Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Characterizing Tabebuia rosea (Bertol.) DC. Using Microsatellites in Provenance and Progeny Trials in Colombia

Written By

Ana María López, Marta Leonor Marulanda and Carlos Mario Ospina

Submitted: May 23rd, 2014 Reviewed: September 19th, 2014 Published: April 15th, 2015

DOI: 10.5772/59289

From the Edited Volume

Molecular Approaches to Genetic Diversity

Edited by Mahmut Caliskan, Guul Cevahir Oz, I. Halil Kavakli and Birguul Ozcan

Chapter metrics overview

1,488 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The area under forests is estimated to be approximately 3,870 million hectares worldwide, 95% of which corresponds to natural forests or native woodlands and the remaining 5% to planted forests [1]. Forests are dual purpose—commercial exploitation and environmental improvement [2]. Because of the pressure exerted by environmentalists, current global efforts strive to reduce timber extraction in natural forests. Forecasts are that the future increase in demand for timber will be covered by trees specifically planted for this purpose. Because of their capacity to fix carbon, forests will play an increasingly important role in view of current climate change attributed to greenhouse gas emissions [3].

Genetic improvement programs for forest species face diverse problems such as the long regeneration periods and the high costs involved in maintaining a forest population over a long period of time at different locations. Furthermore, compared with short-cycle crops, the returns to investment in forest plantations are definitively more delayed [4]. Molecular markers have a great impact on genetic improvement because they minimize the intervals of regeneration, increase the genetic gain per generation, and accumulate genetic information key for ‘non-domesticated’ species. Molecular markers are increasingly included in forest genetic breeding programs, where they are used to estimate polymorphism, establish parameters of relationship and mating systems, characterize genotypes, and assist in selection processes [5]. Microsatellites are the markers that have been most used in recent years and can be used to design seed orchards to estimate the contamination of pollen from external sources and to study mating models and variation of male fertility.

The development of microsatellite markers for forest species has been limited. The ratio of use of this type of marker in forest species, as compared its use in other cultivated species, is 6:1. Exceptions to the above are forest species used in the timber industry, such as Pinus, Quercus,and Eucalyptus[6, 7].

In Latin America, Brazil plays a pioneering role in the development of microsatellite markers for forest species of economic and ecological importance, for example Caryocar brasiliense[8], Ceiba pentandra[9], Copaifera langsdorffii[10], Eugenia uniflora[11], and several Carinianaspecies [12], among others.

In Colombia, coffee has been traditionally grown in association with forest species such as Tabebuia roseaand Cordia alliodora, which serve as shade, live fences, or perimeters [13]. Their characteristics, such as good wood quality, make them very appropriate to be used in agro-forestry systems. Tabebuia rosea,a species with high-value, good-quality wood, is very important in Central America. Its lilac-pink flowers make it one of the most eye-catching trees of Central and South America, where it is mainly used as a shade and ornamental plant because of the beauty of its pink flower panicles [14, 15] (Figure 1). Work carried out with microsatellites for the Tabebuiagenus includes studies carried out in Tabebuia aureaby Braga et al. [16], who developed 21 polymorphic microsatellites using a genomic library. This current study characterized, using microsatellite molecular markers, the best-performing T. roseamaterials of provenance and progeny trials established by Colombia’s National Center for Coffee Research (CENICAFE) in the country’s coffee-growing region as well as the best materials established by the Santa Rosalía de Palermo Reforestation Company (REFOPAL) and the National Corporation for Forest Research and Promotion (CONIF) in the country’s Caribbean region.

Figure 1.

Tabebuia roseatree in Colombia´s coffee region


2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant material

Samples were taken from provenance and progeny trials carried out by CENICAFE, a REFOPAL-CONIF clonal orchard, and a CONIF progeny orchard. The provenance and progeny trial, established by CENICAFE in 1997, is located in Colombia’s coffee-growing region. Seed from plus trees collected in Colombia as well as in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua were introduced for this trial (Table 1).

The REFOPAL-CONIF clonal seed orchard for conservation purposes, established in 1999, is located in Colombia’s Caribbean region (code SA). Several progeny of this trial are also located in the Caribbean region (code HI). The REFOPAL-CONIF trial involves 24 sites of origin, 21 of which correspond to clones originating from plus trees and 3 from commercial seed (absolute controls) (codes HIT1, HIT2, and HIT3) (Table 1). All samples were identified according to their origin: Population 1, REFOPAL and CONIF clonal orchards; Population 2, progenies of REFOPAL and CONIF clonal orchards; and Population 3, CENICAFE provenance and progeny trials.

Progeny/clone/plus tree
CodeCountry of originType of trialTrial or collection site
(plus trees)
1SA2Colombia (Atlántico)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
2SA16Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
3SA32Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
4SA3Colombia (Atlántico)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
5SA17Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
6SA33Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
7SA4Colombia (Bolívar)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
8SA18Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
9SA34Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
10SA6Colombia (Atlántico)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
11SA19Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
12SA35Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
13SA7Colombia (Atlántico)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
14SA20Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
15SA36Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
16SA8Colombia (Bolívar)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
17SA22Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
18SA38Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
19SA10Colombia (Magdalena)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
20SA24Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
21SA41Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
22SA11Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
23SA25Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
24SA42Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
25SA12Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
26SA27Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
27SA43Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
28SA13Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
29SA28Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
30SA44Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
31SA14Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
32SA29Colombia (Sucre)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
33SA46Colombia (Magdalena)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
34SA15Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
35SA31Colombia (Córdoba)Clonal orchardSan Antero (Córdoba)
36HI31Colombia (Córdoba)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
37HI9Colombia (Magdalena)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
38HI33Colombia (Córdoba)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
39HI35Colombia (Córdoba)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
40H1T2CheckCommercial material 2La Independencia Hacienda
41HIT3CheckCommercial material 3La Independencia Hacienda
42HI19Colombia (Córdoba)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
43HI47Colombia (Sucre)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
44H1T1CheckCommercial material 1La Independencia Hacienda
45HI23Colombia (Sucre)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
46HI44Colombia (Córdoba)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
47HI5Colombia (Bolívar)Progeny of clonal orchardsLa Independencia Hacienda
48061/96El SalvadorCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
49506/92GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
50SO2386NicaraguaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
51AGO95GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
52CU-II-1*Colombia (Cundinamarca)CENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
53MAR 96-09GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
54AG 95-30GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
55SO2386NicaraguaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
56M-I-1*ColombiaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander). Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
57CU-I-1-10ColombiaCENICAFE plus treesCundinamarca
58CU-I-1-11ColombiaCENICAFE plus treesCundinamarca
59CU-I-1-12ColombiaCENICAFE plus treesCundinamarca
60CU-II-1-10ColombiaCENICAFE plus treesCundinamarca
61CU-II-1-11ColombiaCENICAFE plus treesCundinamarca
62ABR 95-24GuatemalaCENICAFE plus treesFloridablanca (Santander) Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
63CU-II-*ColombiaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander) Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
64ABR 95-30GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFloridablanca (Santander) Pueblo Bello (Cesar)
65MAR96/09GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialLíbano (Tolima)
66AGO25-30GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)
67ABR 95-24GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)
68AGO95-30GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)
69MAR96-09GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)
70061/96El SalvadorCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)
71ABR95-30GuatemalaCENICAFE provenance and progeny trialFredonia (Antioquia)

Table 1.

Samples used, codes, country of origin, and type of trial to characterize Tabebuia roseain Colombia.

2.2. Molecular characterization

Molecular characterization was performed using microsatellite markers in two ways:

  1. Applying the principle of transferability: markers developed for T. aureaby Braga et al. [16] were used in T. rosea.

  2. Developing specific microsatellites for T. roseafrom genomic libraries enriched for microsatellite motifs.

In both cases, the same plant material was used as well as the same DNA extraction protocols and electrophoresis and silver nitrate staining procedures; however, amplification conditions varied depending on the group of microsatellite markers. Amplified products were separated by denatured 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, run in BioRad’s Sequi-Gen GT Sequencing Cell vertical electrophoresis chambers. Gels were dyed with silver nitrate following the protocol of Benbouza et al. [17].

Details of the procedure are described below:

2.3. DNA extraction

The QIAGEN Plant DNeasy Mini Kit was used to extract DNA from 20 mg macerated dry leaf tissue following the manufacturer’s recommendations. To improve quality, the DNA was purified using the protocol described by Castillo [18]. DNA quality and quantity were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis at 0.8%, dyed with ethidium bromide.

2.4. DNA amplification using microsatellites developed for Tabebuia aurea

Based on the principle of transferability, DNA amplification of T. roseawas performed using 21 microsatellites developed by Braga et al. [17] for T. aurea(Bignoniaceae), which were identified with the prefix ‘Tau’ (Table 2).

The amplification protocol was carried out in a final volume of 15 µl, with 0.9 µM of each primer, 1U Taq polymerase, 200 µM of each dNTP, 1X reaction buffer (10 mM Tri HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) and 10 ng DNA. The amplification profile consisted of 30, 1-minute cycles at 94 °C, 1 minute at melting temperature (°C) (see Table 2), 1 minute at 72 °C, with a final 10-minute extension at 72 °C.

accession number
Primer sequence F (5´-3´)Primer Sequence R (5´-3´)Annealing temperature
(° C)
Number of lociHe1Ho1PIC1

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 24 microsatellite markers used in Tabebuia rosea.

1 He: Expected heterozygosity; Ho: Observed heterozygosity; PIC: polymorphic information content.

2.5. Construction of genomic libraries to design primers for Tabebuia rosea

A genomic library enriched for microsatellite motifs was built to obtain a higher number of microsatellites. The microsatellites developed using this methodology was identified with prefix ‘TR’. The procedure for building the library is described below:

Colony production.Recombinant plasmids were produced by linking digested fragments of T. roseain the Hind IIIrestriction site of plasmid pUC19. Fragments were enriched for microsatellite motifs. Digested products were introduced by electroporation within Escherichia coliDH5α races (ElectroMax™, Invitrogen). To isolate colonies for subsequent sequencing, cells were planted on Petri dishes with culture media containing Blue-gal/IPTG/ampicillin-LB agar, X-gal/IPTG/ampicillin-LB agar, or S-gal/IPTG/ampicillin-LB agar.

Clone selection for sequencing. Fragments containing microsatellite sequences were selected using biotinylated oligonucleotides complementary to the AG/CT repeat sequences and then amplified by PCR. DNA inserts were sequenced using the Amersham DYEnamic™ kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions, and then run on electrophoresis in an ABI 377 sequencer (Applied BioSystems).

Microsatellite design.Before designing the primers, vector contamination was suppressed in the clone sequences and the percentage of redundancy in the genomic library was determined. PCR primers were designed using the software DesignerPCR, version 1.03 (Research Genetics, Inc). Table 2 presents the SSRs used in this study.

2.6. Amplification of microsatellites designed for Tabebuia rosea

Amplification reactions were conducted in a final volume of 10 µl with 0.6 µm of each primer, 200 µm of each dNTP, 1X reaction buffer, 1 U Taq polymerase, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2 ng DNA. The amplification profile was 94 °C, 4 minutes of initial denaturation, 30 cycles, 40 seconds each, at 94 °C, melting temperature (° C) (see Table 2) for 40 seconds, 72 °C for 30 seconds, and a final 4-minute extension at 72 °C.

2.7. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using the program GENAlEX version 6.2 [19]. The analysis included the measurement of genetic variability, genetic diversity, and genetic distance.


3. Results and discussion

3.1. Transferability of Tau microsatellites

Of the 21 microsatellite markers evaluated, 11 presented positive amplification in samples of T. roseaand, of these, nine presented polymorphic amplifications (Table 2). The transferability of markers between species of the same genus was possible thanks to the synteny described in plant species and to comparative mapping in plants, such as that carried out by Bonierbale et al. [20] in Solanaceae. Other important synteny studies have been carried out in Gramineae to evaluate maize microsatellites in sugarcane [21] and rice microsatellites in sorghum [22]. Rice and sugarcane microsatellite sequences were used to characterize natural populations of Guadua angustifolia[23].

The transferability of microsatellites between species of the same genus, in particular tropical trees, has been addressed by Collevatti-Garcia et al. [8] for the Caryocargenus and by Braga et al. [16] for the Tabebuiagenus. The latter study confirmed the transferability of microsatellite markers—the same used in this study—to other species of the Tabebuiagenus (T. ochracea, T. serratifolia, T. roseo-alba, T. impetiginosa). Braga et al. [16] described the primers Tau 12, Tau 14, Tau 15, Tau 21, Tau 22, Tau 27, Tau 28, and Tau 31 as the most versatile primers because they presented positive amplification in all the aforementioned species of Tabebuia, whereas Tau 13, Tau 17, and Tau 30 presented amplification in at least three of the four Tabebuiaspecies. Of the first group described by Braga et al. [16], Tau 12, Tau 14, Tau 21, Tau 22, and Tau 31 amplified samples of T. roseain the present study and, of the second group, Tau 17 and Tau 30.

The nine polymorphic microsatellites used in the present study showed amplifications of one or two loci for a single microsatellite marker (Table 2), although polymorphic amplification was obtained with nine SSRs and 11 loci were observed. Markers presenting two loci were Tau 22 and Tau 30 (Table 2). The size of the products obtained ranged from 150 to 300 bp. These data agreed with those described for microsatellite development.

The distribution of the allele patterns in the three tree populations of T. roseastudied indicate that the average number of alleles in the three populations varied between four and five alleles. The number of frequent alleles ranged between three and four, whereas the number of informative alleles ranged between two and three (Table 2). The latter indicates the allelic diversity throughout all loci in each population. The average number of private alleles (whose frequency is less than 5%) is close to 1, with the CENICAFE population presenting the highest number of private alleles.

3.2. Molecular characterization with TR microsatellites

A total of 109 different microsatellites were identified in four of the enriched genomic libraries, which contained between 10,000-15,000 recombinant cells and allowed 74 microsatellite primers to be designed and 24 primers to be synthesized. The percentage of redundancy for this library was 11.4%. The latter were initially tested with the six samples that presented the highest polymorphism in analysis with Tau primers. The seven microsatellite primers presenting polymorphic amplification (Table 2) were then selected. Each of these seven primers presented amplification of two loci, except for the TRB6 primer pair, which presented the amplification of one locus (Table 2).

The results obtained based on the construction of the genomic library can be compared with those obtained by Braga et al. (2007), who obtained 271 positive colonies after constructing enriched libraries in the same genus, from which 31 polymorphic primers were synthesized.

For the most part, the microsatellites developed for T. rosea(TR primers) allowed the amplification of two loci per primer pair. Multi-allelic SSRs, such as TRB103 and TRB6, could be differentiated based on the allele frequencies of each locus in each population. With the primer pair TRB6, private alleles occur in the CENICAFE population (alleles 9, 10, and 11). The second locus of TRA3 presents a high frequency (over 80%) of allele 2 in the three populations. This allele could serve as marker for the species. The distribution of allele patterns indicates that the total number of alleles ranges between 4 and 6 and the number of informative alleles between 3 and 4.

Other studies carried out in forest species, such as the one conducted by Li et al. [24], report an average of 5-7 informative alleles for Quercus aquifolioides, using six microsatellites, after having obtained 12 alleles on average. These results ratify the phenomenon observed in the present study, where after having an average of 4-6 alleles, the number of informative alleles declined drastically to only 3-4. Braga et al. [16] reported an average of 18.7 alleles for T. aurea, which differs from the value found in this study (average of 4-6 alleles). This difference could be attributed to the fact that Braga et al. [16] worked with natural populations, whereas the present study was conducted in selected populations where several alleles could have been lost. This hypothesis gains strength if the number of alleles obtained for the two groups of Tau and TR primers is compared. The results are similar. In addition, with both Tau and TR primers, the highest number of alleles is observed in selected REFOPAL-CONIF and CENICAFE populations.

3.3. Molecular characterization with both groups of SSRs (Tau and TR)

The results of the analyses of the 24 loci corresponding to both groups of microsatellites (Tau and TR) are analyzed and discussed below.

3.4. Measures of genetic variability (private alleles)

The evaluation of the presence of private alleles indicated a marked prevalence of this type of alleles in CENICAFE provenance and progeny populations and in REFOPAL-CONIF clonal orchards, indicating the need to preserve these orchards to perform directed crosses.

Lombardi [25] found a total of 85 alleles, with an average of 10.6 alleles per locus, when samples of T. roseo-albawere amplified with markers developed by Braga et al. [16]. Feres et al. [26] found, in turn, an average of 4.4 alleles per locus in T. roseo-alba, values very similar to those found in the present study. Averages of 13.5 alleles have been reported for other Bignoniaceae such as Jacaranda copaia[27].

3.5. Measures of genetic diversity

The genetic diversity parameters found when analyzing the 24 loci (Tau and TR primers) helped identify populations with low consanguinity, multi-allelic markers, and expected heterozygosities equal to observed heterozygosities. The mean expected heterozygosity is similar to the mean observed heterozygosity (Table 3). These values also indicate that the frequency of several alleles in the population is clearly concentrated in a few alleles. Values higher than 0.8 have been obtained in multi-allelic microsatellites in tropical forest species, those presenting between 9-10 alleles [8]. This finding differs from the results obtained in this study, where the average number of alleles for all loci and populations ranged between 4 and 5 with the microsatellites used. Findings suggest that these populations, although selected for genetic improvement, are balanced. Studies in T. aureawith microsatellites specifically developed for the species revealed an average of 26 alleles per locus and an observed heterozygosity of 0.587, a value similar to that reported for T. rosea. In addition, the probability of genetic identity was high (1.03 × 10-37) and the probability of exclusion was 0.9889 [16].

REFOCOSTA-CONIF (clonal orchards)5.3333.3740.6300.608
REFOCOSTA-CONIF (progenies)4.2502.9370.5980.635
CENICAFE (provenance and progeny trials)4.8752.9070.6080.502
All populations/all loci4.8193.0720.6120.582

Table 3.

Genetic diversity in three populations for forest improvement programs of Tabebuia roseaand two groups of microsatellites (Tau and TR).

* Na=Number of alleles with frequencies higher than or equal to 5%; Ne=Number of informative alleles; He=Expected heterozygosity; Ho=Observed heterozygosity

Other forest species of interest, such as pine species Pinus elliottiivar. elliottii and P. caribaeavar. hondurensis, yielded heterozygosity values of 0.52+/-0.2. Shepherd et al. [28] attribute these values to the use of transpecific microsatellites in pine species, a situation which is replicated in this study by using T. aureamicrosatellites in T. rosea.

Lombardi [25], who also worked with Tau primers, reported a mean observed heterozygosity of 0.271, compared with a heterozygosity of 0.746. Feres et al. [26] attribute the differences between heterozygosities to the presence of null alleles that mask heterozygote individuals under the presence of one band. Null alleles occur more frequently in transferred primers than in primers designed specifically for a given species.

The analysis of molecular analysis (AMOVA) revealed that the highest percentage of variation could be attributed to differences between individuals (71%), followed by the variation between populations (25%) and variation within populations (4%). Miller and Schaal [29] analyzed the structure of natural and cultivated populations of a forest species presenting an edible fruit (Spondias purpurea). The percentage of variation between natural populations was 35.65% and, within populations, 64.35%, whereas the corresponding values in cultivated materials were 30.19% and 69.81%.

3.6. Genetic distance measurements

The genetic distance between populations indicates that the populations that are closest genetically (0.114) are those of REFOPAL–CONIF (both clonal orchards and progenies). This value was expected because of the higher inter-relationship of the trees of this group. The CENICAFE population, on the other hand, is distant from populations on Colombia’s Atlantic Coast.

Principal coordinates analysis, based on the genetic distances between individuals, revealed greater proximity between the REFOPAL-CONIF populations—clonal orchards and progenies—and a greater distance regarding the CENICAFE provenance and progeny trial (Figure 2). The genetic distance between the populations of the CENICAFE trials and the REFOPAL–CONIF trials (both clonal orchards and progenies) is evident. CENICAFE trials present greater variability than REFOPAL–CONIF trials and this could be attributed to the introduction of Central American materials to CENICAFE’s genetic breeding program. Figure 2 endorses the idea that both breeding programs are complementary, and that the exchange of material and information can prove advantageous for both entities. If plans are to begin controlled pollinations, then it would be practical to cross materials from both programs. Likewise, tree clones of both programs should be established in open-pollinated orchards.

Figure 2.

Principal coordinates analysis of samples ofTabebuia rosea.

Probability of identity: Given the need to identify each individual and assign each a probability of unequivocal identity, the study showed that this identity was established by combining eight different loci. More multi-allelic markers, with higher indexes of heterozygosity, are preferred. The optimal combination to characterize accessions of Vitis vinifera has also been reported to be eight primers [30].

Kirst et al. [31] determined the probability of identity of Eucalyptus grandisusing microsatellites. The probability of finding identical genotypes in a population was found to be 2.3 x 10-9 using six EMBRA microsatellites developed in Brazil. This probability is considered practically null. Similar results were obtained with an improved population of Eucalyptus dunnii, when 46 individuals from a seed orchard were identified using four microsatellites [32].


4. Conclusions

This study verifies the transferability of microsatellites existing in the Tabebuiagenus and sets forth the principle of synteny as an economically viable alternative for other Tabebuiaspecies for which information on the development of molecular markers is not available. The ample use of the microsatellites developed for T. aurea(Tau microsatellites) in several species of Tabebuiaproves useful for the exchange of information between genetic breeding and conservation groups of Tabebuiaspecies at the national and international levels.

Both groups of microsatellites amplified 24 polymorphic loci that could be useful in genotyping individuals of T. rosea. The measurement of genetic variability yielded an average of 4-5 alleles and between 3-4 frequent alleles. Expected heterozygosities equal to observed heterozygosities indicate that there is equilibrium within the populations, despite dealing with selected materials. The low indices of consanguinity of the three populations originating from improvement programs confirm the allogamous behavior of the species and, with the previous results, the hypothesis that the flower is self-incompatible gains strength. Meanwhile, private alleles were more frequent in the CENICAFE provenance and progeny trials and the REFOPAL-CONIF clonal orchards. The introduction of Central American materials influenced the high variability of CENICAFE materials. As a result, both selection processes are non-exclusive; on the contrary, they are complementary and the exchange of plant materials and information will prove beneficial to both.



The authors express their sincere thanks to Dr. Marco Cristancho (CENICAFE) for the technical revision of the present manuscript, to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Republic of Colombia, to the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia, to the Government of the Department of Risaralda, and to the Technical University of Pereira for funding this research; to REFOPAL and CONIF for providing plant materials and morphological information on the evaluated materials. Our sincere thanks also go to Juliana Arias Villegas for planning and managing the project and to the staff of the Plant Biotechnology Lab of the Technical University of Pereira for their valuable contributions throughout the present study.


  1. 1. Espinal CF., Martínez H., and Gonzalez, E. Características y estructura del sector forestal-madera-muebles en Colombia: Una mirada global de su estructura y dinámica 1991-2005. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Observatorio Agrocadenas Colombia. Documento de trabajo No. 95. 2005.
  2. 2. Burley J. Forest genetics for sustainable forest management. In: Plantation technology in tropical forest science. Edited by K. Suzuki, K. Ishii, S. Sakurai, and S. Sasaki. Springer. Tokyo. pp. 336. 1996.
  3. 3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Land use, land use change and forestry. A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University, United States of America. 377 p. 2000.
  4. 4. Dale G., and Chaparro J. Integration of molecular markers into tree breeding and improvement programs. In Tree improvement for sustainable tropical forestry. Edited by M.J. Dieters, A.C. Matheson, D.G. Nikles, C.E. Harwood, and S.M. Walker. QFRI–IUFRO, Australia. pp. 472-477. 1996.
  5. 5. Wickneswari R., Norwati M., Lee SL., Lee CT., Yeang HY., Lokmal N., and Rasip AGA. Practical uses of molecular markers in tropical tree improvement. In Proceedings of the QFRI-UIFRO Conference of Tree Improvement for Sustainable Tropical Forestry. Edited by M.J. Dieters, A.C. Matheson, D.G. Nikles, C.E. Harwood, and S.M. Walker. Queensland, Australia. pp. 506-511. 1996.
  6. 6. Ruane J., and Sonnino A. Marker-assisted selection as a tool for genetic improvement of crops, livestock, forestry and fish in developing countries: an overview of the issues. In Marker-assisted selection: Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish. Edited by E.P. Guimarães, J. Ruane, B.D. Scherf, A. Sonnino, and J.D. Dargie. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 3-13. 2007.
  7. 7. Grattapaglia D. Marker-assisted selection inEucalyptus. In Marker-assisted selection: Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish. Edited by E.P. Guimarães, J. Ruane, B.D. Scherf, A. Sonnino, and J.D. Dargie. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 251-282. 2007.
  8. 8. Collevatti-García R., Brondani V., and Grattapaglia D. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis of a Brazilian endangered tree speciesCaryocar brasiliense. Heredity 1999; 83: 748-756.
  9. 9. Brondani, C., Rangel, P., Oliveira, T., Pereira, R., and Brondani, V. Transferability of microsatellite and sequence tagged site markers inOryzaspecies. Hereditas 2003; 138(3): 187-192.
  10. 10. Ciampi A.Y., Brondani R.P.V., and Grattapaglia D. Desenvolvimento de marcadores microssatélites paraCopaifera langsdorffiiDesf. (Copaíba)-Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae e otimização de sistemas fluorescentes de genotipagem multiloco. Boletim de Pesquisa 2000 (16). Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), and Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos (Cenargen), Brasília (Distrito Federal). 2000.
  11. 11. Ferreira-Ramos R., Laborda P., Oliveira Santos M., Mayor M., Mestriner M., Souza A., and Alzate-Marin A.L. Genetic analysis of forest speciesEugenia unifloraL. through newly developed SSR markers. Conserv. Genet. 2006; 9(5): 1281-1285.
  12. 12. Guidugli M., De Campos T., Barbosa de Sousa A.C., Massimino Feres J., Sebbenn A.M., Mestriner M.A., Betioli Contel E.P., and Alzate-Marin A.L. Development and characterization of 15 microsatellite loci forCariniana estrellensisand transferability toCariniana legalis, two endangered tropical tree species. Conserv. Genet. 2009; 10(4): 1001-1004.
  13. 13. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café (CENICAFE), and Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (FEDECAFE). Ensayo de procedencias y progenies para dos especies forestales tropicales de alto valor comercial: Resultados marzo 1996-febrero 2000. Special collaborative agreement between FEDERACAFE-Ministry of the Environment of Colombia for forestry research with native species. 2000.
  14. 14. Hoyos J. Flora emblemática de Venezuela. Armitano, Caracas, Venezuela. 213 p. 1985.
  15. 15. Blanco-Mavares C.M. 25 Árboles de Caracas. FUNDARTE, Alcaldía de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela. 72 p. 1995.
  16. 16. Braga A., Reis A.M.M., Leoi L., Pereira R., and Collevatti R. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the tropical tree speciesTabebuia aurea(Bignoniaceae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007; 7: 53-56.
  17. 17. Benbouza H., Jacquemin J.M., Baudoin J.P., and Mergeai G. Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrylamide gels. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 2006; 10(2): 77-81.
  18. 18. Castillo N.R. Fingerprinting and genetic stability ofRubususing molecular markers. M.Sc. thesis, Oregon State University, Oregon. 244 p. 2006.
  19. 19. Peakall R., and Smouse P.E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006; 6: 288-295.
  20. 20. Bonierbale M.W., Plaisted R.L., and Tanksley S.D. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal models of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 1998; 120: 1095-1103.
  21. 21. Selvi A., Nair N.V., Balasundaram N., and Mohapatra T. Evaluation of maize microsatellite markers for genetic diversity analysis and fingerprinting in sugarcane. Genome 2003; 46: 394-403.
  22. 22. Ishii T., and McCouch S.R. Microsatellites and microsynteny in the chloroplast genomes ofOryzaand eight other Gramineae species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000; 100: 1257-1266.
  23. 23. Marulanda M.L., López A.M., and Claros J.L. Analyzing the genetic diversity ofGuaduaspp. in Colombia using rice and sugarcane microsatellites. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2007; 7(1): 43-48.
  24. 24. Li Ch., Zhang X., Liu X., Luukkanen O., and Berninger F. Leaf morphological and physiological responses ofQuercus aquifolioidesalong an altitudinal gradient. Silva Fennica 2006; 40(1): 5-13.
  25. 25. Lombardi M. Aplicação de marcadores microssatellites na caracterização de recursos genéticos deTabebuia roseo–albaconservados ex situ no Banco de Germoplasma da Floresta da USP de Ribeirão Prieto. M.Sc. thesis, Departamento de Biologia, Universidad de Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Prieto, Brazil. 126 p. 2008.
  26. 26. Feres J., Martinez M., Martinez C., Mestriner M., and Alzate-Marin A.L. Transferability and characterization of nine microsatellite markers for the tropical tree speciesTabebuia roseo-alba. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008; 9: 434-437.
  27. 27. Jones F., and Hubbell S.P. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the tropical treeJacaranda copaia(Bignoniaceae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2003; 3(3): 403-405.
  28. 28. Shepherd M., Cross M., Maguire T.L., Dieters M.J., Williams C.G., and Henry R.J. Transpecific microsatellites for hard pines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002; 104: 819-827.
  29. 29. Miller A.J., and Schaal B.A. Domestication and the distribution of genetic variation in wild and cultivated populations of the Mesoamerican fruit tree,Spondias purpureaL. (Anacardiaceae). Mol. Ecol. 2006; 15: 1467-1480.
  30. 30. Tessier C., David J., This P., Boursiquot J.M., and Charrier A. Optimization of the choice of molecular markers for varietal identification ofVitis viniferaL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999; 98(1): 171-177.
  31. 31. Kirst M., Cordeiro C.M., Rezende G.D.S.P., and Grattapaglia D. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis inEucalyptus grandisbreeding populations. J. Hered. 2005; 96(2): 161-166.
  32. 32. Marcucci Poltri S.N., Zelener N., Rodriguez Traverso J., Gelid P., and Hopp H.E. Selection of a seed orchard ofEucalyptus dunniibased on genetic diversity criteria calculated using molecular markers. Tree Physiol. 2003; 23: 625-632.

Written By

Ana María López, Marta Leonor Marulanda and Carlos Mario Ospina

Submitted: May 23rd, 2014 Reviewed: September 19th, 2014 Published: April 15th, 2015