Abstract
The general objective of this research was to evaluate socioemotional competences among university students. We analyzed the relationship among empathy levels, social skills, mindfulness, and other psychoeducational variables among Spanish university students. The sample consisted of 100 students. Instruments were administered to evaluate empathy, social skills, mindfulness, and other psychoeducational variables. An ex post facto design was used. An analysis of the relationships among these variables is presented. The data are relevant for implementing future programs for the training of socioemotional competences such as soft skills related to teamwork, assertiveness, empathy, creativity, and critical thinking.
Keywords
- mindfulness
- social skills
- empathy
- organizational happiness
- university happiness
- university students
1. Introduction
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [1] and models such as EuroPsy [2] consider the development of socioemotional competences to be important. Among these socioemotional competences, empathy, self-efficacy, and resilience can be considered relevant variables. It can be considered that after the pandemic, it is even more necessary to contribute to the promotion and acquisition of such competences.
Along similar lines, several studies have argued that emotional intelligence plays a relevant role in people’s well-being since it can be related to higher performance at work, better interpersonal relationships, optimism, and greater satisfaction with oneself, all of which usually lead to greater self-esteem, happiness, and extraversion [3, 4, 5]. A recent study [4] corroborates that empathy is one of the dimensions of emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence refers to the “ability to perceive, assimilate, understand and regulate one’s own emotions and those of others, promoting emotional and intellectual growth” (p. 10) [6]. Somehow, “Empathy allows us to approach the other, to tune in with him and, therefore, it is a key aspect in the educational relationship” (p. 178) [7]. This study shows the enormous pedagogical value that, according to this author, the variable empathy has; it also underlines the fact that the development of empathy is encouraged in the university environment. A study has shown that in the contemporary scenario, empathy is discussed from an integrative perspective considering its cognitive and affective or emotional dimensions [8]. In this sense, it can also be noted that prosocial behaviors have links with other non-cognitive skills, such as self-efficacy [9], which has been defined as perceived capabilities within specific domains [10, 11, 12, 13]. As evident in recent studies, it is necessary to contribute to improving this construct called self-efficacy in the university environment [14, 15]. Likewise, other studies highlight the importance of resilience to optimize the development and quality of life [16], and advocate for its orientation to university students [17].
Regarding full consciousness, for André (p. 70) [18], it can be understood that “Full consciousness is the quality of consciousness that emerges when we concentrate the mind deliberately in the present moment. Attention is directed to the experience that is lived and suffered, without any filter (it is accepted as it is), without formulating judgment (good or bad, desirable or not), and without expecting anything in particular.” Different studies (e.g., [19, 20]) have highlighted the benefits of mindfulness on the quality of life and well-being, enhancing problem solving skills, emotional self-regulation, and satisfaction with all aspects in life.
Precisely, this work aimed to evaluate the socioemotional competences among university students. Specifically, scores on the variables of mindfulness, self-efficacy, empathy, social skills, and resilience were examined in a sample of university students.
2. Methods
2.1 Participants
The participants were 109 university students, and most of them were women between the ages of 18 and 22, from the fields of Educational Sciences and Psychology. Instruments were administered to assess the constructs of mindfulness, social skills, empathy, resilience, and self-efficacy. An ex post facto design was used. The final sample was 100 students after excluding part-time students and those who did not complete all the instruments. In the final sample, 39 (39%) are men and 61 (61%) women. In these degrees, the majority are women and a gender-balanced incidental sample was used. The consecutive recruitment of participants was performed.
2.2 Instruments
Several tools have been applied to assess mindfulness, self-efficacy, empathy, social skills, and resilience.
2.3 Procedure
The questionnaires were administered collectively in the different classrooms. This research has the favorable report of the Ethics Committee in Human Sciences of the University of Granada and respects the principles established by national and international legislation within the Ethics Committee in Human Research and all the rights linked to the protection of personal data. Participants were informed that collected data would remain anonymous and be used only for research purposes. A control sample used to counter-verify the results obtained. The completion of each questionnaire lasted approximately 6 to 9 minutes.
2.4 Data design and analysis
This study adopted a quantitative cross-sectional design. A cross-sectional non-experimental research design was selected involving convenience sampling of student participants. Participants were students recruited from Educational Sciences and Psychology courses at the Granada University and were asked to complete a series of self-report scales with a Likert response format. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22.0. The normal distribution of the variables was confirmed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Descriptive analyses and bivariate analyses were carried out to study the relationship between the variables of this research using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
3. Results
Regarding the main study variable of mindfulness, the mean score was 33.07, and the standard deviation was 9.03. For the resilience variable under the personal competence factor, the mean score was 60.85, and standard deviation was 9.08. For the acceptance of oneself and life factor of the resilience variable, the mean score was 15.71 (standard deviation
Regarding the relationship between the study variables, statistically significant positive correlations were found between mindfulness scores and empathy in university students (
Statistically significant correlations were exhibited between the variables of mindfulness and the two factors under the variable of resilience-personal competence (
No significant differences were found in levels of mindfulness according to gender.
4. Discussion
This study aimed to examine mindfulness, levels of empathy, resilience, and levels of perceived self-efficacy in a sample of university students. Moreover, the relationships among the variables of the study were analyzed.
The results show the existence of statistically significant associations between the study variables. These results can be considered congruent with previous studies that found relationships between mindfulness and empathy [28, 29] and resilience [30]. Another study also found how mindfulness and self-efficacy variables were related to stress levels in university students [31].
Another recent previous research [32] shows that the mindfulness score was associated with better emotion regulation, which leads us to propose, as indicated in this study, the need for mindfulness training interventions that contribute to improving emotional regulation in university students. Likewise, another study [33] finds that the development of mindfulness and emotional management can contribute to improving the university students’ well-being and resilience. Developing these competences or actions can contribute to the promotion or construction of resilience in university students [34], which will allow better adjustment or adaptation with the use of more productive coping strategies and a more effective orientation [17]. In this sense, it can be noted that one of the factors or characteristics that can be identified in resilient students is self-esteem [16].
Before concluding this chapter, it should be noted that in the study by Sierra et al. [28], it was found that a program with mindfulness sessions influenced the emotional dimension with an increase in the levels of empathy and a decrease in school stress. In this sense, there is a need to develop such programs for the university environment, given the impact on academics and well-being and health generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
A limitation of the study was our inability to use a longitudinal design that allows us to see how the scores on these variables evolve and transform. In this sense, causal relationships could not be established from the results obtained in this study. Further studies should analyze relationships among other psychoeducational variables or constructs that can help improve well-being and build organizational happiness under different contexts of study and work.
5. Conclusions
It can be concluded that mindfulness shows statistically significant positive correlations with all the variables evaluated, such as self-efficacy, self-perceived self-efficacy, communication and empathic skills, and resilience in its two dimensions.
The assessment of self-perceived self-efficacy and resilience in university students is considered fundamental since it has relevant implications from the educational and clinical point of view, given its repercussions for greater well-being and coping with adversity and the continuous challenges that the European Higher Education Area demands. However, there are still fewer studies on the university population compared to studies on those in other developmental stages such as adolescence.
The data obtained are relevant for designing a future program or psychoeducational intervention that will contribute to improving self-esteem and resilience for coping with academic, health-related, and interpersonal situations that can generate stress in the university environment. The information provided by these data is necessary under the current situation of the pandemic to train individuals in coping strategies and intrapersonal and interpersonal skills to prevent technological stress, academic stress, and other fears considering the age of adversity and uncertainty that we live in. This can enhance the acquisition and/or development of technological and socioemotional competences.
References
- 1.
United Nations Educational; Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). La nueva dinámica de laeducación superior y la investigación para el cambio social y el desarrollo (Comunicado): The new dynamicsof higher education and research for social change and development (communication). In: Proceedings Ofthe World Conference on Higher Education. 5-8 July 2009. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2010 - 2.
Belaunzaran J. Euro Psy: un Modelo basado en competencias. ¿Es aplicable a la formación sanitaria especializada en Psicología Clínica? [descriptive analysis of Euro Psy: a competency-based model. Is this model applicable to specialised health training in clinical psychology?]. Education Médica. 2018; 394 :1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2018.05.017 - 3.
Petrides KV, Furnham, A, y Mavroveli S. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence: Moving forward in the field of EI. In Matthews G, Zeidner M, Roberts R. Emotional Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns (Series in Affective Science). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 - 4.
Di Lorenzo R, Venturelli G, Spiga G, Ferri P. Emotional intelligence, empathy and alexithymia: A cross-sectional survey on emotional competence in a group of nursing students. Acta biomedica: Atenei Par-mensis. 2019; 90 (4-S):32-43. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i4-S.8273 - 5.
Spielberger CD. Anxiety as an emotional state. In: Spielberger CD, editor. Anxiety Behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1972. pp. 23-49 - 6.
Mayer JD, Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P, Sluyter D, editors. Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educators. Nueva York: Basic Books; 1997. pp. 3-31 - 7.
La M-OV. empatía en la educación: estudio de una muestra de alumnos universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala. 2011; 14 (4):174-190 - 8.
Gorostiaga A, Balluerka N. Evaluación de la empatía en el ámbito educativo y su relación con la inteligencia emocional. Revista de Educación. 2014; 364 :12-38. DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-364-253 - 9.
Caprara GV, y Steca, P. Self–efficacy beliefs As determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2005; 24 (2):191-217 - 10.
Bandura A. Pensamiento y acción. Martínez-Roca: Fundamentos sociales; 1987 - 11.
Morales-Rodríguez FM, Pérez-Mármol JM. The role of anxiety, coping strategies, and emotional intelligence on general perceived self-efficacy in university students. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019; 2019 (10):1689. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01689 - 12.
Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research. 1996; 1996 (66):543-578 - 13.
Schunk DH, Pajares F. The development of academic selfefficacy. In: Wigfield A, Eccles JS, editors. Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2002. pp. 15-31 - 14.
Álvarez-Pérez PR, López-Aguilar D, Garcés-Delgado Y. Study on commitment and expectations of academic self-efficacy in undergraduate students. Educare. 2021; 57 (2):481-499 - 15.
Valle MD, Vergara J, Bernardo AB, Díaz A, Herrera IG. Study of latent motivational profiles associated with academic satisfaction and academic self-efficacy of university students. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica. 2020; 57 (4):37-147 - 16.
Fiorentino MT. La construcción de la resiliencia en el mejoramiento de la calidad de vida y la salud. Suma Psicológica. 2008; 15 (1):95-114 - 17.
González-Torres MC, Artuch R. Perfiles de resiliencia y estrategias de afrontamiento en la universidad: Variables contextuales y demográficas. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 2014; 12 (3):621-648. DOI: 10.14204/ejrep.34.14032 - 18.
La AC. meditación de consciencia plena. Mente y Cerebro. 2013; 59 :70-76 - 19.
Cuevas-Toro AM, Díaz-Batanero C, Delgado-Rico E, Vélez-Toral M. Incorporación del mindfulness en el aula: un estudio piloto con estudiantes universitarios. Universitas Psychologica. 2017; 16 :1-13. DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-4.imae - 20.
González-Valero G, Puertas-Molero P, Ramírez-Granizo I, Sánchez-Zafra M, Ubago-Jiménez JL. Relación del mindfulness, inteligencia emocional y síndrome de burnout en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje: una revisión sistemática. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte. 2019; 8 :13-22. DOI: 10.6018/sportk.401061 fatcat:2qgo5wj4vbdknmlnj24qnrsqby - 21.
Cox A, Ullrich-French S, French B. Validity evidence for state mindfulness scale scores in a physical activity context. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2016; 20 :38-49 - 22.
Ullrich-French S, González Hernández J, Hidalgo Montesinos MD. Validity evidence for the adaptation of the state mindfulness scale for physical activity (SMS-PA) in Spanish youth. Psicothema. 2017; 29 (1):119-125. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2016.204 - 23.
Baessler J, Schwarzer R. Evaluación de la autoeficacia; Adaptación española de la escala de autoeficacia general. Ansiedad y estrés. 1996; 2 (1):1-8 - 24.
Sanjuán P, Pérez AM, Bermúdez J. Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema. 2000; 12 :509-513 - 25.
Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980; 10 (85):1-17 - 26.
Pérez-Albéniz, de Paúl J, Etxeberría J, Montes MP, Torres E. Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema. 2003; 15 (2):267-272 - 27.
Sánchez-Teruel D, Robles-Bello MA. Escala de Resiliencia 14 ítems (RS-14): propiedades Psicométricas de la Versión en español. RIDEP. 2015; 2 (40):103-113 - 28.
Sierra OL, Urrego G, Montenegro S, Castillo C. Estrés escolar y empatía en estudiantes de bachillerato practicantes de Mindfulness. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica. 2015; 26 :175-197 - 29.
Jones SM, Bodie GD, Hughes SD. The impact of mindfulness on empathy, active listening, and perceive provisions of emotional support. Communication Research. 2016; 46 :1-28. DOI: 10.1177/0093650215626983 - 30.
Roulston A, Montgomery L, Campbell A, Davidson G. Exploring the impact of mindfulnesss on mental wellbeing, stress and resilience of undergraduate social work students. Social Work Education. 2017; 37 :1-16. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2017.1388776 - 31.
Rayan A. Mindfulness, self-efficacy, and stress among final-year nursing students. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing. 2019; 57 (4):1-55 - 32.
McLaughlina LE, Luberto CM, O'Bryand EM, Kraemere KM, McLeishf AC. The indirect effect of positive affect in the relationship between trait mindfulness and emotion dysregulation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019; 145 :70-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.020 - 33.
Finkelstein-Fox L, Park CL, Riley KE. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: Promoting well-being during the transition to college. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2018; 31 :1-15. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1518635 - 34.
López P, Rosa G. El desarrollo de competencias para la promoción de la resiliencia: Buenas prácticas y procesos formativos en educación social. Edetania. 2004; 45 :145-163