Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Autophagy in Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Written By

Huan-Bin Shi, Shuang Liang, Lu-Yao Huang, Xiao-Hong Liu, Xue- Ming Zhu, Ya-Hui Zhao and Fu-Cheng Lin

Submitted: 29 March 2016 Reviewed: 17 June 2016 Published: 10 November 2016

DOI: 10.5772/64634

From the Edited Volume

Autophagy in Current Trends in Cellular Physiology and Pathology

Edited by Nikolai V. Gorbunov and Marion Schneider

Chapter metrics overview

2,418 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Autophagy is a ubiquitous and conserved process in eukaryotic cells from yeasts to mammals. It also appears to play vital roles in plant pathogenic fungi, impacting growth, morphology, development, and pathogenicity. In this chapter, we have introduced a new concept to delineate the role of autophagy in homeostasis of plant pathogenic fungi and in their interaction with host cells, in breach of host barrier, and in the mechanisms of plant fungal infection.


  • plant pathogenic fungi
  • autophagy
  • selective autophagy
  • process and function
  • molecular mechanism

1. Introduction of plant pathogenic fungi

Filamentous fungi play important roles in health care, agriculture, and bioprocessing. There are thousands of species of plant pathogenic fungi that collectively are responsible for 70% of all known plant diseases. An improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms of plant fungal pathogenesis will ultimately lead to better control of plant fungal diseases. However, until recently, the complexity of fungal pathogen-plant host interactions made for slow progress in understanding both the mechanisms of plant host resistance and fungal pathogenesis. Over the last 40 years, the development and application of productive approaches based on genetics and molecular biology has led to the cloning and analysis of many plant resistance genes and fungal pathogenesis determinants to reveal a plethora of fungus-plant molecular interactions [13]. Diverse plant organs present different obstacles to infection by potential fungal pathogens, and therefore successful pathogens have evolved specific strategies, especially infection structures, that are able to break through host plant roots, stems, leaves, flowers, or other special tissues. These infection structures are usually modified hyphae specialized for the invasion of the target host plant tissue(s).

The typical life cycle of plant pathogenic fungi includes an asexual and a sexual stage. In the asexual stage, pathogens often repeatedly produce many asexual spores during the crop growing season; these play important roles in the spread of plant disease. The asexual spores germinate into filamentous hyphae, which can differentiate into a series of complex infection structures such as infection cushions, haustoria, appressoria, penetration pegs, and others [4]. This stage plays an important role in the spread of plant disease. When the vegetative growth stage reaches a certain period of time, fungi begin to enter the sexual stage to form various sexual spores, which are the initial sources of infection during the next disease cycle, in addition to giving rise to offspring and aiding pathogenic fungi in adverse environments. In favor of pathogens undergoing successful sporulation and infection, autophagy plays important roles in nutrient homeostasis. However, studies examining the role of autophagy are still not advanced in plant pathogenic fungi. With the publication of the genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 1996, the use of yeast as a model system to study the molecular mechanisms of autophagy came to the fore. The noteworthy discovery of the role of autophagy, following its induction by nutrient starvation, in the development of turgor in the appressorium represents a milestone emphasizing the importance of recognizing the role of autophagy in the formation of infection structures in plant pathogenic fungi. This achievement adds to our fundamental knowledge of both plant fungal pathogenesis and the biological roles of autophagy [5]. In the last two decades, our knowledge has advanced remarkably and autophagy has been examined in organisms from yeast to plant pathogenic fungi, such as Magnaporthe oryzae, Colletortrichum spp., Fusarium spp., and Ustilago maydis.

The rice blast fungus, M. oryzae, a filamentous ascomycete fungus, is the causal agent of rice blast disease, the most destructive disease of rice worldwide [6]. M. oryzae differentiates a special infection structure, the appressorium, to rupture the strong cuticular layer, which is the first defense barrier of the plant host, and gain entry to colonize into plant tissue [4, 7]. The appressorium is a flattened, hyphal structure that is used to enter host cells during infection. It generates colossal intracellular turgor pressure (as much as 8.0 MPa), allowing it to penetrate the leaf cuticle. The mechanical forces that generate a mature appressorium and deliver its penetration peg have been confirmed by researchers worldwide. This enormous turgor in the appressorium is a consequence of the accumulation of very large quantities of glycerol in the cell, and potential sources for glycerol biosynthesis are lipids and glycogen, as well as sugars, trehalose, and mannitol, in the conidium [8]. The sequenced genomes of M. oryzae have been provided online [9].

Colletotrichum is the causal agent of anthracnose and other diseases on leaves, stems, and fruits of numerous plant species, including several important crops. The damage caused by Colletotrichum spp. extends to important staple food crops, including bananas, cassava, and sorghum. In addition, it is particularly successful as a postharvest pathogen because latent infections, which are initiated before harvest, do not become active until the fruit has been stored or appears on the market shelf. Colletotrichum is highly significant as an experimental model in studies of fungal development, infection processes, host resistance, signal transduction, and the molecular biology of plant-pathogen interactions. Colletotrichum can differentiate the specialized infection structure, the appressorium, as well. Dozens of laboratories are studying the biology and pathology of various species of Colletotrichum all over the world. The sequenced genomes of C. graminicola and C. higginsianum have been provided online [10].

The ascomycete Fusarium graminearum (teleomorph Gibberella zeae) is a highly destructive pathogen of all cereal species. It causes Fusarium head blight, a devastating disease on wheat and barley. Infection causes shifts in the amino acid composition of wheat, resulting in shriveled kernels and contamination of the remaining grain with mycotoxins, primarily deoxynivalenol. Mycotoxins in grain can affect human and animal health when they enter the food chain. The other important Fusarium species, F. oxysporum, can induce susceptibility in more than 120 types of plants such as cotton, tomato, and banana. The infection process begins when the pathogen reaches the surface of plant roots, subsequently resulting in the penetration and colonization of this fungus. Ultimately, the pathogens will diffuse in the xylem vessels, which can result in both local and systemic defense responses in the host plant. The typical disease symptoms in the infected plant cells are slow growth, browning, wilting, and finally the death of the host. In addition to the economic importance of Fusarium spp., Fusarium species also serve as key model organisms for biological and evolutionary researches [11].

U. maydis, a member of the smut fungi, infects certain important crops such as wheat, maize, and barley. Smut fungi are obligate parasite pathogens, thus they live in their host plants to obtain necessary nutrition for their sexual life cycle. The haploid yeast-like form of U. maydis can be propagated on artificial media. However, this form is unable to cause disease. Two compatible haploid strains fuse and generate a dikaryotic filament to cause infection. The dikaryotic filament penetrates the host cell via invagination of the plasma membrane. Unlike the systemic infections caused by other smut fungi, U. maydis is unable to cause systemic disease and can only infect the above-ground portions of the host plant maize [12].

In addition, the genetic models Aspergillus spp., Podospora anserina, and Sordaria macrospore are discussed in this chapter. We enumerate progress in studying autophagy and describe the many differences between single cell yeasts and multiple cell fungi in the context of this process.


2. Autophagy: functional roles in eukaryotes

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system that is highly conserved in eukaryotic cells, which degrade proteins and organelles in the vacuole/lysosome. Studies examining the functions of autophagy have increased significantly in the last decade. Autophagy has a wide variety of functions in eukaryotic cells and intensive studies have shown that autophagy is not only involved in nutrient recycling but also in other cellular processes such as cellular differentiation, growth, and pathogenicity [1318].

  • Autophagy is a general term for the degradation of cytoplasmic components within lysosomes. This process is quite distinct from general endocytosis-mediated lysosomal degradation of extracellular and plasma membrane proteins [19]. There are three types of autophagy that are classified based on the different ways in which a substrate in the cytoplasm can be transferred into the vacuole/lysosome: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). In general, we often consider the term “autophagy” to refer to macroautophagy. In recent years, given the selectivity of substrates for degradation, autophagy has been divided into two types: selective autophagy and nonselective autophagy [1618, 20]. The unique organelle, called the autophagosome, mediates autophagy but where and how autophagosomes emerge has been a major question. In yeast, more than 38 Atg (autophagy-related) proteins have been identified, and most of them gather at a site that can be identified by fluorescence microscopy as a punctate spot very close to the vacuolar membrane. As autophagosomes are generated from this site, it is called the “preautophagosomal structure” (PAS) [21, 22]. However, the structure of the PAS has not been characterized until now.

2.1. Autophagy/autolysosomal events

In mammals, the regulation of autophagy is highly complicated. Limited numbers of studies examining autophagy in filamentous fungi have extended the knowledge gleaned from S. cerevisiae, the model organism for the study of autophagy [23]. Generally, autophagy consists of four sequential steps: (1) induction of autophagy; (2) recruitment of ATG proteins by phagophore assembly site proteins, the rapid formation of two-layer autophagosomal membrane structures, and isolation of the cytoplasm and organelles; (3) fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes/vacuoles, in which the inner membrane of the autophagosome and the cytoplasm-derived materials are contained in the autophagosome; and (4) degradation of autophagic bodies in the vacuole into macromolecules that will be recycled. Autophagy facilitates the recycling of cytoplasmic components as nutrients to support cell survival. This feature is remarkably different from the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which only can specifically recognize ubiquitinated proteins for proteasomal degradation. Autophagy can selectively or nonselectively degrade proteins and fragments of organisms to maintain essential activity and viability in response to nutrient limitation.

2.2. The induction and inhibition of autophagy

Like yeast or mammals, fungal autophagy is typically induced by nutrition (e.g., carbon and nitrogen) starvation [24]. Conversely, autophagy is inhibited by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a central cell growth regulator that is connected with growth factor and nutrient sensing. It has been demonstrated that the molecular mechanism is regulated by the mammalian autophagy-initiating kinase Ulk1, a homolog of yeast Atg1 [25]. Under nutrient-rich conditions, TOR kinase is activated and phosphorylates Atg13. Phosphorylated Atg13 does not possess sufficient affinity for the Atg1 kinase and cannot form a complex with Atg1. Thus, the process of autophagy is inhibited [26, 27].

Rapamycin is an inducer of autophagy as inhibition of mTOR mimics cellular starvation by blocking signals required for cell growth and proliferation. Fungi can also be induced by treatment with rapamycin, often with concentrations between 200 and 500 ng/ml in fungal culture [23, 24, 28, 29].

2.3. Autophagy in nutrient recycling

Under nutrient-limited conditions, autophagy can serve as a nutrient recycling pathway to support cell survival [30]. This role was demonstrated in the autophagy-deficient Aspergillus fumigatus ΔAfatg1 mutant strain that experienced limited growth on a nutrient starvation medium (i.e., water-agarose), while the wild-type strain could maintain growth on the same medium. After reconstituting AfATG1 back into the mutant, the complemented strain exhibited the same phenotype as the wild-type strain, suggesting that autophagy can recycle nutrients for growth [31]. For fungi, the colony margin mycelium is more active than the central mycelium and the inner hyphal network recycles nutrients to complement the growing tips [32]. When autophagy was blocked in ΔMoatg1 mutants of M. oryzae, growth of the ΔMoatg1 mutants was assessed on minimal media lacking either of the two crucial nutrients, nitrogen and carbon, and ΔMoatg1 mutant colonies spread more slowly than those of the wild-type strain in both the cases [5]. These studies provide evidence that autophagy is required to support growth.

2.4. Autophagy in cellular degradation

Filamentous fungi have no lysosomes, like mammals, but the vacuoles play a similar role as degradative organelles. Hyphal vacuolation has been shown to increase rapidly in nutrient-starved Aspergillus oryzae mycelia [33]. It has been demonstrated that autophagic bodies can be visualized in vacuoles under starvation conditions; however, autophagic bodies cannot be detected in autophagy-blocked mutants, such as in the A. fumigatus ΔAfatg1 mutant or in the M. oryzae ΔMoatg1, 4, 5, and 9 mutants [5, 31, 3436]. Mon1 or Ypt7 are essential for vesicle fusion and vacuole morphology in yeast, and deleting the homologous genes in M. oryzae results in autophagy blockage in the mutants [37, 38].

2.5. Autophagy in cellular differentiation

In eukaryotic cells, autophagy is involved in cellular differentiation and development [14]. In plant pathogenic fungi, blocked autophagy impacts the phenotypes and morphologies of fungi. In the M. oryzae autophagy-deficient mutant ΔMoatg8, sucrose or glucose supplementation suppresses conidiation defects but the appressorium loses the ability to penetrate [39]. Deletion of MoATG4 or MoATG8 results in nuclear degeneration during appressorium formation and a drastic reduction in asexual conidiospore formation [34, 39]. Deletion of the lipase gene ATG15 in F. graminearum results in reduced degradation of storage lipids [40]. Deletion of autophagy genes also inhibits the formation of sexual reproductive organs such as protoperithecia in P. anserina and perithecia in M. oryzae [5, 41]. These findings strongly suggest that autophagy is needed for proper cellular differentiation in several species of filamentous fungi. However, autophagy does not always appear to be involved in cellular differentiation. For example, hyphal differentiation in Δatg9 mutant of the filamentous yeast Candida albicans does not affect the formation of chlamydospores [42]. Thus, there may be diverse roles for autophagy in the fungal differentiation of different species.


3. Macroautophagy-related genes studied in plant pathogenic fungi

Macroautophagy is the most widely studied type of autophagy. Many ATG genes involved in this process have been identified and characterized in yeast, plant, and mammals [43]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that autophagy is a conserved catabolic pathway in plant pathogenic fungi and plays vital roles in development and differentiation among plant pathogens [44]. In contrast to yeast, many plant pathogenic fungi form special infection structures that can rupture the plant cuticle to gain entry to internal tissue, ultimately causing plant disease. The appressorium is known as a typical feature of some of the most important cereal pathogens such as the devastating rice blast disease-causing fungus, M. oryzae. Macroautophagy-related genes have been studied extensively in the plant pathogens M. oryzae, Aspergillus spp., Colletotrichum spp., Fusarium spp., and U. maydis.

3.1. The Atg1 kinase complex

In S. cerevisiae, Atg1, which encodes a serine/threonine kinase, forms a complex with Atg13, Atg17, Atg29, and Atg31 that are required for PAS formation. The Atg1 complex initiates the formation of the autophagosome by forming a scaffold to recruit other complexes [45]. Homologs of the yeast ATG1 gene have been identified and characterized in many filamentous fungi including Colletotrichum lindemuthianum [46], M. oryzae [5], and P. anserina [41]. Random insertional mutagenesis in C. lindemuthianum clones produced mutations in a putative serine/threonine protein kinase named Clk1 that is associated with pathogenicity in the common bean. Clk1 is homologous to Atg1 in S. cerevisiae, although its role in autophagy has not been reported [46]. Disruption of the ATG1 gene results in blockage of the autophagy process as confirmed by a defect in autophagosome formation and the absence of autophagic bodies in the vacuole in P. anserina [47]. In M. oryzae, deletion of MgATG1(MoATG1) causes reduced conidiation, delayed spore germination, and loss of pathogenicity on barley and rice due to interrupted autophagy [5]. Similarly, deletion of BcATG1 inhibits autophagosome accumulation in the vacuoles of nitrogen-starved cells. A null mutant of BcATG1 is defective in vegetative growth, conidiation, sclerotial formation, and appressorium formation [48]. Functional analysis of AoATG1 in A. oryzae shows that conidiation and aerial hyphae are reduced significantly. Overexpression of AoAtg1 leads to decreased conidiation and excessive development of aerial hyphae [49]. These data are consistent with the role of S. cerevisiae ATG1 in the induction of autophagy.

Upon starvation induction, Atg13 is rapidly dephosphorylated and subsequently activates Atg1 kinase activity. Atg13 binds to the C-terminus of Atg1 and this interaction occurs in a constitutive manner [50]. Data from M. oryzae show that MoATG13 and MoATG29 are not essential for turgor generation and rice blast formation [51]. Although the AoATG13 deletion mutant exhibits a reduction in conidiation and aerial hyphae, the mutant still exhibits autophagic activity in A. oryzae [52]. Thus, unlike S. cerevisiae Atg13, there may be another Atg13 in these plant pathogens.

3.2. Atg9-mediated vesicle transport

In yeast, Atg9 is a transmembrane protein consisting of six transmembrane domains with the amino and carboxyl termini exposed in the cytosol. Atg9 is positioned on the PAS and peripheral sites, shuttling and delivering membrane to form the phagophore. Atg1-Atg13 and Atg2-Atg18 facilitate Atg9-mediated vesicle transport from the PAS to peripheral sites [53], and the return of Atg9-mediated vesicle transport depends on Atg11, Atg23, and Atg27 [54, 55]. A new report indicates that Atg9 is a direct target of Atg1 kinase. Phosphorylated Atg9 is essential for the recruitment of Atg8 and Atg18 to the PAS and extension of the isolation membrane [56].

The functional characterization of Atg9 homologs in filamentous fungi has been documented. In M. oryzae, knockout of 23 autophagy-related genes confirmed that MoATG9 is essential for rice blast formation [51]. Dong et al. also characterized the MoAtg9-mediated trafficking process in detail by observing the fluorescent localization of MoAtg9 in the wild-type strain and null mutants of MoATG1, 2, 13, and 18. MoAtg9 cycling depends on MoAtg1, 2, and 18 but not on MoAtg13. The null mutant of MoATG9 exhibits similar phenotypes to the MoATG1 deletion mutant, such as poor sporulation and appressorium formation, blockage of autophagy, and lack of pathogenicity on susceptible rice [35].

3.3. The two ubiquitin-like systems in autophagy

The process of autophagy involves two ubiquitin-like systems, the Atg12 and Atg8 conjugation systems. Both play key roles in bending and extension of the autophagosome membrane [45]. In the Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 ubiquitin-like system, Atg5 can directly bind the membrane, a process that is negatively regulated by Atg12 and positively regulated by Atg16 [57]. Identification of the proteins associated with the autophagosome has been performed in filamentous fungi. Disruption of the gene BbATG5 resulted in abnormal conidia and reduction in growth, germination, blastospore formation, conidiation, and virulence in Beauveria bassiana [58]. Disruption of MoATG5 in M. oryzae caused loss of pathogenicity, reduced conidiation, and perithecia formation [34]. In Trichoderma reesei, TrATG5 gene knockout resulted in reduced conidiation and abnormal conidiophores [59]. Null mutants Moatg12 and Moatg16 also result in loss of pathogenicity in M. oryzae [51]. We can conclude that the Atg12 ubiquitin-like system is associated with conidiation and pathogenicity in plant pathogens.

Atg8 is another ubiquitin-like protein associated with autophagosome formation throughout the autophagy process and is well conserved in most model organisms and higher eukaryotes. It is associated with the autophagosome membrane and has been used as a marker for autophagy [60]. The amount of Atg8 can regulate the volume of autophagosomes by controlling phagophore expansion [61, 62]. The Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex acts like an E3 ligase, catalyzing Atg8 to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) on the membrane [57].

Deletion of the ATG8 gene in fungi detrimentally inhibits autophagy and affects cellular growth and differentiation [63]. Deletion of FgATG8 in the necrotrophic plant pathogen F. graminearum results in loss of perithecia, reduced conidiation, and collapse of the aerial hyphae [64]. Lipid utilization is dependent on autophagy in F. graminearum for providing nutrients for the nonassimilating portion of the fungi. Although the ability to infect plants is not affected in the null mutant Fgatg8, plant colonization cannot be seen from spikelet to spikelet as with the wild-type fungus [64]. In F. oxysporum, the autophagy-related gene FoATG8 is involved in nuclear degradation after hyphal fusion and the control of nuclear distribution [65]. The null mutant Smatg8 in S. macrospore results in fruiting body loss, impaired ascospore germination, and the ability to undergo hyphal fusion [66]. In M. oryzae, loss of MoATG8 blocks autophagic conidial cell death leading to impaired appressorium formation, loss of pathogenicity, and reduced conidiation [67]. Consistent with its function in M. oryzae, CoATG8 is also involved in normal conidiation, appressorium formation, and pathogenicity in C. orbiculare [68]. Disruption of the AoATG8 gene causes severe defects in the formation of aerial hyphae and conidia by affecting the autophagy process in A. oryzae [69].

The Atg12 and Atg8, two ubiquitin-like conjugating systems, share the same E1-like activating enzyme, Atg7, but have different E2-like conjugating enzymes: Atg10 and Atg3, respectively [45]. In M. oryzae, MoATG7, MoATG10, and MoATG3 are all associated with pathogenicity. Deletion of any of these causes a loss of pathogenicity in M. oryzae [51]. Atg4, a cysteine protease, is responsible for the first cleavage of Atg8 to expose its C-terminal glycine and the second cleavage from PE to recycle Atg8 [47]. In M. oryzae, the cleavage event mediated by MoAtg4 is also conserved as observed in in vitro assays. Disruption of MoAtg4 blocks autophagy and causes defects like other null mutants of autophagy-related genes in M. oryzae [36]. In Sordaria macrospora, SmAtg4 is also capable of cleaving the SmAtg8 precursor [66]. Deletion of AoATG4 results in the loss of aerial hyphae and reduced conidiation, resulting from the destruction of autophagy in A. oryzae [52].

3.4. The PI3K complex

Another protein complex required for autophagy in yeast is the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex that involves Vps15, Vps34, Atg6, and Atg14 [45]. All of these proteins, with the exception of Atg14, are conserved in filamentous fungi. In S. cerevisiae, this complex is not specific to autophagy and is also involved in the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting pathway (CVT) pathway and a fairly diverse array of signaling and membrane transport events including Golgi to vacuole transport [61]. Thus, it is likely that autophagy may be impacted by other cellular signaling events. There have been few studies examining this complex in plant pathogens except in M. oryzae. A null mutant of MoATG6 resulted in the loss of pathogenicity [50].

3.5. Membrane fusion

The membrane fusion of the autophagosome and vacuole requires many proteins. The autophagosome first docks with the surface of a vacuole, and then the outer membrane fuses with the vacuolar membrane. The proteins involved in this step are mostly those proteins which are implicated in membrane fusion, such as the SNARE family proteins and the homotypic fusion and vacuolar protein sorting (HOPS) tethering complex [70, 71]. Once inside the vacuolar lumen, the single-membrane vesicle turns into the autophagic body.

Many SNARE proteins have been characterized in plant pathogens especially in M. oryzae and F. graminearum. In M. oryzae, MoVam7 is essential for vacuolar membrane fusion and vacuolar maturation [72]. MoSec22, an R-SNARE protein, is involved in endocytosis. Both MoVam7 and MoSec22 are required for growth, conidiation, and pathogenicity in M. oryzae [73]. Recently, another syntaxin protein, MoSyn8, has been identified for its role in regulating intracellular trafficking in M. oryzae [74]. In F. graminearum, FgVam7, a homolog of Vam7, plays an important role in regulating cellular differentiation and virulence [75]. Roles for these SNARE proteins in fungal development have been explored in depth but their functions in the autophagy process must be further evaluated. It has been reported that the HOPS subunit MoVps39 is crucial for pathogenicity in M. oryzae due to its role in anchoring G protein signaling. Rab GTPases also function in vesicle-vacuolar fusion [76]. In M. oryzae, MoYpt7, a homolog of Ypt7 in yeast, has been confirmed to be required for autophagy by affecting membrane fusion and assembly of the mature vacuole [37]. MoMon1, an ortholog of S. cerevisiae Mon1, is also required for membrane fusion in mature vacuolar formation [38]. Consistent with the results in M. oryzae, it has also been demonstrated that the F. graminearum homologs of Ypt7 and Mon1 are conserved in vacuole fusion and autophagy [77, 78].

3.6. Degradation of the autophagic body

The last step during autophagy is the degradation of the autophagic body in the vacuoles and recycling of cellular macromolecules to supply nutrient. Two autophagy-related proteins, Atg15 and Atg22, have been identified in yeast and are involved in this process [45]. Atg15 is a putative lipase involved in the lysis of CVT bodies, autophagic bodies, and incorporated peroxisomes in the vacuole [79]. Atg15 is well conserved in yeast and filamentous fungi, but it contains a distinct repeat motif at its C-terminus in front of the Ser/Thr-rich region [80]. In A. oryzae, AoAtg15 is required for autophagosome formation and the lysis of autophagic bodies. A null mutant of Aoatg15 exhibits differentiation defects for the aerial hyphae and conidia [52]. Disruption of FgATG15 causes a delay in lipid body degradation and utilization and abnormal development of the conidia and aerial hyphae formation [81]. In M. oryzae, MoATG15 is also involved in pathogenicity [53]. On the other hand, Atg22 is an integral vacuolar transmembrane protein with structural similarity to permeates. It may function as a transporter in the export of recycled amino acids from the vacuole to the cytosol [82]. In A. nidulans and many other filamentous fungi, multiple paralogs of Atg22-like proteins have been identified [80]. In P. anserina, the pspA/idi-6 gene encoding serine protease A is the functional ortholog of the S. cerevisiae vacuolar protease B (Prb1). Both of these proteases are involved in autophagy [47].


4. Selective autophagy in plant pathogenic fungi

With the exception of bulk autophagy, which is nonselective, eukaryotic cells possess several types of selective autophagy to maintain homeostasis during stress. These processes include the CVT pathway (which is only found in S. cerevisiae), pexophagy (which targets peroxisomes), mitophagy (the specific elimination of mitochondria), nucleophagy (which targets the nucleus), reticulophagy (which mediates the turnover of the endoplasmic reticulum), and ribophagy (the specific elimination of ribosomes) [83]. Here, we provide a brief introduction to the mechanisms that have been identified and the development of selective autophagy in plant pathogenic fungi.

4.1. Pexophagy

Peroxisomes share enzymes involved in the β-oxidation of fatty acids and the production and degradation of H2O2 or other reactive oxygen species (ROS); thus, homeostasis in peroxisomes plays an important role in survival and development. Researchers have found that peroxisomes exhibit high variability under changing circumstances because their numbers can be rapidly increased when their functions are required but then can be quickly recycled when they are not essential to avoid wasting energy [84]. There are two biological processes that explain this phenomenon: the process of peroxisome growth and division and the specific degradation of peroxisomes by autophagy, known as pexophagy. Studies of methylotrophic yeasts have shown that two distinct, selective modes are exploited for pexophagy: macropexophagy and micropexophagy. It appears that high levels of ATP activate micropexophagy, while lower levels induce macropexophagy. Macropexophagy is initiated at a specific PAS (different from the CVT pathway); newly synthesized membrane wraps around and sequesters the peroxisomes one by one and then forms a double membrane pexophagosome, which is ultimately delivered to the vacuole. In contrast to macropexophagy, a cluster of peroxisomes is swallowed by vacuolar sequestering membranes (VSMs) in micropexophagy. Meanwhile, the micropexophagy-specific membrane apparatus (MIPA), which mediates fusion between the tips of the invagination vacuoles, extends from the PAS. Finally, membrane scission occurs on the inner side of the vacuolar membrane and the peroxisomes are cracked [85].

Among 38 ATG genes that have been identified in yeasts, 16 Atg proteins constitute the core machinery mediating the formation of the autophagosome for almost all types of autophagy. While the specialization of any selective autophagy pathway is determined by the selective cargo recognized and engulfed by the autophagosomes, this requires the help of other selective autophagy-specific ATG genes. In Pichia pastoris, phosphorylated Atg30 physically interacts directly with Atg11 and Atg17. These two proteins act as scaffolds at the PAS to recruit other proteins. In Hansenula polymorpha, Atg25 is essential to connect Atg11 and Atg17. In contrast, Atg30 is required for macropexophagy in S. cerevisiae. During the final stages of pexophagy in P. pastoris and S. cerevisiae, Atg24 is involved in the regulation of membrane fusion at the vacuolar surface. Atg26 is a sterol glucosyltransferase that synthesizes sterol glucoside and is necessary for both modes of pexophagy but not bulk autophagy. In P. pastoris, the protein is associated with the MIPA during micropexophagy [86].

In the cucumber anthracnose fungus C. orbiculare, pexophagy is required for phytopathogenicity. To penetrate host epidermal cells and cause infection, C. orbiculare forms a specific structure, the appressorium. Researchers showed that while appressoria could still form in the Coatg26 deletion mutant, the infection process was severely delayed. Furthermore, deletion of Coatg8 impaired formation of the appressoria, suggesting the important role of autophagy during infection. A GFP fusion protein was peroxisomally expressed in C. orbiculare to monitor peroxisome conditions. Massive fluorescent dots could be observed in the wild-type strain and Coatg26 mutant showing that the Atg26 null mutant still possessed a normal ability to perform peroxisome biosynthesis. The authors also observed that CoAtg8-tagged phagophores could swallow the peroxisomes through diffusion of GFP inside the vacuoles in the wild-type strain. However, bright peroxisomal dots were present in the appressoria of the Coatg26 mutant. This indicated that appressoria pexophagy of the Coatg26 mutant was significantly impaired compared with the wild-type strain. Taken together, nonselective general autophagy is essential for early stage pathogen development and Atg26-dependent selective pexophagy is essential for later stages of infection [68].

4.2. Mitophagy

Mitochondria are the sites of oxidative metabolism in eukaryotic organisms and are the places where the energy is released by the final oxidation of carbohydrates, fats, and amino acids. Reactive oxygen species are a side-product of the mitochondria. ROS release damages mitochondrial DNA and proteins and other cellular compartments, e.g., nuclear DNA. Thus, mitochondrial homeostasis is critical for organisms. Mitochondria degradation is mediated through a selective type of autophagy, called mitophagy. In S. cerevisiae, Atg32 (a mitochondrial outer membrane protein) functions as a receptor protein that interacts with Atg11 and Atg8 [87]. Recent studies show that a portion of the molecular mechanism involved in mitochondrial fission participates in mitophagy [88].

In M. oryzae, Atg24-assisted mitophagy in the foot cells is necessary for proper asexual differentiation and functions in redox homeostasis and nutrient modulation. MoAtg24, a sorting nexin related to yeast Snx4, is only required for mitophagy. The ΔMoatg24 strain exhibited a decreased rate of conidiophore formation and reduced aerial hyphal growth. Subcellular localization of MoAtg24-GFP under ROS stress and starvation conditions found that MoAtg24-GFP was localized to the mitochondria and studies employing Mito-GFP clearly indicated signals in the foot cells. The Bin-Amphiphysin-Rvs (BAR) and Phox homology (PX) domains of MoAtg24 are essential for its mitochondrial localization [89].

4.3. Reticulophagy and ribophagy

The ribosome is a cellular ribonucleoprotein particle that is primarily composed of RNA (rRNA) and proteins, and its only function is to catalyze amino acids for proteins according to the instructions imparted by the mRNA. Ribophagy involves degradation of the 60S ribosomal subunit and is regulated by both ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Some proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) shortly after synthesis begins. The ER also modulates the modification and processing of protein folding and assembly and transport of nascent peptides. Like other selective autophagy pathways, reticulophagy and nucleophagy should be highly controlled. ERphagy is differentially induced, depending on the intensity and type of the ER stress [90]. This shows that the Ypt/Rab GTPase module, formed by the Trs85 containing the Ypt1, the Atg11 effector and the TRAPPIII GEF, functions in reticulophagy. With the exception of Ypt/Rab GTPases [91], macroreticulophagy also depends on Atgs and their cargos. In conclusion, Atg9-dependent ERphagy involved autophagy of the endoplasmic reticulum, Ypt1- and core Atg-dependent phagy mediate the organization of PAS, and Ypt51-dependent phagy mediates the delivery of autophagosomes to the vacuole [92].

Recently, researchers identified two Atg8-binding proteins in S. cerevisiae, Atg39 and Atg40, both of which are receptors for reticulophagy. ER consists of 3 subdomains in S. cerevisiae, specifically, the cytoplasmic ER (cytoER), the cortical ER (cER), and the perinuclear ER (pnER), i.e., the nuclear envelope (NE). Atg39 specifically localizes to the pnER/NE and induces autophagic sequestration of double-membrane vesicles as well as some intranuclear components. Thus, the Atg39-dependent pathway should also be called nucleophagy. Atg40 is primarily responsible for cER/cytoERphagy. Atg39 mutant cells die earlier than wild-type cells under prolonged nitrogen starvation, while Atg40 mutant cells do not, suggesting the physiological significance of the pnER-autophagy pathway. It is still unknown whether the generation of nuclear envelope-derived vesicles and ER fragments are coupled with their sequestration into autophagosomes [93, 94]. The processes of reticulophagy and ribophagy still need to be studied in plant pathogens.

4.4. Nucleophagy

The removal of damaged/nonessential/entire (in some circumstances) nuclei under stress is crucial for cell survival. Nucleophagy is the selective degradation of nuclear material by autophagy. It has two modes: macronucleophagy and micronucleophagy. Two processes (piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus, PMN, and late nucleophagy) exist in S. cerevisiae and are considered microautophagy. In the PMN, two proteins, Vac8 (located in the vacuolar membrane) and Nvj1 (in the nuclear envelope), recognize each other at nucleus-vacuole (NV) junctions. Then, nuclear membranes that are associated with NV junctions invaginate into the vacuolar lumen. Sequestration of the nuclear cargo occurs via the fission of nuclear membranes and the vacuolar membrane, and ultimately a triple-membrane PMN vesicle is released into the vacuolar lumen and is degraded. The cargo that is sequestered by PMN includes nonessential nuclear components; PMN requires the core ATG genes, and specific ATG genes are necessary at the step in which the vacuolar membrane fuses. Conversely, late nucleophagy can occur in the absence of Nvj1, Vac8, and Atg11 [95].

Micronucleophagy has been studied in A. oryzae. EGFP-tagged Atg8 has been utilized to track autophagosomal structures. Large autophagosomes (1–2 mm in diameter) are formed around the nuclei and then sequester whole targets. Subsequently, nuclear material is dispersed throughout neighboring vacuoles, suggesting that autophagosomes forming close to targeted nuclei in turn sequester whole nuclei [96]. Micronucleophagy has been studied in M. oryzae. A dome-shaped structure, called the appressorium, penetrates host tissues. To form appressoria, spores undergo a series of autophagy steps including nuclear degeneration. In contrast to piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus, nuclear degradation in M. oryzae is dependent on core autophagy genes, and fungi, such as A. oryzae, possess large autophagosomes, while M. oryzae’s autophagosomes are smaller and more punctate [97].

In M. oryzae, core ATG genes such as MoATG1, MoATG5, and MoATG8 were studied in the context of pathogenicity but given that these genes are essential for both selective and bulk autophagy, it is still unknown if selective autophagy has a critical function in the fungal pathogenicity of M. oryzae [98]. Kershaw et al. conducted a mass gene knockout in M. oryzae to analyze 22 ATG genes [51]. The results showed that M. oryzae becomes nonpathogenic on rice when it loses any one of the core ATG genes but is still pathogenic in the absence of ATG genes for selective autophagy (ATG11, 24, 26–29).


5. Conclusions

In this report, we have introduced a new concept to delineate the role of autophagy in homeostasis of plant pathogenic fungi and in their interaction with host cells, breach of host barrier, and in the mechanisms of plant fungal infection. More knowledge of the diverse modes of autophagy is likely to help us understand the mechanisms of fungal pathogen-plant host interactions. In addition, pathogenic fungi are multicellular organisms that undergo constant polar growth that is completely different from yeast. Due to the differences between yeast and multicellular organisms, greater divergence has been revealed in terms of the CVT pathway, SNARE proteins, and selective autophagy, as mentioned in this chapter. It is necessary to create a new system to analyze autophagy in filamentous fungi. Furthermore, with the development of metabolomics and proteomics, studies of autophagy in plant pathogenic fungi can be combined with new technologies based on the molecular mechanisms of autophagy.



This study was supported by grants (no. 31371890 and no. 31370171) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


  1. 1. Keen NT. Gene-for-gene complementarity in plant-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1990; 24: 447–463. Doi: 10.1146/
  2. 2. Baker B, Zambryski P, Staskawicz B, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Science. 1997; 276: 726–733. Doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.726
  3. 3. Greenberg JT. Programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997; 48: 525–545. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.525
  4. 4. Deising HB, Werner S, Wernitz M. The role of fungal appressoria in plant infection. Microbes Infect. 2000; 2: 1631–1641. Doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01319-8
  5. 5. Liu XH, Lu JP, Zhang L, Dong B, Min H, et al. Involvement of a Magnaporthe grisea serine/threonine kinase gene, MgATG1, in appressorium turgor and pathogenesis. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007; 6: 997–1005. Doi: 10.1128/EC.00011-07
  6. 6. Tanweer FA, Rafii MY, Sijam K, Rahim HA, Ahmed F, et al. Current advance methods for the identification of blast resistance genes in rice. C. R. Biol. 2015; 338: 321–334. Doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.03.001
  7. 7. Dean RA. Signal pathways and appressorium morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1997; 35: 211–234. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.35.1.211
  8. 8. Wilson RA, Talbot NJ. Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009; 7: 185–195. Doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2032
  9. 9. Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Farman ML, Mitchell TK, et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature. 2005; 434: 980–986. Doi: 10.1038/nature03449
  10. 10. O'Connell RJ, Thon MR, Hacquard S, Amyotte SG, Kleemann J, et al. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat. Genet. 2012; 44: 1060–1065. Doi: 10.1038/ng.2372
  11. 11. Dean R, Van Kan JA, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Di Pietro A, et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012; 13: 414–430. Doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x
  12. 12. Brefort T, Doehlemann G, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Reissmann S, Djamei A, et al. Ustilago maydis as a pathogen. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009; 47: 423–445. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081923
  13. 13. Cuervo AM. Autophagy: in sickness and in health. Trends Cell. Biol. 2004; 14: 70–77. Doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.12.002
  14. 14. Inoue Y, Klionsky DJ. Regulation of macroautophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010; 21(7): 664–670. Doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.03.009
  15. 15. Mijaljica D, Prescott M, Devenish RJ. Microautophagy in mammalian cells: revisiting a 40-year-old conundrum. Autophagy. 2011; 7(7): 673–682. Doi: 10.4161/auto.7.7.14733
  16. 16. Parzych KR, Klionsky DJ. An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014; 20(3): 460–473. Doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5371
  17. 17. He C, Klionsky DJ. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009; 43: 67–93. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910
  18. 18. Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ. Autophagic processes in yeast: mechanism, machinery and regulation. Genetics. 2013; 194(2): 341–361. Doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.149013
  19. 19. Mizushima N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev. 2007; 21: 2861–2873. Doi: 10.1101/gad.1599207
  20. 20. Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy. 2016; 12(1): 1–222. Doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356
  21. 21. Suzuki K, Kirisako T, Kamada Y, Mizushima N, Noda T, et al. The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 5971–5981. Doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971
  22. 22. 22.Suzuki K, Ohsumi Y. Molecular machinery of autophagosome formation in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett. 2007; 581: 2156–2161. Doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.096
  23. 23. Delorme-Axford E, Guimaraes RS, Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an overview of methods to study autophagy progression. Methods. 2015; 75: 3–12. Doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.008
  24. 24. Dementhon K, Paoletti M, Pinan-Lucarré B, Loubradou-Bourges N, Sabourin M, et al. Rapamycin mimics the incompatibility reaction in the fungus Podospora anserina. Eukaryotic Cell. 2003; 2: 238–246. Doi: 10.1128/EC.2.2.238-246.2003
  25. 25. Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011; 13: 132–141. Doi: 10.1038/ncb2152
  26. 26. Chen YQ, Klionsky DJ. The regulation of autophagy—unanswered questions. J. Cell Sci. 2011; 124: 161–170. Doi: 10.1242/jcs.064576
  27. 27. Tanida I. Autophagosome formation and molecular mechanism of autophagy. Antiox. Redox Signal. 2011; 14: 2201–2214. Doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3482
  28. 28. Pinan-Lucarré B, Balguerie A, Clavé C. Accelerated cell death in Podospora autophagy mutants. Eukaryotic Cell. 2005; 4: 1765–1774. Doi: 10.1128/EC.4.11.1765-1774.2005
  29. 29. Teichert S, Wottawa M, Schönig B, Tudzynski B. Role of the Fusarium fujikuroi TOR kinase in nitrogen regulation and secondary metabolism. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006; 5: 1807–1819. Doi: 10.1128/EC.00039-06
  30. 30. Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Diff. 2005; 12: 1542–1552. Doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765
  31. 31. Richie DL, Fuller KK, Fortwendel J, Miley MD, McCarthy JW, et al. Unexpected link between metal ion deficiency and autophagy in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryotic Cell. 2007; 6: 2437–2447. Doi: 10.1128/Ec.00224-07
  32. 32. Glass NL, Rasmussen C, Roca MG, Read ND. Hyphal homing, fusion and mycelial interconnectedness. Trends Microbiol. 2004; 12: 135–141. Doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.01.007
  33. 33. Pollack JK, Zheng JL, Marten MR. Fungal mycelia show lag time before re-growth on endogenous carbon. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008; 100: 458–465. Doi: 10.1002/bit.21779
  34. 34. Lu JP, Liu XH, Feng XX, Min H, Lin FC. An autophagy gene, MgATG5, is required for cell differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr. Genet. 2009; 55: 461–473. Doi: 10.1007/s00294-009-0259-5
  35. 35. Dong B, Liu XH, Lu JP, Zhang FS, Gao HM, et al. MgAtg9 trafficking in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2009; 5: 946–953. Doi: 10.4161/auto.5.7.9161
  36. 36. Liu TB, Liu XH, Lu JP, Zhang L, Min H, et al. The cysteine protease MoAtg4 interacts with MoAtg8 and is required for differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2010; 6: 74–85. Doi: 10.4161/auto.6.1.10438
  37. 37. Liu XH, Chen SM, Gao HM, Ning GA, Shi HB, et al. The small GTPase MoYpt7 is required for membrane fusion in autophagy and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. Environ. Microbiol. 2015; 17: 4495–4510. Doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12903
  38. 38. Gao HM, Liu XG, Shi HB, Lu JP, Yang J, et al. MoMon1 is required for vacuolar assembly, conidiogenesis and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Res. Microbiol. 2013; 164: 300–309. Doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.01.001
  39. 39. Deng YZ, Ramospamplona M, Naqvi NI. Autophagy-assisted glycogen catabolism regulates asexual differentiation in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2009; 5: 33–43. Doi: 10.4161/auto.5.1.7175
  40. 40. Long NN, Bormann J, Le GTT, Stärkel C, Olsson S, et al. Autophagy-related lipase FgATG15 of Fusarium graminearum is important for lipid turnover and plant infection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011; 48: 217–224. Doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.11.004
  41. 41. Pinan-Lucarre B, Paoletti M, Dementhon K, Coulary-Salin B, Clave C. Autophagy is induced during cell death by incompatibility and is essential for differentiation in the filamentous fungus Podospora anserina. Mol. Microbiol. 2003; 47: 321–333. Doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03208.x
  42. 42. Palmer GE, Kelly MN, Sturtevant JE. Autophagy in the pathogen Candida albicans. Microbiology. 2007; 153: 51–58. Doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03208.x
  43. 43. Noda NN, Inagaki F. Mechanisms of Autophagy. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 2015; 44: 101–122. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034248
  44. 44. Bartoszewska M, Kiel JA. The role of macroautophagy in development of filamentous fungi. Antiox. Redox Signal. 2011; 14: 2271–2287. Doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3528
  45. 45. Feng Y, He D, Yao Z, Klionsky DJ. The machinery of macroautophagy. Cell Res. 2014; 24: 24–41. Doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.168
  46. 46. Dufresne M, Bailey JA, Dron M, Langin T. Clk1, a serine/threonine protein kinase-encoding gene, is involved in pathogenicity of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum on common bean. Mol. Plant-Microbe. Inter. 1998; 11: 99–108. Doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.2.99
  47. 47. Pinan-Lucarre B, Balguerie A, Clave C. Accelerated cell death in Podospora autophagy mutants. Eukaryotic cell. 2005; 4: 1765–1774. Doi: 10.1128/EC.4.11.1765-1774.2005
  48. 48. AU: Please provide volume number and the page range for Refs. [48 and 83].Ren W, Zhang Z, Shao W, Yang Y, Zhou M, et al. The autophagy-related gene BcATG1 is involved in fungal development and pathogenesis in Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016. Doi: 10.1111/mpp.12396
  49. 49. Yanagisawa S, Kikuma T, Kitamoto K. Functional analysis of Aoatg1 and detection of the Cvt pathway in Aspergillus oryzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013; 338: 168–176. Doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12047
  50. 50. Ragusa MJ, Stanley RE, Hurley JH. Architecture of the Atg17 complex as a scaffold for autophagosome biogenesis. Cell. 2012; 151: 1501–1512. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.028
  51. 51. Kershaw MJ, Talbot NJ. Genome-wide functional analysis reveals that infection-associated fungal autophagy is necessary for rice blast disease. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009; 106: 15967–15972. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901477106
  52. 52. Kikuma T, Kitamoto K. Analysis of autophagy in Aspergillus oryzae by disruption of Aoatg13, Aoatg4, and Aoatg15 genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011; 316: 61–69. Doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02192.x
  53. 53. Reggiori F, Tucker KA, Stromhaug PE, Klionsky DJ. The Atg1-Atg13 complex regulates Atg9 and Atg23 retrieval transport from the pre-autophagosomal structure. Dev. Cell. 2004; 6: 79–90. Doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00402-7
  54. 54. Yen WL, Legakis JE, Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Atg27 is required for autophagy-dependent cycling of Atg9. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2007; 18: 581–593. Doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-07-0612
  55. 55. He C, Song H, Yorimitsu T, Monastyrska I, Yen WL, et al. Recruitment of Atg9 to the preautophagosomal structure by Atg11 is essential for selective autophagy in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 2006; 175: 925–935. Doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606084
  56. 56. Papinski D, Schuschnig M, Reiter W, Wilhelm L, Barnes CA, et al. Early steps in autophagy depend on direct phosphorylation of Atg9 by the Atg1 kinase. Mol. Cell. 2014; 53: 471–483. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.011
  57. 57. Walczak M, Martens S. Dissecting the role of the Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex during autophagosome formation. Autophagy. 2013; 9: 424–425. Doi: 10.4161/auto.22931
  58. 58. Zhang L, Wang J, Xie XQ, Keyhani NO, Feng MG, et al. The autophagy gene BbATG5, involved in the formation of the autophagosome, contributes to cell differentiation and growth but is dispensable for pathogenesis in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Microbiology. 2013; 159: 243–252. Doi: 10.1099/mic.0.062646-0
  59. 59. Liu XH, Yang J, He RL, Lu JP, Zhang CL, et al. An autophagy gene, TrATG5, affects conidiospore differentiation in Trichoderma reesei. Res. Microbiol. 2011; 162: 756–763. Doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.011
  60. 60. Cheong H, Klionsky DJ. Biochemical methods to monitor autophagy-related processes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 2008; 451: 1–26. Doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03201-1
  61. 61. Nakatogawa H, Ichimura Y, Ohsumi Y. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell. 2007; 130: 165–178. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.021
  62. 62. Xie Z, Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Atg8 controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008; 19: 3290–3298. Doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1292
  63. 63. Pollack JK, Harris SD, Marten MR. Autophagy in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009; 46: 1–8. Doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.10.010
  64. 64. Josefsen L, Droce A, Sondergaard TE, Sorensen JL, Bormann J, et al. Autophagy provides nutrients for nonassimilating fungal structures and is necessary for plant colonization but not for infection in the necrotrophic plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Autophagy. 2012; 8: 326–337. Doi: 10.4161/auto.18705
  65. 65. Corral-Ramos C, Roca MG, Di Pietro A, Roncero MI, Ruiz-Roldan C. Autophagy contributes to regulation of nuclear dynamics during vegetative growth and hyphal fusion in Fusarium oxysporum. Autophagy. 2015; 11: 131–144. Doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.994413
  66. 66. Voigt O, Poggeler S. Autophagy genes Smatg8 and Smatg4 are required for fruiting-body development, vegetative growth and ascospore germination in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. Autophagy. 2013; 9: 33–49. Doi: 10.4161/auto.22398
  67. 67. Veneault-Fourrey C, Barooah M, Egan M, Wakley G, Talbot NJ. Autophagic fungal cell death is necessary for infection by the rice blast fungus. Science. 2006; 312: 580–583. Doi: 10.1126/science.1124550
  68. 68. Asakura M, Ninomiya S, Sugimoto M, Oku M, Yamashita S, et al. Atg26-mediated pexophagy is required for host invasion by the plant pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 1291–1304. Doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.060996
  69. 69. Kikuma T, Ohneda M, Arioka M, Kitamoto K. Functional analysis of the ATG8 homologue Aoatg8 and role of autophagy in differentiation and germination in Aspergillus oryzae. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006; 5: 1328–1336. Doi: 10.1128/EC.00024-06
  70. 70. Moreau K, Renna M, Rubinsztein DC. Connections between SNAREs and autophagy. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013; 38: 57–63. Doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.11.004
  71. 71. Solinger JA, Spang A. Tethering complexes in the endocytic pathway: CORVET and HOPS. FEBS J. 2013; 280: 2743–2757. Doi: 10.1111/febs.12151
  72. 72. AU: Please provide the page range for Ref. [72].Dou XY, Wang Q, Qi ZQ, Song WW, Wang W, et al. MoVam7, a conserved SNARE involved in vacuole assembly, is required for growth, endocytosis, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis of Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016439
  73. 73. Song WW, Dou XY, Qi ZQ, Wang Q, Zhang X, et al. R-SNARE homolog MoSec22 is required for conidiogenesis, cell wall integrity, and pathogenesis of Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013193
  74. 74. Qi Z, Liu M, Dong Y, Zhu Q, Li L, et al. The syntaxin protein (MoSyn8) mediates intracellular trafficking to regulate conidiogenesis and pathogenicity of rice blast fungus. New Phytologist. 2016; 209: 1655–1667. Doi: 10.1111/nph.13710
  75. 75. Zhang H, Li B, Fang Q, Li Y, Zheng X, et al. SNARE protein FgVam7 controls growth, asexual and sexual development, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016; 17: 108–119. Doi: 10.1111/mpp.12267
  76. 76. Ramanujam R, Calvert ME, Selvaraj P, Naqvi NI. The late endosomal HOPS complex anchors active G-protein signaling essential for pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9: e1003527. Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003527
  77. 77. Li Y, Li B, Liu L, Chen H, Zhang H, et al. FgMon1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor of FgRab7, is important for vacuole fusion, autophagy and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 18101. Doi: 10.1038/srep18101
  78. 78. Zheng H, Zheng W, Wu C, Yang J, Xi Y, et al. Rab GTPases are essential for membrane trafficking-dependent growth and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Environ. Microbiol. 2015; 17: 4580–4599. Doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12982
  79. 79. Epple UD, Suriapranata I, Eskelinen EL, Thumm M. Aut5/Cvt17p, a putative lipase essential for disintegration of autophagic bodies inside the vacuole. J. Bacteriol. 2001; 183: 5942–5955. Doi: 10.1128/JB.183.20.5942-5955.2001
  80. 80. Kiel JA, Van Der Klei IJ. Proteins involved in microbody biogenesis and degradation in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009; 46(Suppl 1): S62–S71. Doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.07.009
  81. 81. Nguyen LN, Bormann J, Le GT, Starkel C, Olsson S, et al. Autophagy-related lipase FgATG15 of Fusarium graminearum is important for lipid turnover and plant infection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011; 48: 217–224. Doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.11.004
  82. 82. Yang Z, Huang J, Geng J, Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Atg22 recycles amino acids to link the degradative and recycling functions of autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006; 17: 5094–5104. Doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-06-0479
  83. 83. Zaffagnini G, Martens S. Mechanisms of selective autophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.004
  84. 84. Bhambra GK, Wang ZY, Soanes DM, Wakley GE, Talbot NJ. Peroxisomal carnitine acetyl transferase is required for elaboration of penetration hyphae during plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Microbiol. 2006; 61: 46–60. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05209.x
  85. 85. Till A, Lakhani R, Burnett SF, Subramani S. Pexophagy: the selective degradation of peroxisomes. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012; 2012: 512721. Doi: 10.1155/2012/512721
  86. 86. Dunn JWA, Cregg JM, Kiel JAKW, Klei IJvd, Oku M, et al. Pexophagy: the selective autophagy of peroxisomes. Autophagy. 2005; 1: 75–83. Doi: 10.4161/auto.1.2.1737
  87. 87. Kanki T, Wang K, Cao Y, Baba M, Klionsky DJ. Atg32 is a mitochondrial protein that confers selectivity during mitophagy. Dev. Cell. 2009; 17: 98–109. Doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.014
  88. 88. Mao K, Klionsky DJ. Mitochondrial fission facilitates mitophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy. 2009; 9: 1900–1901. Doi: 10.4161/auto.25804
  89. 89. He Y, Deng YZ, Naqvi NI. Atg24-assisted mitophagy in the foot cells is necessary for proper asexual differentiation in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2013; 9: 1818–1827. Doi: 10.4161/auto.26057
  90. 90. Cebollero E, Reggiori F, Kraft C. Reticulophagy and ribophagy: regulated degradation of protein production factories. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012; 2012: 182834. Doi: 10.1155/2012/182834
  91. 91. Lipatova Z, Shah AH, Kim JJ, Mulholland JW, Segev N. Regulation of ER-phagy by a Ypt/Rab GTPase module. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2013; 24: 3133–3144. Doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-05-0269
  92. 92. Lipatova Z, Segev N. A role for macro-ER-phagy in ER quality control. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11: e1005390. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005390
  93. 93. Mochida K, Oikawa Y, Kimura Y, Kirisako H, Hirano H, et al. Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature. 2015; 522: 359–362. Doi: 10.1038/nature14506
  94. 94. Nakatogawa H, Mochida K. Reticulophagy and nucleophagy: new findings and unsolved issues. Autophagy. 2015; 11: 2377–2378. Doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1106665
  95. 95. Mijaljica D, Devenish RJ. Nucleophagy at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2013; 126: 4325–4330. Doi: 10.1242/jcs.133090
  96. 96. Shoji JY, Kikuma T, Arioka M, Kitamoto K. Macroautophagy-mediated degradation of whole nuclei in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: e15650. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015650
  97. 97. He M, Kershaw MJ, Soanes DM, Xia Y, Talbot NJ. Infection-associated nuclear degeneration in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae requires non-selective macro-autophagy. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e33270. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033270
  98. 98. Liu XH, Lu JP, Lin FC. Autophagy during conidiation, conidial germination and turgor generation in Magnaporthe grisea. Autophagy. 2010; 3: 472–473. Doi: 10.4161/auto.4339

Written By

Huan-Bin Shi, Shuang Liang, Lu-Yao Huang, Xiao-Hong Liu, Xue- Ming Zhu, Ya-Hui Zhao and Fu-Cheng Lin

Submitted: 29 March 2016 Reviewed: 17 June 2016 Published: 10 November 2016