Open access

Atmospheric Nanoparticles and Their Impacts on Public Health

Written By

Klara Slezakova, Simone Morais and Maria do Carmo Pereira

Submitted: May 29th, 2012 Published: May 15th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54775

Chapter metrics overview

4,078 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that every year around two million people die annually due to the effects of atmospheric pollution (Tranfield & Walker, 2012). These estimates are based on epidemiological studies that showed associations between air pollution exposure and respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses and deaths. Special efforts thus have been made in order to reduce air pollution on a global level (Slezakova et al., 2012) and, more importantly, aiming to reduce the adverse impacts of atmospheric pollutants. Although these efforts have been leading to a reduction of risks and effects, air pollution is still a matter of great concern, mainly to relative impacts on human health.

Air pollution is a mixture of various gases such as ozone, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide combined with airborne particles in sizes range of few nanometers to hundreds of micrometers. According to the WHO, these particles are one of the most important pollutants of present times and their presence in the atmosphere has harmful effects both on human health and environment. Nanosized particles (i.e. smaller than 100 nm) are a subgroup of atmospheric particles. Though humans have been exposed to nanosized particles throughout their evolutionary stages, the respective exposure has dramatically increased over the last century due to contribution from various anthropogenic sources. In addition, the rapidly developing field of nanotechnology is likely to become another source of these particles through increased use of engineered nanomaterials. Thus information about safety and potential hazards is urgently needed. Apart from their role for possible adverse health effects (Hoek et al., 2010; Knol et al., 2009), nanoparticles are important precursors for the formation of coarser particles that are known to strongly influence global climate (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2007; Strawa et al., 2010) and urban visibility (Horvath, 1994). They may also influence the atmospheric chemistry in general as their chemical composition and reactivity are different from coarser particles, thus opening novel chemical transformation pathways in the atmosphere (Anastasio & Martin, 2001).

This chapter focuses specifically on airborne nanosized particles and their importance to public health. Various aspects are discussed in the following sections including sources, levels, chemical compositions, regulations, and health and environmental impacts.


2. Characteristics of atmospheric particles

2.1. Particle sizes

The size of particles in the atmosphere ranges from few nanometers up to hundred micrometers. There is no doubt that the particle size is an important parameter. It controls much of the dynamic behavior of particles as well as their chemical and physical impacts upon the environment. It is also certainly an important parameter for the health consequences of the respective human exposure as particle size determines: (i) the deposition of particles within human respiratory system; (ii) the amount of surface area that can contact tissues; and (iii) the rate of particle clearance from lungs (Oberdörster et al., 2005). Particles have many irregular shapes so their aerodynamic behavior is expressed in terms of the diameter of an idealized sphere (i.e. aerodynamic diameter), which is usually simply referred to as “particle size”. Up to this date various terminologies in relation to particle size are used to describe atmospheric particles. Medical sciences use terms such as inhalable or respirable particles that derived from particles classification according to the entrance into various compartments of the respiratory system (WHO, 2000). Toxicologists typically describe particles as ultrafine, fine and coarse whereas regulatory agencies, namely WHO, US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and European Union (EU) use terms such as PMX where PM stands for particulate matter and the subscripts identifies the upper 50% cutpoint. The aerosol science uses classification of particles into the modes based on the particles diameter. Each mode has distinctive size range, formation mechanisms, sources, chemical composition and deposition pathways (Hinds, 1999).

Typically, the mass-based size distribution of atmospheric particles is bimodal, with a minimum point that generally occurs in the size range of 1000–3000 nm (i.e. 1–3 μm; Sioutas et al., 2005), which distinguishes the coarse and fine modes (Fig. 1). By convention, the coarse mode consists of particles larger than 2500 nm in aerodynamic diameter. Based on their size, the coarse mode particles can be further subdivided into supercoarse and coarse particles. The coarse particles have diameter between 2500 nm and 10000 nm (Fig. 1). These particles are usually produced by mechanical processes such wind erosion. Particles from sea salt sprays, pollen and spores also belong to this mode as do coarse particles from plant fibers and leaves. As coarse particles are large, they settle out of the atmosphere typically within few hours of formation. Coarse particles deposit in the upper airways of the human respiratory system and they are cleared from human body through nose or by coughing or swallowing. The supercoarse particles are those with aerodynamic diameter bigger than 10000 nm (i.e. 10 μm; USEPA, 2012a). As these particles are too large to enter human respiratory system they are not considered as relevant from the health point of view. However, due to their possible environmental impacts, supercoarse particles are partly assessed when evaluating total suspended particulate matter (TSP) which includes particles of size range up to 30000 nm (i.e. 30 μm).

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the size distribution of atmospheric particles.

Fine mode is composed of particles with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2500 nm (Fig. 1). Typically, these particles are generated by anthropogenic sources. The small sizes of the particles make them less susceptible to the gravitational settling resulting in atmospheric lifetimes in range of days up to weeks and the ability to travel over very long distances in the atmosphere (Anastasio & Martin, 2001). When inhaled fine particles deposit in the conducting airways of the lungs but some of them can penetrate beyond conducting airways into the alveolar region. Based on the formation mechanisms fine mode particles are further subdivide into accumulation and nuclei modes. Accumulation mode consists of particles with aerodynamic diameter between 100-1000 nm. They result from anthropogenic sources (combustions of engine fuel and lubricant oil by diesel-fuelled or direct injection petrol-fuelled vehicles; Kumar et al., 2010, 2011) but can be formed by natural formations, i.e. by coagulation of nuclei-mode particles or by condensation of gas or vapor molecules on the surface of existing particles. Coagulation is most efficient for large numbers of particles, and condensation is most efficient for large surface areas. Thus the efficiency of both coagulation and condensation decreases as the particle size increases which produces an upper limit of approximately 1000 nm beyond which particles do not grow by these processes. Particles in the range of 100-1000 nm are important because they can represent a significant fraction of the particulate emissions from some types of industrial processes. In addition, sizes of particles in accumulation mode are comparable with the wavelengths of visible light, and hence they account for much of the anthropogenic visibility impairment problem in many urban areas (Seinfeld & Pandis, 2006).

Nuclei mode consist of particles smaller than 100 nm that are also called as ultrafine particles or nanoparticles. In the atmosphere these particles are formed through nucleation, i.e. condensation of low-vapor-pressure substances formed by high temperature vaporization or by chemical reactions in the atmosphere to form new particles (nuclei). These particles are traditionally considered as fresh emissions that yet have to undergo chemical reactions or modification processes. They are mostly composed of nitrates, sulphates, ammonium, organic compounds as well as trace metals when formed from combustion processes (Sioutas et al., 2005; Seinfeld & Pandis, 2006). Nucleation mode particles accounts for the greatest number of atmospheric particles and are found in high number concentrations near their sources. Their concentration in air is most commonly measured and expressed in terms of number concentrations of particles per unit volume of air (in contrast larger particles are measured in terms of mass concentration) (Kumar et al., 2011). Due to their small sizes and large surface area, they are highly chemically reactive. Collisions with each other and with particles in the accumulation mode are largely responsible for their relatively short atmospheric life time (few minutes up to hours). When inhaled these particles are deposited on the alveolar surface (Naga et al., 2005; West, 2008), thereafter, they can transport through the bloodstream or lymphatic system to vital organs (Oberdörster et al., 2004). In addition to their great efficiency to penetrate deep into the lungs, the large surface area may also account for their negative impacts on human health; the scientific evidence indicates that the larger the superficial area the greater the health impacts of particles (Tranfield & Walker, 2012).

The first research studies used the term ultrafine particles (Granqvist et al., 1976, 1977). Nowadays this term is still being predominantly used in aerosol and environmental sciences. However, in 1990’s the term nanoparticles became vastly popular as substitution of ultrafine particles and quickly became adopted in many fields, such as in medicine, material sciences and engineering. Both terms constitute a somewhat arbitrary classification of particles in terms of their size, indicating the significant role of this physical characteristic on particle fate in the air. Theoretically, nanoparticle is any particle with size range in nanometer scale (i.e. bellow 1000 nm; Anastasio & Martin, 2001; Kumar et al., 2010). British Standards Institution (BSI, 2005) defined nanoparticles as those that have one or more dimensions in the order of 100 nm or less. However in current scientific works, the size range definitions for nanoparticles differ significantly. The term nanoparticles was used for atmospheric particles in size ranges such as below 100 nm, 50 nm, 10 nm or occasionally even for particles smaller than 1 μm (Anastasio & Martin, 2001; British Standards Institution, 2005; Morawska et al., 2008). It is worth mentioning that Kumar et al. (2010) recently defined atmospheric nanoparticles as those bellow 300 nm (Fig. 2). Though this size range represents an overlap between particles from nuclei and accumulation mode, authors rationalized that the respective range includes more than 99% of the total number concentration of particles in the ambient atmospheric environments (Kumar et al., 2008a, 2008b, 2009, 2011), being potentially relevant for future regulations.

Figure 2.

Distribution of atmospheric particles in street canyon in Cambridge, UK (Kumar et al., 2008); Dp, is particle diameter. Definitions of atmospheric particles and their size dependent deposition in alveolar and trancheo-bronchial regions are also shown. Adapted from Kumar et al. (2010).

Therefore, when using the term nanoparticles it is necessary to define the size range of the particles in question. For the purposes of this chapter the term nanoparticles includes ambient nanosized particles < 100 nm (Oberdörster et al., 2005).

2.2. Sources and levels of nanoparticles

The major natural sources of atmospheric nanoparticles (Table 1) are atmospheric formations, vegetation and sea sprays. Volcanic eruptions or forest fires also produce, though sporadically, a large number of atmospheric nanoparticles (Kumar et al., 2011; Oberdörster et al., 2005).

The atmospheric formations of the particles include condensation of semi-volatile organic aerosols, photochemically induced nucleation, and/or nucleation through gas-to particle conversion (Holmes, 2007). Concerning the latter, different nucleation mechanisms have been assumed for the formation of atmospheric nanoparticles (Kumala et al., 2004): (i) binary nucleation of sulphuric acid and water; or (ii) ternary nucleation involving a third molecule, most likely is ammonia that is abundant in the troposphere and has been shown to enhance nucleation rates of sulphuric acid.

Natural sources Anthropogenic sources
Atmospheric formations
Sea spray
Forest fires
Volcanoes (hot lava)
Engine combustions Vehicles (petrol-, diesel-, alternative fuels)
Trains, ships, airplanes
Industrial emissions Power plants
Various processes (smelting, heating, welding)
Commercial productions

In remote sites, the formation of new particles is preceded by an increase in the atmospheric concentration of sulphuric acid (Holmes, 2007). Various studies reported an increase in particles number occurring about 1–2 h after an increase in sulphuric acid (Weber et al., 1996), being followed by a relatively small particle growth rate (between 1 and 2 nm h–1; Birmili & Wiedensohler, 2000a; Weber et al., 1996, 1997). These findings point towards a linear relationship between the number of newly formed particles and the production rate of sulphuric acid. It is still not clear though whether at these environments the binary nucleation (i.e. water–sulphuric acid nucleation) is solely responsible for the formation of new particles or if a third specie, such as ammonia or an organic compound, is involved (i.e. ternary nucleation). In forests the mechanisms responsible for the formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles are not completely understood. Although sulphuric acid is one of the most likely candidates that might be responsible for the formation of the initial nanometre-sized particles (Riipinen et al., 2007), sulphur chemistry does not sustain enough sulphuric acid in the atmosphere to explain more than a small fraction of the observed particle size growth rate (Morawska et al., 2008). Several forest studies have concluded that particle formation can commonly occur from biogenic precursors (O’Dowd et al., 2002), some of them suggesting a direct relation between emissions of monoterpenes and gas-to-particle formation in regions substantially lacking in anthropogenic aerosol sources (Tunved et al., 2006). In addition the authors also estimated that forests provide an aerosol population of 1–2×103 cm-3 of climatically active particles (during the period of late spring to early autumn) thus representing a considerable source of global importance. In the marine environments the possible particle formation mechanisms are (Morawska et al., 2008): seawater bubble-burst process (Clarke et al., 2006; O’Dowd et al., 2004), ternary nucleation producing a reservoir of undetectable particles upon which vapours can condense (Kulmala et al., 2000, 2004), free tropospheric production with mixing down to the boundary layer (Raes, 1995), and generation of coastal iodine particles from macroalgal iodocarbon emissions (Kulmala et al., 2000; O’Dowd et al., 2004; O’Dowd & Hoffmann, 2005). Whereas the iodine-containing particles are not likely to play an important role globally, wind produced bubble-burst particles containing salt are ubiquitous in the marine environments. Clarke et al. (2006) have shown that sea salt aerosols produced by breaking waves are a significant constituent of particles with sizes as small as 10 nm, with 60% of the particles smaller than 100 nm in diameter. The authors estimated that in marine regions between 5% and 90% of the nuclei particles originate from the sea salt flux.

The implication of the above referred text is that nanoparticles are formed in the environments due to natural processes. Therefore, they are always present at some concentration levels even in the atmosphere of environments free from the immediate influence of anthropogenic activities. These concentrations should be considered as “natural background”. In addition, because the rates of formation and growth of nanoparticles differ significantly between various natural environments, there are significant variations in number concentrations of atmospheric particles. Whereas in marine environments particle number concentrations typically range between 102 and 103 particles cm-3 (O’Dowd et al., 2004; Seinfeld & Pandis, 2006), the usual ranges in forests and rural continental regions are 103-104 (Birmili & Wiedensohler, 2000b; O’Dowd et al., 2002; Riipinen et al., 2007), though occurrence of forest fires may temporally increased these levels. Meteorological parameters, such as wind speed, precipitation, relative humidity and temperature also influence particle concentrations. Therefore, when evaluating particle concentrations in urban environments it is important to assess the respective background levels and to compare them with concentrations in urban environments in order to correctly estimate the magnitude of the anthropogenic impacts.

The number concentrations of nanoparticles in the atmosphere can vary by up to five or more orders of magnitude (from 102 to 107 particles cm-3) depending on environmental conditions and source strengths (Kumar et al., 2010) but typically, in natural environments the particle number concentrations are approximately to 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than those in urban areas (Kumar et al., 2010). Morawska et al. (2008) analysed concentration levels of 71 studies performed on nanoparticles in various environments, including those from clean background and rural background sites (Table 2). The authors found (Morawska et al., 2008), respectively, the mean concentrations of 2.6×103 and 4.8×103 particles cm-3 for clean background and rural background sites compared to 42.1×103 and 48.2×103 particles cm-3 for urban and street canyons; in urban areas anthropogenic sources, such as vehicular emissions are strong contributors of nanoparticles, thus much higher particle concentration levels were observed (Table 2). Road tunnels (167.7×103 particles cm-3) account for the highest concentrations. They can act as a trap for pollutants from vehicular emissions that is enhanced by the surrounding built-up environment that limits the dispersion of exhaust emissions (Van Dingenen et al., 2004).

There is no doubt that anthropogenic emissions constitute the major source of atmospheric nanoparticles in urban environments (Table 2). With respect to urban sites various studies have concluded that vehicle exhaust emissions represent a primary source of nanoparticle pollution in urban environments (Harrison et al., 1999; Shi & Harrison, 1999; Shi et al., 2001; Wåhlin et al., 2001) that might be responsible up to 86% of total particle number concentrations (Pey et al., 2009). The vehicle emissions depend on many factors such as type of engines, fuels, lubricating oil, after-treatment or driving conditions. Typically particles emitted from diesel engines are in the size range 20–130 nm (Kittelson, 1998; Harris & Maricq, 2001). Diesel-fuelled vehicles make by far the greatest contributions to total number concentrations (Kumar et al., 2010) although in most of European countries their proportion is lower. In 2009 passenger diesel-fuelled cars in Europe accounted for to 9-10% (Sweden and Cyprus) to 62% (Luxemburg) but in 16 out of 21 European countries (where data is available) their proportion was less than 50% (EU, 2011). Large part of nanoparticles is also produce by heavy duty diesel vehicles (trucks, buses) that exhibit particle number emission factors one to two orders of magnitude larger than a typical petrol car (Ristovski et al., 2005, 2006). In comparison, particles from petrol-fuelled vehicles are in the size range 20–60 nm (Harris & Maricq, 2001; Ristovski et al., 2006), and their emissions vary significantly depending on the engine operating conditions; Graskow et al. (1998) reported that when driven at higher speed (~120 km h-1) or during acceleration, the particle number emissions from petrol vehicles were similar to those observed from diesel vehicles.

Site Number of analyzed studies Estimated concentration× 103 (particles cm-3)
Mean Median
Clean background 5 2.6 3.2
Rural background 8 4.8 2.9
Urban background 4 7.3 8.1
Urban 24 10.8 8.8
Street canyon 7 42.1 39.3
Roadside 18 48.2 34.6
On-road 2 71.5 47.0
Tunnel 3 167.7 99.1

Table 2.

Particle number concentrations in different environments (Morawska et al., 2008)

In general particles from vehicle exhaust may be divided into two main categories. Primary particles are directly emitted from the engines. These particles are mostly submicrometer agglomerates (30-500 nm) of solid phase carbonaceous material containing metallic ash (from lubricating oil additives and engine wear) and adsorbed or condensed hydrocarbons and sulphur compounds (Morawska et al., 2008). Secondary particles are formed in the atmosphere when hot exhaust gases are expelled from vehicle tailpipe; as they cool and condensate they form nuclei mode particles (typically smaller than 30 nm) that consists mainly of hydrocarbons and hydrated sulphuric acid (Morawska et al., 2008). On-roads studies (e.g. when a vehicle is being followed by a mobile laboratory; Kittelson et al., 2004, 2006; Casati et al., 2007) and those performed near busy roads (Harrison et al., 1999; Ntziachristos et al., 2007; Rosenbohm et al., 2005; Westerdahl et al., 2005) reported large number of these particles.

The interactions between vehicle tyres and road can also generate particles of submicron sizes, although it was generally believed that tyre wear on the road contributes mainly to larger size (> 2.5 μm). Some more recent studies report (Gustafsson et al., 2008; Dahl et al., 2006) that considerable emissions of nanoparticles might be generated from road and tyre interactions, depending on surface, vehicle and driving conditions. As this source could be a significant contributor to particle number emissions, more research on this topic is needed.

The industrial sources of atmospheric nanoparticles include power plants, incinerators, or various industrial processes such as smelting or welding, heating operations (Oberdörster et al., 2005). Compared to vehicle exhaust emissions, their contribution to atmospheric nanoparticles is though much lower. In a study performed in Barcelona, Spain, Pey et al. (2009) investigated source apportionment of atmospheric particles in size range 13-800 nm (i.e. nuclei and accumulation mode) at an urban background site. The authors identified vehicular exhaust emissions (65%) and regional/urban background (24%) as the largest contributors to total particle number concentrations (mean of 17×103 particles cm−3); industrial emissions accounted only for 2% of the total particle number. The levels of this contribution were similar in the study (Pey et al. (2009) to: photochemically induced nucleation (3%), sea spray (2%), and mineral dust (1%); unidentified sources accounted for 3%.

In the last decade nanoscience has been a dynamically developing field of scientific interest in the entire world (Aguar-Fernandez & Hullmann, 2007). Small size and relatively large reactive surface area of nanoparticles led to their increased use in a variety of fields such as in medicine, material sciences, electronics or energy storage (Helland et al., 2007). Thus engineered (i.e. manufactured) nanoparticles have become (apart from vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions) another important anthropogenic source of atmospheric nanoparticles. These nanoparticles are not intentionally released into the environment, though some release may occur during production, use and disposal phases of nanomaterial-integrated products (Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska et al., 2009). Their characteristics (sources, composition, homogeneity or heterogeneity, oxidant potential, exposure and emissions) differ from other atmospheric nanoparticles (Oberdörster et al., 2005). The engineered nanoparticles are nowadays incorporated into many products of daily use (pharmaceuticals, lubricants, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, fillers, catalysts, electronic devices or other domestic appliances; Nel et al., 2006). The widespread use of manufactured nanoparticles in consumer products may dramatically increase potential environmental, occupational, and public exposures to these particles that may result in adverse health effects if they are not appropriately controlled. In addition, as nanotechnology has being nowadays used in various industries, it becomes responsible for the production of waste containing residue of nanomaterials; considering the unprecedented application of nanoparticles in various products, significant amounts of new-generation-waste will be certainly created in the near future (Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska et al., 2009).

In view of the comprehensive utilizations of nanotechnological applications, concerns regarding the potential health effects of engineered nanoparticles have been raised (Helland et al., 2005). The available toxicological studies indicate (Nel et al., 2006; Oberdörster et al., 2005) that toxicity of engineered nanoparticles depends on specific physiochemical and environmental factors, implying that toxic potential of each type of nanoparticle has to be evaluated individually (Helland et al., 2007). Due to the great variability in used materials (e.g. titanium dioxide, silver, carbon, gold, cadmium and heavy metals; Kumar et al., 2010) it is thus not possible to generalize the toxicological impacts of the engineered nanoparticles. In addition size, shape, surface characteristics, inner structure and chemical composition may also play an important role in determining toxicity and reactivity (Maynard & Aitken, 2007; Nel et al., 2006).

2.3. Chemical composition of nanoparticles

The composition of atmospheric nanoparticles is highly variable. The source and formations influence their chemical composition and nanoparticles include components such as inorganic compounds (sulphates, nitrates, ammonium, chloride, trace metals), elemental and organic carbon, crystal materials, biological components (viruses), and volatile and semivolatile organic compounds (Oberdörster et al., 2005). They can carry toxic compounds such as heavy metals, dioxins, hydrocarbons and other organic chemicals (some of which are potentially carcinogenic) adhered to their surfaces which then increase their toxicity (Terzano et al., 2010). Apart the source-specificity, composition of nanoparticles also depends on geographical and meteorological parameters which in general lead to great differences in physicochemical properties among nanoparticles.

Several studies including a number of recent ones (Chen et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2011; Klems et al., 2011; Kudo et al., 2011) have evaluated the composition of atmospheric nanoparticles. However, at present, the knowledge on nanoparticles composition is far from comprehensive. The existent scientific studies are conducted at different ways, sample particles in a different size range, use different samplers, and focus on different aspects of particle chemical composition. Thus the reported data are not completely comparable across the studies. In their attempt to improve the current knowledge, Chow & Watson (2007) review and summarized the results of the existent studies. The authors analyzed 25 studies performed at various environments (rural, urban, industrial, coastal, roadside, traffic, city-centre, urban background, and etc.) and in various regions: two studies were conducted in Europe (Finland), four in Japan, three in Asia (one in China, two in Taiwan) and sixteen in USA; eleven US studies were performed in California, eight of them were from different locations within the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Concerning the chemical composition the authors concluded that organic material including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was the most abundant portion of atmospheric nanoparticles in most, but not all environments. High elemental concentrations were found in nanoparticles from industrial sites with potassium, calcium and iron as important elements. Potassium originates from biomass burning, and calcium is used as an oil additive; condensed iron vapors are often found in industrial processes. Much of the nanoparticles appeared to be semi-volatile, consistent with being comprised of organic materials such as hopanes from engine oils or condensed secondary organic aerosol such as organic acids. However, authors emphasize the necessity to conduct more studies on particle chemical composition in to order to provide a more complete understanding on the chemistry of atmospheric nanoparticles and local variations.


3. Regulatory aspects

During last two decades the exponentially growing interdisciplinary research on air quality and health has clearly demonstrated increased incidence and the prevalence of respiratory diseases along with increased air pollution. Particles have emerged as the most dangerous pollutants due their adverse health effects going far beyond the simple toxicity to the lung. The results of the conducted epidemiology studies were so relevant that USEPA and EU have implemented strategies to protect public health which resulted in establishment of regulatory limits of atmospheric particles (PM10). As the ongoing research emphasized the importance of smaller (i.e. fine) particles the new PM2.5 standards were proposed and implemented in most of developed countries (Table 3). However, the reduction of atmospheric particulate emissions is nowadays required especially in rapidly developing countries, such as Brazil, China or India but they are only slowly moving towards implementation of these standards (Slezakova et al., 2012); there are still a number of countries, such as Pakistan where any regulatory limits for atmospheric particles have not been proposed yet.

Country Pollutant Targeted limit Note Reference
European Union PM10 24h mean: 40 μg/m3 Not to be exceeded more than 35 times per calendar year Directive 2008/50/EC
Annual mean: 50 μg/m3
PM2.5 Annual mean: 25 μg/m3 (in force from 2015)
USA PM10 24h mean: 150 μg/m3 USEPA, 2006
PM2.5 24h mean: 35 μg/m3
Annual mean : 15 μg/m3
Canada PM2.5 24h mean : 30 μg/m3 Canadian Council of Ministries of Environment, 2003
Australia PM10 24h mean: 50 μg/m3 Australian Government, 2012
PM2.5 24h mean: 25 μg/m3
Annual mean: 8 μg/m3
Japan PM10 24 h mean: 100 μg/m3 Government of Japan, 2012
PM2.5 24h mean: 35 μg/m3
Annual mean: 15 μg/m3

Table 3.

Air quality standards for atmospheric particles in selected countries

Unlike fine or coarse particles, the regulatory aspect of nanoparticles has not been addressed yet. The difficulty lies as to which metric of nanoparticles would be the most adequate. Several generic and specific characteristics of particles such as chemical composition, size, geometry or surface area have been discussed (Kumar et al., 2010, 2011) but no conclusion has been reached yet. The mass-based paradigm of PM10 and PM2.5 regulator limits is not applicable to nanoparticles as their distribution is not dominated by mass but particle number. Some studies have suggested that the particle number concentrations of ultrafine particles (i.e. smaller than 100 nm) are an important parameter as size range comprises the major proportion (about 80%) of the total number concentration of ambient nanoparticles, but negligible mass concentration. Reliable characterization of nanoparticles in the air is thus vital for developing a regulatory framework. At national levels air quality agencies should be encouraged to integrate nanoparticle measurements in their monitoring networks (number and size distributions measurements). Such initiatives might provide comprehensive data and information necessary to correctly address regulatory aspects of atmospheric nanoparticles in order to prevent the public exposures.


4. Health impacts

Due to intensive research, there is an emerging evidence that exposure to nanoparticles may adversely affect human health (Stölzel et al., 2007). The nanoparticles enter human body through the skin, lung and gastrointestinal tract (Nel et al., 2006). When they are inhaled, their behavior differs from coarse particles. Their small size allows them to be breathed deeply into the lungs where they are able to penetrate alveolar epithelium and enter the pulmonary interstitium and vascular space to be absorbed directly into the blood stream (Terzano et al., 2010). They may also translocate within the body to the central nerve system, the brain, into the systemic circulation and to organs like the liver (Helland et al., 2007; Figure 3). They are more reactive and toxic due to the larger surface areas, leading to detrimental health effects such as oxidation stress, pulmonary inflammation and cardiovascular events (Buseck & Adachi, 2008; Nel et al., 2006).

Though the toxicological studies have provided evidence of the toxicity of nanoparticles, epidemiological evidence of the health effects is limited. Currently, there is also no quantitative summary of concentration-response functions for these particles that could be used in health impact assessment (Hoek et al., 2010). Unlike for coarse and fine particles there are relatively few epidemiological studies on the health effects of atmospheric nanoparticles. The first conducted studies on atmospheric nanoparticles have been panel studies, which generally showed associations between short-term exposure to nanosized particles and occurrence of acute respiratory symptoms and lung function (Ibald-Mulli et al., 2002; Peters et al., 1997; Penttinen et al., 2001a, 2001b). Some of these studies have suggested that nanoparticles might be even more strongly associated with adverse respiratory outcomes than fine particles (Peters et al., 1997; Penttinen et al., 2001a) whereas other studies found similar associations in health outcomes of nano and fine particles (von Klot et al., 2002; Pekkannen et al., 1997, Penttinen et al., 2001b). Up to this date, only few epidemiological studies have assessed more severe end points such as daily, and cause specific mortality and hospital admissions (Stölzel, et al., 2007; Wichman et al., 2000); there are no epidemiological studies on long-term exposure to atmospheric nanoparticles.

Figure 3.

Systemic health effects of atmospheric nanoparticles. Adapted from Terzano et al. (2010).

Although lungs are the primary target of nanoparicles, cardiovascular detrimental consequences due exposure to nanoparticles have been also observed in some epidemiological studies (Kettunen, et al., 2007; Rückerl et al., 2007). Specifically, the “Exposure and Risk Assessment for Fine and Ultrafine Particles in Ambient Air” (i.e. ULTRA) study investigated the health effects of nanoparticles in three European cities (Amsterdam, Erfurt, Helsinki), where daily number concentrations levels of nanoparticles in air were similar (Ruuskanen et al., 2001). The authors followed a cohort of 131 patients aged 40-84 with established coronary heart disease with biweekly submaximal exercise tests over a 6-months period. It was observed that the risk of developing ischemia during exercise was significantly elevated at 2 days after exposure to increased environmental levels of nanoparticles (Pekkanen et al., 2002). The importance of this observation is that it highlights myocardial ischemia as a significant potential mechanism responsible for the adverse cardiac outcomes associated with poor air quality (Terzano et al., 2010). In addition particulate pollution including nanoparticles was associated with decrease in blood pressure (Ibald-Mulli et al., 2004). The study thus started to provide an understanding of how nanoparticles may affect cardiovascular health.


5. Environmental impacts

5.1. Visibility impairment

Impairment of the visibility involves degrading of the ability to perceive the environment. Atmospheric suspended particles are the most important factor in the visibility reduction (Boubel et al., 1994). The reduction of visibility is caused by build-up of the atmospheric particles that absorb or scatter light from the sun (Horvath, 2008); though light scattering by particles is the most important phenomenon responsible for impairment of visibility. The size of particles plays a crucial role for the interaction with light, but so far the existent links between visibility impairment and mass concentrations have been established for larger particles (Boubel et al., 1994; Strawa et al., 2010). Shape and composition of particles are also relevant for visibility reduction; carbon particles may contribute 5–40% of overall visibility reduction through light absorption in polluted areas, whereas particles containing sulphate, organic carbon and nitrate species may cause 60-95% of visibility reduction (Kumar at al., 2010). Finally, visibility impairment is affected by meteorological parameters; it increases with relative humidity and atmospheric pressure and decreases with temperature and wind speed (Kim et al., 2002; Tsai, 2005). In general the role of nanoparticles in visibility impairment is still unclear. However, diesel vehicles emit large number of sulphate and carbonaceous nanoparticles. Particles of these compositions reduce visibility which suggests that nanoparticles might be relevant for visibility impairment. Therefore, deeper understanding of nanoparticles role in visibility impairment is necessary.

5.2. Climate change

Climate system, atmospheric chemistry and even life on the Earth are dependent on solar radiation (Boubel et al., 1994). Approximately 30% of the incoming solar energy is reflected back to space. The remaining 70% is absorbed by the surface–atmosphere system of the Earth. This energy heats the planet and the atmosphere. As the surface and the atmosphere become warm, they release the energy in form of infrared radiation. This process continues until the incoming solar energy and the outgoing heat radiation are in balance. This radiation energy balance provides a powerful constraint for the global average temperature of the planet (Ramanathan & Feng, 2009). Atmospheric greenhouse gases (such as like carbon dioxide and methane) and particles affect the climate by altering the incoming solar and outgoing thermal radiations. In other words changing the atmospheric abundance or properties of these gases and particles can lead to a warming or cooling of the climate system. The influence of a factor (pollutant) that cause change of climate system are typically evaluated in terms of its radiative forcing, which is an estimate of how the energy balance of the Earth-atmosphere system is influenced when the factor in question is altered (IPCC, 2007).

Atmospheric nanosized particles are the main precursors of larger particles. They promote their growth and modify the optical properties thus affecting the radiative properties of the atmosphere. It was generally believed that particles reflect sunlight back to space before it reaches the surface, and thus contribute to a cooling of the surface (i.e. negative radiative forcing; Monks et al., 2009). During time as the concentrations of particles increased (along with greenhouse gases) their cooling effect has masked some of the greenhouse warming (Ramanathan & Feng, 2009). This masking effect could be relative large considering that estimated negative radiative forcing of particles is –1.2 W m-2 compared with +2.63 W m-2 for greenhouse gases (+1.66 W m-2 for carbon dioxide, +0.48 W m for methane and +0.16 W m-2 for nitrous oxide, +0.34 W m-2 for halocarbons; IPCC, 2007). However, in the last years the view of particle role in climate change has deepened. It was found that atmospheric particles may also enhance scattering and absorption of solar radiation thus causing direct warm-up (i.e. positive radiation; IPPC, 2007). Especially, carbonaceous particles are considered as one of the major contributors to global warming (i.e. +0.34 W m-2); if they are coated with sulphate or organic compounds their radiative forcing can increase up to about +0.6 W m-2 (Kumar et al., 2010).

Indirectly nanoparticles can also cause a negative radiative forcing through changes in cloud formations and properties (IPCC, 2007). They can act as cloud condensation nuclei and modify size and number concentrations of cloud droplets. In clean air, clouds are composed of a relatively small number of large droplets. As a consequence, the clouds are somewhat dark and translucent. In polluted air with high concentrations of particles (such as urban areas) water can easily condense on the particles, creating a large number of small droplets. These clouds are dense, very reflective, and bright white. Due to the decrease of the size of water droplets these clouds are less efficient at releasing precipitation. They cause large reductions in the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface, a corresponding increase in atmospheric solar heating, changes in atmospheric thermal structure, surface cooling, disruption of regional circulation systems such as the monsoons, suppression of rainfall, and less efficient removal of pollutants (Ramanathan & Feng, 2009). In general the indirect effects of particles are only partially understood. The interactions between aerosol particles (natural and anthropogenic in origin) and clouds are complex and most instruments cannot measure aerosols within the clouds. Climatologists thus consider the role of clouds to be the largest single uncertainty in climate prediction.

The close relation between climate and air quality also reflects on the impacts of climate change on air pollution levels. For example particle pollution levels are strongly influenced by shifts in the weather (e.g., heat waves or droughts; EEA, 2012a). While closely related, climate change and air pollution have mostly been treated as separate problems. At the international level, various efforts have helped to reduce air pollution levels. The largest reductions have been achieved for emissions of sulphur dioxide which decreased in Europe by 82% between 1990 and 2010 (EEA, 2012b). The implementation of EU regulation limits setting levels of sulphur dioxide in urban areas and various political actions to control urban atmospheric emissions (i.e. sulfur abatement technologies in industrial facilities, EEA, 2011; introduction of fuels with reduced levels of sulfur, Directive 98/70/EC; EN 590/2004) have contributed to these reductions. In addition, significant reductions were also obtained for emissions of air pollutants that are primarily responsible for formation of harmful ground-level ozone: non-methane volatile organic compounds (56% reduction) and nitrogen oxides (47% reduction; EEA, 2012b). However, based on the future climate scenarios (and in the absence of additional emissions reductions) the IPCC still projected declining air quality in cities into the future as a result of climate change (USEPA, 2012b). In agreement, USEPA has concluded that climate change could have various negative impacts on national air quality levels that included both increases and decreases in particle pollution (USEPA, 2009). Thus in order to protect human health and environment, joined efforts to control air pollution and mitigate climate change have to be done in future: air pollution abatement measures may help protect the regional and global climate whilst taking certain climate change measures may yield additional benefits through improved local and regional air quality.


6. Conclusion

Atmospheric nanoparticles represent an area of growing health concern. Although our understanding of the ambient nanoparticles and their behavior has increased considerably in recent years, the magnitude of the impacts of nanoparticles on human health and the environment has still not been fully understood. Lack of answers from epidemiological studies in relation to atmospheric nanoparticles and the absence of the exposure-response relationships also mean that currently it is not possible to develop health guidelines, a basis for national regulations. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach including atmospheric scientists, nanomaterial engineers, epidemiologists, clinicians and toxicologists is necessary to further investigate sources, generation, physicochemical characteristics and potential harmful effects of nanoparticles. This knowledge would allow better understanding of the potential impacts of the particles on the environment and health and would provide scientific foundation for development of strategies to protect public health.

The knowledge on the characteristics of engineered nanoparticles is in general very limited. Though these nanoparticles appear in smaller concentrations than other atmospheric nanoparticles they may pose much larger health risks (Oberdörster et al., 2005). Therefore, the future studies need to consider the specificity of these nanoparticles and the new kinds of environmental and health impacts resulting from the release of these nanoparticles.



The authors would like to thank to Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia for the financial support through grants number PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011 and PEst-C/EQB/UI0511/2011, and fellowship SFRH/BPD/65722/2009.


  1. 1. Aguar-Fernandez, M.A. & Hullmann, A. (2007). A boost for safer nanotechnology. Nano Today, Vol. 2, No. 1, (February 2007), pp. 56, ISSN 1748-0132
  2. 2. Anastasio, C. & Martin, S.T. (2001). Atmospheric nanoparticles, In: Nanoparticles and the Environment, J.F. Banfield, A. Navrotsky (Eds.), pp. 293–349, Mineralogical Society of America, ISBN 0-939950-56-1, Washington, DC.
  3. 3. Australian Government, National Environment Protection Council. (2012). Ambient Air Quality Standards, August 2012, available from <>
  4. 4. Birmili, W. & Wiedensohler, A. (2000a). Evolution of newly formed aerosol particles in the continental boundary layer: a case study including OH and H2SO4 measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 15, (August 2000), pp. 2205–2208, ISSN 0094-8276
  5. 5. Birmili, W. & Wiedensohler, A. (2000b). New particle formation in the continental boundary layer: meteorological and gas phase parameter influence. Geophysical Research Letter, Vol. 27, No. 20, (October 2000), pp. 3325-3328, ISSN 0094-8276
  6. 6. Boubel, R.W., Fox, D.L., Turner, D.B. & Stern, A.C. (1994). Fundamentals of Air Pollution (3rd edition), Academic Press, ISBN 0-12-118930-0, London, United Kingdom
  7. 7. British Standards Institution. (2005). Vocabulary — Nanoparticles. British Standards Institution, ISBN 0 580 45925 X, London, United Kingdom
  8. 8. Buseck, P.R. & Adachi, K. (2008). Nanogeoscience: nanoparticles in the atmosphere. Elements, Vol. 4, No. 6, (December 2008), pp. 389-394, ISSN 1811-5209
  9. 9. Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska, G., Golimowski, J. & Urban, P.L. (2009). Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Management, Vol. 29, No. 9, (September 2009), pp. 2587–2595, ISSN 0956053X
  10. 10. Canadian Council of Ministries of Environment. (2000). Canada-wide Standards for Particulate Matter (PM) and Ozone. CCME Council of Ministers, Quebec City, August 2012, available from <>
  11. 11. Casati, R., Scheer, V., Vogt, R. & Benter, T. (2007). Measurement of nucleation and soot mode particle emission from a diesel passenger car in real world and laboratory in situ dilution. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 41, No. 10, (March 2007), pp. 2125–2135, ISSN 1352-2310
  12. 12. Chen, S.-C., Tsai, C.-J., Chou, C.C.-K., Roam, G.-D., Cheng, S.-S. & Wang, Y.-N. (2010). Ultrafine particles at three different sampling locations in Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 44, No. 4, (February 2010), pp. 533-540, ISSN 1352-2310
  13. 13. Chow, J.C. & Watson, J.G. (2007). Review of measurement methods and Compositions for ultrafine particles. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, (June 2007), pp. 121-173, ISSN 2071-1409
  14. 14. Clarke, A.D., Owens, S.R. & Zhou, J. (2006). An ultrafine sea-salt flux from breaking waves: implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, Vol. 111, No. D6, (March 2006), pp. 1–2, ISSN 0148-0227
  15. 15. Dahl, A., Gharibi, A., Swietlicki, E., Gudmundsson, A., Bohgard, M., Ljungman, A., Blomqvist, G. & Gustafsson, M. (2006). Traffic-generated emissions of ultrafine particles from pavement-tire interface. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 40, No. 7, (March 2006), pp. 1314-1323, ISSN 1352-2310
  16. 16. Directive 2008/50/EC. (2008). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. Official Journal of the European Union, L152, (June 2006), pp. 1-44
  17. 17. Directive 98/70/EC. (1998). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels. Official Journal of the European Communities, L350, (December 1998), pp. 58–68
  18. 18. EN Standard 590/2004. (2004). Automotive Fuels. Diesel. Requirements and Test methods, European Committee for Standardization, ISBN 05-8044-119-9, Brussels, Belgium
  19. 19. Environmental European Agency (EEA). (2011). European Union Emission Inventory Report 1990–2009 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). EEA Technical report No. 9/2011, Office for Official Publications of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9213-216-3, Luxemburg
  20. 20. Environmental European Agency (EEA). (2012a). Evaluation of progress under the EU National Emission Ceilings Directive. EEA Technical report No. 14/2012, Publication Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9213-336-8, Luxemburg
  21. 21. Environmental European Agency (EEA). (2012b). Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe. EEA Report No. 2/2012, Office for Official Publications of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9213-308-5, Luxemburg
  22. 22. European Union (EU). (2011). Energy, Transport, and Environmental Indicators (2011 ed.), European Union, ISBN 978-92-79-21384-7, Luxemburg
  23. 23. Government of Japan, Ministry of Environment. (2012). Environmental Quality Standards in Japan - Air quality, August 2012, available from <>
  24. 24. Granqvist, C.G., Buhrman, R.A., Wyns, J. & Sievers, A.J. (1976). Far-infrared absorption in ultrafine Al particles. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 37, No. 10, (September 1976), pp. 625–629, ISSN 0031-9007
  25. 25. Granqvist, C.G., Buhrman, R.A., Wyns, J. & Sievers, A.J. (1977). Far-infrared absorption in ultrafine Al particles: Drude model versus Gor'kov-Eliashberg theory. Journal de Physique Colloque, Vol.38, pp. C2 93–96, DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:1977219
  26. 26. Graskow, B.R., Kittelson, D.B., Abdul-Khaleek, I.S., Ahmadi, M.R. & Morris, J.E. (1998). Characterization of exhaust particulate emissions from a spark ignition engine. SAE Special Publications, Vol. 1326, (February 1998), pp. 155-165
  27. 27. Gustafsson, M., Blomqvist, G., Gudmundsson, A., Dahl, A., Swietlicki, E., Bohgard, M., Lindbom, J. & Ljungman, A. (2008). Properties and toxicological effects of particles from the interaction between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 393, No. 2-3, (April 2008), pp. 226-240, ISSN 0048-9697
  28. 28. Harris, S.J. & Maricq, M.M. (2001). Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter. Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 32, No. 6, (June 2001), pp. 749–764, ISSN 0021-8502
  29. 29. Harrison, R., Jones, M. & Collins, G. (1999). Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 33, No. 2, (January 1999), pp. 309–321, ISSN 1352-2310
  30. 30. Helland, A., Kastenholz, H., Thidell, A., Arnfalk, P. & Deppert, K. (2006). Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: an analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 8, No. 5, (October 2006), pp. 709–719, ISSN 1388-0764
  31. 31. Helland, A., Wick, P., Koehler, A., Schmid, K. & Som, C. (2007). Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 115, No. 8, (August 2007), pp. 1125-1131, ISSN 0091-6765
  32. 32. Hinds, W.C. (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behaviour and Measurement of Airborne Particles, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-19410-1, Hoboken, USA
  33. 33. Hoek, G., Boogaard, H., Knol, A., de Hartog, J., Slottje, P., Ayres, J.G., Borm, P., Brunekreef, B., Donaldson, K., Forastiere, F., Holgate, S., Kreyling, W.G., Nemery, B., Pekkanen, J., Stone, V., Wichmann, H.E. & van der Sluijs, J. (2010). Concentration response functions for ultrafine particles and all-cause mortality and hospital admissions: results of a European expert panel elicitation. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 44, No. 1, (January 2010), pp. 476-482, ISSN 0013-936X
  34. 34. Holmes, N.S. (2007). A review of particle formation events and growth in the atmosphere in the various environments and discussion of mechanistic implications. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 41, No. 10, (March 2007), pp. 2183-2201, ISSN 1352-2310
  35. 35. Horvath, H. (1994). Atmospheric aerosols, atmospheric optics visibility. Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 25, Suppl. 1, (May 1994), pp. 23-24, ISSN 0021-8502
  36. 36. Horvath, H. (2008). Conference on visibility, aerosols, and atmospheric optics, Vienna, September 3–6, 2006. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 11, (April 2008), pp. 2569-2570, ISSN 1352-2310
  37. 37. Ibald-Mulli, A., Timonen, K.L., Peters, A., Heinrich, J., Wölke, G., Lanki, T., Buzorius, G., Kreyling, W.G., de Hartog, J., Hoek, G., ten Brink, H.M. & Pekkanen, J. (2004). Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure and heart rate in subjects with cardiovascular disease: A multicenter approach. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 112, No. 3, (March 2004), pp. 369-37, ISSN 0091-6765
  38. 38. Ibald-Mulli, A., Wichmann, H.E., Kreyling, W. & Peters, A. (2002). Epidemiological evidence on health effects of ultrafine particles. Journal of Aerosol Medicine: Deposition, Clearance, and Effects in the Lung, Vol. 15, No. 2, (June 2002), pp. 189–201, ISSN 0894-2684
  39. 39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-88009-1, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  40. 40. Kettunen, J., Lanki, T., Tiittanen, P., Aalto, P.P., Koskentalo, T., Kulmala, M., Salomaa, V. & Pekkanen, J. (2007). Associations of fine and ultrafine particulate air pollution with stroke mortality in an area of low air pollution levels. Stroke, Vol. 38, No. 3, (March 2007), pp. 918-922, ISSN 0039-2499
  41. 41. Kim, K.H., Sekiguchi, K., Furuuchi, M. & Sakamoto, K. (2011). Seasonal variation of carbonaceous and ionic components in ultrafine and fine particles in an urban area of Japan. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, No. 8, (March 2011), pp. 1581-1590, ISSN 1352-2310
  42. 42. Kim, Y.J., Kim, K.W. & Oh, S.J. (2001). Seasonal characteristics of haze observed by continuous visibility monitoring in the urban atmosphere of Kwangju, Korea. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 70, No. 1-2, (July 2001), pp. 35-46, ISSN 0167-6369
  43. 43. Kittelson, B.D. (1998). Engines and nanoparticles: a review. Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 29, No. 5-6, (June 1998), pp. 575–588, ISSN 0021-8502
  44. 44. Kittelson, D., Watts, W. & Johnson, J. (2006). On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols – Part1: summary of diesel engine results. Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 37, No. 8, (August 2006), pp. 913–930, ISSN 0021-8502
  45. 45. Kittelson, D.B., Watts, W.F. & Johnson, J.P. (2004). Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 38, No. 1, (January 2004), pp. 9–19, ISSN 1352-2310
  46. 46. Klems, J.P., Pennington, M.R., Zordan, C.A., McFadden, L. & Johnston, M.V. (2011). Apportionment of motor vehicle emissions from fast changes in number concentration and chemical composition of ultrafine particles near a roadway intersection. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 45, No. 13, (July 2011), pp. 5637-5643, ISSN 0013-936X
  47. 47. Knol, A., de Hartog, J., Boogaard, H., Slottje, P., van der Sluijs, J., Lebret, E., Cassee, F., Wardekker, J.A., Ayres, J., Borm, P., Brunekreef, B., Donaldson, K., Forastiere, F., Holgate, S., Kreyling, W., Nemery, B., Pekkanen, J., Stone, V., Wichmann, H.E., Hoek, G., 2009. Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: likelihood of health effects and causal pathways. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Vol. 6, No. 19, (July 2009), 16 pp., ISSN 1743-8977
  48. 48. Kudo, S., Sekiguchi, K., Kim, K.H. & Sakamoto, K. (2011). Spatial distributions of ultrafine particles and their behavior and chemical composition in relation to roadside sources. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, No. 35, (November 2011), pp. 6403-6413, ISSN 1352-2310
  49. 49. Kulmala, M., Pirjola, L., Makela & J. (2000). Stable sulphate clusters as a source of new atmospheric particles. Nature, Vol. 404, No. 6773, (March 2000), pp. 66–69, ISSN 0028-0836
  50. 50. Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Birmili, W. & McMurry, P.H. (2004). Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations. Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 35, No. 2, (March 2004), pp. 143-176, ISSN 0021-8502
  51. 51. Kumar, P., Fennell, P. & Britter, R. (2008a). Effect of wind direction and speed on the dispersion of nucleation and accumulation mode particles in an urban street canyon. The Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 402, No. 1, (August 2008), pp. 82–94, ISSN 0048-9697
  52. 52. Kumar, P., Fennell, P. & Britter, R. (2008b). Measurements of particles in the 5–1000 nm range close to road level in an urban street canyon. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 390, No. 2-3, (February 2008), pp. 437-447, ISSN 0048-9697
  53. 53. Kumar, P., Fennell, P., Hayhurst, A.N. & Britter, R.E. (2009). Street versus rooftop level concentrations of fine particles in a Cambridge street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 131, No. 1, (April 2009), pp. 3-18, ISSN 0006-8314
  54. 54. Kumar, P., Robins, A., Vardoulakis, S. & Britter, R. (2010). A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls mode particles in an urban street canyon. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 44, No. 1, (August 2008), pp. 5035-5052, ISSN 1352-2310
  55. 55. Kumara, P., Robins, A., Vardoulakis, A., Paul Quincey, P. (2011). Technical challenges in tackling regulatory concerns for urban atmospheric nanoparticles. Particuology, Vol. 9, No. 6, (December 2011), pp. 566– 571, ISSN 1674-2001
  56. 56. Maynard, A.D. & Aitken, R.J. (2007). Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology, Vol. 1, No. 1, (March 2007), pp. 26-41, ISSN 1743-5390
  57. 57. Monks, P.S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M.L, Akimoto, H., Amanni, M., Baklanov, A. & et al. (2009. Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 33, (October 2009), pp. 5268–5350, ISSN 1352-2310
  58. 58. Morawska, L., Ristovski, Z., Jayaratne, E.R., Keogh, D.U. & Ling, X. (2008). Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 35, (November 2008), pp. 8113–8138, ISSN 1352-2310
  59. 59. Naga, S., Guptaa, K. & Mukhopadhyay, U.K. (2005). Size distribution of atmospheric aerosols in Kolkata, India and the assessment of pulmonary deposition of particle mass. Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 14, No. 5, (October 2005), pp. 381-389, ISSN 1420-326X
  60. 60. Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L. & Li, N. (2006). Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science, Vol. 311, No. 5761, (February 2006), pp. 622–627, ISSN 0036-8075
  61. 61. Ntziachristos, L., Ning, Z., Geller, M.D. & Sioutas, C. (2007). Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway with heavy duty diesel traffic. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 41, No. 7, (April 2007), pp. 2223–2230, ISSN 0013-936X
  62. 62. O’Dowd, C. & Hoffmann, T. (2005). Coastal new particle formation: a review of the current state-of-the-art. Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245–255, ISSN 1448-2517
  63. 63. O’Dowd, C., Aalto, P., Hameri, K., Kulmala, M. & Hoffmann, T. (2002). Aerosol formation: atmospheric particles from organic vapours. Nature, Vol. 416, No. 6880, (April 2002), pp. 497-498, ISSN 0028-0836
  64. 64. O’Dowd, C., Facchini, M.C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y.J. & Putaud, J.-P. (2004). Biogenically driven organic contribution to marine aerosol. Nature, Vol. 431, No. 7009, (October 2004), pp. 676–680, ISSN 0028-0836
  65. 65. Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E. & Oberdörster, J. (2005). Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 113, No. 7, (July 2005), pp. 823–839, ISSN 0091-6765
  66. 66. Oberdörster, G., Sharp, Z., Atudorei, V., Elder, A., Gelein, R., Kreyling, W. & Cox, C. (2004). Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhalation Toxicology, Vol. 16, No. 6-7, (June 2004), pp. 437-445, ISSN 0895-8378
  67. 67. Pekkanen, J., Peters, A., Hoek, G., Tiittanen, P., Brunekreef, B., De Hartog, J., Heinrich, J., Ibald-Mulli, A., Kreyling, W.G., Lanki, T., Timonen, K.L. & Vanninen, E. (2002). Particulate air pollution and risk of ST-segment depression during repeated submaximal exercise tests among subjects with coronary heart disease: The exposure and risk assessment for fine and ultrafine particles in ambient air (ULTRA) study. Circulation, Vol. 106, No. 8, (August 2002), pp. 933-938, ISSN 00097322
  68. 68. Pekkanen, J., Timonen, K.L., Ruuskanen, J., Reponen, A. & Mirme, A. (1997). Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms. Environmental Research, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 24-33, ISSN 0013-9351
  69. 69. Penttinen, P., Timonen, K.L., Tiittanen, P., Mirme, A., Ruuskanen, J. & Pekkanen, J. (2001a). Ultrafine particles in urban air and respiratory health among adult asthmatics. European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, (March 2001), pp. 428-435, ISSN 0903-1936
  70. 70. Penttinen, P., Timonen, K.L., Tiittanen, P., Mirme, A., Ruuskanen, J. & Pekkanen, J. (2001b). Number concentration and size of particles in urban air: Effects on spirometric lung function in adult asthmatic subjects. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 109, No. 4, (April 2001), pp. 319-323, ISSN 0091-6765
  71. 71. Peters, A., Wichmann, H.E., Tuch, T., Heinrich, J. & Heyder, J. (1997). Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 155, No.4, (April 1997), pp. 1376-83, ISSN 1073-449X
  72. 72. Pey, J., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Rodríguez, S., Putaud, J.P. & Van Dingenen, R. (2009). Source apportionment of urban fine and ultra fine particle number concentration in a Western Mediterranean City. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 29, (September 2009), pp. 4407–4415, ISSN 1352-2310
  73. 73. Raes, F. (1995). Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100, No. D2, (February 1995), pp. 2893–2904, ISSN 0148-0227
  74. 74. Ramanathan, V. & Feng, Y. (2009). Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 1, (January 2009), pp. 37–50, ISSN 1352-2310
  75. 75. Riipinen, S., Kulmala, M., Arnold, F., Dal Maso, M., Birmili, W., Saarnio, K., Teinilä, K., Kerminen, V., Laaksonen, A. & Lehtinen, K. (2007). Connections between atmospheric sulphuric acid and new particle formation during QUEST III-IV campaigns in Heidelberg and Hyytiälä. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, No. 8, (April 2007) pp. 1899–1914, ISSN 1680-7316
  76. 76. Ristovski, Z.D., Jayaratne, E.R., Lim, M., Ayoko, G.A. & Morawska, L. (2006.) Influence of diesel fuel sulphur on the nanoparticle emissions from city buses. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 4, (February 2006), pp. 1314–1320, ISSN 0013-936X
  77. 77. Ristovski, Z.D., Jayaratne, E.R., Morawska, L., Ayoko, G.A., Lim, M. (2005). Particle and carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicles operating on unleaded petrol and LPG fuel. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 345, No. 1-3, (June 2005), pp.93–98, ISSN 0048-9697
  78. 78. Rosenbohm, E., Vogt, R., Scheer, V., Nielsen, O., Drieseidler, A., Baumbach, G., Imhof, D., Baltensperger, U., Fuchs, J. & Jaeschke, W. (2005). Particulate size distributions and mass measured at a motorway during the BAB II campaign. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 39, No. 31, (October 2005), pp. 5696–5709, ISSN 1352-2310
  79. 79. Rückerl, R., Phipps, R.P., Schneider, A., Frampton, M., Cyrys, J., Oberdörster, G., Wichmann, H.E. & Peters, A. (2007). Ultrafine particles and platelet activation in patients with coronary heart disease--results from a prospective panel study. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Volume 4, (January 2007), pp. 1, ISSN 17438-977
  80. 80. Ruuskanen, J., Tuch, Th., Ten Brink, H., Peters, A., Khlystov, A., Mirme, A., Kos, G.P.A., Brunekreef, B., Wichmann, H.E., Buzorius, G., Vallius, M., Kreyling, W.G. & Pekkanen, J. Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 35, No. 21, (July 2001), pp. 3729-3738, ISSN 1352-2310
  81. 81. Seinfeld, J.H. & Pandis, S.N. (2006). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change (2nd edition), John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-72018-8, Hoboken, New Jersey
  82. 82. Shi, J. & Harrison, R.M. (1999). Investigation of ultrafine particle formation during diesel exhaust dilution. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 33, No. 21, (September 1999), pp. 3730–3736, ISSN 0013-936X
  83. 83. Shi, J., Evans, D., Khan, A., Harrison, R., 2001. Sources and concentration of nanoparticles (<10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 35, No. 7, (July 2001), pp. 1193–1202, ISSN 1352-2310
  84. 84. Sioutas, C., Delfino, R. J. & Singh, M. (2005). Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and implications in epidemiologic research. Environmental Health Perspective, Vol. 113, No. 8, (August 2005), pp. 947-955, ISSN 0091-6765
  85. 85. Slezakova, K., Morais S. & Pereira M.C. (2012). Traffic–related air pollution: legislation versus health and environmental effects, In: Environmental Health – Emerging Issues and Practice, J. Oosthuizen (Ed.), pp. 103–124, Intech, ISBN 978-953-307-854-4, Rijeka, Croatia
  86. 86. Slezakova, K., Morais S. & Pereira M.C. (2012). Air pollution: particulate matter, In: Encyclopedia of Environmental Management, S.E. Jorgensen (Ed.), in press, CRC Press, ISBN 9781-439-829-271, Boca Raton, Florida
  87. 87. Stölzel, M., Breitner, S., Cyrys, J., Pitz, M., Wölke, G., Kreyling, W., Heinrich, J., Wichmann, H.E. & Peters, A. (2007). Daily mortality and particulate matter in different size classes in Erfurt, Germany. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. 5, (August 2007), pp. 458-467, ISSN 1559-0631
  88. 88. Strawa, A.W., Kirchstetter, T.W., Hallar, A.G., Ban-Weiss, G.A., McLaughlin, J.P., Harley, R.A. & Lunden, M.M. (2010). Optical and physical properties of primary onroad vehicle particle emissions and their implications for climate change. Journal of Aerosol Science Vol. 41, No. 1, (January 2010), pp. 36-50, ISSN 0021-8502
  89. 89. Terzano, C., Di Stefano, F., Conti, V., Graziani, E. & Petroianni, A. (2010). Air pollution ultrafine particles: Toxicity beyond the lung. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 10, (October 2010), pp. 809-821, ISSN 1128-3602
  90. 90. Tranfield, E.M. & Walker D.C. (2012). Understanding of Human Illness and Death Following Exposure to Particulate Matter Air Pollution, In: Environmental Health – Emerging Issues and Practice, J. Oosthuizen (Ed.), pp. 81-102, Intech, ISBN 978-953-307-854-4, Rijeka, Croatia
  91. 91. Tsai, Y.I. (2005). Atmospheric visibility trends in an urban area in Taiwan 1961-2003. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 39, No. 30, (September 2005), pp. 5555-5567, ISSN 1352-2310
  92. 92. Tunved, P., Hansson, H., Kerminen, V., Strom, J., Dal Maso, M., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Aalto, P., Komppula, M. & Kulmala, M. (2006). High natural aerosol loading over boreal forests. Science, Vol. 312, No. 5771, (April 2006), pp. 261–263, ISSN 0036-8075
  93. 93. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2006). National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 71, No. 200 (October 2006), pp. 61144, August, 2012, available from <>
  94. 94. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2009). Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A Synthesis of Climate Change Impacts on Ground-Level Ozone, EPA 600-R-07-094F, Office of Research and Development, National Centre for Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  95. 95. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2012a). Characteristics of Particles - Particle Size Categories, June 2012, Available from: <>
  96. 96. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2012b). Our Nation’s Air: Status and Trends through 2010, EPA-454/R-12-001, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  97. 97. Van Dingenen, R., Raes, F., Putaud, J.-P., Baltensperger, U., Charron, A., Facchini, M.-C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H.-C. & et al. (2004). A European aerosol phenomenology - 1: physical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 38, No. 16, (May 2004), pp. 2561–2577, ISSN 1352-2310
  98. 98. von Klot, S., Wölke, G., Tuch, T., Heinrich, J., Dockery, D.W., Schwartz, J., Kreyling, W.G., Wichmann, H.E. & Peters, A. (2002). Increased asthma medication use in association with ambient fine and ultrafine particles. European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, (September 2002), pp. 691-702, ISSN 0903-1936
  99. 99. Wåhlin, P., Palmgren, F., Dingenen, R., & Raes, F. (2001). Pronounced decrease of ambient particle number emissions from diesel traffic in Denmark after reduction of the sulphur content in diesel fuel. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 35, No. 21, (July 2001), pp. 3549–3552, ISSN 1352-2310
  100. 100. Weber, R., Marti, J.J., McMurray, P., Eisele, F.L., Tanner, D.J. & Jefferson, A. (1996). Measured atmospheric new particle formation rates: implications for nucleation mechanisms. Chemical Engineering Communications, Vol. 151, No. 1, (January 1996), pp. 53–64, ISSN 0098-6445
  101. 101. Weber, R., Marti, J.J., McMurray, P., Eisele, F.L., Tanner, D.J. & Jefferson, A. (1997). Measurement of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, No. 4, (February 1997), pp. 4375–4386, ISSN 0148-0227
  102. 102. West, J.B. (2008). Pulmonary Pathophysiology: the Essentials, (7th edition), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, ISBN 978-0-7817-6414-8, Baltimore, Philadelphia
  103. 103. Westerdahl, D., Fruin, S., Sax, T., Fine, P. & Sioutas, C. (2005). Mobile platform measurements of ultrafine particles and associated pollutant concentrations on freeways and residential streets in Los Angeles. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 39, No. 20, (June 2005), pp. 3597–3610, ISSN 1352-2310
  104. 104. Wichmann and Peters, H.E., Spix, C., Tuch, T., Wolke, G., Peters, A., Heinrich, J., Kreyling, W.G & Heyder, J. (2000). Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. Research report (Health Effects Institute), No. 98, (November 2000), pp.5-86; discussion 87, ISSN 1041-5505
  105. 105. World Health Organization (WHO). 2000. Particulate Matter, Chapter 7.3; WHO Regional Publications, European Series: Copenhagen, Denmark; pp. 1–40, August 2012, <>

Written By

Klara Slezakova, Simone Morais and Maria do Carmo Pereira

Submitted: May 29th, 2012 Published: May 15th, 2013