Different microwave bands and the corresponding magnetic field.
1. Introduction
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is similar to the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) where both of them describe the case of resonance of an atomic particle as a result of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation absorption in the presence of external magnetic field. The main difference is that NMR is related to nucleus, while EPR is related to the unpaired electron.
1.1. Basic concepts
The electron, as a charged rotating particle, possesses a magnetic field which makes the electron appears as a minute magnet [1]. In normal cases, for the unpaired electron (single electron), the spin energy levels are degenerate, and electrons spin randomly.
After applying an external magnetic field, spin energy levels split, and electrons spin either aligned to or opposite to the direction of the magnetic field. Splitting of the spin energy levels results in the emergence of some energy difference (
When incident photon energy (
Such process is expressed by the following formula:
where
1.2. Spectrometer structure
A conventional continuous wave (cw) spectrometer is represented in Figure 2. The figure is composed of four groups: the source components, the magnet system, the detection system, and the modulation system. The function of the first group, the source, is to produce the electromagnetic radiation and holds the sample to be subjected to the incident waves. The source region also controls and directs the incident microwaves. The magnet system helps to provide the required magnetic field necessary for splitting the energy level; the field must be homogeneous and stable over the desired range. Both of the modulation system and the detection system act to amplify the received signal and to record it [3].
1.3. High-field high-frequency measurements
Usually, EPR measurements are carried out at X-band and Q-band due to the instrumental availability, where conventional electromagnets can provide up to 1 Tesla. However, higher spectral resolution needs led to the use of more advanced EPR measurements with higher microwave bands and more intensive magnets. Currently, there are many bands for EPR measurements according to the practical requirements. Table 1 represents different microwave frequencies and the corresponding values for magnetic field [4, 5].
Waveband | L | S | C | X | P | K | Q | U | V | E | W | F | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
λ/mm | 300 | 100 | 75 | 30 | 20 | 12.5 | 8.5 | 6 | 4.6 | 4 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
ν/GHz | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 24 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 75 | 95 | 111 | 140 |
H/T | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 1.25 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 4.9 |
The higher the frequency is used, the more intensive magnetic field is needed to reach the resonance. High-field high-frequency measurements can provide more detailed spectra and hence more molecular information.
References
- 1.
Philip Rieger H. Electron Spin Resonance. Analysis and Interpretation. Vol. 104. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Annual Reports on the Progress of Chemistry, Section C: Physical Chemistry, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2007. pp. 81-123 - 2.
Nakagawa K, Eaton GR, Eaton SS. Electron spin relaxation times of irradiated alanine. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part A. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1993; 44 :73-77 - 3.
Weil JA, Bolton JR, Wertz JE. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, Elementary Theory and Practical Applications. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1994 - 4.
Brustolon M, Giamello E. Electron Paramgnetic Resonance: A Practitioner’s Toolkit. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009 - 5.
Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Barr DP, Weber RT. Quantitative EPR. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 2010