Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Phenolic Extractives and Natural Resistance of Wood

Written By

M. S. Nascimento, A. L. B. D. Santana, C. A. Maranhão, L. S. Oliveira and L. Bieber

Submitted: July 7th, 2012 Reviewed: March 11th, 2013 Published: June 14th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/56358

From the Edited Volume

Biodegradation

Edited by Rolando Chamy and Francisca Rosenkranz

Chapter metrics overview

3,701 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Wood is a natural organic material that consists mainly of two groups of organic compounds: carbohydrates (hemicelluloses and cellulose) and phenols (lignin), that correspond to (65-75%) and (20-30%), respectively (Pettersen 1984). The wood is also constituted of minor amounts of extraneous materials, mostly in the form of organic extractives (usually 4–10%) and inorganic minerals (ash), mainly calcium, potassium, and magnesium, besides manganese and silica.

Generally, wood has an elemental composition of about 50% carbon, 6% hydrogen, 43% oxygen, trace amounts of nitrogen and several metal ions.

Cellulose is a long-chain linear polymer exclusively constructed of β-1,4-linked D-glucose units which can appear as a highly crystalline material (Fan et al, 1982). Often 5000 to 15000 glucose rings are polymerized into a single cellulose molecule.

Hemicelluloses consist of relatively short heteropolymers consisting of the pentoses D-xylose and L-arabinose and the hexoses, D-glucose, D-mannose, D-galactose, D-rhamnose and their corresponding uronic acids. It is composed of only 500-3000 sugar units, and thus has a shorter chain than cellulose (Saka 1991)

Lignin, the third cell wall component, is an aromatic polymer synthesized from phenylpropanoid precursors (Adler 1977). It is a three-dimensional polymer formed of coniferyl, syringyl, and coumaryl alcohol units with many different types of linkages between the building blocks and by far the most complex of all natural polymers.

Extractives are chemical constituents residing in the lignocellulosic tissue that contains an higher diversity of organic compounds, for example triglycerides, steryl esters, fatty acids, sterols, neutral compounds, such as fatty alcohols, sterols, phenolic compounds such as tannins (Fava et al, 2006), quinones (Carter et al, 1978; Ganapaty et al, 2004), flavonoids (Reyes-Chilpa et al, 1995; Ohmura et al, 2000; Chen et al, 2004; Morimoto et al, 2006; Sirmah et al, 2009), besides terpenoids (Kawaguchi et al, 1989; Chang et al, 2000; Watanabe et al, 2005) and alkaloids (Kawaguchi et al, 1989).

Advertisement

2. Extractives and natural resistance of wood

Cellulose is the major structural component of wood and also the major food of insects and decay fungi. Termites, like fungi, are important biological agents in the biodegradation of wood (Syofuna et al, 2012).

Extractives are low molecular weight compounds present in wood (Chang et al, 2001), also called secondary metabolites, and are indeed crucial for many important functional aspects of plant life. The relationship between extractives and natural durability of wood was first reported by Hawley et al (1924). The natural durability of wood is often related with its toxic extractive components (Scheffer and Cowling 1966; Carter et al, 1978; Hillis 1987; McDaniel 1992; Taylor 2006; Santana et al, 2010).

Heartwood extractives retard wood decay can protect the wood against decay organisms (Walker 1993, Hinterstoisser et al, 2000; Schultz and Nicholas 2002), but the natural durability is extremely complex and additional factors such as density of wood and lignin content, besides this dual fungicidal and antioxidant action, may be involved (Schultz and Nicholas 2002).

Several studies have shown that after removal of extractives, durable wood loses its natural resistance and makes them more susceptible to decay (Ohmura, 2000; Taylor et al, 2002; Oliveira et al, 2010). Several authors investigated the relationships between the wood properties and extractives (Carter et al, 1978; Schultz et al, 1990; Reyes-Chilpa et al, 1998; Chang et al, 1999; Morimoto et al, 2006).

One of the most limiting factors for the commercial utilization of wood is its low resistance to fungi and termites, especially in the semi-arid and sub-humid tropics. The biodegradation is supposed to be one of the major challenges to incur the heavy economic loss. Wood decay fungi and some species of termites are important and potent wood-destroying organisms attacking various components of the wood (Istek et al, 2005; Gonçalves and Oliveira 2006).

The largest group of fungi that degrades wood is the basidiomycetes and is divided into: white-rot, brown- rot and soft-rot fungi (Anke et al, 2006). Brown-rot fungi occurs most often in buildings, can degrade only structural carbohydrates (cellulose and hemicellulose), leaving lignin essentially undigested, whereas white-rot fungi utilize all wood constituents including both the carbohydrates and the lignin. Soft-rot fungi utilize preferably carbohydrates, but also degrade lignin (Belie et al, 2000). They hydrolyze and assimilate as food the lignocellulose components by injecting enzymes into the wood cells (Erickson et al, 1990).

Termites cause significant losses to annual and perennial crops and damage to wooden components in buildings (Verma 2010). Damage caused by subterranean termites, Nasutitermes, Coptotermesand Reticulitermeshistorically has been a concern of researchers worldwide. Korb (2007) estimated annual damage caused by termites at about U.S. $50 billion worldwide. In the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, alone, a 20-year loss of $3.5 billion was incurred (Lelis, 1994).

The concentration of extractives varies among species, between individual trees of the same species and within a single tree. Some of these extractives render the heartwood unpalatable to wood destroying organisms. Factors affecting wood consumption by termites and fungi are numerous and complexly related. The amount however can vary from season to season even in the same tissue or are restricted in certain wood species (Taylor et al, 2006).

Several woods contain extractives which are toxic or deterrent for termites, bacteria and fungi resistance (Maranhão 2013; Taylor et al, 2006). Termite resistance of wood is a function of heartwood extractive variability while individual extractives inhibit fungal growth (Neya at al, 2004; Arango et al, 2006).

Biological deterioration of wood is of concern to the timber industry due to the economic losses caused to wood in service or in storage. Fungi, insects, termites, marine borers and bacteria are the principal wood biodegraders. They attack different components of wood at different rates giving rise to a particular pattern of damage (Sirmah 2009). Degradation is influenced by environmental conditions of the wood; whether in storage or in use. The degraded wood material is returned into the soil to enhance its fertility (Silva et al, 2007).

The proposal of this study is to demonstrate the importance of phenolic compounds in natural resistence of wood biodegradation. We collected information of the most representative phenolic compounds (flavonoids, stilbenes, quinones and tannins) found in wood, responsible for resistance of some wood species to bio-degraders (Toshiaki 2001; Windeisen et al, 2002).

Advertisement

3. Flavonoids

Flavonoids are secondary metabolites that occur naturally in all plant families (Harbone 1973). Widely distributed in all parts of plants, these compounds afford protection against ultraviolet radiation, pathogens, and herbivores (Harbone and Willians 2000). The general structure includes a C15 (C6-C3-C6) skeleton joined to a chroman ring (benzopyran moiety), classified into flavanones, flavones, chalcones, dihydroflavonols, flavonols, aurones, flavan-3-ols, flavan-3,4-diols, anthocyanidins, isoflavonoids, and neoflavonoids. Some examples of each class of flavonoids are described in figure 1.

Figure 1.

Classification of flavonoids

Flavonoids have an important effect on the durability of wood (Chang et al, 2001; Wang et al, 2004). Accord to Schultz and Nicholas (2000) flavonoids protect heartwood against fungal colonization by a dual function: fungicidal activity and being excellent free radical scavengers (antioxidants). Flavonoids are natural antioxidants and have received attention due to their role in the neutralization or scavenging of free radicals (Gupta and Prakash 2009). Pietarinen (2006) showed that the radical scavenging activity is particularly important because both white-rot and brown-rot fungi are believed to use radicals to disrupt cell walls.

The heartwood of Lonchocarpus castilloiStandley (Leguminosae) is highly resistant to attack by the dry wood termites Cryptotermes brevis(Walker) (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Two flavonoid isolated from the heartwood of this plant, castillen D and castillen E (Figure 2), that presented feeding deterrent activity to C. brevis(Reves-Chilpa et al, 1995).

Figure 2.

Structure of castillen E and castillen D

Ohmura et al (2000) reported that flavonoids present in Larix leptolepis(Pinaceae) wood, principally taxifolin and aromadedrin, showed strong feeding deterrent activities against the subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanusShiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and suggested that some flavonoids such as quercetin and taxifolin (Figure 3) might be useful for termite control agents considering their abundance in plants.

Figure 3.

Structure of quercetin and taxifolin

The heartwood of Acacia auriculiformis(Leguminosae) has been shown to contain a number of different flavonoids and proanthocyanidins content (Sarai et al, 1980; Barry et al, 2005). According to Schultz et al (1995) the durability of Acaciaspecies was attributed the presence of dihydromorin and aromadedrin (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Structure of dihydromorin and aromadendrin

From heartwood of Morus mesozygia(Moraceae), besides dihydromorin, were isolated morin and pinobanksin (Figure 5), but the resistance against wooddestroying basidiomycetes, Coriolus versicolor, Lentinus squarrosulusand Poriaspp. was related to the presence of dihydromorin (Toirambe Bamoninga and Ouattara, 2008).

Figure 5.

Structure of morin and pinobanksin

According to Sirmah et al (2009) the durability of Prosopis juliflorawood (Leguminosae) was assigned to (−)-mesquitol (Figure 6), but Pizzo et al (2011) related that (-)-mesquitol alone cannot be considered the single most important factor in determining the durability of the Prosopisspecies. Laboratory tests indicated that the heartwood of P. juliflorawas resistance against to both white- and brown-rot fungi (Sirmah 2009).

Figure 6.

Structure of mesquitol

The antifeedant activity of some flavonoids against the subterranean termite Coptotermes formosanusShiraki was examined with no-choice tests and two-choice tests (Ohmura et al, 2000). The structure-activity relationships of these flavonoids (Figure 7) were evaluated and it was found that flavonoids containing hydroxyl groups at C-5 and C-7 in A-rings showed high antifeedant activity. Furthermore, the presence of a carbonyl group at C-4 in the pyran rings of the compounds was necessary for the occurrence of high activity. 3-hydroxyflavones and 3-hydroxyflavanones with 3’, 4’- dihydroxylated B-rings exhibited higher activity than those with 4’-hydroxylated B-rings.

Figure 7.

Flavonoids and antifeedant activity against the subterranean termiteC. formosanus

The antifeedant activities of pterocarpans isolated from the heartwood of Pterocarpus macrocarpusKruz. (Leguminosae) were evaluated against the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes speratusKolbe (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Three isolated pterocarpans, (-)-homopterocarpin, (-)-pterocarpin, and (-)-hydroxyhomopterocarpin were tested (Figure 8). The most active antifeedant against R. speratuswas (-)-homopterocarpin. However, all pterocarpans showed antifeedant activity against R. speratus(Morimoto et al, 2006).

Figure 8.

Structure of homopterocarpin, pterocarpin and hydroxyhomopterocarpin

From the heartwood of Dalbergia latifolia(Leguminosae) were isolated and identified as active against termites and fungi, the neoflavonoids, latifolin, dalbergiphenol, and 4-methoxydalbergione (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Structure of latifolin, dalbergiphenol, and 4-methoxydalbergione

With respect to activity against Trametes versicolor, a white-rot basidiomycete, latifolin and 4-methoxydalbergione showed activity. Dalbergiphenol exhibited relatively high antifungal activity against the brown-rot basidiomycete, Fomitopusis palustris(Sekine et al, 2009).

Latifolin showed high termiticidal activity and termite-antifeedant against Reticulitermes speratus(Kolbe). Dalbergiphenol and 4-methoxydalbergione exhibited moderate termite-antifeedant activity (Sekine et al, 2009).

The structure-activity relationships of latifolin (Figure 10) and its derivatives were analyzed to check if there was a correlation between antitermitic and antifungal activity. It was found that the termite mortality in response to the derivatives 2’-O-methyllatifolin, latifolin dimethyl ether, and latifolin diacetate increased 2-fold compared to latifolin. No difference was presented in mortality of termites in the presence of 5-O-methyllatifolin and latifolin. The results indicate that the phenolic hydroxyl group at C-5 of the A ring provides antitermitic activities.

Figure 10.

Structure of latifolin and its derivatives

With respect to antifungal activity of these compounds, it was found that all compounds presented less activity against white- and brown-rot fungi than latifolin. In addition, both C-5 and C-2’ phenolic hydroxyl groups in the A and B rings have antifungal activity against white- and brown-rot fungi. In conclusion, the bioactivity of latifolin depends upon the position of phenolic hydroxyl groups (Sekine et al, 2009).

The heartwood of Dalbergia congestifloraPittier (Leguminosae) tree presented natural resistance to fungal attack. The antifungal effect of various extracts from the D. congestifloraheartwood was evaluated against Trametes versicolorfungus (Martínez-Sotres et al, 2012). The major component of hexane extract that caused 100% growth inhibition from tested fungi was characterized as (-)-Medicarpin (Figure 11). Medicarpin also isolated from heartwood of Platymiscium yucatanum(Leguminosae) was identified active against T. versicolor(Reyes-Chilpa et al, 1998).

Figure 11.

Structure of medicarpin

Advertisement

4. Quinones

Various types of quinones (benzoquinones, naphthoquinones, or anthraquinones) occur in many plant families (Toshiaki 2001). The above mentioned classification of quinones is described in Figure 12. Termite resistant woods are said to contain allelochemicals such as quinones that possess natural repellent and toxic properties (Carter et al, 1978; Scheffrahn 1991; Ganapy et al, 2004; Dungani et al, 2012).

Figure 12.

Classification of quinones

The heartwood of Tectona grandisL. f. (Lamiaceae) contains a large amount of quinones that possess considerable influence on the natural durability of teak wood. The naphthoquinone, 4’, 5’–dihydroxyepiisocatalponol (Figure 13) plays a key role in the resistance of teak against fungi attack. In-vitro bioassays indicated that this compound acted as a fungicide against the White-rot fungi Trametes versicolor(Niamké et al, 2012). Tectoquinone (Figure 13), a anthraquinone, presented strong antitermitic activity and is assumed to be at the origin of the resistance of teak wood to termites (Haupt et al, 2003; Kokutse et al, 2006). According to Wolcott (1955) this substance is highly repellent to the dry-wood termite Cryptotermes brevis(Walker) and Sandermann and Dietrichs (1957) demonstrated its toxicity to subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes.

Figure 13.

Structure of 4’, 5’–dihydroxyepiisocatalponol and tectoquinone

Castillo and Rossini (2010) isolated naphthoquinones from heartwood of Catalpa bignonioides(Bignoniaceae) that showed activity against the termite Reticulitermes flavipes. The most abundant and active termiticidal compounds were catalponol and catalponone (Figure 14).

Figure 14.

Structure of catalponol and catalponone

From heartwood of Tabebuia impetiginosa(Bignoniaceae) were isolated naphthoquinones, mainly lapachol (Figure 15), that showed no repellent activity to Reticulitermestermites but it was repellent to two other termites, Microcerotermes crassus(Isoptera: Termitidae) and Kalotermes flavicollis(Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) (Becker et al, 1972).

Figure 15.

Structure of lapachol

The naphthoquinone, 7-methyljuglone (Figure 16) was isolated and identified as termicidal constituent of heartwood of Diospyros virginianaL. (Ebenaceae). Its dimer, isodiospyrin possess also termicidal activity against Reticulirmes flavipes, but to a lesser extent (Carter et al, 1978).

Figure 16.

Structure of 7-methyljuglone and isodiospyrin

Advertisement

5. Stilbenes

Stilbenes are compounds possessing the 1,2-diphenylethene structure, as well as bibenzyls and phenanthrenes, which are composed of C6-C2-C6 skeleton. Stilbenes derivatives of 1,2-diphenylethlene, process a conjugated double bond system. There are two isomeric forms of 1,2-diphenylethylene: trans-stilbene and cis-stilbene, and the chemical structure of these two stilbenes are shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17.

The chemical structure of stilbenes

Hydroxylated trans-stilbene has an important role in heartwood durability, especially for a resistance to fungal decay. The durability and resistance to decay by Pinus sylvestris(Pinaceae) is due to pinosylvins (Figure 18). Pinosylvin present in the heartwood of Pinusspecies is formed as a response to external stress such as fungal infections or UV light. The 2, 4, 3’, 5’-tetra and 3, 4, 5, 3’, 5’-pentahydroxystilbenes are responsible for wood resistance against Brown-rot and whit-rot fungi (Schultz et al, 1995).

Figure 18.

The chemical structure of pinosylvin and derivates

From the heartwood of Bagassa guianensis(Moraceae) was isolated moracins including others polyphenols such as flavonoids and stilbenoids (Figure 19), that presented activity against Pycnoporus sanguineus,a white-rot fungus. Possible synergism between compounds have been hypothesized (Royer et al, 2012).

Figure 19.

The chemical structure polyphenols fromB. guianensis

Advertisement

6. Tannins

Tannins constitute a distinctive and unique group of higher plant metabolites. They presented polyphenolic character and relatively large molecular size (from 500 to >20,000). They are thought by some to constitute one of the most important groups of higher plant defensive secondary metabolites (Haslam 1989).

The designation of tannin includes compounds of two distinct chemical groups: hydrolysable tannins (Figure 20) and condensed tannins (Figure 21).

Figure 20.

Structure of hydrolysable tannins

Hydrolysable tannins are molecules with a polyol (D-glucose) as a central core. The hydroxyl groups of these carbohydrates are partially or totally esterified with phenolic groups like gallic acid (gallotannins) or ellagic acid (ellagitannins). Hydrolysable tannins are usually present in low amounts in plants.

Condensed tannins are probably the most ubiquitous of all plant phenolics, and presented exceptional concentrations in the barks and heartwoods of a variety of tree species. They are oligomers or polymers of flavonoid units (flavan-3-ol) linked by carbon-carbon bonds not susceptible to cleavage by hydrolysis (Sirmah 2009).

Figure 21.

Structure of condensed tannins

Condensed tannins are natural preservatives and antifungal agents, found in high concentrations in the bark and wood of some tree species (Zucker 1983). Most plant-pathogenic fungi excrete extracellular enzymes such as cellulases and lignases, involved in the invasion and spread of the pathogen. Condensed tannins most likely act as inhibitors of these enzymes by complexing, blocking their action (Peter et al, 2008). For this reason, extract from various woods and barks rich in tannin have been used as adhesives and wood preservatives for a long time (Brandt 1952; Plomely 1966; Mitchell and Sleeter 1980; Pizzi and Merlin 1981; Laks et al, 1988; Lotz and Hollaway 1988; Toussaint 1997; Thevenon 1999).

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

The protection of wood against biodeterioration is related to its chemical composition, mainly due to the accumulation of extractives in the heartwood. Wood extractives are nonstructural wood components that play a major role in the susceptibility of wood against wood decay organisms. The attack of these organisms in general can be prevented with synthetic organic and inorganic preservatives; however, such products are very harmful to human health and the environment. Several studies have considered that, it is possible the application of wood extractives as natural preservatives. The main components of wood extractives that confers natural resistance against biodeterioration agents are, tannins, flavonoids, quinones and stilbenes.

  • Frequently, condensed tannin can be obtained inexpensively by extracting the bark materials with hot water solvent and has been used as preservatives for a long time.

  • Flavonoids exhibit antifungical activity as well as feeding deterrent activities against subterranean termites.

  • Quinones – possess natural repellent and toxic properties, mainly against termites.

  • Stilbenes has an important role in heartwood durability, especially for a resistance to fungal decay.

The characteristics of all wood species are described in Table 1.

Scientific nameFamilie nameCommon nameResistanceOrigin
Acacia auriculiformisLeguminosaeAustralian wattleDurable wood
(Ashaduzzaman et al, 2011)
Australia, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea
Bagassa guianensisMoraceaeTatajubaVery resistant (Rover et al. 2012)Guianas and Brazil
Catalpa bignonioidesBignoniaceaeCommon Catalpa
Indian Bean
Highly decay resistant heartwood (Muñoz-Mingarro et al, 2006)North America
Dalbergia congestifoliaPittierLeguminosaeRosewoodResistant wood (Martínez-sotres et al, 2012)Central America
Dalbergia latifoliaLeguminosaeIndian rosewoodResistant wood (Lemmens, 2008)Asia
Diospyros virginianaEbenaceaeCommon persimmon-Africa, Asia
Larix leptolepisPinaceaeJapanece larchresistant (Schaffer and Morrell 1998)Japan
Lonchocarpus castilloiLeguminosaeBlack cabbage barkvery resistant
(Schaffer and Morrell 1998)
Latin America
Morus mesozygiaMoraceaeMulberryNon-resistant (Schaffer and Morrell 1998)Africa
Pinus sylvestrisPinaceaeRedwood, Scots pineNon-resistant (Schaffer and Morrell 1998)Europe, Asia
Platymiscium yucatanumLeguminosaeGranadillovery resistant (Schaffer and Morrell 1998)Latin America
Prosopis julifloraLeguminosaeMesquite, algarrobaResistant
(Ramos et al, 2006)
South and Central America
Pterocarpus macrocarpusLeguminosaeBurma padaukvery resistant
(Schaffer and Morrell 1998)
Native to Thailand and Myanmar
Tabebuia impetiginosaBrazil woodVery resistant (Paes et al, 2005)Latin America
Tectona grandisL. f.LamiaceaeteakVery resistant (Kokutse et al, 2006)Native to southern Asia

Table 1.

List of wood species with their family, common names, resistance and distribution.

References

  1. 1. AdfaMYoshimuraTKomuraKKoketsuM2010Antitermite activities of coumarin derivatives and scopoletin fromProtium javanicumBurm. f. Journal of Chemical Ecology36720726
  2. 2. AdlerE1977Lignin chemistry-past, present and future. Wood Sci. Technol.11169218
  3. 3. AmusantNMorettiCRichardBProstENuzillardJ. MThevenonM. F2007Chemical compounds from Eperua falcata andEperua grandifloraheartwood and their biological activities against wood destroying fungus (Coriolus versicolor). Holz als Roh- und Werkstof652328
  4. 4. AnkeHRolandWWeberS2006White-rots, chlorine and the environment- a tale of many twists. Mycologist2038389
  5. 5. Arango, R. A, Green III, F, Hintz, K, Lebow, P. K, & Miller, R. B. (2006). Natural durability of tropical and native wood against termite damage byReticulitermes flavis(Kollar). International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 57, 146-150.
  6. 6. AshaduzzamanMDasA. KShamsM. I2011Natural Decay Resistance ofAcacia auriculiformisCunn. ex. Benth andDalbergia sissooRoxb. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res.,46225230
  7. 7. BarryK. MMiharaRDaviesN. WMitsunagaTMohammedC. L2005Polyphenols inAcacia mangiumandA. auriculiformisheartwood with reference to heart rot. J. Wood Sci.51615621
  8. 8. BeckerGLenzMDietzS1972Unterschiede im Verhalten und der Giftempfindlichkeit verschiedener Termiten-Arten gegenuber einigen Kernholzstoffen. Z. Angew. Entomol.71201214
  9. 9. BeckwithJ. R1998Durability of Wood. University of Georgia School of Forest Resources Extension Publication for98026
  10. 10. BelieN. DRichardsonMBraamC. RSvennerstedtBLenehanJ. JSonckB2000Durability of Building Materials and Components in the Agricultural Environment: Part I, The agricultural environment and timber structures. J. agric. Engng Res.75225241
  11. 11. BrandtT. G1952Mangrove tannin-formaldehyde resins as hot-pressed plywood adhesives. Tectona, 42, 137.
  12. 12. CarterF. LGarloA. MStanelyJ. B1978Termiticidal components of wood extracts: 7-methyl-juglone fromDiospyros virginiana. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry26869873
  13. 13. CastilloLRossiniC2010Bignoniaceae Metabolites as Semiochemicals. Molecules20101570907105
  14. 14. ChangS. TWangJ-HWuC. LChenP. FKuoY. H2000Comparison of the antifungal activity of cadinane skeletal sesquiterpenoid from Taiwania (Tawania CrypromerioidesHayara) heartwood. Holzforschung543241245
  15. 15. ChangSTWangS. -YWuC. -LSuY. -CKuoY.-H.1999Antifungal compounds in the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the extractives of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioidesHayata) heartwood. Holzforschung535487490
  16. 16. ChenKOhmuraWDoiSAoyamaM2004Termite feeding deterrent from Japanese larch wood. Resource Technology95129134
  17. 17. Dungani, R, Bhat, I. U. H, Abdul Khalil, H. P. S, Naif, A, & Hermawan, D. (2012). Evaluation of Antitermitic Activity of Different Extract Obtained from Indonesian Teakwood (Tectona grandisL.f). Journal of Bioresources7214521461
  18. 18. ErickssonK. E. LBlanchetteR. AAnderP1990Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 407p.
  19. 19. FanL. TLeeY. HGharpurayM. M1982The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis. Adv. Biochem. Eng.23158187
  20. 20. Fava, F, Monteiro de Barros, M, Stumpp, E, & Ramão Marceli Jr., F. (2006). Aqueous extract to repel or exterminate termites. Patent Application WO2005BR173 20050824.
  21. 21. Ganapaty, S, Thomas, P. S, Fotso, S, & Laatsch, H. (2004). Antitermitic quinones fromDisopyros sylvatica. Phytochemistry, 65, 1265-1271.
  22. 22. GonçalvesF. GOliveiraJ. T. S2006Resistência ao ataque de cupim-de-madeira seca (Cryptotermes brevis) em seis espécies florestais. Cerne,1218083
  23. 23. GuptaSPrakashJ2009Studies on Indian green leafy vegetables for their antioxidant activity. Plant Foods and Human Nutrition643945
  24. 24. HarborneJ. B1973Phytochemical Methods. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London49188
  25. 25. HarborneB. JWilliamsA. CAdvances in flavonoids research since1992Phytochemistry.55481504
  26. 26. HauptMLeithoffHMeierDPulsJRichterH. DFaixO2003Heartwood extractives and natural durability of plantation-grown teakwood (Tectona grandis L.)- a case study. Holz als Roh- und Werkst.616473474
  27. 27. HawleyL. FFleckL. CRichardsC. A1924The relation between durability and chemical composition in wood. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry.167699700
  28. 28. HinterstoisserBStefkeBSchwanningerM2000Wood: Raw material- material-Source of Energy for the future. Lignovisionen22936
  29. 29. IstekASivrikayaHErogluHGulsoyS. K2005Biodegradation ofAbies bornmülleriana(Mattf.) andFagus orientalis(L.) by the white rot fungusPhanerochaete chrysosporium. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation556367
  30. 30. Kawaguchi, H, Kim, M, Ishida, M, Ahn, Y. J, Yamamoto, T, Yamaoka, R, Kozuka, M, Goto, K, & Takhashi, S. (1989). Several antifeedants fromPhellodendron amurenseagainst Reticulitermes speratus. Agricultural Biology and Chemistry5326352640
  31. 31. KokutseA. DStokesABailleresHKokouKBaudasseC2006Decay resistance of Togolese teak (Tectona grandisL.) heartwood and relationship with colour. Trees 20, 219 223.
  32. 32. KorbJ2007Termites. Current Biology17995999
  33. 33. LaksP. EMckaigP. AHemingwayR. W1988Flavanoid biocides: wood preservatives based on condensed tannins. Holzforschung42299306
  34. 34. LelisA. T1994Termite problem in São Paulo City-Brazil. In: Lenoir, A., Arnold, G., Lepage, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the International Union for the Study of Social Insects-IUSSI, Paris4246
  35. 35. LemmensR. H. M. J2008Dalbergia latifoliaRoxb. In: Louppe, D.; Oteng-Amoako, A. A.; Brink, M. (Editors). Prota 7(1): Timbers/Bois d’œuvre 1. [CD-Rom]. PROTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  36. 36. LotzR. WHollawayD. F1988Wood preservation. US patent4732817
  37. 37. MaranhãoC. APinheiroI. OSantanaL. B. D. AOliveiraL. SNascimentoM. SBieberL. W2013Antitermitic and antioxidant activities of heartwood extracts and main flavonoids ofHymenaea stigonocarpaMart. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation79913
  38. 38. Martínez-Sotres, C, López-Albarrán, P, Cruz-de-León, J, García-Moreno, T, Rutiagaquiñones, J. G, Vázquez-Marrufo, G, Tamariz-Mascarúa, J, & Herrera-Bucio, R. (2012). Medicarpin, an antifungal compound identified in hexane extract ofDalbergia congestifloraPittier heartwood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 69, 38-40.
  39. 39. McdanielC. A1992Major antitermitic components of the heartwood ofSouthern Catalpa. Journal of Chemical Ecology183359369
  40. 40. MitchellRSleeterT. D1980Protecting wood from wood degrading organisms. US patent4220688
  41. 41. MorimotoMFukumotoHHirataniMChavasirWKomaiK2006Insect Antifeedants, Pterocarpans and Pterocarpol in Heartwood ofPterocarpus macrocarpusKruz. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.7018641868
  42. 42. Muñoz-mingarro, D, Acero, N, Llinares, F, Pozuelo, J. M, Galán de Mera, A, Vicenten, J. A, Morales, L, Alguacil, L. F, & Pérez, C. (2003). Biological activity of extracts fromCatalpa bignonioidesWalt. (Bignoniaceae) Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 87, 163-167.
  43. 43. SchefferT. CMorellJ. J1998Natural Durability of Wood: A Worldwide Checklist of Species. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University; College of Forestry, Research Contribution 2245
  44. 44. NeyaBHakkouMPétrissansMGérardinP2004On the durability ofBurkea Africanaheartwood: evidence of biocidal and hydrophobic properties responsible for durability,” Annals of Forest Science,613277282
  45. 45. NiamkéF. BAmusantNStienDChaixGLozanoYKadioA. ALemenagerNGohDAdimaA. AKati-coulibalySJay-allemandC2012Dihydroxy-epiisocatalponol, a new naphthoquinone fromTectona grandisL.f. heartwood, and fungicidal activity. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation749398
  46. 46. OhmuraWDoiSAoyamaMOharaS2000Antifeedant activity of flavonoids and related compounds against the subterranean termiteCoptotermes formosanusShiraki. Journal of Wood Science46149153
  47. 47. Oliveira, L. S, Santana, A. L. B. D, Maranhão, C. A, Miranda, R. C. M, Galvão de Lima, V. L. A, Silva, S. I.; Nascimento, M. S, & Bieber, L. (2010). Natural resistance of five woods toPhanerochaete chrysosporiumdegradation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation64711715
  48. 48. PaesJ. BMoraisV. MLimaC. R2005Resistência natural de nove madeiras do semi-árido brasileiro a fungos causadores da podridão-mole. R. Árvore293365371
  49. 49. PettersenR. C1984The chemical composition of wood. In: Rowel, R.M. (Ed.), The Chemistry of Wood. Advances in Chemistry Series 207, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA57126
  50. 50. PietarinenS. PWillforS. MVirkstromF. AHolmbomB. R2006Aspen knots, a rich source of flavonoids. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology26245258
  51. 51. PizziAMerlimM1981A new class of tannin adhesives for exterior particleboard. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1, 261.
  52. 52. PizzoBPomettiC. LCharpentierJPBoizotNSaidmanB. O.2011Relationships involving several types of extractives of five native argentine wood species of generaProsopisandAcacia. Industrial Crops and Products341851859
  53. 53. PlomelyK. F1966Tannin-formaldehyde adhesives for wood. II Wattle tannin adhesives. CSIRO Division of Forest Products Technological Paper 39116
  54. 54. Ramos, I. E. C, Paes, J. B, Farias Sobrinho, D. W, & Santos, G. J. C. (2006). Efficiency of CCB on resistance ofProsopis juliflora(Sw.) D.C. wood in accelerated laboratory test decay. R. Árvore305811820
  55. 55. Reyes-chilpaRViveros-rodriguezNGomez-garibayFAlavez-solanoD1995Antitermitic activity ofLonchocarpus castilloiflavonoids and heartwood extracts. Journal of Chemical Ecology214455463
  56. 56. Reyes-chilpa, R, Gomez-Garibay, F, Moreno-Torres, G, Jimenez-Estrada, M, & Quiroz Vaásquez, R. I. (1998). Flavonoids and isoflavonoids with antifungal properties fromPlatymiscium yucatanumheartwood. Holzforschung525459462
  57. 57. RoyerMRodriguesA. M. SHerbetteGBeauchêneJChevalierMHéraultBThibautBStienaD2012Efficacy ofBagassa guianensisAubl. extract against wood decay and human pathogenic fungi. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation705559
  58. 58. SahaiRAgarwalS. KRastogiR. P1980Auriculoside, a new flavan glycoside fromacacia auriculiformis. Phytochemistry1915601562
  59. 59. Saka, S. (1991). Chemical composition and Distribution. Dekker, New York, 3-58.
  60. 60. SandermannWDietrichsH. H1957Investigations on termite-resistant wood. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff, 15, 281.
  61. 61. SantanaA. L. B. DMaranhãoC. ASantosJ. CCunhaF. MConceiçãoG. MBieberL. WNascimentoM. S2010Antitermitic activity of extractives from three Brazilian hardwoods againstNasutitermes corniger. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 64, 7-12.
  62. 62. ScheffrahnR. H1991Allelochemical resistance of wood to termites. Sociobiology19257281
  63. 63. SchefferT. CMorrellJ. J1998Natural Durability of Wood: a Worldwide Checklist of Species. Oregon State University College of Forestry, Forest Research Laboratory Research Contribution 22.
  64. 64. SchultzT. PHarmsW. BFisherT. HMcmurtreyK. DMinnJNicholasD. D1995Durability of angiosperm heartwood: The importance of extractives. Holzforschung4912934
  65. 65. SchultzT. PNicholasD. D2002Naturally durable heartwood: evidence for a proposed dual defensive function of the extractives. Phytochemistry544752
  66. 66. Schultz, T. P, Hubbard Jr., T. F, Jin, L, Fisher, T. H, & Nicholas, D. D. (1990). Role of stilbenes in the natural durability of wood: fungicidal structure-activity relationships. Phytochemistry2915011507
  67. 67. SekineNAshitaniTMurayamaTShibutaniSHattoriSTakahashiK2009Bioactivity of latifolin and its derivatives against termites and fungi. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry5757075712
  68. 68. SilvaC. AMonteiroM. B. BBrazolinSLopezG. A. CRichterABragaM. R2007Biodeterioration of brazilwoodCaesalpinia echinataLam. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) by rot fungi and termites. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation , 60, 285-292.
  69. 69. SirmahPDumarçaySGérardinP2009Effect Unusual amount of (-)-mesquitol of from the heartwood ofProsopis julifloraNatural Product Research23183189
  70. 70. SirmahP. K2009Valorisation du "Prosopis juliflora" comme alternative à la diminution des ressources forestières au Kenya. Thesis-Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy I.
  71. 71. SyofunaABananaA. YNakabongeG2012Efficiency of natural wood extractives as wood preservatives against termite attack. Maderas, Ciencia y Tecnología142155163
  72. 72. TaylorA. MGartnerB. LMorrellJ. J2006Efects of Heartwood Extractive fractions ofThuja plicataandChamaecyparis nootkatensisonwood degradation by termites or Fungi. Journal of Wood Science52147153
  73. 73. ThevenonM. F1999Formulation of long-term, heavy-duty and lowtoxicwood preservatives. Application to the associations boric acid-condensed tannins and boric acid-proteins. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nancy I, France.
  74. 74. Toirambe Bamoninga, B, & Ouattara, B. (2008).Morus mesozygiaStapf. In: Louppe, D, Oteng-Amoako, A. A, & Brink, M. (Editors). Prota 7(1): Timbers/Bois d’œuvre 1. [CD-Rom]. PROTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  75. 75. Toussaint, L. (1997). Utiliser les tannins pour la protection du bois. Telex bois, 4, 12
  76. 76. ToshiakiU2001Chemistry of extractives. In: "Wood and cellulosic chemistry". Ed Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York,213241
  77. 77. WangQ. AZhouBShanY2004Progress on antioxidant activation and extracting technology of flavonoids. Chem. Product. Technol.112933
  78. 78. WatanabeYMiharaRMitsunagaTYoshimuraT2005Termite repellent sesquiterpenoids fromCallitris glaucophyllaheartwood. Journal of Wood Science51514519
  79. 79. VermaMSharmaSPrasadR2010Biological alternatives for termite control: A review International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation638959972
  80. 80. ZuckerW. V1983Tannins: Does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. Am. Nat.121335365
  81. 81. WalkerJ. C. F1993Primary Wood Processing. Principles and Practice.1st Edition. Chapman and Hall. 285 pp.
  82. 82. WindeisenEWegenerGLesninoGSchumacherP2002Investigation of the correlation between extractives content and natural durability in 20 cultivated larch trees. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff60373374
  83. 83. WolcottG. N1955Organic termite repellents tested againstCryptotermes brevis. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico, 39, 115.

Written By

M. S. Nascimento, A. L. B. D. Santana, C. A. Maranhão, L. S. Oliveira and L. Bieber

Submitted: July 7th, 2012 Reviewed: March 11th, 2013 Published: June 14th, 2013