Open access

Sediment Transport Dynamics in Ports, Estuaries and Other Coastal Environments

Written By

X. H. Wang and F. P. Andutta

Submitted: 16 February 2012 Published: 13 March 2013

DOI: 10.5772/51022

From the Edited Volume

Sediment Transport Processes and Their Modelling Applications

Edited by Andrew J. Manning

Chapter metrics overview

6,177 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Given ever expanding global trade, the international economy is linked to the well-being of major coastal infrastructures such as waterways and ports. Coastal areas comprise about 69% of the major cities of the world; therefore the understanding of how coastal aquatic environments are evolving due to sediment transport is important. This manuscript discusses topics from both modelling and observation of sediment transport, erosion and siltation in estuarine environments, coastal zones, ports, and harbour areas. It emphasises particular cases of water and sediment dynamics in the high energy system of the Po River Estuary (Italy), the Adriatic Sea, the Mokpo Coastal Zone (South Korea), the Yangtze Estuary and the Shanghai Port, the Yellow Sea (near China), and Darwin Harbour (Northern Australia). These systems are under the influence of strong sediment resuspension/deposition and transport that are driven by different mechanisms such as surface waves, tides, winds, and density driven currents.

The development of cities around ports is often associated with the expansion of port activities such as oil, coal, and gas exportation. Such development results in multiple environmental pressures, such as dredging to facilitate the navigation of larger ships, land reclamation, and changes in the sediment and nutrient run-off to catchment areas caused by human activities [1]. The increase in mud concentrations in coastal waters is a worldwide ecological issue. In addition, marine sediment may carry nutrients and pollutants from land sources. An understanding of sediment transport leads to a better comprehension of pollution control, and thus helps to preserve the marine ecosystem and further establish an integrated coastal management system [e.g., 2-3]. [4] observed that many historical sandy coasts have been replaced by muddy coasts, and is considered permanent degradation. Additionally, [5] reported that recreational and maritime activities may be adversely impacted by processes of sediment resuspension and deposition. It was shown by [6] that increased sediment concentration in the Adriatic Sea has affected the growth of phytoplankton at the subsurface, because sunlight penetration is considerably reduced.

Before proceeding with the key issues about the transport of sediment in the previously mentioned systems, a brief and summarized overview of the main characteristics and dynamics of sediment transport is provided to contribute to the understanding of this chapter. In general, sediment particles considered in transport of sediment cycle, consist of non-cohesive and cohesive sediment types (Fig. 1a). (a) Sediments of particle size d50< 4 µm, mud or clay, are classified as a cohesive sediments. In contrast, (b) particle size d50> 64 µm may be weakly cohesive; however, these particles are included in the non-cohesive group, and range from mud through to sand [7]. The dynamics of sediment transport rely upon water circulation, salinity concentration, biological interaction, and sediment type. Cohesive sediments, such as clay and small-particle mud, are often transported in the water column, as these sediments are easily suspended by water currents. Alternatively, non-cohesive sediments, such as sand, are usually transported along the bottom by the processes of saltation, rolling, and sliding. Many numerical models include these processes and are based on empirical experiments, often performed in laboratories. These experiments provide estimates of the bed load transport according to particle size, bottom stress, and a threshold stress for initial bed movement [7].

The interaction between sediments is also an important feature pertinent to the transport of sediment. The interaction among cohesive sediments (mud) is different from that of non-cohesive sediments (sand). Cohesive sediments may aggregate, forming flocs of typical sizes of 100-200 μm. This aggregation process is called flocculation, and is caused by chemical or biological interaction. Flocculation is important for increasing the settling velocity; flocculated sediment particles settle faster on the bottom. “Chemical flocculation” is started by salinity ions that attach to the small mud particles, causing electronic forces between these particles, which start aggregating and thus forming a larger mud floc. In contrast, “Biological flocculation” is caused by bacteria and plankton, which produce exopolymer (i.e. a transparent mucus) that acts as glue between mud particles. This mucus results in the formation of extremely large flocs (~1000 μm in size), known as snow flocs [7].

The concentration of sediment near the surface may affect the formation of snow flocs, because sunlight penetration in the water column is decreased due to increased suspended-sediment concentration (SSC) and thereupon the reduced light penetration inhibits the production of plankton. In high turbidity waters, i.e. SSC > 0.5 g l-1, marine snow is scarce; however, in less turbid water, i.e. SSC < 0.1 g l-1, marine snow is common. Also, algae mats formation may influence the degree of erosion, because they decrease the propensity of sediment resuspension. In contrast, the influence of animal burrows may facilitate erosion [7]. Because of the different types of sediments and the flocculation process, the profile of the vertical distribution of SSC varies considerably. This vertical profile may indicate a well-mixed distribution, a smooth increase in sediment concentration with depth, or a depth-increase concentration with a step shape, called lutocline (Fig. 1b). The lutocline inhibits vertical mixing and thus conserves a nepheloid layer (i.e. bottom layer of high sediment concentration).

Figure 1.

(a) Cycle of deposition and resuspension of cohesive sediment involved in particle aggregation and breakup. (b) Three typical vertical profiles of suspended sediment concentration in estuaries, where a, b and c denote a nearly well-mixed, partially-mixed and step shape profiles, respectively [source: 7-8].

This chapter gives an overview of four important suspended sediment transport processes that occur in ports, estuaries and other coastal environments. The following topics are investigated, based upon research on sediment dynamics at the University of New South Wales, Australia:

  • The importance of including wave-currents when modelling sediment transport, showing the effect of waves generated during Bora events on SSC and net sediment flux in the Northern Adriatic Sea;

  • The effect of increased SSC, combined with increased irradiance factor (Fc) of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), on phytoplankton blooms (PB), with analysis of the PB event that occurred between January and April 2001 in the Mokpo Coastal Zone (Korea);

  • The effect of coastal constructions on sediment transport, with analysis of the effect of dikes on the Yangtze River Delta, and problems with silting in the navigation channel of Shanghai Port (China);

  • Tidal circulation modelling, specifically the role of mangrove and tidal flat areas in causing tidal asymmetry, and the effect on the transport of suspended sediment in Darwin Harbour (Australia).

Advertisement

2. Description of study sites

2.1. The Po River and the Adriatic Sea

The Po River (~12.5o E and ~45o N) is 680 km in length, and is located in the northern area of the Adriatic Sea. It provides up to 50% of the total fresh water discharge into the Adriatic Sea (Fig. 2). The annual mean river flow is ~ 46 km3/year, with the maximum river discharge events typically occurring during the spring and a few times in autumn. The climate is temperate, with average temperatures of over 10° C in summer, and over 0° C in winter, and a runoff of 250-750 mm/year. Strong northeasterly winds prevail in winter, known as Bora events (typical wind speed ~30 m s-1). These winds are usually ~10 o C cooler than the water in the Adriatic Sea. In contrast, the southeasterly winds, which are often less intense and occur during summer and autumn, are known as Scirocco. The Bora and Scirocco wind conditions result in downwelling and upwelling events, respectively, in the western Adriatic coast [9-11].

The Adriatic Sea is a semi-enclosed sea, being one of the arms of the Mediterranean Sea. The Adriatic is connected to the eastern part of the Ionian Sea through the Ontranto Strait (Fig. 2). This sea is approximately 800 km long and 200 km wide. Depths vary from less than 200 m in the northern area, up to 1320 m in the southern area – with such depths covering an entire ~120 km wide expanse (i.e. South Adriatic Pit, [12]), and reduce to less than 800 m at the 70 km wide Ontranto Strait [10]. The eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea comprises numerous islands varying in main diameter from a few tens of meters up to tens of kilometres, and this coastline has many zones of high steepness. In contrast, the western coast has isobaths running parallel to the coastline and a smoother slope compared to the eastern coast (Fig. 2). The Adriatic Sea receives the runoff of 28 rivers, mostly located along the coast of Italy. The main river inflow to the Adriatic is from the Po River; however, the rivers Tagliamento, Piave, Brenta, and Adige together contribute a runoff of ~15.2 km3/year, which is nearly one third of the Po’s total runoff. The remaining 23 rivers in the Adriatic provide an average runoff of ~8 km3/year [11].

The general circulation in the Adriatic Sea has been studied using field data and numerical simulations by [1, 10, 13-16], and is observed to be a cyclonic (anti-clockwise) circulation that is highly variable with the seasons [10, 13-17]. The annual water temperature excursion exceeds 15o C. [1] observed the intense boundary current on the western side, the Western Adriatic Coastal Current (WACC), which is both thermohaline and wind driven. The WACC reaches maximum velocities during winter, under the influence of strong northeasterly wind stress, i.e. Bora events [18]. The thermohaline component of the WACC is mainly forced by river discharge from the Po River, and thus reaches maximum intensity during spring and autumn [9, 19]. The position of the WACC is deflected from the inshore areas in winter, towards the shelf slope during the summer by an opposite wind-driven current due to Scirocco events. Similar processes showing boundary currents being pushed offshore by opposing wind-driven currents have also been observed at other shelves, such as: the Great Barrier Reef, the continental shelf north of the Monterey Bay, and New Jersey shelf [20-22].

Figure 2.

The Adriatic Sea location and a synthesized description of the main circulation.

Thermal balance in the Adriatic Sea is complex and influenced by river discharge (e.g. the Po River), surface heat flux by the wind (Bora and Scirocco events), and heat flux through the Otranto Strait. Water masses of the Northern Adriatic are renewed each year when the colder and denser water mass sinks and moves along the seabed to the deep basin of the Adriatic [1]. This northern Adriatic water mass forms a “denser cascade water”, which, for the Adriatic Sea, is caused by temperature gradients, while for many aquatic systems, located in Tropical and Sub-tropical areas, this is often caused by hypersaline waters [e.g. 23-30]. During the spring and summer, however, the water mass in the northern Adriatic is warmed up and forms a well-defined thermocline. Furthermore, the water discharge from the Po River is an important controlling factor to the baroclinic currents in the basin of the Adriatic Sea [9]. The thermal balance within the Adriatic Sea is also maintained by the net heat inflow through the Otranto Strait from the Ionian Sea [1].

The annual load of sediment from the Po River is 10-15 x 106 tons/year. The sediment in the Northern Adriatic Sea is mainly formed by sand with grain size varying from 50 to 2000 μm, and silt with grain size between 2 and 50 μm. The smaller sediment particles, i.e. clay, are also observed, however, they do not provide the major contribution of fine sediment in the northern area [1]. This chapter concerns the sediment transport in the Adriactic Sea of two classes: sediment particles larger and smaller than 50 μm grain size. [31] suggested that fine sediments such as silt and clay are mostly supplied from the Northern Adriatic Sea Rivers (e.g. Po River). Sediment is supplied into the sea and later dispersed through local circulation. Because the general circulation of the Northern Adriatic Sea is cyclonic, with the presence of the WACC on the western coast, there is a possibility that the sediment input from the rivers in the Northern Adriatic is transported southward by the coastal current. Therefore, the bottom sediment distribution would be predominantly sorted by the grain size according to their respective settling velocities.

2.2. The Youngsan River and the Mokpo Coastal Zone (Korea)

The Youngsan River Estuary (YRE) is located in the Mokpo coastal zone (MKZ), in the southwestern area of South-Korea (Fig. 3). The annual mean river flow is ~1.5 km3/year, and the sediment load to the Yellow Sea is 0.7 x 106 tons/year. The climate is temperate, with average temperatures typically between 1.7o C and 4.4o C during winter and between 21.4o C and 26.1o C in summer. Maximum rainfall generally occurs during summer, accounting for 50 to 70% of the annual precipitation. Annual runoff is 250-750 mm. [11, 32-33]. The Mokpo area is located at the southeastern boundary of the Yellow Sea, and the YRE is connected to the Yellow Sea through four narrow inlets (i.e. ~1-3 km wide).

Figure 3.

The domain of the hydrodynamic-sediment transport model at the southwest coast of Korea. The inset shows the location of the 1-D ecosystem model (●) in the Youngsan River Estuarine Bay (YREB) [source: 33].

Tidal features in the YRE are mixed, but predominantly semidiurnal according to the criteria of A. Courtier of 1938 [34], with the tidal form number [Nf=(K1+O1)/(M2+S2)=0.28]. Although there is the presence of many island and tidal flat areas, the tidal currents of the YRE are ebb dominant. Ebb/flood dominance is characterized by a shortened ebbing/flooding period, resulting in stronger ebb/flood currents, respectively. In addition, the flooding periods are nearly twice as large as the ebbing periods [35-37]. The ebb dominance is likely to be caused by important features such as the many scattered islands, combined with the extensive tidal flats [35]. Moreover, [38] observed that ebb dominance is likely to appear in regions of abundant tidal flats.

To add complexity to such tidal asymmetry problems (e.g. flood and ebb dominance), the MCZ has three important sea structures: the dike built in 1981, the Youngam seawall built in 1991, and the Geumho seawall built in 1994. Since the construction of these structures, changes in the tidal characteristics such as the increased amplitudes have been observed [37, 39-40].

This chapter section aims to show that in order to properly predict the variability in phytoplankton mass production in the turbid waters of the MCZ, it is important to use a 3D sediment transport model, coupled with the ecosystem model. This solves the variable vertical dynamics of sediment resuspension and mixing [33].

2.3. Yangtze River and the Shanghai Port in the East China Sea

The Yangtze River or Changjiang River (Fig. 4) is the third longest river in the world (6300 km), and the fourth in terms of both water flow (~900 km3/year) and sediment discharge (470-490 x 106 tons/year), with the transport of a dissolved load of 180 x 106 tons/year [11, 41-44]. The climate of this area is temperate, with temperatures of over 10o C in summer and 0o C winter, and an average runoff of 250-750 mm/year, the maximum river discharge occurring in summer [11]. The Yangtze is a mesotidal estuary according to the criteria of A. Courtier of 1938 [34], with a mean tidal range of 2.7 m [43].

Figure 4.

The Yangtze River or Changjiang River in China, and the indication of the navigation channel used for the trades of Shanghai Port [source: 44].

The sediment of the Yangtze River Estuary (YRE) mainly consists of small sediment particles of less than 63 μm (over 95%). The system is dominated by small sediment particles that lead to a highly turbid environment, and therefore the near bottom SSC can reach or exceed 4 g/l [44-47]. The Yangtze connects to the coastal zone through four inlets, namely North Branch, North Channel, North Passage, and South Passage. The main physical mechanics driving the transport of suspended sediment (TSS) varies between the four inlets: (a) in the South Passage TSS is mainly driven by tidal distortion, (b) in the North Passage TSS is dominated by gravitational circulation and tidal distortion, (c) in the North Channel TSS is dominated by gravitational circulation, and (d) for the North Branch the main mechanisms are not well described [44, 48-49]. For the North Passage other mechanisms are also suggested to contribute to the TSS and formation of the estuarine turbidity maximum zone (ETM), which include advective transport and turbulence suppression by salinity or suspended sediment induced stratification [50]. [51] performed a large analysis of the temporal and spatial variation of fluid mud, and flocculated settling. However, the joint contribution of the different TSS driving mechanisms with geometry is quite complex and requires further investigation.

The TSS in the Yangtze River Estuary (YRE) has been studied for many years [e.g. 41, 48-49, 52-59]. However, since the completion of the Deep Navigation Channel in 2011, important changes to the local hydrodynamics, and thus to the transport of sediment, are expected. In addition, there is the effect of the fluvial sediment trap by the Three Gorges Dam, which caused a significant decrease to fluvial sediment load [59-60]. Although the reduction of fluvial sediment has been reported, the silting problem attracted attention because the estimate deposition of sediment in the navigation channel was over 100% of the original yearly average predicted value, i.e. 30 million m3 [62]. Recently, [44, 63] have reported that the greater siltation within the delta of the YRE is mostly influenced by the redistribution of local sediment through processes such as erosion and deposition within the delta area.

On Yangtze Estuary is the Shanghai Port, the world’s busiest container port, which is extremely important to the economy of China. During 2010 and 2011, this port handled nearly 30 million container units per year. To facilitate local navigation, the Deepwater Navigation Channel (DNC) was built, 92 km in length and 12.5m deep. Although the channel comprises two dikes of nearly 50 km each, as well as 19 groins built to increase speed along the DNC, silting is still an issue, and dredging maintenance is greater than originally predicted [44, 55, 64-67].

A 1-DV model was applied to study the fine suspended sediment distribution at the South Channel-North Passage of the YRE [68]. Then, a 2D vertical integrated model was used to simulate, and subsequently to investigate the characteristics of tidal flow and suspended sediment concentration at this channel [69]. From these studies it was observed that new features had formed after the finalization of the shipping channel; however, the model used did not include the baroclinic component, which is an important factor in the transport of sediment.

2.4. Darwin Harbour (Australia)

Darwin Harbour (DH) is a shallow estuary, with a typical depth of less than 20 m and a maximum depth of up to ~40m. The harbour is situated in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, and connects to the Timor Sea. The land surrounding DH is occupied by the cities of Palmerston and Darwin (the latter is the capital of NT). DH is defined as the water body south of a line from Charles Point (west point) to Gunn Point (east point), and comprises the Port Darwin, Shoal Bay and the catchments of the West Arm, Middle Arm and East Arm [Darwin Harbour Advisory Committee 2003]. DH forms two adjacent embayments. The western embayment receives the freshwater inputs predominantly from the Elizabeth River (flowing into the East Arm), the Darwin River, Blackmore River and Berry Creek (flowing into the Middle Arm), while the eastern embayment receives freshwater input from the Howard River [70]. DH area comprises numerous tidal flats and mangroves, with nearly 5% of the whole mangrove area in the Northern Territory, i.e. ~274 km2. [71-72]

Darwin Harbour is forced by semi-diurnal tides, and is classified as a macro-tidal estuary (tidal form number Nf = 0.32). The maximum observed tidal range is 7.8 m, with mean spring and neap tidal ranges of 5.5 m and 1.9 m, respectively [11, 73-76].

Evaporation usually exceeds rainfall throughout the year, except during the wet season. From February to October, the evaporation rate ranges from 170 mm to 270 mm, respectively, with an average annual evaporation rate of ~2650 mm. The fresh-water input into DH is negligible in the dry season, and evaporation exceeds river discharge. Therefore, in the dry season salinity concentrations in the harbour may become at least 0.8 psu higher than the adjacent coastal waters [77].

Figure 5.

(a) Model domain of Darwin Harbour with indication of the harbour areas and data available to calibrate and validate the model (yellow dots). (b) Unstructured numerical mesh used for the simulations, where colour corresponds to depth in meters, and numbered points indicate location of sampling stations used to analyse tidal asymmetry along the harbour [source: 76].

The climate of this region is tropical savannah, with average monthly temperatures of over 20o C throughout the year. DH is located in a subarid/humid area with a typical rainfall of 1500-1600 mm/year (rainfall of 2500 mm in exceptionally wet years). Runoff typically varies between 100 and 750 mm/year, with maximum runoff usually occurring between October and April [11]. Although DH is of great economic importance to the NT, most of the current knowledge about the main driving forces for the local hydrodynamics is due to efforts by [75-76, 78-80]. To add complexity to the understanding of the hydro-dynamical and morphological changes in DH, the combined effect from the headlands, rivers, and embayments create a complicated bathymetry that leads to the formation of many tidal jets within narrow channels, eddies etc.

[76] Conducted some research at the western embayment of DH (Fig. 5a), and provided a calibrated and validated model to study the hydrodynamics in the harbour (Fig. 5b). From this study, the role that the mangrove and tidal flat areas play on the tidal asymmetry could be verified. It was thus confirmed that a decrease in area of the tidal flat and mangroves would lead to increased tidal asymmetry of flood dominance, and, because of this, result in the net sediment transport to the inner harbour area.

Advertisement

3. Methods

This chapter addresses the different study regions, followed by independent research and numerical modelling. As such, we have provided the methodology in separate sub-sections. Each of the following sub-sections summarizes the field work conducted, the calibration, and validation of the model for the four study sites.

3.1. Setting up of the numerical model for the Northern Adriatic Sea

For the Adriatic Sea, a sediment transport model similar to that of [81] was used, with improvements made by incorporating the effect of wave current [1, 82-84]. The Adriatic Intermediate Model was based on the Princeton Ocean Model (POM) [85]; with the horizontal resolution of 5 km applied to a structured mesh. The model had 21 vertical layers that used the sigma coordinate, with a high vertical resolution was used near the surface and bottom. The simulations had the time steps of 7 and 700 seconds for the external and internal modes. The 2.5 turbulent closure method of Mellor-Yamada was used, and the diffusivity coefficient for SSC was assumed to be equal to that of heat and salt, and viscosity according to [86].

The flocculation of fine suspended sediment is mostly observed near the Po River mouth, and in areas before reaching the ocean [87]. Because of that, flocculation or aggregation processes were neglected, and thus all sediment behaves as a non-cohesive type and moving as a Newtonian fluid. For the fine sediment, i.e. silt and fine sand (20 < d < 60 μm), resuspension was caused by turbulence. Inertia of sediment particles was also neglected, and their vertical velocity parameterized by a small settling velocity (w s ). For more information about the settling velocity, sediment source in the Adriatic Sea, and all the physical and numerical parameters used in the model, please refer to [1, 82-84].

The tides are known to be relatively week in the Northern Adriatic Sea; however, [83] included the tides to observe the tidal current effect on sediment transport. For the bottom stress two expressions were applied, an expression that considered the wave orbital velocity on the bottom, and the other expression that neglected this effect. The third version of the SWAN model was used to simulate the waves. The model was used in the stationary mode to compute the wave fields under the forcing of 6 hour interval.

The suspended sediment concentration was assumed not to affect water density. It is important to note that this last assumption is only valid for low concentrations of SSC, such as those lower than 1 g/l [e.g., 88-90]. The conservation of SSM in the water column was applied and the fluid considered incompressible. [2] showed that the Adriatic Sea is supplied by a riverine sediment input that is ~ 1.67 Mt/month, with the Po River contributing nearly 70% of that. The other rivers along the Adriatic coast had the equal contribution, which represented the remaining 30 % of the sediment input.

The sediment dynamics in the Northern Adriatic Sea is induced by riverine sources or resuspended sediment from the seabed. Simulations were conducted to quantify the different mechanisms responsible for the transport of suspended sediment [1], and the simulations examining in details the wave-current interaction [84].

The numerical simulations by [1] were: (a1) simulation forced only by the Po River plume, (b1) simulation forced by the Po River plume and wind stress. (c1, d1 and f1) simulation forced by the Po River plume, wind stress, and additional wave forcing. For the simulation assuming wind effect, the assumed wind conditions were the Bora and Scirocco, which are typical wind conditions of the region [e.g., 9, 14-15, 19, 91] and summarized in [Table 2, in 1]. A homogeneous field with initial temperature of 12o C, and salinity 38 psu were assumed in the model. These are representative of ambient winter conditions without stratification. Simulations for a 30 day period were made, assuming continuous discharge from the Po River.

In contrast, the numerical simulations by [84] were: (a2) simulation forced without waves, tides, and SSC effect on water density; (b2) simulation forced by waves, but without tides and SSC effect on water density; (c2) similar to b2, except with waves assumed to be aligned with bottom currents; (d2) simulation forced with waves and tides, but without SSC effect on water density; (e2) simulation forced with waves and SSC effect on water density, but without tides. River runoff was assumed to be continuous from 1 January 1999 to 31 January 2001. The initial conditions were obtained from climatological simulation of the Adriatic Sea circulation in [17], and the sediment model was coupled with the hydrodynamical model from 1 December 2000.

3.2. Setting up of the numerical model for the Mokpo Coastal Zone

The simulation for MCZ consists of a 3D hydrodynamical model coupled with the sediment transport model, and a 1-D biogeochemical model [33]. The Princeton Ocean Model (POM) was chosen [85]. This model used the 2.5 turbulence closure scheme [92], and included the effect of sediment concentration on water density, and the stability function on the drag bottom coefficient [93]. The biological 1-D Modular Ecosystem Model (MEM) is based on the European Regional Sea Ecosystem Model [94]. This model constrains the physical and geophysical environmental conditions such as photosynthetically active radiation, temperature, and salinity. It also includes the trophic interactions between biological functional groups [95-96].

The simulations were run from January to April 2001, and the vertical salinity and temperature data used to calibrate/validate the hydrodynamical model were obtained by Mokpo National University at seven stations in the Youngsan River Estuary. The period of simulation partially covers the winter to spring seasons, and the distribution of the 7 sampling stations covers areas near the river mouth and upstream regions.

Hourly data from the hydrodynamic and sediment model were provided to the biogeochemical model. Specifically, temperature was used to compute the metabolic response to the biota, salinity was used for oxygen saturation concentration, the vertical diffusion coefficient was used for the biogeochemical-state variables, and the combination of sea surface elevation with suspended sediment concentration was used to estimate light penetration in the water column. The river discharge from the Youngsan Reservoir was also included. The water depth at the Youngsan River Estuarine Bay was assumed to be 21 m. The horizontal grid resolution of the model was 1km, with 18 vertical sigma layers. The open boundary was forced with the four main tidal components, i.e. M2, S2, K1 and O1. Nodal corrections and astronomical arguments were included to predict tides during the period of simulation.

The initial concentration values of pelagic biogeochemical are listed in (Table 1). The phytoplankton population, biomass content of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and silicon for each phytoplankton group were obtained from [97]. Model sensitivity tests were performed in 8 different simulations, by assuming different parameters for light attenuation and vertical mixing rates, see Table 4 in [33]. A complete description of the whole setting of the model, the modelling experiments, and additional numerical and physical parameters is provided in [33].

Nitrate Phosphate Ammonia Silicate DO
Surface 2.25 0.26 1.15 6.02 333
Bottom 1.36 1.20 1.20 7.36 340

Table 1.

Initial condition assumed for concentrations of pelagic biogeochemicals (unit in mmol m−3) [source: 33].

3.3. Setting up of the numerical model for the Yangtze Estuary

To study the hydrodynamics and transport of sediment, the 3D Princeton Ocean Model (POM) was used. This model uses a structured mesh and resolves the equations for momentum, temperature, and salinity using the finite differences method. The vertical coordinate is sigma [85, 98-99], and the turbulent closure method is described in [92, 100], while to compute the vertical mixing processes [101] was used. To compute the horizontal diffusion of momentum, the Smagorinsky diffusion scheme [86] was used. The complete description of the model is shown by [99]. The wetting and drying scheme for the domain is implemented in the model, with a minimum water depth established to avoid negative values [102-103].

To calibrate and validate the model in order to study the transport of sediment in the Deep Navigation Channel DNC of the YRE, field data measured in 2009 were used. The data were collected after the construction of the two dikes and 19 groins; however, the water depth was about 10.5 m at that time [43-44]. The equation used in the model, the initial conditions for the hydrodynamics, and initial sediment distribution are all described in [44]. The physical and numerical parameters are summarized in table 2.

Parameter Description Value
ws50 free settling velocity -1.715×10-5(ms-1)
m1 empirical settling coefficient -0.014
n1 empirical settling coefficient 2.20
m2 empirical settling coefficient 2.89
n2 empirical settling coefficient 2.80
C0 Flocculate empirical coefficient 0.20 (kgm-3)
α empirical coefficient 10.0
β empirical coefficient 0.5
E0 empirical erosion coefficient 2.0×10-5(kgm-2s-1)
τc critical shear stress for erosion or deposition 0.05(kgm-1s-2)

Table 2.

Parameters used in the sediment transport model [source: 44].

Tidal harmonic components from 8 sites were used to verify the model, and the root mean square error (RMSE). The tidal components used in the model were observed to represent nearly 95% of the tidal oscillation (i.e. M2, S2, K1 and O1). Tidal currents were used to verify the water speed, and a good agreement was achieved. Salinity measurements were used to verify the proper simulation of mixing in the YRE, and aside from the periods of highly vertical stratification during ebb currents, the model properly simulated the temporal variation in salinity at the sampling sites. The final validation of the model was to verify the proper simulation of the transport of SSC, and in general the model could reproduce the physical mechanism driving the transport of sediment well. In summary, aside from drawbacks such as over-mixing of salinity during the neap tide due to the 2.5 Mellor-Yamada turbulence closure scheme, the model was calibrated and verified, and thus was still a valuable tool to study and understand the influence the navigation channel has on the transport of sediment within YRE.

3.4. Setting up of the numerical model for the Darwin Harbour

To simulate the hydrodynamics and transport of sediment for Darwin Harbour, the unstructured numerical model FVCOM was applied [104]. The mesh was formed by 9,666 horizontal grid cells, and 20 vertical layers using sigma coordinate. The horizontal resolution varied between ~ 20 to ~3,300 m, with the higher resolution areas in the inner harbour and lower resolution in the outer harbour [76].

To force the model at the external open boundary, tidal forcing was used in the coastal area between Charles Point and Lee Point. The tidal components were obtained from TPXO7.2 global model. The semi-diurnal components used to force the model were (M2, S2, N2 and K2), while the diurnal components were (K1, O1, P1 and Q1). Three shallow-water components (M4, MS4, MN4) and two extra tidal components of low frequency were also used, i.e. Mf and Mm. For the internal boundary, e.g. upstream river zones, there are three sources of fresh water in the domain (Elizabeth River, Blackmore River and Berry Creek); however, the simulation was for the dry season and thus river discharge was negligible [76]. In the dry season, the small presence of density-driven currents is often confined upstream of Darwin Harbour, and they are often less than 3% of the maximum tidal current intensity. At the surface, the wind is an important mechanism to cause sediment resuspension, by wind-driven currents and waves [105]. The macro-tides in Darwin Harbour (typical tidal oscillation between 3.7 and 7.8 m), however, dominate the transport of sediment with tidal currents of up to ~ 3m s-1 [106]. The additional effects from wind, river discharge and the heat flux at the free-surface boundary were negligible, allowing the simulation to be forced by tides alone.

The bottom drag coefficient (C d ) was set to be a function of the water depth (see Eq. 2 in 76). The mangrove area was treated differently, because the influence of roots and trees significantly increase the friction and thus reduce water speed [107]. From empirical experiments C d was observed to vary between 1 and 10, and its value relies upon tidal conditions, mangrove species, and patchiness of mangrove distribution. Therefore, the main value for C d was set to 5. The remaining numerical and physical parameters, such as the viscosity and diffusion coefficient, are all described in more detail in [76].

For the initial conditions, constant values for salinity (33 psu) and temperature (25°C) were used. These are characteristic values during the dry season, and, with the zero river input, result in a barotropic model. The simulation started on 20th of June 2006 (00:00:00), with a one second time step, and duration of 31 days. Six different simulations were analysed, different sizes of tidal flats and mangrove areas were assumed, and one simulation excluding the presence of tidal flats and mangrove areas. These simulations provide an understanding of the independent effects of tidal flats and mangroves in the tidal asymmetry of Darwin Harbour. There were three main numerical experiments, namely: (Exp. 1) where tidal flats and mangrove areas were considered, (Exp. 2) where mangrove areas were removed from the domain, and (Exp. 3) where both mangrove and tidal flat areas were removed from the domain.

Advertisement

4. Results and discussion

4.1. Sediment transport in the Adriatic Sea

The key results from [84] are summarized as follows:

The Bora wind generated barotropic southward longshore currents that connected to the partially buoyancy driven WACC. This resulted in surface water currents of up to 1.3 m s-1 near the Po River mouth, and maximum bottom currents of 0.3 m s-1 near Ortona. These general features were all in concordance with [108]. The smooth wind conditions resulted in a reduced interior vorticity, which is caused by the orographic incisions around the Dinaric Alps [109]; however, the good representation of the WACC in the Nothern Adriatic Shelf combined with the wave-currents provided a realistic physical representation of sediment transport during the Bora event. The Bora wind caused higher wave heights on the western coast than on the eastern coast. The wave direction was mainly aligned with the wind direction in the Adriatic Sea; however, the direction was mainly perpendicular when approaching the western coast because of wave refraction.

For low and moderate wind conditions, the modelled waves showed good agreement with observed waves. The measurements used to verify the model were obtained at the buoys at Ancona and Ortona. During strong wind conditions, such as Bora events, the model showed good results compared to observations of the waves at Ortona, while for Ancona the wave response was underestimated by 50%. This was caused by the low horizontal scale resolution of 40 km ECMWF wind fields. Due to the complex orography, the model is incapable of resolving the fine wind variability [91, 110].

Figure 6.

The bottom stress on 15 January 2001, predicted by Experiment 1 (a), Experiment 2 (b), and their difference (c) [source: 84].

Waves and currents have been shown to affect sediment resuspension in the Bottom Boundary Layer (BBL). Recent field studies conducted near the Po River delta were used to analyse the effect of wave-current interaction [e.g., 111-113]. The simulation without the wave effect (experiment 1) showed the bottom current reaching ~ 0.34 m s-1 during the Bora event. The Bora event caused the bottom stress to increase from 0.01 N m-2 to 0.66 N m-2 (Fig. 6a).

This increased bottom stress results in considerable erosion, and a subsequent increase in concentration of both fine and course sediment near the bottom. During periods without Bora winds, the resuspension was weak, and the fine sediment from the Po River discharge dominated the SSC in the water column. For experiment 2, in which the effect of wave-current interaction was considered (Fig. 6b), the bottom stress reached a maximum value of 2.2 N m-2, and the concentration of fine and coarse sediments increased by 80%. (Fig. 7b). The wave-current interaction increased the bottom drag coefficient from 0.0048 to values of up to 0.015 (not shown).

Figure 7.

The surface (layer 1) fine sediment concentration on 15 January 2001, predicted by experiment 1 (a), Experiment 2 (b), and their difference (c) [source: 84].

In experiment 1, a high bottom stress was predicted in the north-east shelf along the Italian coast. Therefore, high SSC was obtained (i.e. 28 g m-3) near the Po River delta, with similar concentration of coarse and fine sediments, which were very well vertically mixed. In experiment 2 the distribution patterns were very similar to those of experiment 1. The bottom stress and sediment concentration increased in magnitudes to 1.3 N m-2 and 50 g m-3, respectively. This increase was verified along the coast (~ 200 km long), southwards from the Po River nearshore zone. It was observed that the prediction of the fine suspended sediment concentration showed good agreement with [112]. [113] has also obtained SSC in the range of 70-100 g m-3.

The sediment flux was analysed in experiment 1, using results from a cross-sectional area. During the Bora event on 15th of January, an upwelling net sediment flux was observed, despite the downwelling currents along the Italian coast. The horizontal fields near the surface and bottom were also analysed, and a net sediment flux with maximum values of 20 g m-2 s-1, was observed southwards near the Italian coast. The predictions were in agreement with estimates by [113] in a different Bora event. In experiment 1, the southward flux of 10.5 t s-1 (fine sediment) and 9.3 t s-1 (coarse sediment) was calculated at a cross-section area (N) near the Po River delta in the Adriatic Sea. In contrast, for experiment 2, the flux of fine and coarse sediment increased to 25.6 t s-1 and 24.1 t s-1, respectively.

Experiment 3 was conducted to verify the effect from the wave and current aligned to the sediment transport. The net sediment flux of fine and coarse sediment was over predicted by 8% and 9%, respectively, from experiment 2. These small differences are evidence that the wave propagation direction had little effect on sediment flux. This was shown for strong wave conditions by [114].

To observe the effect of the tides, experiment 4 was conducted. It considered the same conditions as experiment 2, with the additional influence of tidal currents. The four main semi-diurnal tidal components were used (i.e. M2, K2, N2, S2), and the three main diurnal components (i.e. K1, O1, P1). The sediment flux at the cross-sectional area (N) was observed to be reduced by 1%, compared with results from experiment 2.

The final experiment was similar to experiment 2. It included, however, the additional influence of sediment concentration on water density, using a simple bulk relation from [83]. Because of the small SSC, the effect on sediment flux was negligible, with slight changes of less than 1%.

4.2. Factors driving the phytoplankton bloom in the Mokpo coastal zone

The results showed little change in phytoplankton biomass throughout the entire water column during January. In contrast, in February the concentration of phytoplankton biomass increased at the surface. In the first two weeks of March this biomass increased significantly, and reached maximum values at the surface after two weeks (i.e. mid March). The model simulated the timing of the phytoplankton blooms well; however, the maximum biomass obtained from the theoretical results was 2-3 times lower than observed values. Some possible explanations for this underestimation are the short period of simulation (4 months), and the use of a 1-D biogeochemical model instead of a 3D model. Moreover, when the sluice gates located upstream are opened, the system temporally becomes a salt-wedge estuary. This increased fresh water input may cause the sinking riverine phytoplankton detritus that flows along the bottom. Additionally, there is a likely effect from the resuspended phytoplankton and/or detritus that were not incorporated in the model [33].

A good correlation was found between the variation in phytoplankton biomass and diatom concentrations. Despite the observed increase in radiance Q (W m-2), the diatom bloom finished in April. Diatom concentration decreases mostly because of lack of dissolved phosphate (P) and silicate (Si) in the euphotic zone. This depletion is caused by phytoplankton uptake combined with stratification-induced limitation of nutrient supply near the bottom. It has been shown that phytoplankton blooms develop due to a decrease in vertical mixing rates. Therefore, the increased vertical mixing that occurs from early January to mid-February inhibits the permanence of phytoplankton cells in the euphotic area [33]. Vertical mixing was increased due to the colder wind decreasing surface water temperatures, which then caused convective overturn in the water column.

The features of phytoplankton biomass (PB) variation were examined for light attenuation coefficients (Fc) of 0.43, 0.46 and 0.49 (Fig. 8). The PB over the euphotic zone increased slowly. All the blooms started at the same time, reaching nearly the same maximum of PB, i.e. 35 mg m-2. However, the rates of increase were different, with maximum growth rate verified to occur for Fc = 0.49. Moreover, variation between neap and spring tides has also been shown to affect the PB. Water turbidity is increased due to larger sediment resuspension caused by the strong spring tidal current, and thus the PAR attenuation may affect phytoplankton production. The model results showed that the absence of the effect from SSC reduces PAR attenuation, and therefore changes phytoplankton production (not shown). Vertical mixing also affects the PB, because phytoplankton cells are taken to deeper layers where light attenuation is higher [33]. [115] proposed that blooms happen when phytoplankton growth exceeds the rate of vertical movement. Therefore, a decrease in vertical mixing results in phytoplankton blooms in coastal and oceanic waters [e.g. 116-118].

Figure 8.

Temporal variation of the vertical integrated chlorophyll-a concentration in the euphotic zone. The numerical experiment for different values of Fc and the simulation start time at January 2001 [source: 33].

4.3. The effect of dikes on sediment transport in the Yangtze River Estuary

Tidal harmonic components were calculated using measurements from 8 water level stations, and later compared with results of the model. The root mean square error obtained for the 4 main components was under 10%, and the shift of tidal phases less than 10 degrees. In general, the model showed reasonable agreement compared with measurements of tidal oscillation, water current, and temporal variation of salinity and SSC. Details of the model calibration and verification are shown in [44]. The results of the SSC calculated from the model are shown in (Fig. 9a). Differences between simulations and observations of the speed increase of the surface flood currents, during the rising sea level, were verified. Observations showed more steepness during flood tides, and, for a short period of time, measured flood current was approximately 20% higher than the model result. In contrast, water currents near the bottom consistently showed good agreement between modelled and observed values at any given time. Even with the minor differences found, the model was properly calibrated, and thus shown to be a valuable tool for studying sediment transport mechanisms in the YRE [44].

Figure 9.

(a) Measured (red line) and model simulated (blue dotted line) suspended sediment concentration at 62 cm above the seabed. (b) The tidally averaged residual suspended sediment flux and its three components, i.e. residual flow (Fr), tidal pumping (Ft), and shear dispersion (Fs), where the positive value indicates ebb transport of SSC. (c) and (d) show the tidally averaged suspended sediment concentration after and before the DNC construction, respectively. The location of the dikes is indicated in both figures (c and d), and the location of the sampling station in the DNC (black dot).

Figure 9b shows field data results of the sediment transport near the bottom. During the spring tides between 30th of March and 2nd of April, there was more suspended sediment present at the onset of the ebb tide than at the onset of the flood tide. This resulted in a residual and tidal pumping transport of sediment downstream, where residual transport dominated the total transport of suspended sediment (TSS). Commonly, high residual TSS causes a downstream shear dispersion TSS, whereas low residual transport causes an upstream shear dispersion transport. In contrast, during the neap tide observed from the 2nd of April onwards, the bottom horizontal water velocities were much smaller than those observed during spring tides. Because of this, sediment resuspension decreased considerably, and therefore the residual transport of SSC was reduced. In addition, tidal pumping was observed to transport SSC mainly landward. The residual transport and shear dispersion were observed to alternate SSC transport between upstream and downstream directions.

The results showed that the maximum SSC is generated in the sand bar area (Figs. 9c,d). The simulation in which the effect of the two dikes was applied (Fig. 9c) showed a discontinuity in the high SSC caused by the DNC, and the maximum SSC was observed adjacent to the north dike (e.g. SSC ~ 6 kg m-3). In contrast, the simulation without the presence of dikes showed high SSC within the entire sand bar area near the estuarine mouth. The SSC decreasing upstream indicated a low local resuspension of sediment and a low sediment input from river discharge. In addition, the Three Gorges Dam caused a significant decrease in sediment load to the Yangtze River [60-61]. This local sediment resuspension is therefore evidence that the silting occurring within the DNC is caused by redistribution of sediment between the shoals on each side of the dikes.

Comparison between the simulations with and without the dikes, found enhanced ebb dominance to occur with the inclusion of the dikes (not shown). These changes have previously been observed and reported [63], by comparing field measurements obtained before and after construction of the dikes. After construction, the traditional sediment transport path across the estuarine mouth was blocked; however, some sediment may still be transported around the dike edges, and a small amount may enter the channel. This sediment intruding into the DNC is likely to cause siltation near the seaward side of the DNC.

4.4. Tidal asymmetry in Darwin Harbour

The amplitude of the M2 tidal component was observed to gradually increase from the open boundary (i.e. outer harbour) to nearly 1.7 m in the arms, and decrease from the arms to nearly 1.0 and 0 meters in the tidal flat and mangrove areas, respectively. The decrease in amplitude for the tidal flat and mangrove areas was caused by large energy dissipation due to bottom friction. The phase shifted in areas of the outer harbour and harbour arms, and this shift was caused by reduced wetting-drying areas. The maximum horizontal velocity is about 3.0 m s-1 in the Middle Arm (see Fig. 5). The variation of M2 tidal current ellipses were observed at many vertical layers and locations of the domain. In the outer harbour the M2 currents were up to 0.3 m s-1, and up to 0.6 m s-1 in the channel. The horizontal currents were observed to decrease by almost 30 % from the surface to the bottom [76].

Comparison of the three numerical experiments from simulations that neglected the tidal flat or mangrove areas, showed an increase in the tidal amplitude for the inner and outer harbour. The maximum increase was obtained when both tidal flats and mangroves areas were not considered in the domain (0.02 m), while there was an increase of 0.01 m for the simulation neglecting only the mangrove areas. Although the variation of tidal amplitude was observed to be quite small, for the M4 tidal component, there was an increase in amplification of almost 50% when the mangrove areas were removed, and almost 75% when both the tidal flats and mangrove areas were removed. The phase of the M4 tidal component was observed to advance almost 20 degrees when the mangrove areas and tidal flats were not included in the domain [76].

To verify the effect of mangrove and tidal flat areas on tidal asymmetry, the tidal asymmetry skewness parameter γ was calculated. This allows identification of the major factors controlling tidal asymmetry. For γ, it was verified that the main tidal components controlling tidal asymmetry were M2 and M4, and so the expression to calculate γ was:

γ M 2 / M 4 = 3 2 a M 2 2 a M 4 2 sin ( 2 ϕ M 2 ϕ M 4 ) [ 1 2 ( a M 2 2 + 4 a M 4 2 ) ] 3 2 E1

where a and ϕ are respectively the amplitudes, and phases of the astronomical tides M2 and M4.

Figure 10.

Predicted changes of the coefficient ( γ ), with results obtained from the difference between experiment 2 and 1 (A), and 3 and 1 (B). (C) Parameter γ calculated for different percentages of mangrove area removed in the East Arm near Station Blay [source: 76].

Figure 10 shows that the removal of mangroves and tidal flat areas resulted in an increased tidal asymmetry. In turn, Darwin Harbour would have more flood dominance in tidal currents (Figs. 10A,B). The maximum increase in asymmetry was observed in experiment 3. The experiments in which different percentages of the mangrove areas were removed are shown in figure 10C. The relation between removed mangrove area and increased tidal asymmetry skewness factor was observed to be almost linear, and increased by 0.1 if 100% of the mangrove areas were removed. These results demonstrate that the tidal flats and mangrove zones function as sponge zones for dampening tidal asymmetry [76].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

This chapter provided information about four important suspended sediment transport processes. It showed how wave current interaction increases SSC and therefore affects the net transport of sediment, and demonstrated the importance of applying a coupled hydrodynamical and biogeochemical numerical model to better simulate phytoplankton blooms. In addition, the effect of coastal construction on sediment transport was described, along with the role of tidal flats and mangrove areas in causing tidal asymmetry. Specific conclusions for each case study are as follows:

5.1. Effect of wave current interaction on sediment transport in coastal zones

The general features of the model during the Bora event in January 2001 predicted the WACC, and the large wave fields generated by the strong winds agreed with observations on the western Adriatic shelf. The bottom boundary layer was resolved, and the wave-current interaction was able to be implemented in the model. Moreover, the tidal effect on sediment transport was also examined in the Northern Adriatic Sea.

The model showed that the Bora event occurring from 13–17 January 2001 caused waves with height of 2 m, and period of 5 s. The wave-current near the bottom layer resulted in strong sediment resuspension. The wave effect, combined with the longshore coastal currents and the turbulent driven vertical flux, caused a large southward sediment flux. The flux was estimated using data from a cross-section area of the Adriatic Sea, near the Po River. The experiment including the wave-current interaction showed larger southward sediment flux than the experiment with waves neglected. The sediment flux was clearly maintained by the strong vertical mixing and the bottom sediment resuspension. The results also showed that the southward flux was more confined to the northern area of the Adriatic Sea, and sediment plumes were confined to the western Adriatic shelf north of Ancona.

Simulation results have shown that in areas between the Po River and Ancona, sedimentation and erosion rates doubled due to the combined motion of wave–current interaction in the BBL during the Bora event. Bora events typically occur 9 times during winter seasons [119], and thus the influence of waves is important in the long-term sediment transport at this coastal area. The annual sedimentation rate near the Po River mouths was found to be 2-6 cm yr-1 [120]. The sedimentation rate predicated during the Bora event of 13-17 January 2001 represented nearly 10% of the annual rate. This prediction agrees with observations if we assume the average of ~ 10 Bora events per year. In addition, from experiment 2, it was verified that the high concentration of suspended sediment along the western coast, north of Ancona, was locally driven by waves. Moreover, the wave-current interaction with the BBL enhanced the bottom stress and caused increased sediment resuspension. From the third experiment it was observed at the cross-sectional area (N), that wave direction and tides had little effect on sediment resuspension in the northeastern coast of the Adriatic Sea.

5.2. Effect of SSC on phytoplankton bloom

Simulation of phytoplankton biomass dynamics was obtained during the winter and spring seasons. The model was run using irradiance forcings and physical oceanographic forcings such as SSC, temperature, salinity, tides, and vertical diffusivity. The results from winter revealed that cooling of the surface waters induced vertical mixing, and thus inhibited the growth of phytoplankton biomass. In contrast, periods of neap tides combined with increased freshwater discharge decreased vertical mixing, and in turn triggered PB spring bloom. In the tidally turbid coastal waters, such as the MCZ, the small neap tidal currents were not capable of increasing SSC. As a result, more light was observed though the water column, favouring increases in phytoplankton biomass [33].

Results revealed that prediction of phytoplankton blooms are very sensitive to the light attenuation factor (Fc), vertical diffusion (Kv), and suspended sediment concentration (SSC). Moreover, simulations using depth-averaged diffusivity and monthly averaged vertical diffusivity, may hinder the primary production processes. Finally, the simulations revealed the importance of coupling the 3D hydro-sediment model with the ecosystem model, which leads to more realistic estimates of phytoplankton biomass oscillation [33].

5.3. Influence of coastal construction on sediment transport

The simulations were well calibrated and validated using field data measured in the DNC in Shanghai Port on March 2009. Combining the field measurements with the extrapolated results for the whole domain of the YRE, we have verified that the system is highly stratified during neap tides; however, close to well mixed during spring tides. Calculation of the Richardson number revealed the dominance of fresh water inflow over vertical mixing during neap tides; while, in spring tides, vertical mixing overcomes the buoyancy of the fresh water river inflow [44].

The simulations revealed that the transport of sediment into the DNC comes from open areas, rather than from upstream areas as is commonly expected. Therefore, the input from the Yangtze River is not the major source of sediment, causing siltation, in this navigation channel. The dikes were observed to inhibit the majority of the alongshore sediment transport near the delta zone; however some of the sediment transported towards the dikes veers south, and as it approaches the edges of the dikes a small amount may enter the channel. It was verified that, in the North Channel, the estuarine maximum turbidity zone was generated predominantly by gravitational circulation, whereas, in the South Passage, it was generated mainly by tidal distortion effects. For the DNC there was no maximum turbidity generated locally. Some turbid waters in adjacent areas were observed to be transported upstream in this channel. In summary, the simulation results revealed the magnitude of the maximum turbidity zone in the North Passage, and showed that most of the sediment depositing into the DNC is caused by sediment redistribution from adjacent zones [44].

5.4. Tidal asymmetry modulated by tidal flats and mangrove areas

The results obtained from the simulations, combined with field observations, showed that the circulation in DH is mainly driven by tides during the dry season, with negligible wind and river influence. DH is a semidiurnal system, dominated primarily by the M2 tidal component, and secondarily by the S2 component. The maximum velocities observed were in the Middle Arm, with peaks of over 3.0 m s-1 at the surface layer. The Middle Arm also had the maximum and minimum vertical shear of the horizontal velocities, which would therefore result in some of the maximum vertical mixing zones of DH.

The sensitivity test evidenced that tidal flats and mangrove areas play an important role in modulating the amplitude and phase of some tidal components. In particular, the amplitude of the M4 component was observed to increase by almost 75%, and the phase was verified to advance/delay a few degrees in the outer/inner harbour respectively. In addition, the amplitude and phase of the M2 component were observed to change in the inner harbour, with an amplitude increase of 1% and phase advance of 4 degrees.

The parameter gamma was calculated, showing variation in the tidal elevation skewness. Gamma was observed to increase by 100% in the absence of mangrove areas, and by 120% in the absence of both tidal flats and mangrove areas. Furthermore, the increase in the elevation skewness correlated almost linearly with the decrease in mangrove area. It was therefore suggested that a similar effect would be found with a decrease in tidal flat areas. The findings of this study show how important flooding estuarine areas, e.g. tidal flats and mangroves, are in modulating tidal asymmetry. These findings could be further used to verify similar effect in other estuaries, bays, and harbour areas. As tidal asymmetry strongly affects sediment transport in the estuaries, care must be taken in terms of the reclamation of the mangrove areas and tidal flats around the harbour watershed.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

X. H. Wang and F. P. Andutta were supported by a 2011 Australian Research Council/ Linkage Project – LP110100652. This work was also supported by the National Computational Infrastructure National Facility at the Australian National University. This is a publication of the Sino-Australian Research Centre for Coastal Management, paper number 10.

References

  1. 1. Wang X. H. Pinardi N. 2002 Modeling the dynamics of sediment transport and resuspension in the northern Adriatic Sea Journal of Geophysical Research 107 C12 3225 doi:10.1029/2001JC001303
  2. 2. Frascari F. Frignani M. Guerzoni S. Ravaioli M. 1988 Sediments and pollution in the Northern Adriatic Sea Annals of the New York Academy Sciences 534 1000 1020
  3. 3. Giordani P. Hammond D. E. Berelson W. M. Montanari G. Poletti R. Milandri A. Frignani M. Langone L. Ravailoi M. Rovatti G. Rabbi E. 1992 Benthic fluxes and nutrient budgets for sediments in the Northern Adriatic Sea: Burial and recycling efficiencies Science of the Total Environment, Supplement 251 275
  4. 4. Wolanski E. 2007 Estuarine Ecohydrology Elsevier Amsterdam 157
  5. 5. Warren R. Johnsen J. 1993 Cohesive sediment modelling for coastal lagoons paper presented at International Colloquium and Exposition on Computer Applications in Coastal and Offshore Engineering (ICE-CA COE’93) Kuala Lumper, Malaysia June 14-16, 1993
  6. 6. Vichi M. Pinardi N. Zavatarelli M. Matteucci G. Marcaccio M. Bergamini M. C. Frascari F. 1998 One-dimensional ecosystem model tests in the Po Prodelta area (Northern Adriatic Sea) Environmental Modelling & Software 13 471 481
  7. 7. Wolanski E. Andutta F. P. Delhez E. 2012 Estuarine hydrology In: Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs. Lars Bengtsson, Reginald Herschy, Rhodes Fairbridge (eds.) Springer In press
  8. 8. Maggi F. 2005 Flocculation dynamics of cohesive sediment PhD-Thesis Delft University of Technology Delft 136
  9. 9. Kourafalou V. H. 1999 Process studies on the Po River plume, North Adriatic Sea Journal of Geophysical Research 104 29963 29985
  10. 10. Wang X. H. 2005 A numerical study of sediment transport in a coastal embayment during a winter storm Ocean Modelling 10 253 271
  11. 11. Milliman J. D. Farnsworth K. L. 2011 River Discharge to the Coastal Ocean: A Global Synthesis Cambridge University Press 392
  12. 12. Vilibić I. 2003 An analysis of dense water production on the North Adriatic shelf Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56 697 707
  13. 13. Malanotte-Rizzoli P. Bergamasco A. 1983 The dynamics of the coastal regions of the Northern Adriatic Sea Journal of Physical Oceanography 13 1105 1130
  14. 14. Artegiani A. Bregant D. Paschini E. Pinardi N. Raicich F. Russo A. 1997a The Adriatic Sea general circulation. Part I: air-sea interactions and water mass structure Journal of Physical Oceanography 27 1492 1514
  15. 15. Artegiani A. Bregant D. Paschini E. Pinardi N. Raicich F. Russo A. 1997b The Adriatic Sea general circulation. Part II: Baroclinic circulation structure Journal of Physical Oceanography 27 1515 1532
  16. 16. Zavatarelli Z. Pinardi N. Kourafalou V. H. Maggiore A. 2002 Diagnostic and prognostic model studies of the Adriatic Sea general circulation: Seasonal variability Journal of Geophysical Research 107 3004 doi:10.1029/2000JC000210
  17. 17. Zavatarelli M. Pinardi N. 2003 The Adriatic Sea modelling system: a nested approach Annales Geophysicae 21 345 364
  18. 18. Poulain P. M. 2001 Adriatic Sea surface circulation as derived from drifter data between 1990 and 1999 Journal of Marine System 29 3 32
  19. 19. Raicich F. 1996 On the fresh water balance of the Adriatic Sea Journal of Marine System 9 305 319
  20. 20. Haley J. P. J. Lermusiaux P. F. J. 2010 Multiscale two-way embedding schemes for free-surface primitive equations in the “Multidisciplinary simulation, estimation and assimilation system” Ocean Dynamics 60 1497 1537
  21. 21. Ramp S. R. Lermusiaux P. F. J. Shulman I. Chao Y. Wolf R. E. Bahr F. L. 2011 Oceanographic and atmospheric conditions on the continental shelf north of the Monterey Bay during August 2006 Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 52 192 223
  22. 22. Andutta F. P. Ridd P. V. Wolanski E. submitted Age and the flushing time in the Great Barrier Reef coastal waters
  23. 23. Nunes Vaz. R. A. Lennon G. W. Bowers D. G. 1990 Physical behaviour of a large, negative or inverse estuary Continental Shelf Research 10 277 304
  24. 24. Diop E. S. Soumare A. Diallo N. Guisse A. 1997 Recent change of mangroves of the Saloum river estuary, Senegal Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1 163 172
  25. 25. Largier J. L. Hollibaugh J. T. Smith S. V. 1997 Seasonally hypersaline estuaries in Mediterranean-climate regions Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45 789 797
  26. 26. Lavin M. F. Godinez V. M. Alvarez L. G. 1998 Inverse-estuarine features of the upper gulf of California Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47 769 795
  27. 27. Webster I. T. 2010 The hydrodynamics and salinity regime of a coastal lagoon- The Coorong Australia- Seasonal to multi-decadal timescales Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 90 264 274
  28. 28. Andutta F. P. Ridd P. V. Wolanski E. 2011 Dynamics of hypersaline coastal waters in the Great Barrier Reef Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sciences 94 299 305
  29. 29. Winant C. D. de Velasco G. G. 2012 Dynamics of hypersaline estuaries: Laguna San Ignacio, Mexico Chapter 12 in 2 In: Uncles R J, Monismith S G (Ed.), Water and Fine Sediment Circulation. In: Wolanski E, McLusky D (Series Ed.), The Treatise on estuarine and coastal Science Elsevier
  30. 30. Nunes Vaz. R. A. 2012 The salinity response of an inverse estuary to climate change & desalination Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sciences 98 49 59
  31. 31. Brambati A. Bregant D. Lenardon G. Stolfa D. 1973 Transport and sedimentation in the Adriatic Sea Museo Friulano di Storia Nat. Udine, Italy Publ. 20 60
  32. 32. Byun D. S. Wang X. H. Holloway P. E. 2004 Tidal characteristic adjustment due to dyke and seawall construction in the Mokpo Coastal Zone, Korea Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 59 185 196
  33. 33. Byun D. S. Wang X. H. Zavantarelli M. Cho Y. K. 2007 Effects of resuspended sediments and vertical mixing on phytoplankton spring bloom dynamics in a tidal estuarine embayment Journal of Marine Systems 67 102 118
  34. 34. Defant A. 1960 Physical Oceanography Pergamon Press New York 2 598
  35. 35. Kang J. W. 1999 Changes in tidal characteristics as a result of the construction of sea-dike/sea-walls in Mokpo coastal zone in Korea Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48 429 438
  36. 36. Kang J. W. Jun K. S. 2003 Flood and ebb dominance in estuaries in Korea Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56 187 196
  37. 37. Kang J. W. Moon S. R. Lee K. H. 2009 Analyzing sea level rise and tide characteristics change driven by coastal construction at Mokpo Coastal Zone in Korea Ocean Engineering 36 415 415
  38. 38. Speer P. E. Aubrey D. G. 1985 A study of nonlinear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems. Part II: theory Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 21 207 224
  39. 39. Lee S. W. 1994 Change in tidal height at Mokpo Harbour due to the construction of Youngsan River Estuary Dyke Korean harbour hydraulics 18 27e37 in Korean
  40. 40. Jeong M. S. Jeong D. D. Shin S. H. Lee J. W. 1997 Tidal changes in the harbor due to the development of Mokpo Coastal Zone Journal of Korean Harbour 11 1e8 in Korean
  41. 41. Milliman J. D. Shen H. Yang Z. Meades R. H. 1985 Transport and deposition of river sediment in the Changjiang estuary and adjacent continental shelf Continental Shelf Research 4 1/2 37 45
  42. 42. Milliman J. D. Syvitski J. P. M. 1992 Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers Journal of Geology 100 5 525 544
  43. 43. Cao Z. Wang X. H. Guan W. Hamilton L. J. Chen Q. Zhu D. submitted Observations of nepheloid layers in the Yangtze estuary, China Marine Technology Society Journal
  44. 44. Song D. Wang X. H. inpreparation Observation and Modelling Study of the Turbidity Maximum in the Deepwater Navigation Channel in the Yangtze River Estuary
  45. 45. He Q. Li J. Li Y. Jin X. Che Y. 2001 Field measurements of bottom boundary layer processes and sediment resuspension in the Changjiang estuary Science in China (Series B) 44 Supp. 80 86
  46. 46. Shi J. Z. Zhang S. Y. Hamilton L. J. 2006 Bottom fine sediment boundary layer and transport processes at the mouth of the Changjiang Estuary, China Journal of Hydrology 327 1/2 276 288
  47. 47. Liu G. Zhu J. Wang Y. Wu H. Wu J. 2011 Tripod measured residual currents and sediment flux Impacts on the silting of the Deepwater Navigation Channel in the Changjiang Estuary Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 93 3 192 201
  48. 48. Li J. Zhang C. 1998 Sediment resuspension and implications for turbidity maximum in the Changjiang Estuary Marine Geology 148 3-4 117 124
  49. 49. Shi Z. Kirby R. 2003 Observations of fine suspended sediment processes in the turbidity maximum at the North Passage of the Chanjiang estuary, China Journal of Coastal Research 19 3 529 540
  50. 50. Shi Z. 2004 Behaviour of fine suspended sediment at the North passage of the Changjiang Estuary, China Journal of Hydrology 293 1-4 180 190
  51. 51. Shen H. Pan D. 2001 Turbidity maximum in the Changjiang Estuary China Ocean Press Beijing in Chinese with English introduction 194
  52. 52. Yang Z. Milliman J. D. Fitzgerald M. G. 1982 Transfer of Water and Sediment from the Yangtze River to the East China Sea, June 1980 Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40 S1 72 82
  53. 53. Milliman J. D. Hsueh Y. Hu D. Pashinski D. J. Shen H. Yang Z. Hacker P. 1984 Tidal phase control of sediment discharge from the Yangtze River Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 19 1 119 128
  54. 54. Beardsley R. C. Limeburner R. Yu H. Cannon G. A. 1985 Discharge of the Changjiang (Yangtze River) into the East China Sea Continental Shelf Research 4 1-2 57 76
  55. 55. Su J. Wang K. 1986 The suspended sediment balance in Changjiang Estuary Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 23 1 81 98
  56. 56. Shen H. Li J. Zhu H. Han M. Zhou F. 1993 Transport of the suspended sediment in the Changjiang Estuary International Journal of Sediment Research 7 45 63
  57. 57. Shen J. Shen H. Pan D. Xiao C. 1995 Analysis of transport mechanism of water and suspended sediment in the turbidity maximum of the Changjiang Estuary Acta Geographica Sinica 50 5 411 420 in Chinese with English abstract
  58. 58. Hamilton L. J. Shi Z. Zhang S. Y. 1998 Acoustic backscatter measurements of estuarine suspended cohesive sediment concentration profiles Journal of Coastal Research 14 4 1213 1224
  59. 59. Gao J. Yang Y. Wang Y. Pan S. Zhang R. 2008 Sediment dynamics of turbidity maximum in Changjiang River mouth in dry season Frontiers of Earth Science in China 2 3 249 261
  60. 60. Chen X. Zong Y. 1998 Coastal erosion along the Changjiang deltaic shoreline, China: History and prospective Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 46 5 733 742
  61. 61. Yang Z. Wang H. Saito Y. Milliman J. D. Xu K. Qiao S. Shi G. 2006 Dam impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) River sediment discharge to the sea: The past 55 years and after the Three Gorges Dam Water Resource Research 42 W04407 doi:10.1029/2005WR003970.
  62. 62. Wu H. Guo W. 2004 The physical model study on suspend sediment back silting in navigation channel of Yangtze River Estuary Shanghai Estuarine and Coastal Science Research Centre in Chinese
  63. 63. Tan Z. Fan Q. Zheng W. Zhu J. 2011 Analysis of reasons for the siltation in North Passage of Yangtze Estuary Port & Waterway Engineering 1 29 40 in Chinese with English abstract
  64. 64. He S. Sun J. 1996 Characteristics of suspended sediment transport in the turbidity maximum of the Changjiang River Estuary Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica 27 1 60 66 in Chinese with English abstract
  65. 65. Chen J. Li D. Chen B. Hu F. Zhu H. Liu C. 1999 The processes of dynamic sedimentation in the Changjiang Estuary Journal of Sea Research 41 1-2 129 140
  66. 66. Wu J. Wang Y. Cheng H. 2009 Bedforms and bed material transport pathways in the Changjiang (Yangtze) Estuary Geomorphology 175 184
  67. 67. Ge J. Ding P. Chen C. 2010 Impacts of Deep Waterway Project on local circulations and salinity in the Changjiang Estuary, China paper presented at the 32nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering Shanghai, China
  68. 68. Shi J. Z. 2010 Tidal resuspension and transport processes of fine sediment within the river plume in the partially-mixed Changjiang River estuary, China A personal perspective Geomorphology 121 3-4 133 151
  69. 69. Shi J. Z. Zhou H. Q. Liu H. Zhang Y. G. 2010 Two-dimensional horizontal modeling of fine-sediment transport at the South Channel-North Passage of the partially mixed Changjiang River estuary China Environment Earth Sciences 61 8 1691 1702
  70. 70. Wilson D. Padovan A. Townsend S. 2004 The Water Quality of Spring and Neap Tidal Cycles in the Middle Arm of Darwin Harbour during the Dry Season Water Monitoring Branch, Natural Resource Management Division Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment Darwin
  71. 71. Brocklehurst P. Edmeades B. 1996 The Mangrove Communities of Darwin Harbour Tech Memo. 96
  72. 72. Tien A. T. 2006 Influence of deep aquifer springs on dry season stream water quality in Darwin Rural Area Water Monitoring Branch Natural Resource Management Division Report 6/2006D 54
  73. 73. Michie M. G. 1987 Distribution of foraminifera in a macrotidal tropical estuary: Port Darwin, Northern Territory of Australia Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38 249 259
  74. 74. Woodroffe C. D. Bardsley K. N. Ward P. J. Hanley J. R. 1988 Production of mangrove litter in a macrotidal embayment, Darwin Harbour, N.T., Australia Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 26 6 581 598
  75. 75. Li L. Wang X. H. Sidhu H. Williams D. 2011 Modelling of three-dimensional tidal dynamics in Darwin Harbour, Australia in Proceedings of the 15th Biennial Computational Techniques and Applications Conference (CTAC-2010) 52 C103 C123
  76. 76. Li L. Wang X. H. Williams D. Sidhu H. Song D. 2012 Numerical study of the effects of mangrove areas and tidal flats on tides: A case of study of Darwin Harbour, Australia Journal of Geophysical Research In press
  77. 77. Padovan A. V. 1997 The water quality of Darwin Harbour: October 1990 - November 1991 Water Quality Branch, Water Resources Division, Department of Lands, Planning and Environment, NT Government, Report 34/1997D December 1997
  78. 78. Williams D. Wolanski E. Spagnol S. 2006 Hydrodynamics of Darwin Harbour In: Wolanski E, editor. The Environment in Asia Pacific Harbours Springer Printed in The Netherlands 461 476
  79. 79. Williams D. 2009 Part 1: hydrodynamics and sediment transport In Dredging of sand from Darwin Harbour, hydrographic and marine life, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Arafura Timor Research Facility Brinkin, Northern Territory 1 33
  80. 80. Ribbe J. Holloway P. E. 2001 A model of suspended sediment transport by internal tides Continental Shelf Research 21 395 422
  81. 81. Wang X. H. 2001 A numerical study of sediment transport in a coastal embayment during a winter storm Journal of Coastal Research 34 414 427
  82. 82. Wang X. H. 2002 Tide-induced sediment resuspension and the bottom boundary layer in an idealized estuary with a muddy bed Journal of Physical Oceanography 32 3113 3131
  83. 83. Wang X. H. Pinardi N. Malacic V. 2007 Sediment transport and resuspension due to combined motion of wave and current in the northern Adriatic Sea during a Bora event in January 2001: A numerical modelling study Continental Shelf Research 27 613 633
  84. 84. Blumberg A. F. Mellor G. L. 1987 A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model in Three dimensional Coastal Ocean Models, edited by N. S. Heaps American Geophysical Union Washington D. C. 1 16
  85. 85. Smagorinsky J. 1963 General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I: the basic experiment Monthly Weather Review 91 99 164
  86. 86. Nittrouer C. Miserocchi S. Trincardi F. 2004 The PASTA project: investigation of Po and Apenine sediment transport and accumulation Oceanography 17 4 46 57
  87. 87. Adams C. E. Jr Weatherly G. L. 1981 Some effects of suspended sediment stratification on an oceanic bottom boundary layer Journal of Geophysical Research 86 4161 4172
  88. 88. Trowbridge J. H. Kineke G. C. 1994 Structure and dynamics of fluid muds over the Amazon continental shelf Journal of Geophysical Research 99 865 874
  89. 89. Fohrmann H. Backhaus J. O. Laume F. Rumohr J. 1998 Sediments in bottom-arrested gravity plumes: numerical case studies Journal of Physical Oceanography 28 2250 2274
  90. 90. Cavaleri L. Bertotti L. 1997 In search of the correct wind and wave fields in a minor basin Monthly Weather Review 125 1964 1975
  91. 91. Mellor G. L. Yamada T. 1982 Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 20 4 851 875
  92. 92. Byun D. S. Wang X. H. 2005 Numerical studies on the dynamics of tide and sediment transport in the western tip of the southwest coast, Korea Journal of Geophysical Research 110 C03011
  93. 93. Baretta J. G. Ebenhöh W. Ruardij P. 1995 The European regional seas ecosystem model, a complex marine ecosystem model Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 33 233 246
  94. 94. Legendre L. Rassoulzadegan F. 1995 Plankton and nutrient dynamics in marine waters Ophelia 41 153 172
  95. 95. Vichi M. Oddo P. Zavatarelli M. Coluccelli A. Coppini G. Celio M. Fonda Umani. S. Pinardi N. 2003 Calibration and validation of a one-dimensional complex marine biogeochemical fluxes model in different areas of the northern Adriatic Sea Annales Geophysicae 21 2 413 437
  96. 96. Yoon Y. H. 2000 On the distributional characteristics of phytoplankton community in Mokpo Coastal Waters, Southwestern Korea during low temperature season Journal of Institute for Basic Sciences Yosu Natinia University 2 71 82 in Korean
  97. 97. Blumberg A. F. Mellor G. L. 1983 Diagnostic and prognostic numerical circulation studies of the South Atlantic Bight Journal of Geophysical Research 88 C8 4579 4592
  98. 98. Mellor G. L. 2004 Users guide for a three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544 0710
  99. 99. Mellor G. L. Yamada T. 1974 A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 31 7 1791 1806
  100. 100. Mellor G. L. 2001 One-dimensional, ocean surface layer modeling: a problem and a solution Journal of Physical Oceanography 31 3 790 809
  101. 101. Oey L. Y. 2005 A wetting and drying scheme for POM Ocean Modelling 9 2 133 150
  102. 102. Oey L. Y. 2006 An OGCM with movable land-sea boundaries Ocean Modelling 13 2 176 195
  103. 103. Chen C. Liu H. Beardsley R. C. 2003 An Unstructured Grid, Finite-Volume, Three-Dimensional, Primitive Equations Ocean Model: Application to Coastal Ocean and Estuaries J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 20 159 186
  104. 104. Wright L. D. Boon J. D. Xu J. P. Kim S. C. 1992 The bottom boundary layer of the bay stem plains environment of lower Chesapeake Bay Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35 1 17 36 doi: 10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80054-X
  105. 105. Mehta A. J. 1988 Laboratory studies on cohesive sediment deposition and erosion in Physical processes in estuaries, edited by J. Dronkers and W.V. Leussen Springer Verlag Berlin 427 445
  106. 106. Mazda Y. Magi M. Kogo M. Hong P. N. 1997 Mangroves as a coastal protection from waves in the Tong King delta, Vietnam Mangroves and salt marshes 1 2 127 135 doi: 10.1023/a:1009928003700
  107. 107. Lee C. M. Askari F. Brook J. Carniel S. Cushman-Rosin B. Dorman C. Doyle J. Flament P. Harris C. K. Jones B. H. Kuzmic M. Martin P. Ogston A. Orlic M. Perkins H. Poulain P. Pullen J. Russo A. Sherwood C. Signell R. P. Thaler Detweiler. D. 2005 Northern Adriatic response to a wintertime Bora wind event EOS Transactions 86 16 19
  108. 108. Pullen J. Doyle J. D. Hodur R. Ogston A. Book J. W. Perkins H. Signell R. 2003 Coupled ocean-atmosphere nested modeling of the Adriatic Sea during winter and spring 2001 Journal of Geophysical Research 108 C103320
  109. 109. Signell R. P. Carniel S. Cavaleri L. Chiggiato J. Doyle J. Pullen J. Sclavo M. 2005 Assessment of operational wind models for the Adriatic Sea using wind and wave observations: a first analysis focused on the Venice lagoon region Journal of Marine System 53 217 233
  110. 110. Matteucci G. Frascari F. 1997 Fluxes of suspended materials in the north Adriatic Sea (Po Prodelta area) Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99 557 572
  111. 111. Boldrin A. Langone L. Miserocchi S. Turchetto M. Acri F. 2005 Po River plume on the Adriatic continental shelf: dispersion and sedimentation of dissolved and suspended matter during different river discharge rates Marine Geology 222-223 135 158
  112. 112. Traykovski P. Wiberg P. L. Geyer W. R. 2006 Observations and modeling of wave-supported sediment gravity flows on the Po prodelta and comparison to prior observations from the Eel shelf Continental Shelf Research 111 C03S17 doi:10.1029/2005JC003110
  113. 113. Grant W. D. Madsen O. S. 1979 Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom Journal of Geophysical Research 84 1797 1808
  114. 114. Huisman J. Von Oostveen P. Weissing F. J. 1999 Critical depth and critical turbulence: two different mechanism for the development of phytoplankton blooms Limnology and Oceanography 44 1781 1787
  115. 115. Gran H. H. Braarud T. 1935 A quantitative study of the phytoplankton in the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of Marine Journal of the Biological Board of Canada 1 279 467
  116. 116. Sverdrup H. U. 1953 On conditions for vernal blooming of phytoplankton Journal du Conseil- Conseil International Pour L’exploration de La Mer 18 287 295
  117. 117. Cloern J. E. 1991 Tidal stirring and phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an estuary Journal of Marine Research 49 203 221
  118. 118. Wang X. H. Oddo P. Pinardi N. 2006 On the bottom density plume on coastal zone off Gargano (Italy) in the southern Adriatic Sea and its inter-annual variability Journal of Geophysical Research 111 C03S17 doi:10.1029/2005JC003110
  119. 119. Palinkas C. M. Nittrouer C. A. Wheatcroft R. A. Langone L. 2005 The use 7Be to identify event and seasonal sedimentation near the Po River delta, Adriatic Sea Marine Geology 222-223 95 112

Written By

X. H. Wang and F. P. Andutta

Submitted: 16 February 2012 Published: 13 March 2013