Clinicopathological features of neoplasias in the surveillance and nonsurveillance groups (adapted from Fujii et al., 2003b)
1. Introduction
The first ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated carcinoma (colitic cancer) appears to have been 14-year history of UC (Fujii et al., 2002, as cited in Crohn & Rosenberg, 1925). It is widely accepted that inflammation plays important roles in the development of various cancers, and indeed, patients with UC show an increased incidence of colorectal neoplasia, and UC-associate dysplasia/neoplasia represents a major cause of increased mortality in such patients. In order to improve the prognosis of patients with UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia, diagnosis at an early or precancerous stage is crucial. Predisposition to colorectal dysplasia/neoplasia in UC is generally considered to depend on 2 risk factors, namely the presence of long-standing disease and extensive colitis (Fujii et al., 2008, as cited in Ekbom, et al., 1990, and Eaden et al., 2001). Thus, colitic cancers are believed to arise through a chronic inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, and therefore early detection of precancerous dysplasia is very important for optimizing the prognosis of patients with long-standing UC. In a clinical setting, UC patients are monitored for dysplasia endoscopically on a regular basis, but it is difficult to discriminate UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia from inflamed regenerating epithelium even by pathological examination. Therefore, surveillance colonoscopy with multiple random biopsies has been widely recommended for patients with long-standing and extensive UC. However, because UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia is often difficult to detect endoscopically and to discriminate from inflammatory regenerative epithelium histologically, it remains a matter of contention whether conventional surveillance colonoscopy is effective for the early detection of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. Here we describe the ulcerative colitis/dysplasia based on pathology and discuss relevant issues in arriving at the correct differential diagnosis based on morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular findings.
2. Risk factor and clinicopathological characteristics of dysplasia/neoplasia development in the patients with ulcerative colitis
The reported prevalence rates of colitic cancer range from 1 to 10% of all patients with UC. This increased risk, above that of the general population, appears approximately 8–10 years after the onset of the disease. The risk increases with the duration of disease and is greater in persons with extensive colitis (Fujii et al., 2002, as cited in Dobbins, 1984). A cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer was 5–10% with UC of 20 years duration and 12–20% with UC of 30 years duration (Fujii et al., 2002, as cited in Levin, 1995). The risk of colorectal cancer in patients with left-sided colitis was considered to increase 20 years after the onset of UC. Moreover incidence of colitic cancer in patients with left-sided disease did not differ from that in patients with pancolitis. In order to detect UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia and the early stages of cancer, surveillance colonoscopy has been recommended for patients with long-standing and extensive UC. In Japan, possibly because the number of UC patients with dysplasia/neoplasia is smaller than that in Western countries. We reviewed Japanese case reports of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia published between 1990 and 2002 (Fujii et al., 2003b). Of 118 patients with UC-associated neoplasia, 41 underwent surveillance colonoscopy (surveillance group), 64 did not (nonsurveillance group), and the remaining 13 cases were unknown as to surveillance status. The 64 UC associated neoplasias including colitic cancer (UC associated carcinoma) in the nonsurveillance group were found by colonoscopy that was undertaken because of developing symptomatic episode, or for the evaluation of inflammation activities. The depth of tumor invasion, incidence of lymph node metastasis, incidence of liver metastasis, and stage in the two groups are shown in Table 1.
Surveillance (41) | Nonsurveillance (64) | |
Depth of neoplastic invasion | ||
Tis | 11 | 11 |
T1 | 12 | 5 |
T2 | 5 | 6 |
T3 | 10 | 30 |
T4 | 0 | 6 |
Unknown | 3 | 6 |
Lymph node metastasis | ||
Positive | 4 | 25 |
Negative | 25 | 23 |
Unknown | 12 | 16 |
Liver metastasis, positive | 1 | 4 |
Peritoneal dissemination, positive | 0 | 7 |
Dukes’ stage | ||
A | 22 | 15 |
B | 2 | 8 |
C | 4 | 25 |
Unknown | 13 | 16 |
Regarding depth of tumor invasion, early colorectal cancer, defined as tumor invading the lamina propria and/or muscularis mucosae and/or submucosa, was more frequent in the surveillance group than in the nonsurveillance group (60.5% vs. 27.6%). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was lower in the surveillance group than in the nonsurveillance group (13.8% vs. 52.1%). Four out of the five tumors associated with liver metastasis and, all seven tumors associated with peritoneal dissemination were in the nonsurveillance group. The distribution of Dukes’ stages in the two groups was: A/B/C, 78.6%/7.1%/14.3% in the surveillance group, compared with 31.2%/16.7%/52.1% in the nonsurveillance group. Similar to Western countries, surveillance colonoscopy in Japan contributes to the early detection of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. The surveillance colonoscopy appears to contribute to the early detection and excellent prognosis of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. But it still remains questionable whether surveillance colonoscopy with multiple-step biopsy effectively enables the early detection of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia.
3. The morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular finding of ulcerative colitis/dysplasia
Morphological futures of macroscopic and endoscopic images, UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasias in the precancerous and early stages show various changes. Such dysplasia/neoplasias are often flat, plaque-like, and superficially elevated or even depressed, and frequently appear as faintly red, mildly discoloured, finely villous, and granular (Fig.1).
Macroscopic and endoscopic changes are not clear, and are sometimes missed in chronically inflamed epithelium. Detecting UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasias in the precancerous and early stages is difficult by macroscopy (Fig.2), endoscopy (Fig.3a), and stereomicroscopic finding (Fig.3b). We retrospectively verified the percentage of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasias that was detectable endoscopically before surgical resection (Yamagishi et al., 2009). When classified UC-associated dysplastic/neoplastic lesions according to macroscopic appearance, 79.1% lesions were of flat-type. In detail, 92.5% dysplasias, 80.9% Tis carcinomas, 60% T1 carcinomas were of flat (flat and superficial elevated type), whereas 6 of 7 (85.7%) T2-4 carcinomas were protruding (polypoid type). In each T category, the detection rare of lesions tends to be high in the protruding appearance (Table 2). Most of the undetectable lesions were the flat or flat-elevated type macroscopically. Thus, endoscopic detection of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasias at the precancerous and early stage appears to be difficult. Therefore, improvements to the current methods of colonoscopy are needed in order to detect UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasias more effectively and accurately. On the other hand, several Japanese investigators reported that observation of the configuration of the outlet of the colorectal surface lesion using high-resolution endoscopy, chromoendoscopy (Fujii et al., 2008, as cited in Rembacken, et al., 2000, and Kudo et al., 1994), increasingly useful for diagnosing and treating colorectal neoplasia. Recent reported the usefulness of high-resolution endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and new endoscopic system (NBI, FICE, i-scan) for detecting UC associated dysplasia ・neoplasia (East et al., 2006).
T grade | P value | Protruding | Flat | *P value | |
Dysplasia(n=40) | |||||
Detectable | 19 | 3 | 16 | 0.058 | |
Undetectable | 21 | 0 | 21 | ||
Tis(n=15 | |||||
Detectable | 10 | 0.205a | 3 | 7 | 0.171 |
Undetectable | 5 | 0 | 5 | ||
T1(n=5) | |||||
Detectable | 2 | 0.751a | 2 | 0 | <0.05 |
Undetectable | 3 | 0.292b | 0 | 3 | |
Advanced (n=7) | |||||
Detectable | 7 | <0.05 a | 6 | 1 | ND |
0.082 b | |||||
Undetectable | 0 | <0.05 c | 0 | 0 | |
a Compared with dysplasia, b Compared with Tis, c Compared with T1. | |||||
* Relationship between detection and macroscopic appearance. NF: not determined |
3.1. Histological diagnosis of ulcerative colitis/dysplasia
UC associated dysplasia was a precursor of colitic cancer in UC, several studies have shown that UC-associated dysplasia correlates with the presence of colitic cancer. The existence of carcinoma at the time of colectomy in UC patients with high-grade dysplasia, as determined by a preoperative rectal biopsy. A presence of dysplasia could identify patients likely either to have or to develop colitic cancer. Thus, dysplasia is not only a precursor of colitic cancer, but may also be a marker for the existence of colitic cancer in other areas of the colorectum. Gastrointestinal surgical pathologist have been diagnosis inflammatory grade and epithelial injury on UC patient using by Matts grading system (Table 3), The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Morphology Study Group in Western countries attempted to verify a standardized terminology and classification for the assessment of dysplasia in UC (Table 4). However, in Japan, the interpretation of‘dysplasia’ in UC varies from one pathologist to another. Therefore, the Research Committee on Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan proposed a new classification for UC associated dysplasia/neoplasia in 1993 (Table 5).
Grade 1 | Normal appearance. |
Grade 2 | Some infiltration of the mucosa or lamina propria with either round cells or polymorphs. |
Grade 3 | Much cellular of the mucosa or lamina propria and submucosa. |
Grade 4 | Presence of crypt abscess, with much infiltration of all layers of the mucosa. |
Grade 5 | Ulceration, erosion, or necrosis of the mucosa, with cellular infiltration of some or all its layer. |
Negative |
Normal mucosa |
Inactive (quiescent) colitis |
Active colitis |
Indefinite |
Probably negative (probably inflammatory) |
Unknown |
Probably positive (probably dysplasia) |
Positive |
Low-grade dysplasia |
High-grade dysplasia |
Category | Description |
UC-I | Inflammatory change |
UC-II | Indefinite |
UC-IIa | Probably inflammatory |
UC-IIb | Probably neoplastic |
UC-III | Neoplastic but not carcinoma |
UC-IV | Carcinoma |
UC: ulcerative colitis. |
Matts grading system (Table 3) and UC associated dysplasia/neoplastic classification (Table 4 & 5) are used for clinical and research purposes and applies to both colectomy and biopsy specimens. The histological characteristics of each stage of UC-associated dysplasia/ neoplasia with inflammatory lesion (Fig 4). However, it is difficult and sensitive to discriminate between UC-associated dysplasia and regenerative epithelium by the conventional Hematoxylin and Eosin staining section. Histological diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia is based on a combination of architectural and cytological alterations. The architectural alterations often result in glandular arrangements, e.g., club-shaped villi, crawling glands or bifid formation at the base of the crypts. The cytological alterations comprise cellular and nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear hyperchromatism, loss of nuclear polarity, marked nuclear stratification, dystrophic goble cells and failure of maturation from the crypt base to the surface.
3.2. Immunohistochemical finding of ulcerative colitis/dysplasia
Pathologically, it is not rare those surgical pathologists are unable to distinguish between from UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia and inflammatory regenerative epithelium using by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Furthermore, there are differences in the diagnostic criteria that different surgical pathologist use for dysplasia/neoplasia. In order to improve the accuracy of pathological diagnosis, it will be necessary to use ordinary method for immunohistochemical technique.
3.2.1. P53 protein nuclear accumulation
Several reports have shown that the rate of the tumor suppressor
3.2.2. Increased expression of DNA Methyltransferase -1
Neoplastic progression in UC occurs in a histologically stepwise manner, from chronic epithelial inflammation to dysplasia/neoplasia, and the process of neoplastic progression involves accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations. Some of these alterations are
Histological diagnosis | n | Positive staining(%) |
Inflammatory change (UC-I) | 5 | 0(0) |
Indefinite, probably inflammatory (UC-IIa) | 38 | 0(0) |
Indefinite, probably neoplastic (UC-IIb) | 35 | 14(40.0) |
Neoplastic but not carcinoma (UC-III) | 24 | 14(58.3) |
Carcinoma (UC-IV) | 18 | 11(61.1) |
known to occur in both the neoplastic and nonneoplastic epithelium of UC patients with neoplasia, and are considered to be widespread and to occur early in the process of neoplastic progression. In several types of neoplasia, aberrant methylation of promoter-region CpG islands, as an epigenetic modification of DNA, is associated with transcriptional inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and plays a crucial role in the development and progression of neoplasia (Hsieh et al., 1998). DNA methylation results from a methyl transfer reaction performed by the three active DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs): DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b (Okano et al., 1999). Of these, DNMT1 is the most abundant DNMT targeted to replication foci and has a preference for hemimethylated DNA substrates. Recent investigations have shown that DNMT1 is overexpressed in tumorigenic cells and several types of human tumors, and that increased expression of DNMT1 is dependent on cell proliferation. We reported that the immunoreactive DNMT1 expression gradually increased from rectal epithelium of UC patients without neoplasia to nonneoplastic rectal epithelium of UC patients with neoplasia (p <0.001), and to colorectal neoplasia (p <0.001) (Fujii et al., 2010). Among 31 neoplasias, there was no difference in the immunoreactive DNMT1 expressions between dysplasia and invasive cancer. Expression of DNMT1 in non-neoplastic epithelium may precede or be a relatively early event in UC-associated carcinogenesis (Fig. 6).
3.3. Molecular alterations of ulcerative colitis/dysplasia
Numerous reports have revealed molecular alterations (e.g.,
3.3.1. P53 gene abnormalities
In the
3.3.2. Age-related methylation and methylation analysis of ER Gene
In several neoplasias, aberrant methylation of promoter region Chg. islands, as an epigenetic modification of DNA, is associated with transcriptional inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and plays a crucial role in the development and progression of neoplasia (Hsieh et al., 1998). In normal colorectal epithelium, some genes are methylated with aging, and this alteration is known as age-related methylation. A methylation of the estrogenic receptor (ER) Chg. Island increased with age in no neoplastic colorectal epithelium and that the same methylation occurred in most sporadic colorectal neoplasias (Issa et al. 1994). They concluded that methylation of the
4. Conclusion
In this issue, we have discussed the efficacy of surveillance colonoscopy for UC associated dysplasia/neoplasia, several problems related to the diagnosis of UC–associated dysplasia/neoplasia and molecular markers that can be used to identify individuals with UC at increased risk of dysplasia/neoplasia. Current surveillance colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory, due to difficulties with endoscopic and histological diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. These difficulties may be overcome by introducing adjunctive techniques for diagnosing UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia, analysis of
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. S. Kameok a and Dr. M. Itabashi (Department of Surgery II, Tokyo Women’s Medical College), Dr. B. Iizuka (Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical College), Dr. H. Mitooka (Division of Gastroenterology, Kobe Kaisei Hospital), Dr. T. Tanaka (Division of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital) and Dr. N. Kitajima (Division of Gastroenterology, Kasai City Hospital) for kindly supplying the tissue materials. We would like to thank Dr. K. Ichikawa, Dr. J, Imura (Department of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, DOKKYO Medical University School of Medicine), Dr. H. Yamagishi (Department of Pathology, DOKKYO Medical University Koshigaya Hospital), and Dr. H. Fukui (Division of Upper Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine) for their insightful comments. The authors greatly thank Ms C. Sato -Matsuyama, A. Shimizu, T. Ono, M. Katayama, N. Nagashima, (Department of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, DOKKYO Medical University School of Medicine) for technical assistance and to Ms. A. Kikuchi (Department of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, DOKKYO Medical University School of Medicine) for secretarial assistance in preparing the manuscript.
This work was partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B: No 16790390), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C: No 18659101, 23590410) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and Dokkyo Medical University Young Investigator Award (2009 for graduate student Dr. H. Tanaka and 2011-03-2 for graduate student Dr. K. Oono).
References
- 1.
Baker S. J. et al. 1990 p53 gene mutations occur in combination with 17p allelic deletions as late events in colorectal tumorigenesis.50 23 December 1990),7717 7722 0008-5472 Print), 1538-7445 (Electronic) - 2.
Brentnall T. A. et al. 1994 Mutations in the p53 gene: an early marker of neoplastic progression in ulcerative colitis. ,107 2 August 1994),369 378 0016-5085 Print), 1528-0012 (Electronic) - 3.
East J. E. et al. 2006 Narrow band imaging with magnification for dysplasia detection and pit pattern assessment in ulcerative colitis surveillance: a case with multiple dysplasia associated lesions or masses. ,55 10 October 2006),1432 1435 0017-5749 Print), 1468-3288 (Electronic) - 4.
Fujii S. Fujimori T. Kashida H. 2002 Ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia.52 3 March 2002),195 203 1320-5463 Print), 1440-1827 (Electronic) - 5.
Fujii S. Fujimori T. Chiba T. 2003a Usefulness of analysis of p53 alteration and observation of surface microstructure for diagnosis of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia.22 1 March 2003),107 115 1756-9966 Print) - 6.
Fujii S. et al. 2003b Efficacy of surveillance and molecular markers for detection of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia.38 12 Decenber 2003),1117 1125 0944-1174 Print), 1435-5922 (Electronic) - 7.
Fujii S. et al. 2005 Methylation of the oestrogen receptor gene in non-neoplastic epithelium as a marker of colorectal neoplasia risk in longstanding and extensive ulcerative colitis.54 9 December 2005),1287 1292 0017-5749 Print), 1468-3288 (Electronic) - 8.
Fujii S. Katsumata D. Fujimori T. 2008 Limits of diagnosis and molecular markers for early detection of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia.77 No.supplement 1, (January 2008),2 12 1421-9867 Print), 0012-2823 (Electronic) - 9.
Fujii S. Katake Y. Tanaka H. 2010 Increased Expression of DNA Methyltransferase-1 in Non-Neoplastic Epithelium Helps Predict Colorectal Neoplasia Risk in Ulcerative Colitis.82 3 June 2010),179 186 1421-9867 Print), 0012-2823 (Electronic) - 10.
Holzmann K. et al. 2001 Comparison of flow cytometry and histology with mutational screening for p53 and Ki-ras mutations in surveillance of patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis.36 12 December 2001),1320 1326 0036-5521 Print), 0036-5521 (Electronic) - 11.
Hsieh C. et al. 1998 Hypermethylation of the p16INK4a promoter in colectomy specimens of patients with long-standing and extensive ulcerative colitis.58 17 September 1998),3942 3945 0008-5472 Print), 1538-7445 (Electronic) - 12.
Issa J. P. et al. 1994 Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon.7 4 August 1994),7717 7722 1061-4036 Print), 1546-1718 (Electronic) - 13.
Konishi F. et al. 1993 Histological Classification of the Neoplastic Epithelium Arising in Ulcerative Colitis. , 1993;153 156 in Japanese with English abstract). - 14.
BA Lashner et al. 1999 Evaluation of the usefulness of testing for p53 mutations in colorectal cancer surveillance for ulcerative colitis. ,94 2 February 1999),456 462 0002-9270 Print), 1572-0241 (Electronic) - 15.
Matts S. G. 1961 The value of rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis.30 4 October 1961),393 407 0033-5622 Print), 0033-5622 (Electronic) - 16.
Okano M. et al. 1999 DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development.99 3 October 1999),247 257 1097-4172 Print), 0092-8674 (Electronic) - 17.
Riddel R. H. et al. 1983 Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: standardized classification with provisional clinical applications.14 11 November 1983),931 968 0046-8177 Print), 1532-8392 (Electronic) - 18.
Tominaga K. et al. 2005 Prediction of colorectal neoplasia by quantitative methylation analysis of estrogen receptor gene in nonneoplastic epithelium from patients with ulcerative colitis.11 24 Part 1, (December 2005),8880 8805 1078-0432 Print), 1557-3265 (Electronic) - 19.
Yamagishi H. et al. 2009 Pathological Approach for Surveillance of Ulcerative Colitis-associated cancer: Usefulness of Immunohistochemistry for p5336 1 March 2009),27 32 0385-5023 Print), 0385-5023 (Electronic)