Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Colloidal Behaviors of Conducting Polymer/Chitosan Composite Particles

Written By

Mehmet Çabuk

Submitted: 03 April 2016 Reviewed: 10 August 2016 Published: 23 November 2016

DOI: 10.5772/65125

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Colloid Science

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman and Abdullah Mohamed Asiri

Chapter metrics overview

2,254 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


In this study, colloidal behaviours of conducting polymer (CP) and chitosan (CS) multi‐functional composite particles were investigated by using electrokinetic measurements. The effects of pH, electrolytes, surfactants and temperature on electrokinetic properties were determined as a function of ζ‐potential of the colloidal dispersions. The obtained result showed that the zeta (ζ)‐potential of CP increases to the higher positive region due to interaction with polycationic CS. Isoelectric points (IEP) of the CP/CS composite are also shifted to higher pH values. The positive ζ‐potential of the composite shifts to more positive regions when the electrolyte valence and cationic surfactant concentration are increased. Also, these ζ‐potential value shifts to negative region with the addition of anionic surfactant. Temperature affects the ζ‐potential of the CP/CS dispersion. As a conclusion, colloidal behaviours of CP/CS composite particles can be altered by using different charged molecules. Therefore, CP/CS composite particles could be a good adsorbent for separation process.


  • zeta potential
  • isoelectric point
  • conducting polymer
  • chitosan
  • colloidal particle

1. Introduction

1.1. Electrokinetic properties

Electrokinetic measurements are very useful techniques to present the interactions between dispersed particles in an aqueous dispersion. Electrokinetic properties of materials are also important to prepare sedimentation problems of solved materials. Zeta (ζ)‐potential value is a surface charge of colloidal particles in an aqueous solution [13] and gives information about surface groups of colloidal particles and interaction between solid and liquid interfaces. It can be used for determination of some physical properties such as colloidal properties, Particle interactions and synthesis of charged polymeric composites. ζ‐Potential cannot be measured directly. It can be determined using electrokinetic techniques, such as streaming current or potential, electric conductivity and electrophoretic mobility [4, 5].

The electrokinetic potential on surface of a solid particle in contact with a polar medium (i.e. H2O) is controlled by the dissociation of surface groups, the preferential adsorption of cations or anions, the adsorption of polyelectrolytes and surfactants, the isomorphic substitution of cations and anions [6]. Generally, descriptions of the charge distribution at solid/liquid interface assume the presence of an electrical double layer consisting of a fixed (Stern) layer and a diffuse layer [7]. Externally applied electrical force causes a relative movement between these layers (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Zeta potential on a charged particle.

The interface between a solid and a solution may be treated as a semi‐permeable membrane, which allows only the charged species common to both the solid and the pass through. These species are called potential determining ions and have the ability to affect the sign of the ζ‐potential. They are the major ions responsible for establishment of the surface charge of particle. On the other hand, some ions called indifferent ions are adsorbed by electrostatic attraction only thereby affecting the magnitude of ζ‐potential and not by the surface potential [811]. The indifferent ions remain within outer (diffuse) part of the electrical double layer and do not strongly adsorb at the solid particle's wall.

The potential at this surface is called the ζ‐potential. IEP of dispersed particles and potential determining ions in a solution have important role to understand the adsorption mechanism of various ionic species onto the dispersed particles [12]. Also, they help for flotation or coagulation in various colloidal dispersions.

When the ζ‐potential is low, attraction of suspended particles to each other exceeds repulsion and the particles tend to aggregate. The ζ‐potential can be determined from measured electrophoretic mobility and Henry's function, f(κα) value is either 1.5 or 1.0. For the Smoluchowski approximation, f(κα) is 1.5 in aqueous (polar) solutions. For the Hückel approximation, f(κα) is 1.0 in non‐polar medium [1315].

As shown in Figure 2, when ζ‐potential value of a dispersion is more positive than +30 mV or less negative than -30 mV, the dispersed particles will tend to be stable. Some parameters such as time, pH, ion and surfactant concentrations and types, and temperature may affect the value of ζ‐potential [16, 17].

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of change of zeta (ζ) potential with pH.

1.2. Conducting polymers

Conducting polymers have unique properties such as electrical stability, ease of synthesis and durability leading to a variety of potential applications. Conjugated polymers have attracted enormous attentions from both science and technology as semiconductors and electroactive materials for their applications in batteries, molecular electronic devices, sensors, solid phase extractions and light emitting diodes [1821]. The most common conducting polymers are polypyrrole, polythiophene and polyaniline, as shown in Figure 3. The biggest advantage of these polymers is their processability, mainly by dispersion.

Figure 3.

Chemical structures of some conjugated conducting polymers.

1.3. Chitosan as a biodegradable polymer

Polysaccharides are a major class of biomaterials, such as chitosan, chitin, starch, cellulose and alginate. Chitin is extracted from the shells of crustaceans like crabs and shrimps [22]. Chitosan [poly (β‐(1‐4)‐2‐amino‐2‐deoxy‐d‐glucan] is N‐deacetylated derivative of chitin (Figure 4). CS is a polycationic and insulating biopolymer and contains free amino groups (-NH2) at neutral and alkaline pH values, but they are protonated (-NH3+) under acidic conditions, thus making ionic interactions possible upon the reaction with anions [2326]. CS has interesting characteristics such as biodegradability, chemical inertness, biocompatibility and low cost. Therefore, chemical derivatives of CS with conducting polymers are important topic for production of multi‐functional materials. CS as a biodebredable polymer have been using in many application area especially in the food and medical industry. Chitosan is easily enzymatically biodegradable in nature [27].

Figure 4.

Structures of chitin and chitosan.


2. Electrokinetic measurements of colloidal particles

The incorporation of conducting polymers into natural polymers can enhance the performance of both the ‘host’ and the ‘guest’ thereby leading to interesting physical and chemical properties [28]. Generally, fabrication of CP/CS composite is carried out by chemical polymerization of monomer such as aniline, pyrrole and thiophene using as initiator (FeCl3, APS, etc.) in the presence of 1% CS solution. The ζ‐potential measurements are performed with a Malvern Nano ZS which works with Laser Doppler Electrophoresis technique using folded capillary cell equipped with gold electrodes (Figure 5). Note that 0.1 g/L dispersions is taken and pH value is adjusted with 0.1 M HCl(aq) and 0.1 M NaOH(aq) solution.

Figure 5.

Image of the Malvern Nano Zeta Sizer.

Zeta‐Sizer software is used for the ζ‐potential measurements of the dispersed particles. In aqueous medium, the ζ‐potential is determined by using the Smoluchowski model. The thickness of the electrical double layer, EDL (κ-1) is accepted to be smaller in comparison with the particle size. First, to measure surface potential, solid particles are dispersed in deionized water as 0.1 g/L concentration. This dispersion is subjected to ultrasonication for 30–60 min. And then the dispersion is left to establish equilibrium for 2–3 h. Finally, the supernatant liquid is taken for the ζ‐potential measurements. pH of the dispersion is adjusted with diluted HCl(aq) and NaOH(aq) solution by MPT‐2 autotitrator unit at 25°C. The effects of pH, electrolytes, surfactants and temperature on the ζ‐potentials of the colloidal dispersions can be investigated.

2.1. Effect of pH on colloidal behaviour of dispersions

Electrokinetic properties of polyaniline, polypyrrole and polythiophene‐chitosan composites are given as a function of pH in Figure 6. It is shown that ζ‐potential values of the conducting polymers increase and shift to positive region due to positive surface charge of polycationic chitosan molecules in the composite structure. At the same time, it causes to an increase in colloidal stabilities of the dispersed particles. With the addition of HCl(aq) solution into the dispersion medium, concentration of hydronium cations increases in the aqueous dispersion, and the particle surfaces are surrounded by the hydronium ions. This causes to the protonation of the amino groups of CS or the selective adsorption of the hydronium cations on the surfaces of the dispersed colloidal particles. As a result, the ζ‐potential values of the particles gradually increase with decreasing pH values, as shown in Figure 6. ζ‐potential of CS molecules is related with number of -NH3+ ions [29]. With the addition of NaOH(aq) solution into the dispersion medium, number of hydronium ions reduces and the number of OH- anions increases. And then, deprotonation of protonated -NH3+ ions to -NH2 and selective adsorption of OH- anions on the surfaces of the dispersed particles occur. As a result, ζ‐potential of the colloidal dispersions decreases and shifts to more negative values due to the overcompensation of the positive surface charge with the negatively charged counter ions.

Figure 6.

Change of ζ‐potential with pH, 10-3 M NaCl, c = 0.1 g/L, T = 25°C.

Dispersed particles have zero surface charge at their isoelectric points. At this point, number of positive charges is equal to the number of negative charges. Therefore, the particles in a solution are only stabilized by steric effect. CS is deprotonated around pH 8.5 due to the zwitterionic structure of carboxyl groups in CS molecules. To signify the unique zwitterionic properties, the CS derivatives are named as zwitterionic chitosans. Conducting polymers may act as anion or cation exchangers [3033].

2.2. Effect of electrolytes on colloidal behaviour of dispersions

The effect of cationic and anionic electrolytes on ζ‐potentials of conducting polymers and their CS composites is presented in Figure 7. As can be seen, monovalent (Na+) and divalent (Ba2+) cations and divalent (SO42-) anions are indifferent ions which only compressed the electrical double layer. As shown in Figure 7, ζ‐potential values of colloidal particles shift to the positive regions in 1 M BaCl2 solution due to increasing valency of the cations. It can be attributed to the larger ionic radius of the Ba2+ ions, which makes difficult to exchange with the other ions such as Na+ present in the dispersion. On the other hand, with increasing valency of the anion, ζ‐potential of the colloidal dispersions shifts to more negative region. It can be attributed the presence of a Stern layer formed by negatively charged divalent counter ions (SO42-), over compensating the positive surface charge of the colloidal particles [34, 35]. Also, it was observed that IEP values of the dispersions shift to higher or lower pH values with increasing ionic strength of the cations and anions present in the dispersion medium, respectively.

Figure 7.

Change of ζ‐potential with pH, 10-3 M BaCl2 and Na2SO4, c = 0.1 g/L, T = 25°C.

2.3. Effect of various surfactants on the ζ‐potential of colloidal dispersions

A small amount of surfactants could be adsorbed easily on the surfaces of the dispersed particles due to their hydrophobic surfaces and cause rapid ζ‐potential change. The changes in ζ‐potentials of the colloidal dispersions as a function of cationic (CTAB), anionic (SDS) and nonionic (Triton X‐100) surfactant concentrations are given in Figure 8. As shown, CTAB is added into the colloidal dispersion, ζ‐potential of the dispersions increases, without passing through an IEP. After the surface coverage is completed, ζ‐potential value slowly decreases and then similarly charged CTAB ions repulsive each other [36, 37]. With the addition of the anionic SDS molecules, the surface coverage of the particles increases with an increasing number of negatively charged SDS molecules. As a result, ζ‐potential of the particles in the dispersion shifts to negative values with passing through an IEP. It may be caused by the electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged SDS tails and the positively charged CP/CS surfaces [38]. On the other hand, with the addition of non‐ionic surfactant (Triton X‐100), ζ‐potential value of the colloidal dispersion is almost similar, as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Effect of surfactant type on ζ‐potential of colloidal dispersions.

It is known that mobility of the dispersed particles increases with increasing temperature. When the ionic mobility increases, viscosity of dispersion decreases at higher temperatures [39, 40]. Therefore, the establishment of diffuse layer leading to the formation of ζ‐potential around the particles becomes difficult. Therefore, ζ‐potential value of the CP/CS dispersions decreases with increasing temperature.


3. Conclusion

These results showed that the ζ‐potential of the both CP and CS can be changed with the synthesis of their CP/CS composites. Besides, the ζ‐potential of CP/CS colloidal dispersions can be altered by using different electrolytes, cationic or anionic surfactants and their colloidal stability can be improved. It is an important result from their industrial applications point of view.


  1. 1. Gestel TV, Vandecasteele C, Buekenhoudt A, Dotremont C, Luyten J, Leysen R, Bruggen BV, Maes G. Salt retention in nanofiltration with multiplayer ceramic TiO2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2002; 209: 379–389.
  2. 2. El‐Gholabzouri O, Cabrerizo‐Vilchez MA, Hidalgo‐Alverez R. Zeta‐potential of polystyrene latex determined using different electrokinetic techniques in binary liquid mixtures. Colloids Surf. A 2006; 291: 30–37.
  3. 3. Alkan M, Demirbas O, Dogan M. Electrokinetic properties of sepiolite suspensions in different electrolyte media. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2005; 281: 240–248.
  4. 4. Davis JA, James R, Leckie JO. Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface: I. Computation of electrical double layer properties in simple electrolytes. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1978; 63: 480–499.
  5. 5. Duman O, Tunc S. Electrokinetic and rheological properties of Na‐bentonite in some electrolyte solutions. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2009; 117: 331–338.
  6. 6. Gur A. Dissolution mechanism of colemanite in sulphuric acid solutions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2007; 24(4): 588–591.
  7. 7. Hang JZ, Zhang YF, Shi L, Feng Y. Electrokinetic properties of barite nanoparticles suspensions in different electrolyte media. J. Mater. Sci., 2007; 42: 9611–9616.
  8. 8. Ozdemir O, Celik MS. Surface properties and flotation characteristics of boron minerals. Open Min. Proces. J. 2010; 3: 2–13.
  9. 9. Stamm M. Polymer Surface and Interface Characterization Techniques. Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces, (Stamm M, Editor ) Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
  10. 10. Rao SR. Surface Chemistry of Forth Flotation, (Rao, S R, Editor) Luwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2004, p. 223.
  11. 11. Unal HI, Sahan B, Erol O. Investigation of electrokinetic and electrorheological properties of polyindole prepared in the presence of a surfactant. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012; 134: 382–391.
  12. 12. Wan Y, Creber KAM, Peppley B, Bui VT. Synthesis, characterization and ionic conductive properties of phosphorylated chitosan membranes. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003; 204: 850–858.
  13. 13. Jin X, Wang J, Bai J. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of the Schiff base from chitosan and citral. Carbohydr. Res. 2009; 344: 825–829.
  14. 14. Li X, Wang Y, YangX, Chen J, Fu H, Cheng T. Conducting polymers in environmental analysis. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2012; 39: 163–179.
  15. 15. Ma Y, Hou S, Ji B, Yao Y, Feng X. A novel temperature‐responsive polymer as a gene vector. Macromol. Biosci. 2010; 10: 202–210.
  16. 16. Fessi H, Elaissari A. Polymer‐based nanocapsules for drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2010; 385: 113–142.
  17. 17. Koyuncu K, Unal HI, Gumus OY, Erol O, Sari B, Ergin T. Electrokinetic and electrorheological properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/polyindole conducting composites. Polym. Advanc. Technol. 2011; 23: 1464–1472.
  18. 18. Cabuk TZ, Sari B, Unal HI. Preparation of novel polyindene/polyoxymethylene blends and investigation of their properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010; 117: 3659–3664.
  19. 19. Xu MJ, Zhang J, Wang SR, Guo XZ, Xia HJ, Wang Y, ZhangSM, Huang WP, Wu SH. Gas sensing properties of SnO2 hollow pheres/polythiophene inorganic‐organic hybrids. Sens. Actuator B‐Chem. 2010; 146: 8–13.
  20. 20. Gumus OY, Unal HI, Erol O, Sari B. Synthesis, characterization, and colloidal properties of polythiophene/borax conducting composite. Polym. Compos. 2011; 32: 418–426.
  21. 21. Zhang X, Bai R. Surface electric properties of polypyrrole in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 2003; 19: 10703–10709.
  22. 22. Sashiwa H, Aiba S. Chemically modified chitin and chitosan as biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004; 29; 887–908.
  23. 23. Du WL, Xu YL, Xu ZR, Fan CL. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties against E. coli K88 of chitosan nanoparticle loaded copper ions. Nanotechnology 2008; 19: 85707–85711.
  24. 24. Sabaa MW, Mohamed NA, Mohamed RR, Khalil NM, Abd El Latif SM. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of poly(N‐vinyl imidazole) grafted carboxymethyl chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010; 79: 998–1005.
  25. 25. Wang QZ, Chen XG, Liu N, Wang SX, Liu CS, Meng XH, Liu CG. Protonation constants of chitosan with different molecular weight and degree of deacetylation, Carbohydr. Polym. 2006; 65: 194–201.
  26. 26. Cabuk M, Yavuz M, Unal HI, Erol O. Synthesis, characterization and electrorheological properties of biodegradable chitosan/bentonite composites. Clay Min. 2013; 48: 129–141.
  27. 27. Liu Y, Naidu R, Ming H. Surface electrochemical properties of red mud (bauxite residue): zeta potential and surface charge density. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013; 394: 451–457.
  28. 28. Bower MJD, Bank TL, Geise RF, VanOss CJ. Nanoscale forces of interaction between glass in aqueous and non‐aqueous media: a theoretical and empirical study. Colloids Surf. A 2010; 362: 90–96.
  29. 29. Xu P, Bajaj G, Shugg T, Van Alstine WG, Yeo Y. Zwitterionic chitosan derivatives for pH‐sensitive stealth coating, Biomacromolecules 2010; 11: 2352–2358.
  30. 30. Guzel S, Unal HI, Erol O, Sari B. Polyindene/organo‐montmorillonite conducting nanocomposites I: synthesis, characterization and electrokinetic properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011; 123: 2911–2922.
  31. 31. Cabuk M, Yavuz M, Unal HI, Alan Y, Synthesis, characterization, and enhanced antibacterial activity of chitosan‐based biodegradable conducting graft copolymers. Polym. Compos. 2014; 36: 497–503.
  32. 32. Parks GA, The isoelectric points of solid oxides, solid hydroxides and aqueous hydroxo complex systems. Chem. Rev. 1965; 65: 177–198.
  33. 33. Boomi P, Prabu HG, Mathiyarasu J. Synthesis and characterization of polyaniline/Ag‐Pt nanocomposite for improved antibacterial activity. Colloid Surf. B 2013; 103: 9–14.
  34. 34. Ishikawa Y, Katoh Y, Ohshima H. Colloidal stability of aqueous polymeric dispersions: effect of pH and salt concentration. Colloid Surf. B 2005; 42: 53–58.
  35. 35. Zhao Y, Xing YZW, Xu N, Wong FS. Effects of inorganic electrolytes on zeta potentials of ceramic microfiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005; 42: 117–121.
  36. 36. Ruso JM, Deo N, Somasundaran P. Complexation between dodecyl sulfate surfactant and zein protein in solution. Langmuir 2004; 20: 8988–8991.
  37. 37. Blanco E, Ruso JM, Prieto G, Sarmiento F. On relationships between surfactant type and globular proteins interactions in solution. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2007; 316: 37–42.
  38. 38. Kirby BJ, Hasselbrink EF. Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations. Electrophoresis 2004; 25: 187–202.
  39. 39. Garcia‐Garcia S, Jonsson M, Wold S. Temperature effect on the stability of bentonite colloids in water. J Colloid Interf. Sci. 2004; 298: 694–702.
  40. 40. Hsu JP, Tai YH, Yeh LH. Importance of temperature effect on the electrophoretic behavior of charge‐regulated particles. Langmuir 2012; 28: 1013–1019.

Written By

Mehmet Çabuk

Submitted: 03 April 2016 Reviewed: 10 August 2016 Published: 23 November 2016