Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Strain-Specific Allele Loss: An Important Clue to Tumor Suppressors Involved in Tumor Susceptibility

By Nobuko Mori and Yoshiki Okada

Submitted: June 2nd 2012Reviewed: November 21st 2012Published: April 10th 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55159

Downloaded: 891

1. Introduction

Development of tumors is controlled by multiple genes such as cellular oncogenes and tumor suppressors activated or inactivated by somatic mutations and/or epigenetic mechanisms. Tumor development is also controlled by heritable factors as well as environmental factors, i. e., diet, oxidative stress and sustained inflammation, as reviewed by a large number of recent reports [1-12]. Both heritable and environmental factors are important targets for clinical controls and prevention of cancers.

Heritable factors underlying cancer risks have been identified in familial cancer-prone pedigrees. In the pedigree members, tumors develop in a Mendelian dominant inheritance fashion. Breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) encoding a nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability is one of the heritable cancer risk factors hitherto identified. Women bearing a mutated BRCA1 allele are at high risk for both breast and ovarian cancers through their lifespan. According to the recent estimations, average cumulative risks in BRCA1-mutation carriers by age 70 years are 65% (95% confidence interval 44%–78%) for breast cancer and 39% (18%–54%) for ovarian cancer [13]. Thus, disease penetrance is incomplete, albeit rather high, in the mutated-BRCA1 carriers. The BRCA1 gene maps to human chromosome 17q21, where frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is observed in both familial and sporadic breast cancers. Although tumors developed in the BRCA1-mutation carriers are homozygous for the defective BRCA1 allele via LOH mechanisms, sporadic cases rarely show mutation in the BRCA1 gene [14]. The BRCA1 gene may rather undergo inactivation via epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation in sporadic tumors.

Unlike the BRCA1 case, tumor susceptibility is expressed in a non-Mendelian inheritance manner, because multiple genes with incomplete penetrance participate in the phenotype. Moreover, tumor susceptibility alleles may occasionally express genetic interaction, i. e., epistasis that hides or enhances the effect of some alleles at some susceptibility loci with the effect of other alleles at other susceptibility loci [15]. Despite growing number of association studies localizing tumor susceptibility loci exploiting SNPs in humans [16, 17], validation of these loci in human population with miscellaneous variations in the genetic background might be an intractable task.

Several strains of mice with different susceptibility to lymphomagenesis so far reported might be useful in the study of tumor susceptibility. Using genetic crosses between BALB/cHeA (refer to as BALB/c, hereafter) and STS/A (refer to as STS) mice with different tumor susceptibility, and between the BALB/c and recombinant congenic CcS/Dem strains of mice with 12.5% STS and 87.5% BALB/c allele in the genome, we mapped three loci controlling susceptibility to radiation-induced apoptosis of thymocytes to chromosomes 16, 9 and 3 [18, 19], and two loci for susceptibility to lymphomagenesis to chromosome 4 [20]. We identified the protein kinase, DNA activated, catalytic polypeptide (Prkdc) as a candidate for the apoptosis susceptibility gene mapped to chromosome 16, which was also associated with susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis [21]. As indicated by our studies, susceptibility to apoptosis as well as lymphomagenesis is controlled by multiple genes. To analyze the effect of one gene involved in such multigenic traits, congenic animals are ordinarily used. We are currently analyzing the genes controlling susceptibility to lymphomagenesis on chromosome 4 by the use of congenic animals.

In this chapter, we initially review recent advances in the research of tumor susceptibility, in particular, susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis in mice, and show that two loci controlling radiation lymphomagenesis map to chromosome 4. Then, we show that two types of allele loss, i. e., loss common to lymphoma and parental strain-specific loss, occur in radiation-induced lymphomas from various F1 hybrids between strains with different lymphoma susceptibility. We show that LOH on chromosome 4 in F1 hybrids between BALB/c and STS occurs in a strain-specific manner and exhibits a bias towards the STS allele loss. At the close, by exploiting congenic strains of mice containing different segments of chromosome 4 from the donor strain STS on the BALB/c background, we present a concordance between the allele loss region and a lymphoma susceptibility locus area on chromosome 4, where the BALB/c mouse harbors a hypomorphic allele of Cdkn2a. Significance of the strain-specific allele loss in probing tumor susceptibility loci will be discussed.

2. Mouse strain difference in susceptibility to radiation-induced lymphomagenesis

In laboratory strains of mice irradiated by ionizing radiation according to a well-established protocol, development of lymphomas starts around three months after the exposure to radiation and is terminated around ten months. Radiation-induced lymphomas are mostly of thymic origin. Several laboratory strains of mice such as BALB/c and C57BL reside in Mus musculus musculus, and are known to be highly susceptible to radiation-induced lymphomagenesis, while other strains STS and MSM/Ms (refer to as MSM) are not [22, 23]. The BALB/cHeA and STS/A strains of mice are originally provided by Dr. J. Hilgers at the Netherlands Cancer Institute [22], and maintained more than twenty generations at the animal facility of Osaka Prefecture University. The BALB/cHeOpu mouse is the direct descendant of the BALB/cHeA mouse [20]. The MSM/Ms strain of mice belongs to a subspecies Mus musculus molossinus. Its progenitor was trapped in Mishima-city, Shizuoka, Japan and established as an inbred strain at the National Institute of Genetics (Mishima, Japan). Mice were exposed to 4 x 1.7 Gy of X rays using a well-established protocol for radiation-induced lymphomagenesis. Tumor development was observed during one year. The results were summarized in Table 1. BALB/cHeA mice developed lymphomas at high frequency (33/43, 77%), while STS/A mice develop tumors at less than 10% of frequencies [22]. The onset of tumor development was around three months in both strains. On the other hand, one of 30 MSM/Ms mice developed lymphoma with more than ten months of latency. Lymphomas occurred at high frequency (30/35, 86%) in BALB/cHeOpu mice subjected to X-ray irradiation using the same protocol. Thus, the pattern of tumor development in BALB/cHeOpu mice showed good concordance with that in their progenitor BALB/cHeA mice [20].

Strain of miceNumber of irradiatedaNumber of affected (%)bReference
BALB/cHeA4333 (77%)[22]
BALB/cHeOpu3530 (86%)[20]
STS/A605 (8%)[22]
MSM/Ms301 (3%)[23]

Table 1.

Strain difference in susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis

aOnly females.

bCumulative incidence of lymphomas within one year in BALB/cHeA, STS/A and MSM/Ms, and within ten months in BALB/cHeOpu.

3. Current status of the studies on tumor susceptibility in mice

Numerous tumor susceptibility loci have been mapped by analyzing genetic crosses between strains of mice exhibiting different tumor susceptibility [17]. Several genes responsible for tumor susceptibility have been identified, some of which are validated by supporting evidences: Pla2g2a encoding phospholipase A2, group IIA (platelets, synovial fluid), for the modifier of Min1 (APCMin)-induced intestinal tumors (Mom1) identified in the distal portion of chromosome 4 [24–26]; cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (Cdkn2a) encoding a tumor suppressor p16, for pristen-induced plsmacytoma resistance1 (Pctr1) mapped in the middle of chromosome 4 [27, 28]; protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, J, (Ptprj), for susceptibility to colon cancer 1 (Scc1) on chromosome 2 [29, 30]. LOH occurs at PTPRJ, the human homolog of mouse Ptprj (Scc1), in the early stage of human colorectal cancer [31]. Hence, PTPRJ may play a role in tumor suppression in humans. The biological function of Pla2g2a (Mom1) differs from other tumor susceptibility genes so far identified. Pla2g2a plays a role in physiological processes such as anti-bacterial defense, inflammation and eicosanoid generation, which are preferable targets of medical controls for cancer prevention.

Despite the availability of strains of mice with obvious difference in susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis, it is much difficult to analyze such traits as to be expressed in a binominal fashion (tumor-free survivals of animals after exposure to radiation). However, there is one successful case: a suggestive linkage near D4Mit12 at 57.8 centimorgan (cM) position on chromosome 4 with susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis, which was detected in the genetic cross between BALB/c and MSM, is confirmed by exploiting congenic mice with the MSM allele at D4Mit12 on the BALB/c background [32, 33]. Because BALB/c mice had a hypomorphic allele at the Mtf1 locus, they reported the metal-responsive transcription factor-1 (Mtf1) gene as the candidate gene for the susceptibility locus near D4Mit12 [32, 34]. Mtf1 activates expression of metallothionein I and II genes as well as gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase, a key enzyme for glutathione biosynthesis, and metallothionein and glutathione are involved in detoxification processes, such as scavenging reactive oxygen intermediates generated by ionizing radiation. Reduced reactivity of Mtf-1 retains an increased level of ROS in the BALB/c thymus [35].

4. Mapping of lymphoma susceptibility loci on mouse chromosome 4 using genetic crosses between BALB/c and STS strains of mice

We so far showed that the protein kinase, DNA activated, catalytic polypeptide (Prkdc) gene was a candidate for the apoptosis susceptibility gene on chromosome 16, and also responsible for susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis [21]. DNA-PK is a key enzyme for DNA double-stranded-break repair as well as V(D)J recombination of T- and B-cell receptors. Because BALB/c mice carry a Prkdc variant allele that causes lower DNA-PK activity, resultant hypersensitivity to radiation may raise frequency of cell death in the thymus and promote lymphomagenesis possibly via illegitimate recombination mechanisms. However, strain difference between BALB/c and STS in susceptibility to radiation lymphomagenesis has not been fully explained by the variations in Prkdc. According to M. Okumoto et al. [22, 23], cumulative incidence of lymphomas in (BALB/c x STS)F1 exposed to 4 x 1.7 Gy of X-ray irradiation was in between those in parental BALB/c and STS, while (BALB/c x MSM)F1 developed lymphomas at high frequency similar to BALB/c. The data suggest that strain difference in tumor susceptibility is controlled by multiple genes that influence onset, latency and frequency of tumorigenesis.

Previously, M. Okumoto et al. reported a suggestive linkage of susceptibility to radiation-induced lymphomagenesis, named lymphoma resistance (Lyr) (Mouse Genome Informatics, MGI: 96893) in the middle area of chromosome 4 using a series of recombinant inbred (RI) CXS strains of mice whose genome was constituted of 50% STS and 50% BALB/c genes [36]. It is worthwhile to test whether the Lyr locus is segregated in a genetic cross using BALB/c and STS. We performed genome-wide screen for microsatellite markers linked to lymphoma susceptibility using siblings from (BALB/c x STS)F1 backcrossed to BALB/c or STS. We detected significant linkage disequilibrium in the middle area of chromosome 4 by the use of 219 siblings from (BALB/c x STS)F1 backcrossed to BLB/c [20]. No significant linkage was detected by using another backcross. The primary locus with a conspicuous effect existed in an approximately 10 cM segment spanning D4Mit302 (37.6 cM) and D4Mit255 (48.5 cM) in the middle range of chromosome 4 (χ2=19.3, genome-widely corrected p=0.0075). This locus was likely identical to the Lyr locus localized between tyrosinase-related protein 1 (Tyrp1) (38 cM) and interferon alpha (Ifna) (42.6 cM) [36]. The secondary locus with a weaker effect was detected near D4Mit17 (χ2=16.0, genome-widely corrected p=0.034), a marker approximately 10 cM proximal to D4Mit302. The STS allele at these loci was associated with resistance to lymphomagenesis. Mtf1, a candidate susceptibility gene for radiation lymphomagenesis so far identified by other investigators, is located near D4Mit12 (57.8 cM), more than 10 cM distal to the critical regions containing these loci [32, 33]. Effect of Prkdc, which we identified as a lymphoma susceptibility gene by exploiting congenic mice [21], was not detected in tumor-free survivals in these crosses.

Figure 1.

The Lyr locus exists between D4Mit302 and D4Mit144 on chromosome 4.

To narrow down the tumor susceptibility gene regions, we generated congenic strains of mice with different portions of STS-derived chromosome 4 on the BALB/c background by backcrossing (BALB/c x STS)F1 mice to the BALB/c. Establishment of the congenic lines was facilitated by positive and negative selections with typing of microsatellite markers on chromosome 4 and markers distributed in the whole genome [20]. Because the Lyr locus was so vicinal (10 cM distance, approximately) to the secondary locus, we selected several strains with or without the STS allele at the critical markers D4Mit17, D4Mit302 and other markers near these markers, and compared their tumor-free survivals with that of BALB/cHeOpu exposed to X-ray irradiation (data shown in Table 1). A part of the results in [20] is represented in Figure 1. In this figure, the strain names of the C.S congenic mice are abbreviated by hyphened two Arabic numbers that represent STS allele-bearing microsatellite (Mit) markers at the proximal and distal end of the chromosomal segment. For instance, C.S163–31 represents a congenic line with the STS allele in the segment spanning D4Mit163 and D4Mit31. The order and megabase (Mb) positions of the markers are indicated by arrowheads on chromosome 4, which is represented by a line at the top of the figure. The primary lymphoma susceptibility locus Lyr exists between D4Mit302 (85.2 Mb) and D4Mit9 (94.7 Mb). Although the secondary locus was not detectable by a simple comparison of the tumor-free survival of congenic lines with that of BALB/c, linkage was reconfirmed by crossing congenic lines (data not shown here).

5. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in radiation-induced lymphomas from various F1 hybrids: common loss and cross-dependant loss

Tumor suppressors frequently undergo loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a variety of tumors in humans and mice. We previously reported that frequent LOH (more than 20%) occurred on chromosomes 4, 12 and 19 in radiation-induced lymphomas from (BALB/c x STS) F1 mice, with incidences 27% (20 of 74 lymphomas), 57% (42 of 74 lymphomas) and 50% (37 of 74 lymphomas) on chromosomes 4 (at D4Mit31), 12 (at D12Mit17) and 19 (at D19Mit11), respectively [37] (Table 2). Importantly, STS allele-specific loss occurred on chromosome 4. The bias was confirmed using reciprocal F1 hybrids between BALB/c and STS [37].

MiceaNumber of tumorsChrMarker (Mb)bLOH (%)Reference
(CXS)F1744D4Mit31 (106.8)20 (27%)[37]
12D12Mit17c42 (57%)
19D19Mit11 (42.5)37 (50%)
(SXM)F1204D4Mit54 (137.4)5 (25%)[39]
12D12Mit233 (109.5)12 (60%)
(CXM)F1 d8112D12Mit181 (110.0)53 (65%)[40]
16D16Mit122 ( 74.5 )38 (45%)

Table 2.

LOH in radiation-induced lymphomas from various F1 hybrids.

aAbbreviations used are BALB/c, C; MSM, M; STS, S.

bMegabase (Mb) positions of markers are according to Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) 5.10.03. (

cPhysical position not assigned.

dF1 hybrids between BALB/c and MSM hemizygous for Trp53.

In these crosses, allele loss involved almost entire chromosomes 4 and 19, without showing any peaks in LOH frequencies. Cytogenetic analysis showed that allele loss in such large areas was not caused by chromosomal deletion, but ascribable to mitotic recombination [38]. In lymphomas from (STS x MSM)F1 mice, LOH occurred on chromosomes 4 and 12 with incidences 25% (5 of 20 lymphomas) and 60% (12 of 20 lymphomas) on chromosome 4 (at D4Mit54) and chromosome 12 (at D12Mit233), respectively [39]. In these lymphomas, LOH on chromosome 19 was infrequent (1/20, 5% at D19Mit63). In radiation-induced lymphomas from (BALB/c x MSM)F1 mice, allele loss frequently occurred on chromosomes 12 (53/81, 65% at D12Mit181) and 16 (38/81, 45% at D16Mit122) [40].

Interestingly, LOH on chromosome 12 commonly occurred in radiation-induced lymphomas from these three F1 hybrids, while LOH frequencies on chromosomes 4 and 19 markedly varied. Frequent LOH was detected on chromosome 4 in lymphomas from (STS x MSM)F1 mice, but not (0/20 at D4Mit13) in lymphomas from (BALB/c x MSM)F1 mice [40]. LOH on chromosome 19 was infrequent (0/20 and 1/20, at D19Mit63 and D19Mit123) in lymphomas from (STS x MSM)F1 mice. In the context of LOH on chromosome 19, results were similar in lymphomas from the (BALB/c x MSM)F1 hybrid. Thus, LOH on chromosomes 4 and 19 occurred in a cross-dependent manner. This suggests that LOH frequencies on these chromosomes are controlled by genetic interaction, possibly between putative tumor suppressors, the locations of which are indicated by LOH, and by genetic variations in the background. Moreover, the situation of LOH on chromosome 4 is somewhat different from that on chromosome 19. We present allele loss frequencies at several markers on chromosome 4 in these lymphomas in Table 3.

MiceaNumber of tumorsMarker (Mb)bLOH (%)References
(CXS)F147D4Mit17 (63.0)14 (30%)[37]
D4Mit9 (94.7)14 (30%)
D4Mit13 (142.0)14 (30%)
(SXM)F120D4Mit9 (94.7)1 (5%)[39]
D4Mit54 (137.4)5 (25%)
(CXM)F1 c20D4Nds2 (124.4)0 (0%)[40]
D4Mit13 (142.0)0 (0%)
(CXM)F143D4Mit9 (94.7)3 (7%)Unpublished data
51D4Mit13 (142.0)4 (8%)[41]

Table 3.

Variation of LOH frequencies at microsatellite markers on chromosome 4 in radiation-induced lymphomas from various F1 hybrids.

aAbbreviations used are BALB/c, C; MSM, M; STS, S.

bMegabase (Mb) positions of markers are according to Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) 5.10.03. (

cF1 hybrids between BALB/c and MSM hemizygous for Trp53.

Notably, LOH frequency at D4Mit9 was reduced compared to that at D4Mit54, a marker in the proximity of D4Mit13 and approximately 43 Mb distal to D4Mit9, in lymphomas from (STS x MSM)F1 hybrid mice. Using lymphomas from (BALB/c x MSM)F1 mice, we reconfirmed that allele loss at markers D4Mit9 and D4Mit13 on chromosome 4 was very infrequent (3/4 and 4/51 [41], respectively). Because D4Mit9 is located very close to cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (Cdkn2a) encoding tumor suppressors p16 and p19Arf, Cdkn2a is excluded as the putative tumor suppressor for lymphomagenesis in the (STS x MSM)F1 and (BALB/c x MSM)F1 backgrounds. Frequent LOH on chromosome 4 and 19 were also reported by other investigators in lymphomas from (C57BL/6JxBALB/cJ)F1 and (C57BL/6J x RF/J) F1 hybrid mice [42, 43]. According to the data in [43], strain-specific allele elimination is not found in the LOH on chromosome 4 from (C57BL/6JxBALB/cJ)F1 mice.

The LOH frequencies at markers on chromosome 12 formed a sharp peak near telomere [41], and a putative tumor suppressor B cell leukemia/lymphoma 11B (Bcl11b) was later cloned from the peak [44]. The BCL11B tumor suppressor is also involved in human T cell acute lymphoblastic lymphomas [45]. Some of the lymphomas used for the genome-wide screen of LOH were generated in Trp53 hemizygous (BALB/c x MSM)F1 mice [40]. Because LOH frequencies at markers on chromosome 16 were markedly varied depending on the status of Trp53 in (STS x MSM)F1 mice [39], the high frequency of the LOH on chromosome 16 observed in lymphomas from (BALB/c x MSM) F1 mice may likewise be explained.

6. The STS allele-specific loss occurred in the Lyr region on chromosome 4

Allele loss on chromosome 4 was significantly biased towards loss of the STS allele in lymphomas from (BALB/c x STS)F1 mice [37]. It is of interest to examine whether putative tumor susceptibility genes on chromosome 4, which we identified in different regions of chromosome 4, are associated with the strain-specific allele loss on chromosome 4 by using congenic strains of mice with various regions of chromosome 4 from the donor strain STS on the background strain BALB/c, namely the C.S congenic series. LOH was studied in lymphomas generated in (BALB/c x C.S163–31)F1 and (BALB/c x C.S302–9)F1 mice. Both C.S163–31 and C.S302–9 strains of mice showed resistance to lymphomagenesis as shown in Figure 1. The C.S163–31 strain harbors the STS allele at two tumor susceptibility loci, one locus near D4Mit17 and the other, Lyr in the D4Mit302–D4Mit9 segment. The results are shown in Table 4.

Frequent allele loss at markers in the chromosome 4 segments was detected in lymphomas from (BALB/c x C.S163–31)F1 (cross A) and (BALB/c x C.S302–9)F1 (cross B) with incidences 11/34 (32%) and 10/34 (29%), respectively. The LOH frequencies in these F1 hybrids were concordant with the original data in (BALB/c x STS)F1 ([37] in Table 3). The STS-allele loss ratios were 9/11 (D4Mit302) and 10/11 (D4Mit9) in the cross A; 8/10 (D4Mit302) and 9/10 (D4Mit9) in the cross B. Because the STS-allele loss occurred with similar ratio in both crosses, we combined the data from crosses A and B (presented as A + B in Table 4). Analysis of the combined ratios 17/21 (D4Mit302) and 19/21 (D4Mit9) indicate that the distortions are significant at both markers D4Mit304 and D4Mit9 (χ2 values were 8.0 and 13.7, p<0.005, degree of freedom = 1, respectively). The data indicating the STS-allele specific loss (D4Mit31) in lymphomas from reciprocal (BALB/c x STS)F1 and (STS x BALB/c)F1 hybrids are also presented ([37] in Table 4). Thus, the skewed allele loss that was originally observed in a wide area of chromosome 4 in (BALB/c x STS)F1 and (STS x BALB/c)F1 hybrids is reproducible in the limited segments of the STS-derived chromosome 4. Our results suggest that tumor suppressor(s) associated with susceptibility to lymphomagenesis exist in the limited areas of chromosome 4. Since C.S39–86 mice carry the STS allele in the vicinity of D4Mit17, i. e., the secondary locus controlling susceptibility to lymphomagenesis, we further examined allele loss at markers D4Mit7 (67.7 Mb), a marker in the vicinity of D4Mit17, and D4Mit86 using 25 lymphomas from (BALB/c x C.S39–86)F1 x BALB/c mice [20]. Allele loss at these markers was detected in only one of 25 tumors (less than 5%). In this case the BALB/c allele was lost. Hence, approximately 40 Mb of the D4Mit39–86 segment, to which the secondary locus for tumor susceptibility was localized, was excluded from the skewed loss region. Analysis on congenic strains strongly suggest that the STS-strain specific loss is ascribable to the D4Mit302–D4Mit9 segment of chromosome 4, which harbors a putative tumor susceptibility gene Lyr.

MiceaNumber of tumorsMarker (Mb)bLOH (%)S lossC loss
A. (C x C.S163–31)F134D4Mit17 (63.0)11 (32%)92 c
D4Mit302 (85.2)11 (32%)92 c
D4Mit9 (94.7)11 (32%)101 c
D4Mit31 (106.8)11 (32%)101 c
B. (C x C.S302–9)F134D4Mit302 (85.2)10 (29%)82 d
D4Mit9 (94.7)10 (29%)91 d
A + B68D4Mit302 (85.2)21 (31%)174
D4Mit9 (94.7)21 (31%)192
(C x S)F139D4Mit31 (106.8)11 (28%)101 e
(S x C)F135D4Mit31 (106.8)9 (26%)72 e
(C x S)F1 + (S x C)F174D4Mit31 (106.8)20 (27%)173 e

Table 4.

LOH at markers on chromosome 4 in lymphomas induced by radiation in F1 hybrids between BALB/c and STS or C.S congenic lines.

aBALB/c and STS mice are abbreviated as C and S.

bMegabase (Mb) positions of markers are according to Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) 5.10.03. (

cUnpublished data.

d Data in [20].

eData in [37].

In the Lyr region between D4Mit302 and D4Mit144, three known tumor suppressors Cdkn2a, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B (Cdkn2b) encoding p15INK4B and methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (Mtap) exist (Figure 2). Involvement of Cdkn2a and Cdkn2b, specifically in acute lymphoblastic lymphomas (ALL) in humans and thymic lymphomas in mice has been reported [46–49]. Mtap is a key enzyme in purine and polyamine metabolism and regulation of transmethylation reactions and frequently inactivated in human tumors such as lymphomas by large homozygous deletion of the 9p21 region [50]. Since these deletions inactivate CDKN2A/ARF and CDKN2B as well as MTAP [51], it has been hypothesized that loss of MTAP in tumors is a result of co-deletion. However, a recent study showed that mice heterozygous for the targeted Mtap gene were affected with T-lymphocyte hyperproliferation followed by T-cell lymphomas late in their lives [52]. In these lymphomas, as shown by the study, expression of Mtap was markedly reduced, while expression of Cdkn2a was not. The results suffice the criteria for tumor suppressors, indicating that Mtap is a candidate tumor suppressor distinct from Cdkn2a. It has also been reported that the Cdkn2b gene is particularly inactivated by allele loss and hypermethylation of the remainder allele in radiation-induced lymphomas in mice [53]. BALB/c mice carry a hypomorphic variant allele at Cdkn2a, which is shown to be causative in the sensitivity to plasmacytomagenesis [28]. STS mice and most of strains other than BALB/c have the wild-type allele at the Cdkn2a locus ([28], DNA sequences we confirmed). Although Cdkn2a is a potential candidate for tumor susceptibility gene Lyr, Cdkn2b and Mtap are at present not ruled out as candidates for the tumor susceptibility gene. Analysis for allele loss, sequences and expression levels of these tumor susceptibility genes in BALB/c and C.S302–9 congenic mice is currently underway.

Figure 2.

Locations of tumor suppressors in the lymphoma susceptibility Lyr gene region.

7. Conclusion

Frequent LOH occurs on chromosomes 4, 12 and 19 in radiation-induced lymphomas from various F1 hybrid mice. These allele losses are classified into two groups: common loss and cross-dependent loss. The putative tumor suppressor harbored in common loss on chromosome 12 might be a key player in radiation-induced lymphomgenesis. Cross-dependent allele loss such as those on chromosomes 4 and 19 reflects genetic interaction between tumor suppressors harbored in the LOH region and the genetic background. BALB/c and STS strains of mice are susceptible and resistant to radiation-induced lymphomagenesis, respectively. Allele loss occurs on chromosome 4 in approximately 30% of lymphomas induced by radiation in (BALB/c x STS)F1 mice and shows preferential loss of the STS allele. Our analysis of congenic lines with various portions of STS-derived chromosome 4 on the BALB/c background shows a link between the skewed LOH and the tumor susceptibility Lyr locus, where tumor suppressors p16Ink4a/Arf, p15Ink4b and Mtap genes are localized. Although the Lyr gene is as yet unidentified, p16Ink4a/Arf may be one of the potential candidates. Studying cross-specific LOH and distorted allele loss may lead to better understanding of variable pathways of radiation lymphomagenesis.


We thank Ms. Yuko Mitaki and Ms. Ikuko Kinoshita for their contribution to tumor sampling and genotyping. We thank Emeritus Professor M. Okumoto for his helpful discussion in preparation of this manuscript.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Nobuko Mori and Yoshiki Okada (April 10th 2013). Strain-Specific Allele Loss: An Important Clue to Tumor Suppressors Involved in Tumor Susceptibility, Future Aspects of Tumor Suppressor Gene, Yue Cheng, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/55159. Available from:

chapter statistics

891total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

To Grow, Stop or Die? – Novel Tumor-Suppressive Mechanism Regulated by the Transcription Factor E2F

By Eiko Ozono, Shoji Yamaoka and Kiyoshi Ohtani

Related Book

First chapter

Tumor Suppressor Gene p16/INK4A/CDKN2A and Its Role in Cell Cycle Exit, Differentiation, and Determination of Cell Fate

By Payal Agarwal, Farruk Mohammad Lutful Kabir, Patricia DeInnocentes and Richard Curtis Bird

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us