Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Molecular Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in Brazilian Patients with Early Gastric Cancer and a Review to Understand the Prognosis of the Disease

Written By

Bruna Maria Roesler and José Murilo Robilotta Zeitune

Submitted: September 18th, 2013 Reviewed: February 4th, 2014 Published: April 3rd, 2014

DOI: 10.5772/58328

Chapter metrics overview

1,640 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) is an universally distributed bacterium that affects more than half of the world population and is considered an important public health problem. Although colonization with H. pyloriis not actually a disease, it is a condition that affects the relative risk of developing various clinical disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract, as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) and gastric adenocarcinoma, and, possibly, extradigestive diseases.

Colonization with H. pylorivirtually leads to infiltration of the gastric mucosa in both antrum and corpus with neutrophilic and mononuclear cells. Gastritis can be classified as an acute or chronic gastritis and it can involve all parts of the stomach or just the fundus, corpus or antrum. The chronic active gastritis is the primary condition related to H. pyloricolonization, and other H. pylori-associated disorders, in particular, resulting from this chronic inflammatory process, as atrophic gastritis, causing an elevated risk of gastric cancer. Considering this association, in 1994 the bacterium was classified as a group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization.

Molecular techniques have revealed that H. pyloripossesses a remarkable degree of genetic diversity, which could be responsible for its adaptation in the host stomach and for its pathological characteristics, in addition to the clinical outcome of the infection, although this aspect remains unclear.

In Brazil, it is estimated that only about 10 to 15% of the gastric cancer cases are diagnosed at an early stage, aspect that directly impact the prognosis of the disease, which presents low survival rates. Unlike patients with advanced gastric cancer, that ones diagnosed at the early stage of the disease present an excellent prognostic, in which a five-year survival rate is more than 90%.

Many early gastric cancers are believed to go through a life cycle consisting of ulcerations, followed by healing, then reulceration, and some tumors remain at this early stage for years even without treatment. Nevertheless, some of these tumors rapidly advanced, perhaps one of the principal questions concerning the gastric carcinogenesis.

Consequently, some questions can be considered about it. Is the H. pyloripresence important for the evolution of the early lesions in advanced ones? To what extent H. pylorieradication could prevent the progression of lesions from one to another stage? Are the genetic characteristics of H. pyloristrain that is colonizing the patient with early gastric cancer important for the progression of the disease in a faster or in a slower way?

The principal aim of our book chapter is to identify the genetic characteristics of H. pyloristrains in Brazilian patients diagnosed with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma, trying to determine the genotypic pattern of bacterium in our population through molecular techniques. Besides, other aim of our study is to discuss the principal aspects of the H. pyloriinfection and then correlate them with the development of the precancerous lesions and the development of the early gastric cancer properly, trying to understand to what extent the microorganism eradication treatment could be important to preventing the disease progression.


2. Helicobacter pylori

2.1. General characteristics

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)is a spiral-shaped Gram-negative flagellate bacterium that colonizes the human stomach and can establish a long-term infection of the gastric mucosa [1]. In gastric biopsy specimens, H. pyloriorganisms are 2.5 to 5.0 μm long and 0.5 to 1.0 μm wide, with four to six unipolar sheated flagella, which are essential for bacterial motility. When cultured on solid medium, the bacteria assume a rod-like shape and spiral shapes are infrequent or absent [2]; after prolonged culture on solid or liquid medium, coccoid forms, that are metabolically active, tipically predominate [3].

Gastric colonization with H. pyloriaffects at least half the world´s population, and, while the infection is on a fast decline in most of the western countries, mainly due to the success of therapeutic regimens and improved personal and community hygiene that prevents re-infection, the situation is exactly opposite in many of the developing countries due to failure of treatment and emergence of drug resistance [4,5]. Most studies suggest that males and females are infected at approximately the same rates [6] and, probably, the infection occurs in the childhood. In developed countries, persons of higher socioeconomic status have lower infection rates, although among certain ethnic minorities, high rates persist despite economic advancement [7].

The routes of transmission of H. pyloristill remain unclear. Person-to-person transmission and intrafamilial spread seem to be the main route, based on the intrafamilial clustering observed in some studies [8,9]. Children are often infected by a strain which a genetic fingerprint identical to that of their parents, and they maintain this genotype even after moving to a different environment [10]. Animals harbor organisms that resemble H. pylori,but with the exception of nonhuman primates [11] and, under particular circumstances, perhaps cats [12] and houseflies (Musca domestica) [13], none harbor H. pylori.In the same way, food-borne transmission has not been substantiated [14]. Nevertheless, the waterborne infection remains possible [15,16].

H. pyloriremains one of the most common worldwide human infections and its isolation by Marshall and Warren (1984) [17] has markedly improved our understanding about the nature of chronic gastritis and other important upper gastrointestinal disorders, such as peptic ulcer disease, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma [18]. In 1994, the bacterium was classified as a group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is regarded as a primary factor for gastric cancer development [19]. For their revolutionary discovery, Marshall and Warren received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2005.

In addition, in the last years, H. pyloriinfection has also been associated with some extradigestive diseases, such as iron-deficiency anemia [20], idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [21,22], cardiovascular diseases [23,24], hepatobiliary diseases [25,26], and diabetes mellitus [27], among others.

2.2. Virulence factors of H. Pylori

H. pyloripopulations are highly diverse and constantly change their genome, which can be an important factor in its adaptation to the host stomach and also for the clinical outcome of the infection. The changes in its genome occur mainly due to point mutations, substitutions, insertions, and/or deletions of their genome. Moreover, mixed infections are frequent and lead to exchange of DNA fragments between different H. pyloristrains in a single host [28,29]. Experience with other bacterial pathogens suggests that H. pylori-specific factors may exist that influence the microorganism pathogenicity, and, these factors, together with the host genetic characteristics and the external environment, can contribute to the clinical outcome of the infection. Among the most studied virulence factors of H. pyloriare the urease gene, the vacuolating cytotoxin gene (vacA), the cytotoxin associated gene-Pathogenicity Island (cagPAI) and the duodenal ulcer promoting gene (dupA).

Urease is an important enzyme which is produced by H. pylorito counteract the acidic environment of the stomach. Urease causes damage to the epithelium through the production of ammonia, that, in conjunction with neutrophil metabolites, forms carcinogenic agents that might participate in the development of gastric malignances [30,31]. Ammonia is capable to cause different cell alterations, including swelling of intracellular acidic compartments, alterations of vesicular membrane transport, repression of protein synthesis and ATP production, and cell-cycle arrest [32]. Urease might also help to the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes in the mucosa and to the production of proinflammatory cytokines [33]. It has been demonstrated that this enzyme plays and important hole in the H. pyloricolonization, being observed that urease-defective bacteria mutants are not able to colonize the gastric environment [32].

VacA is a cytotoxin secreted from H. pylorias a large 140kd polypeptide and latter trimmed at both ends to finally deliver it in an active form to host cells, where it exerts its activity [34]. The gene encoding VacA is present in all H. pyloristrains and displays allelic diversity in three main regions: s (signal), i (intermediate) and m (middle); consequently, the activity of the toxin varies between strains [35]. Different combinations of two major alleles of each region (s1, s2, i1, i2, m1, m2) may exist, which results in VacA toxins with distinct capability of inducing vacuolating in epithelial cells [36]. VacA induces multiple cellular activities, including the alteration in the endosomal maturation which consequently leads to vacuolating of epithelial cells, the induction of membrane-channel formation, the cytochrome c releasing from mitochondria and the binding to cell-membrane receptors activating a proinflammatory response [35].

The cagPAI is a 40kb region of chromosomal DNA encoding approximately 31 genes that forms a type IV secretion system that forms a pilus that delivers CagA, an oncoprotein, into the cytosol of gastric epithelial cells through a rigid needle structure covered by CagY, a VirB10-homologous protein and CagT, a VirB7-homologous protein, at the base [37,38]. cagA is a polymorphic gene that presents different numbers of repeat sequences located in its 3´region and each repeat region of the CagA protein contains Glu-Pro-IIe-Tyr-Ala (EPIYA) motifs, including a tyrosine phosphorylation site [39]. Upon delivery into host cells, CagA undergoes Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation and activates an eukaryotic phosphatase (SHP-2), leading to dephosphorylation of host cell proteins and cellular morphologic changes [40]. CagA has also been shown to dysregulate β-catenin signaling [41] and apical-junctional complexes [42], events that have been linked to increased cell motility and oncogenic transformation in a variety of models [43]. In addition, some studies have been reported that the cagPAI appears to be involved in the induction of gastric interleukin-8 (IL-8) production, a potent neutrophil-activating chemokine [44]. Consequently, the presence of the cagA gene has been associated with higher grades of inflammation, which may lead to the development of the most severe gastrointestinal diseases, such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer [45-48].

H. pyloriduodenal ulcer promoting gene (dupA), located in the plasticity region of bacterium genome, has been initially described as a risk marker for duodenal ulcer development and a protective factor against gastric cancer [49]. It was the first putative specific marker whose association was described using strains obtained from in both Asian (Japan and Korea) and Western (Colombia) regions and it is though to be a virB4 homologue [49, 50]. dupA gene encompasses two continuous sequences, jhp0917 and jhp0918, as described in strain J99. The jhp0917 gene encodes a protein of 475 amino acids, but lacks a region homologous to the C-terminus of virB4, while jhp0918 gene encodes a product of 140 amino acids that is homologous to the missing virB4 region [51]. Since its discovery, dupA gene has been studied by various authors, and the results of their researches suggest that, in some places, dupA gene is not associated with an specific disease [52], or it is suggested that it can be associated with gastric cancer development [53-55], or it is directly associated with the development of duodenal ulcer disease [50,56]. Considering all these results, it is suggested that there must be diversity in gene content that can contribute to bacterial adaptation to genetically different ethnic groups that make up de human population [57].


3. Gastric cancer

3.1. Epidemiology

Cancer is a worldwide full-scale problem as it will affect one in three men and one in four women during their lifetime [58]. Nowadays, this disease represents one in eight deaths around the world. The global cancer rate has doubled in the last 30 years of the 20th century, and will almost triple by 2030, a year in which it is foreseen that 20.3 million people will be diagnosed cancer and 13.2 million will die as a result of this disease [59].

World Health Organization estimates that 43% of cancer deaths are due tobacco, diet and infection. One-fifth of cancers worldwide are due to chronic infections, mainly from hepatitis viruses (liver), papillomaviruses (cervix), H.pylori(stomach), schistosomes (bladder), the liver fluke (bile duct), and human immunodeficiency virus (Kaposi sarcoma and lymphoma) [60].

Gastric cancer continues to be a major global health problem [61] and, despite the decreasing incidence and mortality rates observed worldwide over the last 50 years, it still ranks as a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in many parts of the world [62]. As symptoms are often absent or nonspecific in patients with the early stages of the disease, gastric cancer is usually diagnosed in an advanced stage, when curative options are limited. With exceptions in countries that have developed screening programs for early diagnoses, as example Japan, most patients reach treatment with cancers already in advanced stages [63]. Consequently, gastric cancer carries a poor prognosis, with an overall five-year survival rate of less than 20% [64].

Besides, one study assessed the survival of gastric cancer in population-based registries obtained in cities from four continents and concluded that the large differences observed among these areas were exclusively due to the different types of stomach cancer, highlighting the importance of the stage of the disease as an indicator of the effect of delayed diagnosis on the prognosis of these patients [65].

In Brazil, in 2005, the highest incidence rates, adjusted by age, were found in São Paulo (male, 38,8/100.000; female, 15,0/100.000) and the Federal District (male, 32,7/100.000; female 14,7/100.000) [66]. The National Institute of Cancer in Brazil estimates that, in 2014, there will occur 580.000 new cases of cancer. The most frequent cancers in Brazilian population will be non-melanoma skin (182.000), prostate (69.000), breast (57.000), colon and rectum (33.000), lung (27.000) and stomach (20.000). Considering Brazilian regions and gender, gastric cancer will be the fourth most common cancer in Brazil. In male gender, it is the second most common tumour in the North (11/100.000 cases) and Northeast (10/100.000 cases) regions; it is the fourth most common tumour in the Midwest (11/100.000 cases) and in the South (16/100.000) regions and the fifth most common in the Southeast region (15/100.000 cases). Concerning the female gender, gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in Brazil, the third most frequent in the North region (6/100.000 cases), and the fifth most frequent in the Northeast (6/100.000 cases) and Southeast (8/100.000 cases) regions [67].

The chances of surviving the onset of some common cancers depend largely on how early they are detected and how well they are treated. Early detection is based on the observation that treatment is more effective when cancer is detected early. It includes awareness of early signs and symptoms of cancer and screening, which is the mass testing of people who appear to be healthy. In many developing countries, where these are not feasible, several other low technology approaches are being studied and look promising. The success of public health programmes in detecting cancer early depends on the allocation of resources, availability of qualified specialists and access to follow-up treatment [60].

3.2. Classification of gastric cancer

The vast majority of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas. Two histologically distinct variants of gastric adenocarcinoma have been described, each with different pathophysiological features: the diffuse type and the intestinal type [68], which corresponds, respectively, to the undifferentiated or poorly-differentiated type and to the well-differentiated type, in the Japanese classification [69].

Diffuse type gastric adenocarcinoma is often associated with familial distribution and more commonly affects younger people. It consists of individually infiltrating neoplastic cells that do not form glandular structures and arises closer to the advancing border of inflammation but without any identifiable histological precursor lesion [62,70,71].

Gastric adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type is preceded by a prolonged precancerous process. In 1975, Correa and colleagues proposed a model of gastric carcinogenesis, postulating that the intestinal type of gastric cancer was the end result of progressive changes in the gastric mucosa, starting with chronic gastritis, followed by multifocal atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia [72]. This model was updated in 1988 and 1992 [73,74] and the following steps were recognized: normal gastric mucosa → superficial gastritis (later renamed non-atrophic gastritis) → multifocal atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia → intestinal metaplasia of the complete (small intestine) type → intestinal metaplasia of the incomplete (colonic) type → low-grade dysplasia (low-grade noninvasive dysplasia) → high-grade dysplasia (high-grade noninvasive dysplasia) → invasive adenocarcinoma [75]. These lesions are well-characterized histopathologically and represent a continuum of changes depicting multiple events that increase in intensity and extension with time [76].

Both diffuse and intestinal types are associated with H. pyloriinfection, which plays an initiating role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer by changing many important factors, including antioxidant agents, reactive oxygen metabolites, and the balance between epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis [77]. H. pyloriinfection induces cell apoptosis, stimulates cell proliferation in the gastric epithelium, and causes alterations or mutations of apoptosis/proliferation-related genes [78].

3.3. Helicobacter pyloriand gastric cancer — The precancerous cascade

Exposure of gastric epithelial cells to H. pyloriresults in an inflammatory reaction with the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide that, in turn, deaminates DNA causing mutations [62]. The complex interplay among H.pyloristrain, inflammation and host characteristics, besides the external environment, may directly promote diffuse type gastric cancer or induce the cascade of morphological events that leads to intestinal type gastric cancer.

Specifically regarding to intestinal type gastric adenocarcinoma, evidence that H. pyloriincreases the risk of gastric cancer development via the sequence of atrophy and metaplasia originates from various studies, in which it was shown that H. pyloripositive subjects develop these conditions more often than do uninfected controls [79]. Consequently, since H. pyloriisolation, many investigators have emphasized its role in gastric carcinogenesis [80,81]. Epidemiological studies have determined that the attributable risk for gastric cancer conferred by H. pyloriis approximately 75% [82]. Besides, in respect to localization in the stomach, premalignant lesions are most frequently localized in the antrum in the transitional zone between the antrum and corpus [83].

As explained before, Correa and colleagues (1975) proposed a model of gastric carcinogenesis, considering that the intestinal type gastric cancer probably is the result of histological continuum changes that occur especially due to H.pyloriinfection: chronic active nonatrophic gastritis, multifocal atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and, finally, invasive adenocarcinoma. Consequently, the principal characteristics of each one of these stages are report below.

3.3.1. Chronic active non-atrophic gastritis

Gastritis is characterized by increased infiltration of the lamina propria with mononuclear leukocytes (chronic inflammation) and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (acute inflammation). Additionally, scattered eosinophils and mast cells can be observed. The gastritis is called “active” when polymorphonuclear neutrophils are found, representing acute inflammation. This phase of the precancerous process does not show loss of glands (atrophy) and is called “nonatrophic gastritis” in the updated Sydney classification of gastritis, adopted by most pathologists (Figure 1) [84].

The most frequent cause of gastritis is H.pyloriinfection and the severity of inflammation may vary according to the infected H. pyloristrain [75].

Figure 1.

Chronic gastritis

3.3.2. Multifocal atrophic gastritis

Loss of normal glandular tissue is the first specific recognizable step in the precancerous cascade. Usually it is the result of a prolonged inflammatory process and tends to be multifocal, giving rise to the so-called multifocal atrophic gastritis (Figure 2). The foci of atrophy are present in the mucosa of gastric antrum and body, and their extension progresses with time [75]. More virulent bacterial strains and a permissive host immune response are strongly associated with atrophy and progression to severe disease [84].

Figure 2.

Atrophic gastritis

3.3.3. Intestinal metaplasia

At this stage of the gastric precancerous process, the original glands and the foveolar epithelium are replaced by cells with intestinal phenotype [84]. Intestinal metaplasia (Figure 3) is considered to be an advanced stage of atrophy because the metaplastic glands replace the original glands and chronologically the metaplastic glands appear after the gastric glands are lost. Intestinal metaplasia has been classified on the basis of morphology and enzyme histochemistry in two main types: the small intestine or complete type, and the colonic or incomplete type [75].

Up to this point in the cascade, the epithelium in the atrophic and metaplastic lesions remains well differentiated, with normal nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, normal nuclear morphology, and normal tissue architecture. The dynamics of the precancerous process to this point shows a gradual phenotypic transformation from normal epithelium to metaplastic cells with small intestinal morphology and then to cells resembling colonic mucosa, additionally expressing gastric and colonic mucins. This process usually takes decades and is progressive, supporting the notion that although environmental alterations (bacterial factors and cytokine environment, loss of cell signaling) may have initially driven differentiation decisions, with time, permanent changes in the stem cell compartment have occurred. In some patients with incomplete metaplasia, a mild degree of nuclear atypia and architectural distortion is observed, leading some investigators to consider incomplete metaplasia as a mild form of dysplasia [84,85].

Figure 3.

Intestinal metaplasia (antrum)

3.3.4. Dysplasia

Also called intraepithelial neoplasia or noninvasive neoplasia, dysplasia is characterized by a neoplastic phenotype, both in terms of cell morphology and architectural organization [75]. The nuclei of the dysplastic epithelium are enlarged, hyperchromatic, irregular in shape, and devoid of polarity [84]. The Padova classification is focused on gastric dysplasia and was developed by an international group of experienced gastrointestinal pathologists and recognizes five categories of lesions, utilizing mostly western nomenclature and grouping them numerically following the prevailing Japanese system: 1. negative for dysplasia; 2. indefinite for dysplasia; 3. noninvasive neoplasia (sub-classified in low grade or high grade); 4. suspicious for invasive carcinoma; and 5. invasive carcinoma [86].

The management of low-grade dysplasia is not well defined and there is a recommendation of annual endoscopic monitoring with rebiopsy [87]. Nevertheless, patients with high-grade dysplasia confirmed at least two gastrointestinal pathologists should undergo surgical or endoscopic resection because of the high probability of coexisting or metachronous invasive carcinoma [88].

3.3.5. Invasive adenocarcinoma

Invasive adenocarcinoma is the next stage in the cascade and requires the penetration of neoplastic cells into the surrounding stroma (Figure 4). Recent evidence suggests that this step demands that neoplastic cells acquire the capability of degrading the stromal matrix surrounding the neoplastic cells [75.

Figure 4.

Gastric adenocarcinoma

3.4. Early and advanced lesions

Follow-up of patients with precursor lesions in populations at high gastric cancer risk has thrown light on the dynamics of the process. The progression of the precursor lesions described before follows a pattern of steady state, with episodes of progression to more advanced lesions and episodes of regression to less advanced lesions.

Unlike patients with advanced gastric cancer, patients diagnosed in an early stage of the disease present an excellent prognostic, in which a five-year survival rate is more than 90%. Early gastric cancer lesions are defined as the adenocarcinoma that is confined to the mucosa or submucosa, irrespective of lymphonode invasion (Figure 5). Many early gastric cancers are believed to go through a life cycle consisting of ulcerations, followed by healing, then reulceration, and some lesions remain at this early stage for years even without treatment [89]. Nevertheless, some early tumours rapidly became advanced and it is one of the principal questions concerning the gastric carcinogenesis. Are H. pylorivirulence factors important to influence these alterations? To what extent H. pylorieradication treatment would be important to prevent the continued progression of the disease? To what extent H. pylorieradication in the early stage of cancer would be important to prevent the appearance of new lesions?

Figure 5.

Early gastric adenocarcinoma

Considering these important questions, our chapter is divided into two sections: 1. the identification of the principal genetic characteristics of H. pyloristrains in Brazilian patients with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma, in order to determine the genotypic pattern of bacterium in our population through molecular techniques; 2. the discussion of the principal studies concerning H.pylorieradication and its importance to prevent the progression of precancerous lesions and the importance of H. pylorieradication in the early gastric cancer to prevent the development of new cancerous lesions.


4. Materials and methods

4.1. Determination of principal genotypes of H. Pyloriin Brazilian patients with early gastric adenocarcinoma

4.1.1. Clinical samples

Clinical isolates of H. pylorianalyzed in this study were obtained from the Laboratory of Pathology of the Center of Diagnosis of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil). Third one paraffin wax-embedded specimens of gastric tissue were analyzed from a total of 31 patients with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma. All the gastric tissue samples were obtained from endoscopic biopsy and were positive for H. pyloriby histological analysis. Samples from gastric tissue obtained from endoscopic biopsy of patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease and positive for H. pyloriwere used as positive controls for all the reactions carried out in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas.

4.1.2. Methods

Paraffin wax-embedded tissue DNA extraction was carried out with xylene and ethanol washes for paraffin removal; successive steps using proteinase K, phenol, chloroform, and isoamyl alcohol were carried out in order to isolate and purify the DNA [90]. Quantification of the obtained product and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for human betaglobin gene [91] were carried out to guarantee the quality of all the results.

After DNA extraction, PCR for ureaseC [92], vacA (s and m) [93,94,95], cagA [96], cagT [97] and dupA (jhp0917 and jhp0918) [49] genes were performed. Primers pairs for all the genes as well as the length of the fragments are described in Table 1. PCR for ureaseC gene was carried out to confirm the positivity for H. pyloriin all the samples.

After amplification, each PCR product was analyzed by eletrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide with a 0.5 X tris-acetate-EDTA buffer. A 100-bp ladder was used as standard.

GeneStrandPrimer sequence (5´ - 3´)Length (bp)
vacA (s1/s2)+
s1: 259
s2: 286
vacA m1+
vacA m2+
dupA (jhp0917)+
dupA (jhp0918)+

Table 1.

Sequence of synthetic oligonucleotide primers used to characterization of H. pyloristrains

Then, for each specific reaction, products obtained were classified in vacA s1m1, s2m1, s1m2 or s2m2; cagA positive or negative; cagT positive or negative; and dupA positive or negative. dupA gene was considered positive when its two regions (jhp0917 and jhp0918) were positive simultaneously.

After all amplifications, a table with absolute frequencies (n) and percentages (%) was made in order to determine genotypes combinations.

4.2. Analysis of the principal manuscript references concerning the study of eradication treatment of H. pyloriin precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer

After determination of the principal genotype presented in Brazilian patients with early gastric cancer, a review concerning the importance of eradication of H.pyloriin precancerous lesions and in early gastric adenocacinoma was done.


5. Results

5.1. Determination of principal genotypes of H. Pyloriin Brazilian patients with early gastric adenocarcinoma

PCR for ureaseC gene of H. pyloriwas positive for all 31 samples obtained from patients with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma. As regards to vacA gene region s, of 31 samples, 71.0% (22 cases) were s1 and 29.0% (9 cases) were s2. Related to the vacA region m, all the samples were m1. Following this analysis, samples were classified in s1m1 or s2m1. So, 71.0% (22 cases) were s1m1 and 29.0% (9 cases) were s2m1.

UreaseC31 (100.0%)
vacA s1
vacA s2
22 (71.0%)
9 (29.0%)
vacA m1
vacA m2
31 (100.0%)
0 (0.0%)
vacA s1m1
vacA s2m1
22 (71.0%)
9 (29.0%)
cagA positive
cagA negative
19 (61.3%)
12 (38.7%)
cagT positive
cagT negative
17 (54.8%)
14 (45.2%)
dupA (jhp0917/jhp0918) positive
dupA (jhp0917/jhp0918) negative
11 (35.5%)
20 (64.5%)
Total31 (100.0%)

Table 2.

Frequencies and percentages of the principal genes of H. pyloristudied in samples of early gastric cancer

As regards to gene cagA, 61.3% (19 cases) were cagA positive and, for cagT gene, 54.8% (17 cases) were positive. For dupA (jhp0917/jhp0918) gene, there were 35.5% (11 cases) of positivity. All these results can be seen in Table 2.

Genotypes combinations where then analyzed and the most prevalent genotype for gastric samples obtained from Brazilian patients with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma was vacA s1m1, cagA positive, cagT positive and dupA negative (Table 3).

Genotype combinations:vacA s/m cagA cagT dupA (jhp0917/jhp0918)Early gastric cancer
s1m1 neg neg neg4 (12.90)
s1m1 neg neg pos1 (3.23)
s2m1 neg neg neg1 (3.23)
s2m1 neg neg pos0 (0.00)
s1m1 neg pos neg2 (6.45)
s1m1 neg pos pos1 (3.23)
s2m1 neg pos neg2 (6.45)
s2m1 neg pos pos1 (3.23)
s1m1 pos neg neg3 (9.68)
s1m1 pos neg pos2 (6.45)
s2m1 pos neg neg2 (6.45)
s2m1 pos neg pos1 (3.23)
s1m1 pos pos neg5 (16.13)
s1m1 pos pos pos4 (12.90)
s2m1 pos pos neg2 (6.45)
s2m1 pos pos pos0 (0.00)

Table 3.

Genotype combinations for early gastric adenocarcinoma samples

5.2. Analysis of the principal manuscript references concerning the study of eradication treatment of H. pyloriin precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer

Epidemiological studies have established a strong causal relationship between H. pyloriinfection and gastric cancer. H. pylorieradication is therefore likely to be one of the most promising approaches to gastric cancer prevention. Animal studies have shown that eradication of H. pyloriinfection, especially at the early stage, is effective in preventing H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis. However, the available data from human studies show that H. pylorieradication does not completely prevent gastric cancer and that it might be useful in patients without atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia at baseline [77].

Considering these important issues, the present chapter book analized and discussed some studies that assessed the possible relationship between the eradication of H. pyloriinfection and the prevention of gastric cancer even if the precancerous cascade has started. Obviously, there should be a point which there is no return in this process and the presence of H. pyloricould not be more decisive to continue the progression of the precancerous lesions. With the aim to analyze these topics, we discussed some important questions concerning H. pyloriinfection, precancerous cascade and H. pylorieradication treatment, both in the precancerous lesions (atrophic gastritis, metaplasia intestinal and dysplasia) and in the early gastric cancer stage.


6. Discussion

Molecular techniques may be applied to the measurement of host or agent factors and of exposures. Molecular techniques help to stratify and to refine data by providing more sensitive and specific measurements, which facilitate epidemiologic activities, including disease surveillance, outbreak investigations, identifying transmission patterns and risk factors among apparently disparate cases, characterizing host-pathogen interactions, detecting uncultivatable organisms, providing clues for possible infectious causes of cancer and other chronic diseases, and providing better understanding of disease pathogenesis at the molecular level [98].

Our study determined the principal genotype of H. pyloristrains in Brazilian patients with early distal type intestinal gastric adenocarcinoma, which is vacA s1m1, cagA positive, cagT positive and dupA negative. It provides to the scientific community important information concerning the epidemiology of gastric cancer in Brazil, as regards to the infecting strains. This principal H.pylorigenotype was also the principal found in advanced gastric cancer samples, but, when considering the cagA gene in an isolate evaluation, it was more incident in patients with advanced gastric cancer [48].

Many factors, including a high-salt diet [99], genetic abnormality [100] and autoimmune gastritis [101], among others, have been reported concerning gastric carcinogenesis; however, it is clear that H. pyloriinfection is the most important gastric carcinogen [60, 102].

Currently recommended anti-H. pyloriinfection therapies achieve eradication rates of up to 90% [103]. Several studies have indicated that H.pyloriscreening and eradication is a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of gastric cancer in middle-aged adults, even if the treatment prevents only 20%-30% of H. pylori-associated cancers, and that the strategy is particularly beneficial in high-risk populations and in the long term [77,104,105,106], although the feasibility, safety and appropriated timing of this strategy for cancer prevention in the general population remains to be determined [77].

Some studies focused on patients with gastric precancerous lesions such as gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia and evaluated the effect of eradicating H. pylorion the intermediate lesions in the carcinogenic cascade rather than using gastric cancer as the primary end points [107].

Conflicting results have been reported on whether or not these precancerous lesions were reversible following successful eradication of H. pyloriinfection.

The investigation of Uemura et al. (2001) [108] is considered the first study providing some evidence that H. pylorieradication has an impact in gastric cancer. In this study, none of the 253 treated patients developed cancer, whilst there were 36 gastric cancer cases among 993 untreated patients. However, it is of note that the mean duration of follow-up after eradication was significantly shorter than the mean duration for patients who were not treated (4,8 vs. 8,5 years; p < 0.001). Therefore, the risk of gastric cancer development could have been understated in the treated group [107].

In a randomized placebo controlled study in China, gastritis (acute and chronic) decreased in both the antrum and the corpus at one year after H. pylorieradication and a slight regression of intestinal metaplasia was observed [109]. With similar results, a follow-up study developed by Zhou et al. (2003) [110] demonstrated that H. pylorieradication significantly reduced the severity and activity of chronic gastritis. Besides, while the proportion of intestinal metaplasia in the H. pyloripositive group increased significantly, intestinal metaplasia in the antrum either regressed or had no progression in the H. pylorinegative group.

In Colombia, a randomized, controlled chemoprevention trial with patients with confirmed multifocal nonmetaplastic atrophy and/or intestinal metaplasia demonstrated that, after H. pylorieradication therapy and/or dietary supplementation with ascorbic acid or beta-carotene, or their placebos, it was observed a significant increase in the rate of regression of the precursos lesions [111].

Other follow-up studies also identified that H. pylorieradication in patients with intestinal metaplasia could be important in the regression of the lesions [112-118]. In the same way, other randomized studies identified that H. pylorieradication in intestinal metaplasia could be important in the regression of this precancerous lesion [76,109-111,119,120]. Oppositely, other trials, both follow-up and randomized control, had not identified regression of intestinal metaplasia when H. pylorieradication was administrated [121-129].

Concerning to patients with gastric atrophy, the most part of the studies have identified that this lesion presents a regression when H. pylorieradication occurs [76, 109, 111, 119, 120, 128-130]. In Japan, where there is a significant ability in diagnostic, with a detection of 94% of early gastric cancers, one important multicenter randomized controlled trial by the Japan Gast Study Group enrolled patients undergoing previous endoscopic therapy for gastric cancer and demonstrated that eradication therapy significantly reduced the prevalence of secondary gastric cancer in a 3-year follow-up period [131]. However, this study does not demonstrate that eradication therapy can prevent newly developed gastric cancer even in secondary cancer, because the follow-up period was too short.

As well as other authors mentioned before, Ito (2009) [132] considered that theoretically H. pylorieradication therapy should be beneficial for cancer prevention. However, attention should be drawn to the fact that the gastric cancer risk is not similar between noninfected and eradicated people. Until now, many human studies have demonstrated that some patients develop gastric cancer even if they have undergone successful eradication therapy [133]. Considering it, we can conclude that eradication therapy may have an effect on cancer prevention if the therapy is administrated before a single cancer cell has transformed or before cancer tissue shows invasive growth. It is likely that eradication therapy has no effect if the cancer has progressed to an advanced stage.

Wong et al. (2004) [134], with the aim to determine whether eradication of H. pyloriinfection reduces the incidence of gastric cancer, carried out a randomized, placebo controlled trial with 1630 H. pyloriinfected patients in a high-risk region of China. Their results indicated that H. pylorieradication can reduce the incidence of gastric cancer in patients without precancerous lesions at entry. Besides, the eradication therapy had no statistically significant effect on the incidence of gastric cancer in patients with precancerous lesions on presentation. It appears that there is a point of no return for patients with precancerous lesions and a chemoprevention strategy may work only in a subset of H. pyloriinfected subjects [135].

As regards to animal models, they are useful because they represent tractable systems that permit insights into the effects of host, pathogen and environmental factors on gastric carcinogenesis [136]. Nevertheless, the use of animals does not completely reflect H. pylori-induced cancer in humans. Romero-Gallo et al. (2008) [137], using a population of gerbils that received antibiotics for H. pyloritreatment, demonstrated that the timing of intervention influences the magnitude of suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, inflammation, pre-malignant, and neoplastic lesions. These findings have demonstrated that treatment of H. pyloridecreases the incidence and the severity of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, as well as premalignant and malignant lesions. However, the effectiveness of eradication is dependent upon the timing of intervention [137].

A 5-year study in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fustata) demonstrated that H.pyloriinfection can cause gastric atrophy, increased cell proliferation, and mutation of p53in gastric epithelial cells [138]. In other study, with Mongolian gerbils, it was demonstrated that the resulting pathological changes in gastric mucosa are similar to those in humans [139]. Some studies demonstrated that when the animals were infected with H. pyloritogether with a carcinogen (N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine), they developed gastric cancer (both diffuse and intestinal types) that were at significantly higher frequencies than animals receiving either H. pylorior the carcinogen alone [140-142]. Gastric cancer incidence was reduced at 75 weeks to 6.7%, 27.3%, and 38.2% in Mongolian gerbils receiving eradication treatment at early (15 weeks), middle (35 weeks) and late (55 weeks) stages, respectively. These results suggest that eradication at an early stage might be effective in preventing carcinogenesis. Other study demonstrated that application of antimicrobial therapy at 8 weeks postinoculation of bacterium attenuated inflammation, but did not completely prevent the development of premalignant and malignant lesions, indicating that the H. pylorieradication therapy is effective when administered at an early stage after infection [143]. Nevertheless, it is important to remember that the carcinogenic potential of H. pyloriis strain dependent and some results of these studies could be caused by the use of an H. pyloristrain that lacked carcinogenic potential.

In the mouse model, both H. pyloriinfection and gastric atrophy increase the serum concentration of polypeptide hormone gastrin, a hormone that controls secretion of gastric acid by the stomach´s parietal cells and hypergastrinemia is regarded to play a role in the development. The results obtained indicated that the timing of antimicrobial eradication therapy is very important as early application can prevent the progression of gastric cancer [144].

Finally, for cancers detected early, endoscopic mucosal resection can conserve the noncancerous gastric mucosa, but it can not eliminate the recurrence of metachronous gastric cancer [145]. Fukase et al. (2008) [131], in a randomized control trial, studied a group of patients submitted to H. pylorieradication therapy following endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. These patients were monitored at different time intervals: at 3 years, metachronous gastric cancer had developed in 9 of 225 patients in the eradication group compared with 24 of 250 patients in the control group, suggesting that prophylactic eradication of H. pyloriin a high-risk population can substantially reduce gastric cancer rates.

Briefly, the most part of the studies suggests that H. pylorieradication is able to induce regression of precancerous lesions in most of the treated subjects, and particularly in those with baseline, early and non-severe lesions. However, it also seems that a proportion of treated subjects will still show progression of preneoplastic lesions. So, we can consider that they really are other factors that contribute to the progression of these lesions. So, H. pylorieradication is an effective strategy in reducing the risk of gastric cancer; however, it is not efficient enough to eradicate gastric cancer. Prevention of the infection, H. pyloriimmunization, H. pylorieradication in the youth, selection of the high-risk population, and alternative chemopreventive measures may be essential for optimal management of malignancy of the stomach.


7. Conclusions

All the available evidence suggests that H. pylorieradication might represent a primary chemo-preventive strategy in a subset of subjects. However, H. pylorieradication in those patients who have already developed advanced preneoplastic lesions does not prevent gastric cancer development, and endoscopic follow-up should always be performed.

More research is needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying the H. pylori-induced gastric carcinogenesis. As the infection usually depends on the characteristics of the infecting strain, studies that determine the genotypes in gastric cancer, as we presented in our study, are necessary. Besides, more trials concerning the interaction among the infecting strain, the host characteristics and the external environment are also needed to explaining the complex gastric carcinogenesis. An understanding of biochemical, genetic and epigenetic changes following eradication therapy would be helpful to develop strategies to identify high-risk individuals, thereby contributing to effective management in gastric cancer prevention.

Finally, it is important to gain more insight into the pathogenesis of H. pylori-induced gastric adenocarcinoma, not only to develop more effective treatments for this cancer, but also because it might serve as a paradigm for the role of chronic inflammation in the genesis of other malignancies.


  1. 1. Kusters JG, van Vliet AHM, Kuipers EJ. Pathogenesis ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2006; 19(3): 449-490.
  2. 2. Goodwin CS, Armstrong JA. Microbiological aspects ofHelicobacter pylori(Campylobacter pylori). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990; 9(1): 1-13.
  3. 3. Bode G, Mauch F, Malfertheiner P. The coccoid forms ofHelicobacter pylori.Criteria for their viability. Epidemiology and Infection 1993; 111(3): 483-490.
  4. 4. Blaser MJ. An endangered species in the stomach. Scientific American 2005; 292(2): 38-45.
  5. 5. Ahmed N. 23 years of the discovery ofHelicobacter pylori:Is the debate over? Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2005; 4: 17-19.
  6. 6. Replogle ML, Glaser SL, Hiatt RA, Parsonnet J. Biologic sex as a risk factor forHelicobacter pyloriinfection in healthy young adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 1995; 142(8): 856-863.
  7. 7. Graham DY, Malaty HM, Evans DG, Evans DJ, Klein PD, Adam E. Epidemiology ofHelicobacter pyloriin an asymptomatic population in the United States. Gastroenterology 1991; 100(6): 1495-1501.
  8. 8. Urita Y, Watanabe T, Kawagoe N, Takemoto I, Tanaka H, Kijima S, Kido H, Maeda T, Sugasawa Y, Miyazaki T, Honda Y, Nakanishi K, Shimada N, Nakajima H, Sugimoto M, Urita C. Role of infected grandmothers in transmission ofHelicobacter pylorito children in a Japanese rural town. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2013; 49(5): 394-398.
  9. 9. Bastos J, Carreira H, La Vecchia C, Lunet N. Childcare attendance andHelicobacter pyloriinfection: systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2013; 22(4): 311-319.
  10. 10. Covacci A, Telford JL, Del Giudice G, Parsonnet J, Rapuolli R.Helicobacter pylorivirulence and genetic geography. Science 1998; 284(5418): 1328-1333.
  11. 11. Dubois A, Fiala N, Heman-Ackah LM, Drazek ES, Tarnawski A, Fishbein WN, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Natural gastric infection withHelicobacter pyloriin monkeys: a model for spiral bacteria infection in humans. Gastroenterology 1994; 106(6): 1405-1417.
  12. 12. Fox JG, Batchelder M, Marini R, Yan L, Handt L, Li X, Shames B, Hayward A, Campbell J, Murphy JC.Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in the domestic cat. Infection and Immunity 1995; 63(7): 2674-2681.
  13. 13. Grubel P, Hoffman JS, Chong FK, Burstein NA, Mepani C, Cave DR. Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) forHelicobacter pylori. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997; 35(6): 1300-1303.
  14. 14. Dunn BE, Cohen H, Blaser MJ.Helicobacter pylori. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1997; 10(4): 720-741.
  15. 15. Lu Y, Redlinger TE, Avitia R, Galindo A, Goodman K. Isolation and genotyping ofHelicobacter pylorifrom untreated municipal wastewater. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2002; 68(3): 1436-1439.
  16. 16. Bahrami AR, Rahimi E, Ghasemian Safaei H. Detection ofHelicobacter pyloriin City Water, Dental Unit´s Water and Bottled Mineral Water in Isfahan, Iran. Scientific World Journal 2013.
  17. 17. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1984; 1(8390): 1311-1315.
  18. 18. Ahmed N, Sechi LA.Helicobacter pyloriand gastroduodenal pathology. New threats of the old friend. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2005; 4:1-10.
  19. 19. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Schistosomes, liver flukes andHelicobacter pylori.IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer 1994; 61: 1-241.
  20. 20. Capurso G, Lahner E, Marcheggiano A, Caruana P, Carnuccio A, Bordi C, Delle Fave G, Annibale B. Involvement of the corporal mucosa and related changes in gastric acid secretion characterize patients with iron deficiency anemy associated withHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2001; 15(11): 1753-1761.
  21. 21. Pelicano R, Franceschi F, Saracco G, Fagoonee S, Roccarina D, Gasbarrini A.Helicobactersand extragastric diseases. Helicobacter 2009; 14(Suppl 1): 58-68.
  22. 22. Arnold DM, Bernotas A, Nazi I, Stasi R, Kuwana M, Liu Y, Kelton JG, Crowther MA. Platelet count response toH. pyloritreatment in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura with and withoutH. pyloriinfection: a systematic review. Haematologica 2009; 94(6): 850-856.
  23. 23. Franceschi F, Navarese EP, Mollo R, Giupponi B, De Marco G, Merra G, Gasbarrini G, Silveri NG.Helicobacter pyloriand atherosclerosis. A review of the literature. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 2009; 100(2): 91-96.
  24. 24. Rogha M, Nikvarz M, Poumoghaddas Z, Shirneshan K, Dadkhah D, Poumoghaddas M. IsHelicobacter pyloriinfection a risk factor for coronary heart disease? ARYA Atherosclerosis 2012; 8(1): 5-8.
  25. 25. Isaeva GSh, Abuzarova ER, Valeeva IuV, Pozdeev OK, Murav´eva EV.Helicobacter pyloriin patients with disorders of hepatobiliary system. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2009; 2: 96-101.
  26. 26. Pirouz T, Zounubi L, Keivani H, Rakhshani N, Hormazdi M. Detection ofHelicobacter pyloriin paraffin-embedded specimens from patients with chronic liver diseases, using the amplification method. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2009; 54(7): 1456-1459.
  27. 27. Zhou X, Zhang C, Wu J, Zhang G. Association betweenHelicobacter pyloriinfection and diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2013; 99(2): 200-208.
  28. 28. Blaser MJ, Berg DE.Helicobacter pylorigenetic diversity and risk of human disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2001; 107(7): 767-773.
  29. 29. Suerbaum S, Michetti P.Helicobacter pyloriinfection. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 347(15): 1175-1186.
  30. 30. Megraud F, Neman-Simha, Brugmann D. Further evidence of the toxic effect of ammonia produced by Helicobacter pylori urease on human epithelial cells. Infection and Immunity 1992; 60(5): 1858-1863.
  31. 31. Suzuki M, Miura S, Suematsu M, Fukumura D, Kurose I, Suzuki H, Kai A, Kudoh Y, Ohashi M, Tsuchiya MHelicobacter pylori-associated ammonia production enhances neutrophil-dependent gastric mucosal cell injury. American Journal of Physiology 1992; 263 (5 Pt 1): G719-725.
  32. 32. Montecucco C, Rapuolli R. Living dangerously: howHelicobacter pylorisurvives in the human stomach. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 2001; 2(6): 457-466.
  33. 33. Harris PR, Mobley HL, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ, Smith PD.Helicobacter pyloriurease is a potent stimulus of mononuclear phagocyte activation and inflammatory cytokine production. Gastroenterology 1996; 111(2): 419-425.
  34. 34. Leunk RD, Johnson PT, David BC, Kraft WG, Morgan DR. Cytotoxic activity in broth-culture filtrates ofCampylobacter pylori. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1988; 26(2): 93-99.
  35. 35. Amieva MR, El-Omar EM. Host-bacterial interactions inHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Gastroenterology 2008; 134(1): 306-323.
  36. 36. Atherton JC, Cao P, Peek RMJr, Tummuru MK, Blaser MJ, Cover TL. Mosaicism in vacuolating cytotoxin alleles ofHelicobacter pylori. Association of specific vacA types with cytotoxin production and peptic ulceration.Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995;270(30): 17771-17777.
  37. 37. Covacci A, Rappuoli R. Tyrosine-phosphorylated bacterial proteins: Trojan horses for the host cell. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2000; 191(4): 587-592.
  38. 38. Backert S, Selbach M. Role of type IV secretion inHelicobacter pyloripathogenesis. Cellular Microbiology 2008; 10(8): 1573-1581.
  39. 39. Hatakeyama M. Oncogenic mechanisms of theHelicobacter pyloriCagA protein. Nature Reviews. Cancer 2004; 4(9): 688-694.
  40. 40. Higashi H, Tsutsumi R, Muto S, Sugiyama T, Azuma T, Asaka M, Hatakeyama M. SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatase as an intrancellular target ofHelicobacter pyloriCagA protein. Science 2002; 295(5555): 683-686.
  41. 41. Murata-Kamiya N, Kurashima Y, Teishikata Y, Yamahashi Y, Saito Y, Higashi H, Aburatani H, Akiyama T, Peek RMJr, Azuma T, Hatakeyama M.Helicobacter pyloriCagA interacts with E-cadherin and deregulates the β-catenin signal that promotes intestinal transdifferentiation in gastric epithelial cells. Oncogene 2007; 26(32): 4671-4626.
  42. 42. Amieva MR, Vogelmann R, Covacci A, Tompkins LS, Nelson WJ, Falkow S. Disruption of the epithelial apical-junctional complex byHelicobacter pyloriCagA. Science 2003; 300(5624): 1430-1434.
  43. 43. Suzuki M, Mimuro H, Suzuki T, Park M, Yamamoto T, Sasakawa C. Interaction of CagA with Crk plays an important role inHelicobacter pylori-induced loss of gastric epithelial cell adhesion. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2005; 202(9): 1235-1247.
  44. 44. Brandt S, Kwok T, Hartig R, Konig W, Backert S. NF-kappaB activation and potentiation of proinflammatory responses by theHelicobacter pyloriCagA protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005; 102(26): 9300-9305.
  45. 45. Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Kleanthous H, Cover TL, Peek RM, Chyou PH, Stemmermann GN, Nomura A. Infection withHelicobacter pyloristrains possessing cagA is associated with an increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Cancer Research 1995; 55(10): 2111-2115.
  46. 46. Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Orentreich N, Vogelman H. Risk for gastric cancer in people with CagA positive or CagA negativeHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Gut 1997; 40(3): 297-301.
  47. 47. Figueiredo C, van Doorn LJ, Nogueira C, Soares JM, Pinho C, Figueira P, Quint WG, Carneiro F.Helicobacter pylorigenotypes are associated with clinical outcome in Portuguese patients and show a high prevalence of infections with multiple strains. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology2001; 36(2): 128-135.
  48. 48. Roesler BM, Costa SCB, Zeitune JMR. Virulence factors ofHelicobacter pyloriand their relationship with the development of early and advanced distal intestinal type gastric adennocarcinoma. In: Paola Tonino (ed.). Gastritis and gastric cancer. New insights in gastroprotection, diagnosis and treatments. Rijeka: InTech; 2011.
  49. 49. Lu H, Hsu P, Graham DY, Yamaoka Y. Duodenal ulcer promoting gene ofHelicobacter pylori.Gastroenterology 2005; 128(4): 833-848.
  50. 50. Zhang Z, Zheng Q, Chen X, Xiao S, Liu W, Lu H. TheHelicobacter pyloriduodenal ulcer promoting gene, dupA in China. BMC Gastroenterology 2008; 8: 49-54.
  51. 51. Yamaoka Y. Roles of the plasticity regions ofHelicobacter pyloriin gastroduodenal pathogenesis. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2008; 57(5): 545-553.
  52. 52. Douraghi M, Mohammadi M, Oghalaie A, Abdirad A, Mohagheghi MA, Hosseini ME, Zeraati H, Ghasemi A, Esmaieli M, Mohajerani N. dupA as a risk determinant inHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2008; 57 (Pt.5): 554-562.
  53. 53. Argent RH, Burette A, Miendje Deyi VY, Atherton JC. The presence of dupA inHelicobacter pyloriis not significantly associated with duodenal ulceration in Belgium, South Africa, China or North America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 45(9): 1204-1206.
  54. 54. Schimidt HMA, Andres S, Kaakoush NO, Engstrand L, Eriksson L, Goh KL, Fock KM, Hilmi I, Dhamodaran S, Forman D, Mitchell H. The prevalence of the duodenal ulcer promoting gene (dupA) inHelicobacter pyloriisolates varies by ethnic group and is not universally associated with disease development: a case-control study. Gut Pathogens 2009; 1(1): 5-13.
  55. 55. Roesler BM, Oliveira TB, Costa SCB, Zeitune JMR. Is there any relationship betweenHelicobacter pyloridupA gene and the development of early and advanced gastric cancer in Brazilian patients? Journal of Medical Research and Science 2011; 2(1): 15-24.
  56. 56. Arachchi HSJ, Kalra V, Lal B, Bhatia V, Baba CS, Chakravarthy S, Rohatgi S, Sarma PM, Mishra V, Das B, Ahuja V. Prevalence of duodenal ulcer promoting gene (dupA) ofHelicobacter pyloriin patients with duodenal ulcer in North Indian population. Helicobacter. 2007; 12(6): 591-597
  57. 57. Gressmann H, Linz B, Ghai R, Pleissner KP, Schlapbach R, Yamaoka Y, Kraft C, Suerbaum S, Meyer TF, Achtman M. Gain and loss of multiple genes during the evolution ofHelicobacter pylori.PLoS Genetics2005; 1(4): e43.
  58. 58. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011. The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA. a cancer journal for clinicians 2011; 61(4): 212-236.
  59. 59. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transition according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncology 2012, 13(8): 790-801.
  60. 60. World Health Organization. Global action against cancer. Global cancer control. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Switzerland 2005. (accessed 01 december 2013).
  61. 61. Malfertheiner P, Bornschein J, Selgrad M. Role ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection in gastric cancer pathogenesis: a chance for prevention. Journal of Digestive Diseases 2010; 11(1): 2-11.
  62. 62. Nardone G, Rocco A, Malfertheiner P. Review article:Helicobacter pyloriand molecular events in precancerous gastric lesions. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2004; 20(3): 261-270.
  63. 63. Hoehnberger P, Gretschel S. Gastric cancer. Lancet 2003; 362(9380): 305-315.
  64. 64. Bowles MJ, Benjamin IC. ABC of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Cancer of the stomach and pancreas. BMJ 2001; 323(7326): 1413-1416.
  65. 65. Verdecchia A, Mariotto A, Gatta G, Bustamante-Teixeira MT, Ajiki W. Comparison of stomach cancer incidence and survival in four continents. European Journal of Cancer 2003; 39(11): 1603-1609.
  66. 66. Guerra MR, Gallo CVM, Mendonça GAS. The risk of cancer in Brazil: tendencies and recent epidemiologic studies. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia 2005; 51(3): 227-234.
  67. 67. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2014 – Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. MS: (accessed 29 November 2013).
  68. 68. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: Diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 1975; 64: 31-49.
  69. 69. Sugiyama T, Asaka M.Helicobacter pyloriinfection and gastric cancer. Medical Electron Microscopy 2004; 37(3): 149-157.
  70. 70. Yoshimura T, Shimoyama T, Fukuda S, Tanaka M, Axon AT, Munakata A. Most gastric cancer occurs on the distal side of the endoscopic atrophic border. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1999; 34(11): 1077-1081.
  71. 71. Polk DB; Peek Jr RM.Helicobacter pylori: gastric cancer and beyond. Nature Reviews. Cancer 2010; 10(6): 403-414.
  72. 72. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Tannenbaum S, Archer M. A model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet 1975; 2(7924): 58-60.
  73. 73. Correa P. A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Research 1988; 48(13): 3554-3560.
  74. 74. Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process – First American Cancer Society Award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention. Cancer Research 1992; 52(24): 6735-6740.
  75. 75. Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. Journal of Digestive Diseases 2012; 13(1): 2-9.
  76. 76. Mera R, Fontham ET, Bravo LE, Bravo JC, Piazuelo MB, Camargo MC, Correa P. Long term follow up of patients treated forHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Gut 2005; 54(11): 1536-1540.
  77. 77. Cheung TK, Xia HH, Wong BCY.Helicobacter pylorieradication for gastric cancer prevention. Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 42(Suppl. 17): 10-15.
  78. 78. Yang Y, Deng CS, Peng JZ, Wong BC, Lam SK, Xia HH. Effect ofHelicobacter pylorion apoptosis and apoptosis related genes in gastric cancer cells. Molecular Pathology 2003; 56(1): 19-24.
  79. 79. Kuipers EJ. Review article: relationship betweenHelicobacter pylori, atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 1998; 12(Suppl 1): 25-36.
  80. 80. Forman D, Newell DG, Fullerton F, Yarnell JW, Stacey AR, Wald N, Sitas F. Association between infection withHelicobacter pyloriand risk of gastric cancer: evidence from a prospective investigation. BMJ 1991; 302(6788): 1302-1305.
  81. 81. Danesh J.Helicobacter pyloriinfection and gastric cancer: systemic review of the epidemiological studies. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 1999; 13(7): 851-856.
  82. 82. Herrera V, Parsonnet J.Helicobacter pyloriand gastric adenocarcinoma. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2009; 15(11): 971-976.
  83. 83. de Vries AC, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. The detection, surveillance and treatment of premalignant gastric lesions related toHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Helicobacter 2007; 12(1): 1-15.
  84. 84. Correa P, Houghton J. Carcinogenesis ofHelicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 2007; 133(2): 659-672.
  85. 85. Filipe MI, Potet F, Bogomoletz WV, Dawson PA, Fabiani B, Chauveinc P, Fenzy A, Gazzard B, Goldfain D, Zeegen R. Incomplete sulphomucin-secreting intestinal metaplasia for gastric cancer. Preliminary data from a prospective study from three centres. Gut 1985; 26(12): 1319-1326.
  86. 86. Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon MF, Haltori T, Leandro G, Lewin K, Riddeli RH, Sipponen P, Watanabe H. Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classification. The American journal of surgical pathology 2000; 24(2): 167-176.
  87. 87. Lauwers GY, Srivastava A. Gastric preneoplastic lesions and epithelial dysplasia. Gastroenterology clinics of North America 2007; 36(4): 813-829.
  88. 88. Hirota WK, Zuckerman MJ, Adler DG, Davila RE, Egan J, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Fanelli R, Wheeler-Harbaugh J, Baron TH, Faigel DO. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2006; 63(4): 570-580.
  89. 89. Everett SM, Axon ATR. Early gastric cancer: disease or pseudo-disease? Lancet 1998; 351(9112): 1350-1352.
  90. 90. Goelz SE, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B. Purification of DNA from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human tissue. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 1985; 130(1): 118-126.
  91. 91. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a termostable DNA polymerase. Science 1988; 239(4839): 487-491.
  92. 92. Lage AP, Godfroid P, Fauconnier A, Burette A, Butzler JP, Bollen A, Glupczynski Y. Diagnosis ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection by PCR: comparison with other invasive techniques and detection of cagA gene in gastric biopsy specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33(10): 2752-2756.
  93. 93. Atherton JC, Peek RM, Tham KT, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Clinical and pathological importance of heterogenicity in vacA, the vacuolating cytotoxin gene ofHelicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 1997; 112(1): 92-97.
  94. 94. Atherton JC, Cover TL, Twells RJ, Morales MR, Hawkey CJ, Blaser MJ. Simple and accurate PCR-based system for typing vacuolating cytotoxin alleles ofHelicobacter pylori. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1999; 37(9): 2979-2982.
  95. 95. Thomazini CM, Pinheiro NA, Pardini MI, Naresse LE, Rodrigues MAM. Infecção porHelicobacter pylorie câncer gástrico: freqüência de cepas patogênicas cagA e vacA em pacientes com câncer gástrico. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial 2006; 42(1): 25-30.
  96. 96. Faundez G, Troncoso M, Figueroa G. cagA and vacA in strains ofHelicobacter pylorifrom ulcer and non-ulcerative dyspepsia patients. BMC Gastroenterology 2002; 2:20-24.
  97. 97. Mattar R, Marques SB, Monteiro MS, Santos AF, Iriya K, Carrilho FJ.Helicobacter pyloricag pathogenicity island genes: clinical relevance for peptic ulcer disease development in Brazil. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2007; 56(1): 9-14.
  98. 98. Foxman B, Riley L. Molecular Epidemiology: Focus on Infection. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 153(12): 1135-1141.
  99. 99. Nozaki K, Shimizu N, Inada K, Tsukamoto T, Inoue M, Kumagai T, Sugiyama A, Mizoshita T, Kaminishi M, Tatematsu M. Synergistic promoting effects ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection and high-salt diet on gastric carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research 2002; 93(10): 1083-1089.
  100. 100. Humar B, Blair V, Charlton A, More H, Martin I, Guilford P, E-cadherin deficiency initiates gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma in mice and man. Cancer Research 2009; 69(5): 2050-2056.
  101. 101. Fukayama M, Hino R, Uozaki H. Epstein-Barr vírus and gastric carcinoma: vírus-host interactions leading to carcinoma. Cancer Science 2008; 99(9): 1726-1733.
  102. 102. Suzuki H, Hibi T, Marshall BJ.Helicobacter pylori:present status and future prospects in Japan. Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 42(1): 1-15.
  103. 103. Xia HH, Yu Wong BC, Talley NJ, Lam SK. Alternative and rescue treatment regimens forHelicobacter pylorieradication. Expert Opinion of Pharmacotherapy 2002; 3(9): 1301-1311.
  104. 104. Parsonnet J, Harris RA, Hack HM, Owens DK. Modelling cost-effectiveness ofHelicobacter pyloriscreening to prevent gastric cancer: a mandate for clinical trials. Lancet 1996; 348(9021): 150-154.
  105. 105. Fendrick AM, Chernew ME, Hirth RA, Bloom BS, Bandekar RR, Scheiman JM. Clinical and economic effects of population-basedHelicobacter pyloriscreening to prevent gastric cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999; 159(2): 142-148.
  106. 106. Roderick P, Davies R, Raftery J, Crabbe D, Pearce R, Patel P et al. Cost-effectiveness of population screening forHelicobacter pyloriin preventing gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease, using simulation. Journal of Medical Screening 2003; 10(3): 148-156.
  107. 107. Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Minardi ME, Bazzoli F. Systematic review.Helicobacter pylorieradication for the prevention of gastric cancer. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2007; 25(2): 133-141.
  108. 108. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura M, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ.Helicobacter pyloriinfection and the development of gastric cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345(11): 784-789.
  109. 109. Leung WK, Lin SR, Ching JY, To KF, Ng EK, Chan FK, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Factors predicting progression of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Results of a randomized trial onHelicobacter pylorieradication. Gut 2004; 53(9): 1244-1249.
  110. 110. Zhou L, Sung JJ, Lin S, Jin Z, Ding S, Huang X, Xia Z, Guo H, Liu J, Chao W. A five-year follow-up study on the pathological changes of gastric mucosa afterH. pylorieradication. Chinese Medical Journal 2003; 116(1): 11-14.
  111. 111. Correa P, Fontham ET, Bravo JC, Bravo LE, Ruiz B, Zarama G, Realpe JL, Malcom GT, Li D, Johnson WD, Mera R. Chemoprevention of gastric dysplasia: randomized trial of antioxidant supplements and anti-Helicobacter pyloritherapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000; 92(23): 1881-1888.
  112. 112. Genta RM, Lew GM, Graham DY. Changes in the gastric mucosa following eradication ofHelicobacter pylori. Modern Pathology 1993; 6(3): 281-289.
  113. 113. Ciok J, Dzieniszewski J, Lucer C.Helicobacter pylorieradication and antral intestinal metaplasia – two years follow-up study. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 1997; 48(Suppl. 4): 115-122.
  114. 114. Uemura N, Mukai T, Okamoto S, Yamaguchi S, Mashiba H, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Haruma K, Sumii K, Kajiyama G. Effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on subsequent development of cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1997; 6(8): 639-642.
  115. 115. Kim N, Lim SH, Lee KH, Choi SE, Jung HC, Song IS, Kim CY. Long-term effects ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on intestinal metaplasia in patients with duodenal and benign gastric ulcers. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2000; 45(9): 1754-1762.
  116. 116. Ohkusa T, Fujiki K, Takashimizu I, Kumagai J, Tanizawa T, Eishi Y, Yokoyama T, Watanabe M. Improvement in atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in patients in whomHelicobacter pyloriwas eradicated. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; 134(5): 380-386.
  117. 117. Kokkola A, Sipponen P, Rautelin H, Härkönen M, Kosunen TU, Haaapiainen R, Puolakkainen P. The effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on the natural course of atrophic gastritis with dysplasia. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2002; 16(3): 515-520.
  118. 118. Ito M, Haruma K, Kamada T, Mihara M, Kim S, Kitadai Y, Sumii M, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K.Helicobacter pylorieradication therapy improves atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia: a 5-year prospective study of patients with atrophic gastritis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2002; 16(8): 1449-1456.
  119. 119. You WC, Brown LM, Zhang L, Li JY, Jin ML, Chang YS, Ma JL, Pan KF, Liu WD, Hu Y, Crystal-Mansour S, Pee D, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr, Xu GW, Gail MH. Randomized double-blind factorial trial of three treatments to reduce the prevalence of precancerous gastric lesions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006; 98(14): 974-983.
  120. 120. Ley C, Mohar A, Guarner J, Herrera-Goepfert R, Figueroa LS, Halperin D, Johnstone I, Parsonnet J.Helicobacter pylorieradication and gastric preneoplastic conditions: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2004; 13(1): 4-10.
  121. 121. Witteman EM, Mravunac M, Becx MJ, Hopman WP, Verschoor JS, Tytgat GN, de Koning RW. Improvement of gastric inflammation and resolution of epithelial damage one year after eradication ofHelicobacterpylori. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1995; 48(3): 250-256.
  122. 122. Forbes GM, Warren JR, Glaser ME, Cullen DJ, Marshall BJ, Collins BJ. Long-term follow-up of gastric histology afterHelicobacter pylorieradication. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 1996; 11(7): 670-673.
  123. 123. van der Hulst RW, van der Ende A, Dekker FW, Ten Kate FJ, Weel JF, Keller JJ, Kruizinga SP, Dankert J, Tytgat JN. Effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on gastritis in relation to cagA: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. Gastroenterology 1997; 113(1): 25-30.
  124. 124. Satoh K, Kimura K, Takimoto T, Kihira K. A follow-up study of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia after eradication ofHelicobacter pylori.Helicobacter 1998; 3(4): 236-240.
  125. 125. Kyzekova J, Mour J. The effect of eradication therapy on histological changes in the gastric mucosa in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia andHelicobacter pyloriinfection. Prospective randomized intervention study. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46(27): 2048-2056.
  126. 126. Annibale B, Aprile MR, D´Ambra G, Caruana P, Bordi C, Delle Fave G. Cure ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection in atrophic body gastritis patients does not improve mucosal atrophy but reduces hypergastrinemia and its related effects on body ECL-cell hyperplasia. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2000; 14(5): 625-634.
  127. 127. Sung JJ, Lin SR, Ching IY, Zhou LY, To KF, Wang RT, Leung WK, Ng EK, Lau JY, Lee YT, Yeung CK, Chao W, Chung SC. Atrophy and intestinal metaplasia one year after cure ofH. pyloriinfection: a prospective, randomized study. Gastroenterology 2000; 119(1): 7-14.
  128. 128. Kamada T, Haruma K, Hata J, Kusunoki H, Sasaki A, Ito M, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M. The long-term effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication therapy on symptoms in dyspeptic patients with fundic atrophic gastritis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2003; 18(2): 245-252.
  129. 129. Kuipers EJ, Nelis GF, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Snel P, Goldfain D, Kolkman JJ, Festen HP, Dent J, Zeitoun P, Havu N, Lamm M, Walan A. Cure ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection in patients with reflux oesophagitis treated with long term omeprazole reverses gastritis without exacerbation of reflux disease: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2004; 53(1): 12-20.
  130. 130. Ruiz B, Garay J, Correa P, Fontham ET, Bravo JC, Bravo LE, Realpe JL, Mera R. Morphometric evaluation of gastric antral atrophy: improvement after cure ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2001; 96(12): 3281-3287.
  131. 131. Fukase K, Kato M, Kikuchi S, Inoue K, Uemura N, Okamoto S, Terao S, Amagai K, Hayashi S, Asaka M, Japan Gast Study Group. Effect of eradication ofHelicobacter pylorion incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372(9636): 350-352.
  132. 132. Ito M, Takata S, Tatsugami M, Wada Y, Imagawa S, Matsumoto Y, Takamura A, Kitamura S, Matsuo T, Tanaka S, Haruma K, Chayama K. Clinical prevention of gastric cancer byHelicobacter pylorieradication therapy: a systematic review. Journal of Gastroenterology 2009; 44(5): 365-371.
  133. 133. Takata S, Ito M, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, Imagawa S, Haruma K, Chayama K. Host factors contributing to the discovery of gastric cancer after successful eradication therapy ofHelicobacter pylori:preliminary report. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2007; 22(4): 571-576.
  134. 134. Wong BC, Lam SK, Wong WM, Chen JS, Zheng TT, Feng RE, Lai KC, Hu WH, Yuen ST, Leung SY, Fong DY, Ho J, Ching CK, Chen JS, China Gastric Cancer Study Group.Helicobacter pylorieradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of China: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(2): 187-194.
  135. 135. Kabir S. Effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on incidence of gastric cancer in human and animal models: underlying biochemical and molecular events. Helicobacter 2004; 14(3): 159-171.
  136. 136. Rogers AB, Fox JG. Inflammation and Cancer. Rodent models of infectious gastrointestinal and liver cancer. American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 2004; 286(3): G361-G366.
  137. 137. Romero-Gallo J, Harris EJ, Krishna U, Washington MK, Perez-Perez GI, Peek Jr RM. Effect ofHelicobacter pylorieradication on gastric carcinogenesis. Laboratory Investigation 2008; 88(3): 328-336.
  138. 138. Oda T, Murakami K, Nishizono A, Kodama M, Nasu M, Fujioka T. Long-termHelicobacter pyloriinfection in Japanese monkeys induces atrophic gastritis and accumulation of mutations in thep53tumor suppressor gene. Helicobacter 2002; 7(3): 143-151.
  139. 139. Hirayama F, Takagi S, Kusuhara H, Iwao E, Yokoyama Y, Ykeda Y. Induction of gastric ulcer and intestinal metaplasia in mongolian gerbils infected withHelicobacter pylori. Journal of Gastroenterology 1996; 31(5): 755-757.
  140. 140. Shimizu N, Inada K, Nakanishi H, Tsukamoto T, Ikehara Y, Kaminishi M, Kuramoto S, Sugiyama A, Katsuyama T, Tatematsu M.Helicobacter pyloriinfection enhances glandular stomach carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils treated with chemical carcinogens. Carcinogenesis 1999; 20(4): 669-676.
  141. 141. Sugiyama A, Maruta F, Ikeno T, Ishida K, Kawasaki S, Katsuyama T, Shimizu N, Tatematsu M.Helicobacter pyloriinfection enhances N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced stomach carcinogenesis in the Mongolian gerbil. Cancer Research 1998; 58(10): 2067-2069.
  142. 142. Tokieda M, Honda S, Fujioka T, Nasu M. Effect ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection on the N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced gastric carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils. Carcinogenesis 1999; 20(7): 1261-1266.
  143. 143. Franco AT, Israel DA, Washington MK, Krishna U, Fox JG, Rogers AB, Neish AS, Collier-Hyams L, Perez-Perez GI, Hatakeyama M, Whitehead R, Gaus K, O´Brien DP, Romero-Gallo J, Peek RM Jr. Activation of beta-cateninby carcinogenicHelicobacter pylori. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005; 102(30): 10646-10651.
  144. 144. Cai X, Carlson J, Stoicov C, Li H, Wang TC, Houghton J.Helicobacter feliseradication restores normal architecture and inhibits gastric cancer progression in C57BL/6 mice. Gastroenterology 2005; 128(7): 1937-1952.
  145. 145. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 2001; 48(2): 225-229.

Written By

Bruna Maria Roesler and José Murilo Robilotta Zeitune

Submitted: September 18th, 2013 Reviewed: February 4th, 2014 Published: April 3rd, 2014