Open access

Pathogenesis of Chronic Chagasic Myocarditis

Written By

Julián González, Francisco Azzato, Giusepe Ambrosio and José Milei

Published: 08 May 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55387

From the Edited Volume

Diagnosis and Treatment of Myocarditis

Edited by José Milei and Giuseppe Ambrosio

Chapter metrics overview

1,983 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) is the most serious manifestation of the chronic form of Chagas’ disease and constitutes the most common type of chronic myocarditis in the world [1-5]. Chagas’ disease, a chronic illness caused by the flagellate parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), was first described in 1909 by the Brazilian physician Carlos Chagas [6]. The insect vectors of the disease are present throughout most of South and Central America, and their zone of distribution extends across the southern United States [7]. It was estimated by year 2000, that in endemic areas 40 million people were considered to be at risk of infection, being 20 million already infected. Every year near 200,000 new cases are expected to happen, and 21,000 deaths per year occur [8].

Although always considered to be confined to Latin America, due to migratory movements from endemic countries to Europe and North America, Chagas’ disease is being detected more frequently in developed countries. Europe is estimated to have from 24,001 to 38,708 (lower or upper limit of estimate, respectively) immigrants with T. cruzi infection [1]. In the United States 6 autochthonous cases, five transfusion related cases and five transplant associated cases have been reported, but migratory movements still remain the main source of Chagas’ disease. It has been estimated that around 89,221 to 693,302 infected Latin Americans migrated to the United States in the period 1981 to 2005 [3].

Two phases of the disease can be distinguished: (1) acute phase, with transiently high concentration of parasites in tissue and blood, nonspecific symptoms, and a 5% myocarditis incidence, lasting 4 – 8 weeks; and (2) chronic phase, lasting lifelong. Chronic phase can be presented as indeterminate form, characterized by lack of symptoms and normal ECG and normal radiographic examination of the chest, esophagus and colon. Approximately 60 – 70% of patients remain in this form for the rest of their lives. Only 20 - 40% of infected individuals, 10 - 30 years after the original acute infection, will develop cardiac, digestive or mixed form of the disease, characterized by the appearance of megavicera (dilated cardiomyopathy, megaesophagus and/or megacolon). It poses a substantial public health burden due to high morbidity and mortality [3, 7, 9].

CCC is manifested by a chronic, diffuse, progressive fibrosing myocarditis that involves not only the working myocardium but also the atrioventricular (AV) conduction system, autonomic nervous system and microcirculation [10 - 12]. This leads to cardiomegaly, cardiac failure, arrhythmias, thromboembolism, and death [11]. Colon and esophagus are also commonly affected by Chagas’ disease, being megacolon with constipation and megaesofagus with achalasia also features of the disease [7].


2. Pathogenesis of Chagas’ myocarditis

Milei et al. proposed a combined theory that could explain the pathogenic mechanism in chronic chagasic myocarditis [2, 13] that has been previously reviewed by us [14]. This hypothesis is based on three ingredients: the parasite, host immune system and fibrosis. These ingredients are proposed as being the primary causative agents of damage on myocardial tissue, conduction system, autonomic ganglia and nerves and microvasculature.

2.1. First ingredient: The parasite

The role of T. cruzi in the chronic phase has been previously underestimated due to the fact that its presence was believed to be scarce and unrelated to the inflammatory infiltrate present at this stage. Nowadays, the involvement of the parasite in the chronic phase has been well documented. Using dissimilar methods, different authors demonstrated either the persistence of T. cruzi or parasite antigens in mice [15], the parasite DNA sequence amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [16, 17], T. cruzi antigens from inflammatory lesions in human chagasic cardiomyopathy [18], or the immunohistochemical finding of the parasite in endomyocardial biopsies with PCR confirmation [19]. This would suggest a direct role for the parasite in the perpetuation of myocardial inflammation. In other words, the antigen stimulation would persist throughout the chronic stage, even though the parasites are not morphologically detectable by light microscopy [20].

The role of parasitemia is more controversial. High parasitemia correlated with severity of disease in one report [21], but showed no association in another [22]. Interestingly, it has been observed that immunosuppression reactivates rather than ameliorates the disease, as seen in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy to prevent transplant rejection and in AIDS patients. Accordingly, many experimental models where strains of genetically manipulated mice lacking various immune functions showed increased susceptibility to develop the disease [23].

2.1.1. Life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi (Figure 1)

When a reduviid bug feeds from an infected mammal, it takes up circulating trypomastigotes, which reach then the bug’s gut. There, they differentiate to amastigotes, which proliferate and start to differentiate into epimastigotes. In this process, when amastigote is still sphere-shaped but has developed its flagellum, some authors call this stage spheromastigotes. Then, it elongates its cell body and flagellum, taking the classical epimastigote shape. At this stage, the parasite undergoes metacyclogenesis, differentiating in metacyclic trypomastigotes, the infective form for mammals. When the bug feeds again, it excretes trypomastigotes with feces, which in turn reach blood torrent through bug’s wound. Trypomastigotes can infect a wide variety of host cells, within them it differentiate into amastigotes and proliferate. Then, they can differentiate into trypomastigotes again, reach circulation and infect new cells. If an uninfected bug feeds from the animal in the moment of parasitemia, cycle starts again [24].

Figure 1.

Life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi

2.1.2. Genetic variability of Trypanosoma cruzi and its relation to its pathogenesis

The genetics of T. cruzi caught the attention of researchers in late 80’ and early 90’. First studies on variability were performed analyzing electrophoretic variants on cellular enzymes. The groups resulting were called zymodemes and were named Z1, Z2, Z3. Only Z2 was associated with domestic transmission cycle.

THe development of PCR based techniques allowed the study of new variant regions and the characterization of multiple variants of a great number of genes. All these variants showed significant correlation with each other, suggesting the existence of two subtypes of T. Cruzi based on these data [25]. Moreover, T. cruzi II which is clearly linked to human pathology, being T. cruzi I mainly related to infection of wild sylvatic mammals. Even, applying LSSP-PCR to the study of the variable region of kinetoplast minicircle from T. cruzi provided evidence of a differential tissue distribution of genetically diverse T. cruzi populations in chronic Chagas’ disease, suggesting that the genetic variability of the parasite is one of the determining factors of the clinical form of the disease [26].

2.1.3. Cell host invasion and intracellular survival by Trypanosoma cruzi

Once T. cruzi reaches blood torrent, it invades a great variety of cells in the host. When parasiting non phagocytic cells, T. cruzi uses some surface glycoproteins to attach to cell: gp82, gp30 and gp35/50. All three glycoproteins are known to induce calcium mobilization from intracellular reservoirs. Gp82 is linked to the phospholipase C (PLC) and inositol 1,4,5 – triphosphate (IP3). Gp 35/50is associated to increasing intracellular levels of cyclic AMP. On the other side, cruzipain, a protein known to be secreted by T. cruzi, acts on kininogen and produces bradykinin, which binds to its receptor, further increasing intracellular calcium. Increased intracellular calcium produces modifications in cytoskeleton that lead to parasite endocytosis [27].

In the parasitoforous vacuole, mainly by the action of gp85/TS a glycoprotein with trans-sialidase action, and TcTox, a protease, the parasite degrades the membrane of the vacuole, escapes from it and proliferates within the cell [28].

2.1.4. Molecular mimicry

The induction of autoimmunity by similarities between T. cruzi and host epitopes has been long proposed as a mechanism that leads to tissue damage in the chronic phase of the disease. Both humoral and cellular autoimmune responses have been described, but we will discuss them in more detail in the section of immune system. The real importance of molecular mimicry in the pathogenesis of chagasic myocarditis is still a matter of debate [29].

Although it seems that in some cases this mechanism triggers autoimmunity, in many others, autoimmunity seems to be an epiphenomenon of cellular destruction, with exposition of intracellular epitopes not normally exposed to the immune system. This, in turn may activate autoreactive lymphocytes leading to the appearance of autoantibodies that are not the cause of damage, rather a consequence [29].

The most important cross reacting epitopes of T. cruzi and the correspondent epitopes in humans are listed in table 1, as well as the kind of immune response they elicit.

2.2. Second ingredient: Host immune system

When the three ingredients theory was first proposed [2, 13], second ingredients were mainly T lymphocytes and macrophages. In the subsequent years some evidence grew about the participation of humoral immune system through autoantibodies in the pathogenesis. As a consequence, the whole immune system of the host is now considered as the second ingredient.

As described earlier, mononuclear cells persist in the chronic stage of the disease, contributing to the inflammation through its products of secretion or through its own cytotoxicity (suppressor T cells) and cytolytic action (macrophages) [13]. As previously stated, molecular mimicry may be the main explanation of autoimmunity, triggering both cellular and humoral autoreactivity [29]. Figure 2 summarizes the most important immune events in CCC pathogenesis.

Parasite antigen Human Antigen Immune reaction
B13 Cardiac myosin heavy chain Autoantibodies
Autoreactive T cells
R13 (ribosomal protein) Ribosomal protein
β1-adrenergic receptor
M2-muscarinic receptor
38-kDa heart antigen
Ribosomal protein PO β1-adrenergic receptor Autoantibodies
FL-160 47-kDA neuron protein Autoantibodies
Shed acute-phase antigen (SAPA) Cha antigen Autoreactive T cells
TENU2845/36 kDa Cha antigen Autoantibodies
Calcireticulin Calcireticulin Autoantibodies
Autoreactive T cells
Galactosyl-cerebrosides Galactosyl-cerebrosides Autoantibodies
Unknown Neurons, liver, kidney, testis Autoantibodies
Sulphated glycolipids Neurons Autoantibodies
150-kDa protein Smooth and striated muscle Autoantibodies
Cruzipain Cardiac myosin heavy chain
M2-muscarinic receptor
Microsomal fraction Heart and skeletal muscle Autoantibodies
Cytoskeleton 95-kDa myosin tail Autoantibodies
SRA Skeletal muscle Ca2+ dependent SRA Autoantibodies
MAP MAP (brain) Autoantibodies
Soluble extract Myelin basic protein Autoantibodies
Autoreactive T cells
55-kDa membrane protein 28-kDa Lymphocyte membrane protein Autoantibodies

Table 1.

Examples of cross-reacting epitopes [12, 29]

Figure 2.

A. The immune pathogenesis of Chagas disease in indeterminate patients. The presence on numerous down regulating mechanisms shift the response towards an anti-inflammatory profile. B. The immune pathogenesis of Chagas disease in CCC patients. Cells evolve towards a proinflammatory profile, with development of autoimmunity.

2.2.1. Innate immunity

In recent years innate immunity came to the attention of researchers of Chagas’ disease pathogenesis. The role of NK cells has been particularly studied in early and late indeterminate phases of the disease and in CCC patients. In early indeterminate patients, compared to non infected people, increased values of pre-natural killer (NK)-cells (CD3- CD16+ CD56-), and higher values of proinflammatory monocytes (CD14+ CD16+ HLA-DR++) were found. The higher values of activated B lymphocytes (CD19+ CD23+) contrasted with impaired T cell activation, indicated by lower values of CD4+ CD38+ and CD4+ HLA-DR+ lymphocytes, a lower frequency of CD8+ CD38+ and CD8+ HLA-DR+ cells; a decreased frequency of CD4+ CD25HIGH regulatory T cells was also observed. All these data suggest a rather proinflammatory profile [30]. This profile may be useful to limit parasitemia and confine infection to tissues. In fact, it has been demonstrated that NK cells are important in defence against the spread of parasitic infection [31], and are an important source of INF-γ, a key cytokine to activate macrophages and help with parasite clearance [32].

In late indeterminate phase, CD3-CD16+CD56+ and CD3-CD16+CD56DIM NK cells are increased but are in normal range in CCC patients, suggesting a protective role for them [33]. NK cells showing CD56DIM may play a role in the down modulation of cytotoxic deleterious T CD8+ response reported in CCC patients [34].

Monocytes display different cytokine profile. In indeterminate patients they produce more IL-10 [35] while in CCC patients they produce more TNF-α [36], leading to a proinflammatory profile that could be responsible for chronic myocarditis. Conversely in vitro experiments culturing moncytes from indeterminate and CCC patients showed a predominant production of INF-γ in the former and IL-10 in the later [37]. Also, monocytes of indeterminate patients showed downregulation of Fc-γR, TLR and CR1 molecules, related to an impaired phagocytic capacity [38].

Toll-like receptors (TLR) are also implied in the response to acute infection with T. cruzi. TLR-2 has been shown to recognize GPI surface molecules from the parasite. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that macrofages stimulated with GPIs through TLR-2/CD14 receptors produce NO, TNF-α and IL-12 [39]. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficiency genotype D299G/T399I occurred more frequently in asymptomatic (14.8%) than CCC patients. TLR1-I602S, TLR2-R753Q, TLR6-S249P, and MAL/TIRAP-S180L did not associate with CD or CCC. These findings indicate that curbed TLR4 activation might be beneficial in preventing CCC [40].

A key role of complement in infection control has been clearly established. The complement activating molecules C1q, C3, mannan-binding lectin and ficolins bound to all strains analysed; however, C3b and C4b deposition assays revealed that T. cruzi activates mainly the lectin and alternative complement pathways in non-immune human serum [41]. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) initiates complement on Trypanosoma cruzi through the MBL-associated serine protease 2 (MASP2). MASP2 polymorphisms, specialy g.1961795C, p.371D diplotype (short CD), occurred at a higher frequency among symptomatic patients, compared with the indeterminate group, highlighting the importance of complement in the pathogenesis of CCC [42].

2.2.2. Cellular adaptative immunity

The role of immune cells in the pathogenesis of Chagas’ heart disease has been de dominant hypothesis for many years. The paucity of parasite cells in the inflamed myocardium and the presence throughout the evolution of the disease of macrophages and lymphocytes in patched infiltrates lead to this hypotesis. As early as in 1929, Magariños Torres, observing those infiltrates postulated an “allergic” mechanism for CCC. Further, Mazza and Jörg followed this thought and supported the “allergic” theory [13].

The study of circulating lymphocytes in peripheral blood of chagasic patients showed an increase in the percentages and actual numbers of double-positive cells of the phenotype CD3+/HLA-DR+, as well as decrease in the percentage of CD45RA+/CD4+ and CD45RA+/CD8+ T cells, indicating greater numbers of activated T cells circulating. Consistent parallel increases were seen also in the B lymphocyte subset which stained double-positive for CD19/CD5 [43]. These results were similar for both indeterminate and CCC patients. Moreover, T cells from chagasic patients do not express the co-stimulatory molecule CD28 [44] but express high levels of HLA-DR molecules [45]. Some interesting differences were demonstrated between indeterminate and CCC patients. CD28- T cells in indeterminate patients showed expression of CTLA-4, which recognizes the same ligands as CD28, but instead of inducing cell activation it causes down modulation of T cells. On the contrary, T cells in CCC patients do not up-regulate CTLA-4 [46].

Monocytes from indeterminate patients, when infected in vitro with T. cruzi, express low levels of HLA-DR and high levels of CD80, a ligand for CTLA-4 [47]. The interaction of these monocytes with CTLA-4+ T cells leads to the expression of IL-10, a cytokine known to down-modulate inflammatory responses [35]. This is not observed in CCC patients. CD28- T cells, not expressing CTLA-4, express TNF-α and INF-γ [44].

In the same direction, CD4-CD8- γδ T cells are found to be increased in indeterminate patients compared with CCC ones. These cells are also linked to the production of IL-10 and a down modulatory effect on inflammation [48].

Cells infiltrating myocardium have also been studied. As demonstrated with immunostaining of endomyocardial biopsies by our group, leukocytes infiltrating myocardium in Chagas’ disease were approximately 50% macrophages, and 50% lymphocytes, mainly T lymphocytes [49]. Further immunohistochemical characterization of these cells with CD45R for lymphocytes, CD20 and lambda and kappa light chains for B lymphocytes, CD45R0 for T lymphocytes and CD68 for macrophages, confirmed these findings [2].

Autoreactive T cells have caught the attention of many investigators. In experimental models, CD4+ T cells from infected mice showed a proliferative response to the exposition to human cardiac myosin heavy chain and to T. cruzi B13 protein. They also arrested the beating of fetal heart cells and, more importantly, induced myocarditis in immunized mice and promoted rejection of transplanted normal hearts in the absence of T. cruzi [50]. Also, it has been described that T cells infiltrating the myocardium of chagasic patients cross react with human cardiac myosin heavy chain and to T. cruzi B13 protein and express high levels of INF-γ and low levels of IL-4, switching to a Th1 profile [51].

A second group of autoreactive T cells have been characterized, that react to Cha antigen in human heart. Cha antigen is a protein in human myocardium of unknown function that is recognized sera from chagasic patients. When anti-Cha T cells are transferred to non infected mice, they cause myocarditis and stimulate anti-Cha autoantibodies production [52].

In recent years, a newly described T cell, named Treg, has come to attention in relation to Chagas’ disease pathogenesis. These cells are characterized by the expression of CD4 and CD25. Treg cells are increased in indeterminate patients compared to CCC, which correlates negatively with levels of activated CD8+ [33]. In a recent review on the role of these cells on the pathogenesis of CCC it is highlighted that indeterminate patients have a higher frequency of Treg cells, suggesting that an expansion of those cells could be beneficial, possibly by limiting strong cytotoxic activity and tissue damage. Indeterminate patients also show an activated status of Treg cells based on low expression of CD62L and high expression of CD40L, CD69, and CD54 by cells from all chagasic patients after T. cruzi antigenic stimulation. Moreover, there was an increase in the frequency of the population of Foxp3+ CD25HighCD4+ cells that was also IL-10+ in the IND group, whereas in the cardiac (CARD) group, there was an increase in the percentage of Foxp3+ CD25High CD4+ cells that expressed CTLA-4 [53].

An additional mechanism is the bystander activation. This is the activation of autoreactive lymphocytes by antigen presenting cells in a proinflammatory environment [54]. This kind of autoreactive T cells activation has been described in Chagas’disease [55].

2.2.3. Humoral adaptative immunity

The importance of humoral immunity in controlling T. cruzi acute infection has been clearly established. Mice lacking B lymphocytes rapidly succumb to infection [56]. But the fact that attracted most attention from researchers is the production of a wide variety of autoantibodies.

The first autoantibody to be described was one that reacted to endocardium, blood vessels and interstitium of skeletal muscle (EVI) [57], but was the same group of investigators who recognized the heterophil nature of the antibody and realised that had no pathogenic role [58].

Another autoantibody, studied by our group, was anti-laminin antibody [59, 60]. These antibodies were shown to react against T. cruzi amastigotes and trypomastigotes and human laminin [61] and deposition of this antibody in marked thickened basement membranes of myocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells was shown by us with light microscopy, electron microscopy and immunohistochemical techniques in endomyocardial biopsies of chagasic patients [62] but then we found that only 50% of patients had the antibody on their sera and no correlation with disease severity could be established [59].

Anti-myosin antibodies are postulated by some authors to be generated through molecular mimicry with two T. cruzi antigens: B13 protein [63] and cruzipain [64, 65]. Although cruzipain antibodies mainly react to skeletal muscle myosin, they can cause conduction disturbances when transferred to uninfected mice and, when transferred to pregnant animals, they caused conduction disturbances in pups [65]. On the other hand, immunossuppresed mice did not mount any humoral response when immunized with myosin but still develop myocarditis [66]. This fact made some authors doubt on the molecular mimicry hypothesis and rather consider antibodies to myosin a consequence of myocyte damage [67].

Antibodies that react with muscarinic receptors are also being intensely studied. In early 1990’s IgG from chagasic patients was observed to bind to muscarinic M2 receptors and activate them [68]. These anti-muscarinic antibodies were found to increase intracellular cGMP and decrease cAMP [69] and were positively related to the presence of dysautonomia [70]. These antibodies also causes accumulation of inositol phosphate and nitric oxide synthase stimulation, with a negative inotropic effect on myocardium [71]. As mentioned before, anti-muscarinic autoantibodies are positively related to the presence of dysautonomia [70], the presence of achalasia in chagasic patients [72], sinus node dysfunction [73], but are not related with the degree of myocardial dysfunction [73, 74], nor with the presence of brain lesions [75]. In fact patients with cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction but without autonomic dysfunction show low levels of anti-muscarinic antibodies [76].

Autoantibody Hypothetic pathogenic role Reference
Anti-Cerebroside Probably related to neurologial symptoms [77]
Anti-Gal Apparently protective [78]
Anti-Brain Microtubules Unknown [79]
Anti-Ribosome Unknown [80, 81]
Anti- UsnRNPs Unkwnown [82]
Anti-Sulfatides May cause myocarditis and induce arrhythmias [83]
Anti-Galectin-1 Increased in CCC patients [84]
Anti-Cha R3 Specific of CCC [85]
Anti-Desmoglein-1 Related to Penphigus foliaceum [86]
Anticardiolipin Unknown [87]
Anti- TrkA, TrkB and TrkC Prevents apoptosis of neurons and helps cellular invasion [88]
Anti-MBP Related to gastrointestinal form [89]

Table 2.

Less studied autoantibodies in Chagas’ disease

Antibodies against β1-adrenergic receptors are also intensely studied. Described in early 1980’s [90] these antibodies increased cAMP in mouse atrial fibers, increasing the release of PGE2 and TXB2 causing diminished contractility [91]. Increased cAMP activates PKA and then increases the intracellular calcium concentration. This causes in turn inhibition of the Na+/K+-ATPase and stimulates Ca2+-ATPase activity leading to intracellular depletion of K+ and further increase in Ca2+. These alteration alter contractility and electric impulse generation and conduction [92]. Antiadrenergic autoantibodies titers could not be related to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction [74] and patients with overt cardiomyopathy but without autonomic dysfunction show low leves of these antibodies [76]. Antibodies against β2-adrenergic receptors have also been described but are mainly related to megacolon [93].

Antibodies against atrio-ventricular (AV) node and sinus auricular node tissues have been studied as markers of chronic cardiopathy condition. When compared in chronic chagasic cardiopathy patients, non-chagasic cardiopathy patients, indeterminate chagasic subjects, healthy blood donors as controls, they more frequently found in chronic chagasic cardiopathy, but not enough to be good markers for chagasic cardiopathy group. Besides, no clear association with complex rhythm or conduction aberrations was found [94].

Many other autoantibodies have been described (table 2) but are not so widely studied and their role in pathogenesis of chagasic myocarditis is not clear.

2.2.4. Genetic factors

Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) have show some relation to de development of CCC. HLA-B40 and Cw3 combination was protective for CCC [95], as resulted DRB1*14, DQB1*0303 [96], HLA-DQB1*06 [97] and HLA-A68 [98]. On the other hand, HLA-C*03 [99], DRB1*1503 [100], DRB1*01, DRB1*08, DQB1*0501 [96] and HLA-DR16 alelles [98] were positively related to the development of CCC.

A number of other genes related to immune system have been studied in order to determine their relation to a predisposition to develop CCC. In table 3 we list those positively related to the appearance of CCC [101].

Gene Polymorphism
CCL2/MCPI - 2518
CCR5 + 53029
TNF-α - 308G/A, -238G/A, -1031T/C
LT-α + 80A/C, + 252A/G
BAT-1 - 22C/G, - 348C/T
NF-kB - 62, - 262
IL-1β - 31, + 3954, + 5810
IL-1RN +11100T/C
IL-4 -509C/T
IL-10 - 1082G/A
IL-12β + 1188A/C
INF-γ +874T/A
MCP-1 -2518α/G
MIF -174G/C
TGF-β1 +10T/C

Table 3.

Genetic polymorphisms related to CCC. Adapted from [101, 102].

2.2.5. The cytokines and chemokines

Although proinflammatory cytokines seem to be necessary for controlling parasitemia during acute phase of the disease [101], CCC patients display a rather proinflammatory cytokine while indeterminate patients display a down modulator one. CCC patients have increased levels of TNF-α and CCL2 than indeterminate patients [103, 104]. Infiltrating macrophages from CCC patients express INF-γ, TNF-α and IL-6 but show low levels of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-10 [105-107]. Also CCR5, CXCR3 and CCR7 and their ligands are increased in hearts of CCC patients, as well as monocytes expressing CXCR3, CCR5, CXCL9 and CCL5 [101]. It has been shown that INF-γ and CCL2 induce myocytes to secrete arial natriuretic factor and cause hyperthrophy [108], and IL-18 and CCR7 ligands, which are increased in CCC, cause cardiomyocyte hyperthrophy and fibrosis [109-111]. Cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with moderate and severe cardiomyopathy produced high levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ and low levels of IL-10, when compared to mild cardiomyopathy or cardiomyopathy-free patients. Flow cytometry analysis showed higher CD4+IL-17+ cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured from patients without or with mild cardiomyopathy, in comparison to patients with moderate or severe cardiomyopathy, reflecting a relative protective effect of IL-10 and IL-17 compared with INF-γ and TNF-α [112]. In another experiment in which CD8+ in culture were stimulated with trypanosomal antigens, those cells froms patients with CCC produced larger amounts of INF-γ and TNF-α than those obtained from indeterminate patients [113].

2.3. The third ingredient: Fibrosis

Fibrosis is one of the most striking characteristics of CCC. In our experience with endomyocardial biopsies, fibrosis had replaced between 8,2 and 49% of contractile myocardium, with only one patient having less than 10% [49]. In our experience with autopsies of hearts, fibrosis was more extensive in conduction system than in contracting myocardium [2]. The deposition of laminin in extracellular and basement membranes has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory process, as laminin is able to bind proinflammatory citokines [114]. The inflammatory infiltrate in CCC is related to the production of citokines such as INF-γ, TNF-α, IL-18, CCL2 and CCL21, that may have modulator actions on fibrotic process [101].


3. Pathophysiological consequences of myocarditis

With the perpetuation of inflammation, necrosis and scarring fibrosis, damage to all histological components of myocardium occurs. Damage to contracting myocardial fibers determines contractile failure as well as electrophysiological disturbances. Conduction system, nervous autonomic system and microvasculature are also damaged and as a consequence they cause further damage to contractile myocardium and produce electrical instability.

3.1. Dysautonomia

As early as 1922 Carlos Chagas noted that the chronotropic response to atropine was altered in chagasic patients [115], but it was not until late 1950’s that Köberle published his works showing impressive neuronal depopulation in microscopic sections obtained from the intercaval atrial strip in chagasic patients using a standardized technique of cardiac intramural neuronal counting developed by himself [116, 117]. These findings led to the “neurogenic hypothesis” [118], which explained all megas in Chagas’ disease as a consequence of neuronal depletion.

Although many other authors claimed to have confirmed this finding [119, 120], other authors called to attention about the criteria used to diagnose neuronal depletion because of the great variability in the number of neurons in autonomic ganglia [121] and they also remark that the only right criterion to establish neuronal depletion is the presence of proliferation of satellite cells, with the formation of Terplan’s nodules, a characteristic lesion described as proliferating satellite cells which replace degenerating neurons, forming nodular structures. These lesions, once considered patognomonic, can be found in other cardiomyopathies [121]. The same author could not confirm the loss of neurons or denervation in CCC [122]. Finally, it was demonstrated that, using Terplan’s nodules as diagnostic criterion, CCC patients with heart failure has more neuronal depletion than patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of other causes [120]. In our experience the neuroganglionic involvement was variable in autopsies of chagasic hearts [11].

According to neurogenic hypothesis [118], early and irreversible damage to the parasympathetic system during acute phase of the disease causes a cathecolaminergic cardiomyopathy, but this point of view has been debated and evidence is contradictory. Functional test performed in CCC patients demonstrated impaired parasympathetic heart rate regulation: metaraminol, phenylephrine and atropine intravenous injections, facial immersion, Valsalva maneuver, head-up and head-down tilt tests, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, hand grip, graded dynamic exercise, and spectral analysis of Holter recordings [123-130], but a carefull analyasis of these data showed that many patients had normal autonomic function and most patients had heart failure, that could explain autonomic dysfunction per se [131]. But the study of indeterminate patients has shown conflicting results. While some authors could demonstrate impaired autonomic function [132, 133] others could demonstrate that autonomic function was normal in patients without myocardial damage and that abnormalities in autonomic dysfunction was proportional to heart dysfunction, leading these authors to propose that these abnormalities arise as a compensating mechanism for the progressive left ventricular dilatation [134, 135]. These findings led to a new “neurogenic theory”, which considers autonomic dysfunction as secondary to ventricular dilatation and hemodynamic alterations, but once installed, acts synergistically with parasitism and inflammation to cause further myocardial damage [136].

3.2. Microvascular damage

Microcirculation abnormalities have been demonstrated in experimental models as well as in clinical practice [137]. Many investigators have found abnormal myocardial perfusion using isonitrile-99m-technetium [138] and thallium-201 [139, 140] scintigraphy in chagasic patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries. Furthermore, the progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with both the presence of reversible perfusion defects and the increase in perfusion defects at rest [141, 142]. Anatomopathological studies in humans also provided evidence of microvascular damage in CCC. In late 1950’s first reports showing collapse of arterioles and intimal proliferation [143] caught the attention of investigators. Also, microthrombi have been described [144]. In endomyocardial biopsies we also found thickening of capilary basement membranes [49].

Additional evidence of microvascular damage was obtained from experimental models. Vascular constriction, microaneurysm formation, dilatation and proliferation of microvessels has been demonstrated [145-148].

Many factors have been advocated in the genesis of these lesions. First, the parasite itself. It was shown that T. cruzi produces a neuraminidase that removes sialic acid from de surface of endotelial cells. This results in thrombin binding and platelet aggregation [149]. T. cruzi also produces tromboxane A2 (TXA2), specially during amastigote state [150], also favouring platelet aggregation and vascular spasm. Direct parasitism of endothelial cells by T. cruzi has also been demonstrated, and this causes the activation of the NF-kB pathway increasing the expression af adhesion molecules [151], and secreting proinflammatory citokines [152] and iNOS [153].

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is another proposed pathogenic element. Elevated levels of mRNA for preproendothelin-1, endothelin converting enzyme and endothelin-1 were observed in the infected myocardium [154], and elevated levels of ET-1 have been found in CCC patients [155]. Mitogen-activated protein kinases and the transcription factor activator-protein-1 regulate the expression of endothelin-1, and both are shown to be increased in myocardium, interstitial cells and vascular and endocardial endothelial cells [156]. Besides, treatment with phosphoramidon, an inhibitor of endothelin converting enzyme, decreases heart size and severity of pathology in an experimental model of Chagas’ disease [157]. Moreover, the use of bosentan, a dual endothelin A (ETA) receptor and endothelin B (ETB) receptor was accompanied by a significant increase in parasitemia and tissue parasitism or inflammation and reduced the infection-associated increase in NOx serum concentration, suggesting that ETA and ETB may play a role in the control of T. cruzi infection probably by interfering in NO production [158].

Inflammation also produces dysfunction of endothelial cells. Macrophages secrete TXA2 and platelet activating factor (PAF) that act on endothelium causing vasoconstriction [159]. Endothelial cells infected in vitro with T. cruzi lose their antithrombotic properties in response to interleukin 1 β (IL-1β) [160, 161].

It is remarkable that, although the data presented, endothelial function seems to be normal in CCC patients without heart failure, as measured by increases in blood flow in response to acetilcholine and sodium nitroprusside [162]. A normal endothelial function has also been found using pulse plethysmography in 40 asymptomatic patients with Chagas’ disease compared with healthy controls, although a prothrombotic and proinflammatory state has been noted in Chagas’ disease patients [163].


4. A combined theory that could explain the pathogenic mechanism in chronic chagasic myocarditis

With the perpetuation of inflammation, necrosis and scarring fibrosis, damage to all histological components of myocardium occurs. Damage to contracting myocardial fibers determines contractile failure as well as electrophysiological disturbances. Conduction system, nervous autonomic system and microvasculature are also damaged and as a consequence they cause further damage to contractile myocardium and produce electrical instability. Figure 3 illustrates with a flow chart the interactive network of different elements in the pathogenesis of CCC.

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the integrated theory of multiple factors that determine myocardial damage in CCC.


5. Conclusions

As shown across the sections of this chapter, the numerous hypothesis about pathogenic pathways of CCC have supporting data and pitfalls. All hypothesis finally interact with each other, giving us the idea that none of these theories explains the development of CCC by itself. Rather, it seems more feasible that all of these conform a network of damaging elements, and that all elements cause and/or enhances each other. The triggering element is obviously the interaction between parasite and host’s immune system. Cell parasitism, the inflammatory process and consequent necrosis and fibrosis cause damage to contracting myocardium, autonomic system, conduction system and microcirculation. Autonomic damage causes impaired regulation of microvasculature and further alterations in blood flow. Ischemia causes more myocardial damage. Necrosis exposes intracellular epitopes and causes autoantibodies production, with more necrosis, fibrosis and so on. It seems that, if adequate down modulator immune mechanisms work properly, this vicious circle stops and patients do not develop cardiomyopathy, rather they remain in an indeterminate form lifelong.

This work has been performed as part of a Framework Agreement between the Division of Cardiology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, and the Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas "Alberto C. Taquini", University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. This study received financial support from PIP 6549, CONICET and UBACYT M052, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and from Istituto S. Paolo, Turin, Italy.


  1. 1. Guerri-Guttenberg, R.A., et al., Chagas cardiomyopathy: Europe is not spared!. European Heart J, 2008. 29(21): p. 2587-2591.
  2. 2. Milei, J., et al., Myocardial Inflammatory infiltrate in human chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy: Immunohistochemical findings. Cardiovasc Pathol, 1996. 5(4): p. 209-219.
  3. 3. Milei, J., et al., Prognostic impact of Chagas disease in the United States. American Heart J, 2009. 157(1): p. 22-29.
  4. 4. Milei, J., et al., Does Chagas' disease exist as an undiagnosd form of cardiomyopathy in the United States? Am Heart J, 1992. 123(6): p. 1732-1735.
  5. 5. Storino, R.A., H. Barragan, and J. Milei, Aspectos epidemiologicos de la enfermedad de Chagas en la Argentina y America Latina. Revista Federación Argentina de Cardiología, 1992. 21(3): p. 239-246.
  6. 6. Chagas, C., Nova tripanozomiaze humana. Estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotripannum cruzi n. gen., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade mobida do homem. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 1909. 1(2): p. 159 - 218.
  7. 7. Rassi, A., Jr., A. Rassi, and J.A. Marin-Neto, Chagas disease. Lancet, 2010. 375(9723): p. 1388-402.
  8. 8. WHO, Reporte sobre enfermedad de Chagas. 2005.
  9. 9. Rassi, A., Jr., A. Rassi, and W.C. Little, Chagas' heart disease. Clinical Cardiology, 2000. 23(12): p. 883-9.
  10. 10. Andrade, Z.A., A patologia da doenca de Chagas no honen. Annales de la Societe Belge de Medecine Tropicale, 1985. 65(1): p. 15-30.
  11. 11. Milei, J., et al., Histopathology of specialized and ordinary myocardium and nerves in chronic Chagas disease, with a morphometric study of inflammation and fibrosis. Cardiologia, 1991. 36(2): p. 107-115.
  12. 12. Marin-Neto, J.A., et al., Pathogenesis of Chronic Chagas Heart Disease. Circulation, 2007. 115(9): p. 1109-1123.
  13. 13. Storino, R.A. and J. Milei, Enfermedad de Chagas. 1994, Buenos Aires: Mosby-Doyma. 652.
  14. 14. Gonzalez, J., et al., Pathogenensis and Pathology of Chronic Chagas' Myocarditis, in Myocarditis, D. Chiakova, Editor. 2011, Intech: Rijeka. p. 119 - 150.
  15. 15. Younées-Chennoufi, A.B., et al., Persistence of Trypanosoma cruzi antigens in the inflammatory lesions of chronically infected mice. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1988. 82: p. 77.
  16. 16. Jones, E.M., et al., Amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA sequence from inflammatory lesions in human chagasic cardiomyopathy. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1993. 48: p. 348-357.
  17. 17. Schijman, A.G., et al., Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in cardiac lesions of Argentinean patients with end-stage chronic chagas heart disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2004. 70(2): p. 210-20.
  18. 18. Higuchi, M.L., T. Brito, and M. Martins Reis, Correlation between trypanosoma cruzi parasitism and myocardial inflammatory infiltrate in human chronic chagasic myocarditis: in light microscopy and immunohistochemical findings. Cardiovasc Pathol, 1993. 2: p. 101-106.
  19. 19. Añez, N., et al., Myocardial parasite persistence in chronic chagasic patients. Amer J Trop Med Hyg, 1999. 60(5): p. 726-732.
  20. 20. Andrade, Z., Novos aspectos sobre a patogenia da doenca de Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 1992. 25(3): p. 8.
  21. 21. Basquiera, A.L., et al., Risk progression to chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy: influence of male sex and of parasitaemia detected by polymerase chain reaction. Heart, 2003. 89(10): p. 1186-90.
  22. 22. Castro, C., A. Prata, and V. Macedo, The influence of the parasitemia on the evolution of the chronic Chagas' disease. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2005. 38(1): p. 1-6.
  23. 23. Tarleton, R. and L. Zhang, Chagas Disease Etiology: Autoimmunity or Parasite Persistence? Parasitology Today, 1999. 15(3): p. 94 - 99.
  24. 24. Tyler, K.M. and D.M. Engman, The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi revisited. International Journal for Parasitology, 2001. 31: p. 472 - 481.
  25. 25. Macedo, A.M., et al., Trypanosoma cruzi: Genetic Structure of Populations and Relevance of Genetic Variability to the Pathogenesis of Chagas Disease. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2004. 99(1): p. 1 - 12.
  26. 26. Vago, A.R., et al., Genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi directly from tissues of patients with chronic Chagas disease: differential distribution of genetic types into diverse organs. The American Journal of Pathology, 2000. 156(5): p. 1805-9.
  27. 27. Yoshida, N. and M.R. Cortez, Trypanosoma cruzi: parasite and host cell signaling during the invasion process. Subcellular Biochemistry, ed. R. Harris. Vol. 47. 2008, Houton: Springer Science.
  28. 28. Alves, M.J.M. and W. Colli, Trypanosoma cruzi: Adhesion to the Host Cell and Intracellular Survival. IUBMB Life, 2007. 59(4 - 5): p. 274 - 279.
  29. 29. Girones, N., H. Cuervo, and M. Fresno, Trypanosoma cruzi-induced molecular mimicry and Chagas' disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 2005. 296: p. 89-123.
  30. 30. Vitelli-Avelar, D.M., et al., Are increased frequency of macrophage-like and natural killer (NK) cells, together with high levels of NKT and CD4+CD25high T cells balancing activated CD8+ T cells, the key to control Chagas' disease morbidity? Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 2006. 145(1): p. 81-92.
  31. 31. Brener, Z. and R.T. Gazzinelli, Immunological control of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and pathogenesis of Chagas' disease. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 1997. 114(2): p. 103-10.
  32. 32. Camargo, M.M., et al., Glycoconjugates isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi but not from Leishmania species membranes trigger nitric oxide synthesis as well as microbicidal activity in IFN-gamma-primed macrophages. The Journal of Immunology, 1997. 159(12): p. 6131-6139.
  33. 33. Vitelli-Avelar, D.M., et al., Chagasic Patients with Indeterminate Clinical Form of the Disease have High Frequencies of Circulating CD3+CD16–CD56+ Natural Killer T Cells and CD4+CD25High Regulatory T Lymphocytes. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2005. 62(3): p. 297-308.
  34. 34. Sathler-Avelar, R., et al., Innate immunity and regulatory T-cells in human Chagas disease: what must be understood? Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2009. 104 Suppl 1: p. 246-51.
  35. 35. Gomes, J.A., et al., Evidence that development of severe cardiomyopathy in human Chagas' disease is due to a Th1-specific immune response. Infection and Immunity, 2003. 71(3): p. 1185-93.
  36. 36. Vitelli-Avelar, D.M., et al., Strategy to assess the overall cytokine profile of circulating leukocytes and its association with distinct clinical forms of human Chagas disease. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2008. 68(5): p. 516-25.
  37. 37. de Melo, A.S., et al., IL-10 and IFN-γ gene expression in chronic Chagas disease patients after in vitro stimulation with recombinant antigens of Trypanosoma cruzi. Cytokine, 2012. 58(2): p. 207-212.
  38. 38. Gomes, J.A.S., et al., Impaired phagocytic capacity driven by downregulation of major phagocytosis-related cell surface molecules elicits an overall modulatory cytokine profile in neutrophils and monocytes from the indeterminate clinical form of Chagas disease. Immunobiology, 2012. 217(10): p. 1005-1016.
  39. 39. Campos, M. and R. Gazzinelli, Trypanosoma cruzi and its components as exogenous mediators of inflammation recognized through Toll-like receptors. Mediators of Inflammation, 2004. 13(3): p. 139-143.
  40. 40. Weitzel, T., et al., Mannose-Binding Lectin and Toll-Like Receptor Polymorphisms and Chagas Disease in Chile. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2012. 86(2): p. 229-232.
  41. 41. Cestari, I. and M.I. Ramirez, Inefficient Complement System Clearance of Trypanosoma cruzi Metacyclic Trypomastigotes Enables Resistant Strains to Invade Eukaryotic Cells. PloS one, 2010. 5(3): p. e9721.
  42. 42. Boldt, A.B.W., P.R. Luz, and I.J.T. Messias-Reason, MASP2 haplotypes are associated with high risk of cardiomyopathy in chronic Chagas disease. Clinical Immunology, 2011. 140(1): p. 63-70.
  43. 43. Dutra, W.O., et al., Activated T and B lymphocytes in peripheral blood of patients with Chagas' disease. International Immunology, 1994. 6(4): p. 499-506.
  44. 44. Menezes, C.A.S., et al., Phenotypic and functional characteristics of CD28+ and CD28− cells from chagasic patients: distinct repertoire and cytokine expression. Clinical & Experimental Immunology, 2004. 137(1): p. 129-138.
  45. 45. Dutra, et al., Self and Nonself Stimulatory Molecules Induce Preferential Expansion of CD5+ B Cells or Activated T Cells of Chagasic Patients, Respectively. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2000. 51(1): p. 91-97.
  46. 46. Souza, P.E.A., et al., Trypanosoma cruzi Infection Induces Differential Modulation of Costimulatory Molecules and Cytokines by Monocytes and T Cells from Patients with Indeterminate and Cardiac Chagas' Disease. Infect. Immun., 2007. 75(4): p. 1886-1894.
  47. 47. Souza, P.E., et al., Monocytes from patients with indeterminate and cardiac forms of Chagas' disease display distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics associated with morbidity. Infection and Immunity, 2004. 72(9): p. 5283-91.
  48. 48. Villani, F.N., et al., Trypanosoma cruzi-induced activation of functionally distinct alphabeta and gammadelta CD4- CD8- T cells in individuals with polar forms of Chagas' disease. Infection and Immunity, 2010. 78(10): p. 4421-30.
  49. 49. Milei, J., et al., Endomyocardial biopsies in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings. Cardiology, 1992. 80(5-6): p. 424-37.
  50. 50. Ribeiro-Dos-Santos, R., et al., A heart-specific CD4+ T-cell line obtained from a chronic chagasic mouse induces carditis in heart-immunized mice and rejection of normal heart transplants in the absence of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite Immunology, 2001. 23(2): p. 93-101.
  51. 51. Cunha-Neto, E. and J. Kalilf, Heart-infiltrating and Peripheral T Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human Chagas' Disease Cardiomyopathy. Autoimmunity, 2001. 34(3): p. 187-192.
  52. 52. Girones, N., et al., Dominant T- and B-cell epitopes in an autoantigen linked to Chagas' disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2001. 107(8): p. 985-93.
  53. 53. de Araújo, F.F., et al., Regulatory T Cells Phenotype in Different Clinical Forms of Chagas' Disease. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2011. 5(5): p. e992.
  54. 54. Fujinami, R.S., et al., Molecular Mimicry, Bystander Activation, or Viral Persistence: Infections and Autoimmune Disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 2006. 19(1): p. 80-94.
  55. 55. Fedoseyeva, E.V., et al., De Novo Autoimmunity to Cardiac Myosin After Heart Transplantation and Its Contribution to the Rejection Process. The Journal of Immunology, 1999. 162(11): p. 6836-6842.
  56. 56. Kumar, S. and R.L. Tarleton, The relative contribution of antibody production and CD8+ T cell function to immune control of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite Immunology, 1998. 20(5): p. 207-216.
  57. 57. Cossio, P.M., et al., Chagasic Cardiopathy: Demonstration of a Serum Gamma Globulin Factor Which Reacts with Endocardium and Vascular Structures. Circulation, 1974. 49(1): p. 13-21.
  58. 58. Khoury, E.L., et al., Heterophil nature of EVI antibody in Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1983. 27(2): p. 283-288.
  59. 59. Milei, J., et al., Antibodies to laminin and immunohistochemical localization of laminin in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy: a review. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 1993. 129(2): p. 161-170.
  60. 60. Sanchez, J.A., et al., Immunohistochemical localization of laminin in the hearts of patients with chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy: Relationship to thickening of basement membranes. Am Heart J, 1993. 126: p. 1392-1401.
  61. 61. Szarfman, A., et al., Antibodies to laminin in Chagas' disease. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1982. 155(4): p. 1161-1171.
  62. 62. Sanchez, J.A., et al., Immunohistochemical localization of laminin in the hearts of patients with chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy: relationship to thickening of basement membranes. Am Heart J, 1993. 126(6): p. 1392 - 1401.
  63. 63. Gruber, A. and B. Zingales, Trypanosoma cruzi: characterization of two recombinant antigens with potential application in the diagnosis of Chagas' disease. Experimental Parasitology, 1993. 76(1): p. 1-12.
  64. 64. Giordanengo, L., et al., Cruzipain induces autoimmune response against skeletal muscle and tissue damage in mice. Muscle & Nerve, 2000. 23(9): p. 1407-1413.
  65. 65. Giordanengo, L., et al., Induction of antibodies reactive to cardiac myosin and development of heart alterations in cruzipain-immunized mice and their offspring. European Journal of Immunology, 2000. 30(11): p. 3181-3189.
  66. 66. Neu, N., B. Ploier, and C. Ofner, Cardiac myosin-induced myocarditis. Heart autoantibodies are not involved in the induction of the disease. The Journal of Immunology, 1990. 145(12): p. 4094-4100.
  67. 67. Kierszenbaum, F., Views on the autoimmunity hypothesis for Chagas disease pathogenesis. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 2003. 37(1): p. 1-11.
  68. 68. Sterin-Borda, L., G. Gorelik, and E.S. Borda, Chagasic IgG binding with cardiac muscarinic cholinergic receptors modifies cholinergic-mediated cellular transmembrane signals. Clin Immnol Immunopathol, 1991. 61: p. 387-397.
  69. 69. Goin, J., et al., Interaction of human chagasic IgG with the second extracellular loop of the human heart muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: functional and pathological implications. The FASEB Journal, 1997. 11(1): p. 77-83.
  70. 70. Goin, J.C., et al., Identification of antibodies with muscarinic cholinergic activity in human Chagas' disease: pathological implications. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System, 1994. 47(1-2): p. 45-52.
  71. 71. Sterin-Borda, L., et al., Participation of Nitric Oxide Signaling System in the Cardiac Muscarinic Cholinergic Effect of Human Chagasic IgG. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 1997. 29(7): p. 1851-1865.
  72. 72. Goin, J.C., et al., Functional implications of circulating muscarinic cholinergic receptor autoantibodies in chagasic patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology, 1999. 117(4): p. 798-805.
  73. 73. Altschuller, M.B., et al., Chronic Chagas disease patients with sinus node dysfunction: is the presence of IgG antibodies with muscarinic agonist action independent of left ventricular dysfunction? Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2007. 40(6): p. 665 - 671.
  74. 74. Talvani, A., et al., Levels of anti-M2 and anti-[beta]1 autoantibodies do not correlate with the degree of heart dysfunction in Chagas' heart disease. Microbes and Infection, 2006. 8(9-10): p. 2459-2464.
  75. 75. Py, M.O., et al., The presence of antiautonomic membrane receptor antibodies do not correlate with brain lesions in Chagas' disease. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2009. 67(3A): p. 633 - 638.
  76. 76. Sterin-Borda, L. and E. Borda, Role of Neurotransmitter Autoantibodies in the Pathogenesis of Chagasic Peripheral Dysautonomia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2000. 917(1): p. 273-280.
  77. 77. Avila, J.L. and M. Rojas, Elevated cerebroside antibody levels in human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis, Trypanosoma rangeli infection, and chronic Chagas' disease. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1990. 43(1): p. 52-60.
  78. 78. Gazzinelli, R.T., Natural anti-Gal antibodies prevent, rather than cause, autoimmunity in human Chagas' disease. Research in Immunology, 1991. 142(2): p. 164-7.
  79. 79. Kerner, N., et al., Trypanosoma cruzi: antibodies to a MAP-like protein in chronic Chagas' disease cross-react with mammalian cytoskeleton. Experimental Parasitology, 1991. 73(4): p. 451-9.
  80. 80. Levitus, G., et al., Humoral autoimmune response to ribosomal P proteins in chronic Chagas heart disease. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 1991. 85(3): p. 413-7.
  81. 81. Skeiky, Y.A., et al., Cloning and expression of Trypanosoma cruzi ribosomal protein P0 and epitope analysis of anti-P0 autoantibodies in Chagas' disease patients. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1992. 176(1): p. 201-11.
  82. 82. Bach-Elias, M., et al., Presence of autoantibodies against small nuclear ribonucleoprotein epitopes in Chagas' patients' sera. Parasitology Research, 1998. 84(10): p. 796-9.
  83. 83. Garcia, R., et al., [Anti-sulfatide antibody titers in patients with chronic Chagas disease and other forms of cardiopathy]. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica, 1998. 3(4): p. 249-56.
  84. 84. Giordanengo, L., et al., Anti-galectin-1 autoantibodies in human Trypanosoma cruzi infection: differential expression of this beta-galactoside-binding protein in cardiac Chagas' disease. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 2001. 124(2): p. 266-73.
  85. 85. Girones, N., et al., Antibodies to an epitope from the Cha human autoantigen are markers of Chagas' disease. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2001. 8(6): p. 1039-43.
  86. 86. Diaz, L.A., et al., Anti-desmoglein-1 antibodies in onchocerciasis, leishmaniasis and Chagas disease suggest a possible etiological link to Fogo selvagem. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2004. 123(6): p. 1045-51.
  87. 87. Pereira de Godoy, M.R., et al., Chagas disease and anticardiolipin antibodies in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2005. 41(3): p. 235-8.
  88. 88. Lu, B., et al., Autoantibodies to neurotrophic receptors TrkA, TrkB and TrkC in patients with acute Chagas' disease. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2010. 71(3): p. 220-5.
  89. 89. Oliveira, E.C., et al., Neuropathy of gastrointestinal Chagas' disease: immune response to myelin antigens. Neuroimmunomodulation, 2009. 16(1): p. 54-62.
  90. 90. Borda, E., et al., A circulating IgG in Chagas' disease which binds to beta-adrenoceptors of myocardium and modulates their activity. Clinical & Experimental Immunology, 1984. 57(3): p. 679 - 686.
  91. 91. Gorelik, G., et al., Antibodies bind and activate beta adrenergic and cholinergic lymphocyte receptors in Chagas' disease. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1990. 55(2): p. 221-36.
  92. 92. Borda, E.S. and L. Sterin-Borda, Antiadrenergic and mucarinic receptor antibodies in Chagas' cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Cardiology, 1996. 54: p. 149-156.
  93. 93. Wallukat, G., et al., Distinct patterns of autoantibodies against G-protein-coupled receptors in Chagas' cardiomyopathy and megacolon. Their potential impact for early risk assessment in asymptomatic Chagas' patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010. 55(5): p. 463-8.
  94. 94. Arce-Fonseca, M., et al., Autoantibodies to human heart conduction system in Chagas' disease. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 2005. 5(3): p. 233-6.
  95. 95. Llop, E., et al., [HLA antigens in Chagas cardiomyopathy: new evidence based on a case-control study]. Revista Medica de Chile, 1991. 119(6): p. 633-6.
  96. 96. Fernandez-Mestre, M.T., et al., Influence of the HLA class II polymorphism in chronic Chagas' disease. Parasite Immunology, 1998. 20(4): p. 197-203.
  97. 97. Deghaide, N.H., R.O. Dantas, and E.A. Donadi, HLA class I and II profiles of patients presenting with Chagas' disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1998. 43(2): p. 246-52.
  98. 98. Cruz-Robles, D., et al., MHC class I and class II genes in Mexican patients with Chagas disease. Human Immunology, 2004. 65(1): p. 60-5.
  99. 99. Layrisse, Z., et al., HLA-C(*)03 is a risk factor for cardiomyopathy in Chagas disease. Human Immunology, 2000. 61(9): p. 925-9.
  100. 100. Garcia Borras, S., et al., Distribution of HLA-DRB1 alleles in Argentinean patients with Chagas' disease cardiomyopathy. Immunological Investigations, 2009. 38(3-4): p. 268-75.
  101. 101. Cunha-Neto, E., et al., Immunological and non-immunological effects of cytokines and chemokines in the pathogenesis of chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2009. 104 Suppl 1: p. 252-8.
  102. 102. Vasconcelos, R.H.T., et al., Genetic susceptibility to chronic Chagas disease: An overview of single nucleotide polymorphisms of cytokine genes. Cytokine, 2012. 59(2): p. 203-208.
  103. 103. Ferreira, R.C., et al., Increased plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in asymptomatic/"indeterminate" and Chagas disease cardiomyopathy patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2003. 98(3): p. 407-11.
  104. 104. Talvani, A., et al., Elevated concentrations of CCL2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in chagasic cardiomyopathy. Clin Infect Dis, 2004. 38(7): p. 943-50.
  105. 105. Reis, D.D., et al., Characterization of inflammatory infiltrates in chronic chagasic myocardial lesions: presence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha+ cells and dominance of granzyme A+, CD8+ lymphocytes. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1993. 48(5): p. 637-44.
  106. 106. Abel, L.C., et al., Chronic Chagas' disease cardiomyopathy patients display an increased IFN-gamma response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Journal of Autoimmunity, 2001. 17(1): p. 99-107.
  107. 107. Reis, M.M., et al., An in situ quantitative immunohistochemical study of cytokines and IL-2R+ in chronic human chagasic myocarditis: correlation with the presence of myocardial Trypanosoma cruzi antigens. Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 1997. 83(2): p. 165-72.
  108. 108. Cunha-Neto, E., et al., Cardiac gene expression profiling provides evidence for cytokinopathy as a molecular mechanism in Chagas' disease cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Pathology, 2005. 167(2): p. 305-13.
  109. 109. Reddy, V.S., et al., Interleukin-18 stimulates fibronectin expression in primary human cardiac fibroblasts via PI3K-Akt-dependent NF-kappaB activation. J Cell Physiol, 2008. 215(3): p. 697-707.
  110. 110. Riol-Blanco, L., et al., The chemokine receptor CCR7 activates in dendritic cells two signaling modules that independently regulate chemotaxis and migratory speed. J Immunol, 2005. 174(7): p. 4070-80.
  111. 111. Sakai, N., et al., Secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (SLC/CCL21)/CCR7 signaling regulates fibrocytes in renal fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006. 103(38): p. 14098-103.
  112. 112. Guedes, P.M.M., et al., Deficient Regulatory T Cell Activity and Low Frequency of IL-17-Producing T Cells Correlate with the Extent of Cardiomyopathy in Human Chagas' Disease. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2012. 6(4): p. e1630.
  113. 113. Lorena, V.M.B., et al., Cytokine Levels in Serious Cardiopathy of Chagas Disease After In Vitro Stimulation with Recombinant Antigens from Trypanosoma cruzi. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2010. 72(6): p. 529-539.
  114. 114. Savino, W., et al., Cytokines and cell adhesion receptors in the regulation of Immunity to Trypanosoma cruzi. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 2007. 18: p. 107 - 124.
  115. 115. Chagas, C. and E. Vilella, Cardiac form of American trypanosomiasis. . Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 1922. 14(1): p. 5 - 61.
  116. 116. Köberle, F., Chagas disease: a disease of the peripheral autonomic nervous system. Wien Klin Woschenschr, 1956. 68(17): p. 333 - 339.
  117. 117. Köberle, F., Pathological findings in muscular hollow organs in experimental Chagas disease. Zentralbl Allg Pathol, 1956. 95(7 - 8): p. 321 - 329.
  118. 118. Köberle, F., Cardiopathia parasympathicopriva. Munch Med Wochenschr, 1959. 101: p. 1308-10.
  119. 119. Mott, K.E. and J.W.C. Hagstrom, The Pathologic Lesions of the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System in Chronic Chagas' Myocarditis. Circulation, 1965. 31(2): p. 273-286.
  120. 120. Oliveira, J.S., A natural human model of intrinsic heart nervous system denervation: Chagas' cardiopathy. American Heart Journal, 1985. 110(5): p. 1092 - 1098.
  121. 121. Rossi, L., et al., Depleción neuronal en la enfermedad de Chagas: todo debería revisarse. Revista Argentina de Cardiología, 1994. 62(3): p. 239 - 246.
  122. 122. Rossi, L., Neuroanatomopathology of the cardiovascular system., in Neurocardiology., H.E. Kulbertus and G. Franck, Editors. 1988, Futura Publishing Co. Inc.: Mount Kisco, N.Y.
  123. 123. Amorim, D.S., et al., Effects of acute elevation in blood pressure and of atropine on heart rate in Chagas' disease. A preliminary report. Circulation, 1968. 38(2): p. 289-94.
  124. 124. Amorim, D.S., et al., Chagas' heart disease. First demonstrable correlation between neuronal degeneration and autonomic impairment. Acta Cardiol, 1973. 28(4): p. 431-40.
  125. 125. Manço, J.C., et al., Degeneration of the cardiac nerves in Chagas' disease. Further studies. Circulation, 1969. 40(6): p. 879-85.
  126. 126. Marin-Neto, J.A., et al., Postural reflexes in chronic Chagas's heart disease. Heart rate and arterial pressure responses. Cardiology, 1975. 60(6): p. 343-57.
  127. 127. Gallo, L., Jr., et al., Abnormal heart rate responses during exercise in patients with Chagas' disease. Cardiology, 1975. 60(3): p. 147-62.
  128. 128. Junqueira Junior, L.F., et al., Subtle cardiac autonomic impairment in Chagas' disease detected by baroreflex sensitivity testing. Braz J Med Biol Res, 1985. 18(2): p. 171-8.
  129. 129. Guzzetti, S., et al., Impaired heart rate variability in patients with chronic Chagas' disease. Am Heart J, 1991. 121(6 Pt 1): p. 1727-34.
  130. 130. Sousa, A.C., et al., Cardiac parasympathetic impairment in gastrointestinal Chagas' disease. Lancet, 1987. 1(8539): p. 985.
  131. 131. Davila, D.F., G. Inglessis, and C.A. Mazzei de Davila, Chagas' heart disease and the autonomic nervous system. Int J Cardiol, 1998. 66(2): p. 123-7.
  132. 132. Vasconcelos, D.F. and L.F. Junqueira, Jr., Distinctive impaired cardiac autonomic modulation of heart rate variability in chronic Chagas' indeterminate and heart diseases. Journal of Electrocardiology, 2009. 42(3): p. 281-9.
  133. 133. Molina, R.B.G., et al., Dysautonomia and ventricular dysfunction in the indeterminate form of Chagas disease. International Journal of Cardiology, 2006. 113(2): p. 188-193.
  134. 134. Davila, D.F., et al., Cardiac parasympathetic innervation in Chagas' heart disease. Medical Hypotheses, 1991. 35(2): p. 80-4.
  135. 135. Davila Spinetti, D.F., G. Inglessis, and C.A. Mazzei de Davila, [Chagas cardiomyopathy and the autonomic nervous system. Clinical studies]. Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico, 1999. 69(1): p. 35-9.
  136. 136. Davila, D.F., et al., A modified and unifying neurogenic hypothesis can explain the natural history of chronic Chagas heart disease. International Journal of Cardiology, 2004. 96(2): p. 191-5.
  137. 137. Rossi, M.A., et al., Coronary Microvascular Disease in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy Including an Overview on History, Pathology, and Other Proposed Pathogenic Mechanisms. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2010. 4(8): p. e674.
  138. 138. Castro, R., E. Kuschnir, and H. Sgammini, Evaluación de la performance cardíaca y perfusión miocárdica con radiotrazadores en la cardiopatía chagásica crónica. Revista de la Federación Argentina de Cardiología, 1988. 17: p. 226 - 231.
  139. 139. Marin-Neto, J.A., et al., Myocardial perfusion abnormalities in chronic Chagas' disease as detected by thallium-201 scintigraphy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992. 69(8): p. 780-4.
  140. 140. Hagar, J.M. and S.H. Rahimtoola, Chagas' Heart Disease in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 1991. 325(11): p. 763-768.
  141. 141. Hiss, F.C., et al., Changes in myocardial perfusion correlate with deterioration of left ventricular systolic function in chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2009. 2(2): p. 164-72.
  142. 142. Schwartz, R.G. and O. Wexler, Early Identification and Monitoring Progression of Chagas' Cardiomyopathy With SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2009. 2(2): p. 173-175.
  143. 143. Torres, C.M., Miocitólise e fibrose do miocárdio na doença de Chagas. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 1960. 58(2): p. 161 - 182.
  144. 144. Rossi, M.A., S. Gonçalves, and R. Ribeiro-dos-Santos, Experimental Trypanosoma cruzi Cardiomyopathy in BA4LB/c Mice. The Potential Role of Intravascular Platelet Aggregation in its Genesis. American Journal of Pathology, 1984. 114(2): p. 209 - 216.
  145. 145. Factor, S.M. and E.H. Sonnenblick, Hypothesis: Is congestive cardiomyopathy caused by a hyperreactive myocardial microcirculation (Microvascular spasm)? The American Journal of Cardiology, 1982. 50(5): p. 1149-1152.
  146. 146. Morris, S.A., et al., Verapamil ameliorates clinical, pathologic and biochemical manifestations of experimental chagasic cardiomyopathy in mice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989. 14(3): p. 782-789.
  147. 147. Tanowitz, H.B., et al., Parasitic diseases of the heart I: Acute and chronic Chagas' disease. Cardiovascular Pathology, 1992. 1(1): p. 7-15.
  148. 148. Tanowitz, H.B., et al., Compromised Microcirculation in Acute Murine Trypanosoma cruzi Infection. The Journal of Parasitology, 1996. 82(1): p. 124 - 130.
  149. 149. Libby, P., J. Alroy, and M.E. Pereira, A neuraminidase from Trypanosoma cruzi removes sialic acid from the surface of mammalian myocardial and endothelial cells. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1986. 77(1): p. 127-135.
  150. 150. Ashton, A.W., et al., Thromboxane A2 is a key regulator of pathogenesis during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2007. 204(4): p. 929-940.
  151. 151. Huang, H., et al., Infection of Endothelial Cells with Trypanosoma cruzi Activates NF-kappa B and Induces Vascular Adhesion Molecule Expression. Infect. Immun., 1999. 67(10): p. 5434-5440.
  152. 152. Tanowitz, H.B., et al., Cytokine Gene Expression of Endothelial Cells Infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992. 166(3): p. 598-603.
  153. 153. Huang, H., et al., Expression of Cardiac Cytokines and Inducible Form of Nitric Oxide Synthase (NOS2) inTrypanosoma cruzi-infected Mice. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 1999. 31(1): p. 75-88.
  154. 154. Petkova, S.B., et al., Myocardial Expression of Endothelin-1 in Murine Trypanosoma cruzi Infection. Cardiovascular Pathology, 2000. 9(5): p. 257-265.
  155. 155. Salomone, O.A., et al., High plasma immunoreactive endothelin levels in patients with Chagas' cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001. 87(10): p. 1217-1220.
  156. 156. Petkova, S.B., et al., The role of endothelin in the pathogenesis of Chagas' disease. International Journal for Parasitology, 2001. 31(5-6): p. 499-511.
  157. 157. Jelicks, L.A., et al., Cardioprotective effects of phosphoramidon on myocardial structure and function in murine Chagas' disease. International Journal for Parasitology, 2002. 32(12): p. 1497-506.
  158. 158. Rachid, M.A., et al., Blockade of endothelin ETA/ETB receptors favors a role for endothelin during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rats. Microbes and Infection, 2006. 8(8): p. 2113-2119.
  159. 159. Rossi, M.A. and S.G. Carobrez, Experimental Trypanosoma cruzi cardiomyopathy in BALB/c mice: histochemical evidence of hypoxic changes in the myocardium. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 1985. 66(2): p. 155 - 160.
  160. 160. Bevilacqua, M.P., et al., Interleukin 1 (IL-1) induces biosynthesis and cell surface expression of procoagulant activity in human vascular endothelial cells. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1984. 160(2): p. 618-623.
  161. 161. Nachman, R.L., et al., Interleukin 1 induces endothelial cell synthesis of plasminogen activator inhibitor. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1986. 163(6): p. 1595-1600.
  162. 162. Consolim-Colombo, F.M., et al., Endothelial Function Is Preserved in Chagas' Heart Disease Patients Without Heart Failure. Endothelium, 2004. 11(5-6): p. 241-246.
  163. 163. Herrera, R.N., et al., Inflammatory and Prothrombotic Activation With Conserved Endothelial Function in Patients With Chronic, Asymptomatic Chagas Disease. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2011. 17(5): p. 502-507.

Written By

Julián González, Francisco Azzato, Giusepe Ambrosio and José Milei

Published: 08 May 2013