Characteristic times for a Ti/NaCl/Ar aerosol at 1100°C.
1. Appendix A
1.1. Heating Effects
The aim of this appendix is to study the heat transfer process occurring during condensation. The motivation for such study comes from the uncertainty in the applicability of the
the rate of condensation is proportional to the net difference in partial pressure of the condensing material in the environment and at the surface of the particle (P_{∞}P_{p});
the partial pressure at the surface of the particle is equal to the saturation pressure of the vapor (P_{p}= P_{s}), when the Kelvin effect is neglected; and
the saturation pressure has a very strong dependence with temperature (P_{s} = a*T^{n}, where a and n are constants, n~11 for NaCl),
it can be concluded that any small change in particle temperature could affect the rate of particle growth substantially. Dealing with condensation in the CR, it is common to argue that the increase in temperature is negligible and then the respective growth laws can be used directly. However, the situation could be very different in the FMR.
A heat transfer model has been developed to evaluate the extent of particle heating during the process of condensation in both the CR and FMR.
The system is a uniform liquid phase spherical droplet embedded in a supersaturated vapor. The initial conditions are same temperature for particle and vapor, and particle size slightly greater than the critical size for condensation.
Since the vapor concentration profile near the particle approaches a steadystate condition before appreciable growth occurs, the steadystate diffusional flux may be used to calculate the particle growth rate. As growth proceeds hundreds of times slower than diffusion, the profile near the particle remains close to its steadystate value at all times, whereas the transient region propagates farther from the particle.
S  τ_{D}[s]  τ_{cond}[s]  τ_{HT}[s]  Biot  r*[nm] 
1.010  2.05x1010  2.71x103  2.71x103  2.47x102  70.1 
1.125  1.47x1012  1.74x105  1.73x1010  5.92  
1.500  1.24x1013  1.10x106  1.46x1011  1.72 
An energy balance describes the effects of latent heat release by condensation at the particle surface. Heat conduction occurs toward both the particle interior and the exterior gas phase. The ratio of the characteristic times for conduction within the droplet and the characteristic time for heat transfer in the gas phase is known as the
where
For Bi << 1 the resistance to conduction within the solid is much less than the resistance to convection across the fluid boundary layer. Hence, it can be assumed that the temperature within the so1id is uniform at any given time.
With this assumption, the energy conservation equation for the liquid droplet system can be expressed as:
where ρ is the particle density,
The term on the left of Equation (2) represents the latent heat released during condensation; The first term on the right represents the energy absorbed by the particle in increasing its temperature, and the second term represents the energy dissipated by convection.
For convective heat transfer of a single sphere with a stagnant environment, the Nusselt number is equal to 2, (N_{u} = 2). Hence, the convective heat transfer coefficient
Nondimensionalizing partic1e size as η=r/r*, where r* is critical size for condensation; temperature as Ψ= (TT∞) / ζ where ζ=3H_{v}/C_{p}; and time as τ=t/τ_{cond}, the energy equation reduces to:
where the parameter
The rate of growth equation for condensation in the CR in its nondimensional form is reprinted here for the reader’s convenience:
The energy equation and the growth rate equation need to be solved numerically, subject to the initial conditions Ψ = 0 and η = 1.00001.
The first and simplest approach to evaluate the increase in particle temperature during condensation is to assume that the vapor concentration at the surface of the particle is un influenced by the change in the particle temperature. Results obtained through this assumption are the upper limit of the real situation. Then, if the increase in temperature is minimum δT<< 1, the model would prove that the assumption of constant temperature is a good assumption. If that is not the case, the temperature dependence of vapor phase concentration at the surface of the particle needs to be included.
Equations (3) and (5) were solved numerically for different values of the parameter ξ_{CR,} assuming that the rate of condensation is uninfluenced by the increase in particle temperature. The actual increase in particle temperature is determined by the parameter ξ_{CR} and ζ. 1/ζ is the fraction of the energy released that is used to increase the particle temperature, while ξ_{CR} is the ratio of the energy dissipated by conduction and the energy required to increase particle temperature. Higher values of ξ_{CR} means that more energy can be dissipated per degree of particle temperature increased, and therefore lower δTs for the same rate of energy release.
For NaCl at 1100°C,
Table 2 shows the increase in temperature when the particle has grown 10 times its initial size by condensation. δT is small for S<1.5 and therefore it can be concluded that the assumption of constant temperature during condensation of NaCl in the CR is acceptable for low rates of condensation.




1.010  2.82x10^{4}  3.18x10^{5}  0.24 
1.125  2.14x10^{3}  3.99x10^{4}  3.05 
1.500  4.65x10^{2}  1.62x10^{3}  12.4 
Particle heating during condensation in the FMR is enhanced because thermal conduction in the FMR is not as good as in the CR. Conduction of heat in the FMR follows very different laws from those obeyed under ordinary circumstances. References 84, 85, 86, and 87 are frequently used references in this respect.
Expressions for thermal conduction from a single sphere toward its environment in stagnant conditions are obtained from the kinetic theory of gases. On it, the area surrounding the particle is divided in two zones. The inner zone is of the width of one mean free path, and transport occurs at collisionless rates. This is known as the Langmuir zone. At larger distances, transport processes involve many collisions and follow the CR description. The heat flux due to conduction across the Langmuir layer is given by [^{84]}:
where A is surface area, q is heat flux, γ = C_{p}/C_{v} is the ratio of specific heat capacities, and K_{k} is an equivalent thermal conductivity as given by the kinetic theory. Equation (6) states that in the FMR, conduction is proportional to the pressure of the gas, and dependent only upon shape but not size of the bounding surfaces.
Replacing the conduction term of Equation (1) by the expression for conduction in the FMR (Equation (6)), the energy balance for condensation in the FMR is:
and the condensation rate in the FMR is:
where the same type of nondimensionalization has been used as for the CR case. Figure 2 shows the numerical solution of Equations (7) and (9) subject to the initial conditions Ψ = O and η = 1.00001. Again it has been assumed that particle heating does not affect the rate of condensation.
Figure 2 shows that the nondimensional temperature reaches a steadystate value Ψ_{∞}. This steadystate condition is reached when the Kelvin effect ceases and the rate of condensation becomes constant. This behavior can be explained in the following way.
At any time during condensation, a gradient of temperature δT = T_{p}T_{∞} is established such that the rate of energy dissipation, which is proportional to δT, balances the rate of heat release, which is proportional to the rate of condensation. During condensation controlled by the Kelvin effect, the rate of condensation is a function of particle size and then the temperature of the particle is also a function of particle size. However, when the particles grow, the Kelvin effect becomes negligible and the rate of condensation independent of particle size. Consequently, despite further condensation, the particles reach and maintain a constant temperature.
Equation (3) shows the actual increase in particle temperature for several conditions of super saturation of NaCl at 1100°C. It shows that even for low values of S, the increase of particle temperature is substantial. Therefore, a heat transfer analysis that includes the effect of particle heating on the rate of condensation is required.
Saturation pressure can be expressed as P_{s} = a*T^{n}, where a and n are constants. Then the saturation ratio can be expressed as S=S_{∞}(T/T_{∞})^{n},where the subscript ∞ refers to the properties of the aerosol far away from the particle. Properties at ∞ are assumed to be constant.
(T/T_{∞})^{n} can be expressed in terms of δT/T_{∞}=(T_{p}T_{∞})/T_{∞} by expanding it in Taylor series and neglecting higherorder terms. The resulting expression is S=S∞*Exp(n δT/T∞). In terms of the nondimensional variable Ψ and ζ:
Incorporating this expression into the energy and condensation equation, nondimensionalizing in the same fashion as before but with respect to the properties at ∞, the energy and condensation equations become:
Now the condensation equation is coupled to the energy equation and vice versa. Figure 4 shows the results after integrating simultaneously the two equations subject to the initial conditions Ψ = O and η = 1.00001, for ζ/T_{∞} = 5.57 and the values of ξ corresponding to S = 1.01, 1.125, and 1.5.
The behavior of the particle temperature is similar to that already described, except that the steadystate temperature is ~4 times less. Table 3 compares the values obtained with and without correction for temperature. It shows that particle heating due to condensation is substantial for higher values of S_{∞}.
Figure 5 shows the effect of particle heating on particle growth. It shows that particle growth has the same profile with and without correction for temperature; however, particle heating decreases the rate of growth by a factor of ~4. Then, clearly the effect of particle heating on the rate of condensation in the FMR is important.
S_{∞}  ξ  τ_{cond}  m  δT  m_{w/o}/m  δT_{w/o}/δT 
1.01  2340  2.71x10^{3}  0.25  0.81  3.92  3.8 
1.125  178  1.74x10^{5}  0.23  9.86  4.03  3.9 
1.5  38.7  1.10x10^{6}  0.18  37.5  4.49  4.3 
Figure 5 can be used to evaluate particle growth in the FMR for any starting size and a given δt by using:
where η_{oτ} is the tabulated universal value for growth due to condensation during τ nondimensional times. Equation (13) is in general not valid because condensation is coupled to the energy equation. Particle growth depends on the particle temperature and in general particles of the same size could have different temperatures.
However, for situations where ζ<<1 and Bi<<l, as in the case of NaCl condensation over nanosize particles, Equation 13 is still valid because a) the amount of energy required to heat up the particle is negligible compared to the energy available (ζ<<l) and b) the rate of particle heating is instantaneous (Bi<<l). Therefore, particles of the same size have the same temperature regardless of how much condensation was received, as long as there has been some condensation. Figure 6 shows this behavior. For the same conditions but different initial size, particle temperature is only a function of particle size.
2. Appendix B
2.1. Sintering
The theory of sintering of solid particles or highly viscous fluids is based in the interaction of two equalsized spheres. At the contact point of the two spheres, a neck is formed whose size grows with time. For the initial stage, the rate of growth is driven by the curvature gradients in the neck region. At intermediate sintering rates, the curvature gradient diminishes and the surface free energy becomes the driving force for continued sintering. At this stage, the motion is induced by the tendency of the interface to reduce its area in order to minimize the interfacial energy. [88]
For the initial stage of the sintering process, the kinetic model formulated by Frenkel 89 and generalized by German and Muir [88] has shown good agreement with experimental values obtained during sintering studies of various materials. On it, the rate of surface area reduction is given by:
where
Hiram and Nir [90] developed a numerical solution for the equations of motion describing the coalescence of two particles by the viscous flow mechanism. The results show similar behavior for all particle size to fluid viscosity ratios. The sintering behavior displays three regions of evolution: an initial transitory stage followed by an intermediate pseudoFrenkel stage. Beyond these two short states, particles assume their spherical shape following a firstorder exponential decay.
In this case, the characteristic time for coalescence
Koch and Friedlander [91] assumed that the linear growth rate, Equation (1), holds for the solidstate diffusion mechanism, and obtained an expression for
For the rate of sintering of Ti at T<T_{m}, it is assumed that the rate of sintering is due to solidstate diffusion. Since information about selfdiffusion as a function of temperature is not available for Ti, the respective information for C in HCP Ti has been used [92] as a first approximation. The values obtained are reported in Table 2. The results show that the rate of sintering of Ti is high up to particles of size r~1O nm, but it is a strong function of temperature. The rate of sintering by viscous flow is reported in Table 2 for NaCl. It shows that liquid NaCl particles sinter extremely fast.
Mechanism  Equation (1)  Equation (2)  
γ  δγ  τ_{f}  Material  Expression Used  
Viscous  1.1  

SiO_{2} ^{93}  6.5x10^{15} d Exp(8.3x10^{4}/T) 
Evaporation/Condensation  1.6  


Solidstate diffusion  
Volume diffusion  2.7  
B_{4}C ^{95}  39 T d^{3} Exp(53 648/T)  
Grain boundary diffusion  3.3  
TiO_{2} ^{93}  7.4x10^{8} T d^{4} Exp(3.1x10^{4}/T)  
Surface diffusion  3.6  
Size r [nm]  τ_{sint} [µs]  
1100°C  800 °C  
Ti (c)  NaCl (l)  Ti (c)  NaCl (l)  
3.8  1.21x10^{2}  3.73x10^{4}  4.14x10^{1}  3.18x10^{3} 
5.9  4.48x10^{2}  5.78x10^{3}  1.55x10^{0}  4.94x10^{3} 
15.0  7.11x10^{1}  1.45x10^{2}  2.55x10^{1}  1.26x10^{2} 
50.0  2.70x10^{1}  4.88x10^{2}  9.44x10^{2}  4.19x10^{2} 
100.0  2.16x10^{2}  9.77x10^{2}  7.55x10^{3}  8.37x10^{2} 
3. Appendix C
3.1. Particle Dynamics in a Colloidal System
A colloid is an entity dispersed in a medium, having at least one dimension between 1 nm and 1 μm. The entity may be solid or liquid or, in some cases, even gaseous. A solid colloid dispersed in a liquid medium is known as sol or dispersion. However, the term “colloid” is generally used for the system as a whole.[96, 97]
Particles in a liquid medium possess Brownian motion and therefore eventually collide. The theory of coagulation due to Brownian motion may be applied to the colloidal system to determine how fast the particles collide. The resistance of the liquid phase to the motion of a spherical particle is proportional to the size of the particle and the hydrodynamic nature of the liquid phase. That relation is well known as the Stokes formula:
where μ is the viscosity of the fluid, r is the particle size, and V is the particle velocity. The ratio of the velocity of the particle V to the force causing its motion F_{M} is called mobility (B) of the particle. B is the drift velocity that is attained under unit external force. In some other areas the quantity f=1/B=6πμr. It is more popular and it is known as the Stokes friction coefficient. On the other hand, the diffusivity (D) of a particle of size r_{i} in the liquid medium is given by:
and the collision frequency function β is given by:
Finally, the collision frequency of the solid particles in the colloidal system is given by:
where Nᵢ is the concentration of particles of size rᵢ. Replacing Equations 1, 2, and 3 in Equation 4, an explicit expression for the frequency of collision can be obtained. Considering a colloidal system, made of two equalsized particles (r) embedded in a liquid droplet of size R, the characteristic collision time
The characteristic collision time
NaCl droplet Size R [nm]  τ_{B} [µs]  
1100°C  800°C  
10  9.38x10^{1}  1.27x10^{0} 
25  1.47x10^{1}  1.98x10^{1} 
50  1.17x10^{2}  1.58x10^{2} 
100  9.38x10^{2}  1.27x10^{3} 
References
 1.
Suryanarayana, C., and Froes, F.H. Metallu Trans A. 23A:10711081. (1992).  2.
Birringuer, R. Nanocrystalline Materials. Mater Sci Engin A. 117:3343. (1989).  3.
Gleiter, H. Materials with Ultrafine Microstructures: Retrospectives and Perspectives. Nano Struct Mater. 1:119. (1992).  4.
Cohen, M. Progress and Prospects in Metallurgical Research. Advancing Material Research. Washington D.C. Pp. 51110. (1987).  5.
Gleiter, H. Progr Mater Sci. 33:223315. (1989).  6.
Nieman, G.W., Weertman, J.R., and Siegel, R.W. Scri. Metal. 24:145. (1990).  7.
Suryanarayana, C., and Froes, F.H. Nanocrystalline Metals: A Review. Physical Chemistry of Powder Metals. Production and Processing. Pp. 279296. (1989).  8.
Courtney, T.H. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. McGrawHill. New York. (1990).  9.
Birringer, R., Bohn, R.W., and Weertman, J.R., Mater Sci Engin A. 153:679. (1993).  10.
Nieman, G.W., Siegel, R.W., and Weertman, J.R. J Mater Res. 6:1012. (1991).  11.
Siegel, R.W., and Hahn, H. Current Trends in Physic of Materials. In World Scientific. Singapore. Pp. 403. (1987).  12.
Ashley, S. SmallScale Structure Yields Big Property Payoffs. Mechanical Engineering. February. Pp. 5257. (1994).  13.
Stiglich, J.J., Sudarshan, T.S., and Dowding, R.J. Synthesis and Consolidation of Nanoparticles. U.S. Army Research Laboratory. ADA238 314. (1994).  14.
Simon, C. Stabilization of Aqueous Powder Suspensions in the Processing of Ceramic Materials and Advanced Materials, in Coagulation and Flocculation, Theory and Applications. Ed. Dobias, B., Marcel. D. Inc. New York. Pp. 487. (1993).  15.
Niihara, K. Cera Soc Jpn. 99:974. (1991).  16.
Zachariah, M.R. Principles of Gas Phase Processing of Ceramics During Combustion. Pp. 7176. (1994).  17.
Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K., and Uhlmann, D.R. Introduction to Ceramics. Wiley. New York. (1976).  18.
Matteazzi, P. Basset, D., Miani, F., and LeCaer, G. Mechanosynthesis of Nanophase Materials. Nanostr Mater. 2:217229. (1993).  19.
Gurav, A., Kodas, T., Pluym, T., and Xiong Y. Aerosol Processing of Materials. Aerosol Sci Technol. 19:411452. (1993).  20.
Uyeda, R. Studies of Ultrafine Particles in Japan: Crystallography, Methods of Preparation and Technological Applications. Progr Mater Sci. 35:196. (1991).  21.
Chorley, R.W., and Lednor, P.W. Synthetic Routes to High Surface Area NonOxide Materials. Adv Mater. 3:10:474485. (1991).  22.
Lamprey, H., and Ripley, R.L., J Electrochem Soc. 109:8:713715. (1962).  23.
Pratsinis, S.E., and Kodas, T.T., Manufacturing of Materials by Aerosol Processes. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. Pp. 721746. (1993).  24.
Flagan, R.C., and Wu, J.J. Aerosol Reactor Production of Uniform Submicron Powders. Patent No. 248486. (1991).  25.
Zachariah, M.R., and Dimitriou, P. Aerosol Sc Technol. 13:413425. (1990).  26.
Axelbaum, R.L., DuFaux, O.P., and Rosen, L.J. Patent No. 5498446. (1995).  27.
Magness, L.S., and Farrand T.G. Army Science Conference. (1990).  28.
Ryan, K.F., and Dowding, R.J. Army Research Laboratories. ARLTR143. (1993).  29.
Schubert, W.D. Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 11:151157. (1992).  30.
Williams, B.E., Stiglich, J.J., and Kaplan R.B. Coated Tungsten Powders For Advance Ordinance Applications. US Army Materials Technology Laboratory. MTL TR. Pp. 92. (1992).  31.
German, R.M., Tungsten and Tungsten Alloys. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Tungsten and Tungsten Alloys. Metal Powder Industry Federation. New Jersey. Pp. 3. (1993).  32.
Raghunathan, S., Bourell, D.L., and Persad, C. Microcomposites and Nanophase Materials. The Minerals, Metals &Materials Society. Pp. 81. (1991).  33.
Kecskes, L.J., and Hall, I.W. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Tungsten and Tungsten Alloys. Metal Powder Industry Federation. New Jersey. Pp. 155. (1993).  34.
Hessel, S., Shpigler, B., and Botstein, O. Rev Chem Engin. 9:34:345364. (1993).  35.
Kear, B.H., and McCandlish, L.E. J Adv Mater. October. Pp.1119. (1993).  36.
Currie, A.L., and Howard, K.E. J Mater Sci. 27:27392742. (1992).  37.
Belkacem, A., Arnal, Y., and Pelletier, J. Thin Solid Films. 241:301304. (1994).  38.
Evans, R. D., and Leet, D.M. J Electrochem Soc. 141: 7:18671871. (1994).  39.
Hojo, J., Oku, T., and Kato, A. J Less Common Metals. 59:8595 (1978).  40.
Smiley, S.H., Brater, D.C., and Kaufman, H.L. J Metals. June. Pp. 605. (1965).  41.
Revankar, V., Zhao, G.Y., and Hlavacek, V. Ind Eng. Chem. Res. 30:2344. (1991).  42.
DuFaux, O.P., and Axelbaum, R.L. Combust Flame. 100:350358. (1995).  43.
Axelbaun, R.L., Lottes, C.R., Huertas, J.I., and Rosen L. To be published in TwentyFifth Symposium International on Combustion. (1996).  44.
Gould, R.K., and Dickson, C.R. Patent No. 5021221. (1991).  45.
Calcote, H.F., and Felder, W. TwentyFourth Symposium International on Combustion. Pp.18691876 (1994).  46.
Glassman, I, Davis, K.A., and Brezinsky, K. TwentyFourth International Symposium on Combustion. Pp. 114. (1994).  47.
Steffens, K.L., Zacbariah, M.R., DuFaux, D.P., and Axelbawn, R.L. To be published. (1996).  48.
Massalski, T.B. Binary Alloys Phase Diagrams. 2nd Ed. New York. (1990).  49.
Cullity, B.O. Elements of Xray diffraction. 2nd Ed. MA. (1977).  50.
Friedlander, S.K. Smoke, Dust and Haze. John Wiley & Sons. New York. (1977).  51.
Suck, S.H, and Brock, J.R. J Aerosol Sci. 10:581590. (1979).  52.
Friedlander, S.K., and Wang, C.S. The SelfPreserving Particle Size Distribution for Coagulation by Brownian Motion. J Colloid Interf Sci. 22:126132. (1966).  53.
Lee, K.W., Chen, H., and Gieseke, J.A. Aerosol Sci Technol. 3:53 (1984).  54.
Gelbard, F., Tambour, Y., and Seinfeld, J.H. Sectional Representations for Simulating Aerosol Dynamics. J Colloid Interf Sci. 76:2:541556. (1979).  55.
Husar, R.B. Coagulation of Knudsen Aerosols. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota. (1971).  56.
Kaplan, C.R., and Gentry, J.W. Agglomeration of ChainLike Combustion Aerosols Due to Brownian Motion. Aerosol Sci Technol. 8:1128. (1988).  57.
Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J.H. J Colloid Interf Sci. 68:363. (1979).  58.
Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J.H. Simulation of Multicomponent Aerosol Dynamics. J Colloid Interf Sci. 78:2:485501. (1980).  59.
Tsang, T.H. and Rao, A. Comparison of Different Numerical Schemes for Condensational Growth of Aerosols . Aerosol Sci Technol. 9:271277. (1988).  60.
Warren, D.R. and Seinfeld, J.H. Simulation of Aerosol Size Distribution Evolution in Systems with Simultaneous Nucleation, Condensation, and Coagulation. Aerosol Sci Technol. 4:3143. (1985).  61.
Gelbard, F. Modeling Multicomponent Aerosol Particle Growth by Vapor Condensation. Aerosol Sci Technol. 12:399412. (1990).  62.
Jacobson, M.Z., and Turco, R.P. Simulating Condensational Growth, Evaporation.and Coagulation of Aerosols Using a Combined Moving and Stationary Size Grid. Aerosol Sci Technol. 22:7392. (1995).  63.
Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J. Exact Solution of the General Dynamic Equation for Aerosol Growth by Condensation. J Colloid Interf Sci. 28:1:173183. (1978).  64.
Seinfeld, J.H. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution. John Wiley & Sons. New York. (1986).  65.
Siegel, R., and Howell, J.R. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. 2nd Ed. Washington. (1981).  66.
Shreider, Y.A. The Monte Carlo Method Pergamon Press. New York. (1966).  67.
Schaad, L.J. The Monte Carlo Integration of Rate Equations. J Am Cera Soc. 85:35883592. (1963).  68.
Kaplan, C.R., and Gentry, J.W. Agglomeration of ChainLike Combustion Aerosols due to Brownian Motion. Aerosol Sci Technol. 8:1128. (1988).  69.
Akhtar, M.K, Lippscomb, G.G., and Pratsinis, S.E. Monte Carlo Simulation of Particle Coagulation and Sintering. Aerosol Sci Technol. 21:8393 (1994).  70.
Sutherland, D.N. A Theoretical Model of Floc Structures. J Colloid Interf Sci. 25; 373380. (1967).  71.
Kemeny, J.G, and Snell, J.L Finite Markov Chains. New York. (1960).  72.
Levine, J., Levine, M., Negus, C., and Schumer, L. The UNIX Dictionary of Commands, Terms and Acronyms. McGrawHill. NewYork. (1996).  73.
Hidy, G. M. On the Theory of the Coagulation of Noninteracting Particles in Brownian Motion. J Colloid Sci. 20:123144. (1964).  74.
Lee, K.W., Curtís, L.A. and Chen, H. An Analytic Solution to the Free Molecule Aerosol Coagulation. Aerosol Sci Technol. 12:457462. (1990).  75.
Matsoukas, T. and Friedlander, S.K. Dynamics of Aerosol Agglomerate Formation. J Colloid Interf Sci. 146:2. (1991).  76.
Megaridis, C. Morphological Description of Flame generated Materials. Combust Sci Technol. 71:95109. (1990).  77.
Akhtar, M.K., Xiong, Y., and Pratsinis, S.E. Vapor Synthesis of Titania Powder by Titanium Tretachloride Oxidation. AlChE J. 37:10:15611570. (1991).  78.
Law, A.M., and Kelton, W.D. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 2nd Ed. McGrawHill. New York. (1991).  79.
Abraham, F.F. Homogeneous Nucleation Theory. Academic Press. New York. (1974).  80.
MacDonald. Am J Phys. 30:12:870877. (1962).  81.
MacDonald. Am J Phys. 31:1:3141. (1963).  82.
German, R.M. and Munir, Z.A. Surface Area Reduction During Isothermal Sintering, JAm Cera Soc. 59:910. (1976).  83.
Dukhin, S.S., Kretzschmar, G., and Mil1er, R. Dynamics of Adsorption at Liquid Interfaces. Elsevier. The Netherlands. (1995).  84.
Kennard, E.H. Kinetic Theory of Gases. McGrawHill. New York. (1938).  85.
Chapman, S and Cowling, T.G. The Mathematical Theory of NonUniform Gases. Cambridge University Press. London (1970).  86.
Eckbreth, A.C. Effect of LaserModulated Particle Incandescence on Raman Scattering Diagnostics. J Appl Phys. 48:11:44734479. (1977).  87.
McCoy, B.J. and Cha, C.Y. Transport Phenomena in the Rarefied Gas Transition Regime. Chem Engin Sci. 29:381388. (1974).  88.
German, R.M. and MWlir, Z.A. Surface Area Reduction During Isothermal Sintering, J Am Cera Soc. 59:910. (1976).  89.
Frenkel, J. J Phys. 9:385. (1945).  90.
Hiram, Y and Nir, A. A Simulation of Surface Tension Driven Coalescence. J Colloid Interf Sci. 95:2:462470. (1983).  91.
Koch, W and Friedlander, S.K. The Effect of Particle Coalescence on the Surface Area of a Coagulating Aerosol, J Colloid Interf Sci. 140:2:419427. (1990).  92.
Van Vlack, L.H. Elements of Material Science and Engineering. 5th Ed. AdisonWesley. New York. (1985).  93.
Xiong, Y., Akhtar K., and Pratsinis, S.E. Formation of Agglomerate Particles by Coagulation and Sintering Part 11. The Evolution of the Morphology of AerosolMade Titania, Silica, and Silica Doped Titania Powders. J Aerosol Sci. 24:3:310313. (1993).  94.
Friedlander, S.K., and Wu, M.K. Linear Rate Law for the Decay of the Excess Surface Area of a Coalescing Solid Particle. Phys Rev B. 49:36223624. (1994).  95.
Xiong, Y., Pratsinis, S.E., and Weimer, A.W. Modeling the Formation of Boron Carbide Particles in an Aerosol Flow Reactor. AIChE J. 38:11:16851692. (1992)  96.
Lyklema, J. Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science. Vol. l. Academic Press. New York. (1991).  97.
Hunter, R.J. Foundations of Colloid Science. Vol. 1. Clarendon Press. New York. (1987).  98.
Hinds, W.C. Physical and Chemical Changes in Particulate Phase. In Aerosol Measurements, Principles, Techniques and Applications . Ed. Willeke, K., and Baron, P.A. John Wiley and Sons. New York (1994).