Structure, logP and application of some important safeners.
Herbicide safeners, formerly referred to as herbicide antidotes, are chemical agents that increase the tolerance of monocotyledonous cereal plants to herbicides without affecting the weed control effectiveness. The use of safeners offer several benefits to agricultural weed control. Safeners may allow: (1) the selective chemical control of weeds in botanically related crops; (2) the use of nonselective herbicides for selective weed control; (3) the counteraction of residual activity of soil-applied persistent herbicides such as triazines in crop rotation systems; (4) an increase in the spectrum of herbicides available for weed control in “minor” crops; (5) an expansion and extension of the uses and marketability of generic herbicides; (6) the elucidation of sites and mechanism by serving as useful biochemical tools . The commercial viability of safener concept is indicated by the growing number of herbicide-safener products available on the pesticide market. With the use of safeners, difficult weed control problems can be addressed and without safeners, many herbicidally active substances could have never been applied for weed control .
The concept to enhance crop tolerance to nonselective herbicide by using chemical agents was introduced by Otto Hoffman. In the late 1940s Hoffmann serendipitiously found that no herbicide injury symptons were developed in tomato plants previously treated with 2,4,6-T, an inactive analogue of herbicide 2,4-D when plant were exposed accidentally to vapors of 2,4-D due to the malfunction of the ventillation system of the greenhouse . Following this observation Hoffmann reported later the antagonistic effects of 2,4-D against herbicidal injury by barban after foliar treatments of wheat plants . Research and development in finding new safeners as well as subsequent commercialization proceeded very intensively in the 1970s. Since the patent application of the safening properties of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (NA) intensive research on discovery of new safeners resulted in compounds with diverse chemistries (Table 1) successfully applied to alleviate injury symptoms by various classes of herbicides in cereal crops.
NA patented by Hoffmann  has been considered as the most versatile safener showing less botanical and chemical specificity than other safeners developed later. NA protected cereals as seed treatments against various herbicide chemistries . NA was reported to be mildly phytotoxic to maize (chlorosis and growth inhibition) under some growing conditions. One problem in treating seeds with safeners prior to planting is that phytotoxicity can increase as the time the safener is exposed to the seed increases. With NA, the phytotoxicity to the crop increases with increased time the safener is in contact with the seed during storage. This problem has thus far prevented NA from being introduced to the commercial market .
The introduction of dichloroacetamide derivatives developed as safeners against thiocarbamates and chloroacetanilides was a breakthough in the history of the safeners since these compounds can be applied to the soil in preplant incorporated (PPI) or preemergence (PRE) technology in prepackaged tank mixture with the herbicide. Generally, prepackaged herbicide-safener mixtures offer several advantages over seed safeners. First of all, the manufacturer controls all components of the formulation secondly, the farmers buy and use a single and reliable product which allows a wider selection of crop cultivars. Dichlormid exhibited a remarkable degree of chemical and botanical specificity in protection of maize against thiocarbamates such as EPTC, butylate, vernolate but the safener was less protective to maize against chloroacetanilides. In addition to dichlormid, a number of dichloroacetylated amine derivatives were marketed. Among them AD-67, a spiro-oxazolidine compound was commercialized to protect maize plants against acetochlor while benoxaxor can be used to safen
The oxime ethers such as cyometrinil, oxabetrinil, and fluxofenim were marketed as seed treatment safeners to protect sorghum plants against chloroacetanilides, in particular, metolachlor. Flurazole, a 2,4-disubstituted 5-thiazolecarboxylate is also a seed safener allowing the safe use of alachlor in sorghum. The phenylpyrimidine safener fenclorim was introduced against pretilachlor in rice and can be used in tank mixture formulated together with the chloroacetanilide herbicide.
Trends toward post-emergence herbicide treatments and the use of high-activity herbicide molecules have led to the development of safeners with post-emergence application in winter cereals. A new era in safener research began with the discovery of 1,2,4-triazolcarboxylates and fenchlorazole-ethyl was developed as a post-emergence safener against ACCase inhibitor fenoxaprop-ethyl in wheat in a tank mixture with the herbicide. Similarly, the dihydropyrazol dicarboxylate mefenpyr-diethyl was used against ACCase inhibitors including fenoxaprop-ethyl as well as mesosulfuron and iodosulfuron in a variety of cereals. The main application of 8-quinolinoxy-acetate cloquintocet-mexyl is against clodinafop-propargyl in wheat. Dihydroisoxazole-carboxylate isoxadifen-ethyl can safen herbicides of various mode of action. First, it was applied in maize in combination with foramsulfuron but mixture with foramsulfuron and iodosulfuron-methyl is also in use. In rice, it can be used with fenoxafop-P-ethyl and ethoxysulfuron. The arylsulfonyl-benzamide, cyprosulfamide is the latest achievement in safener research. It protects maize against isoxaflutole pre-emergence and can also be used in maize with isoxaflutole plus thiencarbazone in pre-emergence and early post-emergence applications .
Interestingly, no successful safeners have been developed for broad-leafed crops. Recently, the non-phytotoxic microbial inhibitor dietholate (
Despite large amount of information published on the activity, mode of action and uses of safeners during the 50-year history of these herbicide antagonists this overview will focus on several less addressed topics such as a) relationships between the molecular structure and the safening properties; b) basis for differential chemical selectivity; and c) safener effects on detoxifying enzymes in crop plants and weeds.
2. Structure–safening activity relationships
Structure-activity correlations are very important in the search for biological activity because they provide useful information about chemical substituents that are necessary for the required bioactivity. Published structure-activity correlation studies with safeners and analogous compounds have been limited.
Hoffmann’s original patent for NA against EPTC in maize claimed only a few NA analogs such as alkyl esters, barium and tin salts as well as
Detailed structure-activity correlations were conducted mainly with various amide safeners that protect maize from thiocarbamate injury. Studies with several hundred of amides revealed that the most effective safeners were
Structure-safening activity studies with oxime ether derivatives revealed that the safening activity is affected by the number of nucleophilic sites present in the molecule. An oxime ether with two nucleophilic sites was more effective than those with only one. In addition to cyometrinil, oxabetrinil and fluxofenim pyridin-2-aldoxime
Structure-safening activity relationships for thiazol-5-carboxylic acids against acetamide herbicides were described for 60 derivatives in the original patent . Thiazolecarboxylates substituted by a trifluoromethyl in the 4-position are clearly superior to those substituted in the 4-position by methyl in reducing herbicidal injury to sorghum. Another preferred group of thiazolecarboxylates contained a halogen atom at position 2 preferably chlorine.
A structure-activity relationship study to safen maize against acetochlor was carried out with the herbicide safener MG-191 and its acetal and ketal analogues at preemergence application [24-26]. Open chain acetals formed from 1,1-dichloroacetaldehyde exhibited only marginal safening efficacy. Dialkyl ketals of 1,1-dichloroacetone showed increasing effectiveness up to 3 carbon length of the alkyl group with further increases in carbon atoms resulted in loss of activity. The 5-, 6- and 7-membered 1,3-dioxacycloalkanes prepared from dichloroacetaldehyde had hardly detectable safening activity. However, introducing alkyl or aryl substitution at the 2-position of the 1,3-dioxacycloalkane ring remarkably increased the safening activity. Regarding ring size the highest activity observed was for 2-dichloromethyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxepane. Replacing an oxygen in the 1,3-dioxolane ring for nitrogen resulted in oxazolidines with reduced safening activities but alkyl or aryl substitution on the nitrogen increased the safening activity of compounds. Replacement of oxygens by sulfur atoms leads to less active derivatives among which 1,3-dithiolane derivative showed higher activity than the oxathiolanes. Various 1,3-dioxolane-4-ones provided significant protection against the acetochlor. Benzo[1,3]-dioxoles were ineffective while benzo[1,3]dioxin-4-ones were protective in safening maize. 5-Dichloromethyl-3-substituted-isoxazoles were also active safeners.
Unfortunately, no publication has been reported for the other chemistry of safeners. However, no unifying structural motifs for compounds to be safeners can be predicted from these studies.
3. Chiral safeners
The importance of the chirality in the biological activity has long been recognized. Since biochemical processes in the cells take place in chiral environment and most enzymatic pathways are stereoselective, a high degree of enantiomeric and enantiotopic selectivity can be obtained when chiral or prochiral molecules are introduced into biological systems. About one fourth of the presently available pesticides are chiral, existing as two mirror images called enantiomers. These stereoisomers generally possess identical physico-chemical properties but widely different biological activities, such as toxicity, mutagenicity, and carciogenecity . The active enantiomer of the chiral pesticide would have the desired effect on target species while the other may be inactive .
Among the commercially available safeners, four such as benoxacor, furilazole, cloquintocet-mexyl, and mefenpyr-dietyl are chiral compounds but used exclusively as racemic (
Nevertheless, only a few molecules have been reported as safeners in enantiomerically pure form. The optical isomers of 4-(dichloromethylene)-2-[
4. Prosafeners and natural compounds with safening activity
The term prosafeners refers to molecules with safening activity undergoing biotransformation to the actual safening agent prior to exhibiting their safening effect. Substituted
Safening activities of natural cyclic hydroxamic acids (DIMBOA, DIBOA, and MBOA ) as well as synthetic analogues such as 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones and 1,3-benzoxazolidin-2-ones were prepared and tested to safen maize against acetochlor and EPTC injuries . Cyclic hydroxamic acids were supposed to act as safeners by catalyzing hydroxylation of herbicides containing reactive chlorine in their structure and they are ineffective against herbicides not possessing leaving groups. While no safening activities of natural hydroxamic acids were detected, the synthetic analogues exhibited low to moderate activity.
Metabolism of the herbicide safener, fenclorim resulting, in a semi-natural product with safening activity has recently been described in
Oxylipins constitute a family of oxygenated natural products which are formed from fatty acids. Safeners and reactive electrophilic oxylipins (RES oxylipins) have a common biological activity in that they both strongly induce the expression of defence genes and activate detoxification responses in plants [39, 40]. Surprisingly, the application of oxylipin A has been found to reduce the herbicidal injury .
5. Interaction of safeners and herbicides on the absorption and translocation
Published results on how safeners affect the herbicide absorption are rather contradictory and, therefore, no general conlusion can be drawn. In an excellent summary the effect of 15 safeners toward various herbicides was reviewed . Interestingly the majority of papers published report safener-enhanced herbicide uptake followed by no effect then reduced uptake results. According to a recent study mefenpyr-diethyl had no effect on the uptake of either mesosulfuron-methyl or iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium . These results suggest that the influence of safeners on the herbicide uptake may not be a decisive factor in the protective action. However, the knowledge of absorbed amounts of safeners and herbicides by crops may help to determine the optimal herbicide/safener ratios applicable in the agricultural practice. In addition, determination of the site of safener and herbicide uptake can contribute to prepare the most selective herbicide-safener mixture. A suitable placement of soil-applied herbicides to roots or the emerging shoots is of great practical importance in achieving the most effective weed control and the least injury to crop plants.
Studies on how maize can differentiate in the absorbtion of herbicides and safeners were conducted with radiolabeled EPTC, acetochlor and MG-191 [42, 43]. Time-dependent uptake of root-applied [14C]EPTC reached a maximum after 6h and decreased up to 3 days (Figure 1). The first measurable shoot growth inhibition appeared just after 1-day-exposition to the herbicide and 38% shoot length inhibition was observed 3 DAT. In general, the MG-191 safener had no influence on the herbicide uptake except for 1 DAT when the safener enhanced the herbicide uptake by 1.5-fold as compared to that in the unsafened plants. Nevertheless, the safener conferred a complete protection to maize throughout the study. The highest amount of herbicide uptake was 65 μg/g fresh weight.
As a comparision, the amount of root-absorbed [14C]acetochlor was continuously increased up to 3 days (Figure 2). As a result of increasing uptake the first detectable shoot length inhibition occurred 6h after treatment. At 3 DAT 28% shoot and 52% root (data not shown) growth inhibition by the herbicide occurred. Addition of the MG-191 safener did not affect the acetochlor absorption by maize seedlings but completely antagonized the herbicide shoot growth inhibition. The maize seedlings absorbed much higher amounts of acetochlor (377 μg/g fresh weight).
All previous efforts to elucidate modes of action of safeners focused on the fate of various herbicides as affected by the safener treatments while no studies were conducted on how uptake, translocation and metabolism of safeners were influenced by herbicides. For a better understanding of the herbicide-safener interaction, absorption of [14C]MG-191 by maize seedlings was studied as influenced by EPTC. Absorbed amount of the labeled safener following application to the roots of 5-day-old maize plants increased over the time and no influence of EPTC on uptake was observed (Figure 3). At a higher safener concentration (50 μM), plants absorbed higher amounts of radiolabel than at a lower concentration (10 μM) but plants contained low levels (3% and 1%) of the safener applied. The highest value for the safener content in the maize seedlings was less than 8 μg/g fresh weight.
These data clearly suggest that even this small amount of safener offer protection to maize. The absorbed herbicide/safener ratio (μg/μg) at 3 DAT accounted for 50 with acetochlor and 1.7 with EPTC at same concentrations of the herbicide. These results may partly explain why safening efficacy of MG-191 toward EPTC is higher than toward acetochlor under field conditions. Site of uptake can also affect the MG-191 effectiveness. In experiments using a charcoal barrier to separate shoot and root zones of maize, the influence of site of safener placement on acetochlor phytotoxicity was studied . MG-191 was the most protective when both the safener and the herbicide were applied simultaneously to shoots and roots but also satisfactory protection was achieved when the safener was applied in the root zone and the herbicide to the emerging shoots. This also indicates the main site of uptake for acetochlor absorption is the coleoptile while the root-uptake is very significant in the safener performance. Under field conditions the more water-soluble MG-191 (log P, 1.35) can be more easily leached to the roots of maize plants than the less water-soluble acetochlor (log P 4.14). The higher logP of acetochlor also supports its higher uptake as compared to MG-191.
It is also difficult to put the results of safener affected translocation of absorbed herbicides in perspective. Reduction of translocation of herbicides such as acetochlor, methazachlor, and imidazolinones from roots of maize to the shoots following treatments with dichlormid, BAS 145,138 and NA is likely a consequence of the safener-enhanced herbicide metabolism to more polar and less mobile products [45-49]. On the other hand, no effect of MG-191 on EPTC and acetochlor translocation has been observed [42, 44]. It is interesting to note that safener MG-191 and the herbicide acetochlor exhibit different translocation patterns (Figure 4). While the majority of the absorbed radiolabel from [14C] acetochlor was found in the roots and coleoptiles of maize seedlings (Figure 4a), the root-applied [14C]MG-191 distributed evenly within the plants (Figure 4b) showing similar mobility and distribution as EPTC (data not shown). This may be further evidence for the higher protective efficacy of this safener against EPTC as compared to acetochlor. The similar translocation pattern of the herbicide and the safener may be a prerequisite for the high level of safening activity.
6. Action of safeners on the glutathione-mediated detoxification of herbicides
Various chemistries of safeners were found to enhance the herbicide detoxification in the safened plants by elevating the activity of the mediating enzymes such as glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), cytochrome P450 mixed function oxidases (CYPs), glycosyltransferases (UGTs) and ATP-binding casette (ABC) transporter proteins as well as a cofactor endogenous glutathione (GSH) involved in detoxification of herbicides [2, 50-52]. The best studied group of plant enzymes involved in herbicide metabolism is the GSTs that mediate the conjugation of the major cellular thiol tripeptide, GSH with herbicide substrates. GSTs are multifunctional enzymes, each composed of two subunits which catalyze conjugation of a broad range of electrophilic substrates with GSH . Herbicides known to conjugate with GSH include thiocarbamates, chloro-
Only two studies are available in the literature on how the safener structure affects the expression of GST isoforms. The herbicide safener MG-191 (2-dichloromethyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane) and its less effective structural analogue dichloromethyl-dioxolanone (NO-17; 2-dichloromethyl-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4-one) were reported to differentially enhance the expression of members of the GSTs in maize .
None of these safener molecules had influence on the expression of
Analysis of isoenzyme profile of maize GSTs revealed that phi class of GSTs predominate, with ZmGSTF1 as the major subunit which is present constitutively and shows high specificity to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) substrate . A second phi type GST termed
In other, structure and GST isoform expressing ability studies with acetal and ketal analogues of MG-191 as well as mono-and dichloroacetamides (Table 2) demonstrated that the safener structure affects the specific expression of GSTs mediating the detoxication of acetochlor (Matola et al., 2003). Nevertheless, no correlation was found between the degree of induction of GSH and GSTs and the safening activity as related to the structure. A higher inducibility of these GST isoforms was observed in root tissues (Figure 6a and c). In shoots, when the heterodimer
The exact mechanism of the safener-mediated enhancement of GST activity is not completely understood. GSTs are induced by a diverse range of chemicals and accompanied by the production of active oxygen species. Thus the connection between safener-mediated protection of crops and oxidative stress tolerance has been suggested . Many GSTs are effective not only in conjugating electrophilic substrates but also function as glutathione peroxidases. Safeners may induce GST expression by mimicking oxidative insult . Our results indicate that safener structure plays a decisive role in specific expression of GSTs mediating the detoxication of chloroacetamide herbicides. Since no correlation between the degree of induction of levels of GSH and GST isoforms and the safener activity was found, the mode of action of safeners is a more complex process than simply promoting the metabolism of herbicides.
7. Effect of safeners on herbicide detoxification enyzmes in weeds
Studies on the mechanism of action of safeners revealed that herbicide safeners improve crop tolerance to herbicides by regulating the expression of genes involved in herbicide metabolism . It is widely accepted that safeners selectively protect crop plants against herbicide injury by stimulating the plant detoxifying mechanism at herbicide rates required for effective weed control. Nevertheless, only a few papers were published on the safener effect of GSTs and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases of various weed species. To a better understanding on why safeners do not provide protection to weeds it is essential to explore the safener action on detoxification enzymes of weeds.
7.1. Effect of safeners on weed glutathione (GSH) content and glutathione
S-transferase enzyme (GSTs) activities
Safeners such as MG-191, dichlormid, AD-67, BAS-145138, and flurazol were reported to reduce phytotoxicity of EPTC in grassy weeds . MG-191, BAS-145138 and flurazole offered moderate safening to
Nevertheless, much less is known about GSH or other non-protein thiol contents and GST activities of different weed species following treatments by herbicides and safeners. In order to explain differential physiological and biochemical responses of monocot and dicot weeds to these herbicides, non-protein thiol levels and GST activities were studied in selected mono- and dicot weeds species . The most sensitive
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities using CDNB substrate were not correlated with herbicide susceptibility of the selected weed species (Figure 6a). The GSTs extracted from monocot seedlings exhibited much higher activities than from dicot seedlings. GSTCDNB activity detected in
With [14C]acetochlor substrate, GSTacetochlor activities of both mono- and dicot seedlings were in the same range except for velvetleaf (ABUTH) (Figure 6b). Regardless of treatment, extractable GSTs from velvetleaf did not show specificity for acetochlor. Nevertheless, GSTacetochlor activities in all weed species were less expressed than in maize. No correlation was found between enzyme activity and acetochlor susceptibilities of these weed species. In monocot seedlings higher enzyme inductions (up to 2-fold increase) were observed as compared to those in dicots following safener treatment. Nevertheless, GSTacetochlor activity of the maize seedlings exceeded those of weed species which may indicate that the higher detoxication capability of crop plant is closely related to the herbicide tolerance. It is also noteworthy that both GSH and cysteine conjugates of chloroacetamides were found inhibitory to GSTs from maize,
7.2. Interaction of safeners on weed cytochrome P450 monooxygenases
The involvement of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in herbicide detoxication and selectivity has been well demonstrated [81, 82]. The role of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in enhanced metabolism of resistant weed species has also been documented [83, 84]. Nevertheless, only a few examples can be found in the literature as to cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase system in weed species .
Weed microsomal cytochrome P450 enzymes were found less stable than those from maize. Carbon-monoxide difference spectra for
It is difficult to evaluate changes in the enzyme contents of weed species pretreated with the safener NA or the P450 inhibitor ABT due to the high values of standard deviation of the data. Following treatments with NA, a stimulating tendency could be observed for weeds except
For further characterization of
These results demonstrate that safeners can marginally protect weed species by stimulating the herbicide detoxifying enzymes but the lower level of these enzymes in weeds as compared to those in crops provide a basis for the botanical selectivity of safeners.
8. Mechanism of safener action
The mechanism by which safeners act is currently unknown despite the widespread agricultural use and the substantial experimental evidence accumulated on the biochemical basis of action. Safeners appear to induce a set of genes that encode enzymes and biosynthesis of cofactors involved in the herbicide detoxication [50, 52, 89, 90].
The exact mechanism of safener-mediated enhancement of GST activity is not completely understood. GSTs are induced by a diverse range of chemicals and accompanied by the production of active oxygen species. Thus the connection between safener-mediated protection of crops and oxidative stress tolerance has been suggested . Many GSTs are effective not only in conjugating electrophilic substrates but also function as glutathione peroxidases. Safeners may induce GST expression by mimicking oxidative insult . Herbicide safeners increase herbicide tolerance in cereals but not in dicotyledonous crops. The reason(s) for this difference in safening is unknown. Treatment of
Concerning the location of safener binding site(s) of plants few studies have been conducted. A high-affinity cytosolic-binding site for the dichloroacetamide safener (
Proteomic methods were used to identify herbicide safener-induced proteins in the coleoptile of
Safeners were suggested to trigger an unidentified, preexisting signaling pathway for detoxification of endogenous toxins or xenobiotics . According to a new hypothesis, safeners may be utilizing an oxidized lipid-mediated (oxylipins) or cyclopentenone-mediated signaling pathway which subsequently leads to the expression of GSTs and other proteins involved in detoxification and plant defense . Some possible safener-mediated signaling pathways for the regulation of defense genes and activation of detoxification pathways have been suggested (Figure 8). Safeners may tap into a RES oxylipin-mediated signaling pathway and up-regulate TGA transcription factors, an Nrf2-Keap1-mediated as well as jasmonic acid-mediated signaling pathways. Safeners and oxylipins as reactive electrophilic species (RES oxylipins) have a common biological activity since both strongly induce the expression of defense genes and activate detoxification responses in plants [39, 40].
Fifty-year of herbicide safeners resesearch and use confirms that these molecules offered new ways to improve herbicide selectivity. Although this technology now competes with herbicide-tolerant, genetically-modified or naturally-selelected crops, safeners still comprise an important part of the herbicide market in maize, cereals and rice . Many of the commercial safeners are in off-patent status offering a chance for the generic manufacturers to enter the market together with off-patent herbicides. In contrast, recent herbicide mixture patents with new herbicides still allow their exclusive usage by the patent holder .
Although safeners do not improve herbicide tolerance in dicot plants, but the utilization of biotechnology tools may help in extending the safener response from monocot to dicots. It was found, however that
The use of safeners to enhance tolerance of plants to organic pollutants such as herbicides, heavy metals or oils in the environment (soil, water) could also be a promising application of these chemicals. Phytoremediation studies with soils contaminated with oils and heavy metals and safener-treated wheat seeds have recently been reported . While untreated seeds were unable to germinate on the contaminated soil, safener treatments resulted in seedlings briefly growing before succumbing to the pollutants.
Hatzios K. K. (1989). Development of herbicide safeners: Industrial and university perspectives. In: Crops safeners for herbicides. Hatzios K. K., Hoagland R. E. (Eds). pp 3-45, Academic Press, San Diego, USA.)
Davies J., Caseley J. C. (1999). Herbicide safeners: a review. Pestic. Sci., 55, 1043–1058.
Hoffmann O. L. (1978). Herbicide antidotes: From concept to practice. In: Chemistry and action of herbicide antidotes. Pallos F. M., Casida J. E. (Eds). pp 35-61, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Hoffmann O. L., Gull P. W., Zeising H. C., Epperly J. R. (1960). Factors influencing wild oat control with barban. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf., 17, 20.
Hoffman O. L. (1971). Coated corn seed. US Patent3,564,768.
Abu-Hare A. Q., Duncan H. J. (2002). Herbicide safeners: uses, limitations, metabolism, and mechanism of action. Chemosphere, 48, 965-974.
Monaco T. J., Weller S. C., Ashton F. M. (Eds). (2002). Herbicides and the plants, In: Weed science: Principles and practices. pp 98-126, Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
Miyauchi N., Kobayashi K., Usui K. (2002). Differential safening activity of dymron and fenclorim on pretilachlor injury in rice seedlings in soil. Weed Biol. Manag. 2, 46-51.
Matsunaka S., Wakabayashi K.(1989). In: Crop Safeners for Herbicides. Hatzios K. K., Hoagland R. E. (Eds). pp 47-61, Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
Rosinger C., Bartsch K., Schulte W. (2012). Safener for Herbicides. In: Modern Crop Protection Compounds. Krämer W., Schirmer U., Jeschke P., Witschel M. (Eds) Vol. 1. pp 371-398. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Tam A. C., Behki R. M., Khan S. U. (1988). Effect of dietholate (R-33865) on the degradation of thiocarbamate herbicide by an EPTC-degrading bacterium. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 36, 654-657.
Keifer D. W. (2005). Method for safening crop from the phytotoxic effect of herbicide by use of phosphorated esters. US Patent 6,855,667.
Hatzios K. K., Zama P. (1986). Physiological interactions between the herbicide EPTC and selected analogues of the antidote naphthalic anhydride on two hybrids of maize. Pestic. Sci., 17, 25-32.
Pallos F. M., Brokke M. E., Arneklev D. R. (1975). Antidotes protect corn from thiocarbamate herbicide injury. J. Agric. Food Chem., 23, 821-822.
Dutka F., Komives T., Marton A. F., Hulesch A., Fodor-Csorba K., Karpati M. (1979). Structure-activity relationships of herbicide antidotes. Proc. Hung. Annu. Meet. Biochem., 19, 1-4.
Görög K., Muschinek G., Mustardy L. A., Faludi-Daniel A. (1982). Comparative studies of safeners for prevention of EPTC injury in maize. Weed Res., 22, 27-33.
Pallos F. M., Reed A. G., Arneklev D. R., Brokke M. E. (1978). Antidotes protect corn from thiocarbamate herbicide injury. In: Chemistry and action of herbicide antidotes, Pallos F. M., Casida J. E., (Eds), pp 15-20, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Stephenson G. R., Chang F. Y. (1978). Comparative activity and selectivity of herbicide antidotes. In: Chemistry and action of herbicide antidotes, Pallos F. M., Casida J. E., (Eds), pp 35-61, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Stephenson G. R., Bunce J. J., Makowski R. I., Curry J. C. (1978). Structure-activity relationships for S-ethyl- N, N-dipropyl thiocarbamateantidotes in corn. J. Agric. Food Chem., 26, 137-140.
Yenne S. P., Hatzios K. K. (1990). Molecular comparisons of selected herbicides and their safeners by computer-aided molecular modeling. J. Agric. Food Chem., 38, 1950-1956.
Bordas B., Komives T., Lopata A. (2000). Comparative three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of safeners and herbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 926-931.
Chang T. S., Merkle M. G. (1982). Oximes as seed safeners for grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 30, 70-73.
Howe R. K., Lee L. F. (1980). 2,4-Disubstituted-5-thiazolecarboxylic acids and derivatives. US Patent4,199,506.
Jablonkai I., Matola T. (2002). Structure–activity relationships of 2-dichloromethyl-1,3-dioxacycloalkanes and heteroanalogues in safening maize against chloroacetanilide herbicides. 10th IUPAC International Congress on Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland, August 4-9, 2002, Book of Abstracts, p. 132.
Matola T., Jablonkai I., Dixon D., Cummins I., Edwards R. (2003). Structure of dichloromethyl-ketal safeners affects the expression of glutathione S-transferase isoforms. Proceedings of BCPC - Weeds, vol 2, 527-532.
Matola T., Jablonkai I. (2007) Safening efficacy of halogenated acetals, ketals and amides and relationships between the structure and effect of glutathion and glutathione S-transferases in maize . Crop Prot., 26, 278-284.
Lewis D. L., Garrison A. W., Wommack K. E., Whittemore A., Steudler P., Melillo J. (1999). Influence of environmental changes on degradation of chiral pollutants in soils. Nature, 401, 898-901.
Garrison A. W. (2006). Probing the enantioselectivity of chiral pesticides. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 16-23.
Wittingham W. G. (2012). 6-Amino-4-pyridine carboxylate derivatives and their preparation, agrochemical compositions and use as herbicidal safener. UK Patent Application, GB 2484982.
Bollinger F. G., Hemmerly D. M., Mahoney M. D., Freeman J. J. (1989). Optical isomers of the herbicidal antidote 4-(dichloromethylene)-2-[ N-(α-methylbenzyl)imino]-1,3-dithiolane hydrochloride. J. Agric. Food Chem., 37, 484-485.
Jablonkai I., Matola T., Cummins I., Dixon D., Edwards R. (2010). Safening activity of carvone stereoisomers against acetochlor herbicide in maize. Royal Australian Chemical Institute’s 13th National Convention in conjunction with the 12th IUPAC International Congress of Pesticide Chemistry, Melbourne, Australia, July 4-8, 2010, Abstr. No. 624.
Jablonkai I., Visy J., Matola T., Cummins I., Dixon D., Edwards R. (2010). Diastereomers of a chiral safener 1,2-dichloromethyl-[1,3]oxathiolane 3-oxide exhibit differential safening activity against acetochlor in maize. Royal Australian Chemical Institute’s 13th National Convention in conjunction with the 12th IUPAC International Congress of Pesticide Chemistry, Melbourne, Australia, July 4-8, 2010, Abstr. No. 623.
Zhao L. X., Liu C. G., Fu Y., Xing Z. Y., Gao S. (2012). Induction of maize glutathione S-transferase by herbicide safeners and their effect on enzyme activity against chlorsulfuron . Advanced Materials Research, vol. 518-523, 5480-5483.
Rubin B., Kirino O. (1989). Herbicide prosafeners: Chemistry, safening activity, and mode of action. In: Crop Safeners for Herbicides. Hatzios K. K., Hoagland R. E. (Eds). pp 317-351, Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
Hilton J. L., Pillai P. (1986). L-2-oxathiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid protection against tridiphane toxicity. Weed Sci., 34, 669-675.
Hilton J. L., Pillai P. (1988). Thioproline protection against herbicide toxicity. Weed Technol., 2, 72-76.
Jablonkai I., Dutka F. (1996). Safening activity of natural hydroxamic acids and analogous compounds against herbicide injury to maize. J. Environ. Sci. Health. Part B. - Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 31, 555-559.
Brazier-Hicks M., Evans K. M., Cunningham O. D., Hodgson D. R. W., Steel P. G., Edwards R. (2008). Catabolism of glutathione conjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana: Role in metabolic reactivation of the herbicide safener fenclorim. J. Biol. Chem., 283, 21102-21112.
Zhang Q., Xu F. X., Lambert K. N., Riechers D. E. (2007). Safeners coordinately induce multiple proteins and MRP transcripts involved in herbicide metabolism and detoxication in Triticum tauschiiseedling tissues. Proteomics, 7, 1261-1278.
Mueller M. J., Berger S. (2009). Reactive electrophilic oxylipins: pattern recognition and signalling. Phytochemistry, 70, 1511-1521.
Kreuz K., Riechers D. E., Zhang Q. (2010). The use of oxylipins as safeners and safening herbicidal compositions comprising oxylipins. WO2011/134539.
Jablonkai I. (1991). Basis for differential chemical selectivity of MG-191 safener against acetochlor and EPTC injury to maize Z. Naturforsch., 46c, 828-835.
Jablonkai I., Dutka F. (1995). Uptake, translocation and metabolism of MG-191safener in corn (Zea Mays L.), Weed Sci., 43, 169-174.
Jablonkai I., Repasi J., Dutka F. (1991). Effect of the site of MG-191 application on acetochlor herbicide uptake, distribution and phytotoxicity. Pestic. Sci., 31, 91-93.
Jablonkai I., Dutka F. (1985). Effect of R-25788 antidote on the uptake, translocation and metabolism of acetochlor herbicide by corn. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., Letters, 96, 419-426.
Barrett M. (1989) Protection of corn ( Zea mays) and sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor)from imazethapyr toxicity with antidotes. Weed Sci.37, 296-301.
Fuerst E. P., Lamoureux G. L. (1992). Mode of action of the dichloroacetamide antidote BAS 145138 in corn. II. Effects on metabolism, absorption and mobility on metazachlor. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 42, 78-87.
Little D. L., Ladner D. W., Shaner D. L. (1994). Modeling root absorption and translocation of 5-substituted analogs of the imidazolinone herbicide, imazzapyr. Pestic Sci., 41, 171-185.
Davies J., Caseley J. C., Jones O. T. G., Barrett M., Polge N. D. (1998). Mode of action naphthalic anhydride as a safener for herbicide AC 263,222 in maize. Pestic. Sci., 52, 29-38.
Hatzios K. K., Burgos N. (2004). Metabolism-based herbicide resistance: regulation by safeners. Weed Sci., 52, 454-467.
Coleman J. O. D., Blake-Kalff M. M. A., Emyr Davies T. G. (1997). Detoxication of xenobiotics by plants: chemical modification and vacuolar compartmentation. Trends Plant Sci., 2, 144-151.
Riechers D. E., Kreuz K., Zhang Q. (2010). Detoxification without intoxication: Herbicide safeners activate plant defence gene expression. Plant Physiol.,153, 3-13.
Marrs K. A. (1996). The function and regulation of glutathione S-transferases in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 47, 127-158.
Cole D. J., Cummins I., Hatton P. J., Dixon D., Edwards R. (1997). Glutathione transferases in crops and weeds. In: Regulation of enzymatic systems detoxifying xenobiotics. Hatzios K. K. (Ed). pp 107-154, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Hatzios, K. K. (2001). Functions and regulation of plant glutathione S-transferases. In: Pesticide biotransformation in plants and microorganisms: Similarities and divergencies.Hall J. C, Hoagland R. E., Zablotowicz R. M. (Eds). pp 218-239, ACS Symposium Series 777, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
Dixon D. P., Hawkins T., Hussey P. J., Edwards R. (2009). Enzyme activities and subcellular localization of members of the Arabidopsisglutathione transferase superfamily. J. Exp. Bot., 60, 1207-1218.
Edwards R., Dixon D. P., Walbot V. (2000). Plant glutathione S-transferases: enzymes with multiple functions in sickness and in health. Trend Plant Sci., 5, 193-198.
Dixon D. P., Lapthorn A., Edwards R. (2002). Plant glutathione transferases. Genome Biol., 3, 3004.1-3004.10.
Dixon D. P., Skipsey M., Edwards R. (2010). Roles for glutathione transferases in secondary plant metabolism. Phytochemistry, 71, 338-350.
Farago S., Brunold C., Kreuz K. (1994). Herbicide safeners and glutathione metabolism. Physiol Plant., 91, 537-542.
Jablonkai I., Hulesch A., Cummins I., Dixon D. P., Edwards R., (2001). The herbicide safener MG-191 enhances the expression of specific glutathione S-transferases in maize. Proceedings of BCPC - Weeds, vol 2, 527-532.
Dixon D. P., Cole D. J. Edwards R (1997). Characterisation of multiple glutathione transferases containing the GST I subunit with activities toward herbicide substrates in maize ( Zea mays). Pestic. Sci. 50, 72-82.
Dixon D. P., Cole J., Edwards R. (1998). Purification, regulation and cloning of glutathione transferase (GST) from maize resembling the auxin-inducible type-III GSTs. Plant Mol. Biol. 36, 75-87.
Dixon D. P., Cole D. J., Edwards R. (1999). Dimerization of maize glutathione transferases in recombinant bacteria. Plant Mol. Biol.40: 997-1008.
Rossini L., Jepson I., Greenland A. J., Sari Gorla M. (1996). Characterization of glutathione S-transferase isoforms in three inbred lines exhibiting differential sensitivity to alachlor. Plant Physiol. 112: 1595-1600.
Theodoulou F. L., Clark I. M., He X. L., Pallett K. E., Cole D. J., Hallahan D. L. (2003). Co-induction of glutathione S-transferases and multidrug resistant protein by xenobiotics in wheat. Pestic. Manag. Sci., 59, 202-214.
Dixon D. P., Cummins I., Cole D. J., Edwards R. (1998b). Glutathione-mediated detoxication system in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1, 258-266.
Davies J. (2001). Herbicide safeners – commercial products and tools for agrochemical reseseach. Pesticide Outlook, February 2001, 10-15.
Hulesch A., Dutka F. (1993). Investigation of the safening of EPTC on several grassy crops and weeds by various safeners. Proceedings of Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, vol 1, 207-212.
Breaux E. J., Patanella J. E., Sanders E. F. (1987). Chloroacetanilide herbicide selectivity: analysis of glutathione and homoglutathione in tolerant, susceptible, and safened seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem., 35 474–478.
Hatton P. J., Dixon D., Cole D. J., Edwards R. (1996). Glutathione transferase activities and herbicide selectivity in maize and associated weed species. Pestic. Sci., 46, 267-275.
Andrews C. J., Skipsey M., Townson J. K., Morris C., Jepson I., Edwards R. (1997). Glutathione transferase activities toward herbicides used selectively in soybean. Pestic. Sci., 51, 213-222.
Hirase K., Molin W. T. (2002). Measuring cysteine biosynthesis activity from serine in extracts from sorghum, corn and grass weeds, and their metolachlor susceptibility. Weed Biol. Manag., 2, 52-59.
Hatton P. J., Cummins I., Price L. J., Cole D. J., Edwards R. (1998). Glutathione transferases and herbicide detoxification in suspension-cultured cells of giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi). Pestic Sci.53, 209-216.
Jablonkai I., Hulesch A., Dutka F. (1995). Influence of herbicides and safeners on glutathione content and glutathione S-transferase activities of monocot and dicot weeds. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides -Cordoba (Spain), DePrado R., Jorrin J., Garcia-Torres L., Marshall G. (Eds), p. 89-91.
Jablonkai I., Hulesch A, Barta I. C. (1997). Glutathione and cysteine conjugates inhibit glutathione S-transferase enzymes mediating GSH conjugation of the herbicide acetochlor. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds, vol 2, p.801-806.
Edwards R., Del Buono D., Fordham M., Skipsey M., Brazier M., Dixon D. P., Cummins I. (2005). Differential induction of glutathione transferases and glucosyltransferases in wheat, maize and Arabidopsis thalianaby herbicide safeners. Z. Naturforsch., 60c, 307-316.
Cummins I., Bryant D. N., Edwards R. (2009). Safener responsiveness and multiple herbicide resistance in the weed black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Plant Biotech. J.,7, 807-820.
Del Buono D., Scarponi L., Espen L. (2007). Glutathione S-transferases in Festuca arundinacea: Identification, characterization and inducibility by safener benoxacor. Phytochemistry, 68, 2614-2624.
Scarponi L., Del Buono D., Quagliarini E., D’Amato R. (2009). Festuca arudinaceagrass and herbicide safeners to prevent herbicide pollution. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 29, 313-319.
Scalla R. (1991). Interaction of herbicides with safeners and synergist. In: Pesticide chemistry: Advances in international research, development, and legislation. Frehse H. (Ed). pp 141-150, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Durst F., Benveniste I., Lesot A., Salaün J.-P., Werck-Reichhart D. (1997). Induction of plant cytochrome P450. In: Regulation of enzymatic systems detoxifying xenobiotics in plants. Hatzios K. K. (Ed). pp 19-34, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Burnett M. W. M., Loveys B. R., Holtum J. A. M., Powles S. B. (1993). A mechanism of chlortoluron resistance in Lolium rigidum. Planta, 190, 182-189.
Burnett M. W. M., Loveys B. R., Holtum J. A. M., Powles S. B. (1994). Identification of two mechanisms of sulfonylurea resistance within one population of rigid ryegrass ( Lolium rigidum) using a selective germination medium, Weed Sci., 42, 153-157.
Burton J. D., Maness E. P. (1992) Constitutive and inducible bentazon hydroxylation in shuttercane ( Sorghum bicolor) and Johnsongrass ( Sorghum halapense). Pestic. Biochem. Biochem. Physiol., 44, 40-49.
Jablonkai I., Hulesch A. (1996). Cytochrome P450 levels of monocot and dicot weeds and influence of herbicides, safeners and P450 inhibitors on enzyme contents. Proceedings of the 2nd International Weed Control Congress - Copenhagen (Denmark), Brown H., Cussans G. W., Devine M. D., Duke S.O., Fernandez-Quintanilla C., Helweg A., Labrada R. E., Landes M., Kudsk P., Streibig J. C. (Eds), Vol 3, p. 789-794.
Barta I. C., Dutka F. (1991) Interaction of maize cytochrome P450 with safeners and 1-aminobenzotriazole. Proceedings of Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, vol 3, 1127-1132.
Jablonkai I., Hatzios K. K. (1994). Microsomal oxidation of the herbicides EPTC and acetochlor and of the safener MG-191 in maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 48, 98-109.
Gatz C. (1997). Chemical control of gene expression. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 48, 89–108.
Padidam M. (2003). Chemically regulated gene expression in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 6, 169-177.
DeRidder B. P., Goldsbrough P. B. (2006). Organ-specific expression of glutathione S-transferases and the efficacy of herbicide safeners in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 140, 167-175.
Walton J. D., Casida J. E. (1995). Specific binding of a dichloroacetamide herbicide safener in maize at a site that also binds thiocarbamate and chloroacetanilide herbicides. Plant Physiol., 109, 213-219.
Scott-Craig J. S., Casida J. E., Poduje L., Walton J. D. (1998). Herbicide safener-binding protein of maize. Plant. Physiol., 116, 1083-1089.
Cummins I., Brazier-Hicks M., Stobiecki M., Franski R., Edwards R. (2006). Selective disruption of wheat secondary metabolism by herbicide safeners. Phytochemistry, 67, 1722-1730.
Zhang Q., Riechers D. E. (2004). Proteomic characterization of herbicide safener-induced proteins in the coleoptile of Triticum tauschiiseedlings. Proteomics, 4, 2058-2071.
Riechers D. E., Vaughn K. C., Molin W. T. (2005). The role of plant glutathione S-transferases in herbicide metabolism. In: Environmental fate and safety management of agrochemicals.Clark J. M., Ohkawa H. (Eds), pp 216-232, ACS Symposium Series 899, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
Taylor V. L., Cummins I., Brazier-Hicks M., Edwards R. (2012). Protective responses induced by herbicide safeners in wheat. Environ. Exp. Botany,doi: 10.1016/jenvexpbot.2011.12.030.