Open access

Uruguayan Pinnipeds (Arctocephalus australis and Otaria flavescens): Evidence of Influenza Virus and Mycobacterium pinnipedii Infections

Written By

Juan Arbiza, Andrea Blanc, Miguel Castro-Ramos, Helena Katz, Alberto Ponce de León and Mario Clara

Submitted: 21 November 2011 Published: 07 November 2012

DOI: 10.5772/54214

From the Edited Volume

New Approaches to the Study of Marine Mammals

Edited by Aldemaro Romero and Edward O. Keith

Chapter metrics overview

3,366 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

1.1. Location and general characteristics of the pinniped population

1.1.1. Otariid and phocid species of Uruguay

Uruguay has 450 km of shorelines along the La Plata River and 220 km along the Atlantic Ocean (MTOP-PNUD-UNESCO, 1980). Two species of Otariids breed and reproduce on Uruguayan Atlantic islands: the South American fur seal, Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783) (Fig. 1), and the South American sea lion, Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800), (Fig. 2), (Ponce de León, 2000; Ponce de León & Pin 2006; Vaz-Ferreira, 1976, 1982). Both are polygynous, gregarious and show strong sexual dimorphism (Bartholomew, 1970). South American fur seal adult males reach lengths of 1.9 m and weigh from 120 kg to 200 kg, while females can reach 1.4 m long and weigh from 40 kg to 55 kg, and newborns can be from 0.4 m to 0.5 m long and weigh from 3.5 kg to 5.5 kg (Vaz-Ferreira, 1982). Sea lion males may reach 2.8 m and weigh up to 354 kg while adult females are much smaller, reaching up to 1.9 m long and weighing as much as 150.0 kg (Ponce de León, 2000). Newborns in this species are between 0.7 m and 0.9 m long and weigh from 10.0 kg to 17.0 kg (Cappozzo et al., 1994). A third pinniped species, the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina (Fig. 3), is a frequent visitor of Uruguayan islands and shorelines, although its reproductive areas are located in Argentina. Elephant seals can reach up to 5 m, 3 m or 1.3 m in length for males, females and pups respectively, and they can weigh as much as 5,000 kg, 800 kg from 40 kg to 50 kg (Reeves et al., 1992).

Figure 1.

Group of South American fur seal Arctocephalus australis males, females and pups on Lobos Island. Photograph: A. Ponce de León.

Figure 2.

South American sea lion Otaria flavescens reproductive groups with pups on Marco Island with pups. Photograph: A. Ponce de León.

Figure 3.

Young male southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina on Coronilla’s Islet. Photograph: A. Ponce de León.

1.2. Brief exploitation history

The exploitation of fur seals by Europeans in Uruguay is known to have begun in 1516, soon after the Spaniards explored the South Western Atlantic Ocean. During this exploration, Juan Díaz de Solís discovered the La Plata River and his crew landed on Isla de Lobos, where they killed 66 seals for their meat to be salted and consumed on their way back to Europe. The first semi-organized commercial exploitation took place in 1724, and the seal oil obtained was used for illuminating the city of Maldonado. From 1792 the Real Compañía Marítima, under direct instructions of the King of Spain, was responsible for sealing, until England invaded the territory in 1808. Shortly after, seal harvesting was carried out by private concessionaries and controlled by the local Government. From 1873 to 1900 a total of 440,000 seals were slaughtered (annual average of 16,000 pelts), whereas no records are available from 1901 to 1909. Further on, from 1910 to 1942, 72,000 South American fur seals were killed, as well as 17,000 more between 1943 and 1947. Due to the uncontrolled exploitation, populations of both seal species began to decrease. After 1950 a new management scheme started on Isla de Lobos, based on the system used for Northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in Pribilof Islands (Alaska), and the harvest was restricted to males. Also, private sector concessions were suspended, and the Government directly organized the harvesting program and related activities. Between 1959 and 1991 a total of 276,000 South American fur seals were removed (about 8,400 animals per year) and from 1967 to 1978, 36,400 sea lions were also slaughtered (3,000 animals per year). Products taken were crude skins, oil, meat and male genitals. Pelts were tanned and prepared in specific areas in Uruguay. Carcasses and fat were processed to obtain special oil for making soap, cosmetics and paints. In the XIX century, seal oil was used for illuminating the main streets of some cities. The meat was sometimes dried and given to the Montevideo Zoo for feeding big cats, eagles and condors. Since 1980, genitals were processed and sold for preparing medicines and aphrodisiacs (Acosta y Lara, 1884; DINARA, 2006; Pérez Fontana, 1943; Ponce de León, 2000; Vaz-Ferreira 1982; Vaz-Ferreira & Ponce de León, 1984, 1987).

Harvesting and slaughtering of Uruguayan seals stopped in 1978 for South American sea lions and in 1991 for South American fur seals. From 1992 to the present day, the conservation and preservation of pinnipeds and cetacean species are under control of the National Direction of Aquatic Resources (DINARA: Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos).

1.3. Local geographical distribution

Uruguayan South American fur seal and sea lion colonies are located on three main islands in the Atlantic Ocean: 1) Isla de Lobos and Lobos Islet, 9,260 m off Punta del Este (Department of Maldonado); 2) Torres Group Islands (Rasa Island, Encantada Island and Islet) close to Polonio’s Cape (Department of Rocha) and 3) Marco Island close to Valizas (Department of Rocha). There are two more small islets close to La Coronilla (Department of Rocha), where small groups of sea lions aggregate in reproductive areas (Fig. 4). Sometimes, a few South American fur seals also appear on these islands (Ponce de León, 2000; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Smith, 1934; Vaz Ferreira, 1950, 1952, 1956; Vaz Ferreira & Ponce de León, 1984, 1987).

Figure 4.

Location of Uruguayan South American fur seal and sea lion calving, breeding and mating islands close to the shorelines of the Departments of Maldonado and Rocha : Isla de Lobos (35º 01’ 38” S – 54º 52’ 55” W) and Lobos Islet; Rasa Island (34º 24’ 12” S – 53º 46’ 10” W), Encantada Island (34º 24’ 26” S – 53º 45’ 56” W), Torres Islet (34º 24’ 09” S – 53º 44’ 59” W); Marco Island (34º 20’ 59” S – 53º 44’ 26” W); 3) Verde Island and Coronilla’s Islet (33º 56’ 21” S – 53º 29’ 15” W). Isobath data layer obtained from FREPLATA-Proyecto de Protección Ambiental del Río de la Plata y su Frente Marítimo (

1.4. Biology, population state and trends

Parturition and mating occur between November and January for South American fur seals and during January and February for South American sea lions (Franco-Trecu, 2005; Ponce de León, 2000, 2001; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Trimble, 2008). Gestation lasts around one year. In South American fur seals, lactation extends for several months and weaning begins between the 8th and the 12th month of age (Ponce de León, 1983, 1984, 2000; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006). From the 6th month of age, pups start eating fish and small mollusks as can be seen when analyzing stomach contents and gastrointestinal parasites of indirect cycle (Katz et al., 2012; Morgades et al., 2006). In some cases, South American fur seal lactation can be extended further, and the mother has to feed two pups from two consecutive breeding seasons: the yearling pup and the new one (Vaz-Ferreira & Ponce de León, 1987). In sea lions, there is a mother-pup relation for one year and in some cases for two (Vaz-Ferreira & Achaval, 1979) or possibly, up to three years (Soto, 1999). Little is known about the exact time of weaning, and whether pups are mixing milk with solid prey. It was suggested that weaning occurs when the mother actively rejects the older pup because a new one is born (Vaz-Ferreira, 1981; Vaz-Ferreira & Achaval, 1979).

South American fur seals have a lek reproductive system (Franco-Trecu, 2005). During the reproductive season, males fight each other to defend territories in very violent battles that can result in serious wounds and scars (Ponce de León, 2000; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Vaz-Ferreira, 1976, 1982; Vaz-Ferreira & Ponce de León, 1984, 1985, 1987). Females have no strong bonds with the areas defended by males. Fur seal colonies on islands are occupied by individuals from different age classes during the entire year. During the reproductive season there is a high density of animals in rocky areas as compared to sandy surfaces. As a consequence of the high environmental temperature, territorial males may abandon the reproductive areas in order to refresh themselves in the water (Vaz-Ferreira & Palerm, 1962; Vaz-Ferreira & Sierra de Soriano, 1962). After giving birth, South American fur seal females may remain with their pups for 6 to 11 days (Franco-Trecu, 2010) before starting short foraging trips that gradually become longer as the pups grow bigger and more independent (Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Franco-Trecu, 2010).

The Uruguayan South American fur seal population is the biggest in South America (Vaz-Ferreira, 1982), with an annual growth rate of 3.3% (Páez, 2006) and an actual size estimated at 400,000 individuals. However, this species is included by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in the list of globally protected species because of population decline of other South American colonies (de Oliveira et al., 2006). For the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) the same species is listed as “Of low concern”.

South American sea lions have a polygynous breeding system (Ponce de Leon & Pin, 2006; Trimble, 2008; Vaz-Ferreira, 1981; Vaz-Ferreira & Sierra de Soriano, 1962). The reproductive season extends from mid December to mid February. During this time males fight each other to establish territories and to defend females from other males (Campagna & Le Boeuf, 1988; Ponce de Leon & Pin, 2006). Pregnancy has an estimated duration of 363 days (Franco-Trecu & Trimble, unpublished data). Territorial males display violent fights that may last at least one hour, and end with serious wounds. After parturition, sea lion females remain with their pups in order to suckle them for approximately one week and then start short foraging trips of three days, alternated with two-day suckling periods on land (Campagna & Le Boeuf, 1988). There is a decrease in the number of adult males and females at the end of the reproductive season because, after fasting during the breeding season, males begin their foraging period at sea. In addition, adult females alternate foraging trips at sea and suckling periods ashore, and move to other areas of the island (Franco-Trecu & Trimble, unpublished data; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006). Despite the fact that sea lions abandon the islands in order to move to feeding areas, there are generally some animals in the rookeries, even outside the reproductive season. In many other South American colonies this species maintains an increasing population growth (Grandi et al., 2008; Sepúlveda et al., 2006) and has been classified as low risk by the IUCN. However, sea lions in Uruguay are considered a highly endangered species due to their population decrease of 1.7 to 2% annually, with a total population estimated at only 12.000 individuals (Páez, 2006; Pedraza et al., 2009).

On Lobos Island and Lobos Islet, South American sea lion groups are found in small patches, surrounded by large groups of South American fur seals. However, on the Torres Islands (Rasa Island, Encantada Island and Islet), Marco Island and other islets, groups of sea lions are more numerous than on the bigger Lobos Island. According to Pedraza et al., (2009) and Ponce de León (unpublished data), sea lion populations are stable or increasing (2.4% annually) in Polonio´s Cape islands, while in Lobos Island their growth have a negative tendency. This is related to a positive trend in the A. australis population and may be an indicator of competition for territory (breeding areas), a process that occurs only on Lobos Island and Lobos Islet.

The breeding and reproductive areas of the elephant seal Mirounga leonina are located in sub Antarctic regions along the coast of South America (Campagna & Lewis, 1992; Lewis et al., 1998) and smaller colonies are formed in the Antarctic (Le Boeuf & Laws, 1994). The only large breeding colony of southern elephant seals on the South American continent is found in Península Valdés (42°04'S, 63°45'W) (Campagna & Lewis, 1992; Le Boeuf & Laws 1994; Lewis et al., 2004). Young, juvenile and adult animals migrate to northern regions (Lewis et al., 2006) and occur at different points all along the Uruguayan shoreline of the La Plata River and Atlantic Ocean beaches. During practically the whole year, elephant seals of both sexes are frequently seen in the flat areas of access to Lobos Island, Lobos Islet, Rasa Island and Coronilla Islet (Fig. 3 and 4). Mother and pup couples have been seen on Lobos Island in October, and in some odd cases, individuals have swum up the waters of the Uruguay River to the Departments of Rio Negro and Paysandú (Ponce de León & Pin, 2000).

1.5. Feeding, diet and diving behaviour

South American fur seals have mainly pelagic feeding habits (Naya et al., 2002; Ponce de León & Pin, 2000, 2006; Vaz-Ferreira, 1976) but also feed in shallower waters (Franco-Trecu, 2010). Their diet is basically composed of anchovies (Engraulis anchoita, Anchoa marinii), squid (Illex argentinus, Loligo sanpaulensis), hake (Merluccius hubbsi), striped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa), oceanic shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri) and cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus) (Frau &Franco-Trecu, 2010; Naya et al., 2002; Pin et al., 1996; Ponce de León et al., 1988; Ponce de León et al., 2000; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Vaz Ferreira 1976; Vaz-Ferreira & Ponce de León, 1984, 1987). Uruguayan fur seals usually do not interfere directly with artisanal and industrial fisheries, as they do not eat from nets nor destroy fishing gears (Ponce de León & Pin, 2006), though there are a few records of fur seal by-catch in artisanal (Franco-Trecu et al., 2009) and industrial fisheries (Szephegyi et al., 2010).

Diving records obtained by different researchers showed that during lactation, female fur seals perform ​​dives of up to 186 m (media: 23.5 m ± 19.5 m) in depth with an average duration of 1.2 min ± 0.8 min (max. 5.3 min.) (Riet et al., 2010; York et al., 1998). These data suggest that females use both benthic and pelagic foraging strategies, and demonstrate their huge endurance for deep dives, apnea resistance and swimming ability. Diurnal dives were shallower and shorter than nocturnal ones (Riet et al., 2010). It was determined that lactating females consume different prey species, adapting their diving strategies to variations in food resources (Ponce de León & Páez, 1996; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Riet et al., 2010; York et al., 1998).

During early lactation, female sea lions perform dives of 21 m ± 8 m in depth with an average time of 1.9 min ± 0.7 min. Mean distance traveled per trip was 62.2 km ± 63.0 km. Foraging trips lasted 1.3 ± 0.8 days and did not exceed the continental shelf (>50 m of depth). Maximum distance from the colony was 98.60 km ± 31.3 km. These results indicate that during the breeding season females forage in coastal and shallow continental shelf areas (Riet et al., 2009, 2012). In autumn, foraging trips last 5 days (range: 1-14 days). Most animals seemed to complete round trips along the same tracks, meaning that each animal uses the same path on successive trips, with low overlap between individuals. Site fidelity to Lobos Island was highly remarkable for all animals, independently of their reproductive condition (Rodríguez et al., 2012).

Sea lions compete directly with small-scale coastal fishing and artisanal fisheries, feeding on species that are part of the fishermen's daily catch by stealing prey trapped in nets and longlines, and sometimes causing important damage or cracks in the gear (Franco-Trecu et. al., 2012; Lezama & Szteren, 2003; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Szteren & Páez, 2002). According to different authors, the sea lions' diet is mainly made up of coastal prey and some pelagic fishes: whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri), striped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa), Brazilian codling (Urophysis brasiliensis), cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus), mackerel (Trachurus lathami), Argentinean conger (Conger orbignyanus), carangid (Parona signata), two species of anchovies (Engraulis anchoita and Anchoa marinii), and Argentinean croaker (Umbrina canosai) (Franco-Trecu, 2010; Naya et al., 2000; Pinedo & Barros, 1983; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006; Riet et al., 2011, 2012; Vaz Ferreira, 1981). As a consequence of interactions with sea lions, fishermen lost prey with high local commercial market value. Sometimes, fishermen find small shark specimens in their nets (Mustelus schmitti, Galeorhinus galeus, Myliobatis spp.) which have bite marks in their abdominal area (Fig. 5) from sea lions that learned to exploit this energy reservoir (Ponce de León & Pin, 2006). Recent reports show that during the early lactation period, foraging home ranges of sea lion females overlapped with fishing effort areas of coastal bottom trawl fisheries (15%) and artisanal fisheries (>1%). For both fisheries the resource overlap per fisheries impact index identified the “hotspots” which are distributed along the coast, west of the breeding colony (56ºW - 55Wº) (Riet et al., 2011).

Figure 5.

Artisan fishery capture of Mylobatis spp. The opened abdominal areas of the sharks are seen, from where sea lions have taken highly nutritive and energy rich livers and pancreas. Photograph: A. Ponce de León.

1.6. Future exploitation for tourism

South American fur seals and South American sea lions could represent an important tourism attraction. Since the seals are only a few meters away from visitors on Lobos Island and Polonio’s Cape, seal watching in both of these popular natural areas could be exploited for tourism activities (Ponce de León & Pin, 2000, 2006; Ponce de León & Barreiro 2010). This type of exploitation should be regulated by serious and responsible Government rules in order to assure sustainable coastal management of environmental resources. New employment opportunities for local people in the Departments of Maldonado and Rocha would be created. This kind of offer would also contribute to public awareness-raising programs for conservation of these charismatic species and for conservation of aquatic ecosystems.

1.7. Management considerations

Nowadays, fur seals are an important nontraditional exportation item: between 60 and 80 living young fur seals are captured annually on Lobos Island and exported to aquaria and theme parks all over the world. The principal objective of these parks is to educate people about environmental issues and about the conservation of aquatic and marine resources and ecosystems. Although live sea lions had been sold by the Uruguayan Government since 1980, the exportation of living specimens of this Otariid was suspended in 2006 by DINARA-MGAP due to decreasing population numbers. Captures of animals are held in Lobos Island from mid March to mid November. This special period was defined in order to avoid disturbances and to be respectful of parturition, breeding and mating periods of the two Otariid species present in the island (Ponce de León, 2000; Ponce de León & Pin, 2006).

As far as research is concerned, DINARA maintains the old seal factory plant on Lobos Island, using parts of the buildings for providing accommodation to researchers who are developing studies in both species. Through the development of various research projects, the Government institution DINARA, students and graduates of the University of Uruguay (Universidad de la República) as well as from foreign countries, are gathering and collecting data to increase knowledge about the population dynamics of both species, which will also help in developing appropriate rules and guidelines for their management, and ensuring the conservation of Uruguayan natural resources.


2. Evidence of influenza virus infections in Arctocephalus australis individuals

Marine mammals are susceptible to a variety of pathogens including influenza viruses. In humans, influenza causes annual epidemics and occasional pandemic diseases, with a significant threat to human health. In wild animals, several outbreaks have been reported and especially marine mammals experienced several devastating episodes that highlight the importance of monitoring wild populations to perform conservation programs and to evaluate possible risks to human health.

Influenza viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family and are enveloped viruses with a segmented, negative-sense RNA genome (Webster et al., 1992). Embedded in the lipid envelope, the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins are responsible for virus attachment and release from host cells, respectively (Webster et al., 1992). This family of viruses is composed of four genera: influenza A, B and C viruses and Thogoviruses (Wright & Webster, 2001). While influenza B and C viruses are primarily “human” viruses, influenza A viruses infect a variety of avian and mammalian species including humans, horses, swine and marine mammals such as seals and cetaceans (Wright & Webster, 2001; Webster et al., 1992). Influenza B virus was isolated from a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) for the first time in the year 2000 (Osterhaus et al., 2000) becoming a possible second reservoir of this virus.

Influenza viruses are unique among respiratory tract viruses as they undergo considerable antigenic variation. Both surface antigens of the influenza A viruses are subject to two types of variation: drift and shift. Antigenic drift involves minor changes in the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) and plays a role in influenza epidemics, which occur sporadically. Antigenic shifts involve major changes in these molecules resulting from replacement of the gene segment, producing new pandemic strains (Wright & Webster, 2001).

Phylogenetic evidence suggests that influenza epidemics in humans and other mammals, including seals, come from mutation and antigenic drift of viruses originating from aquatic birds (Webster et al., 1992). Several influenza events which have affected marine mammals have been described since the late seventies. The New England coast was the scene of an episode of influenza virus between December 1979 and November 1980. More than 400 harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) died of acute pneumonia associated with the influenza virus A/Seal/Massachusetts/1/80 (H7N7). This was the first evidence of an influenza virus antigenically and genetically related to avian viruses that could be associated with severe disease in wild animals (Geraci et al., 1982; Lang et al., 1981; Webster et al., 1981). This H7N7 strain was associated with an approximate 20% mortality of the seal population and also showed potential for causing conjunctivitis in humans. However, it was not transmitted among humans.

A new event was described along the New England coast from June 1982 through March 1983. This time the influenza virus isolation was an H4N5 subtype, which had previously been detected only in birds. It was recovered from harbor seals dying of viral pneumonia (Hinshaw et al., 1984). This strain, which caused an estimated mortality of 2 % to 4 %, was found to be genetically and serologically related to avian strains.

In January 1991 and January to February 1992, influenza A viruses were isolated from seals that died of pneumonia along the Cape Cod Peninsula in Massachusetts. Antigenic characterization identified two H4N6 and three H3N3 viruses. This was the first isolation of an H3 influenza virus from seals, although this subtype is frequently detected in birds, pigs, horses and humans (Callan et al., 1995). Genetic analysis indicated that the viruses were both of avian origin and that transmission from birds to seals was the most likely possibility.

Also, indirect evidence of influenza infection was reported from a variety of marine mammal species. In pinnipeds, antibodies against influenza A virus were detected in sera from harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) and hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) collected between 1991 and 1992 in the Barents Sea (Steuen et al., 1994), as well as from sea lions (Otariidae) and seals in the North and Bering seas (De Boer et al., 1990), and a ringed seal (Pusa hispida) in Alaska (Danner et al., 1998). A serological survey of influenza A antibodies from five species of marine mammals collected from Arctic Canada between 1984 and 1998, revealed that 2.5% of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) were serologically positive (Nielsen et al., 2001). A serological study of influenza virus infection in Caspian seals (Phoca caspica) detected antibodies to human-related (H3N2) virus in 36% of the seals (Ohishi et al., 2002). Two years later, another study suggested that human-related H3 viruses were prevalent in Baikal seals (Phoca sibirica) and ringed seals (Pusa hispida) inhabiting the central Russian Arctic (Ohishi et al., 2004). Serological evidence of influenza A virus infection was reported in Kuril harbor seals (Phoca vitulina stejnegeri) of Hokkaido, Japan, from samples collected between 1998 and 2005 (Fujii et al., 2007). In this study, antibodies to H3 and H6 subtypes of influenza A virus were detected. This was the first time that H6 antibodies were identified in seals (Fujii et al., 2007).

Indirect evidence of influenza A viruses has been reported in 27% of the South American fur seals sampled in Uruguay (Blanc et al., 2009). By Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) it was found that all the positive samples reacted with A/New Caledonia/20/99(H1N1) antigen reaching HAI titer of 320 but none of the sampled serum reacted with A/Panamá/2007/99(H3N2) antigen. For the first time, the presence of influenza A in A. australis was confirmed (Blanc et al., 2009) (Fig. 6).

Influenza viruses have also been detected in whales. An H1N3 virus was isolated from a striped whale in the South Pacific (Lvov et al., 1978). In 1984 influenza A viruses of the H13N2 and H13N9 subtypes were isolated from a pilot whale (Globicephala melas) (Hinshaw et al., 1986). Serological, molecular, and biological analyses indicate that the whale isolates are closely related to the H13 influenza viruses from gulls (Hinshaw et al., 1986). In cetaceans, specific antibodies were observed in a low portion of sera from belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in Arctic Canada (Nielsen et al., 2001).

Few studies have been reported regarding the detection of influenza B viruses in marine mammals. The first one reported the isolation of influenza B virus (B/seal/Netherlands/1/99) from a naturally infected harbor seal in the year 2000. Sequence analyses as well as serology indicated that this influenza B virus is closely related to strains that circulated in humans 4 to 5 years earlier. Retrospective analyses of sera collected from 971 seals showed a prevalence of antibodies of the influenza B virus in 2% of the animals after 1995, and in none before that year, suggesting that the virus was introduced in the seal population from a human source around 1995 (Osterhaus et al., 2000). Antibodies to influenza B viruses were detected by ELISA in 14% and 10% of serum samples collected from Caspian seals in 1997 and 2000, respectively (Ohishi et al., 2002).

Serologic evidence of influenza B virus has been reported from South American Uruguayan fur seals A. australis (Blanc et al., 2009). Thirty of the 37 serum samples assayed by HAI reacted against one of the three antigens used: 25/37 (68%) reacted against B/Beijing/184/93-like viruses, 20/37 (54%) reacted against B/Hong Kong/330/01, and 24/37 (65%) reacted against B/Sichuan/379/99. The results show that 17 sera reacted against all B antigens, only six reacted against two antigens and eight sera did not react against any of them. The highest titer reached was (640) against B/sichuan antigen. The results demonstrated influenza B virus circulation in South American fur seals for the first time in our country and in this species. The antigens assayed correspond to strains that circulated in humans between the years 1999 and 2001, 3 to 5 years after the study was carried out, confirming the hypothesis of other authors that marine mammals could be a reservoir of influenza strains that circulated in the past (Fig. 6).

It is important to consider that marine mammals share their habitat with several different wild shorebirds as well as with aquatic birds, the main influenza A virus hosts. The presence of bird feces in water, which can shed high concentrations of Avian Influenza viruses, and the close contact during feeding activities between birds and seals, increase the probability of fecal-oral transmission.

Figure 6.

Antibodies to Influenza A and B virus by HAI in fur seal sera. Percent (number positive/number tested) of samples bearing antibodies vs. HAI titer for each Influenza antigen assayed. Titers ≥ 80 were considered positive. Antigens used: A/New Caledonia/20/99(H1N1), A/Panamá/2007/99(H3N2), B/Beijing/184/93-like viruses, B/Yamanashi/166/98, B/Hong Kong/330/01, and B/Sichuan/379/99.

Monitoring the distribution of the influenza virus in wild animal species including marine mammals is important for understanding the ecology and evolution of the virus, and also to understand how the virus can mutate and re-emerge more virulent, producing devastating epidemic diseases.


3. Mycobacterium pinnipedii infections in Arctocephalus australis, Otaria flavescens and Mirounga leonina individuals

Bacteria belonging to the Genera Mycobacterium are acid-fast bacilli (AFB) classified in different complexes and species according to biochemical, cultural and genetic features. The first communication of tuberculosis (TB) in captive seals dates from the early twentieth century (Blair, 1913). However, the diagnosis and study of tuberculosis and mycobacteriosis in different species of marine mammals is fairly recent. Ehlers (1965) reported a tuberculosis case in a Northern seal (Cystophora cristata). Subsequently, Kinne (1985) described tuberculosis cases in several marine mammal species. In 1986, the first isolates of Mycobacterium spp. were obtained in Australian fur seals and sea lions (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus and Neophoca cinerea respectively) and New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) in captive and wild conditions (Forshaw & Phelps, 1991; Woods et al., 1995). Successive isolations were made from wild pinniped species in the Southern Hemisphere (Bastida et al., 1999; Bernardelli et al., 1996; Cousins et al., 1993; Hunter et al., 1998; Romano et al., 1995; Woods et al., 1995; Zumárraga et al., 1999).

In Uruguay, the first isolation of Mycobacterium spp. in pinnipeds was conducted in 1987 from samples of South American sea lion O. flavescens specimens kept in “Villa Dolores” municipal zoo. Of the ten animals studied, one died and nine others were tuberculin-positive and were later euthanized. Seven animals showed typical histo-pathological lesions of tuberculosis, and a total of 6 strains were isolated. Initially, it was considered that the bacillus was M. bovis according to results from a smear, biochemical tests and culture features. The strains were inoculated to guinea pigs (0,1 mg) that developed characteristic lesions and subsequently Mycobacterium spp. were isolated, fulfilling Koch's postulates (Castro-Ramos et al., 1998). In 1997 Mycobacterium spp. was isolated from lung samples of an adult South American fur seal stranded on the coast of Montevideo. The animal was collected from the beach by a NGO and sent to quarantine in a zoo for recovery, but died four days after admission. The observed granulomatous lung lesions were typical of TB, and a Mycobacterium spp. strain was isolated (Castro-Ramos et al., 2001).

Between 2001 and 2006, pathological, microbiological and genetic studies were conducted on dead stranded animals of different species of pinnipeds found along ocean shores of Uruguay: South American fur seal (n = 129), South American sea lion (n = 24) and Southern elephant seal (n = 1). Necropsies were performed using standard methods (Dierauf, 1990). Samples from several organs with or without lesions (lung, mediastinal lymph nodes, spleen, liver) (n = 36) were stored at 4° C, frozen at -20° C or fixed in 10% formalin.

Formalin fixed samples were processed by standard histological methods: 4-5 cuts were made at 5-6 µm and stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) (Luna, 1968). Mycobacteriological studies were performed according to the methodology described by the Pan American Zoonoses Center (Centro Panamericano de Zoonosis (OPS/OMS) (1979), Office International des Epizooties (OIE) (2000), Runyon et al., (1980) and Tacquet et al., (1967). Smears from single or pooled samples of each animal were performed and then cultured in Stonebrink and Lowenstein Jensen media. Cultures were kept for eight weeks at 37° C and periodically reviewed. Culture tests were based on microscopic features, morphology of the colony, growth temperature, time of development and cromogenicity of isolates. The identification was completed with the following biochemical tests: niacin, nitrate reduction, catalase at 22° C and 68° C, hydrolysis of Tween 80 at 5 and 10 days, reduction of potassium tellurite 0.2% at 3 days, urease and pyrazinamidase. A total of 14 strains were isolated (Table 1).

Strains isolated in 1987 (N° 01073, adult male O. flavescens), 1997 (N ° 01337, juvenile male A. australis) and 2002 (N ° 2493, juvenile female O. flavescens) were analyzed through amplification of 200 bp of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) as in Roth et al., (2000). Sequences obtained were compared to those available at GenBank database through a maximum parsimony phylogenetic tree, and strains were grouped with sequences of M. tuberculosis / M. pinnipedii.

During the necropsies, granulomatous lesions were observed in only five animals: two South American sea lions (juvenile male and female) and three South American fur seals (two adult and one juvenile male) (Fig. 7), from which M. tuberculosis / M. pinnipedii complex strains were isolated. Isolates were also obtained from organs without gross lesions belonging to pups and juvenile fur seals (n = 9) and from a sub-adult male elephant seal (Castro-Ramos et al., 2005, 2006) (Fig. 9).

Year of samplingSpecies
SexCategoryOrigin BaciloscopyCulture
0875 2003AaPupw++
1405 2003OfJuvenilew++
1332/3 2004AaPup w---+
21742005MlJuvenile w-+
Aa= Arctocephalus australis; Of= Otaria flavescens; Ml= Mirounga leonina; c= captive, w= wild.

Table 1.

Isolation of Mycobacterium spp / M. pinnipedii in Arctocephalus australis, Otaria flavescens and Mirounga leonina in Uruguay.

Macro and microscopic lesions were recorded. Hydrothorax and hemothorax were found in two adult animals. Papillary and proliferative lesions in parietal and visceral pleura (Fig. 7) were associated with a chronic inflammatory process, mononuclear and lymphocytic infiltration, and in some cases congestion and hemorrhage. Lungs presented yellowish-white nodules on surface and deep pulmonary parenchyma, which corresponded to granulomas with AFB. Histology showed mononuclear infiltration throughout the parenchyma as well as congestion, emphysema and atelectasia near nodules. Granulomas showed the typical structure with a necrotic center surrounded by a mild fibroblastic reaction and mononuclear infiltration with AFB in single arrangements or small groups (Fig. 8). In bronchi and bronchioles mononuclear exudates at the lumen and lymphocyte/macrophage aggregates below the cartilage were present. Necrotic foci were also recorded in mediastinal lymph nodes with AFB. In one juvenile sea lion a mediastinal abscess and hematoma were found between the great vessels near the heart, which was associated with a chronic inflammatory process.

Figure 7.

Macroscopic view of an Arctocephalus australis lung. Numerous granulomas were present on the surface and deep parenchyma (white arrows) and a significant thickening of the visceral pleura.

Figure 8.

Histological section from an Arctocephalus australis lung. A granuloma in the lung parenchyma (star) surrounded by areas of congestion and atelectasis (arrows) can be observed. Inset: AFB groups within the granuloma (immersion) (black arrows). (Ziehl-Neelsen. 400x)

Figure 9.

Mycobacterium spp. / M. pinnipedii colonies in Stonebrink medium culture. Sample obtained from a Mirounga leonina lung.

These results indicate a wide distribution of the disease in Uruguayan fur seal and sea lion colonies associated with a high prevalence of the disease in zoos and aquaria from South American native pinnipeds populations (Jurzinsky et al., 2011; Lacave, 2009; Lacave et al., 2009; Moser et al., 2008). The region used for genetic analysis can only discriminate between two large complexes within the Genera Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) and M. avium (MAC). Based on these results we can conclude that the sequences studied are part of the MTC and correspond to M. pinnipedii as determined by more precise genetic studies (Cousins​​ et al., 2003, Jurczinski et al., 2012; Kriz et al., 2011; Moser et al., 2008) which include a strain isolated in Uruguay (Cousins et al., 2003). Discrimination between different members of the MTC is essential for epidemiological investigations of wild populations, as well as the diagnosis of human cases associated with an adequate chemotherapy (de la Rua-Domenech, 2006).

The isolation of bacilli in pups and juvenile animals without apparent lesions indicates early transmission of the organism even though the animals do not show symptoms of respiratory disease. Similar findings were reported for wild carnivores for which positive cultures for M. bovis were not accompanied by gross or histological lung lesions (Bruning-Fann et al., 2001; Little et al., 1982). Furthermore, cattle with M. bovis developed a non-progressive disease, with small lesions in lymph nodes (retropharyngeal and mediastinal), which in turn are positive reactors to diagnostic tests for delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity (Tuberculin skin test). Most individuals of the population carrying the dormant bacilli may become ill with TB at some point in their life, if an immunodeficient situation develops. It is therefore necessary to consider all infected individuals as potentially diseased animals (Rider, 1999).

The fact that most gross and microscopic lesions are located in the respiratory system of pinnipeds (Bastida et al., 1999; Bernardelli et al., 1996; Castro-Ramos et al., 1998, 2001; Forshaw & Phelps, 1991; Katz et al., 2002; Moser et al., 2008; Woods et al., 1995) indicates that the main transmission is by aerosols. Less frequently, lesions were located in liver, spleen, kidney and abdominal lymph nodes (Bernardelli et. al., 1996; Forshaw & Phelps 1991; Kiers et al., 2008; Kriz et al., 2011), cases in which the bacilli probably spread through blood flow or swallowing of sputum containing mycobacteria (Forshaw & Phelps, 1991; Kriz et al., 2011). In wildlife, it is expected that transmission takes place mainly through spray during coughing and sneezing which is frequently observed in pups and adults (H. Katz, pers. obs.) or the typical naso-nasal contact between pinnipeds.

M. pinnipedii have been isolated from fur seals, sea lions and elephant seals from the Southern Hemisphere (Arctocephalus australis, A. forsteri, A. pussilus doriferus, A. tropicalis, Otaria flavescens, Neophoca cinerea, Mirounga leonina, Phocarctos hookeri). They have been found both in wild animals and specimens kept in European aquaria or theme parks taken from South American colonies (Bernardelli et al., 1996; Castro-Ramos et al., 2005; Cousins ​​et al., 2003; Duignan et al., 2003; Kiers et al., 2008; Kriz et al., 2011; Lacave, 2009). Micobacteriosis was diagnosed in only one Otariid species of the Northern Hemisphere (California sea lion, Zalophus californianus, Ehlers, 1965; Gutter et al., 1987). Most diagnoses were made in captive Otaria flavescens, probably because it is the most common species in aquaria as it is easily trained. Uruguay exported this species destined for aquaria from 1980 to 2006, when captures were restricted due to population decline (Páez, 2006). Nowadays, only live juvenile specimens of A. australis are caught for exportation to different destinations (Asia, Latin America and Europe). As this species is also carrier of M. pinnipedii (Cousins ​​et al., 2003; Castro-Ramos et al., 2006; Katz et al., 2002) it is important to establish accurate diagnostic methods. The isolation of M. pinnipedii from different mammalian species (cattle, Bactrian camels, Malayan tapirs, Guinea pigs and humans), indistinguishable from strains isolated from pinnipeds, suggests that the bacillus has significant potential to infect a wide range of hosts, particularly when animals are in captivity (Cousins ​​et al., 2003; Kiers et al., 2008; Moser et al., 2008).

Presently, the diagnostic methods in living specimens have certain inaccuracies or deficiencies that make it difficult to establish a universal technique or golden standard. This is particularly important given that individuals carrying the microorganism can take years to show signs of the disease; only in terminal cases have nonspecific symptoms including anorexia, dysphagia, lethargy and weight loss been described. Coughing has not been described as a sign accompanying respiratory infection although significant lung lesions were present (Bernardelli, 1996; Castro-Ramos et al., 1998, 2006; Cousins ​​et al., 1993; Kiers et al., 2008; Kriz et al., 2011; Lacave, 2009). In necropsied seals, tuberculosis diagnosis had been made based on mycobacterial isolation, histopathology and genetic characterization of strains. Imaging methods (radiography, computer tomography) have been used in captive animals, but in wild conditions these procedures are impractical. Chest radiographs were performed on pinnipeds of different sizes, but in cases of very small lesions in large animals with thick blubber, radiological images do not give appropriate information (Forshaw & Phelps, 1991; Jurczynski et al., 2012). In some zoos computer tomography has been used for detection of small calcified granulomas (Jurczynski et al., 2011, 2012), but it is very difficult to be used routinely. Different serological tests (rapid test, Elephant TB STAT-PAK, Chembio; multiantigen print immunoassay (MAPIA) Chembio; dual path platform assay (DPP Vet; Chembio) have been used in O. flavescens individuals in captivity, with DPP technique demonstrating greater sensitivity (87.5%) (Jurczynski et al., 2012). The tuberculin skin test (TST) with purified protein derivative (PPD bovine and avian) for screening has been done in O. flavescens and A. australis individuals (Bernardelli et al., 1990; Castro-Ramos et al., 1998; Kiers et al, 2008; Lacave, 2009) and reported by Forshaw & Phelps (1991) in A. forsteri, A. pusillus doriferus and N. cinerea. This technique is very sensitive, economical and easy to perform. The possible occurrence of false negatives must be taken into consideration in cases of advanced infection with anergy or very recent infections that have not yet generated an appropriate immune response (Jurczynski et al., 2011). False positives may also occur in nonspecific cases of exposure to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (Mycobacterium avium, M. chelonae, M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis) (Bernardelli et al., 1990; Forshaw & Phelps, 1991). Tissue and bronchial secretion smears have been used for diagnosis (Jurczynski et al., 2012), but the AFB may correspond to mycobacteria other than M. pinnipedii and, therefore, other confirmation methods must be used. Molecular techniques (PCR, spoligotyping and MIRU / VNTR) applied to samples from purified cultures, tissues and sputum, have produced quick results, allowing the identification of strains involved and their origin (Cousins et al., 2003; Jurczynski et al., 2011; Kiers et al., 2008; Kriz et al., 2011; Moser et al., 2008). In zoo collections, it is suggested that the final diagnosis should be based on the simultaneous use of three different methods, needing a minimum of two positive tests to increase the overall sensitivity when making the final decision for euthanasia. In case of wild animals, the possible diagnostic methods could include the TST, culture and molecular analysis of sputum (PCR) and serology (DPP). This would be extremely important in order to establish or confirm the endemic conditions of the disease in wild colonies and prevent the exportation or handling of carrier animals.


4. Importance of infectious diseases in Uruguayan pinniped colonies with zoonotic potential

It has been documented that the introduction of novel pathogens into a native animal population without previous exposure could result in epizootics. Human and wildlife populations share a wide range of diseases. While the most common disease transmissions reported are between wild and domestic animals (though many zoonoses do have wildlife origin), emerging diseases of animal origin represent one of the greatest potential threats to public health.

The emergence and re-emergence of over 30 agents have been reported in marine mammals (Miller et al., 2001). There are several reports about their susceptibility to virus, bacterial, fungal and parasitic agents, provoking diseases that result in mass mortality events (Gulland et al., 1996; Miller et al., 2004; Ostehaus, 2000). Once new or previous pathogens are established in the host, they can represent a health risk to other marine vertebrates, humans, or both. It is, however, very difficult to know which routes these zoonotic marine mammal infections take in the marine environment.

The dynamic governing the relationship between infectious diseases affecting humans and marine vertebrates, including sea mammals is very complex and generally poorly understood. It is probable that human activity is a greater threat to marine vertebrate health than vice versa (Mos et al., 2006). However, it is very difficult to establish the role of marine animals as vectors or carriers of zoonotic diseases. Although the role of sea mammals in transmission of potential zoonotic pathogens is not well established, several risk factors, including frequent and prolonged direct contact with live specimens, were clearly identified in workers exposed to these animals (Hunt et al. 2008). Thus, these animals may present a zoonotic potential and also the potential for epizootic events which could cause health problems in marine animals. Since the influenza virus is transmitted by direct contact with infected individuals, by aerosol, or contact with infected objects, several incidents of influenza A virus transmission have occurred from infected seals and whales maintained in captivity to humans (Webster et al., 1981).

Due to their life span, high trophic feeding and the continuous exposition to emerging pathogens, sea mammals might be considered as sentinel species of emerging/re-emerging diseases. Pinnipeds share these characteristics and may serve as effective sentinels providing information about public and aquatic ecosystem health, and indicating the current or potential negative impacts on animal health at the individual or population level.

Implementing a proper management and the accurate execution of conservation policies of wildlife requires the analysis of the vulnerability of the animals to infectious diseases. The majority of animals included in our studies belonged to colonies near cities or towns in proximity to shore (Punta del Este, Polonio's Cape), regions that are commonly used by humans, marine and terrestrial mammals and different avian species, establishing an optimal opportunity for zoonotic disease transmission and long-term disease maintenance. The dense aggregations of pinniped colonies make fur seals and sea lions vulnerable to epizootics. Also, movements between adjacent latitudinal domains are common in both pinniped species, which could transmit or acquire pathogens during feeding trips to other parts of the Atlantic Ocean and the La Plata River.

The diagnosis of influenza virus in high-density seal populations in Uruguay generated considerable concern about the potential impacts on South American fur seal and sea lion colonies, as well as potential health risks to humans and domestic animals. In the evolution and ecology of influenza viruses, interspecies transmission is an important factor; seabirds and marine mammals are conspicuous animals that integrate changes in the ecosystem and reflect the existing state of the environment (Aguirre & Tabor, 2004; Boersma, 2008; Moore, 2008; Thiele et al., 2004). Transmission of the influenza virus occurs between avian and several marine mammal species (Mandler et al., 1990) at least for influenza A virus, representing an important step in the evolution and emergence of new mammalian viral strains. Fur seals have the potential to serve as an influenza reservoir for other mammal species. However, more detailed studies are needed to elucidate the role of seals in the epidemiology of influenza along the Uruguayan coasts and in other South American countries.

Our findings confirm that fur seals can act as reservoirs of human influenza strains that circulated in the past, and also suggest that influenza A and B viruses may be transmitted from humans to seals as has been mentioned by other authors (Ohishi et al., 2002, 2004; Osterhaus, 2000). This transmission is due to the highly social lifestyle of pinnipeds, which congregate at sea and on land, and frequently associate with seals from other colonies. It is important to note that there is a strong interaction between seals and humans on Lobos Island and Polonio's Cape during live animal captures; nowadays, most interactions occur during capture and research activities, as well as in rehabilitation centers and sometimes with divers that swim near the seal islands. These events constitute opportunities for new influenza strains to jump between humans and seals, providing the potential for an epidemic event. Gaining information on the full spectrum of influenza viruses circulating in our seal colonies and detecting these viruses will remain an important task for its surveillance, outbreak control, and animal and public health.

As described previously, tuberculosis in pinnipeds had been recorded from the beginning of the twentieth century but it was not until mid 80's and later that several publications appeared with data from stranded animals and zoological collections. It is important to note that most records are from Otariids from the Southern Hemisphere, a single diagnosis is from a southern elephant seal and one from one native Northern Otariid species kept in captivity in the Northern Hemisphere.

Despite the fact that the seal harvest in Uruguay extended for 200 years, there are no records of macroscopic lesions observed in animals, nor of tuberculosis diagnosis from the staff working in the capture, slaughter or processing of the by-products, that could contribute retrospective data to this disease in Uruguayan pinniped colonies. The disease is considered endemic because of the numerous cases diagnosed in wild animals and the high prevalence of South American seals kept in aquaria and zoos. Unfortunately, to date non epidemiological studies have been conducted in any of the seal colonies from the Southern Hemisphere which could indicate the prevalence of the disease in its natural environment.

Information presented in this work, including the isolation of M. pinnipedii in pups and juvenile seals, indicates the early transmission of the organism. However, it is difficult to establish the course of the disease or immune mechanisms that may develop in each individual to control the infection or, in other cases, allow individuals to act as healthy carriers for several years until some trigger factor determines the development of the disease.

The most important mechanism of transmission of M. tuberculosis, and probably M. pinnipedii, is through the air by droplets produced when an individual with respiratory tract TB eliminates aerosolized microorganisms by coughing or sneezing. Large droplets fall quickly due to their weight and reach the ground without evaporation. Smaller drops evaporate and decrease in size, becoming infectious droplet nuclei, which remain suspended in ambient air for a long time and can be airborne for days. Successful transmission requires that these micro droplets charged with bacilli are of sufficiently small size (1 to 5 µm) to enable them to reach very deep into the lungs and alveoli (Rider, 1999). This phenomenon is more frequent in captive conditions in zoos and aquaria where spray released during enclosure hygiene, poor ventilation and exposure among animals in confined environments, constitute increased risk factors for infection as has been shown in different zoos (Cousins ​​et al., 1993 and 2003; Kiers et al., 2008; Thompson et al., 1993). In wild pinniped colonies, natural ventilation and increased exposure to UV is a natural way of microorganism control that could be the reason for the less common occurrence of TB in these colonies.

In the early course of host-pathogen interaction, mycobacteria are phagocytized by alveolar macrophages. In case the macrophage cannot destroy the pathogen, it resides in a quiescent state with a relatively low multiplication until cell mediated immunity is compromised transiently or permanently. Among the risk factors for immune-compromise, are age, history of a spontaneous TB cure with residual fibrotic lesions, and the time elapsed since infection. Other medical conditions such as endocrine disorders, tumors, malnutrition and stress may influence the progression of infection to disease (Musser et al., 2000; Rider, 1999). This evolution of the disease is consistent with the findings by different authors who have isolated AFB in organs without lesions from pups and juveniles (Bruning-Fann et al., 2001), identified the presence of calcified granulomas in mediastinal lymph nodes in adult and some juvenile animals in captivity and documented tuberculosis lesions in older animals (Jurczynski et al., 2011, 2012).

Keepers and veterinarians at zoos, aquaria and rehabilitation centers are at increased risk of infection because of their extensive contact with the animals. The degree of risk depends on the type of accommodation and sanitizing procedures of the enclosures (Kiers et al., 2008; Thompson et al., 1993) in association with the presence of open tuberculosis cases. Given the zoonotic condition of the disease, it is important to take preventive measures in all personnel working near or with access to wild and captive pinnipeds (researchers, fishermen, seal hunters, rehabilitation centers, aquaria and zoos staff) (Kiers et al., 2008; Thompson et al., 1993) and to establish hygiene measures for reducing the chances of spreading the infection.

Since development of the disease is triggered under immunosuppressive conditions, it is important to assess which factors directly or indirectly affect the immune system and allow development of the disease in wild populations of the Southern Hemisphere. This also applies to other diseases that may be affecting the health status of wild colonies, particularly in O. flavescens from Uruguay, whose population is declining.

Further investigation is needed in order to establish the sources of zoonotic potential in the marine environment and to better understand the nature of health risks for sea mammals and human. Additional epidemiologic studies are also required, to investigate epizootic episodes assessing its impact and to elucidate how these diseases spread among and within marine mammal’s populations.


The present work has been conducted with research permission from DINARA-MGAP at Isla de Lobos and Cabo Polonio. We are extremely grateful to the fur seal keepers Leonardo Olivera, Nelson Veiga, Miguel Casella and César Barreiro who helped us to work with the animals at Isla de Lobos; Lic. Oscar Castro, Dr. Gustavo de Souza, Dra. Graciela Pedrana, Dr. Antonio Moraña, Dr. Francisco Gutiérrez, MSc. Valentina Franco and Dr. Federico Riet, who helped during field work and contributed with bibliography that enriched the present article. We thank Dr. Riet for the figure showing pinniped colonies distribution.


  1. 1. AcostaLaraF.1984La pesca de lobos. Revista de la Sociedad Universitaria. Montevideo. 1March, 1984), 337352
  2. 2. AguirreA. A.TaborG. M.2004Introduction: marine vertebrates as sentinels of marine ecosystem health. EcoHealth 1September, 2004), 236238
  3. 3. BartholomewG. A.1970A model for the evolution of pinnipeds polygyny. Evolution (Lancaster, Pa), 24546559
  4. 4. BastidaR.LoureiroJ.QuseV.BernardelliA.RodriguezD.CostaE.1999Tuberculosis in a wild subantartic fur seal from Argentina. Journal Wildlife Diseases, 35October, 1999), 796798
  5. 5. BernardelliA.NaderA. J.LoureiroJ.MichelisH.DebenedettiR.1990Micobacteriosis en mamíferos y aves marinas.Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’ Office International des Epizooties, 9411211129
  6. 6. BernardelliA.BastidaR.LoureiroJ.MichelisH.RomanoM. I.CataldiA.CostaE.Tuberculosis in sea lions and fur seals from the south-western Atlantic coast.Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’ Office International des Epizooties, 15September, 19969851005
  7. 7. BlairW. R.1913Report of the veterinarian on the mammals: In Seventeenth Annual report of the New York Zoological Society. New York Zoological Society, (1913), 7374
  8. 8. BlancA.RuchanskyD.ClaraM.AchavalF.Le BasA.ArbizaJ.2009Serologic Evidence of Influenza A and B Viruses in South American Fur Seals (Arctocephalus australis).Journal of Wildlife Diseases45N° 2, (April, 2009), 519521
  9. 9. BoersmaP. D.2008Penguins as Marine SentinelsBioScience58N° 7, (July, 2008), 597607
  10. 10. Bruning-FannC. S.SchmittS. M.FitzgeraldS. D.FierkeJ. S.FriedrichP. D.KaneeneJ. B.ClarkeK. A.ButlerK. L.PayeurJ. B.WhippleD. L.CooleyT. M.MillerJ. M.MuzoD. P.2001Bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging carnivores from Michigan.Journal of Wildlife Diseases371January, 2001), 5864
  11. 11. CallanR. J.EarlyG.KidaH.HinshawV. S.1995The appearance of H3 influenza viruses in seals.Journal of General Virology, 76January, 1995), 199203
  12. 12. CampagnaC.Le BoeufB.1988Reproductive behaviour of Southern Sea LionsBehaviour104January, 1998), 233261
  13. 13. CampagnaC.LewisM.1992Growth and distribution of a southern elephant seal colonyMarine Mammal Science8October, 1992), 387396
  14. 14. CappozzoH. L.BernabeuR. O.CrespoE. A.1994Discriminación de stocks de Otaria flavescens y Arctocephalus australis en Uruguay y Argentina. Sub Proyecto 1. 19In: Problemas de conservación y manejo de los mamíferos marinos del Atlántico Sud Occidental en Uruguay y Argentina: un proyecto conjunto de investigación. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA). Informe final sobre los trabajos realizados durante 1992-1993
  15. 15. Castro-RamosM.AyalaM.ErricoF.SilveraF. V.1998Aislamiento de Mycobacterium bovis en Pinnípedos Otaria byronia (Lobo marino común) en Uruguay. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria. 793197200
  16. 16. Castro-RamosM.LeizagoyenC.AlvesF.CirilloF.ZipitríaR.2001Tuberculosis en Arctocephalus australis (Lobo marino de dos pelos) en la costa de Uruguay, América del Sur. V Encuentro Nacional de Microbiólogos, Noviembre de 2001. Montevideo, Uruguay.
  17. 17. Castro-RamosM.KatzH.CastroO.GutiérrezF.2005Primera comunicación de tuberculosis en Mirounga leonina (Mammalia, Phocoidea) (elefante marino del sur) en Uruguay. VII Encuentro Nacional de Microbiólogos. Octubre de 2005. Montevideo, Uruguay.
  18. 18. Castro-RamosM.KatzH.MorañaA.TiscorniaM. I.MorgadesD.CastroO.2006Tuberculosis en pinnípedos (Arctocephalus australis y Otaria flavescens) de Uruguay. In: Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa atlántica uruguaya. Menafra R., Rodríguez-Gallego, L., Scarabino, F. & Conde D. (Editors). Vida Silvestre Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay. 668
  19. 19. Centro Panamericano de Zoonosis (OPS/OMS).1979Serie de Monografías Científicas y Técnicas CPZ-11 Bacteriología de la tuberculosis humana y animal, 63 pp
  20. 20. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)2012
  21. 21. CousinsD. V.WilliamsS. N.ReuterR.ForshawD.ChadwickB.CoughranD.CollinsP.GalesN.1993Tuberculosis in wild seals and characterization of the seal bacillus. Australian Veterinary Journal, 70January, 1993), 9297
  22. 22. CousinsD. V.BastidaR.CataldiA.QuseV.RedrobeS.DowS.DuignanP.MurrayA.DupontC.AhmedN.CollinsD. M.RayButler. W.DawsonD.RodríguezD.LoureiroJ.RomanoM. I.AlitoA.ZumárragaM.BernardelliA.Tuberculosis in seals caused by a novel member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: Mycobacterium pinnipedii sp. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology53January, 200313051314
  23. 23. DannerG. R.McgregorM. W.1998Serologic evidence of influenza virus infection in a ringed seal (Phoca hispida) from AlaskaMarine Mammal Science14April, 1998), 380384
  24. 24. De BoerG. F.BackW.OsterhausA.1990An ELISA for the detection of antibodies against influenza A nucleoprotein in humans and various animal species. Archives of Virology115N° 1-2 (March, 1990), 4761
  25. 25. de la Rua-DomenechR.2006Human Mycobacterium bovis infection in the United Kingdom: Incidence, risks, control measures and review of the zoonotic aspects of bovine tuberculosisTuberculosis86N° 2, (March, 2006), 77109
  26. 26. De OliveiraL. R.Arias-SchreiberM.MeyerD.MorgantJ. S.2006Effective population size in a bottlenecked fur seal populationBiology of Conservation. 131September, 2006), 505509
  27. 27. DieraufL.1990Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine: Health, Disease and Rehabilitation. 2C.R.C. Press. 735 pp
  28. 28. Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (DINARA-MGAP).2006Información disponible en:íferos-Marinos/Explotación.htm
  29. 29. DuignanP. J.PádraigX. E. . D. U. I. G. N. A. N.J..DupontC.CousinsD.CollinsD. M.MurrayA.Dupont, C.; Cousins, D.; Collins, D. M. & Murray, A. (2003Tuberculosis associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis subsp. pinnipedae subsp. nov. in New Zealand fur seals and sea lions. 3rd International Wildlife Management Congress. University of Canterbury, Christchurch. New Zealand. Accessible in
  30. 30. EhlersK.1965Records of the hooded seal Cystophora cristata Erxleben, and other animals at Bremerhaven Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook, 5January, 1965), 148149
  31. 31. ForshawD.PhelpsG. R.1991Tuberculosis in a captive colony of pinnipeds.Journal Wildlife Diseases, 27April, 1991), 288295
  32. 32. FrancoTrecu. V.2005Comportamiento maternal y aspectos reproductivos de Arctocephalus australis en Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. Tesis. Universidad de la República, Facultad de Ciencias. Montevideo, Uruguay
  33. 33. Franco-TrecuV.CostaP.AbudC.DimitriadisC.LaportaP.PassadoreC.SzephegyM.2009By-catch of franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei in Uruguayan artisanal gillnet fisheries: an evaluation after a twelve-year gap in data collectionLatin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals7December, 2009), 1122
  34. 34. Franco-TrecuV.2010Éxito de crianza y hábitos alimenticios en hembras del lobo fino sudamericano (Arctocephalus australis) y su relación trófica con hembras del león marino sudamericano (Otaria flavescens). Tesis de Maestría. PEDECIBA. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias. Montevideo, Uruguay. 90pp
  35. 35. Franco-TrecuV.AuriolesD.LimaM.ArímM.2012Prepartum and postpartum trophic segregation between sympatrically breeding female Arctocephalus australis and Otaria byronia. Journal of Mammalogy, (2012) 93(2). In press.
  36. 36. Frau-MartínezR.Franco-TrecuV.2010Especialización alimenticia en el lobo fino sudamericano (Arctocephalus australis) en Uruguay. XVI Reunião de Trabalho de Especialistas em Mamíferos Aquáticos da America do Sul. Florianopolis-SC-Brasil. 24 al 28 de octubre 2010.
  37. 37. FujiiK. C.KakumotoM.KobayashiS.SaitoT.KariyaY.WatanabeY.SakodaH.KidaSuzukiM.2007Serological evidence of Influenza A Infection in Kuril Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina stejneri) of Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Veterinary and Medical Sciences, 69March, 2007), 259263
  38. 38. GeraciJ. R.AubinS. T.D. J.BarkerI. K.WebsterR. G.HinshawV. S.BeanW. J.RuhnkeH. L.PrescottJ. H.EarlyG.BakerA. S.MadoffS.SchooleyR. T.1982Mass mortality of harbor seals: pneumonia associated with influenza A virus. Science, 215February, 1982), 11291131
  39. 39. GrandiF.DansS.CrespoE.2008Social composition and spatial distribution of colonies in an expanding population of South American sea lionsJournal of Mammalogy895October, 2008), 12181228
  40. 40. GullandF. M. D.KoskiM.LowenstineL. J.ColagrossA.MorganL.SprakerT.1996Leptospirosis in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) stranded along the central California coast, 1981-1994.Journal of Wildlife Diseases32October, 1996), 572580
  41. 41. GutterA. E.WellsS. K.SprakerT. R.1987Generalized mycobacteriosis in a California Sea Lion (Zalophus californianus). Journal of Zoo Animal Medicine, 18N° 2-3 (September, 1987), 118120
  42. 42. HinshawV. S.BeanW. J.GeraciJ. R.FiorelliP.EarlyG.WebsterR. G.1986Characterization of two influenza A viruses from a pilot whale.Journal of Virology 582May, 1986), 655656
  43. 43. HinshawV. S.BeanW. J.WebsterR. G.RehgJ. E.FiorelliP.EarlyG.GeraciJ. R.StAubin. D. J.1984Are seals frequently infected with avian influenza viruses? Journal of Virology, 513September, 1984), 863865
  44. 44. HuntT. D.ZiccardiM. H.GullandF. M. D.YochemP. K.HirdD. W.RowlesT.MazetJ. A. K.2008Health risks for marine mammal workers. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 81May, 2008), 8192
  45. 45. HunterJ. E.DuignanP. J.DupontC.FrayL.FenwickS. G.MurrayA.1998First report of potentially zoonotic tuberculosis in fur seals in New Zeland. New Zeland Medical Journal 111130131
  46. 46. JurczynskiK.LyashchenkoK. P.ScharpeggeJ.FlueggerM.LacaveG.MoserI.TortschanoffS.GreenwaldR.2012Use of Multiple Diagnostic Tests to Detect Mycobacterium pinnipedii Infections in a Large Group of South American Sea Lions (Otaria flavescens)Aquatic Mammals3814355in press) DOIAM.38.1.2012.43
  47. 47. JurczynskiK.ScharpeggeJ.Ley-ZaporozhanJ.LeyS.CracknellJ.LyashchenkoK.GreenwaldR.SchenkJ. P.2011Computed tomographic examination of South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) with suspected Mycobacterium pinnipedii infection.Veterinary Record, 2December, 2011), 169608
  48. 48. KatzH.MorañaA.MorgadesD.CastroO.CasasL.Le BasA.DelbeneD.2002Hallazgos histopatológicos en lobo marino (A. australis) en Uruguay. Estudios iniciales de un caso de tuberculosis. X RT & 4º Congreso SOLAMAC, Valdivia, Chile. 1419de octubre, 2002
  49. 49. KatzH.MorgadesD.CastroO.2012Necropsies findings in South American Fur Seal pups (Arctocephalus australis) in Uruguay. Florida Marine Mammal Health Conference IV. April 24 to 27, 2012. Sarasota, USA
  50. 50. KiersA.KlarenbeekA.MendeltsB.Van SoolingenD.KoeterG.Transmission of Mycobacterium pinnipedii to humans in a zoo with marine mammals.International Journal of Lung Diseases. 12July, 200814691473
  51. 51. KinneO.1985Diseases of Mammalia: Pinnipedia, In: Diseases of Marine Animals. Volume IV Part 2. 698Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg
  52. 52. KrizP.KralikP.SlanyM.SlanaI.SvobodovaJ.ParmovaI.BarnetV.JurekV.PavlikI.2011Mycobacterium pinnipedii in a captive Southern sea lion (Otaria flavescens): a case reportVeterinarni Medicina566June, 2011), 307313
  53. 53. LacaveG.2009Pinnipeds tuberculosis: the importance of medical training and access to animals for population survey during spreading of a potentially zoonotic disease. 37th IMATA. Atlanta, United States of America. November, 2009
  54. 54. LacaveG.MaillotA.AlerteV.BoschiroliM. A.LecuA.2009Atypical case of Mycobacterium pinnipedii in a patagonian sea lion (Otaria flavescens) and Tuberculosis cases history review in pinnipeds. 40th IAAAM, San Antonio, May 2009
  55. 55. LangG.GagnonA.GeraciJ. R.1981Isolation of an influenza A virus from seals.Archives of Virology683-4September,1981), 189195
  56. 56. Le BoeufB. J.LawsR. M.1994Elephant seals: population ecology, behaviour and physiology.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 414
  57. 57. LewisM.CampagnaC.MarinM. R.FernandezT.2006Southern elephant seals north of the Antarctic Polar Front.Antarctic Science182June, 2006), 19
  58. 58. LewisM.CampagnaC.QuintanaF.FalabellaV.1998Estado actual y distribución de la población del elefante marino del sur en la Península Valdés, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, 5June, 1998), 2940
  59. 59. LewisM.CampagnaC.ZavattiJ.2004Annual cycle and interannual variation in the haulout pattern of a growing southern elephant seal colony. Antarctic Science, 16September, 2004), 219226
  60. 60. LezamaC.SzterenD.2003Interacción entre el león marino sudamericano (Otaria flavescens) y la flota pesquera artesanal de Piriápolis, Uruguay. II Jornadas de Conservación y Uso Sustentable de la Fauna Marina. Escuela Naval. Montevideo, 13de octubre de 2003.
  61. 61. LittleT. W. A.SwanC.ThompsonH. V.WilesmithJ. W.1982Bovine tuberculosis in domestic and wild mammals in an area of Dorset. III. The prevalence of tuberculosis in mammals other than badgers and cattle. Journal of Hygiene. 89April, 1982), 225234
  62. 62. LunaL. G.1968Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (Third Edition). American Registry of Pathology. Lee G. Luna Editor. McGraw-Hill Book Company. USA
  63. 63. LvovD. K.ZhdanovV. M.SazonovA. A.BraudeN. A.VladimirteevaE. A.AgafonovaL. V.SkljanskajaE. I.KaverinN. V.1978Comparison of influenza viruses isolated from man and from whalesBulletin WHO, 566923930
  64. 64. MandlerJ.GormanO. T.LudwigS.SchroederE.FitchW. M.WebsterR. G.ScholtissekC.1990Derivation of the nucleoproteins (NP) of influenza A viruses isolated from marine mammals.Virology1761May, 1990), 255261
  65. 65. MillerD.EwingR. Y.BossartG. D.2001Emerging and resurging diseases. In: Marine Mammal Medicine, L. Dierauf and F. Gulland, Eds, 1525CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  66. 66. MillerM. A.GriggM. E.KreuderC.JamesE. R.MelliA. C.CrosbieP. R.JessupD. A.BoothroydJ. C.BrownsteinD.ConradP. A.2004An unusual genotype of Toxoplasma gondii is common in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) and is a cause of mortality.International Journal of Parasitology. 34March, 2004), 275284
  67. 67. MooreS.2008Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinelsJournal of Mammalogy893June, 2008), 534540
  68. 68. MorgadesD.KatzH.CastroO.CapellinoD.CasasL.BenítezG.VenzalJ. M.MorañaA.2006Fauna parasitaria del lobo fino Arctocephalus australis y del león marino Otaria flavescens (Mammalia, Otariidae) en la costa uruguaya, 8996In: Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. Menafra, R., Rodríguez-Gallego, L., Scarabino, F. & Conde, D. (Editors). Vida Silvestre Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay. Pp. 668
  69. 69. MosL.MorseyB.JeffriesS. J.YunkerM. B.RavertyS.De GuiseS.RossP. S.2006Chemical and biological pollution contribute to the immunological profiles of free-ranging Harbor Seals.Environmental Toxicology And Chemistry, 2512June, 2006), 31103117
  70. 70. MoserI.ProdingerW. M.HotzelH.GreenwaldR.LyashchenkoK. P.BakkerD.GomisD.SeidlerT.EllenbergerC.HetzelU.WuennemannK.MoissonP.2008Mycobacterium pinnipedii: transmission from South American sea lion (Otaria byronia) to Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus bactrianus) and Malayan tapirs (Tapirus indicus)Veterinary Microbiology1273-4March, 2008), 399406
  71. 71. -PM. T. O. P.-UN. U. D.N. E. S. C. O.1980Conservación y mejora de playas. Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas- Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo- UNESCO. Proyecto UNDP/URU/73/007. Informe Técnico. FMR/SC/OPS/80/214 (UNDP). 593
  72. 72. MusserJ. M.AminA.RamaswamyS.2000Negligible genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis host immune system protein targets: evidence of limited selective pressure.Genetics, 155May, 2000), 716
  73. 73. NayaD. E.VargasR.ArimM.2000Análisis preliminar de la dieta del león marino del sur (Otaria flavescens) en Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay (2da época). 121421
  74. 74. NayaD. E.ArimM.VargasR.2002Diet of South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis) in Isla de Lobos, UruguayMarine Mammal Science183July, 2002), 734745
  75. 75. NielsenO.ClavijoA.BoughenJ. A.2001Serological evidence of Influenza A infection in marine mammals of Arctic Canada. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37October, 2001), 820825
  76. 76. Office International des Epizooties2000Bovine tuberculosis. In: Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Test and Vaccines. Paris: World Organization for Animal Health, 267275
  77. 77. 48905909Ohishi, K.; Kishida, N.; Ninomiya, A.; Kida, H.; Takada, Y.; Miyazaki, N.; Boltunov, A. & Maruyama, T. (2004). Antibodies to Human-related H3 Influenza A viruses in Baikal Seals (Phoca sibirica) and ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in Russia. Microbiology and Immunology Vol. 48, (August, 2004), pp. 905-909
  78. 78. OhishiK.NinomiyaA.KidaH.ParkC.MaruyamaT.AraiT.KatsumataE.TobayamaT.BoltunovA.KhuraskinL.MiyazakiN.Serological evidence of transmission of human Influenza A and B viruses to Caspian Seals (Phoca caspica).Microbiology and Immunology469July, 2002639644
  79. 79. OlsenB.MunsterV. J.WallenstenA.WaldenströmJ.OsterhausA.FouchierR.2006Global patterns of influenza A virus in wild birds.Science, 312384388
  80. 80. OsterhausA.RimmelzwaanG. F.MartinaB.BestebroerT. M.FouchierR.2000Influenza B virus in Seals.Science 288May, 2000), 10511053
  81. 81. PáezE.2006Situación de la administración del recurso lobos y leones marinos en Uruguay. Pág. 577583Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. Menafra, R., Rodríguez-Gallego, L., Scarabino, F. & Conde, D. Eds. 668pp, Vida Silvestre. Montevideo, Uruguay
  82. 82. PedrazaS. N.Franco-TrecuV.LigroneA.2009Tendencias Poblacionales de Otaria flavescens y Arctocephalus australis en Uruguay. Workshop “Estado de situación del lobo marino común en su área de distribución”. Valparaíso, Chile, 1517Junio 2009
  83. 83. PérezFontana. H. V.1943Informe sobre la Industria Lobera (ciento diez años de de explotación de la industria lobera en nuestro país). Servicio Oceanográfico y de Pesca. (S.O.Y.P.). Monteverde. Montevideo. 69 pp
  84. 84. PinO.Ponce deLeón. A.ArímM.1996Identificación de categorías alimentarias en contenido estomacal y fecas del lobo fino sudamericano Arctocephalus australis en Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. VII Reunión de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur, 1er Congreso de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos. Viña del Mar, 2225de octubre de 1996
  85. 85. PinedoM. C.BarrosN.1983Análises dos conteúdos estomacais do leão marinho Otaria flavescens e do lobo marinho Arctocephalus australis na costa do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 187199In: Primera Reunión de Trabajo de Expertos en Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 25 al 29 de junio de 1984
  86. 86. Ponce deLeón. A.1983Crecimiento intrauterino y postnatal del lobo de dos pelos sudamericano, Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783), en las islas de Uruguay. VIII Simposio Latinoamericano de Oceanografía Biológica. Intendencia Municipal de Montevideo, Uruguay. 28 de noviembre al 2 de diciembre de 1983.
  87. 87. Ponce deLeón. A.1984Lactancia y composición cuantitativa de la leche del lobo fino sudamericano Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783). ILPE: Industria Lobera y Pesquera del Estado. Montevideo, Uruguay. Anales, 134358
  88. 88. Ponce deLeón. A.2000Taxonomía, sistemática y sinopsis de la biología y ecología de los pinipedios de Uruguay. 936In: Sinopsis de la biología y ecología de las poblaciones de lobos finos y leones marinos de Uruguay. Pautas para su manejo y Administración. Parte I. Biología de las especies. Rey, M. & Amestoy, F. (Editors). Montevideo, Uruguay, pp. 117
  89. 89. Ponce deLeón. A.2001Explotación, manejo y situación actual de las especies de otáridos que crían en islas de Uruguay. III Jornadas sobre animales silvestres, desarrollo sustentable y medio ambiente. AONIKEN, Comisión Ambientalista. Asociación de Estudiantes de Veterinaria. Facultad de Veterinaria. Montevideo, Uruguay. Noviembre de 2001.
  90. 90. Ponce deLeón. A.PáezE.1996Análisis del buceo en hembras del lobo fino sudamericano Arctocephalus australis en aguas uruguayas. VII Reunión de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur, 1er Congreso de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos. Viña del mar, Chile. 22 al 25 de octubre de 1996
  91. 91. Ponce deLeón. A.MalekA.PinO.1988Resultados preliminares del estudio de la alimentación del lobo fino sudamericano, Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783), Pinnipedia, Otariidae, para 19871988III Reunión de Trabajo de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur. Montevideo, Uruguay. 26 al 30 de julio de 1988
  92. 92. Ponce deLeón. A.PinO.ArimM.2000Identificación de presas en contenido estomacal y fecas de ejemplares de lobo fino Arctocephalus australis del rebaño de Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. 3751In: Sinopsis de la biología y ecología de las poblaciones de lobos finos y leones marinos de Uruguay. Pautas para su manejo y Administración. Parte I. Biología de las especies. Rey, M. & Amestoy, F. (Editors). Montevideo, Uruguay, pp. 117
  93. 93. Ponce deLeón. A.PinO. D.2000Planificación y estrategias sugeridas para el desarrollo de visitas turísticas en la Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. 7790In: Sinopsis de la biología y ecología de las poblaciones de lobos finos y leones marinos de Uruguay. Pautas para su manejo y Administración. Parte I. Biología de las especies. Rey, M. & Amestoy, F., (Editors). Montevideo, Uruguay, pp 117
  94. 94. Ponce deLeón. A.PinO. D.2006Distribución, reproducción y alimentación del lobo fino Arctocephalus australis y del león marino Otaria flavescens en Uruguay. Págs. 305-313. In: Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. Menafra, R., Rodríguez-Gallego, L., Scarabino, F. & Conde, D. (Editors). Vida Silvestre Uruguay. Montevideo, 668
  95. 95. Ponce deLeón. A.BarreiroJ. C.2010Estado de las poblaciones de los lobos marinos de Uruguay. Departamento de Mamíferos Marinos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos (DINARA). 10º Congreso Nacional y 8º Internacional de Profesores de Biología, La Paloma, Rocha. 19 al 22 de septiembre de 2010
  96. 96. ReevesR. R.StewartB. S.LeatherwoodS.1992The Sierra Club Handbook of Seals and Sirenias. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco. 359
  97. 97. RiderH. L.1999Bases epidemiológicas del control de la tuberculosis. Primera edición. Ed: Unión Internacional contra la Tuberculosis y Enfermedades Respiratorias. 68, Boulevard Saint-Michel 75006 Paris
  98. 98. Riet-SaprizaF.CostaD. P.Franco-TrecuV.HückstadtL. A.ChilversL.2009Foraging Areas & Diving Behavior of lactating South American sea lions Otaria flavescens during the austral summer at Lobos Island, Uruguay. 18th Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals. Quebec, Canada. October 2009.
  99. 99. Riet-SaprizaF. G.Franco-TrecuV.CostaD. P.ChilversL.HückstadtL. A.2010Existe plasticidad en el comportamiento de buceo en hembras lactantes del lobo fino sudamericano Arctocephalus australis de Isla de Lobos, Uruguay. XIII Congreso SOLAMAC. Florianópolis, Brasil. Octubre 2010.
  100. 100. Riet-SaprizaF.CostaP. D.Franco-TrecuV.MarínY.ChoccaJ.GonzálezB.BeathyateG.ChilversL. B.HückstadtL. A.2011Spatial and resource overlap between the Uruguayan fisheries and lactating South American sea lions, Otaria flavescens. IV International Science Symposium on Bio-logging Location. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia- March 2011.
  101. 101. RietSapriza. F. G.CostaD. P.Franco-TrecuV.MarínY.ChoccaJ.GonzálezB.BeathyateG.ChilversL. B.HückstadtL. A.2012Foraging behavior of lactating South American sea lions, Otaria flavescens and spatial-resource overlap with the Uruguayan fisheries. Deep-Sea Research II. In press
  102. 102. RodríguezD. H.DassisM.Ponce deLeón. A.BarreiroJ. C.FarengaM.BastidaR.DavisR.2012Foraging strategies of Southern sea lion (Otaria flavescens) females in La Plata River Estuary (Argentina-Uruguay). Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. (2012) In preparation.
  103. 103. RomanoM. I.AlitoA.BigiF.FisanottiJ. C.CataldiA.1995Genetic characterization of mycobacteria from South American wild seals.Veterinary Microbiology47March, 1995), 8998
  104. 104. RothA.ReischlU.StreubelA.NaumannL.KroppenstadtR. M.HabichtM.FischerM.MauchH.2000Novel diagnostic for identification of Mycobacteria using genus-specific amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer and restriction endonucleoses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 383March, 2000), 10941104
  105. 105. RunyonE. H.KarlsonA. G.KubicaG. P.WayneL. G.1980Mycobacterium. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology (Third Edition). Lennett Editor, 150179American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC
  106. 106. SepúlvedaM.HinostrozaP.Pérez-AlvarezM. J.OlivaD.MoragaR.2006Seasonal variation in the abundance of South American sea lions Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800) in Chañaral Island, Reserva Nacional Pingüino de Humboldt, Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía, 443December, 2006), 685689
  107. 107. SmithH. M.1934The Uruguayan fur-seal islands.Scientific Contributions of the New York Zoological Society. Zoologica, 96271294
  108. 108. SotoK. H.1999Efectos de El Niño 19971998sobre el ciclo reproductivo del lobo marino chusco Otaria byronia en las islas Ballestas, Pisco, Perú. Tesis Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.
  109. 109. SzephegyiM. N.Franco-TrecuV.DoñoF.ReyesF.ForselledoR.CrespoE.2010Primer relevamiento sistemático de captura incidental de mamíferos marinos en la flota de arrastre de fondo costero de Uruguay. XVI Reuniao de Trabalho de Especialistas em Mamíferos Aquáticos da America do Sul. Florianopolis-SC-Brasil. 24 al 28 de octubre 2010
  110. 110. SzterenD.PáezE.2002Predation by southern sea lions (Otaria flavescens) on artisanal fishing catches in UruguayMarine and Freshwater Research5311611167
  111. 111. TacquetA.TisonF.DevulderB.RossP.1967Tecniques for decontamination pathological specimens for culturing Mycobacteria. Bulletin International. Union Against Tuberculosis, 39June, 1967), 2124
  112. 112. SteuenS.HaveP.OsterhausA.ArnemoJ. M.MousgtaardA.1994Serological investigation of virus infections in harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) and hooded seals (Cystophora cristata). Veterinary Record, 134May, 1994), 502503
  113. 113. ThieleD.ChesterE. T.MooreS. E.SirovicA.HildebrandtJ. A.FriedlaenderA. S.2004Seasonal variability in whale encounters in the western Antarctic Peninsula.Deep-Sea Research II, 5117-19August-September, 2004) 23112325
  114. 114. ThompsonP. J.CousinsD. V.GowB. L.CollinsD. M.WilliamsonB. H.DagniaH. T. (1993). Seals, seals trainers, and mycobacterial infection. American Review of Respiratory Diseases, 147 (January, 1993), 164167
  115. 115. TrimbleM.2008Reconocimiento materno-filial en el león marino sudamericano Otaria flavescens en Isla De Lobos, Uruguay. Tesis de Maestría, PEDECIBA Biología, Subárea Zoología. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República. 95pp
  116. 116. Vaz-FerreiraR.1950Observaciones sobre la Isla de Lobos. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Montevideo. 5145176
  117. 117. 9237258Vaz-Ferreira, R. (1952). Observaciones sobre las Islas de Torres y de Castillo Grande. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Montevideo. Vol. 9, (1952), pp. 237-258
  118. 118. Vaz-FerreiraR.1956Características generales de las islas uruguayas habitadas por lobos marinos. Servicio Oceanográfico y de Pesca. Departamento Científico y Técnico. Trabajos sobre Islas de Lobos y Lobos Marinos (1): 23 pp
  119. 119. Vaz-FerreiraR.1976Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann) South American fur seal. Advisory Committee on Marine Resources Research, 113
  120. 120. Vaz-FerreiraR.1981South American sea lion Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800), In: Handbook of Marine Mammals. Volume I: The walrus, sea lions, fur seals and sea otters. 3965Ridgway, S. H. & Harrison, R. J. Eds. Academic Press Inc. London.
  121. 121. Vaz-FerreiraR.1982Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann), South American fur seal. 497508In: Mammals in the Seas. FAO Fisheries Series 5, 4Small cetaceans, seals, sirenias and otters. Pp. 531
  122. 122. Vaz-FerreiraR.AchavalF.1979Relación y reconocimiento materno-filial en Otaria flavescens (Shaw) “lobo de un pelo” y reacciones de los machos subadultos ante los cachorros. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 35295302
  123. 123. Vaz-FerreiraR.PalermE.1962Efectos de los cambios meteorológicos sobre agrupaciones terrestres de Pinnipedios. Ministerio de Industrias y Trabajo. Servicio Oceanográfico y de Pesca. Departamento Científico y Técnico. Trabajos sobre Islas de Lobos y Lobos Marinos 412
  124. 124. Vaz-FerreiraR.Sierra deSoriano. B.1962Estructura de una agrupación social reproductora de Otaria byronia (de Blainville), representación gráficaMinisterio de Industrias y Trabajo. Servicio Oceanográfico y de Pesca. Departamento Científico y Técnico. Trabajos sobre Islas de Lobos y Lobos Marinos, 312
  125. 125. Vaz-FerreiraR.Ponce deLeón. A.1984Estudios sobre Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783), lobo de dos pelos sudamericano, en Uruguay. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Universidad de la República. Contribuciones del Departamento de Oceanografía. Montevideo, Uruguay. 18118
  126. 126. Vaz-FerreiraR.Ponce deLeón. A.1985Estructura de grupos de dos especies de Otariidae. Actas de las Jornadas de Zoología de Uruguay, 7577
  127. 127. Vaz-FerreiraR.Ponce deLeón. A.1987South American Fur Seal, Arctocephalus australis, in Uruguay. 2932In: Proceedings of an International Symposium and Workshop. Status, biology and ecology of fur seals. Croxall & Gentry. (Editors). NOAA Technical Report NMFS 51. Cambridge, 23-27 April 1984.
  128. 128. WebsterR. G.HinshawV. S.BeanW. J.Van WykeK. L.GeraciJ. R.StAubin. D. J.PeturssonG.1981Characterization of an influenza A virus from seals.Virology1132September, 1981), 712724
  129. 129. WebsterR. G.BeanW. J.GormanO. T.ChambersT. M.KawaokaY.1992Evolution and ecology of Influenza A viruses. Microbiology Reviews, 561March, 1992), 152179
  130. 130. WoodsR.CousinsD. V.KirkwoodR.ObendorfD. L.1995Tuberculosis in a wild Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) from Tasmania.Journal of Wildlife Diseases311January, 1995), 8386
  131. 131. WrightP.WebsterR. G.2001Orthomyxoviruses. In: Fields virology. B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley, Eds. 12541292Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA
  132. 132. YorkA.LimaM.Ponce deLeón. A.MalekA.PáezE.1998First description of diving females South American fur seals in Uruguay. Abstract Volume. WMMSC, Monaco, (January 1998), 153
  133. 133. ZumárragaM. J.BernardelliA.BastidaR.QuseV.LoureiroJ.CataldiA.BigiF.AlitoA.CastroRamos. M.SamperS.OtalI.MartinC.RomanoM. I.1999Molecular characterization of mycobacteria isolated from seals.Microbiology, 145May, 1999), 25192526

Written By

Juan Arbiza, Andrea Blanc, Miguel Castro-Ramos, Helena Katz, Alberto Ponce de León and Mario Clara

Submitted: 21 November 2011 Published: 07 November 2012