Content of several phenolic compounds in four sweet cherry cultivars (mg /100g fresh weight).
Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites abundant in our diet. These compounds may affect positively or negatively the sensory characteristics of food with important impacts on color, flavor, and astringency. An adequate consumption of phenolic compounds may also offer health benefits. After the consumption of fruits, the colon is the main site of microbial fermentation, where high molecular weight phenolic compounds are transformed into low molecular weight phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids or lactone structures by intestinal microbiota, which produce metabolites with biological and antioxidant activity, with evidence on health benefits for humans. A large amount of different phenolic compounds are responsible for physicochemical and sensory characteristics of table grapes and wines. Also, sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) is one of the most popular temperate table fruits; they contain flavonoids, flavan‐3‐ols, and flavonols in addition to non‐flavonoid compounds. Anthocyanins are the major polyphenols in blueberries, and this group of phytochemicals is thought to be responsible for many of the health benefits of berry consumption. Therefore, considering the importance of red/dark‐colored fruits phenolic composition, the purpose of this chapter is to make a review of the most recent publications about these fruits’ phenolic composition and their impact on sensorial properties as well as the effect of microorganisms on fruit phenolic composition.
- phenolic compounds
- sweet cherries
- sensorial characteristics
Phenolic compounds (phenolic acids, flavonoids, and stilbenes) are today among the most important classes of phytochemicals, since they are responsible for disease protection conferred from diets rich in these compounds . Some fruits with high content of phenolic compounds, including flavonols, flavones, anthocyanins, and phenolic acids are grapes, sweet cherries, and blueberries. Polyphenolic compounds form complexes with salivary proteins, playing a role in the sensation of astringency, due to delubrication of oral surfaces. For astringency, the tannin molecular weight seems to be important for its perception and to the interactions with salivary proteins. Flavor and color are also important factors for the selection of fruit by consumers. Sweetness and bitterness are mutually suppressed in mixtures, but astringency and bitterness tend to be perceived as negative attributes. Polyphenols’ sensory properties are related to molecules specific structures, including pigments correlated to fruit color . This richness in phenolic compounds is also directly related with the positive effects on human health. However, the phenolic composition of the red/dark‐colored fruits depends on cultivar, maturity, growing environment, cultural practices, postharvest conditions, and processing techniques .
2. Phenolic composition of red/dark‐colored fruits
2.1. Phenolic composition of wine grapes and table grapes
2.2. Phenolic composition of sweet cherry
Cherries are an excellent source of antioxidants, particularly phenolics, such as flavonoids, flavan‐3‐ols, and flavonols in addition to non‐flavonoid compounds such as hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids, which are concentrated in the epicarp and mesocarp of the fruit [25, 26]. The most abundant phenolic compounds are anthocyanins such as cyanidin‐3‐
Almost all phenolic compounds in sweet cherry show strong antioxidant activity [35, 40, 41]. Adequate consumption of phenolic compounds may offer health benefits that include inhibition of tumor cells growth , inhibition of inflammation , and protection against neurodegenerative diseases . According to Matias et al. , a phenolic‐rich extract derived from sweet cherries could be an attractive candidate to formulate an agent for the prevention of oxidative stress‐induced disorders such as intestinal inflammation disorders. In spite of the large variations in the phenolic compounds content observed among several cherry cultivars, the levels of health‐promoting compounds are relevant to human health. Sweet cherries might therefore be considered as a functional food . In fact, cyanidin‐3‐
2.3. Phenolic composition of blueberries
Blueberries are flowering plants of the genus
3. Impact of fruit phenolic compounds on sensorial characteristics
Regarding fruit's oral sensory characteristics, there are six oral sensory attributes of fruit: sourness, sweetness, bitterness, spiciness, aroma, and astringency. For many people, the oral sensory properties of fruit have a great impact on their choice, acceptability, and consumption. Phenolic compounds, apart from possessing valuable biological properties, impart a high sensory activity to foods . They are closely associated with the sensory and nutritional quality of fresh and processed plant foods and may affect positively or negatively the sensory characteristics of food with impacts on color, flavor, and astringency. This impact becomes important for consumer's acceptance, so that health‐promoting products can be palatable and largely consumed . Fruit preservation also influences the quantity and quality of fruits’ phenolic content. For instances, during thawing of fruits, oxidation of phenolic compounds takes place and is negatively correlated with the acceptance level of fruits . However, in a study comparing different pretreating processes of strawberries, samples with the highest phenolic content were also the most pleasant ones . Specific structures are described to be related to polyphenols’ sensory properties, namely color perception. Color, in fruits, is derived from natural pigments that change through plant ripening. Chlorophylls (green), carotenoids (yellow, orange, and red), anthocyanins (red and blue), flavonoids (yellow), and betalains (red) are the primary pigments responsible for fruit color . Also, water‐soluble brown‐, gray‐, and black‐colored pigments may occur due to enzymatic and non‐enzymatic browning reactions . Many polyphenol pigments in plants are reactive anthocyanins, yellow flavanols, and flavones . Anthocyanins can be used in food industry to color food. The six anthocyanins that can be found in the following red/dark‐colored fruits are cyanidin (cherries, blackcurrants, raspberries, and elderberries), delphinidin (blackcurrants and blueberries), malvidin (grapes), pelargonidin (strawberries and radishes), peonidin (cranberries), and petunidin (blueberries)—Figure 2. Due to their water solubility, anthocyanins are applicable for dyeing low pH systems. Increasing pH leads to a lesser color intensity and a bluer tone appears at pH higher than 4.5, giving its bluish color to blackcurrant. Proanthocyanidins react with anthocyanins to form new red pigments . Loss or stabilization of color and increases in the range of available hues are resulted by the conversion of anthocyanins to other compounds during food processing . The color of fruits is a sensory attribute that can really change consumers’ fruit acceptance. It is considered the most important product‐intrinsic sensory cue leading the sensory expectations that the consumer holds concerning the foods that they may consume  and, according to Piqueras‐Fizman et al. , humans’ experience of taste/flavor is determined by the expectations that they often generate prior to tasting. Consumers inspect fruits, visually, before deciding on whether or not to buy them. People associate certain colors with certain flavors. For instances, red/dark fruit coloring also appears to be a particularly good inducer of sweetness .
Gavrilova et al.  studied the phenolic profile of four blueberry varieties (
|Red currants||Black currants||Blueberries|
|Hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives||0.23|
Plant‐based phenol compounds, flavonoids, isoflavones, terpenes, and glucosinolates are almost bitter and astringent . These substances provide defense against predators by making the plants unpalatable . But also humans reject foods that are perceived to be excessively bitter . Flavonoid phenols have been indicated as the main responsible for the taste of bitterness and the mouth‐fell sensation of astringency in several types of fruits and in beverages [2, 77]. Several works suggested that some polyphenols can be responsible for the bitterness of fruits even if they are present in very low concentrations . The bitterness and astringency of red wines and red/dark‐colored fruits are mainly given by the flavanols. The mechanisms through which bitter taste perception occurs are not well understood; however, it is known that these mechanisms involve the activation of distinct human bitter taste receptors [77, 78]. While lower‐molecular‐weight phenolic compounds tend to be likely bitter, higher‐molecular‐weight polymers are perceived as astringent. Astringency or drying/puckering mouth‐feel detectable throughout the oral cavity is due to a complex reaction between polyphenols and proteins of the mouth and saliva . Interaction between tannins and saliva proteins plays an important role in astringency perception in wine ; however, the physiological and physicochemical mechanisms for this phenomenon are not fully understood and more studies focusing on this subject must be done in wines and fruits.
Total concentration, mean degree of polymerization , subunit composition, and distribution  are some of the variables related to tannins, highly correlated with the perception of astringency in fruits. Tannins vary in size, from dimers up to oligomers, with more than 30 subunits . Polymer size affects astringency correlating positively with the perception of astringency . Increased galloylation can be responsible for increased “abrasiveness” while trihydroxylation of the B‐ring can decrease it . As referred by He et al. , the synthesis of astringent substances controlled by a variety of structural and regulatory genes must be studied. Moreover, these authors state that “(…) cloning and functional identification of genes, in the astringency metabolic pathway, and their spatio‐temporal expression patterns as well as tannin biosynthesis‐related transcription factor genes must be considered in future work to finally make it possible to control fruit astringent substances quantitatively (…)”.
4. Effect of microorganisms on fruit phenolic compounds
After the consumption of fruits, the colon is the main site of microbial fermentation, where high molecular weight phenolic compounds are transformed into low molecular weight phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids or lactone structures by intestinal microbiota. The human healthy adult gut microbiota already identified can be classified into three dominant phyla:
|Myricetin||2‐(3,5‐Dihydroxyphenyl) acetic acid|
2‐(3‐Hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid
|Quercetin||3‐(3,4‐Dihydroxyphenyl) propionic acid|
|Epicatechin||5‐(3,4‐Dihydroxyphenyl) valeric acid|
|Malvidin||3,4‐Dimethoxybenzoic acid||[98, 99]|
|Caffeic, ferulic, and ||3‐Hydroxyphenyl propionic acid|
Benzoic acid 3‐(4‐Hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid Vanillin
5. Final remark
Red/dark‐colored fruits are considered healthy and nutritious, the major potential health benefits being a reduced risk for cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Phytochemicals from red/dark‐colored fruits are also shown to prevent body weight gain, lower blood cholesterol, and reduce cancer risk. Nevertheless, further rigorous, prospective studies are needed in order to better understand the benefits included in red/dark‐colored fruits in our diet. There is also an emergent interest in the study of red/dark‐colored fruits astringency because of the healthy properties of astringent substances found in red/dark‐colored fruits including antibacterial, antiviral, anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, antiallergenic, hepatoprotective, and vasodilating. The role of phenolic compounds and their metabolites as prebiotics, contributing to beneficial gastrointestinal health effects by modulating gut microbial balance with the simultaneous inhibition of pathogens and stimulation of beneficial bacteria, should also be highlighted.
Arts IC, Hollman PC: Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2005, 81(1 Suppl.): 317S–325S.
Oliveira LL, Carvalho MV, Melo L: Health promoting and sensory properties of phenolic compounds in food. Revista Ceres, 2014, 61(Suppl.): 764–779. DOI: 10.1590/0034‐737x201461000002
Kårlund A, Moor U, Sandell M, Karjalainen RO: The impact of harvesting, storage and processing factors on health‐promoting phytochemicals in berries and fruits. Processes, 2014, 2: 596–624. DOI: 10.3390/pr2030596
Jordão AM, Ricardo‐da‐Silva JM, Laureano O: Evolution of proanthocyanidins in bunch stems during berry development ( Vitis viniferaL.). Vitis, 2001, 40: 17–22.
Jordão AM, Ricardo‐da‐Silva JM, Laureano O: Evolution of catechins and oligomeric procyanidins during grape maturation of Castelão Francês and Touriga Francesa. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2001, 53: 231–234.
Pastrana‐Bonilla E, Akoh CC, Sellappan S, Krewer G: Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of muscadine grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51: 5497–5503. DOI: 10.1021/jf030113c
Cosme F, Ricardo‐Da‐Silva JM, Laureano O: Tannin profiles of Vitis viniferaL. cv. red grapes growing in Lisbon and from their monovarietal wines. Food Chemistry, 2009, 112: 197–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.058
Costa E, Cosme F, Rivero‐Pérez MD, Jordão AM, González‐SanJosé ML: Influence of wine region provenance on phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and radical scavenger activity of traditional Portuguese red grape varieties. European Food Research and Technology, 2015, 241: 61–73. DOI: 10.1007/s00217‐015‐2434‐x
Eyduran SP, Akin M, Ercisli S, Eyduran E, Maghradze D: Sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds of ancient grape cultivars ( Vitis viniferaL.) from Igdir province of Eastern Turkey. Biological Research, 2015, 48: 1–8. DOI: 10.1186/0717‐6287‐48‐2
Meng J, Fang Y, Zhang A, Chen S, Xu T, Ren Z, Han G, Liu J, Li H, Zhang Z, Wang H: Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Chinese raisins produced in Xinjiang Province. Food Research International, 2011, 44: 2830–2836. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.032
Ghrairi F, Lahouar L, Amira A, Brahmi F, Ferchichi A, Achour L, Said S: Physicochemical composition of different varieties of raisins ( Vitis viniferaL.) from Tunisia. Industrial Crops and Products, 2013, 43: 73–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.008
Sério S, Rivero‐Pérez MD, Correia AC, Jordão AM, González‐San José ML: Analysis of commercial grape raisins: phenolic content, antioxidant capacity and radical scavenger activity. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 2014, 29: 1–8. DOI: 10.1051/ctv/20142901001
Jordão AM, Ricardo-da-Silva JM, Laureano O: Influence of irrigation on the phenolic composition of red grapes from the Touriga Francesa variety ( Vitis viniferaL.). CyTA - Journal of Food, 1998, 2: 60–73. DOI: 10.1080/11358129809487584.
Pérez‐Magariño S, González‐Sanjosé ML: Polyphenols and colour variability of red wines made from grapes harvested at different ripeness grade. Food Chemistry, 2006, 96: 197–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.021
Costa E, Da Silva JF, Cosme F, Jordão AM: Adaptability of some French red grape varieties cultivated at two different Portuguese terroirs: comparative analysis with two Portuguese red grape varieties using physicochemical and phenolic parameters. Food Research International, 2015, 78: 302–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.029
Monagas M, Gómez‐Cordovés C, Bartolomé B, Laureano O, Ricardo‐da‐Silva JM: Monomeric, oligomeric, and polymeric flavan‐3‐ol composition of wines and grapes from Vitis viniferaL. Cv. Graciano, Tempranillo, and Cabernet Sauvignon. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51: 6475–6481. DOI: 10.1021/jf030325+
Obreque‐Slier E, López‐Solís R, Castro‐Ulloa L, Romero‐Díaz C, Peña‐Neira A: Phenolic composition and physicochemical parameters of Carménère, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Cabernet Franc grape seeds ( Vitis viniferaL.) during ripening. LWT ‐ Food Science and Technology, 2012, 48: 134–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.02.007
He JJ, Liu YX, Pan QH, Cui XY, Duan CQ: Different anthocyanin profiles of the skin and the pulp of Yan73 (Muscat Hamburg× Alicante Bouschet) grape berries. Molecules, 2010, 15: 1141–1153. DOI: 10.3390/molecules15031141
Ubalde JM, Sort X, Zayas AA, Poch RM: Effects of soil and climatic conditions on grape ripening and wine quality of Cabernet Sauvignon. Journal of Wine Research, 2010, 21: 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2010.495851
Mateus N, Machado JM, De Freitas V: Development changes of anthocyanins in Vitis viniferagrapes grown in the Douro Valley and concentration in respective wines. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2002, 82: 1689–1695. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1237
Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N: Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2001, 52: 1–7.
Downey MO, Dokoozlian NK, Krstic MP: Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: a review of recent research. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2006, 57: 257–268.
Madeira FC: Effect of ultraviolet radiation b on vine-growing behavior of the variety Cabernet Sauvignon ( Vitis ViníferaL.) grown on São Joaquim, Santa Catarina. Master dissertation (Master in Plant Genetic Resources), University Federal of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2011.
Bruno G, Sparapano L: Effects of three esca‐associated fungi on Vitis viniferaL: V. Changes in the chemical and biological profile of xylem sap from diseased cv. Sangiovese vines. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 2007, 71: 210–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.02.005
Gao L, Mazza G: Characterization, quantification and distribution of anthocyanins and colorless phenolics in sweet cherry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43: 343–346. DOI: 10.1021/jf00050a015
Gonçalves B, Landbo AK, Knudsen D, Silva AP, Moutinho‐Pereira J, Rosa E: Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the phenolic profiles of cherries ( Prunus aviumL.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, 52: 523–530. DOI: 10.1021/jf030595s
Gonçalves B, Silva AP, Moutinho‐Pereira J, Bacelar E, Rosa E, Meyer AS: Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the evolution of colour and anthocyanins in cherries ( Prunus aviumL.). Food Chemistry, 2007, 103: 976–984. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.039
Ballistreri G, Continella A, Gentile A, Amenta M, Fabroni S, Rapisarda P: Fruit quality and bioactive compounds relevant to human health of sweet cherry ( Prunus aviumL.) cultivars grown in Italy. Food Chemistry, 2013, 140: 630–638. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.024
Usenik V, Fajt N, Mikulic‐Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R: Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58: 4928–4933. DOI: 10.1021/jf903755b
Liu Y, Liu X, Zhong F, Tian R, Zhang K, Zhang X, Li T: Comparative study of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in different species of cherries. Journal of Food Science, 2011, 76: 633–638. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750‐3841.2011.02150.x
Jakobek L, Marijan S, Vóca S, Šindrak Z, Dobričević N: Flavonol and phenolic acid composition of sweet cherries (cv. Lapins) produced on six different vegetative rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 123: 23–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.012
Serrano M, Díaz‐Mula HM, Zapata PJ, Castillo S, Guillén F, Martínez‐Romero D: Maturity stage at harvest determines the fruit quality and antioxidant potential after storage of sweet cherry cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57: 3240–3246. DOI: 10.1021/jf803949k
Stöhr H, Mosel H, Herrmann KZ: VII. The phenolics of cherries and plums and the changes in catechins and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives during the development of fruits. Lebensmittel‐Untersuchung und Forschung, 1975, 159: 85–91.
Martínez‐Esplá A, Zapata PJ, Valero D, García‐Viguera C, Castillo S, Serrano M: Preharvest application of oxalic acid increased fruit size, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant capacity in sweet cherry cultivars ( Prunus aviumL.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014, 62: 3432–3437. DOI: 10.1021/jf500224g
Gonçalves B, Landbo AK, Let M, Silva AP, Rosa E, Meyer AS: Storage affects the phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of cherries ( Prunus aviumL.) on human low‐density lipoproteins. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2004, 84: 1013–1020. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1752
Goulas V, Minas IS, Kourdoulas PM, Lazaridou A, Molassiotis AN, Gerothanassis IP, Manganaris GA: 1H NMR metabolic fingerprinting to probe temporal postharvest changes on qualitative attributes and phytochemical profile of sweet cherry fruit. Front. Plant Science, 2015, 6: 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00959
Esti M, Cinquanta L, Sinesio F, Moneta E, Di Matteo M: Physiochemical and sensory fruit characteristics of two sweet cherry cultivars after cool storage. Food Chemistry, 2002, 76: 399–405. DOI: 10.1016/S0308‐8146(01)00231‐X
Petriccione M, De Sanctis F, Pasquariello MS, Mastrobuoni F, Rega P, Scortichini M, Mencarelli F: The effect of chitosan coating on the quality and nutraceutical traits of sweet cherry during postharvest life. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2014, 8(2): 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-014-1411-x
Valverde JM, Giméneza MJ, Valero D, Martínez‐Romero D, Serrano M: Methyl salicylate treatments of sweet cherry trees increase antioxidant systems in fruit at harvest and during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2015, 109: 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.06.011
Kelebek H, Selli S: Evaluation of chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry ( Prunus aviumL.) cultivars. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2011, 46: 2530–2537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2621.2011.02777.x
Serra AT, Duarte RO, Bonze MR, Duarte CMM: Identification of bioactive response in traditional cherries from Portugal. Food Chemistry, 2011, 125: 318–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.088
Seeram NP, Momin RA, Nair MG, Bourquin LD: Cyclooxygenase inhibitory and antioxidant cyanidin glycosides in cherries and berries. Phytomedicine, 2001, 8: 362–369. DOI: 10.1078/0944‐7113‐00053
Kim DO, Heo HJ, Kim YJ, Yang HS, Lee CY: Sweet and sour cherry phenolics and their protective effects on neuronal cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53: 9921–9927. DOI: 10.1021/jf0518599
Matias AA, Rosado‐Ramos R, Nunes LS, Figueira I, Serra AT, Bronze MR, Santos CN, Duarte C: Protective effect of a (poly)phenol‐rich extract derived from sweet cherries culls against oxidative cell damage. Molecules, 2016, 21: 1–16. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21040406
Adisakwattana S, Yibchok‐Anun S, Charoenlertkul P, Wongsasiripat N: Cyanidin‐3‐rutinoside alleviates postprandial hyperglycemia and its synergism with acarbose by inhibition of intestinal α‐glucosidase. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, 2011, 49: 36–41. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.10‐116
Xia M, Hou M, Zhu H, Ma J, Tang Z, Wang Q, Li Y, Chi D, Yu X, Zhao T, Han P, Xia X, Ling W: Anthocyanins induce cholesterol efflux from mouse peritoneal macrophages. The role of peroxisome proliferators‐activated receptor Ó‐Liver X Receptor α‐ABCA1 Pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280: 36792–36801. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M505047200
Srivastava A, Akoh CC, Fischer J, Krewer G: Effect of anthocyanin fractions from selected cultivars of Georgia‐grown blueberries on apoptosis and phase II enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2007, 55: 3180–3185. DOI: 10.1021/jf062915o
Vander Kloet SP, Dickinson TA: The taxonomy of Vacciniumsection Myrtillus( Ericaceae). Brittonia, 1999, 51: 231–254. DOI: 10.2307/2666632
Routray W, Orsat V: Blueberries and their anthocyanins: factors affecting biosynthesis and properties. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2011, 10: 303–320. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541‐4337.2011.00164.x
Martin RR, Polashock JJ, Tzanetakis E: New and emerging viruses of blueberry and cranberry. Viruses, 2012, 4: 2831–2852. DOI: 10.3390/v4112831
Liu RH: Health‐promoting components of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Advances in Nutrition, 2013, 4: 384S–392S. DOI: 10.3945/an.112.003517
Villata M: Trends in world blueberry production. Available online: http://www.growingproduce.com/article/26272/trends‐in‐world‐blueberry‐production/2016(accessed on 31 August 2016).
US Department of Agriculture (USDA): 2016. Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts—2015 Summary. Available online: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/NoncFruiNu/NoncFruiNu‐07‐06‐2016.pdf(accessed on 31 August 2016).
Espin JC, Soler‐Rivas C, Wichers HJ, Garcia‐Viguera C: Anthocyanin‐based natural colorants: a new source of antiradical activity for foodstuff. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000, 48: 1588–1592. DOI: 10.1021/jf9911390
Stevenson D, Scalzo J: Anthocyanin composition and content of blueberries from around the world. Journal of Berry Research, 2012, 2: 179–189. DOI: 10.3233/JBR‐2012‐038
Nile SH, Park SW: Edible berries: bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition, 2014, 30: 134–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.04.007
Yousef GG, Brown AF, Funakoshi Y, Mbeunkui F, Grace MH, Ballington JR, Loraine A, Lila MA: Efficient quantification of the health‐relevant anthocyanin and phenolic acid profiles in commercial cultivars and breeding selections of blueberries ( Vacciniumspp.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61: 4806–4815. DOI: 10.1021/jf400823s
Huang WY, Liu YM, Wang J, Wang XN, Li CY: Anti‐inflammatory effect of the blueberry anthocyanins malvidin‐3‐glucoside and malvidin‐3‐galactoside in endothelial cells. Molecules, 2014, 19: 12827–12841. DOI: 10.3390/molecules190812827
Borges G, Degeneve A, Mullen W, Crozier A: Identification of flavonoid and phenolic antioxidants in black currants, blueberries, raspberries, red currants, and cranberries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58: 3901–3909. DOI: 10.1021/jf902263n
Cho MJ, Howard LR, Prior RL, Clark JR: Flavonoid glycosides and antioxidant capacity of various blackberry, blueberry and red grape genotypes determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2004, 84: 1771–1782. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1885
Troszyñska A, Estrella I, Lamparski G, Hernández T, Amarowicz R, Pegg RB: Relationship between the sensory quality of lentil ( Lens culinaris) sprouts and their phenolic constituents. Food Research International, 2011, 44: 3195–3201. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.08.007
Blanda G, Cerretani L, Bendini A, Cardinali A, Scarpellini A, Lercker G: Effect of vacuum impregnation on the phenolic content of Granny Smith and Stark Delicious frozen apple cv. European Food Research and Technology, 2008, 226: 1229–1237. DOI: 10.1007/s00217‐007‐0624‐x
Blanda G, Cerretani L, Cardinali A, Barbieri S, Bendini A, Lercker G: Osmotic dehydrofreezing of strawberries: polyphenolic content, volatile profile and consumer acceptance. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 2009, 42: 30–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.002
Barrett DM, Beaulieu J, Shewfelt R: Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh‐cut fruits and vegetables: desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2010, 50: 369–389. DOI: 10.1080/10408391003626322.
Kasım MU, Kasım R: Color quality of fresh‐cut fruits and vegetables. Conference paper in the Sixth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium “Agrosym 2015”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 15–18. Book of Proceedings, 2015, 47: 1007–1014.
El Gharras H: Polyphenols: food sources, properties and applications – a review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2009, 44: 2512–2518. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2621.2009.02077.x
Just the Berries. What Are Blackcurrants? A Brief History of the World's Best Super‐Fruit. Available online: http://jtbpd.com/information.php?information_id=1. 2013 (accessed on 22 August 2016).
Cadot Y, Caillé S, Samson A, Barbeau G, Cheynier V: Sensory representation of typicality of Cabernet franc wines related to phenolic composition: impact of ripening stage and maceration time. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2012, 732: 91–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.02.013
Spence C: On the psychological impact of food colour. Flavour, 2015, 4: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s13411‐015‐0031‐3
Piqueras‐Fizman B, Spence C: Sensory expectations based on product‐extrinsic food cues: an interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference, 2015, 40: 165–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013
Spence C: Multisensory flavour perception. Current Biology (special issue), 2013, 23: R365–R369. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.028
Gavrilova V, Kajdzanoska M, Gjamovski V, Stefova M: Separation, characterization and quantification of phenolic compounds in blueberries and red and black currants by HPLC‐DAD‐ESI‐MSn. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59: 4009–4018. DOI: 10.1021/jf104565y
Honkanen E, Pyysalo T, Hirvi T: The aroma of Finnish wild raspberries , Rubus idaeus. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel‐Untersuchung und Forschung, 1980, 171: 180–182. DOI: 10.1007/BF01042646
Aprea E, Biasioli F, Gasperi F: Volatile compounds of raspberry fruit: from analytical methods to biological role and sensory impact (Review). Molecules, 2015, 20: 2445–2474. DOI: 10.3390/molecules20022445
Bravo L: Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutrition Reviews, 1998, 56: 317–333.
Rouseff RL: Bitterness in food products: an overview. In: Bitterness in foods and beverages. Developments in Food Science, Rouoseff R.L., ed. 1990, 25. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–14.
Vilela A, Cosme F, Jordão AM: Wine phenolics: looking for a smooth mouthfeel (Review Article). SDRP Journal of Food Science &' Technology, 2015, 1: 8.
Soares S, Kohl S, Thalmann S, Mateus N, Meyerhof W, De Freitas V: Different phenolic compounds activate distinct human bitter taste receptors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61: 1525–1533. DOI: 10.1021/jf304198k
Noble CA: Bitterness in wine. Physiology and Behavior, 1994, 56: 1251–1255.
Ma W, Guo A, Zhang Y, Wang H, Liu Y, Li H: A review on astringency and bitterness perception of tannins in wine. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2014, 40: 6–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.08.001
Preys S, Mazerolles G, Courcoux P, Samson A, Fischer U, Hanafi M, Bertrand D, Cheynier V: Relationship between polyphenolic composition and some sensory properties in red wines using multiway analyses. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2006, 563: 126–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.082
Quijada‐Morin N, Regueiro J, Simal‐Gandara J, Tomas E, Rivas‐Gonzalo JC, Escribano‐Bailon MT: Relationship between the sensory‐determined astringency and the flavanolic composition of red wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2012, 60: 12355–12361. DOI: 10.1021/jf3044346
Adams DO: Phenolics and ripening in grape berries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2006, 57: 249–256.
Vidal S, Francis L, Guyot S, Marnet N, Kwiatkowski M, Gawel R, Cheynier V, Waters EL: The mouth‐feel properties of grape and apple proanthocyanidins in a wine‐like medium. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2003, 83: 564–573. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1394
Peleg H, Gacon K, Schlich P, Noble AC: Bitterness and astringency of flavan‐3‐ol monomers, dimers and trimers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1999, 79: 1123–1128. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0010(199906)79:8<1123::AID‐JSFA336>3.0.CO;2‐D
He M, Tian H, Luo X, Qi X, Chen X: Molecular progress in research on fruit astringency (Review). Molecules, 2015, 20: 1434–1451. DOI:10.3390/molecules20011434
Cardona FC, Andrés‐Lacueva S, Tulipani F, Tinahones J, Queipo‐Ortuño MI: Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 2013, 24: 1415–1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.05.001
Marín L, Miguélez EM, Villar CJ, Lombó F: Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: antimicrobial Properties. BioMed Research International, 2015, 905215: 18. DOI: 10.1155/2015/905215
Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F: The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiology, 2009, 9: 123. DOI: 10.1186/1471‐2180‐9‐123
Winter J, Moore LH, Dowell Jr VR, Bokkenheuser VD: C‐ring cleavage of flavonoids by human intestinal bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55: 1203–1208. DOI: 0099‐2240/89/051203‐06$02.00/0
Krumholz LR, Bryant MP: Eubacterium oxidoreducenssp. nov. requiring H2 or formate to degrade gallate, pyrogallol, phloroglucinol and quercetin. Archives of Microbiology, 1986, 144: 8–14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00454948
Schneider H, Simmering R, Hartmann L, Pforte H, Blaut M: Degradation of quercetin‐3‐glucoside in gnotobiotic rats, associated with human intestinal bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2000, 89: 1027–1037. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365‐2672.2000.01209.x
Rechner AR, Smith MA, Kuhnle G, Gibson GR, Debnam ES, Srai SKS, Moore KP, Rice‐Evans CA: Colonic metabolism of dietary polyphenols: influence of structure on microbial fermentation products. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2004, 36: 212–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2003.09.022
Monagas M, Urpi‐Sarda M, Sanchez‐Patán F, Gómez‐Cordovés C, Andres‐Lacuevab C, Bartolomé B: Insights into the metabolism and microbial biotransformation of dietary flavan‐3‐ols and the bioactivity of their metabolites. Food and Function, 2010, 1: 233–253. DOI: 10.1039/C0FO00132E
Tzounis X, Vulevic J, Kuhnle GGC, George T, Leonczak J, Gibson GR, Kwik‐Uribe C, Spencer JPE: Flavanol monomer‐induced changes to the human faecal microflora. British Journal of Nutrition, 2008, 99: 782–792. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507853384
Schneider H, Blaut M: Anaerobic degradation of flavonoids by Eubacterium ramulus. Archives of Microbiology, 2000, 173: 71–75.
Yamakoshi J, Tokutake S, Kikuchi M, Kubota Y, Konishi H, Mitsuoka T: Effect of proanthocyanidin‐rich extract from grape seeds on human fecal flora and fecal odor. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 2001, 13: 25–31. DOI: 10.3402/mehd.v13i1.7996
Miladinović B, Kostić M, Šavikin K, Ðordević B, Mihajilov‐Krstev T, Živanović S, Kitić D: Chemical profile and antioxidative and antimicrobial activity of juices and extracts of 4 black currants varieties ( Ribes nigrumL.). Journal of Food Science, 2014, 79: C301–C309. DOI: 10.1111/1750‐3841.12364
Burdulis D, Sarkinas A, Jasutiené I, Stackevicené E, Nikolajevas L, Janulis V: Comparative study of anthocyanin composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity in bilberry ( Vaccinium myrtillusL.) and blueberry ( Vaccinium corymbosumL.) fruits. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica—Drug Research, 2009, 66: 399–408.
Gonthier MP, Remesy C, Scalbert A, Cheynier V, Souquet JM, Poutanen K, Aura AM: Microbial metabolism of caffeic acid and its esters chlorogenic and caftaric acids by human faecal microbiota in vitro. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 2006, 60: 536–540. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2006.07.084
Andreasen MF, Kroon PA, Williamson G, Garcia‐Conesa MT: Esterase activity able to hydrolyze dietary antioxidant hydroxycinnamates is distributed along the intestine of mammals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001, 49: 5679–5684. DOI: 10.1021/jf010668c
Couteau D, McCartney AL, Gibson GR, Williamson G, Faulds CB: Isolation and characterization of human colonic bacteria able to hydrolyse chlorogenic acid. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 90: 873–881. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365‐2672.2001.01316.x