belgium, such meat product is “filet américain” composed of raw beef meat, and often raw egg. Kampelmacher [25] reported that a dose of only 1 kGy decreased Salmonella number in such a product by two log cycles. Rajkowski et al. [14] examined the effect of e-beam and gamma rays irradiation on the mixture of S. typhimurium DT104 strains inoculated into three ground pork products containing various fat contents and obtained D10 values for salmonellae from 0.42 to 0.62 kGy. The data prove that the content of fat had no effect on radiation resistance of salmonellae. The D10 values are similar to the values reported by Szczawińska [26] for S. typhimurium strains inoculated into poultry meat. Clavero et al. [27] subjected raw ground beef patties inoculated with mixture of serovars of S. dublin, S. typhimurium, and S. enteritidis to gamma irradiation (60°C) treatment. The influence of two levels of fat (8–14% (low fat) and 27–28% (high fat)) and temperature (frozen (−17 to −15°C) and refrigerated (3–5°C)) on the inactivation of pathogens by irradiation was investigated. D10 values for salmonellae in beef patties ranged from 0.618 to 0.800 kGy. The authors discovered that temperature did not have a significant effect when salmonellae were irradiated in high-fat ground beef.

D10 values for Salmonella spp. have been reported [28] to range from 0.38 to 0.77 kGy at 2°C in mechanically deboned chicken; sensitivity of Salmonella spp. to ionizing radiation has been found to be highly dependent on serovars. Similarly, the D10 values were reported by Szczawińska [26] for S. typhimurium strains inoculated into poultry meat, whereas a D10 value of 0.57 kGy has been observed for the pathogen in ground beef treated at 18–20°C [29].

In another work by Thayer et al. [30], Musculus longissimus dorsi from beef, pork, and lamb and turkey breast and leg meats were inoculated with Salmonella spp., and the gamma radiation resistance of the pathogens was determined at 5°C under identical conditions. The authors concluded that the D-value for a mixture of Salmonella spp. was significantly lower on pork than on beef, lamb, turkey breast, and turkey leg meats; however, all D-values were within expected ranges. Thayer et al. [31] studied the survival of salmonellae in vacuum-canned, commercial MDCM. The MDCM was challenged with S. enteritidis (ca 104 CFU/g of meat) followed by irradiation to 0, 1.5, and 3.0 kGy and storage at 5°C for 0, 2, and 4 weeks. The researchers reported that the number of salmonellae in unirradiated MDCM decreased about one log cycle after 1 month of storage; however, in meat irradiated with 3.0 kGy dose the presence of this pathogen was not detected at the very beginning of storage. Thayer and Boyd also found that S. typhimurium was more resistant to gamma radiation when vacuum packaged than when air was present during irradiation [32]. The final equations predict a reduction in the number of surviving Salmonella in mechanically deboned chicken meat. If MDCM is irradiated at −20°C with a dose of 1.50 kGy in air then the expected reduction of this pathogen is 2.53 and 2.12 logs in vacuum. After 3.0 kGy dose, at −20°C in air the level of bacteria will be lower by 4.78 and 4.29 logs in vacuum [32].

Bacteria are more resistant when irradiated at frozen temperatures compared to chill or ambient temperatures; Szczawińska [26] reported that the mean D10 value for 13 Salmonella strains irradiated in chicken meat using gamma rays at 4°C amounted to 0.575 kGy, whereas for samples irradiated in a frozen state (at −18°C) the mean D10 value amounted to 0.687 kGy. Gamma-irradiated broiler halves packed in polyethylene pouches with the dose of 2.5 kGy should ensure Salmonella reduction adequate to eliminate naturally occurring contamination. In frozen poultry meat, similar effects can be expected after a dose of 3.5 kGy [26]. In the same work, Szczawińska [26] discovered that the packaging material exerted a very strong effect on radiation resistance of S. typhimurium. Two strains of S. typhimurium were irradiated in ground chicken meat at temperatures +4 and −18°C. D10 values obtained for salmonellae irradiated at +4 and packed in PE pouches were 0.194 and 0.210 kGy, whereas D10 values obtained for salmonellae packed in PA/PE laminate pouches at the same temperature were 0.424 and 0.533 kGy. D10 values obtained for salmonellae irradiated at -18°C and packed in PE pouches were 0.412 and 0.633 kGy, whereas D10 values obtained for salmonellae packed in PA/PE laminate pouches at the same temperature were 0.538 and 0.721 kGy. Thus, the contribution of food-packaging material and packaging system is a very important issue in this technology. Irradiation was also combined with curing salts. The combined effects of 1-kGy irradiation dose and curing salts (NaNO2 and NaCl) on the survival of S. typhimurium, S. agona, and S. cholerasuis in pork meat were studied by Szczawiński et al. [33]. Salmonellae were inoculated in ground M. longissimus dorsi, and irradiated at 1 kGy dose. The three experimental groups were designed. The meat was treated with 100 mg NaNO2, 200 mg NaNO2,and 200 mg NaNO2 plus 3% NaCl. Meat samples were stored at 0–2°C for 3 weeks or at 20°C for 7 days. The authors reported that irradiation at 1 kGy dose reduced Salmonella number by 1.2–2 logs and that an additive effect of curing salts and irradiation was observed at low temperature of storage, and that synergistic effect of irradiation and curing salts was observed at temperature abuse [33].

Poultry, as already mentioned, as regards the radicidation, has been recognized as one of the best candidates for irradiation aiming a reduction or elimination of food-borne pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. Irradiation of poultry up to an overall average dose of 7 kGy was proposed by the Scientific Committee on Food [24] with the purpose to improve microbiological safety.

Salmonella caused 38.18%, the highest number of outbreaks and human cases among all causative agents according to data of EFSA for 2014 [34]. Raw poultry meat and poultry products are vehicles of those two food-borne pathogenic bacteria. In the EU, in 2013 [34], Salmonella was detected in 3.5% of the broiler meat. At retail, the overall proportion of Salmonella-positive samples was 7.5%, higher than at slaughterhouse (4.9%) and at the processing plant (2.6%) level [34]. Since December 2011, a Salmonella criterion for S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in raw poultry entered into force [35].

In 2013, EFSA [34] reported that Salmonella was found in 0.3% of the 4776 samples of RTE broiler meat products tested at retail or at processing (0.1% of single samples and 1.9% of batches). Of the 2100 tested units of RTE products from turkey meat, only 0.1% in total were found to be Salmonella-positive [34].

Kudra et al. [36] studied the survival of S. typhimurium subjected to irradiation combined with high-CO2 + CO MAP in chicken meat product. The authors did not find significant difference between D10 values for bacteria irradiated in vacuum (0.55 kGy) or in high-CO2 + CO MAP (0.54 kGy). The dose of 1.5 kGy decreased the number of salmonellae by three logs. Salmonella presence was detected in both packaging systems during cold storage. During storage of this meat product at temperature abuse (25°C), Salmonella was able to grow in both packaging systems. The authors concluded that low-dose irradiation is a suitable method for destruction of this pathogen; however, packaging system did not exert significant influence on Salmonella number during storage at low temperature. The authors concluded that if the initial contamination of these pathogens is high, cross-contamination of ready-to-eat food at temperature abuse of the product is likely to continue to be a food safety concern regardless of irradiation treatment doses or packaging treatments.

Szczawińska [26] reported that the mean D10 value for 13 Salmonella strains irradiated in chicken meat using gamma rays at 4°C amounted to 0.575 kGy, whereas for samples irradiated in a frozen state (at −18° C) the mean D10 value amounted to 0.687 kGy. Gamma-irradiated broiler halves packed in polyethylene pouches with the dose of 2.5 kGy should ensure Salmonella reduction adequate to eliminate naturally occurring contamination; in frozen poultry meat, similar effects can be expected after a dose of 3.5 kGy [26].

Nassar et al. [37] evaluated the survival of Salmonella virchow inoculated into raw chicken carcasses as a result of radiation treatment (dose range of 2–7 kGy) or disinfection with three chemical substances. The presence of salmonellae in chicken meat was not detected after 7 kGy dose; however, after chemical disinfection this pathogen was still present.

On the basis of the various published data, it seems that the dose up to 7 kGy for frozen poultry and about 3.5 kGy for unfrozen meat can be recommended to reduce the most radioresistant vegetative pathogenic bacteria by five logs [18].

Thayer et al. [38] compared gamma radiation resistance of a mixture of salmonellae (S. dublin, S. enteritidis, S. newport, S. senftenberg, and S. typhimurium) in the so-called “exotic” meats such as ground bison, ostrich, alligator, and caiman meats at 5°C. The type of meat did not significantly alter the radiation resistance of salmonellae, and the D-value of 0.53 ± 0.02 kGy for Salmonella spp. was obtained. In the conclusions, authors emphasized that the efficacy of the radiation treatment in elimination of Salmonella spp. in exotic meats and non-exotic meats (e.g., poultry) is similar, thus similar control measures can be applied to ensure exotic meat safety. When considering cooked chilled and other ready-to-eat poultry meat products, the food-borne pathogens of higher concern are represented by L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. Hence, stricter microbiological criteria for poultry meat products intended to be eaten cooked, as amended by the Commission Regulation (EU) No 365/2010, which enhance food safety, must be respected by EU members [39]. Another (EC) regulation [40], which lays down general rules for food business operators on the hygiene of foodstuffs, requires food business operators to comply with microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Regulation (EC) No 853/2005 [41], which sets specific hygiene rules for foods of animal origin, also requires that food business operators ensure compliance with microbiological criteria.

Radiation sensitivity of L. monocytogenes was determined by many authors (i.e., for example, see Ref. [42]). Reported D10 values for L. monocytogenes in cooked turkey nuggets were about 0.70 kGy, making L. monocytogenes generally more radiation-resistant than Campylobacter and Salmonella. Taking into consideration similar radiation sensitivity of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp., it can be assumed that doses of ionizing radiation effective for the inactivation of L. monocytogenes will be sufficient to inactivate salmonellae.

2.2. Reducing of Salmonella spp. in ready-to-eat foods

Ready-to-eat foods deserve special interest. Very often, they contain not only cooked poultry or other meats and cooked seafoods but also raw meats which are consumed without heat treatment (e.g., “filet américain” composed of raw beef meat). Thus, those complex RTE foods may represent an individual specific hazard to consumers since they are often composed of a mixture of several types of ingredients. RTE foods vary by country and may include, for example, dried meat (beef jerky), uncooked and fermented minced meat products (salami), cooked offal or minced meat products (chicken liver pâté or luncheon sausage), and cooked whole meat products (ham) [43]. Gormley et al. [44] conducted a wide study on microbiological quality of ready-to-eat specialty meats (2359 samples of continental sausages, cured/fermented, and dried meats) and reported that 0.4% were unacceptable due to the presence of Salmonella spp. or L. monocytogenes (>10(2) CFU/g). These unacceptable meats were all prepacked prior to supply to retail premises indicating that contamination with bacterial pathogens occurred earlier in the production chain; the authors emphasize how important it is to prevent food contamination before final packaging and to control conditions of storage.

Song et al. [45] investigated the efficacy of radiation treatment and fumaric acid on the reduction of L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium inoculated into sliced ham. The authors noted the decrease of number of listeriae and salmonellae by 2.42 and 3.78 logs, respectively, after irradiation of this ready-to-eat product while the decrease of only one log for both organisms was found after acid treatment.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently evaluating a petition to allow irradiation of RTE meats in the United States including deli turkey, ham, pastrami, beef bologna, bacon bits, and pepperoni. The basis for the petition is data reported by Sommers and Mackay [46].

The authors observed in their study that irradiation of food-borne pathogenic bacteria with a dose of 3.75 kGy on ready-to-eat meats caused reduction of bacteria comparable to that obtained due to pasteurization, that is, minimum of five logs.

Sommers and Boyd [47] discovered that doses in the range of 2–4 kGy eliminate Salmonella spp. in many RTE foods.

The ability of ionizing radiation to inactivate E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus inoculated onto a frankfurter on a roll product containing the antimicrobials sodium diacetate and potassium lactate in the presence of an MA (100% N2, 50% N2 plus 50% CO2, or 100% CO2) was investigated. The authors reported that the radiation resistance (D10 values) for Salmonella in frankfurter on a roll product was from 0.61 to 0.71 kGy. MA had no effect on the radiation resistance of the pathogens. During a 2-week storage period under mild temperature abuse (10°C), both salmonellae and other pathogens were not able to proliferate on the frankfurter on a roll product, regardless of the MA used. Although the pathogens were unable to proliferate on the frankfurter on a roll product during the storage period, the application of a postpackaging intervention step was needed to actually inactivate the food-borne pathogens. The authors concluded that, when applied as a terminal intervention as part of a HACCP plan, food irradiation could reduce the risk of food-borne pathogens on complex ready-to-eat foods such as sandwiches. It seems that intervention technologies including ionizing radiation, antimicrobials, and modified atmospheres (MAs) can be used to inhibit the growth of or inactivate food-borne pathogens on complex ready-to-eat foods such as sandwiches. Cárcel et al. [48] in their study elaborated mathematical model for the most efficient elimination of Salmonella spp. from two poultry products taking into consideration shelf life and sensory attributes. It was concluded that in the case of hamburgers, the optimum calculated dose was 2.04 kGy, which guaranteed the safety of the product and provided the best combination of sensory and instrumental attributes. As regards the steaks, the optimum assessed dose was 1.11 kGy, significantly lower than for hamburgers.

According to the data of a research project of a joint Food and Agriculture Organization/International Academy of Engineering (FAO/IAE), the application of ionizing radiation combined with other methods used for food preservation offers improved safety of many various prepared meals and longer shelf life [49].

Kang et al. [50] studied the efficacy of radiation treatment combined with leek (Allium tuberosum R.) extract on the survival of several food-borne pathogens inoculated in pork jerky. The authors used doses in the range of 0.5–4 kGy. The D10-value for S. typhimurium irradiated with leek extract was 0.32 kGy and without this extract 0.39 kGy. The results prove that this combination strengthens both microbiological safety and shelf life of this meat.

2.3. Reducing Salmonella spp. in fish and shellfish

Raw fish and shellfish can be contaminated with pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, vulnificus, Vibrio cholerae, S. aureus, and viruses.

According to the data delivered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [51], Salmonella was found in 21% of 153 aquaculture catfish collected from aquaculture ponds and retail markets. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration data from 1998 to 2004 on examination of seafood import refusal identified Salmonella contamination to be the most frequent violation in catfish (41.91% of violation categories). Hatha and Laksmanaperumalsamy [52] found Salmonella spp. in 14–25% of fish belonging to 18 families. On the basis of the data presented in the literature, along with outbreak data and FDA import refusal data, it can be concluded that the highest microbial hazard associated with catfish consumption is Salmonella spp. Raw finfish might contain V. parahaemolyticus, Salmonella spp., or L. monocytogenes [53]. According to the report of USDA, nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. in raw and RTE catfish are considered as higher priority microbial hazards [51]. In terms of risk assessment related to catfish consumption, USDA estimated that the mean reduction of Salmonella per catfish serving caused by frying is about two logs, and caused by baking is about three logs [51]. Thus, it seems that such reduction of Salmonella spp. number, taking into consideration that naturally contaminated foods contain usually low levels of salmonellae, may significantly lower the risk of food-borne disease due to consumption of contaminated catfish. These findings could partially explain the differences between a significant contamination of raw finfish by pathogenic bacteria and relatively small number of outbreaks in which etiologic agent is Salmonella spp.

The monthly data on import refusal published in the USA prove that 1/10 of the refused products are seafood products and that second in terms of rejection reason is the detection of Salmonella spp. [54]. Risk analysis conducted in New Zealand by Reed [55] for fillet meat of Pangasius spp. fish from Vietnam considered that contamination of fillets with water not of a suitable purity could result in the presence of exotic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae, E. coli, Salmonella spp., V. cholerae, and Cryptosporidia spp., which is a risk to human health. Shabarinath et al. [56] studied the prevalence of Salmonella in seafood samples by conventional culture and by a DNA-based molecular technique, polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Using PCR, which was considered to be better method, they isolated Salmonella spp. from over 50% of seafood samples collected from the southwest coast of India; 14 of 19 isolates belonged to serovar Salmonella enterica Weltevreden.

The FAO experts in their report, after thorough evaluation of Salmonella spp. problem related to seafood, concluded that good hygienic practices during aquaculture production and biosecurity measures can minimize but not eliminate Salmonella in products of aquaculture [57].

Among various seafood, shrimp as the largest single seafood commodity in value terms (at around 15% of the total value of internationally traded fishery products in 2012) mainly produced in developing countries such as South and East Asia and Latin America deserves special attention [58] particularly that the consumption of this commodity consumption has been trending upward.

Norhana et al. [59] in their comprehensive review paper on prevalence, persistence, and control of Salmonella and Listeria in shrimp and shrimp products indicated that the continued reporting of the presence of these bacteria in fresh and frozen shrimps, and even in the lightly preserved and ready-to-eat products, shows that the existing hygienic practices in fishery industry are insufficient to eliminate these pathogens which have been isolated from shrimps and shrimp products on a regular basis since the 1980s. Shrimp is frequently imported from tropical and subtropical areas and reports indicate that the product does not always meet the microbiological standards set for EU-producing countries or USA, because of either contaminated production sites or unhygienic processing conditions.

Salmonella bacteria are associated with pond water, sediment, and shrimp throughout the culture cycle, including the pre-stocking period, farming phase, and harvest. Untreated chicken manure used to fertilize ponds and droppings from aquatic birds are significant sources of Salmonella. The survival rate of the microorganism is enhanced by nutrients, manure, and feed present in the pond system and by the favorable interaction of various biological and physical factors [60]. Shrimps are usually eaten fully cooked. The major health hazards with these products are contamination during or after processing.

Pinu et al. [61] evaluated the microbiological condition of the frozen shrimps found in the local markets and departmental chain shops of Dhaka city. Pathogenic bacterial load was found greater in the samples of departmental shops rather than that of local markets. The researchers found Salmonella spp., Vibrio spp., and Shigella spp. in shrimps’ samples and discovered that the samples collected from local markets and departmental shops were heavily contaminated and were of special concern for human consumption.

Asai et al. [62] reported that the examination of 353 samples of 29 types of seafood revealed that S. enterica serotype Weltevreden was isolated from two of 47 black tiger prawn samples. The contamination levels of Salmonella were in a range of <30–40 most probable number per 100 g. Asai concluded that these results indicate the possibility that shrimp and prawns contribute to food-borne infections.

In recent years, safety risks are associated to the consumption of raw or subjected to mild heat treatment fish and shellfish; molluscan shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops) are often consumed whole and raw. Huss et al. [54] and Olgunoglu [63] in his comprehensive review on Salmonella in fish and fishery products show that the pathogens of concern in this seafood include both bacteria (e.g., Vibrio spp., Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, Shigella spp., C. jejuni), viruses (e.g., hepatitis A virus and norovirus), and parasites. Molluscan shellfish feed on phytoplankton and zooplankton. They are passive feeders that filter and concentrate pathogens present in harvest area. Their environment, particularly near-shore harvest water, is contaminated from sewage, which may contain pathogens from both human and animal fecal sources (e.g., V. cholerae O1 and O139, Salmonella spp.). Also, poor sanitary practices on the harvest vessel, poor aquacultural practices, and transportation can cause contamination of fishery products.

As observed in previous years, the food category with the highest level of non-compliance at processing was RTE fishery products (4.7% of single samples and 10.8% of batches), mainly in smoked fish [34].

Distribution of strong-evidence outbreaks by food vehicle in the EU in 2014 indicated that crustaceans, shellfish, molluscs, and products thereof were responsible for 8.1% of outbreaks with strong evidence (data from 592 outbreaks with strong evidence) [34]. Taking the above-mentioned data into consideration, health authorities in many countries including European Community emphasized that the increasing trend in raw fish consumption (sushi, sashimi, salmon, etc.) has been identified as a risk to human health. Oysters and mussels can cause food-borne illness. Consumer can contract food-borne salmonellosis due to consumption of raw oysters.

It is generally known that the best method of controlling pathogens is to use a postharvest treatment. Some treatments, such as thermal treatment, ionizing radiation, and high hydrostatic pressure processing, reduce the number of pathogenic microorganisms (bacteria and viruses) while the long-term freezing most widely used method of food preservation is mainly effective in controlling parasites.

Brands et al. [64] reported that Salmonella was isolated from oysters from each coast of the United States, and 7.4% of all oysters tested contained Salmonella. Isolation tended to be bay specific. The vast majority (78/101) of Salmonella isolates from oysters were S. enterica serovar Newport, a major human pathogen, confirming the human health hazard of raw oyster consumption. Bakr et al. [65] showed that out of the 150 seafood samples examined, collected from 11 localities in Alexandria, Egypt, Salmonella was isolated from 10% of samples (shrimp, oyster, and mussel). In 1986, the Scientific Committee for Foods [24] recommended that fish and shellfish could be irradiated at doses up to 3 kGy. In the United States, FDA has approved the use of ionizing radiation for the control of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus and other food-borne pathogens in fresh or frozen molluscan shellfish. Irradiation of fresh and frozen molluscan shellfish may not exceed an absorbed dose of 5.5 kGy [53]. Also, FDA proposes radiation treatment for the control of food-borne bacteria in crustaceans with a dose of 6.0 kGy. The D10 values cited in the published literature for several Salmonella serotypes in grass prawns and shrimp homogenate ranged from 0.30 to 0.59 kGy. Thus, irradiation of crustaceans at a maximum absorbed dose of 6.0 kGy would be effective at controlling pertinent pathogens. The petitioner requested a maximum absorbed dose of 6.0 kGy to achieve a six-log reduction of L. monocytogenes. It can be expected that this dose should also eliminate majority of non-sporing pathogenic bacteria including Salmonella. Irradiation of fish and shellfish is intended, similarly like in the case of other foods to extend shelf life, reduce pathogen load, and inactivate parasites. Irradiation has been applied to fresh, frozen, as well as dried fish, fish products, and shellfish [18]. As for other foods, pathogenic bacteria are more resistant to irradiation in frozen state compared to chilled one. Most studies indicate that irradiation at doses recommended by the SCF (3 kGy) should yield two to five logs reduction of pathogenic, non-spore-forming bacteria for the majority of fish and fish products. Sommers and Rajkowski [66] determined the radiation D10 values for Salmonella inoculated onto seafood samples (scallops, lobster meat, blue crab, swordfish, octopus, and squid). The samples were frozen and irradiated in the frozen state (−20°C); D10 values for Salmonella ranged from 0.47 to 0.70 kGy. By contrast, the radiation D10 value for Salmonella suspended on frozen pork was 1.18 kGy. They concluded that radiation dose needed to inactivate these food-borne pathogens on frozen seafood is significantly lower than that for frozen meat or frozen vegetables. Salmonella spp. and other primary pathogens of concern can also be introduced after pasteurization. Some fishery products are cooked before they are packaged; therefore, they are at risk for recontamination between cooking and packaging (e.g., vacuum packaging, modified atmosphere packaging). Kamat and Thomas [67] evaluated the effect of fat content in fish on radiation sensitivity of L. monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, S. typhimurium, and Yersinia enterocolitica. The radiation response of all those pathogens was examined in sardine with high fat and golden anchovy with low fat. The results clearly suggest that regardless of the level of lipid in fish, the application of a 3 kGy dose at refrigeration temperature would effectively decontaminate approximately 105 CFU g−1 of all the organisms tested, except spores of B. cereus. The authors concluded that the studies revealed a lack of influence of lipid levels in fish on radiation resistance of four food-borne bacterial pathogens.

Jakabi et al. [68] studied the survival of S. enteritidis and S. infantis inoculated into oysters and sensory properties as the result of irradiation with doses in the dose range of 0.5–3.0 kGy. The number of those both Salmonella populations decreased after a 3.0 kGy dose by five to six logs. The authors also discovered that oysters irradiated with the highest dose were still alive and concluded that a dose of 3.0 kGy could be considered effective in inactivating Salmonella in oysters without changing their odor, flavor, or appearance.

The SCF [24] recommended that shrimps could be irradiated at doses of 5 kGy which is considered to be an effective decontamination method. Ito et al. [69] reported that the dose of gamma irradiation necessary to reduce both S. typhimurium and L. monocytogenes in frozen shrimps at a level of below 10−4 per gram was about 3.5 kGy. Sinanoglou et al. [70] irradiated using a cobalt-60 gamma source frozen molluscs (squid, octopuses, and cuttlefish) and crustaceans (shrimp) with different doses. The authors noted the substantial decrease of mesophiles number in shrimp irradiated with the dose of 2.5 kGy, whereas after the dose of 4.7 kGy the presence of those bacteria in squid was not detected. Shrimp is considered separately from fish and shellfish given that certain pathogens (i.e., L. monocytogenes) require doses about 3 kGy for several log10 reduction. Sommers et al. [71] evaluated the effect of cryogenic freezing (−82°C, 3 min), and gamma irradiation on the survival of mixture of Salmonella spp. (S. schwarzengrund, S. bahrenfeld, S. weltevreden, and S. panama isolated from seafood, including shrimp), on raw frozen shrimp. D10 values for salmonellae irradiated in shrimp were about 0.56 kGy. The authors observed the decrease of Salmonella spp. number after cryogenic freezing and irradiation with a dose of 2.25 kGy by over five logs and that this effect persisted during 3 months storage at −20°C. The authors conclude that radiation treatment combined with cryogenic freezing offers big benefits in regard to frozen shrimp.

Nerkar and Bandekar [72] studied radiation resistance of S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis inoculated at 1 × 108 cells/ml in shrimp homogenate and they determined that the D10 value was in the range from 0.30 to 0.40 kGy. Finally, they concluded that a dose of 4.0 kGy could be used to completely eliminate Salmonella in frozen prepackaged shrimp.

Luo et al. [73] studied radioresistance of non-spore-forming and spore-forming pathogenic microorganisms inoculated into shelf-stable foods, semi-dried pork, and fish which have been vacuum-packaged. The water activity (aw) of semi-dried food products ranged between 0.930 and 0.940 for pork, and 0.852 and 0.895 for fish. The authors observed that S. enteritidis was eliminated at a dose of 2.5 kGy in semi-dried fish, and the minimum irradiation dose required to inactivate this pathogen in pork was 5 kGy.

2.4. Reducing Salmonella spp. in frog’s legs

The skin of frogs and their internal organs are often contaminated with Salmonella spp. and other pathogens, such as E. coli and S. aureus. Although frog’s legs are cooked before consumption, there is a risk for cross-contamination.

The highest radiation dose for frog’s legs suggested by the Scientific Committee for Foods is 5 kGy [18]. The most important hazard arises from contamination with Salmonella and other fecal pathogens occurring in frog’s legs at the time of deep-freezing. E. coli and S. aureus have been also found in frog’s legs. Tambunan’s [74] studies showed that irradiating frog legs artificially contaminated with Salmonella up to 106/g before freezing a dose of 3 kGy and above resulted in no detection of the bacteria. If irradiation was carried out after freezing, a dose of 4 kGy and above has to be used. The latter procedure appears to be more feasible commercially than the former one. It was concluded that a combination of chlorination, freezing, and irradiation with a dose ranging from 3 to 6 kGy should provide sufficient conditions for the elimination of Salmonella in the product.


3. Concluding remarks

Ionizing radiation in industry can be used to reduce the level of Salmonella spp. in both raw and cooked meats, poultry, and seafood. This intervention technology can be regarded as a Critical Control Point in the HACCP plan. Irradiation treatment, applied as the final processing step, seems to be of particular importance in the case of packed food products, including ready-to-eat food. In the USA, FDA [75] proposes radiation treatment with the maximum dose of 4.5 kGy for a variety of raw meats and meat products for the improvement of microbial safety and for shelf-life extension.

The data from literature prove that the D-values for L. monocytogenes are similar to those reported for Salmonella spp. irradiated under similar conditions. Thus, Salmonella spp. in meats, poultry, and fish and shellfish including ready-to-eat foods may be controlled by the same dose required for L. monocytogenes.

It should be noted, however, that dose range used for radicidation (2.5–10 kGy) is not sufficient to sterilize foods. Thus, all additional control measures (e.g., an unbroken cold chain, appropriate handling of raw meat, and procedures for cleaning disinfection and waste disposal, etc.) should maintain or even increase the beneficial effects of radiation treatment.

Referring to irradiation facilities, electron beams are much more useful for packs of relatively thin cooked, sliced meats, and other ready-to-eat products while gamma radiation is more suited for treating whole carcasses [76].


  1. 1. Leistner L., Gorris L.G.M.: Food preservation by hurdle technology. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 1995;6:41–46.
  2. 2. Farkas J.: Combination of irradiation with mild heat treatment. Food Control. 1990;1:223–229.
  3. 3. Chouliara E., Badeka A., Savvaidis I., Kontaminas MG.: Combined effect of irradiation and modified atmosphere packaging on shelf-life extension of chicken breast meat: microbiological, chemical and sensory changes. European Food Research and Technology. 2008;226:877–888. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-007-0610-3.
  4. 4. Grant I.R., Patterson M.F.: Combined effect of gamma radiation and heating on the destruction of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium in cook-chill roast beef and gravy. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1995;27:117–128. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00156-Z.
  5. 5. Thayer D.W., Songprasertchai S., Boyd G.: Effects of heat and ionizing radiation on Salmonella typhimurium in mechanically deboned chicken meat. J. Food Prot. 1991;54:718–724.
  6. 6. Sofos J., Flick G., Nychas G., O’Bryan C., Ricke S., Crandall P. Meat, Poultry, and Seafood, p 111-167. In: Doyle M, Buchanan R (ed), Food Microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, DC. 4th ed. 2013. DOI: 10.1128/9781555818463.ch6.
  7. 7. Szczawińska M.E., Szczawiński J., Łobacz A.: Effect of temperature on the growth kinetics of Salmonella enteritidis in cooked ham. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2014;58:47–56. DOI: 10.2478/bvip-2014-0008.
  8. 8. Anonymous: CODEX STAN 106-1983, REV.1-2003 Revised Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods, 1–10.
  9. 9. Goresline H.E., Ingram M., Macuch P., Mocquot G., Mossell D.A.A., Niven C.F., Thatcher F.S.: Tentative classification of food irradiation processes with microbiological objectives. Nature 1964;204:237–238.
  10. 10. Mulder R.W.A.W.: Salmonella radicidation of poultry carcasses [thesis]. Spelderholt Institute for Poultry Research, Beekbergen, The Netherlands. Report 363. 1982.
  11. 11. European Food Safety Authority: The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014. European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. EFSA Journal 2015;13(12):4329 AMENDED: 4 February 2016.
  12. 12. Anonymous: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. OJ, L338,22.12.2005, p. 1.
  13. 13. Farkas J.: Radiation processing of dry food ingredients. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 1985;25:271–280.
  14. 14. Rajkowski K.T., Niebuhr S.E., Dickson J.: Effect of gamma or beta radiation on Salmonella DT 104 in ground pork. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:1430–1433.
  15. 15. Miyahara M., Miyahara M.: Effects of gamma ray and electron-beam irradiations on survival of anaerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku. 2002; 120: 75–80.
  16. 16. Webpage IAEA Clearance of Irradiated Foods Database at Internet. Available from
  17. 17. Anonymous: European Commission: Report From The Commission To The European Parliament And The Council On Food And Food Ingredients Treated With Ionising Radiation For The Year 2014. Brussels, 17.12.2015 COM(2015) 665 final. EUR-Lex-52015DC0665.
  18. 18. European Food Safety Authority: Statement summarising the Conclusions and Recommendations from the Opinions on the safety of Irradiation of Food adopted by the BIOHAZ and CEF Panels. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(4): 2107 [155 pp.]. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011. 2107.
  19. 19. Maxcy R.B., Tiwari N.P.: Irradiation of meats for public health protection. In: Radiation Preservation of Food. IAEA, Vienna, 1973, pp. 491–504.
  20. 20. Dickson J.S., Olson D.G.: Growth rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in irradiated beef. Journal of Food Protection 2001;64:1828–1831.
  21. 21. Szczawińska M., Szczawiński J., Szulc M.: The survival of irradiated bacteria during conventional methods of meat preservation. Archiv fur Lebensmittelhygiene 1983;34:53–58.
  22. 22. Szczawińska M.E., Thayer D.W., Phillips J.G.: Fate of unirradiated Salmonella in irradiated mechanically deboned chicken meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1991;14:313–324.
  23. 23. Kim A.Y., Thayer D.W.: Mechanism by which gamma irradiation increases the sensitivity of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 to heat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1996; 62:17591763.
  24. 24. SCF (Scientific Committee on Food). Food - Science and Techniques. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Eighteenth Series). 1986.
  25. 25. Kampelmacher E.H.: Irradiation of food: a new technology for preserving and ensuring the hygiene of foods. Fleischwirtschaft 1984;64:322–327.
  26. 26. Szczawińska M.: Prospects for elimination of salmonellae from poultry by irradiation in Poland. Food Irradiation in the Middle East and Europe. Proceedings of the Final Coordination Meeting of an FAO/IAEA Coordinated Research Programme organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Cadarache, France, 8–12 March 1993. IAEA-TECDOC-754, pp. 77–96, July 1994.
  27. 27. Clavero M.R., Monk J.D., Beuchat L.R., Doyle M.P., Brackett R.E.: Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, salmonellae, and Campylobacter jejuni in raw ground beef by gamma irradiation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1994;60:2069–2075.
  28. 28. Thayer D.W., Boyd G., Muller W.S., Lipson C.A., Hayne W.C., Baer S.H. Radiation resistance of Salmonella. Journal of Industrial Microbiology. 1990;5:383–390.
  29. 29. Tarkowski J.A., Beumer R.R., Kampelmacher E.H.: Low gamma irradiation of raw meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1984;1:25–31.
  30. 30. Thayer D.W., Boyd G., Fox I. B., Ir., Lakritz L., Hampson I.W.: Variations in radiation sensitivity of foodborne pathogens associated with the suspending meat. I. Food Science. 1995a;60:63–67.
  31. 31. Thayer D.W., Boyd G., Huhtanen C.N.: Effects of ionizing-radiation and anaerobic refrigerated storage on indigenous microflora, Salmonella, and Clostridium botulinum type-A and type-B in vacuum-canned, mechanically deboned chicken meat. Journal of Food Protection. 1995;58:752–757.
  32. 32. Thayer D.W., Boyd G.: Survival of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 on the surface of chicken legs or in mechanically deboned chicken meat gamma irradiated in air or vacuum at temperatures of -20 to +20 degree. Poultry Science. 1991:70:1026–1033.
  33. 33. Szczawiński J., Szczawińska M., Szulc M.: Combined effects of irradiation and curing salts (NaNO2 and NaCl) upon the behaviour of salmonellae in meat. Archiv fur Lebensmittelhygiene. 1985;36:(3):55–58.
  34. 34. EFSA: SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA AND ECDC The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013 European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden: EFSA Journal. 2015;13(1):3991.
  35. 35. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1086/2011of 27 October 2011 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 as regards salmonella in fresh poultry meat.
  36. 36. Kudra L.L., Sebranek J.G., Dickson J.S., Mendonca A.F., Zhang Q., Jackson-Davis A., Prusa K.J.: 2011. Control of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in chicken breast meat by irradiation combined with modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Food Protection. 2011 Nov;74(11):1833–1839. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-195.
  37. 37. Nassar T.J., al-Mashhadi A.S., Fawal A.K., Shalhat A.F.: Decontamination of chicken carcasses artificially contaminated with Salmonella. Revue Scientifique et Technique. 1997;16:891–897.
  38. 38. Thayer D.W., Boyd G., Fox J.B. Jr., Lakritz L.: Elimination by gamma irradiation of Salmonella spp. and strains of Staphylococcus aureus inoculated in bison, ostrich, alligator, and caiman meat. Journal of Food Protection. 1997;60:756–760.
  39. 39. Commission Regulation (EU) No 365/2010 of 28 April 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs as regards Enterobacteriaceae in pasteurised milk and other pasteurised liquid dairy products and Listeria monocytogenes in food grade salt. OJ L 107, 29 April 2010, pp. 9–11.
  40. 40. Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. OJ L 139, 30.4.2004.
  41. 41. Regulation (EC) No 853/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of food of animal origin. OJ L 139, 30.4.2004.
  42. 42. Thayer D.W., Boyd G., Kim A., Fox J.B., Jr., Farrell H.M., Jr.: Fate of gamma-irradiated Listeria monocytogenes during refrigerated storage on raw or cooked turkey breast meat. Journal of Food Protection. 1998;61:979–987.
  43. 43. Responsibilities in relation to producing and handling ready-to-eat (RTE) meats in Queensland. Available from:
  44. 44. Gormley F.J., Little C.L., Grant K.A., de Pinna E., McLauchlin J.: The microbiological safety of ready-to-eat specialty meats from markets and specialty food shops: a UK wide study with a focus on Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiology. 2010;27:243–249. Doi: 10.1016/ Epub 2009 Oct 21.
  45. 45. Song H.J., Lee J.H., Song K.B.: Effects of irradiation and fumaric acid treatment on the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated on sliced ham. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2011. Doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.06.012.
  46. 46. Sommers C.H., Mackay W.J.: Irradiation of Ready-To-Eat Meat Products. In: Institute of Food Technologist Series: Food Irradiation Research and Technology, 2nd ed. Fan X and Sommers CH., editors. 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781118422557.ch11. This edition first published 2013 © 2013 Blackwell Publishing and the Institute of Food Technologists.
  47. 47. Sommers C.H., Boyd G.: Radiation sensitivity and postirradiation growth of foodborne pathogens on a ready-to-eat frankfurter on a roll product in the presence of modified atmosphere and antimicrobials. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:2436–2440.
  48. 48. Cárcel J.A., Benedito J., Cambero M.I., Cabeza M.C., Ordóñez J.A.: Modeling and optimization of the E-beam treatment of chicken steaks and hamburgers, considering food safety, shelf-life, and sensory quality. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2015;96:133–144. DOI:
  49. 49. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), Vienna, Irradiation to Ensure the Safety and Quality of Prepared Meals. STI/PUB/1365. 2009. ISBN 978-92-0-111108-1.
  50. 50. Kang M., Kim H.-J., Jayasena D.D., Bae S.Y., Yong I.H., Lee M., Jo C.: Effects of combined treatments of electron-beam irradiation and addition of Leek (Allium tuberosum) extract on reduction of pathogens in pork jerky. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2012;9:1083–1087. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1249.
  51. 51. Bauer N., Cook V., Disney T., Ebel E., Guo C., Johnston J., La Barre D., Lee J., McCoy E., Morrison J., Schlosser W., Williams M.: DRAFT Risk Assessment of the Potential Human Health Effect of Applying Continuous Inspection to Catfish, Prepared by the Risk Assessment Division Office of Public Health Science Food Safety and Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture. December, 2010.
  52. 52. Hatha AAM and Laksmanaperumalsamy P.: Prevalence of Salmonella in fish and crustaceans from markets in Coimbatore, South India. Food Microbiology.1997;14:111–116.
  53. 53. FDA Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Department Of Health And Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Center For Food Safety And Applied Nutrition Office Of Food Safety. Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011.
  54. 54. Huss H.H., Ababouch L., Gram L.: Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 444. Rome, FAO. 2004.
  55. 55. Reed C.: Import risk analysis: Frozen, skinless and boneless fillet meat of Pangasius spp. fish from Vietnam for human consumption MAF Biosecurity New Zealand, 2008.
  56. 56. Shabarinath S., Kumar H.S., Khushiramani R., Karunasagar I.: Detection and characterization of Salmonella associated with tropical seafood. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2007;114:227–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.012.
  57. 57. FAO: Report of the FAO Expert Workshop on The Application Of Biosecurity Measures To Control Salmonella Contamination In Sustainable Aquaculture. FAO. Mangalore, India, 19–21 January 2010. Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 937 FIPM/R937 (En).
  58. 58. Dent F.: Fishery Industry Officer, Fish Products, Trade & Marketing Branch (FIPM): Global Outlook for Shrimp Markets and Demand, 2013, at
  59. 59. Norhana M.N.W., Poole S.E., Deeth H.C., Dykes G.A.: Prevalence, persistence and control of Salmonella and Listeria in shrimp and shrimp products: a review. Food Control. 2010;21:343–361.
  60. 60. Flick G.J., Jr., Granata L.A.: Biological Safety of Fresh and Processed Shellfish. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center (SRAC) SRAC Publication No. 4901, April 2010.
  61. 61. Pinu F.R., Yeasmin S., Bar B.L., Rahman M.M.: Microbiological conditions of frozen shrimp in different food markets of Dhaka City. Food Science and Technology Research. 2007;13:362–365. DOI: 10.3136/fstr.13.362.
  62. 62. Asai Y., Kaneko M., Ohtsuka K., Morita Y., Kaneko S., Noda H., Furukawa I., Takatori K., Hara-Kudo Y.: Salmonella prevalence in seafood imported into Japan. Journal of Food Protection. 2008;71:1460–1464. PMID: 18680947.
  63. 63. Olgunoglu I.A.: Salmonella in Fish and Fishery Products. 2012. In: Salmonella - A Dangerous Foodborne Pathogen, Dr. Dr. Barakat S M Mahmoud (Ed.), ISBN:978-953-307-782-6, Rijaka, Croatia, InTech, Available from:
  64. 64. Brands D.A., Inman A.E., Gerba C.P., Maré C.J., Billington S.J., Saif L.A., Levine J.F., Joens L.A.: Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Oysters in the United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:893–897. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.893-897.2005. PMCID: PMC546685
  65. 65. Bakr Wafaa M.K., Hazzah Walaa A., Abaza Amani F.: Detection of Salmonella and Vibrio species in some seafood in Alexandria. Journal of American Science. 2011;7:663–668.
  66. 66. Sommers C.H., Rajkowski K.T.: Radiation inactivation of foodborne pathogens on frozen seafood products. Journal of Food Protection. 2011;74:641–644. Doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-419.
  67. 67. Kamat A., Thomas P.: Radiation inactivation of some food-borne pathogens in fish as influenced by fat levels. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1998;84:478–484.
  68. 68. Jakabi M., Gelli D.S., Torre J.C., Rodas M.A., Franco B.D., Destro M.T., Landgrafi M.: Inactivation by ionizing radiation of Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Infantis, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters (Crassostrea brasiliana). Journal of Food Protection. 2003;66:1025–9.
  69. 69. Hitoshi I., Harun Or R., Naruemon S., Pitaya A., Pongpen R., Isao I.: Effect of gamma-irradiation on frozen shrimps for decontamination of pathogenic bacteria. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 1993;42:279–282. DOI: 10.1016/0969-806X(93)90249-T.
  70. 70. Sinanoglou V.J., Batrinou A., Konteles S., Sflomos K.: Microbial population, physicochemical quality, and allergenicity of molluscs and shrimp treated with cobalt-60 gamma radiation. Journal of Food Protection. 2007;70:958–966.
  71. 71. Sommers C.H., Rajkowski K.T., Sheen S., Samer C., Bender E.: The effect of cryogenic freezing followed by gamma radiation on the survival of Salmonella spp. on frozen shrimp. Journal of Food Processing & Technology2011;S8.
  72. 72. Nerkar D.P., Bandekar J.R.: Elimination of Salmonella from frozen shrimp by gamma radiation. Journal of Food Safety, 1990;10(3):175–180.
  73. 73. Luo X., Cui S., Li Y., Jiang T.: A Study On The Use Of Irradiation In Combination With Vacuum Packaging To Produce Non-Sterile Shelf-Stable Food, Semi-Dried Meat, Seafood And Vegetables. In: Radiation Processing For Safe, Shelf-Stable And Ready-To-Eat Food. Proceedings of a final Research Co-ordination Meeting held in Montreal, Canada, 10–14 July 2000. IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1337 ISBN 92–0–100703–5 ISSN 1011–4289, p.194-198.
  74. 74. Tambunan P.R.: Elimination of Salmonella in frog legs by irradiation. Final Report to the International Atomic Energy Agency on Contract No 2711/R1/RB. Central Research Institute for Fisheries, Indonesia. 1984.
  75. 75. Federal Register: Irradiation in the Production, Processing and Handling of Food, A Rule by the Food and Drug Administration on 11/30/2012 Fed Regist. 2012 Nov 30;77(231):71312–71316.
  76. 76. Farkas J.: Irradiation of poultry meat. In: Food Safety Control in the Poultry Industry. G. Mead. Cambridge, 2005:433–452.

Written By

Małgorzata E. Szczawińska

Submitted: 10 May 2016 Reviewed: 09 January 2017 Published: 05 April 2017