Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Crystal Structure and Solid-State Properties of Metal Complexes of the Schiff Base Ligands Derived from Diacetylmonoxime: A Brief Review

By Palash Mandal, Uttam Das, Kamalendu Dey and Saikat Sarkar

Submitted: July 1st 2019Reviewed: October 16th 2019Published: February 19th 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90171

Downloaded: 143


The fabulous advancement of a large section of modern coordination chemistry depends upon different kinds of strategically designed and functionally tuned ligand systems; Schiff base ligands play a pivotal role among them. Such Schiff bases become more motivating when they are designed to be synthesized using very simple organic molecules. This paper reviews our work on a family of three functionally different types of Schiff base ligands, derived from diacetylmonoxime, which have been employed to synthesize mononuclear metal complexes with various binding modes of ligands and topologies around the metal centers. Such Schiff base ligands have been synthesized by reacting diacetylmonoxime with diethylenetriamine, 1,3-diaminopropane-2-ol, and morpholine N-thiohydrazide. The synthesized Schiff bases and the metal complexes of such “privileged ligands” show many interesting supramolecular coordination architectures involving different weak forces, e.g., H-bonding, C–H···π interactions, etc.


  • Schiff base
  • diacetylmonoxime
  • crystal structure
  • weak force interactions
  • semiconducting behavior
  • optical properties

1. Introduction

The synthesis and characterization of metal complexes of Schiff bases have been started since 1865. But the importance of Schiff base ligands in several fields compelled us to consider it as a “privileged ligand” even in recent days [1, 2]. Currently, there has been considerable interest in the chemistry of Schiff base metal complexes, primarily because of their tremendous biochemical activity, viz., antibacterial [3, 4], antimalarial [5, 6], antiviral [7, 8], and antitumor activities [9, 10, 11]. Besides, some transition metal Schiff base complexes were found to be efficient catalysts in organic synthesis [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Such types of Schiff base metal complexes are also very interesting for opening of a new pathway in crystal engineering [19, 20]. Various kinds of supramolecules of diverse fascinating structures are being synthesized by different Schiff bases [20, 21]. Different types of weak force interactions (e.g., H-bonding, π···π, C–H···π, etc.) are responsible for construction of such new metal organic frameworks (MOF) [22, 23, 24]. Multinuclear metal complexes of Schiff base are of real importance on the field of magnetochemistry [25, 26, 27, 28]. Various ferro- and antiferro-type magnetic interactions are responsible for the generation of different magnetic materials. Besides, the solid-state properties, e.g., variable temperature conductivity, and optical properties of such complexes are also producing very interesting results which are extremely important in materials chemistry. Very recently the comparison of different observed physical properties with the theoretically predicted values is being done by the use of DFT approach [29, 30, 31, 32].

In the above context, the development of new pathways for the synthesis of new Schiff base ligands and their metal complexes is of immense significance. The strategic pathway becomes more important when the Schiff base ligands and their corresponding metal complexes are produced in a controlled approach fulfilling the main objectives of the synthesis. We have chosen easily available, exceptionally economical, and full of exciting properties organic molecule, diacetylmonoxime, as our precursor molecule for the synthesis of many new Schiff base ligands by reacting it with different molecular amine systems. One of the main advantages of such Schiff base ligands is the change in their ligational behavior depending on the metallic systems and the stoichiometry.

In this review, we have selected only three Schiff base ligands (Figure 1) derived from diacetylmonoxime and three different amine systems. Though a huge number of metal complexes have been synthesized and characterized using such ligand systems, only the structure of the ligands and metal complexes for which single crystal or PXRD have been determined, are discussed in this mini-review including the weak force interactions depicted therein. Some of the solid-state properties, viz., electrical and optical properties of such complexes, are also discussed to enlighten their fascinating material properties.

Figure 1.

Structural drawing of the ligand systems.

2. Synthesis of the ligands

2.1 Mono-imine Schiff base (L1) ligand

The stoichiometrically controlled condensation reaction of diacetylmonoxime (dam) (1.01 g, 10 mmol) and diethylenetriamine (dien) (1.04 g, 10 mmol) in 1:1 molar ratio in methanol (15 ml) on constant stirring for 45 min at room temperature and then refluxing for 2 h on water bath (Figure 2) afforded the monocondensed amine-imine-oxime Schiff base ligand 3-((2-((2-aminoethyl)-amino)ethyl)imino)butan-2-one oxime (L1). Yield is 55% [29].

Figure 2.

Scheme of formation of ligand L1.

2.2 Di-imine Schiff base (H2L2) ligand

The condensation reaction of 1,3-diaminopropane-2-ol (0.45 g, 5 mmol) (dapol) with diacetylmonoxime (1.01 g, 10 mmol) in 1:2 molar ratio in methanol (25 ml) under gentle reflux for 2 h yielded the tetradentate bicondensed di-imine Schiff base 3,3′-((2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl)bis(azanylylidene))bis(butan-2-one) dioxime (H2L2) (Figure 3). Yield is 65% [33].

Figure 3.

Scheme of formation of ligand H2L2.

2.3 Thio-hydrazone Schiff base (H2L3) ligand

The condensation reaction of diacetylmonoxime (1.01 g, 10 mmol) with morpholine N-thiohydrazide (mth) (1.6 g, 10 mmol) in 1:1 molar ratio in ethanol (30 ml) on refluxing for 2 h afforded a gummy mass with very low yield. The isolation of solid ligand in pure form with high yield is still a challenge. Considering the low yield of the ligand, all the complexation reactions with this ligand were carried out under in situ condition. However, the molecular thiol form of the ligand H2L3 (Figure 4) was established from the structural analysis (single-crystal X-ray diffraction) of its metal complexes [34, 35, 36].

Figure 4.

Scheme of formation of ligand H2L3 and zwitterionic heterocycle (L4).

A slight modification of synthetic procedure by continuing the refluxing procedure for 16 h with few drops of water in 1:1 molar ratio in ethanol (50 ml) (shown in the left part of Figure 4) yielded a light yellow crystalline solid compound (yield 45%). X-ray diffraction study of single crystal along with other analytical data of this compound inferred a zwitterionic structure of a nitrogen–sulfur heterocyclic compound, N-(3,4-dimethyl-1,2,5-thiadiazole-2-ium-2-yl)morphine-4-carbathio-ate (abbreviated as L4) [25]. Metal complexes with L4 have not been reported yet.

The hydrogen atom attached with N atom of hydrazide group can undergo thione-thiol tautomerism (Figure 5). Thus NNS coordination mode is facilitated during the formation of complexes [34].

Figure 5.

Thione-thiol tautomerism.

2.3.1 Crystal structure of L4

The molecular structure of L4 was established with the single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. It was observed that the N–N, N–C, and C–S bond distances are shorter than the corresponding single bond distances indicating a partial double bond character due to resonance stabilization using π-bonded electrons. The morpholine moiety preferred chair conformation in the solid state. The distance between the nonbonded S···S is 2.738 Å, and weak interactions (Figure 6) were observed between them in the solid state. A two dimensional supramolecular network is formed by the H-bonding and π- π interactions [34].

Figure 6.

Perspective view of the ligand L4 with atom number scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

3. Synthesis of metal complexes

3.1 Metal complexes with mono-imine Schiff base (L1) ligand

With this new neutral N4 donor ligand system, a crystalline Ni(II) complex has been synthesized. Two routes of synthesis of the nickel complex (complex 1) were reported (Figure 7). According to Route 1, the nickel complex was synthesized by in situ reaction of an equimolar mixture of diacetylmonoxime (1.01 g, 10 mmol) and diethylenetriamine (1.04 g, 10 mmol) and Ni(SCN)2.4H2O (2.47 g, 10 mmol) in methanol under reflux condition, which produces [Ni(L1)(SCN)2] (complex 1). In Route 2, complex 1 was synthesized by following the same steps, but nickel chloride (NiCl2.6H2O) (2.37 g, 10 mmol) was used instead of Ni(SCN)2 and then by treating the product with NH4SCN (1.52 g, 20 mmol) in aqueous-methanol (1:1, 10 ml). Pure crystals (single) were obtained from the slow evaporation of the mother liquor. Yields of the complex 1 in the routes 1 and 2 are 85% and 82% respectively [29].

Figure 7.

Scheme of preparation of Ni(II) complexes.

3.2 Metal complex with di-imine Schiff base (H2L2) ligand

The di-imine Schiff base ligand (H2L2) was employed for the synthesis of a oxovanadium complex, the PXRD of which have also been determined. Reflux of equimolecular mixture of H2L2 (1.28 g, 5 mmol) and vanadyl acetate (0.93 g, 5 mmol) in methanol (30 ml) (Figure 8) afforded the greenish-gray complex of vanadium (complex 2), having composition [VO(L2)]. In this complex the ligand is found to act as a dibasic N4 donor system [33].

Figure 8.

Scheme of preparation of VO(IV) complex.

3.3 Metal complexes with thio-hydrazone Schiff base (H2L3) ligand

The thio-hydrazone Schiff base ligand (H2L3) is very interesting, and the thiol form of the Schiff base is always observed for the binding purposes (see Figure 5) with the metal systems during complexation. Most interestingly, this ligand is found to show two types of binding modes (Figure 9), one is observed through N,S donor atoms and another one through N,N,S donor atoms. An efficient control over the ligand for binding through either N,S or N,N,S mode has been achieved though specific choice of metal systems [34, 35, 36, 37, 38].

Figure 9.

Different modes of binding of H2L3 ligand.

An organometallic complex, [PhHg(HL3)] (complex 3), and the zinc(II) complex [Zn(HL3)(OAc)(H2O)] (complex 4) were prepared by the gentle reflux of the equimolar quantities of diacetylmonoxime (0.5 g, 5 mmol) and morpholine N-thiohydrazide (0.8 g, 5 mmol) (Figure 10) in the presence of the respective metal salts, [PhHg(OAc)] (1.68 g, 5 mmol) and [Zn(OAc)2].2H2O (1.1 g, 5 mmol). Yields of the complexes are 65% (3) and 75% (4). The pure single crystals of the complexes were obtained from their chloroform solutions [34, 35].

Figure 10.

Scheme of formation of metal complexes using H2L3 ligand indicating different binding pattern.

The Cd(II), Cr(III), and Fe(III) complexes, i.e., [Cd(HL3)2)] (complex 5), [Cr(HL3)2]Cl.3H2O (complex 6), and [Fe(HL3)2]Cl.3H2O (complex 7), were prepared by the gentle reflux of the mixture of diacetylmonoxime (0.5 g, 5 mmol) and morpholine N-thiohydrazide (0.8 g, 5 mmol) and the respective metal salts ([Cd(OAc)2].2H2O (0.67 g, 2.5 mmol), CrCl3.6H2O (0.67 g, 2.5 mmol), and FeCl3.6H2O (0.68 g, 2.5 mmol) in the ratio of 2:2:1 (Figure 10). Yields of the complexes had been recorded as 75% for each complex. The pure single crystals of the complexes were obtained from their chloroform solutions [35, 36].

Another zinc(II) complex (complex 8) was synthesized by the reflux of the mixture of diacetylmonoxime (0.5 g, 5 mmol) and morpholine N-thiohydrazide (0.8 g, 5 mmol) in the presence of Zn(OAc)2.2H2O (0.55 g, 2.5 mmol) in the molar ratio of 2:2:1 in water–methanol (1:1, v/v) mixture (Figure 11). The yellow colored complex of composition [Zn(HL3)2]. 2H2O had been separated with 60% yield and recrystallized from chloroform [37].

Figure 11.

Scheme of preparation of other metal complexes using H2L3 ligand.

The complexes of Ni(II) (complex 9), Co(II) (complex 10), and Cu(II) (complex 11) were synthesized by gentle reflux of three sets of equimolar quantities of diacetylmonoxime (0.5 g, 5 mmol) and morpholine N-thiohydrazide (0.8 g, 5 mmol) in the presence of the metal salts (Ni(OAc)2.4H2O (1.24 g, 5 mmol), Co(OAc)2.4H2O (1.25 g, 5 mmol), and Cu(OAc)2.4H2O (1.28 g, 5 mmol), respectively) in ethanol (50 ml) (Figure 11) [29]. General molecular formula of the metal complexes 9–11 is [MII(HL3)(OAc)] where M stands for Ni, Co, and Cu.

4. Crystal structures, PXRD, and some interesting properties of the metal complexes

4.1 Crystal structure and catalytic properties of nickel(II) complex with the mono-imine Schiff base ligand (L1)

The neutral monomeric complex [Ni(L1)(NCS)2] (1) has been found to possess octahedral geometry where central Ni(II) is coordinated by the neutral ligand L1 with tetradentate N4 binding mode and two N-bonded thiocyanate ions occupying the cis-position. Figure 12 depicts the molecular structure of the nickel (II) complex 1 [29].

Figure 12.

Perspective view of complex 1 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

The coordination environment around the nickel(II) ion is surrounded by N6 fashion (four N from ligand and two N from thiocyanate ions) tending towards distorted octahedral geometry. The Ni2+ center is not lying exactly within the equatorial plane of N4 moiety, and unequal axial and equatorial bond distances (2.112 Å and 2.072 Å, respectively) confirm the distortion. The non-coordinated O–H groups on the ligand L1 are engaged in H-bonding interactions with thiocyanate S atoms (Figure 6) which lead to 1D supramolecular sheet-like arrangement (Figure 13). These H-bonding interactions lead to O···S separations of 3.132 Å and play prominent role in crystal packing.

Figure 13.

S···O interaction in the crystal of complex 1 (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

4.1.1 Catalytic activity of complex 1

Analytical grade reagents and freshly distilled solvents, viz., water, acetonitrile, methanol, and dichloromethane, were used to check the catalytic activity. The oxidation reaction was carried out in liquid phase under vigorous stirring in two-necked round bottom flask fitted with a water condenser and placed in an oil bath at 60°C. Substrate (5 mmol) was taken in 10 ml solvent(s) for different sets of reactions along with 5 mg catalyst, to which 10 mmol of tert-Butyl hydrogen peroxide (TBHP, 70% aq.) was added as oxidant immediately before the start of the reaction. Aliquots of the reaction mixture were withdrawn at various time intervals, and the products were analyzed by using Agilent 6890A gas chromatograph equipped with HP-1 capillary column and FID. All reaction products were identified and estimated by using an Agilent GC–MS (QP-5050 model).

The [Ni(L1)(NCS)2] (1) exhibits good catalytic activity towards the oxidation of styrene in the presence of TBHP which leads to the formation of benzaldehyde as a major product with small amount of styrene oxide as shown in Figure 14. By varying solvents, reaction time, temperature, and substrate-to-oxidant ratio, a successful conversion of 70% of the styrene was reached at the optimum condition [29].

Figure 14.

Oxidation of styrene using [Ni(L1)(NCS)2] as catalyst.

4.2 PXRD structure and solid-state properties of oxovanadium(IV) complex with the di-imine Schiff base ligand (H2L2)

Despite our repeated attempts and best effort, the single crystal of the oxovanadium(IV) complex with the ligand H2L2 could not be grown, and it led us to carry out the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) study to characterize the oxovanadium(IV) complex 2. The composition of the complex is [VO(L2)], where the ligand H2L2 acts as a dibasic [(L2)2−] tetradentate arrangement. The result of the PXRD shows that the unit cell is monoclinic in nature and the cell parameters of the complex 2 are a = 16.0619 Å, b = 11.5517 Å, c = 12.7262 Å, and β = 122.427°; and the cell volume (V) is 1993.05 Å3.

Other solid-state properties, viz., electrical, optical, and thermal properties of the complex [VO(L2)], have also been studied [24]. The complex is electrically an insulator at room temperature; however, the conductivity is increased as the temperature increases from 330 K, indicating the semiconducting nature of the complex. It behaves as an n-type semiconductor, and the semiconducting behavior of the oxovanadium(IV) complex with the dibasic Schiff base ligand was substantiated by the extended conjugated chemical structure. The said properties are discussed in detail in the following sections.

4.3 Crystal structures and properties of metal complexes with thio-hydrazone Schiff base ligand (H2L3)

4.3.1 Crystal structure of organometallic phenylmercury(II) complex (3)

The organometallic phenylmercury(II) compound 3 crystallized in triclinic form to give a tricoordinated T-shaped geometry (Figure 15). Here the monobasic ligand [(HL3)] coordinated the central mercury in a bidentate manner through S and N (N of hydrazone function) and the third coordination of the mercury was satisfied by the C atom of phenyl group of the metal precursor. Thus, by choosing the phenylmercury system, the ligand H2L3 has been compelled to act in a bidentate mode leaving another N donor (the oxime N) uncoordinated [35].

Figure 15.

Perspective view of complex 3 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

The Hg(II) atom remains 0.027(1) Å above the plane. Due to the contribution of electron flow from mercury to the π* orbitals of the phenyl group, the Hg–C bond distance is found shorter than that in the analogous methylmercury(II) compound, where no such electron drifting is observed. The C–S bond gets partial double bond character in the complex, similar to related thiosemicarbazonates of methylmercury(II) and dimethylthallium(III). It is interesting to note that there is no intermolecular π–π interaction between the phenyl rings. But a weak interaction between C(8)–H(8A) and a π group (phenyl ring) links the two phenylmercury molecules into a supramolecular dimer having a C–H π synthon (Figure 16) having characteristic H···Cg distance 2.84 Å, where Cg is the midpoint of the phenyl ring.

Figure 16.

Weak interaction (C–H···π) between the π-electrons of the phenyl ring with the H atom of ligand in a supramolecular dimer.

4.3.2 Crystal structure of the zinc(II) complex (4)

The X-ray crystal structure shows that due to constrained ligand structure, the [Zn(HL3)(OAc)(H2O)].H2O complex 4 (Figure 17) has adopted distorted square pyramidal geometry (τ = 0.05) in which the oxime nitrogen, azomethine nitrogen, deprotonated thiol sulfur of ligand [(HL3)], and acetato oxygen defines the equatorial plane, while the axial position is occupied by oxygen (O4) of coordinated water molecule. The zinc(II) ion is 0.3766 (8) Å out of the basal plane towards the oxygen (O4) of coordinated water molecule. The deprotonation of the ligand results in extensive delocalization of charge, and as a consequence the C–S bond length (1.7459(18) Å) is much closer in length to a C–S single bond (1.82 Å), which has partial double bond character [34].

Figure 17.

Perspective view of complex 4 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

Due to intramolecular hydrogen bonding, the Zn–N(3) (azomethine) distance is slightly shorter than Zn–N(4) (oxime) distance. Here the H(1) of coordinated water molecule is hydrogen bonded to morpholinic oxygen O(1), while H(2) is hydrogen bonded to acetate oxygen O(3), and such H-bonding forms the 1D supramolecular framework diagonal to the ab plane (Figure 18).

Figure 18.

One-dimensional network through H-bonding in [Zn(HL3)(OAc)(H2O)].H2O.

4.3.3 Crystal structure of the cadmium(II) complex (5)

The cadmium(II) complex [Cd(HL3)2] (5) crystallized in a triclinic space group P1̅ (2). The central Cd (II) ion is coordinated by two units of monobasic ligand [(HL3)] forming trapezoidal bipyramid (Figure 19), where the equatorial plane was formed by thiol S1, azomethine N3, oxime N4 of one Schiff base unit, and azomethine N7 atoms of another unit (second) and the axial positions are being coordinated by oxime N8 and thiol S2 atoms of the second Schiff base unit. The C–S bond gets partial double bond character in the complex and is shorter than that in phenylmercury(II) complex (3). The C–N average bond distance confirms double bond character, and deprotonation of the hydrazinic NH proton induces double bond character [35].

Figure 19.

Perspective view of complex 5 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

Complex 5 forms a 2D supramolecular sheet in the bc plane through hydrogen bonding interactions (O–H···O and C–H···O) (Figure 20). The average D···A separations and the average D–H···A angle is 145°. These supramolecular sheets stack along (100) the plane. There are no directional weak force interactions (π–π, C–H···π, hydrogen bonding) operating between the two sheets. Therefore, an intermolecular van der Waals interaction might be responsible for such supramolecular stacking. The methyl terminals of the ligand from adjacent sheets face each other in this arrangement.

Figure 20.

Two-dimensional network through H-bonding in [Cd(HL3)2] (5).

One of the most interesting parts of the structure is that the crystal structure possesses a remarkably short intermolecular C(sp3)···O(sp3) contact [C9···O4* 2.958(3) Å]. An interesting packing force using an uncommon C(sp3)···O(sp3) interaction has been reported. The three H atoms (H9A, H9B, H9C) of the methyl group of the propylidene moiety form a triangular plane which is supported by the angle ∠C8–C9···O4* of 172.0°. The O4 atom of the oxime is directed towards the center of the plane formed by three H atoms (H9A, H9B, H9C) of the methyl group. The C9–H9A···O4*, C9–H9B···O4*, and C9–H9C···O4* angles are 89.0°, 83.8°, and 97.6°, respectively, which are less than the generally accepted ∠C–H···O angles (110°), and such short bond angles might be responsible for the greater C···O attraction. Thus, the cooperative effect of the three individual interactions acts on the face of the plane of the three methyl hydrogens of the C9 atom due to their high acidic character. This very unusual and nonconventional interaction was termed as a CH3···O interaction and proved to be a good supramolecular synthon. The trifurcated H-bonding interactions are shown in (Figure 21).

Figure 21.

Trifurcated H-bonding interactions [35] in[Cd(HL3)2] (5).

4.3.4 Crystal structure of the chromium(III) complex (6)

The X-Ray single-crystal analysis revealed that complex [Cr(L3)2]Cl·3H2O (6) forms slightly distorted octahedral geometry with [CrN4S2] core having meridional conformation via the oximino N, imine N, and thiol S atoms (Figure 22), i.e., the two monobasic tridentate L3 ligands act as N,N,S donor during formation of the complex [36].

Figure 22.

Perspective view of complex 6 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

4.3.5 Crystal structure of the iron(III) complex (7)

The X-ray structure of [Fe(L3)2]Cl·3H2O (7) is quite similar to that of complex (6) with pseudo-octahedral geometry except that the equatorial plane is formed by two oximino N atoms and two thiol S atoms and the axial positions are occupied by two imine N atoms of the ligand (Figure 23). The Fe–N(imine) bond lengths are significantly shorter than the Fe–N(oximino) bond lengths because azomethine nitrogen is a stronger base than the oximino nitrogen. The deprotonation of the ligands results in extensive delocalization of charge, and thus the C–S bond gets partial double bond character [36].

Figure 23.

Perspective view of complex 7 with atom numbering scheme (hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).

The most interesting part of the crystalline structure of complex [Cr(L3)2]Cl·3H2O (6) and [Fe(L3)2]Cl·3H2O (7) is that both the complexes form a 1D supramolecular chain along the c-axis through C–H···O interactions between each molecule (Figure 24).

Figure 24.

One-dimensional network through C–H···O interactions in complexes (6) and (7).

The 1D chains are arranged in parallel direction to form a supramolecular host having channels along the c-axis (Figure 25). Such channels are filled by self-assembled “water-chloride” clusters having chair conformation (Figure 25).

Figure 25.

Supramolecular channels and “water-chloride” cluster along the c-axis in complexes (6) and (7).

It is proven by the crystal structure analysis that there are three crystals of water molecules per formula unit of complexes 6 and 7 along with chloride ion, and these are involved in forming the infinite “water-chloride” cluster [36] with a chair conformation. The three water molecules and a chloride molecule form a four-membered cyclic motif, and such three adjacent four-membered rings form the chair conformation (Figure 26).

Figure 26.

Chair conformation formed by “water-chloride” cluster in complexes (6) and (7). Magnetic property and Mössbauer spectroscopy of complex (7)

The variable temperature (2.5–300 K) magnetic moment study shows the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility. The χm values at 2.5 and 300 K are 0.33 and 0.005 cm 3 mol−1, while the μeff values are 2.61 and 3.46 B.M., respectively. The detailed study shows that the magnetic moment value consists of a superimposition of both the low-spin and high-spin states. At very low temperature, the 1-D supramolecular species which is formed by strong intermolecular C–H···O interactions and the cooperative interactions with the “water-chloride” cluster between mononuclear spin crossover (SCO) sites stabilize the low-spin state, and thus the high-spin contribution decreases to 21%, and the low-spin contribution increases to 79%. Thus, such variable temperature magnetic behavior may be due to a continuous S = 1/2 to 5/2 spin crossover phenomenon of iron centers [36].

The Mössbauer spectroscopic study also supports that a spin crossover phenomenon exists in the iron(III) complex (7). Both the spin states, low (S = 1/2) and high (S = 5/2), exist in room temperature (300 K) as well as in very low temperature at 20 K. The population density of the electrons decreases from high-spin state to the low-spin state with decreasing temperature (Table 1).

TemperatureSpin stateOccupancy
300 KLow spin (1/2)49%
High spin (5/2)51%
20 KLow spin (1/2)77%
High spin (5/2)23%

Table 1.

Population density at variable temperature in [Fe(L3)2]Cl·3H2O (7).

4.3.6 PXRD, SEM, and EDX studies of complexes (8)–(11)

Suitable single crystals of complexes (8)–(11) could not be grown even after repeated efforts; hence they were characterized by the powder X-ray diffraction study of the compounds [28, 29]. Some of the important lattice parameters of the PXRD study are summarized in Table 2.

Cell parameters[Zn(L3)2]. 2H2O (8)[Ni(L3)(OAc)] (9)[Co(L3)(OAc)]. H2O (10)[Cu(L3)(OAc)]. H2O (11)
V (Å3)1294.88810.31127.71044.17
a (Å)10.2973686.36417219.60087618.953438
b (Å)11.3253127.4979315.534226.365518
c (Å)12.3459474.68693612.327868.729238

Table 2.

Powder X-ray diffraction data.

The SEM investigation of all the above complexes, the ground powders, and the fracture surfaces indicates that the grain size distribution is not uniform, and submicron grains (finely ground powder) as well as grains (fracture surfaces) even above 20 μm (for complex 8) and above 10 μm (for complexes 9–11) have been observed [37, 38].

The formation of metal–ligand complexes and the presence of metal along with C and S within the metal complexes have been substantiated by the EDX analysis.

4.4 Electrical conductivity

To explore the utility of the metal complexes as functional materials, the electrical conductivity study was performed, and it shows the semiconducting nature of the complexes [33, 37, 38].

The samples for the measurement of electrical conductivity were prepared from the complexes in the form of tablets of approximately thickness ∼0.1 cm at a pressure of ca. 1 × 108 Pascal. These tablets were placed between two copper electrodes covered with silver paste, and contacts of the prepared tablets were to be Ohmic or not. A two-probe method was used to investigate the electrical conductivities of the complex tablets by measuring the current through the probes with a high impedance electrometer (Keithley 6514) upon application of a DC voltage current supplied by a programmable source of voltage (Keithley 230). The conductivities were calculated by using the general equation of σ = (I/Vc)(d/a), where (I) is the current in ampere, Vc the potential drop across the sample of cross-sectional area (a), and is the thickness (d).

Variation of electrical conductivity of a compound behaving like semiconductor with temperature can be obtained by the Arrhenius equation:


where σ is the electrical conductivity, σo denotes the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy for this thermally activated process, and k is the Boltzmann constant. Generally, “log σ” is plotted against “1000/T” which is expected to have a linearly fitted graph. The thermal energy of activation (Ea) is determined from the slope of the graph.

If the graph obtained is linear (i.e., fitted with one straight line), then it may be concluded that no molecular rearrangement occurred during heating and the compound will have only one Ea. In this case the electrical conduction is mainly due to the intrinsic conducting property, whereas the nonlinear plot clearly indicates molecular rearrangement during heating of the compound. In case of nonlinear plot, more than one straight line are fitted against the linear parts of the plot. One straight line corresponding to lower temperature range is known as region I, and the other straight line corresponding to the higher temperature range is known as region II. In this case the compound will have two distinct energy of activations (Ea1 and Ea2).

Conduction corresponding to the region I is attributed to the intermolecular conduction via weak force interactions between the molecules. The charge carriers hop near Fermi level within the localized state. Delocalized π-electrons are mainly responsible for this conduction, whereas conduction corresponding to the region II is attributed to intramolecular conduction between the metal center and the ligand center within a metal complex. This conduction occurs due to tunneling of electrons between equivalent HOMO and LUMO of the ligand and metal ion, respectively. Such tunneling of electrons through the intermolecular potential barrier is reinforced through π–π stacking and extensive H-bonding [24]. Depending on the availability of π-electrons, the compound behaves like n-type semiconductor.

From the Arrhenius plots (Figure 27), the electronic parameters, i.e., activation energy of electrical conduction (Ea) and the energy gap for directly allowed transitions of metal complexes (2) and (8–11), are calculated, and the results obtained are summarized in Table 3.

Figure 27.

Temperature dependence. Electrical conductivity curves of the complexes [24, 28, 29].

ComplexEa1 (eV)Ea2 (eV)Egd (eV)
(Lower temp)(Higher temp)
[VOL2] (2)0.481.183.45
[Zn(L3)2].2H2O (8)0.594.22.52
[Ni(L3)(OAc)] (9)0.542.75
[Co(L3)(OAc)].H2O (10)0.970.762.37
[Cu(L3)(OAc)].H2O (11)0.342.141.58

Table 3.

Activation energies and direct band gap values.

It is also very clear from the Arrhenius plots that the conductivity of metal complexes generally increases with increase in temperature. At room temperature they behave as an insulator, while at higher temperature the semiconducting nature of complexes is observed.

4.5 Optical properties

Optical absorption spectra was taken by using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda 2S/45 Double Beam) and measured as function of wavelength in the wavelength range 190–1100 nm.

The energy band gaps and the nature of the optical transitions involved in the metal complex framework systems have been practically determined by the fundamental absorption edge analysis of the recorded optical transitions using the theory of Mott and Davis [39]. It is also observed that the semiconducting behavior of a material increases with rise in temperature which may also damage the actual molecular structure of the material. Hence, Tauc method is used to calculate the energy band gap through optical absorption properties [40].

Utilizing the relation between the optical linear absorption coefficient (α) with photon energy (hν), the energy band gap (Eg) between the top of the valence band and bottom of the conduction band can be determined using equation (Eq. (2)):


where A is a constant characteristic parameter of the respective transition independent of ν.

The values of n depend on the kind of optical transitions. For directly allowed, directly forbidden, indirectly allowed, and indirectly forbidden transitions, the values of n are ½, 3/2, 2, and 3, respectively. Thus the energy band gap for directly allowed (Egd) and indirectly allowed (Egi) transitions can be determined by relating Eq. (2) as follows:




where Egd and Egi are direct and indirect energy gaps, respectively.

To calculate the direct and indirect energy band gap, we need to plot a curve of (αhν)2 against f(hν) and (αhν)1/2 against f(hν) and then by the extrapolation of the most linear part of the curve to zero.

The satisfactory graphs were obtained for the metal complexes (2) and (8)–(11) by plotting (αhν)2 against f(hν). Therefore, the energy gaps determined correspond to the direct energy gap (Egd). The Egd values of the metal complexes are collected in Table 3. The comparison of the band gap cannot be directly related to the atomic number of the metals in the complexes.

5. Conclusion

In this review, the synthesis, crystal structure, and solid-state properties of three Schiff base ligands derived from diacetylmonoxime with diethylenetriamine, 1,3-diaminopropane-2-ol, and morpholine N-thiohydrazide and their metal complexes have been vividly discussed. A zwitterionic nitrogen–sulfur heterocyclic compound with nonbonded S···S interaction has also been reported to be formed by the reaction of diacetylmonoxime with morpholine N-thiohydrazide under long refluxing (16 h) condition in ethanol. The single X-ray crystal structures have shown many beautiful weak force interactions including a CH3···O trifurcated interface communication. Wherever the single-crystal structures could not be grown, the PXRD study has enlightened their structural features. The electrical and optical properties also explored the semiconducting nature of some of the metal complexes. It is also observed that the electron transport process gets influenced by the supramolecular frameworks of the metal complexes.


One of the authors (S.S.) is thankful to the UGC (ERO), Kolkata, for financial grants (MRP) to carry out a part of this work and also to Prof. Y. Aydogdu, Department of Physics, Gazi University, and Dr. S. Biswas, our lab-mate for some useful discussion.

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Palash Mandal, Uttam Das, Kamalendu Dey and Saikat Sarkar (February 19th 2020). Crystal Structure and Solid-State Properties of Metal Complexes of the Schiff Base Ligands Derived from Diacetylmonoxime: A Brief Review, Stability and Applications of Coordination Compounds, Abhay Nanda Srivastva, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90171. Available from:

chapter statistics

143total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Stability of Metal Complexes

By Senthilkumar Muthaiah, Anita Bhatia and Muthukumar Kannan

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

By Eram Sharmin and Fahmina Zafar

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us