Signaling Pathways Regulating Vessel Stabilization
1. Introduction
Proper vascular network structure is essential for normal tissue function. The vasculature provides oxygen, nutrients and immune cells, as well as removes tissue waste and by-products. (Jain 2003) In tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, the existence of functional blood vessels is critical to the survival of the newly generated tissue. Current strategies for promoting new blood vessel formation, or neovascularization, have mostly focused on angiogenesis, which is the formation of new capillaries from pre-existing vessels by sprouting of endothelial cells (ECs). (Carmeliet 2003) Another mechanism of neovascularization, vasculogenesis, which is the
While the delivery of angiogenic factors has been successful in promoting new capillary formation, the structure of the newly formed vessels is often non-ideal. The vessels can be immature, with small diameters and lack of some essential cellular and extracellular components required for proper function. Immature vascular structure may result in poor blood perfusion and possibly vessel regression upon a decrease in the vascular stimulus. (Benjamin et al., 1999) In addition, the formation of small capillaries alone is not likely to be sufficient for vascularization of large, complex tissues, which are often needed for tissue engineering. Therefore, the goal of neovascularization in engineered tissue should be focused not only on the initial assembly of capillaries via angiogenesis or vasculogenesis, but also the expansion and stabilization of new vessels, which means the formation of mature, long-lasting vessels with dimensions that meet the requirement of high conductance blood flow. (Carmeliet & Conway, 2001) In this chapter, we will discuss current status in the generation of stable, long-lasting vascular networks in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, identifying recent advances and limitations yet to be overcome.
2. Angiogenesis stabilization: basic mechanisms
The process of angiogenesis includes four stages: (a) initiation, in which a certain angiogenic stimulus increases vessel permeability and protein leakage; (b) progression, characterized by the production of proteolytic enzymes that degrade the basement membrane (BM) lining endothelial cells (ECs) and surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) to allow EC invasion and migration; (c) differentiation, which involves the assembly of ECs into a network with a luminal structure; and (d) stabilization and maturation, where mural cells (pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells) are recruited and ECs deposit new BM. (Bussolino et al., 1997) It is important to note that the MCs may be recruited after initial network function or simultaneous with vessel assembly. (Brey et al., 2004) Numerous cellular and molecular factors are involved in the regulation of this process. Failure in this regulation could result in excessive vessel generation or premature regression, which is seen in many pathological conditions. In the following sections we will describe the basic components of the vessel and their role in vessel stability.
2.1. Cells
The walls of stable blood vessels are composed of two distinct cell types: ECs and mural cells (MCs). (Figure 1) While ECs form the inner lining of vascular tubes, MCs associate with and coat the outside of the endothelial tube. (Gaengel et al., 2008) In the case of capillaries the MCs, or pericytes, are intermittently present on the surface. For larger vessels the MCs, or vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), coat the entire vessel surface often in multiple layers. Interactions between the ECs and MCs play a critical role in the regulation of vascular formation, stabilization, remodeling, and function. Abnormal interactions between the two cell types are implicated in a number of pathological conditions, including tumor angiogenesis, diabetic microangiopathy, ectopic tissue calcification, and stroke and dementia syndrome. (Armulik et al., 2005; Carmeliet 2003)
Junctional structures, including adherent junctions and tight junctions, are present between ECs and provide the endothelium with integrity, mechanical strength and tightness, and a barrier to molecular transport. (Carmeliet 2003) During vascular sprouting, junctions are partially disorganized to allow cell migration and proliferation, and to increase vessel permeability. During vessel stabilization, junctional integrity is re-established and permeability is tightly controlled. (Dejana, 2004) As vessels sprout and migrate, they will form branches. These sprouts then inosculate with other vessels to form complex networks. Typically, a high vessel density is formed in response to the initial vascular stimuli. This vasculature must be remodeled for tissue-specific transport and function. Apoptosis of ECs are involved at this later stage to remove excessive vessels. (Darland & D'Amore, 2001) However, excessive apoptosis may result in premature vessel regression. Growth factors, which are essential for angiogenesis, not only stimulate EC proliferation and migration but also inhibit EC apoptosis. (Dimmeler & Zeiher, 2000) Thus, the prevention of EC apoptosis may improve the survival and durability of blood vessels formed in engineered tissues.
MCs are commonly subdivided into VSMCs, which are associated with arteries and veins forming multiple concentric layers; and pericytes, which are associated with small diameter capillaries. (Gaengel et al., 2009) Intermediate-size vessels, arterioles and venules, have MCs with properties between those of typical VSMCs and pericytes. Since VSMCs and pericytes share some common cellular markers, such as -smooth muscle actin (-SMA) and desmin, they are believed to represent phenotypic variants of the same lineage, and may function as progenitors for each other depending on external stimuli. (Gerhardt & Betsholtz, 2003)
The presence of MCs on the surface of ECs plays a critical role in vessel stability. Intercellular adhesion between MCs and ECs is mediated by integrin α4β1, which is expressed by proliferating ECs, and its ligand VCAM-1, which is expressed by proliferating MCs. (Garmy-Susini et al., 2005) Studies have shown that the association of MCs to the newly formed endothelial plexus stabilizes the vasculature, while the disruption of EC-MC associations results in excessive regression of vasculature. (Benjamin et al., 1998) Co-culture of EC with SMC in a 3D
2.2. Extracellular components
Extracellular matrices (ECM), including BM (primarily collagen IV and various laminin isoforms) and interstitial matrices (typically collagen I, elastin and fibronectin but depends on the particularly tissue), play important roles in angiogenesis. (Francis et al., 2008) Firstly, the ECM scaffold provides mechanical support for ECs to form channels, preventing vessels from collapsing. In addition, EC adhesion to ECM regulates EC proliferation, migration, and survival, mediated by different signaling pathways. (Davis & Senger, 2005) And finally, the deposition of ECM, particularly BM, which occurs after MC recruitment stabilizes the vessel by decreasing permeability and preventing vessel regression. (Stratman et al., 2009)
The ECM is dynamically regulated during angiogenesis. In the initiation of angiogenesis, ECM is degraded by proteinases, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The degradation of ECM not only allows EC migration and proliferation, but also releases soluble growth factors trapped in the matrix. (Ghajar et al., 2008) After lumen formation, MCs are recruited to EC tubes and induce the deposition of new BM as well as the secretion of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which inhibit MMPs proteolysis. (Stratman et al., 2009) Dysregulation of ECM, such as glycation of collagen due to diabetes and aging, can slow ECM vessel assembly. (Francis-Sedlak et al., 2010)
2.3. Signaling pathways
The formation of stable vasculature is tightly regulated by the spatial and temporal kinetics of numerous signaling pathways. A stable, operational vascular network results from a balance between signals that favor angiogenesis and vascular stabilization, and those that promote vascular regression. (Bussolino et al., 1997) Signaling pathways affect vascular stabilization presumably by regulating proliferation and apoptosis of ECs and MCs, as well as the deposition and degradation of ECM. (Jain 2003) In this section, we will discuss some of the signaling pathways and their roles in vascular stabilization.
2.3.1. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) family
The PDGF family is composed of disulfide-bonded homodimers of four subunits, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-C and PDGF-D, as well as the heterodimer PDGF-AB. PDGF isoforms exert their biological effects through the activation of two tyrosine kinase receptors, PDGFR-α and PDGF-β, which are present on MCs and messenchymal cells. (Hellberg et al., 2010)
Specifically, PDGF-BB, secreted by proliferating ECs during angiogenic sprouting, stimulates the migration and proliferation of MCs, which express PDGFR-β. In addition, PDGF-BB induces the differentiation of messenchymal cells toward a MC lineage.(Hirschi
2.3.2. Angiopoietins
The angiopoietin (Ang) family consists of Ang-1, Ang-2, Ang-3 and Ang-4. The angiopoietins are ligands for the Ties, a family of receptors that are expressed within the vascular endothelium. (Yancopoulos
Ang-1 stabilizes nascent vessels and make them leak-resistant, presumably by facilitating interactions between ECs and MCs. Genetic deletion of Ang-1 or its receptor Tie2 in mice resulted in defects in vessel remodeling with poor association of ECs with BM, and failure to recruit MCs. (Sato et al., 1995; Suri et al., 1996) Transgenic overexpression of Ang-1 in mice lead to a significant increase in vessel diameter and increased resistance to vessel leakage. The resistance is presumably due to the ability of Ang-1 to maximize interactions between ECs, MCs and BM. (Thurston et al., 1999, 2000) Ang-2, on the other hand, acts as an antagonist of Ang-1, destabilizes vessels and contributes to vessel regression. Transgenic overexpression of Ang-2 disrupts blood vessel formation in the mouse embryo, resulting in similar effects to Ang-1 or Tie 2 knockouts. (Maisonpierre et al., 1997) Thus, angiopoietins positively or negatively regulate vessel stabilization, however, the detailed mechanism of the signaling pathways are not yet well-described.
2.3.3. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P)
S1P is a bioactive lipid mediator that is primarily secreted by platelets. It activates a family of G-protein coupled receptors (S1P1 to 5), formerly known as endothelial differentiation gene (Edg)-receptors. (Gaengel et al., 2009) Mice deficient in S1P have severe vascular defects resulting in embryonic lethality, with incomplete coverage of MCs. Mice deficient in S1P1, its receptor, also showed severe defect in vascular maturation, suggesting the role of S1P/S1P1 signaling pathway in promoting vascular stabilization. (Mizugishi et al., 2005) Moreover, knockout of the EC-specific S1P1 in mice embryos resulted in a similar phenotype as obtained for the S1P1 full knockout, suggesting that S1P1 functions mainly through ECs instead of other cell types. (Allende et al., 2003) It was found that S1P/S1P1 signaling pathway promotes vascular stabilization by activation of N-Cadherin, which is a cell adhesion molecule connecting ECs and MCs. (Paik et al., 2004)
2.3.4. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)
TGF-, a growth factor family with three different isoforms TGF-1, TGF-2 and TGF-3, is expressed by a number of cell types, including ECs and MCs. Depending on its receptor TGF- mediates distinct signaling pathways. TGF- can be both pro- and anti-angiogenic. (Pepper 1997) The major receptors for TGF- in regulating vascular stabilization include activin receptor-like kinase (Alk)-1, Alk-5, and endoglin. (Gaengel et al., 2009)
Activation of Alk-1 triggers EC migration, proliferation, and inhibits vessel maturation and MC differentiation; whereas activation of Alk-5 instead mediates inhibition of EC migration, reduced proliferation, increased vessel maturation and MC differentiation, suggesting that TGF- regulates vessel maturation and stabilization via a balance between Alk-1 and Alk-5. (Goumans et al., 2002) The determination of which signaling pathway TGF- activates appears to depend on its concentration. At low doses, TGF- promotes EC proliferation by activating TGF- /Alk-1 pathway; while at high doses, Alk-5 is activated instead. (van den Driesche et al., 2003) Endoglin, a TGF- co-receptor expressed specifically in ECs, modulates Alk-1 and Alk-5 mediated pathways, possibly by favoring the TGF-/Alk-1 pathway. (Letamendia et al., 1998)
2.3.5. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family
VEGF is a family of angiogenic growth factors expressed by a variety of cells, including keratinocytes, macrophages, mast cells, vSMCS, and ECs. Members of the VEGF family include VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and placental growth factor (PlGF). VEGF is a major mitogen for ECs, mediated via VEGF tyrosine kinase receptors (VEGFRs) expressed on ECs. (Bussolino et al., 1997; Yancopoulos
However, the role of VEGF in regulating vascular stabilization can be both positive and negative, depending on its spatial and temporal kinetics. On the one hand, VEGF enhances EC survival and protects EC from apoptosis by up-regulating the expression of Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2), an apoptosis regulator protein. (Nor et al., 1999) Withdrawal of VEGF prior to stabilization and remodeling may result in excessive vessel regression by EC apoptosis. (Benjamin et al., 1999; Jain, et al., 1998) On the other hand, VEGF is also considered as a negative regulator for vessel maturation by disrupting VSMC function and pericyte coverage of nascent vascular sprouts, leading to vessel destabilization. (Greenberg et al.,2008). The overexpression of VEGF results in leaky, immature and unstable vessels, which contribute to a number of pathological conditions, such as tumors, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, the dosage of VEGF must be tightly regulated in a spatial, temporal and quantitative manner in therapeutic applications to avoid abnormal or aberrant vascular structure. (Yancopoulos
2.3.6. Ephrins and notch
Ephrins and Notch are two signals that are generally involved in the differentiation of many cell types. In angiogenesis, the two signaling pathways are involved in the determination of arterio-venous vessel fate. (Jain 2003) Thus, the ephrins and Notch signaling pathways are considered novel targets for therapeutic angiogenesis. (Sullivan & Bicknell, 2003; Cristofaro & Emanueli, 2009) The ephrin ligands and Eph receptors are both transmembrane molecules expressed on ECs and other cell types.(Yancopoulos
2.3.7. Others
There are a number of other signaling pathways involved in the formation of stable vasculature. For example, brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin for neuron survival and differentiation. It is also an EC survival factor involved in intramyocardial vessel stabilization, by activation of trk B receptors expressed on cardiac microvascular ECs.(Donovan et al., 2000) Monocyte chemotatic protein-1 (MCP-1) is a small cytokine best known for its ability to recruit monocytes after injury. However, recent studies have shown that MCP-1 improves vessel stabilization during angiogenesis by promoting MC recruitment and inducing VSMC proliferation. (Aplin et al., 2010; Selzman
Ang-1 (MCs) | Tie2 (ECs, MSCs) | Stabilizes vessels by mediating EC-MC and EC-ECM adhesion; Induces production of factors such as HB-EGF, HGF and MCP-1. |
Ang-2 (ECs) | Tie2 (ECs; MSCs) | Destabilizes vessels by binding to Tie2 to attenuate the effect of Ang-1. |
Bcl-2 (ECs) | ERKs (ECs) | Prevents EC apoptosis and enhances vessel durability. |
BDNF (neurons; ECs) | Trk-B (neurons; ECs; MCs ) | Promotes intramyocardial arteries and capillaries stabilization by enhancing EC survival during embryogenesis. |
Delta/Serrate (ECs) | Notch (ECs) | Determines arterial-venous fate of ECs by repressing venous fate in arterial ECs. |
Ephrin-B2 (Arterial ECs) | Eph-B4 (Venous ECs) | Determines arterial and venous EC specialization. |
HB-EGF (ECs) | ErbB1, ErbB2 (MCs) | Promotes MCs proliferation and protects from apoptosis, involved in Ang(s) regulation. |
HGF (ECs, MSCs) | C-met (ECs, SMCs) | Induces SMC migration, mediating angiopoietins regulated vessel stabilization. |
MCP-1 (ECs, MCs) | CCR-2 (MCs) | Mediates spontaneous and Ang-1 induced MC recruitment. |
PDGF-BB (ECs) | PDGFR-β (MCs; MSCs) | Promotes MC migration and proliferation; Induces MSCs differentiation to MCs. |
S1P (Platelets) | S1P1 (MCs) | Activates adhesion molecule connecting ECs and MCs; directs MC recruitment and association to vessels. |
TGF-β (ECs; MCs) | Alk1 (ECs; MSCs) | Promotes EC migration and proliferation; Inhibits vessel maturation and MC differentiation. |
Alk5 (ECs; MSCs) | Induces MC differentiation and ECM production; Inhibits EC migration and proliferation. | |
Endoglin (ECs) | Modulates Alk-1 and Alk-5 mediated pathway by favoring Alk-1. | |
VEGF (Macrophages; MCs; fibroblasts) | VEGFRs (ECs) | Enhances EC survival by inducing Bcl-2 expression; Inhibits MC association and increases vessel permeability. |
Many of the signaling pathways mentioned above work in a coordinated fashion to regulate vessel stabilization. For example, MCP-1 was found to be one of the many cytokines released during angiopoietin induced MC recruitment.(Aplin et al., 2010) Other cytokines involved in angiopoietin function include EC-derived heparin binding-epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) (Iivanainen et al., 2009; Stratman et al., 2010) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (Kobayashi et al., 2006). PDGF-BB was found to promote MC proliferation partially by inducing the release of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), which in turn transactivates FGFR-1. (Millette
3. Tissue engineering strategies
Extensive attention has been given to tissue engineering for its potential to restore, maintain or improve tissue functions. (Langer & Vacanti, 1993) However, the clinical application of engineered tissues requires the ability to form extensive, stable microvascular networks within engineered tissues. (Brey & McIntire, 2008) While strategies for neovascularization, including angiogenesis, vasculogenesis and arteriogenesis, have been extensively reviewed elsewhere (Brey et al., 2005; Ennett & Mooney, 2002; Sneider et al., 2009), increased attention is being given to the later stage of neovascularization, which is the maturation and stabilization of newly formed vessels. Different tissue engineering strategies, including protein delivery, gene therapy and cell therapy (Table 2) have been developed and tested in both
Protein Delivery | Better dose control than gene therapies; Temporal control over release can be achieved with certain delivery systems. | Expensive to produce and isolate proteins; Short protein half-lives |
Gene Therapy | Long-term active growth factor expression; Delivery restricted to area of modified cells | Safety issues based on delivery methods; Difficult to control the level and duration of gene expression; Limited transfection efficiency. |
Cell Therapy | Introducing cell population that is sensitive to stimuli unlike many cells in the disease/damaged tissue Cells can stimulate neovascularization by incorporation into new vessels or release of soluble factors | Costly and time consuming for cell isolation and expansion; Limited cell sources for autologous transplantation; Immunosuppresive medications needed for allogeneic or exnogeneic transplantation. |
3.1. Protein delivery
3.1.1. Single factor delivery
The formation of a stable vascular network during normal healing involves a complex spatial and temporal regulation of a large number of angiogenic stimulators and inhibitors. (Jain, 2003) While it may seem logical that all of these factors would be required in order to generate vessels in engineered tissues, researchers have attempted to initiate the entire process through the delivery of a single factor. Members of the VEGF and FGF families were some of the first identified angiogenic growth factors and have been used in clinical trials for the treatment of limb ischemia. (Cao et al., 2005) However, the short term delivery of basic FGF (FGF-2) or VEGF may result in immature vessels, stable for only a short time prior to regression. (Dellian et al., 1996) Based on these issues others have chosen to use factors with a known role in angiogenesis stabilization. For example, PDGF-BB, Ang-1, HGF, and ephrin-B2 are some of the factors currently under investigation in animal and
It is possible that the short lifetime and immaturity exhibited by vessels stimulated in these cases is not the result of using only a single factor, but instead due to the transient nature of their presence. The short lifetime of proteins and their rapid transport out of tissues can results in only a short-term stimulus. A single protein delivered in a controlled manner may be able to provide enough signal to prolong the vascularization response and, possibly, increase vessel maturation. A number of delivery systems, including natural and synthetic biomaterials, have been developed for growth factor delivery. Commonly used materials include naturally occurring materials, such as alginate, gelatin and fibrin, as well as synthetic materials, such as poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and modified polyethylene glycol (PEG). Sustained growth factor delivery can be achieved and controlled using those materials in the form of hydrogels, micro/nano particles, fibers, porous matrix, or their combinations. (Chen & Mooney, 2003; Zisch et al., 2003a) The materials can be used to modulate delivery via diffusive resistance or through direct interactions between the materials and the growth factors. For example, the release of FGF-1 encapsulated in alginate microbeads can be modulated based on alginate composition. The release of FGF-1 from this relatively simple biomaterial can result in significantly prolonged increase in vascular density compared to a bolus injection of FGF-1. The enhancement in neovascularization can persist for greater than 6 weeks. In addition, release of FGF-1 from alginate can lead to a greater number of capillaries interacting with MCs but the fraction of MCs was not changed. (Moya et al., 2009, 2010)
In addition to diffusion-controlled release, molecules can also be covalently immobilized to a polymeric surface or matrix for growth factor delivery and presentation. For example, VEGF has been covalently bound to fibrin gels resulting in cell demanded release. The immobilized VEGF cannot diffuse out and is only released as the fibrin is degraded. Compared to VEGF that diffuses from the fibrin gels, which formed leaky and chaotic vessels, the VEGF immobilized fibrin gels were able to stimulate the formation of nonleaky, organized vasculature with MC coverage and BM deposition. (Ehrbar et al., 2004) Synthetic polymer matrixes have also been used for immobilized growth factor delivery. PEG hydrogels modified with MMP sensitive degradation sequences and cell adhesion sequences have been used in combination with a number of growth factors, including VEGF (Leslie-Barbick et al., 2011; Moon et al., 2010; Zisch et al., 2003b), Ephrin-A1 (Moon et al., 2007), and PDGF-BB (Saik et al., 2011). Capillary-like structures were formed only in the contact area with the immobilized VEGF
3.1.2. Multiple factors delivery
Since the formation of a stable vascular network appears to require the collaboration of a number of growth factors, the delivery of a combination (cocktail) of angiogenic molecules has been investigated as a method for improved vascular maturation. For example, co-delivery of both FGF-2 and VEGF from an accellular collagen-heparin scaffold resulted in higher vessel density and more MC covered mature vessels, compared to single factor delivery. (Nillesen
Moreover, it appears that in dual factor delivery, the sequence of the molecules administrated matters. Angiogenic factors, such as VEGF and FGF, are involved in the initial stages of angiogenesis primarily acting on ECs, while vessel maturation factors, such as PDGF-BB, Ang-1 and S1P, are involved in the later stage of vessel stabilization, mostly targeting MCs. Therefore, a temporal separation for distinct kinetics is likely preferred with initial administration of angiogenic factor(s) followed by a vessel maturation factor(s). The sequential delivery of VEGF followed by S1P (Tengood et al., 2010) and FGF-2 followed by PDGF (Tengood et al., 2011) resulted in increased vessel density and stability compared to simultaneous dual delivery. A reverse in the sequential delivery results in decreased vessel density and stability, presumably due the factors working against each other. It was proposed that early delivery of vessel maturation factors restricts EC tube formation and expansion, resulting in decreased vessel density and vessel diameter. The late delivery of angiogenic factors was thought to then inhibit MC recruitment, resulting in excessive formation of immature vessels susceptible to regression. (Tengood et al., 2010, 2011)
With certain modifications, sequential delivery of multiple growth factors can be achieved with delivery materials. For example, alginate can be made into multilayer microbeads with an internal region for slow protein release and external layer for faster protein release. (Khanna et al., 2010) PLGA, a biodegradable copolymer, can be made into microspheres encapsulated porous matrix, in which the microspheres are loaded with factor required for later stage of angiogenesis (PDGF-BB) with slow release kinetics, while the porous matrix is loaded with factor required for initial stage of angiogenesis (VEGF) with fast release rate. (Carmeliet & Conway 2001; Richardson et al., 2001) Although the temporal and spatial kinetics of the growth factor(s) delivered to the target tissues can be controlled using certain delivery systems, there are still limitations existing with this strategy. The production and purification of massive amounts of active protein factors can be very expensive. And since most growth factors have relatively short half-lives, their bioactivity can be compromised due to storage, delivery routes, and metabolism
3.2. Gene delivery
3.2.1. Genes
While the use of protein delivery offers improved control of the dose for the growth factors, there are also some disadvantages for those strategies, including expensive mass production of the proteins, and short protein half lives
Transient
3.2.2. Vectors
Vectors are needed in order for the genetic material to be transferred into cells and expressed. Commonly used vectors for gene delivery are plasmids and viral vectors. (Rissanen et al., 2001) Plasmids are DNA sequences that can automatically repeat and express in a host cells. They are easy to manufacture in a large quantity, and have low toxicity with a low immune response. However, naked plasmid DNA usually has very low transfection efficiency except in muscle tissue, therefore biomaterials have been used to increase plasmid-based gene transfer efficiency. (Yia-Herttuala & Alitalo, 2003) For example, PLGA, a degradable copolymer that has been widely used as a tissue engineering scaffold and drug delivery vehicle, has been applied as a carrier for plasmid. PLGA can be made into nanoparticles with the modification of cationic polymer chitosan to increase plasmid transfer efficiency. (Tahara et al., 2008) It can also be prepared as a matrix for sustained plasmid delivery, which in turn, results in longer term growth factor expression. (Nie et al., 2008) Viral vectors, on the other hand, have much higher transfection efficiency compared to naked plasmids, but have significant safety concerns. Adenoviruses (Levanon et al. 2006) and adeno-associated viruses (AAV) (Arsic et al., 2003) are the most commonly used viral vectors for growth factor gene delivery. While adenoviral vectors may cause inflammatory reactions and lack sustained expression, AAV only causes a very mild immune response and has shown long-term transgene expression, which makes it more attractive in gene therapy. (Dickson
Despite the success of gene therapies for the formation of stable vasculature in some animal models, clinical efficacy has yet to be observed. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gene vectors and products remain largely unknown and difficult to control. In addition, data from long-term follow up of clinical studies is lacking. (Yia-Herttuala & Alitalo, 2003) Moreover, the method of gene delivery must be carefully selected to balance the need for maximum transfer efficiency with minimum risk of vector related safety issues. (Brey & McIntire, 2008)
3.3. Cell therapies
Although the delivery of growth factors or their genes has shown great potential to activate the host angiogenic response, certain pathological conditions may also require the transplantation of appropriate blood vessel forming cells, due to loss of, or damage to, the host vascular cells. In addition, these cells may rapidly assemble into vessels which can inosculate with the host, decreasing the time required for tissue perfusion relative to protein/gene approaches. In cell therapies, the cells would have to be isolated from donor or host sources, expanded and implanted into the target tissue, where the cells proliferate and incorporate into functional vessels. (Ennett & Mooney, 2002) ECs are of great interest in this strategy for their potentials to mimic vasculogenesis and assemble into capillary structures, as well as to release multiple angiogenic factors following implantation. (Brey et al., 2005, 2008) Transplantation of mature ECs have been shown to increase neovascularization in engineered tissues. (Nor et al., 2001) However, the limited availability and proliferation capability of mature ECs limtis this approach. (Kim & von Recum, 2008) Therefore, a number of other cell types and modifications may be needed in addition to the used of mature ECs for stable vasculature formation.
Recent preclinical studies have shown that stem and progenitor cells derived from embryos or adult bone marrows have the potential to restore tissue vascularization after ischemic events. (Rafi & Lyden, 2003) Unlike mature cells, stem and progenitor cells have the potential to self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types. While mature ECs seeded into collagen-fibronectin gels and implanted into different animal models suffered from poor perfusion and fast regression (Au et al., 2008b; Koike et al., 2004), ECs derived from human embryonic stem (hES) cells formed durable and functional blood vessels
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from circulating blood or bone marrow have also been used to introduce neovascularization
Cell therapies can also be used in combination with single or multiple growth factors or their genes to improve the function of the transplanted cells. Stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1), a small chemokine involved in recruiting EPCs, was delivered in combination with EPCs to promote EPC engraftement in ischemic muscle. (Kuliszewski et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2009) Dual delivery of VEGF and MCP-1 from alginate microbeads has been shown to support EC transplantation, with VEGF improving survival of transplanted ECs and MCP-1 inducing MCs recruitment. (Jay et al., 2010) A similar effect was observed when co-delivering FGF-2 and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with bone marrow cells transplanted in a rodent model of critical limb ischemia. While FGF-2 directs EC migration and proliferation, G-CSF promotes the homing of bone marrow stem cells (in particular EPCs) to the ischemic site. (Layman et al., 2011) PLGA microparticles loaded with VEGF and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), as well as Ang-1, were delivered in combination with cord blood derived vasculogenic progenitor cells. The delivery of triple growth factors significantly enhanced the effect of cell therapy in multiple animal models, with increased progenitor cell incorporation, improved vessel function, and stabilization. (Saif et al., 2010)
In addition to combined gene or protein delivery with cells, ECs and EPCs can also be genetically modified
In spite of the promising results seen with cell therapies, certain limitations still exist. First, the sources of cells for transplantation, either mature cells or progenitor cells, can be problematic. If autologous cells have to be used, there are usually limited number of cells available, not to mention that their viability and activity are compromised due to disease or aging of the patient. (Brey & McIntire, 2008) If allogeneic and xenogeneic cells can be used, they would initiate a host immune response, which requires immunosupressive medication, making the patient vulnerable to infection and other diseases. Secondly, the expansion of isolated cells
3.4. Analytical methods
3.4.1. In vitro models
In order to investigate the efficacy of different tissue engineering strategies for neovascularization, a serial of preclinical tests should be done with different analytical models before jumping to any conclusion and proceeding with patients.
Another
3.4.2. In vivo models
While the
Subcutaneous implantation of scaffold materials is a commonly used method to evaluate protein, gene or cell therapies. (Jay et al., 2010; Shea et al., 1999; Tengood et al., 2010) Growth factors, genes or cells can be embedded a matrix material, which will then be implanted subcutaneously to animals as a "plug". The presence of therapeutic agents will affect local neovascularization and tissue invasion into the material. At different time points after the implantation, local tissues will be harvested for evaluation. Typically histologic analysis of vessel density, diameter, and SMC coverage are performed, but more sophisticated techniques such as confocal microscopy, vascular casts, and microCT following contrast enhancement can be used to provide a better understanding of vascular structure. This model is relatively easy to use, and can be applied to evaluate different therapeutic strategies. However, all animals need to be sacrificed in order for the neovascularization assessmment, and it only provides the evaluation of some basic parameters. Therefore, other animal models are often used to provide greater detail into the process.
The mouse corneal micropocket assay allows for monitoring neovascularization without sacrificing animals. The method has been used by Cao
Mice, rats or rabbits hindlimb ischemia models have been used to evaluate the efficacy of protein delivery, gene therapy and cell therapy in neovascularization. (Cao et al., 2003; de Paula et al., 2009; Laymen et al., 2011) The model applies ligation to the femoral artery and its branches to create ischemia in one limb. This model attempts to mimic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), however this model only recreates the ischemic event and not the chronic vascular disease that lead to the condition in humans. After a certain treatment strategy, a number of neovascularizaiton parameters can be assessed, including flow recovery rate. The intensity of blood perfusion in the created ischemic area can be measured with different imaging techniques include laser Doppler or after systemically injection of fluorescent- or radio-labeled particles. Another ischemic model is the myocardial infraction heart model. Instead of femoral artery, the left anterior descend artery (LAD) is ligated in the animal to create ischmia. (Hao et al., 2004) Besides common neovascularation parameters, cardiac morphology and function can also be evaluated using this model.
There are also a number of other animal models used in evaluating angiogenesis and vascular stability. The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model with chicken or quail embryos is a simple method to evaluate vascularization in response to different therapies. (Saif et al., 2010; Stratman et al., 2010) After therapeutic agents injection or implantation, the angiogenic effect can be easily assessed by imaging vascular regions of the CAM. This model is cost efficient and easy to perform compared to other mammalian animal models. Suitable animal models should be selected based on the target function of the therapeutic strategy. In most cases, one single animal model may not be sufficient to testing all the aspects of interest in neovascularization, therefore multiple
4. Conclusions
The formation of stable vascular networks is critical for the survival of regenerated tissue in tissue engineering applications. In many cases, current strategies can result in immature vessel formation, providing poor perfusion and eventually leading to vessel regression. Recent studies have focused more on the later stage of neovascularization, which is the stabilization and remodeling of new vasculature. The process is highly regulated by both soluble and insoluble factors. Studies in the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in vascular maturation have provided insight towards the development of strategies for the formation of stable vascular networks in engineered tissues. Successes have seen in many preclinical studies with these strategies; however, future success requires collaboration from interdisciplinary fields, including molecular and cellular biology, engineering and medicine.
References
- 1.
Adams R. H. Wilkinson G. A. Weiss C. Diella F. Gale N. W. Deutsch U. Risau W. Klein R. 1999 Roles of ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors in cardiovascular development: demarcation of arterial/venous domains, vascular morphogenesis, and sprouting angiogenesis.13 3 February 1999),295 306 0890-9369 - 2.
Allende M. L. Yamashita T. Proia R. L. 2003 G-protein-coupled receptor S1P1 acts within endothelial cells to regulate vascular maturation.102 10 November 2003),3665 3667 0006-4971 - 3.
Aplin A. C. Fogel E. Nicosia R. F. 2010 MCP-1 promotes mural cell recruitment during angiogenesis in the aortic ring model.13 3 September 2010),219 226 0969-6970 - 4.
Armulik A. Abramsson A. Betsholtz C. 2005 Endothelial/pericyte interactions.97 6 September. 2005),512 523 0009-7300 - 5.
Asahara T. Masuda H. Takahashi T. Kalka C. Pastore C. Silver M. Kearne M. Magner M. Isner J. M. 1999 Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization.85 3 August 1999),221 228 0009-7300 - 6.
Arsic N. Zentilin L. Zacchigna S. Santoro D. Stanta G. Salvi A. Sinagra G. Giacca M. 2003 Induction of functional neovascularization by combined VEGF and angiopoietin-1 gene transfer using AAV vectors.7 4 April 2003),450 459 1525-0016 - 7.
Au P. Tam J. Fukumura D. Jain R. K. 2008a Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitate engineering of long-lasting functional vasculature.111 9 May 2008),4551 4558 0006-4971 - 8.
Au P. Daheron L. M. Duda D. G. Cohen K. S. Tyrrell J. A. Lanning R. M. Fukumura D. Scadden D. T. Jain R. K. 2008b Differential in vivo potential of endothelial progenitor cells from human umbilical cord blood and adult peripheral blood to form functional long-lasting vessels.111 3 February 2008),1302 1305 0006-4971 - 9.
Benjamin L. E. Keshet E. 1997 Conditional switching of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in tumors: induction of endothelial cell shedding and regression of hemangioblastoma-like vessels by VEGF withdrawal.94 16 August 1997),8761 8766 0027-8424 - 10.
Benjamin L. E. Hemo I. Keshet E. 1998 A plasticity window for blood vessel remodelling is defined by pericyte coverage of the preformed endothelial network and is regulated by PDGF-B and VEGF.125 9 May 1998),1591 1598 1011-6370 - 11.
Benjamin L. E. Golijanin D. Itin A. Pode D. Keshet E. 1999 Selective ablation of immature blood vessels in established human tumors follows vascular endothelial growth factor withdrawal.103 2 January 1999),159 165 0021-9738 - 12.
Brey EM, McIntire LV, Johnston CM, Reece GP & Patrick CW. 2004 Three-dimensional, quantitative analysis of desmin and smooth muscle alpha actin expression during angiogenesis. .32 8 August 2004),1100 1107 0090-6964 - 13.
Brey E. M. Uriel S. Greisler H. P. Mc Intire L. V. 2005 Therapeutic neovascularization: contributions from bioengineering.11 3-4 March-April 2005),567 584 1937-3368 - 14.
Brey E. M. Mc Intire L. V. 2008 Vascular assembly in engineered and nature tissues, In: , A. Atala, (Ed.),1020 1037 Elsiver,978-0-12369-410-2 Burlington, MA, USA. - 15.
Bussolino F. Mantovani A. Persico G. 1997 Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel formation.22 7 July 1997),251 256 0968-0004 - 16.
Cao R. Bråkenhielm E. Pawliuk R. Wariaro D. MJ Post Wahlberg. E. Leboulch P. Cao Y. 2003 Angiogenic synergism, vascular stability and improvement of hind-limb ischemia by a combination of PDGF-BB and FGF-2.9 5 May 2003),604 613 1078-8956 - 17.
Cao Y. Hong A. Schulten H. MJ Post 2005 Update on therapeutic neovascularization.65 3 February 2005),639 648 0215-1920 X - 18.
Carmeliet P. 2000 Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis.6 4 April 2000),389 395 1078-8956 - 19.
Carmeliet P. Conway E. M. 2001 Growing better blood vessels.19 11 November 2001),1019 1020 1087-0156 - 20.
Carmeliet P. 2003 Angiogenesis in health and disease.9 6 June 2003),653 660 1078-8956 - 21.
Chen F. Tan Z. Dong C. Y. Chen X. Guo S. F. 2007 Adeno-associated virus vectors simultaneously encoding VEGF and angiopoietin-1 enhances neovascularization in ischemic rabbit hind-limbs.28 4 April 2007),493 502 1671-4083 - 22.
Chen RR & Mooney DJ. 2003 Polymeric growth factor delivery strategies for tissue engineering. .20 8 August 2003),1103 1112 0724-8741 - 23.
Chen RR, Silva EA, Yuen WW & Mooney DJ. 2007 Spatio-temporal VEGF and PDGF delivery patterns blood vessel formation and maturation.24 2 February 2007),258 264 0724-8741 - 24.
Cristofaro B. Emanueli C. 2009 Possible novel targets for therapeutic angiogenesis. ;9 2 April 2009),102 108 1471-4892 - 25.
Cristofaro B. Stone O. A. Caporali A. Dawbarn D. Ieronimakis N. Reyes M. Madeddu P. DO Bates Emanueli C. 2010 Neurotrophin-3 is a novel angiogenic factor capable of therapeutic neovascularization in a mouse model of limb ischemia.30 6 June 2010),1143 1150 1079-5642 - 26.
Darland DC & D’Amore PA. 1999 Blood vessel maturation: vascular development comes of age.103 2 January 1999),157 158 0021-9738 - 27.
Davis GE & Senger DR. 2005 Endothelial extracellular matrix: biosynthesis, remodeling, and functions during vascular morphogenesis and neovessel stabilization.97 11 November 2005),1093 1107 0009-7300 - 28.
Dejana E. 2004 Endothelial cell-cell junctions: happy together.5 4 April 2004),261 270 1471-0072 - 29.
Dellian M. Witwer B. P. Salehi H. A. Yuan F. Jain R. K. 1996 Quantitation and physiological characterization of angiogenic vessels in mice: effect of basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor, and host microenvironment.149 1 July 1996),59 71 0002-9440 - 30.
de Paula EV, Flores-Nascimento MC, Arruda VR, Garcia RA, Ramos CD, Guillaumon AT & Annichino-Bizzacchi JM. 2009 Dual gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-2 and platelet derived growth factor-BB using plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid promotes effective angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in a rodent model of hindlimb ischemia.153 5 May 2009),232 239 1943-8141 - 31.
Dimmeler S. Zeiher A. M. 2000 Endothelial cell apoptosis in angiogenesis and vessel regression.87 6 September 2000),434 439 0009-7300 - 32.
MJ Donovan Lin. M. I. Wiegn P. Ringstedt T. Kraemer R. Hahn R. Wang S. Ibañez C. F. Rafii S. Hempstead B. L. 2000 Brain derived neurotrophic factor is an endothelial cell survival factor required for intramyocardial vessel stabilization.127 21 November 2000),4531 4540 1011-6370 - 33.
Ehrbar M. Djonov V. G. Schnell C. Tschanz S. A. Martiny-Baron G. Schenk U. Wood J. Burri P. H. Hubbell J. A. Zisch A. H. 2004 Cell-demanded liberation of VEGF121 from fibrin implants induces local and controlled blood vessel growth.94 8 April 2004),1124 1132 0009-7300 - 34.
Enis D. R. Shepherd B. R. Wang Y. Qasim A. Shanahan C. M. Weissberg P. L. Kashgarian M. Pober J. S. Schechner J. S. 2005 Induction, differentiation, and remodeling of blood vessels after transplantation of Bcl-2-transduced endothelial cells. .102 2 January 2005),425 430 0027-8424 - 35.
Ennett AB & Mooney DJ. 2002 Tissue engineering strategies for in vivo neovascularisation.2 8 December 2002),805 818 1471-2598 - 36.
ME Francis Uriel. S. Brey E. M. 2008 Endothelial cell-matrix interactions in neovascularization.14 1 March 2008),19 32 1937-3368 - 37.
ME Francis-Sedlak Moya. M. L. Huang J. J. Lucas S. A. Chandrasekharan N. Larson J. C. Cheng M. H. Brey E. M. 2010 Collagen glycation alters neovascularization in vitro and in vivo.80 1 July 2010),3 9 0026-2862 - 38.
Gaengel K. Genové G. Armulik A. Betsholtz C. 2009 Endothelial-mural cell signaling in vascular development and angiogenesis.29 5 May 2009),630 638 1079-5642 - 39.
Garmy-Susini B. Jin H. Zhu Y. Sung R. J. Hwang R. Varner J. 2005 Integrin alpha4beta1-VCAM-1-mediated adhesion between endothelial and mural cells is required for blood vessel maturation.115 6 June 2005),1542 1551 0021-9738 - 40.
Gerhardt H. Betsholtz C. 2003 Endothelial-pericyte interactions in angiogenesis.314 1 October 2003),15 23 0030-2766 X - 41.
Ghajar CM, George SC & Putnam AJ. 2008 Matrix metalloproteinase control of capillary morphogenesis.3 251 278 1045-4403 - 42.
Ghosh R. Walsh S. R. Tang T. Y. Noorani A. Hayes P. D. 2008 Gene therapy as a novel therapeutic option in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.62 9 September 2008),1383 1390 1368-5031 - 43.
MJ Goumans Valdimarsdottir. G. Itoh S. Rosendahl A. Sideras P. ten Dijke. P. 2002 Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors.21 7 April 2002),1743 1753 0261-4189 - 44.
Greenberg J. I. Shields D. J. Barillas S. G. Acevedo L. M. Murphy E. Huang J. Scheppke L. Stockmann C. Johnson R. S. Angle N. Cheresh D. A. 2008 A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation.456 7223 December 2008),809 813 0028-0836 - 45.
Hao X. Månsson-Broberg A. Blomberg P. Dellgren G. Siddiqui A. J. Grinnemo K. H. Wärdell E. Sylvén C. 2004a Angiogenic and cardiac functional effects of dual gene transfer of VEGF-A165 and PDGF-BB after myocardial infarction.322 1 September 2004),292 296 0000-6291 X - 46.
Hao X. Månsson-Broberg A. Gustafsson T. Grinnemo K. H. Blomberg P. Siddiqui A. J. Wärdell E. Sylvén C. 2004b Angiogenic effects of dual gene transfer of bFGF and PDGF-BB after myocardial infarction.315 4 March 2004),1058 1063 0000-6291 X - 47.
Hellberg C. Ostman A. Heldin C. H. 2010 PDGF and vessel maturation.180 103 114 0080-0015 - 48.
Hellström M. Kalén M. Lindahl P. Abramsson A. Betsholtz C. 1999 Role of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta in recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes during embryonic blood vessel formation in the mouse.126 14 June 1999),3047 3055 1011-6370 - 49.
Iivanainen E. Nelimarkka L. Elenius V. Heikkinen S. M. Junttila T. T. Sihombing L. Sundvall M. Maatta J. A. Laine V. J. Yla-Herttuala S. Higashiyama S. Alitalo K. Elenius K. 2003 Angiopoietin-regulated recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells by endothelial-derived heparin binding EGF-like growth factor.17 12 September 2003),1609 1621 0892-6638 - 50.
Ikeda Y. Fukuda N. Wada M. Matsumoto T. Satomi A. Yokoyama S. Saito S. Matsumoto K. Kanmatsuse K. Mugishima H. 2004 Development of angiogenic cell and gene therapy by transplantation of umbilical cord blood with vascular endothelial growth factor gene.27 2 February 2004),119 128 0916-9636 - 51.
Iurlaro M. Scatena M. Zhu W. H. Fogel E. Wieting S. L. Nicosia R. F. 2003 Rat aorta-derived mural precursor cells express the Tie2 receptor and respond directly to stimulation by angiopoietins.116 17 September 2003),3635 3643 0021-9533 - 52.
Jain R. K. Safabakhsh N. Sckell A. Chen Y. Jiang P. Benjamin L. Yuan F. Keshet E. 1998 Endothelial cell death, angiogenesis, and microvascular function after castration in an androgen-dependent tumor: role of vascular endothelial growth factor.95 18 September 1998),10820 10825 0027-8424 - 53.
Jain RK. 2003 Molecular regulation of vessel maturation.9 6 June 2003),685 693 1078-8956 - 54.
Jay SM, Shepherd BR, Andrejecsk JW, Kyriakides TR, Pober JS & Saltzman WM. 2010 Dual delivery of VEGF and MCP-1 to support endothelial cell transplantation for therapeutic vascularization.31 11 April 2010),3054 3062 0142-9612 - 55.
Kashiwagi S. Izumi Y. Gohongi T. Demou Z. N. Xu L. Huang P. L. Buerk D. G. Munn L. L. Jain R. K. Fukumura D. 2005 NO mediates mural cell recruitment and vessel morphogenesis in murine melanomas and tissue-engineered blood vessels.115 7 July 2005),1816 1827 0021-9738 - 56.
Khanna O. Moya M. L. Greisler H. P. Opara E. C. Brey E. M. 2010 Multilayered microcapsules for the sustained-release of angiogenic proteins from encapsulated cells.200 5 November 2010),655 658 0147-5185 - 57.
Kobayashi H. De Busk L. M. Babichev Y. O. Dumont D. J. Lin P. C. 2006 Hepatocyte growth factor mediates angiopoietin-induced smooth muscle cell recruitment.108 4 August 2006),1260 1266 0006-4971 - 58.
Koike N. Fukumura D. Gralla O. Au P. Schechner J. S. Jain R. K. 2004 Tissue engineering: creation of long-lasting blood vessels.428 6979 March 2004),138 139 0028-0836 - 59.
Korff T. Kimmina S. Martiny-Baron G. Augustin H. G. 2001 Blood vessel maturation in a 3-dimensional spheroidal coculture model: direct contact with smooth muscle cells regulates endothelial cell quiescence and abrogates VEGF responsiveness.15 2 February 2001),447 457 0892-6638 - 60.
Korpisalo P. Karvinen H. Rissanen T. T. Kilpijoki J. Marjomäki V. Baluk P. Mc Donald D. M. Cao Y. Eriksson U. Alitalo K. Ylä-Herttuala S. 2008 Vascular endothelial growth factor-A and platelet-derived growth factor-B combination gene therapy prolongs angiogenic effects via recruitment of interstitial mononuclear cells and paracrine effects rather than improved pericyte coverage of angiogenic vessels.103 10 November 2008),1092 1099 0009-7300 - 61.
MA Kuliszewski Kobulnik. J. Lindner J. R. Stewart D. J. Leong-Poi H. 2011 Vascular Gene Transfer of SDF-1 Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Engraftment and Enhances Angiogenesis in Ischemic Muscle. [ahead of print]1525-0016 1525 0016 - 62.
Kupatt C. Hinkel R. Pfosser A. El -Aouni C. Wuchrer A. Fritz A. Globisch F. Thormann M. Horstkotte J. Lebherz C. Thein E. Banfi A. Boekstegers P. 2010 Cotransfection of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and platelet-derived growth factor-B via recombinant adeno-associated virus resolves chronic ischemic malperfusion role of vessel maturation.56 5 July 2010),414 422 1558-3597 - 63.
Lai C. M. Brankov M. Zaknich T. Lai Y. K. Shen W. Y. Constable I. J. Kovesdi I. Rakoczy P. E. 2001 Inhibition of angiogenesis by adenovirus-mediated sFlt-1 expression in a rat model of corneal neovascularization.12 10 July 2001),1299 1310 1043-0342 - 64.
Langer R. Vacanti J. P. 1993 Tissue engineering.260 5110 May 1993),920 926 0036-8075 - 65.
Lawson N. D. Scheer N. Pham V. N. Kim C. H. Chitnis A. B. Campos-Ortega J. A. BM Weinstein 2001 Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development.128 19 October 2001),3675 3683 1011-6370 - 66.
Layman H. AA Rahnemai-Azar Pham. S. M. Tsechpenakis G. Andreopoulos F. M. 2011 Synergistic angiogenic effect of codelivering fibroblast growth factor 2 and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor from fibrin scaffolds and bone marrow transplantation in critical limb ischemia.17 1-2 January 2011),243 254 1937-3368 - 67.
Leslie-Barbick J. E. Shen C. Chen C. West J. L. 2011 Micron-Scale Spatially Patterned, Covalently Immobilized Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Hydrogels Accelerates Endothelial Tubulogenesis and Increases Cellular Angiogenic Responses. .17 1-2 January 2011),221 229 1937-3368 - 68.
Letamendía A. Lastres P. Botella L. M. Raab U. Langa C. Velasco B. Attisano L. Bernabeu C. 1998 Role of endoglin in cellular responses to transforming growth factor-beta. A comparative study with betaglycan.273 49 December 1998),33011 33019 0021-9258 - 69.
Levanon K. Varda-Bloom N. Greenberger S. Barshack I. Goldberg I. Orenstein A. Breitbart E. Shaish A. Harats D. 2006 Vascular wall maturation and prolonged angiogenic effect by endothelial-specific platelet-derived growth factor expression. .73 3 149 158 1015-2008 - 70.
Lindahl P. Johansson B. R. Levéen P. Betsholtz C. 1997 Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice.277 5323 July 1997),242 245 0036-8075 - 71.
Liu Z. J. Shirakawa T. Li Y. Soma A. Oka M. Dotto G. P. Fairman R. M. Velazquez O. C. Herlyn M. 2003 Regulation of Notch1 and Dll4 by vascular endothelial growth factor in arterial endothelial cells: implications for modulating arteriogenesis and angiogenesis.23 1 January 2003),14 25 0270-7306 - 72.
Lu H. Xu X. Zhang M. Cao R. Bråkenhielm E. Li C. Lin H. Yao G. Sun H. Qi L. Tang M. Dai H. Zhang Y. Su R. Bi Y. Zhang Y. Cao Y. 2007 Combinatorial protein therapy of angiogenic and arteriogenic factors remarkably improves collaterogenesis and cardiac function in pigs.104 29 July 2007),12140 12145 0027-8424 - 73.
Maisonpierre P. C. Suri C. Jones P. F. Bartunkova S. Wiegand S. J. Radziejewski C. Compton D. Mc Clain J. Aldrich T. H. Papadopoulos N. Daly T. J. Davis S. Sato T. N. Yancopoulos G. D. 1997 Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis.77 5322 July 1997),55 60 0036-8075 - 74.
Melero-Martin J. M. Khan Z. A. Picard A. Wu X. Paruchuri S. Bischoff J. 2007 In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells.109 11 June 2007),4761 4768 0006-4971 - 75.
Melero-Martin J. M. ME De Obaldia Kang. S. Y. Khan Z. A. Yuan L. Oettgen P. Bischoff J. 2008 Engineering robust and functional vascular networks in vivo with human adult and cord blood-derived progenitor cells.103 2 July 2008),194 202 0009-7300 - 76.
Mizugishi K. Yamashita T. Olivera A. Miller G. F. Spiegel S. Proia R. L. 2005 Essential role for sphingosine kinases in neural and vascular development.25 24 December 2005),11113 11121 0270-7306 - 77.
Moon JJ, Lee SH & West JL. 2007 Synthetic biomimetic hydrogels incorporated with ephrin-A1 for therapeutic angiogenesis. .8 1 January 2007),42 49 1525-7797 - 78.
Moon JJ, Saik JE, Poché RA, Leslie-Barbick JE, Lee SH, Smith AA, Dickinson ME & West JL. 2010 Biomimetic hydrogels with pro-angiogenic properties.31 14 May 2010),3840 3847 0142-9612 - 79.
Moya M. L. Lucas S. Francis-Sedlak M. Liu X. Garfinkel M. R. Huang J. J. Cheng M. H. Opara E. C. Brey E. M. 2009 Sustained delivery of FGF-1 increases vascular density in comparison to bolus administration.78 2 September 2009),142 147 0026-2862 - 80.
Moya M. L. Garfinkel M. R. Liu X. Lucas S. Opara E. C. Greisler H. P. Brey E. M. 2010 Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) loaded microbeads enhance local capillary neovascularization.160 2 May 2010),208 212 0022-4804 - 81.
Nie H. Lee L. Y. Tong H. Wang C. H. 2008 PLGA/chitosan composites from a combination of spray drying and supercritical fluid foaming techniques: new carriers for DNA delivery.129 3 August 2008),207 214 0168-3659 - 82.
Nicosia R. F. Ottinetti A. 1990 Growth of microvessels in serumfree matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro.63 115 122 0023-6837 - 83.
Nishishita T. Lin P. C. 2004 Angiopoietin 1, PDGF-B, and TGF-beta gene regulation in endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell interaction. .91 3 February 2004),584 593 0730-2312 - 84.
Nör J. E. Christensen J. Mooney D. J. Polverini P. J. 1999 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis is associated with enhanced endothelial cell survival and induction of Bcl-2 expression.154 2 February 1999),375 384 0002-9440 - 85.
Nör J. E. Peters M. C. Christensen J. B. MM Sutorik Linn. S. Khan M. K. Addison C. L. Mooney D. J. Polverini P. J. 2001 Engineering and characterization of functional human microvessels in immunodeficient mice.81 4 April 2001),453 463 0023-6837 - 86.
Paik J. H. Skoura A. Chae S. S. Cowan A. E. Han D. K. Proia R. L. Hla T. 2004 Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor regulation of N-cadherin mediates vascular stabilization18 19 October 2004),2392 9403 0890-9369 - 87.
Peirce SM, Price RJ & Skalak TC. 2004 Spatial and temporal control of angiogenesis and arterialization using focal applications of VEGF164 and Ang-1.286 3 March 2004),918 925 0009-7300 - 88.
Pepper MS. 1997 Transforming growth factor-beta: vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel wall integrity.8 1 March 1997),21 43 1359-6101 - 89.
Rafii S. Lyden D. 2003 Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration.9 6 June 2003),702 712 1078-8956 - 90.
Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB & Mooney DJ. 2001 Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery.19 11 November 2001),1029 1034 1087-0156 - 91.
Rissanen T. T. Vajanto I. Ylä-Herttuala S. 2001 Gene therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis in critically ischaemic lower limb- on the way to the clinic.31 8 August 2001),651 666 0014-2972 - 92.
Rissanen T. T. Markkanen J. E. Gruchala M. Heikura T. Puranen A. Kettunen M. I. Kholová I. Kauppinen R. A. Achen M. G. Stacker S. A. Alitalo K. Ylä-Herttuala S. 2003 VEGF-D is the strongest angiogenic and lymphangiogenic effector among VEGFs delivered into skeletal muscle via adenoviruses.92 10 May 2003),1098 1106 0009-7300 - 93.
Rubina K. Kalinina N. Efimenko A. Lopatina T. Melikhova V. Tsokolaeva Z. Sysoeva V. Tkachuk V. Parfyonova Y. 2009 Adipose stromal cells stimulate angiogenesis via promoting progenitor cell differentiation, secretion of angiogenic factors, and enhancing vessel maturation..15 8 August 2009),2039 2050 1937-3368 - 94.
Saif J. Schwarz T. M. Chau D. Y. Henstock J. Sami P. Leicht S. F. Hermann P. C. Alcala S. Mulero F. Shakesheff K. M. Heeschen C. Aicher A. 2010 Combination of injectable multiple growth factor-releasing scaffolds and cell therapy as an advanced modality to enhance tissue neovascularization.30 10 October 2010),1897 1904 1079-5642 - 95.
Saik JE, Gould DJ, Watkins EM, Dickinson ME & West JL. 2011 Covalently immobilized platelet-derived growth factor-BB promotes angiogenesis in biomimetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. .7 1 January 2011),133 143 1742-7061 - 96.
Sato T. N. Tozawa Y. Deutsch U. Wolburg-Buchholz K. Fujiwara Y. Gendron-Maguire M. Gridley T. Wolburg H. Risau W. Qin Y. 1995 Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation.376 6535 July 1995),70 74 0028-0836 - 97.
Schechner J. S. Nath A. K. Zheng L. MS Kluger Hughes. C. C. Sierra-Honigmann M. R. Lorber M. I. Tellides G. Kashgarian M. Bothwell A. L. Pober J. S. 2000 In vivo formation of complex microvessels lined by human endothelial cells in an immunodeficient mouse. .97 16 August 2000),9191 9196 0027-8424 - 98.
Shea L. D. Smiley E. Bonadio J. Mooney D. J. 1999 DNA delivery from polymer matrices for tissue engineering.17 6 June 1999),551 554 1087-0156 - 99.
Shepherd B. R. Jay S. M. Saltzman W. M. Tellides G. Pober J. S. 2009 Human aortic smooth muscle cells promote arteriole formation by coengrafted endothelial cells.15 1 January 2009),165 173 1937-3368 - 100.
Shyu K. G. Manor O. Magner M. Yancopoulos G. D. Isner J. M. 1998 Direct intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA encoding angiopoietin-1 but not angiopoietin-2 augments revascularization in the rabbit ischemic hindlimb.98 19 November 1998),2081 2087 0009-7322 - 101.
Siddiqui A. J. Blomberg P. Wärdell E. Hellgren I. Eskandarpour M. Islam K. B. Sylvén C. 2003 Combination of angiopoietin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy enhances arteriogenesis in the ischemic myocardium.310 3 October 2003),1002 1009 0000-6291 X - 102.
Sneider EB, Nowicki PT & Messina LM. 2009 Regenerative medicine in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.108 4 November 2009),753 761 0730-2312 - 103.
Stratman AN, Malotte KM, Mahan RD, Davis MJ & Davis GE. 2009 Pericyte recruitment during vasculogenic tube assembly stimulates endothelial basement membrane matrix formation.114 24 December 2009),5091 5101 0006-4971 - 104.
Stratman AN, Schwindt AE, Malotte KM & Davis GE. 2010 Endothelial-derived PDGF-BB and HB-EGF coordinately regulate pericyte recruitment during vasculogenic tube assembly and stabilization.116 22 November 2010),4720 4730 0006-4971 - 105.
Su H. Takagawa J. Huang Y. Arakawa-Hoyt J. Pons J. Grossman W. Kan Y. W. 2009 Additive effect of AAV-mediated angiopoietin-1 and VEGF expression on the therapy of infarcted heart.133 2 April 2009),191 197 0167-5273 - 106.
Sullivan D. C. Bicknell R. 2003 New molecular pathways in angiogenesis. .89 2 July 2003),228 231 0007-0920 - 107.
Suri C. Jones P. F. Patan S. Bartunkova S. Maisonpierre P. C. Davis S. Sato T. N. Yancopoulos G. D. 1996 Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis.87 7 December 1996),1171 1180 0092-8674 - 108.
Tahara K. Sakai T. Yamamoto H. Takeuchi H. Kawashima Y. 2008 Establishing chitosan coated PLGA nanosphere platform loaded with wide variety of nucleic acid by complexation with cationic compound for gene delivery. .354 1-2 April 2008),210 216 0378-5173 - 109.
Tengood JE, Kovach KM, Vescovi PE, Russell AJ & Little SR. 2010 Sequential delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and sphingosine 1-phosphate for angiogenesis.31 30 October 2010),7805 7812 0142-9612 - 110.
Tengood J. E. Ridenour R. Brodsky R. Russell A. J. Little S. R. 2011 Sequential Delivery of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor for Angiogenesis. [ahead of print]1937-3368 1937 3368 - 111.
Thurston G. Suri C. Smith K. Mc Clain J. Sato T. N. Yancopoulos G. D. Mc Donald D. M. 1999 Leakage-resistant blood vessels in mice transgenically overexpressing angiopoietin-1.286 5449 December 1999),2511 2514 0036-8075 - 112.
Thurston G. Rudge J. S. Ioffe E. Zhou H. Ross L. Croll S. D. Glazer N. Holash J. Mc Donald D. M. Yancopoulos G. D. 2000 Angiopoietin-1 protects the adult vasculature against plasma leakage.6 4 April 2000),460 463 1078-8956 - 113.
Uutela M. Wirzenius M. Paavonen K. Rajantie I. He Y. Karpanen T. Lohela M. Wiig H. Salven P. Pajusola K. Eriksson U. Alitalo K. 2004 PDGF-D induces macrophage recruitment, increased interstitial pressure, and blood vessel maturation during angiogenesis. .104 10 November 2004),3198 3204 0006-4971 - 114.
van den Driesche. S. Mummery C. L. Westermann C. J. 2003 Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: an update on transforming growth factor beta signaling in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.58 1 April 2003),20 31 0215-1920 X. - 115.
Wang HU, Chen ZF & Anderson DJ. 1998 Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4.93 5 May 1998),741 753 0092-8674 - 116.
Wang Z. Z. Au P. Chen T. Shao Y. Daheron L. M. Bai H. Arzigian M. Fukumura D. Jain R. K. Scadden D. T. 2007 Endothelial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells form durable blood vessels in vivo.25 3 March 2007),317 318 1087-0156 - 117.
Ylä-Herttuala S. Alitalo K. 2003 Gene transfer as a tool to induce therapeutic vascular growth.9 6 June 2003),694 701 1078-8956 - 118.
Yu J. X. Huang X. F. Lv W. M. Ye C. S. Peng X. Z. Zhang H. Xiao L. B. Wang S. M. 2009 Combination of stromal-derived factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor gene-modified endothelial progenitor cells is more effective for ischemic neovascularization.50 3 September 2009),608 616 1078-5884 - 119.
Zisch AH, Lutolf MP & Hubbell JA. 2003a Biopolymeric delivery matrices for angiogenic growth factors.12 6 November-December 2003),295 310 1054-8807 - 120.
Zisch A. H. Lutolf M. P. Ehrbar M. Raeber G. P. Rizzi S. C. Davies N. Schmökel H. Bezuidenhout D. Djonov V. Zilla P. Hubbell J. A. 2003b Cell-demanded release of VEGF from synthetic, biointeractive cell ingrowth matrices for vascularized tissue growth.17 15 December 2003),2260 2262 0892-6638