miRNA targets and their associated function
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous non-coding RNAs that play important regulatory roles in animals and plants by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression. Small RNAs are classified into different types by their biogenesis and mode of action, such as miRNAs, siRNAs, piRNAs, and snoRNAs. In the case of miRNAs, this specific type regulates gene expression in plants and animals by targeting mRNAs for cleavage and translational repression, respectively. Diverse miRNAs regulate plant development, metabolism, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. The identification of miRNAs has been accomplished in diverse species, organs and developmental or diverse biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Novel massive sequencing techniques and further bioinformatics analysis have allowed the identification of hundreds of miRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Malus domestica, Zea mays, Solanum lycopersicum, and other plants. Functional characterization of a given miRNA in a specific biological context has shown their role in the fine-tuning mechanisms of posttranscriptional gene regulation. In this chapter, besides making a summary of genome-wide miRNA profiling in plants, we describe how gain and loss of function approaches influence plant phenotypes that affect development, physiology or stress responses, pointing to miRNAs as effective tools for the generation of new plant phenotypes that improve plant productivity and conservation.
Keywords
- Gene expression
- Plant development
- mRNA targeting
- miRNA
- sRNAs
1. Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding endogenous small RNAs (sRNAs) that have attracted a huge interest from scientists. Experimental and computational approaches have demostrated that miRNAs play crucial roles during plant growth and development. Expression of miRNAs is highly regulated at both the transcriptional and postranscriptional level.
The development of new sequencing technologies has been crucial for the identify of novel miRNAs and to understand their function in specific process including the adaptation of plants to extreme environments. Plant development and of course, in the improvement of plants for human consumption. This book chapter highlights research progress on plant miRNAs and their various functions on plant growth, development, and stress responses.
2. Plant sRNAs´classification
Regulatory sRNAs are ubiquitous components of endogenous plant transcriptomes, as well as common responses to exogenous viral infections and introduced double-stranded RNA molecules (dsRNA). They range from 20 to 24 nucleotides in length. Endogenous sRNAs are processed from dsRNA precursors sRNAs can be classified based on their origin and function. In plants, those derived from single stranded precursors capable of adquiring an imperfect extensive nearly perfect dsRNA precursors hairpin are called hairpin small RNAs (hpRNAS) and those derived from dsRNA are referred to as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Frequently, siRNAs fall into one of three additional groups: heterochromatic siRNAs, secondary siRNAs, and natural antisense transcript siRNAS (NAT-siRNAs; Figure 1) [1].
2.1. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs)
miRNAs are a well-studied subset of hpRNAs defined by the highly precise excision of one or sometimes a few functional products, which correspond to the mature miRNAs (Figure 1) [1, 2]. miRNAs have a defined set of miRNA targets [1, 3], and individual miRNA families can be evolutionary conserved [1, 4]. Most plant miRNAs require a member of the DCL1-clade for their biogenesis, and a member of the AGO1-clade to exert their function, although some exceptions have been described [1, 5].
Several miRNA families are conserved in plant species, and some are conserved from mosses to flowering plants [1, 6]. Conserved miRNAs have homologous target mRNAs in several species, showing that miRNA/target relationships are very stable during plant evolution [1, 3]. However, some relationships between plant miRNAs and their targets can be novel; for example, miR159 is a highly conserved miRNA that targets MYB transcription factors in several plant species. Buxdorf
However, not all plant miRNAs are conserved; some of the miRNAs present in any given plant species seem to be unique to that species, and some other miRNAs are conserved only between closely related species [1]. The lineage-specific miRNAs are different in some ways from the more conserved miRNAs. These miRNA have more heterogeneous processing from their hairpin precursors, and have low abundance, and they are generally encoded by single genes instead of multiple paralogs [1, 8]. These differences suggest that some lineage-specific miRNAs could be transient, nonfunctional entities, and categorize them as a distinct subset of miRNAs (Figure 1) [1].
3. Plant miRNAs´ biogenesis
The mode of action of miRNAs between plant and animal kingdoms is different [9]. The miRNA biogenesis in plants has been documented using
The miRNA released by DCL1 is exported out of the nucleus through the exportin - 5´ortholog (HASTY). The pre-miRNA is converted into a mature miRNA, but the double strand persist, so one of the two strands is the guide strand and the other is the passenger (that gets degraded), the mature guide miRNA is methylated by HEN1 to prevent the degradation by sRNA degrading nuclease [14].
The next step is the recruiting of the miRNA by an Argonaute (AGO) protein. In
4. Plant miRNAs´ function and plant development
A miRNA is a 21–24 nucleotide RNA product of a non-protein-coding gene. Plants, like animals, have a large number of miRNA-encoding genes in their genomes. Plant miRNAs have been predicted or confirmed to regulate a variety of processes, such as development, metabolism, and stress responses (Table 1). Plant miRNAs have been predicted or confirmed to regulate genes encoding various types of proteins. A major category of miRNA target genes consists of transcription factors or other regulatory proteins that function in plant development or signal transduction [16]. The first evidence that sRNAs play roles in plant development, came from mutants with impaired sRNA biogenesis or function [17].
4.1. Auxin signaling
Auxins are critical for plant development and their interaction with the environment. Local concentration of auxins, as established by polar auxin transport, provides the growth pattern on the axis of the embryo from root stem cells, and controls primordia outgrowth from meristems, as well as initiate, lateral root formation, and gravitropic responses.
A number of genes in auxin signaling are confirmed or predicted targets of miRNAs. The TIR1 auxin receptor is a predicted target of miR393 [17] (Table 1). Several auxin response factors, such as ARF10, ARF16, and ARF17, contain potential binding sites for miR160 [18] and ARF6; ARF8 have sites for miR167 [19]. In
|
|
|
|
mir156 | SBP |
|
Apical dominance |
mir159 | MYB TCP |
|
Male sterility |
mir160 | ARF |
|
Root development |
mir164 | NAC |
|
Aging induced cell death. Senescence |
mir166 | HD-ZIPIII |
|
Female sterility Organ polarity |
mir167 | ARF |
|
Auxin signaling |
mir169 | HAP2 |
|
Root architecture Stress response |
mir171 | SCL |
|
Developmental patterning |
mir172 | AP2 |
|
Flower development |
mir393 | bZIP |
|
Auxin signaling Root development |
mir396 | GRF |
|
Cell proliferation Leaf development |
mir444 | MADS |
|
Defense response |
4.2. Plant organ boundary formation
Three members of the NAC gene family,
miR164 targets CUC1 and CUC2 but not CUC3 [17]. Assays of miR164 overexpression in wild-type plants (under the control of CaMV35S promoter) lead to floral organ fusion [20] and cotyledon fusion, in a lower frequency [22]. Expressing a CUC2 resistan version to miR164 can restore sepal separation in miR164 overexpressing lines [22]. A wild-type plant expression of CUC1 resistant to miR164 results in changes in sepal (reduced) and petal number (increased) and broadened leaves [20].
Expression of the CUC2 mir164-resistan version also increased the width of the boundary domain between sepals [22]. A similar effect was observed in miRNA mutants such as
4.3. Polarity at the leaves and floral organs
Leaves and floral organs, are initiated as primordia on the SAM or floral meristems. These lateral organs have polar structures that develop in the adaxial side in the primordium, and they differ from the side that faces away from the meristem (called the abaxial side) [16]. The polarity of lateral organs is established through antagonistic interactions between two groups of genes: the class III homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-zip) including
Analysis of a particular set of mutants in PHB, PHV and REV revealed their regulation by miR165/miR166 the wild types, and shown that mutations in the binding sites of miRNA165/166 affecting the regulation of these genes at the miRNA level rather than the activity of the proteins [16, 18]. In a gain-of-function assays with the
4.4. Organ identity in flowers
Floral organs are organized in whorls at the floral meristem. The identities of the floral primordia are directed by the activities of floral homeotic genes known as the A, B, and C genes, and the regulation is known as the ABC model [16]. The A and C genes specify the identities of the perianth and reproductive organs, respectively. Mutations in AGAMOUS (class C gene) replace the reproductive organs by perianth organs, and mutations in APETALA2 (class A gene) lead to the loss of perianth. It suggests that A and C genes are antagonists to their activity within the floral meristem [16].
AP2 contains a binding site for miR172 and is regulated by miR172
Another miRNA, miR159 plays a role in reproductive development (Table 1) by regulating two MYB-domain transcription factor genes, MYB33 and MYB65. These two genes act redundantly to prevent the hypertrophy of the tapetum during anther development [29]. miR159 reduces the MYB33 and MYB65 expression to anthers. Transformed plants with MYB33 (a miR159-resistant version) under its own promoter arrested plant growth at various stages, suggesting that MYB33 expression by miR159 is critical for plant development [29].
4.5. Developmental transitions
The SAM generates leaves during the vegetative phase and flowers during the reproductive phase. The types of leaves produced at vegetative stage that are put out earlier (juvenile leaves) differ from the ones produced later (adult leaves). These changes between the developmental states are regulated by sRNAs[16].
miR172 regulates some other AP2-like genes, such as
miR156 overexpression also affects flowering time. 35S::MIR156 plants show a late flowering phenotype [31]. miR156 targets
A pronounced vegetative phase change is observed in maize; an
4.6. Leaf development
The
4.7. sRNA metabolism
DCL1 contains a binding site for miR162 and miR162-guided cleavage products of DCL1 mRNA are detected
5. miRNAs sequencing and prediction
Since the early beginning of noncoding RNA findings in developmental patterning, researchers have emphasized the bioinformatic challenges [40-42], not only in the miRNA discovery but also in the target prediction in order to better understand the expression, processing, and mechanism of regulation through base pairing recognition [12, 43, 44].
Genetic screening and direct cloning approaches work for simple miRNA candidate per event; therefore, these technologies have been replaced with Northern blotting, qRT-PCR and miRNA array assays. However, since the availability of next generation sequencing, this kind of technologies has been more frequently used as an efficient strategy for detailed research on plant miRNA of a wide variety of species because of the generation of millions of sequences per run. It can not only identify miRNA but also generate expression profiles. Moreover, big data analyses require a support of computational tools in order to extract relevant and refined information [45, 46].
Parallel to the development of deep sequencing strategies, sophisticated computational tools, and refined databases have played a major role in the effort to obtain a genome-wide profiling of miRNAs. Because of such effort, MiRBase, TargetScan, Plant Non-coding RNA Database (PNRD), miRNEST 2.0, and miRDeepFinder have been developed as free-access tools available for the study of miRNAs [46, 47].
miRBase Database [48] is a public repository first established in 2002. Nowadays, it is managed by Griffiths-Jones lab at the University of Manchester. In one of its latest version (released v.21, June 2014) there are a total of 28,645 hairpin precursors and 35,828 mature products all over across 223 species. Besides, the miRBase includes a functional miRNA information connected with Wikipedia resource [48].
Tha Plant miRNA Database (PMRD, http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/PMRD/) was created in 2009 by Prof. Zhen Su´s lab to integrate only plant miRNA data from public databases to keep together sequence information, secondary structure, target genes, and expression profiles [49]. New findings for ncRNA were identified, such as epigenetic regulators. The central focus of miRNA on the PMRD became limited for regulatory repository of data. PNRD (http://structuralbiology.cau.edu.cn/PNRD/index.php) is the updated version on PMRD released with improvements in functional analysis and service [50].
miRNESt was developed in 2012 by the Laboratory of Functional Genomics as a comprehensive repository for plant, animal and virus miRNAs. In consulted version (miRNEST2.0, http://rhesus.amu.edu.pl/mirnest/copy/home.php) are included 522 miRNA from animal and plant with prediction data cross to 15 external databases, predicted targets for plant candidates supported by experimental validation, miRNA gene structure, and degradome data [51].
miRDeepFinder is a software developed in order to identify miRNA cross their target from deep sequencing. This package also provides to analyze miRNA functionality and it is a specific tool for plant species. From biogenesis, gene regulation as well as target recognition, abundance miRNA/miRNA* analysis, miRDeepFinder is capable to analyze RNA deep sequencing.
There are some computational approaches available for miRNA expression as well as miRNA target determination. Moreover, the false positive data are estimated for around 24-70%,therefore the experimental validation is required to characterize miRNA function [52].
There are methodologies for miRNA function validation at different levels: protein level by Western blot and mRNA level by qRT-PCR [52]. qRT-PCR is one of the most used techniques for detection of miRNA expression due for its high sensitivity to miRNA detection, the capability to identify single nucleotide changes [53]. miR-RACE (PCR-based) is an effective method to determine the precise sequence of miRNA at their 5´ and 3´ ends, which can distinguish between members of a miRNA family, and they can determine expression patterns at different family member levels [53, 54].
Parallel analysis of RNA ends (PARE) is a modification of miR-RACE, deep sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis for high-throughput sequencing. PARE is also known as degradome or genome-wide mapping of uncapped transcripts. PARE is used to plant systems manly to identify large subsets of miRNA targets to direct cleavage [55].
6. Conclusions and perspectives
Genetic, biochemical, and genomic studies have revealed a diverse array of endogenous sRNAs in plants, and resulted in the identification of several distinct classes of sRNAs. The study of these sRNAs has increased our knowledge regarding the function of these gene regulatory molecules.
Traditional computational approaches have made great progress in predicting new miRNAs in combination with molecular analysis. Most of the miRNAs are likely to be non conserved and/or species specific; this makes it hard to adapt the current approaches to predict non-conserved miRNA genes, and how to identify non-conserved miRNAs in non-model species where a reference genome is not available is an area of intense research.
Studies on miRNA target identification represents a big challenge beyond the identification of miRNA genes; total number of miRNA targets per miRNA family is still unknown and a large number of predicted miRNAs have not been validated experimentally. The identification of miRNA targets will improve our understanding of miRNA-mediated regulation of plant growth and development. miRNAs regulate gene expression by cleaving mRNA or by repressing mRNA translation; thus, now it is possible to design artificial miRNAs to suppress the expression of a target gene in order to study gene function, similar to the use of alternative molecular tools (i.e. antisense mRNA) used for studying gene functions.
The use of miRNA to improve plant yields, quality, or resistance to various environmental stresses including insect and pathogen infection will come with the understanding of miRNA regulation over specific processes. Future study of miRNAs will provide us with tools for improving crop growth and quality.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank Fondo Institucional de Fomento Regional para el Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación, for financial support (CONACyT- FORDECyT 193512).
References
- 1.
Axtell M J. Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013;64:137-159. DOI:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120043 - 2.
Meyers BC, Axtell MJ, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Baulcombe D, Bowman J.L., Cao X, Carrington JC, Cheni X, Green PJ, Griffiths-Jones S, Jacobsen S, Mallory AC, Martienssen RA, Poethig RS, Qi Y, Vaucheretl H, Voinnet O, Watanabe Y, Weigel D, Jian-Kang Z. Criteria for annotation of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell. 2008;20:3186–3190. DOI:10.1105/tpc.108.064311 - 3.
Jones-Rhoades MW. Conservation and divergence in plant microRNAs. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012;80:3–16. DOI:10.1007/s11103-011-9829-2 - 4.
Cuperus JT, Carbonell A, Fahlgren N, Garcia-Ruiz H, Burke RT, Takeda A, Sullivan CM, Gilbert SD, Montgomery TA, Carrington JC. Unique functionality of 22 nt miRNAs in triggering RDR6-dependent siRNA biogenesis from target transcripts in Arabidopsis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:997–1003. DOI:10.1038/nsmb.1866 - 5.
Wu L, Zhou H, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Ni F, Chang L, Yijun Q. DNA methylation mediated by a microRNA pathway. Mol. Cell. 2010;38:465–475. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.008 - 6.
Cuperus JT, Fahlgren N, Carrington JC. Evolution and functional diversification of miRNAgenes. Plant Cell. 2011;23:431–42. DOI:10.1105/tpc.110.082784 - 7.
Buxdorf K, Hendelman A, Stav R, Lapidot M, Ori N, Arazi T. Identification and characterization of a novel miR159 target not related to MYB in tomato. Planta. 2010; 232:1009–1022. DOI:10.1007/s00425-010-1231-9 - 8.
Ma Z, Coruh C, Axtell MJ. Arabidopsis lyrata small RNAs: Transient MIRNA and small interfering RNA loci within theArabidopsis genus. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1090–1103. DOI:10.1105/tpc.110.073882 - 9.
Pogue AI, Clement C, Hill JM, Lukiw WJ. Evolution of microRNA (miRNA) Structure and Function in Plants and Animals: Relevance to Aging and Disease. J Aging Sci. 2014;2: 119: 1-5. DOI:10.4172/2329-8847.1000119 - 10.
Axtell MJ, Westholm JO, Lai EC. Vive la difference: Biogenesis and evolution of microRNAs in plants and animals. Genome Biol. 2011;12: 221. DOI:10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-221 - 11.
Ameres SL, Zamore, PD. Diversifying microRNA sequence and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:475- 488. DOI:10.1038/nrm3611 - 12.
Voinnet O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009;136:669-687. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.046 - 13.
Vaucheret H. Gene silencing: Mode of miRNA biogenesis matters. Nat. Plants. 2015;1:475-483. DOI:10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.19 - 14.
Jover-Gil S, Candela H, Robles P, Aguilera V, Barrero JM, Micol JL, Ponce M R. The microRNA pathway genes AGO1, HEN1 and HYL1 participate in leaf proximal–distal, venation and stomatal patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:1322-1333. DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcs077 - 15.
Zhang H, Xia R, Meyers B C, Walbot V. Evolution, functions, and mysteries of plant ARGONAUTE proteins. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015;27:84-90. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.011 - 16.
Chen X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science. 2004;303:2022– 2025. DOI:10.1126/science.1088060 - 17.
Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol. Cell. 2004;14:787–799. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027 - 18.
Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513–520. DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00863-2 - 19.
Mallory AC, Reinhart BJ, Jones‐Rhoades MW, Tang G, Zamore PD, Barton MK, Bartel DP. MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development: Importance of pairing to the microRNA 5´-region. EMBO J. 2004;23:3356–3364. DOI:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600340 - 20.
Mallory AC, Dugas DV, Bartel DP, Bartel B. MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative, and floral organs. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1035–1046. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.022 - 21.
Vroemen CW, Mordhorst AP, Albrecht C, Kwaaitaal MA, de Vries SC. The CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON3 gene is required for boundary and shoot meristem formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1563–1577. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.012203 - 22.
Laufs P, Peaucelle A, Morin H, Traas J. MicroRNA regulation of the CUC genes is required for boundary size control in Arabidopsis meristems. Development. 2005;131:4311–4322. DOI:10.1242/dev.01320 - 23.
Baker CC, Sieber P, Wellmer F, Meyerowitz EM. The early extra petals1 mutant uncovers a role for microRNA miR164c in regulating petal number in Arabidopsis . Curr. Biol. 2005;15:303–315. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.017 - 24.
Otsuga D, DeGuzman B, Prigge MJ, Drews GN, Clark SE. REVOLUTA regulates meristem initiation at lateral positions. Plant J. 2001;25:223–236. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2001.00959.x - 25.
McConnell JR, Emery J, Eshed Y, Bao N, Bowman J, Barton MK. Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature. 2001;411:709–713. DOI:10.1038/35079635 - 26.
Bao N, Lye KW, Barton MK. MicroRNA binding sites in Arabidopsis class III HD-ZIP mRNAs are required for methylation of the template chromosome. Dev. Cell. 2004;7:653–662. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.003 - 27.
Floyd SK, Bowman JL. Gene regulation: Ancient microRNA target sequences in plants. Nature. 2004;428:485–486. DOI:10.1038/428485a - 28.
Aukerman MJ, Sakai H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2730–2741. DOI:10.1105/tpc.016238 - 29.
Millar AA, Gubler F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:705–721. DOI:10.1105/tpc.104.027920 - 30.
Schmid M, Uhlenhaut NH, Godard F, Demar M, Bressan R, Weigel D, Lohmann JU. Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis. Development. 2003;130:6001–6012. DOI:10.1242/dev.00842 - 31.
Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell. 2006;8:517–527. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.018 - 32.
Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, Carrington JC, Weigel D. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature. 2003;425:257–263. DOI:10.1038/nature01958 - 33.
Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harber NP. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin regulated microRNA. Development. 2004;131:3357–3365. DOI:10.1242/dev.01206 - 34.
Kerstetter RA, Poethig RS. The specification of leaf identity during shoot development. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 1998;14:373–398. DOI:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.373 - 35.
Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP. MicroRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9412- 9417. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0503927102 - 36.
Nath U, Crawford BC, Carpenter R, Coen E. Genetic control of surface curvature. Science. 2003;299:1404–1407. DOI:10.1126/science.1079354 - 37.
Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC. Negative feedback regulation of Dicer-like1 in Arabidopsis by microRNA-guided mRNA degradation. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:784–789. DOI:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00281-1 - 38.
Vaucheret H, Vazquez F, Crete P, Bartel DP. The action of ARGONAUTE1 in the miRNA pathway and its regulation by the miRNA pathway are crucial for plant development. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1187–1197. DOI:10.1101/gad.1201404 - 39.
Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–221. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004 - 40.
Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to Iin-14. Cell. 1993;75:843–854. DOI:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-Y - 41.
Ambros V. MicroRNAs: Tiny regulators with great potential. Cell. 2001;107:823–826. DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00616-X - 42.
Lee RC, Ambros V. An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans . Science. 2001;294:862–864. DOI:10.1126/science.1065329 - 43.
Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science. 2001;294:853–858. DOI:10.1126/science.1064921 - 44.
Zhang B, Chen Y, Hu X, Guo J. Affiliated with The Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CATAS). Computational identification of microRNAs and their targets in apple. Comput. Biol Chem, 2006;30:395–407. DOI:10.1007/s13258-013-0070-z - 45.
Dai Q, Smibert P, Lai EC. Exploiting Drosophila genetics to understand microRNA function and regulation. In E. Hornstein, ed. MicroRNAs in Development . Academic Press (Elsevier), 2012. p. 222. - 46.
Zhang B, Wang Q. MicroRNA-based biotechnology for plant improvement. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1–15. DOI:10.1002/jcp.24685 - 47.
Neilsen CT, Goodall GJ, Bracken CP. IsomiRs-The overlooked repertoire in the dynamic microRNAome. Trends Genet. 2012;11:544–549. DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.005 - 48.
Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. MiRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:68–73. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkt1181 - 49.
Zhang, Z, Yu J, Li D, Zhang Z, Liu F, Zhou X, Wang T, Ling Y, Su Z. PMRD: Plant microRNA database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;38:806–813. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkp818 - 50.
Yi X, Zhang Z, Ling Y, Xu, W, Su Z. PNRD: A plant non-coding RNA database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;43: D982–D989. DOI:10.1093/nar/gku1162. - 51.
Szcześniak MW, Deorowicz S, Gapski J, Kaczyński Ł, Makalowska I. miRNEST database: An integrative approach in microRNA search and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 ; 40:198–204. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkr1159 - 52.
Thomson DW, Bracken CP, Goodall GJ. Experimental strategies for microRNA target identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:6845–6853. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkr330 - 53.
Leng X, Leng X, Fang J, Pervaiz T, Li Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhu X, Fang J. Characterization of expression patterns of grapevine microRNA family members using microRNA rapid amplification of complementary DNA ends. Plant Genome. 2015;8:1–9. DOI:10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0069 - 54.
Wang C, Han J, Liu C, Kibet KN, Kayesh E, Shangguan L, Li X, Fang J. Identification of microRNAs from Amur grape ( Vitis amurensis Rupr.) by deep sequencing and analysis of microRNA variations with bioinformatics. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:122. DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-13-122 - 55.
German M, Luo S, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ. Construction of Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) libraries for the study of cleaved miRNA targets and the RNA degradome. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:356–362. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2009.8