Periodic expression of
1. Introduction
Cell duplication is a strictly regulated process that underlies growth and development of all organisms. The ordered series of events that lead to the duplication of a cell is commonly referred to as the cell cycle. The purpose of the cell cycle is to transmit an intact and complete copy of the genome from one generation to the next. Although certain highly specialized cell types undergo multiple rounds of replication per cell cycle in a developmentally coordinated process termed endoreplication, like for example megakaryocytes, plant endosperm,
2. The cell cycle
2.1. Regulation of the cell cycle by cyclin dependent kinases
The cell cycle is generally divided into four specific phases: G1 phase, during which the cell grows and prepares for cell cycle entry; S phase, during which DNA synthesis takes place; G2 phase, during which cells prepare for M phase; and M phase, in which chromosomes segregate and cells divide. In eukaryotic cells, the cell cycle is controlled by cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs; Figure 1). CDKs have been highly conserved during evolution; even to such a degree that vertebrate CDK1 can substitute for
eukaryotes, several CDKs are involved in cell cycle regulation, i.e. Cdk1, Cdk2, Cdk4 and Cdk6 (Satyanarayana and Kaldis 2009). Mitogens induce transcription of cyclin D and cyclin E, which form complexes with Cdk4/6 and Cdk2, respectively, to induce entry into the cell cycle. Cdk1 is traditionally thought of as a mitotic CDK that is only involved in regulation of mitosis (Satyanarayana and Kaldis 2009). However, mouse knockout models have changed this paradigm; only Cdk1 was shown to be necessary and sufficient for cell cycle control, while Cdk2/4/6 do not suffice to regulate the cell cycle (Malumbres and Barbacid 2009). Instead, Cdk2/4/6 are important for development of the organism by controlling the cell cycle in cells of specialized tissues (Malumbres and Barbacid 2009). Note that this single-CDK model is very similar to the yeast cell cycle model in which a single CDK suffices for cell cycle regulation.
2.2. Regulation of cyclin dependent kinases
CDK activity is controlled at multiple levels (Figure 2). CDKs are inactive during G1 phase because cyclin levels are low (Pines 1994). As the cell progresses through G1 phase, cyclin levels increase, and binding of cyclin to CDK increases the catalytic activity of the kinase (Jeffrey, Russo et al. 1995). CDKs, like other kinases, have a two-lobed structure. In absence of cyclins the catalytic cleft is blocked by a large, flexible structure called the T loop, and the phosphates of the ATP molecule are improperly aligned (Pavletich 1999). When cyclins bind, the T loop moves away from the catalytic cleft, and the phosphates of the ATP molecule realign, allowing phosphorylation of substrate proteins. In addition, phosphorylation of the T loop increases the affinity of the CDK for cyclins and further exposes the catalytic cleft (Russo, Jeffrey et al. 1996). CDK activity is negatively regulated by cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs), such as p21WAF, p27CIP and p16INK4. CKIs directly bind cyclin-CDK complexes, and inhibit binding of ATP to the kinase (p27CIP) or prevent binding of the cyclin (p16INK4) (Pavletich 1999). Furthermore, CDKs can be phosphorylated on residues in the N-terminus by Wee1 kinases, leading to inhibition of CDK activity. For instance,
2.3. Positive feedback induces entry into S phase
A notable feature of cell cycle regulation is the abundant use of feedback loops, which make cell cycle transitions particularly switch-like (Ferrell, Tsai et al. 2011). One example is the transition from G1 to S phase (Fig. 3A). During G1 phase, CDKs are inactive due to low cyclin levels and the presence of CKIs. However, as the cell progresses through G1, cyclin levels (Cln3 in
The mechanism of cell cycle entry is highly conserved between
Once the cell has successfully entered the cell cycle, it shuts off the G1 transcriptional program. This is important for proper cell cycle progression and promotes unidirectionality of the cell cycle. In
3. CDKs control DNA replication at multiple levels
The purpose of the cell cycle is to faithfully transmit a complete copy of the genome from one generation to the next. Two events are fundamental to this process: DNA replication, and segregation of the replicated chromosomes into the daughter cells. It is important that chromosome segregation does not occur before DNA replication is complete, otherwise the cell would experience massive genome instability. Therefore, these two processes are separated in time; chromosome segregation (which takes place in M phase) does not occur until DNA replication (which occurs in S phase) has finished (Murray and Kirschner 1989). Furthermore, as I will discuss below, several mechanisms have evolved that make sure that DNA replication only takes place during S phase and just once per cell cycle.
3.1. Licensing of origins of replication is restricted to G1 phase
DNA replication is a multi-step process. It starts with origin licensing, a process in which a specific protein-DNA complex called the prereplicative complex (pre-RC) is formed at origins in G1 phase, when Cdk1 is inactive (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5). In
3.2. Phosphorylation of DNA replication factors induces firing of origins of replication during S phase
Clb5-Cdk1 and Clb6-Cdk1 complexes are responsible for inducing DNA replication (Schwob and Nasmyth 1993). The activity of these complexes is restricted to S phase because the Clb5,6 cyclin genes are part of the G1 transcriptional program, and therefore expression of Clb5,6 peaks at the G1-S transition. However, Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes are still maintained in an inactive state by the CKI Sic1 until the cell is ready to initiate DNA replication (Schwob, Bohm et al. 1994). Cln1,2-Cdk1 complexes then phosphorylate Sic1, which leads to ubiquitination of Sic1 by the Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) complex, targeting it for degradation by the proteasome (Nash, Tang et al. 2001). This then results in activation of Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes.
Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes induce DNA replication by phosphorylating Sld2 and Sld3 (Fig. 6) (Araki 2010). Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 increases their affinity for Dpb11 (Araki 2010). Dpb11 has two pairs of tandem BRCT domains, which are known to be phosphopeptide binding domains; the N-terminal pair of BRCT domains interact with Sld3, while the C-terminal pair preferentially bind Sld2 (Araki 2010). The interaction between Dpb11, Sld2 and Sld3 is necessary and sufficient for initiation of DNA replication, although the exact molecular mechanism remains obscure (Araki 2010).
It was recently reported that phosphorylation of Sld2 may promote formation of the pre-loading complex (pre-LC), which consists of Sld2, Dpb11, GINS and Polε (Muramatsu, Hirai et al. 2010). GINS and Polε form a subcomplex throughout the cell cycle, which associates with Sld2-Dpb11 upon phosphorylation of Sld2 by Cdk1 (Muramatsu, Hirai et al. 2010). One proposed function for formation of the pre-LC is that the pre-LC serves to bring the GINS complex to the pre-RC complex through the interaction of Dpb11 with the pre-RC-associated, Cdk1-phosphorylated Sld3 (Araki 2010). Arrival of GINS at the pre-RC would then result in formation of the Cdc45-MCM2-7-GINS (CMG) complex, which represents the active helicase that unwinds DNA to mediate DNA replication (Araki 2010).
In addition to Clb5,6-Cdk1, a second kinase complex termed Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK), which consists of the regulatory subunit Dbf4 and the catalytic subunit Cdc7, controls initiation of DNA replication (Araki 2010). DDK is only active during S phase, because Dbf4 is only expressed in late G1, and because Dbf4 is degraded by the APC (Tanaka and Araki 2010). Because Cdk1 phosphorylates and inactivates components of the APC (Jaspersen, Charles et al. 1999; Ostapenko, Burton et al. 2008), Dbf4 is stabilized when Cdk1 becomes active, i.e. at the G1/S transition (Tanaka and Araki 2010). DDK is recruited to origins independently of the pre-LC complex, probably through its interaction with the MCM2-7. DDK directly phosphorylates the MCM2-7 complex, which is thought to increase its affinity for Cdc45 and GINS, thus leading to formation of the CMG complex (Tanaka and Araki 2010). DNA polε extends the leading strand at each replication fork, while DNA Polα/primase synthesizes Okazaki fragments that are extended by DNA Polδ on the lagging strand.
The requirement for Cdk1 can be bypassed to induce DNA replication outside of S phase. To circumvent the requirement for Cdk1, both Sld2 and Sld3 phosphorylation must be bypassed (Araki 2010). The requirement for Sld2 phosphorylation can be bypassed by expressing a phospho-mimetic form of Sld2, either Sld2-T84D or Sld2-11D. The requirement for Sld3 can be bypassed by expressing an Sld3-Dpb11 fusion protein. However, cells that express phospho-mimetic Sld2 and Sld3-Dpb11 still depend on DDK1 activity to induce DNA replication (Araki 2010). Dbf4 is normally unstable in G1 phase, but overexpressing Dbf4 in combination with expressing Sld2-T84D/Sld2-11D and Sld3-Dpb11 leads to DNA replication in G1 phase.
3.3. Expression of most DNA replication factors is limited to a specific phase of the cell cycle
Importantly, the expression of many genes that encode DNA replication factors is confined to a specific phase of the cell cycle (Table 1). In general, genes that have functions in early stages of the DNA replication process (i.e. licensing of origins of replication) are transcribed in G2 and M phase, such that their protein levels are highest in G1 phase. Genes that function later in the DNA replication process (e.g. proteins that are part of the DNA replication complex) peak during late G1, such that their levels are highest in S phase when DNA replication takes place. The confined expression of DNA replication factors to specific phases of the cell cycle plays an important role in restricting DNA replication to S phase (Enserink and Kolodner 2010).
|
|
|
|
|
Subunit of the origin recognition complex | Late S | Pre-RC complex |
|
Subunit of the origin recognition complex | G2 | Pre-RC complex |
|
Subunit of the origin recognition complex | G2 | Pre-RC complex |
|
Subunit of the origin recognition complex | G2 | Pre-RC complex |
|
DNA replication licensing factor | G2 | Pre-RC complex |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Helicase | Late M | Replicative helicase |
|
Component of the pre-RC complex | Late M | Pre-RC complex |
|
Required for initiation of DNA replication | Late G1 | Origin firing |
|
Cyclin involved in Sld2 phosphorylation | Late G1 | Origin firing |
|
Cyclin involved in Sld2 phosphorylation | Late G1 | Origin firing |
|
Required for stable replication fork pausing | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Required for stable replication fork pausing | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
GINS complex | Late G1 | Replicative helicase |
|
GINS complex | Late G1 | Replicative helicase |
|
Regulatory subunit of Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase complex | Late G1 | Origin firing |
|
Loads DNA polε onto pre-RCs | Late G1 | Origin firing |
|
Replication factor A complex | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Replication factor A complex | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Replication factor A complex | Early S | Replication fork |
|
PCNA | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA replication initiation factor; recruited to MCM pre-RC complexes | Late G1 | Replicative helicase |
|
DNA replication and checkpoint signaling | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase ε catalytic subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase δ catalytic subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase δ subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase δ subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase α primase subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Ligase that joins Okazaki fragments | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
RNase H2, degrades Okazaki fragments | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
RNase H2, degrades Okazaki fragments | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Flap Endonuclease | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Alternative RFC complex component | Late G1 | Replication fork |
|
Ribonucleotide reductase, dNTP synthesis | Late G1 | dNTP synthesis |
|
Replication factor C complex | Late G1 | PCNA loading |
|
Replication factor C complex | Late G1 | PCNA loading |
|
Replication factor C complex | Late G1 | PCNA loading |
|
GINS complex | G1/S border | Replicative helicase |
|
Ribonucleotide reductase, dNTP synthesis | G1/S border | dNTP synthesis |
|
Ribonucleotide reductase, dNTP synthesis | G1/S border | dNTP synthesis |
|
Catalytic subunit of Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase complex | G1/S border | Origin firing |
|
DNA polymerase ε subunit | G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase ε subunit | G1 | Replication fork |
|
DNA polymerase α primase catalytic subunit | Late G1 | Replication fork |
3.4. Preventing re-replication
A major challenge to the cell is to make sure that its genetic material does not get copied more than once. Several mechanisms are in place to prevent that firing of origins takes place outside of S phase, and that origins do not fire more than once per cell cycle (Fig. 7). One major mechanism that prevents re-replication focuses on Cdc6 (Remus and Diffley 2009), and Cdc6 is inhibited at three levels. First, transcription of Cdc6 is limited to G1-S phase (Moll, Tebb et al. 1991). Second, phosphorylation of Cdc6 by Cdk1 targets it for degradation by the SCF (Drury, Perkins et al. 1997). Third, any remaining free Cdc6 is 'mopped up' through phosphorylation by Cdk1, which induces the binding of Cdc6 to Clb2-Cdk1, thereby preventing Cdc6 from licensing origins (Mimura, Seki et al. 2004). Although depletion of Cdc6 efficiently inhibits re-firing or origins, additional mechanisms exist to prevent re-replication. For instance, the MCM2-7 complex and the associated Cdt1 are shuttled out of the nucleus in a Cdk1-dependent manner (Labib, Diffley et al. 1999; Nguyen, Co et al. 2000; Liku, Nguyen et al. 2005). Finally, the ORC complex is inhibited through phosphorylation by Cdk1 (Nguyen, Co et al. 2001).
3.5. Precocious activation of Cdk1 leads to DNA damage during S phase
A key feature of tumor cells is uncontrolled entry into the cell cycle, which is nearly always the result of defects in the pRB pathway. Studies in yeast have shown that this is highly detrimental to genome stability (Lengronne and Schwob 2002; Tanaka and Diffley 2002; Enserink, Hombauer et al. 2009). Precocious activation of Cdk1, either through overexpression of
4. Checkpoints monitor DNA replication stress and DNA damage
Stalled replication forks are a threat to the cell’s genome because they could collapse, leaving the cell with partially unreplicated, broken chromosomal DNA. Therefore, cells have developed elaborate systems that sense DNA damage and stalling of DNA replication forks to arrest the cell cycle and to induce DNA repair (Fig. 8) (Hartwell and Weinert 1989).
Cells respond to DNA replication blocks and to damaged DNA by activating checkpoints that arrest or slow the cell cycle and then help activate DNA repair pathways (Hartwell and Weinert 1989). The DNA damage checkpoint acts at the G1/S and G2/M borders in the presence of damaged DNA. In addition, two types of checkpoints have been described in S phase: the DNA replication checkpoint, which arrests cell cycle progression and inhibits firing of late replication origins in response to replication stress; and the intra-S checkpoint, which slows DNA replication and cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). Here I will focus mainly on the DNA replication checkpoint.
Typically, checkpoints are thought to function in a signalling hierarchy: Damage signals -> damage sensors -> signal transducers -> effectors (Fig. 8) (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). However, several damage sensors are part of the DNA replication fork, and they are themselves targets of these signalling pathways (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). Therefore, these pathways are not strictly linear.
The DNA replication checkpoint plays a major role in maintenance of genome stability. It is activated when DNA replication forks stall, for instance due to a lesion in the DNA or due to depletion of dNTPs (Branzei and Foiani 2010). Exactly how this is sensed remains unclear, but likely involves exposure of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (Byun, Pacek et al. 2005). ssDNA may be generated because the CMG complex keeps unwinding double-stranded DNA, even though it is uncoupled from DNA replication because the replication fork has stalled (Byun, Pacek et al. 2005). The ssDNA binding complex RPA, a heterotrimeric protein complex consisting of Rfa1, Rfa2 and Rfa3, may have a function in sensing ssDNA (Zou and Elledge 2003). Other proteins that have been proposed to act as sensors include Rfc5, PCNA, Dpb11, Pol2 and Sgs1 (Kolodner, Putnam et al. 2002). How these proteins relay the signal to activate the checkpoint is not very clear. Two phosphatidyl inositol 3' kinase-related kinases (PIKK) family kinases, Mec1 and Tel1, play a central role in checkpoint activation in
In addition to Rad53, another kinase, Chk1, becomes activated by the checkpoint, while the kinase Dun1 is thought to function downstream of Rad53 (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). Together, these kinases phosphorylate a large number of substrates involved in cell cycle control, DNA repair and nucleotide metabolism (Fig. 8).
4.1. Cdk1 activity remains high during activation of the replication checkpoint in S. cerevisiae
The replication checkpoint has several important functions that help maintain cell viability during DNA replication stress. The best known function of the checkpoint is to induce cell cycle arrest (Hartwell and Weinert 1989). In contrast to higher eukaryotes, Cdk1 activity remains high during checkpoint arrest (Sorger and Murray 1992). One reason for maintaining high Cdk1 activity during S phase arrest is that Cdk1 activity, as described above, prevents re-licensing of origins that have already fired (Zegerman and Diffley 2010). Thereby, the cell will not activate additional origins of replication in the face of replication stress, which could further threaten genome stability. Another reason for maintaining Cdk1 activity is that Cdk1 is important for repair of DNA double strand break (DSBs) that may have arisen as a result from collapsed DNA replication forks (Ira, Pellicioli et al. 2004). Here, Cdk1 phosphorylates and activates the nuclease Sae2 (Huertas, Cortes-Ledesma et al. 2008), which is required for resection of DNA double strand breaks, the first step of homologous recombination (HR). At the same time, Cdk1 actively suppresses the recruitment of proteins involved in non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) (Zhang, Shim et al. 2009). This mechanism ensures that in G1 (when there is only one copy of the genome present in the cell and therefore no template for HR) NHEJ is the preferred mechanism of repair of DSBs, while during the cell cycle stages that Cdk1 is active (S-G2-M) HR is the preferred repair pathway.
4.2. The DNA replication checkpoint enforces cell cycle arrest
If Cdk1 remains active during activation of the DNA replication checkpoint, how then is cell cycle arrest enforced? One main mechanism of preventing cell cycle progression is the inhibition of firing of late origins of replication by Rad53 through phosphorylation of Sld3 and Dbf4 (Lopez-Mosqueda, Maas et al. 2010; Zegerman and Diffley 2010) (Fig. 9). Rad53-mediated Sld3 phosphorylation may prevent the interaction of Sld3 with Cdc45 and Dpb11, thus preventing origins from firing. However, the mechanism whereby Rad53-mediated Dbf4 phosphorylation prevents DDK from activating origins remains unknown (Lopez-Mosqueda, Maas et al. 2010; Zegerman and Diffley 2010). Rad53, in conjunction with Pds1, also prevents cell cycle progression by stabilizing Pds1 (Sanchez, Bachant et al. 1999; Agarwal, Tang et al. 2003). Pds1 is the yeast version of securin, an inhibitor of the separase Esp1. Esp1 is important for activating anaphase by cleaving cohesin, a protein complex that keeps sister chromatids together after DNA replication. Thus, stabilization of Pds1 by Rad53 and Chk1 helps prevent anaphase onset.
4.3. The DNA replication checkpoint stabilizes replication forks
A major function of the replication checkpoint is to stabilize replication forks. Stalled replication forks are at risk of collapse, which would result in partially unreplicated DNA and DNA double strand breaks, often leading to genome instability. Mec1 and Rad53 are the main players in stabilizing replication forks, while Chk1 appears to have a more redundant function (Segurado and Diffley 2008). The exact molecular mechanism remains unclear. Many substrates of Mec1 and Rad53 have been suggested (Segurado and Tercero 2009). A main target of Rad53 may be Exo1 (Segurado and Diffley 2008), although the exact molecular mechanism is not very clear. The targets of Mec1 and Chk1 in replication fork stabilization remain unknown. After the problems leading to DNA replication stress and activation of the checkpoint have been rectified, the replication forks need to restart. This process requires the activity of Rad53 and may also involve HR-dependent mechanisms (Petermann and Helleday 2010).
4.4. Other processes controlled by the DNA replication checkpoint
Although I will not go into great detail, it is worth mentioning that activation of the replication checkpoint has several other consequences. One important target of the checkpoint is Sml1, which is an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, which synthesizes
dNTPs. Sml1 is phosphorylated by the checkpoint kinase Dun1, leading to destruction of Sml1 and thus increased activity of ribonucleotide reductase, which is important for sustaining cellular dNTP levels (Zhao and Rothstein 2002). Another process controlled by the checkpoint is transcription. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint by chemicals such as MMS, which methylates DNA leading to replication fork stalling, broadly alters transcription of a large number of genes (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). Many of these genes do not confer resistance to agents that induce DNA replication stress (Putnam, Jaehnig et al. 2009). Nonetheless, there also exist specific pathways that activate transcription of genes that have important functions in maintaining cell viability during DNA replication stress. For example, Dun1 phosphorylates and inhibits the transcriptional repressor Crt1, which leads to increased transcription of the ribonucleotide reductase encoding genes
5. Concluding remarks
DNA replication and cell cycle control are tightly connected. The cyclin dependent kinase Cdk1 is involved both in initiation of DNA replication and in safeguarding that replication takes place once per cell cycle. Deregulated Cdk1 activity leads to inefficient DNA replication and genome instability, and checkpoints have evolved that monitor DNA replication and chromosomal integrity. While the past decade has strongly increased our understanding of the processes that control DNA replication, the details of the molecular mechanisms often remain shrouded, and it will be exciting to see this field develop.
References
- 1.
Agarwal R. Tang Z. et al. 2003 "Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage." J Biol Chem278 45 45027 33 . - 2.
Alcasabas A. A. Osborn A. J. et al. 2001 "Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53." Nat Cell Biol3 11 958 65 . - 3.
Araki H. 2010 "Cyclin-dependent kinase-dependent initiation of chromosomal DNA replication." Curr Opin Cell Biol22 6 766 71 . - 4.
Bell S. P. Stillman B. 1992 "ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex." Nature357 6374 128 34 . - 5.
Booher R. N. Deshaies R. J. et al. 1993 "Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins." Embo J 12(9): 3417-26. - 6.
Branzei D. Foiani M. 2010 "Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork." Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol11 3 208 19 . - 7.
Byun T. S. Pacek M. et al. 2005 "Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint." Genes Dev19 9 1040 52 . - 8.
Charvin G. Oikonomou C. et al. 2010 "Origin of irreversibility of cell cycle start in budding yeast." PLoS Biol 8(1): e1000284. - 9.
Costanzo M. Nishikawa J. L. et al. 2004 "CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast." Cell117 7 899 913 . - 10.
de Bruin R. A. Kalashnikova T. I. et al. 2006 "Constraining G1-specific transcription to late G1 phase: the MBF-associated corepressor Nrm1 acts via negative feedback." Mol Cell23 4 483 96 . - 11.
de Bruin R. A. Mc Donald W. H. et al. 2004 "Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5." Cell117 7 887 98 . - 12.
Dotiwala F. Haase J. et al. 2007 "The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A104 27 11358 63 . - 13.
Drury L. S. Perkins G. et al. 1997 "The Cdc4/34/53 pathway targets Cdc6p for proteolysis in budding yeast." EMBO J16 19 5966 76 . - 14.
Enserink J. M. Hombauer H. et al. 2009 "Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae." J Cell Biol185 3 423 37 . - 15.
Enserink J. M. Kolodner R. D. 2010 "An overview of Cdk1 -controlled targets and processes." Cell Div 5: 11. - 16.
Enserink J. M. Smolka M. B. et al. 2006 "Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." J Cell Biol175 5 729 41 . - 17.
Ferrell J. E. Jr Tsai T. Y. et al. 2011 "Modeling the cell cycle: why do certain circuits oscillate?" Cell144 6 874 85 . - 18.
Gilbert C. S. Green C. M. et al. 2001 "Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine." Mol Cell8 1 129 36 . - 19.
Gunjan A. Verreault A. 2003 "A Rad53 kinase-dependent surveillance mechanism that regulates histone protein levels in S. cerevisiae." Cell115 5 537 49 . - 20.
Hartwell L. H. Weinert T. A. 1989 "Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events." Science246 4930 629 34 . - 21.
Huang D. Kaluarachchi S. et al. 2009 "Dual regulation by pairs of cyclin-dependent protein kinases and histone deacetylases controls G1 transcription in budding yeast." PLoS Biol 7(9): e1000188. - 22.
Huertas P. Cortes-Ledesma F. et al. 2008 "CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination." Nature455 7213 689 92 . - 23.
Ira G. Pellicioli A. et al. 2004 "DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1." Nature431 7011 1011 7 . - 24.
Jaspersen S. L. Charles J. F. et al. 1999 "Inhibitory phosphorylation of the APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14." Curr Biol9 5 227 36 . - 25.
Jeffrey P. D. Russo A. A. et al. 1995 "Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclinA-CDK2 complex." Nature376 6538 313 20 . - 26.
Koch C. Schleiffer A. et al. 1996 "Switching transcription on and off during the yeast cell cycle: Cln/Cdc28 kinases activate bound transcription factor SBF (Swi4/Swi6) at start, whereas Clb/Cdc28 kinases displace it from the promoter in G2." Genes Dev10 2 129 41 . - 27.
Kolodner R. D. Putnam C. D. et al. 2002 "Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." Science297 5581 552 7 . - 28.
Krishnan V. Nirantar S. et al. 2004 "DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior." Mol Cell16 5 687 700 . - 29.
Labib K. Diffley J. F. et al. 1999 "G1-phase and B-type cyclins exclude the DNA-replication factor Mcm4 from the nucleus." Nat Cell Biol1 7 415 22 . - 30.
Lee H. O. Davidson J. M. et al. 2009 "Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose." Genes Dev23 21 2461 77 . - 31.
Lengronne A. Schwob E. 2002 "The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1)." Mol Cell9 5 1067 78 . - 32.
Liku M. E. Nguyen V. Q. et al. 2005 "CDK phosphorylation of a novel NLS-NES module distributed between two subunits of the Mcm2-7 complex prevents chromosomal rereplication." Mol Biol Cell16 10 5026 39 . - 33.
Lopez-Mosqueda J. Maas N. L. et al. 2010 "Damage-induced phosphorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing." Nature467 7314 479 83 . - 34.
Malumbres M. Barbacid M. 2009 "Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm." Nat Rev Cancer9 3 153 66 . - 35.
Mimura S. Seki T. et al. 2004 "Phosphorylation-dependent binding of mitotic cyclins to Cdc6 contributes to DNA replication control." Nature431 7012 1118 23 . - 36.
Moll T. Tebb G. et al. 1991 "The role of phosphorylation and the CDC28 protein kinase in cell cycle-regulated nuclear import of the S. cerevisiae transcription factor SWI5." Cell66 4 743 58 . - 37.
Muramatsu S. Hirai K. et al. 2010 "CDK-dependent complex formation between replication proteins Dpb11, Sld2, Pol (epsilon}, and GINS in budding yeast." Genes Dev24 6 602 12 . - 38.
Murray A. W. Kirschner M. W. 1989 "Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle." Science246 4930 614 21 . - 39.
Nash P. Tang X. et al. 2001 "Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication." Nature414 6863 514 21 . - 40.
Newlon C. S. Theis J. F. 2002 "DNA replication joins the revolution: whole-genome views of DNA replication in budding yeast." Bioessays24 4 300 4 . - 41.
Nguyen V. Q. Co C. et al. 2000 "Clb/Cdc28 kinases promote nuclear export of the replication initiator proteins Mcm2-7." Curr Biol10 4 195 205 . - 42.
Nguyen V. Q. Co C. et al. 2001 "Cyclin-dependent kinases prevent DNA re-replication through multiple mechanisms." Nature411 6841 1068 73 . - 43.
Ostapenko D. Burton J. L. et al. 2008 "Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation." Mol Cell Biol28 15 4653 64 . - 44.
Pavletich N. P. 1999 "Mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation: structures of Cdks, their cyclin activators, and Cip and INK4 inhibitors." J Mol Biol287 5 821 8 . - 45.
Petermann E. Helleday T. 2010 "Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart." Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol11 10 683 7 . - 46.
Pines J. 1994 "The cell cycle kinases." Semin Cancer Biol5 4 305 13 . - 47.
Putnam C. D. Jaehnig E. J. et al. 2009 "Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." DNA Repair (Amst). - 48.
Remus D. Diffley J. F. 2009 "Eukaryotic DNA replication control: lock and load, then fire." Curr Opin Cell Biol21 6 771 7 . - 49.
Russell P. Nurse P. 1986 "cdc25+ functions as an inducer in the mitotic control of fission yeast." Cell45 1 145 53 . - 50.
Russo A. A. Jeffrey P. D. et al. 1996 "Structural basis of cyclin-dependent kinase activation by phosphorylation." Nat Struct Biol3 8 696 700 . - 51.
Sanchez Y. Bachant J. et al. 1999 "Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms." Science286 5442 1166 71 . - 52.
Satyanarayana A. Kaldis P. 2009 "Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms." Oncogene28 33 2925 39 . - 53.
Schwob E. Bohm T. et al. 1994 "The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae." Cell 79(2): 233-44. - 54.
Schwob E. Nasmyth K. 1993 "CLB5 and CLB6, a new pair of B cyclins involved in DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." Genes Dev 7(7A):1160 75 . - 55.
Segurado M. Diffley J. F. 2008 "Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks." Genes Dev22 13 1816 27 . - 56.
Segurado M. Tercero J. A. 2009 "The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork." Biol Cell101 11 617 27 . - 57.
Smolka M. B. Chen S. H. et al. 2006 "An FHA domain-mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth." J Cell Biol175 5 743 53 . - 58.
Sorger P. K. Murray A. W. 1992 "S-phase feedback control in budding yeast independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of34cdc28 " Nature 355(6358): 365-8. - 59.
Stinchcomb D. T. Struhl K. et al. 1979 "Isolation and characterisation of a yeast chromosomal replicator." Nature282 5734 39 43 . - 60.
Tanaka S. Araki H. 2010 "Regulation of the initiation step of DNA replication by cyclin-dependent kinases." Chromosoma119 6 565 74 . - 61.
Tanaka S. Diffley J. F. 2002 "Deregulated G1-cyclin expression induces genomic instability by preventing efficient pre-RC formation." Genes Dev16 20 2639 49 . - 62.
Theis J. F. Newlon C. S. 1997 "The ARS309 chromosomal replicator of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on an exceptional ARS consensus sequence." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A94 20 10786 91 . - 63.
van den Heuvel. S. Dyson N. J. 2008 "Conserved functions of the pRB and E2F families." Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol9 9 713 24 . - 64.
Wang H. Carey L. B. et al. 2009 "Recruitment of Cln3 cyclin to promoters controls cell cycle entry via histone deacetylase and other targets." PLoS Biol 7(9): e1000189. - 65.
Zegerman P. Diffley J. F. 2010 "Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation." Nature467 7314 474 8 . - 66.
Zhang Y. Shim E. Y. et al. 2009 "Regulation of repair choice: Cdk1 suppresses recruitment of end joining factors at DNA breaks." DNA Repair (Amst)8 10 1235 41 . - 67.
Zhao X. Rothstein R. 2002 "The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99 6 3746 51 . - 68.
Zou L. Elledge S. J. 2003 "Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes." Science300 5625 1542 8 .