1. Introduction
The first meiotic prophase is divided into five sequential stages, referred to as
2. Self-assembly in biological systems
Self-assembly is the autonomous organization of constituents into higher-order structures or assemblages, in which disordered pre-existing components form organized architectures as a consequence of specific, local interactions among the components, without external intervention. This phenomenon is widely found in the natural world, and is a fundamental mechanism in biological systems (Whitesides and Grzybowski, 2002). A characteristic of biological self-assembly is the variety and complexity of the functions of the resulting structures (Kushner, 1969; Perham, 1975). We see such examples in lipid bilayer formation, base pairing, protein folding, protein-protein interactions, including the formation of quaternary structures, protein-nucleic acid interactions, flagella formation from flagellin, actin assembly, microtubule and microfibril formation, and virus, organ and cell assembly (Kushner, 1969; Whitesides and Grzybowski, 2002; Mueller et al., 1962; Watson and Crick, 1953; Oosawa and Asakura, 1975; Asakura, 1968; Horváth et al., 1949; Miki-Noumura and Mori, 1972; Fraser et al., 1976; Fraenkel-Conrat and Williams, 1955). Generally, self-assembly occurs by the tendency of a system to move toward the state of minimum free energy, and the assemblages are the result of the thermodynamic equilibrium, which is determined by various conditions, including temperature, pH, pressure, the concentrations and/or chemical potentials of various molecules and ions (Oosawa and Asakura, 1975) and London-van der Waals forces (Jehle, 1963).
3. DNA can sense homology and self-assemble
The possibility of a nucleotide sequence-dependent, selective interaction between dsDNA fragments was first studied theoretically (Kornyshev and Leikin, 2001). The following scenario was depicted: sequence-dependent twist modulation leads to axial variation of the local helical pitch, which allows an electrostatically favorable alignment of two DNA fragments; as the result, only DNA with homologous sequences can have negatively charged strands facing positively charged grooves over a large juxtaposition length, and nonhomologous sequences cannot align well because they require higher energy for juxtaposition. In another model, proposed over 40 years ago, the homology recognition is based on non-Watson-Crick hydrogen bond interactions occurring between bases in the major or minor grooves (McGavin, 1971). In still another model, proposed over 50 years ago, homology recognition is based on correlations in the fluctuating polarizations of nearby identical molecules (the London-van der Waals force) (Yos
The first experimental evidence proving that DNA can sense homology and self-assemble was obtained in 2007 (Inoue et al., 2007). Electrophoretic analyses of thirteen different dsDNA molecules with ~100 - ~800 bp lengths and an atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis revealed that in a solution composed of heterogeneous DNA species, DNA molecules preferentially interact with the molecules bearing an identical sequence and length, and they can form assemblages (Fig. 1A). This phenomenon efficiently occurs in the presence of physiological concentrations of Mg2+ ions, usually several mM. Nanomolar DNA concentrations also seem to be a prerequisite for the stable formation of self-assemblages. Interestingly, curved DNA and DNA with an A-form-like conformation also exhibited the self-assembling property. Thus, this phenomenon is not specific to the usual B-form DNA, but seems to be general for all kinds of dsDNA.
In 2008 (Baldwin et al., 2008), another experimental approach confirmed this homology-sensing and pairing ability of dsDNA. In this approach, 5’-amine-modified-DNAs with ~300 bp lengths were labeled with either Alexa Fluor 555, a green fluorescent tag, or Alexa Fluor 647, a far-red fluorescent tag, condensed into aggregates, mounted on microscope slides, equilibrated for two weeks, and subjected to a confocal microscopy analysis. Interestingly, segregation of the two kinds of DNA was observed within each spherulite (discrete liquid-crystalline aggregate) (Fig. 1B). Although the experimental conditions seemed to be far from
In 2009, using phage λ DNA and a parallel single molecule magnetic tweezers-based assay, an experiment further confirmed the presence of homologous dsDNA pairing (Danilowicz et al., 2009) (Fig. 1C). This study showed that pairing can occur even in the absence of divalent cations or crowding agents. Specifically, the pairing occurred in the presence of more than 50 mM Na+ or K+ (the effect of the latter was generally smaller than that of the former). In 10 mM Na+, homologous pairing between λ DNA and its 5 kb fragment was not detected. However, significant homologous pairing was detected between the two at 10 mM Mg2+. Although a 10 mM Mg2+ concentration may be slightly higher than the
In conclusion, the three above-mentioned studies proved that dsDNA has homology-sensing ability and can self-assemble, but the mechanism underlying the phenomenon remains enigmatic. The next issue to be discussed is whether nucleosomes, the fundamental units of chromatin (Luger et al., 1997), have sequence-dependent self and non-self discrimination properties. Regarding this, to our knowledge, no report has ever been presented. Before moving on to this subject, let’s review the structures of chromatin and nucleosomes.
4. Nucleosomes, the fundamental units of chromatin
Chromatin provides the structural basis for all nuclear events involving DNA, such as replication, transcription, repair and recombination (Ransom et al., 2010; Svejstrup, 2010; Weake and Workman, 2010). The main building block of chromatin is the nucleosome (Oudet et al., 1975), the core of which consists of 146-147 bp of DNA and a histone octamer of two each of the four core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The DNA is wrapped around the histones to form 1.65-1.67 turns of left-handed supercoils (Davey et al., 2002; Luger et al., 1997). The main body of chromatin fibers has nucleosome cores, core-connecting linker DNAs (Felsenfeld and Groudine, 2003; Simpson, 1978), and a specific complement of associated proteins such as the linker histone H1, localized at DNA entry and exit sites protruding from the nucleosome core, and architectural proteins (McBryant et al., 2006, 2010; Thoma et al., 1979). The simplest form of chromatin is the “beads-on-a-string” structures (10 nm fibers) formed by nucleosomes and linker DNAs (Thoma et al., 1979). The secondary packaging level of chromatin is thought to be 30 nm fibers, which have been observed in thin sections of intact cells and whole mount preparations (Igo-Kemenes et al., 1982; Kornberg, 1977; Richmond and Widom, 2000; and references therein). High ionic strength and the presence of linker histones can fold 10 nm fibers into 30 nm fibers
5. Nucleosomes can self-assemble
Our recent study (Nishikawa and Ohyama, 2013) strongly suggested that nucleosomes have sequence-dependent self and non-self discrimination properties, and can self-assemble. We constructed oligonucleosomes using DNA octamers or tetramers and histone cores. Each of the original DNA fragments had 177 or 209 base pairs and contained a clone of
6. DNA self-assembly and nucleosome self-assembly may be key players in presynaptic alignment
The pairing of homologous chromosomes begins during the late
In mammals, plants and fungi, the recombination pathway is often functionally interdigitated with presynaptic alignments and synapsis. Namely, in some organisms, meiotic double-stranded break (DSB) formation and recombination are required for these processes (Zickler, 2006; Zetka, 2009). On the other hand, in
7. Conclusion
In this chapter, we have described that both DNA and nucleosomes have sequence-dependent self and non-self discrimination properties, and can self-assemble. These properties of DNA and nucleosomes seem to be the key mediators of presynaptic alignment in some organisms. We hypothesize that the attractive force facilitating DNA self-assembly and nucleosome self-assembly is widely employed in many biological processes, including not only meiotic chromosome pairing but also somatic chromosome pairing, such as polytene chromosome formation in
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology - Japan (MEXT) to T.O.
References
- 1.
Asakura S 1968 A kinetic study of in vitro polymerization of flagellin. J. Mol. Biol.35 237 239 - 2.
Baldwin G. S Brooks N. J Robson R. E Wynveen A Goldar A Leikin S andSeddon J. M Kornyshev A. A 2008 DNA double helices recognize mutual sequence homology in a protein free environment. J. Phys. Chem. B112 1060 1064 - 3.
Blumenstiel J. P Fu R andTheurkauf W. E Hawley R. S 2008 Components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal associations are dispensable for meiotic and early somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics180 1355 1365 - 4.
Cook P. R 1997 The transcriptional basis of chromosome pairing. J. Cell Sci.110 1033 1040 - 5.
Danilowicz C Lee C. H Kim K Hatch K Coljee V. W andKleckner N Prentiss M 2009 Single molecule detection of direct, homologous, DNA/DNA pairing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106 19824 19829 - 6.
Davey C. A Sargent D. F Luger K andMaeder A. W Richmond T. J 2002 Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol.319 1097 1113 - 7.
Dernburg A. F Mcdonald K Moulder G Barstead R andDresser M Villeneuve A. M 1998 Meiotic recombination inC. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell94 387 398 - 8.
Ding D. Q Okamasa K Yamane M Tsutsumi C Haraguchi T andYamamoto M Hiraoka Y 2012 Meiosis-specific noncoding RNA mediates robust pairing of homologous chromosomes in meiosis. Science336 732 736 - 9.
MacLellan, K.M., Maeshima, K., Frangakis, A.S. and Dubochet, J. (Eltsov M 2008 Analysis of cryo-electron microscopy images does not support the existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in mitotic chromosomes in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105 19732 19737 - 10.
andFelsenfeld G Groudine M 2003 Controlling the double helix. Nature421 448 453 - 11.
andFinch J. T Klug A 1976 Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA73 1897 1901 - 12.
andFraenkel-conrat H Williams R. C 1955 Reconstitution of active tobacco mosaic virus from its inactive protein and nucleic acid components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA41 690 698 - 13.
MacRae, T.P. and Suzuki, E. (Fraser R. D 1976 Structure of the alpha-keratin microfibril. J. Mol. Biol.108 435 452 - 14.
Fussner E andChing R. W Bazett-jones D. P 2011 Living without 30 nm chromatin fibers. Trends Biochem. Sci.36 1 6 - 15.
Horváth I andKirály C Szerb J 1949 Action of cardiac glycosides on the polymerization of actin. Nature 164, 792. - 16.
Huynh V. A andRobinson P. J. J Rhodes D 2005 A method for thein vitro reconstitution of a defined "30 nm" chromatin fibre containing stoichiometric amounts of the linker histone. J. Mol. Biol.345 957 968 - 17.
Igo-kemenes T andHörz W Zachau H. G 1982 Chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem.51 89 121 - 18.
Inoue S Sugiyama S andTravers A. A Ohyama T 2007 Self-assembly of double-stranded DNA molecules at nanomolar concentrations. Biochemistry46 164 171 - 19.
Jehle H 1950 Specificity of Interaction Between Identical Molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA36 238 246 - 20.
Jehle H 1963 Intermolecular forces and biological specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA50 516 524 - 21.
Kornberg R. D 1977 Structure of chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem.46 931 954 - 22.
andKornyshev A. A Leikin S 2001 Sequence recognition in the pairing of DNA duplexes. Phys. Rev. Lett.86 3666 3669 - 23.
Kushner D. J 1969 Self-assembly of biological structures. Bacteriol. Rev.33 302 345 - 24.
andLowary P. T Widom J 1998 New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol.276 19 42 - 25.
Luger K Mader A. W Richmond R. K andSargent D. F Richmond T. J 1997 Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature389 251 260 - 26.
Mcbryant S. J andAdams V. H Hansen J. C 2006 Chromatin architectural proteins. Chromosome Res.14 39 51 - 27.
Mcbryant S. J andLu X Hansen J. C 2010 Multifunctionality of the linker histones: an emerging role for protein-protein interactions. Cell Res.20 519 528 - 28.
Mcgavin S 1971 Models of specifically paired like (homologous) nucleic acid structures. J. Mol. Biol.55 293 298 - 29.
Mckee B. D 2004 Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1677 165 180 - 30.
Mckim K. S Green-marroquin B. L Sekelsky J. J Chin G Steinberg C andKhodosh R Hawley R. S 1998 Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science279 876 878 - 31.
andMiki-noumura T Mori H 1972 Polymerization of tubulin: the linear polymer and its side-by-side aggregates. J. Mechanochem. Cell Motil.1 175 188 - 32.
Mueller P Rudin D. O andTien H. T Wescott W. C 1962 Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system. Nature194 979 980 - 33.
andNishikawa J Ohyama T 2013 Selective association between nucleosomes with identical DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.41 1544 1554 - 34.
Nishino Y Eltsov M Joti Y Ito K Takata H Takahashi Y Hihara S Frangakis A. S Imamoto N andIshikawa T Maeshima K 2012 Human mitotic chromosomes consist predominantly of irregularly folded nucleosome fibres without a 30-nm chromatin structure. EMBO J.31 1644 1653 - 35.
andOosawa F Asakura S 1975 Thermodynamics of the Polymerization of Protein (London: Academic Press). - 36.
Oudet P andGross-bellard M Chambon P 1975 Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell4 281 300 - 37.
Perham R. N 1975 Self-assembly of biological macromolecules. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B272 123 136 - 38.
Ransom M andDennehey B. K Tyler J. K 2010 Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair. Cell140 183 195 - 39.
andRichmond T. J Widom J 2000 Nucleosome and chromatin structure. In Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression, S.C.R. Elgin, and J.L. Workman, eds. (New York: Oxford University Press)1 23 - 40.
Robinson P. J. J Fairall L andHuynh V. A. T Rhodes D 2006 EM measurements define the dimensions of the “30-nm” chromatin fiber: Evidence for a compact, interdigitated structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103 6506 6511 - 41.
Schalch T Duda S andSargent D. F Richmond T. J 2005 X-ray structure of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre. Nature436 138 141 - 42.
Simpson R. T 1978 Structure of the chromatosome, a chromatin particle containing 160 base pairs of DNA and all the histones. Biochemistry17 5524 5531 - 43.
andStack S. M Anderson L. K 2001 A model for chromosome structure during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles. Chromosome Res.9 175 198 - 44.
Svejstrup J. Q 2010 The interface between transcription and mechanisms maintaining genome integrity. Trends Biochem. Sci.35 333 338 - 45.
andTerasaki M Rubin H 1985 Evidence that intracellular magnesium is present in cells at a regulatory concentration for protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA82 7324 7326 - 46.
Thoma F andKoller T. H Klug A 1979 Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J. Cell Biol.83 403 427 - 47.
andWatson J. D Crick F. H. C 1953 Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature171 737 738 - 48.
andWeake V. M Workman J. L 2010 Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Genet.11 426 437 - 49.
andWhitesides G. M Grzybowski B 2002 Self-assembly at all scales. Science295 2418 2421 - 50.
Williams S. P Athey B. D Muglia L. J Schappe R. S andGough A. H Langmore J. P 1986 Chromatin fibers are left-handed double helices with diameter and mass per unit length that depend on linker length. Biophys. J.49 233 248 - 51.
Woodcock C. L. F andFrado L. L. Y Rattner J. B 1984 The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement. J. Cell Biol.99 42 52 - 52.
Yos J. M andBade W. L Jehle H 1957 Specificity of the London-Eisenschitz Wang force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA43 341 346 - 53.
Zetka M 2009 Homologue pairing, recombination and segregation inCaenorhabditis elegan s. In Meiosis (Genome Dynamics5 R. Benavente, and J.-N. Volff, eds. (Basel: Karger)43 55 - 54.
Zickler D 2006 From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma115 158 174