Open access

Skin Biopsy Diagnosis of Langerhans Cell Neoplasms

Written By

Olga L. Bohn, Julie Teruya-Feldstein and Sergio Sanchez-Sosa

Submitted: 04 May 2012 Published: 03 July 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55893

From the Edited Volume

Skin Biopsy - Diagnosis and Treatment

Edited by Suran L. Fernando

Chapter metrics overview

3,209 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

This chapter reviews the clinical presentation, histopathology, immunoprofile and molecular features of Langerhans cell neoplasms of the skin including Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and its malignant counterpart, Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS). Biopsy of the skin is a useful method to confirm LCH/LCS diagnosis, as cutaneous involvement is seen in more than 50% cases. Skin can be the only presenting site of LCH, but it is usually seen as an integral part of multisystemic disease involvement.

Langerhans cells (LC) are bone marrow-derived antigen presenting cells [1]. Although LC, dendritic cells and monocytic/histiocytic cells share a common multipotential progenitor cells that reside in the bone marrow, to the date, myeloid derived macrophages and dendritic cells constitute divergent lines of differentiation from bone marrow precursors [2]. However, recent evidence demonstrates that LC can be generated from lymphoid-committed CD4low precursors, suggesting the role of lineage plasticity/ trans-differentiation and clonal infidelity [3-4].

LC can be found in the epidermis and mucosal lining of multiple organs including cervix, vagina, stomach and esophagus. The specific immunophenotypic profile is helpful distinguishing LCs, as they can express CD1a and langerin (CD207); in addition the detection of Birbeck granules, seen in both pathological and resting LC is a prominent feature [5].

LCH encompasses a spectrum of disease characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation of LC [5]. The etiology of LCH/LCS is unknown in most cases, and there is not clear understanding of the pathogenesis. Although LCH is believed to be a clonal proliferation of LC [2, 6], the exact nature is controversial, as pulmonary LCH is thought to be a reactive/inflammatory disorder rather than a neoplastic process, and spontaneous remissions have been documented [7-8]. In a recent study of well characterized LCH cases, 30% had clonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH@), immunoglobulin kappa light chain (IGK@) or T-cell receptor gamma (TCRG@) gene rearrangements, suggesting a close relationship between LCH and lymphoid lineage [3]. Additional data that suggests LCH is in fact a clonal disease is the presence of specific mutations such as BRAF V600E, which have been found in up to 76% of tumors in children <10 years of age [7, 9].


2. Langerhans cell histiocytosis

2.1. Clinical presentation

LCH can affect a wide range of patients, including neonates, young children and adults. In children younger than 2 years of age, cutaneous involvement is the most common presentation [10]. In neonates and young infants, skin is frequently involved, as solitary or multiple papules or nodules with ulceration or necrosis. Patients usually present with dermatitis-like lesions that involves scalp, trunk, intertriginous skin folds and perineum with brownish/whitish papules covered with scales and crust [11]. In neonates, eruptions may affect most of the body surface. In contrast, in adults, LCH with initial presentation occurring in the skin is unusual [12].

LCH can be localized, multifocal or multisystemic. Systemic disease can involve organs such as bone marrow, liver, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, lungs and spleen. Systemic forms include Letterer-Siwe disease (with skin, lymph node and visceral involvement) and Hand-Schuller-Christian syndrome (in young children).

Congenital disease is rare and often clinically benign, presented in the form of reticulohistiocytosis (Hashimoto-Pritzker disease) as a self-healing or regressive form of the disease. Congenital disease usually presents at birth or in the first few weeks of life as a widespread cutaneous eruption of red-brown nodules that resolves spontaneously [10, 13], although it can rarely be associated with multiorgan involvement [10, 14].

2.2. Histopathology

Recognition of morphologic and immunohistochemical features is essential to establish both the diagnosis and the LC origin. The skin shows a predominant diffuse papillary dermal infiltrate composed of large cells with lobulated, eccentric grooved nuclei with “coffee-bean shape” appearance and inconspicuous nucleoli. The epidermis may be ulcerated and epidermotropism is commonly seen (FIGURE 1).

Figure 1.

Histological features of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). A and B. Skin shows dermal infiltrate with epidermotrophism. C. Cells with grooved nuclei.

A variable polymorphic infiltrate of eosinophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells and neutrophils is usually admixed with neoplastic cells. Eosinophils are often but not invariably present, and sometimes can be quite numerous, masking LC (FIGURE 2). Mitotic activity may be brisk. In some cases, LC may resemble histiocytes or Touton cells. Sometimes, a granulomatous reaction with histiocytic infiltrate can be identified.

Figure 2.

Histological features of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH). Skin with inflammatory infiltrate composed of Langerhans cells admixed with abundant eosinophils and neutrophils.

2.3. Immunoprofile and electron microscopy

Identification of LC may be done by routine hematoxylyn-eosin alone. However, confirmation requires positive staining for CD1a, S100 and langerin (CD207) (FIGURE 3), with variable expression of CD68 and usually absence of CD163 stain.

Figure 3.

Histological features and immunophenotypic profile of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH). A. Skin with dermal infiltrate and epidermotrophism. B. Langerin immunostain (CD207) highlights neoplastic Langerhans Cells (LC). C. LC are positive for CD1a.

A novel antibody, JL1, has been described as a specific marker in LCH. Interestingly, LC in the epidermis of normal skin express langerin but not JL1; however both antibodies are expressed in inflamed skin [5]. In addition, a recent specific antibody to detect BRAFV600E mutation in LCH by immunohistochemistry is identified that can be used for routine screening [15]. E-cadherin expression has been reported as well (FIGURE 4). Electron microscopy can be used to demonstrate intracytoplasmic Birbeck granules of approximately 300 nm with a tennis-racket shape.

Figure 4.

Immunoprofile of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. E-cadherin is positive in scattered LC.

2.4. Differential diagnosis

Related and unrelated histiocytic disorders and benign LC proliferations lead to diagnostic pitfalls in LCH. Localized LC proliferations are seen in a vast number of skin conditions that may be reactive, but are often neoplastic. Similarly, histiocytic infiltrates in the dermis are very common, and appear in response to inflammatory conditions, infections and neoplasms.

LC microabscesses can sometimes be seen in the epidermis of spongiotic dermatitides and lichenoid dermatitis. LC are usually seen as small to large collection of pale staining/mononuclear cells, positive for CD1a and S100. These aggregates can mimic Pautrier’s microabscessess in mycosis fungoides [16].

In children with eczematous eruptions and histiocytic infiltrates, langerhans cell hyperplasia (LCHP) has to be ruled out. LCHP can mimic LCH and has been reported in cases of human scabies, arthropod bite reaction, contact dermatitis and pytiriasis lichenoides and usually cells express CD1a and S100 [17-20]. The increased in LC in the dermis can be explained by the antigenic stimulation and cutaneous trauma that produce LC migration into the skin, especially when occurs in perivascular areas. Therefore, the clinical context in which the lesion or proliferation arises is important in the differential diagnosis.

Likewise, reactive histiocytosis in the skin can be seen secondary to foreign body reactions to implants and polarizable material is often identified [21]. LC can also mimic dermal histiocytes found in inflammatory and infectious conditions (mycobacteria, fungal and parasitic processes), thus clinicopathologic correlation, immunostains and appropriate special stain can be helpful in the differential. Eosinophils, a common finding in LCH can also be seen in a variable number of conditions such as drug eruptions, urticaria and wells syndrome.

Furthermore, a group of conditions named as non-Langerhans cells histiocytosis (N-LCH) can mimic LCH. These entities are characterized by accumulation of histiocytes and immunohistochemistry is a useful adjuvant for the distinction; some of them will be describe in the following pages [22].

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a self-limiting histio-proliferative disorder that can compromise almost any organ, and occasionally involves the skin [23]. Cutaneous RDD is characterized by the presence of a dense infiltrate of foamy histiocytes with emperipolesis surrounded by a background of lymphocytes, plasma cells and neutrophils. Occasionally, eosinophils can be increased [24]. Histiocytic cells in RDD usually express CD68 and S100 and lack of CD1a staining.

The Juvenile Xantogranuloma (JXG) family is a spectrum of conditions characterized by expression of factor XIIIa, CD68, CD163, fascin and CD14 but lack immunoexpression for CD1a and S100 [22, 24]. The clinical setting is useful to differentiate the entities. JXG is a common member of this family. JXG presents as a solitary skin lesion, most commonly seen throughout the first two decades of life, although some cases have been described in extracutaneous sites. JXG is characterized by circumscribed dermal nodules composed of true foamy histiocytes and Touton giant cells. Touton giant cells are seen in the majority of cases, and show a wreath of nuclei around a homogenous eosinophilic cytoplasm and xanthomatous periphery (FIGURE 5) [22, 25]. JXG has been reported associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and juvenile myelomonocytic chronic leukemia [26-27].

Figure 5.

Juvenile Xantogranuloma (JXG). A. Dome shape lesion with dermal infiltrate. B. Touton giant cells in JXG.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) may also be confused by LCH. ECD is a systemic disease which usually presents with lung and symmetrical long bony lesions. It can also involve the skin and clinically appears with pruritic rash, xanthelasma and eyelid xanthomas, in a background of normal lipid profile [28]. ECD displays collections of enlarged histiocytes with clear cytoplasm. ECD can be differentiated from LCH by immunohistochemical studies; ECD cells usually express CD68, CD163, fascin, while negative for S100, langerin and CD1a. Birbeck granules are absent [22].

Finally, a hybrid entity, indeterminate cell histiocytosis (immature dendritic cells) is an uncommon disease with features between LCH and N-LCH. Although it shows immunophenotypic similarities with LCH such as CD1a positivity and variable expression of S100 and CD68, lacks of Birbeck granules by electron microscopy.

Malignant neoplasms such as histiocytic sarcoma (HS), myelomonocytic leukemia, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and mast cell proliferations should also be considered into the differential diagnosis [24, 29]. HS is a malignant proliferation of mature histiocytes. Skin presentation is often seen, although multisystemic involvement is a frequent feature. Histologically, HS show cytologic atypia, pleomorphism and mitotic activity; the immunophenotypic profile demonstrates that the malignant cells are usually positive for CD68, CD163, CD14, CD4, CD11c and lysozyme. Birbeck granules are not seen [30].

Interestingly, cases of LCH have been found in association with malignancy including solid tumors and hematologic neoplasms [31-32]. In a recent study, adult patients with LCH presenting in the skin have shown an increased risk of a second hematological malignancy [12]. They can present with a solitary papule/nodule or multiple reddish-brown papules. The literature includes reports of LCH and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia [33] and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [31, 34-38]. One of the current theories that could explain the association between LCH and AML relates to trans-differentiation of hematopoietic lineages as LC, dendritic cells, and monocytic/histiocytic cells share common multipotential progenitor cells that reside in the bone marrow [39-42]. These cases suggest a clonal relation between the two neoplastic diseases and support the theories of lineage plasticity in mature and immature lymphoid tumors.

2.5. Prognosis

LCH is a heterogeneous disease with different outcomes including self healing-limited and life-threatening or fatal disease [14]. Clinical staging is a prognostic marker in neonates and infants [14, 43]. Unifocal/localized disease has a good prognosis and long term survival. In contrast, the clinical course and the prognosis of multifocal and multisystemic disease are difficult to predict. When disseminated disease is present at the time of diagnosis, the disease is usually associated with poor outcome [14, 43]. Therefore, identification of specific biomarkers is needed in order to determine who will have limited disease and who will benefit from systemic therapy.

Using OncoMap, the activating mutation BRAF V600E mutation has been recently identified as a recurrent molecular genetic aberration in LCH, however, its clinical significance is still unknown [7, 9, 14]. BRAF V600E mutations have been identified in LCH and ECD, however, they have not seen in RDD and JXG [44]. Interestingly, inhibition of BRAF V600E may be used in the near future as a therapeutic target for LCH similar to what is being done for melanoma, gliomas and hairy cell leukemia. Patients with positive mutation status and protein expression by screening may be allowed for protocol or clinical trial entry with use of Zelboraf (vemurafinib), an FDA approved therapy. Recently, a variant BRAF V600D mutation has been reported in congenital, benign, self-regressive LCH [14]. E-cadherin expression was found as a marker of good prognosis and limited disease, however, the results have not been validated in separated studies [10, 45]. The role of Ki67 as a prognostic marker is limited. One of the most common abnormalities seen in LCH is TP53 over-expression (FIGURE 6); however, TP53 mutations have not been identified [7, 9, 46].

Figure 6.

TP53 over-expression in Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)

2.6. Treatment

Patients require complete clinical history, physical examination, and a comprehensive laboratory and radiographic evaluation [47]. The Histiocyte Society recommends that in order to determine the adequate research protocol, patients should be stratified based upon extension of the disease (unifocal, multifocal/multysistemic), involvement of risk organs (hematolymphoid including spleen and liver) and central nervous system risk lesions [48-49]. Patients with unifocal disease limited to the skin require follow up-and usually no additional treatment is necessary as spontaneous regression may occur. Topical therapy with steroids or PUVA may be used [48]. In cases of multiorgan/multisystemic involvement, the treatment is controversial as those patients have a variable clinical course; it includes systemic chemotherapy with assessment of clinical response after the first 6 weeks of treatment. Monoclonal antibodies are under research. In one large study, Vinblastine with or without prednisolone was the most common chemotherapy regimen, and the overall survival and event free survival rates were 84% and 51.5%, respectively with a medium follow-up time of 8 years [50]. The LCHIII treatment protocol is a common strategy used in patients with multiorgan involvement [51]. Targeted therapy with vemurafenib, an inhibitor of mutated BRAF, has been used in few patients with LCH harboring BRAF V600E mutation [52].


3. Langerhans cell sarcoma

3.1. Clinical presentation

Thirty one cases of LCS have been reported to date [53]. Skin can be a single site involved by LCS or can be seen as part of widespread disease. Cutaneous involvement is present in more than half of cases. Multiorgan involvement includes lymph node, lungs, liver, spleen and bone. Skin biopsy is an accessible and a useful way to demonstrate malignant LC. LCS occurs in all age groups with a male:female ratio 1:1. LCS can appear as an increasingly progressive malignant disease followed by multiple LCH recurrences, de novo and with underlying myeloproliferative disease [53-55]. De novo or primary LCS has been reported exclusively in adults, without previous evidence of LCH. In a recent publication, a case of trans-differentiation of acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia into a LCS has been documented, as both show identical IGH@ gene rearrangements [54].

3.2. Histopathology

Skin biopsy usually shows an infiltrative and poorly defined high grade malignant neoplasm composed of large cells with grooved nuclei, granular chromatin, prominent nucleoli and high mitotic rate. Although inflammatory infiltrate can be present and abundant, especially if there is associated necrosis, eosinophils are usually scattered. Epidermis can be ulcerated and epidermotropism is seen [2, 55]. (FIGURE 7)

Figure 7.

Histological appearance of Langerhans Cell Sarcoma (LCS). A. Dermal infiltrate of large atypical cells with epidermotrophism. B. Bizarre and pleomorphic cells with abundant mitotic figures and lack of cohesiveness. C. Detailed figure of LCS cells with prominent intranuclear inclusions.

3.3. Immunoprofile and electron microscopy

Malignant LC are usually positive for CD1a, S100 and Langerin (CD207) (FIGURE 8). There is lack of reactivity for T and B cell antigens. Neoplastic cells have a high proliferative Ki67 index and overexpress p53. CD56 /neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) positivity has been found expressed in LCS [56]. A broad panel of immunohistochemical stains is used to confirm LC due to the atypical features of the neoplasm, and electron microscopy is usually performed for identification of intracytoplasmic Birbeck granules.

Figure 8.

Immunoprofile of Langerhans Cell Sarcoma (LCS). A. Langerin (CD207) expression in cells with malignant features. Numerous mitotic figures are identified. B. Malignant cells retain CD1a expression.

3.4. Differential diagnosis

Because of the marked pleomorphism and cytologic atypia, hematologic and nonhematologic entities must be considered in the differential diagnosis including malignant melanoma, carcinoma, mesenchymal malignant neoplasms and lymphomas with anaplastic features. Pleomorphic large cells may be mistaken for malignant melanoma, which shares S100 positivity but also expresses other melanocytic markers. LCS comprises cells with bizarre pleomorphic nuclei and abundant cytoplasm mimicking hematolymphoid neoplasms including anaplastic large cell lymphoma, anaplastic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, plasma cell neoplasm with anaplastic features, lymphomatoid papulosis, peripheral T cell lymphoma and myeloid sarcoma (FIGURE 9) (TABLE 1) [55]. In those cases, immunohistochemical and molecular features are useful to distinguish the cell of origin.

Figure 9.

Myeloid Sarcoma. A. Skin shows a diffuse dermal infiltrate composed of malignant cells. B. Features of neoplastic cells with promyelocytic differentiation. C. CD34 stain is positive in the majority of cells. D. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) positivity in tumor cells.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Immunohistochemical marker
Melanoma S100+, Melan A+, HMB45+
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma CD30+, ALK+/-, EMA+, CD3-/+, CD43+
Histiocytic Sarcoma CD68+, CD163+, CD14+, CD4+, lysozyme, S100+/-
Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma CD21+, CD23+, CD35+, CD68+/-, S100+/-, Clusterin+, CD45+/-
Interdigitating Dendritic Cell Sarcoma S100+, CD21-, CD35-, CD1a-, fascin +, CD68-/+
Myeloid Sarcoma CD34+, CD117+, MPO+, CD68+, lysozyme+

Table 1.

Langerhans Cell Sarcoma (LCS) - Differential Diagnosis

3.5. Prognosis and treatment

Currently, no specific marker has demonstrated to predict prognosis in LCS. In a study, CD56 expression was associated to poor prognosis and the results have not been validated in a different set of patients [56]. Despite combination chemotherapy/radiotherapy and surgery, LCS is an aggressive high grade malignancy with poor prognosis, frequent recurrences and short survival, usually resulting in death within 1 year [2, 53, 55].


  1. 1. RomaniNClausenB. EStoitznerPLangerhans cells and more: langerin-expressing dendritic cell subsets in the skin. Immunol Rev. 2010Mar;234112041
  2. 2. JaffeR W. LFacchettiFTumors derived from Langerhans cells. 4th Edition ed. Swerlow SH CE, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, editor. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008
  3. 3. ChenWWangJWangELuYLauS. KWeissL. Met alDetection of clonal lymphoid receptor gene rearrangements in langerhans cell histiocytosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010Jul;347104957
  4. 4. AnjuereFdel Hoyo GM, Martin P, Ardavin C. Langerhans cells develop from a lymphoid-committed precursor. Blood. 2000Sep 1;96516337
  5. 5. ParkH. JJeonY. KLeeA. HOhY. HParkS. HJungK. CUse of the JL1 epitope, which encompasses the nonglycosylation site of CD43, as a marker of immature/neoplastic Langerhans cells. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012Aug;36811507
  6. 6. WillmanC. LBusqueLGriffithB. BFavaraB. EMcclainK. LDuncanM. Het alLangerhans’-cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X)--a clonal proliferative disease. N Engl J Med. 1994Jul 21;331315460
  7. 7. Badalian-veryGVergilioJ. ADegarB. AMacConaill LE, Brandner B, Calicchio ML, et al. Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2010Sep 16;11611191923
  8. 8. McelligottJMcmichaelASanguezaO. PAnthonyERoseDMcleanT. WSpontaneous regression of langerhans cell histiocytosis in a neonate with multiple bony lesions. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008Jan;301856
  9. 9. Badalian-veryGVergilioJ. ADegarB. ARodriguez-galindoCRollinsB. JRecent advances in the understanding of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Haematol. 2012Jan;156216372
  10. 10. KapurPEricksonCRakhejaDCarderK. RHoangM. PCongenital self-healing reticulohistiocytosis (Hashimoto-Pritzker disease): ten-year experience at Dallas Children’s Medical Center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007Feb;5622904
  11. 11. ElderD. E E. RJohnsonBIoffredaMMillerJMillerO. Feditor. Lever’s Histopathology of the skin. 9th edition ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004
  12. 12. EdelbroekJ. RVermeerM. HJansenP. MStoofT. JVan Der LindenM. MHorvathBet alLangerhans cell histiocytosis first presenting in the skin in adults: frequent association with a second hematological malignancy. Br J Dermatol. 2012Jul 27.
  13. 13. HashimotoKPritzkerM. SElectron microscopic study of reticulohistiocytoma. An unusual case of congenital, self-healing reticulohistiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1973Feb;107226370
  14. 14. KansalRQuintanilla-martinezLDattaVLopateguiJGarshfieldGNathwaniB. NIdentification of the 600Dmutation in Exon 15 of the BRAF oncogene in congenital, benign langerhans cell histiocytosis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012Sep 21.
  15. 15. SahmFCapperDPreusserMMeyerJStenzingerALasitschkaFet alBRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cells of variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2012Sep 20;120(12):e2834
  16. 16. CandiagoEMarocoloDManganoniM. ALealiCFacchettiFNonlymphoid intraepidermal mononuclear cell collections (pseudo-Pautrier abscesses): a morphologic and immunophenotypical characterization. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000Feb;22116
  17. 17. BhattacharjeePGlusacE. JLangerhans cell hyperplasia in scabies: a mimic of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2007Sep;34971620
  18. 18. DrutRPeralC. GGaroneARosittoALangerhans cell hyperplasia of the skin mimicking Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a report of two cases in children not associated with scabies. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 20102942318
  19. 19. BurchJ. MKrolAWestonW. LSarcoptes scabiei infestation misdiagnosed and treated as Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2004Jan-Feb;2115862
  20. 20. KimS. HKimD. HLeeK. GProminent Langerhans’ cell migration in the arthropod bite reactions simulating Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2007Dec;3412899902
  21. 21. MillerD. DYaarRPosnikOKarolowWMahalingamMReactive granular histiocytosis secondary to arthroplasty prosthesis: a novel reaction pattern. J Cutan Pathol. 2012May;39555861
  22. 22. WeitzmanSJaffeRUncommon histiocytic disorders: the non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005Sep;45325664
  23. 23. RosaiJDorfmanR. FSinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. A newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969Jan;8716370
  24. 24. CangelosiJ. JPrietoV. GIvanDCutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease with increased number of eosinophils: coincidence or histologic variant? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011Dec;135121597600
  25. 25. DehnerL. PJuvenile xanthogranulomas in the first two decades of life: a clinicopathologic study of 174 cases with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003May;27557993
  26. 26. ArachchillageD. RCarrT. FKerrBHawkinsKKelseyAJudgeMet alJuvenile myelomonocytic leukemia presenting with features of neonatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and cutaneous juvenile xanthogranulomata and successfully treated with allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010Mar;3221525
  27. 27. RaygadaMArthurD. CWayneA. SRennertO. MToretskyJ. AStratakisC. AJuvenile xanthogranuloma in a child with previously unsuspected neurofibromatosis type 1 and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010Jan;5411735
  28. 28. Veyssier-belotCCacoubPCaparros-lefebvreDWechslerJBrunBRemyMet alErdheim-Chester disease. Clinical and radiologic characteristics of 59 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996May;75315769
  29. 29. HuangS. CChangC. LHuangC. HChangC. CHistiocytic sarcoma- a case with evenly distributed multinucleated giant cells. Pathol Res Pract. 200720396839
  30. 30. ChangK. L W. Leditor. Other Histiocytic and Dendritic Cell Neoplasms. 1st ed ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011
  31. 31. GhosnM. GHaddadA. CNassarM. NAbadjianG. AEl KarakF. RAftimosP. GAcute myeloid leukemia and Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: multiple theories for an unusual presentation. Leuk Res. 2010Mar;3434068
  32. 32. EgelerR. MNegliaJ. PPuccettiD. MBrennanC. ANesbitM. EAssociation of Langerhans cell histiocytosis with malignant neoplasms. Cancer. 1993Feb 1;71386573
  33. 33. CastroE. CBlazquezCBoydJCorreaHDe ChadarevianJ. PFelgarR. Eet alClinicopathologic features of histiocytic lesions following ALL, with a review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2010May-Jun;13322537
  34. 34. EgelerR. MNegliaJ. PAricoMFavaraB. EHeitgerANesbitM. EAcute leukemia in association with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1994232815
  35. 35. AricoMComelliABossiGRaiteriEPiomboMEgelerR. MLangerhans cell histiocytosis and acute leukemia: unusual association in two cases. Med Pediatr Oncol. 19932142713
  36. 36. HauptRComelliARosandaCSessaregoMDe BernardiBAcute myeloid leukemia after single-agent treatment with etoposide for Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis of bone. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1993May;1522557
  37. 37. MatsuzakiAInamitsuTWatanabeTOhgaSIshiiENagotoshiYet alAcute promyelocytic leukaemia in a patient treated with etoposide for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Haematol. 1994Apr;8648879
  38. 38. StineK. CSaylorsR. LSawyerJ. RBectonD. LSecondary acute myelogenous leukemia following safe exposure to etoposide. J Clin Oncol. 1997Apr;15415836
  39. 39. MiseryLGuyotatDCambazardFAssociation of Langerhans-cell histiocytosis and acute monocytic leukemia]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1998Oct;125107323
  40. 40. MiseryLCamposLDezutter-dambuyantCGuyotatDTreilleDSchmittDet alCD1-reactive leukemic cells in bone marrow: presence of Langerhans cell marker on leukemic monocytic cells. Eur J Haematol. 1992Jan;4812732
  41. 41. FeldmanA. LArberD. APittalugaSMartinezABurkeJ. SRaffeldMet alClonally related follicular lymphomas and histiocytic/dendritic cell sarcomas: evidence for transdifferentiation of the follicular lymphoma clone. Blood. 2008Jun 15;1111254339
  42. 42. AkashiKTraverDMiyamotoTWeissmanI. LA clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature. 2000Mar 9;40467741937
  43. 43. JaffeRIs there a role for histopathology in predicting the clinical outcome in congenital and infant Langerhans cell disease? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009Dec;5369245
  44. 44. HarocheJCharlotteFArnaudLVon DeimlingAHelias-rodzewiczZHervierBet alHigh prevalence of BRAF 600Emutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Blood. 2012Sep 27;120(13):2700-3.
  45. 45. GeissmannFEmileJ. FAndryPThomasCFraitagSDe ProstYet alLack of expression of E-cadherin is associated with dissemination of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis and poor outcome. J Pathol. 1997Mar;18133014
  46. 46. da Costa CESzuhai K, van Eijk R, Hoogeboom M, Sciot R, Mertens F, et al. No genomic aberrations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis as assessed by diverse molecular technologies. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009Mar;48323949
  47. 47. HauptRMinkovMAstigarragaISchaferENanduriVJubranRet alLangerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH): Guidelines for diagnosis, clinical work-up, and treatment for patients till the age of 18 years. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013Feb;60217584
  48. 48. SatterE. KHighW. ALangerhans cell histiocytosis: a review of the current recommendations of the Histiocyte Society. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008May-Jun;2532915
  49. 49. GroisNPotschgerUProschHMinkovMAricoMBraierJet alRisk factors for diabetes insipidus in langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006Feb;46222833
  50. 50. YagciBVaranACaglarMSoylemezogluFSungurAOrhanDet alLangerhans cell histiocytosis: retrospective analysis of 217 cases in a single center. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008Jun;255399408
  51. 51. SatterE. KA presumptive case of Kindler syndrome with a new clinical finding. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008Nov-Dec;2566468
  52. 52. HarocheJCohen-aubartFEmileJ. FArnaudLMaksudPCharlotteFet alDramatic efficacy of vemurafenib in both multisystemic and refractory Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis harboring the BRAF 600Emutation. Blood. 2012Dec 20.
  53. 53. SagranskyM. JDengA. CMagroC. MPrimary Cutaneous Langerhans Cell Sarcoma: A report of Four Cases and Review of the Literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012Oct 9.
  54. 54. RateiRHummelMAnagnostopoulosIJahneDArnoldRDorkenBet alCommon clonal origin of an acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia and a Langerhans’ cell sarcoma: evidence for hematopoietic plasticity. Haematologica. 2010Sep;95914616
  55. 55. BohnO. LRuiz-arguellesGNavarroLSaldivarJSanchez-sosaSCutaneous Langerhans cell sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Hematol. 2007Feb;85211620
  56. 56. KawaseTHamazakiMOguraMKawaseYMurayamaTMoriYet alCD56/NCAM-positive Langerhans cell sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 4 cases. Int J Hematol. 2005May;8143239

Written By

Olga L. Bohn, Julie Teruya-Feldstein and Sergio Sanchez-Sosa

Submitted: 04 May 2012 Published: 03 July 2013