Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Determination of Nucleopolyhedrovirus’ Taxonomic Position

Written By

Yu-Shin Nai, Yu-Feng Huang, Tzu-Han Chen, Kuo-Ping Chiu and Chung-Hsiung Wang

Submitted: May 19th, 2016 Reviewed: October 28th, 2016 Published: April 5th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/66634

Chapter metrics overview

1,560 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

To date , over 78 genomes of nucleopolyhedroviruses (NPVs) have been sequenced and deposited in NCBI. How to define a new virus from the infected larvae in the field is usually the first question. Two NPV strains, which were isolated from casuarina moth (L. xylina) and golden birdwing larvae (Troides aeacus), respectively, displayed the same question. Due to the identity of polyhedrin (polh) sequences of these two isolates to that of Lymantria dispar MNPV and Bombyx mori NPV, they are named LdMNPV-like virus and TraeNPV, provisionally. To further clarify the relationships of LdMNPV-like virus and TraeNPV to closely related NPVs, Kimura 2-parameter (K-2-P) analysis was performed. Apparently, the results of K-2-P analysis that showed LdMNPV-like virus is an LdMNPV isolate, while TraeNPV had an ambiguous relationship to BmNPV. Otherwise, MaviNPV, which is a mini-AcMNPV, also exhibited a different story by K-2-P analysis. Since K-2-P analysis could not cover all species determination issues, therefore, TraeNPV needs to be sequenced for defining its taxonomic position. For this purpose, different genomic sequencing technologies and bioinformatic analysis approaches will be discussed. We anticipated that these applications will help to exam nucleotide information of unknown species and give an insight and facilitate to this issue.

Keywords

  • nucleopolyhedroviruses
  • Kimura-2-parameter analysis
  • next-generation sequencing
  • bioinformatic analysis

1. Introduction

Baculoviruses are insect-specific viruses which have a large circular double-stranded DNA genome packaged in enveloped, rod-shaped nucleocapsid and occluded within a paracrystalline protein occlusion body (OB) [1, 2]. The family Baculoviridaehas four genera, including Alphabaculovirus, Betabaculovirus, Gammabaculovirusand Deltabaculovirus. Nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) is a member of Alphabaculovirus(lepidopteran-specific NPV) [3]; NPV replicates in the nucleus of the infected host cell and causes a disease of nuclear polyhedrosis. Epidemic outbreak of NPV may play a role in regulation of the host nature population [4]. Thereby, it is a potential agent for biological control with a number of eco-friendly benefits including high virulence and specificity against target insects, environmental safety and sustainable existence with target insects. Several baculoviruses showing promising results have been commercialized as biopesticides for the control of insect pests around the world [5]. For biotechnological applications, baculoviruses have been constructed as a eukaryotic protein expression vectors (baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS)) over the last 30 years and used to gene therapy trials. So far, many recombinant proteins have been expressed in insect cells by BEVS and contribute to human life [6].

To date, baculoviruses are known to infect more than 660 insect species; most of them are belonging to the order of Lepidoptera, Diptera and Hymenoptera [7, 8]. Baculoviruses exhibit genetic variations among species and its isolates [9]. Although a large number of baculoviruses in the nature, only a few have been well studied. To the best of our knowledge, a total of 78 fully sequenced genomes have been deposited in GenBank [10] and also several baculoviruses of whole genomes may soon be sequenced and deposited ( Table 1 ). However, these published viral genomes represent only a small fraction and the genetic relationship among nucleopolyhedroviruses (NPVs) in the natural environment remains a puzzle.

GenusVirusVirus AbbreviationGenBank accessionGenome size (bp)ACGTGC contentORFsSequencingAssemblerReference
Alphabaculovirus(Group I)Anticarsia gemmatalisMNPVAgMNPV-2DNC_008520132,23936,62329,33829,51336,76544.5%158SangerPHRED/ALIGNER[11]
AgMNPV-26KR815455131,67836,41129,28829,40536,57444.6%157Roche 454 GS FLXGeneious[12]
AgMNPV-27KR815456131,17236,27329,17629,33136,39244.6%157
AgMNPV-28KR815457130,74536,18529,01829,24236,30044.6%157
AgMNPV-29KR815458130,50636,07228,98929,21636,22944.6%157
AgMNPV-30KR815459130,74136,19529,01129,17336,36244.5%156
AgMNPV-31KR815460132,12636,54329,36329,56436,65644.6%158
AgMNPV-32KR815461131,49436,34129,23429,38436,53544.6%157
AgMNPV-33KR815462131,05936,32229,11429,24436,37944.5%157
AgMNPV-34KR815463131,54336,43529,23329,38336,49244.6%158
AgMNPV-35KR815464132,17636,55229,38429,55836,68244.6%159
AgMNPV-36KR815465131,21636,29329,12729,27036,52644.5%156
AgMNPV-37KR815466131,85536,53129,25529,40036,66944.5%156
AgMNPV-38KR815467130,74036,19429,01229,17236,36244.5%156
AgMNPV-39KR815468130,69836,21929,02629,18436,26944.5%157
AgMNPV-40KR815469132,18036,54229,40929,58336,64644.6%158
AgMNPV-42KR815470130,94936,27429,09829,27536,30244.6%157
AgMNPV-43KR815471132,07736,53929,36929,52836,64144.6%159
Antheraea pernyiNPVAnpeNPVNC_008035126,62929,51334,04133,66429,40653.5%147SangerContigExpress9.1.0 + SeqMan5.0/DNASTAR[13]
Autographa californicaMNPVAcMNPVNC_001623133,89439,19527,15127,34740,20140.7%156SangerGCG package[14]
Autographa californicaMNPV-WP10AcMNPV-WP10KM609482133,92639,20527,15727,34640,19940.7%151Illumina HiSeq 2000Newbler[15]
Bombyx mandarinaNPVBomaNPVNC_012672126,77037,35825,39825,60138,41340.2%141Solexa GAGENETYX-win Software + DNASTAR[16]
Bombyx moriNPVBmNPVNC_001962128,41337,74725,82826,05638,78240.4%143SangerDNASIS/PROSIS[17]
Catopsilia pomonaNPVCapoNPVKU565883128,05838,93825,34825,44438,32839.7%131Roche 454 GS FLX+GS de novoassembler[10]
Choristoneura fumiferanaDEF MNPVCfDEFMNPVNC_005137131,16035,47430,11029,99335,58045.8%149SangerMacVector + Lasergene/DNASTAR[18]
Choristoneura fumiferanaMNPVCfMNPVNC_004778129,59332,2243265632,26132,45250.1%146SangerGene Runner[19]
Choristoneura murinanaNPVChmuNPVNC_023177124,68831,40830,98631,37030,92450.0%147Roche 454CLC Genomics Workbench[20]
Choristoneura occidentalisNPVChocNPVNC_021925128,44632,10831,90532,48131,95250.1%148Roche 454 GS FLXSeqMan Pro Lasergene/DNASTAR[21]
Choristoneura rosaceanaNPVChroNPVNC_021924129,05233,30931,26131,42533,05748.6%149
Condylorrhiza vestigialisMNPVCoveMNPVNC_026430125,76735,90426,93727,03835,88642.9%138Roche 454Geneious + MIRA[22]
Dasychira pudibundaNPVDapuNPVKP747440136,76131,02237,00837,45431,27754.4%161Illumina MiSeqGeneious[23]
Ectropis obliquaNPVEcobNPVNC_008586131,20440,68324,67624,70841,13737.6%126SangerGenetyx-win[24]
Hyphantria cuneaNPVHycuNPVNC_007767132,95936,03130,03930,46536,42445.5%148RISA-384DNASIS[25]
Lonomia obliquaMNPVLoobMNPVKP763670120,02338,99520,93221,96638,10435.7%134Roche 454 GS FLXGeneious[26]
Maruca vitrataMNPVMaviMNPVNC_008725111,95334,04121,66921,56334,68038.6%126SangerPHRED/PHRAP[27]
Orgyia pseudotsugataMNPVOpMNPVNC_001875131,99529,46336,47736,29529,75855.1%152SangerGCG package[28]
Philosamia cynthia riciniNPVPhcyNPVJX404026125,37628,96633,46133,80929,14053.7%138SangerN/A1[29]
Plutella xylostellaMNPVPlxyMNPVNC_008349134,41739,43727,30327,39640,28140.7%152SangerLasergene/DNASTAR[30]
Rachiplusia ouMNPVRoMNPVNC_004323131,52639,67425,63025,79340,42939.1%149SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[31]
Thysanoplusia orichalceaNPVThorNPVNC_019945132,97840,02226,38826,14240,42639.5%145Solexa GAEdena[32]
Alphabaculovirus(Group II)Adoxophyes honmaiNPVAdhoNPVNC_004690113,22036,50520,02520,32836,36235.6%125RISA-384PHRED/PHRAP[33]
Adoxophyes oranaNPVAdorNPVNC_011423111,72436,30619,40419,69436,32035.0%121SangerSeqMan II Lasergene/DNASTAR[34]
Agrotis ipsilonMNPVAgipMNPVNC_011345155,12240,20137,4907,86039,57148.6%163SangerLasergene/DNASTAR[35]
Agrotis segetumNPVAgseNPVNC_007921147,54440,23733,20034,24739,86045.7%153SangerGap4[36]
Agrotis segetumNPV BAgseNPV-BNC_025960148,98140,49033,6984,37140,42245.7%150Roche 454DNASTAR[37]
Apocheima cinerariumNPVApciNPVNC_018504123,87641,22320,86520,44941,33233.4%117SangerSeqMan Pro Lasergene/DNASTARunpublished
Buzura suppressariaNPVBusuNPVNC_023442120,42037,56822,15222,14238,55836.8%127Roche 454 GS FLXGS de novo assembler[38]
Chrysodeixis chalcitesNPVChchNPVNC_007151149,62245,15129,30429,06046,10739.0%151SangerGap4[39]
Chrysodeixis chalcitesSNPVChchSNPV-TF1-AJX535500149,68445,09029,32429,13346,13739.1%150Roche 454Newbler[40]
ChchSNPV-TF1-CJX560539150,07945,14629,38429,09646,44739.0%150
ChchSNPV-TF1-BJX560540149,08044,98929,15228,98745,95239.0%150
ChchSNPV-TF1-GJX560541149,03945,07529,13628,86945,95838.9%151
ChchSNPV-TF1-HJX560542149,62445,16229,28529,03446,14339.0%150
Clanis bilineataNPVClbiNPVNC_008293135,45441,55725,56025,55842,77937.7%129SangerN/A[41]
Epiphyas postvittanaNPVEppoNPVNC_003083118,58435,22124,28723,95635,12040.7%136SangerDNASTAR[42]
Euproctis pseudoconspersaNPVEupsNPVNC_012639141,29141,73628,45528,54942,55140.3%139SangerWisconsin package + GENETYX-win[43]
Helicoverpa armigeraSNPV AC53HaSNPV-AC53NC_024688130,44239,12125,38925,60640,32639.1%138Ion Torrent PGMCLC Genomics Workbench[44]
Helicoverpa armigeraMNPVHearMNPVNC_011615154,19646,37130,73131,06046,03140.1%162SangerSeqMan 5.0/DNASTAR[45]
Helicoverpa armigeraNPVHearNPVNC_003094130,75939,34525,34025,55240,52238.9%137SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[46,47]
Helicoverpa armigeraNPV G4HearNPV-G4NC_002654131,40539,52925,53025,73840,60839.0%135SangerPHRED/PHRAP[48]
Helicoverpa armigeraNPV NNg1HearNPV-NNg1NC_011354132,42539,75425,79126,05440,82639.2%143RISA-384DNASIS[49]
Helicoverpa zeaSNPVHzSNPVNC_003349130,86939,27325,47125,67540,45039.1%139SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[50]
Hemileucasp. NPVHespNPVNC_021923140,63342,82726,97726,59544,23438.1%137SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[51]
Lambdina fiscellariaNPVLafiNPVNC_026922157,97745,36334,61634,35043,64843.7%137Roche 454CLC Genomics Workbench[52]
Leucania separataNPVLeseNPVNC_008348168,04142,54640,68340,92743,88548.6%169MegaBACE1000DNASTAR[53]
Lymantria disparMNPVLdMNPVNC_001973161,04634,22946,22646,33134,26057.5%164SangerGCG package[54]
Lymantria disparMNPV-27LdMNPV-27KP027546164,15835,02047,13347,11834,88757.4%162Illumina MiSeqCLC Genomics Workbench[55]
Lymantria disparMNPV-BNPLdMNPV-BNPKU377538157,27038,78839,57939,56739,33650.3%154Illumina MiSeqGeneious[56]
Lymantria disparMNPV-2161LdMNPV-2161KF695050163,13834,85546,64846,81234,82357.3%174Roche 454 GS JuniorSeqMan NGEN Lasergene/DNASTAR[9]
Lymantria disparMNPV-3029LdMNPV-3029KM386655161,71234,32146,43446,45734,50057.4%163Roche 454Lasergene/DNASTAR[57]
Lymantria disparMNPV-45LdMNPV-45KU862282161,00634,23446,19246,31434,26457.5%155IlluminaCLC Genomics Workbench[58]
Lymantria disparMNPV-3054LdMNPV-3054KT626570164,47835,15147,11947,14035,06857.3%174Roche 454 GS JuniorLaserGene/DNASTAR[59]
Lymantria disparMNPV-3041LdMNPV-3041KT626571162,65834,71546,47846,64734,81857.3%178
Lymantria disparMNPV-Ab-a624LdMNPV-Ab-a624KT626572161,32134,28246,30246,40534,33257.5%176
Lymantria xylinaMNPVLyxyMNPVNC_013953156,34436,20741,67441,93336,53053.5%157SangerPHRED/PHRAP[60]
Mamestra brassicaeMNPVMabrMNPVNC_023681152,71046,04230,31130,60445,75339.9%159Roche 454GS de novo assembler[61]
Mamestra configurataNPV-AMacoNPV-ANC_003529155,06045,33632,16032,46345,10141.7%169SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[62]
Mamestra configurataNPV-BMacoNPV-BNC_004117158,48247,83131,50431,95347,19440.0%168SangerSequencher 4.0[63]
Orgyia leucostigmaNPVOrleNPVNC_010276156,17946,42031,27031,02047,46939.9%135SangerAgencourt BioScience[64]
PeridromaNPVPespNPVNC_024625151,10935,06040,59339,82235,63353.2%139Roche 454CLC Genomics Workbench[65]
Perigonia luscasingle NPVPeluNPVNC_027923132,83139,96826,16726,36240,25639.6%145Roche 454Geneiousunpublished
Pseudoplusia includensSNPVPsinNPVNC_026268139,13241,84327,45227,21042,60939.3%141Roche 454 GS FLXMIRA[66]
Spodoptera exiguaMNPVSeMNPVNC_002169135,61138,44529,48629,92937,75143.8%139SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[67]
Spodoptera frugiperdaMNPV virusSfMNPVNC_009011131,33139,41726,34626,50739,06140.2%143SangerLasergene/DNASTAR[68]
Spodoptera lituraMNPVSpliMNPV-AN1956JX454574137,99837,46930,80330,84638,88044.7%132Roche 454 GS JuniorLaserGene/DNASTAR[69]
Spodoptera lituraNPVSpltNPVNC_003102139,34239,18029,6912990440,56742.8%141MegaBACE1000DNASIS + DNASTAR[70]
Spodoptera lituraNPV IISpltNPV-IINC_011616148,63440,99833,21033,67140,75545.0%147n/aN/Aunpublished
Sucra jujubaNPVSujuNPVKJ676450135,95241,39526,15726,39942,00138.7%131Roche 454GS de novo assembler[71]
Trichoplusia niSNPVTnSNPVNC_007383134,39440,6016,25626,11741,38439.0%145SangerPHRED/PHRAP[72]
BetabaculovirusAdoxophyes orana granulovirusAdorGVNC_00503899,65733,07717,09817,27532,20734.5%119SangerSeqMan II Lasergene/DNASTAR[73]
Agrotis segetum granulovirusAgseGVNC_005839131,68041,89225,17923,95340,65637.3%132n/an/aunpublished
Clostera anastomosisGV isolate HenanClasGV-ANC_022646101,81827,11523,83223,73927,13246.7%122Illumina GASOAPdenovo[74]
Clostera anastomosisgranulovirus-BClasGV-BKR091910107,43933,64819,90420,67333,21437.8%123Roche 454 GS FLXNewbler[75]
Cnaphalocrocis medinalisGVCnmeGVNC_029304111,24636,02119,75619,38536,08435.2%118Roche 454 GS FLXGS de novo assembler[76]
Cnaphalocrocis medinalisgranulovirusCnmeGVKP658210112,06036,29519,90419,52936,33235.2%133PacBio RS IIHGAP2.2.0[77]
Choristoneura occidentalisGVChocGVNC_008168104,71036,13217,26816,93834,37232.7%116SangerPHRED/PHRAP[78]
Clostera anachoretagranulovirusClanGVNC_015398101,48728,18822,55422,52328,22244.4%123Illumina GASOAPdenovo[79]
Cydia pomonellagranulovirusCpGVNC_002816123,50034,02927,72228,18333,56645.3%143SangerWisconsin package + Lasergene/DNASTAR[80]
Cryptophlebia leucotretagranulovirusCrleGVNC_005068110,90738,09518,09017,89036,83232.4%128SangerLasergene/DNASTAR[81]
Diatraea saccharalisgranulovirusDisaGVNC_02849198,39232,13317,03217,33731,88034.9%125Roche 454Geneious[82]
Epinotia aporemagranulovirusEpapGVNC_018875119,08235,52424,98424,40334,17141.5%132Roche 454 GS FLXNewbler[83]
Erinnyis ellogranulovirusErelGVNC_025257102,75931,70719,44020,32431,28838.7%130Roche 454 GS FLXGeneious[84]
Helicoverpa armigeragranulovirusHearGVNC_010240169,79450,33634,51834,81050,13040.8%179SangerSeqMan Lasergene/DNASTAR[85]
Plodia interpunctellagranulovirusPiGVKX1513952112,536n/an/an/an/an/a123Roche 454 GS JuniorSeqMan NGEN Lasergene/DNASTAR[86]
Phthorimaea operculellagranulovirusPhopGVNC_004062119,21738,30621,12721,43138,35335.7%130SangerN/A[87]
Plutella xylostellagranulovirusPlxyGVNC_002593100,99930,25220,54620,54629,65540.7%120DSQ-1000 LGENETYX-win[88]
Pieris rapaegranulovirusPrGVNC_013797108,59236,61917,86318,16835,94233.2%120SangerNN/A[89]
Pseudaletia unipunctagranulovirusPsunGVNC_013772176,67753,57234,99335,31152,79939.8%183n/aN/Aunpublished
Spodoptera frugiperdaGV isolateVG008SpfrGVNC_026511140,91338,13132,85232,28837,64246.2%146Roche 454 GS FLXNewbler[90]
Spodoptera lituragranulovirusSpliGVNC_009503124,12138,36023,81324,37737,57138.8%136SangerN/A[91]
Xestia c-nigrumgranulovirusXcGVNC_002331178,73353,16636,07936,62752,86140.7%181SangerDNASIS/PROSIS[92]
GammabaculovirusNeodiprion abietisNPVNeabNPVNC_00825284,26428,29213,94814,17727,84733.4%93SangerPHRED/PHRAP[93]
Neodiprion leconteiNPVNeleNPVNC_00590681,75527,74113,59613,64026,61633.4%89SangerSeqMan Lasergene/DNASTAR[94]
Neodiprion sertiferNPVNeseNPVNC_00590586,46229,15814,44414,74528,11533.8%90SangerSequencher 4.1[95]
DeltabaculovirusCulex nigripalpusNPVCuniNPVNC_003084108,25226,62327,22827,83926,56250.9%109SangerCAP3[96]

Table 1.

List of sequenced baculoviruses genomes

N/A: no information is available either in the paper or GenBank file.

The GenBank file with accession number KX1513952 is not available in GenBank website.

Previously, Sanger sequencing was employed to sequence the viral genomic sequences cloned in plasmids. With the advances of sequencing technologies, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming an important technology for large-scale viral genomic sequencing. The high cost of NGS and requirement of intensive bioinformatic analysis remain a hurdle for this application. In a word, NGS is an available tool to facilitate on the study of the genetic relationship of baculoviruses.

Advertisement

2. Identification of NPVs

Biochemical and biotechnology-based methods are the most common approaches employed to identify the NPVs. In most cases, more than one method is employed to compensate the pros and cons for each other. For example, restriction enzyme profiling of viral genomic DNA was used to reveal genetic variations among different isolates [9799] and to distinguish one species from another between closely related viruses such as Rachiplusia ou(RoMNPV), AcMNPV, Trichoplusia ni(TnMNPV), Galleria mellonella(GmMNPV) [100, 101] and the MNPVs of Spodoptera frugiperda[102].

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods were then established. These methods have been shown not only to be more sensitive and faster but also more reliable than restriction enzyme analysis for classifying baculoviral species [4, 103105]. Multiple genetic markers (e.g., egt, ac17, lef-2, polh, p35, pif-2) could be used for the identification of baculoviruses [7, 106109]. The late expression factor 8(lef-8), late expression factor 9(lef-9) and polyhedrin(polh) were found in a highly conserved genes among baculoviruses [110], therefore, used as targets for degenerating PCR to characterize lepidopteran NPVs through the amplification of the conserved regions from a variety range of baculoviruses [111113]. The Kimura 2-parameter (K-2-P) distances between the aligned polh/gran, lef-8and lef-9nucleotide sequences were described by Jehle et al. for baculoviruses identification and species classification [3]. The K-2-P nucleotide substitution model from aligned nucleotide sequences were determined by using the pairwise distance calculation of MEGA version 3.0 applying the Kimura 2-parameter model [114].

Due to the higher cost of NGS for viral genome sequencing, it is frequently required to combine various approaches to cut down the cost but still ensure precision, e.g., PCR-based K-2-P analysis and NGS approach for identifying the potential new NPV species. Two NPVs were isolated from casuarina moth (Lymantria xylina) and golden birdwing larvae (Troides aeacus) collected from the fields, respectively, will be as representative cases for explanation in the following sections. We will focus on the characterization of these two potential new NPVs first and then the use of the sequences of three genes, lef-8, lef-9and polyhedrinof two NPV candidates was used to examine their taxonomic position by K-2-P analysis. Finally, we will focus on the genome sequencing technology and bioinformatic analysis on NPVs.

Advertisement

3. The identification of ambiguous NPVs

In this section, the discussion of molecular identification of NPV species based on K-2-P distance [3] is presented. Two new NPVs were used as examples in this study to reveal different issues regarding the classification of NPVs.

3.1. LdMNPV-like virus

The K-2-P distances, based on the sequences of three genes, between different viruses could mostly evaluate the ambiguous relationship among the NPVs. It was defined that distances less than 0.015 indicates that the two isolates are the same baculovirus species. On the other hand, the difference between two viruses is more than 0.05 should be considered as different virus species. For the distances between 0.015 and 0.05, complementary information is needed to determine whether these two viruses are of the same or different species [3, 9, 115].

A new multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus strain was isolated from casuarina moth, L. xylinaSwinhoe, (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Taiwan. Since the polyhedrinsequence of this virus had high identity to L. disparMNPV (98%), it was named LdMNPV-like virus [116]. To precisely clarify the relationship of three Lymantriidae-derived NPVs (LdMNPV-like virus, LdMNPV and LyxyMNPV [60]), the K-2-P of polh, lef-8and -9was performed. The distances between LdMNPV-like virus and LyxyMNPV exceeded 0.05 for each gene, polh, lef-8, or lef-9and also for concatenated polh/lef-8/lef-9( Figure 1 ). For LdMNPV-like virus and LdMNPV, not only the single lef-8and lef-9sequences but also concatenated polh/lef-8/lef-9, the distances were generally lower than 0.015, but only the polhsequence distance (0.016) exceeded slightly 0.015 ( Figure 1 ). These results strongly suggested that LdMNPV-like virus is an isolate of LdMNPV. However, as indicated by our previous report, the genome of LdMNPV-like virus is approximately 139 Kb, due to large deletions compared to that of LdMNPV [116]. To further investigate the LdMNPV-like virus, a HindIII-PstI fragment (7,054 nucleotides) was cloned, sequenced and compared to the corresponding region of LdMNPV. Nine putative ORFs (including seven with full lengths and two with partial lengths) and two homologous regions (hrs) were identified in this fragment ( Figure 2 ) and those genes, in order from the 5′ to 3′ end, encoded part of rr1, ctl-1, Ange-bro-c, LdOrf151, LdOrf-152-like peptides, Ld-bro-n, two Ld-bro-oand part of LdOrf155-like peptides ( Table 2 ). The physical map of HindIII-PstI fragment of LdMNPV-like virus showed that the gene organization was highly conserved compared to the corresponding region of LdMNPV, although several restriction enzyme recognition sites were different. Additionally, the ld-bro-ogene in the LdMNPV-like virus was split into two ORF7 and ORF8, due to a point deletion in the downstream (+669) of ORF7 and this deletion causes a frameshift that results in the formation of a stop codon (TGA) after 73 bp. Afterward, ORF8 was overlapped with the last four base pairs (ATGA) in ORF7. The nucleotide identities of these genes were 96–100% homologous to those of LdMNPV, except ORF3 which was 68% homologous to Ange-bro-cand ORF7 and ORF8 showing low identities to Ld-bro-o(73% and 26%, respectively). The deduced amino acid sequences of these genes were similar to those of LdMNPV, with identities of 81–100%, except the similarity of ORF3 to Ange-bro-cwas 70% and ORF7 and ORF8 also showed low similarity to Ld-bro-o(67% and 26%, respectively). These results imply that the LdMNPV-like and LdMNPV viruses are closely related but not totally identical.

No*LdMNPV-like virusLdMNPV§
PositionLengthNameIdentity (%)
ntaantaa
11 → 654654217rr19681
21063 → 122416253Ctl-1100100
31397 → 24731077358Ange-bro-c6870
42590 → 3596504168LdOrf-1519998
53200 → 3952753251LdOrf-1529999
64019 → 50261005335Ld-bro-n9391
75645 → 6391744248Ld-bro-o7367
86388 → 665426488Ld-bro-o2626
96758 → 705429799LdOrf-155100100

Table 2.

Comparison of the nucleotide (nt) and deduced amino acid (aa) sequences for putative ORFs in LdMNPV-like virus genomic fragment and their corresponding LdMNPV homologues.

The directions of the transcripts are indicated by arrows.

§Reference from the genome of LdMNPV (Kuzio et al. [63])

*The nine potentially expressed ORFs are numbered in the order in which they occur in the LdMNPV-like virus genomic fragment from the 5′ to 3′ end. Two ORFs extend past this cloning site are printed in bold; only the N-terminus which contains 217 amino acids (654 nucleotides) and 99 amino acids (297 nucleotides) was examined.

Figure 1.

Pairwise K-2-P distances of the nucleotide sequences ofpolh,lef-8andlef-9and concatenatedpolh/lef-8/lef-9fragments of LdMNPV-like virus, LyxyMNPV and LdMNPV. Modified data reproduced with permission of the Elsevier [116].

Figure 2.

Comparison of relative restriction sites and gene locations in the LdMNPV-like virusHindIII-PstI fragment with those of the corresponding LdMNPV fragment. Arrows denote ORFs and their direction of transcription. Gray boxes represent the homologous repeat regions (hrs). ORF homologues in the corresponding regions are drawn with the same patterns. Numbers below the arrows indicate the nine putative ORFs listed inTable 2.

Based on these results, LdMNPV-like virus has a genomic size significantly smaller than that of LdMNPV and LyxyMNPV and appears to be an NPV isolate distinct from LdMNPV or LyxyMNPV. Moreover, a gene, ange-bro-cof LdMNPV-like virus, was truncated into two ORF7 and ORF8 and the sequence showed relatively low identity to that of LdMNPV ( Table 2 ). Taken together, these results indicate that LdMNPV-like virus is a distinct LdMNPV strain with several novel features. Otherwise, LdMNPV-like virus and LdMNPV have distinct geographical locations (from subtropical and cold temperate zones, respectively) and are distinct in genotypic and phenotypic characteristics and it also showed broad genetic variation among LdMNPV isolates [9].

3.2. An NPV isolate from T. aeacuslarvae

A nucleopolyhedrosis disease of the rearing of the golden birdwing butterfly (T. aeacus) larvae was found and the polyhedral inclusion bodies (PIBs) were observed under light microscopy ( Figure 3 ). PCR was performed to amply the polhgene by 35/36 primer set ( Figure 3 ) to further confirm NPV infection [117, 118]. Therefore, this NPV was named provisionally TraeNPV. The three genes, polh, lef-8and lef-9of TraeNPV, were cloned and sequenced and then the K-2-P distances between the aligned single and concatenated polh, lef-8and lef-9nucleotide sequences were analyzed. The results indicated that TraeNPV belonged to the group I baculoviruses and closely related to BmNPV group. Figure 4 showed that most of the distances between TraeNPV and other NPVs were between 0.015 and 0.050, whereas the distances for polhbetween TraeNPV, PlxyNPV, RoNPV and AcMNPV group exceeded 0.05. It should be noted that for all the concatenated polh/lef-8/lef-9sequences, the distances were apparently much more than 0.015 and even to 0.05. These results left an ambiguous situation of this NPV isolate; so far, we could conclude that TraeNPV neither belongs to BmNPV group nor AcMNPV group. More complementary information is needed to determine the viral species of TraeNPV.

Figure 3.

Identification of unknown NPV. (A) Light microscopy observation of liquefaction from the cadavers ofT.aeacuslarvae, scale bar = 20 μm. Black arrows indicated the polyhedral inclusion bodies (PIBs). (B) PCR detection of partialpolyhedringene, M = 100 bp marker, (+) = positive control and (−) = negative control.

Figure 4.

Pairwise Kimura-2-parameter distances of the nucleotide sequences oflef-8,lef-9andpolhand concatenatedpolh/lef-8/lef-9fragments of TraeNPV and 12 viruses.

In summary, K-2-P distances were employed to further clarify the relationship between closely related NPVs. We discussed two different cases analyzed by K-2-P. From the sequence data of LdMNPV-like virus, results strongly supported that LdMNPV-like virus is an isolate of LdMNPV. Since the RFLP profiles of the LdMNPV-like virus showed the genome of this isolate was deleted tremendously, this deletion also showed coordinately in our partial sequences of genomic DNA fragments and the results of K-2-P. The K-2-P distances between TraeNPV and BmNPV or AcMNPV were among 0.05 and 0.015. Anyway, we cannot define that this virus is a new species with the evidences of RFLP, part gene sequences and K-2-P results; therefore, it is necessary to get more data, especially the whole genome sequence of TraeNPV.

Advertisement

4. The importance of whole genome sequencing on baculoviruses

The rapidly growing mass of genomic data shifts the taxonomic approaches from traditional to genomically based issues. The K-2-P distance supported LyxyMNPV as a different viral species (K-2-P values = 0.067–0.088), even though they were still a closely relative species phylogenetically. But, “how different did LyxyMNPV and LdMNPV?” become another question. Thus, the whole genome sequence could provide deep information of this virus. For example, as the genomic data revealed, the most part of the ORF (151 ORFs) between LyxyMNPV and LdMNPV was quite similar while still have several different ORF exhibits or absent in LyxyMNPV, e.g., two ORFs were homologous to other baculoviruses and four unique ORFs were identified in the LyxyMNPV genome and LdMNPV contains 23 ORFs that are absent in LyxyMNPV [60]. Besides, there is a huge genomic inversion in LyxyMNPV compared to LdMNPV [60]. Another example is Maruca vitrataNPV (MaviNPV). All of the K-2-P distance-supported MaviNPV is quite different from other NPVs (K-2-P values = 0.092–0.237) ( Figure 6 ). While the gene content and gene order of MaviNPV were highly similar to that of AcMNPV and BmNPV, through the genomic sequencing, it showed the 100% collinear to AcMNPV [27] and MaviNPV shared 125 ORFs with AcMNPV and 123 with BmNPV. The detailed information could only be captured after whole genome sequencing rather than partial gene sequences or other phylogenetic analyses. Sometimes, usage of K-2-P data may raise other problems, which we mentioned above; it seems LdMNPV-like virus and LdMNPV were the same viral species. While through the restriction enzyme profile and partial genomic data, we could identify that there are some deletion fragments and different gene contents within the LdMNPV-like virus genome. For the TraeNPV, most of the K-2-P values were ranged from 0.015 to 0.05; thus, whole genome sequencing could be one of the best ways to figure out this ambiguous state. The more detailed information we can get, the more deep aspect we can evaluate, e.g., the taxonomic problems and further evolutionary studies.

Figure 5.

Pairwise Kimura-2-parameter distances of the nucleotide sequences of lef-8, lef-9 and polh and concatenated polh/lef-8/lef-9 fragments of MaviNPV and 12 viruses.

Figure 6.

Common bioinformatic workflow for genome assembly and analysis.

Advertisement

5. Genomic sequences of NPVs

5.1. Genome sequencing technology

Previous NPV genome sequencing employed three types of approaches: plasmid clone (or template) enrichment, NGS, or a combination of the two methods. Initially, the most common approach used restriction enzymes to fragmentize the viral genome into smaller pieces. Plasmid-based clone amplification was then employed to enrich templates for sequencing. Later, conventional Sanger sequencing and/or next-generation sequencing was employed for genome assembly. In addition, purely high-throughput sequencing-based approach from isolated viral genome was also employed [9, 15]. To date, next-generation sequencing technology plays an increasingly important role on viral genome assembly. Previous researches showed that Illumina HiSeq has superior performance in yield than 454 FLX [119121]. Baculoviruses usually contain a novel homologous region (hr) feature, which comprises a palindrome that is usually flanked by short direct repeats located elsewhere in the genome [122]. Thereby, the shorter single-read length of Illumina sequencers might lead the difficulty during genome assembly. Further application of paired-end read sequencing method could certainly provide alternative for sequencing overlap the hrs in baculoviral genomes.

5.2. Bioinformatic analysis

Construction of a complete genome map is essential for future genomic investigations. Besides sequencing, bioinformatic approaches are also required for determining the order and content of the nucleotide sequence information for the viral genome of interest. In general, bioinformatic approaches can be separated into three consecutive steps: genome assembly, genome annotation and phylogenetic relationship inference ( Figure 5 ).

5.2.1. Genome assembly

Sequence reads are the building blocks for genome sequencing and assembly. Thus, quality control of sequence reads plays a key role in determining the fidelity of a genome assembly. The procedure of read quality checking includes, but not limited to, the removal of unrelated sequences such as control sequences, adaptors, vectors, potential contaminants, etc., trimming of low-quality bases and selection of high-quality reads. The control sequences (e.g., PhiX control reads in Illumina sequencers, control DNA beads in Roche 454 sequencer) are routinely used by sequencer manufacturers to evaluate the quality of each sequencing run. There are software applications made available to be utilized to identify and remove control sequences and low-quality bases. For NGS, sequencing adapters could be identified in reads if the fragment size is shorter than read length. Cutadapt [123] was implemented to trim the adapter sequences. Ambiguous bases or bases with lower-quality values can be removed by PRINSEQ [124] from either 5′ or 3′ end. NGS QC Toolkit [125] has programmed module to select high-quality reads. If paired-end technology was applied, paired-end reads could be joined by PANDAseq [126], PEAR [127], FLASH [128] and COPE [129], if a fragment size is shorter than read length.

Genome can be assembled from quality paired-end or single-end reads with de novo or reference-guided approaches. There are two standard methods known as the de Bruijn graph (DBG) approach and the overlap/layout/consensus (OLC) approach for de novo genome assembly. The idea of de Bruijn graph is to decompose a read into kmer-sized fragments with sliding window screening. Each kmer-sized fragment will be used to construct graph for longer path (e.g., contigs). Then, long-range paired reads can be utilized to build scaffolds from contigs with given insert size and read orientation. SOAPdenovo [130] is one of the DBG assembler that has an extreme speed by utilizing threads parallelization [131]. The OLC assembler starts by identifying all pairs of reads with higher overlap region to construct an overlap graph. The contig candidates are identified by pruning nodes to simplify the overlap graph. The final contigs are then output based on consensus regions. Additionally, Newbler [132] is a widely used OLC assembler distributed by 454 Life Sciences.

Reference-guided genome assembly is another solution for genome assembly if the genome of a closely related species is already available. For viral genome assembly, closely related species can be identified by mapping quality reads against sequenced viral genomes deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/viruses/) and select top-ranked species as the reference genome(s) to facilitate the assembly of the genome of interest. Reference-guided assembler is also called mapping assembler that the complete genome is generated by mapping quality reads with variant (single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), insertion and deletion) identification. For example, MIRA (a computer program) [133] can create a reference-based assembly by detecting the difference between references.

During the assembly process, gap filling (or gap elimination) is conducted to resolve the undetermined bases either by bioinformatics or other approaches such as PCR and additional sequencing. Bioinformatic approaches normally use paired-end reads to eliminate gaps. PCR coupled with Sanger sequencing is a common approach to finalize the undetermined regions [134]. In addition, Sanger sequencing can also be used for genome validation and homologous region (hr) checking.

5.2.2. Genome annotation

Annotation determines the locations of protein-coding and noncoding genes as well as the functional elements in the genome. Glimmer [135], N-SCAN [136], NCBI ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/), GeneMark [137] and VIGOR [138] are gene prediction tools for identifying protein-codivng genes in the genome. Repetitive sequence regions were detected by RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org/). Viral microRNA candidate hairpins can be predicted by Vir-Mir [139]. The circular map of the viral genome was generated by CGView [140].

5.2.3. Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic relationship inference reveals the evolutionary distances of various, especially closely related, species. MEGA [141] was the most widely used software suite that provides the sophisticated and integrated user interface for studying DNA and protein sequence data from species and populations. Alternatively, phylogenetic relationships among species based on the complete viral genomes or functional regions could also be estimated with Clustal Omega [142]. Clustal Omega was employed for multiple sequence alignment on the complete genomes and DNA fragments, respectively. ClustalW [143] was employed to do file format conversion of multiple sequence alignment. Ambiguously aligned positions were removed by using Gblocks version 0.91b [144, 145] under default settings. Phylogenetic tree inference could be constructed by hierarchical Bayesian method (e.g., MrBayes [146]) or maximum likelihood method (e.g., RAxML [147]) to estimate phylogeny [148]. Tree was depicted with FigTree version 1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). The divergence times of different species were estimated using BEAST version 1.8 or version 2.3.2 [149]. In addition, pairwise sequence identity was determined by BLASTN (NCBI BLAST Package) [150] to analyze sequence-level variation. Also, whole genome pairwise alignment can be done by LAGAN [151]. CGView comparison tool (CCT) [152] was used to represent the block similarity among different species. Mauve [153], one of the multiple genome alignment tools, can help us to visualize the consensus sequence blocks among distant-related species.

Up to 78 baculoviruses have been reported; most of baculoviruses have a narrow host range, only infect their homogenous hosts, such as BmNPV, SpltNPV, SpeiNPV, MaviNPV and so on; LyxyNPV can infect LD and LY cell lines, while AcMNPV has a wide host range; at least 40 hosts in vitro have be found. Therefore, a new baculovirus isolate needs to define its taxonomic position and to analyze its phylogenetic relationship with a known baculovirus member.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

With the accomplishment of the sequencing technologies, more NPV genomes were sequenced. So far, more than 78 baculoviruses have been fully sequenced and based on the sequencing methods, we can divide into two parts, one is sequencing by Sanger method and another is sequencing by NGS method ( Table 1 ). Among these sequenced genomes, 35 genomes were sequenced by Sanger method and 43 genomes were sequenced by NGS methods. It could be expected that whole genome sequencing by NGS method would get much common in this field; however, the upcoming metagenomic era is imperative that one remains aware of and careful about the shortcomings of the information presented about the organisms that are being sequenced and that these databases can oversee neither the correctness of the organismal identifications nor of the sequences entered into the databases.

The natural environment harbors a large number of baculoviruses. However, only a few of them have been sequenced and studied. A lot more information related to the genetic relationship of NPVs in the natural environment is needed to facilitate our understanding of these creatures. Though NGS technology has become an important technology for viral genomic sequencing, high cost of NGS for whole viral genome sequencing remains a barrier. To reduce the cost, it is necessary to evaluate whether the newly collected NPVs are suitable for whole genome sequencing or not. Alternatively, biochemical approaches and biological tools, such as PCR-based K-2-P analysis, can be good options to facilitate the process. As expected, all these applications are anticipated to help us reveal the genetic information of unknown species, so that more detailed insights of their genetic makeup and functional composition can be obtained to help us better understand the nature of these viruses. By using the powerful sequencing technique, the metagenomic progress (e.g., transcriptome analysis of insect host), new pathogen species in the natural environment would be easier to be found in the future. With the increase of new baculoviral genomic data, improvement of bioinformatic analysis methods and further validation of biological information would generate a group of genes, which connect to the viral host range and solve the contradiction situation in the baculoviral genomics.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant 105AS-13.2.3-BQ-B1 from the Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, the Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan and Grant 103-2313-B-197-002-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST).

References

  1. 1. Takatsuka, J.,Lymantria mathuranucleopolyhedrovirus: identification, occurrence and genetic diversity in Iwate Prefecture, Japan. J Invertebr Pathol, 2016.138: pp. 1-9.
  2. 2. Boucias, D. and Pendland, J.C., Principles of insect pathology. 1998, Boston: Kluwer Aca demic Publishers. 537p.
  3. 3. Jehle, J.A., et al., Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of baculoviruses from Lepidoptera. Virology, 2006.346(1): pp. 180-93.
  4. 4. Herniou, E.A., et al., The genome sequence and evolution of baculoviruses. Annu Rev Entomol, 2003.48: pp. 211-34.
  5. 5. Moscardi, F., Assessment of the application of baculoviruses for control of Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol, 1999.44: pp. 257-89.
  6. 6. Smith, G.E., Summers, M.D. and Fraser, M.J., Production of human beta interferon in insect cells infected with a baculovirus expression vector. Mol Cell Biol, 1983.3(12): pp. 2156-65.
  7. 7. Mehrvar, A., R.R.J., Veenakumari, K., Narabenchi, G.B., Molecular and biological characteristics of some geographic isolates of nucleopolyhedrovirus ofHelicoverpa armigera(Lep.: Noctuidae). J Entomol Soc Iran, 2008.28(1): pp. 39-60.
  8. 8. Murhammer, D.W., Useful tips, widely used techniques and quantifying cell metabolic behavior. Methods Mol Biol, 2007.388: pp. 3-22.
  9. 9. Harrison, R.L., Keena, M.A. and Rowley, D.L., Classification, genetic variation and pathogenicity ofLymantria disparnucleopolyhedrovirus isolates from Asia, Europe and North America. J Invertebr Pathol, 2014.116: pp. 27-35.
  10. 10. Wang, J., et al., Genome sequencing and analysis ofCatopsilia pomonanucleopolyhedrovirus: a distinct species in group I Alphabaculovirus. PLoS One, 2016.11(5): p. e0155134.
  11. 11. Oliveira, J.V., et al., Genome of the most widely used viral biopesticide:Anticarsia gemmatalismultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 2006.87(Pt 11): pp. 3233-50.
  12. 12. Brito, A.F., et al., The pangenome of theAnticarsia gemmatalismultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AgMNPV). Genome Biol Evol, 2016.8(1): pp. 94-108.
  13. 13. Nie, Z.M., et al., Complete sequence and organization ofAntheraea pernyinucleopolyhedrovirus, a dr-rich baculovirus. BMC Genomics, 2007.8: pp. 248.
  14. 14. Ayres, M.D., et al., The complete DNA sequence ofAutographa californicanuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology, 1994.202(2): pp. 586-605.
  15. 15. Chateigner, A., et al., Ultra deep sequencing of a baculovirus population reveals widespread genomic variations. Viruses, 2015.7(7): pp. 3625-46.
  16. 16. Xu, Y.P., et al., Comparative analysis of the genomes ofBombyx mandarinaandBombyx morinucleopolyhedroviruses. J Microbiol, 2010.48(1): pp. 102-10.
  17. 17. Gomi, S., Majima, K. and Maeda, S., Sequence analysis of the genome ofBombyx morinucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 1999.80(Pt 5): pp. 1323-37.
  18. 18. Lauzon, H.A., et al., Gene organization and sequencing of theChoristoneura fumiferanadefective nucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2005.86(Pt 4): pp. 945-61.
  19. 19. de Jong, J.G., et al., Analysis of theChoristoneura fumiferananucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2005.86(Pt 4): pp. 929-43.
  20. 20. Rohrmann, G.F., Erlandson, M.A. and Theilmann, D.A., Genome sequence of an alphabaculovirus isolated fromChoristoneura murinana. Genome Announc, 2014.2(1): e01135-13.
  21. 21. Thumbi, D.K., et al., Comparative genome sequence analysis ofChoristoneura occidentalisFreeman andC.rosaceanaHarris (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) alphabaculoviruses. PLoS One, 2013.8(7): p. e68968.
  22. 22. Castro, M.E., et al., Identification of a new nucleopolyhedrovirus from naturally-infectedCondylorrhiza vestigialis(Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae on poplar plantations in South Brazil. J Invertebr Pathol, 2009.102(2): pp. 149-54.
  23. 23. Krejmer, M., et al., The genome ofDasychira pudibundanucleopolyhedrovirus (DapuNPV) reveals novel genetic connection between baculoviruses infecting moths of the Lyman-triidae family. BMC Genomics, 2015.16: p. 759.
  24. 24. Ma, X.-C., et al., Genome sequence and organization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus that infects the tea looper caterpillar,Ectropis obliqua. Virology, 2007.360(1): pp. 235-46.
  25. 25. Ikeda, M., et al., Gene organization and complete sequence of theHyphantria cuneanucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2006.87(Pt 9): pp. 2549-62.
  26. 26. Aragao-Silva, C.W., et al., The complete genome of a baculovirus isolated from an insect of medical interest:Lonomia obliqua(Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Sci Rep, 2016.6: p. 23127.
  27. 27. Chen, Y.R., et al., Genomic and host range studies ofMaruca vitratanucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 2008.89(Pt 9): pp. 2315-30.
  28. 28. Ahrens, C.H., et al., The sequence of theOrgyia pseudotsugatamultinucleocapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus genome. Virology, 1997.229(2): pp. 381-99.
  29. 29. Qian, H., et al., Analysis of the genomic sequence ofPhilosamia cynthianucleopolyhedrin virus and comparison withAntheraea pernyinucleopolyhedrin virus. BMC Genomics, 2013.14: p. 115.
  30. 30. Harrison, R.L. and Lynn, D.E., Genomic sequence analysis of a nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated from the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella. Virus Genes, 2007.35(3): pp. 857-73.
  31. 31. Harrison, R.L. and Bonning, B.C., Comparative analysis of the genomes ofRachiplusia ouandAutographa californicamultiple nucleopolyhedroviruses. J Gen Virol, 2003.84(Pt 7): pp. 1827-42.
  32. 32. Wang, Y.S., et al., Genome ofThysanoplusia orichalceamultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus lacks the superoxide dismutase gene. J Virol, 2012.86(21): pp. 11948-9.
  33. 33. Nakai, M., et al., Genome sequence and organization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated from the smaller tea tortrix,Adoxophyes honmai. Virology, 2003.316(1): pp. 171-83.
  34. 34. Hilton, S. and Winstanley, D., Genomic sequence and biological characterization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated from the summer fruit tortrix,Adoxophyes orana. J Gen Virol, 2008.89(Pt 11): pp. 2898-908.
  35. 35. Harrison, R.L., Genomic sequence analysis of the Illinois strain of theAgrotis ipsilonmultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Genes, 2009.38(1): pp. 155-70.
  36. 36. Jakubowska, A.K., et al., Genome sequence of an enhancin gene-rich nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) fromAgrotis segetum: collinearity withSpodoptera exiguamultiple NPV. J Gen Virol, 2006.87(Pt 3): pp. 537-51.
  37. 37. Wennmann, J.T., Gueli Alletti, G. and Jehle, J.A., The genome sequence ofAgrotis segetumnucleopolyhedrovirus B (AgseNPV-B) reveals a new baculovirus species within theAgrotis baculoviruscomplex. Virus Genes, 2015.50(2): pp. 260-76.
  38. 38. Zhu, Z., et al., Genome sequence and analysis ofBuzura suppressarianucleopolyhedrovirus: a group II Alphabaculovirus. PLoS One, 2014.9(1): p. e86450.
  39. 39. van Oers, M.M., et al., Genome sequence ofChrysodeixis chalcitesnucleopolyhedrovirus, a baculovirus with two DNA photolyase genes. J Gen Virol, 2005.86(Pt 7): pp. 2069-80.
  40. 40. Bernal, A., et al., Complete genome sequences of fiveChrysodeixis chalcitesnucleopolyhedrovirus genotypes from a Canary Islands isolate. Genome Announc, 2013.1(5).
  41. 41. Zhu, S.Y., et al., Genomic sequence, organization and characteristics of a new nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated fromClanis bilineatalarva. BMC Genomics, 2009.10: p. 91.
  42. 42. Hyink, O., et al., Whole genome analysis of theEpiphyas postvittananucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 2002.83(Pt 4): pp. 957-71.
  43. 43. Tang, X.D., et al., Morphology and genome ofEuproctis pseudoconspersanucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Genes, 2009.38(3): pp. 495-506.
  44. 44. Noune, C. and Hauxwell, C., Complete genome sequences ofHelicoverpa armigerasingle nucleopolyhedrovirus strains AC53 and H25EA1 from Australia. Genome Announc, 2015.3(5):e01083-15..
  45. 45. Tang, P., et al., Genomic sequencing and analyses of HearMNPV--a new Multinucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated fromHelicoverpa armigera. Virol J, 2012.9: p. 168.
  46. 46. Zhang, C.X., Ma, X.C. and Guo, Z.J., Comparison of the complete genome sequence between C1 and G4 isolates of theHelicoverpa armigerasingle nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virology, 2005.333(1): pp. 190-9.
  47. 47. Zhang, C.X. and Wu, J.C., Genome structure and the p10 gene of theHelicoverpa armigeranucleopolyhedrovirus. Acta Biochim Biophys Sinica, 2001.33(2): pp. 179-84.
  48. 48. Chen, X., et al., The sequence of theHelicoverpa armigerasingle nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2001.82(Pt 1): pp. 241-57.
  49. 49. Ogembo, J.G., et al., Comparative genomic sequence analysis of novelHelicoverpa armigeranucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) isolated from Kenya and three other previously sequencedHelicoverpaspp. NPVs. Virus Genes, 2009.39(2): pp. 261-72.
  50. 50. Chen, X., et al., Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequences ofHelicoverpa zeaandHelicoverpa armigerasingle-nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedroviruses. J Gen Virol, 2002.83(Pt 3): pp. 673-84.
  51. 51. Rohrmann, G.F., Erlandson, M.A. and Theilmann, D.A., The genome of a baculovirus isolated fromHemileucasp. encodes a serpin ortholog. Virus Genes, 2013.47(2): pp. 357-64.
  52. 52. Rohrmann, G.F., Erlandson, M.A. and Theilmann, D.A., Genome sequence of an alphabaculovirus isolated from the Oak Looper,Lambdina fiscellaria, contains a putative 2-kilobase-pair transposable element encoding a transposase and a FLYWCH domain-containing protein. Genome Announc, 2015.3(3): e00186-15.
  53. 53. Xiao, H. and Qi, Y., Genome sequence ofLeucania seperatanucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Genes, 2007.35(3): pp. 845-56.
  54. 54. Kuzio, J., et al., Sequence and analysis of the genome of a baculovirus pathogenic forLymantria dispar. Virology, 1999.253(1): pp. 17-34.
  55. 55. Kabilov, M.R., et al., Complete genome sequence of a Western SiberianLymantria disparmultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate. Genome Announc, 2015.3(2).
  56. 56. Rabalski, L., et al., An alphabaculovirus isolated from deadLymantria disparlarvae shows high genetic similarity to baculovirus previously isolated fromLymantria monacha– An example of adaptation to a new host. J Invertebr Pathol, 2016.139: pp. 56-66.
  57. 57. Harrison, R.L. and Rowley, D.L., Complete genome sequence of the strain ofLymantria disparmultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus found in the gypsy moth biopesticide Virin-ENSh. Genome Announc, 2015.3(1):e01407-14.
  58. 58. Martemyanov, V.V., et al., The enhancin gene: one of the genetic determinants of population variation in baculoviral virulence. Dokl Biochem Biophys, 2015.465: pp. 351-3.
  59. 59. Harrison, R.L., Rowley, D.L. and Keena, M.A., Geographic isolates ofLymantria disparmultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus: Genome sequence analysis and pathogenicity against European and Asian gypsy moth strains. J Invertebr Pathol, 2016.137: pp. 10-22.
  60. 60. Nai, Y.S., et al., Genomic sequencing and analyses ofLymantria xylinamultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. BMC Genomics, 2010.11: pp. 116.
  61. 61. Choi, J.B., et al., Complete genomic sequences and comparative analysis ofMamestra brassicaenucleopolyhedrovirus isolated in Korea. Virus Genes, 2013.47(1): pp. 133-51.
  62. 62. Li, Q., et al., Sequence and organization of theMamestra configuratanucleopolyhedrovirus genome. Virology, 2002.294(1): pp. 106-21.
  63. 63. Li, L., et al., Complete comparative genomic analysis of two field isolates ofMamestra configuratanucleopolyhedrovirus-A. J Gen Virol, 2005.86(Pt 1): pp. 91-105.
  64. 64. Thumbi, D.K., et al., Complete sequence, analysis and organization of theOrgyia leucostigmanucleopolyhedrovirus genome. Viruses, 2011.3(11): pp. 2301-27.
  65. 65. Rohrmann, G.F., Erlandson, M.A. and Theilmann, D.A., A distinct group II alphabaculovirus isolated from aPeridromaspecies. Genome Announc, 2015.3(2):e00185-15.
  66. 66. Craveiro, S.R., et al., The genome sequence ofPseudoplusiaincludens single nucleopolyhedrovirus and an analysis of p26 gene evolution in the baculoviruses. BMC Genomics, 2015.16: p. 127.
  67. 67. WF, I.J., et al., Sequence and organization of theSpodoptera exiguamulticapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 1999.80(Pt 12): pp. 3289-304.
  68. 68. Harrison, R.L., Puttler, B. and Popham, H.J., Genomic sequence analysis of a fast-killing isolate ofSpodoptera frugiperdamultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 2008.89(Pt 3): pp. 775-90.
  69. 69. Breitenbach, J.E., et al., Determination and analysis of the genome sequence ofSpodoptera littoralismultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Res, 2013.171(1): pp. 194-208.
  70. 70. Pang, Y., et al., Sequence analysis of theSpodoptera lituramulticapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus genome. Virology, 2001.287(2): pp. 391-404.
  71. 71. Liu, X., et al., Genomic sequencing and analysis ofSucra jujubanucleopolyhedrovirus. PLoS One, 2014.9(10): p. e110023.
  72. 72. Willis, L.G., et al., Sequence analysis of the complete genome ofTrichoplusia nisingle nucleopolyhedrovirus and the identification of a baculoviral photolyase gene. Virology, 2005.338(2): pp. 209-26.
  73. 73. Wormleaton, S., Kuzio, J. and Winstanley, D., The complete sequence of theAdoxophyes oranagranulovirus genome. Virology, 2003.311(2): pp. 350-65.
  74. 74. Liang, Z., et al., Genomic sequencing and analysis ofClostera anachoretagranulovirus. Arch Virol, 2011.156(7): pp. 1185-98.
  75. 75. Yin, F., et al., The complete genome of a New Betabaculovirus fromClostera anastomosis. PLoS One, 2015.10(7): p. e0132792.
  76. 76. Zhang, S., et al., Genome sequencing and analysis of a granulovirus isolated from the Asiatic rice leafroller,Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Virol Sin, 2015.30(6): pp. 417-24.
  77. 77. Han, G., et al., Genome ofCnaphalocrocis medinalisgranulovirus, the first Crambidae-infecting betabaculovirus isolated from rice leaffolder to sequenced. PLoS One, 2016.11(2): p. e0147882.
  78. 78. Escasa, S.R., et al., Sequence analysis of theChoristoneura occidentalisgranulovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2006.87(Pt 7): pp. 1917-33.
  79. 79. Liang, Z., et al., Comparative analysis of the genomes ofClostera anastomosis(L.) granulovirus andClostera anachoretagranulovirus. Arch Virol, 2013.158(10): pp. 2109-14.
  80. 80. Luque, T., et al., The complete sequence of theCydia pomonellagranulovirus genome. J Gen Virol, 2001.82(Pt 10): pp. 2531-47.
  81. 81. Lange, M. and Jehle, J.A., The genome of theCryptophlebia leucotretagranulovirus. Virology, 2003.317(2): pp. 220-36.
  82. 82. Ardisson-Araujo, D.M., et al., A betabaculovirus-encoded gp64 homolog codes for a functional envelope fusion protein. J Virol, 2016.90(3): pp. 1668-72.
  83. 83. Ferrelli, M.L., et al., Genome of Epinotia aporema granulovirus (EpapGV), a polyorganotropic fast killing betabaculovirus with a novel thymidylate kinase gene. BMC Genomics, 2012.13: p. 548.
  84. 84. Ardisson-Araujo, D.M., et al., Genome sequence of Erinnyis ello granulovirus (ErelGV), a natural cassava hornworm pesticide and the first sequenced sphingid-infecting betabaculovirus. BMC Genomics, 2014.15: p. 856.
  85. 85. Harrison, R.L. and Popham, H.J., Genomic sequence analysis of a granulovirus isolated from the Old World bollworm,Helicoverpa armigera. Virus Genes, 2008.36(3): pp. 565-81.
  86. 86. Harrison, R.L., Rowley, D.L. and Funk, C.J., The complete genome sequence ofPlodia interpunctellagranulovirus: evidence for horizontal gene transfer and discovery of an unusual inhibitor-of-apoptosis gene. PLoS One, 2016.11(7): p. e0160389.
  87. 87. Taha, A., et al., Comparative analysis of the granulin regions of thePhthorimaea operculellaandSpodoptera littoralisgranuloviruses. Virus Genes, 2000.21(3): pp. 147-55.
  88. 88. Hashimoto, Y., et al., Sequence analysis of thePlutella xylostellagranulovirus genome. Virology, 2000.275(2): pp. 358-72.
  89. 89. Zhang, B.Q., et al., The genome ofPieris rapaegranulovirus. J Virol, 2012.86(17): p. 9544.
  90. 90. Cuartas, P.E., et al., The complete sequence of the firstSpodoptera frugiperdaBetabaculovirus genome: a natural multiple recombinant virus. Viruses, 2015.7(1): pp. 394-421.
  91. 91. Wang, Y., et al., Genomic sequence analysis of granulovirus isolated from the tobacco cutworm,Spodoptera litura. PLoS One, 2011.6(11): p. e28163.
  92. 92. Hayakawa, T., et al., Sequence analysis of theXestia c-nigrumgranulovirus genome. Virology, 1999.262(2): pp. 277-97.
  93. 93. Duffy, S.P., et al., Sequence analysis and organization of theNeodiprion abietisnucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Virol, 2006.80(14): pp. 6952-63.
  94. 94. Lauzon, H.A., et al., Sequence and organization of theNeodiprion leconteinucleopolyhedrovirus genome. J Virol, 2004.78(13): pp. 7023-35.
  95. 95. Garcia-Maruniak, A., et al., Sequence analysis of the genome of theNeodiprion sertifernucleopolyhedrovirus. J Virol, 2004.78(13): pp. 7036-51.
  96. 96. Afonso, C.L., et al., Genome sequence of a baculovirus pathogenic forCulex nigripalpus. J Virol, 2001.75(22): pp. 11157-65.
  97. 97. Miller, L.K. and Dawes, K.P., Restriction endonuclease analysis for the identification of baculovirus pesticides. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1978.35(2): pp. 411-21.
  98. 98. Smith, G.E. and Summers, M.D., Analysis of baculovirus genomes with restriction endonucleases. Virology, 1978.89(2): pp. 517-27.
  99. 99. Lee, H.H. and Miller, L.K., Isolation of genotypic variants ofAutographa californicanuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Virol, 1978.27(3): pp. 754-67.
  100. 100. Miller, L.K. and Dawes, K.P., Restriction endonuclease analysis to distinguish two closely related nuclear polyhedrosis viruses:Autographa californicaMNPV andTrichoplusia niMNPV. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1978.35(6): pp. 1206-10.
  101. 101. Smith, G.E. and Summers, M.D., Restriction Maps of FiveAutographa californicaMNPV Variants,Trichoplusia niMNPV andGalleria mellonellaMNPV DNAs with Endonucleases SmaI, KpnI, BamHI, SacI, XhoI and EcoRI. J Virol, 1979.30(3): pp. 828-38.
  102. 102. Loh, L.C., et al., Analysis of theSpodoptera frugiperdanuclear polyhedrosis virus genome by restriction endonucleases and electron microscopy. J Virol, 1982.44(2): pp. 747-51.
  103. 103. de Moraes, R.R. and Maruniak, J.E., Detection and identification of multiple baculoviruses using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction endonuclease analysis. J Virol Methods, 1997.63(1-2): pp. 209-17.
  104. 104. Ernoult-Lange, M., et al., Characterization of the simian virus 40 late promoter: relative importance of sequences within the 72-base-pair repeats differs before and after viral DNA replication. J Virol, 1987.61(1): pp. 167-76.
  105. 105. Woo, S.D., Rapid detection of multiple nucleopolyhedroviruses using polymerase chain reaction. Mol Cells, 2001.11(3): pp. 334-40.
  106. 106. Wang, L.H., et al., Sequence analysis of the Bam HI-J fragment of theSpodoptera lituramulticapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. Acta Biochim Biophy Sinica, 2001.33(6): pp. 615-20.
  107. 107. Pijlman, G.P., A.J. Pruijssers and Vlak, J.M., Identification of pif-2, a third conserved baculovirus gene required for per os infection of insects. J Gen Virol, 2003.84(Pt 8): pp. 2041-9.
  108. 108. Herniou, E.A., et al., Use of whole genome sequence data to infer baculovirus phylogeny. J Virol, 2001.75(17): pp. 8117-26.
  109. 109. Somasekar, S., Jayapragasam, M., Rabindra, R. J., Characterization of five Indian isolates of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus ofHelicoverpa armigera. Phytoparasitica, 1993.21(4): pp. 333-7.
  110. 110. Lange, M., et al., Towards a molecular identification and classification system of lepidopteran-specific baculoviruses. Virology, 2004.325(1): pp. 36-47.
  111. 111. Acharya, A. and Gopinathan, K.P., Characterization of late gene expression factors lef-9 and lef-8 fromBombyx morinucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 2002.83(Pt 8): pp. 2015-23.
  112. 112. Crouch, E.A., et al., Inter-subunit interactions of theAutographa californicaM nucleopolyhedrovirus RNA polymerase. Virology, 2007.367(2): pp. 265-74.
  113. 113. Toprak, U., et al., Preoperative evaluation of renal anatomy and renal masses with helical CT, 3D-CT and 3D-CT angiography. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2005.11(1): pp. 35-40.
  114. 114. Kumar, S., K. Tamura and Nei, M., MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform, 2004.5(2): pp. 150-63.
  115. 115. Jose, J., et al., Molecular characterization of nucleopolyhedrovirus of three lepidopteran pests using late expression factor-8 gene. Indian J Virol, 2013.24(1): pp. 59-65.
  116. 116. Nai, Y.S., et al., A new nucleopolyhedrovirus strain (LdMNPV-like virus) with a defective fp25 gene fromLymantria xylina(Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Taiwan. J Invertebr Pathol, 2009.102(2): pp. 110-9.
  117. 117. Chou, C.M., et al., Characterization ofPerina nudanucleopolyhedrovirus (PenuNPV) polyhedrin gene. J Invertebr Pathol, 1996.67(3): pp. 259-66.
  118. 118. Wang, C.H., et al., Continuous cell line from pupal ovary ofPerina nuda(Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) that is permissive to nuclear polyhedrosis virus fromP.nuda. J Invertebr Pathol, 1996.67(3): pp. 199-204.
  119. 119. Sims, D., et al., Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet, 2014.15(2): pp. 121-32.
  120. 120. Goodwin, S., McPherson, J.D. and McCombie, W.R., Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet, 2016.17(6): pp. 333-51.
  121. 121. Luo, C., et al., Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PLoS One, 2012.7(2): p. e30087.
  122. 122. Garcia-Maruniak A.et al., A variable region of Anticarsia gemmatalis nuclear polyhedrosis virus contains tandemly repeated DNA sequences. Virus Res, 1996. 41:123-132.
  123. 123. Martin, M., Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing Reads. EMBnet.journal, 2011.17(1): pp. 10-12.
  124. 124. Schmieder, R. and Edwards, R., Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics, 2011.27(6): pp. 863-4.
  125. 125. Patel, R.K. and Jain, M., NGS QC toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One, 2012.7(2): p. e30619.
  126. 126. Masella, A.P., et al., PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics, 2012.13: pp. 31.
  127. 127. Zhang, J., et al., PEAR: a fast and accurate illumina paired-end reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics, 2014.30(5): pp. 614-20.
  128. 128. Magoc, T. and Salzberg, S.L., FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 2011.27(21): pp. 2957-63.
  129. 129. Liu, B., et al., COPE: an accurate k-mer-based pair-end reads connection tool to facilitate genome assembly. Bioinformatics, 2012.28(22): pp. 2870-4.
  130. 130. Luo, R., et al., SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience, 2012.1(1): p. 18.
  131. 131. Zhang, W., et al., A practical comparison of de novo genome assembly software tools for next-generation sequencing technologies. PLoS One, 2011.6(3): p. e17915.
  132. 132. Margulies, M., et al., Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature, 2005.437(7057): pp. 376-80.
  133. 133. Chevreux, B., et al., Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res, 2004.14(6): pp. 1147-59.
  134. 134. Untergasser, A., et al., Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012.40(15): p. e115.
  135. 135. Salzberg, S.L., et al., Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res, 1998.26(2): pp. 544-8.
  136. 136. van Baren, M.J., Koebbe, B.C. and Brent, M.R., Using N-SCAN or TWINSCAN to predict gene structures in genomic DNA sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 2007.4: p. Unit 4 8.
  137. 137. Lukashin, A.V. and Borodovsky, M., GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res, 1998.26(4): pp. 1107-15.
  138. 138. Wang, S., Sundaram, J.P. and Spiro, D., VIGOR, an annotation program for small viral genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010.11: pp. 451.
  139. 139. Li, S.C., Shiau, C.K. and Lin, W.C., Vir-Mir db: prediction of viral microRNA candidate hairpins. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008.36(Database issue): pp. D184-9.
  140. 140. Stothard, P. and Wishart, D.S., Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics, 2005.21(4): p. 537-9.
  141. 141. Kumar, S., et al., MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform, 2008.9(4): pp. 299-306.
  142. 142. Sievers, F., et al., Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol, 2011.7: pp. 539.
  143. 143. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J. and Higgins, D.G., Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 2002.2: p. Unit 2 3.
  144. 144. Talavera, G. and Castresana, J., Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol, 2007.56(4): pp. 564-77.
  145. 145. Castresana, J., Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol, 2000.17(4): pp. 540-52.
  146. 146. Ronquist, F., et al., MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol, 2012.61(3): pp. 539-42.
  147. 147. Stamatakis, A., RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 2014.30(9): pp. 1312-3.
  148. 148. Douady, C.J., et al., Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol Biol Evol, 2003.20(2): pp. 248-54.
  149. 149. Drummond, A.J., et al., Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol, 2012.29(8): pp. 1969-73.
  150. 150. Camacho, C., et al., BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009.10: p. 421.
  151. 151. Brudno, M., et al., LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res, 2003.13(4): pp. 721-31.
  152. 152. Grant, J.R., Arantes, A.S. and Stothard, P., Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView comparison tool. BMC Genomics, 2012.13: pp. 202.
  153. 153. Darling, A.C., et al., Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res, 2004.14(7): pp. 1394-403.

Written By

Yu-Shin Nai, Yu-Feng Huang, Tzu-Han Chen, Kuo-Ping Chiu and Chung-Hsiung Wang

Submitted: May 19th, 2016 Reviewed: October 28th, 2016 Published: April 5th, 2017