Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Human Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation as Fertility Reserve

By Elena Albani, Graziella Bracone, Sonia Di Biccari, Domenico Vitobello, Nicola Fattizzi and Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti

Submitted: November 21st 2010Reviewed: April 27th 2011Published: January 27th 2012

DOI: 10.5772/22644

Downloaded: 1438

1. Introduction

Oocytes designed for reproductive function in women are the largest cell in the human body. They are surrounded by granulosa cells to form the follicles that in various stages of development are present in the ovarian cortex (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Primary follicle in frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex (20X magnification)

The ovary of a healthy woman contains a finite number of follicles that decreases over time. The peak number is reached in the fifth month of gestation with approximately 7 million follicles. This number reduces progressively due to atresia, so at birth there are only 1-2 million follicles that, at puberty, become 300.000. Approximately, 400 of these follicles become mature oocytes and ovulate during the fertile life of the female.

At the age of 37, there is usually an acceleration of follicular loss, which is correlated with an increase in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level.

Last year Wallace reported with a mathematical model combined with histological evidence, the establishment and decline of non-growing follicles (NGFs) in the human ovary. Wallace shows for the first time that the rate of NGF recruitment increases from birth to age 14 years and then declines with age until menopause (Fig. 2) (Wallace & Kelsey, 2010).

Figure 2.

The best histological model for the establishment of the NGF population after conception and the subsequent decline until menopause (Kindly provided by Professor Wallace).

However, the central dogma of ovarian biology has been questioned by new discoveries. Johnson in 2004 reported that germline stem cells (GSCs) are present in the mouse ovary, and could become new follicles (Johnson et al., 2004). It seems that female germline stem cell reside in an extragonadal location, the bone marrow, and reach the ovary through the circulatory system (Johnson et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2007). De Felici reported that germline stem cells exist in adult mouse ovaries but are quiescent under physiological conditions, contributing to the oocyte reserve only in response to ovotoxic damage (De Felici, 2010). Recently, Bukovsky showed the production of new eggs in cultures derived from premenopausal and postmenopausal human ovaries (Bukovsky et al., 2009).

Despite these exciting new prospects to indicate that oocytes are continuously formed in the female adult, at the present it is known that the pool of follicles is limited, so in case of toxic ovarian events that may affect the ovary, opportune measures should be considered to preserve the fertility of young women. According to the law in different countries regulating assisted reproductive technologies, approaches to fertility preservation include embryo, oocyte cryopreservation, or ovarian tissue banking followed by ovarian tissue transplant or in in-vitro culture.

However, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue may be the only acceptable method to preserve fertility for prepubertal girls, for women who cannot delay the start of cancer treatment for ovarian stimulation, and probably for women with hormone-sensitive malignancies. All these situations make ovarian tissue freezing the only option for female fertility preservation.

Therefore, an entire ovary or part of it, is removed laparoscopically, frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen at -196°C. After complete recovery of the patient, the tissue can be used to restore gametogenic and/or steroidogenic function.

Potential indications for ovarian tissue cryopreservation are patients diagnosed with malignant (extra-pelvic diseases: bone cancer, thyroid cancer, kidney cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, neuroblastoma; pelvic diseases: non-gynecological malignancy, gynaecological malignancy; systemic diseases: Hodkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukaemia, melanoblastoma) or benign diseases (recurrent ovarian cysts, etc), or with non malignant autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune thrombocytopenia or other haematological diseases). These patients are being treated successfully with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy or repeated surgery, greatly improved in recent years, but all these therapies can be toxic to the ovary. So, it is important to focus attention on the quality of life, including fertility preservation, as well as on survival of these young women.

2. Effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or other toxic drugs on female reproduction

The risk of ovarian failure after anticancer treatments is assessed in relation to patient’s age, treatment protocol and type of cancer as reported by Meirow (Meirow and Nugent, 2001).

High-dose ionizing radiation is used to treat many types of cancer and hematologic malignancies. Ovarian transposition is not possible in case of total irradiation as is required for bone marrow transplantation (Meirow et al., 2010). The estimated dose at which half of the follicles are lost in humans (LD50) is 4 Gy (Wallace et al., 1989), but is age-dependent. Lashbaugh reported that the toxic ovarian dose, which leads to permanent loss of fertility is higher in young women (20 Gy) than older (6 Gy) (Lushbaugh & Casarett, 1976).

Chemoterapic agents can be grouped into five classes of drugs based on their mode of action (alkylating agents, aneuploidy inducers, topoisomerase II inhibitors, antimetabolites and radiomimetics) as summarized by Meirow. It was found that alkylating agents imposed the highest risk in causing ovarian failure with an odd ratio (OR) of 3,98, followed by cisplatin with an OR of 1.77 (Meirow and Nugent, 2001).

Schmidt, reported that the ovaries of healthy young girls contain a higher number of follicles than ovaries from older women, meaning young girls are more resistant to chemotherapy. Even if chemotherapeutic agents differ in their ovarian toxicity (Schmidt et al., 2010), they are often used in combination, so their adverse effects are increased and cannot always be easily evaluated.

In 2007, Oktem and Oktay, published an interesting paper on ovarian damage from chemotherapy. They present the first quantitative evidence in humans, by histological evaluation, that alkylating agents can significantly reduce ovarian reserve, and may affect stromal cell function (Oktem & Oktay, 2007). Meirow also reported that injury from chemotherapy is in stromal cells as well as in follicles and blood vessels (Meirow, 2010).

3. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation

To preserve ovarian tissue for a lengthy period of time, it should be stored in liquid nitrogen at a temperature of -196°C. However, ovarian tissue cryopreservation is complex and requires preservation of multiple cell types, thus the ability to successfully cryopreserve would be a powerful clinical tool in an assisted reproductive laboratory.

As reported by Bakhach in 2009, is easy to imagine the cell damage when temperatures fall from +37 C to -196°C. There is a loss of about 95% of intracellular water, an increase of electrolyte concentrations in both intra and extracellular media, and ice formation in the intracellular spaces that deform cells and destroy intracellular structures (Bakhach, 2009).

Hovatta in 2005 published an interesting work on the different methods of ovarian tissue freezing which emphasizes the importance of trying to preserve most of the cellular tissue components, including even the small proportion of ovarian medulla which contain blood vessels and nerves so important for ovarian tissue function recovery after reimplantation (Hovatta, 2005). Recently, Donnez reported that revascularization of grafts depends also on the preservation of vessels in grafted tissue, and not only on neoangiogenesis from the host (Donnez et al., 2011-b).

It should be stressed that the protocol of ovarian tissue freezing is still not standardized. So, there are several freezing procedures that range from slow freezing/rapid thawing, vitrification or ultrarapid-freezing. Freezing protocols differ also depending on the cryoprotectants used, dehydration/rehydration time and temperature, different protein support, and on the containers used for storage such us cryovials, strips or other tubes.

Approaches to human ovarian tissue cryopreservation are currently characterised by the use of slow freezing/rapid thawing methods using dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) or propanediol (PROH) as a cryoprotectant. The slow freezing requires the use of a machine that slowly decreases the temperature, so the freezing programme so takes a few hours. This procedure has the disadvantage that it can lead to the formation of ice crystals, affecting correct tissue preservation. This disadvantage is avoided by using the protocol of vitrification, where high concentrations of cryopotectants are used, which increased ovarian toxicity too. Ultra-rapid freezing should be a method somewhere between the previous two using the advantages given by vitrification with a lower concentration of cryoprotectant to act on increasing the cooling rate.

In 2003 Shaw published an interesting paper on the terminology associated with equilibrium cooling procedures or ‘slow cooling’ and non-equilibrium protocols such as ‘vitrification’, ‘rapid cooling’ and ‘ultrarapid cooling’ that is helpful in clarifying the terms often used inappropriately (Shaw & Jones, 2003).

The positive results achieved by oocyte vitrification, has been discussed in recent years, but at the present time this procedure applied to ovarian tissue has given conflicting results.

Isachenko has worked extensively on the ovarian tissue vitrification. Her paper of 2007 showed a better preservation of ovarian tissue by slow freezing in which the quality of follicles was higher compared to the rapid freezing (Isachenko et al., 2007; Isachenko et al., 2009).

In 2007 Li demonstrated that the vitrification method for cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue is effective and simple (Li et al., 2007). Kagawa in 2009 found no difference in oocyte viability between fresh and vitrified human ovarian cortical tissue (Kagawa, 2009). In another paper ovarian stroma was shown to be significantly better preserved by vitrification compared to slow freezing (Keros et al., 2009).

However, data on cryopreservation of human ovarian tissues by vitrification are still modest and controversial. This may be due to the fact that the same cryopreservation procedure is often used, such as slow freezing or vitrification, but different freezing protocol (types of cryoprotectant, concentration used and time of diffusion, etc.), this creates significant bias that must be considered.

In addition vitrification presupposes direct contact with liquid nitrogen, which is a potential source of microbial contamination, as reported by Isachenko (Isachenko et al., 2009).

In conclusion, an ideal ovarian cryopreservation method has not yet been established.

4. How to use

After 4 or 5 years when the patient is considered oncologically cured, the ovarian tissue stored in liquid nitrogen can be used. There are several ways to use tissue after thawing, such us reimplantation in various anatomic sites in the same patient or in a host animal or in vitro culture to grow primordial follicles present in large number (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Techniques using human cryopreserved ovarian tissue.

4.1. Ovarian tissue culture

When dealing with tumours that can metastasize to the ovary, ovarian tissue reimplantation should be avoided due to the risk of retransmitting cancer cells. In these cases the only option is to develop other methods in which the primordial follicles are matured in vitro within ovarian tissue pieces. Only in mice was the full maturation of primordial follicles with livebirths achieved (Eppig et al., 1996), this is difficult to replicate in large animals and humans.

In 2008 Picton published an interesting review on in vitro growth and maturation of follicles, which showed a number of different culture systems. It showed that culture of thin cortical strips has many advantages such as avoiding the damage caused by mechanical or enzymatic recovery of follicle present in the cortex, and provides a complex support system that resembles the ovary in vivo as the follicles also remain in contact with the surrounding stromal cells. This contact is very important at least until development of secondary follicles, when the follicles from the surrounding stroma should be left to facilitate further development. Thus, a multi-step strategy for the complete in vitro growth and maturation of follicles is promoted (Picton et al., 2008).

Recently another interesting review was published by Fabbri which summarizes the most relevant literature of the last ten years on in vitro cultures of ovarian cortical pieces. The conclusion was that the current optimal method for growing and maturing human follicles remains whole tissue culture. The authors underline the difficult of graduating nutrient concentration and especially what is best to add to the culture media and when (Fabbri et al., 2009).

In conclusion the culture of ovarian cortex strips is under development and currently not applicable to the human species, owing to the long period necessary for the follicle to complete development, almost six months compared to the couple of weeks in mice.

However, as suggested by Picton before these strategies can be utilised therapeutically, extensive testing is required to confirm the epigenetic health and genetic normality of in vitro growth derived oocytes (Picton et al., 2008).

We must not forget that oocytes are matured in vitro, after full development of follicles in vitro for a period exceeding 90 days, with the addition of nutrients that are not exactly what you get in their natural anatomic site, both as concentration and as timing of administration. So, even if complete follicle development in vitro is far from being clinically applicable, this does not mean that patients with malignancies that metastasize to the ovary should be excluded from the eventuality of cryopreserved tissue. We cannot know whether the study of in vitro cultures will make progress in a few years time.

4.2. Ovarian tissue reimplantation

The main option of this strategy is to transplant cortical ovarian tissue into the pelvic cavity, into its original location (orthotopic site) or in a different site, such as forearm, arm, abdominal wall, etc. (heterotopic site) when anticancer treatment is completed and the patient is disease-free.

Human transplantation history begins in the heterotopic site, such as the arm or the forearm. First studies on heterotopic reimplantation of an organ date back to 1975 and were applied to parathyroid gland. Several authors demonstrated that parathyroid autografts secret hormone and maintain normal serum calcium in the host (Wells et al., 1975; Hickey & Samaan, 1975). Oktay was the first to begin reimplanting of heterotopic tissue in the forearm, paving the way to human reimplantation history. In 2004 Oktay published a paper on the first embryo development after heterotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue (Oktay et el., 2004).

Successful orthotopic transplantation of ewe cryopreserved ovarian tissue was first performed by Gosden in 1994 (Gosden et al., 1994). The orthotopic transplantation is the site most suitable compared to the heterotopic site, because it is the natural environment, with comfortable temperatures and pressures for proper follicular development.

After several animal studies, ten years later, the first live human birth after frozen-thawed ovarian cortex orthotopic reimplantation was achieved by the Belgian group led by Donnez (Donnez et al., 2004), followed recently by other live births (Donnez et al., 2011-a; Donnez et al., 2011-b; Meirow & Levron, 2005; Meirow et al., 2007; Demeestere et al., 2007; Demeestere et al., 2009; Andersen et al., 2008; Ernst et al., 2010; Silber et al., 2010; Piver et al., 2009; Sanchez-Serrano et al., 2010; Revel et al., 2011; Roux et al., 2010), as shown in table 1.

The major disadvantage of transplanting ovarian cortical strips is that revascularization of the graft needs several days, according to the species. So, revascularization occurrs within 48h after transplantation in rats and within 1 week of grafting in sheep. This leads to great loss of follicles from the grafts in transplantation due to ischemic injury, which can however be avoided by performing a whole ovarian transplantation thus providing immediate revascularization of the transplant (Onions et al., 2009; Bedaiwy & Falcone, 2004; Bedaiwy et al., 2006; Bromer & Patrizio, 2009). However, whole ovarian transplantations have a high rate of vascular complication, such as risk of thrombosis. Therefore, further work is needed before whole ovarian tissue transplantation can be considered a viable option for fertility preservation.

Exogenous factors such as antioxidants, growth factors or hormones have been tested to improve follicular survival in ovarian grafts by reducing ischaemia-reperfusion injury (Nugent et al., 1998; Torrents et al., 2003; Demeestere et al., 2009).

Until now, slow programmed ovarian tissue freezing is the only procedure that has resulted live births following orthotopic transplantation of frozen/thawed human ovarian tissue slices, but it is unknown or difficult to quantify how many women have attempted ovarian tissue reimplant.

The risk of ovarian tissue reimplantation includes transplantation of the primary tumour. However, most malignant diseases encountered during the reproductive years do not metastasize to the ovaries, except blood-borne malignancies such as leukemias, neuroblastoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma. In the 1996 Shaw reported the transmission of lymphoma from a donor to a graft recipient (Shaw et al., 1996). Recently, Dolmans demonstrated, by quantitative RT-PCR, ovarian contamination by malignant cells by reimplant cryopreserved ovarian tissue in acute and chronic leukaemia patients (Dolmans et al., 2011).

So, it is highly recommended to use the best assessment to detect micro-metastases on a small portion of the harvested tissue before cryopreservation, it is also useful to freeze a less valuable part of the cortex, such as ovarian medulla.

As suggested by Von Wolff, sophisticated techniques are required to exclude first macroscopic ovarian pathology, such as ovarian metastasis, using imaging (sonography, CT scan, etc.). Then immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to exclude single malignant cells, and identified minimal residual disease (MRD) by highly sensitive RT-PCR. Another effective method is xenotransplant small sample of ovarian tissue in a immunodeficient animal host (Von Wolff et al., 2009).

4.3. Xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation falls between reimplantation and in vitro culture, so the follicles within the tissue are growing in vivo in an animal host (T-and B-cell-deficient SCID mice). It has been applied to assess the risk of reimplanting malignant cells after human ovarian tissue reimplantation, and to observe follicle development.

Last year Dath compared four grafting (intraperitoneal, ovarian bursa, sub-cutaneous, and intramuscular) sites for xenotransplantation of human ovarian tissue to nude mice, concluding that all four sites equally supported early follicular growth and preserved some quiescent follicles (Dath et al., 2010). However, Sonmezer reported an asynchrony between oocytes and granulosa cell development (Sonmezer & Oktay, 2010).

FIRST AUTHOR
YEAR
WHEREDIAGNOSISAGE
at cryo
FRESH or CRYO-PRESERVEDSLICES or WHOLEREIMPLANTATION SIDEOUTCOME
Donnez, 2004BelgiumStage IV Hodgkin’s lymphoma25Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovarian fossa peritoneumSpontaneous pregnancy: live birth
Donnez,
2011-a
BelgiumNeuroectodermic tumour17Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovarySpontaneous pregnancy: live birth
Meirow,
2005, 2007
IsraelNon Hodgkin’s lymphoma28Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovaryMild ovarian stimulation - IVF: live birth
Demeestere, 2007, 2010BelgiumStage IV Hodgkin’s lymphoma24Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic (+ heterotopic)Spontaneous pregnancy: live birth in 2007
live birth in 2009
Andersen, 2008DenmarkHodgkin’s lymphoma27Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovaryOvarian stimulation - IVF: live birth
Andersen, 2008;
Ernst,
2010
DenmarkEwing
sarcoma
27Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovaryMild ovarian stimulation - IVF: 1 live birth.
Spontaneous pregnancy:
1 live birth
A- Silber,
2010
B-(Donnez, 2011 b)
USAStage IIIb Hodgkin’s lymphoma20Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopicA- Ongoing pregnancies

B -live birth
Silber,
2010
USA24Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic1 live birth
+
1 live birth
Piver,
2009
FranceMicroscopic polyangiitis27Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopicIVF: live birth
Sanchez-Serrano,
2010
SpainBreast cancer36Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopicOvarian stimulation, IVF: 2 live births (twins)
Revel,
2011
IsraelThalassemia major19Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopicIVF: live birth
Roux, 2010FranceHomozygous sicule cell anemia20Frozen/thawedSlicesOrthotopic: ovary and few strips deposited in the peritoneal windowSpontaneous pregnancy: live birth

Table 1.

Live births after frozen/thawed orthotopic transplantation of human ovarian tissue.

In conclusion, xenotransplantation should be carefully considered in its human clinical application because of the risk of cross-species retroviral infection.

5. Conclusion

As reported by Maltaris it is important to assess the ‘ovarian reserve’ that is the available pool of primordial follicles in the ovary and is a major determinant of female fertility potential. This information is important for a correct strategy of fertility preservation before cancer treatment. In general, ovarian reserve tests are either biochemical or biophysical (Maltaris et al., 2006), but new methods are required.

In conclusion, a common goal of life-saving methods must be to protect the fertility of young women to this aim it is important to form a closely collaborative team comprising gynaecologists, surgeons, oncologists, haematologists, biologists and psychologists. Specifically, it is important that the oncologist gives an assessment of the degree of ovarian damage in order to decide how much ovarian tissue to retrieve and store.

It is known that for each malignant disease only few protocols are commonly used, so it is possible to analyse the risk of ovarian failure. Meirow reported that the ovarian failure rate was 50% for breast cancer, 44% for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and 32% for Hodgkin’s disease (Meirow & Nugent, 2001).

Before proceeding to cryopreserve ovarian tissue, it is important to identify a series of tests for morphological analyses (such as staining with hematoxylin and eosin for observation by an optical microscope, or a more thorough evaluation of cell components by electron microscopy), for functional analyses (such as immunohistochemistry), or for viability analyses (such as trypan blue); in order to assess the degree of overall tissue preservation with the procedure adopted in the laboratory.

In addition, it is also important to put an age limit to the preservation of ovarian tissue. The patient can use it only after cancer remission, therefore not before few years, so the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue of a patient older than 38 years old may be a useless procedure but could give psychological support to women. In any case, patients should be properly informed about the real possibility of recovering fertility and be able to get pregnant.

In conclusion, we agree with Donnez that ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be offered before anticancer treatments in all cases where there is a high risk of premature ovarian failure and where emergency in vitro fertilization is not possible (Donnez et al., 2011-c).

If the dogma of reproductive biology is that of a finite number of follicles in the ovary which, moreover, undergo atresia during reproductive life, all procedures to preserve fertility should be carried out before acting on the ovary with drugs, therapies, surgery or potentially toxic treatments. Therefore, live births after cryoprserved ovarian tissue trasnplantation opened up new chapter in the field of infertility preservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Rosalind Roberts for reviewing the English language, and Elena Gismano (biologist) for assistance with chapter preparation.

© 2012 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Elena Albani, Graziella Bracone, Sonia Di Biccari, Domenico Vitobello, Nicola Fattizzi and Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti (January 27th 2012). Human Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation as Fertility Reserve, Topics in Cancer Survivorship, Ravinder Mohan, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/22644. Available from:

chapter statistics

1438total chapter downloads

2Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Lung Cancer in Elderly

By Anne Dagnault and Jean Archambault

Related Book

First chapter

Vitamin D and Cancer

By Khanh vinh quốc Lương and Lan Thị Hòang Nguyễn

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us