Classification of some free-trifluoroacetate CSD routes depending on the reagents reported in the literature and which do not result on YBCO films containing BaCO3.
1. Introduction
To date there has been intensive research, both theoretical and experimental, about epitaxial growth of high critical temperature superconductor (HTS) thin films [1, 2]. The term epitaxy (from the Greek roots
To achieve the epitaxial growth, the crystal lattice of the substrate must match with that of YBCO, permitting a small difference between them (e.g.
The methods for synthesizing YBCO layers can be classified into two categories: in-situ and ex-situ. In the in-situ methods, the YBCO phase is formed during deposition. Some of them are: Pulsed laser deposition (PLD), liquid phase epitaxy (LPE) and metal organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) [7-13]. In the ex-situ methods, the nucleation and growth of the YBCO film takes place after the deposition, by subsequent heat treatments [14,15]. The advantage of the in-situ techniques over the ex-situ ones are that they allow YBCO films with high
2. Chemical solution deposition technique for obtaining YBCO films
Chemical solution deposition is an ex-situ technique in which a chemical solution precursor is deposited on substrates to epitaxially grow YBCO layers [16,17]. It does not require expensive conditions or equipments such as high vacuum, irradiation or sputtering. In this technique, a solution precursor containing stoichiometric cations of Y, Ba and Cu (with ratio 1: 2: 3) is prepared, usually by sol gel, and directly deposited onto single crystals or templates which transfers their texture to the coating. The YBCO textured film is then obtained after heat treatments in oxidizing atmosphere [18, 19]. Therefore, this technique is cheap, fast and can provide large-area films. In the present work, depending on the Trifluoroacetate composition of the precursor solution, the CSD is classified into two routes: Trifluoroacetate and free-trifluoroacetates.
2.1. Trifluoroacetate metal-organic CSD route
The trifluoroacetate metal-organic (TFA-MOD) CSD route is promising for producing YBCO superconducting films with high critical current density (
In this technique, the precursor solution is prepared by mixing Y and Ba trifluoroacetates with Cu acetate (in molar ratio 1:2:3) in methanol [29] or water [30]. The organic components are eliminated by pyrolisis at around 400 °C, yielding in Y2O3, BaF2 and CuO. These intermediate compounds are then transformed into YBCO tetragonal (non superconductor) by annealing at around 800 °C. The reaction follows the equation [31]:
The superconducting YBCO (orthorhombic) is obtained by oxygenating the latest compound at high temperatures. Nevertheless, the release of the HF-gas product during heat treatments makes this technique hazardous for health and environment. Thus non-fluorine routes are necessary to be investigated.
2.2. Free-trifluoroacetate CSD routes
Chemical solution deposition routes which does not require the use of trifluoroacetates are vast. However, most of them result in YBCO films containing unreacted and/or secondary phases such as Y2O3, BaCO3, Y2BaCuO5 (Y211), BaCuO2, Cu2BaO2, etc. Table 1 list free-trifluoroacetates routes reported in the literature which do not require carbonate ingredients and without BaCO3 formation. The routes are listed according to the employed reagents. In metal alkoxides routes the gelation rate of the precursor solution is adjusted by choosing the proper solvent. The solidification includes the hydrolysis and condensation of the alkoxides through which a polymeric product is formed [32]. However, since the rate of hydrolysis of Y and Ba are faster than that for Cu, different sized clusters results in the sol [33]. In the hydroxides route Ba(OH)2 and Y-and Ba-trimethylacetates are reacted in propionic acid with amine solvent. Remarkably, it has been reported that this stock solution is stable in air and has a shelf life longer than 2 years [34-36]. On the other hand, the CSD based on nitrates, which is also known as polymer-assisted deposition (PAD) because of the use of polymers, obtains a homogeneous distribution of the metal precursors in the solution and the formation of uniform metal–organic films [37]. The formed NO and/or NO2 can be easily eliminated leading in a high homogeneity of the precursor solution. In the following sections, a novel fluorine-free method, based on oxalates, for the CSD of YBCO films is described.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal alkoxides | M(OR)n where M=Y, Ba and Cu, and R=CH3, CH2O5 | H2O, CH3OH | Ni | It is possible to control the degree of gelation. | Inhomogeneity of the precursor gel. | [32] |
Acetyl acetonates | APyP, where A= acetylacetone of Y, Ba and Cu, Py= pyridine, and P = acid | C5H5N, CF3CO2H, CH3OH |
MgO, YSZ |
Smooth surface | Films composed of dispersed grains | [38] |
Hydroxides | Y(C4H9COO)3, Ba(OH)2 and Cu- trimethyl acetate |
Propionic acid / amine solvent | YSZ, LaAlO3, MgO | Smooth surface without cracks | Difficult to reproduce | [34-36, 39-42] |
Nitrates | Y(NO3), Ba(NO3) and Cu(NO3) | (CH3)2NC(O)H | SrTiO3, LaAlO3 | Homogeneous solution precursor | Requires rapid drying to prevent premature crystallization | [43] |
3. Substrates
Similar to the in-situ technique, CSD of YBCO superconducting layers also includes careful selection of substrates. To obtain high quality growth of YBCO, many considerations should be taking into mind, such as:
The potential substrates should have lattice constant similar to that of YBCO orthorhombic so as to allow epitaxial growth.
They must be highly insulating for eventual applications in electrical circuits.
Ferromagnetic substrates must be discarded since they affect the diamagnetic properties of the YBCO superconducting film.
They should have a high melting point since the fabrication of the film requires high temperatures (usually higher than 800 °C).
Some materials which meet well the requirements listed above and are: sapphire (Al2O3), magnesium oxide (MgO), cerium dioxide (CeO2), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3), strontium titanate (SrTiO3) and Yttria-stabilized Zirconia (Y:ZrO2, YSZ). The following sections describe the CSD of YBCO superconducting films onto the three latest substrates (LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ). The substrates used in this work (5 mm2 area) were purchased from CrysTec Ltd. and their main characteristics are listed in Table 2. Note that from them, the YSZ substrate present the highest mismatch in lattice constant with respect to YBCO which, as it will be discussed below, influences in the crystallization, composition, texture and magnetic properties of the resulting YBCO film.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaAlO3 | p.c. | 0.3821 | -0.83 | 6.51 | 2380 | 10 × 10-6 |
SrTiO3 | c.p. | 0.3905 | +1.35 | 5.12 | 2353 | 9 × 10-6 |
YSZ | Cubic | 0.512 | +32.88 | 5.90 | 2780 | 9.2 × 10-6 |
4. Solution preparation and deposition
The first step of the CSD technique to obtain YBCO superconducting films is the preparation of the precursor solution. This solution is required to have homogeneously dispersed Y, Ba and Cu cations, suitable viscosity and without precipitation so as to achieve good adherence to the surface of the substrate and desired thickness of the resulting YBCO film.
Figure 1 provides a schematic representation of the manufacturing process of the YBCO film followed in this work. Initially a precursor solution is obtained by sol-gel similar to previous reports [44-48]. Stoichiometric amounts of yttrium, barium and copper acetates (Y(OOCCH3)3.4H2O, Ba(OOCCH3)2 and Cu(OOCCH3)2.2H2O respectively) were mixed and completely dissolved in a solution of ethanol (C2H5OH) and oxalic acid (H2C2O4) (1:1 ratio). The system was left to decant for about 12 h. The matrix was then dispersed and magnetically stirred at 250 rpm to achieve a homogeneous metathesis reaction (without the segregation of any particular constituents) between the acetate solution and the oxalic acid. The resulting precursor solution was a colloid based on Y, Ba and Cu oxalates. Single drops of this precursor were carefully dripped on the LaAlO3(100), SrTiO3(100) and YSZ(100) substrates with the help of a Fisher pipette. The samples were immediately dried in an oven at 40 °C. The last steps were repeated 7 times. The oxalate is formed by the reaction [49]:
5. Heat treatments
YBa2Cu3O7-x has relatively strong oxygen-metal bonds, thus high temperatures heat treatments are required to rearrange the species in the precursor solution for a correct crystallization and crystal growth. The thermodynamic stability of YBCO limits the synthesis and the crystal growth parameters. For example synthesis at temperatures well below 900 ℃ result in x values from 0.7 to 1, leading the crystalline structure as tetragonal (non superconductor). Further oxidization at high temperatures is necessary to decrease
In this work, the crystallization and epitaxial growth of the YBCO layers were achieved by ex-situ heat treatments, as represented in Fig. 2. After drying the samples for 10 min, they were annealed at 860 °C in a tubular furnace (LENTON LTF-PTF Model 16/610) in low oxygen atmosphere for 12 h. The low oxygen atmosphere facilitates the liquid phase formation, which in turn influences the grain growth and interconnection between crystallites [51]. On the other hand, the slow heating rate (1 °C/min) permits the thermal decomposition to remove residual volatile hydrocarbons thus lowering the risk of trapping CO2 bubbles in. Besides, it is expected that both, the slow rate and the high annealing temperature performed in this work also prevent the formation of BaCO3 [52]. Thus, the chemical reaction during this process might described by [49]:
obtaining mixtures of yttrium, barium and copper oxides (Y2O3, BaO and CuO). At this stage, epitaxial growth of the crystallites occurs specially at the interface of the layer/substrate, together with a considerable decrease of the thickness of the film (as it is represented in the bottom part of the figure) [53]. Furthermore, the microstructure of the film might consist of irregular arrangement of porous together with groups of chemically bounded crystallites. The reaction is described by [49]:
Note also that at this stage the sample consists on YBa2Cu3O
Eventually, the samples were subsequently quenched to room temperature with an intermediate step at 600 °C so as to minimise the stress in the film.
6. Surface morphology
Figure 3 shows the surface morphology of the YBCO films on LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ substrates obtained by the oxalate CSD route and after oxygenation at three different temperatures: 820 840 and 860 °C. The results reveal that all the samples consist on granular films. In the case of the sample deposited on LaAlO3 the YBCO grains are uniformly dispersed over the substrate surface, forming small groups. Previous results report that the average grain size formed is smaller than 100 nm [47]. In the case of the sample deposited on SrTiO3, continuous films are clearly distinguished independently of the oxygenation temperature. However for the sample annealed at 820 °C, bright spots are spread on the surfaces. The light in the microscope might reflect in different directions when it is incident to some clusters or grains spread on the surface of the sample. Note also the formation of wide cracks (~ 5 µm) on the surface of the samples revealing parts of the underneath substrate. These cracks, which are typical for ceramic films under stress, together with some fringes formed on the surfaces (especially in the case of 860 °C annealing) suggest that the YBCO films strain during quenching. The samples deposited on the YSZ substrates also present some cracks indicating stress during the quenching. However, the granular nature of the films is more pronounced than in the previous cases. On this substrate, the accumulation of grains is better appreciated in the film treated at 820 °C, whereas the surface softens at higher temperatures as it is clearly observed on the sample treated at 860 °C revealing the occurrence of melting. Furthermore, on all the samples, macro-segregation, leading to the formation of secondary phases and degradation of the epitaxy might occur as it is studied in more detail by XRD below.
7. Crystallization
YBaCu3O7 films can grow in three different orientations: a) random, b) along the
The crystal orientation of YBCO thin films is commonly studied by X-ray diffraction. Fig. 5 shows the 4 representative angles (θ−2θ, ω, ϕ and Ψ) of the goniometer in a diffractometer. In the θ−2θ scans, by varying the angle of incidence θ, a diffraction pattern is recorded. The position and the intensity of the peaks are used for identifying the phase formation through their respective characteristic reflections. The ω scans are taken to check for a preferential film orientation normal to the substrate plane. In that case a strong peak from the θ−2θ scan is chosen, the detector is set and fixed to the corresponding value of the 2θ angle, as it is discussed in the next section. In this work, the crystallization of the films is studied by both, θ−2θ and ω scans. In a Bragg-Brentano geometry [54], YBCO films containing randomly oriented crystallites are identified by strong (103) reflections. Whereas YBCO films containing
Figure 6 shows the X-ray diffractograms XRD, in semi-logarithmical scale, of the films grown on the three different substrates (LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ) obtained after annealing at 820, 840 and 860 °C. In all the cases, the strongest reflections are those (
On the other hand, since YBCO is a multi-cationic material, during the heat treatment at high temperatures the oxygen atoms can diffuse as they are weakly bounded to the structure, especially the oxygen atoms in the basal plane. Thus, in addition to the YBCO phase, other different stable phases can be formed according to the phase diagram. The stabilization in other structures depends on the number and arrangement of the vacant-sites of oxygen (tetrahedral or octahedral). Following the phase diagram of YBCO at 800 ℃ [55], these phases can be classified as: i) stable (YBa2Cu3O7, YBa2Cu4O8), ii) Secondary (BaCuO2, Y2Cu2O5, Y2BaCuO5, BaCO3 etc), iii) unreacted (CuO, BaO, BaCO3 and Y2O3) and iv) unstable (BaCu2O2, Ba2Cu3O6-x). In the XRD presented in the figure, small reflections corresponding to the phases Y2BaCuO5 (Y211), Y2O3, BaCuO2 and Cu2BaO2 were also detected. They are listed in Table 3. Note that in this work, no BaCO3 has been detected on the XRD of the samples, indicating that the pyrolisis at 860 °C and slow rate (1 °C/min) is effective to prevent the formation of this unwanted phase. In contrast, reflections belonging to Y211 (also called 'green phase') were detected in the XRD for all the samples, suggesting that this phase might be formed during melting of the YBCO phase [56]. Y211 also acts as flux pinning centres improving the electrical and magnetic properties of the YBCO film [57]. Furthermore, the samples annealed at 820 °C present the majority amount of unreacted phases, indicating that this annealing temperature is not high enough to complete all the reaction. Besides, the less formation of secondary phases is obtained on the LaAlO3 substrate while the sample containing more secondary phases is obtained on YSZ substrates. The latest suggests that as smaller is the mismatch in lattice constant to that of YBCO, there is better reaction between the coating components to form more pure YBCO. The presence of these unwanted phases affect the magnetic properties of the material, as we discuss in more detail below.
For all the samples, the mean crystallite sizes and degree of epitaxy (
where
To calculate
The
Overall, the increase of grain size and
|
|
|
|
|
LaAlO3 | 820 | Y211, Y2O3, BaCuO2, | 25 | 0.60 |
840 | Y211, Y2O3 | 32 | 0.74 | |
860 | Y211 | 33 | 0.88 | |
SrTiO3 | 820 | Y211, Y2O3, BaCuO2, Cu2BaO2 | 25 | 0.02 |
840 | Y211, Y2O3, BaCuO2, Cu2BaO2 | 30 | 0.61 | |
860 | Y211 | 35 | 0.64 | |
YSZ | 820 | Y211, Y2O3, CuO, BaCuO2 | 34 | 0.90 |
840 | Y211, Y2O3, CuO, BaCuO2 | 36 | 0.86 | |
860 | Y211, Y2O3, BaCuO2 | 56 | 0.91 |
8. Texture
As mentioned in the previous section, X-ray diffraction can also provide qualitative information about the texture of the YBCO films. Figure 7 shows a schematic representation of inclined crystallites and their correspondent identification by ω-scans. The inclination (Fig. 7 (a)) is related to the out-of-plane deviation of the crystallites and it is also called out-of-plane texture (along the
Figure 8 shows the rocking curves corresponding to the (005) reflection of the YBCO films obtained by the oxalate CSD route on LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ substrates and after oxygenation at 860 °C. This reflection was chosen because its intensity is higher than the other (00
|
|
|
|
Close to the film/substrate interface | 0.45° | 0.35° | 0.4° |
Intermediate layer | - | 0.83° | 6.0° |
Close to the surface | 2.0° | 1.0° | 9.0° |
9. Superconductivity
Figure 9 shows the magnetic moment vs. temperature of the YBCO films on LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ substrates obtained by the oxalate CSD route and oxygenation at 860 °C. The plots show the measurements taken in zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) modes for external magnetic field applied parallel to the film plane of 100 mT for films deposited on LaAlO3 and SrTiO3 and 50 mT for that deposited on YSZ. The superconducting property of the obtained films is demonstrated by the diamagnetic signals below the transition temperature TC=90 K, thus confirming the formation of the superconducting YBCO. Note that the sample deposited on YSZ shows an up turn in the diamagnetic signal at low temperature, which can be attributed to other phases which are present in the sample. In fact, according to Table 3, this sample contains more secondary and unreacted phases than the other samples oxygenated at 860 °C. Therefore, the diamagnetic behaviour of the YBCO superconductor is screened by the paramagnetic response of those unwanted phases. The latest is better distinguished at the lowest temperatures in which the paramagnetic response tends to rise both, the ZFC and FC, branches to positive values of the magnetic moment.
10. Conclusions
YBa2Cu3O7 films were successfully deposited on LaAlO3, SrTiO3 and YSZ by the oxalate CSD route and heat treatments at 820, 840 and 860 °C. The preparation of the precursor solution does not require trifluoroacetates components. The obtained samples consist of granular YBCO films. X-ray diffraction reveals that all the samples contain crystallites oriented to (00
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Con-Con program of the National University of San Marcos, Peru (Funding No. 121301041). The work in Cambridge was supported by the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC-RG63021). The work in Brazil has been supported by CNPq (307552/2012-8), CAPES (PNPD-230.007518/2011-11) and FACEPE (APQ-0589-1.05/08).
References
- 1.
G. Desgardin, I. Monot y B. Raveau, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 12 (1999) R115. - 2.
E. K. Hollmannt, O. G. Vendik, A. G. Zaitsev y B.T. Melekh, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 7 (1994) 609. - 3.
J. L. Mayo, Superconductivity: The Threshold of a New Technology, TAB Books, Inc., Blue Ridge Summit, Pasadena (1989). - 4.
W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 270. - 5.
C. Poole, H.A. Farach, R.J. Creswick, R. Prozorov, Superconductivity, 2nd ed., Academic Pres, The Netherlands 2007. - 6.
High performance YBCO-coated superconductors wires, MRS Bulletin 29 No 8 (2004). - 7.
S. U. K. Nair, P. R. S. Warriary J. Koshy; Bull. Mater. Sci. 25, (2002) 95. - 8.
D. P. Norton; Annu. Rev. Matter. Sci. 28, 299 (1998). - 9.
R. Wondenweber, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 12 (1998). - 10.
T. Manabe, I. Yamaguchi, S. Nakamura, W. Kondo, T. Kumagai, S. Mizuta, J. Mat. Res. 10 (1995) 1635-1643. - 11.
J.A. Smith, M.J. Cima, N. Sonnenberg, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 9 (1999)1531-1534. - 12.
K. Yamagiwa, T. Araki, Y. Takahashi, H. Hier, S.B. Kim, K. Matsumoto, J. Shibata, T. Hirayama, H. Ikuta, U. Mizutani, I. Hirabayashi, J. Crystal Growth 229 (2001) 353-357. - 13.
T. Araki, I. Hirabayashi, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 16 (2003) R71-R94. - 14.
K. Yamagiwa, T. Araki, Y. Takahashi, H. Hiei, S. B. Kim, K. Matsumoto, J. Shibata, T. Hirayama, H. Ikuta, U. Mizutani, I. Hirabayashi; J. Cryst. Growth 229, 353 (2001). - 15.
O. Castano, A. Cavallaro, A. Palau, J. C. Gonzalez, M. Rossell, T. Puig, F. Sandiumenge, N. Mestres, S. Pinol, A. Pomar, X. Obradors; Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16, 45-53 (2003). - 16.
R.W. Schwartz, Chem. Mater, 9 (1997) 2325-2340. - 17.
W. Cui, J.L. Tanner, T.W. Button, J. Phys.: Conf. Series, 97 (2008) 012257. - 18.
K. Knoth, S. Egel, C. Apettri, M. Falter, B. Schlobach, R. Huhne, S. Oswald, L. Schultz, B. Holzapfel, Current Op. Sold. Stat. Mat. Sci., 10 (2006) 205-216. - 19.
A. Sheth, K. Trembath, J. Mat. Process. Tech., 123 (2002) 167-178. - 20.
M.E. Gross, M. Hong, S.H. Liou, P.K. Gallagher, J. Kwo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 160-162. - 21.
M.L. Kullberg, M.T. Lanagan, W. Wu, R.B. Poeppel, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 4 (1989) 337-342. - 22.
Y.L. Chen, J.V. Mantese, A.H. Hamdi, A.L. Mecheli, J. Mater. REs. 4 (1989) 1065-1070. - 23.
K. Yamagiwa, H. Hiei, Y. Takahashi, S.B. Kim, K. Matsumoto, H. Ikuta, U. Mizutani, I. Hirabayashi, Physica C 334 (2000) 301-305. - 24.
P.C. McIntyre, M.J. Cima, J.A. Smith, R.B. Hallock, M.P. Siegal, J.M. Phillips, J. Appl. Phys. 71 (1992) 1868-1877. - 25.
P.C. McIntyre, M.J Cima, A. Roshko, J. Appl. Phys. 77 (1995) 5263-5272; S. Sathyamurthy, K. Salama, Physica C 329 (2000) 58-68. - 26.
A. Malozemoff, S. Annavarapu, L. Fritzmeier, Q. Li, V. Prunier, M. Rupich, C. Thieme, W. Zhang, A. Goyal, M. Paranthaman, D.F. Lee, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 13 (2000) 473-476. - 27.
A. Gupta, R. Jagannathan, E.I. Cooper, E.A. Giess, J.I. Landman, B.W. Hussey, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 2077-2079. - 28.
P.C. McIntyre, M.J. Cima, J.A. Smith, R.B. Hallock, M.P. Siegal, J.M. Phillips, J. Appl. Phys., 71 (1992) 1868-1877. - 29.
X.M. Cui, B.W. Tao, Z. Tian, J. Xiong, X.Z. Liu, Y.R. Li, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19 (2006) L13-L15. - 30.
S. Wang, L. Wang, B. Gu, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 24 (2008) 899-902. - 31.
X. Tang, Development of a fluorine-free chemical solution deposition route for rare-earth cuprate superconducting tapes and its application to reel-to-reel processing, PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2013. - 32.
I.H. Mutlu, H. Acun, E. Celick, H. Turkmen, Physica C 451 (2007) 98-106. - 33.
K.S. Mazdiyashi, C.T. Lynch, J.S. Smith, Inorg. Chem., 5 (1996) 342-346. - 34.
B. Zhao, H.B. Yao, K. Shi, Z.H. Han, Y.L. Xu, D.L. Shi, Physica C 386 (2003) 348-352. - 35.
J. Lian, H. Yao, D. Shi, L. Wang, Y. Xu, Q. Liu, Z. Han, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 (2003) 838-844. - 36.
S. Shi, Y. Xu, H. Yao, Z. Han, J. Lian, L. Wang, A. Li, H.K. Liu, S.X. Dou, Supercond. Sci. Tech. 17 (2004) 1420-1425. - 37.
Q.X. Jia, T.M. McCleskey, A.K. Burrell, Y. Lin, G.E. Collis, H. Wang, A.DQ. Li, S.R. Foltyn, Nature Matt. 3 (2004) 529. - 38.
T. Manabe, I. Yamaguchi, H. Obara, S. Kosaka, H. Yamasaki, M. Sohma, T. Tsuchiya, S. Mizuta, T. Kumagai, Physica C 378-381 (2002) 1017-1023. - 39.
D. Shi, Y. Xu, S.X. Wang, J. Lian, L.M. Wang, S.M. Mc Clellan, R. Buchanan, K.C. Goretta, Physica C 371 (2002) 97-103 - 40.
A.H. Li, M. Ionescu, H.K. Liu, D.L. Shi, X.L. Wang, X. Peng, E.W. Collings, Physica C 426-431 (2005) 1408-1414. - 41.
H. Yao, B. Zhao, K. Shi, Z. Han, Y. Xu, D. Shi, S. Wang, L.M. Wang, C. Peroz, C. Villard, Physica C 392-396 (2003) 941-945. - 42.
L. Lei, G.Y. Zhao, J.J. Zhao, H. Xu, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 20 (2010) 2286-2293. - 43.
C. Apetrii, H. Schlorb, M. Falter, I. Lampe, L. Schultz, B. Holzapfel, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 (2005) 2642-2644. - 44.
A. Bustamante Domínguez, A. M. Osorio, L. De Los Santos Valladares, H. Carhuancho, J.C. González, G.R.C. Cernicchiario, J.A. Feijoo Lévano, Advances in Science and Technology 47 (2006) 37-42. - 45.
H.E. Sanchez, A. Bustamante Domínguez, A. Osorio Anaya, L. De Los Santos Valladares, J. Albino Aguiar, C.H.W. Barnes, J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 8 (2014) 547-511. - 46.
A. Bustamante Domínguez, A.M. Osorio, L. De los Santos Valladares, J. Garcia, J.C. González, C.H.W. Barnes, Y. Azuma, Y. Majima, J. Albino Aguiar, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 507 (2014) 01005. - 47.
A. Bustamante Domínguez, L. León Felix, J. Garcia, J. Flores Santibañez, L. De Los Santos Valladares, J.C. González, A. Osorio Anaya, M. Pillaca, Phys. Proc. 36 (2012) 526-531. - 48.
J. García, A. Bustamante Domínguez, L. De Los Santos Valladares, J.C. González, L. León Felix, J. Flores Santibañez, A. Osorio Anaya, J. Albino Aguiar, Rev. Inv. Fis. 15 (2012) 121502102 (in Spanish). - 49.
J.C. González, A. Osorio, A. Bustamante, Rev. Soc. Quim. Peru 77 (2011) 249 (in Spanish). - 50.
J. Jorgensen, M. Beno, D. Hinks, L. Sodeholm, K. Volin, C. Segre, K. Zhang, M. Kleefisch, Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987) 3608. - 51.
Z. Aslanoglu, Y. Akin, M.I. El-Kawni, W. Sigmund, Y.S. Hascicek, Physica C 384 (2003) 501-506. - 52.
A. Bustamante Domínguez, L. De Los Santos Valladares, J. Flores Santibañez, R. Lozano, J. Palomino, G.R.C. Cernicchiario, Rev. Inv. Fis. 7 (2004) 30-33. - 53.
J.C. González, L. De Los Santos Valladares, A.M. Osorio Anaya, J. Albino Aguiar, A. Bustamante Domínguez, Rev. Inv. Fis. 15 (2012) 121501104 (in Spanish). - 54.
B. D. Cullity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. USA, 1956), pp.96-102. - 55.
E. Brosha, F. Garzon, I. Raistrick, P. Davies, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 1745. - 56.
M. Llosa, L. de los Santos Valladares, N. de la Cruz Centeno, A. Bustamante Domínguez, Rev. Inv. Fis. 7 (2004) 34-37 (in Spanish). - 57.
F. Frangi, T. Higuchi, M. Deguchi, M. Murakmi, J. Matter. Res. 10 (1995) 2241-2250. - 58.
Powder Diffraction Files PDF-2 of The International Centre for Diffraction Data® (ICDD®)-2001.