Two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis is a high-resolution technique for the study of proteome. This chapter describes how it can be applied to characterize specific differences in the proteome profile of breast cancer cells following gene target interference. The proteome is the complete set of proteins encoded by a genome, and proteomic analysis consists in profiling the whole proteins expressed in a given cell, tissue, organ, or organism. Proteomic expression has the main purpose of qualitatively and quantitatively comparing proteins expressed under physiological and/or pathological conditions. Although it is not the unique approach used in modern proteomics, two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) is unrivaled allowing simultaneous separation of thousands of proteins and the detection of post-translational modification, not predictable through genome analysis. 2DE combines two physical principles to separate complex protein mixtures: the isoelectric point and the molecular weight. The result is a gel map in which each protein isoform present in the sample can be visualized as a spot, analyzed, quantified, and identified by mass spectrometry analysis. Here we outline features and advantages of the 2DE-based proteomic approach and we describe how 2DE meets biochemistry and molecular biology to address specific issues.
- 2D gel electrophoresis
- mass spectrometry
- breast cancer
- western blot
- image analysis
- silver staining
- trypsin digestion
Proteins are the effectors of almost all functions in living cells. The proteome is the complete set of proteins encoded by a genome [1, 2]. For a given organism or living cells, genome is a static entity, except if a peculiar mutation occurs. Proteome is dynamic and its composition differs under the influence of specific physiological and or pathological stimuli. Proteomics is the science that describes the proteome and provides identification and quantification of proteins, including co- and post-translational modifications, their localization, interactions, activities, and functions .
Resolution of thousands of proteins in a single experiment implies the employment of high-throughput analytical tools with high resolution, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis is a key separation technique for proteomic research, useful for qualitative and quantitative protein expression profiling. The technique has been initially applied for protein separation in 1975 by O′ Farrel ; it has been used for over three decades, and it is still the most widely utilized protein separation method for proteome or sub-proteome analysis. The main advantage of 2DE is the capability of simultaneously resolving complex protein mixture, up to 10,000, allowing their quantitation as well as the analysis of all post-translational modifications . 2DE has been adopted for a variety of applications: from drug discovery to diagnostics, therapy, and biochemistry [6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
In the last decade, 2DE has been significantly improved and currently it is a high-resolution, reliable, and reproducible method [11, 12, 13]. 2DE coupled together isoelectric focusing (IEF) with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), resolves proteins by two independent physic principles: the isoelectric point (pI) in the first dimension and molecular mass (Mr) in the second dimension. Therefore, any modifications that may change protonable groups of a protein, such as those due to phosphorylation, acetylation, and alkylation, would greatly affect the migration rate on the first dimension, likewise modifications of molecular mass as glycosylation, ubiquitination, farnesylation, for example, might affect the migration rate on second dimension. A combination of these ptms might result in the vectorial addition of the two perpendicular shifts.
The result is a 2D gel map of resolved protein isoforms that may be visualized with either visible colorimetric method (Coomassie blue, silver stain) [14, 15] or fluorescent die . In theory, 2DE is capable of detecting and quantifying protein amounts of less than 1 ng per spot.
After 2DE separation, gel images may be acquired using densitometers, and quantified by means of specific software for image analysis. After that, spots of interest are excised, destained, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS [8, 13, 17].
Here we give an overview of the technique and provide protocol useful for the analysis of the proteome of specific cellular line.
2. Protocol text
2.1.1 Protein isolation
Cell lines were washed twice with PBS (1X), PBS was carefully removed, and cells were scraped after addition of 500 μl of lysis buffer prepared in accordance with Table 1. Cell suspension was collected, incubated at 0°C for 30 min, and sonicated using Ultrasonic Baths (VWR) at 4°C for 10 s. Cell lysate was centrifuged at 15000×g for 20 min. The supernatant was carefully removed and stored at −80°C for further analysis .
|15 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 120 mM sodium chloride, 30 mM potassium chloride, dithiothreitol 0.1%, and Triton X-100, 0.5%, supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail/Halt Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).||Add protease inhibitors just prior to use. The 2X lysis buffer can be stored at 4°C up to 1 month.|
|Rehydration buffer (RB)||8 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 0.8% (v/v) carrier ampholytes (pH 3–10 NL), traces of bromophenol blue, and 70 mM DTE (add as powder).||Add DTE and carrier ampholytes just prior to use. RB buffer can be stored at −20°C up to 6 months.|
|Equilibration buffer A||6 M Urea, 2% (w/v/) SDS, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 30% (v/v), and 1% (w/v) dithiothreitol (DTT).||Dissolve by shaking, but not by heating the solution. All chemical used must be of ultrapure quality.|
|Equilibration buffer A||6 M Urea, 2% (w/v/) SDS, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 30% (v/v), 2.5% (w/v) iodoacetamide (IAA).||Dissolve by shaking, but not by heating the solution. All chemical used must be of ultrapure quality.|
|Acrylamide stock||30% acrylamide–bis solution (29:1).|
|SDS stock||20% SDS in MQ-water.|
|Tris stock||1.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.8.|
|APS stock||10% ammonium persulfate.||Prepare fresh by dissolving 0.1 g APS in 1 mL MQ-water.|
|SDS running buffer|
|25 mM Tris base, 192 mM glycine, and 0.1% SDS.|
|SDS running buffer|
|25 mM Tris base, 192 mM glycine, and 0.2% SDS.|
|Agarose sealing solution||1% Agarose in 1X SDS running buffer with trace of bromophenol blue.|
|Gel solution||10% acrylamide–bis solution (29:1), 37.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, Na2S2O3 0.025%, APS 0.1%, and TEMED 0.04%; adjust volume using MQ-water.||Add TEMED and APS just before use.|
|Fixing solution (silver staining)||40% (w/v) Ethanol and 10% (w/v) acetic acid.||Prepare the solution using Milli-Q water.|
|Sensiting solution (silver staining)||0.02% Sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate.||Prepare the solution using Milli-Q water.|
|Silver nitrate solution|
|0.2% Silver nitrate and 0.02% formaldehyde (37%).||Prepare the solution using Milli-Q water.|
|3% Sodium carbonate, 0.05% formaldehyde (37%), and 0.005% sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate.||Prepare the solution using Milli-Q water.|
Solution must be prepared just before use.
|2% Acetic acid.||Prepare the solution using Milli-Q water.|
|30 mM Potassium ferricyanide and 100 mM sodium thiosulfate.||Prepare the solution using HPLC grade water.|
|Gel washing solution (spot excision)||50% acetonitrile, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate.||Prepare the solution using HPLC grade water.|
|Digestion buffer (spot excision)||Resuspend lyophilized trypsin (20 μg/vial) in 100 μL of the 1 mM HCl, yielding a 0.2 μg/μL stock solution. Aliquot into 10 × 10 μl and place at −20°C.|
To obtain the working solution, take 10 μl of this trypsin solution and add 500 μl of 50 mM NH4HCO3.
|Prepare the solution using HPLC grade water.|
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw of trypsin stock solutions more than once.
|Extraction solution||50% ACN–0.2% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).|
2.1.2 Protein concentration assay
The main step of proteomic analysis is the measurement of protein extract concentration. An accurate protein quantitation is essential to avoid bias in the determination of differentially expressed proteins.
Protein content from control and treated samples was measured using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad) .
Standard curve preparation (for sample with 1–18 μg ml−1 protein)
We prepare seven dilutions of a HSA protein standard in a range from 1 to 18 μg protein.
A total of 10 μl of each standard solution was diluted in 790 μl of Milli-Q water. A total of 200 μl of Bradford reagent was added to each tube; the solution was mixed thoroughly and incubated at RT for 15 min in the dark.
The absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a BioPhotometer (Eppendorf). The assay was done in triplicate using a specific clear cuvette (UV-Vis transparent between 220 and 1600 nm). The BioPhotometer was calibrated on the basis of standard quantitative data.
About 2 μl of each protein extract was suspended in 798 μl of Milli-Q water, 200 μl of Bradford reagent was added to the mixture, vortexed, and incubated at RT for 15 min in the dark. The assay was performed in triplicate. Sample absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a calibrated BioPhotometer (Eppendorf).
2.1.3 First dimension: isoelectric focusing (IEF)
During isoelectric focusing, proteins are resolved in function of their isoelectric point (pI). The pI of a protein is the value of pH at which the electrophoretic mobility is nil. The majority of proteins have a pI within pH 4–7, although some proteins show an extreme value of pI as histone proteins. IEF is carried out using a precast strip of polyacrylamide with the most appropriate pH gradient range. The use of immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips improves reproducibility, resolution, and protein load capability.
The pH gradient is created by dissolving in the IPG a mixture of aliphatic polyamino-polycarboxylic acids (carrier ampholines) that under the influence of an electric field create a stable pH gradient.
Proteins are resolved, in addition to their amino and carboxyl group, in function of a protonable group in their side chains. When the pH < pI, a protein has a net positive charge and at pH > pI, it becomes negatively charged. Therefore, under the influence of an electric field, proteins with acidic pI migrate toward the cathode and those with basic pI move toward the anode, until it reaches the strip region in which pH = pI. The method allows the separation of all protein isoforms .
In this experiment, we loaded 130 μg of each sample diluted into RB buffer (Table 1) during the rehydration step. When IEF is carried out for comparative experiments, IPG strips must have the same length and identical pH range; samples must be handled in parallel.
The rehydration volume is a function of strip length , for a strip 24 cm long, the appropriate volume is 480 μl. The rehydration tray was cleaned, dried, and leveled to ensure uniform reswelling.
A total of 480 μl of RB buffer, containing the sample, was distributed along the reswelling slot. The strips were deprived of protective cover and carefully flat on the fluid with the gel side down. The strips were checked for the presence of bubbles below and covered with mineral oil to prevent sample evaporation and urea crystallization. The tray was closed with the lid and rehydration was carried out for 16 h at RT.
IEF conditions may vary accordingly with sample amount, sample composition, IPG strip length, and pH range.
After the rehydration step, the IPG strips were removed from the slot, rinsed with Milli-Q water, and transferred on the Ettan IPGphor ceramic tray. During IEF, the gel strip is sided up. The strips were overlaid with mineral oil and the movable electrodes were assembled properly at the cathodic and the anodic end of the strip. A bit piece of filter paper was positioned between the strip and the electrode to eliminate ion excess.
IEF was carried out on a GE Healthcare IPGphor unit at 20°C, applying 50 uA/Strip, until a total of 70,000 Vh was reached. The following IPGphor program was used: (1) 300 V 3 h step, (2) 1000 V 6 h gradient, (3) 8000 V 3 h gradient, and (4) 8000 V 3 h step.
2.1.4 Second dimension
During SDS PAGE, IPG-focused proteins were separated according to their molecular weights.
For gel casting, a single gel for each IPG strip was prepared. Gel casting was done simultaneously. Gel caster was assembled with glass plates, separator sheets, and blank cassette inserts. Each component was previously cleaned and dried. Monomer solution was prepared according to the protocol (Table 1: gel solution) and carefully poured in the funnel casting.
After 2 min, the surface of each gel was layered with 2 ml of isopropanol to minimize exposure to oxygen. After 10 min, isopropanol was replaced with Milli-Q water and the gel was allowed to polymerize for at least 5 h. The gels were prepared concomitantly with the start of IEF and stored at 4°C until use.
Equilibration step: the equilibration step is essential to saturate focused proteins with SDS and allow their separation by SDS PAGE.
After IEF, IPG strips were equilibrated using 15 ml of equilibration buffer A (Table 1) followed by treatment with 15 ml of equilibration buffer B (Table 1) [19, 20]. The equilibrated IPG strip was rinsed with running buffer 1X and positioned with acidic end to the left and the plastic back facing one the higher glass plates, avoiding the formation of bubbles between the strip and the top of the gel.
A small piece of filter paper soaked with 10 μL of protein MW marker was positioned at the right side using forceps.
The strips were sealed using agarose solution. The second dimension was done on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
The electrophoretic unit was filled with running buffer 1X and connected with the MultiTemp III Thermostatic Circulator. When the temperature of the buffer reached the seat value of 25°C, the gels were positioned in the chamber; the empty slots were filled with blank cassettes. The upper chamber was positioned in the electrophoretic unit and filled with running buffer 1X, SDS 0.02%. The lid was closed and attached to the power supply. Run was done at constant voltage (2 W/gel, 25°C) until the bromophenol blue dye front reached the end of the gels [20, 21].
After electrophoresis, gels were carefully removed from their gel cassettes and placed on a glass tray for staining.
2.1.5 Staining with MS-compatible silver staining
|Fixing||Fixing solution||500 ml||2 h|
|Washing||Wash with 30% ethanol||500 ml||30 min|
|Sensiting||Sensiting solution||500 ml||1 min|
|Washing||Milli-Q water||500 ml||2 × 2 min|
|Staining||Silver nitrate solution||500 ml||30 min|
|Rinsing||Milli-Q water||500 ml||2 × 2 min|
|Developing||Developing solution||500 ml||2 min|
|Developing||Developing solution||500 ml||Develop for the time necessary to clearly visualize the spot.|
|Stop solution||Stop solution||500 ml||20 min|
|Washing||Milli-Q water||500 ml||3 × 10 min|
2.1.6 Gel image analysis
The main aim of proteomics consists in the identification of differentially expressed proteins. To proceed with the 2DE analysis, the first step is the digitalization of gel images. It has been done by Image Scanner II (GE healthcare).
The gels were scanned at 600 dpi and saved as tiff.
Subsequent analysis was performed using the Image Master 2D-Platinum software, version 6.0 (GE Healthcare) according to the software manual. Briefly, raw images were imported into the software and processed for protein detection. The spot auto-detect function was used for all group comparisons applying the following parameters: smooth 2, min area 5, saliency 1.00000. Digital images were checked to ensure that all the proteins present in the gel were correctly detected. Differences in protein expression were assessed using the relative volume (%Vol) option of the software. Using this option, the data becomes independent variables caused by differences in loading or staining .
Analysis was done using three independent replicates. All data were presented as mean ± SEM (N), where SEM is the standard error of the mean and N represents the number of replicates. Protein levels in every data set were compared to control group using unpaired t-test. We considered statistically significant a two-sided p-value <0.05. Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft) was used for data plotting .
2.1.7 Spot excision and digestion
A main issue during spot excision and digestion procedure is avoiding contamination with keratins that can affect subsequent mass spectrometry analysis. Proper lab-equipment and dedicated reagents mast be used for protein spot digestion. All instruments, as well as the benchtop, were meticulously cleaned with 70% ethanol.
Protein spots, with a differential expression profile, were manually excised from silver stained gel using OneTouch Plus Spotpicker (Gel company).
Gel pieces were washed with Milli-Q water and destained incubating with a destaining solution (Table 1) for 15 min.
The destaning solution was removed and gel spot washed three times with 200 μl of 200 mM NH4HCO3 pH 7.8 for 15 min; the incubation was done in a tube shaker at 37°C. Spots were incubated with ACN for 10 min at 37°C. A total of 70 μl of trypsin working solution (Table 1) was added to gel pieces prior to incubation at 37°C overnight. Trypsin solution was carefully recovered and placed in a fresh tube (t).
Additional peptides were recovered by incubating the gel piece with extraction solution at 37°C for 10 min. The solution was recuperated and pooled in the fresh tube (t). Peptide solution was concentrated using a speedy vac [24, 25].
The resulting tryptic peptides were purified by Pierce® C18 Spin Columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s procedure, eluted with 40 μL of 70% acetonitrile, and dehydrated in a vacuum evaporator .
220.127.116.11 Nanoscale LC-MS/MS analysis
Tryptic peptides were analyzed using Nanoscale LC-MS/MS. The analysis was performed as service in our mass spectrometry facility.
Chromatography analysis was done on Easy LC 1000 nanoscale liquid chromatography (nanoLC) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Odense, Denmark) as previously reported by Scumaci et al. . Purified peptides were re-suspended with 0.1% formic acid and injected at 500 nL/min on the analytical column. A binary gradient was used for the elution of peptides. Mass analysis was done by means of a quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer Q-Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) working in positive ion mode, using nanoelectrospray (nESI) potential at 1800 V. Acquisition of data was achieved with a top-5 method using resolution (FWHM), AGC target, and maximum injection time (ms) for full MS and MS/MS of, respectively, 70,000/17,500, 1e6/5e5, and 50/400. Precursor ion isolation was done using a mass window of 2.0 m/z, while normalized collision energy was 30. Ion threshold for generating MS/MS events was 2e4. Dynamic exclusion was set at 15 s. Data were processed using Proteome Discoverer 1.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany), search engine was Sequest, and the HUMAN-refprot-isoforms.fasta was used as a sequence database. Searching parameters were: MS tolerance 15 ppm; MS/MS tolerance 0.02 Da; fixed modifications: cysteine carbamidomethylation; variable modification: methionine oxidation, serine, threonine, and tyrosine phosphorylation; enzyme: trypsin; max. missed cleavages 2; taxonomy Human. We consider only protein hits generated with two successful peptide identifications valid and acceptable .
2.1.8 Western blot validation
Western blot analysis of prohibitin and gelsolin was done to verify 2D gel electrophoresis data. Analysis was performed on cell extracts of MCF7wt and BRCA1 interfered MCF7.
About 50 μg of each protein extract were resolved on a 4–15% SDS PAGE precast gel (Bio-Rad), and blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane followed by immunoblotting. The working concentration of rabbit monoclonal antibody against BRCA1 (clone D-20, Santa Cruz was 1 μg/ml) .
Anti-PHB1 (Prohibitin 1) from cell signaling technology was used at 1:1000 dilution and Anti-Gelsolin (Santa Cruz) was used at 1:1000 dilution. The signal was detected using the specific horseradish peroxidase-conjugate secondary antibodies; blots were developed using the SuperSignal West Femto ECL substrate (Pierce). Densitometric software (Alliance 2.7 1D fully automated software) determined the percent distribution of blotted proteins after image acquisition by Alliance 2.7 (UVITEC, Eppendorf, Milan, Italy) .
Data were analyzed and plotted using Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft), and expressed as mean ± SEM (N), where SEM represents the standard error of the mean and N indicates the number of experimental repeats. Unpaired t-test was used to compare protein levels in each data set. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
2D gel electrophoresis was applied to analyze the whole proteome of breast cancer cell expressing or not BRCA1. BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene, often mutated in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. The gene encodes for a large protein involved in several cellular pathways that include DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint activation, maintenance of genomic stability, DNA damage repair, as well as chromatin remodeling, protein ubiquitination, transcriptional regulation, and apoptosis . Recently, it has been also reported that BRCA1 is able to induce reprogramming of metabolism toward aerobic glycolysis in breast cancer cells . Here we induce the transient inactivation of BRCA1 in MCF-7 cell line for 48 h by transfection with Oligo siRNA/Brca1 [20, 31]. It has been done by Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oligo siRNA/Brca1 duplex was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used at a final concentration of 100 nM. The silencing of BRCA1 was checked by western blot analysis (Figure 1). Transient knock down of BRCA1 was done at 48 h according to our previous results . The analysis workflow is summarized in Figure 2. The analysis was performed using three biological replicates.
Using 2D gel electrophoresis, we obtained a gel map of about 500 protein spot for each replicate (Figure 3). Image analysis allowed to identify 25 differentially expressed proteins. Of these, 15 protein spots were down-expressed, while 10 were up-regulated.
Differentially expressed proteins were manually excised, destained, trypsin digested, and identified using LC-MS/MS analysis. A list of identified protein is provided in Table 3.
|Spot ID||ID protein||Description||Score||Coverage||Unique peptides||Molecular weight||pI||BRCA1 interfered MCF7/MCF7 wt|
|1||P09651-3||Isoform 2 of Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=HNRNPA1 − [ROA1_HUMAN]||76.57||43.07||9.00||29.37||9.14||−24.63|
|4||Q15102||Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit gamma OS=Homo sapiens GN=PAFAH1B3 PE=1 SV=1 − [PA1B3_HUMAN]||5.59||11.26||3.00||25.72||6.84||−2.60|
|6||P25788-2||Isoform 2 of Proteasome subunit alpha type-3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PSMA3 − [PSA3_HUMAN]||18.38||23.79||7.00||27.63||5.33||−1.93|
|7||P78417||Glutathione S-transferase omega-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GSTO1 PE=1 SV=2 − [GSTO1_HUMAN]||14.83||21.99||6.00||27.55||6.60||−13.10|
|8||P43487||Ran-specific GTPase-activating protein OS=Homo sapiens GN=RANBP1 PE=1 SV=1 − [RANG_HUMAN]||0.00||8.96||2.00||23.30||5.29||−3.84|
|9||P04792||Heat shock protein beta-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=HSPB1 PE=1 SV=2 − [HSPB1_HUMAN]||22.60||30.73||6.00||22.77||6.40||−4.42|
|13||P35232||Prohibitin OS=Homo sapiens GN=PHB PE=1 SV=1 − [PHB_HUMAN]||46.62||45.22||11.00||29.79||5.76||−1.94|
|14||P43487||Ran-specific GTPase-activating protein OS=Homo sapiens GN=RANBP1 PE=1 SV=1 − [RANG_HUMAN]||4.76||8.96||2.00||23.30||5.29||−4.99|
|15||O00299||Chloride intracellular channel protein 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=CLIC1 PE=1 SV=4 − [CLIC1_HUMAN]||55.50||57.68||9.00||26.91||5.17||−1.15|
|16||P00491||Purine nucleoside phosphorylase OS=Homo sapiens GN=PNP PE=1 SV=2 − [PNPH_HUMAN]||10.39||16.96||4.00||32.10||6.95||−2.77|
|22||P30740||Leukocyte elastase inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=SERPINB1 PE=1 SV=1 − [ILEU_HUMAN]||25.33||27.70||10.00||42.71||6.28||2.21|
|24||Q9NP79||Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein VTA1 homolog OS=Homo sapiens GN=VTA1 PE=1 SV=1 − [VTA1_HUMAN]||4.65||9.45||2.00||33.86||6.29||−4.32|
|27||B7Z7E9||Aspartate aminotransferase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GOT1 PE=2 SV=1 − [B7Z7E9_HUMAN]||3.86||8.67||3.00||44.12||8.07||2.02|
|29||P35998||26S protease regulatory subunit 7 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PSMC2 PE=1 SV=3 − [PRS7_HUMAN]||93.17||60.28||26.00||48.60||5.95||−1.45|
|32||F8VPV9||ATP synthase subunit beta OS=Homo sapiens GN=ATP5B PE=2 SV=1 − [F8VPV9_HUMAN]||20.60||22.39||8.00||55.27||5.40||−3.96|
|33||P14618||Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PKM PE=1 SV=4 − [KPYM_HUMAN]||29.08||32.02||13.00||57.90||7.84||2.36|
|34||P00352||Retinal dehydrogenase 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ALDH1A1 PE=1 SV=2 − [AL1A1_HUMAN]||21.35||24.35||10.00||54.83||6.73||2.31|
|35||P14868||Aspartate--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic OS=Homo sapiens GN=DARS PE=1 SV=2 − [SYDC_HUMAN]||7.94||8.18||4.00||57.10||6.55||2.15|
|36||Q9UMS4||Pre-mRNA-processing factor 19 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PRPF19 PE=1 SV=1 − [PRP19_HUMAN]||7.76||8.93||4.00||55.15||6.61||3.80|
|37||O43175||D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=PHGDH PE=1 SV=4 − [SERA_HUMAN]||40.04||29.08||12.00||56.61||6.71||2.16|
|39||B4DUR8||T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma OS=Homo sapiens GN=CCT3 PE=2 SV=1 − [B4DUR8_HUMAN]||11.04||15.20||6.00||55.64||5.64||−1.85|
|40||Q96RQ3||Methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, mitochondrial OS=Homo sapiens GN=MCCC1 PE=1 SV=3 − [MCCA_HUMAN]||36.71||24.69||13.00||80.42||7.78||1.84|
|46||P49721||Proteasome subunit beta type-2 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PSMB2 PE=1 SV=1 − [PSB2_HUMAN]||14.09||27.86||5.00||22.82||7.02||2.90|
|47||P37802||Transgelin-2 OS=Homo sapiens GN=TAGLN2 PE=1 SV=3 − [TAGL2_HUMAN]||12.17||34.17||6.00||22.38||8.25||3.23|
|51||P13020-2||Isoform 2 of Gelsolin OS=Mus musculus GN=Gsn − [GELS_MOUSE]||10.66||4.10||3.00||80.71||5.72||−2.03|
|52||P60709||Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 − [ACTB_HUMAN]||13.39||17.07||2.00||41.71||5.48||−1.15|
2DE data were confirmed using western blot analysis for two selected candidates (Figure 4).
Differentially expressed protein was analyzed using Ingenuity software PA tool.
3.1 Pathway and network analysis
Differentially expressed proteins were connected using ingenuity pathway analysis (Ingenuity Systems,
Proteins were mapped onto three networks (Figure 5). The most representative, with a score of 28 and 13 focus molecules, had function associated with cancer, cellular movement, and connective tissue disorders. The second network, including 12 focus molecules with a score of 25, exhibited functions connected with free radical scavenging, protein synthesis, DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Finally, the last network grouped proteins involved in cancer, cell death and survival, and cell morphology.
The aim of this work is to describe how 2D gel electrophoresis might be effectively applied to provide a comprehensive, quantitative description of protein expression and its change under the influence of a specific biological perturbation. Here we provide an overview of the 2DE methodologies with special focus on the technical procedure.
To provide an example of the technique application, we describe the proteome profiling of breast cancer cells following BRCA1 interference.
Using 2D gel electrophoresis, we found that BRCA1 silencing affected the expression of 25 proteins belonging to different cellular compartments and implicated in a variety of cellular pathways. We focused our attention on the downregulation of prohibitin and gelsolin as well as the upregulation of pyruvate kinase.
Upon BRCA1 interference, we found a reduced level of prohibitin, coherently with literature data that highlighted the ability of prohibitin in inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis . In addition, we found a reduced level of gelsolin, fully in agreement with what we previously published . Otherwise, the expression of pyruvate kinase, together with D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, was found up-regulated, according with a metabolic shift toward glucose metabolism .
Although interesting, these findings deserve validations and further investigations that largely exceed the scope of this chapter. However, the approach provided the opportunity to highlight the capability of 2D gel electrophoresis in proteome profiling breast cancer cells and in detecting the specific phenotypic changes induced by the interference of the key gene BRCA1.
The fundamental step of our proteomic analysis was the preparation of the samples. Protein extracts for 2DE were done directly on a plate with a minimum amount of lysis buffer, to avoid contaminations with 2DE interfering substances, but enough to ensure the complete extraction, solubilization, and disaggregation of all cellular proteins avoiding proteolysis and poor recovery. This was a critical step because experimentally induced protein changes may be challenging to distinguish from biological differences under investigations. Sample protein content was carefully quantized and loaded using the “in-gel rehydration” procedure. The second dimension was performed at constant voltage and temperature. Silver staining was done in glass tray with accuracy, avoiding the formation of gray precipitates as well as the formation of the dark background caused by an extra developing.
The reproducibility of the spot pattern in gel images of different samples reflects the accurateness of the procedures. Moreover, the presence of spot well distributed on the gel with finely defined borders as well as the lack of streak and background staining proved the quality of 2D separation.
In this chapter, we point out the key aspects of 2D gel electrophoresis describing in practice the use of the technique for the proteomic profiling of breast cancer cells expressing or not BRCA1.
We offer an overview of methodological peculiarities, undelaying that, in spite of some technical limitations, 2D gel electrophoresis is still one of the major current analytical technologies useful to investigate specific change in the profiles of proteome in different cells, tissues, or organism .
The proteome of higher eukaryotes holds a huge complexity due to dynamic changes in protein expression, modification, and interactions. It’s obvious that a single proteomic approach is not enough to address complex biological questions, but we are confident that the methods, here deepened, represents a gold standard for the analysis of intact proteins and all relative post-translational modifications responsible for a peculiar phenotype or function [36, 37, 38, 39, 40].
2DE is unrivaled by other proteomic approach because it consents the simultaneous detection and quantification of thousands of proteins isoforms, not predictable through other techniques including genome analysis [41, 42].
We are confident that protocols and methodologies we described are going to be useful for all scientists interested in 2DE separation to address their own biological questions.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (UMG) for support to Domenica Scumaci, and MIUR grant PON03PE_00009_2(iCARE) for support to Giovanni Cuda.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.