Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Perspective Chapter: Novel Slow-Release Nanocomposite Fertilizers

Written By

Atena Mirbolook

Submitted: 27 February 2024 Reviewed: 08 March 2024 Published: 30 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114830

Nanocomposites - Properties, Preparations and Applications IntechOpen
Nanocomposites - Properties, Preparations and Applications Edited by Viorica Parvulescu

From the Edited Volume

Nanocomposites - Properties, Preparations and Applications [Working Title]

Dr. Viorica Parvulescu and Dr. Elena Maria Maria Anghel

Chapter metrics overview

8 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Slow-release fertilizers (SRF) create a physical barrier and prevent the rapid release of nutrients. These fertilizers are produced in two ways: coated and matrix. SRFs can reduce nutrient loss such as nitrogen and cause gradual use according to the plant’s needs. This will increase productivity and make fertilizer more effective. The process of producing fertilizers is increasing every year in the world. It can also be predicted that this trend will continue in the coming years. Nanotechnology-based fertilizers also are a new strategy to enhance agricultural yields and show great potential as viable options in the fertilizer industry. Recently slow- and controlled-release nano-fertilizers (SRNF and CRNF) have advanced through the improvement of nanocomposites or coating techniques with the help of various chemical things. SRNFs are more effective than usual nano-fertilizers because these deliver elements in a controlled method and can be adjusted by many environmental and physical motivations (such as pH, temperature, humidity). The application of controlled-release fertilizers reduces nutrient loss due to evaporation and leaching and provides a carefully designed nutrient-release system that is aligned with the goal of sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

  • nano-fertilizers
  • slow-release
  • nutrient
  • nanocomposite
  • preparation

1. Introduction

Agriculture in the world is in crisis due to population increase, high demand for quality food, and adverse effects of climatic, biotic, and abiotic stresses on global food production [1]. Predictions show that the world’s population will reach 9.7 billion by 2050, requiring food security with naturally functioning water, energy, and non-renewable feedstocks, productive land, phosphate reserves, and ecosystems. Given the current alarms about food safety in the future, the design and application of sustainable solutions are urgently needed. With the use of current resources and technologies, agricultural production is now at its maximum. Revolutionary nanotechnology in the energy, agriculture, and health industries can revolutionize the approach to agriculture in the world. The productivity of agriculture is decreasing day by day because this particular sector is facing a lot of problems, among them the reduction of fertile land, mismanagement in the use of fertilizers, lack of suitable food sources, and reduction of soil health and organic matter [2]. Since the development of fertile agricultural land is not possible, proper management of fertilizers, disease, and stress (biotic and abiotic) may be an ideal way to increase crop production [3]. For many years, various types of chemical fertilizers have been used to achieve the goals of farmers and high yield.

Recently, the science of nanotechnology has emerged as an attractive topic for major changes in the agricultural sector. Nano compounds affect various aspects of agriculture such as seed germination, plant growth and development [4], enrichment of fertilizers [3], plant diseases [5], and plant stress management [6]. The small size of these particles (usually 1–100 nm) and their high specific surface area led to their increased absorption and efficiency in systems. By using these compounds, we can predict higher fertilization efficiency, increased plant productivity, and minimum costs for farmers [7]. However, nano-fertilizers cannot solve all the problems related to fertilization, because some problems such as leaching and accessibility and transfer of nutrients still exist. In addition, improving nutrient use efficiency (NUE) is a critical development area.

Advertisement

2. Slow- and controlled-release nano-fertilizers

Slow- and controlled-release nano-fertilizers (SRNFs and CRNFs) are a step ahead of conventional nanoparticles (iron, copper, zinc, manganese oxide nanoparticles, etc.) that can solve the problems of nutrient absorption and transport more effectively. These include coated nano-fertilizers (CRNF) or composite nano-fertilizers (SRNF) that release nutrients in a controlled manner, thereby reducing the possibility of leaching and wastage of nutrients in the soil [8]. SRN are usually nanocomposite fertilizers with a complex polymer network, which are mainly used to prepare controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs). They use coated nano-fertilizers to prepare SRFs. These fertilizers retain nutrients and due to having external coatings or composition in a complex matrix, the steps of releasing nutrients from their structure happen slowly or in a controlled manner. Synthesis of CRFs is achieved by various encapsulation and coating methods, while SRFs can be prepared using a variety of composite materials including hydroxyapatite, hydrogel, chitosan, alginate, etc. [9]. In SRF, nutrient release can be stimulated or controlled through various parameters such as pH, temperature, and soil moisture, and as a result, regulation of nutrient release is possible [10, 11]. Additionally, the release of a specific element can be tracked or monitored by various analytical techniques (such as AAS, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, airborne, electrochemical, and mobile sensors).

Regarding the use of nanotechnology, attention should also be paid to environmental pollution. This pollution happens with the release of these nanoparticles in the environment [12, 13].

Nutrient elements in the structure of nano-fertilizers can be transferred to plants in the following ways:

  1. Targeted delivery of nutritional elements on a nanoscale in the form of particles or emulsions.

  2. Controlled release of nano-fertilizers by encapsulating nutrients to achieve the goal in a controlled manner, which includes three types:

    1. Slow-release systems (releasing the nutrients from the coating or matrix polymer for a long period).

    2. Rapid-release systems (the nutrients are released immediately from the target surface).

    3. Conditional release systems (the release of nutrients is performed based on external factors such as pH, temperature, humidity, or magnetic/ultrasonic pulse).

  3. Special materials are included in the matrix of organic biochemical polymers that act as carriers [14].

Among these nano-fertilizers, SRNFs are currently considered a suitable instrument for the synthesis of nano-fertilizers of macronutrient and micronutrient essential elements. CRNF and SRNF are often used interchangeably [15].But they are different and one of the differentiating factors between CRNF and SRNF is the existence of cover. SRNFs are nanocomposites in which nutrients are combined into a compound with high molecular weight and a complex structure, and these are released through the diffusion of soluble and degradable compounds in water and microbial decomposition [16]. SRNF release nutrients more slowly than usual nanoparticles, but they cannot handle the release of nutrients [10, 17].

Slow-release fertilizers (SRFs), distinct CRFs, are not encapsulated (Figure 1). The most common SRFs, provide nitrogen (N) at a slower rate than when a readily soluble nitrogen source (such as ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, or urea) is used. In one such fertilizer, fertilizer producers synthesized a SRF by chemical reaction of a nitrogen source molecule with an aldehyde, for example, urea-formaldehyde or methyl urea. Delayed release of nitrogen is done by microbial action in the growth medium. This process is done in such a way that the long chain molecules are slowly broken and finally nitrogen is released in the form of ammonium and will be converted into nitrate and absorbed.

Figure 1.

Controlled and slow-release nano-fertilizers.

It should be highlighted that the release time in SRF cannot be controlled since the efficiency of microbial organisms in molecular decomposition depends on other factors such as the growth environment, humidity, and temperature. Also, release time cannot be expected for more than 2 or 3 months.

CRFs differ fundamentally from SRFs both in technology and in the way, nutrients are released. Soluble necessary plant nutrients are encapsulated in an organic resin or polymer coating to form coated granules. This coating results in the delayed release of nutrients in a SRF.

In an SRF fertilizer, the coating on the granules acts as a selectively permeable or semipermeable membrane, which is a barrier to some molecules but allows others to pass through. When a CRF is placed in a suitable moisture condition, water passes one way from the coating into the fertilizer granule, and this phenomenon is osmosis. The absorbed water moderately dissolves the nutrients inside the coated fertilizer granule to make a highly concentrated solution. Then the hydrostatic pressure inside the capsule increases, and when the hydrostatic pressure on both sides of the capsule is equal, water will no longer enter (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Diffusion mechanism for releasing nutrients from coated granules of fertilizers, nutrients moved out through the coated materials.

The process of movement of nutrients toward the plant occurs as a diffusion phenomenon, that is, the movement of molecules from a liquid with a higher concentration to a liquid with a lower concentration. The reason for this phenomenon is related to the coating structure, which has small micropores. When plants are watered, the hydrostatic pressures inside and outside the capsule become unequal, and small amounts of dissolved nutrients are released into the growing medium by diffusion through these pores.

The type of coating agent determines the rate and pattern of nutrient release. CRNFs are known as coated fertilizers wherever the factors determining the rate, duration, and pattern of nutrient release can be fully controlled during preparation [16, 17, 18]. The coating and matrix materials used to prepare CRNF or SRNF can be inorganic or organic. Minerals include phosphogypsum, bentonite, sulfur, etc. Organic polymers can be synthetic (polyethylene, polyurethane, alkyd resin, etc.) or natural (chitosan, starch, cellulose, etc.) [10, 15].

SRNFs have properties that are very useful for agricultural activity. They are one of the most effective ways to deliver nutrients to plants because they can be designed to release nutrients slowly and deliver them to plants with minimal wastage.

Advertisement

3. Types of nanocomposites-based SRNFs

3.1 Hydroxyapatite-based nanocomposites

Hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles are a group of minerals that belong to calcium phosphate and have a chemical composition (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) that is very similar to the mineral found in human bones and teeth [19]. These nanoparticles have been extensively researched due to their importance in materials science, biology, and pharmaceuticals [20]. According to research, hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HANPs) are between 40 and 60 nm in size. They can also be easily activated with various biomolecules such as proteins and peptides to enhance their biological activity. The HA nanoparticles are biocompatible and nontoxic, making them promising medical and agricultural materials [20, 21]. When suspended in water, they exhibit colloidal properties and can carry various other nutrients. Gao et al. [22] showed that HANPs in combination with urea perform a dual function, that is, in addition to releasing sufficient nitrogen and phosphorus, they can also reduce the rate of urea decomposition in the soil and as a result, improve agricultural efficiency [22]. A recent review article showed that nano-hydroxyapatite particles can have both adverse and beneficial effects on plant growth and improvement, and recommended that more research is needed on different plants [23]. The desired food nutrients can be mixed with HANPs to synthesize hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and use a slow-release process.

3.2 Nanocomposites based on hydrogel

Hydrogel is a three-dimensional network of hydrophilic polymers that can swell in water and retain a significant amount of water in its structure. Due to their significant water content, hydrogels exhibit remarkable flexibility, which is very similar to natural tissues. It facilitates water retention in their structure and physiochemical cross-linking between separate polymer chains in the hydrogel. There are different hydrophilic groups including ∙NH2∙CONH2, ∙COOH, ∙OH, ∙SO3H, and ∙CONH in the hydrogel [24].

Hydrogels have recently attracted considerable attention due to their potential participation in agricultural activities and can be used as nanocomposite compounds for the synthesis of SRFs [25, 26]. Noppakundilograt et al. [27] prepared a novel three-layer coated NPK hydrogel fertilizer using a coating technique [27]. In this synthesis method, NPK bits were immersed in the solution of polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan. Cross-linking between cellulose layers was done using glutaraldehyde. The results show that the cross-linking of the chitosan layer increases the water infiltration and the coating layer increases the water suspension time.

3.3 SRNFs based on chitosan

Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide composed of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-glucosamine groups, is a biodegradable polymer that fits fine into SRNF formulations [28]. This acetylated chitin absorbed maximum water due to its super absorbent properties. In addition, their biocompatible, cost-effective, hydrophilic, non-toxic, and biodegradable nature makes them suitable for agricultural use [29, 30]. This biopolymer has been widely studied due to its swelling ability and nutrient-release capacity [30, 31]. Chitosan can play an important role with cross-linking agents, such as sodium tripolyphosphate, epichlorohydrin, glutaraldehyde, etc., to entrap nutrients [29]. Chitosan nanoparticles can be simply mixed with nutrients to control the release of that by forming SRNF [32].

Araujo et al. [33] formulated chitosan-based coating materials using humic substances (peat, humic acid, humin) [33]. It has been reported that depending on the type of humic substances and the pH of the environment, according to the functional group and possible interactions of each compound with urea, it will have a different effect on the release rate. Huey et al. [34] included the use of allicin, a urease inhibitor, in chitosan/starch composites [34]. Allicin has been reported to reduce the rate of urea hydrolysis and delay the availability of nutrients to plants.

3.4 Graphene oxide or carbon-based nanocomposites

Graphene oxide (GO) is a single atomic layer material obtained through the oxidation of graphite. Numerous studies show that GO is a non-toxic and biocompatible material with a large surface area and a large number of reactive oxygen functional groups [35]. Due to their high specific surface, materials containing graphene provide a suitable substrate for loading nutrients and preparing SRFs [36]. Haydar et al. study [4] showed that iron and manganese nanoparticles were integrated into graphene using a doping technique, which led to the preparation of graphene-based nanocomposites with micronutrients [4].

3.5 SRNFs based on diatomite

Diatomite (D) is a type of sedimentary rock that includes a shell of hard silicified diatomite and some other minerals such as clay minerals, feldspar, etc. Diatomite has unique physical and chemical properties including high porosity, high adsorption capacity, resistance, small particle size, and a high specific surface area of 10–30 m2 g−1. Diatomites are compounds that have a high cation exchange capacity, and these characteristics make them important for use in the structure of SRFs [37]. Hydroxyl groups on the surface of diatomite are the main reaction sites. In addition, acidic sites are also seen on the surface of diatomite, which are suitable for surface reactions [38]. Nano-clay minerals have higher surface area and charge density than micro-sized clay minerals [39]. Yuvaraj and Subramanian [40] used a nano zeolite as a zinc carrier and observed that 1176 hours were spent to release zinc from the nano zeolite structure [40]. Also, in another research, it was found that nano bentonite can retain cadmium, chromium, and copper elements up to 74, 99.03, and 99.18% more than normal ionic solution [41]. Meanwhile, the adsorption efficiency in micro bentonite for cadmium and chromium was reported as 82.4% and 55%, respectively [42]. In research conducted by Mirbolook et al. [43], it was determined that the binding of urea-zinc complex on the porous surface of diatomite and nano diatomite can reduce the release rate of urea in the water environment and nitrogen and zinc in the soil environment [43]. The newly synthesized fertilizer was known as SRF and showed high efficiency in maintaining the mineral forms of nitrogen and zinc in the soil. The results showed that the diffusion of urea in water follows a sigmoidal pattern. In the case where urea was present in the matrix with nano-diatomite, about 20% of urea was released in water after 12 hours, while in normal urea, 40–50% of urea was released after 12 hours. These SRNFs can be considered as a potential material for the slow release of elements in the soil as well as minimizing the cost and environmental problems.

3.6 SRNFs based on carbon dot

Carbon nanomaterials are one of the environmentally friendly components and are widely used for agricultural development [44]. Carbon dots (CDs) [45], carbon nanotubes [46], and fullerenes [47] have all been examined for plants, but CDs have attracted specific attention due to their small size (less than 10 nm). The CDs have numerous advantages, including simplicity of synthesis and surface modification, high water solubility, fluorescence properties, low toxicity, and biocompatibility [48]. Carbon dots are simply uptake by plants and can promote growth. These components can increase photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, and nitrogen fixation. Studies have also shown that CDs have a positive effect on plant growth and resistance to environmental stresses [49]. In the study of Alikhani et al. [50], a carbon dot was used as a new carrier for the slow release of zinc elements. For this purpose, Zn-doped carbon dot (Zn-NCDs) was synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method [50]. Then, the effect of zinc-NCDs as a source of zinc on wheat plants under greenhouse conditions was investigated. The results showed that the application of slow release through carbon nanocarrier significantly increased wheat growth indices, biomass, grain yield, nitrogen, and zinc content. In addition, the molar ratio of phytic acid to zinc in wheat grains decreased significantly, which affects the bioavailability of zinc in wheat grains. Finally, although significant progress has been made in the field of the effect of CDs on plants, more research is still needed for the application of CDs in the preparation of SRNFs in agriculture.

3.7 SRNFs based on alginate

One of the natural polymers used as a coating in fertilizer granules is sodium alginate. Carbohydrate alginate derived from brown algae is a natural polymeric polysaccharide that consists of two monosaccharides [51]. These two are β-D-mannuronic acid and α-L-guluronic acid. These two monomers are connected in a straight line to form a macromolecular structure of alginate [51]. Sodium alginate can react with polyvalent cations and form a gel, and the gelation process is thermally irreversible [52]. In terms of biodegradability, compatibility, and adhesion, it shows good performance, which is suitable for controlling the release rate of food elements. The study by Meng et al. used a combination of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/sodium alginate (SA) polymer membranes as environmentally friendly and biodegradable coatings for SRFs [53]. The use of these compounds greatly reduced the release of nitrogen from the fertilizer structure. Chen et al. [54] worked on the fabrication of potassium chloride encapsulated in a starch alginate matrix, crosslinked by calcium chloride to form a hydrogel bead [54]. The result shows that a higher concentration of SA reduces the swelling of fertilizer granules and thus reduces the release of potassium. In other words, with higher SA concentration, the emission intensity was better controlled. In contrast, it was also observed that the dissolution of the sample in water increased after 24 hours with increasing SA content. The importance of this research depends on its potential applications in agricultural practices, especially in drought fields. By fine-tuning the ratios of starch, alginate, and potassium, this study opens the way for further improvements in sustainable nutrient delivery systems.

Figure 3 shows a classification of composite material used to prepare slow-release nano fertilizers.

Figure 3.

Various types of composite material used to prepare slow-release nano-fertilizers.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion and future perspectives

The increase in population and the need for healthy food have led to a significant increase in the amount of fertilizer used in agriculture. Recent research has focused increasingly on the development of nanoparticle-based fertilizer synthesis methods. However, the chance of excessive usage of nano-based fertilizers, their interaction with soil macro and microorganisms, and their impact on human health and ecosystems remain unclear, and their allowable dosage limits should be determined. The use of controlled nano-fertilizers in agricultural systems has many advantages, but the increasing use of their synthesis methods in laboratories and their use in cultivated systems should be further investigated.

References

  1. 1. Beig B, Niazi MBK, Jahan Z, Hussain A, Zia MH, Mehran MT. Coating materials for slow release of nitrogen from urea fertilizer: A review. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2020;43:1510-1533
  2. 2. Prost L. Revitalizing agricultural sciences with design sciences. Agricultural Systems. 2021;193:103225
  3. 3. Elemike EE, Uzoh IM, Onwudiwe DC, Babalola OO. The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production. Applied Sciences. 2019;9:499
  4. 4. Haydar MS, Ghosh S, Mandal P. Application of iron oxide nanoparticles as micronutrient fertilizer in mulberry propagation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2021;20:1-20
  5. 5. Worrall EA, Hamid A, Mody KT, Mitter N, Pappu HR. Nanotechnology for plant disease management. Agronomy. 2018;8:285
  6. 6. Manzoor A, Dar AH, Pandey VK, Shams R, Khan S, Panesar PS, et al. Recent insights into polysaccharide-based hydrogels and their potential applications in the food sector: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2022;213:987-1006
  7. 7. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2019;12:908
  8. 8. Chen S, Yang M, Ba C, Susu Y, Jiang Y, Zou H, et al. Preparation and characterization of slow-release fertilizer encapsulated by biochar-based waterborne copolymers. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;615:431-437
  9. 9. Elsayed AAA, Ahmed EL-G, Taha ZK, Farag HM, Hussein MS, AbouAitah K. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as novel nano-fertilizer for production of rosemary plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2022;295:110851. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110851
  10. 10. Trenkel ME. Slow-and Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers: An Option for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA); 2021
  11. 11. Varadachari C, Goertz HM. Slow-Release and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers. Indian Nitrogen Group, Society; 2010
  12. 12. Shah GM, Amin M, Shahid M, Ahmad I, Khalid S, Abbas G, et al. Toxicity of ZnO and Fe2O3 nano-agro-chemicals to soil microbial activities, nitrogen utilization, and associated human health risks. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2022;34:1-12
  13. 13. Suazo-Hernández J, Arancibia-Miranda N, Mlih R, Cáceres-Jensen L, Bolan N, de la Luz Mora M. Impact on some soil physical and chemical properties caused by metal and metallic oxide engineered nanoparticles: A review. Nanomaterials. 2023;13:572
  14. 14. Guha T, Gopal G, Kundu R, Mukherjee A. Nanocomposites for delivering agrochemicals: A comprehensive review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2020;68:3691-3702
  15. 15. Lawrence D, Wong SK, Low DYS, Goh BH, Goh JK, Ruktanonchai UR, et al. Controlled release fertilizers: A review on coating materials and mechanism of release. Plants. 2021;10:238
  16. 16. Shaviv A. Advances in Controlled-Release Fertilizers. 2001
  17. 17. Liu Y, Tong Z, Prud'homme RK. Stabilized polymeric nanoparticles for controlled and efficient release of bifenthrin. Pest Management Science: Formerly Pesticide Science. 2008;64:808-812
  18. 18. Gregorich EG, Turchenek LW, Carter MR, Angers DA. Soil and Environmental Science Dictionary. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001
  19. 19. Wei G, Ma PX. Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4749-4757
  20. 20. Ferraz MP, Mateus AY, Sousa JC, Monteiro FJ. Nanohydroxyapatite microspheres as a delivery system for antibiotics: Release kinetics, antimicrobial activity, and interaction with osteoblasts. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2007;81:994-1004
  21. 21. Teng S-H, Lee E-J, Wang P, Jun S-H, Han C-M, Kim H-E. Functionally gradient chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for controlled drug release. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2009;90:275-282
  22. 22. Gao X, Li C, Zhang M, Wang R, Chen B. Controlled release urea improved the nitrogen use efficiency, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on silt loamy soil. Field Crops Research. 2015;181:60-68
  23. 23. Maghsoodi MR, Najafi N, Reyhanitabar A, Oustan S. Hydroxyapatite nanorods, hydrochar, biochar, and zeolite for controlled-release urea fertilizers. Geoderma. 2020;379:114644. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114644
  24. 24. Bahram M, Mohseni N, Moghtader M. An introduction to hydrogels and some recent applications. In: Emerging Concepts in Analysis and Applications of Hydrogels. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2016
  25. 25. Bouranis DL, Theodoropoulos AG, Drossopoulos JB. Designing synthetic polymers as soil conditioners. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 1995;26:1455-1480
  26. 26. Ye D, Chang C, Zhang L. High-strength and tough cellulose hydrogels chemically dual cross-linked by using low-and high-molecular-weight cross-linkers. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20:1989-1995
  27. 27. Noppakundilograt S, Pheatcharat N, Kiatkamjornwong S. Multilayer-coated NPK compound fertilizer hydrogel with controlled nutrient release and water absorbency. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2015;132. DOI: 10.1002/app.41249
  28. 28. Kubavat D, Trivedi K, Vaghela P, Prasad K, Vijay Anand GK, Trivedi H, et al. Characterization of a chitosan-based sustained release nano fertilizer formulation used as a soil conditioner while simultaneously improving biomass production of Zea mays L. Land Degradation & Development. 2020;31:2734-2746
  29. 29. Perez JJ, Francois NJ. Chitosan-starch beads prepared by ionotropic gelation as potential matrices for controlled release of fertilizers. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;148:134-142
  30. 30. Pimsen R, Porrawatkul P, Nuengmatcha P, Ramasoot S, Chanthai S. Efficiency enhancement of slow release of fertilizer using nano zeolite–chitosan/sago starch-based biopolymer composite. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2021;18:1321-1332
  31. 31. León O, Soto D, Antúnez A, Fernández R, González J, Piña C, et al. Hydrogels based on oxidized starches from different botanical sources for release of fertilizers. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;136:813-822
  32. 32. Kondal R, Kalia A, Krejcar O, Kuca K, Sharma SP, Luthra K, et al. Chitosan-urea nanocomposite for improved fertilizer applications: The effect on the soil enzymatic activities and microflora dynamics in N cycle of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Polymers. 2021;13:2887
  33. 33. Araújo BR, Romão LPC, Doumer ME, Mangrich AS. Evaluation of the interactions between chitosan and humics in media for the controlled release of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017
  34. 34. Huey CE, Yahya WZN, Mansor N. Allicin incorporation as urease inhibitor in a chitosan/starch based biopolymer for fertilizer application. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2019;16:2187-2196
  35. 35. Liu J, Cui L, Losic D. Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013;9:9243-9257
  36. 36. Kabiri S, Baird R, Tran DNH, Andelkovic I, McLaughlin MJ, Losic D. Cogranulation of low rates of graphene and graphene oxide with macronutrient fertilizers remarkably improves their physical properties. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2018;6:1299-1309
  37. 37. Pasković I, Pecina M, Bronić J, Perica S, Ban D, Ban SG, et al. Synthetic zeolite as zinc and manganese fertilizer in calcareous soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2018;49:1072-1082
  38. 38. Yuan P, Wu DQ , He HP, Lin ZY. The hydroxyl species and acid sites on diatomite surface: A combined IR and Raman study. Applied Surface Science. 2004;227:30-39
  39. 39. Anjum M, Miandad R, Waqas M, Gehany F, Barakat MA. Remediation of wastewater using various nano-materials. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2019;12(8):4897-4919
  40. 40. Yuvaraj M, Subramanian KS. Development of slow release Zn fertilizer using nano-zeolite as a carrier. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2018;41:311-320
  41. 41. Sirait M, Manalu PDS. Preparation nature nano-bentonite as adsorbent heavy metal Cd and Hg. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1120:012023
  42. 42. Barkat M, Chegrouche S, Mellah A, Bensmain B, Nibou D, Boufatit M. Application of Algerian bentonite in the removal of cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions. Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology. 2014;4:210-226
  43. 43. Mirbolook A, Sadaghiani MR, Keshavarz P, Alikhani M. New slow-release urea fertilizer fortified with zinc for improving zinc availability and nitrogen use efficiency in maize. ACS Omega. 2023;8:45715-45728
  44. 44. Gopinath KP, Vo D-VN, Prakash DG, Joseph AA, Viswanathan S, Arun J. Environmental applications of carbon-based materials: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2021;19:557-582
  45. 45. Guo B, Liu G, Wei H, Qiu J, Zhuang J, Zhang X, et al. The role of fluorescent carbon dots in crops: Mechanism and applications. SmartMat. 2022;3:208-225
  46. 46. Patel DK, Kim H-B, Dutta SD, Ganguly K, Lim K-T. Carbon nanotubes-based nanomaterials and their agricultural and biotechnological applications. Materials. 2020;13:1679. DOI: 10.3390/ma13071679
  47. 47. Chandel M, Kaur K, Sahu BK, Sharma S, Panneerselvam R, Shanmugam V. Promise of nano-carbon to the next generation sustainable agriculture. Carbon. 2022;188:461-481
  48. 48. Feng Z, Adolfsson KH, Yanan X, Fang H, Hakkarainen M, Mingbo W. Carbon dot/polymer nanocomposites: From green synthesis to energy, environmental and biomedical applications. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2021;29:e00304. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00304
  49. 49. Li Y, Xiaokai X, Ying W, Zhuang J, Zhang X, Zhang H, et al. A review on the effects of carbon dots in plant systems. Materials Chemistry Frontiers. 2020;4:437-448
  50. 50. Alikhani M, Mirbolook A, Sadeghi J, Lakzian A. Effect of a new slow-release zinc fertilizer based on carbon dots on the zinc concentration, growth indices, and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023;107783
  51. 51. Niu C, Lin Z, Qian F, Yutao X, Chen Y, Lingbin L. An eco-friendly versatile superabsorbent hydrogel based on sodium alginate and urea for soil improvement with a synchronous chemical loading strategy. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2024;327:121676
  52. 52. Makarova AO, Derkach SR, Khair T, Kazantseva MA, Zuev YF, Zueva OS. Ion-induced polysaccharide gelation: Peculiarities of alginate egg-box association with different divalent cations. Polymers. 2023;15:1243
  53. 53. Meng W, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhu W, Huang H, et al. Poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate polymer membranes as eco-friendly and biodegradable coatings for slow-release fertilizers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2023;103:3592-3601
  54. 54. Chen YS, Phang SW, Shuib AS, Tee JL. Release behavior and biodegradability of controlled-release potassium fertilizer encapsulated in starch–alginate matrix. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2023;18:e2998

Written By

Atena Mirbolook

Submitted: 27 February 2024 Reviewed: 08 March 2024 Published: 30 April 2024