Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Open Conversion after EVAR: Indications and Technical Details

By Andrea Siani, Federico Accrocca, Tommaso Castrucci, Gianluca Smedile, Giulia Ianni, Stefano Corona, Gennaro De Vivo and Stefano Bartoli

Submitted: November 6th 2017Reviewed: April 26th 2018Published: November 12th 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78017

Downloaded: 235

Abstract

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is widely used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Complications secondary to EVAR are also treated with endovascular techniques. When this is not applicable, open surgical repair is mandatory. Surgical re-intervention following EVAR is considered to be more demanding compared with primary open repair and it is related to the type of endograft implanted (infra renal vs. suprarenal fixation), to the indications for surgical conversion (infection vs. non infection), to the setting of presentation (elective vs. emergency) and type of conversion (total vs. partial). While technically challenging, delayed open conversion of EVAR can be accomplished with low morbidity and mortality in both the elective and emergent settings. These results reinforce the justification for long-term surveillance of endografts following EVAR.

Keywords

  • late conversion
  • EVAR
  • open conversion

1. Introduction

Despite endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), reducing the perioperative morbidity and mortality, it seems to be associated with an increased rate of late secondary re-interventions. Proportions of patients with postoperative complications in need for secondary interventions range from 12.5 to 43% and secondary endovascular approach are generally considered as the first line treatment. Stent graft failure secondary to endoleaks, stent graft migration, endotension and/or sac enlargement, infection or stent graft tear and fracture, continue to be a persistent problem that can result in aneurysm rupture. Indeed large cohorts of studies have reported rupture rates between 0.5 and 1.2% per patient per year after EVAR.

Open conversion is considered the last line therapy for several EVAR complications as endoleaks unfit for endovascular management, stent graft infection, and aneurysm rupture and stent graft thrombosis.

Surgical re-intervention following EVAR is considered to be more demanding compared with primary open repair and it is related to the type of endograft implanted (infra renal vs. suprarenal fixation), to the indications for surgical conversion (infection vs. non infection), to the setting of presentation (elective vs. emergency) and type of conversion (total vs. partial) [1, 2].

2. Indications to open conversion

The need for conversion from endovascular repair to open results from:

  • Procedural and technical errors

  • Unsuitable aortic morphology and device failures

Predictors of clinical failure or need for re-intervention seem to be due to some anatomical features of AAA as:

  • Large aneurysm size

  • Diffuse neck thrombus or calcification

  • Neck angulation >45–70°

  • Conical aortic neck and an aortic neck with diameter > 28 mm

  • Short infra renal neck (<10 mm)

  • Common iliac artery diameter > 20 mm

  • Persistent type II endoleak

  • Age > 80 years and female gender

Despite narrow aortic bifurcation (<20 mm) or small iliac diameter are currently considered as no contraindications for EVAR and are treated by means of the use of low-profile device, the high incidence of late and persistent Type II endoleaks could be affect an increase of sac enlargement in the future and need for redo-endovascular treatment or late open conversion.

Some specifically anatomic situation can be associated with high incidence of late conversion:

  • Chimney endovascular procedure used to increase the sealing zone in cases of insufficient neck for endovascular approach, especially when distance between the target vessel which needs chimney graft implantation and first aortic side branch above the covered stent is <15 mm, in emergent conditions to treat type IA endoleak or when three visceral vessels are covered.

  • Distal complex procedure to achieve a safe landing zone for sealing as iliac side branch (common iliac artery <50 mm in length, iliac diameter bifurcation <15 mm)

  • Fenestrated and branched endografts

During follow up the significant risk for rupture were proximal type I endoleak, type III endoleak, migration with kinking of the endograft, in contrast with distal type I endoleak or limb thrombosis that were present but statistically not significant. Many authors reported increased rupture risk in patients with persistent type II endoleak. Regarding the correlation between endotension and device, in experimental model e-PTFE reduces sac pressure more effectively than Dacron, but some clinical studies observed that endograft with PTFE produced a high rate of sac enlargement, probably due to inflammatory reaction with cytokine production (post inflammatory syndrome).

Currently the surgical indications for conversion to open repair are:

  • Aneurysmal rupture unfit for endovascular treatment

  • Sac enlargement due to migration and endoleak (type I, II, III or endotension) unfit for endovascular approach

  • Infection with or without aortoenteric fistula

  • Late graft or graft limb thrombosis

3. Clinical presentation

The clinical findings are determined by the cause of failure. These may be:

  • No symptoms (sac enlargement)

  • Abdominal pain with radiation to the back and flanks, hypotension and shock in cases of rupture

  • Leg ischemia due graft/limb thrombosis

  • Fever, leukocytosis and gastrointestinal bleeding in case of infection

3.1. Diagnostic tests

Include Duplex ultrasound, and angio CT scan. Leukocyte scintigraphy, FDG-PET or SPECT plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with suspected infection.

3.2. Treatment

3.2.1. Type of grafts

The type of endoprosthesis and its relationship with aortic neck and renal arteries and its proximal attachment, infra renal or suprarenal, significantly affects the surgical strategy (Table 1). We can basically define four clinical scenarios:

  1. Endograft with infrarenal fixation

  2. Endograft with suprarenal fixation

  3. Endograft with visceral vessel involvement (Chimney, F-EVAR, B-EVAR)

  4. Sealing technology endograft explant

Product nameFixation locationStent expansionStent materialGraft material
TreoSuprarenal, infrarenalSelf-expandingNitinolTightly woven polyester
Zenith alpha abdominalSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Zenith fenestrated AAA endovascular graft (distal bifurcated body)Self-expandingStainless steelWoven polyester
Zenith fenestrated AAA endovascular graft (one proximal seal stents)SuprarenalSelf-expandingStainless steelWoven polyester
Zenith fenestrated AAA endovascular graft (two proximal seal stents)SuprarenalSelf-expandingStainless steel and nitinolWoven polyester
Zenith flex with Z-TrakSuprarenalSelf-expandingStainless steel and nitinolWoven polyester
Incraft AAA stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
AFX endovascular AAA system—AFX2 bifurcated endograft systemFixation at bifurcation, infrarenal, or suprarenal configurations for sealSelf-expandingCobalt chromium alloyDuraply multilayer ePTFE
Ovation iX abdominal stent graft systemSuprarenalNonexpansive polymer-filled ring*NitinolPTFE
Gore excluder AAA endoprosthesis featuring C3 delivery systemInfrarenalSelf-expandingNitinolePTFE
E-tegra stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
E-vita abdominal XT stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Altura endograft systemSuprarenalDelivery system controlledNitinolPolyester
Aorfix AAA endovascular stent graftInfrarenal, transrenalSelf-expandingNitinolPolyester
Endurant AAA stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Endurant II AAA stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Endurant II AUI stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Endurant IIs AAA stent graft systemSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
AnacondaInfrarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester
Fenestrated anacondaSuprarenalSelf-expandingNitinolWoven polyester

Table 1.

Currently available endografts on the market.

4. Operative procedure

4.1. Infra renal fixation

In cases of endoprosthesis with internal fixation, the surgical removal is relatively easy. The results mainly depend on the indication of conversion. In cases of total conversion, the abdominal aorta can be approached with standard trans peritoneal approach. After mobilization of the 3rd and 4rd duodenal portion and Treitz ligament dissection the posterior peritoneum is prepared and the aneurysm neck carefully dissected. In selected cases, the total conversion can be due to type IA endoleak. In this setting a more proximal dissection and suprarenal aortic control can be advocate. The periaortic inflammation of aortic wall due to endoprosthesis needs of a minimal but sometimes carefully dissection. The distal control depends to the aneurysm extension. Although the presence of iliac limb inside the iliac arteries seems to suggest the placement of iliac clamp only after removing of the same iliac limbs to avoid any damage on the iliac wall. In some cases the use of endoclamping with Foley or Fogarty catheters could be useful.

The sac was opened longitudinally, the thrombus or hygromas or both removed and then all the lumbar arteries were sutured. The inferior mesenteric artery can be ligated or re-implanted on the basis of back bleeding. The final step is the restoration of aortic flow with tube or bifurcated graft. When the iliac limb is too difficult to remove, some authors suggest the insertion of the vascular graft on the iliac limb.

In cases of semi conversion (Figure 1), to treat a type II endoleak, the infrarenal aorta was prepared. A preventive banding and reshaping of the neck with a Teflon band to consolidate the graft to the aortic neck with four or five stitches binding together the Teflon, the aortic wall, and the endograft was carried out. When the proximal neck was secured, the sac was opened longitudinally and all the lumbar arteries were ligated. The sac was sutured leaving some fenestrations to avoid repressurization with the consequent risk of expansion and rupture. In some cases the proximal neck can be approached by means of less aggressive standard retroperitoneal approach through the 11th intercostal space, without rib resection or reflection of the left kidney. In cases of iliac artery involvement the standard laparotomy is mandatory. In all the cases, drainage is left in place from 3 days and until only traces of chyle are present.

Figure 1.

Type II EL with sac enlargement in patient treated 4 years early with 26 mm ovation prime endograft the sac was opened longitudinally, and the thrombus removed.

4.2. Suprarenal fixation

In cases of suprarenal fixation, the presence of anchoring metal barbs, generally extended over the superior mesenteric artery lead to complete control of supra celiac aorta. The supra celiac aorta can be controlled by means of classical surgical approach or with endovascular aortic balloon placed from trans axillary or trans femoral approach.

In case of supra celiac control, the aorta was approached by means of trans peritoneal route. After resection of left triangular ligament and retraction of the left lobe of the liver, the gastro-hepatic omentum is opened. After splitting of the diaphragms crura and identification of nasogastric tube with the finger, the aorta can be clamped. Medial visceral mobilization by standard full-length midline incision extended to the left towards the top of 7th rib to allow an anterior thoracotomy of 8–10 cm with short radial phrenotomy lead to excellent exposure and safe dissection of the entire visceral aorta.

To reduce the morbidity and mortality, an endovascular control of proximal aorta seems to be better. Through axillary approach an aortic balloon (Table 2) can be placed at renal level. In our experience trans femoral approach seems to be better, avoid the problem due to large sheets placed in subclavian artery (vertebral occlusion, embolism to posterior cerebral circulation, arm ischemia) (Figure 2). In cases of small diameter of axillary artery, surgical approach to proximal axillary artery below the clavicle must be carried out to place a large introducer sheath without problems (Figure 3). After proximal balloon was inflated, the aneurysm was open, back bleeding from iliac arteries and lumbar /IMA stopped by means of ligature and iliac clamping or endoclamping. The free flow is normally fixed in aorta due to re epithelization. The infolding of the endoprothesis, as suggest by some authors with transacted syringe is speculative and hazardous. We prefer to perform a cut below the anchoring barbs, leaving the free flow in place. A Dacron graft is sutured in an end-to-end fashion, passing the stiches through the aorta and the first covered stent in order to minimize the risk of late complications. In case of necessary total endograft excision (infection), a thoracoabdominal approach must be planned. Some new generation endoprothesis, as Ovation prime, have a very long free flow. In this case a partial salvage of the graft can be performed anastomosing the surgical graft with the proximal part of endograft, between two polymer rings or above the first.

Product nameSize (F)Recommended introducer size (F)Guidewire diameter (inch)Maximum inflated balloon diameter (mm)
Berenstein occlusion balloon catheter680.0388.5, 11.5
Equalizer balloon catheter714–16, 40-mm via cut down only0.03820, 27, 33, 40
Standard occlusion balloon catheter790.03811.5
Coda balloon catheter10140.03546
Coda LP balloon catheter9120.03532
Q50 plus stent graft balloon catheter8120.038 or smaller50
Reliant stent graft balloon catheter8120.038 or smaller

Table 2.

Aortic occlusion balloons.

Figure 2.

Aortic occlusion balloon (coda 32 mm) at level of Freeflow of ovation 26 mm through femoral approach by means of 12 Fr dry seal sheath.

Figure 3.

Axillary approach (12 FR introducer sheath-coda LP balloon catheter).

In cases of more proximal endograft procedure as chimney, F-EVAR or B-EVAR, or in presence of endoanchor, thoracoabdominal approach or medial visceral rotation must be performed [3, 4, 5, 6].

Medial visceral rotation has been developed to obtain adequate exposure of para renal and suprarenal aorta avoiding the thoracic approach. The preferred route for medial visceral rotation is a standard midline trans-abdominal incision. Incising the left lateral peritoneal reflection allows mobilization of the descending and, if necessary, sigmoid colon. The peritoneal incision is carried cephaled through the phrenocolic and lineorenal ligaments. A plane is developed between the pancreas and Gerota’s fascia. The descending colon, pancreas, spleen, and stomach are then rotated anteriorly and medially, leaving the left renal vein, ureter, left kidney, and adrenal gland in situ. The triangular ligament and left lobe of liver are freed. All of abdominal aorta is now exposed from the diaphragm to the bifurcation. Resection of median arcuate ligament and separation of the muscle fibers of the diaphragm expose the distal thoracic aorta within the lower mediastinum. The origin of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric arteries may be freed from the surrounding autonomic ganglia tissue. The aortic cross clamping is performed above the superior mesenteric artery or celiac trunk, according to the extension of the free flow. A longitudinal arteriotomy is then performed into the antero-lateral wall of the aorta, starting from the origin of renal arteries for a sufficient length to allow a safe free flow remove avoid any intimal lesion. After free-flow extraction, the longitudinal aortotomy is closed with 4/0 running polypropylene suture, the visceral arteries and aorta flushed and the clamp placed in infrarenal position to perform a standard aorto-aortic substitution. In cases in which a long renal or visceral ischemic time is expected, a renal protection by means of cold perfusion (4°C lactated Ringer’s solution).

In cases of thoracoabdominal approach an incision through the four to eight intercostal spaces is employed according to the extension of Chimney, F/B-EVAR. Generally a thoracophrenolaparotomy in the seventh or eighth intercostal spaces is carried out. After posterior section of the rib, the pleural space I entered after single right–lung ventilation is initiated. After careful isolation of thoracic aorta, avoiding lesion on vagus nerve or esopaghous wall, a limited circumferential section of the diaphragm is carried out, spatting the phrenic center to avoid paralysis of the left hemi-diaphragm and respiratory failure in the postoperative period. The upper abdomen is approached via trans peritoneal approach. The retro peritoneum entered lateral to the colon. A medial visceral rotation is carried out. The spleen, left colon and left kidney can be retracted anteriorly and to the right. Special care must be taken when isolating the left renal artery (retro aortic renal vein). After the section of left diaphragmatic pilasters, and periotic ganglia division, the aorta is exposed from thoracic to abdominal bifurcation.

At this point, surgical cannulation of femoral artery (14 FR) and intrapericardial cannulation of left superior pulmonary vein (20 FR) are carried out to start a left heart bypass pump. The LHBP is started at 1500–2500 ml/min with an ACT > 200″, with 35°C until the clamp was removed and LHBP stopped. After aortic clamping and incision, the endoprothesis and components were removed. The backflow from intercostal arteries are temporarily stopped with 3 o 4 F occlusion balloon catheters. To prevent paraplegia, an aggressive policy of intercostal arteries reimplantation must be carried out. The visceral arteries (renal, superior mesenteric and celiac trunk) are perfused by means of 9 F Pruitt occlusion-perfusion catheters with oxygenated isotherm blood at 500 ml/h or 4°C lactated Ringer’s solution.

4.3. Sealing explant technology

Regarding explanation of polymer sealing based technology endografts, few cases have been described, mostly for infection. After opening the aneurysm sac, the graft has been easily removed without extensive dissection of aortic neck. After removal of endobag, the clamp is placed in infrarenal position and perfusion is restored with interposition of Dacron graft. The nellix explant seems to be a straightforward procedure compared to the removal of a conventional endograft with suprarenal fixation (temporary suprarenal clamping, lack of penetrating components in the juxta and infrarenal aorta).

4.4. Emergency conversion

Rupture after EVAR has been estimated to be 0.9–1.2% with a mortality rate of 30% in emergency situation. Patients submit to open conversion appeared to be older, with severe comorbidities (coronary disease, chronic renal failure). In emergency patients received more frequently a supra mesenteric endovascular or surgical control, renal and visceral cross clamp times were longer and the blood loss greater. So despite good results in literature, emergency surgical conversion due to AAA rupture especially in cases of endograft with suprarenal fixation or infection are associated with low results and high morbidity and mortality rate [7, 8].

4.5. Special situation

4.5.1. Open conversion after EVAR for graft infection

The endograft infection is rare, with an incidence of 0.2–0.7%. Predominant microorganism is Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, and is often associated with aortoenteric fistula or erosion. Generally it is observed in emergency conditions. Currently, graft infections are classified as low-grade and high-grade infections. Low-grade infections occur later and are caused by less virulent bacteria (coagulase negative staphylococci, CNS) and clinical symptoms are generally non-specific. High-grade infections occur earlier, are caused by more aggressive bacteria and associated with signs of sepsis, graft thrombosis, septic embolism or GIT erosion with bleeding. In elective condition current imaging modalities to diagnose infection are angioCT scan. Relatively new techniques are fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or SPECT. After proximal control (surgical or endovascular) and duodenum mobilization by means of intestinal derotation, vascular reconstruction options include:

  • Extra-anatomic bypass and aortic stump: after endograft explanation, an axillo-byfemoral bypass graft is performed. Results of extra atomic approach were disappointing because of high mortality rates, mostly due to aortic stump blowout and failure of the extra-anatomic graft due to thrombosis and reinfection. Adequate closure of aortic stump is essential, but can raise quite a challenge because of the inflamed tissue and fragile aortic wall. Several techniques have been proposed to ensure stump integrity such as double plane sutures, use of paravertebral fascia, use of epiplon or omental wrapping.

Extra-anatomic approach seems to be preferable in case of high-grade infection, with massive contamination of retroperitoneal space.

  • In situ reconstruction:

    1. Allografts

    2. Autologous vein grafts (NAIS) with femoropopliteal vein in various configuration.

    3. Antimicrobial grafts (rifampin-soaked polyester)

Many authors suggest to place a cuff or endoprothesis as bridge therapy to achieve a bleeding control and to perform a surgical conversion in semi-elective condition, especially in cases of a reconstruction performed with superficial femoral veins. Literature review evidence such as stent graft infection with graft excision has a mortality rate ranging between 36 and 56% [9, 10, 11].

4.5.2. Graft or limb thrombosis

Severe iliac artery angulation, narrow aortic bifurcation (<20 mm) and small graft limb diameter can predispose to endograft limb stenosis. In some cases limb graft occlusion seems due to complications at the femoral artery level due to thrombosis or dissection after percutaneous approach (Prostar XL or Proglide System). It is more frequent in tortuous iliac anatomy, in presence of pre-existing iliac stenosis and in unsupported endograft. For endograft limb occlusion treatment depends on the clinical manifestations. In case of mild or absent symptoms, a conservative approach could be desirable. However in most cases an endovascular approach or surgical reintervention is required. If occlusion has occurred in recent period (<48 h), the thrombolysis/thromboaspiration and endovascular treatment of the cause of limb occlusion (stenosis, kinking) seems to be the best treatment. In cases of late symptomatic occlusion a surgical approach by means of extra atomic bypass graft (femoro-femoral or axillo-femoral) seems to be the best treatment.

In cases of acute aortic thrombosis bilateral embolectomy with Fogarty catheters and relining with new endoprothesis (aorto-uni-iliac and femoro-femoral bypass or use of two iliac leg graft) seems to be the treatment of choice.

Direct aortic reconstruction (graft excision or semi conversion and aortobifemoral bypass graft) or extra-anatomic approach with femoro-femoral or axillo-femoral bypass grafts seems to be feasible only in selected cases [12].

4.6. Complications

Because most operations for conversion of endovascular to open repair require suprarenal clamping in high-risk patients, the complication rate is higher as compared to open repair and include:

Cardiac complications, hemorrhage, iatrogenic injuries, renal failure, distal embolization, gastrointestinal and respiratory complications. Moreover the incidence of late complications as pseudo aneurysms as well infection of the graft was observed with an incidence of 1.4% [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].

5. Summary

Open conversion after EVAR for AAA are feasible but carry out an high risk of complications. Whit a large numbers of endografts implanted worldwide, the issue of late conversion to open repair will increase significantly in the near future. The future incidence of late conversion of endografts is changing. With increasing off label use, the limitations of graft design are being stretched and redefined. As interventionalists become more comfortable with EVAR devices and use devices in anatomy that is outside the instructions for use, we can expect to have inferior outcomes compared with data from IDE trials that may predispose some patients to late conversion Mortality for elective late EVAR AAA-related conversion is not significantly different than primary open repair but is technically more challenging. Endovascular surveillance may identify late complications that require removal and justifies continued monitoring. Early elective conversion of EVAR for type I and type III endoleak or migration that cannot be treated with endovascular procedures may improve outcomes. The mortality rate for conversion in the setting of rupture or infection remains very high [1923].

© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Andrea Siani, Federico Accrocca, Tommaso Castrucci, Gianluca Smedile, Giulia Ianni, Stefano Corona, Gennaro De Vivo and Stefano Bartoli (November 12th 2018). Open Conversion after EVAR: Indications and Technical Details, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - From Basic Research to Clinical Practice, Igor Koncar, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78017. Available from:

chapter statistics

235total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Biomechanic and Hemodynamic Perspectives in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment

By Nikolaos Kontopodis, Konstantinos Tzirakis, Emmanouil Tavlas, Stella Lioudaki and Christos Ioannou

Related Book

First chapter

Transplant Inequalities – A United Kingdom Perspective

By Gurch Randhawa

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us