Mass fraction of κ-carrageenan (
1. Introduction
Applications of bio-polymeric materials have increased significantly for both textile engineering and medical sciences. Use of biopolymer in place of artificial polymers has been increasing due to stringent environmental regulations [1]. The development of new-generation materials that extend the industrial and biomedical applications of membrane processes will require a high level of control of the characteristics of the base polymeric support layer [2]. Current research in membrane science is now focusing more on biopolymers from natural raw material with well-defined structure to develop new membrane materials [3]. Noticeably, biopolymer production can be sustainable, carbon neutral, and renewable because biopolymers are made from sea or land plant materials that can be grown year after year indefinitely. Novel biopolymer membranes enable separation based on other driving forces like electrical charge and physicochemical interactions, and with appropriate functional groups can provide applications such as tunable water permeation and separation, toxic metal capture, toxic organic dechlorination, and biocatalysts [4-5].
Biopolymers for stabilizers, thickeners, and gelling agents were extracted from various raw natural resources. They determine a number of critical functions including moisture binding, control, structure, and flow behavior that enable organisms to thrive in a natural environment [6]. A number of the typical biopolymers from natural resources such as alginate, cellulose, and chin/chitosan have been applied for functional polymer networks (e.g., carriers for controlled drug release, membranes with regulated permeability, sensor devices, and artificial muscles). For these purposes, proper responses to changes in external physicochemical conditions and developed internal microstructure of the gels are required. Interest in the behavior of biopolymer gels and networks has grown significantly. The various hydrophilic bio and/or artificial polymers that can be used for membrane formation are also discussed.
Various novel membrane materials and systems have been developed and applied. The technological benefits of such membrane materials and systems have begun to be identified for a wide range of applications for controlled drug delivery, chemical separation, water treatment, bio-separation, chemical sensors, tissue engineering, etc. There have been two main subjects of research in the field of biopolymer membrane materials and systems: development of novel and efficient biopolymer materials and improvement of capability of membrane processes and operations [7].
This chapter discusses the novel function of polysaccharides (κ-carrageenan (κC) and pullulan (P)) in membrane formation and molecular-size screening. The κ-carrageenan mass fraction (
2. Development of Biopolymer membranes
When discussing biopolymer gelation, the biopolymer types of interest fall naturally into two categories: protein and polysaccharides. A second classification is in terms of the molecular networks underlying the gels, that is, in terms of associative and particulate networks [8]. The present status of biological and ecological research demands much more emphasis on efficient biopolymers with multiple applications such as membrane-separation engineering.
One of the most common membrane types currently in use is the asymmetric cellulose acetate (CA) membrane. This high-flux, high-rejection membrane was developed in the early 1960s by Loeb and Sourirajan [9]. Chitin, poly (β-(1-4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine), is a natural polysaccharide of major importance, first identified in 1884. When the degree of deacetylation of chitin reaches about 50% (depending on the origin of polymer), it becomes soluble in aqueous acidic media and is called chitosan [10-11]. Chitosan membranes have been explored in many uses, such as in water–ethanol pervaporation [12-14], enzyme immobilization and cationic specimen transportation [15-16], protein separation [17] and concentration, controlled ingredient-release, and environmental applications [18-19]. Among the various biopolymers, alginate is the most studied matrix for membrane separation technology [20]. Hirst and Rees (1965) were the first to postulate that alginate is a polymer of mannuronic acid and guluronic acid having 1,4 linkage. Kashima and Imai (2011) investigated the α-L-guluronic acid chain with regard to regulation of the mass-transfer characteristics of the alginate membrane [21]. Many other biopolymers also consist of membrane structures. Exploiting and improving the chemical and mechanical properties of biopolymer membranes will create many more applications in the membrane industry.
3. Novel biopolymer membrane materials (κ-carrageenan & pullulan)
Biopolymers of marine algae origin are ubiquitous in surface waters and have attractive potential. The seaweed extractives of commercial importance fall into three main groups, two of which (agar and carrageenans) are derived from red algae, and the third (alginates) from brown algae. All three types of extractive are associated with the cell walls of the algae and resemble cellulose in basic molecular organization. Red algae are considered as the most important resource of many biologically active metabolites compared to other algal classes [22-23]. Marine algae as carrageenans have optimum growth conditions with sufficient sun light, stable temperature, and no climate change impact on the ground; stable harvests are thus expected. Marine algae can be produced in virtually unlimited amounts around seafaring nations. It contributes noticeably on the preventing Global Warming and coexistent with fishery.
Carrageenans are large, highly flexible molecules that curl and form helical structures. They are widely used in food and other industries as thickening and stabilizing agents. Carrageenans consist of alternating copolymers of α-(1→3)-D-galactose and β-(1→4)-3,6-anhydro-D- or L-galactose. Several isomers of carrageenan are known (κ-, ι-, and λ-carrageenans), and they differ in the number and position of the ester sulfate groups on the repeating galactose units. κ-Carrageenan has only one negative charge per disaccharide and tends to form a strong and rigid gel. The gelling power of κ-carrageenans imparts excellent film-forming properties, and κ-carrageenan forms a firm gel with the aid of potassium ions. Hot solutions of κ-carrageenans set when cooled below the gel point, which is between 30° and 70°, depending on the cations and other ingredients present, to form a range of gel textures. The two-step gel mechanism is illustrated in Fig. 1, with stage B being elastic (iota) and stage C being brittle (kappa).
κ-Carrageenan selects potassium ions to stabilize the junction zones within the characteristically firm, brittle gel. Potassium ions counter sulphate charges without sterically hindering close approach and double-helix formation (Fig. 2) [24-30].
Pullulan is an extracellular glucan elaborated by a fungus of the genus Aureobasidium, commonly called black yeast. The structure of pullulan is a linear glucan consisting of repeating units of maltotriose joined by α-D-(1→6) linkages. The safety of pullulan in foods is supported by its chemical composition, the purity of the final product, a series of toxicological studies, and the fact that it has been used about 30 years as an ingredient in human foods in Japan [31-33]. Recently, the demand for pullulan has rapidly increased for films and hard capsules, and its use in these fields is expected to grow [34-35]. The major interest in pullulan concerns its capacity to form strong, resilient films and fibers [36]. Pullulan can be used on its own or combined with other thickeners or gelling agents. The stringiness of pullulan may be a disadvantage for some applications, but this can be modified by adding a small amount of another polysaccharide such as carrageenan or xanthan gum [37]. Combinations of κ-carrageenan and pullulan achieve gel-network strengths and elasticity between the two extremes and consistent with the ratio used (Fig. 3).
In our study, original biopolymer composite membrane was successfully prepared from marine biopolymer (κ-carrageenan) and food polysaccharide (pullulan). Selective mass transfer and excellent water permeability were achieved. The membrane was characterized from the mass fraction of κ-carrageenan. The attractive potential of marine biopolymer (κ-carrageenan) combined with polysaccharide (pullulan) was demonstrated in membrane-separation engineering. The authors focused on the complex cross-linked biopolymers (κ-carrageenan and pullulan) regulating mass-transfer flux. The membrane was prepared by a simple casting method. The κ-carrageenan-pullulan composite membrane has sufficient mechanical strength for practical use and excellent mass-transfer characteristics, especially for molecular-size screening.
4. Polymer membranes preparation
The most important part in any membrane separation process is choosing the membrane material. Membranes have very different structures, functions, transport properties, transport mechanisms, and materials. The methods of making membranes are just as diverse as the membranes are. The methods of making membranes are considering the large diversity suited for technical application. The following characteristic of membranes determine separation capability.
● Membrane materials.
Organic polymers, inorganic materials (oxides, ceramics, and metals), or composite materials.
● Membrane cross-section.
Isotropic (symmetric), integrally anisotropic (asymmetric), bi- or multilayer, thin-layer or mixed matrix composites.
● Preparation methods.
Phase separation (phase inversion) of polymers, sol–gel process, interface reaction, stretching, extrusion, track-etching, and micro-fabrication.
● Membrane shape.
Sheet, hollow fiber, capsule.
The process for forming a biopolymer membrane comprises three steps.:
I. Mixing a biomaterial in a solvent to define a gel.
II. Drying the gel to define a sponge having a solvent content.
III. Adjusting the solvent content of the sponge so that the sponge is substantially filled with the solvent.
4.1. Preparing of κ-carrageenan/pullulan composite membranes
κ-Carrageenan and pullulan powders were dissolved in distilled water (70°C) using a magnetic stirrer to prepare film-forming solutions of various blend-weight ratios. All polymer solutions were prepared based on 3g total polymer weight dissolved in 97g of distilled water at 70°C for one hour. In addition, each solution was stirred for one hour at 70°C. Glutaraldehyde solution (30 ~ 130mM) was introduced into the polymer solutions [39]. And then twenty grams of the polymer solutions was then cast into a petri dish, followed by drying in an electrical blast-drying chest at 65°C for 24 hours. The dried membranes (attached to the petri dishes) were immersed in potassium chloride solution [40] (0.1 to 1.0M) for 24 hours. The swollen membrane spontaneously peeled from the petri dish at 25 ± 1°C and was washed clean with pure water for further testing. Membrane samples were tested in triplicate. Pure pullulan single component membrane (cross-linked by glutaraldehyde) was too weak to make a flat membrane in our study [41].
|
|
|
|
|
0.33 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
0.42 | 1.25 | 1.75 | |
0.5 | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
0.58 | 1.75 | 1.25 | |
0.66 | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
0.75 | 2.25 | 0.75 |
5. Measurement of biopolymer composite membranes’ properties
Commercial membrane applications focus much effort on desalination requirements [42-43], membrane-fouling characterization [44-45], drinking-water disinfection [46-47], industrial waste treatment [48-49], food industry material separation [50-51], adsorption desalination [52-53], biofiltration [54], membrane bioreactor [55-56], thermal distillation [57], electrodialysis desalination [58], reverse-osmosis desalination [59], oil–water separation applications [60], and future membrane and desalination developments. The stress-strain correlation of biopolymer membrane is affected by the origin of polymers, molecular weight, and methods of membrane preparation, conditioning, and cross-linking. Biopolymer membranes may be amorphous homopolymers or heterogeneous, depending on whether they are prepared from a single polymer or from blended polymers [61]. However, the properties of biopolymer membranes are inconsistent with the requirements of industrial-processing technologies, since the range of biopolymers suitable for membrane-separation processes is limited. To expand the application area of commercial membranes, research on improving their properties is necessary.
5.1. Mechanical properties of κ-carrageenan/pullulan composite membrane
A rheometer (CR-DX500, Sun Scientific Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine the tensile strength and the percentage elongation at break. Three rectangular-strip specimens (10mm wide, 40mm long) were cut from each membrane for tensile testing. The initial grip separation was set to 20mm, and the crosshead speed was set to 1mm/s. The initial membrane thickness was measured using a micrometer (Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan). The average thickness of the membrane strip was used to estimate the initial cross-sectional area of the membrane sample. Maximum Stress (σ) (MPa) was calculated by dividing the maximum load (N) by the initial cross-sectional area (m2):
where
Maximum Strain (λ) (%) was calculated as follows:
where
Dehydration of hydroxyl groups in the polysaccharide chain by glutaraldehyde facilitates formation of polymer networks. The polysaccharide composite membrane was further cross-linked with glutaraldehyde to reduce swelling and increase the structural strength of the membrane as well as to improve its thermal and mechanical stability [63]. The lower
The authors prepared κ-carrageenan/pullulan membranes with 90mM of glutaraldehyde added and 0.7M potassium chloride-immersion. (Fig. 5)
5.2. Water content
Water content is important for evaluating hydrophilic characteristics. The volumetric water content of the membrane indicated voids in the network that affect the water permeability [64]. Gravimetric methods were used to determine the mass-based water content (
Here,
5.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The membranes were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen then dried in a vacuum freeze dryer (RLE-103, Kyowa Vacuum Engineering. Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (298 K) for 24 hours. The membranes were then sputter-coated with a thin film of Pt, using a sputter-coater (E-1010 Ion Sputter, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Images of cross sections of the membranes were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi, Ltd.,).
6. Mass transfer in biopolymer membrane
The prolific application of membrane separation processes in industry today is primarily due to innovations in membrane materials technology. Loeb and Sourirajan (1963) pioneered the first reverse-osmosis (RO) asymmetric cellulose acetate (CA) membrane capable of withstanding the rigors of industrial use [66]. Since then, many types of biopolymer membranes have been developed and commercialized: membranes for microfiltration (MF) [67-68], ultrafiltration (UF) [69-70], nanofiltration (NF) [71-72], gas separation [73-74], and so on. These membrane separation systems are illustrated in Fig. 7.
The energy consumption for these technological filtration (MF, UF, and NF) processes is low, as latent heat in the phase change is not consumed in the membrane separation process. Membrane separation is expected to be one of the most promising and energy-efficient separation technologies. Diffusion of solutes through non-porous biopolymer membranes is discussed using a molecular-diffusion model [75-76].
In many conventional porous membranes, the membrane material is not an active participant; only its pore structure matters, not its chemical structure [77]. A common feature of biopolymer membranes in the solution-diffusion process is that the solute molecules dissolved in the biopolymer membranes diffuse through the polymer chains (also called mass-transfer channels) and then exit the membrane at the other side phase [78]. The biopolymer is an active participant in both the solution and diffusion processes.
6.1. Diffusion in biopolymer membrane
According to a solution-diffusion mechanism based on Fick’s law (Eq. 4) [79], mass transfer flux was indicated as followed:
where
In this chapter, mass-transfer experiments were carried out using a standard side-by-side diffusion cell with two compartments separated by a membrane with an area of 23cm2 (Fig. 8).
The diffusion cell was installed in a water bath to keep the temperature constant (303K). The feed compartment was filled with water-soluble marker components in solution (190ml) (Fig. 9), and the stripping compartment was filled with distilled water. During the experiment, the two compartments of solutions were stirred at a constant speed (850min−1) in order to minimize the film mass-transfer resistance near the membrane surface. The solutions in the feed and stripping compartments were sampled at a fixed time interval, and the concentration was determined by measuring UV absorbance. The wavelengths of maximum absorbance are listed in Table 2. The relationship between concentration and absorbance was calibrated by taking spectra of known concentrations. The diffusion of solutes through the membrane was monitored by periodically removing 1cm3 samples from both diffusion cells.
|
|
|
|
|
Urea | 60 | 6.0 | 5.4 | NH2CONH2 |
Glucose | 180 | 8.9 | 5.8 | C6H12O6 |
Methyl Orange | 327 | 10.6 | 5.6 | C14H14N9O9SNa |
Indigo Carmine | 466 | 11.9 | 5.4 | C16H8N2Na2O9S2 |
Bordeaux S | 604 | 13.0 | 5.9 | C20H11N2Na3O10S3 |
Brilliant Blue | 826 | 14.4 | 5.5 | C45H44N3NaO7S2 |
Rose Bengal | 1017 | 15.6 | 5.8 | C20H2CI4I4Na2O5 |
a Determined from the marker component aqueous solutions of concentration at 1mM. |
6.2. Determination of effective diffusion coefficient (Deff ) in the biopolymer
The concentration of the solution transported through the membrane is required to estimate the mass-transfer characteristics of the membrane. Diffusion is a fundamental phenomenon in several physical and chemical molecular processes, representing the molecular motion of neutral or charged species in solutions [80]. The diffusion coefficient in liquid is an important parameter for understanding the complex processes of mass transfer. Several empirical methods for estimating the diffusion coefficient in aqueous phase consider infinite dilution and are based on molecular-size indicators. Figure 10 presents a schematic of the mass-transfer model. This chapter introduces the following method [81].
Here,
The concentrations in the two diffusion cells were uniform, so the mass-transfer flux was so small that the diffusion process can be regarded as in the quasi-steady state. Accordingly, we can use Eqs. (6) and (7) to calculate the effective diffusion coefficients.
The mass-transfer resistances
The mass-transfer characteristics were evaluated from the effective diffusion coefficient estimated by measuring the mass-transfer rate in the composite membrane. Water-soluble components were employed to determine the size of the transfer channel in the membrane. The reference molecular size was from 60 to 1017Da indicating Urea, Glucose, Methyl Orange, Indigo Carmine, Bordeaux S, Brilliant Blue, and Rose Bengal (Table 2). The diffusion coefficient (
The effective diffusion coefficient in the membrane (
7. Water permeability
In pressure-driven membrane separation processes such as RO and NF, solvent permeability estimation has to consider the series of resistances to fluid flux, including the membrane resistance and the boundary layer proposed, to explain the mass transfer and the hydrodynamic permeability in these processes [82]. The mass transfer inside the membrane in the absence of any osmotic effect using pure solvent (pure water) as feed indicated the moisture sensitivity of polymers. Permeability should be a more reliable indicator [83-84]. Enhancement of water permeability of the filtration membrane reduces the cost of modules used.
Goldstick [85] argued that water permeation flux in membranes follows Darcy’s law for hydrodynamic flow through porous media but with swelling-pressure gradients driving the transport. In 1856, Darcy observed that the rate of flow of water through a bed of given thickness could be related to the driving pressure
where
If there is no fouling (clean membrane), if feed water is completely free of any solutes, and assuming laminar flow through capillary tubes of radius
where
Flux is proportional to porosity, pore size, and trans-membrane pressure.
To study the performance of prepared membranes, pure-water permeability through a κ-carrageenan/pullulan membrane was measured under steady-state conditions. Prior to the experiments, the membranes were immersed in pure water for 12h and then cut into the desired size needed for fixing in a pure water permeability set-up.
The pure-water permeability experiment used a filtration cell with a volume of 200mL and effective filtration area of 21cm2. A magnetic stirring bar was installed on the membrane upper surfaces. The filtration cell was employed for constant-flux, constant-pressure filtration. For operation in the constant-flux mode, a nitrogenous gas pump was connected to the inlet of the filtration cell and pumped the permeation water from the outlet. A pressure transducer was installed between the filtration cell and the pump in order to monitor the variation in applied pressure during filtration. The weight of the filtration water was logged by an electronic balance. The schematic of the module and set-up is presented in Fig. 12. In this chapter, the pure-water permeability was measured at different pressures and using Eq. 10.
Here,
The pure-water flux was measured as a function of applied pressure to investigate the stability and hydraulic properties of biopolymer membranes. In Fig. 13, the water flux and content increased linearly with increasing
7.1. Obtaining the selectivity curve and molecular weight cutoff
The selectivity of a membrane is usually represented by its molecular weight cutoff [86], defined as the minimum molar mass of a test solute that is 90% retained (or 95% depending on the manufacturer) by the membrane. It is thus determined experimentally from a plot of the variation of the retention rate for tracer molecules according to their molar mass (i.e., from the selectivity (or sieving) curve) (Fig. 14).
To determine a cutoff threshold, an intrinsic characteristic of the biopolymer membrane only, it is essential that the operating conditions (trans-membrane pressure, tangential circulation speed, etc.) should not affect the retention data. The rejection used for molecular weight cutoff evaluation was defined as follows.
Figure 15 presents the effect of
8. Conclusions
There are increasing reports on the physicochemical behavior of well-characterized biopolymer systems based on the fundamentals of gelation, and component interactions in the bulk and at interfaces. It appears, however, that a gap has emerged between the recent advances in fundamental knowledge and the direct application to products with a growing need for scientific input. As can be seen from the above, biopolymers are now one of the most explored potential materials for membrane-separation technology, but there is much experimental and theoretical work left to complete. An analysis of the structure–property relationships provides much information on the effects of side groups, structure, and stiffness of the main chains that can be used in directed search for advanced membrane materials of other classes. Much more interesting results have been obtained for composite and modified biopolymers. Here, significantly fewer structures have been examined, so much is yet to be done.
Biopolymer κ-carrageenan/pullulan composite membrane was successfully prepared by the casting method. It has sufficient mechanical strength for practical use and excellent mass-transfer characteristics, especially for molecular-size screening. The relationship between mass-transfer characteristics and the mass fraction of κ-carrageenan in the composite membrane was formulated based on mass-transfer flux and pure-water flux experiments. The results provided a novel and simple method of preparing membranes and mass-transfer channels based on molecular-size indicators, and suggested that different
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by research funding grants provided by the Iijima Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Food Science and Technology. The authors sincerely thank Dr. Kei Tao of Nihon University, who provided technical assistance on SEM photography.
References
- 1.
Krishna R. K. S. V. Vijaya B. Naidu K. Subha M. C. S. Sairam M. Mallikarjuna N. N. Aminabahvi T. M. 2006 Novel carbonhydrate polymeric blend membranes in pervaporation dehydration of acetic acid 66 345 351 - 2.
Stanek L. G. Heilmann S. M. Gleason W. B. 2006 Preparation and copolymerization of a novel carbohydrate containing monomer 65 552 556 - 3.
Lee K. P. Arnot T. C. Mattia D. 2011 A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination-Development to date and future potential 370 1 22 - 4.
Catherine C. 2009 A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination 245 214 231 - 5.
Guessasma S. Hamdi A. Lourdin D. 2009 Linear modeling of biopolymer systems and related mechanical properties 76 381 388 - 6.
Imeson A. 2009 Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling Agents Wiley-Blackwell 343 10.1002/9781444314724 - 7.
Kumar A. Srivastava A. Galaev I. Y. Mattiasson B. 2007 Smart polymer: Physical forms and bioengineering applications 32 1205 1237 - 8.
Clark A. H. 1996 Biopolymer gels 1 712 717 - 9.
McCray S. B. Vilker V. L. Nobe K. 1991 Reverse osmosis cellulose acetate membranes. I. Rate of hydrolysis 59 305 316 - 10.
Rinaudo M. 2006 Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications 31 603 632 - 11.
Pillai C. K. S. Paul W. Sharma C. P. 2009 Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation 34 641 678 - 12.
Lee Y. M. Shin E. M. 1991 Pervaporation separation of water-ethanol through modified chitosan membranes. IV. Phosphorylated chitosan membranes 64 145 152 - 13.
Won W. Feng X. S. Lawless D. 2002 Pervaporation with chitosan membranes: separation of dimethyl carbonate/methanol/water mixtures 209 493 508 - 14.
Devi D. A. Smitha B. Sridhar S. Aminabhavi T. M. 2005 Pervaporation separation of isopropanol/water mixtures through crosslinked chitosan membranes 262 91 99 - 15.
Huang X. J. Ge D. Xu Z. K. 2007 Preparation and characterization of stable chitosan nanofibrous membrane for lipase immobilization 43 3710 3718 - 16.
Beppu M. M. Vieira R. S. Aimoli C. G. Santana C. C. 2007 Crosslinking of chitosan membranes using glutaraldehyde: Effect on ion permeability and water absorption 301 126 130 - 17.
Zeng X. F. Ruckenstein E. 1998 Cross-linked macroporous chitosan anion-exchange membranes for protein separations 148 195 205 - 18.
Takahashi T. Imai M. Suzuki I. Sawai J. 2008 Growth inhibitory effect on bacteria of chitosan membranes regulated with deacetylation degree 40 485 491 - 19.
Takahashi T. Imai M. Suzuki I. 2007 Water permeability of chitosan membrane involved in deacetylation degree control 36 43 48 - 20.
Kashima K. Imai M. Suzuki I. 2010 Superior molecular size screening and mass-transfer characterization of calcium alginate membrane 17 143 159 - 21.
Kashima K. Imai M. 2011 Dominant impact of the α-L-guluronic acid chain on regulation of the mass transfer character of calcium alginate membranes 134 257 265 - 22.
El Gamal A. A. 2010 Biological importance of marine algae 18 1 25 - 23.
Rasmussen R. S. Morrissey M. T. 2007 Marine biotechnology for production of food ingredients 52 237 292 - 24.
Millane R. P. Chandrasekaran R. Arnott S. 1988 The molecular structure of kappa-carrageenan and comparison with iota-carrageenan 183 1 17 - 25.
Dea I. C. M. Mckinnon A. A. Rees D. A. 1972 Tertiary and Quaternary Structure in Aqueous Polysaccharide Systems which Model Cell Wall Cohesion: Reversible Changes in Conformation and Association of Agarose, Carrageenan and Galactomannans 68 153 172 - 26.
Bixler H. J. Johndro K. Falshaw R. 2001 Kappa-2 carrageenan: structure and performance of commercial extracts II. Performance in two simulated dairy applications 15 619 630 - 27.
Falshaw R. Bixler H. J. Johndro K. 2001 Structure and performance of commercial kappa-2 carrageenan extracts I. Structure analysis 15 441 452 - 28.
Ekstrom A. G. Kuivinen J. 1983 Molecular weight distribution and hydrolysis behaviour of carrageenans 116 89 94 - 29.
El Gamal A. A. 2010 Biological importance of marine algae 18 1 25 - 30.
Mangione M. R. Giacomazza D. Bulone D. Martorana V. Cavallaro G. San Biagio P. L. 2005 K+ and Na+ effects on the gelation properties of k-Carrageenan 113 129 135 - 31.
Leathers T. D. 2003 Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan 62 468 473 - 32.
Ueda S. Fujita K. Komatsu K. Nakashima Z. 1963 Polysaccharide produced by the genus Pullularia I. Production of polysaccharide by growing cells 11 211 215 - 33.
Singh R. S. Saini G. K. Kennedy J. F. 2008 Pullulan: Microbial sources, production and applications 73 515 531 - 34.
Xiao Q. Lim L. T. Tong Q. 2011 Properties of pullulan-based blend film as affected by alginate content and relative humidity 87 227 234 - 35.
Shih F. F. Daigle K. W. Champagne E. T. 2011 Effect of rice wax on water vapour permeability and sorption properties of edible pullulan films 127 118 121 - 36.
Lazaridou A. Biliaderis C. G. Kontogiorgos V. 2003 Molecular weight effects on solution rheology of pullulan and mechanical properties of its films 52 151 166 - 37.
Trinetta V. Cutter C. N. Floros J. D. 2011 Effects of ingredient composite on optical and mechanical properties of pullulan film for food-packaging applications 44 2296 2301 - 38.
Ulbricht M. 2006 Advanced functional polymer membranes 47 2217 2262 - 39.
Lebrun L. Blanco J. F. Metayer M. 2005 Preparation of ion-exchange membranes using pullulan as polymer matrix 61 1 4 - 40.
Datta S. Mody K. Gopalsamy G. Jha B. 2011 Novel application of κ-carrageenan: As a gelling agent in microbiological media to study biodiversity of extreme alkaliphiles 85 465 468 - 41.
Wu P. Imai M. 2011 Food polymer pullulan-κ-carrageenan composite membrane performed smart function both on mass transfer and molecular size recognition 34 239 245 - 42.
Sairam M. Sereewatthanawut E. Li K. Bismarck A. Livingston A. G. 2011 Method for the preparation of cellulose acetate flat sheet composite membranes for forward osmosis-Desalination using MgSO4 draw solution 273 299 307 - 43.
Miao J. Chen G. Gao C. Dong S. X. 2008 Preparation and characterization of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/Polysulfone composite nanofiltration membrane crosslinked with epichlorohydrin 233 147 156 - 44.
Peeva P. D. Million N. Ulbricht M. 2012 Factors affecting the sieving behavior of anti-fouling thin-layer cross-linked hydrogel polyethersulfone composite ultrafiltration membranes 390-391 99 112 - 45.
Elimelech M. Zhu X. H. Childress A. E. Hong C. S. 1997 Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes 127 101 109 - 46.
Zio A. D. Prisciandaro M. Barda D. 2005 Disinfection of surface waters with UF membranes 179 297 305 - 47.
Singh G. Rana D. Matsuura T. Ramakrishna S. Narbaitz R. M. Tabe S. 2010 Removal of disinfection byproducts from water by carbonized electrospun nanofibrous membranes 74 202 212 - 48.
Lameloise M. Matinier H. Fargues C. 2009 Concentration and purification of malate ion from a beverage industry waste water using electrodialysis with homopolar membranes 343 73 81 - 49.
Yushina Y. Hasegawa J. 1994 Process performance comparison of membrane introduced anaerobic digestion using food industry waste water 98 413 421 - 50.
Blocher C. Noronha M. Funfrocken L. Dorda J. Mavrov V. Janke H. D. Chmiel H. 2002 Recycling of spent process water in the food industry by an integrated process of biological treatment and membrane separation 144 143 150 - 51.
Alp B. Mutltu S. Mutlu M. 2000 Glow-discharge-treated cellulose acetate (CA) membrane for a high linearity single-layer glucose electrode in the food industry 33 107 112 - 52.
Kabay N. Bryjak M. Schlosser S. Kitis M. Avlonitis S. Matejka Z. Al-Mutaz I. Yuksel M. 2008 Adsorption-membrane filtration (AMF) hybrid process for boron removal from seawater: an overview 223 38 48 - 53.
Redondo J. Busch M. Witte J. D. 2003 Boron removal from seawater using FILMTECTM high rejection SWRO membranes 156 229 238 - 54.
Hu J. H. Song L. F. Ong S. L. Phua E. T. Ng W. J. 2005 Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system 59 127 133 - 55.
Alvarez-Hornos F. J. Volckaert D. Heynderickx P. M. Langenhove H. V. 2011 Performance of a composite membrane bioreactor for the removal of ethyl acetate from waste air 102 8893 8898 - 56.
Zheng X. Liu J. 2006 Dyeing and printing wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor with a gravity drain 190 277 286 - 57.
Su M. Teoh M. M. Wang K. Y. Su J. C. Chung T. S. 2010 Effect of inner-layer thermal conductivity on flux enhancement of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes in direct contact membrane distillation 364 278 289 - 58.
Shah B. G. Shahi V. K. Thampy S. K. Rangarajan R. Ghosh P. K. 2009 Comparative studies on performance of interpolymer and heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes for water desalination by electrodialysis 172 257 265 - 59.
Misdan N. Lau W. J. Ismail A. F. 2012 Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) desalination by thin-film composite membrane-Current development, challenges and future prospects 287 228 237 - 60.
Maguire-Boyle S. J. Barron A. R. 2011 A new functionalization strategy for oil/water separation membranes 382 107 115 - 61.
Steward P. A. Hearn J. Wilkinson M. C. 2000 An overview of polymer latex film formation and properties 86 195 267 - 62.
Tong Q. Xiao Q. Lim L. T. 2008 Preparation and properties of pullulan-alginate-carboxymethylcellulose blend films 41 1007 1014 - 63.
Martelli S. M. Moore G. R. P. Laurindo J. B. 2006 Mechanical Properties, Water Vapor Permeability and Water Affinity of Feather Keratin Films Plasticized with Sorbitol 14 215 222 - 64.
Rao P. S. Smitha B. S. Sridhar S. Krishnaiah A. 2006 Preparation and performance of poly(vinyl alcohol)/polyethyleneimine blend membranes for the dehydration of 1,4-dioxane by pervaporation: Comparison with glutaraldehyde cross-linked membranes 48 244 254 - 65.
Takahashi T. Imai M. Suzuki I. 2008 Cellular structure in an N-acetyl-chitosan membrane regulate water permeability 42 20 27 - 66.
McCray S. B. Vilker V. L. Nobe K. 1991 Reverse osmosis cellulose acetate membranes. I. Rate of hydrolysis 59 305 316 - 67.
Vasileva N. Godjevargova T. 2004 Study on the behaviour of glucose oxidase immobilized on microfiltration polyamide membrane 239 157 161 - 68.
Villegas M. Vidaurre E. F. Habert A. C. Gottifredi J. C. 2011 Sorption and pervaporation with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) membranes: methanol/methyl tert-butyl ether mixtures 367 103 109 - 69.
Matsuoka Y. Kanda N. Lee Y. M. Higuchi A. 2006 Chiral separation of phenylalanine in ultrafiltration through DNA-immobilized chitosan membranes 280 116 123 - 70.
Papageorgiou S. K. Katsaros F. K. Favvas E. P. Romanos G. E. Athanasekou C. P. Beltsios K. G. Tzialla O. I. Falaras P. 2012 Alginate fibers as photocatalyst immobilizing agents applied in hybrid photocatalytic/ultrafiltration water treatment processes 46 1858 1872 - 71.
Miao J. Chen G. H. Gao C. J. 2005 A novel kind of amphoteric composite nanofiltration membrane prepared from sulfated chitosan (SCS) 181 173 183 - 72.
Li X. L. Zhu L. P. Zhu B. K. Xu Y. Y. 2011 High-flux and anti-fouling cellulose nanofiltration membranes prepared via phase inversion with ionic liquid as solvent 83 66 73 - 73.
Wu J. Yuan Q. 2002 Gas permeability of a novel cellulose membrane 204 185 194 - 74.
Xiao S. Feng X. S. Huang R. Y. M. 2007 Trimesoyl chloride crosslinked chitosan membranes for CO2/N2 separation and pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol 306 36 46 - 75.
Feil H. Bae Y. H. Feijen J. Kim S. W. 1991 Molecular separation by thermosensitive hydrogel membranes 64 283 294 - 76.
Peppas N. A. Reinhart C. 1983 Solute Diffusion in Swollen Membranes. Part I. A New Theory 15 275 287 - 77.
Baltus R. E. 1997 Characterization of the pore area distribution in porous membranes using transport measurements 123 165 184 - 78.
Krajewska B. Olech A. 1996 Pore structure of gel chitosan membranes. I. Solute diffusion measurements 4 33 43 - 79.
Neogi P. 1996 Diffusion in Polymer Marcel Dekker 309 - 80.
Chen C. X. Han B. B. Li J. D. Shang T. G. Jiang W. J. 2001 A new model on the diffusion of small molecule penetrants in dense polymer membranes 187 109 118 - 81.
Miyabe K. Isogai R. 2011 Estimation of molecular diffusivity in liquid phase systems by the Wilke-Chang equation 1218 6639 6645 - 82.
Mehdizadeh H. Molaiee-Nejad K. Chong Y. C. 2005 Modeling of mass transport of aqueous solutions of multi-solute organics through reverse osmosis membranes in case of solute-membrane affinity Part 1. Model development and simulation 267 27 40 - 83.
Yaroshchuk A. E. 1995 Solution-diffusion-imperfection model revised 101 83 87 - 84.
Yaroshchuk A. E. 1995 The role of imperfections in the solute transfer in nanofiltration 239 9 15 - 85.
Fatt I. Goldstick T. K. 1965 Dynamics of water transport in swelling membranes 20 962 989 - 86.
Jonsson G. 1985 Molecular weight cut-off for ultrafiltration membranes of varing pore size 53 3 10