A comparison between the effects of the radius and the chiral angle on the band-gap of SWCNT. In this table G is the band-gap. ΔG is the difference in band-gap of the two SWCNT with the different chiral angles.

## 1. Introduction

The exploration of CNTs was a great contribution to the world of science and technology. After its exploration in 1991 by Iijima (Eq. 1), extensive practical and theoretical researches about its nature gradually began to develop (Eq. 2, Eq. 6). Today, we know about CNTs much more about its chemical, mechanical, optical and electrical properties than before. The methods of fabrication have also progressed. Due to their electrical and optical properties, CNTs are the subject of studies about their usage in new electronic and optoelectronic devices. In this chapter we will focus on their electronic band structure, because it is the most important characteristic of a solid that should be studied to be used in determination of its electronic, optical and optoelectronic properties. In order to investigate the electronic band structure of a solid, it is first necessary to have a good understanding of its crystal lattice and atomic structure. Therefore, as the first step of this chapter we will begin with the investigation of the geometry of SWCNTs. Then we will continue with the calculation of allowed wave vectors for the electronic transport. Having finished this step, we will introduce the electronic band structure of SWCNTs.

As is known, single walled carbon nanotube or SWCNT consists of grephene sheet that is rolled into a cylinder over a vector called “chiral vector” (Fig. 1 a) so that the beginning and the end of this vector join to form the circumstantial circle of the cylinder Fig. 1 b.

As is shown in Fig. 1(a) the chiral vector may be written in terms of unit vectors a_{1} and a_{2}, therefore C may be written as:

Here |a_{1}| = |a_{2}|= a_{0} = √3_{C-C} where a_{C-C} is the bonding distance of the two adjacent carbon atom and is equal to 0.142nm and m > n. Having been familiar with chiral vector, its usage and its relationship with unit vectors a_{1} and a_{2}, one can investigate the geometry of carbon nanotube.

## 2. Investigation of the geometry of SWCNT

### 2.1. The investigation of radius and the chiral angle

In this section of this chapter we continue with the calculation of some aspects of the geometry of SWCNT, e.g. radius, chiral angle. As is illustrated in Fig. 1(b), the chiral vector C coincides the circumference of the cross sectional circle of the cylinder. Now, keeping this reality in the mind, we can easily infer the radius of the cylinder:

which yields:

Next, we are to investigate a quantity called chiral angle. Chiral angle is the angle between chiral vector and the unit vector a_{1}. The value can simply be calculated as:

This value is a symbol of the way that the carbon atomic pairs (unit cell of graphene) are arranged.

### 2.2. Translational, helical and rotational symmetries

In this section we explain the three major types of symmetries of SWCNT. As a chiral structure, SWCNT is expected to have a * translational* symmetry. Thus, if we represent this symmetry with the vector T, such that T = t

_{1}a

_{1}+ t

_{2}a

_{2}(t

_{1}and t

_{2}are natural numbers) we are faced with shortest symmetry vector that is perpendicular to the vector C, so:

Therefore:

in solving this equation we note that a_{i}.a_{j} is equal to 0.5a_{0}^{2} if i ≠ j and is equal to a_{0}^{2} if i = j. Now, solving (Eq. 5), regarding that p_{1},p_{2},m and n are positive natural numbers, m > n and we are seeking for the smallest value of p_{1} and p_{2}, we will have the following equation:

where * gc*d is standing for Greatest Common Devisor. As described before, T is a translational symmetry vector which means that if we move on the surface of the nanotube by T vector we catch up similar points.

Now we are to investigate the second and the third types of symmetries on the surface of the SWCNT which are * helical* and

*symmetries [Eq. 7]. As mentioned before, nanotube’s cylinder is formed by rolling graphene on the lattice vector C. Thus, we begin our investigation by means of a mapping process. We first, try to map the unit cell of graphene on the surface of the cylinder. We suppose that d is a vector such that it begins from the lattice site A and ends to lattice site B. The first atom can be placed on an arbitrary place on the surface of the cylinder. The second atom must be placed at the height of*rotational

_{M}= 2πrh. Where h is the height of the mentioned section. h can be regarded as the magnitude of a vector H =

p

_{1}a

_{1}+

p

_{2}a

_{2}; therefore, A

_{M}can be expressed as:

Now we are to minimize the term: _{1}* m*-

p

_{2}

*. Mathematically, it can be shown that this term is minimized when:*n

where * N = gcd(m,n)*. In order to acquire unique values for

p

_{1}and

p

_{2}we find

p

_{1}and

p

_{2}such that

*H| has the minimum value. Knowing that the area of a unit cell of the graphene (which is an atomic pair) is equal to*|

*atomic pairs which are located in the multiples of the azimuthal angle of*N

*times in angular space of*N

## 3. The band structure of SWCNT in equilibrium conditions

### 3.1. Bloch function

At this step we are facing the problem of finding the wave function for a crystal lattice. In this situation we are facing periodic boundary conditions. Therefore, it is expected that we acquire a periodic wave function. Using these facts, in 1927 Bloch showed that the electron wave function has the following form for a crystal lattice:

where _{k}(r) is the electron wave function, u_{k}(r) a periodic function with the period of the crystal and k is the electron wave vector. After this step, we find the energy of the electron, E, using the Hamiltonian operator, H, as follows:

But we don’t have u_{k}(r). Therefore, we don’t know the exact form of _{k}(r). There are a variety of methods to describe the interaction of electron and the crystal lattice. In this chapter we investigate the mentioned interaction according to nearest neighbor π-Tight Binding (π-TB) and the third neighbor π-TB method.

### 3.2. Brillouin zone

Suppose that we have a wave function of the form e^{iG.r}. We want to find G vector such that

or:

where * l* is an arbitrary integer. Now regarding the following equations for G and R:

where

which suggests that:

Solving above equations [Eq. 8]:

Now we have unit vectors of the reciprocal lattice. In order to get the Brillouin zone we should we should apply the following condition:

thus:

Using (18-c) we can draw the borders of the Brillouin zone. The inner most area is called the first Brillouin zone and hence, simply it is called “Brillouin zone”.

Now we return to our lattice which is graphene sheet, a two dimensional crystal. If we write (Eq. 16) for this kind of lattice we will have:

From (Eq. 19) it is clear that k_{1} and k_{2} are perpendicular to a_{2} and a_{1} respectively. Having a_{1} and a_{2} from Fig. 1(a) we can easily find k_{1} and k_{2} and draw the Brillouin zone (Fig. 3).

As mentioned earlier, theoretically, SWCNT can be considered as a graphene lattice that is rolled over into a cylinder. Thus, according to Fig. 1(b) we catch up the following:

Therefore [Eq. 9]:

where * l* is again, an arbitrary integer. This boundary condition which is so called, “Born-von Karman” condition, makes the Brillouin zone to be quantized. Fig. 4 shows this fact. At this point we can begin our investigation about the band structure of SWCNT.

### 3.3. Tight-binding approximation

As mentioned, there are many methods and approximations that are used to investigate the electronic band structure of a solid. In this section we use the tight-binding approximation. In this approximation we consider the wave function of an electron as the Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals and hence the method is also called as LCAO.

As is known, the energy of an electron can be estimated using Schrödinger’s equation as follows:

where m is the mass of an electron and

where

where _{t} is the total number of unit cells in the system. We regard the single 2p_{z} orbital of the carbon atoms to used in (Eq. 23); besides, we take into account the interaction of the nearest neighbor atoms (Fig. 5), because they have the most important role in formation of the energy states [10]. We write the wave function

and consequently:

Now, we define the following values:

then (Eq. 27) becomes:

knowing that:

Replacing (Eq. 30 a) and (Eq. 30 b) in (Eq. 28 a) to (Eq. 28 d) yields:

which make (Eq. 27 b) to become:

considering (Eq. 29) and (Eq. 32) together; to have a non trivial solutions for _{1} and _{2} we should have:

Solving (Eq. 33) for * E* [11]:

where:

Neglecting the overlap of 2p_{z} orbitals of atomic neighbors, _{AB}, we get:

Now applying Born von-Karman boundary condition (equation (Eq. 21)) to (Eq. 36) one can draw the energy diagram or the electronic band structure of SWCNT. Illustrated in Fig. 6(a) to 6(f) are the electronic band structures for several chiral vectors. At this step of our work, it is necessary to mention a few points. First of all, according to their chiralities, SWCNTs are

roughly divided to three classifications. A nanotube with chirality of (n,0) is called a “zig-zag” nanotube. A nanotube with chirality of (n,n) is called an “armchair” nanotube and a nanotube without the two mentioned chiralities, is called a “chiral” nanotube. As examples, illustrated in Fig. 6(a) and (c) are the band structure of SWCNTs with chiral vectors (6,0) and (8,0) which are zig-zag nanotubes, and Fig. 6(d) and (e) show the band structure of SWCNTs with chiral vectors (5,5) and (8,8) which are armchair nanotubes.

As the Second point, it worth noting that, if we examine (Eq. 36) with Born-von Karman boundary condition, it is observed that for any chiral vector (n,m) when (n-m) mod 3 is equal to 0, then the band-gap is equal to zero. Two samples of this type are shown in Fig. 6(a) and (b). It is clear that according to this model armchair nanotubes are of this type. At early days it was believed that these nanotubes are metallic, but next, the deeper researches and calculations with other methods and approximations showed that they are “semi-metallic”[12].

Until now, we have performed our analytic calculations with the two assumptions. First, we assumed that the overlap of the two nearest neighbors is zero. Second, we assumed that the 2p_{z} orbitals of the second and the third neighbors have no participation in formation of the band structure. However, in the following lines, we take into account the donation of these neighbors to the formation of the band structure of SWCNT.

Shown in Fig. 7 are the second and the third neighbors of the atom 0 of this figure. According to this figure, one can write:

Now, if we apply the formalism of the tight-binding approach, we catch up the following formulae:

where the hopping parameters γ_{0}, γ_{1}, γ_{2} and the overlap parameters s_{0}, s_{1} and s_{2} are introduced as follows:

Then, (Eq. 38 a) to (Eq. 38 g) should be replaced in (Eq. 34) to get the energy formula. The numerical values for γ_{0}, γ_{1}, γ_{2} and s_{0}, s_{1},s_{2} in addition to a comparison between the results of the mentioned method with the nearest neighbor π-TB can be found in [13].

At this point, we continue our work by examining some SWCNTs with different chiral vectors to investigate the effect of radius and chiral angle on the band-gap of these nanotubes. In Table I we have collected chiral vectors that have the same radii but different chiral angles to investigate such an effect. In this table from left, the first column shows the pairs of chiral vectors with the same radii. The second column shows their radii; the third column, their chiral angle; the forth one, the difference between chiral angles; the fifth column indicates the energy gap and finally sixth column shows the difference in band-gap which emanates from the difference between the chiral angle of the nanotubes with the same radii. As can be seen in this table the effect radius on the band-gap is considerable and the band-gap is approximately proportional to

:(m,n) | r (nm) | θ (Degrees) | |Δθ| (Degrees) | G (eV) | |ΔG| (eV) |

(9,1) | 0.373 | 5.20 | 21.78 | 1.091448 | 0.031806 |

(6,5) | 26.99 | 1.059642 | |||

(9,8) | 0.576 | 28.05 | 17.89 | 0.694152 | 0.018414 |

(13,3) | 10.15 | 0.675738 | |||

(14,3) | 0.615 | 9.51 | 13.17 | 0.655092 | 0.010044 |

(11,7) | 22.68 | 0.645048 | |||

(15,2) | 0.630 | 6.17 | 9.43 | 0.617706 | 0.021204 |

(13,5) | 15.60 | 0.63891 | |||

(15,4) | 0.679 | 11.51 | 15.17 | 0.593154 | 0.000558 |

(11,9) | 26.69 | 0.593712 | |||

(18,2) | 0.746 | 5.20 | 21.78 | 0.5219532 | 0.0054126 |

(12,10) | 26.99 | 0.5273658 | |||

(19,2) | 0.785 | 4.94 | 17.89 | 0.5116302 | 0.001953 |

(14,9) | 22.84 | 0.5135832 | |||

(19,3) | 0.808 | 7.22 | 7.34 | 0.483786 | 0.01395 |

(17,6) | 14.56 | 0.497736 | |||

(19,5) | 0.858 | 11.38 | 9.43 | 0.4684968 | 0.0026784 |

(16,9) | 20.81 | 0.4658184 | |||

(23,1) | 0.920 | 2.11 | 21.78 | 0.4248612 | 0.01607 |

(16,11) | 23.89 | 0.4409316 | |||

(23,4) | 0.987 | 7.88 | 16.42 | 0.3977982 | 0.014564 |

(17,12) | 24.31 | 0.412362 | |||

(29,4) | 1.221 | 6.37 | 21.78 | 0.322524 | 0.019139 |

(19,17) | 28.16 | 0.3416634 | |||

(30,4) | 1.260 | 6.17 | 9.43 | 0.3167766 | 0.0071982 |

(26,10) | 15.60 | 0.3095784 |

## 4. The electronic band structure of SWCNTs under non-equilibrium conditions

### 4.1. The investigation of the band gap under mechanical strain

In this section of this chapter, we investigate the effect of the two types of mechanical strain, namely uniaxial (tensile) and torsional strains, by means of the two mentioned approximations.

If we denote the amount of uniaxial strain by σ_{t}, the angle of shear by α and the bonding lengthes R_{11}-R_{0}, R_{12}-R_{0}, R_{13}-R_{0} by r_{1}, r_{2} and r_{3} respectively, then, under these two type of strain we have the following relations [14]:

where _{it} is that part of r_{i} that is along the axis of the nanotube (with the unit vector_{ic} is that part of r_{i} that is in azimuthal direction or along the circumference of the nanotube (with the unit vector

Using these relations in conjunction with (Eq. 40 a) and (Eq. 40 b), we have the following formulae for r_{1}, r_{2} and r_{3}:

and (Eq. 41 c) is still valid. At this step, we are to derive the 3^{rd} neighbor π-tight-binding formulation to investigate the effect of uniaxial and torsional strains. We know that, there is the following formula for the interaction energy [14]:

where _{C-C} is the bond length in the absence of strain and _{1i} with * i =*1,2,3 is |r

_{i}| in the presence of strain. After performing the formal routine of the deriving of the tight-binding approximation formulae, we find:

where functions * f* (k),

f

_{sγ}(k), g

_{s}(k),g

_{γ}(k),

f

_{γγ}(k), and

f

_{ss}(k) in addition to details of calculations are given in [15].

Now, it’s time to apply (Eq. 44 a) to (Eq. 44 d) and see the results in comparison to other methods. Illustrated in Fig. 8 are the results of application of mentioned method for uniaxial and torsional strains in comparison with the nearest neighbor π-TB and the four orbital tight-binding approximations.

As shown in Fig. 8 the method is examined for three chiral vectors, namely (6,5), (8,1) and (7,5). It can roughly be seen that, the 3^{rd} neighbor π-TB approach yields a better agreement with the four orbital TB than the nearest neighbor π-TB. If we examine the energy formulae for a wide variety of chiral vectors, we find that, there is an approximately, linear relation between the percents of strain (both uniaxial and torsional) and the increase in band-gap [15].

### 4.2. The investigation of the band structure under magnetic field

The effect of magnetic field on the electronic band structure of SWCNT is the second effect that is investigated in this section. The application of * H* field parallel to the tubule axis is investigated by

*method in [16],[17] and an Aharanov-Bohm effect is shown during this investigation. In this section the effect of perpendicular magnetic field is investigated using π-TB model. The investigation is originally performed by R. Saito et al. [18]. The investigation is based on two assumptions: first, the atomic wave function is localized at a carbon site; second, the magnetic field varies sufficiently slowly over a length scale equal to the lattice constant. The vector potential A is declared as:*k.p

where L = |C|, _{M} is the magnetic field and the coordinates * x* and

*are taken along the circumference and the axis of the nanotube, respectively. Under the perpendicular magnetic field the basis functions of (Eq. 30 a) and (Eq. 30 b) are changed to:*y

_{R} is the phase factor that is associated with the magnetic field and is expressed as the following:

Under application of magnetic field Hamiltonian operator becomes:

After application of Hamiltonian to (Eq. 46):

Since

In deriving the equation above the two mentioned assumptions are used, namely, it is assumed that the magnetic field is slowly changing compared with the change of _{s}. Now, we can calculate the matrix elements of Hamiltonian between the two Bloch functions, _{M} [18].

## 5. Conclusion

In this chapter we first described the concept of chiral vector, chiral angle and the radius of SWCNTs and formulated them. Then we explained different symmetries of single walled carbon nanotubes including translational, helical and rotational symmetries. We investigated the Brillouin zone and the electronic band structure of single walled carbon nanotube in the absence of perturbating mechanisms. Our investigation included the nearest neighbor π-TB and the third nearest neighbor π-TB approximations. Next, using these two models we investigated the effect of two types of mechanical strain and perpendicular magnetic field.

## References

- 1.
Iijima S. Nature . London Vol. 354 56 58 , (1991) - 2.
Saito R. Fujita M. Dresselhaus G. Dresselhaus M. S. Appl Phys. Lett 602204 2204 (1992) - 3.
Popov V. N. Henrard L. Phys Rev. 70 70. 115407(2004) - 4.
Yang L. Anantram M. P. Han J. Lu J. P. Phys Rev. B. 6013874 (1999) - 5.
Pakkhesal M. Ghayour R. Cent Eur. Phys 6824 824 (2008) - 6.
Pakkhesal M. Ghayour R. Kordrostami Z. Fullerenes Nanotubes. Carbon Nanostructures. 1799 99 (2009) - 7.
White C. T. Robertson D. H. Mintmire J. W. Phys Rev. 47 47. 5485 (1993) - 8.
Kittel, “Solid State Physics”,1999 - 9.
Saito R. Fujita M. Dresselhaus G. Dresselhaus M. S. Phys Rev. 46 46. 1804(1992) - 10.
71Wallace P. R. Phys Rev. 1947 - 11.
B 65.15541(2002)Reich S. Thomsen C. Phys Rev. - 12.
Mintmire J. W. Dunlap B. I. White C. T. Phys Rev. 63 .I. Dunlap, C. T. White. Phys. Rev. B 63. 073408 (1993) - 13.
B 65.15541(2002)Reich S. Thomsen C. Phys Rev. - 14.
Yang L. Anantram M. P. Han J. Lu J. P. Phys Rev. 60 60, 13874, 1999 - 15.
Pakkhesal M. Ghayour R. Cent Eur. Phys 8304 304 (2010) - 16.
Ajiki H. Ando T. Phys J. Soc Jpn. 621255 1255 (1993) - 17.
Ajiki H. Ando T. Phys J. Soc Jpn. 622470 2470 (1993) - 18.
Saito R. Dresselhaus G. Dresselhaus M. S. Phys Rev. 50 50. 14698 1994