Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Microsatellite Markers in the Mud Crab (Scylla paramamosain) and their Application in Population Genetics and Marker- Assisted Selection

Written By

Hongyu Ma, Chunyan Ma, Lingbo Ma, Xincang Li and Yuanyou Li

Submitted: March 3rd, 2016 Reviewed: July 27th, 2016 Published: November 30th, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/65041

Chapter metrics overview

1,672 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) is a commercially important species for aquaculture and fisheries in China. In this study, a total of 302 polymorphic microsatellite markers have been isolated and characterized. The observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.04 to 1.00 and from 0.04 to 0.96 per locus. The wild populations distributed along South-eastern China coasts showed high genetic diversity (HO ranged from 0.62 to 0.77) and low genetic differentiation (FST = 0.018). Meanwhile, a significant association (r2 = 0.11) was identified between genetic and geographic distance of 11 locations. Furthermore, a PCR-based parentage assignment method was successfully developed using seven polymorphic microsatellite loci that could correctly assign 95% of the progeny to their parents. Moreover, three polymorphic microsatellite loci were identified to be significantly associated with 12 growth traits of S. paramamosain, and four genotypes were considered to be great potential for marker-assisted selection. Finally, a first preliminary genetic linkage map with 65 linkage groups and 212 molecular markers was constructed using microsatellite and AFLP markers for S. paramamosain. This map was 2746 cM in length, and covered approximately 50% of the estimated genome. This study provides novel insights into genome biology and molecular marker-assisted selection for S. paramamosain.

Keywords

  • genetic linkage map
  • growth traits linked loci
  • microsatellite marker
  • parentage assignment
  • population genetic diversity

1. Introduction

The mud crab (Scylla paramamosain), a big size crustacean, is one of the most important aquaculture species and marine fisheries in China. It is naturally distributed along the coasts of South-eastern China, as well as other East and Southeast Asian countries. Due to the good flavor, high nutrition value, and fast growth speed, S. paramamosain is now becoming more and more popular in the above countries. In China, the artificial culture of this crab can date back more than 100 years [1], and in recent years, the culture production is usually above 100,000 tons per year [2]. However, the current culture capacity cannot meet the demands of market. Under the natural conditions, mature S. paramamosain mates inshore, then the gravid females migrate offshore for spawning eggs, and finally the offspring return to inshore. Nowadays, the wild resource of this crab including adults and larvae has been decreasing quickly due to seawater pollution and overexploitation. Therefore, for conservation and sustainable utilization of this valuable marine resource, we first need to better understand its population genetic diversity and improve economic traits. Molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) is thought to be a good method for genetic improvement, because it can shorten the selection period, and increase the accuracy of improvement. Of the many known molecular markers, microsatellite marker is an ideal genetic tool for helping to fulfill this purpose.

Microsatellites, normally known as simple sequence repeats (SSR), are widely used for population structure analysis [3, 4], parentage assignment [5], genetic map construction [6, 7], and marker-assisted selection [8, 9] because they are abundantly distributed throughout genome, codominant, and hyper-variable in most eukaryotic organism genomes. Before this study, there were only 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci available for S. paramamosain [10, 11]. The lack of efficient microsatellite markers has severely blocked the genetic studies in S. paramamosain.

The purpose of this study is to massively develop polymorphic microsatellite markers, uncover the population genetic diversity, create molecular parentage assignment technique, identify growth performance-associated markers, and construct a genetic linkage map, so as to provide novel insights into population genetic diversity and genetic improvement of economic traits for S. paramamosain.

Advertisement

2. Microsatellites and their application in population genetics and MAS

2.1. Material and methods

For microsatellite loci isolation, a total of six different strategies based on PIMA [12], FIASCO [13], GenBank-derived genes [14], 5’ anchored PCR [15], cDNA library [16], and 454 sequencing transcriptome [17, 18] have been employed to isolate microsatellite markers. The polymorphisms of microsatellite loci were evaluated by using a wild population with approximately 30 individuals.

For population genetics analysis, a total of 397 wild individuals were sampled from 11 locations (Sanmen, Ningde, Zhangzhou, Shantou, Shenzhen, Zhanjiang, Haikou, Wenchang, Wanning, Dongfang, and Danzhou) of South-eastern coasts of China. Nine polymorphic microsatellite markers were genotyped in these specimens [19].

For development of parentage assignment technique, four G1 families were collected, with 46 progenies in each family. Family 1 lost both parents information, and families 2, 3, and 4 only had maternal information. Ten polymorphic microsatellite loci were selected for genotyping the above crabs [20].

For trait-marker association analysis, a total of 96 three-month-old full-sib specimens were randomly sampled from a G1 family. Sixteen growth traits including carapace length (CL), internal carapace width (ICW), carapace width (CW), body height (BH), carapace frontal width (CFW), carapace width at spine 8 (CWS8), abdomen width (AW), fixed finger length of the claw (FFLC), fixed finger width of the claw (FFWC), fixed finger height of the claw (FFHC), distance between lateral spine 1 (DLS1), distance between lateral spine 2 (DLS2), meropodite length of pereiopod 1 (MLP1), meropodite length of pereiopod 2 (MLP2), meropodite length of pereiopod 3 (MLP3), and body weight (BW) were measured. Moreover, 129 transcriptome-derived polymorphic microsatellite loci were genotyped in these animals [17].

For genetic linkage map construction, a G1 family with 95 individuals was selected as mapping population. Microsatellite and AFLP markers were employed for linkage analysis. A total of 337 polymorphic microsatellite markers and 64 AFLP selective primer combinations were used in this study [21].

For data analysis, the observed (Na) and effective (Ne) number of alleles, the observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and linkage disequilibrium (LD) were calculated by softwares POPGENE 1.31 [22] and ARLEQUIN 3.01 [23]. Significance values for multiple tests were corrected by sequential Bonferroni procedure [24]. The null allele frequency was predicted by MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 [25]. Genetic differentiation was tested by AMOVA analysis using software GENA1EX 6.41 [26]. The UPGMA tree among 11 locations was constructed by software MEGA 4.0 [27]. The links between genetic distance and geographic distance were evaluated by Mantel test [28]. The exclusion probability of microsatellite loci and parentage assignment were carried out using software CERVUS 3.0 [29]. Double-blind test was performed using seven most informative microsatellites and 40 specimens. The UPGMA tree of these 40 individuals was created by software MEGA 4.0. The general linear model (GLM) was used to identify the association between microsatellite loci and growth performance. A linear animal model with the fixed effects was used as follows: Yijk = µ + Gi + Sj + eijk, where Yijk is the observed value of the ijkth trait; μ is the mean value of the trait; Gi is the effect of the ith genotype; Sj is the effect of the jth sex; and eijk is the random error effect. Significant differences in growth traits among the different genotypes were calculated through multiple comparison analysis using the S-N-K method. The software JoinMap 3.0 [30] was used for linkage analysis of microsatellite and AFLP genotypes. The population type was defined as cross-pollination (CP). A critical logarithm of odds (LOD) score threshold ≥2.5 was referenced for markers assignment. Linkage groups were drawn by MapChart 2.1 software [31]. The expected genome size (Ge) was estimated using the formula: Ge = (Ge1 + Ge2)/2 [32]. The expected genome size is the sum of the revised lengths of all linkage groups [33]. The observed map length (Goa) was the total length of groups, triplets, and doublets. The estimated coverage of the genome (Coa) was calculated as: Goa/Ge accordingly.

2.2. Results and discussion

2.2.1. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci

In this study, a total of 302 polymorphic microsatellite markers were successfully developed by using six different strategies. For methods based on PIMA, FIASCO, GenBank-derived genes, 5’ anchored PCR, cDNA library, and 454 sequencing transcriptome, a total of 12, 54, 18, 18, 36, and 164 polymorphic microsatellite loci were identified, respectively. A total of 1858 alleles were detected with an average of 6.15 alleles per locus from these microsatellite markers. The observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.04 to 1.00, and from 0.04 to 0.96 per locus, respectively. The genotype proportions at 45 microsatellite loci significantly deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations after Bonferroni correction; this could be due to the small sample size or the presence of null alleles, but cannot be attributed to technical or statistical artifacts. No significant linkage disequilibrium was detected between these loci pairs. According to the utilities for comparative mapping, molecular markers are classified into two types: type I markers are linked with genes of known functions, while type II markers are linked with anonymous genomic fragments. Among these 302 microsatellite loci, 218 may be associated with functional genes, which were classified as type I markers that are usually considered to have lower polymorphic level than type II markers. In this study, the genetic diversity level of type I loci was slightly lower than that of genome-derived loci too. Moreover, the polymorphisms of type II loci isolated in this study were lower than those described in previous references [10, 11].

2.2.2. Population genetic diversity and differentiation

The population genetic diversity of S. paramamosain distributed along South-eastern coasts of China was found to be high by nine microsatellite markers. A total of 104 alleles were observed at these nine microsatellite loci, with an average of 11.6 alleles per locus. The HO values ranged from 0.32 to 1.00 per locus-location combination, and from 0.62 to 0.77 per location. This result was in accordance with the previous study by mtDNA marker [34]. Three factors are usually thought to be associated with high genetic variation of marine animals: environmental heterogeneity, the life history characteristics, and large population size [35, 36]. Further, we determined that the genetic diversity level of S. paramamosain population was gradually increased from the Northern location to the South. This interesting trend was also found in previous study by mtDNA marker [34].

Approximately 98.2% of variance was within locations and 1.8% of that was among locations, which indicated that the population genetic variation mainly existed within locations, and the genetic differentiation level was very low among locations (Table 1).

Source of variation df  Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation FST
Among locations 10  83.706 0.064 1.83 0.0183
Among individuals within
locations
386  1465.290 0.388 11.18
Within individuals 397  1199.000 3.020 86.99
Total 793  2747.996 3.472 100

Table 1.

AMOVA design and results in 11 locations of Scylla paramamosain.

Figure 1.

The UPGMA tree constructed among 11 locations of Scylla paramamosain. SM, Sanmen; ND, Ningde; ZZ, Zhangzhou; ST, Shantou; SZ, Shenzhen; ZJ, Zhanjiang; HK, Haikou; WC, Wenchang; WN, Wanning; DF, Dongfang; DZ, Danzhou.

The mtDNA data also indicated that the population genetic structure of this crab was genetically homogeneous [37]. Therefore, we concluded that S. paramamosain population distributed along South-eastern coasts of China is a single genetically homogeneous population with low differentiation. Moreover, from the UPGMA tree (Figure 1), we observed that there were totally two groups: one consisted of 10 locations and the other one contained only one location (Sanmen). Mantel tests showed a significantly positive link between pairwise FST/(1 − FST) and natural logarithm of geographic distance (km) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Relationship estimated between genetic differentiation and geographic distance (km) among 11 locations of Scylla paramamosain.

2.2.3. Parentage assignment technique based on PCR

In this study, 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci produced 1870 genotypes in 184 offspring and three parents. The genetic diversity indexes showed a relative high variation of these individuals, with HO and PIC values ranging from 0.38 to 0.99 and from 0.44 to 0.75, respectively. Two loci deviated from HWE in family 1 and 4, four loci in family 2, and six loci in family 3. According to Mendelian inheritance principle, the genotypes of all parents were successfully deduced based on genotypes of offspring, suggesting microsatellites are ideal molecular markers for evaluating genetic relationship among different individuals. In panda and tiger, microsatellite loci were also successfully used to identify the relationship among different specimens [38, 39].

Furthermore, the exclusion probability was used to distinguish the pedigree relationship of S. paramamosain individuals. The PIC value was found to be associated with the exclusion probability: when the PIC value went up, the exclusion probability increased accordingly. Moreover, the combined exclusion probability was observed higher than single locus in this study (Figure 3). Ten microsatellite loci had 97% exclusion probability under without parent information conditions. The assignment success rate reached to 100% when seven microsatellite markers were combined together under the condition of no any parent information. Practical application showed that seven microsatellite loci combination could accurately assign 95% of the offspring to right parents (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Cumulative assignment success rates of seven most informative microsatellite loci of Scylla paramamosain.

Figure 4.

The UPGMA dendrogram of 40 progeny of Scylla paramamosain constructed using double-blind test.

2.2.4. Identification of growth performance related microsatellite markers

In aquatic animals, a set of microsatellite markers were identified to link to growth traits [40, 41]. In this study, of 129 polymorphic microsatellite loci, 30 showed polymorphisms in the experimental G1 family. Statistical analysis indicated that three markers (Scpa36, Scpa75, and Spm30) were significantly linked to 12 growth traits (CL, BH, ICW, AW, FFWC, FFLC, FFHC, CWS8, MLP2, MLP3, DLS2, and BW) in S. paramamosain. Microsatellite marker Scpa36 was significantly associated with growth traits CL, FFLC, FFWC, AW, MLP2, BH, FFHC, and MLP3. Out of four genotypes AB, BB, BC, and AC at this locus, the genotype BC had the highest potential for artificial selection (Table 2). Microsatellite marker Scpa75 was significantly linked to growth traits ICW, DLS2, MLP3, AW, and CWS8. Among four genotypes AD, AC, BC, and BD at this locus, the genotypes BC and BD showed the highest correlation rate with growth traits in S. paramamosain (Table 3). Locus Spm30 was significantly associated with three traits BH, BW, and DLS2. Multiple comparison analysis indicated that genotypes AC and BD at this locus had the highest association degree with growth traits (Table 4). Moreover, growth traits CW, CFW, DLS1, and MLP1 were not found to link to any microsatellite marker in this study.

Locus  Genotype  Number  Growth trait (Means ± SD, mm) 
CL  AW  BH  FFLC  FFWC  FFHC  MLP2  MLP3 
Scpa36 AB 19 47.87 ± 7.88a 23.85 ± 3.62a 28.37 ± 3.96a 43.98 ± 7.34a 11.80 ±
2.25a
17.10 ± 3.37a 26.58 ± 3.72a 21.88 ± 2.88a
BB 21 49.80 ± 7.85ab 24.48 ± 4.08ab 28.97 ± 4.68a 46.90 ± 9.20ab 13.01 ± 3.14ab 18.65 ± 4.39ab 27.29 ± 4.71ab 22.98 ± 4.33ab
AC 23 52.50 ± 8.83ab 26.20 ± 4.86ab 30.73 ± 5.36ab 49.79 ± 9.72ab 14.07 ±
3.25b
19.99 ± 4.86ab 28.70 ± 5.30ab 24.73 ± 3.98bc
BC 21 54.46 ± 5.012_1 27.08 ± 2.75b 32.21 ± 3.10b 52.37 ± 7.57b 14.39 ±
2.68b
21.01 ± 4.29b 30.45 ± 3.36b 25.75 ± 2.64c

Table 2.

Association analysis performed between microsatellite locus Scpa36 and eight growth traits of Scylla paramamosain.

CL, carapace length; AW, abdomen width; BH, body height; FFLC, fixed finger length of the claw; FFWC, fixed finger width of the claw; FFHC, fixed finger height of the claw; MLP2, meropodite length of pereiopod 2; MLP3, meropodite length of pereiopod 3.

a, b, ab, bc and c, the superscripts in different genotypes without a common one are significant different (P < 0.05).

Locus Genotype Number Growth trait (Means ± SD, mm)
ICW AW CWS8 DLS2 MLP3
Scpa75 AD 32 69.79 ± 11.83a 24.10 ± 4.20a 71.90 ± 12.50a 43.45 ± 7.18a 22.45 ± 4.20a
AC 17 74.70 ± 11.75a 24.98 ± 3.75a 77.03 ± 12.06a 46.65 ± 6.50ab 24.63 ± 3.83a
BD 24 76.82 ± 9.99a 26.85 ± 4.32a 79.15 ± 10.16a 47.21 ± 5.28ab 24.54 ± 3.52a
BC 14 77.59 ± 7.34a 26.45 ± 2.65a 80.00 ± 7.74a 48.69 ± 4.30b 25.51 ± 2.83a

Table 3.

Association analysis performed between microsatellite locus Scpa75 and five growth traits of Scylla paramamosain.

ICW, internal carapace width; AW, abdomen width; CWS8, carapace width at spine 8; DLS2, distance between lateral spine 2; MLP3, meropodite length of pereiopod 3.

a, b and ab, the superscripts in different genotypes without a common one are significant different (P < 0.05).

Among 16 growth traits tested in this study, traits AW and MLP3 were associated with two loci Scpa36 and Scpa75, and traits BH and DLS2 were associated with two loci Scpa75 and Spm30. Meanwhile, traits CL, FFWC, FFLC, ICW, MLP2, BW, and CWS8 were associated with only one microsatellite locus. It is considered to be a common event that one locus contributes to several quantitative traits and/or several different loci influence a same quantitative trait [41, 42]. In the next artificial breeding program, these three microsatellite markers should be first considered for marker-assisted selection of S. paramamosain.

Locus Genotype Number Growth trait (Means ± SD, mm)
BH DLS2 BW
Spm30 CD 18 27.34 ± 4.47a 42.13 ± 7.28a 57.72 ± 31.66a
AB 24 29.52 ± 5.24ab 44.78 ± 7.07ab 79.68 ± 38.73b
BD 33 30.88 ± 4.22b 47.28 ± 5.30b 89.53 ± 32.98b
AC 21 31.08 ± 3.58b 47.54 ± 4.25b 92.99 ± 31.06b

Table 4.

Association analysis performed between microsatellite locus Spm30 and three growth traits of Scylla paramamosain.

BH, body height; DLS2, distance between lateral spine 2; BW, body weight.

a, b and ab, the superscripts in different genotypes without a common one are significant different (P < 0.05).

2.2.5. Construction of genetic linkage map

Of 337 microsatellite markers, 118 segregated from parents to offspring of S. paramamosain with a rate of 35%. Meanwhile, 64 AFLP selective primer combinations produced 574 segregated bands. After chi-square test according to Mendelian ratio, a total of 470 molecular markers were suitable for genetic map construction. The phenomenon that markers deviated from Mendelian ratio could be caused by small population size, scoring errors, selection pressure, nonrandom segregation, and gametes competition [43].

A first preliminary genetic linkage map was developed for S. paramamosain (Figure 5). This map contained 65 linkage groups and 212 molecular markers (60 microsatellites and 152 AFLPs). In theory, the number of linkage group is equal to the number of haploid chromosome. In this study, the haploid chromosome number (N = 49) [44] was much lower than the total group number (N = 65), which indicated that this genetic map may still be preliminary with small number and low resolution of markers. The number of markers per genetic group ranged from 2 to 14, with an average of 3.3. All markers were evenly distributed in genetic groups and no clustering was found. This linkage map was 2746 cM in length with an average resolution of 18.7 cM. The expected genome was estimated to be approximately 5540 cM, which covered about 50% by our preliminary genetic map. In the next step, a high density genetic linkage map needs to be constructed in order to facilitate QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for S. paramamosain.

Figure 5.

Genetic linkage map constructed for the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain). Genetic distances are listed on the left in Kosambi units (cM). Markers are shown on the right of each linkage group. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers are named by the primer combination and fragment size. Microsatellite markers are in bold.

Advertisement

3. Conclusions

This study isolated and characterized 302 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the mud crab (S. paramamosain), and uncovered the high polymorphism and low genetic differentiation of wild populations distributed along South-eastern China coasts. Furthermore, a PCR-based parentage assignment method was well developed which could correctly assign 95% of the offspring to right parents. Moreover, three microsatellite loci were identified to link with growth performance of S. paramamosain. Finally, a first preliminary genetic linkage map was created for S. paramamosain using microsatellite and AFLP markers. These findings should provide novel insights into genome biology, wild resource background, and molecular marker-assisted selection in S. paramamosain.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31001106), and the Fund of Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, China (Grant No. 2013-SDMFMA-KF-5).

References

  1. 1. Shen Y, Lai Q. Present status of mangrove crab (Scylla serrata (Forskål)) culture in China. The ICLARM Quarterly. 1994; 17: 28–29.
  2. 2. Fishery Bureau of Ministry of Agriculture of China. China Fisheries Yearbook (2014). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press. 2015; 219 p.
  3. 3. Ma HY, Bi JZ, Shao CW, Chen Y, Miao GD, Chen SL. Development of 40 microsatellite markers in spotted halibut (Verasper variegatus) and the cross-species amplification in barfin flounder (Verasper moseri). Animal Genetics. 2009; 40: 576–578. DOI: 10.111/j.1365-2052.2009.01869.x
  4. 4. Hughes JM, Schmidt DJ, Huey JA, Real KM, Espinoza T, McDougall A, Kind PK, Brooks S, Roberts DT. Extremely low microsatellite diversity but distinct population structure in a long-lived threatened species, the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri (Dipnoi). Plos One. 2015; 10: e0121858. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121858
  5. 5. Bai X, Huang S, Tian X, Cao X, Chen G, Wang W. Genetic diversity and parentage assignment in Dojo loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus based on microsatellite markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2015; 61: 12–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.05.005
  6. 6. Ma HY, Chen SL, Yang JF, Chen SQ, Liu WH. Genetic linkage maps of barfin flounder (Verasper moseri) and spotted halibut (Verasper variegatus) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Molecular Biology Reports. 2011; 38: 4749–4764. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-010-0612-2
  7. 7. Nietlisbach P, Camenisch G, Bucher T, Slate J, Keller LF, Postma E. A microsatellite-based linkage map for song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015; 15: 1486–1496. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12414
  8. 8. Ibitoye DO, Akin-Idowu PE. Marker-assisted-selection (MAS): A fast track to increase genetic gain in horticultural crop breeding. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010; 9: 8889–8895. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2010.000-3318
  9. 9. Chen SL, Ji XS, Shao CW, Li WL, Yang JF, Liang Z, Liao XL, Xu GB, Xu Y, Song WT. Induction of mitogynogenetic diploids and identification of WW super-female using sex-specific SSR markers in half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Marine Biotechnology. 2012; 14: 120–128. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-011-9395-2
  10. 10. Takano M, Barinova A, Sugaya T, Obata Y, Watanabe T, Ikeda M, Taniguchi N. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite DNA markers from mangrove crab, Scylla paramamosain. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2005; 5: 794–795. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01065.x
  11. 11. Xu XJ, Wang GZ, Wang KJ, Li SJ. Isolation and characterization of ten new polymorphic microsatellite loci in the mud crab, Scylla paramamosain. Conservation Genetics. 2009; 10: 1877–1878. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-9843-y
  12. 12. Ma HY, Ma CY, Ma LB, Cui HY. Novel polymorphic microsatellite markers in Scylla paramamosainand cross-species amplification in related crab species. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2010; 30: 441–444. DOI: 10.1651/09-3263.1
  13. 13. Ma HY, Ma CY, Ma LB, Zhang FY, Qiao ZG. Isolation and characterization of 54 polymorphic microsatellite markers in Scylla paramamosain by FIASCO approach. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 2011; 42: 591–597. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00503.x
  14. 14. Ma HY, Ma CY, Ma LB. Identification of type I microsatellite markers associated with genes and ESTs in Scylla paramamosain. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2011; 39: 371–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2011.05.007
  15. 15. Cui HY, Ma HY, Ma LB. Development of eighteen polymorphic microsatellite markers in Scylla paramamosain by 5’ anchored PCR technique. Molecular Biology Reports. 2011; 38: 4999–5002. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-010-0645-6
  16. 16. Ma CY, Ma HY, Ma LB, Jiang KJ, Zhang FY, Song W. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci from cDNA library of Scylla paramamosain. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011; 10: 11142–11148. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.973
  17. 17. Ma HY, Jiang W, Liu P, Feng NN, Ma QQ, Ma CY, Li SJ, Liu YX, Qiao ZG, Ma LB. Identification of transcriptome-derived microsatellite markers and their association with the growth performance of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain). Plos One. 2014; 9: e89134. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089134
  18. 18. Ma HY, Ma CY, Li SJ, Jiang W, Li XC, Liu YX, Ma LB. Transcriptome analysis of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) by 454 deep sequencing: assembly, annotation, and marker discovery. Plos One. 2014; 9: e102668. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102668
  19. 19. Ma HY, Cui HY, Ma CY, Ma LB. High genetic diversity and low differentiation in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) along the southeastern coast of China revealed by microsatellite markers. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012; 215: 3120–3125. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.071654
  20. 20. Ma QQ, Ma HY, Chen JH, Ma CY, Feng NN, Xu Z, Li SJ, Jiang W, Qiao ZG, Ma LB. Parentage assignment of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) based on microsatellite markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2013; 49: 62–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2013.03.013
  21. 21. Ma HY, Li SJ, Feng NN, Ma CY, Wang W, Chen W, Ma LB. First genetic linkage map for the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) constructed using microsatellite and AFLP markers. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2016; 15: gmr.15026929. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15026929
  22. 22. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T. POPGENE version 1.31. Microsoft window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. 1999. Available from: http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/.
  23. 23. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. ARLEQUIN (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics. 2005; 1: 47–50.
  24. 24. Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989; 43: 223–225. DOI: 10.2307/2409177
  25. 25. Van OCW, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2004; 4: 535–538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
  26. 26. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2006; 6: 288–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
  27. 27. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA 4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24: 1596–1599. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm092
  28. 28. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research. 1967; 27: 209–220.
  29. 29. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology. 2007; 16: 1099–1106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
  30. 30. Van OJW. JoinMap 3.0: software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International. 2001. Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  31. 31. Voorrips RE. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Journal of Heredity. 2002; 93: 77–78. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
  32. 32. Fishman L, Kelly AJ, Morgan E, Willis JH. A genetic map in the Mimulus guttatus species complex reveals transmission ratio distortion due to heterospecific interactions. Genetics. 2001; 159: 1701–1716.
  33. 33. Chakravarti A, Lasher LK, Reefer JE. A maximum likelihood method for estimating genome length using genetic linkage data. Genetics. 1991; 128: 175–182.
  34. 34. Lu XP, Ma LB, Qiao ZG, Zhang FY, Ma CY. Population genetic structure of Scylla paramamosain from the coast of the Southeastern China based on mtDNA COI sequence. Journal of Fisheries of China. 2009; 33: 15–23. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.00001 (In Chinese with English abstract)
  35. 35. Nei M. Melecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York, Columbia University. 1987.
  36. 36. Avise J. Phylogeography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1998.
  37. 37. He L, Zhang A, Weese D, Zhu C, Jiang C, Qiao Z. Late Pleistocene population expansion of Scylla paramamosain along the coast of China: a population dynamic response to the last interglacial sea level highstand. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2010; 385: 20–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.01.019
  38. 38. Zhang YG, Li DQ, Rao LQ, Xiao QM, Liu D. Identification of polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci and paternity testing of Amur tigers. Acta Zoologica Sinica. 2003; 49: 118–123. (In Chinese with English Abstract)
  39. 39. Zhang ZH, Sen FJ, Sun S, David VA, Zhang AJ, O’Brien SJ. Paternity assignment of giant panda by microsatellite genotyping. Hereditas. 2003; 25: 504–510. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2003.05.002 (In Chinese with English Abstract)
  40. 40. Yang J, Zhang XF, Chu ZY, Sun XW. Correlation analysis of microsatellite markers with body weight, length, height and upper jaw length wensize of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Journal of Fishery Sciences of China. 2010; 17: 721–730. (In Chinese with English Abstract)
  41. 41. Liu L, Li J, Liu P, Zhao FZ, Gao BQ, Du Y, Ma CY. Correlation analysis of microsatellite DNA markers with growth related traits of swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus). Journal of Fisheries of China. 2012; 36: 1034–1041. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1231.2012.27872 (In Chinese with English abstract)
  42. 42. Li XH, Bai JJ, Ye X, Hu YC, Li SJ, Yu LY. Polymorphisms in the 5’ flanking region of the insulin-like growth factor I gene are associated with growth traits in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Fisheries Science. 2009; 75: 351–358. DOI: 10.1007/s12562-008-0051-3
  43. 43. Liebhard R, Koller B, Gianfranceschi L, Gessler C. Creating a saturated reference map for the apple (Malus × domesticaBorkh.) genome. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2003; 106: 1497–1508. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1209-0
  44. 44. Chen XL, Wang GZ, Chen LH, Li SJ. Methodological improvement and its application effect in chromosome study of mud crab, Scylla serrata. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait. 2004; 23: 347–353. (In Chinese with English Abstract)

Written By

Hongyu Ma, Chunyan Ma, Lingbo Ma, Xincang Li and Yuanyou Li

Submitted: March 3rd, 2016 Reviewed: July 27th, 2016 Published: November 30th, 2016