Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Allele Mining and Development of Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) Marker in Plant Breeding

Written By

Hemant Sharma, Sourabh Kumar and Deepa Bhadana

Submitted: 08 September 2023 Reviewed: 12 September 2023 Published: 24 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1003055

From the Edited Volume

Recent Trends in Plant Breeding and Genetic Improvement

Mohamed A. El-Esawi

Chapter metrics overview

46 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Crop improvement refers to the systematic approach of discovering and selecting plants that possess advantageous alleles for specific target genes. The foundation of crop improvement initiatives typically relies on the fundamental concepts of genetic diversity and the genetic architecture of agricultural plants. Allele mining is a contemporary and efficacious technique utilized for the identification of naturally occurring allelic variations within genes that exhibit advantageous characteristics. Consequently, the utilization of allele mining has significant potential as a feasible approach for enhancing crop-related endeavors. The gene pool of a plant exhibits a substantial degree of genetic variety, characterized by the presence of a multitude of mechanism genes. The utilization of genetic variants for the detection and separation of novel alleles of genes that display favorable traits from the current gene pool, and their subsequent incorporation into the development of improved cultivars through the application of marker-assisted selection, is of utmost importance.

Keywords

  • allele
  • PCR
  • genotyping
  • marker
  • abiotic and biotic stress

1. Introduction

Plant breeding is a vital field in agriculture that focuses on generating crop varieties with enhanced features to suit the expanding worldwide demand for food, feed, fiber, and bioenergy. Over the decades, conventional breeding methods have played a key role in crop improvement [1, 2]. However, the advent of molecular biology and genomics has revolutionized the profession, giving plant breeders with sophisticated tools to examine the genetic basis of desired traits. One of these technologies, known as allele mining, has emerged as a basic approach to detect and harness beneficial genetic variants within plant populations. In this comprehensive discussion, we will study the notion of allele mining, its significance in identifying favorable genetic variations, its usefulness in boosting agricultural attributes, and the methodologies and procedures employed in this process [3].

The process of introducing desirable genetic variants or alleles into the genetic makeup of a plant population or cultivar is referred to as allele introduction in plants [4]. This can be accomplished through a variety of breeding approaches that aim to increase individual features or overall performance. Allele introduction is an important stage in plant breeding because it allows breeders to harness genetic variation and develop new plant types with desirable traits. The practice of searching and detecting novel genetic variations or alleles within a species’ gene pool is referred to as allele mining in plant breeding [5]. This strategy seeks to identify and exploit valuable genetic resources for agricultural improvement. Breeders can acquire desirable features that may be absent or underrepresented in cultivated varieties by tapping into existing genetic diversity. Breeders can use these techniques to transfer desirable alleles into plants and generate new varieties with improved features including disease resistance, stress tolerance, yield potential, qualitative qualities, or agronomic performance. The technique of choice is determined by the specific breeding objectives, the availability of genetic resources, and the features of the target plant species. KASP markers, also known as Kompetitive allele-specific PCR markers, are a type of molecular marker that find widespread application in the field of genetic analysis and plant breeding. They operate on the premise of allele-specific amplification through the utilization of real-time PCR that is based on fluorescence [6]. For the purpose of conducting large-scale screenings of the genetic variants that exist within plant populations, KASP markers offer a solution for genotyping that is high-throughput, quick, and economical. In the field of plant breeding, KASP markers provide a number of benefits, some of which are their high level of specificity, precision, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. They are very helpful when it comes to genotyping huge populations, carrying out high-throughput screening, and locating genetic variants that are connected with key features. In order to hasten the process of selecting better crop varieties and developing new ones, plant breeding programs have extensively included KASP markers into their procedures.

Advertisement

2. Allele mining and identifying desirable genetic variations

Allele mining, also known as allelic variation finding, is a rigorous and methodical strategy designed to investigate and ascertain the genetic variety present in a particular plant species or population. The fundamental objective of allele mining is the identification of alleles, which are variant forms of genes, that exhibit associations with specific qualities of interest. The alleles can exhibit variances in their DNA sequences, which can subsequently lead to differences in the expression or functionality of the corresponding genes [7]. The process of allele mining is of great significance in the exploration of the latent genetic capacity of crops, as it enables the identification of genetic variations that can be utilized for the enhancement of agricultural traits. The initial step in the process of allele mining is the acquisition of genetic data from a wide range of plant individuals or groups belonging to a certain species [8]. The variety in question encompasses a range of plant materials, such as conventional landraces, wild cousins, mutant lines, and other specimens that possess genetic variants with possible implications. The genetic information is thereafter submitted to meticulous study, frequently employing sophisticated molecular biology techniques and genomic tools [3, 9, 10].

Advertisement

3. Enhancing crop traits through allele mining

The significance of allele mining in plant breeding is broad and involves various fundamental areas of crop enhancement:

  1. Increased Crop Yields: One of the main goals of plant breeding is to enhance crop varieties that can achieve higher yields in order to address the increasing worldwide demand for food and agricultural commodities. The process of allele mining plays a crucial role in the pursuit of this objective as it enables the identification of alleles that are linked to enhanced yield potential. These alleles have the potential to influence multiple facets of crop development, such as seed size, grain count, and photosynthetic efficiency.

  2. Disease Resistance: Crop diseases produced by various pathogens, including bacteria, fungus, viruses, and nematodes, present substantial obstacles to the field of agriculture. The identification of alleles associated with disease resistance is of paramount importance in the development of crops that possess the ability to survive attacks by pathogens. Through the process of allele mining, breeders are able to identify genetic differences that provide inherent resistance to certain conditions. This allows for the development of crops that necessitate fewer chemical treatments, thereby mitigating environmental consequences and decreasing production expenses.

  3. Stress Tolerance: Stress tolerance is a critical factor affecting crop output, as environmental stressors such as drought, heat, salt, and soil nutrient deficits can have a significant negative influence. The process of allele mining enables the identification of alleles that are correlated with stress tolerance, so enabling breeders to cultivate crop varieties that exhibit resilience in unfavorable environmental conditions. These genotypes have the potential to impact physiological systems, such as water consumption efficiency or ion transport, which play a crucial role in stress adaption.

  4. Nutritional Quality: Nutritional Quality: In conjunction with enhancing crop productivity and stress tolerance, allele mining can also be employed to enhance the nutritional composition of agricultural produce. The identification of genes responsible for the synthesis of crucial minerals, vitamins, and antioxidants has the potential to facilitate the cultivation of crops with heightened nutritional content. This advancement could effectively tackle worldwide health issues associated with malnutrition and dietary insufficiencies.

Advertisement

4. Methods and techniques used for allele mining

The attainment of success in allele mining necessitates the utilization of a synergistic amalgamation of sophisticated methodologies and procedures to investigate and evaluate the genetic variability present within plant populations. Several prominent strategies and techniques utilized in the process of allele mining encompass:

  1. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS): The advent of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has brought about a significant transformation in the field of allele mining, since it allows for the efficient and economical sequencing of complete plant genomes [9, 10]. This methodology, sometimes referred to as whole-genome sequencing, offers a comprehensive perspective on the genetic composition of a plant, enabling the identification of particular genes and alleles linked to advantageous features. Moreover, the utilization of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) enables researchers to evaluate gene expression patterns, so augmenting our comprehension of how alleles exert an influence on features.

  2. Bioinformatics Tools: The utilization of bioinformatics tools is essential for the intricate examination of the extensive genomic datasets produced by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques. Bioinformatics tools and software play a crucial role in the processing and interpretation of this data. These methods facilitate the identification of candidate alleles, the prediction of their possible impacts on phenotypes, and the execution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to establish links between alleles and phenotypic variants.

  3. Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS): Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) is a technique employed in breeding programs to incorporate possible candidate alleles that have been identified by allele mining. The utilization of molecular markers, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), that are associated with the target alleles, is employed for the purpose of screening and selecting plants that possess these desired genetic variants. The elimination of time-consuming and resource-intensive phenotypic tests expedites the breeding process.

  4. Population Genetics and Association Mapping: Population genetics and association mapping are important tools in the field of allele mining, as they offer valuable insights on the genetic diversity and structure of plant populations. Through the examination of the frequency and distribution patterns of particular alleles within populations, scholars are able to discern regions of significance within the genome. Association mapping approaches facilitate the discovery of alleles that are linked to specific features through the analysis of the relationship between genetic markers and differences in phenotypic expression.

  5. Functional Genomics: Functional genomics plays a crucial role in not only finding potential alleles but also in unraveling the underlying biological pathways that contribute to the features of interest. Researchers employ several methodologies, including gene expression analyses, gene knockout studies, and gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9 technology, to gain insights into the impact of certain alleles on the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic development and functionality.

  6. Eco Tilling: Eco-Tilling (Targeting Induced Original Lesions in Genomes) is a modified tillage approach for identifying single-nucleotide allelic variants (or, more accurately, compelling point mutations) in target genes. It is a viable alternative. Mutations in the gene of interest are identified [11]. A large number of individual variations may be found quickly, and he only needs to sequence one existing variation once for each haplotype, which saves money. In tillage, chemical mutagens are employed to introduce random mutations. To induce a single-nucleotide point mutation (G/C to A/T) in seeds, EMS, a chemical mutagen, is used [12]. M1 seeds self-pollinate to produce the M2 seed population. Look for point mutations in M2 progeny from a single seed line. During screening, DNA is pooled in a variety of ways to improve the effectiveness of mutation detection. 5′ prime end-specific primers are used to target the locus of interest, and the PCR products are heated and chilled to form heteroduplexes. The CEL I nuclease enzyme is used to cleave the base mismatch, and the products reflecting the generated mutations are examined using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. These PCR products are denatured and reannealed to allow for mismatched or heteroduplex conformations, which reflect natural and compelling SNPs.

Advertisement

5. Steps involved in designing KASP markers

Designing Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) markers for plant breeding involves the following steps.

The initial stage in the development of KASP markers involves the identification of the target SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism). This entails determining the particular SNP that is linked to the trait or characteristic under investigation or desired for selection in the field of plant breeding. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in question should possess biological significance and demonstrate relevance to the specific breeding objectives at hand [9].

5.1 SNP validation

Following the identification of the target single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), it is imperative to undertake a process of validation to ascertain its genuine association with the specific trait of interest. The validation process may entail genotyping a varied collection of plant samples in order to verify the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and its correlation with the specific trait. The process of primer design holds significant importance in the context of KASP assays, as it involves the creation of primers that are unique to the target of interest. The amplification of the area surrounding the target SNP in KASP markers is achieved through the utilization of allele-specific primers. To amplify each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), it is necessary to utilize a pair of allele-specific primers, with one primer designed for each allele, often representing the main and minor alleles. The design of these primers should be allele-specific, ensuring that they exclusively amplify the targeted allele [13, 14].

5.2 Fluorescent labelling

Within KASP tests, it is customary to employ distinct fluorescent dyes (e.g., FAM for one allele and HEX for the other) to label the allele-specific primers. The process of labelling facilitates the discrimination of alleles during the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. This study aims to determine the best polymerase chain reaction (PCR) settings for the KASP assay. This entails the determination of the annealing temperature, cycle parameters, and additional conditions in order to guarantee the targeted amplification of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) area. Control markers are frequently used into KASP experiments. The aforementioned control markers are markers that lack polymorphism and serve to amplify a specific and well-defined section of the genome. Positive controls are utilized in order to verify the proper functioning of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process and to standardize the fluorescence measurements.

5.3 Testing and optimization

Prior to implementing KASP markers in high-throughput genotyping, it is imperative to do thorough testing and optimize the assay. To ensure the reliability and robustness of the outcomes, it may be necessary to conduct experiments involving the examination of various primer concentrations, annealing temperatures, and cycle circumstances.

5.4 Genotyping

Following the validation and optimization of the KASP test, it can be employed for genotyping a greater quantity of plant samples. The experimental procedure encompasses the extraction of DNA from plant tissue, followed by PCR amplification with the KASP assay, and subsequently assessing the fluorescence data to ascertain the genotype of each individual sample.

5.5 Data analysis

The genotyping data will be subjected to analysis in order to ascertain the allelic composition of each individual sample. The existence of specific alleles can be determined by analyzing the fluorescence signals emitted by different dyes.

5.6 Data interpretation

Analyze the genotyping data within the framework of the breeding objectives. The objective is to identify the genotypes that are linked to the desired trait or characteristic, and thereafter utilize this knowledge to make informed decisions in the selection of plants for further breeding purposes.

5.7 Marker validation

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the KASP marker in larger breeding populations, hence ensuring its reliability in consistently selecting for the desired trait.

5.8 Incorporation into breeding programs

Following validation, the KASP marker should be integrated into the plant breeding program. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) can be employed to effectively identify plants possessing the required genotype, hence expediting the breeding procedure.

5.9 Ongoing surveillance

It is advisable to consistently observe and evaluate the efficacy of KASP markers within your breeding program, as the correlation between the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and the specific characteristic under consideration may undergo alterations over time as a result of recombination or other influencing variables.

Advertisement

6. Bioinformatics tools used in allele mining

Allele mining is a fundamental procedure in the field of genetics and genomics, whereby the objective is to discern and elucidate the allelic variations present within a given population of organisms. This method is commonly employed to gain insights into the genetic diversity within a population or to ascertain the presence of alleles that may be linked to particular traits of significance. The field of bioinformatics plays a pivotal part in the process of allele mining by offering a wide range of tools and resources that facilitate the study and interpretation of data (Table 1). The following is a compilation of frequently employed bioinformatics tools utilized in the process of allele mining.

S.No.ToolFunctionURL
1MEMEMultiple EM for Motif Elicitation. Analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs for similarities among them.meme.nbcr.net/meme/cgi-bin/meme. CGI [15]
2JASPARDatabase of Transcription Factor Binding Site (TFBS)http://jaspar.genereg.net/ [16]
3AGRISArabidopsis gene regulatory information server. A new information resource of Arabidopsis cis- promoterhttp://arabidopsis.med.ohio-state.edu [17]
4FastPCRFastPCR software for PCR primers or probes design and in silicoPCR, oligonucleotide assemblyhttp://en.bio-soft.net/pcr/FastPCR.html [18]
5PlantCAREA database of plant cis-acting regulatory elementshttp://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html [19]
6Primer 3Primer design. A computer program that suggests PCR primers for a variety of applicationshttp://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/ [20]
7Plantprom DBA database of plant promoter sequenceshttp://mendel.cs.rhul.ac.uk/mendel.php?topic=plantprom [21]
8Clustal OmegaMultiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences/Multiple sequence alignment programs.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/ [22]
9T-CoffeeMultiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences/Multiple sequence alignment programs.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/tcoffee/ [23]
10MAFFTMultiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences/Multiple sequence alignment programs.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/mafft/ [24]
11MUSCLEMultiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences/Multiple sequence alignment programs.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/ [25]
12DnaSPDNA Sequence Polymorphism analysis, to identify SNPs and InDels and Phylogeny analysishttp://www.ub.edu/dnasp/ [26]
13MEGAIntegrated Software Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and Sequence Alignment.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562624/ [27]
14Transcriptional regulatory element database (TRED)Collection of mammalian regulatory elementshttp://rulai.cshl.edu/cgi-bin/TRED/tred.cgi?process=home [28]
15MultalinMultiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences/Multiple sequence alignment programs.http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/ [29]
16MAT inspectorTo predict TFBS and of promoter analysishttp://www.genomatix.de/products/matinspector/ [28]

Table 1.

List and details of different bioinformatics tools used in allele mining.

Advertisement

7. KASP markers in plant breeding

The utilization of the Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) assay has significantly advanced our understanding and improvement of various traits in cereal crops. Recent studies from 2017 onwards have demonstrated the efficacy of the KASP assay in identifying key genetic markers and genes associated with important traits (Table 2).

CropsTraitsNumber and name of QTLs/markers/genesReferences
WheatDwarf bunt resistance2 QTLs[30]
WheatFusarium head blight resistanceQFhb-5A[31]
WheatLeaf rust resistance4 markers[32]
WheatStripe rust resistance3 markers[33]
WheatGrain yield-related traits26 markers[34]
WheatGreen bug resistanceGb7 gene[35]
WheatHessian fy resistanceH32 gene[35]
WheatPre-harvest sprouting resistance10 markers[36]
WheatKernel weightTaTAP46-5A gene[37]
WheatWheat curl mite resistance2 markers[38]
WheatHeat tolerancesHSP26 gene[39]
WheatDrought toleranceTaSST-D1, TaSST-A1[40]
RiceNarrow root cone angle12 markers[41]
RiceGrain yield and adaptability traits110 markers[42]
RiceVariety identification and breeding guidance48 markers[43]
RiceDrought and low nitrogen tolerances8 markers[44]
RiceBacterial leaf streak resistancexa5 gene[45]
RiceCold tolerance6 markers[46]
RiceGrain yield and yield components21 markers[47]
RiceSalt tolerance25 markers[32]
RiceBrown plant hopper resistance20 markers[48]
RiceDirty panicle disease resistance12 markers[49]
MaizeAgronomic traits including yield50 markers[50]
Maize202 markers[51]
MaizeMaize tar spot complex resistanceqRtsc8–1 QTL[52]
MaizeStalk fracture angle2 markers[53]
MaizeEnrichment of provitamin A content5 markers[54]
MaizeChilling-tolerant20 markers[55]
BarleyGreenbug resistance2 markers[56]
BarleyGreenbug resistance3 markers[57]
BarleyLeaf rust resistanceRph13 gene[58]
OatStem rust resistancePg13 gene[59]
OatOat crown rust resistancePc39 gene[60]
SorghumStarch content and constitution7 markers[61]
Pearl milletPollen production2 markers[62]

Table 2.

The following is a list of current studies that have focused on the development of KASP markers for a variety of critical traits.

In wheat, researchers have made notable discoveries using the KASP assay. Wang et al. [30] and Muellner et al. [63] identified two QTLs associated with dwarf bunt resistance, while Jiang et al. [31] discovered the QFhb-5A marker for Fusarium head blight resistance. Additionally, Li et al. [32] and Liu et al. [33] identified markers associated with leaf rust resistance and stripe rust resistance, respectively. Other studies investigated traits such as grain yield-related traits, green bug resistance, pre-harvest sprouting resistance, kernel weight, wheat curl mite resistance, heat tolerance, and drought tolerance [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40].

The KASP assay has also been instrumental in uncovering the genetic basis of important traits in rice. In another study he identified 12 markers associated with narrow root cone angle [41], while indifferent study [42] they identify 110 markers associated with grain yield and adaptability traits. According to another study Tang et al. [43] identified 48 markers for variety identification and breeding guidance. Other studies focused on drought and low nitrogen tolerances, bacterial leaf streak resistance, cold tolerance, grain yield and yield components, salt tolerance, brown planthopper resistance, and dirty panicle disease resistance [32, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49].

In maize, the KASP assay has played a crucial role in unraveling the genetic architecture of agronomic traits. In another study [50] they identified 50 markers associated with various agronomic traits, including yield, while in different study Lu [51] discovered 202 markers providing valuable genetic information in maize research. Studies also focused on maize tar spot complex resistance, stalk fracture angle, enrichment of provitamin A content, and chilling tolerance [52, 53, 54, 55].

Furthermore, the KASP assay has been employed in other cereal crops. Xu [56, 57] identified markers associated with greenbug resistance in barley, and Jost [58] identified the Rph13 gene for leaf rust resistance in barley. Kebede [59] and Zhao [60] utilized the KASP assay to identify genes associated with stem rust resistance and oat crown rust resistance in oat, respectively. Chen [61] identified markers associated with starch content and constitution in sorghum, while Pucher [62] identified markers associated with pollen production in pearl millet.

These studies collectively highlight the versatility and effectiveness of the KASP assay in identifying QTLs, markers, and genes associated with various traits in cereal crops. The findings have significant implications for crop improvement programs, facilitating the development of high-yielding, disease-resistant, and stress-tolerant crop varieties.

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Allele mining is a potent crop development strategy that takes advantage of natural genetic variation within plant populations. This strategy is useful for identifying and exploiting advantageous genetic variants or alleles linked to desirable qualities such as higher agricultural yields, disease resistance, stress tolerance, and nutritional quality. The incorporation of modern molecular techniques, such as the Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) assay, has revolutionized allele mining, allowing researchers to uncover and use genetic markers and genes associated with these desirable features more quickly.

The KASP assay has proven to be a powerful tool for finding essential genetic markers and genes linked with important agronomic features in recent research spanning a variety of cereal crops, including wheat, rice, maize, barley, oat, sorghum, and pearl millet. This not only speeds up the breeding process, but it also adds to the production of crop varieties that meet rising global food need, environmental resilience, and better nutritional value.

References

  1. 1. Pandey S, Singh A, Parida SK, Prasad M. Combining speed breeding with traditional and genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Plant Breeding. 2022;141(3):301-313
  2. 2. Lamaoui M, Jemo M, Datla R, Bekkaoui F. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2018;6:26
  3. 3. Raddy AM, Gambhire VB, Raddy RT. Allele mining in crop improvement. International Journal of Development Research. 2014;4:300-305
  4. 4. Kumar GR, Sakthivel K, Sundaram RM, Neeraja CN, Balachandran SM, Rani NS, et al. Allele mining in crops: Prospects and potentials. Biotechnology Advances. 2010;28:451-461
  5. 5. Salgotra RK, Stewart CN Jr. Functional markers for precision plant breeding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(13):4792
  6. 6. Li L, Sun Z, Zhang Y, Ke H, Yang J, Li Z, et al. Development and utilization of functional Kompetitive allele-specific PCR markers for key genes underpinning fiber length and strength in Gossypium hirsutum L. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:853827
  7. 7. Barkley NA, Wang ML. Application of tilling and ecotilling as reverse genetic approaches to elucidate the function of genes in plants and animals. Current Genomics. 2008;9(4):212-226
  8. 8. Comai L, Young K, Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Greene EA, Codomo CA, et al. Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by ecotilling. The Plant Journal. 2004;37(5):778-786
  9. 9. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437(7057):376-380
  10. 10. Hutchison CA. DNA sequencing: Bench to bedside and beyond. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35:6227-6237
  11. 11. Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Green EA, Codomo CA, Enns LC, Johnson JE, et al. Large-scale discovery of induced point mutations with high-throughput tilling. Genome Research. 2003;13:524-530
  12. 12. Nagy J, Sulyok D, Huzsvai L. Effect of tillage on the yield of crop plants. Cereal Research Communications. 2006;34(1):255-258
  13. 13. Ma KB, Yang SJ, Jo YS, Kang SS, Nam M. Development of Kompetitive allele specific PCR markers for identification of persimmon varieties using genotyping-by-sequencing. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2021;49:72-81
  14. 14. Kalendar R, Shustov AV, Akhmetollayev I, Kairov U. Designing allele-specific competitive-extension PCR-based assays for high-throughput genotyping and gene characterization. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2022;9:773956
  15. 15. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. MEME: Discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Research. 2006;34:W369-W373
  16. 16. Bryne JC, Valen E, Tang MHE, Marstrand T, Winther O, Piedade ID, et al. JASPAR, the open access database of transcription factor-binding profiles: New content and tools in the 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008;36:D102-D106
  17. 17. Davuluri RV, Sun H, Palaniswamy SK, Matthews N, Molina C, Kurtz M, et al. AGRIS: Arabidopsis gene regulatory information server, an information resource of Arabidopsis cis-regulatory elements and transcription factors. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:25
  18. 18. Kalendar R, Lee D, Schulman AH. FastPCR software for PCR primer and probe design and repeat search. Genes, Genomes and Genomics. 2009;3(1):1-4
  19. 19. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, YVD P, et al. PlantCARE, a database new entries and other development. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35:D137-D140
  20. 20. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. 1999;132:365-386
  21. 21. Shahmuradov IA, Gammerman AJ, Hancock JM, Bramley PM, Solovyev VV. PlantProm: A database of plant promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31(1):114-117
  22. 22. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Molecular Systems Biology. 2011;7:539
  23. 23. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2000;302(1):205-217
  24. 24. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-i, Miyata T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;30(14):3059-3066
  25. 25. Edgar RC. Muscle: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5(1):1-9
  26. 26. Rozas J, Ferrer-Matta A, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sanchez-Gracia A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2017;32(12):3299-3302
  27. 27. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9(4):299-306
  28. 28. Jiang C, Xuan Z, Zhao F, Zhang MQ. TRED: A transcriptional regulatory element database, new entries and other development. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35(Suppl. 1):D137-D140
  29. 29. Mitchell C. MultAlin–multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. 1993;9(5):614
  30. 30. Wang R, Gordon T, Hole D, Zhao W, Isham K, Bonman JM, et al. Identification and assessment of two major QTLs for dwarf bunt resistance in winter wheat line ‘IDO835’. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2019;132:2755-2766
  31. 31. Jiang P, Zhang X, Wu L, He Y, Zhuang W, Cheng X, et al. A novel QTL on chromosome 5AL of Yangmai 158 increases resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Plant Pathology. 2020;69(2):249-258
  32. 32. Li Z, Yuan C, Herrera-Foessel SA, Randhawa MS, Huerta-Espino J, Liu D, et al. Four consistent loci confer adult plant resistance to leaf rust in the durum wheat lines Heller# 1 and Dunkler. Phytopathology. 2020;110(4):892-899
  33. 33. Liu Y, Qie Y, Li X, Wang M, Chen X. Genome-wide mapping of quantitative trait loci conferring all-stage and high-temperature adult-plant resistance to stripe rust in spring wheat landrace PI 181410. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(2):478
  34. 34. Yang L, Zhao D, Meng Z, Xu K, Yan J, Xia X, et al. QTL mapping for grain yield-related traits in bread wheat via SNP-based selective genotyping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2020;133:857-872
  35. 35. Tan CT, Yu H, Yang Y, Xu X, Chen M, Rudd JC, et al. Development and validation of KASP markers for the greenbug resistance gene Gb7 and the hessian fly resistance gene H32 in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2017;130:1867-1884
  36. 36. Liu G, Mullan D, Zhang A, Liu H, Liu D, Yan G. Identification of KASP markers and putative genes for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The Crop Journal. 2023;11(2):549-557
  37. 37. Zhang Y, Li T, Geng Y, Wang Y, Liu Y, Li H, et al. Identification and development of a KASP functional marker of TaTAP46-5A associated with kernel weight in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Breeding. 2021;140(4):585-594
  38. 38. Dhakal S, Tan CT, Anderson V, Yu H, Fuentealba MP, Rudd JC, et al. Mapping and KASP marker development for wheat curl mite resistance in “TAM 112” wheat using linkage and association analysis. Molecular Breeding. 2018;38:1-3
  39. 39. Comastri A, Janni M, Simmonds J, Uauy C, Pignone D, Nguyen HT, et al. Heat in wheat: Exploit reverse genetic techniques to discover new alleles within the Triticum durum sHsp26 family. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:1337
  40. 40. Khalid M, Afzal F, Gul A, Amir R, Subhani A, Ahmed Z, et al. Molecular characterization of 87 functional genes in wheat diversity panel and their association with phenotypes under well-watered and water-limited conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:717
  41. 41. Vinarao R, Proud C, Snell P, Fukai S, Mitchell J. QTL validation and development of SNP-based high throughput molecular markers targeting a genomic region conferring narrow root cone angle in aerobic rice production systems. Plants. 2021;10(10):2099
  42. 42. Sandhu N, Singh J, Singh G, Sethi M, Singh MP, Pruthi G, et al. Development and validation of a novel core set of KASP markers for the traits improving grain yield and adaptability of rice under direct-seeded cultivation conditions. Genomics. 2022;114(2):110269
  43. 43. Tang W, Lin J, Wang Y, An H, Chen H, Pan G, et al. Selection and validation of 48 KASP markers for variety identification and breeding guidance in conventional and hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2022;15(1):48
  44. 44. Feng B, Chen K, Cui Y, Wu Z, Zheng T, Zhu Y, et al. Genetic dissection and simultaneous improvement of drought and low nitrogen tolerances by designed QTL pyramiding in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:306
  45. 45. Thianthavon T, Aesomnuk W, Pitaloka MK, Sattayachiti W, Sonsom Y, Nubankoh P, et al. Identification and validation of a qtl for bacterial leaf streak resistance in rice (Oryza sativa l.) against thai xoc strains. Genes. 2021;12(10):1587
  46. 46. Yang L, Liu H, Lei L, Wang J, Zheng H, Xin W, et al. Combined QTL-sequencing, linkage mapping, and RNA-sequencing identify candidate genes and KASP markers for low-temperature germination in Oryza sativa L. ssp. Japonica. Planta. 2023;257(6):1-3
  47. 47. Ashfaq H, Rani R, Perveen N, Babar AD, Maqsood U, Asif M, et al. KASP mapping of QTLs for yield components using a RIL population in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica. 2023;219(7):79
  48. 48. Ishwarya Lakshmi VG, Sreedhar M, JhansiLakshmi V, Gireesh C, Rathod S, Bohar R, et al. Development and validation of diagnostic KASP markers for brown planthopper resistance in Rice. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022;13:914131
  49. 49. Riangwong K, Aesomnuk W, Sonsom Y, Siangliw M, Unartngam J, Toojinda T, et al. QTL-seq identifies genomic regions associated with resistance to dirty panicle disease in rice. Agronomy. 2023;13(7):1905
  50. 50. Chen Z, Tang D, Ni J, Li P, Wang L, Zhou J, et al. Development of genic KASP SNP markers from RNA-Seq data for map-based cloning and marker-assisted selection in maize. BMC Plant Biology. 2021;21:1-1
  51. 51. Lu H, Zhou L, Lin F, Wang R, Wang F, Zhao H. Development of efficient KASP molecular markers based on high throughput sequencing in maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2019;45(6):872-878
  52. 52. Ren J, Wu P, Huestis GM, Zhang A, Qu J, Liu Y, et al. Identification and fine mapping of a major QTL (qRtsc8-1) conferring resistance to maize tar spot complex and validation of production markers in breeding lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2022;135(5):1551-1563
  53. 53. Wang X, Shi Z, Zhang R, Sun X, Wang J, Wang S, et al. Stalk architecture, cell wall composition, and QTL underlying high stalk flexibility for improved lodging resistance in maize. BMC Plant Biology. 2020;20(1):1-2
  54. 54. Kebede D, Mengesha W, Menkir A, Abe A, Garcia-Oliveira AL, Gedil M. Marker based enrichment of provitamin a content in two tropical maize synthetics. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):14998
  55. 55. Yan M, Li F, Sun Q , Zhao J, Ma Y. Identification of chilling-tolerant genes in maize via bulked segregant analysis sequencing. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2023;208:105234
  56. 56. Xu X, Mornhinweg D, Bai G, Li G, Bian R, Bernardo A, et al. Characterization of Rsg3, a novel greenbug resistance gene from the Chinese barley landrace PI 565676. The Plant Genome. 2023;16(1):e20287
  57. 57. Xu X, Mornhinweg D, Bernardo A, Li G, Bian R, Steffenson BJ, et al. Characterization of Rsg2. a3: A new greenbug resistance allele at the Rsg2 locus from wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum). The Crop Journal. 2022;10(6):1727-1732
  58. 58. Jost M, Singh D, Lagudah E, Park RF, Dracatos P. Fine mapping of leaf rust resistance gene Rph13 from wild barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2020;133:1887-1895
  59. 59. Kebede AZ, Admassu-Yimer B, Bekele WA, Gordon T, Bonman JM, Babiker E, et al. Mapping of the stem rust resistance gene Pg13 in cultivated oat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2020;133:259-270
  60. 60. Zhao J, Kebede AZ, Bekele WA, Menzies JG, Chong J, Mitchell Fetch JW, et al. Mapping of the oat crown rust resistance gene Pc39 relative to single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Plant Disease. 2020;104(5):1507-1513
  61. 61. Chen BR, Wang CY, Ping WA, Zhu ZX, Ning XU, Shi GS, et al. Genome-wide association study for starch content and constitution in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2019;18(11):2446-2456
  62. 62. Pucher A, Hash CT, Wallace JG, Han S, Leiser WL, Haussmann BI. Mapping a male-fertility restoration locus for the a 4 cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility system in pearl millet using a genotyping-by-sequencing-based linkage map. BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18:1-1
  63. 63. Muellner AE, Eshonkulov B, Hagenguth J, Pachler B, Michel S, Buerstmayr M, et al. Genetic mapping of the common and dwarf bunt resistance gene Bt12 descending from the wheat landrace PI119333. Euphytica. 2020;216:1-5

Written By

Hemant Sharma, Sourabh Kumar and Deepa Bhadana

Submitted: 08 September 2023 Reviewed: 12 September 2023 Published: 24 November 2023