Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Modeling and Simulation of Shape Memory Alloys using Microplane Model

Written By

Reza Mehrabi

Submitted: November 3rd, 2014 Reviewed: June 29th, 2015 Published: November 25th, 2015

DOI: 10.5772/61124

Chapter metrics overview

1,802 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In this chapter, a three-dimensional phenomenological constitutive model for the simulation of shape memory alloys is introduced. The proposed macromechanical model is based on microplane theory. Microplane approach is chosen to have limited material parameters in that all of those are measurable by simple tests. User material subroutine is developed to implement the proposed model in a commercial finite element package. NiTi hollow tube specimens are under various loading conditions in order to experimentally study the superelastic response of shape memory alloys. Comparing experimental data with numerical results in simple tension and pure torsion as well as proportional and nonproportional tension-torsion loadings demonstrates the capability of proposed model in constitutive modeling of shape memory alloys.

Keywords

  • Shape memory alloy
  • phenomenological model
  • microplane
  • proportional
  • nonproportional
  • experiment

1. Introduction

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) can recover their original shape when subjected to thermomechanical loading. If the original shape is remembered under external load, it is in superelastic form, and when the original shape is remembered under thermal load, it is in shape memory effect form. Commercial applications of these materials get more attention in recent years. Some of these unique properties are including biocompatibility, good mechanical properties (very similar to the different parts of human body), hysteresis damping, excellent fatigue properties in cyclic loads, and strain hardening. These characteristics make them attractive for diverse fields of application such as biomedical tools (blood clot filters, vascular stents, orthodontic arches), aerospace applications (space shuttle, morphing aircraft, hydraulic fittings and couplings for airplanes), automotive (engines and actuators for smart systems, thermostats), robotic (human robots, artificial muscle), eyeglass frames, cellular phone antennae, coffee maker, and so on [1-9].

In order to design new application of shape memory alloys, basic understanding behavior of these materials under different conditions is essential. Different aspects of SMAs are identified with constitutive modeling. Most models are based on thermodynamics using free energy formulation. However, some models are based on micromechanics concepts or macromechanics model [10]. Micromechanic models deal with crystallographic texture in microscale response of SMAs [11-17]. These models are used to model the phase transformation and grains propagation and consequently are appropriate for modeling the response of SMAs at the microscale [18]. In order to study SMAs polycrystalline, crystallographic texture is a key property. A micromechanic model for single crystals is used to study polycrystal structures [19]. In the micromechanics models, a volume fraction coefficient is defined for variants, and transformation strain is obtained from martensite variants by averaging procedure.

Even though micromechanical models reflect microscopic physical nature of SMAs, they are not suitable for finite element implementation and structural analysis. Therefore, macromechanical models based on phenomenological findings are proposed. These models are efficient in modeling the thermomechanical behavior of SMAs in different engineering applications. In a macromechanic model, macro-scale response of SMAs is considered [20-24]. Phenomenological models belong to a class of macromechanic models that are defined by macroscopic energy functions. These models are calibrated from material characterization and experimental data that depend on the internal variables.

Macrophenomenological models are categorized to one- and three-dimensional models. One-dimensional models are used for the simulation of wire and bar samples under uniaxial loads, while 3-D models can be used for complicated devices under complex loadings. Since most SMA devises are used in multidimensional or under complex loadings, one-dimensional models should extend to three-dimensional models. Three-dimensional constitutive modeling is an important step in analysis and design of SMAs in different industries. Some of the existing macro phenomenological models with specifications and limitations are summarized in Table 1.

Group Formulation Characteristics Limitation
Tanaka [25] Helmholtz free energy (1) 1-D model
(2) Exponential phase transformation equation
3-D, shape memory
Liang and Rogers [26] Helmholtz free energy (1) 1-D model, extension of the Tanaka model
(2) Cosine phase transformation equation
Shape memory
Brinson [27] Helmholtz free energy (1) 1-D model, martensite volume fraction separate into two parts induced by stress and temperature
(2) Cosine phase transformation equation
(3) Different elastic moduli for austenite and martensite
3-D
Auricchio et al. [22, 28] Based on phase diagram (1) 1-D and 3-D model
(2) Finite-strain regime, rate-dependent behavior
(3) Asymmetry behavior and numerical implementation
Shape memory
Lagoudas et al.
[2, 20, 29-31]
Gibbs free energy (1) 3-D model, exponential phase transformation equation
(2) Tension-compression asymmetry behavior
(3) Nonassociated flow rule during reverse transformation
Depend on the specific alloy
Panico and Brinson [32] Helmholtz free energy (1) 3-D model, extension of the Lexcellent model [33, 34]
(2) Variant reorientation modeling under nonproportional loadings
(3) Computational modeling of porous SMAs
Depend on the specific alloy
Helm and Haupt [35] Free energy (1) 3-D model based on continuum thermodynamics framework
(2) Simulation of nonproportional loading
(3) Finite strain regime
Depend on the specific alloy
Oliveira et al. [36] Helmholtz free energy (1) 3-D model
(2) Based on Fremond’s method
(3) Asymmetric behavior and based on plasticity
Unmeasurable material parameter
Brocca et al. [37] Microplane theory (1) 3-D model
(2) Constant module for different phases
(3) Simulation of nonproportional loading
Fundamental concept need to be revised
Arghavani et al. [21, 38] Helmholtz free energy (1) 3-D model
(2) Finite deformations
(3) Martensite volume fraction is a scalar parameter and variant orientation is a tensor
Unmeasurable material parameter
Saleeb et al.
[23, 39]
Gibbs free energy (1) 3-D model
(2) Deviation from normality and reorientation under nonproportional loading
(3) Cyclic behavior
Unmeasurable material parameter
Mehrabi et al.
[40, 41]
Gibbs free energy (1) 3-D model, microplane formulation
(2) Anisotropic behavior under nonproportional loadings
(3) Tension-compression asymmetry and numerical implementation
Under investigation
Patoor et al.
[15, 39, 42]
Gibbs free energy (1) 3-D model
(2) Tension-compression asymmetry
(3) Cyclic behavior and nonproportional loading
Unmeasurable material parameter
Zaki et al. [43-46] Helmholtz free energy (1) 3-D model
(2) cyclic and asymmetry behavior
(3) Capture plastic deformations
Unmeasurable material parameter

Table 1.

Macromechanical models

One-dimensional constitutive model was proposed by Tanaka [47] based on exponential phase transformation equation. Liang and Rogers [26] proposed a one-dimensional phase transformation based on cosine type. Martensite volume fraction suggested by Liang and Rogers is modified by Brinson [27] into two different parts. These two fractions included martensite volume fraction induced by stress and temperature. This assumption was done to distinct superelastic behavior from shape memory effect. Boyd and Lagoudas [30] had developed 1-D model to 3-D constitutive model. For this development, they used effective stress and strain in phase transformation equations. A three-dimensional constitutive model includes twinned martensite and detwinned martensite. In addition, multidimensional models could predict behavior of shape memory effect as well as superelastic behavior. A 3-D model based on the phase transformation equation of exponential type was proposed by Peng et al. [48]. They used classical plastic theory and defined equivalent stress and strain for modeling SMA response. Reali et al. [22] proposed a 3-D constitutive model, which is capable of simulating superelastic and shape memory behavior. Proposed model is developed within the framework of thermodynamics by defining a scalar and a tensorial internal variable [21]. The 3-D phenomenological model demonstrates the ability of developed model in proportional and nonproportional loadings. In most existing 3-D phenomenological constitutive models, some internal variables are necessary to be calibrated. In calibration process, most models estimate various material parameters in which some of those are not simply measurable by experimental tests. Among various phenomenological models, the microplane model is utilized due to its simplicity and the limited material parameters needed for calibration.

The behavior of some quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete, soil, and stiff foams, is studied using the microplane method [49-52]. A one-dimensional phase transformation model using microsphere formulation was proposed by Ostwald et al. [53] to simulate the polycrystalline materials. The three-dimensional model based on the microplane model was proposed by Brocca et al. [37]. In the microplane model, all material parameters can be determined from uniaxial tension tests at different temperatures. The microplane model considers 1-D equations for some directions on arbitrary plane and is extended to 3-D model using homogenization process [54]. Mehrabi et al. [40, 41, 55] developed this idea within the framework of thermodynamics and proved the capability of the proposed model under multiaxial loadings. Some unique characteristics of SMAs such as deviation from normality in nonproportional loading, anisotropic behavior, and tension-compression asymmetry behavior of SMAs were studied by Mehrabi et al. [56, 57] using the microplane approach.

The proposed microplane model is implemented in a standard commercial finite element package. Some experimental studies under tension, torsion, proportional, and nonproportional loadings have been performed on SMA hollow tubes to assess the proposed model [58]. The numerical results extracted from the microplane model compared with experimental data demonstrate the ability of the microplane approach.

Advertisement

2. Phenomenological constitutive modeling

In this section, phenomenological model based on microplane theory is used to describe SMAs material behavior in a simple way. The general definition of the microplane approach is that the 1-D constitutive law is defined for associated normal and tangential stress/strain components on any microplane at each material point. The generalization of 1-D equation to 3-D model is done by homogenization process. In microplane formulation, strain tensor is in closed form of stress tensor. Mehrabi and co-workers have done a thorough research on 3-D phenomenological model based on microplane theory to demonstrate their model features [40, 41, 55, 57, 59, 60]. The three main steps of the microplane model are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

General schematic of the microplane model based on the volumetric-deviatoric split.

For any plane on the shape memory alloys, microscopic Gibbs free energy (Gmic) is defined as

Gmic=G^mic(σV,σD,T,ξ)E1

Here, σV and σDare stress components on each microplane, T is temperature, and ξ is martensite volume fraction, which is defined as internal variable [27, 61].

Macroscopic strain tensor is defined as [41]

ε=ρGσ=ρ32πΩGmicσdΩ==32πΩ[ρGmicσVσVσρGmicσDσDσ]dΩ==32πΩ(εVV+DevT.εD)dΩE2

These integrals calculated on different orientations of hemisphere at a material point. Projection tensor Dev and the transpose of the deviatoric projection tensor DevT are defined as [62]

Dev:=n.Idev, DevT:=Idev.nE3

in which n represents the unit normal vector on the plane and Idev is deviatoric projection tensor (forth-order identity tensor) that is defined as follows

Idev=32πΩDevT.DevdΩ E4

The local 1-D constitutive laws in the volumetric and deviatoric components of the strain for SMAs are defined as

εV=σVEV0, εD=σDED0+Rε*ξE5

where  ε* is the axial maximum recoverable strain, EV0and ED0 are the local linear elastic modulus, which are a function of the global elastic constants. Transformation strain is only initiated in deviatoric direction of microplanes.

Here a standard procedure in the microplane model [57] is used to generalize the 1-D equations to 3-D formulation. Macroscopic strain tensor for shape memory alloys is calculated as

ε=εe+εtr=32πΩ(12υE(ξ)VV:σ+1+υE(ξ)DevT.Dev:σ)dΩ+32πΩε*ξDevT.R dΩE6

where R is a vector that is defined in reference [41]. In order to numerically calculate these integrals, an integration technique consisting of 21 Gaussian integration points is utilized [63].

Advertisement

3. Experimental study

In order to have a robust constitutive modeling, an experimental study of polycrystalline SMAs gets more attention in recent years. Since some SMA devices experience complex loading paths, investigation of material behavior under multiaxial loadings is essential. Some of the experimental findings are summarized in Table 2. In this table, some of the famous groups and loading schemes on the specific materials are introduced. As it is shown, most experimental studies are on the NiTi materials and copper based SMAs.

Group Specification Material
Sittner et al. [64, 65] Tension-Torsion CuAlZnMn
Jacobus et al. [66, 67] Triaxial stress CuZnAl, NiTi
Tokuda et al. [68, 69] Tension-Torsion CuAlZnMn
Lim and McDowell [70] Tension-Torsion NiTi
McNaney et al. [71] Tension-Torsion NiTi
Grabe and Bruhns [72, 73] Tension-Torsion NiTi
S. Arbab-Chirani and C.
Lexcellent [74, 75]
Tension-Pressure-Torsion CuAlBe, NiTi
Wang et al. [76, 77] Tension-Torsion NiTi
Reedlunn et al. [78] Tension-Pressure-Bending NiTi
Mehrabi et al. [55-58] Tension-Torsion NiTi

Table 2.

Experimental study

A vast experimental study of the NiTi hollow tubes under uniaxial tension, pure torsion, and proportional and nonproportional tension-torsion were done by the author in the Dynamic and Smart Systems Laboratory at the University of Toledo, USA. The Johnson Matthey provided NiTi tube specimens, and the experimental tests were performed using BOSE ElectroForce machine. All mechanical tests were performed at room temperature, and in order to have an isothermal condition, the loading rate was below 10-3s-1 [76]. The experimental results are compared with numerical findings to show the capability of the proposed approach in the next section.

Advertisement

4. Numerical simulation

In order to use microplane approach to simulate real SMA devices, the proposed model is implemented and developed into the FE code. The computational algorithm is outlined in Table 3.

1. Import the strain increment and the stress evaluated from ABAQUS
2. Check for transformation according to the phase diagram and compute the transformation strain if necessary
3. Compute the elastic strain
4. Compute the total strain
5. Compute the Jacobian matrix
6. Compute the incremental stress tensor
7. Update stress
8. End the program

Table 3.

Algorithm for implementation of constitutive modeling of SMA

Tensile and torsional tests are conducted on the NiTi tubes to investigate the capability of the microplane approach in capturing the behavior of SMAs. The material parameters calibrated for the microplane model are listed in Table 4 [55].

Symbols Values Units
EA 20,000 MPa
EM 13,300 MPa
υA=υM 0.33
TfM -32 °C
TsM -15 °C
TsA -5 °C
TfA 15 °C
σscr 20 MPa
σfcr 100 MPa
CM 6 MPa/°C
CA 8.2 MPa/°C
ε* 0.038

Table 4.

Material properties

Figures 2 and 3 represent comparison between the axial stress-strain responses of the microplane model and the experimental results as well as shear stress-strain response at room temperature. These comparisons confirm the fact that material parameter calibration process is done as well. Calibrated material parameters are constant during numerical study of proportional and nonproportional loadings.

Figure 2.

Comparison of the microplane model with experimental result [55].

Figure 3.

Comparison of the microplane model with experimental result [55].

To demonstrate other aspects of the microplane model, proportional tension-torsion loading is experimentally performed. Proportional loading path is shown in Figure 4(a). According to this loading path, axial stress and shear stress are increasing in step 1 and are decreasing to zero during step 2. The experimental findings are compared with the numerical results for axial stress-strain and shear stress-strain in Figures 4(b) and (c). The studied proportional loading demonstrates the capability of the proposed model.

Figure 4.

Comparison of the microplane model with experimental result in proportional loading: (a) proportional loading path, (b) axial stress-strain, (c) shear stress-strain [55].

In order to show the capability of the proposed approach in multiaxial loading, one complex loading path is considered here. In Figure 5, nonproportional tension-torsion loading path is shown. At first, shear stress increases while axial stress is zero. During step 2, shear stress is constant, and axial stress increases. Then, shear stress and axial stress are recovered to zero, respectively. Experimental results are compared with microplane numerical results in Figure 6. Comparison of results shows that the proposed model has good agreement with experimental results in both axial stress-strain and shear strain-axial strain. It is obvious that a discrepancy between experimental results and numerical results in the shear stress-strain curve is found. As the proposed model could predict general behavior of SMAs in different loadings, this negligible discrepancy is acceptable.

Figure 5.

Nonproportional loading path.

Figure 6.

Comparison of the microplane model with experimental result in nonproportional loading: (a) axial stress-strain, (b) shear stress-strain, (c) axial strain-shear strain [57].

In recent years, some biomedical applications [5] such as stent [79], catheters [80], muscle [81], artificial muscles [82], and shape memory implants [83] are produced by SMAs. Therefore, the simulation of biomedical devices using 3-D finite element method [84] is an interesting topic that leads to future works.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Constitutive modeling of shape memory alloys (SMAs) is a key property that leads researchers to find new engineering applications. Phenomenological modeling in macroscopic frame is an appropriate way for modeling the thermomechanical response of SMAs. One of the unique constitutive models based on the microplane model is utilized to investigate behavior of SMAs. Material parameters defined in the proposed model are limited and are calibrated with simple experimental tests. The proposed model is developed to implement and analyze in a finite element package. Some multiaxial loadings as proportional and nonproportional loadings are investigated with constitutive model. Numerical results in comparison of experimental findings show the microplane approach ability in simulation of SMAs behavior.

References

  1. 1. Anson, T., Shape memory alloys—medical applications. Materials World, 1999. 7 (20): p. 745-747.
  2. 2. Lagoudas, D.C., Shape memory alloys: modeling and engineering applications. 2008: Springer.
  3. 3. Lagoudas, D.C. and D.J. Hartl, Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part G—Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2007. 221(G4): p. 535-552.
  4. 4. Mohd Jani, J., et al., A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials and Design, 2014. 56: p. 1078-1113.
  5. 5. Petrini, L. and F. Migliavacca, Biomedical applications of shape memory alloys. Journal of Metallurgy, 2011. 2011.
  6. 6. Song, G., N. Ma, and H.-N. Li, Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures, 2006. 28(9): p. 1266-1274.
  7. 7. Van Humbeeck, J., Non-medical applications of shape memory alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1999. 273: p. 134-148.
  8. 8. Webb, G., et al., Adaptive control of shape memory alloy actuators for underwater biomimetic applications. AIAA Journal, 2000. 38(2): p. 325-334.
  9. 9. Barbarino, S., et al., A review on shape memory alloys with applications to morphing aircraft. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014. 23(6): p. 063001.
  10. 10. Brinson, L.C., I. Schmidt, and R. Lammering, Stress-induced transformation behavior of a polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloy: micro and macromechanical investigations via in situ optical microscopy. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2004. 52(7): p. 1549-1571.
  11. 11. Entchev, P.B. and D.C. Lagoudas, Modeling porous shape memory alloys using micromechanical averaging techniques. Mechanics of Materials, 2002. 34(1): p. 1-24.
  12. 12. Bhattacharya, K. and A. Sadjadpour, A micromechanics inspired constitutive model for shape-memory alloys: the one-dimensional case. Smart Materials and Structures, 2007. 16(1): p. S51-S62.
  13. 13. Gao, X.J., M.S. Huang, and L.C. Brinson, A multivariant micromechanical model for SMAs Part 1. Crystallographic issues for single crystal model. International Journal of Plasticity, 2000. 16(10-11): p. 1345-1369.
  14. 14. Levitas, V.I. and I.B. Ozsoy, Micromechanical modeling of stress-induced phase transformations. Part 1. Thermodynamics and kinetics of coupled interface propagation and reorientation. International Journal of Plasticity, 2009. 25(2): p. 239-280.
  15. 15. Patoor, E., A. Eberhardt, and M. Berveiller, Micromechanical modelling of superelasticity in shape memory alloys. Journal De Physique IV, 1996. 6(C1): p. 277-292.
  16. 16. Sadjadpour, A. and K. Bhattacharya, A micromechanics-inspired constitutive model for shape-memory alloys. Smart Materials and Structures, 2007. 16(5): p. 1751-1765.
  17. 17. Thamburaja, P., H. Pan, and F. Chau, The evolution of microstructure during twinning: constitutive equations, finite-element simulations and experimental verification. International Journal of Plasticity, 2009. 25(11): p. 2141-2168.
  18. 18. Mirzaeifar, R., et al., A micromechanical analysis of the coupled thermomechanical superelastic response of textured and untextured polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys. Acta Materialia, 2013. 61(12): p. 4542-4558.
  19. 19. Thamburaja, P. and L. Anand, Superelastic behavior in tension-torsion of an initially-textured Ti-Ni shape-memory alloy. International Journal of Plasticity, 2002. 18(11): p. 1607-1617.
  20. 20. Lagoudas, D., et al., Constitutive model for the numerical analysis of phase transformation in polycrystalline shape memory alloys. International Journal of Plasticity, 2012. 32: p. 155-183.
  21. 21. Arghavani, J., et al., A 3-D phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadings. International Journal of Plasticity, 2010. 26(7): p. 976-991.
  22. 22. Reali, A., F. Auricchio, and U. Stefanelli, A three-dimensional model describing stress-induced solid phase transformation with permanent inelasticity. International Journal of Plasticity, 2007. 23(2): p. 207-226.
  23. 23. Saleeb, A.F., S.A. Padula, and A. Kumar, A multi-axial, multimechanism based constitutive model for the comprehensive representation of the evolutionary response of SMAs under general thermomechanical loading conditions. International Journal of Plasticity, 2011. 27(5): p. 655-687.
  24. 24. Sedlák, P., et al., Thermomechanical model for NiTi-based shape memory alloys including R-phase and material anisotropy under multi-axial loadings. International Journal of Plasticity, 2012.
  25. 25. K. Tanaka, S. Kobayashi, and Y. Sato, Thermomechanics of transformation pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect in alloys. International Journal of Plasticity, 1986. 2: p. 59-72.
  26. 26. Liang, C. and C. Rogers, One-dimensional thermomechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1990. 1(2): p. 207-234.
  27. 27. Brinson, L.C., One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1993. 4(2): p. 229-242.
  28. 28. Auricchio, F. and E. Sacco, A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 1997. 32(6): p. 1101-1114.
  29. 29. Bekker, A., et al., Impact induced propagation of phase transformation in a shape memory alloy rod. International Journal of Plasticity, 2002. 18(11): p. 1447-1479.
  30. 30. Boyd, J.G. and D.C. Lagoudas, Thermomechanical response of shape-memory composites. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1994. 5(3): p. 333-346.
  31. 31. Hartl, D.J., et al. Phenomenological modeling of induced transformation anisotropy in shape memory alloy actuators. Proceedings of SPIE. 2012.
  32. 32. Panico, M. and L.C. Brinson, A three-dimensional phenomenological model for martensite reorientation in shape memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2007. 55(11): p. 2491-2511.
  33. 33. Bouvet, C., S. Calloch, and C. Lexcellent, A phenomenological model for a Cu-Al-Be shape memory alloy pseudoelasticity under complex loading. Journal De Physique IV, 2003. 112: p. 201-204.
  34. 34. Lexcellent, C. and G. Bourbon, Thermodynamical model of cyclic behaviour of Ti-Ni and Cu-Zn-Al shape memory alloys under isothermal undulated tensile tests. Mechanics of Materials, 1996. 24(1): p. 59-73.
  35. 35. Helm, D. and P. Haupt, Shape memory behaviour: modelling within continuum thermomechanics. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2003. 40(4): p. 827-849.
  36. 36. Oliveira, S., M. Savi, and A. Kalamkarov, A three-dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2010. 80(10): p. 1163-1175.
  37. 37. Brocca, M., L.C. Brinson, and Z. Bazant, Three-dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys based on microplane model. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2002. 50(5): p. 1051-1077.
  38. 38. Arghavani, J., et al., A 3D finite strain phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys considering martensite reorientation. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2010. 22(5): p. 345-362.
  39. 39. Chemisky, Y., et al., Constitutive model for shape memory alloys including phase transformation, martensitic reorientation and twins accommodation. Mechanics of Materials, 2011. 43(7): p. 361-376.
  40. 40. Mehrabi, R. and M. Kadkhodaei, 3D phenomenological constitutive modeling of shape memory alloys based on microplane theory. Smart Materials and Structures, 2013. 22(2): p. 025017.
  41. 41. Mehrabi, R., M. Kadkhodaei, and M. Elahinia, A thermodynamically-consistent microplane model for shape memory alloys. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014. 51(14): p. 2666-2675.
  42. 42. Lagoudas, D.C., et al., Shape memory alloys, Part II: modeling of polycrystals. Mechanics of Materials, 2006. 38(5-6): p. 430-462.
  43. 43. Morin, C., Z. Moumni, and W. Zaki, A constitutive model for shape memory alloys accounting for thermomechanical coupling. International Journal of Plasticity, 2011. 27(5): p. 748-767.
  44. 44. Zaki, W. and Z. Moumni, A 3D model of the cyclic thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2007. 55(11): p. 2427-2454.
  45. 45. Zaki, W. and Z. Moumni, A three-dimensional model of the thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2007. 55(11): p. 2455-2490.
  46. 46. Zaki, W., An efficient implementation for a model of martensite reorientation in martensitic shape memory alloys under multiaxial nonproportional loading. International Journal of Plasticity, 2012. 37: p. 72-94.
  47. 47. Tanaka, K., Thermomechanical sketch of shape memory effect: one-dimensional tensile behavior. Res Mechanica: International Journal of Structural Mechanics and Materials Science, 1986. 18(3): p. 251-263.
  48. 48. Peng, X., Y. Yang, and S. Huang, A comprehensive description for shape memory alloys with a two-phase constitutive model. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2001. 38(38-39): p. 6925-6940.
  49. 49. Bazant, Z., Microplane model for strain controlled inelastic behavior. Mechanics of engineering materials, 1984. 3: p. 45-59.
  50. 50. Bažant, Z.P. and B.H. Oh. microplane model for fracture analysis of concrete structures. In Proceedings of Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures. 1983. Washington.
  51. 51. Bažant, Z.P. and P.C. Prat, Microplane model for brittle plastic material. I: theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1988. 114: p. 1672-1688.
  52. 52. Carol, I., M. Jirasek, and Z. Bazant, A thermodynamically consistent approach to microplane theory. Part I. Free energy and consistent microplane stresses. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2001. 38(17): p. 2921-2931.
  53. 53. Ostwald, R., T. Bartel, and A. Menzel, A computational micro‐sphere model applied to the simulation of phase‐transformations. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 2010. 90(7-8): p. 605-622.
  54. 54. Kadkhodaei, M., et al., Modeling of shape memory alloys based on microplane theory. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2008. 19(5): p. 541-550.
  55. 55. Mehrabi, R., et al., Microplane modeling of shape memory alloy tubes under tension, torsion, and proportional tension-torsion loading. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2014: p. 1045389X14522532.
  56. 56. Mehrabi, R., et al., Anisotropic behavior of superelastic NiTi shape memory alloys; an experimental investigation and constitutive modeling. Mechanics of Materials, 2014. 77: p. 110-124.
  57. 57. Mehrabi, R., M. Kadkhodaei, and M. Elahinia, Constitutive modeling of tension-torsion coupling and tension-compression asymmetry in NiTi shape memory alloys. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014. 23(7): p. 75021-75035.
  58. 58. Mehrabi, R., et al., Experimental study of NiTi thin-walled tubes under uniaxial tension, torsion, proportional and non-proportional loadings. Experimental Mechanics, 2015: p. 1-14.
  59. 59. Mehrabi, R., M. Kadkhodaei, and S. Arbab Chirani, Microplane modeling of martensite reorientation in shape memory alloys. ECCOMAS 2012, Austria, 10-14 September, 2012.
  60. 60. Mehrabi, R., M. Kadkhodaie, and M. Elahinia, Microplane modeling of shape memory alloys in an alternative formulation. SMASIS2013, Snowbird, Utah, 2013, 2013.
  61. 61. Brinson, L.C. and M.S. Huang, Simplifications and comparisons of shape memory alloy constitutive models. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1996. 7(1): p. 108-114.
  62. 62. Leukart, M. and E. Ramm, A comparison of damage models formulated on different material scales. Computational Materials Science, 2003. 28(3): p. 749-762.
  63. 63. Bažant, P. and B. Oh, Efficient numerical integration on the surface of a sphere. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 1986. 66(1): p. 37-49.
  64. 64. Sittner, P., Y. Hara, and M. Tokuda, Experimental-study on the thermoelastic martensitic-transformation in shape-memory alloy polycrystal induced by combined external forces. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1995. 26(11): p. 2923-2935.
  65. 65. Sittner, P., et al., On transformation pathways of general stress controlled thermoelastic martensitic transformation in shape memory alloys. Journal De Physique IV, 1996. 6(C1): p. 357-366.
  66. 66. Gall, K., et al., Stress-induced martensitic phase transformations in polycrystalline CuZnAl shape memory alloys under different stress states. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1998. 29(3): p. 765-773.
  67. 67. Jacobus, K., H. Sehitoglu, and M. Balzer, Effect of stress state on the stress-induced martensitic transformation in polycrystalline Ni-Ti alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1996. 27(10): p. 3066-3073.
  68. 68. Tokuda, M., et al., Multi-axial constitutive equations of polycrystalline shape memory alloy—(Experimental background). JSME International Journal Series A. Solid Mechanics and Material Engineering, 2002. 45(2): p. 276-281.
  69. 69. Tokuda, M., et al., Thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloy under complex loading conditions. International Journal of Plasticity, 1999. 15(2): p. 223-239.
  70. 70. Lim, T.J. and D.L. McDowell, Mechanical behavior of an Ni-Ti shape memory alloy under axial-torsional proportional and nonproportional loading. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-Transactions of the Asme, 1999. 121(1): p. 9-18.
  71. 71. McNaney, J.M., et al., An experimental study of the superelastic effect in a shape-memory Nitinol alloy under biaxial loading. Mechanics of Materials, 2003. 35(10): p. 969-986.
  72. 72. Bruhns, O.T. and C. Grabe, Path dependence and multiaxial behavior of a polycrystalline NiTi alloy within the pseudoelastic and pseudoplastic temperature regimes. International Journal of Plasticity, 2009. 25(3): p. 513-545.
  73. 73. Grabe, C. and O.T. Bruhns, Tension/torsion tests of pseudoelastic, polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys under temperature control. Materials Science and Engineering A. Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2008. 481: p. 109-113.
  74. 74. Lexcellent, C., et al., Experimental and numerical determinations of the initial surface of phase transformation under biaxial loading in some polycrystalline shape-memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2002. 50(12): p. 2717-2735.
  75. 75. Saint-Sulpice, L., S.A. Chirani, and S. Calloch, A 3D super-elastic model for shape memory alloys taking into account progressive strain under cyclic loadings. Mechanics of Materials, 2009. 41(1): p. 12-26.
  76. 76. Wang, X., et al., An experimental study of the superelastic behavior in NiTi shape memory alloys under biaxial proportional and non-proportional cyclic loadings. Mechanics of Materials, 2010. 42(3): p. 365-373.
  77. 77. Wang, Y., Z. Yue, and J. Wang, Experimental and numerical study of the superelastic behaviour on NiTi thin-walled tube under biaxial loading. Computational Materials Science, 2007. 40(2): p. 246-254.
  78. 78. Reedlunn, B., et al., Tension, compression, and bending of superelastic shape memory alloy tubes. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2013.
  79. 79. Thériault, P., et al., Finite element modeling of a progressively expanding shape memory stent. Journal of biomechanics, 2006. 39(15): p. 2837-2844.
  80. 80. Migliavacca, F., et al., Stainless and shape memory alloy coronary stents: a computational study on the interaction with the vascular wall. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2004. 2(4): p. 205-217.
  81. 81. Stirling, L., et al., Applicability of shape memory alloy wire for an active, soft orthotic. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2011. 20(4-5): p. 658-662.
  82. 82. Shiraishi, Y., et al. Development of an artificial myocardium using a covalent shape-memory alloy fiber and its cardiovascular diagnostic response. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE-EMBS, 2005. IEEE.
  83. 83. Kim, Y.-S., H.-Y. Zhang, and C. Illustrations, Shape Memory Implant. Dynamic Reconstruction of the Spine, 2006: p. 292.
  84. 84. Mehrabi, R., KaramoozRavari, M.R., Superelastic Simulation of SMA Helical Springs. Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal, 2015. 16 (1): p.183-194.

Written By

Reza Mehrabi

Submitted: November 3rd, 2014 Reviewed: June 29th, 2015 Published: November 25th, 2015