Open access

Silicate Glass-Based Nanocomposite Scintillators

Written By

Martin Nikl, Daniel Niž?anský, Jakub Ruzicka, Carla Cannas and Takayuki Yanagida

Submitted: 05 November 2010 Published: 27 July 2011

DOI: 10.5772/19981

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Nanocomposite Technology

Edited by Abbass Hashim

Chapter metrics overview

4,722 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Scintillation materials are employed to detect X-ray and gamma-ray photons, neutrons or accelerated particles. Usually the wide band-gap insulator materials of a high degree of structural perfection are used in the form of artificially made single crystals. They accomplish fast and efficient transformation of incoming high energy photon/particle into a number of electron-hole pairs collected in the conduction and valence bands, respectively, and their radiative recombination at suitable luminescence centres in the material. Generated UV or visible light can be then detected with high sensitivity by conventional solid state semiconductor- or photomultiplier-based photodetectors, which are an indispensable part of scintillation detectors.

Development of scintillation materials was stimulated by the discoveries of X-rays in 1895 (Röntgen, 1896) and natural radioactivity of uranium and other elements soon after that (Becquerel, 1896; Curie, 1898). A simple photographic film was found rather inefficient for their detection. As a result, the search for materials able to convert X() rays to visible rays started immediately in order to couple them with sensitive photographic film-based detectors. CaWO4 and ZnS-based powder phosphors were used for this purpose for a long time. But the development of true bulk single crystal scintillators started only at the end of 1940s when Tl-doped NaI and CsI and CdWO4 crystals were reported to be applicable for scintillation detection (Weber, 2002).

As mentioned above, scintillation detectors were mainly based on single crystal materials. Despite their best figure-of-merit, by far not all intrinsically efficient compounds can be grown in the form of the bulk single crystals of the sufficient size and manufacturing costs acceptable for practical applications. Too high melting temperatures, the presence of phase transitions between the melting point and room temperature (RT), or stoichiometry problems arising from different volatility of binary constituents from the high temperature melt of complex compounds are just a few examples of problems potentially disabling a single crystal preparation. In less demanding applications the suitably doped glasses are also used. However, their efficiency and stability in the radiation environment is usually much inferior to the single crystal systems. Modern technologies bring new material conceptions, e.g. the optical ceramics which found its use in the Computed Tomography medical imaging (Greskovich & Duclos, 1997; van Eijk, 2002).

Most recently, an innovative approach was reported consisting in preparation of composite materials composed of an inorganic scintillating phase embedded in an inert optical organic or inorganic material. However, the refractive index change between the two phases can result in scattering phenomena and transparency degradation. To diminish such a problem the active scintillator phase has to be scaled down to few tens of nanometers size, because then the visible light scattering is considerably reduced. Scaling down the crystalline phase to nano-metric size can change physical properties of the material itself and can offer a unique combination of optical, luminescence and scintillation characteristics which cannot be obtained in a bulk single phase material. While semiconductor nanocrystals have been a subject of study for more than thirty years, investigations of wide band-gap insulating nanocrystals begun only recently (Tissue, 1998; Meltzer et al., 1998). Nanocrystals of Y2O3 doped with europium or terbium were produced by condensation from gas phase (Bihari et al., 1997; Meltzer et al., 1999), sol-gel (Goldburt et al., 1997) or combustion (Muenchausen et al., 2007) methods. Gd2O3:Eu was produced by sol-lyophilization (Louis et al., 2003; Mercier et al., 2004, 2006) and CBD (Cluster Beam Deposition) (Mercier et al, 2007) techniques. The band gap increase of a crystal due to exciton quantum confinement is a well known phenomenon in direct gap semiconductors like GaAs, GaN or CdSe. To a lesser extent, similar increase is observed also in insulating Gd2O3:Eu nanocrystals (Mercier et al., 2007). In this material the reduced size can strongly influence the relative population of the dopant energy levels and the width of emission lines (Mercier et al., 2006); moreover, the presence of dopant ions on the nanocrystal surface can be evidenced by appearance of a specific emission band (Mercier et al., 2004). Luminescence efficiency can also be affected by quantum confinement; in fact, in Y2O3:Tb an increase of Tb3+ luminescence efficiency is observed by reducing particle size probably because of the decrease of non-radiative recombination phenomena (Goldburt et al., 1997). Moreover, the fluorescence time decay is strongly affected by refractive index of the inert host material (Meltzer et al., 1999) and quenching phenomena are shifted towards higher concentrations with respect to the single crystal (Muenchausen et al., 2007).

Among reported attempts on preparation of such nanocomposite systems the fluoro-cloro-zirconate glass-ceramic can be mentioned: luminescence arises at Eu2+-containing BaCl2 nanocrystals with average size of 14 nm, thus, the material possesses good transparency (Johnson et al., 2006). CdTe nanoparticles show an efficient luminescence when embedded in BaFBr:Eu (Chen et al., 2006). Nanoporous silica matrix impregnated by CdSe/ZnS luminescent nanoparticles or rhodamine dye shows also intense emission (Létant et al., 2006a, 2006b). Multiple quantum wells hybrid structures, where semiconducting PbI4 layers are alternated with organic insulating ones, have shown superfast efficient luminescence (390 ps) due to excitonic superradiance and quantum confinement effect which might allow them to be used as ultra-fast scintillators (Shibuya et al., 2004).

Scintillation properties of the Ce-doped rare-earth orthosilicates were mentioned for the first time in early 1980s in the study dealing with the Gd2SiO5:Ce (GSO) (Takagi et al., 1983). Following studies concerned mainly Lu2SiO5:Ce (LSO) (Suzuki et al., 1992) and mixed Lu2-xYxSiO5:Ce (LYSO) (Cooke et al., 2000) which became materials of choice for PET imaging in medicine. Single crystals of these orthosilicate materials were prepared by the Czochralski method using radio-frequency (RF) heating due to very high melting point of these compounds (between ~1950-2150 °C) (Melcher et al., 1993). The growth of single crystals of another stoichiometry in the SiO2-RE2O3 system, namely RE2Si2O7, was reported also in early 1980’s and basic optical and luminescence characteristics were explored (Bretheau-Raynal et al., 1980; Vakhidov et al., 1981). However, scintillation characteristics of Ce-doped single crystals of Lu2Si2O7 (LPS) started to be studied only in last decade (Pauwels et al., 2000). LPS:Ce has shown similar light yield and other scintillation characteristics as LSO:Ce, but no afterglow at RT was found due to the absence of TSL peaks close to RT which is a substantial advantage of this material (Pidol et al., 2007). Very recently also single crystal of YPS:Ce was grown and its scintillation properties were characterized (Feng et al., 2010).

Several different methods were reported for the preparation of powder silicate phosphors which were considered for another applications like FED or cathodoluminescence screens (Holloway et al., 1999). Meijerink et al. (Meijerink et al., 1991) used the classic solid-state sintering to synthetize YSO:Ce. Kang et al. employed method of spray pyrolysis (Kang et al., 1999) which provides samples with better homogeneity. Combustion synthesis (Gonzalez-Ortega et al., 2005), hydrothermal (Cooke et al., 2006) and sol-gel (Marsh et al., 2002; Jiao et al., 2007) methods were also employed in order to reduce too high temperatures necessary for the preparation. Using pulsed laser deposition, YSO:Ce thin films were prepared and studied (Coetsee et al., 2007). Ce-doped lutetium pyrosilicate synthesis and photoluminescence characteristics were published recently (Sokolnicki et al., 2009).

The sol-gel methods are well applicable to silicate-based synthesis due to stability of TEOS (tetraethoxysilane) which is used as an Si precursor. However, final results depend on many parameters like the temperature of gelation, type of solvent, use of the additives etc. The additives like formamide influence the surface tension in the pores (Brinker & Scherer, 1990) and help to prepare crack-free monolite samples. They participate in chemical reactions during the stages of hydrolysis and gelation (Niznansky & Rehspringer, 1995) and they also influence the phase evolution during heat treatment (Niznansky et al., 2001).


1.1/ Phase diagram Y2O3-SiO2

Yttrium and lutetium silicates have similar phase diagram which is shown in Fig. 1.

It follows from Fig. 1 that two stoichiometric compounds, RE2SiO5 and RE2Si2O7 (RE = Y, Lu), are stable at RT. Second important conclusion is the presence of the region with limited miscibility of SiO2 and RE2Si2O7 which is a condition favourable to preparation of RE2Si2O7 nanocomposite in the silica matrix.

1.2. Structure of pyrosilicate

YPS crystallizes in several crystalographic forms. α-Y2Si2O7 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group (a=6.59 Å, b=6.64 Å, c=12.25 Å, α =94°, β =89°, γ=93°) (Liddell & Thompson, 1986) at the temperature of 1100 °C. β-Y2Si2O7 is isotypic with thortveitite, Sc2Si2O7, and crystallizes in the C2/m space group (a=6,83 Å, b=8,97 Å, c=4,72 Å, β=101°) (Redhammer & Roth, 2003). Y3+ cation occupies a distorted octahedral site with Y-O bond lengths in the range 2.239 (2)-2.309 (2) Å. The SiO4 tetrahedron is regular with Si-O bond lengths in the range 1.619 - 1.630 Å. Monoclinic C2/m phase was obtained after heat treatment at 1300°C. γ-Y2Si2O7 was found to crystallize in the monoclinic P21/c space group (Leonyuk et al., 1999) and its lattice parameters are a=4.694 Å, b=10.856 Å, c=5.588 Å, β=96.01°. According to Dias et al. (Dias et al., 1990) the structure of high temperature phase δ-Y2Si2O7 has the orthorhombic space group Pnam (a=13.81 Å, b=5.02 Å, c=8.30 Å).

Figure 1.

Phase diagram of Y2O3-SiO3 system

Lu2Si2O7 has one stable crystallographic phase at RT representing the thorveitite structure with monoclinic symmetry, space group C2/m. It has a single crystallographic site for lutetium ions with six oxygen neighbours. It is a distorted octahedral site with C2 symmetry (Bretheau-Raynal et al., 1980; Soetebier et al., 2002).

This monoclinic structure can be briefly described as a stacking of alternating parallel layers of [LuO6] octahedral sharing edges and isolated [Si2O7] groups. [Si2O7] groups are formed by two [SiO4] tetrahedra sharing oxygen, Si–O–Si bond angle between tetrahedra is equal to 180°, see Fig. 2. The layers of [Si2O7] groups are organized this way:Si atom of the [Si2O7] group shares one oxygen atom from the [LuO6] layer above and two from the one below in the c-direction, the Si atom from the opposite side is in a reverse situation (Yan et al., 2006).

In this chapter, we describe the preparation of RE2Si2O7 (RE = Y (YPS), Lu (LPS)) compounds doped by Ce ions in powder form using the sol-gel method. XRD and SEM are employed to check the crystal structure, luminescence spectra and decays are measured to characterize Ce3+ ion emission in an LPS host. Furthermore, we prepare nanocomposites of Ce-doped RE2Si2O7 in the silica matrix and use XRD, SEM, HRTEM and luminescence techniques for their characterization.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram for the monoclinic structure of Lu2Si2O7 crystal. Lu ions are green and [Si2O7] groups are yellow. Reprinted from (Yan et al., 2006).


2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of pyrosilicate powder phosphor

Y(NO3)3 6H2O (in the case of YPS) or Lu(NO3)3 5H2O (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), TEOS (98%,Sigma-Aldrich), 96% methanol and HNO3 (0.03 M) were used as starting materials. First, RE(NO3)3 nH2O (RE = Y, Lu) was dissolved in methanol (CH3OH) at RT and HNO3 was added as catalyser for TEOS acid hydrolysis and condensation. Ce as doping element in the form of nitrate was then dissolved in methanol solution and the molar ratio Ce:RE was fixed onto the value of 1:199 (0,5 molar % of Ce). After dissolving had been completed, TEOS was added at the molar ratio TEOS : (RE+Ce) fixed at the values 1:1. The gelation time at 55°C was approximately 24 hours. The samples were left 2 days for ageing. Then, they were progressively dried at 50 °C for 3 days in flowing N2-atmosphere. After drying they were successively annealed at 900 °C, at 1100 °C and 1300 °C with heating rate of 1 °C/min under atmospheric pressure.

2.2. Preparation of YPS:Ce/SiO2 a LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposites

The same starting materials were used for YPS(LPS):Ce/SiO2 preparation like for pyrosilicate powder. The molar ratio of RE/Si was fixed onto 1/10. The final heating temperatures were chosen in the range of 1100 – 1300 °C. The resulting samples were transparent with yellowish colour due to presence of Ce doping cations. When the silica matrix had crystallized, samples became milky and non-transparent.

2.3. Characterization methods

Powder XRD spectra were measured at ambient temperature using Phillips X-pert diffractometer with Cu Kα-radiation.

Thermal analysis (TG and DTA) measurements were carried out using SETARAM device and NETZSCH STA (QMS) 409/429-403 coupled to Mass Spectroscopy unit.

SEM was accomplished by Scanning Electron Microscope PHILIPS XL 30 CP and by Tescan Proxima SEM system equipped with SE, BSE and CL detectors.

Radio- and photoluminescence characterization was performed using model 5000M Spectrofluorometer, Horiba Jobin, Yvon equipped with single-grating monochromators and photon counting detectors. In case of radioluminescence and photoluminescence spectra the X-ray tube (40 kV, 15 mA) Seifert GmBh., and a D2 continuous lamp were used as the excitation sources, respectively. In case of photoluminescence decays the hydrogen-filled nanosecond and microsecond pulse xenon flashlamps were used for the fast and slow decay kinetics measurements, respectively. Scintillation decay was measured using the ps X-ray pulse source excitation and streak camera detection, see the details in (Yanagida et al., 2010). SpectraSolve software package (Ames Photonics) was used to apply deconvolution procedures to extract true decay times. All measurements were performed at RT.


3. Results and discussion

3.1. Powder pyrosilicate materials

3.1.1. XRD measurements

Powder YPS prepared by sol-gel methods was heat-treated at three different temperatures (900, 1100 and 1300 °C) and characterized using XRD.

The samples heated at 900°C were amorphous. Triclinic P-1 phase was formed at 1100°C, while monoclinic C2/m phase was obtained after heat-treatment at 1300°C (Fig. 3)

We observe simpler situation in case of lutetium silicates (Lu2Si2O7) because LPS have only one stable phase at RT. The samples annealed at 1100 °C show Lu2Si2O7 pure phase pattern in agreement with PDF No. 35-0326, Fig. 4.

3.1.2. Electron microscopy

The TEM observations are consistent with the XRD results. Fig. 5 shows that the sample annealed at 900 °C has amorphous character, no regular crystalline shapes are observed.

The morphology of 1100 °C heat-treated samples (Fig. 6) is similar to the 900 °C heat-treated one. SEM image(left) show the particles of the size of few to several microns. Nevertheless, well developed crystals of the size of tens of nanometers are also observed (right part of the figure).

SEM and HR TEM of 1300 °C heat-treated YPS:Ce is shown at Fig. 7. The figure shows large crystallized particles of the size of microns. These particles no longer consist of submicron crystals (like in case of the 1100 °C heat-treated sample) but monolithic shape can be observed in TEM image (right side of Fig. 7).

The HRTEM observation of Lu2Si2O7 (Fig. 8a) heat-treated powder shows characteristic non-agglomerate particles of the size of about 20 nm. At higher resolution (Fig. 8b), well ordered structure of LPS crystal can be seen. In Fig. 8c, the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern is shown.

Figure 3.

X-ray diffraction pattern of the sample Y2Si2O7, annealed at 900, 1100 and 1300 °C.

Figure 4.

X-ray diffraction pattern of the sample Lu2Si2O7, annealed at 1100 °C

Figure 5.

SEM (A) and TEM (B) of YPS:Ce annealed at 900 °C.

Figure 6.

SEM (A) and TEM (B) of YPS annealed at 1100 °C heat treated sample. Left image (SEM) shows the glassy aspect of sample while right image (TEM) shows the formation of nanometres-sized crystals.

Figure 7.

SEM (A) and TEM (B) of 1300 °C heat treated YPS:Ce

Figure 8.

a, b, c) HRTEM measurement of Lu2Si2O7

3.1.3. Luminescent properties

Radioluminescence spectra of the YPS:Ce samples were measured under X-ray excitation. The spectra are dominated by the Ce3+ 5d1-4f emission peaks at about 440 nm, Fig. 9 The intensity increased strongly with increasing temperature of the heat treatment. The maximum of the spectrum is noticeably long-wavelength shifted with respect to that of YPS:Ce single crystals (361+381 nm) (Feng et al., 2010). It points to a number of perturbation/defect-associated Ce sites in the YPS:Ce powder because such perturbations are known to shift Ce3+ emission to lower energy (Pedrini et al., 1992). In YPS:Ce with increasing annealing temperature the maximum of the spectrum shifts to shorter wavelength with approximately constant width (Fig. 10). Such intensity and shape evolution of the spectra can be caused by structural evolution with heat treatment temperature described before.

Figure 9.

Radioluminescence spectra dependence on the heat treatment temperature of the Ce-doped YPS (excitation by an X-ray tube, 40 kV) Spectra can be mutually compared in an absolute scale. Small dips around 510 nm and 565 nm are experimental artifacts

Figure 10.

Normalized radioluminescence spectra of YPS:Ce and their dependence on annealing temperature. Small dips around 510 nm and 565 nm are experimental artifacts.

Photoluminescence decays in Fig. 11 were measured for all the YPS:Ce samples. The decays are normalized for better comparison of the differences.

Figure 11.

Normalized photoluminescence decays of YPS:Ce heat-treated at different temperatures marked in the legend. Single exponential fit with decay time of 32 ns by a solid line is shown for 1300 °C treated samples to evaluate the decay time. exc = 345 nm, em = 440 nm.

There is a clear correlation between the decay shape and heat treatment temperature: in the sample treated at 1300 °C, the decay is close to a single exponential with the decay time of about 32 ns. The decay becomes faster and strongly deviated from a single exponential at lower heat treatment temperatures. The distortion of single exponential decay points to a nonradiative energy transfer (quenching) process which occurs from the Ce3+ relaxed 5d1 excited state towards a nearby lying defect level. The relative photoluminescence efficiency losses caused by this process were estimated from the integral of normalized decay curves. In the YPS host the Ce3+ photoluminescence quantum efficiency is diminished to 0.87 and 0.35 for 1100 °C and 900 °C heat-treated samples, respectively, relative to the 1300 °C heat-treated sample. In the 1300 °C heat-treated sample the non-decreasing temperature dependence of the Ce3+ decay time from 80 K up to the temperature well above RT (not shown here) evidences that the quantum efficiency of Ce3+ at RT is close to unity. The calculated photoluminescence efficiency losses related to the Ce3+ centre itself are much less significant with respect to the decrease of scintillation efficiency reflected in the radioluminescence intensity dependence on annealing temperature in Fig. 9. This means that the loss of scintillation efficiency in the samples heat-treated at lower temperatures occurs mainly in the transport stage, i.e. in the host material itself before reaching the Ce3+ luminescence centres.

In Fig. 12 the spectra are provided for the Ce-doped LPS. They correspond well with the earlier published data on LPS:Ce single crystals (Pidol et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2010), including Stokes shift value of 0.27 eV.

Figure 12.

Normalized PL excitation (em=420 nm) and RL (X-ray, 40 kV) spectra of Ce-doped LPS annealed at 1100 °C.

PL decay shows nanosecond decay time of 34 ns (Fig. 13), which is due to the allowed 5d-4f transition of Ce3+ and that is in very good agreement with that measured in LPS:Ce single crystals (Pidol et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2010). Decay acceleration in the initial part of the decay curve might be due to an energy transfer from Ce3+ centres to some defects e.g. at grain surface layer.

Figure 13.

Photoluminescence decays of the Ce-doped LPS (exc= 300nm, em=400 nm) annealed at 1100 °C. Decay time of 34 ns was evaluated in the tail of the decay.

3.2. Nanocomposite materials

The SiO2/RE2Si2O7:Ce (RE = Y, Lu) nanocomposite samples were prepared using the same sol-gel method. The overstoichiometric ratio of RE/Si (1/10) was used for the material preparation.

The nanocomposites are transparent when silica matrix is amorphous, see Fig. 14, but during the heat treatment at the temperature of more than 1250 °C the crystallisation of amorphous silica matrix takes place and cristobalite structure is formed. Consequently, the sample breaks into small pieces of sub-millimetre size.

Figure 14.

Photo of the transparent SiO2/ Lu2Si2O7:Ce nanocomposite heat-treated at 1000 °C.

3.2.1. XRD measurements

SiO2/Y2Si2O7 system was prepared and heat-treated at different temperatures. The samples annealed at 1000°C are amorphous and transparent. Further increase of annealing temperature to 1100-1200 °C leads to crystallisation of both silica matrix (into crystobalite) and of Y2Si2O7 as shown in Fig. 15. Fig. 16 shows XRD spectra of the samples denoted as TK10 which are transparent. Annealing for 2h at 1000°C and 1100°C was carried out on the TK10 samples first and then a rapid thermal treatment (RTT) procedure was applied at 1250°C and 1300°C, consisting of increase of temperature from 1000°C or 1100°C to 1250°C - 1300°C in 2 minutes, 5 minutes at this temperature, cooling down in 5 minutes. The RTT temperature of 1300°C keeps sample transparent and amorphous but luminescent intensity improves. It is interesting to note that in case of non-transparent crystallized sample α-YPS phase is observed in XRD spectra, while in transparent ones rather β-YPS phase is found or sample remains purely amorphous.

Figure 15.

XRD patterns of SiO2/ Y2Si2O7:Ce nanocomposites (denoted as A10) heat-treated at different temperatures.

The same XRD study was carried out for the lutetium analogs, see Fig. 17. The samples were progressively heat-treated at the temperatures from 1100 °C to 1300 °C (by 50°C, for 2 hours at a given temperature) and their XRD spectra were measured. The samples heat-treated up to 1200 °C are mainly amorphous. Complete crystallization occurs at 1300 °C, the XRD pattern of this sample consist of Lu2Si2O7 and SiO2 (cristobalite).

3.2.2. Electron microscopy

In Fig. 18 the SEM and HR TEM images of SiO2/Y2Si2O7 nanocomposites (Sample TK10 heat-treated at 1000 °C and 1100 °C) are shown.

SEM image with the lower resolution (Fig. 18a) shows the homogeneous glassy aspect of the sample. HRTEM images reveal the internal structure of this sample (Fig. 18b,c). Regular round Y2Si2O7 particles of tens of nanometers size embedded in the silica matrix are clearly observed. The ideal round shape can be surprising because the crystals do not crystallize in

Figure 16.

TK samples annealed at 1000 °C, 1100 for 2 hours, RTT procedure then applied at 1250 °C and 1300 °C as described in the text before.

Figure 17.

XRD spectra of SiO2/Lu2Si2O7 composite after annealing at different, gradually increasing temperatures.

Figure 18.

SEM and HR TEM images of TK10 SiO2/Y2Si2O7 nanocomposite samples: a) corresponds to SEM of natural sample surface, annealed at 1000°C, b) HRTEM of sample annealed at 1000°C, c) HR TEM of sample annealed at 1100°C.

the shapes of spherical symmetry. The explanation is found in the Y2O3 phase diagram (Fig. 1). Y2Si2O7 and SiO2 are not miscible even in the liquid state. The surplus of SiO2 leads to the phase separation of Y2Si2O7 which forms spherical particles in order to minimize the surface energy (like the oil droplets in the water). The resulting nanocomposite is transparent if the particle size of these nanoparticles is smaller than 1/10 of the wavelength of the used light, i.e. below 40-50 nm (Krell et al., 2009).

The nanocomposite Lu2Si2O7/SiO2 has the same tendency. The HRTEM images in Fig. 19 show the mean particle size increasing with the heat treatment temperature. Statistical evaluation of the particle size distribution from HRTEM image was performed and is shown in Fig. 20 for the sample heat-treated at 1100 °C.

Figure 19.

HRTEM of SiO2/Lu2Si2O7 nanocomposite heat-treated at 1100 °C (a), 1200 °C (b) and 1300 °C (c).

The average particle size of the 1100 °C heat-treated sample is about 30 nm, the 1200 °C heat-treated sample reaches the mean particle size of about 50 nm and the 1300 °C heat-treated nanocomposite shows the particle size of about 100 nm.

Figure 20.

Size distribution of LPS nanospheres for the sample heat-treated at 1100 °C evaluated from HRTEM images.

3.2.3. Thermal analysis

Thermal behaviour of the both Yttrium and lutetium nanocomposites was similar. Fig. 21 shows the TG and DTA analysis of SiO2/Lu2Si2O7 nanocomposite. First decrease of TG within the range of 200°C to 400°C corresponds to the elimination of organic species in the matrix and decomposition of the lutetium nitrate. The mass of SiO2/Lu2Si2O7 nanocomposite is constant above 800°C. DTA curve shows exo-effect at 300°C which corresponds to the oxidation of organic residue by nitrates. Second exo-effect situated near 1100°C probably corresponds to the crystallisation of both amorphous silica matrix and Lu2Si2O7 as could be seen from XRD spectra. The crystallisation of both components took place simultaneously, therefore it was not possible to distinguish on process from the other. Moreover, the temperature of this transition varied significantly within the range of 1100 to 1250°C when some of the parameters (heating rate, air or inert atmosphere, different sample size) were changed in DTA measurement. It means that this crystallisation is kinetically very slow process, possibly hindered in big parts of the composite. This fact could be used for the RTT procedure when the crystallization of nanoparticles of Lu2Si2O7 can be expected while silica matrix remains amorphous.

3.2.4. Luminescent properties

RL spectra of the bulk composite TK 10 YPS:Ce/SiO2 sample are shown in Fig. 22. Emission intensity of yet amorphous sample heat-treated at 1100 0C is smaller and its maximum is low energy shifted (455 nm) in comparison with the densely cracked one which was heat-treated at 1300 °C. The latter spectrum shows the subbands at about 360 nm and 382 nm which are very close to those in YPS:Ce single crystal (Feng et al., 2010). It can be interpreted that the Ce3+ centres are well embedded in regular YPS structure. Furthermore, comparison with standard BGO scintillator shows reasonable scintillation efficiency of the nanocomposite YPS:Ce/SiO2 system heat-treated at 1300 °C. In case of samples which were prepared in powder form from the very beginning the RL intensity shows even higher values compared to BGO, Fig. 23

Figure 21.

TG and DTA analysis of SiO2/LPS nanocomposite

Figure 22.

RL spectra of the bulk TK 10 YPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample heat-treated at 1100°C and 1300 °C and the spectrum of BGO standard scintillator sample.

Figure 23.

RL spectra of A10 nanocomposite YPS:Ce/SiO2 samples prepared in powder form. Annealing temperatures are shown in the figure, comparison with BGO standard scintillator sample is provided as well.

Fig. 24 shows the PL and PLE spectra of A10 powder nanocomposite sample. Very good correspondence of both emission and excitation subbands is found compared to the bands reported for YPS:Ce single crystal (Feng et al., 2010) which again points to embedding Ce3+ ions in well ordered YPS structure without excessive influence of any lattice flaws and perturbations.

Luminescence characteristics of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite samples were found to be quite analogous to those of yttrium-based system ones. RL intensity strongly increases with annealing temperature and comparatively higher intensities are obtained in comparison to the YPS:Ce/SiO2 ones, see Fig. 25. Normalized spectra show high energy shift and smaller FWHM with increasing annealing temperature, see Fig. 26. Position of excitation and emission peaks for Tan=1250-1300 °C match reasonably well those of LPS:Ce single crystal (Pidol et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2010). RL spectrum for the highest annealing temperatures can be in fact perfectly decomposed in components belonging to undoped LPS, Ce3+ in SiO2 and Ce3+ in LPS (Fig. 27)

PL decay of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample annealed at 1300 0C is given in Fig. 28. Leading decay time of 29 ns is slightly shorter compared to 32 ns found in LPS:Ce single crystal (Feng et al., 2010). It might be caused by the effect of small size of nanospheres of LPS:Ce and different refractive index of surrounding medium (Metzer et al., 1999). Slower decay tail of very low amplitude is of unclear origin. It could be related to Ce3+ ions close to LPS nanophase surface where e.g. tunneling from 5d1 excited state of Ce3+ to a defect might exist. Scintillation decay of the same sample under the excitation by picosecond X-ray pulse is given in Fig. 29. The leading decay component of decay time 29.4 ns is perfectly consistent with that in PL decay in Fig. 28. In addition, there is slower decay process which overestimates the fit above 60-70 ns and must be due to the delayed recombination process arising in the transport stage of scintillator mechanism.

Figure 24.

PL (ex=247 nm) and PLE (em=390nm) spectra of YPS:Ce/SiO2 A10 sample at RT.

Figure 25.

RL spectra of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample annealed at different temperatures given in the figure. Excitation X-ray, 40 kV.

Figure 26.

Normalized RL spectra of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite samples from Fig. 25. Excitation X-ray, 40 kV. PLE spectrum for Tan=1300 °C and em=410 nm is shown as well

Figure 27.

Radioluminescence spectra (excitation X-ray, 40 kV) of LPS:Ce single crystal, LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite, undoped LPS powder and SiO2:Ce glass. The latter three samples were made by an analogous sol-gel route, single crystal was grown by Czochralski method (Feng et al., 2010)

Figure 28.

PL decay of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample. Ex=300 nm, em=410 nm. Solid line is the fit I(t) given in the figure.

Figure 29.

Scintillation decay of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample. Excitation by picosecond X-ray pulse, for technical details see (Yanagida et al., 2010).

Following the procedure carried out at the Ce-doped silicate glasses (Chiodini et al., 2002) the samples of SiO2/Lu2Si2O7 nanocomposites annealed at 1000°C were rapidly heat-treated at temperature between 1600-2000 °C. This rapid thermal treatment (RTT) consisted of 30 seconds heating period in the hydrogen-oxygen flame. The characterization by XRD showed that they remain amorphous after such a treatment. RL spectra of the samples show that the RTT strongly influences the shape, position and intensity of RL spectrum (Fig. 30). In (Chiodini et al., 2002) strong increase of scintillation efficiency was reported at Ce-doped silicate glass after RTT treatment. In our case, similar conclusion can be drawn for the highest RTT temperature of 2000 °C, when the spectrum remains low energy shifted compared to the situation in the powder nanocomposite annealed at 1250-1300 °C (Fig. 26). This is consistent with the fact that LPS nanophase crystallized in the latter case while remaining amorphous after RTT procedure. RTT probably helps to form better SiO2 glass host which provides higher efficiency for charge carrier transport in the scintillation mechanism.

Figure 30.

RL spectra of LPS:Ce/SiO2 nanocomposite sample after application of RTT procedure, the temperature of which is given in the legend


4. Conclusions

Sol-gel method has been successfully used for preparation of Ce-doped yttrium (YPS) and lutetium (LPS) pyrosilicates in powder form and of composite materials (REPS:Ce)0.1-(SiO2)0.9, RE=Y,Lu. XRD measurements showed that the crystallization of YPS take the place at 1100°C in the case of pure powder sample while, in the case of nanocomposites, it is shifted to the range of 1200-1300 °C. Moreover, in the latter case, it is accompanied by simultaneous crystallization of SiO2 matrix leading to non-transparent samples. Nevertheless, this drawback (cristobalite formation, loss of transparency) could be partially overcome by RTT, because the kinetics of cristobalite formation is very slow. TEM images of (REPS:Ce)0.1-(SiO2)0.9, RE=Y,Lu revealed the regular round shapes nanoparticles in the silica matrix. Its average size increases with the temperature of heat treatment from 30 nm (heat-treated at 1100 °C) to 100 nm (heat-treated at 1300 °C).

Luminescence spectra of powder YPS:Ce were found low energy shifted in comparison to the single crystal analogue which might be due to extensive perturbation of Ce3+ centers by the grain surface and structural flaws. LPS:Ce emission characteristics showed to be closer to the bulk single crystal.

Photo- and radioluminescence spectra of YPS:Ce and LPS:Ce crystallized nanophase in SiO2 host appeared very similar to their bulk single crystal analogs. Slightly shortened Ce3+ decay times in REPS:Ce/SiO2 can indicate the effect of small size of REPS:Ce nanospheres and different refractive index of surrounding medium. RTT leaves the pyrosilicate phase amorphous although the luminescence efficiency increases noticeably, small low energy shift of Ce3+ spectrum is consistent with the amorphous character of REPS host. RTT procedure indicates the possibility to obtain transparent bulk optical elements with scintillating REPS:Ce nanophase, but more experimental work has to be done to achieve good transparency and crack-free samples.



The support of Grant Agency of AS CR, project KAN300100802 is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are due to A. Beitlerova, R. Kucerkova and V. Jary for luminescence measurements. V.Tyrpekl and I.Jakubec are acknowledged for SEM, TEM and HRTEM photographs. CRYTUR Ltd. and P. Horodysky are acknowledged for technical help in the experiments.


  1. 1. BecquerelH. 1896 Sur les Radiations Invisibles Emises par les Corps Phosphorescents. Comptes-Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 122 501503 .
  2. 2. BihariB.EilersH.TissueB. M. 1997 Spectra and Dynamics of Monoclinic Eu2O3 and Eu3+:Y2O3 Nanocrystals. Journal of Luminescence, 75 1 (July 1997), 110 , 0022-2313
  3. 3. Bretheau-RaynalF.TercierN.BlanzatB. 1980 Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study of Lutetium Pyrosilicate Single Crystals Doped with Trivalent Europium. Materials Research Bulletin, 15 5 (May 1980), 639646 , 0025-5408
  4. 4. BrinkerC. J.SchererG. W. 1990 Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing, Academic Press, 978-0-12134-970-7 San Diego
  5. 5. ChenW.ZhangJ.WescottS. L.JolyA. G.MalmJ.O.BovinJ.O. 2006 The Origin of X-Ray Luminescence from CdTe Nanoparticles in CdTe/BaFBr:Eu2+ Nanocomposite Phosphors. Journal of Applied Physics, 99 3 (1 Feb 2006), 034302 5 pages), 0021-8979
  6. 6. ChiodiniN.FasoliM.MartiniM.RosettaE.SpinoloG.VeddaA.NiklM.SolovievaN.BaraldiA.CapellettiR. 2002 High-Efficiency SiO2:Ce3+ Glass Scintillators. Applied Physics Letters, 81 23 2 Dec 2002), 43744376 , 0003-6951
  7. 7. CoetseeE.SwartH. C.TerblansJ. J. 2007 Cathodoluminescence Degradation of Y2SiO5:Ce Thin Films. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, 25 4 (July 2007), 12261230 , 0734-2101
  8. 8. CookeD. W.Mc ClellanK. J.BennettB. L.RoperJ. M.WhittakerM. T.MuenchausenR. E.SzeR. C. 2000 Crystal Growth and Optical Characterization of Cerium-Doped Lu1.8Y0.2SiO5, Journal of Applied Physics, 88 12 (15 Dec 2000), 73607362 , 0021-8979
  9. 9. CookeD. W.LeeJ.K.BennettB. L.GrovesJ. R.JacobsohnL. G.Mc KigneyE. A.MuenchausenR. E.NastasiM.SickafusK. E.TangM. J.ValdezA. 2006 Luminescent Properties and Reduced Dimensional Behavior of Hydrothermally Prepared Y2SiO5:Ce Nanophosphors. Applied Physics Letters, 88 10 (6 Mar), 103108 3 pages), 0003-6951
  10. 10. CurieM. 1898 Rayons Emises par les Composes de l’Uranium et du Thorium, Comptes-Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 126 11011103
  11. 11. DiasW.GlasserF. P.GunwardaneR. P.HowieR. A. 1990 The Crystal Structure of δ-Yttrium Pyrosilicate, δ-Y2Si2O7. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 191 1-2 , (January 1990), 117123 , 0044-2968
  12. 12. FengH.DingD.LiH.LuS.PanS.ChenX.RenG. 2010 Growth and Luminescence Characteristics of Cerium-Doped Yttrium Pyrosilicate Single Crystal. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 489 2 (21 Jan 2010), 645649 , 0925-8388
  13. 13. GoldburtE. T.KulkarniB.BhargavaR. N.TaylorJ.LiberaM. 1997 Size Dependent Efficiency in Tb Doped Y2O3 Nanocrystalline Phosphor. Journal of Luminescence, 72-74 , (June 1997), 190192 , 0022-2313
  14. 14. Gonzalez-OrtegaJ. A.TejedaE. M.PereaN.HirataG. A.BoszeE. J.Mc KittrickJ. 2005 White Light Emission from Rare Earth Activated Yttrium Silicate Nanocrystalline Powders and Thin Film. Optical Materials, 27 7 (April 2005), 12211227 , 0925-3467
  15. 15. GreskovichC.DuclosS. 1997 Ceramic Scintillators. Annual Review of Materials Science, 27 (August 1997), 6988 , 0084-6600
  16. 16. HollowayP. H.TrottierT. A.AbramsB.KondoleonC.JonesS. L.SebastianJ. S.ThomesW. J.SwartH. 1999 Advances in Field Emission Displays Phosphors. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, 17 2 (March 1999), 758764 , 1071-1023
  17. 17. JiaoH.WeiL. Q.ZhangN.ZhongM.JingX. P. 2007 Melting Salt Assisted Sol-Gel Synthesis of Blue Phosphor Y2SiO5:Ce. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 27 1 (2007), 185189 , 0955-2219
  18. 18. JohnsonJ. A.SchweizerS.HenkeB.ChenG.WoodfordJ.NewmanP. J.MacfarlaneD. R. 2006 Eu-Activated Fluorochlorozirconate Glass-Ceramic Scintillators. Journal of Applied Physics, 100 3 (1 Aug 2006), 034701 5 pages), 0021-8979
  19. 19. KangY. C.LenggoroI. W.ParkS. B.OkuyamaK. 1999 Y2SiO5:Ce Phosphor Particles 0.5- 1.4 m in Size with Spherical Morphology. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 146 1 (August 1999), 168175 , 0022-4596
  20. 20. KrellA.KlimkeJ.HutzlerT. 2009 Transparent Compact Ceramics: Inherent Physical Issues. Optical Materials, 31 8 (June 2009), 11441150 , 0925-3467
  21. 21. LeonyukH. I.BelokonevaE. L.BocelliG.RighiL.ShvanskiiE. V.HenrykhsonR. V.KulmanN. V.KozhbakhteevaD. E. 1999 High-Temperature Crystallization and X-Ray Characterization of Y2SiO5, Y2Si2O7 and LaBSiO5, Journal of Crystal Growth, 205 3 (September 1999), 361367 , 0022-0248
  22. 22. LétantS. E.WangT.F. 2006a Study of Porous Glass Doped with Quantum Dots or Laser Dyes under Alpha Irradiation. Applied Physics Letters, 88 10 (6 Mar 2006), 103110 3 pages), 0003-6951
  23. 23. LétantS. E.WangT.F. 2006b Semiconductor Quantum Dot Scintillation under -Ray Irradiation. Nano Letters, 6 12 (December 2006), 28772880 , 1530-6984
  24. 24. LiddellK.ThompsonD. P. 1986 X-Ray Diffraction Data for Yttrium Silicates. British Ceramic, Transactions and Journal, 85 1 (January-February 1986), 1722 , 0266-7606
  25. 25. LouisC.BazziR.FloresM. A.ZhengW.LebbouK.TillementO.MercierB.DujardinC.PerriatP. 2003 Synthesis and Characterization of Gd2O3:Eu3+ Phosphor Nanoparticles by a Sol-Lyophilization Technique. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 173 2 (July 2003), 335341 , 0022-4596
  26. 26. MarshP. J.SilverJ.VechtA.NewportA. 2002 Cathodoluminescence Studies of Yttrium Silicate:Cerium Phosphors Synthesised by a Sol-Gel Process. Journal of Luminescence, 97 3-4 , (June 2002), 229236 , 0022-2313
  27. 27. MeijerinkA.SchipperW. J.BlasseG. 1991 Photostimulated Luminescence and Thermally Stimulated Luminescence of Y2SiO5:Ce, Sm. Journal of Physics D, 24 6 (June 1991), 9971002 , 0022-3727
  28. 28. MelcherC. L.ManenteR. A.PetersonC. A.SchweitzerJ. S. 1993 Czochralski Growth of Rare Earth Oxyorthosilicate Single Crystals. Journal of Crystal Growth, 128 1-4 Part 2, (1 March 1993), 10011005 , 0022-0248
  29. 29. MeltzerR. S.JangK. W.HongK. S.SunY.FeofilovS. P. 1997 Optical Dephasing of Rare Earth Ions in Mixed Crystalline and Size-Restricted Systems. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 250 1-2 , (20 March, 1997) 279286 , 0925-8388
  30. 30. MeltzerR. S.FeofilovS. P.TissueB.YuanH. B. 1999 Dependence of Fluorescence Lifetimes of Y2O3:Eu3+ Nanoparticles on the Surrounding Medium. Physical Review B, 60 20 (15 November 1999), R14012R14015 , 1098-0121
  31. 31. MercierB.DujardinC.LedouxG.LuisC.TillementO.PerriatP. 2004 Observation of the Gap Blueshift on Gd2O3:Eu3+ Nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Physics, 96 1 (1 July 2004), 650653 , 0021-8979
  32. 32. MercierB.DujardinC.LedouxG.LouisC.TillementO.PerriatP. 2006 Confinement Effects in Sesquioxydes. Journal of Luminescence, 119-120 , (July-October 2006) 224227 , 0022-2313
  33. 33. MercierB.LedouxG.DujardinC.NicolasN.MasenelliB.M´elinonP.BergeretG. 2007 Quantum Confinement Effect on Gd2O3 Clusters. Journal of Chemical Physics, 126 4 (28 January 2007), 044507 7 pages), 0021-9606
  34. 34. MuenchausenR. E.JacobsohnL. G.BennetB. L.Mc KigneyE. A.SmithJ. F.ValdezJ. A.CookeD. W. 2007 Effects of Tb Doping on the Photoluminescence of Y2O3:Tb Nanophosphors. Journal of Luminescence, 126 2 (October 2007), 838842 , 0022-2313
  35. 35. NiznanskyD.RehspringerJ. L. 1995 Infrared Study of SiO2 Sol to Gel Evolution and Gel Aging. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 180 2-3 , (January1995), 191196 , 0022-3093
  36. 36. NiznanskyD.LančokA.HutlováA.BursikJ.RehspringerJ.L. 2001 Preparation of Y3Fe5O12 Nanocomposites by Sol-Gel Method: Influence of Modifiers. International Journal of Inorganic Materials, 3 6 (September 2001), 479483 , 1466-6049
  37. 37. PauwelsD.Le MassonN.VianaB.Kahn-HarariA.van LoefE. V. D.DorenbosP.van EijkC. W. E. 2000 A novel Inorganic Scintillator: Lu2Si2O7 :Ce3+ (LPS). IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 47 6 (December 2000), 17871790 , 0018-9499
  38. 38. PedriniC.MoineB.GaconJ. C.JacquierB. 1992 One- and Two-Photon Spectroscopy of Ce3+ Ions in LaF3-CeF3 Mixed Crystals. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 4 24 (15 June 1992), 54615470 , 0953-8984
  39. 39. PidolL.VianaB.BessièreA.GaltayriesA.DorenbosP.FerrandB. 2007 High Efficiency of Lutetium Silicate Scintillators, Ce-Doped LPS and LYSO Crystals for Medical Applications. Materials Science Forum, 555 (2007), 371376 , 0255-5476
  40. 40. RedhammerG. J.RothG. 2003 β-Y2Si2O7, A New Thortveitite-Type Compound, Determined at 100 and 280 K. Acta Crystallographica C, 59 10 (October 2003), i103i106 , 0108-2701
  41. 41. RöntgenW. C. 1896 On a New Kind of Rays. Science, 3 59 (14 February 1896), 227231 .
  42. 42. ShibuyaK.KoshimizuM.MurakamiH.MuroyaY.KatsumuraY.AsaiK. 2004 Development of Ultra-Fast Semiconducting Scintillators Using Quantum Confinement Effect. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 43 Part 2, 10B (15 October 2004), L1333L1336 , 0021-4922
  43. 43. SoetebierF.UrlandW. 2002 Crystal Structure of Lutetium Disilicate Lu2Si2O7. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie- New Crystal Structure, 217 1 (2002), 22 1433-7266
  44. 44. SokolnickiJ.GuzikM. 2009 Synthesis and Photoluminescence of Nanocrystalline Lutetium Pyrosilicate Doped with Ce3+. Optical Materials, 31 6 (April 2009), 826830 , 0925-3467
  45. 45. SuzukiH.TombrelloT. A.MelcherC. L.SchweitzerJ. S.J. S. 1992 UV and Gamma-Ray Excited Luminescence of Cerium-Doped Rare-Earth Oxyorthosilicates, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 320 1-2 , (15 August 1992), 263272 , 0168-9002
  46. 46. TakagiK.FukazawaT. 1983 Cerium-Activated Gd2SiO5 Single Crystal Scintillator. Applied Physics Letters, 42 1 (1 January 1983), 4345 , 0003-6951
  47. 47. TissueB. M. 1998 Synthesis and Luminescence of Lanthanide Ions in Nanoscale Insulating Hosts. Chemistry of Materials, 10 10 (October 1998), 28372845 , 0897-4756
  48. 48. VakhidovS. A.IbragimovaE. M.NuritdinovI.RakovA. F.IkramovG. I. 1981 Self-Trapped Particles in Complex Oxide Crystals. Physica Status Solidi B, 106 1 (July 1981), 3135 , 0370-1972
  49. 49. van EijkC. W. E. 2002 Inorganic Scintillators in Medical Imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47 8 (21 April 2002), R85R106 , 0031-9155
  50. 50. WeberM. J. 2002 Inorganic Scintillators: Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Luminescence, 100 1-4 , (December 2002), 3545 , 0022-2313
  51. 51. YanC.ZhaoG.HangY.ZhangL.XuJ. 2006 Czochralski growth and crystal structure of cerium-doped Lu2Si2O7 scintillator. Materials Letters, 60 16 (July 2006), 19601963 , 0016-7577X
  52. 52. YanagidaT.FujimotoY.YoshikawaA.YokotaY.KamadaK.PejchalJ.KawaguchiN.IshizuS.FukudaK.SuyamaT.UchiyamaK.MoriK.KitanoK.NiklM. 2010 Development and Performance Test of Picosecond Pulse X-Ray Excited Streak Camera System for Scintillator Characterization. Applied Physics Express, 3 5 (May 2010), 056202 3 pages), 1882-0778

Written By

Martin Nikl, Daniel Niž?anský, Jakub Ruzicka, Carla Cannas and Takayuki Yanagida

Submitted: 05 November 2010 Published: 27 July 2011