Summary statistics of species richness in different plant groups, climate variables, and areas of 11 floristic regions and 270 nature reserve used in this paper.
1. Introduction
It is a fascinating issue for ecologists to develop a general theory or principle to interpret the mechanisms of global gradients and stabilization of biodiversity. This question has perplexed biogeographers and ecologists for about 100 years, and the diverse theories and hypotheses have been put forward to account for latitudinal gradients in biodiversity (Wright 1983; Rohde, 1992; Waide et al., 1999; Colwell & Lees, 2000; Gaston, 2000; Allen et al. 2002; Hawkins et al., 2003; Willig et al. 2003; Ricklefs, 2004; Evans & Gaston, 2005; Evans et al., 2005; Mittelbach et al. 2007; Gillooly& Allen, 2007; Storch et al. 2007; Cardinale, et al., 2009), Recent decade, the metabolic theory of biodiversity (MTB) is developed and attracting a lot of attentions of ecologists as a novel hypothesis based on metabolic theory of ecology (MTE) and the energetic-equivalence rule (West et al. 1997, 1999; Enquist et al. 1998; Allen et al. 2002, 2007; Brown et al. 2004; Deng et al. 2006, 2008). The MTB is recognized as a general principle that can quantify relationships between the dynamic processes of population and biodiversity patterns in ecosystem, and between species richness and environmental factors (see also Allen et al. 2003, 2006; Allen & Gillooly 2006; Gillooly & Allen 2007). The metabolic eco-evolutionary model of biodiversity, the most recent extension of the MTB, has been developed by Stegen
The MTB considered that species richness,
The intense and continuous controversies for the MTB have been focusing on two primary predictions: 1) whether ln-transformed species richness is linearly associated with an inverse rescaling of ambient temperature or not, and 2) if so, whether the slope of the relationship is encompassed in the theoretical value range of -0.6 to -0.7. The proponents argue that this theory accounts for diversity gradients over a range of spatial scales from mountain slopes to continental and global gradients, and for many groups of plants and ectothermic animals (Allen et al. 2002, 2003;Brown
Sample type | Variable | N | Minimm | Maximum | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis |
Compositae | 9 | 104 | 655 | 293.78 | 163.66 | 1.34 | 2.50 | |
Poaceae | 9 | 86 | 597 | 254.44 | 155.37 | 1.29 | 2.52 | |
Rosaceae | 9 | 49 | 406 | 197.33 | 122.44 | 0.45 | -0.64 | |
Liliaceae | 9 | 35 | 164 | 93.22 | 41.32 | 0.11 | -0.32 | |
Labiatae | 9 | 28 | 253 | 130.33 | 79.02 | 0.07 | -1.10 | |
Angiosperm | 11 | 1009 | 7891 | 4363.45 | 2513.16 | -0.02 | -1.47 | |
Gymnosperm | 10 | 4 | 63 | 31.90 | 19.53 | 0.27 | -0.73 | |
Seed plant | 11 | 1019 | 7954 | 4392.45 | 2524.83 | -0.03 | -1.47 | |
MAT (°C) | 11 | -2.80 | 20.88 | 12.34 | 7.48 | -0.98 | 0.002 | |
Mean latitude (°) | 11 | 23 | 50 | 35.33 | 9.54 | 0.35 | -1.49 | |
Mean longitude (°) | 11 | 100 | 132 | 115.1 | 9.94 | 0.25 | -0.44 | |
Area (km2) | 11 | 52000 | 960000 | 401660 | 273070 | 0.64 | 0.73 | |
Compositae | 71 | 11 | 324 | 78.66 | 44.51 | 2.55 | 12.34 | |
Poaceae | 70 | 8 | 131 | 63.13 | 28.75 | 0.40 | -0.16 | |
Rosaceae | 71 | 2 | 185 | 54.93 | 33.76 | 1.27 | 2.24 | |
Liliaceae | 49 | 1 | 85 | 31.7 | 19.52 | 1.08 | 0.93 | |
Labiatae | 56 | 3 | 96 | 30.41 | 17.51 | 1.31 | 2.99 | |
Angiosperm | 255 | 79 | 3893 | 1186.44 | 705.08 | 0.84 | 0.91 | |
Gymnosperm | 234 | 1 | 110 | 14.21 | 12.33 | 3.32 | 19.32 | |
Pteridophyte | 189 | 1 | 594 | 108.86 | 92.75 | 1.41 | 3.51 | |
Vascular plant | 193 | 138 | 4543 | 1388.18 | 809.92 | 0.86 | 0.99 | |
MAT (°C) | 270 | -2.8 | 29 | 13.93 | 5.71 | -0.61 | 0.44 | |
Mean latitude (°) | 270 | 18.4 | 51.6 | 30.74 | 6.55 | 0.71 | 0.37 | |
Mean longitude (°) | 270 | 95 | 130.6 | 111.88 | 7.04 | 0.12 | -0.37 | |
Area (km2) | 270 | 0.64 | 6698 | 490.89 | 922.28 | 3.94 | 18.69 |
Empirical evaluations of how well observed richness patterns fit the central predictions of the MTB are now appearing in several literature (Allen et al., 2002; Kaspari et al., 2004; Hunt et al., 2005; Algar et al., 2007; Cassemiro et al., 2007; Latimer, 2007; Hawkins et al., 2007a, b; Sanders et al., 2007). Although to date the observed patterns in biodiversity have been taxonomically and geographically limited (Ellison, 2007), the data sets for the detailed plant groups are relatively absent. Wang et al. (2009) showed that magnitude of temperature dependence (i.e.
Here we aimed to evaluate how the relationship between species richness and temperature predicted by MTB varied with respect to sampling scales, as well as with respect to different plant taxonomic group using an extensive plant data sets including three divisions in vascular plant at two different sample scales including nature reserve grain and floristic grain.
2. Methods
We compiled species richness and other basic characteristics of 11 floristic regions and 270 natural reserves. All of the plant species richness data sets used in our analysis were collected from the previous reports involving eleven floristic regions and 270 nature reserves across the eastern China (Zhao & Fang, 2006, many others; for details see Zhang et al.2011). All species were compiled and classified into three groups (pteridophyte, gymnosperm, and angiosperm) at both floristic and reserve scales (the details see Zhang et al.2011). Here the alien species were excluded from our data analyses and only the native species retained. The areas of nature reserves and floristic regions were respectively range from 0.64 to 6689 and from 52000 to 960000 square kilometers (km2) between 18.4° N and 51.6° N latitude and between 95° E and 130.6° E longitude covering a total terrestrial area of 132,540 km2 (See Fig1 and Table1). The temperature and the size distribution of the 270 nature reserves also were showed in Table 1.
The mean annual temperature (MAT), assigned to each nature reserve based on its location and used to analyze the relationship between temperature and species richness, was compiled from a 1971-2000 temperature database of China generated from 722 climate stations across China. Flora’s MAT was an average value of all the covered climate stations within each floristic region. Other environmental variables such as geographical range and area were also documented.
Descriptive statistics of plant species richness and environmental variables were produced to interpret the information on the data distributions (Table1). The observed slopes of In-transformed richness versus 1/
3. Results
The natural logarithm of species richness was significantly linear with (
The species-area relationships for all taxonomic divisions at both the floristic and nature reserve special scales indicated that the area size of community have more impact on the species richness for subdivision (e.g. family) than for division (Fig. 4 and 5). Moreover, the observed slope values were close to or encompass (95% CI) the theoretical values predicted by MBT at the spatial scale range of 50- 6698 km2, excluding the size of area class less than 50 km2 (Fig. 6; Table 4).
Group | Figure | N | R2 | P | RMA slope(95%CI) |
Compositae | 2-a | 9 | 0.64 | 0.009 | |
Poaceae | 2-b | 9 | 0.82 | <0.001 | |
Rosaceae | 2-c | 9 | 0.73 | 0.003 | |
Liliaceae | 2-d | 9 | 0.67 | 0.007 | |
Labiatae | 2-e | 9 | 0.89 | <0.001 | |
Angiosperm | 2-f | 11 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
Gymnosperm | 2-g | 10 | 0.71 | 0.002 | |
Seed plant | 2-h | 11 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
Group | Figure | N | R2 | P | RMA slope(95%CI) |
Compositae | 3-a | 71 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.73(0.56– 0.91) |
Poaceae | 3-b | 70 | 0.00 | 0.58 | -0.71(-0.89– -0.54) |
Rosaceae | 3-c | 71 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.96(0.73– 1.18) |
Liliaceae | 3-d | 49 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.81(0.58– 1.05) |
Labiatae | 3-e | 56 | 0.01 | 0.60 | -0.81(-1.03– -0.59) |
Angiosperm | 3-f | 255 | 0.05 | 0.09 | -0.90(-1.01– -0.79) |
Gymnosperm | 3-g | 234 | 0.00 | 0.326 | -0.91(-1.03– -0.79) |
Pteridophyte | 3-h | 189 | 0.21 | <0.001 | |
Vascular plant | 3-i | 193 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
Area classes(km2) | Figure | N | R2 | P | RMA slope(95%CI) |
<50 | 7-a | 32 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 1.04(0.67-1.42) |
50-100 | 7-b | 25 | 0.04 | 0.32 | -0.72(-1.02– -0.41) |
100-200 | 7-c | 44 | 0.25 | <0.001 | |
200-400 | 7-d | 33 | 0.06 | 0.19 | -1.24(-1.69– -0.80) |
400-800 | 7-e | 22 | 0.36 | 0.003 | |
800-1600 | 7-f | 12 | 0.25 | 0.08 | -0.96(-1.55– -0.38) |
"/>1600 | 7-g | 16 | 0.18 | 0.10 | -0.84(-1.27– -0.40) |
4. Discussion
Hawkins’ et al. (2007a) suggested that the relationship of logarithm transformed species richness and inverse temperature was nonlinear through analyzing the datasets of Chinese angiosperm taken from nature reserves with a range of area from 100 km2 to 247 km2. Here we similarly failed to observe significantly linear relationships between them at the nature reserve grain with the regions ranging from 0.64 km2 to 6689 km2, excepting for two large groups (angiosperm and pteridophyte). Moreover, almost all slope values were exclusive from the predictive range of MTB (Table 2) as the pattern of tree species distribution in eastern Asia (Wang et al., 2009). However, when we analyzed these data sets at the floristic regions ranging from 52000 km2 to 960000 km2, not only this linear relationship was observed, but also the slopes is highly in agreement with the theoretical values of MTB (Allen et al. 2002; Brown et al. 2004). Therefore, the plant species richness patterns predicted by MTB apparently depended on the grain size (Ellison, 2007). This scenario may be due to the fact that the number of species at the large scale overwhelmed the number of species at the relative small sample scale (e.g. nature reserve). However our analysis of species richness-area relationships showed no significant relations at floristic grain (Fig 4). The adjacent nature reserves frequently have the similar annual temperature, but the other environmental factors (i.e. water, elevation and nutrition) may exhibit a lot of variations between them that can also strongly influence the local plant species richness (Storch et al., 2007). The large-scale (floristic region) patterns are not simply explicable in terms of knowledge of small-scale (nature reserve) processes (Storch and Gaston, 2004). On the contrary, despite the habitat heterogeneity including annual temperature is large between plant flora, it is usually overwhelmed within plant flora because of the enormous sample scale (Field et al., 2009).
For the purpose of evaluating the MBT’s robustness, Hawkins et al. (2007a) show the relationship between the inverse of temperature and the natural log of richness in terrestrial ectotherms (including amphibians, reptiles), invertebrates, mammals and plant around the world. However, in their plant data sets, detailed taxonomic unit (e g, pteridophyte, gymnosperm and family unit) were not contained. In their 46 data sets, 14 had no significant relationship; 9 of the remaining 32 were linear, meeting the first prediction of the MBT, but the slope values against its second prediction. So, they contended that it was important to use appropriate taxonomic ranges for accepting or refusing the prediction of MBT (see also, Ellison, 2007).
Our results clearly showed that the significant taxonomic dependence in the nature reserve data sets. Pteridophyte unit which potentially supported the first prediction of MTB dominantly differs from the other groups in particular. Pteridophytes have a reproductive strategy based on the high dispersibility of spores, and have a strong moisture dependence of the sexual reproduction (Pausas & Sáez, 2000; Lehmann,
The plant species were not subdivided into division group to test the slopes converge around the predicted value -0.65 by MTB (Allen et al. 2002; Brown et al. 2004). Whereas the significant heterogeneity of slopes were observed at both floristic region and reserve scale among the different taxonomic groups as the most recently reported by Hawkins et al. (2007a,b) and Wang et al.(2009), indicating that the plant groups may hold variable activation energies rather than an invariant value. Our more recently research showed that validity of the MTB lies on if the area size of the community has no significant effect on species richness (Zhang et al. 2011). Therefore we believe that the slope value for each taxonomic group should be co-influenced by the restriction of distribution range, the area size of sampling community and other abiotic factors, as well as the inherent activation energy differences.
5. Conclusion
Our results suggested that the relationship predicted by MTB between the plant richness and temperature can be tested at the larger regional scale (e.g. floristic region) well. However, at the small scale (e.g. nature reserve), the predicted relationships were easily influenced by the many other factors such as area size of community, taxonomic divisions, seed dispersal and so on. Allen et al. (2003) claimed that the theory of biodiversity proposed by themselves is not complete and comprehensive. Here we consider that the theory must integrate the fundamental influences of multifactor involving temperature, area size, water, elevation and nutrition on the species richness patterns in small scale regions where the disturbance of environmental factors easily result in change of the species diversity. At the same time, we should also seek the more biological interpretation for the noticeable differences among taxonomic groups in the future.
Acknowledgement
This study were supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31000286), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University to J.M.D. and Key Project of Ministry of Education of China (no. 109152).
References
- 1.
Algar A. C. Kerr J. T. Currie D. J. 2007 A test of metabolic theory as the mechanism underlying broad-scale species-richness gradients. Global Ecol. Biogeogr16 170 178 - 2.
Allen A. P. Brown J. H. Gillooly J. F. 2002 Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science297 1545 1548 - 3.
Allen A. P. Gillooly J. F. 2006 Assessing latitudinal gradients in speciation rates and biodiversity at the global scale. Ecol Lett9 947 954 - 4.
Allen A. P. Gillooly J. F. Brown J. H. 2003 Response to comment on “Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics and the energetic-equivalence rule”. Science 299, 346c. - 5.
Allen A. P. Gillooly J. F. Savage V. M. Brown J. H. 2006 Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103 9130 9135 - 6.
Brown J. H. Gillooly J. F. Allen A. P. Savage V. M. West G. B. 2004 Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology85 1771 1789 - 7.
Cardinale B. J. Hillebrand H. Harpole W. S. Gross K. Ptacnik R. 2009 Separating the influence of resource ‘availability’ from resource ‘imbalance’ on productivity-diversity relationships 12 475 487 - 8.
Cassemiro F. A. S. Barreto B. S. Rangel T. F. L. V. B. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. 2007 Non-stationarity, diversity gradients and the metabolic theory of ecology. Global Ecol. Biogeogr16 820 822 - 9.
Colwell R. K. Lees D. C. 2000 The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness Trends in Ecology and Evolution,15 70 76 - 10.
Deng J. M. Li T. Wang G. X. Liu J. Zhao C. M. Ji M. F. Zhang Q. Liu J. Q. 2008 Trade-offs between the metabolic rate and population density of plants. Plos One, 3 (3), 1799. - 11.
Deng J. M. Wang G. X. Morris E. C. Wei X. P. Li D. X. Chen B. M. Zhao C. M. Liu J. Wang Y. 2006 Plant mass-density relationship along a moisture gradient in north-west China. Journal of Ecology94 953 958 - 12.
Ellison A. M. 2007 Metabolic theory and patterns of species richness.1889 EOF - 13.
Enquist B. J. Brown J. H. West G. B. 1998 Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density 395 163 165 - 14.
Evans K. L. Gaston K. J. 2005 Can the evolutionary-rates hypothesis explain species-energy relationships? Functional Ecology,19 899 915 - 15.
Evans K. L. Warren P. H. Gaston K. J. 2005 Species-energy relationships at the macroecological scale: a review of the mechanisms 80 1 25 - 16.
Field R. Hawkins A. B. Cornell H. V. Currie D. J. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. Guégan J. F. Kaufman D. M. Kerr J. T. Mittelbach G. C. Oberdorff T. O’Brien E. M. Turner J. R. G. 2009 Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Biogeography,36 132 147 - 17.
Gaston K. J. 2000 Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature,405 220 227 - 18.
Gillooly J. F. Allen A. P. 2007 Linking global patterns in biodiversity to evolutionary dynamics using metabolic theory.88 1890 1894 - 19.
Hawkins B. A. Albuquerque F. S. Araújo M. B. Beck J. Bini L. M. Cabrero-Sańudo F. J. Castro-Parga I. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. Ferrer-Castán D. Field R. et al. 2007a A global evaluation of metabolic theory as an explanation for terrestrial species richness gradients. Ecology88 1877 1888 - 20.
Hawkins B. A. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. Bini L. M. Araújo M. B. Field R. Horta,l J. Kerr J. T. Rahbek C. Rodríguez M. Á. Sanders N. J. 2007b Metabolic theory and diversity gradients: where do we go from here? Ecology,88 1898 1902 - 21.
Hawkins B. A. Field R. Cornell H. V. Currie D. J. Guegan J. F. Kaufman D. M. Kerr J. T. Mittelbach G. G. Oberdorff T. O’Brien E. M. Porter E. E. Turner J. R. G. 2003 Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness 84 3105 3117 - 22.
Hunt G. Cronin T. M. Roy K. 2005 Species-energy relationship in the deep see: a test using the Quaternary fossil record. Ecol Lett8 739 747 - 23.
Kaspari M. Ward P. S. Yuan M. 2004 Engery gradients and the geographic distribution of local ant diversity. Oecologia140 407 413 - 24.
Latimer A. M. 2007 Geography and resource limitation complicate metabolism-based predictions of species richness.88 1895 1898 - 25.
Mittelbach G. G. Schemske D. W. Cornell H. V. Allen A. P. Brown J. M. Bush M. B. Harrison S. P. Hurlbert A. H. Knowlton N. Lessio H. A. et al. 2007 Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett,10 315 331 - 26.
Ricklefs R. E. 2004 A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity Ecol Lett7 1 15 - 27.
Rohde K. 1992 Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause 65 514 527 - 28.
Rosenzweig M. L. 1995 Species Diversity in Space and Time Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. - 29.
Sanders N. S. Lessard J. P. Fitzpatrick M. C. Dunn R. 2007 Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains. Global Ecol. Biogeogr16 640 649 - 30.
Advancing the matabolic theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters2009 R Stegen J. C. Enquist B. J. Ferriere 20. R. 12 1001 1015 - 31.
Storch D. 2003 Comment on “Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule”. Science 299, 346. - 32.
Storch D. Gaston K. J. 2004 Untangling ecological complexity on different scales of space and time 5 389 400 - 33.
Storch D. Marquet A. Brown J. H. 2007 Scaling Biodiversity Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. - 34.
Waide R. B. Willig M. R. Steiner C. F. Mittelbach G. Gough L. Dodson S. I. Juday G. P. Parmenter R. 1999 The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,30 257 300 - 35.
Wang Z. Brown J. H. Tang Z. Fang J. 2009 Temperature dependence, apatial scale, and tree species diversity in eastern Asia and North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106 13388 13392 - 36.
West G. B. Brown J. H. Enquist B. J. 1997 A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science276 122 126 - 37.
West G. B. Brown J. H. Enquist B. J. 1999 A general model for the structure, function, and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature400 664 667 - 38.
Willig M. R. Kaufman D. M. Stevens R. D. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst2003 Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis34 273 309 Wright, D. H. 1983 Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory. Oikos 41, 496-506. - 39.
Zhang Q. Wang Z. Q. Ji M. F. Fan Z. X. Deng J. M. 2011 Patterns of species richness in relation to temperature, taxonomy and spatial scale in eastern China 307 EOF 313 EOF - 40.
Zhao S. Fang J. 2006 Patterns of species richness for vascular plants in China’s nature reserves Diversity Distrib12 364 372