Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Emergency Surgery

Written By

K. Madan and Ramya B. Sriram

Submitted: 10 December 2022 Reviewed: 24 January 2023 Published: 16 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110180

From the Edited Volume

Topics in Postoperative Pain

Edited by Victor M. Whizar-Lugo, Analucía Domínguez-Franco, Marissa Minutti-Palacios and Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit

Chapter metrics overview

115 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Patients presenting with acute abdominal pain frequently need very good analgesia. In order to obtain successful analgesia, pain should be evaluated, and a suitable intervention should be performed employing multimodal analgesic techniques and a minimum dose of opioid with appropriate monitoring as opioids raise the possibility of the patient being over-sedated, experience hypoventilation, or possibly aspirate. ERAS protocol is a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach to peri-operative management which aims for evidence-based reduction of physiological stress, post-operative complications and organ dysfunction, reoccurrence and mortality whilst also increasing mobility, ultimately leading to early discharge and better surgical outcomes. Multimodal analgesia has an advantage where different techniques are used to tackle pain by targeting different receptors in the pain pathway. Here we discuss a number of multimodal analgesic therapies used to alleviate acute postoperative pain in emergency surgeries, explains their advantages, and evaluates relevant findings and evidence-based management guidelines.

Keywords

  • postoperative pain
  • ERAS
  • emergency surgeries
  • opioid sparing
  • multimodal analgesia

1. Introduction

Acute postoperative pain is one of the biggest challenges for both surgeons and anaesthesiologists which affects more than 80% of patients who have surgery with less than 75% of them reporting its severity [1]. However, the use of opioids for pain control in the postoperative period is associated with serious adverse effects like respiratory depression, prolonged hospital stays and opioid addiction on chronic use which impedes enhanced recovery of the patients [2]. Hence enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society has given many guidelines specific to various surgeries which advocates the use of multimodal opioid sparing techniques as they prevent the above-mentioned side effects and helps in early mobilisation and fast return of bowel movements, especially in emergency surgeries [3].

Advertisement

2. Multimodal opioid sparing analgesic techniques

Ideally multimodal analgesia for enhanced recovery should start pre-emptively which prevents central sensitization occurring from incisional and inflammatory injury in the perioperative period. Due to the noxious input brought on by the surgical procedures, the CNS becomes hyperactive, which causes pain hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability (prolonged response of the neurons after tissue damage) which when not treated early may lead to chronic pain. When there is total multi-segmental blockage of unpleasant stimuli and its extension into the postoperative period, the greatest therapeutic improvement is seen. The intensity of immediate postoperative pain/hyperalgesia and chronic pain after surgery might theoretically be decreased or perhaps completely eliminated by preventing central sensitization with comprehensive multimodal analgesic interventions [4, 5].

Multiple strategies and drug classes can be used to control postoperative pain and to allow early mobilisation, enteral nutrition, and to decrease the perioperative stress response. Different techniques like patient education, local anaesthetic-based techniques (local infiltration, peripheral nerve blocks, and neuraxial analgesia), and a combination of analgesic drugs that act via different mechanisms on different receptors can be used [6].

These strategies collectively help in enhanced recovery of the patient and reduces hospital stay.

2.1 Non opioid pharmacological techniques

2.1.1 Acetaminophen

It acts via activating descending serotonergic pathways in the CNS and inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis [7]. When administered intravenously, onset of action is 5 minutes and peak plasma concentrations is attained within 15 minutes [8, 9]. Due to its minimal side effects and varied availability, this drug is widely used in the perioperative period. However, exceeding maximum daily dose of 4 grams in adults and 2–3 grams in frail adults can lead to dose dependant hepatotoxicity and poisoning [10]. When used with NSAIDS, opioid requirement was reduced by 20% [11]. In a study done by Moon et al. with 76 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, use of acetaminophen showed reduced requirement of opioid and its associated side effects [12]. Similar results were seen in the RCT study done by Unal et al., in patients undergoing open nephrectomy [13].

2.1.2 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The mechanism of action is inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) and synthesis of prostaglandins, which are mediators of peripheral sensitization and hyperalgesia. The COX1 and COX 2 isoforms act peripherally whereas COX3 isoform acts centrally [14]. COX-1 produces prostaglandins, which are important for general functions such as gastric protection and haemostasis. Whereas COX-2, produces prostaglandins that mediate pain, inflammation, fever, and carcinogenesis.

A systematic review of randomised trials was conducted which showed very clear benefits for selective COX2 inhibitors in reducing postoperative pain and further requirement of analgesia [15]. However, they should not be used in patients with a known history of coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular disease.

NSAIDs significantly decrease opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting and sedation [16].

The optimal dose of ketorolac (COX1 Inhibitor) for postoperative pain control is 15–30 mg intravenously every 6–8 hours (not to exceed 5 days). However, patients with renal dysfunction should receive a lower dose.

The recommended oral loading dose for Celecoxib (COX-2–specific inhibitor) is a 400 mg followed by 200 mg orally every 12 hours. The dose of injectable COX-2–specific inhibitor parecoxib is 40 mg intravenously or intramuscularly initially followed by 20–40 mg every 4–6 hours not to exceed 80 mg/day.

The nonselective NSAIDs may be avoided during the perioperative phase for a number of reasons, including platelet dysfunction, bronchospasm, gastrointestinal ulcers, and an increased risk of nephrotoxicity especially in patients with hypovolemia, congestive heart failure, and chronic renal insufficiency because prostaglandins dilate the renal vascular beds and mediate diuretic and natriuretic renal effects [17].

Ibuprofen IV and intranasal ketorolac are two newer NSAID formulations that have been approved for the treatment of immediate postoperative pain.

A meta-analysis done by Martinez et al. showed efficacy best with α-2 agonists, NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors when used alone and least with tramadol and acetaminophen [18].

In order to avoid systemic side effects transdermal patches can be used which have proven as efficacious as other routes of administration. In the study done by Bhargava et al., it is seen that diclofenac sodium patch proved to be as effective as diclofenac sodium intramuscular injection in post operative analgesia. With added advantages of longer onset of action, lesser local side effects like skin erythema, pruritis, oedema, abscess and necrosis and lesser gastrointestinal effects [19].

2.1.3 N-methyl D Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists

The spinal cord N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are activated by glutamate when C-fibre nociceptors fire repeatedly. Central sensitization results from the activation of NMDA receptors, which makes spinal cord neurons more receptive to all of their inputs thus causing prolonged postoperative pain.

Ketamine acts by non-competitively inhibiting NMDA receptors [20]. It also interacts with opioid, cholinergic, and monoaminergic receptors and blocks sodium channels [21]. Ketamine reduces postoperative pain significantly and also reduces opioid tolerance [22] and rescue analgesic requirements and pain intensity [23]. In a systematic review, it was discovered that IV ketamine for postoperative analgesia was an efficient adjunct, especially in patients undergoing major upper abdominal, thoracic, and orthopaedic surgeries [24]. Low-dose ketamine (0.25–0.5 mg intravenous bolus followed by an infusion of 2–4 μg/kg/min) can provide significant analgesia and is opioid-sparing.

Major side effect of ketamine is its impact on cognitive level (such as hallucinations, vivid dreams, diplopia, blurred vision, nystagmus, or dysphoria) of the patient which is usually not seen when administered in analgesic doses [25].

Dextromethorphan also acts by non-competitively inhibiting NMDA receptors. However, it poses a variety of side effects like nausea and vomiting (oral preparation) and hypotension and tachycardia (on large intravenous does). Hence intramuscular route od administration is preferred.

Magnesium also acts by non-competitively inhibiting NMDA receptors. A study done by Albrecht et al. showed that when magnesium was given intravenously peri-operatively, it could reduce opioid consumption, and also pain scores, in the first 24 hrs postoperatively, without any serious adverse effects [26]. Two different meta-analysis showed that magnesium showed reduction of pain both at rest and on movement with reduced postoperative requirement of opioids [27, 28].

2.1.4 Gabapentinoids

These were earlier developed as anti-epileptic drugs for the treatment of partial onset seizures which was later found to have analgesic properties and hence was used in neuropathic pain (e.g., postherpetic neuralgia), and other chronic pain states (e.g., fibromyalgia). These drugs have been recently used for acute perioperative pain relief also. These opioid sparing analgesics also have added advantage of reduced incidence of postoperative vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention.

Tissue damage makes dorsal horn neurons hyperexcited which is decreased by gabapentinoids. They bind presynaptically with calcium receptors (both in central and peripheral nervous system) thus redistributing the calcium channels away from its functional membrane bound site to its non-functional cytosolic site [29, 30].

The dose given to manage postoperative pain in an adult is 900 mg of gabapentin orally, 1–2 hours before surgery [31]. A saturable transport system in the gastrointestinal tract allows for the absorption of gabapentin, which results in a decline in bioavailability with increasing doses. As a result, as the drug dose is raised, the plasma drug concentration grows gradually less (e.g., nonlinear pharmacokinetics [32].

Pregabalin has better potency and lesser side effects compared to gabapentin for the treating of acute perioperative pain. A RCT study showed that when pregabalin was given at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, it reduced preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirement with better sleep quality [33]. A study done by Bekawi et al. showed that pregabalin when given perioperatively per orally with a dose of 150 mg, it proved to be very effective for postoperative pain when compared to pethidine [34].

2.1.5 Intravenous lidocaine

Lidocaine, an amide local anaesthetic and class 1b antiarrhythmic, when given intravenously inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels, voltage-gated calcium channels, various potassium channels, NMDA receptors, glycine system, and G protein pathways [35] and thus prevents hypersensitization and hyperalgesia [36].

Numerous clinical investigations indicate that perioperative systemic lidocaine administration reduces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines caused by surgical stress [37, 38, 39].

Some studies showed that when lidocaine infusion with dose 2 mg/kg/hr. was given intraoperatively and postoperatively for 8 hrs in patients undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopic abdominal surgery, there was quicker return of bowel movements and reduced postoperative pain, hence reduced need of opioid consumption [40, 41, 42].

However, some studies have reported a few adverse drug reactions associated with systemic lidocaine administration like drowsiness, perioral numbness, nausea and blood pressure changes [43]. Systemic lidocaine showed be used cautiously in patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Lidocaine is also available as transdermal patches which when applied on the laparoscopic port sites reduced postoperative pain [44].

2.1.6 Alpha-2 agonists

Analgesia is primarily mediated by presynaptic stimulation of alpha 2-receptors, which causes a reduction in the release of norepinephrine. Analgesia works at 3 sites, supraspinally (locus coeruleus), spinally (substantia gelatinosa), and peripherally.

Both clonidine and dexmedetomidine are selective partial agonists for the α2-adrenoreceptor, but the latter is 8 times more selective than the former.

Analgesia is seen supraspinally (locus coeruleus), spinally (substantia gelatinosa), and peripherally [45].

Dexmedetomidine has advantages over clonidine analgesia, titratable sedation (e.g., “cooperative sedation”), anxiolysis, cardioprotective, prevent respiratory depression associated with ketamine and opioid [46]. Loading dose of dexmedetomidine is 1 μg/kg intravenous over 10 minutes and maintenance dose is infusion of 0.2–0.7 μg/kg/hr [47].

2.1.7 Glucocorticoids

Analgesic effect mainly occurs due to by inhibiting leukotriene and prostaglandin production.

A recent study done by Koc et al. showed that when dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) and gabapentin (800 mg orally) were administered together 1 hour prior to varicocele surgery, postoperative analgesia was much better [48].

2.1.8 Surgical site infiltration

Intraperitoneal local anaesthetics- Here the local anaesthetic is sprayed in the right subdiaphragmatic region in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the beginning of the procedure. Many trials have shown significant positive results proving its efficacy extending to postoperative period. Local anaesthetics like lidocaine or bupivacaine can be used in different concentrations and volume [49, 50]. It has also been efficacious in other laparoscopic surgeries like gynaecological laparoscopy, sterilisation, fundoplication, appendectomy, etc. with postoperative analgesia upto 24 hours and reduced analgesia consumption by 50% [51].

Trocar and port site infiltration with local anaesthetics- Many studies have shown that trocar and port site infiltration of local anaesthetic in various layers of the abdominal wall is very helpful like in the preperitoneal or subfascial or subcutaneous layers [52, 53, 54]. A study done by Candiotti et al., used opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and liposome bupivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Here long-acting liposomal formulation of bupivacaine is infiltrated in the surgical site. This technique proved to show lower requirement of opioid and shorter duration of hospital stay [55].

2.2 Preoperative patient pain education and preparedness

Literature shows that postoperative pain remains undertreated despite decades of education and evidence-based guidelines [56]. Counselling and educating the patient and their family both preoperatively and postoperatively regarding the pain and its management plays a pivotal role in reduced pharmacological means of analgesia, especially opioids and sedatives [57].

2.3 Neuraxial analgesic techniques

Epidural analgesia is a key component of multimodal analgesia which can either be given as single shot dose or continuously with a catheter placed in situ. Successful epidural analgesia depends on a number of factors like site of catheter insertion, choice of analgesic drugs, rates of infusion, duration of analgesia, and type of pain (rest or dynamic).

Epidural analgesia works by, spinal and supraspinal mechanism. Spinal mechanism occurs when the drug diffuses into cerebrospinal fluid.

Better analgesia is seen when a local anaesthetic is combined with an opioid for epidural analgesia because when given epidurally opioid is devoid of significant sympatholytic and motor blockade and also the combination has synergistic effect. Adjuncts like clonidine and ketamine can also be added to improve duration and efficacy.

Epidural analgesia is contraindicated in a few conditions like severe coagulation abnormalities like disseminated intravascular coagulation. Cautious use in case of sepsis, increased intracranial pressure, thrombocytopenia, pre-existing central nervous system disorder, previous back surgery, pre-existing neurologic injury, back pain, etc.

Extended-release epidural morphine was also found effective for lower abdominal surgeries where the opioid, morphine in in a liposome delivery system. This system controls the release of morphine over a period of 48 hours postoperatively [58].

Intrathecal analgesia is a also widely accepted especially with opioids [59]. Other adjuncts can also be used like α2-agonists, NSAIDs, NMDA receptor antagonists, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, adenosine, epinephrine, and benzodiazepines.

2.4 Peripheral nerve blocks

There are numerous peripheral nerve blocks that enhance analgesia for both intraoperative and postoperative pain due to abdominal surgeries (both laparoscopic and laparotomy). These blocks can either be performed under landmark technique or ultrasound guided. Some of the blocks that will be discussed in brief with respect to abdominal surgeries are transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, paravertebral block, rectus sheath block, quadratus lumborum block, ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric block, erector spinae and other interfascial blocks.

2.4.1 Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

Four major muscles are considered with respect to transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. The transversus abdominis plane contains T6–L1 thoracolumbar nerves which supply sensitivity to the skin and muscles of the anterior abdominal wall, upper hip, groin, and thigh.

The landmark technique block is performed at the level of the Petit triangle (formed by the iliac crest as the inferior border, the latissimus dorsi as the posterior border, and the external oblique as the anterior border) with patient in supine position. The local anaesthetic is deposited when 2 pops are felt while advancing the needle in the triangle of petit.

There are various approaches to ultrasound guided TAP block like subcostal, lateral and posterior approaches.

A meta-analysis done by Yu n et al. showed that 24 hours VAS score in patients with TAP block was much less compared to patients who were given local wound infiltration [60]. A meta-analysis done by Zhao et al. showed that TAP block used in laparoscopic surgeries reduced the analgesic requirement postoperatively [61].

2.4.2 Rectus abdominus block

Rectus sheath is formed mainly by the aponeurosis of 3 main abdominal wall muscles (external oblique, internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles) which thus surrounds the rectus abdominus muscle. This sheath contains nerves from ventral rami arising from T7 to T11 intercostal nerves and the subcostal nerve (T12). This block is mainly useful in umbilical surgeries. This block is best performed under ultrasound guidance. With the transducer placed in the midline at the level of the umbilicus, the needle is passed through the rectus abdomnus muscle till the tip is on the posterior rectus sheath. Where the local anaesthetic is deposited.

In the study done by Kartaloy et al., the results showed that the patients who received rectus abdominus muscle block for abdominal surgeries requiring general anaesthesia had lower pain scores and reduced need for morphine when compared to patients who were given general anaesthesia alone [62].

In a study done by Gunaney et al., ultrasound guided rectus abdominus block was better than surgical site infiltration of local anaesthetic in patients undergoing umbilical hernia surgeries [63].

2.4.3 Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block

Both these nerves arise from L1 supplies sensory inputs to the skin of the lower abdominal wall, upper hip and upper thigh. This block has shown good analgesia in inguinal hernia surgeries especially in children.

In a study done on cadavers showed 95% successful block rates done under ultrasound guidance compared to blind technique [64].

A study done by Demirci et al. showed that this block done under ultrasound guidance for adult herniorrhaphies is better than landmark technique for providing postoperative analgesia [65].

2.4.4 Thoracic paravertebral block

This block is mainly useful for breast and thoracic surgeries but can also be used for upper abdominal surgeries when given at the level T6–T12 for providing postoperative analgesia.

Studies were done where sole thoracic paravertebral block was compared to spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgeries which showed lower pain scores in the early postoperative period [66, 67, 68, 69].

A study was done by Kaya et al. comparing the efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block and transversus abdominis plane block as adjunct where the former proved to be better as postoperative analgesia. This block has given good results also for cholecystectomy (both open and laparoscopic) [70, 71, 72] and ventral hernia surgeries and other urological and gynaecological procedures.

2.4.5 Erector spinae plane (ESP) block

It is an inter-fascial plane, where the local anaesthetic when deposited affects both the ventral and dorsal branches of the thoracic spinal nerves and the rami communicants that contain sympathetic nerve fibres. When given for abdominal surgeries at the level of T7, it gives both visceral and somatic analgesia. When administered the local anaesthetic spreads in both cranial and caudal directions [73, 74].

A study done by Altıparmak et al., showed erector spinae plane (US-ESP) block given under ultrasound guidance reduced the opioid requirement and pain scores postoperatively compared to TAP block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases [75].

2.4.6 Quadratus lumborum (QL) block

It is an interfascial block where the local anaesthetic is administered in thoracolumbar fascia which encloses quadratus lumborum, psoas major, and the erector spinae muscles which extends from T6-L1 [76].

This local anaesthetic provides blockade to referred dermatome.

Many case reports are published proving its efficacy for postoperative analgesia in major laparotomies. Two case reports done by Kadam et al. showed that QL block when given for open right hemi colectomy with a midline incision and laparotomy for duodenal tumour excision as a component of multimodal analgesia showed significant reduction of dynamic pain scores in the subsequent postoperative period [77, 78].

Another case report was done for a patient undergoing subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis where the patient received transmuscular QL block on the left side and TAP block on the right side (right side as control). It was found that sensation on the left side from T8-L1 was reduced and persisted for 48 hours while on the right side the sensation reduced from T10-L1 which only lasted for 48 hours.

2.5 Cognitive behavioural therapies (CBT)

Along with pharmaceutical medications, it can be employed as a component of multimodal pain control during the healing process (weak recommendation). The stress associated with anxiety for surgery aggravates pain and this will become a vicious cycle. Hence different types of cognitive behavioural therapies act like adjuncts in alleviating pain. The various types of cognitive behavioural therapies are music therapy, relaxation techniques, guided imagery, intraoperative conversation with patient, hypnosis, electro analgesia in the form of transcutaneous or peripheral electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture [79, 80, 81].

Music therapy alleviates pain by attention shift or cognitive coping [82]. Role of music in the postoperative period was studied by Hole et al. in the form of a systematic review. It was seen that patients who used music with noise cancelling headphones during trans rectal biopsy were found to have lesser pain scores compared to use of noise-cancelling headphones alone [83]. Another analysis done with 73 randomised controlled studies and 20,458 patients showed that music reduced both post-operative pain and anxiety and hence increased patient satisfaction scores. Music therapy was also seen to be beneficial when patients were under general anaesthesia [84]. However, more research is necessary for establishing evidence on the type and duration of music therapy for adequate opioid sparing.

A randomised control trial done in patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries showed the reduced requirement of propofol and lidocaine when these patients underwent clinical hypnosis [85].

Advertisement

3. Conclusion

Good perioperative pain control is the key for early recovery in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) especially in emergency surgeries. It is important for the clinicians to have patient-oriented strategies for the overall faster recovery of these patients. It is crucial to begin pain relief therapy before the surgery because patients scheduled for emergency surgeries already endure excruciating pain. Hence for early recovery opioid sparing multimodal analgesia management should be followed as advocated by ERAS. Use of multiple modalities in treating perioperative pain helps reduce the dose and side effects of a single drug or modality. This strategy has been demonstrated to enhance prospects for these patients with very high risks. Use of regional anaesthetic procedures should be promoted as improved results are observed. The goal here should be to provide appropriate and safer pain management methods to reduce perioperative pain.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, et al. Management of Postoperative Pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American pain society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ committee on regional Anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council. The Journal of Pain. 2016;17(2):131-157
  2. 2. Dahan A, Aarts L, Smith TW. Incidence, reversal, and prevention of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):226-238
  3. 3. Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, Anderson ID, Bang Foss N, Cooper Z, et al. Guidelines for perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: Part 1—Preoperative: Diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(5):1272-1290
  4. 4. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(3):725-741
  5. 5. Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(4):1123-1133
  6. 6. Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001;87(1):62-72
  7. 7. Sinatra RS, Jahr JS, Reynolds L, Groudine SB, Royal MA, Breitmeyer JB, et al. Intravenous acetaminophen for pain after major Orthopedic surgery: An expanded analysis: IV acetaminophen for pain after major Orthopedic surgery. Pain Practice. 2012;12(5):357-365
  8. 8. McNicol ED, Ferguson MC, Haroutounian S, Carr DB, Schumann R. Single dose intravenous paracetamol or intravenous propacetamol for postoperative pain. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. Cochrane Database System Review. 2016;2016:23. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3
  9. 9. Liukas A, Kuusniemi K, Aantaa R, Virolainen P, Niemi M, Neuvonen PJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous paracetamol in elderly patients. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2011;50(2):121-129
  10. 10. American Geriatrics Society Panel on the Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons: Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society. 2009;57(8):1331-1346
  11. 11. Cao X, Elvir-Lazo OL, White PF, Yumul R, Tang J. An update on pain management for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2016;29(6):674-682
  12. 12. Moon YE, Lee YK, Lee J, Moon DE. The effects of preoperative intravenous acetaminophen in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;284(6):1455-1460
  13. 13. Unal SS, Aksoy M, Ahiskalioglu A, Erdem AF, Adanur S. The effect of intravenous preemptive paracetamol on postoperative fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing open nephrectomy: A prospective randomized study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015;18(1):68-74
  14. 14. Svensson CI, Yaksh TL. The spinal phospholipase-cyclooxygenase-Prostanoid Cascade in nociceptive processing. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2002;42(1):553-583
  15. 15. Straube S, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Effect of preoperative Cox-II-selective NSAIDs (coxibs) on postoperative outcomes: A systematic review of randomized studies. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2005;49(5):601-613
  16. 16. Marret E, Kurdi O, Zufferey P, Bonnet F, Warltier DC. Effects of nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory drugs on patient-controlled analgesia morphine side effects. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(6):1249-1260
  17. 17. Rowlingson JC, Eisenach JC. Essentials of pain medicine and regional Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(6):1154-1154
  18. 18. Martinez V, Beloeil H, Marret E, Fletcher D, Ravaud P, Trinquart L. Non-opioid analgesics in adults after major surgery: Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;118(1):22-31
  19. 19. Bhargava G, Bansal D, Sidhu A, Bhatia A. Diclofenac patch: A better alternative to injectable diclofenac in postoperative pain management. International Surgery Journal. Nov 2015;2(4):623-628
  20. 20. Thomson AM, West DC, Lodge D. An N-methylaspartate receptor-mediated synapse in rat cerebral cortex: A site of action of ketamine? Nature. 1985;313(6002):479-481
  21. 21. Weinbroum AA. A single small dose of postoperative ketamine provides rapid and sustained improvement in morphine analgesia in the presence of morphine-resistant pain. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2003;2003:789-795
  22. 22. Laskowski K, Stirling A, McKay WP, Lim HJ. A systematic review of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2011;58(10):911-923
  23. 23. Dahmani S, Michelet D, Abback PS, Wood C, Brasher C, Nivoche Y, et al. Ketamine for perioperative pain management in children: A meta-analysis of published studies: Ketamine for perioperative analgesia. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2011;21(6):636-652
  24. 24. Morgan CJA, Curran HV. Acute and chronic effects of ketamine upon human memory: A review. Psychopharmacology. 2006;188(4):408-424
  25. 25. Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Kargi E, Ozkocak I, Hosnuter M, Demirel CB, et al. The postoperative analgesic effect of tramadol when used as subcutaneous local anesthetic. Anaesthesia Analgesic. Nov 2004;99(5):1461-1464
  26. 26. Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Liu SS, Brull R. Peri-operative intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate and postoperative pain: A meta-analysis: Peri-operative intravenous magnesium and postoperative pain. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(1):79-90
  27. 27. De Oliveira GS, Castro-Alves LJ, Khan JH, McCarthy RJ. Perioperative systemic magnesium to minimize postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(1):178-190
  28. 28. Murphy JD, Paskaradevan J, Eisler LL, Ouanes JPP, Tomas VAG, Freck EA, et al. Analgesic efficacy of continuous intravenous magnesium infusion as an adjuvant to morphine for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2013;22(1):11-20
  29. 29. Zhang J, Ho KY, Wang Y. Efficacy of pregabalin in acute postoperative pain: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;106(4):454-462
  30. 30. Taylor CP. Mechanisms of analgesia by gabapentin and pregabalin—Calcium channel α2-δ [Cavα2-δ] ligands. Pain. 2009;142(1):13-16
  31. 31. Turan A, White PF, Karamanlioğlu B, Memis D, Taşdoğan M, Pamukçu Z, et al. Gabapentin: An alternative to the Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for perioperative pain management. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2006;102(1):175-181
  32. 32. Gilron I. Gabapentin and pregabalin for chronic neuropathic and early postsurgical pain: Current evidence and future directions. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2007;20(5):456-472
  33. 33. Shimony N, Amit U, Minz B, Grossman R, Dany MA, Gonen L, et al. Perioperative pregabalin for reducing pain, analgesic consumption, and anxiety and enhancing sleep quality in elective neurosurgical patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2016;125(6):1513-1522
  34. 34. Bekawi MS, El Wakeel LM, Al Taher WMA, Mageed WMA. Clinical study evaluating Pregabalin efficacy and tolerability for pain Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2014;30(11):944-952
  35. 35. van der Wal SEI, van den Heuvel SAS, Radema SA, van Berkum BFM, Vaneker M, Steegers MAH, et al. The in vitro mechanisms and in vivo efficacy of intravenous lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain. European Journal of Pain. 2016;20(5):655-674
  36. 36. Kawamata M, Takahashi T, Kozuka Y, Nawa Y, Nishikawa K, Narimatsu E, et al. Experimental incision-induced pain in human skin: Effects of systemic lidocaine on flare formation and hyperalgesia. Pain. 2002;100(1):77-89
  37. 37. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, Wong CS, Yeh CC, Sheen MJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006;97(5):640-646
  38. 38. Yardeni IZ, Beilin B, Mayburd E, Levinson Y, Bessler H. The effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative pain and immune function. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2009;109(5):1464-1469
  39. 39. Sridhar P, Sistla SC, Ali SM, Karthikeyan VS, Badhe AS, Ananthanarayanan PH. Effect of intravenous lignocaine on perioperative stress response and post-surgical ileus in elective open abdominal surgeries: A double-blind randomized controlled trial: Attenuation of stress response with lignocaine. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2015;85(6):425-429
  40. 40. Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y, Gan TJ. Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2012;55(11):1183-1194
  41. 41. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2010;70(9):1149-1163
  42. 42. Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative use of intravenous lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(4):729-737
  43. 43. Peixoto RD, Hawley P. Intravenous lidocaine for Cancer pain without electrocardiographic monitoring: A retrospective review. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2015;18(4):373-377
  44. 44. Kwon YS, Kim JB, Jung HJ, Koo YJ, Lee IH, Im KT, et al. Treatment for postoperative wound pain in Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: Topical lidocaine patches. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Advances Surgery Technology. 2012;22(7):668-673
  45. 45. Chan AKM, Cheung CW, Chong YK. Alpha-2 agonists in acute pain management. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2010;11(17):2849-2868
  46. 46. Ebert T, Maze M. Dexmedetomidine: Another arrow for the Clinician’s quiver. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(3):568-570
  47. 47. Gerlach AT, Dasta JF. Dexmedetomidine: An updated review. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2007;41(2):245-254
  48. 48. Koç S, Memis D, Sut N. The preoperative use of gabapentin, dexamethasone, and their combination in Varicocele surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2007;105(4):1137-1142
  49. 49. Weber A, Muñoz J, Garteiz D, Cueto J. Use of subdiaphragmatic bupivacaine instillation to control postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy. 1997;7(1):6-8
  50. 50. Mraovič B, Jurišič T, Kogler-Majeric V, Sustic A. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 1997;41(2):193-196
  51. 51. Cunniffe MG, McAnena OJ, Dar MA, Calleary J, Flynn N. A prospective randomized trial of intraoperative bupivacaine irrigation for management of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. American Journal of Surgery. 1998;176(3):258-261
  52. 52. Ke R. A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998;92(6):972-975
  53. 53. Saff GN, Marks RA, Kuroda M, Rozan JP, Hertz R. Analgesic effect of bupivacaine on extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Anesthesia Analgesia. 1998;87(2):377-381
  54. 54. Deans GT, Wilson MS, Brough WA. Controlled trial of preperitoneal local anaesthetic for reducing pain following laparoscopic hernia repair. The British Journal of Surgery. 2003;85(7):1013-1014
  55. 55. Candiotti KA, Sands LR, Lee E, Bergese SD, Harzman AE, Marcet J, et al. Liposome bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy: Results from prospective phase IV sequential cohort studies assessing health economic outcomes. Current Therapeutic Research. 2014;76:1-6
  56. 56. O’Donnell KF. Preoperative pain management education: A quality improvement project. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2015;30(3):221-227
  57. 57. Khorfan R, Shallcross ML, Yu B, Sanchez N, Parilla S, Coughlin JM, et al. Preoperative patient education and patient preparedness are associated with less postoperative use of opioids. Surgery. 2020;167(5):852-858
  58. 58. Hartrick CT, Hartrick KA. Extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur™): Review and safety analysis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2008;8(11):1641-1648
  59. 59. Rathmell JP, Lair TR, Nauman B. The role of intrathecal drugs in the treatment of acute pain. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005;101(5S):S30-S43
  60. 60. Yu N, Long X, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Succar J, Xin X, Wang X. Transversus abdominis-plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration in lower abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiology. 2014;14(1):121
  61. 61. Zhao X, Tong Y, Ren H, Ding XB, Wang X, Zong JY, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2014;7(9):2966-2975
  62. 62. Kartalov A, Jankulovski N, Kuzmanovska B, Zdravkovska M, Shosholcheva M, Tolevska M, et al. The effect of rectus sheath block as a supplement of general Anesthesia on postoperative analgesia in adult patient undergoing umbilical hernia repair. Prilozi. 2017;38(3):135-142
  63. 63. Gurnaney HG, Maxwell LG, Kraemer FW, Goebel T, Nance ML, Ganesh A. Prospective randomized observer-blinded study comparing the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and local anaesthetic infiltration for umbilical hernia repair. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;107(5):790-795
  64. 64. Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, Curatolo M, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: Accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006;97(2):238-243
  65. 65. Demirci A, Efe EM, Türker G, Gurbet A, Kaya FN, Anil A, et al. Iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in inguinal hernia repair for postoperative pain management: Comparison of the anatomical landmark and ultrasound guided techniques. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2014;64(5):350-356
  66. 66. Akcaboy EY, Akcaboy ZN, Gogus N. Ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: Paravertebral block versus spinal anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2009;75(12):684-691
  67. 67. Bhattacharya P, Mandal MC, Mukhopadhyay S, Das S, Pal PP, Basu SR. Unilateral paravertebral block: An alternative to conventional spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2010;54(2):246-251
  68. 68. Mandal MC, Das S, Gupta S, Ghosh TR, Basu SR. Paravertebral block can be an alternative to unilateral spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;55(6):584-589
  69. 69. Fusco P, Cofini V, Petrucci E, Scimia P, Paladini G, Behr AU, et al. Unilateral paravertebral block compared with subarachnoid anesthesia for the management of postoperative pain syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pain. 2016;157(5):1105-1113
  70. 70. Agarwal A, Batra RK, Chhabra A, Subramaniam R, Misra MC. The evaluation of efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012;6(4):344-349
  71. 71. Abou Zeid HA, Al-Ghamdi AMA, Abdel-Hadi MSA, Zakaria HM, Al-Quorain AAA, Shawkey MN. Bilateral paravertebral block in advanced schistosomal liver disease: A prospective study. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterological Official Journal of Saudi Gastroenterological Association. 2004;10(2):67-77
  72. 72. Naja MZ, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T5-6) vs. general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2004;21(6):489-495
  73. 73. Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):452-460
  74. 74. Restrepo-Garces CE, Chin KJ, Suarez P, Diaz A. Bilateral continuous erector Spinae plane block contributes to effective postoperative analgesia after major open abdominal surgery: A case report. Case Report. 2017;9(11):319-321
  75. 75. Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Kuşçu Y, Gümüş DS. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019;57:31-36
  76. 76. Visoiu M, Yakovleva N. Continuous postoperative analgesia via quadratus lumborum block—An alternative to transversus abdominis plane block. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2013;23(10):959-961
  77. 77. Kadam V. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as a postoperative analgesic technique for laparotomy. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2013;29(4):550
  78. 78. Kadam V. Ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block or posterior transversus abdominis plane block catheter infusion as a postoperative analgesic technique for abdominal surgery. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2015;31(1):130
  79. 79. Zhang Q , Li YN, Guo YY, Yin CP, Gao F, Xin X, et al. Effects of preconditioning of electro-acupuncture on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(26):e7375
  80. 80. Meissner W. The role of acupuncture and transcutaneous-electrical nerve stimulation for postoperative pain control. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2009;22(5):623-626
  81. 81. Chandra A, Banavaliker J, Das P, Hasti S. Use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as an adjunctive to epidural analgesia in the management of acute thoracotomy pain. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010;54(2):116
  82. 82. Pyati S, Gan TJ. Perioperative pain management. CNS Drugs. 2007;21(3):185-211
  83. 83. Tsivian M, Qi P, Kimura M, Chen VH, Chen SH, Gan TJ, et al. The effect of noise-cancelling headphones or music on pain perception and anxiety in men undergoing Transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology. 2012;79(1):32-36
  84. 84. Hole J, Hirsch M, Ball E, Meads C. Music as an aid for postoperative recovery in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2015;386(10004):1659-1671
  85. 85. Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedure-related pain in children and adolescents: A comprehensive methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;32(4):328-339

Written By

K. Madan and Ramya B. Sriram

Submitted: 10 December 2022 Reviewed: 24 January 2023 Published: 16 February 2023