Open access

Assembly of Carbon Nanotube Sheets

Written By

Mei Zhang and Ray Baughman

Submitted: March 17th, 2011 Published: July 27th, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/17352

Chapter metrics overview

5,497 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Over the past decades, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been actively explored as building blocks for next-generation electronics(Tans et al., 1998; Bachtold et al.,2001; Misewich et al., 2003), optoelectronics, and sensors (Kong et al., 2000; Xia et al., 2003; T. Zhang,2008), including flexible and transparent devices ( Ju et al., 2007) as well as stretchable devices (Xu et al., 2011). A critical step in constructing CNT-based devices is assembly of CNTs on a substrate or free-standing for device fabrication, which include alignment, density control, and transfer. Scalable and controlled assembly of CNTs synthesized with diverse methods (e.g., solution fabrication or solid-state fabrication methods) on diverse substrates (e.g., silicon, plastics, rubbers, etc) or free-standing presents a major fabrication challenge that must be overcome if CNTs are to be utilized in practical applications. For assembling CNTs into thin films (or called sheet, buckypaper), there are several different methods or processes in different conditions (e.g., solution or solid-state processes) (Hu et al., 2010). Solution processes start with the CNTs in powder form; the powder is dispersed in an appropriate solvent with or without functionalization. The CNTfilms (buckypapers) are usually made using versions of the ancient art of paper making, by typically long-time filtration of nanotubes dispersed in solvent and peeling the dried nanotubes as a layer from the filter (Rinzler et al., 1998; Endo et al.,2005). Buckypaper normally has a laminar structure with a random orientation of the bundles of the nanotubes in the plane of the film (Berhan et al., 2004). Interesting variations of the filtration route provide ultra-thin nanotube sheets that are highly transparent and highly conductive(Wu et al., 2004; Hu et al., 2004). While filtration-produced sheets are normally isotropic within the sheet plane, sheets having partial nanotube alignment result from applying high magnetic fields during filtration (Fischer et al.,2003). In other important advances, nanotube films have been fabricated by Langmuir-Blodgett deposition (Y. Kim et al., 2003), casting from oleum (Sreekumar et al., 2003), coating(Ago et al., 1999; Dan et al., 2009), and printing (Zhou et al., 2006;Unidym Inc, 2007).The solid-state processes generally have two approaches. One isto synthesize CNTs by floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition (CVD), either to deposit CNTs on a substrate inside the CVD chamber or to collect the CNT aerogel outside of the chamber on a special substrate and then densify it into a film (Y. Li et al., 2004; Martin, 2010). The catalysts are with the CNTs and the CNTs in the film are usually disoriented. The optimized process control lowers the impurities to less than 5 wt% in the film and a 1.2 meterwide and 10 meter long CNT film has been made (Nanocomp Tech. 2010). The other approach is to synthesize CNTs from the catalysts fixed on substrate to form a array either parallel to the substrate(Kong et al., 1998)or perpendicular to the substrate (also called vertical aligned CNT forest) which are fabricated into the CNT films after the synthesis process by the “domino pushing effect” motion (Ding et al., 2008; Pevzner et al., 2010)or drawing CNTs out of the forest (M. Zhang et al., 2004&2005). The domino pushing of the CNT forest can efficiently ensure that most of the CNTs are aligned tightly in the film. Well aligned CNT sheets are obtained by drawing CNTs from the forest.

For fabricating sheets that have close to single nanotube properties, long nanotubes are needed. Solution fabrication methods work only for short nanotubes since the ability to disperse nanotubes into a liquid and to fabricate oriented nanotube sheets from liquid dispersions decreases with increasing nanofiber length. Solid-state fabrication methods do not disturb the length of the nanotubes and are the methods that benefit from long nanotubes. In this chapter, two processes for assembling well aligned and super-thin CNT sheets are presented. One is to produce a drawable CNT forest, which hasspecial topology,by CVD and then draw CNTs out of forest to form a free-standing CNT sheet. Another process involves synthesis of a patterned CNT array on substrate by CVD and then knocking them down to form an aligned CNT sheet on substrate with the help of the solvent. The CNT growth and the conditions for making drawable CNT forests are discussed.


2. Fabrication of CNT sheet

Since the CNT sheets are fabricated directly from the forests, the synthesis of the CNT forest is an important step. In this chapter, the CNTs are multi-walled CNTs. The CNT forests were synthesized by catalytic CVD using hydrocarbon gas, acetylene or ethylene, as the carbon source (M. Zhang et al., 2004). The following is the basic process and conditions. The catalyst was a ~3 nm thick iron film, which was deposited on a silicon substrate by electron beam evaporation. The substrates were set in the center of a quartz tube furnace. After heating up to 680°C in helium at one atmospheric pressure, 5 molar percent acetylene in helium was introduced at the total flow rate of 580 sccm. Within a few minutes, the dense and vertically aligned CNT forests were grown on substrates. After removing the forest, the substrate is still catalytically active and can be used to grow new forest, indicating a root-growth mode and the presence of the catalysts on the substrate. Based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA), the purity of the nanotube forests was very high ( more than 99% carbon in the form of CNTs), with less than 1 wt% iron and amorphous carbon, but more importantly, no carbon particles within the CNTswere observed. The CNT sheets are made from the CNT forests by two approaches, knocking down and drawing.

2.1. Knocking down approach

The schematic of the knocking down approach is shown in Fig. 1. The line arrays of thin Fe film was made by patterning the resist on Si substrate following the standard lithography process, depositing the catalyst thin film by electron beam evaporation and then the liftingoff the resist mask. The Fe film cracked into nanoparticlesas catalysts for CNT growth during the temperature ramp up in CVD process. The CNTs grew away from the catalyst particles and formed a thin wall array during the CVD process (Figs. 2a to 2c). The CNT wall is very thin, so it is transparent (Fig. 2a). The substrate with the array of CNT walls was

Figure 1.

Schematic experimental processes for making an aligned thin CNT film on substrate (a) and knocking down method (b).

Figure 2.

SEM images show CNTs grown perpendicular to a substrate as a forest and a thin wall (a) and a thin wall array (b). (c) SEM image in high magnification shows the structure of the thin wall. The wall is so thin, it is transparent. (d), (e), and (f) show the thin wall array is “knocked” down and CNTs forms an aligned thin film on substrate. (g) and (h) show that the CNT thin films are etched into desired patterns. After removal of the photo resist, the CNTs have clean surface and keep the original structures. (f) and (i) show the detail of (e) and (h), respectively. The dark circle in (d), (e), and (g) is the shadow of the in-lens detector.

drawn through an acetone solution to horizontally redirect the vertical alignment and dried using nitrogen gas (Fig. 1b and Figs. 2d to 2f). The width of the patterned catalyst lines and the growth time of CVD determined the thickness and the height of the CNT walls. The walls do not shrink in height during flattening and drying. Figure 2e shows that a CNT sheet on substrate is formed from the CNT wall array in which the height of the wall is controlled to just 2 times the gap between two catalyst lines so that the CNT sheet on substrate has the thickness of two overlapping walls. The thickness of the CNT sheet could range from a few hundred nanometers to micrometers through the same process by using forest of different thicknesses, namely by controlling the width of the catalyst lines. Substrate-forest interaction and lateral CNT orientation guided densification only in wall thickness direction to essentially flatten the walls to the substrate with strong adhesion. It is because of the surface tension of the liquids and the strong van der Waals interactions that effectively close the CNTs together when liquids were introduced into the thin forest and dried. This self-assembly transformed CNT walls into highly densely packed CNT thin sheets. The CNT sheet was patterned into arbitrarily shaped CNT islands in desired positions by using standard lithographic processes. Figures 2g and 2h are the SEM images showing the patterned CNT sheet by lithography process.The CNT sheets were etched vertically by oxygen/argon reactive ion etching byusing a resist as a mask. Figure 2i is the SEM image of Fig. 2hin high magnification. The surface of the CNTs is clean and the structures of the sheet remain the same, showing that the adhesion with the substrate is sufficient to withstand lithographic processes including heat treatment, immersion into liquids, and drying. The bright and parallel horizontal lines visible in the images are catalyst lines. These lines cannot be totally removed (Fig. 2g). The sheet has to be transferred to another substrate in order for the effects of these lines to be negligible for some applications.

2.2. Drawing approach

In drawing approach, the catalyst thin film covers all surface of the Si substrate (Fig. 3). The CNTs are synthesized on top of silicon substrate as a vertically aligned forest by CVD andthe transparent nanotube sheets were drawn directly from CNT forests. Draw was initiated using an adhesive strip, like that on a 3M Post-it® Note, or using a blade by cutting into the forest to contact CNTs teased from the forest sidewall. Five-centimeter wide, meter long transparent sheets were made at a meter per minute by hand drawing (M. Zhang et al., 2005).

Figure 3.

Schematic experimental processes for fabrication of the free-standing CNT sheet.

Despite a measured areal density of only 3 g/cm2, these 500 cm2 sheets were self-supporting during drawing. Figure 4shows side-view and top view SEM micrographs of forest and sheet. It indicates that the nanotubes in the forest transition from the highly ordered forest state to a rather disordered intermediate state immediately in front of the forest sidewall, and finally to the highly oriented aerogel state. By taking sequential micrographs through a SEM to form a movie, the process in which the forest nanotubes rotate by about 90° in going from nanotube orientation in the forest to that of the highly oriented stateis captured (Kuznetsov et al., 2011).

Figure 4.

SEM images show that a CNT sheet is drawing from a forest. (a)-(c) Side view of the forest and the sheet close to the forest. (b) and (c) show the details in (a) and (b), respectively. (d) and (e) Top view of the forest and the CNT sheet.

The forest-drawn CNT sheets can easily be stacked or conveniently assembled into biaxially reinforced sheet arrays. They can be used as conducting layers on non-planar surfaces (Figs. 5a to 5d). These highly anisotropic aerogel sheets can be applied and easily densified into highly oriented sheets having a thickness of 50 nm and a density of 0.5 g/cm3. We obtain

Figure 5.

a)-(d) SEM images show a CNT sheet covers a substrate with sharp turns. (b) and (d) are the SEM images in higher magnification of the images in (a) and (c), respectively. (e) A photo image shows cross stacked sheets cover a metal plane with a 2.5 cm-diameter hole after liquid densification. The detail structure is shown in (f).

this 360-fold density increase by simply adhering by contact the as-produced sheet to a planar substrate (e.g. glass, many plastics, silicon, gold, copper, aluminum, and steel), vertically immersing the substrate with attached CNT sheet into a liquid (e.g. ethanol) along the nanotube alignment direction, and retracting the substrate from the liquid. Surface tension effects during ethanol evaporation shrink the aerogel sheet thickness to 50 nm. SEM micrographs taken normal to the sheet plane suggest a decrease in nanotube orientation as a result of densification (Fig.4e). This observation is deceptive – the collapse of 20 m sheets to 50 nm sheets without changes in lateral sheet dimensions means that out-of-plane deviations in nanotube orientation become in-plane deviations that are noticeable in the SEM micrographs. The aerogel sheets can be effectively glued to a substrate by contacting selected regions with ethanol, and allowing evaporation to densify the aerogel sheet. Adhesion increases because the collapse of aerogel thickness increases contact area between the nanotubes and the substrate.

The aerogel sheets can also be densified into super-thin and free-standing sheet. Figure 5e is a photo image showing that a densified CNT sheet covers a 2.5 cm diameter hole in a metal plane. The super-thin sheet is made by densifing two cross-stacked CNT sheets (Fig. 5f). The nanotube sheets, which combine high transparency with high electronic conductivity, are highly flexible and provide giant gravimetric surface areas. The measured gravimetric strength of orthogonally oriented sheet arrays exceeds that of a high-strength steel sheet (Aliev et al., 2009; M. Zhang et al., 2005). These sheets have been used in laboratory demonstrations for microwave bonding of plastics and for making transparent, highly elastomeric electrodes; planar sources of polarized broad-band radiation; conducting appliqués; flexible organic light-emitting diodes; and solar cells (Alive et al., 2009; Ulbricht et al., 2006 & 2007; Williams et al., 2008; M. Zhang et al., 2005).

Many real applications, such as field and thermionic emission electron sources (Kuznetzov et al., 2010; P. Liu et al., 2010; Y. Wei et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2008; Y. C. Yang et al., 2010), loudspeakers (Alive et al., 2010; Kozlov et al., 2009;Xiao et al., 2008), CNT touch screens (Feng et al., 2010), high strength CNT yarns (Lima et al., 2011; K. Liu et al., 2010; M. Zhang et al., 2004; X. Zhang et al., 2006; Zhong et al., 2010), electrodes for batteries and supercapacitors (H. X. Zhang et al., 2009; R. F. Zhou et al., 2010), CNT/polymer composites (Q. F. Cheng et al., 2010; L. Chen et al., 2009; M. Zhang et al., 2005), and wrappers (Lima et al., 2011) were demonstrated. It is also demonstrated that the CNT sheets can be used as scaffolds for tissue engineering (Galvan-Garcia et al., 2007). It is no doubt that more applications will be developed and practiced.


3. Making drawable CNT forest

The CNT draw process does not work for all CNT forests. The experimental results show that the drawability depends strongly on the structural interconnections between CNTs and the network of interconnections between CNT bundles within the forest. The nanotubes in the forest should be intermittently bundled in order to be drawable (Fig. 6). In the forest height direction, this means that a nanotube switches many times from being bundled with a few neighboring nanotubes, to being unbundled, and then to being bundled with a few different neighboring nanotubes. Bundled nanotubes are simultaneously pulled from different elevations in the forest sidewall so that they join with bundled nanotubes that have reached the top and bottom of the forest, thereby minimizing breaks in the resulting fibrils (containing many bundled CNTs) (Figs. 4b and 4c). If there is too little lateral connectivity in the forest, the forest is undrawable because pulling on the forest sidewall just removes a few nanotubes rather than a continuous sheet. If there is too much inter-tube connectivity, only a chunk of forest is extracted before draw terminates.

The interconnections between CNTs and CNT bundles are formed during CNT growth, which are determined by the synthesis process. The CNT synthesis process is a complex process, which is related to the substrate and supporting materials, catalyst materials and their amount, carbon sources and partial pressure (feedstock), carrier gas and gas as an etching agent, total flow rate (gas residual time), process temperature, temperature ramp-up rate and cool-down rate, process pressure, process steps, process time, and many other details, such as history of reaction chamber, contamination, size of chamber and substrate, etc. CNT forests can be produced over a broad range of conditions. However, not every forest is suitable for solid-state fabrication of CNT sheets. This is because the forest needs to meet certain conditions to be a drawable CNT forest as described above. The drawable forest can be fabricated by just using C2H2/Ar (without H2, water or other agents) and Fe thin film on Si substrate (without buffer layers such as SiO2 and Al2O3). The buffer layers and other gases as well as their combinations are necessary to control the size and properties of CNTs. The drawable forests can be fabricated under different synthesis conditions. The CNT area density, height of forest, and purity of the CNTs are considered being the parameters for monitoring and controling the interconnections of CNTs in the forest.

Figure 6.

SEM images show the side views of a drawable CNT forest (a) and its structure in high magnification (b).

3.1. Structures of CNT forest

A single nanotube naturally curves (in bending status) during growth if no external forces exist. The bending stress can come from the nanotube’s own weight, interaction with neighbor nanotubes, or limited growing space. As shown in Fig. 7a, a single tube keeps growing straight for a limited length: it falls down to the substrate and turns its growth direction many times during CVD process. A group of CNTs can form a randomly oriented CNT mat or well-aligned CNT arrays, depending on the density of catalyst and their activities under the same synthesis conditions. Figures 7b to 7d show the effects of the number of catalyst particles with similar area density on the formation of a CNT thin sheets array. Figure 7b shows CNT walls that were grown from 0.1μm wide and 40 μm long catalyst lines patterned by e-beam lithography. There were no external forces during CNT growth. The walls bend when their height is over a certain level. The bending directions and angles depend on each wall’s morphologies. The nanotubes within each wall confine the nearest neighbors and attract the outermost nanotubes to their neighbors via van der Waals forces, thereby producing oriented growth. However, the CNTs in such thin walls present random curvatures and are tangled (Fig. 7b) because of the weak confinement in thickness direction. As the thickness of the wall increases, the alignment of the CNTs is improved due to the crowding effect. Figure 7c shows ~100 μm high CNT wall array grown from a 0.5 μm wide and 40 μm long catalyst lines in which nanotubes were better aligned (Fig. 7d). In a forest, the CNTs can have different growth rates, which lead to the structure of the forest. Figure 8 shows three typical structures. In Fig. 8f, more than 80% of the CNTs are not straight: they periodically bend within fixed intervals throughout their entire length. As a result of this regular bending, a wavy structure resulted. It is believed that the wavy structure is formed because there are roughly two groups of catalysts uniformly distributed on substrate: one is more active and results in higher CNT growth rate than the other. Due to van der Waals forces, which stick nanotubes together whenever they touch, the growth rate of the array is limited by the nanotubes with relatively slow growth rate when catalysts stay on the surface of substrate. The nanotubes with higher growth rate are forced to bend periodically. The period of the wave is related to the ratio of growth rates of these two groups (Fig. 8c). When the distribution of the catalyst activity is relatively narrow and the density is high (Fig. 8a), the forest will have the morphology as shown in Fig. 8d. When the distribution of the catalyst activity results in the distribution of growth rate as shown in Fig. 8b and the density is high, the forest will be formed by the straight CNTs which form bundles while the waved CNTs switch between different bundles as the morphologies show in Figs. 6b and 8e. Such structure is believed to be important for assembling CNT sheets by drawing CNTs directly from the forest.

Figure 7.

SEM image of CVT walls grow on patterned (a) very thin, (b) 0.1 μm wide and 40 μm long, and (c) 0.5 μm wide and 40 μm long catalyst lines. (d) SEM image of the CNTs in a wall in (c).

Figure 8.

a) to (c) Schematic of the population of the CNTs related with the growth rate and (d) to (f) typical SEM images of the CNT forests. (d), (e), and (f) are in the same scale and they are corresponding to (a), (b), and (c), respectively.

3.2. CNT area density

As shown in Fig. 7, CNT area density (number of nanotubes per square centimeter) in the forest is a key factor to establishing the interconnections between CNTs in the forest and the drawability of the forest. The schematic illustration of drawability to the area density is shown in Fig. 9. If the area density is very low, CNTs will lay on the substrate randomly. The CNTs can grow in the out-of-plane direction and form a vertical aligned forest when its area density exceeds a threshold value. If the forest has very high density, the CNTs in the forest will form big bundles and the forest will not be drawable.

Figure 9.

Schematic illustration showing the relationship between the forest drawability and the area density of CNTs.The dash line corresponds to the forest with higher height.

Experimentally, the area density of the forest is calculated from counting the root of the nanotubes on substrate after removal the forest from the substrate. Figure 10 shows the surfaces of the substrates after removing the forest. Each circle dot in the images is the root of a nanotube.

Figure 10.

SEM images show the surfaces of the substrate after removal CNT forests. (a) and (b) show the typical surfaces of the drawable forest and the un-drawable forest, respectively. Each circle in the image is a root of a CNT. The bright dots are the by-products of the CVD process. Two images are in the same scale.

Figure 11.

SEM image of a drawable forest. There are holes with ~ 1 μm diameter distributed in the forest.

Drawable forests must have a high enough area density for CNTs in the forest to form interconnections. The required area density of the forest is related to the diameter of the nanotubes. When the forest is formed by CNTs with ~10 nm diameters, the well-drawn forest has the area density ~1011/cm2, and the undrawable forest has an area density of less than 1010/cm2. The area density needs to be higher for the forest with thinner CNTs.

The effect of area density can be compensated by adjusting the height of the forest (see section 3.4). The area density can also be lowered by controlling the distribution of catalysts through patterning. Figure 11 shows the SEM image of a drawable forest. There are uniformly distributed holes due to the missing catalysts on the substrate. The less CNT interconnectionsin the holes results in the easy draw of the too densely packed CNT forest.

3.3. Purity of the CNTs

Generally, the drawable forests need to be clean. Amorphous carbon (a-C) deposited on CNTs during CVD process might not be avoidable. A proper amount a-C might be helpful in CNT interconnections. However, too much a-C will increase the locking between CNTs and CNT bundles, which will cause the breaking of fibrils during sheet draw. The results of TGA measurement of the drawable forest and TEM observation of the CNT sheet are shown in Fig. 12.

Figure 12.

a) TGA data shows the thermal stability and the purity of the CNTs and (b) TEM image of a CNT sheet.

3.4. Height of the forest

As described above, the interconnections of CNTs in the forest play an important role in the drawability of the forest. The CNTs form small bundles, each consisting of a few nanotubes, in the forest with individual nanotubes moving in and out of different bundles. The three-dimensional connectivity caused by intermittently switched bundling is believed to be important for the drawing process. The too-long and too-short CNT forests are not suitable for the solid-state process because the interconnections there either too much or too little for continuously pulling CNTs out of the forest. Figure 13a is the schematic relationship between drawability and length of the forest. CNTs can be drawn from a ~20 μm high forest as shown in Fig. 13b. Experiments demonstrated that the good drawablity has been obtained in up to 500m high forests formed by nanotubes 10 nm in diameter. Two-millimeter high forests formed by tubes 30~50 nm in diameter are demonstratedto be drawable Inoue, 2011.

Since the drawability is determined by the interconnections of CNTs in the forest, the very-short and very-high forests could be drawable by adjusting other parameters. For example, very-short forest could be drawable if the area density is high enough and relatively more interconnections occur along their length. For high forests,lowering the area densityand the interconnections between CNTs and their bundles along their length will create the same effect (Fig. 9).

Figure 13.

a) Schematic of the possible relationship between drawability and forest height. (b) SEM image shows that the CNTs can be drawn continuously from a 20 μm high CNT forest.

The forest-sheet conversion rate and the thickness of as-produced sheet depend on the height and the density of the forest, as well as the bundling level of tubes in the forest. For forests having similar topology, the highest forests were easiest to draw into sheets – most probably because increasing nanotube length increases inter-fibril mechanical coupling within the sheets, and produce a higher forest-sheet conversion rate. A one centimeter length of 245 m high forest converts to about a three-meter-long free-standing CNT sheet. By adjusting the height and density of the forest; converting a one centimeter length forest to over a ten meter long sheet has been achieved. The thickness of the as-produced CNT sheet increased with increasing forest height and was 18 m in SEM images of a sheet drawn from a 245 m high forest.

3.5. Process temperature

Temperature is another important parameter, which determines other synthesis parameters for CNT growth and the quality of the CNTs. The intensity ratio of the G band (IG at ~1580 cm-1) and D band (ID at ~1350 cm-1) in Raman spectra and the initial burning temperature of the CNTs obtained from the TGA are used to evaluate the quality of the CNTs. G band and D band were originated from the Raman active in-plane atomic displacement E2g mode and disorder-included features due to the finite particle size effect or lattice distortion, respectively (Tuinstra & Koenig, 1970). The increase of IG/IDindicates that the degree of long-range ordered crystalline perfection of the CNTs increases. The better the crystallization of the graphene layers of the CNTs, the higher the initial burning temperature of the CNTs. Maintaining a spatial homogeneous temperature during the growth process was demonstrated a critical factor for fabricating long CNTs with consistent electrical characteristics (X. Wang et al., 2009). Many researches show that the quality of the CNTs becomes better as the growth temperature increases (Y. T. Lee et al., 2002; C. J. Lee et al., 2001; K. Kim et al., 2005; X. Feng et al., 2009). However, other parameters for CNT growth must be optimized if increasing temperature since the temperature increase has direct influences on the formation and the activity of the catalysts and the feedstock of the carbon atoms. The partial pressure of the hydrocarbon gas usually needs to be lowered at a higher process temperature.

Figure 14.

SEM image of large amount of helically coiled carbon nanostructures.Each coil grows with its own diameter and pitch.


4. Conclusion

Individual carbon nanotubes are like minute bits of string, and many trillions of these invisible strings must be assembled together to make useful macroscopic articles. This chapter presents the fabrication processes to making CNT sheets. The purity of the nanotubes, the height of the forest, the morphology of the forest, especially the 3D structure by self-assembly during CVD process, and the area density of the nanotubes are the main factors of the drawability of the forest.There are no inherent limitations on either sheet width or length, and no special difficulties arise in maintaining sheet quality during the draw. Currently, the sheets are drawn at up to 2 m/s from special CNT forests (Aliev et al., 2009;Lima, et al., 2011) and the width at up to 20 cm (C. Feng et al., 2010).This solid-state process is scalable for continuous, high-rate production. Extension of the technologies of solid-state sheet fabrication to longer CNTs, as well as to a few walled or single walled nanotubes, are important because longer nanotube lengths will enable properties improvements for active devices by means of enabling closer approach of sheet properties to those of individual nanotubes and the conductivity, transparency, and strength of the sheet could be improved by using thinner nanotubes.

CNTs can also be in the coiled structure (Amelinckxet al., 1994 ; Dunlap, 1992; M. Zhang & J. Li, 2009). Figure 14 shows the helically coiled CNTs grown on iron-coated indium tin oxide substrate by catalytic CVD (M. Zhang et al., 2000).More than 95% of the wires are in helical structures. The coils have various diameters and pitches. They grow out of the substrate and maintain their self-organization well during growth. If the coiled CNT forest is drawable, the sheet will have interesting properties that the straight CNTs could not provide. There is plenty of room to further improve the processes and properties of the CNT sheets.



This work was supported or supported partly by National Science Foundation, the Air Force Research Laboratory, Texas Advanced Technology Program,Robert A. Welch Foundation, and the Strategic Partnership for Research in NanotechnologyConsortium in Texas.


  1. 1. AgoH.PetritschK.ShafferM. S. P.WindleA. H.FriendR. H. (1999).Composites of carbon nanotubes and conjugated polymers for photovoltaic devices.Adv. Matls. 11 11 12811285 .
  2. 2. AmelinckxS.ZhangX. B. .BernaertsD.ZhangX. F. .IvanovV. .NagyJ. B. 1994 A Formation Mechanism for CatalyticallyGrownHelix-Shaped Graphite Nanotubes. Science, 29 635639 .
  3. 3. AliveA.LimaM. D.FangS.BaughmanR. H. (2010).Underwater sound generation using carbon nanotube projectors.Nano Lett., 10 10 7 23742380 .
  4. 4. AlievA. E.OhJ.KozlovM. E.KuznetsovA. A.FangS. L.FonsecaA. F.OvalleR.LimaM. D.HaqueM. H.GartsteinY. N.ZhangM.ZakhidovBaughmanR. H. 2009 Giant-Stroke, Superelastic Carbon Nanotube Aerogel Muscles.Science, 323 15751579 .
  5. 5. BachtoldA.HadleyP.NakanishiT.DekkerC. 2001 Logic Circuits withCarbon Nanotube Transistors. Science, 294 13171320 .
  6. 6. BerhanL.YiY. B.SastryA. M.MunozE.SelvidgeM.BaughmanR. 2004 Mechanical properties of nanotube sheets: Alterations in joint morphology and achievable moduli in manufacturable materials. J. Appl. Phys. 95 43354346 .
  7. 7. ChenL.LiuC.WangJ.ZhangW.HuC.FanS. 2009 Auxetic Materials with Large Negative Poisson’s Ratios Based on Highly OrientiedCarbn Nanotube Structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 253111
  8. 8. ChengQ. F.WangJ. P.WenJ. J.LiuC. H.JiangK. L.LiQ. Q.FanS. S. 2010 Carbon nanotube/epoxy composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. ChengQ. F.WangJ. P.WenJ. J.LiuC. H.JiangK. L.LiQ. Q.FanS. S. (2010). Carbon nanotube/epoxy composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Carbon, Vol. 48, pp. 260-266., 48 260266 .
  9. 9. DanB. .IrvinG. C. .Pasquali.M. 2009 Continuous and Scalable Fabrication of Transparent ConductingCarbon Nanotube Films. ACS nano, 3 4 835843 .
  10. 10. DunlapB. I. 1992 Connectingcarbon tubules. Phys. Rev. B, 46 19331936 .
  11. 11. EndoM.MuramatsuH.HayashiT.KimY. A.TerronesM.DresselhausM. S. 2005 Nanotechnology: ‘Buckypaper’ from coaxial nanotubes. Nature, 433 476
  12. 12. FengX.LiuK.XieX.ZhouR.ZhangL.LiQ.FanS.JiangK. 2009 Thermal Analysis Study of the Growth Kinetics of Carbon Nanotubes and Epitaxial Graphene layers on Them. J. Phys. Chem. 113 96239631 .
  13. 13. FengC.LiuK.WuJ.LiuL.ChengJ.ZhangY.SunY.LiQ.FanS.JiangK. 2010 Flexible, stretchable, transparent conducting films made from superaligned carbon nanotubes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20 885891 .
  14. 14. FischerJ. E.ZhouW.VavroJ.LlagunoM. C.GuthyC.HaggenmuellerR.CasavantM. J.WaltersD. E.SmalleyR. E. 2003 Magnetically aligned single wall carbon nanotube films: Preferred orientation and anisotropic transport properties.Journal of Applied Physics, 93 21572163 .
  15. 15. Galvan-GarciaP.KeeferE. W.YangF.ZhangM.FangS. L.ZakhidovA. A.BaughmanR. H.RomeroM. I. 2007 Robust Cell Migration and Neuronal Growth on Pristine Carbon Nanotube Sheets and Yarns.Journal of Biomaterials Science, 18 12451261 .
  16. 16. HuL.HechtD. S.Gruener.(2010G. (2010).Carbon Nanotube Thin Films: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications.Chem. Rev. 110 110 57905844 .
  17. 17. HuL.HechtD. S.GruenerG. (2004).Percolation in transparent and conducting carbon nanotube networks.Nano Letters, 4 4 25132517 .
  18. 18. InoueY.SuzukiY.MinamiY.MuramatsuJ.ShimamuraY.SuzukiK.GhemesA.OkadaM.SakakibaraS.MimuraH.NaitoK. 2011 Anisotropic Carbon Nanotube Papers Fabricated from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Webs. Carbon, 49 24372443 .
  19. 19. JuS. Y.FacchettiA.XuanY.LiuJ.IshikawaF.YeP. D.ZhouC. W.MarksT. J.JanesD. B. 2007 Fabrication of Fully Transparent Nanowire Transistors for Transparent and Flexible Electronics.Nat. Nanotechnol., 2 378384 .
  20. 20. KimK.KimK. J.JungW. S.BaeS. Y.ParkJ.ChoiJ.Choo.J. 2005 Investigation on the temperature-dependent growth rate of carbon nanotubes using chemical vapor deposition of ferrocene and acetylene.Chemical Physics Letters, 401 459464 .
  21. 21. KimY.MinamiN.ZhuW. H.KazaouiS.AzumiR.MatsumotoM. (2003). Langmuir-Blodgett films of single-wall carbon nanotubes: layer-by-layer deposition and in-plane orientation of tubes.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 Vol. 42, pp. 7629-.
  22. 22. KongJ. .SohH. T. .CassellA. M.QuateC. F.Dai.H. 1998 Synthesis of individual single-walledcarbon nanotubes on patternedsilicon wafers. Nature, 395 878881 .
  23. 23. KongJ.FranklinN. R.ZhouC.ChaplineM. G.PengS.ChoK.DaiH. 2000 Nanotube Molecular Wires as Chemical Sensors. Science, 287 622625 .
  24. 24. KozlovM. E.HainesC. S.OhJ.LimaM. D.FangS. 2009 Sound of carbon nanotube assemblies. J. Appl. Phys., 106 124311
  25. 25. KuznetzovA. A.LeeS. B.ZhangM.BaughmanR. H.Zakhidov.A. A. 2010 Electron field emission from transparent multiwalled carbon nanotube sheets for inverted field emission displays. KuznetzovA. A.LeeS. B.ZhangM.BaughmanR. H.Zakhidov.A. A. (2010). Electron field emission from transparent multiwalled carbon nanotube sheets for inverted field emission displays. Carbon, Vol. 48, pp. 41-46., 48 4146 .
  26. 26. KuznetsovA. A.FonsecaA. F.BaughmanR. H.ZakhidovA. A. (2011). Structural Model for Dry-Drawing of Sheets and Yarns from Carbon Nanotube Forests.ACS Nano, 5 2), 985993 .
  27. 27. LeeC. J.ParkJ.HuhY.LeeJ. Y. (2001).Temperature effect on the growth of carbon nanotubes using thermal chemical vapor deposition.Chemical Physics Letters, 343 343 3338 .
  28. 28. LeeY. T.ParkJ.ChoiY. S.RyuH.LeeH. J. 2002 Temperature-Dependent Growth of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes in the Range 800−1100 °C.J. Phys. Chem. B, 106 31 76147618 .
  29. 29. LiY.KinlochI. A.WindleA. H. (2004).Direct spinning of carbon nanotube fibers from chemical vapor deposition synthesis.Science, 304 304 276278 .
  30. 30. LimaD.FangS.LepróX.LewisC.Ovalle-RoblesR.Carretero-GonzálezJ.Castillo-MartínezE.KozlovM. E.OhJ.RawatN.HainesC. S.HaqueM. H.AareV.StoughtonS.ZakhidovA. A.BaughmanR. H. 2011 Biscrolling Nanotube Sheets and Functional Guests into Yarns.Science 331 5155 .
  31. 31. LiuK.SunY. H.ZhouR. F.ZhuH. Y.WangJ. P.LiuL.FanS. S.JiangK. L. 2010 Carbon Nanotube Yarns with High Tensile Strength Made by a Twisting and Shrinking Method.Nanotechnology, 21 045708
  32. 32. MartinC. 2010 A Carbon Nano-Wired World.R & Dmagazine, 52 3 June, 2010, 40
  33. 33. MisewichJ. A.MartelR.AvourisPh.TsangJ. C.HeinzeS.TersoffJ. (2003).Electrically Induced Optical Emission from a Carbon Nanotube FET. Science, 300 300 783786 .
  34. 34. Nanocomp Technologies Inc. (2011).
  35. 35. PevznerA.EngelY.ElnathanR.DucobniT.Ben-IshaiM.ReddyK.ShpaismanN.TsukernikA.OksmanM.PatolskyF. 2010 Knocking Down Highly-Ordered Large-Scale Nanowire Arrays.Nano Lett., 10 12021208 .
  36. 36. RinzlerA. G.LiuJ.DaiH.NikolaevP.HuffmanC. B.Rodr´ıguez-Mac´ıasF. J.BoulP. J.LuA. H.HeymannD.ColbertD. T.LeeR. S.FischerJ. E.RaoA. M.EklundP. C.SmalleyR. E. 1998 Large-scale purification of single-wall carbon nanotubes: process, product, and characterization.Applied Physics A, 67 2937 .
  37. 37. SreekumarT. V.LiuT.KumarS.EricsonL. M.HaugeR. H.SmalleyR. E. (2003).Single-wall carbon nanotube films.Chemistry of Materials, 15 15 175178 .
  38. 38. TansS. J.VerschuerenA. R. M.DekkerC. 1998 Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature, 393 4952 .
  39. 39. UlbrichtR.LeeS. B.InoueK.ZhangM.FangS.BaughmanR. H.Zakhidov.A. A. 2007 Transparent Carbon Nanotube Sheets as 3-D Charge Collectors in Organic Solar Cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 91 416419 .
  40. 40. UlbrichtR.JiangX.LeeS. B.InoueK.ZhangM.FangS.BaughmanR. H.Zakhidov.A. A. 2006 Polymetric Solar Cells with Oriented and Strong Transparent Carbon Nanotube Anode.Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 243 35283532 .
  41. 41. Unidym Inc. 2007
  42. 42. WangD.SongP.LiuC.WuW.FanS. 2008 Highly oriented carbon nanotube papers made of aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 7 075609
  43. 43. WangX.LiQ.XieJ.JinZhong.WangJ.LiY.JiangK.FanS. 2009 Fabrication of ultralong and electrically uniform single-walled carbon nanotube on clean substrates.Nano Lett. 9 9 31373141 .
  44. 44. WeiY.LiuL.LiuP.XiaoL.JiangK.FanS. 2008 Scaled fabrication of single-nanotube-tipped ends from carbon nanotube micro-yarns and their field emission applications.Nanotechnology, 19 475707
  45. 45. WilliamsC. D.RoblesR. O.ZhangM.LiS.BaughmanR. H.Zakhidov.A. A. 2008 Multiwalled carbon nanotube sheets as transparent electrodes in high brightness organic light-emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters, 93 183506
  46. 46. WuZ. C.ChenZ. H.DuX.LoganJ. M.SippelJ.NikolouM.KamarasK.ReynoldsJ. R.TannerD. B.HebardA. F.Rinzler.A. G. 2004 Transparent, conductivecarbon nanotube films. Science, 305 12731276 .
  47. 47. XiaY. N.YangP. D.SunY. G.WuY. Y.MayersB.GatesB.YinY. D.KimF.YanY. Q. 2003 One-Dimensional Nanostructures: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 15 353389 .
  48. 48. XiaoL.LiuP.LiuL.JiangK.FengX.WeiY.QianL.FanS.ZhangT. 2008 Barium-Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Yarns as Low-Work-Function Thermionic Cathodes.Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 153108
  49. 49. XiaoL.ChenZ.FengC.LiuL.BaiZ. Q.WangY.QianL.ZhangY. Y.LiQ. Q.JiangK. L.FanS. S. 2008 Flexible, Stretchable, Transparent Carbon Nanotube Thin Film Loudspeakers.Nano Lett., 8 45394545 .
  50. 50. XuF.LuW.ZhuY. 2011 Controlled 3D Buckling of Silicon Nanowires for Stretchable Electronics.ACS Nano, 5 672678 .
  51. 51. ZhangM.NakayamaY.PanL. 2000 Synthesis of Carbon Tubule Nanocoils in High YieldUsingIron-Coated Indium Tin Oxide as Catalyst. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39 L1242L1244 .
  52. 52. ZhangM.AtkinsonK. R.BaughmanR. H. 2004 Multifunctional carbon nanotube yarns by downsizing an ancient technology. Science, 306 13581361 .
  53. 53. ZhangM.FangS.ZakhidovA. A.LeeS. B.AlievA. E.WilliamsC. D.AtkinsonK. R.BaughmanR. H. 2005 Strong, Transparent, Multifunctional Carbon Nanotube Sheets.Science, 309 12151219 .
  54. 54. ZhangM.LiJ. (2009).Carbon Nanotube in Different Shapes.Materials Today, 12 12 1218 .
  55. 55. ZhangT.MubeenS.MyungN.DeshussesM. 2008 Recent progress in carbon nanotube-based gas sensors. Nanotechnology, 19 332001332014 .
  56. 56. ZhangH.FengC.ZhaiY.JiangK.LiQ.FanS. 2009 Cross-Stacked Carbon Nanotube Sheets Uniformly Loaded with SnO2 Nanoparticles: A Novel Binder-Free and High-Capacity Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 21 22992304 .
  57. 57. ZhangX.JiangK.FengC.LiuP.ZhangL.KongJ.ZhangT.LiQ.FanS. 2006 Spinning and Processing Continuous Yarns from 4-Inch Wafer Scale Super-Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays. Adv. Mater., 18 15051510 .
  58. 58. ZhongG.HofmannS.YanF.TelgH.WarnerJ. H.EderD.ThomsenC.MilneW. I.RobertsonJ. 2009 Acetylene: A Key Growth Precursor for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Forests. J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 1732117325 .
  59. 59. ZhongX. H.LiY. L.LiuY. K.QiaoX. H.FengY.LiangJ.JinJ.ZhuL.HouF.LiJ. Y. 2010 Continuous Multilayered Carbon Nanotube Yarns.Adv. Mater., 22 692696 .
  60. 60. ZhouY.HuL.GrunerG. A method of printing carbon nanotube thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 123109
  61. 61. ZhouR.MengC.ZhuF.LiQ.LiuC.FanS.JiangK. 2010 High-performance supercapacitors using a nanoporous current collector made from super-aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 21 345701

Written By

Mei Zhang and Ray Baughman

Submitted: March 17th, 2011 Published: July 27th, 2011