Heavy metal contents of polluted river water and Karachi coastal water
Abstract
Stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C), sulfur (δ34S), oxygen (δ18O), hydrogen (δ2H), nitrogen (δ15N), and radioactive isotope of hydrogen (tritium) have been applied in combination with conventional techniques (chemical) to investigate Karachi coastal water pollution due to Layari and Malir rivers, which mainly carry the domestic and industrial wastewater of Karachi Metropolitan. Heavy metal contents of the Manora Channel and southeast coastal waters were higher than the Swedish guidelines for the quality of seawater. By contrast, heavy metal concentrations in coastal sediments were found to be significantly higher than that of seawater. Mn and Ni contents in sediments of entire coast (Manora Channel, southeast and northwest coast) were above USEPA guidelines except at Buleji site, whereas Cr, Zn, and Cu levels only in Manora Channel sediments were higher than USEPA guidelines. The higher heavy metal contents of Manora Channel water and sediments can be attributed to an influx of a major portion of untreated industrial and/or domestic wastewater. Layari and Malir river water was observed to be depleted in δ13C(TDIC)and δ34S, which showed heavy influx of sewage into these rivers. Manora Channel water was also depleted in δ13CTDIC and δ34S during low tide environment, showing a large-scale domestic wastewater mixing with seawater. Southeast coastal water was found to be slightly enriched in δ13C(TDIC) and δ34S and exhibited mixing of relatively small quantity of sewage with the seawater as compared to the Manora Channel. δ13C(TDIC) and δ34S contents of northwest coastal water were close to the values meant for normal seawater. δ13C and δ15N contents of Karachi coastal seaweed ranged from -31.1‰ to -4.9‰ PDB and from 6.1‰ to 17.8‰ air, respectively. The average δ15N values (10.2‰ air) of Ulva spp. collected from nonpolluted northwest coast was higher as compared to the average δ15N contents (8.0‰ air) of Ulva from the Manora Channel, suggesting that nitrogen isotopic ratios of Ulva spp. could be a good indicator of sewage pollution. The results of a two-component isotope mass balance equation using δ13C and δ34S values for Layari and Malir rivers and coastal water indicated that tide conditions and distance of sampling site from the pollution source were the main factors to control the transport and dissemination of Layari river pollution into the Manora Channel. High tide environment slowed down the Layari river water mixing with seawater coupled with a gradual decrease in pollution levels from the Layari River outfall zone to the Manora Lighthouse.
Keywords
- isotope
- carbon
- sulfur
- oxygen
- mixing
- sediments
- seawater
- coastal
- algae
- metals
- Karachi
- marine
- pollution
1. Introduction
Marine pollution due to anthropogenic activities has now become a worldwide environmental concern [33]. Several researchers [9, 53, 60, W.Q.C., 1972;] have reported the influence of the indiscriminate discharge of untreated industrial effluent and municipal wastewater on the marine environment in terms of danger to habitats, serious risk to marine life, deterioration of aesthetic values, and limited access to coastal areas. Hence, monitoring of marine coastal environment is essential to understand the origin, distribution, fate, and behavior of marine pollutants to formulate a viable management strategy [17]. A variety of techniques ranging from conventional methods to most sophisticated isotopic techniques are available for monitoring the marine coastal pollution [15]. Isotope analysis is an engineering tool that can be used to characterize the pollutants to trace the contributions of pollutants from different sources within the mixing zones of estuaries, coastal water, and shelf water [30].
Like other coastal regions of the world, the Karachi coast, especially the Manora Channel, is heavily polluted due to untreated industrial wastewater and Metropolitan municipal sewage, which are indiscriminately discharged into coastal waters through Layari and Malir rivers [68]. According to a report [32], only 20% of total annual wastewater produced in Metropolitan Karachi is treated and the rest is discharged directly into coastal waters. Sea pollution is further enhanced due to oil spills from cargo ships and oil tankers. The dredging of channel round the year also adds pollution to coastal water in terms of suspended sediments load. This situation demands to characterize the coastal water in order to determine pollution load, its extent, and type. Past attempts to investigate the pollution load of Karachi coastal water [31, 5, 52, 54, 57, 67] were only confined to the use of physicochemical and hydrological techniques. Very recently, [2], however, attempts have been made to apply nuclear techniques to study radionuclide pollution along Pakistan coast. The present study was aimed to apply stable isotope techniques in conjunction with classical pollution monitoring tools to characterize the pollution type and its transport, the mixing of pollutants with sea water, and the origin of salinity in coastal aquifer.
1.1. Coastal areas of Pakistan
A 990-km-long strip of coastal area of Pakistan is stretched from Southeast (Ron of Katch) to Northwest (Gwader) along the Arabian sea [28]. It is geographically divided into two main zones, Baluchistan coastal belt (745 Km) and Sindh coastal belt (245 Km), as shown in Figure 1. Sindh coastal belt includes Indus Delta and Karachi Coast. The Baluchistan coastal belt is scarcely populated and is relatively pollution free. Sindh coastal belt, however, suffers very serious environmental problems because of greater population and industrial activities in Metropolitan Karachi, which is the largest city of Pakistan and is located at latitude 24° 48´ N and longitude 66° 59′ E on the coast of the Arabian Sea.
1.2. Description of pollution sources of Karachi coast
Metropolitan municipal sewage and industrial effluent are two major sources of coastal water pollution. The untreated effluent of more than six thousand industrial units scattered in six big industrial estates along with 300 Mgd municipal wastewater is discharged into Karachi coastal waters through Malir and Layari rivers [67]. Layari River passes right through the center of the Karachi Metropolitan while Malir river flows mainly through eastern part of the city (Figure 2). Both rivers act as an open sewage drain, receiving highly polluted wastewater of industrial and domestic origin. In accordance with a report [32], the Layari River discharges 130,000 tons of solid nitrogen, 160,000 tons of organic matter, 800 tons of nitrogen compounds, 90 tons of phosphate compounds, and 12,000 tons of suspended solid every year in the Manora Channel.
1.3. Stable isotope techniques
Naturally occurring isotopes are found in both stable and radioactive forms in the environment and are known as environmental isotopes [13]. Isotopes of an element exhibit similar chemical properties but differ in physical properties. The difference in the physical properties (bond strength and velocity) gives rise to fractionation among isotopes of an element in an environmental matrix. Fractionation takes place by natural processes, such as evaporation, condensation, and diffusion (kinetic isotope effects), or by ordinary mixing processes. Isotope fractionation leads to isotope variation, which makes it possible to use isotopes as tracers for the study of diverse nature of pollution problems [16, 22, 25, 39]. Figure 3 illustrates the natural variations of 18O, 13C, 15N, and 2H in environmental matrices.
Stable isotopes such as isotopes of light elements (hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, and chlorine) in combination with conventional techniques are most commonly used in the environmental studies [30, 40, 43, 58].
2. Objectives of the study
The main objectives of the study were as follows:
To establish baseline inventories of stable isotopes (carbon, sulfur, hydrogen and oxygen), chemical parameters (physicochemical, heavy metal) in marine coastal waters, and/or sediments along Karachi coast for pollution monitoring
To determine the extent of mixing of polluted waters of Layari and Malir rivers into the Karachi coastal waters using stable isotopes of carbon (13C), oxygen (18O), and sulfur (34S)
To study the potential of stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) compositions of seaweeds and mangroves as pollution tracers in coastal area of Karachi
To determine potable water quality and to identify sources and dynamics of groundwater salinization of Karachi coastal aquifer using stable isotope of oxygen (δ18O) and hydrogen (δD) along with hydrochemical data
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Location of sampling sites
For sampling, Karachi coast was broadly divided into three zones: (i) Manora Channel, (ii) southeast coast, and (iii) northwest coast (Figure 4). Seawater from the Manora Channel was sampled from several sites, including Layari River outfall zone, Fish Harbor, KPT Shipyard Butti, KPT Shipyard, Kaemari Boat Basin, Bhaba Island, Bhit Island, Boat Club, Pakistan Naval Academy, and Manora Lighthouse (Figure 5). Sampling sites along the southeast coast include Marina Plaza, Casino, Naval Jetty, Marina Club, Ghizri area, and Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor, whereas along the northwest coast, sampling sites are Manora island sea side, PNS Himalaya, Kakka Pir, Buleji, Power house, and Sunari point. Figure 6 shows the locations of these sites. The location of sampling points was determined with Garmin GPS-100 Personal NavigatorTM (M/S Garmin, 11206 Thompson Avenue, Lenexa, KS 66219).
3.2. Sample collection and preservation
The period of field sampling was spanned over 2 years (April 2002–September 2004). This period was selected in order to cover overall variation in pollution transport pattern due to monsoon system. To investigate invasion of seawater, water samples were collected from Layari River, Malir River, Indus river, Hab dam, Karachi sea, shallow aquifer (depth <50 m), and deep aquifer (depth >50 m). All the water samples were preserved in accordance with standard procedure [51, 45, 64].
3.3. Chemical analysis
Samples of seawater, river water, and groundwater were characterized in terms of electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity, and pH.Turbidity was measured with a portable turbidity meter. Each instrument was duly calibrated before use. Major ions were Cl-, SO4-2, and HCO3-1
3.4. Stable isotope analysis
The stable isotope analyses were performed using a modified Varian Mat GD-150 Mass Spectrometer. Stable isotope data are reported as standard mean ocean water (SMOW) for 18O and 2H analyses, Pee-Dee Belemnite (PDB) for 13C analysis of total dissolve inorganic carbon, and Canyon Diablo Troilite (CDT)for 34S. The overall analytical errors are ± 0.01‰ for δ13C, ± 0.1‰ for δ18O and δ34S, and ±1‰ forδ2H measurements. To ensure precision, the standard deviation of the mass spectrometer was also computed, and the standard deviation of each sample was ensured to be within permissible limit. For isotope analysis on mass spectrometer, water/sediments/plant samples are converted into gas phase. Since different sample preparation systems are used for analysis of C, S, N, O, and H, these systems were accordingly modified/redesigned in laboratory.
3.5. Determination of polluted water mixing with coastal water
A two-component isotope mixing equation was used to compute polluted river water mixing with coastal water. The mixing fraction (
where δ13CA is the δ13C (TDIC) of polluted river water, δ3CB is the δ13C (TDIC) of nonpolluted Karachi sea water, and δ13CM is the δ13C (TDIC) of contaminated sea water. To calculate the percent fraction of polluted river water into seawater, Equation 2 was obtained:
δ13C was replaced with δ34S and δ18O for computing mixing through δ34S and δ18O isotopes values.
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Chemical characteristics of coastal water and sediments
Heavy metals are considered as one of the hazardous pollutants in natural environment due to their toxicity, persistence, risk (direct/indirect) to human beings and aquatic life [1, 10, 11, 62], and long-term damage to the environment [21, 62]. Metal elements are added to water bodies of our environment either through natural processes and/or anthropogenic activities. Heavy metals like Cu, Cr, Ni, Mn, and Zn are listed among metals known to be essential for aquatic life [59]. However, these metal elements have well-known toxic effects if they are present above permissible limits [62]. Heavy metal load in seawater/sediments is especially measured in this study because of their continuous addition to seawater due to the indiscriminate discharge of municipal sewage and industrial effluent through Layari and Malir rivers [8, 37, 38, 46, 68].
4.1.1. Heavy metal concentration of polluted rivers and coastal waters
Heavy metal levels in Layari and Malir river water and Karachi coastal waters are summarized in Table 1. Cr contents of Malir river water are relatively higher as compared to Layari River, which could be due to a continuous discharge of untreated effluents of tannery industrial units into Malir River. Higher Cu and Zn concentrations in Layari River can be explained best due to the influx of wastewater of industrial units of cable, electrical appliances, electroplating, textile, and glass [36]. Elevated levels of Ni and Mn in water of Layari and Malir rivers owe to the inflow of untreated effluents such as automobile batteries, electroplating, car painting dying, and glass industries [67].
|
|
||||
Cu | Cr | Mn | Ni | Zn | |
Layari River | 124 ± 8 | 300 ± 13 | 190 ± 6 | 180 ± 10 | 360 ± 7 |
Malir River | 110 ± 7 | 400 ± 11 | 200 ± 8 | 190 ± 11 | 180 ± 5 |
Manora Channel | |||||
Layari River outfall | 75 ± 4 | 110 ± 5 | 130 ± 6 | 67± 4 | 220 ± 7 |
Karachi Fish Harbor | 64 ± 7 | 87 ± 4 | 120 ± 3 | 66 ± 3 | 210 ± 8 |
KPT Shipyard | 56 ± 5 | 98 ± 5 | 88 ± 4 | 65 ± 3 | 220 ± 7 |
KPT Shipyard (Butti) | 54 ± 4 | 82 ± 5 | 86 ± 5 | 64 ± 3 | 200 ± 8 |
Bhaba Island | 54 ± 3 | 78 ± 4 | 88 ± 5 | 45 ± 2 | 125 ± 4 |
Bhit Island | 45 ± 2 | 76 ± 3 | 56 ± 3 | 42 ± 2 | 127 ± 4 |
Boat Club | 22 ± 1 | 55 ± 5 | 43 ± 4 | 21 ± 1 | 82 ± 3 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | 21 ± 1 | 50 ± 4 | 39 ± 4 | 18 ± 1 | 78 ± 4 |
Manora Lighthouse | 19 ± 1 | 50 ± 4 | 40 ± 3 | 18 ± 0.5 | 67 ± 6 |
Southeast coast | |||||
Marina Plaza | 20 ± 2 | 54 ± 4 | 40 ± 2 | 11 ± 0.9 | 42 ± 3 |
Casino | 21± 2 | 50 ± 4 | 47 ± 7 | 11 ± 0.7 | 44 ± 4 |
Naval Jetty | 25 ± 3 | 49 ± 3 | 56 ± 5 | 11 ± 0.6 | 40 ± 6 |
Marina Club | 29 ± 2 | 59 ± 2 | 75 ± 7 | 12 ± 0.6 | 56 ± 3 |
Ghizri area | 76 ± 4 | 77 ± 5 | 120 ± 9 | 69 ± 4 | 143 ± 8 |
Ibrahim Haideri | 49 ± 3 | 72 ± 5 | 110 ± 7 | 34 ± 3 | 90 ± 6 |
Northwest coast | |||||
PNS Himalaya | 10 ± 0.8 | 59 ± 4 | 10 ± 0.6 | 11 ± 1 | 35 ± 3 |
Sandspit | 10 ± 0.8 | 53 ± 5 | 23 ± 2 | 9 ± 0.9 | 42 ± 4 |
Kakka Pir | 11± 0.9 | 56 ± 7 | 29 ± 2 | 7 ± 0.5 | 30 ± 2 |
Buleji | 8 ± 0.6 | 45 ± 4 | 28 ± 1 | 8 ± 0.8 | 16 ± 2 |
Power House | 10 ± 0.7 | 30 ± 5 | 27 ± 3 | 9 ± 0.5 | 10 ± 1 |
Sunari point | 8 ± 0.4 | 30 ± 3 | 25 ± 2 | 10 ± 0.4 | 10 ± 1 |
LOD* (ppb) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
Swedish guidelines for safe seawater for aquatic life are divided into three broad classes depending upon the degree of environmental disturbance (Table 2). Class 3 shows safe limit of heavy metal content in seawater. Class 4 indicates an increased risk of environmental disturbance, and class 5 represents a high risk of environmental disturbance even at shorter exposure.
|
|
|||
Cu | Cr | Ni | Zn | |
SNV* Class 3 | 5–15 | 3–9 | 15–45 | 20–60 |
SNV Class 4 | 15–75 | 9–45 | 45–225 | 60–300 |
SNV Class 5 | >75 | >45 | >225 | >300 |
4.1.2. Heavy metal contentsof sea sediments
Surficial sediments are a feeding source for biological life, a transporting agent for pollutants, and an ultimate sink for organic and inorganic matter settling. In heavily polluted sediments, the anthropogenically introduced components by far exceed the natural components and pose a risk to the marine ecosystem [4, 66]. Many researchers [5, 31, 36, 55, 56] attempted to evaluate heavy metal pollution of Karachi coastal sediments. Heavy metals in sediments are generally much higher as compared to seawater because heavy metals entering from other sources into seawater ultimately deposit onto sediments [19, 41]. As shown in Table 3, Mn and Ni contents in coastal sediments of Karachi are much higher than EPA guidelines at all sites except at one site (Kakka Pir).
|
|
||||
Mn | Cr | Ni | Zn | Cu | |
|
|||||
Layari River outfall | 300 ± 29 | 293 ± 23 | 48 ± 6.1 | 537± 27 | 96± 8.4 |
KarachiFish Harbor | 300 ± 30 | 102 ± 12 | 25 ± 2.1 | 581± 19 | 54± 4.4 |
KPT Shipyard | 600 ± 21 | 319 ± 21 | 56± 6.2 | 666± 17 | 65± 57 |
KPT Shipyard (Butti) | 300 ± 22 | 92 ± 7.8 | 41 ± 5.1 | 83± 3.4 | 27± 3.8 |
Bhaba Island | 300 ± 32 | 80 ± 6.6 | 27 ± 7.2 | 95± 5.9 | 52± 4.9 |
Bhit Island | 500 ± 41 | 70 ±8.2 | 30 ± 3.2 | 96± 5.8 | 45± 3.2 |
Keamari Boat Basin | 300 ± 34 | 82 ±6.9 | 39 ± 7.3 | 524± 32 | 27± 2.2 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | 300 ± 21 | 29 ± 2.7 | 28 ± 4.9 | 29± 7.9 | 25± 3.9 |
Manora Lighthouse | 300 ± 23 | 24 ± 1.7 | 27 ± 4.1 | 25± 3.2 | 21± 2.5 |
|
|||||
Marina Plaza | 400± 41 | 13± 1.9 | 18± 1.7 | 21± 2.1 | 21 ± 1.9 |
Casino | 600± 28 | 33± 2.3 | 26± 2.1 | 33± 2.7 | 19 ± 1.4 |
Naval Jetty | 500± 21 | 25 ± 2.3 | 23± 2.2 | 31± 3.1 | 24 ± 1.7 |
Marina Club | 400± 24 | 26 ± 3.2 | 46± 4.2 | 59± 2.9 | 34 ± 2.6 |
Ghizri area | 900± 51 | 85 ± 6.2 | 56± 4.5 | 161± 21 | 65 ± 3.2 |
Ibrahim Haideri | 900± 18 | 74 ± 2.9 | 43± 2.7 | 121± 12 | 87 ± 3.6 |
|
|||||
PNS Himalaya | 500 ± 23 | 23 ± 4.4 | 17 ± 1.9 | 49 ± 3 | 13 ± 1.4 |
Sandspit | 400 ± 34 | 33 ± 4 | 21 ±2.3 | 49 ± 4 | 14 ± 1.7 |
Kakka Pir | 600 ± 45 | 50 ± 4 | 18 ± 2 | 80 ± 5 | 13 ± 1.9 |
Buleji | 400 ± 21 | 18 ± 1.6 | 21± 3 | 29 ± 4 | 15 ± 2.1 |
Power house | 1300 ± 54 | 20 ± 1.8 | 26 ± 4 | 92 ± 6 | 16 ± 3.4 |
LOD | 10 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
EPA Guidelines | 200 | 60 | 20 | 84 | 19 |
In sediments of the Manora Channel, levels of Cr, Zn, and Cu are also higher except at Manora Lighthouse and Pakistan Naval Academy. Heavy metal load also appeared to be decreased as the distance of sampling site is increased from the entry point of Layari River into the Manora Channel. However, exceptionally higher levels are recorded at KPT Shipyard sediments, which may be due to submarine disposal of effluent of KPT Shipyard in addition to untreated domestic and industrial effluents entering the sea. Layari River outfall zone and Karachi Fish Harbor sediments also show considerably high levels of heavy metals, which owes to wastewater of industrial activity such as boat building and fish processing at the harbor. The Manora Channel sediment is clayey, which has high absorption or trapping capacity for heavy metals [62]. Heavy metal load in southeast coastal sediments is considerably less as compared to sediments of the Manora Channel. Metal contents are appeared to be substantially higher than EPA guidelines at the Ghizri area and Ibrahim Haideri due to continuous influx of untreated domestic and industrial waste into the sea at these sites. A comparison of heavy metal concentrations of three coastal zones is given in Figure 7, which shows that sediments of the Manora Channel are heavily contaminated as compared to southeast and northwest coastal sediments. This may be due to the heavy influx of untreated municipal wastewater and industrial effluent into the Manora Channel. A comparison of heavy metal contents of Karachi coastal sediments with other coastal sediments of the world (Table 4) reveals that the findings of this study are in agreement with the results of a previous study [36] and other studies of the world with an exception of South California harbor sediments where Mn concentration is many times higher than other sea sediments and other metal element contents are significantly low as reported in the other studies
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mn | 300–1300 | 300 | 100–500 | 300–500 | 800–4000 |
Cr | 24–319 | 196 | 11–509 | 243–485 | 11–71 |
Ni | 27–56 | 45 | 1–41 | 98–167 | 2–29 |
Zn | 25–666 | 120 | 48–237 | 98–167 | 14–104 |
Cu | 21–96 | 78 | 5–80 | 333–390 | 3–30 |
4.2. Stable isotope characteristics of Karachi coastal water, sediments, and biota
Stable isotope analysis of coastal water, sediments, and biota was undertaken in order to understand the mechanism of the land base terrestrial pollution transport to coastal ecosystem.
4.2.1. δ13C (TDIC)analysis of polluted rivers and coastal water
Theδ13C(TDIC) value for normal seawater is generally in the range of ±1 per mill PDB [13], andδ13C(TDIC) values of waste drains are in the range of-16 to -10 per mill PDB [23, 24].As shown in Table 5, Layari and Malir river water is depleted in δ13C(TDIC).The depleted values of δ13C(TDIC)in water of Layari River(- 8.2‰ PDB) and Malir River (-8.8‰ PDB) owe to the heavy influx of sewage.
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Layari River | -8.1 | -8.2 | -8.0 | -8.0 |
Malir River | -8.8 | -8.9 | -8.7 | -8.9 |
LOD (‰) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - |
δ3CTDIC value is a function of sewage pollution load and can be used in tracing land based pollution flow in marine water. Numerous researchers [12, 23, 26, 27, 61] have used δ3C as a tool to track sewage pollution in the aquatic environment. This study shows that variations in δ13CTDIC contents of the Manora Channel seawater are strongly associated with tide conditions, distance from the entrance of Layari River into the sea, and seasonal variation (Table 6). It is apparent that the Manora Channel water is relatively less depleted in δ13CTDIC during high tide as compared to low tide conditions, which means that high tide environment retards the mixing of the municipal sewage into seawater. Hence, channel water is relatively more depleted in δ13CTDIC during low tide as it facilitates the diffusion of sewage pollution with seawater. The diffusion of sewage pollution appears to be gradually decreased as the distance of sampling site is increased from Layari River joining point with seawater and is shown by a progressive reduction in δ13CTDIC values (Figure 8).The δ13CTDIC values of seawater at PNA and Manora Channel Lighthouse are close to δ13CTDIC values of normal unpolluted seawater, indicating less influx of sewage. Seasonal variation in δ13CTDIC values is attributed to strong currents and high flow of seawater in summer, which hinders the mixing of sewage pollution as indicated by relatively less depleted values of δ13CTDIC as compared to weak currents and moderate seawater flow in winter. Southeast coastal water is enriched in δ3C (TDIC)as compared to the Manora Channel, which indicates less influx of sewage pollution. However, considerable depleted values of δ3C (TDIC) are observed at the Ghizri area where Malir River empties its pollution load (Figure 9). However, seawater of northwest coast exhibits fairly constant δ13CTDIC values (-0.2‰ to 0.46‰ PDB), which are close to normal seawater value and appears to be independent of tidal and seasonal effect (Figure 10). It indicates substantially low sewage pollution load as compared to the Manora Channel and the southeast coast.
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||||||
Layari Riveroutfall | -3.4 | -5.8 | -6.9 | -8.0 | -8.0 | -8.2 | ||||
Fish Harbor | -3.3 | -6.1 | -6.2 | -6.2 | -6.4 | -7.3 | ||||
KPT Shipyard | -3.8 | -5.5 | -4.8 | -7.1 | -7.9 | -6.3 | ||||
Bhaba Island | -1.6 | -3.2 | -5.7 | -5.3 | -6.6 | -6.2 | ||||
Bhit Island | -1.4 | -3.8 | -4.0 | -3.5 | -6.1 | -6.3 | ||||
Boat Club | -1.6 | -3.2 | -2.4 | -2.6 | -4.3 | -2.8 | ||||
Pakistan Naval Academy | -1.6 | -2.7 | -1.8 | -2.2 | -3.1 | -2.9 | ||||
Manora Lighthouse | -1.4 | -2.2 | -1.9 | -2.0 | -2.3 | -2.2 | ||||
|
||||||||||
Marina Plaza | -0.5 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.6 | -0.3 | -1.2 | ||||
Casino | -0.8 | -0.7 | -0.4 | -0.8 | -0.9 | -1.8 | ||||
Naval Jetty | -1.1 | -1.4 | -0.7 | -0.9 | -1.7 | -2.5 | ||||
Marina Club | -1.1 | -2.0 | -1.8 | -1.6 | -2.1 | -2.6 | ||||
Ghizri area | -5.1 | -5.4 | -5.7 | -7.4 | -6.2 | -6.5 | ||||
Ibrahim Haideri | -4.8 | -3.4 | -3.6 | -5.2 | -4.1 | -4.3 | ||||
|
||||||||||
Manora Lighthouse SS | -0.4 | ND | ND | -0.5 | ND | ND | ||||
PNS Himalaya | -0.4 | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.5 | -0.3 | -0.2 | ||||
Sandspit | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.2 | ||||
Kakka Pir | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.2 | ||||
Buleji | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.1 | ||||
Power House | 0.2 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.1 | -0.2 | -0.2 | ||||
Sunari point | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.1 | -0.2 | -0.1 |
4.2.2. Stable sulfur (δ34S) analysis of polluted rivers and coastal water
Many researchers [3, 35, 48, 49, 50, 63] have applied δ34S content of seawater for evaluating sewage pollution contribution toward marine ecosystem. The δ34S value of normal seawater is around 20‰ CDT, and the seawater is depleted in δ34S with the addition of sewage wastewater. Sampling for δ34S was performed only in April 2002. Layari and Malir river waters (6.6‰ and 10.7‰ CDT respectively) are notably depleted in δ34S (Table 7) because of municipal wastewater (sewage pollution). The δ34S composition of coastal water of Karachi Metropolitan is used to ascertain the seawater contamination sources. It is also evident from Table 7 that the factors controlling variations in δ34S composition of the Manora Channel water are tide conditions and distance from the confluence point of Layari River with sea. The Manora Channel water is enriched in δ34S during high tide as compared to low tide conditions because high tide conditions hamper the mixing of sewage with seawater. During low tide, however, channel water is relatively less enriched in δ34S as it facilitates the mixing of sewage pollution with seawater. Sewage pollution gradually decreases as the distance of sampling site is increased from Layari River entry point with seawater. Southeast coastal waters are depleted in δ34S value at the entrance point of Malir River into seawater at the Ghizri area and Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor area. At other sampling sites, δ34S values of seawater are close to the normal seawater value, which demonstrates that the sewage pollution of Malir River diffuses quickly in coastal water due to strong open sea currents. δ34S values of northwest coastal water are apparent to be near to its value for normal seawater in both low and high tide conditions, which shows little domestic wastewater discharge along northwest coastal water.
|
|
|
Layari River | 6.6 | |
Malir River | 10.7 | |
|
|
|
Manora Channel | ||
Layari river outfall zone | 10.8 | 6.7 |
Fish Harbor | 14 | 10.2 |
KPT Shipyard (Butti) | 11.4 | 8.3 |
Kaemari Boat Basin | 17.9 | 12 |
Bhaba Island | 17.4 | 11.2 |
Bhit Island | 17.6 | 14.1 |
Boat Club | 17.5 | 15.8 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | 17.9 | 16.0 |
Manora Lighthouse | 18.1 | 16.2 |
Southeast cost | ||
Marina Plaza | 19.4 | 19.3 |
Casino | 19.2 | 18.8 |
Naval Jetty | 19 | 18.2 |
Marina Club | 18.8 | 18 |
Ghizri area | 15.1 | 12.3 |
Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor | 16.6 | 14.3 |
Northwest coast | ||
Manora Lighthouse (sea side) | 19.6 | 19.7 |
PNS Himalaya | 19.8 | 19.8 |
Sandspit | 19.9 | 19.9 |
Kakka Pir | 19.8 | 19.9 |
Buleji | 20.0 | 20.0 |
Power house | 20.0 | 20.0 |
4.2.3. Stable oxygen (δ18O) analysis of polluted rivers and coastal water
Oxygen isotope (δ18O) has been extensively used by several researchers [6, 29, Hudson et al. 1995;] to determine mixing of fresh water with seawater as their δ18O values are quite different. δ18O value for seawater is around 0‰ [Lear et al., 2000], while freshwater shows a wide range of δ18O isotopic compositions, generally lower than -5‰. However, seawater is depleted in δ18O with the mixing of fresh water [13]. Sampling for δ18O was performed in April 2002. As shown in Table 8, Layari and Malir rivers have δ
|
|
|
Layari River | -6.61 | |
Malir River | -5.94 | |
|
|
|
Manora Channel | ||
Layari River outfall zone | -3.93 | -5.33 |
Fish Harbor | -0.78 | -1.4 |
KPT Shipyard (Butti) | -0.7 | -2.45 |
Kaemari Boat Basin | -0.75 | -1.02 |
Bhaba Island | -0.65 | -0.95 |
Bhit Island | -0.48 | -0.79 |
Boat Club | 0.89 | 0.72 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | 0.95 | 0.82 |
Manora Lighthouse | 0.96 | 0.84 |
Southeast coast | ||
Marina Plaza | 1.13 | 1.01 |
Casino | 1.12 | 1.00 |
Naval Jetty | 1.13 | 0.89 |
Marina Club | -0.1 | -0.8 |
Ghizri area | -1.61 | -3.4 |
Ibrahim Haideri | -1.01 | -1.77 |
Northwest coast | ||
Manora Lighthouse (SS) | 1.15 | 1.13 |
PNS Himalaya | 1.11 | 1.13 |
Sandspit | 1.15 | 1.17 |
Kakka Pir | 1.20 | 1.19 |
Buleji | 1.21 | 1.22 |
Power House | 1.19 | 1.17 |
4.2.4. Stable isotope analysis of marine biota
Isotope signatures δ13C and δ15N of mangrove and seaweeds from different coastal locations were determined to see possible effect of land based pollution on marine plants in terms of their stable isotope composition and physiological characteristics.
4.2.4.1. δ13C and δ15N analysis ofmangroves
Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes composition of mangroves are widely used in environmental studies [Lin and Sternberg, 1992; McKee et al. 2002; Kao et al., 2001]. For example, the leaves of tall and dwarf mangroves often have distinctly different carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic characteristics, which are related to the various environmental conditions such as nutrient status and water use efficiency [Alongi et al., 1992; McKee and Faulkner, 2000; Blasco and Saenger, 1996; Medina and Francisco, 1997]. Dwarf trees are associated with sites that are often in the interior of mangrove islands, while tall trees are, generally, found at the edge of islands. The morphological differences are indicative of phosphorus and nitrogen limitation [McKee et al., 2002].
δ13C values of mangrove leaves ranged from -28.9‰ to -25.8‰ PDB, which are typical of most C-3 plants [O’Leary, 1981]. The mangroves leaves of the Manora Channel backwaters (receiving domestic waste from Layari River) are depleted in δ13C as compared to δ13C of Ghizri Creek mangroves leaves growing in open sea environment (Table 9). McKee et al. (2002) also reported that mangroves leaves growing at domestic waste sites are depleted in δ13C. However, δ15N values of mangroves in the Manora Channel were quite comparable with δ15N values of mangroves found in the Ghizri area, which suggests that the δ15N levels of Mangroves is not a reliable indicator to differentiate between mangroves growing in polluted and nonpolluted sea sites.
Acomparison of δ13C values of tall and dwarf mangrove plants revealed that δ13C values of interior tree leaves are higher as compared to leaves of tall trees leaves. The plants with high δ13C values are reported to have higher water use efficiency [Lin and Sternberg, 1992]. Our results, thus, show that a dwarf mangrove population has higher water use efficiency as compared to tall trees. The findings are also in agreement with earlier study by Lin and Sternberg (1992), where it was shown that dwarf mangrove populations had higher water use efficiency than tall trees. It is generally assumed that water use efficiency is related to the stomatal conductance. Dwarf trees have a lower ratio of the intercellular to atmospheric CO2 resulting in an enriched δ13C value and a higher water use efficiency [Farquhar, et al., 1988; Wooller et al., 2003; Lin and Sternberg, 1992].
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Manora Channel | -28.9 ± 0.3 | -27.2 ± 0.2 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 8.3 ± 0.5 |
Ghizri Creek | -27.5 ± 0.3 | -25.8 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 0.4 |
4.2.4.2. δ13C and δ15Nanalysis of seaweed
Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions were determined in different types of seaweeds as well. δ13C values of seaweed ranged from -31.1‰ to -4.9‰ PDB. However, δ13C contents in majority of seaweeds were in the range of -19‰ to -13‰ PDB (Figure 11), which were in good agreement with the reported values for tropical and subtropical algae (Craig, 1953; Black and Bender, 1976; Fry, et al., 1982). δ13C frequency distribution histograms of green, red, and brown algae are represented in Figure 12. δ13C values of green algae were in the ranges of -21.14‰ to -4.9‰ PDB with a mean value of -14.1‰ PDB. δ13C values of brown algae were found to be in the range of -17.82‰ to -8.9‰ PDB with a mean value of -14. 4‰ PDB, whereas δ13C of red algae ranged from -31.12‰ to -9.49‰ PDB with a mean value of -17.38‰ PDB. The average δ13C content of red algae (-17.4‰) was low as compared to brown (-14. 4‰) and green algae (-14.1‰). Fry et al. (1982) and Maberly et al. (1992) also reported marine red algae with relatively high δ13C value. However, the highest δ13C value was recorded in the green algae
To assess the effect of domestic waste on isotope composition of seaweed, δ13C values of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manora Channel ( |
-14.9 ± 1.2 | 7.9 ± 1.0 |
Northwest coast ( |
-14.5 ± 0.34 | 10.2 ± 0.89 |
Unlike δ13C, variation in δ15N values of seaweeds was small and ranged from 6.1‰ to 17.8‰ air (Figure 13).δ15N values of green algae varied between 6.1‰ and 17.7‰ air with an average value of 11.0‰ air, brown algae ranged from 8.9‰ to 12.9‰ air with an average 10.8‰ PDB, and δ15N concentration of red algae was in the range of 7.7‰ to 14.5‰ air with an average value of 11.2‰ air (Figure 14). Red algae were enriched in δ15N as compared to brown and green algae. δ15N values of
4.2.5. Stable carbon isotope composition of sea sediments
δ13C contents (inorganic and organic) of sediments from Karachi coast are shown in Table 11. δ13Cinorg values of Manora Channel sediments varied from -2.7‰ to -0.6‰ PDB, and δ13Corg contents were in the range of -26.5‰ to -7.0‰ PDB. The sediments from Layari River and Karachi Harbor were appeared to be extremely depleted in δ13Corg (-26.5‰), which indicated domestic sewage as the main source of these sediments. Another reason could be the lithology of the sediments, which was predominantly clay and organic carbon, had affinity toward argillaceous materials [Augley, et al., 2007]. Descolas-Gros and Fontugne (1990) also reported similar δ13Cinorg values in the sediments originating from domestic wastewater. δ13Corg contents of sediments of southeast coast were in the range of -14.9‰ to -8.6‰ PDB. These values do not show any link with sewage material and indicated that sewage material carried through Malir River is diluted and dispersed by sea waves. However, low δ13Corg values recorded in the sediments of Ghizri (-12.86‰ PDB) and Ibrahim Haideri (-14.9‰ PDB) might represent organic matter of dead phytoplankton [Descolas-Gros and Fontugne, 1990]. δ13Cinorg values of sediments pertaining to northwest coast were in the range of -1.0‰ to -0.3‰ PDB, and δ13Corg ranged from -9.4‰ to -7.5‰ PDB, indicating no domestic waste input in sediments.
|
|
|
Manora Channel | ||
Layari River outfall zone | -2.2 | -26.5 |
Karachi Fish Harbor | -2.7 | -26.5 |
KTP Shipyard (Butti) | -1.2 | -15.4 |
Bhaba Island | -1.1 | -18.6 |
Bhit Island | -0.6 | -18.5 |
Boat Club | -0.7 | -10.5 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | -0.6 | -11.7 |
Manora Lighthouse | -0.6 | -7.0 |
Southeast coast | ||
Marina Plaza | -0.7 | -8.6 |
Casino | -0.7 | -9.8 |
Naval Jetty | -0.7 | -9.6 |
Marina Club | -1.0 | -9.5 |
Ghizri area | -1.9 | -12.8 |
Ibrahim Haideri | -1.6 | -14.9 |
Northwest coast | ||
Manora Lighthouse (seaside) | -1.0 | -9.1 |
PNS Himalaya | -0.7 | -9.4 |
Sandspit | -0.3 | -7.8 |
Kakka Pir | -0.3 | -8.1 |
Buleji | -0.3 | -7.9 |
Power house | -0.3 | -7.5 |
4.3. Tritium
Tritium (3H) is isotope of hydrogen with relatively short half-life (12.3y) and decays with an emission of a beta particle[Martin, 2000]. Tritium was introduced into the atmosphere primarily as a result of nuclear bomb testing from the period 1951 to 1957. The natural concentration of tritium in seawater is around 0.02 Bq kg-1. However, its concentration up to 100 Bq kg-1 has also been reported in some seawaters [McCubbin and Leonard, 2001].
The most important use of tritium is in distinguishing water that entered in water bodies prior to 1952 from water that entered into water bodies after 1952 [Drever, 1997]. Tritium is also used for studying mixing of seawater with fresh water [Mazor, 1991]. As shown in Table 12, tritium (3H) content was higher in water of Layari (7.3 TU) and Malir (7.2 TU) river water as compared to seawater where tritium was in the range of 0.8 – 6.0 TU. Tritium content of seawater in mixing zone of Layari River outfall area was 6.0 TU, which decreased as the increased distance from the mixing zone toward Manora Channel exit (1.6 TU at Manora Lighthouse). Tritium contents in Manora Channel water seawater were higher than southeast and northwest coastal water, which show mixing of Layari River in seawater of Manora Channel.
It has also been reported that tritium content >10 TU in a water sample indicates a post-1952 water, whereas a tritium content lower than 0.5 indicate a pre-1952 water. Tritium content in between 0.5 and 10 represents a mixture of pre-1952 and post-1952 water [Mazor, 1999; Clark and Fritz, 19971]. Tritium contents of Karachi coastal water are between 0.8 and 6.2, which suggested that Karachi seawater is a mixture of pre-1952 and post-1952 water.
|
|
Layari River | 7.3 ± 0.6 |
Malir River | 7.2 ± 0.6 |
Layari River outfall zone | 6.0 ± 0.7 |
Boat Club | 2.6 ± 0.6 |
Manora Lighthouse | 1.6 ± 0.7 |
Southeast coast | 0.9 ± 0.7 |
Northwest coast | 0.8 ± 0.7 |
5. Computation of polluted river water mixing with seawater using stable isotopes
A two-component mixing equation was used to assess the pollution contribution to seawater by the Metropolitan wastewater by using stable carbon and sulfur isotopes in addition to the application of oxygen isotope ratio to determine fresh water mixing with seawater. When δ13C and δ14S depleted Malir and Layari river water enters into δ13C and δ34S enriched seawater, the resulting isotopic signature of mixed water is different from both mixing water bodies. Thus, isotopic values of the two end points (such as polluted water body and seawater) can be used to estimate the contribution of polluted river to marine water through a two-component isotope mixing equation [Spiker, 1980]. Numerous researchers [18; Balesdent, et al., 1988; Amundson and Baisden, 2000; Vitousck, et al., 2003; Currie, 2007;[44]; Iqbal, 1998; Wels, et al., 1990; Raymond and Bauer, 2001; Fry, 2002] round the globe have documented the use of stable isotopes in a two-component mixing equation for various applications, including sewage flow in aquatic environment, food web studies, contribution of C-3 and C-4 plant sources to soil organic carbon, and contribution of different water sources in lake/stream. In this study, an attempt has been made to estimate mixing percentage of polluted water in marine environment through stable isotope signatures.
5.1. Computation of river water mixing into Karachi coastal water using δ13C (TDIC)
The equation described in Section 3.9 was used to quantify percentage fraction of Layari river water in Manora Channel water and Malir river water in southeast coastal water during the low and high tide conditions of the sea. The dominant factors that appear to control the extent of terrestrial pollution mixing with Manora Channel seawater are tide conditions, distance from the joining point of Layari River with sea and sampling season. High tide environment hinders the Layari river water mixing with seawater coupled with a gradual decrease in pollution levels from entrance point of Layari River into sea. The mixing of river water with seawater is substantially high near Layari River outfall zone and gradually lowers toward Manora Channel exit with the exception at KPT and Bhaba Island where the addition of sewage input from local population may be considered responsible for increased pollution load. However, in high tide environment, considerable mixing (%) of river water in Manora Channel seawater indicated incomplete flushing, which owes to the fact that Manora Channel is a semienclosed bay. Mixing pattern is also appeared to be effected by seasonal environmental variations. In April, strong currents and high flow of seawater in Manora Channel diluted the Layari River added pollution as compared to weak current season and moderate seawater flow in the channel during September and December when volume of seawater in the channel is decreased; thereby, the ratio of Layari river water to seawater in channel is increased. However, at Layari River outfall zone, mixing seems to be independent of seasonal variation, which is clear from the fact that fraction of Layari River in seawater remains more than 97% in all sampling seasons (Figure 15).
Mixing of Malir River with seawater is considerably high at the Ghizri area, which is the entrance point of Malir River in the sea. The pollution load diffuses quickly as the distance is increased from entrance point to other sampling sites. Under low tidal conditions, the Ghizri area and Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor contained 70–74% and 46–59% water of Malir River. However, at sampling sites like Plaza, Casino, Naval Jetty, and Marina Club, mixing Malir river water into seawater reduced to 5–29%, which shows quick dispersion of Malir water in the sea by strong open sea currents (Figure 16). It appeared that mixing pattern is not much effected by seasonal changes during low and high tide environments except at Ghizri area.
5.2. Computation of polluted river water mixing into Karachi coastal water using δ34S values
To estimate the percent fraction of polluted river water into coastal water using δ34S values, the equation in Section 3.9 was modified by replacing δ13C with δ34S to get the following two-component isotope balance equation:
where δ34SA and δ34SB denotes stable sulfur isotope compositions of polluted river water and the nonpolluted seawaters, respectively. The mean δ34S values of 6.6‰ CDT and 10.7‰ CDT was taken for Layari and Malir river water, respectively, while assuming northwest coastal water as pollution free (20‰ CDT). Tide height and distance of sampling sites from the Layari River outfall are the main factors that play part in transport and spread of Layari River pollution in Manora Channel. Mixing of Layari water with sea water is low in high tide (14–69%) as compared to low tide (28–99%) conditions. There was an optimal mixing of river water with sea at Layari River outfall zone in high and low tide conditions. However, the fraction (percent) of polluted water in seawater appears to be gradually decreased from Layari River outfall zone to Manora Lighthouse (Figure 17).
The computation of Malir river water mixing with seawater computed through δ34S values show the increase in fraction (%) of river water with seawater was observed in low tide as compared to high tide environment particularly at the Ghizri area and Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor. However, at sites like Marina Plaza, Casino, Naval Jetty, and Marina Club, the increase in mixing (percent) was not very significant (Figure 17), which is attributed to dilution of Malir River pollution by open sea currents.
5.3. A comparison of mixing computed through δ13C and δ34S values
The results obtained through δ13C calculation were plotted against the δ34S calculation (Figure 18). Significant correlation coefficient in Manora Channel (
5.4. Application of δ18O to determine freshwater–marine water mixing
δ18O is a useful tool to define mixing between fresh water and marine water mixing [6, 29]. Some researchers [14, 18, 44] used δ18O contents in a two-component isotope mass balance equation for the calculation of mixing fraction of two sources in a water body.
In the present investigation, δ18O values of Layari and Malir river water, unpolluted sea water, and polluted seawater were used in the following two-component isotope equation to evaluate fresh water–seawater mixing:
where
It is evident from Table 13 that freshwater–seawater mixing is influenced by tidal height and distance from the fresh water source. Low tide environment is favored, and high tide environment slows the mixing process. A progressive reduction in proportion of freshwater into seawater is observed from Layari River outfall zone to Manora Lighthouse. At Manora Lighthouse, the ratio of freshwater in seawater is substantially low (3–5%). Along southeast coast, mixing of freshwater with seawater is considerably high at the Ghizri area and Ibrahim Haideri Fish Harbor during low tide environment. At sampling stations (Marina Plaza, Casino, and Naval Jetty), the ratio of freshwater into seawater was not significant showing that Malir river water is diluted quickly by strong open sea currents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manora Channel | ||
Layari river outfall zone | 69.32 | 88.24 |
Fish Harbor | 26.76 | 35.14 |
KPT Shipyard (Butti) | 25.68 | 49.32 |
Kaemari Boat Basin | 26.35 | 30.00 |
Bhaba Island | 25.00 | 29.05 |
Bhit Island | 22.70 | 26.89 |
Boat Club | 4.19 | 6.49 |
Pakistan Naval Academy | 3.38 | 5.14 |
Manora Lighthouse | 3.24 | 4.86 |
|
||
Marina Plaza | 0.99 | 2.68 |
Casino | 1.13 | 2.82 |
Naval Jetty | 0.99 | 4.37 |
Marina Club | 18.31 | 28.17 |
Ghizri area | 39.58 | 64.79 |
Ibrahim Haideri | 31.13 | 41.83 |
6. Conclusion
The present study has demonstrated that stable isotopes (δ13C, δ15N, δ34S, δ2H, and δ18O) can be effectively used to monitor the marine pollution and to investigate origin of salinity in the coastal aquifer. This study may also provide a precise and accurate isotopic database for researchers interested in seawater pollution and its effect on benthic life.
References
- 1.
Ackerfors, H. (1971). Mercury pollution in Sweden with special reference to conditions in the water habitat. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, 177, 365. - 2.
Akram, M., Qureshi, R. M., Ahmad, N., and Solaija, T. J. (2007). Determination of gamma-emitting radionuclides in the inter-tidal sediments off Balochistan (Pakistan) Coast, Arabian Sea. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 123, 268–273. - 3.
Alewell, C., Mitchell, M. J., Likens, G. E., and Krouse, H. R. (1999). Sources of stream sulfate at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: long-term analyses using stable isotopes. Biogeochemistry, 44, 281–299. - 4.
Algan, A. O., Gatay, M. N., Sarikaya, H. Z., Balkis, N., and Sari, E. (1999). Pollution monitoring using marine sediments: a case study on the Istanbul Metropolitan Area. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Science, 23, 39. - 5.
Ali, I., and Jilani, S. (1995). Study of contamination in the coastal waters of Karachi. In: The Arabian, Living Marine Resources and the Environment. M. F. Thompson and N. M. Tirmizi (eds.). Vanguard Books (Pvt) Ltd., 45 The Mall, Lahore, Pakistan, pp. 653–658. - 6.
Anderson, T. F., and Arthur, M. A. (1983). Stable isotopes of oxygen and carbon and their application to sedimentologic and paleoenvironmental problems. In: Stable Isotopes in Sedimentary Geology. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course, vol. 10, pp. 1-1–1-151 - 7.
AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th edition. H. William (ed.). Maryland, USA. Vol. 1. Method 977.15. - 8.
Beg, M. A. A. (1994). Pollution in the marine environment of Karachi. Wildlife and Environment, 3, 36–41. - 9.
Bernhard, M., and Zattera, A. (1975). Major pollutants in the marine environment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on ‘Marine Pollution and Marine Waste Disposal’, San Remo 17–21, December, 1973. E. A. Pearson and E. De Fraja Frangipane (eds.). Pergamon Press Ltd., 207 Queen’s Quay West, Toronto 1, Canada, pp. 195–300. - 10.
Bryan, G. W. (1976). Heavy metal contamination in the sea. In: Marine pollution. R. Johnston (ed.). Academic Press, New York, pp. 186–302. - 11.
Bryan, G. W. (1971). The effects of heavy metal (other than mercury) on marine and estuarine organisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series Biological, 177, 389. - 12.
Burnett, W. C., and Schaeffer, O. A. (1980). Effect of ocean dumping on carbon-13/carbon-12 ratios in marine sediments from the New York Bight. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 11, 6, 605–611. - 13.
Clark, I. D., and Fritz, P. (1997). Environmental Isotopes In Environmental Isotopes in Hydrology. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp. 38. - 14.
Coplen, T. B. (1994). Reporting of stable hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen isotopic abundances. Pure Applied Chemistry, 66, 273–276. - 15.
Costanzo, S. D., O’Donohue, M. J., Dennison, W. C., Loneragan, N. R., and Thomas, M. (2001). A new approach for detecting and mapping sewage impacts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 2, 149–156. - 16.
Dansgaard, W. (1964). Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus, 16, 436–438. - 17.
DE Wolf, H., Van Den Broeck, H., Qadah, D., Backeljau, T., and Blust, R. (2005). Temporal trends in soft tissue metal levels in the periwinkle Littorina littorea along the Scheldt estuary, The Netherlands. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 463–484. - 18.
Dinçer, T., Payne, B. R., Florkowski, T., Martinec, J., and Tongiorti, E. (1970). Snowmelt runoff form measurements of tritium and oxygen-18. Water Resources Research, 6, 110–129. - 19.
El Mamoney, M. H. (1995). Evaluation of terrestrial contribution to the Red Sea sediments, Egypt. PhD thesis, Facility of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt. - 20.
Ergin, M., Bodur, M. N., Ediger, D., Ediger, V., Yemenicio-glu, S., and Yucesoy, F. (1994). Sedimentation rates in the Sea of Marmora: a comparison of results based on organic carbon-primary productivity and 210Pb dating. Continental Shelf Research, 12, 1371–1387. - 21.
Fatoki, O. S., and Mathabatha, S. (2001). An assessment of heavy metal pollution in the East London and Port Elizabeth harbors. Water SA, 27, 2, 233–240. - 22.
Faure, G., and Mensing, T. M. (2005). Isotopes: Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons. 897 p. - 23.
Finaly, J. C., and Kendall, C. (2007). Stable isotope tracing of temporal and spatial variability in organic matter sources to freshwater ecosystem. In: Stable isotope in Ecology and environmental Sciences. Robert Michener and Kate Lafta (eds.). Blackwell, pp. 283–333. - 24.
Fry, B., and Sherr, E. B. (1989). δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. In: Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. P. W. Rundel, J. R. Rundel, and K. A. Nagy (eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 196–229. - 25.
Gat, J. R. (1996). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle. Annual Review of Earth Planetary Science, 4, 225–262. - 26.
Gearing, P. J., Gearing, J. N., Maughan, J. T., and Oviatt, C. A. (1991). Isotopic distribution of carbon from sewage sludge and eutrophication in the sediments and food web of estuarine ecosystems. Environmental and Science Technology,25, 3, 295–301. - 27.
Gichuki, J., Triest, L., and Dehairs, F. (2001). The use of stable carbon isotopes as tracers of ecosystem functioning in contrasting wetland ecosystems of Lake Victoria, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 458, 1–3, 91–97. - 28.
GoP. (2007). Pollution in Karachi harbor and areas around Pakistan air force bases in Karachi, Senate Committee Report, pp. 1–45. - 29.
Hendry, J. P., and Kalin, R. M. (1997). Are oxygen and carbon isotopes of mollusc shells reliable palaeosalinity indicators in marginal marine environments? A case study from the middle Jurassic of England. Journal of Geological Society London, 154, 321–333. - 30.
Hunkeler, D., Chollet, N., Pittet, X., Aravena, R., Cherry, J. A. (2004). Effect of source variability and transport processes on carbon isotope ratios of TCE and PCE in two sandy aquifers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 74, 265–282. - 31.
IAEA-MEL. (1987). Marine pollution baseline. survey in the Korangi. Phitti Creek, Pakistan. Final Report. ILMR, IAEA, Monaco. 27. - 32.
JICA. (2007). Study on Water Supply and Sewerage System in Karachi, JICA, February 2007. - 33.
Kennish, M. J. (1997). Practical Handbook of Estuarine and Marine Pollution. CRC Press Marine Science Series, USA. - 34.
Kremling, K. (1983). Methods of seawater analysis. K. Grasshoff, M. Ehrhardt, and K. Kremling (eds.). VerlagChemie, 196 p. - 35.
Krouse, H. R. (1977). Sulphur isotope abundance elucidate uptake of atmospheric sulphur emissions by vegetation. Nature, 265, 45–46. - 36.
Majid, M. (2002). Geochemical Studies of Heavy Metals in the Sea Water along Karachi Makran Coast. PhD thesis, University of Karachi, Pakistan. - 37.
Majid, M., Azhar. S., Nadia, M., and Tabassum, M. (1999). Status of trace elements level in blood samples of different age population of Karachi, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Medical Science, 29, 697–699. - 38.
Majid, M., Nausheen, M., Azhar, S., and Tabassum. M. (2000). Changes in blood levels of trace elements and electrolytes in hypertensive patients. Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran, 14, 2, 115–118. - 39.
Majoube, M. (1971). Fractionnement en oxygène-18 et en deutérium entre l’eau et sa vapeur. Journal of Chemical Physics, 197, 1423–1436. - 40.
Mancini, S. A., Lacrampe-Couloume, G., Jonker, H., Van Breukelen, B. M., Groen, J., Volkering, F., and Lollar, B. S. (2002). Hydrogen isotopic enrichment: an indicator of biodegradation at a petroleum hydrocarbon field site. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 2464–2470. - 41.
Mansour, A. M., Nawar, A. H., and Mohamed, A. W. (2000). Geochemistry of coastal marine sediments and their contaminant metals, Red Sea, Egypt. A legacy for the future and a tracer to modern sediment dynamics. Sedimentology Journal of Egypt, 8, 231–242. - 42.
Mook, W. G. (2000). Natural abundance of the stable isotopes of C, O and H. In: Environmental Isotopes in the Hydrological Cycle Principles and Applications, Vol-I. W. G. Mook (ed.), pp. 60–123. - 43.
Morrill, P. L., Sleep, B. E., Slater, G. F., Edwards, E. A., and Lollar. B. S. (2006). Evaluation of isotopic enrichment factors for the biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes using a parameter estimation model: toward an improved quantification of biodegradation.Environmental Science and Technology, ASAP Article 10.1021/es051513e S0013-936X(05)01513-0. Web Release Date: May 19, 2006. - 44.
Mortatti, J., Moraes, J. M., Rodrigues, J. C., Victoria, R. L., and Martinelli, L. A. (1997). Hydrograph separation of the Amazon river using 18O as an isotopic tracer. Science of Agriculture, 54, 3. - 45.
Mudroch, A., and McKnight, S. D. (1994). Bottom sediment sampling. In: Handbook of Techniques for Aquatic Sediments Sampling, Chapter 4, 2nd edition. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 236 p. - 46.
Mujahid, S. M., Majid, M., and Tabassum, M. (1994). Determination of trace elements in blood of CRF patients. Proceeding of SBBP Symposium of Biochemist and Biophysics, 1, 185–187. - 47.
Naturvårdsverketa. (2001). Metaller i sjöar och vattendrag, http://www.environ.se. - 48.
Novák, M., Kirchner, J. W., Groscheova, H., Havel, M., Cerny, J., Krejci, R., and Buzek, R. (2000). Sulfur isotope dynamics in two Central European watersheds affected by high atmospheric deposition of SOx. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64, 367–383. - 49.
Nriagu, J. O., Coker, R. D., and Barrie, L. A. (1991). Origin of sulfur in Canadian arctic haze from isotope measurements. Nature, 349, 142–145. - 50.
Ohizumi, T., Fukuzaki, N., and Kusakabe, M. (1997). Sulfur isotopic view on the sources of sulfur in atmospheric fallout along the coast of the Sea of Japan. Atmosphere and Environment, 31, 1339–1348. - 51.
Parsons, T. R., Yoshiaki, M., and Lalli, C. M. (1984). A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford. - 52.
Qureshi, R. M., Sajjad, M. I., Mashiatullah, A., Waqar, F., Jan, S., Akram, M., Khan, S. H., and Siddiqui, S. A. (1997). Isotopic investigations of pollution transport in shallow marine environments off the Karachi Coast, Pakistan. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Isotope Techniques in the Study of Past and Current Environmental Changes in the Hydrosphere and the Atmosphere, 14–18 April, 1997, Vienna, Austria, pp. 353–365. - 53.
Rabalais, N. N., and Nixon, S. W. (2002). Nutrient over-enrichment of the coastal zone. Estuaries,25, 4B, 639–644. - 54.
Rizvi, S. H. N., Masood, T., Khan, S., Ali, M., and Baquer, J. (1995). Circulation pattern in the Karachi coastal waters in relation to the outfall. In: The Arabian Sea—Living Marine Resources and the Environment. M. F. Thompson and N. M. Tirmizi (eds.), pp. 641–652. - 55.
Saifullah, S. M., Sarwat, T., Khan, S. H., and Saleem, M. (2004). Iron pollution in mangrove habitat of Karachi, Indus Delta. Earth Interactions, 8, 17, 1–9. - 56.
Saleem, M., and Kazi G. H. (1995). Distribution of trace metal in seawater and surficial sediment of Karachi Harbor. In: The Arabian Sea-Living Marine Resources and the Environment. M. F. Thompson and N. M. Tirmizi (eds.). pp. 659–666. - 57.
Saleem, M., and Kazi, G. H. (1998). Concentration and distribution of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn) in Karachi shore and offshore sediments. Pakistan Journal of Marine Science, 7, 1, 71–79. - 58.
Slater, G. F. (2003). Stable isotope forensics-when isotopes work. Environment Forensics, 4, 13–23. - 59.
Smith, D. G. (1986). Heavy metals in the New Zealand aquatic environment: a review. Water Quality Centre, Ministry of Works and Development, Wellington, New Zealand. - 60.
Swedmark, M., Broanten, B., Emanuellsson, E., and Grammo, A. (1971). Biological effects of surface active agents on marine animals. Marine Biology, 9, 183–201. - 61.
Sweeney, R. E., and Kaplan, I. R. (1980a). Tracing flocculent industrial and domestic sewage transport in San Pedro Shelf, Southern California, by nitrogen and sulfur isotope ratios. Marine Environmental Research, 3, 215–224. - 62.
Tam, N. F. Y., and Wong, Y. S. (2000). Spatial variation of heavy metals in surface sediments of Hong Kong mangrove swamps. Environmental Pollution,110, 195–205. - 63.
Tucker, J., Sheats, A. E., Giblin, C. S., Hopkinson, P. and. Montoya, J. P. (1999). Using stable isotopes to trace sewage-derived material through Boston harbor and Massachusetts bay. Elsevier Marine Environmental Research, 48, 353–375. - 64.
US EPA. (1983). Sample preservation. In: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-020. USEPA, Ohio, USA. - 65.
Voutsinou-Taliadouri, F., Georgakopoulou-Gregoriadou, E., and Psyllidou-Giouranovits, R. (1995). Geochemical aspects of a gulf influenced by anthropogenic activities (Thermoikos Gulf, N. W. Agean Sea). Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit. 34: 150. - 66.
Waldichuk, M. (1985). Biological availability of metals to marine organisms. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 16, 7–11. - 67.
WWF (2002). Study of heavy metal pollution level and impact on the fauna and flora of the Karachi and Gwadar coast. Final Project Report, No. 50022801. - 68.
Zaigham, N. A. (2004). Unauthorized squatter settlements are one of major sources for polluting surface and subsurface waters in Karachi, Proceedings of the WSSD workshop on human settlement and environment (Pakistan’s Response to its Obligations under the WSSD Plan of Implementation), Islamabad, December 14–15, 2004, pp. 100–112.