Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Functional and Molecular Aspects of Glucocorticoids in the Endocrine Pancreas and Glucose Homeostasis

By Alex Rafacho, Antonio C. Boschero and Henrik Ortsäter

Submitted: December 6th 2011Reviewed: May 28th 2012Published: October 3rd 2012

DOI: 10.5772/50233

Downloaded: 1549

1. Introduction

As presented in the previous chapter, excessive exposure to endogenous or exogenous glucocorticoids (GCs) can disrupt glucose homeostasis in health individuals leading to glucose intolerance and/or insulin resistance (IR), and also aggravates the glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic patients. In this context, we aim, in this chapter, to present and discuss the adaptive compensations in three levels: structural, functional and molecular - of the endocrine pancreas in response to the GC-induced IR and glucose intolerance that are required to maintain glycemia at physiological or near to physiological values. We will bring a comprehensive summary on experimental and clinical investigations performed in humans, rats and mice. Species differences will receive a special focus since the literature regarding humans, rats and mice responses to GC treatment indicates that there are species differences in both response to and sensitivity towards CGs.


2. Effect of glucocorticoids on the endocrine pancreas

GC hormones are secreted by the adrenal cortex under control of the HPA axis. This class of hormones plays an important role on energy homeostasis by modulating glucose, lipid and protein metabolism. The HPA axis may receive several inputs during some stressful conditions, such as fasting, physical activities as well as emotional episodes. In such conditions, the physiological GC actions guarantee adequate substrate supply for oxidative metabolism by increasing hepatic glucose production, lipolysis and proteolysis (Andrews & Walker, 1999).

Alterations in peripheral insulin sensitivity are reciprocally related to pancreatic islet function, in that insulin secretion is initially adaptively increased in response to conditions of IR (e.g., obesity, pregnancy, pre-diabetes) (Kahn et al., 1993). As GCs induce IR, pancreatic β-cells initially also increase their insulin secretion capacity in response to GC treatment (Beard et al., 1984; Nicod et al., 2003; Ahrén, 2008; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2010). However, it is also known that GCs, by direct effects, can cause pancreatic β-cell dysfunction, which leads to attenuated GSIS (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Jeong et al., 2001; Ullrich et al., 2005; Zawalich et al., 2006; Roma et al., 2011). The crucial point is that, at least during short (2 to 15 days) periods of treatment, the direct negative effects of GCs are not reproduced on pancreatic β-cell during in vivoGC administration to normal subjects, and the derangement of β-cells during GC treatment seems to depend on predispositions such as genetic background (Ogawa et al., 1992), age (Novelli et al., 1999) as well as previous glucose intolerance and/or low insulin sensitivity (Wajngot et al., 1992; Ohneda et al., 1993; Henriksen et al., 1997; Larsson & Ahren, 1999; Besse et al., 2005). In the next topic, we will discuss in detail the endocrine pancreas and glucose homeostasis profile both in human and in rodent experimental models of GC treatment. In addition, results of in vitrostudies in which primary β-cells or insulin-producing cells have been exposed to GCs will be discussed.

2.1. GC treatment and glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in humans

2.1.1. Acute GC effects in healthy individuals

The acute effects of GCs in healthy individuals, as judged by cortisol infusion (Shamoon et al., 1980) or by high doses of prednisolone (Kalhan & Adam, 1975; van Raalte et al., 2010), seem to be inhibitory for insulin secretion. This is based on the fact that circulating insulin levels during fasting state are not altered following GC treatment, despite the increase in blood glucose levels. The increase in glycemia is associated with decreased glucose uptake and clearance, whereas the rates of endogenous glucose production are unchanged (Shamoon et al., 1980). Glucose intolerance is observed during an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) in healthy individuals receiving a single oral dose of 1 mg dexamethasone (DEX) just prior to the oGTT. In the latter, glucose intolerance was also a result of decreased glucose clearance; while no differences in endogenous glucose production was observed too (Schneiter & Tappy, 1998). Although the literature concerning rapid GC effects on insulin secretion in healthy individuals is scarce, it seems that insulin secretion under glucose infusion is reduced (Shamoon et al., 1980) or unaltered (Schneiter & Tappy, 1998) in response to a glucose challenge, suggesting an acute inhibitory effect of the GCs on β-cells (Kalhan & Adam, 1975). It should also be mentioned that adaptive compensation to short GC exposures are transitory and usually reversible after discontinuation of steroid treatment (van Raalte et al., 2010).

2.1.2. GC effects during prolonged exposure in healthy individuals

Treatment of healthy subjects with high doses of DEX (2 to 4 days) or prednisolone (6 to 15 days) is associated with normoglycemia or modest increase in fasting blood glucose levels concomitant with significantly heightened circulating insulin concentrations during the post-absorptive state (Pagano et al., 1983; Beard et al., 1984; Grill et al., 1990; Schneiter & Tappy, 1998; Hollingdal et al., 2002; Willi et al., 2002; Nicod et al., 2003; Binnert et al., 2004; van Raalte et al., 2010), (see an overview in Table 1). The elevation of insulinemia indicates IR, a condition also confirmed after GC treatment (Pagano et al., 1983; Grill et al., 1990; Larsson & Ahren, 1999; Hollingdal et al., 2002; Willi et al., 2002; Nicod et al., 2003; Ahrén, 2008). The modest increase in fasting glycemia may be explained by direct effect of GCs on hepatic de novoglucose production or by a reduction of glucose uptake by peripheral tissues (e.g., muscle, liver and adipose tissue). In this case, even high levels of insulin (Schneiter & Tappy, 1998) are insufficient to compensate for IR evoked by the steroid treatment. However, it must be stressed that most studies with GC administration for a short period in healthy volunteers do not show fasting hyperglycemia (Nicod et al., 2003; Binnert et al., 2004; Ahrén, 2008; van Raalte et al., 2010). Under glucose challenging by hyperglycemic-clamp (Beard et al., 1984; Nicod et al., 2003; Binnert et al., 2004) or an oGTT (Schneiter & Tappy, 1998; Hollingdal et al., 2002; Willi et al., 2002), insulin secretion is higher in GC-treated healthy subjects compared with control individuals. This increase in insulin secretion appears to be sufficient to maintain glucose homeostasis (Nicod et al., 2003; Binnert et al., 2004; Ahrén, 2008), suggesting that for the period of steroid exposure observed in the above studies the islets adjust their insulin release to overcome the IR imposed by GC treatment. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that at a more prolonged exposure (months or even years as in patients subjected to chronic GC therapies) β-cell dysfunction develops in face of sustained IR and/or by direct negative effects of GCs on β-cell function/viability resulting in dysregulation of glucose homeostasis.

The increased insulin secretion noted during GC treatment needs not necessarily result from a direct GC action on β-cells. This is suggested as several changes, such as in substrates, hormones, and/or neural influences that β-cells are exposed to, precluding a clear explanation of the factors causing increased islet function. Ahrén (Ahrén, 2008) performed an elegant experiment in which healthy women were subjected to oral DEX administration in a dose and period that resulted in IR, and insulin hypersecretion in response to arginine infusion. After 3 to 6 months, the same volunteers were treated with the same steroid regimen, but also received an intravenous infusion of a ganglionic antagonist (trimethaphan), which interrupts neural transmission. Arginine-stimulated insulin secretion was higher in DEX-treated individuals, as expected, but was markedly inhibited by the ganglionic antagonist. These data imply that a stimulus triggered by IR increases the parasympathetic tone to the islet β-cells to increase insulin secretion and this may contribute to the adaptive hypersecretion of insulin during IR (Ahrén, 2008). Whether this autonomic effect involves the classical neuropeptide acetylcholine, or any of the other parasympathetic neuropeptides, remains to be investigated (Ahrén, 2008).

In summary, the product of insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity, also called the disposition index, remains constant in healthy subjects exposed to GC treatment.

GCRouteDosingInsulin sensitivity (IS) Glucose tolerance (GT)Fasting glycemiaFasting insulinemiaInsulin secretionReference
PredOral15 mg b.i.d.for 7 dDecreased ISModest increaseModest increase-----(Pagano et al., 1983)
DexOral3 mg b.i.d.for
2 1/2 d
-----Modest increaseIncreasedIncreased(Beard et al., 1984)
DexOral3 mg b.i.d.for 2 1/2 dDecreased ISIncreasedIncreasedVaried(Grill et al., 1990)
DexOral4 mg for 5 dDecreased IS----------Increased(Kautzky-Willer et al., 1996)
DexOral0.5 mg q.d.for 2 d and 1 mg at the 3rd d.Decreased GTUnalteredIncreasedIncreased(Schneiter & Tappy, 1998)
PredOral15 mg b.i.d.for 6 dDecreased ISModest increaseIncreasedIncreased(Hollingdal et al., 2002)
DexOral2 mg b.i.d.for 4 dDecreased ISModest increaseIncrease
Increased(Willi et al., 2002)
DexOral0.5 mgq.d.for 2 dDecreased ISUnaltered
IncreasedIncreased(Nicod et al., 2003)
DexOral0.5 mgq.d.for 2 d and 0.5 mg at the 3rd dDecreased ISUnalteredIncreasedIncreased(Binnert et al., 2004)
DexOral3 mg b.i.d.for 2 1/2 dDecreased ISUnalteredIncreased
(Ahrén, 2008)
PredOral30 mg for 15 d
Decreased IS
Decreased GT
IncreasedTendency towards increase
(van Raalte et al., 2010)
b.i.d.;twice a day (from Latin bis in die), d;day,q.d.;four times each day (from Latin quater die sumendus), Pred;prednisolone, Dex;dexamethasone, -----;none

Table 1.

Effects of prolonged GC treatment on glucose homeostasis in healthy volunteers.

2.1.3. GC effects in susceptible subjects

Administration of GCs to individuals with any degree of susceptibility towards glucose intolerance, but still normoglycemic, before treatment with GCs, such as those with low insulin sensitivity (Larsson & Ahren, 1999) or with low insulin response to glucose (Wajngot et al., 1992), obese women (Besse et al., 2005) and first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) (Henriksen et al., 1997), fails to induce the adaptive islet compensation observed in healthy subjects. Thus, in such individuals GC treatment may disrupt glucose homeostasis and cause hyperglycemia. The derangements that contribute to glucose intolerance include reduction in glucose-dependent or arginine-induced insulin release (Larsson & Ahren, 1999), increased glucose production and decreased glucose clearance (Wajngot et al., 1992), and reduction in whole body glucose disposal (Besse et al., 2005). Therefore, the enhancement in β-cell response, required to accommodate the GC-induced IR state, is impaired in these subjects.

2.1.4. Obstacles for the investigation of β-cell function in humans

The prolonged period of GC therapy utilized in clinical practice may surpass the short period used for experimental approaches in human studies that often is restricted to 2-15 days of GC treatment (van Raalte et al., 2009). Thus, the data from human experimental models, although of great relevance, fail to mimic the conditions of clinical practice. Elaboration of chronic GC protocols to investigate β-cell function in human volunteers is not feasible in consideration of the risk to develop irreversible adverse effects, ethical issues, as well as the nature of ex vivoand in vitrotools available for the mechanistic comprehension of β-cell function and growth (van Raalte et al., 2009). Yet, patients exhibiting excess of endogenous or exogenous GCs generally develop other side effects or altered circulating factors that could mask the GC effects on β-cell function (Dessein & Joffe, 2006).

Taken together, acute GC administration seems to exert an inhibitory effect on insulin secretion, while prolonged exposure induces alterations in β-cell function as an adaptive compensation to surpass GC-induced IR. However, susceptible subjects are prone to develop β-cell dysfunction with subsequent impairment of glucose homeostasis. Considering that mechanistic investigations require ex vivoand in vitroapproaches, and that rodent models exhibit similar responses as humans in terms of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis profile, use of experimental rodent models has been important for understanding β-cell function during GC treatments.

2.2. GC treatment and glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in rodents

The effects of GCs on insulin secretion have been assessed in vivoand ex vivoin rats and mice and show that the compensatory islet responses in rats are similar to those observed in human volunteers. The importance of endogenous GCs was demonstrated in rats (Borelli et al., 1982) with bilateral adrenalectomy. These rats exhibit impaired insulin secretion in vivoin response to glucose, which is corrected by GC replacement. The endocrine pancreas adaptations to GC administration are not similar between rats and mice and for this reason we will first discuss the literature obtained with rat models and then proceed to mouse models.

2.2.1. Acute GC effects in normal rats

When administered acutely (4 to 6 hours), DEX causes a modest decrease in insulin sensitivity (Qi et al., 2004) or increased rate of glucose disappearance (Stojanovska et al., 1990). This remains controversial, but at any rate it is accompanied by normoglycemia (Stojanovska et al., 1990; Qi et al., 2004) together with normal (Qi et al., 2004) or increased plasma insulin values (Stojanovska et al., 1990). These data reveal no deleterious effect of DEX on the insulinogenic index (the ratio between insulinemia and glycemia) when the steroid is acutely administered in rats.

2.2.2. Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in GC-treated rats

The majority of the studies using rat models are performed with prolonged exposure to GCs and DEX is the compound preferentially employed. The protocols vary in dose (0.01 to 5 mg/kg, b.w.), duration (1 day to 8 weeks) and administration route (subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, oral), gender, age, and strain (Lee et al., 1989; O'Brien et al., 1991; Koranyi et al., 1992; Ohneda et al., 1993; Wang et al., 1994; Novelli et al., 1999; Holness & Sugden, 2001; Karlsson et al., 2001; Choi et al., 2006; Wierup et al., 2006; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2011) (Table 2). Similar to humans, normal rats treated with DEX had decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity. This GC-induced IR is time-, dose- and age-dependent (Novelli et al., 1999; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2011) and is a common effect in GC-treated rats. This is supported by the fact that most studies showed fasting hyperinsulinemia, an indicator of IR (Lee et al., 1989; Stojanovska et al., 1990; Koranyi et al., 1992; Novelli et al., 1999; Zakrzewska et al., 1999; Barbera et al., 2001; Holness & Sugden, 2001; Karlsson et al., 2001; Severino et al., 2002; Choi et al., 2006; Giozzet et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2010). This rise in circulating insulin concentrations fully compensates for peripheral IR in normal rats and prevents any increase in blood glucose concentrations (Lee et al., 1989; Koranyi et al., 1992; Ogawa et al., 1992; Novelli et al., 1999; Zakrzewska et al., 1999; Barbera et al., 2001; Holness & Sugden, 2001; Severino et al., 2002; Choi et al., 2006; Giozzet et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2010), except in normal elderly rats (Novelli et al., 1999) or when the highest experimental doses (1 mg/kg. b.w.) and/or duration (four days or more) of DEX administration are used. However, these latter experimental conditions provoke only a slight elevation in blood glucose levels that do not exceed an average value of 7.5 mM (Stojanovska et al., 1990; Holness & Sugden, 2001; Holness et al., 2005; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2010). The glucose tolerance in GC-treated rats also varies depending on the dose, duration or predisposing factors (e.g., pregnancy, obesity and aging) (Novelli et al., 1999; Holness & Sugden, 2001). Normal male adult rats receiving 0.1, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg b.w.of DEX for 1 to 3 days do not exhibit glucose intolerance during a glucose load; however, when these rats are submitted to 5 days of DEX treatment at 1 mg/kg b.w.they become glucose intolerant (Rafacho et al., 2008). Thus, for low doses and/or short periods of GC administration, the elevation in insulin secretion is sufficient to prevent any derangement in glucose homeostasis. However, for higher doses and/or prolonged periods of GC treatment, these normal rats are unable to fully compensate for the metabolic demand and glucose intolerance appears, despite the marked increase in insulin response to glucose. Whether increased levels of lipids, like non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), contribute to this metabolic perturbation deserves investigation, but there is already evidence that increased lipolysis may affect insulinogenic index under GC-induced IR in normal rats (Novelli et al., 2008). It is also important to mention that GC-treated elderly rats (Novelli et al., 1999), high-fat diet rats (Holness et al., 2005) or pregnant rats (Holness & Sugden, 2001) become intolerant to glucose after a sugar challenge that is associated with a decreased insulinogenic index. Notably, all above alterations by GC treatment are transitory and normalized after discontinuation of steroid administration in healthy rats (Rafacho et al., 2010).

GCRDosingInsulin sensitivity (IS) Glucose tolerance (GT)Fasting
Fasting insulinemiaInsulin secretionReference
Dex----5 µg b.i.d.for 3 or 4 d in male SDDecreased ISModest increaseIncreasedIncreased
(Stojanovska et al., 1990)
Dexi.p2 mg/kg b.w.for 7 d in female SD---------------Increased 1st phase, but not 2nd in isolated islets(O'Brien et al., 1991)
Dexi.p.5 mg/kg for
24 d (male and female?)
Decreased IS in normal animalsUnaltered-----Increased
(Ogawa et al., 1992)
Dex----0.125 mg/kg b.w. b.i.d.for 4 d in male SD-----UnalteredIncreased-----(Koranyi et al., 1992)
Dexs.c.4 mg/kg b.w.for 10 d
---------------Increased(Wang et al., 1994)
Dexs.c.0,125 mg/kg b.w.for 13 d in 3-, 18- and 26-month old in male SD-----Unaltered for 3-month old and marked increase for 18- and 26-month oldIncreased in age-dependent mannerIncreased mainly in young animals and in less extent in olders
(Novelli et al., 1999)
Dexi.p.2 mg/kg b.w.for 12 d in female SD-----Fed moderate hyperglycemiaFed increaseIncreased
(Karlsson et al., 2001)
Dexs.c.100 µg /kg b.wfor 6 d in non-pregnant WistarModest decrease in GTUnalteredIncreasedIncreased(Holness & Sugden, 2001)
Dexs.c.1 µg b.i.d. for 4 wkDecreased ISUnalteredIncreasedIncreased(Severino et al., 2002)
Dexoral10 or 100 µg /kg b.w.for 8 wk in male SDDecreased ISUnalteredIncreased for both-----(Choi et al., 2006)
Dexi.p.0.1, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg b.w.for 5 d on WistarDecreased
IS in all
Decreased GT (0.5 and 1 mg)
Modest increase with high doseDose-dependent increaseIncreased dose dependently
(Rafacho et al., 2008)
Dexi.p0.125 mg/kg b.w.for 20 d in SDDecreased ISUnalteredIncreasedIncreased(Novelli et al., 2008)
Dexi.p.0.2 mg/kg b.w.for 2 d in male Wistar-----Modest increaseIncreasedIncreased(Sood & Ismail-Beigi, 2010)
Dexi.p.1 mg/kg b.w.for 1, 3 or 5 d in male WistrarDecreased
IS - 3 and 5 d
GT – 5 d
Tendency towards on 5 dTime-dependent increaseIncreased in all(Rafacho et al., 2011)
R;route, b.i.d.;twice a day (from Latin bis in die), d;day, Dex;dexamethasone, SD;Sprague-Dawley, -----;none

Table 2.

Effects of prolonged GC treatment in normal rats on endocrine pancreas parameters.

2.2.3. Ex vivo insulin secretion by isolated islets from GC-treated rats

Islet insulin secretion in response to several stimuli, especially glucose, has been found to be reduced (Ogawa et al., 1992; Ohneda et al., 1993), unchanged (Chuthaputti & Fletcher, 1987; O'Brien et al., 1991) or increased (Wang et al., 1994; Novelli et al., 1999; Barbera et al., 2001; Karlsson et al., 2001; Giozzet et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2009; Rafacho et al., 2010; Sood & Ismail-Beigi, 2010; Rafacho et al., 2011) in GC-treated rats. The abrogation of insulin secretion by glucose is observed in Wistar rats vulnerable to GC treatment (that develop a diabetic profile after steroid treatment) (Ogawa et al., 1992) or in a Zucker fatty strain (fa/fa) (Ogawa et al., 1992; Ohneda et al., 1993). In islets from these rats, a chronological association between reductions in glucose transporter (GLUT)-2 immunolocalization in β-cells and glucose uptake in islets with the development of hyperglycemia is found (Ohneda et al., 1993). The reduction of GLUT2 could however not fully explain the total loss of GSIS in these rats if one considers that the remaining β-cells with intact GLUT2 distribution maintain a normal insulin response to glucose. These findings, if reproduced in humans, speak against the use of GCs in conditions where the insulin demand is already increased prior to GC treatment.

The most prominent functional islet adaptation, when rats are challenged with steroids, is the increased insulin response to glucose. This adaptation most likely occurs to compensate for GC-induced IR. This enhancement of β-cell function, also observed in humans, is anticipated in healthy individuals and guarantees a regular disposition index (the product of insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity). Figure 1 shows an overview of some already known mechanisms involved in this enhanced islet function and the proposed modes of interference by GC treatment. The β-cell possesses a unique signal transduction system dependent on metabolism of fuel stimuli to initiate insulin secretion (Matschinsky, 1996). Glycolytic and oxidative metabolism accelerates the generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). A rise in the cytosolic ATP/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ratio is believed to close metabolically sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels), leading to depolarization of the β-cell membrane. This activates voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and elevates intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), and culminates in the exocytosis of insulin-containing granules. In addition, elevation of [Ca2+]i activates a number of potentiating signaling pathways, including protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC), which amplify insulin release (Nesher et al., 2002).

Figure 1.

Insulin secretory process in β-cells from GC-treated rats. The known components involved in the adaptive increase in β-cell function after GC treatment are highlighted with a positive signal (orange circle), which indicates increased content or activity of the component after GC treatment. Most notably, increased glucose metabolism and cholinergic pathway activity cause increased calcium influx and insulin secretion. Abbreviations: AC, adenylyl cyclase; Ach, acetylcholine; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; Cx36, connexin 36; DAG, diacylglycerol; FFA, free fatty acids; G6P, glucose-6-phosphatase; Gs. G-coupled stimulatory protein; GK, glucokinase; GLUT2, glucose transporter 2; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; M3R, muscarinic receptor type 3; NADH, nicotinamide dinucleotide; NAD(P)H, nicotinamide adenonine dinucleotide phosphate; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate; PK, pyruvate kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C; VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel. Modified fromNussey & Whitehead, 2001; Endocrinology: An integrated approach, box 2.19 (Nussey & Whitehead, 2001).

The establishment of any direct GC effects on β-cells under in vivoconditions is difficult, since systemic metabolic consequences of GC treatment (e.g., circulating factors changing such glucose, NEFA, and other metabolites and hormones) probably interfere with GC-mediated changes in β-cell function (van Raalte et al., 2009). Islets isolated from GC-treated rats have enhanced glucose responsiveness (Novelli et al., 1999; Barbera et al., 2001; Karlsson et al., 2001; Rafacho et al., 2008; Sood & Ismail-Beigi, 2010), higher glucose sensitivity (lower EC50 values to glucose) (Giozzet et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2008), and exhibit pronounced first and second phase insulin secretion in response to glucose (Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2011). The glycolytic components seem not to be involved in such augmented insulin response, since mRNA and protein contents of GLUT2, glucokinase (GK) and pyruvate kinase (PK) are unaltered in islets from DEX-treated rats (Rafacho et al., 2010; Sood & Ismail-Beigi, 2010). However, these data do not exclude that GK and/or PK activities may be elevated since enzymatic activities have not been measured directly. Indirect determination of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate [NAD(P)H] generation and mitochondrial function, by NAD(P)H autofluorescence and rhodamine 123 fluorescence, respectively, indicate increased glucose metabolism in islets from GC-treated rats (Rafacho et al., 2010). These authors did not determine the islet ATP content but found augmented [Ca2+]i in response to glucose that was not a result of elevated basal [Ca2+]i. The glucose-induced elevation in [Ca2+]i appeared not to involve significant changes in KATP channels or voltage-gated Ca2+ channels response, since islets from DEX-treated rats perfused with high K+ or tolbutamide did not show higher [Ca2+]i compared to control islets. These data give a clear indication of enhanced glucose sensitivity in islets from GC-treated rats. The amplifying pathway of GSIS, which involves activation of Ca2+-dependent kinases, is altered in GC-treated rat islets. DEX-treated rats have high islet content of phosphorylated PKCα protein that is associated with increased number of docked insulin-containing granules (Rafacho et al., 2010) as well as higher insulin secretion in response to the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Rafacho et al., 2010). In addition, the cholinergic pathway, mediated by phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol triphosphate (IP3) / PKC signals, contributes to such an increase in β-cell function in GC-treated rats. The insulin secretion and [Ca2+]i are increased in response to cholinergic stimulation in islets from GC-treated rats (Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2010). It is known that DEX-treated rats exhibit higher islet content of muscarinic receptor type 3 (M3R) and PLC β1. These islets are less responsive to cholinergic blockade during dynamic insulin secretion experiments in the presence of stimulatory concentrations of glucose and cholinergic agonists (Angelini et al., 2010). Corroborating this hypothesis, vagus dennervation partially abrogated the hyperinsulinemic profile in DEX-treated rats (Angelini et al., 2010). Notwithstanding the important role of glucose metabolism and cholinergic signals for the increased β-cell function in GC-treated rat models, the involvement of non-glucidic insulin secretagogues (amino acids and NEFA) (Novelli et al., 1999; Rafacho et al., 2010), non-metabolic signals (Rafacho et al., 2010), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinases (Rafacho et al., 2010), and gap junctional intercellular communications (formed by connexin 36 protein in β-cells) (Rafacho et al., 2007) are also observed in these rats. All this information indicates that several factors are involved in augmentation of the insulin secretion response in islets isolated from GC-treated rats. It was recently demonstrated that insulin hypersecretion precedes any discernible indication of IR in DEX-treated rats (Rafacho et al., 2011). After 24 hours of DEX administration, rats become hyperinsulinemic and exhibit increased GSIS concomitant with normal blood glucose values, normal lipidemia, and without any evidence of IR. As the treatment continues, IR unfolds and islets become more responsive to glucose. A possible explanation for the early increase of insulin release may reside in central nervous system (CNS) signals. Direct administration of DEX to the CNS appears to increase parasympathetic system activity, resulting in augmented plasma insulin levels (Zakrzewska et al., 1999). This observation is in agreement with the results obtained with ganglionic antagonist infusion in DEX-induced IR and insulin hypersecretion in human volunteers as described before (Ahrén, 2008). Of note, all these altered ex vivoislet responses are transitory and reversible after discontinuation of GC treatment (Karlsson et al., 2001; Wierup et al., 2006; Rafacho et al., 2010); however, great caution is required in translating these observation to human applications.

2.2.4. Structural changes in pancreatic islets in response to GC treatment in rats

Compensatory islet hypertrophy in response to GC treatment in vivowas first described in the eighties (Jonas et al., 1983; Tomita et al., 1984; Zwicker & Eyster, 1993). The mechanisms involved in islet hypertrophy were elucidated several years later (Rafacho et al., 2007; Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2009). Activation of cell cycle progression machinery in normal rats in response to GC treatment is probably associated with the degree of IR that in turn is correlated to dose and/or duration of GC administration (Rafacho et al., 2009; Rafacho et al., 2011) and does not involve direct effects of GCs on β-cells, since it is known that steroids inhibit β-cell proliferation and promote β-cell death in vitro(Weinhaus et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2006; Ranta et al., 2006; Nicoletti-Carvalho et al., 2010). Instead, increased levels of circulating hormones and/or substrates, such as glucose, insulin, insulin-growth factor (IGF)-1, glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and other circulating growth factors, may be responsible for promotion of β-cell growth in GC-treated rats [for review see references (Heit et al., 2006) and (Vasavada et al., 2006)]. β-cell proliferation is significantly increased after 5 days of DEX treatment in a positive reciprocity with steroid dose (1.0 mg/kg > 0.5 mg/kg b.w.), but absent when IR is modest as in 5-days 0.1 mg/kg b.w.DEX treatment (Rafacho et al., 2009). The same correlation between IR degree and β-cell proliferation is observed when analyzed during time-course studies. After 1 day GC treatment, no changes in β-cell proliferation are observed and IR is not discernible. However, as GC treatment continues (3 to 5 days), IR develops and and the increase in β-cell proliferation is correlated with the degree of IR (Rafacho et al., 2011). With some combinations of GC treatment, β-cell hypertrophy is also observed (Choi et al., 2006; Rafacho et al., 2009). Thus, β-cell hypertrophy and/or proliferation accounts for increased β-cell mass upon GC treatment (Choi et al., 2006; Rafacho et al., 2010, Rafacho, 2009). This augmentation in β-cell mass is associated with increased islet protein content of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2, phosphorylated serine-threonine kinase (PKB), cyclin D (Cd)-2, cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)-4, phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb), but not with activation of extracellular-regulated kinase (Erk)-1/2 (Rafacho et al., 2008; Rafacho et al., 2009). Considering that plasma insulin concentrations increase in a GC dose- and/or time-dependent manner, it is conceivable that circulating insulin is one candidate mediator of β-cell growth. In addition, these GC-induced IR models do not exhibit changes in β-cell death (Rafacho et al., 2009; Rafacho et al., 2010) and almost all morphological changes are transitory and reversible after 10 days discontinuation of steroid treatment, suggesting an unacknowledged plasticity in the regulation of β-cell growth.

Taken altogether, like in humans, rats subjected to prolonged steroid treatment develop increased β-cell function as an adaptive compensation to surpass GC-induced IR. Susceptible strains; however, are prone to develop β-cell dysfunction that results in impaired glucose homeostasis. The β-cell growth accompanies the requirement for insulin in a direct relation with IR and demonstrates a great plasticity of endocrine pancreas to face fluctuations in metabolic demand.

2.3. Functional and structural changes in pancreatic islets in GC-treated mice

Less is known about in vivoGC effects in normal mice than in rats. Acute administration of hydrocortisone (300 mg/kg b.w.) to male Swiss mice inhibits insulin secretion (Longano & Fletcher, 1983) with reduced insulinogenic index already after 1 h of steroid administration. The insulin secretion in response to i.v.glucose load is also suppressed in this hydrocortisone model and may involve increased sympathetic drive. In response to prolonged DEX treatment (2½ days, with a dose equivalent to 1 mg/kg b.w.) islets isolated from normal adult mice show a modest decrease in insulin response to either 5.5 mM or 16.7 mM glucose. However, when the increment in insulin release between 5.5 mM and 16.7 mM glucose is calculated, a higher insulin response in DEX-treated animals as compared to vehicle treated mice is noted. As blood glucose and insulinemia were not determined in this experiment (Ling et al., 1998), which could indicate any deleterious GC effects on glucose homeostasis, caution should be exerted as to making conclusions about GC effects in normal mice.

Most of the data obtained with mouse models come from studies in genetically obese, leptin deficient mice (ob/ob) that display IR (Table 3). Obese mice treated with 25 µg DEX for 1 to 2½ days (at a dose equivalent to 0.5 mg/kg b.w.) exhibit increased islet glucose cycling (dephosphorylation of glucose-6-phosphate [G6P] to glucose by glucose-6-phosphatase [G6Pase]) both at 5.5 mM and at 16.7 mM glucose, but at the same time unaltered islet glucose oxidation and utilization. These results are associated with diminished or inhibited GSIS (Figure 2) (Khan et al., 1992; Khan et al., 1995). In an attempt to extrapolate these observations and determine whether they are caused by direct islet effects of GC in vivo, a transgenic mouse that overexpresses the GR specifically in β-cells was generated (Delaunay et al., 1997). These mice also displayed increased glucose cycling, mild glucose intolerance, decreased insulinogenic index and GSIS, but remained normoglycaemic (Delaunay et al., 1997; Ling et al., 1998). DEX treatment increased glucose cycling and the impairment of GSIS in this transgenic model. Again, islet glucose utilization and oxidation in the transgenic mice were comparable to those in control animals, demonstrating that the enhanced glucose flux trough G6Pase does not alter glucose utilization. Moreover, glucose cycling is neglible in normal rodents (≈ 3%) and appears not to be a plausible explanation of the inhibitory effect of insulin release by DEX (Khan et al., 1992). The impact of direct GC effects in β-cells is better demonstrated in 11- to 12-month-old transgenic mice (GR-overexpressing at β-cells). At this age, mice developed hyperglycemia and hypoinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, borderline IR (not significant), and decreased GSIS both in vivoand ex vivo. The reduction of GSIS was abolished after incubation of islets with an antagonist of α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AdrR) that is associated with increased islet mRNA and α2-AdrR density. No alterations in GLUT2 distribution or in β-cell apoptosis were detected (Davani et al., 2004). Thus, the adrenergic signals (Figure 2) may participate in this impaired β-cell response caused by acutely or for more prolonged periods GC treatment. The transgenic approach revealed valuable information regarding the specific GC effects upon β-cells, but it does not take into account the overall metabolic GC effects. Studies conducted in adult mice treated with GCs, where peripheral effects of GCs are preserved, have shown increased circulating insulin levels when IR is apparent, but investigation of β-cell function and structure was not done (Thomas et al., 1998; Karatsoreos et al., 2010). In summary, acute GC treatment induces reduction of β-cell function in mice and this effect is accelerated in susceptible mice (old, obese or GR-overexpressing), which is in agreement with the deleterious effects of GCs on β-cell function known from studies with predisposed human individuals and in certain rat models. Nevertheless, GC effects on β-cell function and growth in normal mice are not known and merit further investigation.

GCRDosingInsulin sensitivity (IS) Glucose tolerance (GT)Fasting glycemiaFasting insulinemiaInsulin secretionReference
Dexi.p.1 or 2 d of 25 µg for ob/ob mice weighing around 50 g-----Unaltered in bothUnaltered in 48 h, but not determined
in 24 h
Decreased (24 h) or inhibited
(48 h)
(Khan et al., 1992)
Dexi.p.2 ½ d of 25 µg for ob/ob mice weighing more than 50 g--------------------(Khan et al., 1995)
----------Transgenic adult miceMild decrease in GTUnalteredModest decrease only in 1 from 2 groups analyzedDecreased
(Delaunay et al., 1997)
Dexi.p.25 µg for 2 ½ d in normal or transgenic adult weighing around 25 g-----Unaltered between transgenic and controls-----Decreased in normal and transgenic
(Ling et al., 1998)
----------12-15 month-old transgenic miceTendency towards decrease in IS
Decreased GT
IncreasedDecreasedDecreased(Davani et al., 2004)
d;day, Dex;dexamethasone, R;route, Transgenic;glucocoticoid receptor overexpression under rat insulin promoter 1, -----;none

Table 3.

Effects of prolonged GC treatment in ob/obor transgenic mice on endocrine pancreas parameters.

Figure 2.

Insulin secretory process in β-cells from GC-treated mice. The known components involved in the reduced β-cell function are highlighted with a positive signal (orange circle), which indicates increased content or activity of the component after GC treatment. Most notably is the increased adrenergic activity that seems to inhibit insulin secretion. Abbreviations: AC, adenylyl cyclase; Ach, acetylcholine; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine trisphosphate; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; DAG, diacylglycerol; G6P, glucose-6-phosphatase; Gi, G-coupled inhibitory protein; GK, glucokinase; GLUT2, glucose transporter 2; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; M3R, muscarinic receptor type 3; NADH, nicotinamide dinucleotide; NAD(P)H, nicotinamide adenonine dinucleotide phosphate; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate; PK, pyruvate kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C; VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel. Modified fromNussey & Whitehead, 2001; Endocrinology: An integrated approach, box 2.19 (Nussey & Whitehead, 2001).

2.4. Direct glucocorticoid effects on insulin secretion and β-cell growth in islets and β-cell lines

In vitro, as in vivo, it is difficult to determine with accuracy the specific factors involved in the GC effects on β-cell function. This is because in vitroculture does not mimic perfectly the metabolic milieuof an intact system in vivo. For example, the timing, duration and level of exposure to GC compounds, the concentration range of serum and/or glucose in the culture medium, the concentration and variety of insulin secretagogues chosen, and the β cell (isolated islets, dispersed islet β-cells, β-cell lines) and species (human, hamster, rat or mouse islets) vary (Santerre et al., 1981; Lambillotte et al., 1997; Myrsén-Axcrona et al., 1997; Fabregat et al., 1999; Jeong et al., 2001; Shao et al., 2004; Arumugam et al., 2008; Swali et al., 2008; Roma et al., 2011). Despite the repercussions of these variables, in vitroinsights have been of great importance to elucidate the direct effects of GCs on insulin secretion.

2.4.1. Acute GC effects

Rodent-derived islets or dispersed β-cells have diminished or inhibited insulin response to non-metabolizable and metabolizable secretagogues, especially to glucose, both after acute (minutes) (Billaudel & Sutter, 1979; Barseghian & Levine, 1980) or prolonged (hours to days) GC exposure (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Weinhaus et al., 2000; Jeong et al., 2001; Zawalich et al., 2006). In the presence of three different concentrations (physiological and supraphysiological), corticosterone does not affect rat islet insulin secretion under basal glucose conditions, whereas, in response to 16.7 mM glucose, insulin release is inhibited. This study emphasizes that physiological corticosterone concentrations (0.02 and 0.2 mg/L) have strong negative impact on insulin secretion (Billaudel & Sutter, 1979). In the same trend, it was shown that cathecolaminergic signals may play a role in this process, since phentolamine, an α-AdrR blocking agent, ameliorated the strong inhibitory effect of corticosterone on insulin release (Barseghian & Levine, 1980). This immediate negative effect of corticosterone on insulin release is not reproduced by the synthetic GC DEX in isolated mouse (Lambillotte et al., 1997) or rat islets (Zawalich et al., 2006). Thus, acute GC effects on insulin release appear to be more evident with natural corticosterone used at physiological concentrations.

2.4.2. Hours to days GC effects

The inhibition of insulin secretion by GCs begins after 3 to 6 hours (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Weinhaus et al., 2000; Zawalich et al., 2006). The mechanisms by which this occurs are not completely understood, but several components are already identified as shown in a schematic overview and the proposed loci of interference by GCs in Figure 3. Details regarding GC compounds used, concentrations, duration of treatment, and main effects on β-cell function are described in Table 4. The GC-induced reduction in GSIS could not be attributed to decreases in insulin content since it was unchanged or augmented (Pierluissi et al., 1986; Gremlich et al., 1997; Lambillotte et al., 1997; Zawalich et al., 2006), although reduction was also observed under certain conditions (Jeong et al., 2001). It has been shown that presence of DEX in islet or β-cell culture medium induces reduction (Gremlich et al., 1997) or no change (Shao et al., 2004) in GLUT 2 protein content, decrease in β-cell GK (Shao et al., 2004) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) (Arumugam et al., 2010) activities, and increased pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK)-2 mRNA content (Arumugam et al., 2010). Despite alterations of these proximal metabolic components, the failure of β-cells’ response to glucose does not appear to involve a defect in the recognition of glucose, because no changes in the rate of glucose oxidation (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Zawalich et al., 2006), oxygen consumption (Ortsäter et al., 2005), NAD(P)H production (Lambillotte et al., 1997), or [Ca2+]i (Lambillotte et al., 1997) have been observed. There are controversies related to Ca2+ influx in response to glucose or non-glucidic stimuli (Myrsén-Axcrona et al., 1997; Koizumi & Yada, 2008), but in spite of elevation or reduction in Ca2+ influx, there is consensus that Ca2+ oscillations are impaired, which may harm the distal events of secretion dependent of finely tuned Ca2+ handling.

GCDose and period, and β-cell sourceMain resultsReference
Cort0.02, 0.2 or 20 mg/l along first min in isolated rat isletsWith 4.2 mM glucose, Cort did not affect IS, but with 16.7 mM glucose IS was inhibited by the three Cort concentrations tested during static incubation, and by the two physiological during islets perifusion(Billaudel & Sutter, 1979)
CortPhysiological Cort concentrations along first in rat pancreasAcutely inhibit the IS induced by both glucose and arginine. Phentolamine, an α-adrenergic blocking agent, diminished the strong inhibitory effect of Cort on IS(Barseghian & Levine, 1980)
Dex0.1-1.0 µM for 6, 48 or 96 h in hamster β-cell line (HIT)Inhibited the IS to the culture medium after 48 or 96 h, but not to 6 h(Santerre et al., 1981)


0.063, 0.63 or 6.3 µM for 1, 2 or 3h in rat islets
No alteration at 2 mM glucose, but reduced GSIS (20 mM) when cultured with 6.3 µM Dex for 1, 2 or 3h or2 h with 0.063 µM or 630 µM for islet culture. The reduced GSIS under 6.3 µM for 2 h culture was also seen with 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 20 and 30 mM glucose. These responses were re-established after 4 h.Pred and Hydr also induced decreased GSIS and none of these drugs elicit a decrease in islet insulin content(Pierluissi et al., 1986)
24 h in HIT-T15 or RIN-5AH cellsDex, Pred and Hydr induced an increase of α2-AdrR in HIT cells that was prevented by the GR antagonist RU38486. 1µM Dex also induced increased expression of receptor in RIN-5 cells(Hamamdzic et al., 1995)
Dex1 µM for 18 h in mouse isletsDex had inhibitory effect from the 3rd h incubation. Cultured islets in presence of Dex 1 µM had higher insulin content than control and the reversibility of GSIS in islets treated with 0.25 µM dex was observed after 3 h of DEX discontinuation. 20 mM glucose in the medium or the presence of KIC did not change the inhibitory effect of Dex; however, PMA, cAMP or inhibition of α2-AdrR was able to attenuate or reversed the negative action of 18 h 1 µM Dex. The presence of pertussis toxin abolished the negative effect of Dex. IS continues inhibited even after stimulation with tolbutamide, high glucose and diazoxide. Glucose oxidation and NAD(P)H were similar between both islet groups in presence of 3 or 15 mM glucose. Dex islets had reduced response under high glucose during the dynamic protocol and the pattern of calcium oscillations were changed in Dex islets. IS and calcium influx were also lower in response to Cch in Dex islets(Lambillotte et al., 1997)
Dex1 µM for 48 h in rat isletsDex induced a decrease in GLUT2 protein expression in a glucose-dependent manner that is blunted by RU486. Addition of palmitic acid had no additive effect on the reduction of GLUT2 protein expression compared to Dex alone. Dex induced an inhibition of GSIS that was also evidenced by palmitic acid alone or in combination with Dex. The total islet insulin content were decreased in response to the palmitic acid whereas were increased by Dex. The effect of Dex was inhibited by RU486(Gremlich et al., 1997)
Dex100 nM for 1 to 5 d in RINm5 cellsDex induced an increase in NPY mRNA expression in a time-dependent manner. It also induced an increase in NPY immunoreactivity. Dex treated cells had less IS to the medium, whereas increased NPY release. IS in several conditions was reduced in cells treated with Dex. The D-glyceraldehyde-induced raise in [Ca2+]i was impaired after Dex treatment. Also, the increase in cytosolic calcium when stimulated with KCl was lowered by Dex.(Myrsén-Axcrona et al., 1997)
Dex1 nM – 1 µM during 6 d culture in 5 d neonate rat isletsAfter 6 d culture, 10 nM to 1 µM Dex markedly reduced the content of IS to the medium in control and in PRL-treated islets. Dex (100 nM) exerted its effects since the 1st day culture and abolished the positive effects of PRL when incubated together with PRL. Six d of 100 nM Dex inhibited the IS from 2.8 to 7.2 or 13.5mM glucose alone or in combination with PRL, but did not induce a decrease in total islet insulin content(Weinhaus et al., 2000)
11-DHC50 or 500 nM 11-DHC for 20 h in ob/ob mouse isletsIncubation of β cells in the presence of 11-DHC led to a dose-dependent inhibition of IS. Inhibition of 11β-HSD1 activity by carbenoxolone reversed inhibition of IS(Davani et al., 2004)
Dex1, 10 or 100 nM for 1 to 6 h in rat isletsIS decreased in a time- and dose-dependent manner being significant already after the 1st h incubation within 10 or 100 nM Dex, but not for 1 nM until the 6th h culture. The 1st, but not 2nd phase GSIS were reduced in response to 10 or 100 nM Dex (Dex were exposed only during perifusion). The islet insulin content was higher in islets from 1, 10 and 100nM culture after 1 h treatment and reduced for only 100 nM after 6 h. After 6, but not 1 h, 10 and 100 nM Dex reduced the pre-proinsulin mRNA content.(Jeong et al., 2001)
Dex50 ng/ml -1ug/ml for 24 h in MIN6 cellsDex from 50 ng to 1mg/ml inhibited IS to the culture medium after 24 h. Dex (100 nM) inhibited GSIS in a time-dependent fashion from the 6 h to 48 h treatment. Dex (100nM) did not change GK protein content, but inhibited GK activity from the 6 h ahead and did not affect the GLUT2 protein content during long term treatments. Even in response to KIC Dex-treated cells had inhibited IS. Dex induces a reduction in cAMP content that was prevented by the presence of the inhibitor of the PDE. The increase in PDE activity was confirmed after Dex treatment(Shao et al., 2004)
Dex100 nM for 4h in mouse islets or INS1 cells. For IHC, mice received 1 injection of 10 mg/kg b.w.Dex and killed 24 h afterAfter 4 h 100 nM Dex it was observed increased mRNA expression of KV-1.5 (repolarizing K channel). This was associated with increased SGK1 mRNA and protein expression in a time-dependent manner (INS1 cells) and immunoreactivity in mice islet pancreas. All analysis in cells was abrogated by the presence of RU486. The activity of KV-1.5 channel was increased after Dex treatment and mediated by SGK1, that was associated to reduced [Ca2+]i peaks in response to glucose. The inhibited GSIS in DEX-treated INS1 cells and mouse islets were reverted by the presence of K channel inhibitors TEA and MSD. Presence of diazoxide and high KCL also reversed the insulin secretion in DEX-treated INS1 cells. SGK1 knockout mice did not present the same reduction in GSIS.(Ullrich et al., 2005)
11-DHC5, 50 or 500 nM 11-DHC for 48 h in ob/obmouse isletsIslets from the ob/ob mouse contained almost twofold more 11β-HSD1 protein than islets from the C57BL/6J mouse. When islets from ob/ob mice were cultured with 50 nM 11-DHC, the 11β-HSD1 levels doubled compared with islets cultured in the absence of DHC. Selective inhibition of 11β-HSD1 attenuated DHC-induced increase in 11β-HSD1 levels, as did an antagonist of the GR. In individually perfused ob/obmouse islets, early and late phases of GSIS were dose-dependently inhibited by 11-DHC. Whereas inclusion of 11β-HSD1 inhibitors restored, addition of the GR antagonist attenuated the DHC-mediated inhibition of GSIS.(Ortsäter et al., 2005)
Dex100 nM for 3 d in BRIN-BD 11 cellsDEX-treated cells lacked responsiveness to glucose and membrane depolarisation, and both PKA and PKC secretory pathways were desensitised.(Liu et al., 2006)
Dex1 µM concomitant or for 3 h previous culture in rat isletsDex (included in the perifusion solution) has no effect on GSIS. Previous incubation with Dex markedly decrease the 1st and the 2nd phases IS under 15 mM glucose. This result was not associated to reduction in insulin content or glucose oxidation. IS was also reduced in response to TPA or KCl in Dex islets. Dex also reduces the agonist-induced inositol phosphate accumulation in islets, but did not change the protein content of 5 different PLC protein isoforms. Significant reductions in glucose-induced IP accumulation accompanied the reduction in GSIS. Islet exposed to Dex for 3 h contained protein amounts of PLC isoforms and PKCα comparable to control islets. No impairment in label incorporation, used to monitor PLC activation under these conditions, was observed(Zawalich et al., 2006)

10 - 500 ng/ml Cort or 1µg/ml Dex for 3 d in dispersed rat β-cellsCort (10 to 500 ng/ml) decreased the Ca2+ response to glucose in β-cells, which were GR dependent (Ru486). Dex (1ug/ml, but not 10 ng/ml) reduced Ca2+ response to glucose in β-cells. Co-incubation of Cort with aldosterone revealed a protective role for aldosterone.(Koizumi & Yada, 2008)
Dex100 nM for 1 d in INS1 cellsDex upregulated the expression of SGK1 in INS1 cells and increased plasma membrane Na+/K+ ATPase activity.(Ullrich et al., 2007)
100 nM Dex for 20 h in INS1 cellsDex upregulated FoxO1, PGC1α, PPARγ, CPT-1, and UCP-2 mRNAs inhibited GSIS in INS1 cells. Hydr had similar effects.(Arumugam et al., 2008)


For 2 h in mouse islets11β-HSD1 co-localized with glucagon in the periphery of murine and human islets, but not with insulin or somatostatin. Incubation (2 h) of islets from normal mice to Dex resulted in a dramatic reduction of IS in a dose-dependent manner that was GR-dependent (RU486). Cort (50 nM) and 11-DHC (11β-HSD1-mediated) induced inhibition of GSIS. Dex, Cort and 11-DHC also decreased glucagon release, and the effect of 11-DHC was partially prevented by enzyme inhibitor(Swali et al., 2008)
Dex100 nM Dex for 48 h in rat islets or 3 h in 100 nM Dex in RINm5F cellsDex time- and dose-dependently increased total FoxO1 mRNA and protein content together with decreased phosphorylation levels in RINm5F cells as well as islets. Presence of IGF-1 reverses these changes. Dex induced a nuclear localization of FoxO1. The mRNA content of FoxO1 were reduced in RINm5F cells after knockdown, which resulted in increased mRNA and protein levels of the PDX1 in cells cultivated in presence of Dex. Islets infected with Adenovirus-Foxo1-SiRNA had decreased FoxO1 protein content and had ameliorated GSIS.(Zhang et al., 2009)
Dex100 nM Dex for 24h in rat islets or INS1 cellsDex did not alter PC protein or activity levels. Dex reduced PDH activity and had increased PDK2 mRNA in islets and INS-1 cells.(Arumugam et al., 2010)
Dex1 µM for 3 d in rat isletsDex increased the ROS, decreased viability and GSIS, but did not change calcium handling. Dex treatment also resulted in reduction of catalase and synaptotagmine VII mRNA content.(Roma et al., 2011)
PredMost effects achieved by 700 nM after 20 h in INS1 cellsPRED inhibited GSIS and decreased both PDX1 and insulin expression, leading to a marked reduction in cellular insulin content. These PRED-induced detrimental effects were GR-mediated (RU486). PRED induced a GR-mediated activation of both ATF6 and IRE1/XBP1 pathways but was found to reduce the phosphorylation of PERK and its downstream substrate eIF2α. These modulations of ER stress pathways were accompanied by upregulation of calpain 10, increased cleaved caspase 3 and β-cell apoptosis.(Linssen et al., 2011)
Dex;dexamethasone, Pred;prednisolone, Cort;corticosterone, GSIS;glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, Hydr;hydrocorticosterone, IS;insulin secretion, 11-DHC;11-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase

Table 4.

Effects of GCs in vitroon insulin secretion from islets, dispersed islet β-cells or β-cell lines.

The insulin secretory dysfunction induced by GCs is not solely restricted to glucose. Additional effects may contribute to β-cell dysfunction; impairment of insulin secretion in response to α-ketoisocaproate (KIC), tolbutamide, or high K+ concentration after DEX treatment is also observed (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Shao et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006), suggesting that factors distal to oxidative phosphorylation (KIC) or metabolism-independent signals (tolbutamide, high K+) may also be involved in the adverse GC effects on the insulin secretory process. DEX may also modulate the inward repolarizing K+ currents by upregulating Kv1.5 ion channels as well as Na+/K+ ATPase activity, which appear to be mediated through activation of the serum- and GC-inducible kinase (SGK1)-1 (Ullrich et al., 2005; Ullrich et al., 2007). These repolarizing currents may limit Ca2+ influx and insulin secretion. Downstream steps in the insulin secretory machinery also seem involved in the direct GC derangements in β-cells. Zawalich and colleagues (Zawalich et al., 2006) demonstrated that DEX pretreatment of rat islets impairs insulin secretion by decreasing activation of the PLC/PKC signaling pathway. Moreover, GCs increase the mRNA content and α-2AdrR protein density in β-cell lines (Hamamdzic et al., 1995), which may explain the lower cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels and attenuated GSIS (Shao et al., 2004). This latter event is prevented by phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, which aligns well with the upregulated PDE activity by DEX treatment (Shao et al., 2004), although controversy remains (Lambillotte et al., 1997). Overall, it appears that GCs act at distal sites by diminishing the efficacy of [Ca2+]i on the secretory response by interfering with the amplifying pathway, although we cannot exclude their possible negative effects also in the mechanisms involved in the rapid first phase insulin secretion (Jeong et al., 2001). The interference of GCs in distal sites of the insulin secretory machinery may explain the wide spectrum of non-glucose insulin secretagogues being inhibited by GCs (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Myrsén-Axcrona et al., 1997; Shao et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006).

2.4.3. Recent insights into GC effects on insulin secretion in vitro.

The mRNA content of Forkhead box O (FoxO)-1, peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR)-γ coactivator (PGC)-1α and uncoupling protein (UCP)-2 were upregulated in primary islets after 20 hours of DEX treatment (Arumugam et al., 2008). From these observations, it is expected that GC-induced derangements of GSIS can include limited production of cellular ATP due to UCP-2 mediated uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. In addition, increased PGC1-α action, which is associated with elevated fat acid oxidation, could induce impairments in insulin secretory process mediated by lack of critical lipid mediators involved in the amplifying pathway (Herrero et al., 2005). The GC-induced increment in total FoxO1 mRNA and protein content, as well as decreased levels of FoxO-1 phosphorylation in a rat insulinoma cell line (RINm5F), are time-and dose-dependent effects and appear to be mediated by the IGF-1 pathway (Zhang et al., 2009). Using molecular tools, it was demonstrated that lack of FoxO-1 ameliorates the DEX-induced impairment of GSIS in β-cell lines, an effect associated with increased levels of pancreatic duodenal homeobox (PDX)-1. It was recently demonstrated that presence of 1 µM DEX for 3 consecutive days in primary islet culture results in increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Roma et al., 2011). This study also revealed impaired generation of NAD(P)H and reduced GSIS, decreased gene expression of catalase (an antioxidant enzyme) and synaptotagmin VII, without alteration in Ca2+ handling. These DEX effects were attenuated by N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (Roma et al., 2011), further supporting a role for ROS in mediating the cytotoxic effects of GCs. The role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis has also been investigated in the context of prednisolone-induced β-cell dysfunction. It has been observed that PDX-1 expression and cellular insulin content are reduced by steroid treatment (700 nM for 20 hours) in INS-1E cells, which resulted in inhibition of GSIS (Linssen et al., 2011). Prednisolone exerts its effects by activation of activating transcription factor (ATF)-6 and inositol requiring enzyme (IRE)-1/X-box binding protein (XBP)-1 pathways and by decreasing the phosphorylation of protein kinase RNA-activated (PKR)-like eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase (PERK) and its downstream substrate eukaryotic initiation (eIF2)-α. Thus, β-cell dysfunction induced by GCs may be, at least partially, attributed to ER dyshomeostasis. These mechanisms are depicted in Figure 3.

2.4.4. 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and pancreatic islets

The enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) catalyzes the conversion of inactive 11-dehydrocorsticosterone (11-DHC) to active corticosterone in rodents and it was found in pancreatic islets isolated from ob/obmice and humans (Davani et al., 2000). Incubation of β-cells in the presence of 11-DHC leads to a dose-dependent attenuation of GSIS, indicating that cellular activation of 11-DHC may play a role in GC-induced β-cell dysfunction and that 11β-HSD1 may potentiate the detrimental effect of GCs on -cell function. The protein content of 11β-HSD1 is higher in islets from ob/obmice, compared to C57BL/6J mice, and is further increased when ob/obislets are cultured in presence of 11-DHC (Ortsäter et al., 2005). GSIS in islets from ob/obmice (but not from normal mice) was dose-dependently inhibited in presence of 11-DHC, an effect prevented by addition of selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitors or GR antagonist RU486 (Ortsäter et al., 2005). Recently, it was demonstrated that 11β-HSD1 is mainly localized to pancreatic α-cells both in mouse and human islets (Swali et al., 2008). In that study, mouse islets had lower glucagon or insulin secretion when cultured in presence of DEX, corticosterone or 11-DHC; the effect of 11-DHC was partially prevented by an 11β-HSD1 inhibitor. These data suggest that the ability of α-cells to generate active GC within the islet impacts on insulin and glucagon secretion by three distinct mechanisms: (1) directly at the level of the α-cells, modulating glucagon secretion; (2) by decreasing glucagon secretion, which may decrease insulin secretion via glucagon receptors expressed on the β-cells and (3) by GC production by α-cells acting in a paracrine manner, regulating insulin secretion from neighbouring β-cells (Swali et al., 2008). Although the overall conclusion of these findings is that 11β-HSD1 plays a negative role in pancreatic -cell function, it should be noted that the complete lack of 11β-HSD1 expression in -cells is associated with mild -cell impairment (Turban et al., 2012). In addition, moderate -cell specific overexpression of 11β-HSD1 can protect against the diabetogenic effects of a high-fat diet. These data lend support to the notion that GCs under certain conditions can promote -cell function (Hult et al., 2009; Rafacho et al., 2010).

Figure 3.

Direct GC effects on the insulin secretory process in β-cells. The known components involved in the direct effects of GCs on the β-cell insulin secretory process are highlighted with a positive signal (orange circle – indicates GCs stimulate that action) or negative signal (red circle – indicates GCs inhibit that action). Most notably, GCs impair β-cell glucose metabolism, favor repolarizing K+ currents, decrease PKA and PKC activation, induce ER dyshomeostasis and increased FoxO1 protein content that altogether impair calcium handling and inhibits insulin secretion. Abbreviations: AC, adenylyl cyclase; Ach, acetylcholine; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine trisphosphate; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; Cx36, connexin 36; DAG, diacylglycerol; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; FFA, free fatty acids; FoxO1, Forkhead box O; G6P, glucose-6-phosphatase; Gs, G-coupled stimulatory protein; GK, glucokinase; GLUT2, glucose transporter 2; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; Kv1 5, voltage-dependent K+ channel; M3R, muscarinic receptor type 3; PDX-1, pancreatic duodenal homeobox; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C; SGK-1, serum- and glucocorticoid inducible kinase-1; VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel, 11-βHSD-1, 11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Modified fromNussey & Whitehead, 2001; Endocrinology: An integrated approach, box 2.19 (Nussey & Whitehead, 2001) and from van Raalte et al., 2009; Eur J Clin Invest 2009, 39(2):page 87,Figure 3(van Raalte et al., 2009).

2.4.5. Effects of GCs on β-cell growth in vitro

It was demonstrated in the seventies that 10 µg/ml DEX exerts inhibitory effects on β-cell proliferation in rat pancreatic monolayer cells (Chick, 1973). Several years later, it was found that 100 nM DEX negatively interferes with the positive effects of prolactin on β-cell growth both in mouse islet cells and INS-1 cells (Weinhaus et al., 2000). The direct effects of DEX on β-cell proliferation and β-cell death are GR-mediated and involve the activation of caspase-3, mitochondrial depolarization, reduction of Bcl-2 protein content, increase of Hsp90 protein, increased calcineurin activity with attendant elevation in dephosphorylated BAD protein levels, and inhibition of IRS-2, PKB and ERK phosphorylations (Ranta et al., 2006; Avram et al., 2008; Ranta et al., 2008). Exendin-4, an agonist of GLP-1 receptor, and IGF-1 protect β-cells against DEX-induced β-cell death. In a recent study, specific knockdown of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase (MKP)-1 in RINm5F and MIN6 insulinoma cells, counteracted the down-regulation of ERK1/2 protein phosphorylation and the reduction of β-cell proliferation induced by DEX (Nicoletti-Carvalho et al., 2010). Prednisolone also induces β-cell apoptosis in INS-1E cells through up-regulation of calpain 10 and increased cleavage of caspase-3 (Linssen et al., 2011). In their entirety, these data, summarized in Table 5, clearly demonstrate the negative effects of GCs on β-cell growth that contrasts to those observed when GCs are administered in vivo.

GCDose and period, and β-cell sourceMain resultsReference
Dex10 µg/ml for 4 d in rat pancreatic monolayer cellsReduced β-cell proliferation(Chick, 1973)
Dex100 nM for 24 h to 3 d in rat isletDex alone did not induce significant decrease in β-cell proliferation, but markedly decreased the positive effect of PRL on β-cell proliferation. Dex for 24 h to 3 d induced an increase in islet cell death even in the presence of PRL.(Weinhaus et al., 2000)
Dex100 nM for 1 or 4 d in mouse β-cells or INS1 cellsDex induced mouse islet cells or INS1 cells death that was GR-dependent (RU486). Dex induced caspase 3 activity in INS1 cells. Dex reduced mRNA and protein content of Bcl-2 and decrease of mitochondrial polarization. Dex-induced cell death was associated to increased calcineurin activity and increased BAD dephosphorylation (all reverted by RU486 or calcineurin inhibitors). Exendin-4 protects islet cells and INS1 cells from Dex-induced cell death via activation of PKA.(Ranta et al., 2006)
Dex100 nM for 1 d in INS-1 cellsDex inhibited cell growth, BrdU incorporation and induced apoptosis. Dex induced cell death was partially antagonized by IGF-1. Despite increased IRS-2 protein, IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation stimulated by IGF-1 was inhibited by Dex. Dex treatment reduced basal PKB phosphorylation. However, IGF-1-mediated ERK phosphorylation was affected.(Avram et al., 2008)
Dex100 nM for 1 to 4 d in INS-1 cellsIn INS-1 cells cultured up to 4 d with Dex, the percentage of apoptosis increased from 1% to 10.9%. FK506 inhibited dex-mediated cell death. Apoptosis was significantly higher at glucose concentrations that induce [Ca2+]i oscillations than at low, non-stimulatory glucose. Calcineurin activity was unaltered after Dex treatment. However, Dex treatment significantly increased enzyme activity at submaximal, physiological Ca2+ concentrations. Dex did not stimulate the Ca2+-dependent protease calpain, known to activate calcineurin by cleavage. In Dex-treated cells Hsp90 protein, a component of the GR known to stimulate calcineurin,was increased while calcineurin protein levels were unchanged. In immunoprecipitates with calcineurin antibodies, Hsp90 was only detected in Dex-treated cell homogenates.(Ranta et al., 2008)
Dex100nM Dex for 3 d culture both for MIN6 or Rin5 cellsDex reduced phospho-ERK1/2 and increased MKP-1 expression in RINm5F and MIN-6 cells. Inhibition of transduction with cycloheximide and inhibition of phosphatases with orthovanadate efficiently blocked DEX-induced downregulation of phospho-ERK1/2. In addition, specific knockdown of MKP-1 with siRNA suppressed the downregulation of phospho-ERK1/2 and the reduction of proliferation induced by DEX.(Nicoletti-Carvalho et al., 2010)
Dex; dexamethasone

Table 5.

Effects of GC in vitroon cell growth in islets, dispersed islet β-cells or β-cell lines.

3. Conclusions

Collectively, direct effects of GCs on β-cell function in vitroare opposite to those observed when the GCs are administered in vivoto healthy individuals (especially humans and rats), which does not exclude that in vivoGCs might exert their known negative effects on β-cells, increasing 11β-HSD1 activity, induce apoptosis and eventually obscure glucose sensing. However, based on data summarized herein, it seems clear that these direct effects of steroids on the β-cells are overwhelmed by the compensatory adaptations provoked by the GC-induced IR in vivo. Whether continuation of GC treatment for long periods (weeks to years) in healthy individuals results in impaired β-cell function is still a matter of debate; nevertheless, it is reasonable to say that since short treatments in susceptible subjects (obese, low-insulin responders, first-degree relatives of patients with T2DM, pregnant, etc) clearly demonstrate β-cell dysfunction, great caution should be exerted as to use GC therapies in high doses and/or with prolonged duration. The direct effects of GCs are achieved through classical ligand-GR mechanisms, since selective inhibition of GR prevents most GC-induced impairments of β-cells in vitro(Hamamdzic et al., 1995; Gremlich et al., 1997; Lambillotte et al., 1997; Ullrich et al., 2005; Ranta et al., 2006; Koizumi & Yada, 2008; Swali et al., 2008; Linssen et al., 2011) and in vivo(Ohneda et al., 1993). The extent of non-genomic actions of GCs on insulin secretion is not yet clear. However, rapid effects observed by physiological GC concentrations seem to involve sympathetic autonomic signals (Longano & Fletcher, 1983), whereas synthetic compounds with GC activity do not elicit acute modifications in β-cell responses to insulin secretagogues (Lambillotte et al., 1997; Zawalich et al., 2006). The real involvement of 11β-HSD1 on pancreatic islets milieuas well as the effects of GCs on pancreatic α-cells and its paracrine consequences on pancreatic β-cell function remain to be investigated.


H. Ortsäter is funded by the Swedish Society for Medical Research. A. C. Boschero is funded by FAPESP and CNPq. A. Rafacho is funded by CNPq and FAPESC. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

© 2012 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Alex Rafacho, Antonio C. Boschero and Henrik Ortsäter (October 3rd 2012). Functional and Molecular Aspects of Glucocorticoids in the Endocrine Pancreas and Glucose Homeostasis, State of the Art of Therapeutic Endocrinology, Sameh Magdeldin, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/50233. Available from:

chapter statistics

1549total chapter downloads

2Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Adherence to Guidelines and Its Effect on Glycemic Control During the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Turkey: The ADMIRE Study

By Ilhan Satman, Sazi Imamoglu, Candeger Yilmaz and ADMIRE Study Group

Related Book

First chapter

Introduction to Agarose and Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Matrices with Respect to Their Detection Sensitivities

By Patricia Barril and Silvia Nates

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us